In accordance with the Non-disclosure Agreement February 11, 2013 the Postal Service is providing both redacted and un-redacted copies of the PIR.

Transcription

1 April 18, 214 Mr. Mark Dimondstein President American Postal Workers Union, AFL-CIO 13 L Street, NW Washington, DC Certified Mail Tracking Number: Dear Mark: As information, enclosed is a copy of the first Post Implementation Review for the Reading, Pennsylvania, Processing and Distribution Facility (P&DF), Area Mail Processing (AMP). In accordance with the Non-disclosure Agreement February 11, 213 the Postal Service is providing both redacted and un-redacted copies of the PIR. If there are any questions, please contact Rickey Dean at extension Sincerely, P~l Patrick M. Devine Manager Contract Administration (APWU) Enclosures (CA )

2 REDACTED Type of Distribution Consolidated: Destinating Facility Name & Type: Reading PA P&DF Street Address: 21 N 13th St City: Reading State: PA 5 Facility ZIP Code: District: Central Pennsylvania Area: Eastern Finance Number: Current 3 ZIP Code(s): 179, 195, 196 Miles to Gaining Facility: 62 EXFC office: Yes Postmaster: Raymond F. Borger Senior Plant Manager: Christopher L. Alexander District Manager: Dale M. Walker Facility Name & Type: Harrisburg PA P&DC Street Address: 1425 Crooked Hill Rd City: Harrisburg State: PA 5 Facility ZIP Code: 1717 District: Central Pennsylvania Area: Eastern Finance Number: Current 3 ZIP Code(s): , 178 EXFC office: Yes Plant Manager: Christopher L. Alexander Senior Plant Manager: Christopher L. Alexander District Manager: Dale M. Walker Approval Date: February 2, 213 Implementation Date: Jul PIR Type: 1st PIR Date Range of Data: Processing Days per Year: 31 Bargaining Unit Hours per Year: 1,745 EAS Hours per Year: 1,822 Date of DAR Factors/Cost of Borrowing/ New Facility Start-up Costs Update June 16, 211 Jul : Dec Date & Time this workbook was last saved:... l o_3_-_2_7_-2 1_4_1_4_:_4_a --J Area Vice President: Vice President, Network Operations: Area AMP Coordinator: NAI Contact: Joshua D. Colin David E. Williams Bob Roseberry Kathy S Peterson I Barbara Brewington PIR Data Entry Page

3 I I 2 2

4 Executive Summary Last Saved March 27, 214 Date Range of Data PIR Type: 1st PIR Jul Dec Losing Facility Name and Type: Street Address: City: State: Current SCF ZIP Code(s): Type of Distribution Consolidated: Gaining Facility Name and Type: Street Address: City: Savings/Costs 1st PIR vs Pre AMP 1st PIR vs Approved Function 1 Workhour Savings Non-Processing Craft Workhour Savings (less Maint!Trans) PCES/EAS Workhour Savings Transportation Savings Maintenance Savings Space Savings from Work hour Costs Combined from Other Curr vs Prop from Other Curr vs Prop from Transpottatton HCR and Transportation PVS from Maintenance from Space Evaluation and Other Costs Total Annual Savings Total One-Time Costs from Space Evaluation and Other Costs Total First Year Savings Staffing Craft Position Loss PCES/EAS Position Loss from Staffing-Graff from Staffing-PCESIEAS Service Losing Current Qtr Gaining Current Qtr FCM Service Performance (EXFC & PFCM /N) from Service Performance & CSM FCM Service Performance (EXFC & PFCM 2 Day) 92.82% from Servtce Performance & CSM FCM Service Performance (EXFC & PFCM 3 Day) Customer Experience Measurement Overall Satisfaction Residential at PFC level Customer Experience Measurement Overall Satisfaction Small Business at PFC level 9.5% from Service Performance & CSM from Service Performance & CSM from Service Performance & CSM 3 PIR Executive Summary

5 Calculation Befe[eDC!Ui Combined Losing and Gaining Facility Data: Pre AMP Proposed 1st PIR Function 1 Workhour Costs $48,773,469 $46,15,823 $53,741,126 Non-Processing Craft Workhour Costs (less Maintenance & Transportation) $1,283,42 $1,9,331 $3,684,58 PCES/EAS Workhour Costs $6,539,16 $5,528,616 $5,435,125 Transportation Costs $9,321,194 $7,982,678 $8,586,976 Maintenance Costs $19,177,64 $17,222,467 $17,684,435 Space Savings Total Annual Cost Total One-Time Costs Total First Year Costs $85,94,83 $78,547,167 $94,11,61 Staffing Craft Position Total On-Rolls PCES/EAS Position Total On-Rolls st PIR vs Proposed 1st PIR vs Pre-AMP {A[![!rOved) AMP Approved AMP Function 1 Workhour Savings $2,622,646 Non~Processing Craft Workhour Savings (less Ma<ntffrans) $274,72 PCES/EAS Workhour Savings $1 '1 4,35 $93,491 $1,1,544 Transportation Savings $734,218 $1,338,516 Maintenance Savings $1,493,17 $1,955,138 Space Savings Total Annual Savings Total One-Time Costs Total First Year $6,547,663 Staffing Craft Position Loss PCES/EAS Position Loss PIR Executive Summary

6 Summary Narrative Last Saved: March 27, 214 Losing Facility Name and Type: Reading PA P&DF Current SCF ZIP Code(s): 179, 195, 196 Type of Distribution Consolidated: Destinating Gaining Facility Name and Type: Harrisburg PA P&DC Current SCF ZIP Code(s): , 178 Background: The Eastern Area, with the assistance of the Central Pennsylvania District, has completed the first Post Implementation Review (PIR) of the Area Mail Processing (AMP) proposal that consolidated destinating mail from the Reading P&DF into the LeGree S. Daniels (Harrisburg) P&DC. The data for the AMP period was 7/1/1 through 6/3/11 and included all operations for both facilities. The completion of the transfer of destinating mail was 6/1/13. The data for the PIR period was 7/1/13 to 12/31/13. Since MODS for the Reading P&DF was deactivated, data for this PIR comes from finance numbers (P&DF) and (Post Office) and from local knowledge. Financial Summary: Financial savings identified during this first PIR study were impacted by other concurrent AMPs which occurred between the pre-amp study and the PIR period, which resulted in movement of mail to the Harrisburg facility not included in the scope of this AMP study. Combined Losing and Gaining Facility Data: Function 1 Workhour Costs Non-Processing Craft Workhour Costs (less Mamlenance & Transportation) PCES/EAS Worl<hour Costs Transportation Costs Maintenance Costs Space Savings Pre AMP $48,773,469 $1,283,42 $6,539,16 $9,321,194 $19,177,64 Proposed $46,15,823 $1,9,331 $5,528,616 $7,982,678 $17,222,467 1st PIR $53,741,126 $3,684,58 $5,435,125 $8,586,976 $17,684,435 Total Annual Cost Total One-Time Costs Total First Year Costs $85,94,83 $94,11,61 Total Annual Savings Total One-Time Costs Total First Year Savings PIR vs. Pre-AMP ($4,36,89) ($4,969,89) ($9,6,78) PIR vs. Proposed ($11,237,86) ($4,316,637) ($15,554,443) The PIR shows a first year cost of $9,6,78, which is below the proposed first year savings of $6,547,663 for the AMP. These savings were affected by other concurrent activities and impacts: ADC Change- move Reading 179, 195, 196 from ADC Southeastern to ADC Harrisburg (July 212) with an increase to Harrisburg's function 1 operating costs of $1,846,7 (48,466 hrs x $38.9). AADC Lancaster- move automated letter volume to ADC Harrisburg. (July 213) with an increase to Harrisburg's function 1 operating costs of $258,66 (6,53 hrs x $39.52) PARS consolidation moved all PARS operations from the South Jersey and Philadelphia districts to Lancaster P&DC (completed October 212) and which now flows to and is finalized at Harrisburg with an increase to Harrisburg's function1 operating costs of approximately $46,828 (12,15 hrs x $33.86) Lancaster originating AMP, implemented in December 212 with an increase to Harrisburg's function 1 operating costs of $24,571 PIR Summary Narrative 5

7 Williamsport originating & destinating AMP, implemented June 1, 213, with an increase to Harrisburg's operating costs of approximately $2,64,217 ($2,223, 141 for function 1 and $374,76 for Maintenance). Reading originating mail (SCFs 195 & 196) was transferred from Lehigh Valley to Harrisburg via an operational move in February 213 with an increase to Harrisburg's function 1 operating costs of approximately $1,645,443 ($1,494, 7 4 for function 1 and $15,973 for Maintenance). Multiple LDC changes (LDCs 57, 45, 78 and 79) in Reading with costs of $1,855,818, and which are not related to the AMP. Adjusting for the various activities and initiatives, which total $9,15,359, the adjusted first year savings is $8,579. There is an approved deviation of $4,2, for one-time costs for equipment relocations and modifications to the tray line system Customer Service Considerations: There were no changes to the retail or business mail unit at the Reading facility. The facility is also being used as a hub operation. The EXFC overnight, 2-day, and 3-day mail service performance decreased at both the losing and gaining facility. The AMP study was based on the elimination of overnight service, which has not occurred for the first PIRS. The operating plan provides limited capacity for turnaround mail to the outlying service area from the plant coupled with staffing that includes new PSE and MHA. The 2-day and 3-day service also degraded with the AMP. The plant is working through these issues to resolve the processing window by adjusting transportation to align with the new processing windows and increased volumes. Staffing Impacts: The approved AMP identified a decrease in 73 craft positions. The PIR shows an overall decrease of 32 craft positions. Complement data for the first PIR period shows the gaining site with additional 41 craft employees over the proposed level This is due to the previous completed Outgoing AMPs of Reading and Lancaster, and the concurrent Williamsport AMP which added 42 craft positions to Harrisburg. There was a proposed reduction of two management positions for the AMP. The PIR shows a reduction of 19 positions. The hub operation at Reading is being managed by customer services. Harrisburg is currently 21 management positions under authorized. Relocation expense for craft employee moving to the gaining site was $94,512. The AMP study proposed $165, for this line item. This cost includes the relocation of employees to Harrisburg for both the Reading and Williamsport AMPs. Management and Croft Staffing Impacts 1 Craft = Career+ Non-career PIR Summary Narrative 6

8 Transportation Considerations: Transportation between Harrisburg and Reading is by Highway Contract Routes (HCR). The transportation savings proposed in the AMP study not realized due to the need to provide overnight service to the Losing Facility service area. The AMP study was predicated on the elimination of overnight service that would have resulted in additional decreases to the cost of HCR transportation to Williamsport. The first PIR shows that only 36% of the anticipated HCR savings was realized. The PVS operation was not impacted by the AMP, with the exception of the administrative responsibility for Reading was moved to the Postmaster. Staffing remains at pre-amp levels. Although the AMP study proposed the conversion of MVS/PVS to HCR, the switch has not occurred due to changes in transportation focus at Headquarters. Equipment Relocation and Maintenance Impacts: Mail Processing Equipment from the Reading plant was relocated to numerous sites in the Eastern area, each gaining site was responsible for the cost. The gaining site in this AMP received six DBCS and one AFSM w/ai. The movement of the AFSM w/ai was contracted out at a cost of $91,. The DBCSs, six in total, were moved with in-house maintenance employees and the cost of transportation at $37 per DBCS. The cost for the relocation of the six DBCS to the gaining site totaled $1,842. One-Time Costs: The AMP packages for Reading, Williamsport and Lancaster Destinating split costs that called for additional electrical capability at Harrisburg. The electric at Harrisburg was found to be adequate but was changed due other projects at Harrisburg which include the tear down of walls, expansion of workroom floor, expansion of the tray line system and relocation of other equipment. Deviation requests for Reading and Williamsport plus a DAR approved project covers these costs. The total cost expended at Harrisburg to date equals approximately $9M. Only a portion of the total costs is included in this package. Costs were split between the facilities and this PIR package accounts for only a portion of the cost which includes $162,994 (approx 6.9% of facility ebuys of $2,377,) plus $4,619,542 (approx 67.3% of equip ebuys of $6,863,377) for a total of $4,782,536. Additional costs are charged to the Williamsport package and will be charged to the Lancaster package when implemented. Reading had original total one-time costs of $653,253 plus deviation of $4,2, = $4,853,253 and the total one-time costs charged to this package= $4, 969,89 ($4, 782,536 + $187,354). PIR Summary Narrative 7

9 Service Performance and Customer Satisfaction Measurement Last Saved: March 27, 214 Losing Facility: Reading PA P&DF District: Central Pennsylvania PIRType: 1st PIR Implementation Date: 7/1/13,. ' Fiscal Quarter !seforeAMP : After AMP Overnight Percentage 97.76% 94.88% 94.44% 95.9% 95.18% 93.97% 2 Day 3oay Percentage Percentage 97.9% 94.31% 94.68% 9.23% 94.95% 88.99% 96.74% 92.65% 93.92% 92.2% 92.9% 87.39%..... '. : Gaining Facility: Harrisburg PA P&DC District: Central Pennsylvania After AMP (15) Notes: _..-s... co.r... es... sh.,o;.;w.-n... ab;.;o;.;v,.e.-a... re... o... nl~y 8 E... x... F.-c.. _ icustomer Satisfaction Measurement (CSM) became Customer Experience Measurement 21. Data reflects most recently completed quarter available in CEM. :::.:..:::... ~ _ Overall Satisfaction (Overall Experience) Satisfaction with Receiving (Experience with receiving) Satisfaction with Sending (Experience with sending) Satisfaction with most frequently visited PO (Experience with most frequently visited PO) Satisfaction with most recent contact with USPS (Experience with most recent contact witt _::.::..:.::.;:..:.:::....::..::...::..::..;.:;.Jlikely to recommend the USPS 8 PlR Service Performance and Customer Satisfaction Measurement

10 I Combined FacilitieS-~-----~ Workhour Costs -Combined Facilities Last Saved, March Zl, 2!4 PIR Type : ~~~foqi;:;m;..,a;;;;~<df;;f1ist f'ir Type of Distribution Consolidated: Destinating Date Range of Data: Ju!~1-213 to Dec..J1+213 PlR Wofkhour Costs~ Combined Facilities

11 P!R Workhour Costs - Comblned F acllities

12 (27)NOTESo~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~ PW1!4f26 11 PlR Workhour Costs - Combined Facilities

13 Losing Facility: Reading PA P&DF Workhour Costs- Losing Facility last Saved: March 27,214 PIR Type'": *;;"~.:,~'o~~,.,.,b,...,.., """"" 1,.,.,.,.. ~~r c'~ o o Type of Distribution Consolidated: Destinating Date Range of Data: Jul to Dec PIR Workhour Costs- Losing

14 13 P!R Workhour Costs - Losing

15 Workhour Costs - Gaining Facility last Saved: March 27, 214 Gaining Facility: HaJ!t.:: s,b"'u"r,_,p-'a"-'-'p&:o:dc= PIR Type'": ~.~~s~'-'' ~-'.~c_;"c~,c',-,~,,-_,-.-,.-,-'"-,~~,;- -,7,,-.,~,~~. o o Type of Distribution Consolidated: Destinating Date Range of Data: Jul to Dee P!R Workhour Costs- Gaining

16 PIR Workhour Costs -Gaining

17 PIR Workhour Costs ~ Gain1ng

18 (27)NOTES: 17 P!R Workhour Costs- Gaining

19 [ Other Workhour Move Analysis I Date Range of Data: PfR Other Workhour Costs

20 19 PlR Other Workhour Costs

21 PI R Other Workhour Costs

22 21 PIR Other Workhour Costs

23 [ ~--~----- ~ ~--- Distribution to Other PIR Worksheet Tabs I 22 PI R Other Workhour Costs

24 23 P!R Other Workhour Costs

25 Staffing - Craft Last Saved: March 27, 214 PIR Type: 1st PIR Data Extraction Date: 1/1/14 Losing Facility: Reading PA P&DF Finance#: (1) (2) {3) (4) (5) (6 Ctl (8) (9) Craft Positions Non-Career On-Rolls Part Time On-Rolls Full Time On-Rolls Total On-Rolls PreAMP 1st PIR PreAMP 1st PIR PreAMP 1st PIR PreAMP Proposed 1st PIR,Function 1 Clerk I Function 4- Clerk o. 8!Function 1 -Mail Handler ~~ tt 5 I Function 4- Mail Handler!Function 3A- Vehicle Service..~. 7 9 I Function 38-M""""'"""""'. 3 ~ I Functions Lmtd/Rehab/WC..!Other Functions... (). [ o 1!Total I 3..? 17 Craft reports to Reading PO. Employees shown are based on hub operation. ~~ Variances Total On-Rolls Change (1) (11) Analysis 1st PIR vs 1st PIR vs Pre AMP Proposed Positions (15) Percent.J3(i%.% Craft Positions Gaining Facility: Harrisburg PA P&DC Finance #: {12). (13). (14) (15) (t~l I (17) (le) (19) (2) Non-Career On-Rolls Part Time On-Rolls Full Time On-Rolls rotal On-Rolls.. PreAMP 1st PIR 1st PIR PreAMP 1st PIR PreAMP Proposed 1st PIR Function 1 -Clerk l ~ < 3: ~ Function 1 - Mail Handler ( ) Function 3A- Vehicle Service. 7 (... : I Function 38- '"'n' nar""'.. 1, l !Functions Lmtd/Rehab/WC ~ >.~ 3 I> )!her Functions ' !Total I 75 24o I ~ 1 Variances Total On-Rolls (21) (22) Change r ~ ~ 1st PIR vs 1stPIRvs ' (23) ' (24) ' Analysis Pre AMP Proposed 1 1st PIR vs Pre AMP 1 1st PIR vs Proposed 1 Positions Total Craft Position Loss: L._,_,32,,J,_, (4_.~--~-J Percent 15.4% 4.9% (Above numbers are carried forward to the Executive Summary) rev 4/5/.1 24 PIR Staffing -Craft

26 Staffing - PCES/EAS Last Saved March 27, 214 PIR Type: 1st PIR Losing Facility: Reading PA P&DF Data Extraction Date Finance# _4.;.16-'-9, PCES/EAS Positions Authorized Staffing On-Rolls (1) (2) {3) (4) L Position Title Level PreAMP 1s1 PtR R PROCESSING/DISTRIBUTION FCL TY EAS R MAINTENANCE EAS-21 1 EAS OPERATIONS SUPPORT SPECIALIST EAS SUPV DISTRIBUTION OPERATIONS EAS-17 m 6 SUPV MAINTENANCE OPERATIONS EAS-17 7 SUPV TRANSPORTATION OPERATIONS EAS-17 8 SECRETARY (FLD) EAS _. " > Totals 15 }p~:p (6) (7) Proposed 1st P!R z 1.. R=++ -1 i.. _... '.... _12.2 ~ Variances Total Qn.Rolls (15) (16) Change 1st PIR vs 1st PIR vs Analysis PreAMP Proposed 25 Positions (12) Percent 1.% #DIV/1 PIR Staffing P ES/EAS

27 Gaining Facility: Harrisburg PA P&DC Finance#.:4:..:.1:::34::.:8:::5~---- Data Extraction Date: PCES/EAS Positions Authorized Staffing (19) (2) (21) (22) l'r~2:~p On-Rolls (24) (25) Line Position Title Level PreAMP 1st PlR Proposed 1st PJR 1 SR PLANT MANAGER (2) PCES MGR IN-PLANT SUPPORT EAS MGR DISTRIBUTION OPERATIONS EAS MGR MAINTENANCE (LEAD) EAS t 1 tti""'" 5 MGR DISTRIBUTION '"'"''"" OPERATIONS '"'"""' EAS MGR MAINTENANCE OPERATIONS EAS EAS R DISTRIBUTION OPERATIONS EAS R MAINT ENGINEERING SUPPORT EAS R TRANSPORTATION/NETWORKS EAS OPERATIONS SUPPORT SPECIALIST EAS MAINTENANCE ENGINEERING SPECIALIST EAS MGR FIELD MAINT OPRNS (LEAD) EAS MGR MAINTENANCE OPERATIONS SUPPT EAS OPERATIONS SUPPORT SPECIALIST EAS OPERATIONS SUPPORT SPECIALIST EAS SUPV DISTRIBUTION OPERATIONS EAS SUPV MAINTENANCE OPERATIONS EAS SUPV TRANSPORTATION OPERATIONS EAS ETWORKS SPECIALIST EAS EAS ::::±::4 22 SR PLANT MANAGER (1) PCES EAS MGR TRANSPORTATION/NETWORKS EAS OPERATIONS INDUSTRIAL ENGINEER (FI EAS MGR MAINTENANCE OPERATIONS EAS MGR MAINTENANCE OPERATIONS SUPPT EAS-2 i NETWORK SPECIALIST EAS-17 2 E$ 29 ADMINISTRATIVE ASSISTANT (FLD) EAS =H= s Totals 6Q 67 5<1 1>3 4b -~ Variances Total On~Rolls (33) (34) t=j Change Analysis 1st PIR vs PreAMP 1st PIR vs Proposed Positions (7) (17) Percent 13.2% -26.7% I Total PCES/EAS 1 ( r'* ~ ,.* , ~-~- -~, ( I Position Lossl 19 j 17 j ~~ ~ 26 (Above numbers are carried fo!ward to the Executive Summery) PIR Staffing PCES/EAS

28 Transportation - PVS Last Saved: March 27, 214 PIR Type: 1st PIR Date Range of Data: Jul to -- Dec Losing Facility: Reading PA P&DF Finance Number: -'4-'1..:.6..:.92::.:6= (1) (2) PreAMP Proposed PVS Owned Equipment. Seven Ton Trucks Eleven Ton Trucks Single Axle Tractors.L Tandem Axle Tractors... Spotters PVS Transportation...,..... Number of Schedules ' Total Annual Mileage Total Mileage Costs I... $ $ PVS Leases..... Total Vehicles Leased.. Total Lease Costs $ $... I. PVS Workhour Costs. LDC 31 (617, 679, 764) $4,777. $ LDC 34 (765, 766) '' <i,:::ai: A. :'7 $ Total Workhour Costs $711,235 $,.. (3) (4) (5) Variance 1st Variance 1st 1st PIR PIRvs Pre PIRvs AMP Prooosed $ $ $ $ $ $! $62,556 ($2,221) $62,556 $648,59 $2,133 $648,59 $711,146 (589} $711, (11) Total 1st PIR vs Pre AMP Transportation-PVS Savings: ($313,575) (This number added to the Executive Summary Gaining Facility: Harrisburg PA P&DC Finance Number: ""4-'1..:.34...:.8..:.5= I (6) (7) PreAMP Proposed PVS Owned Equipment > '.. Seven Ton Trucks o Eleven Ton Trucks.... ' Single Axle Tractors...,. Tandem Axle Tractors... e Spotters.. PVS Transportation.... Number of Schedules... Total Annual Mileage..... Total Mileage Costs.. ' $ PVS Leases.... < Total Vehicles Leased.... Total Lease Costs ;> $ $... PVS Workhour Costs.. LDC 31 (617, 679, 764)..,. $47,;1583 $47,583 LDC 34 (765, 766) Jt::>5AA?~7 $2,566,237 Total Workhour Costs $3,36,821 $3,36,821.,.,. (8) (9) Variance 1st PIR PIR vs Pre AMP $ $ $ $ $424,9 ( ] $2,299,225!5257,12) $2,723,234 ( ] (1) Variance 1st PIRvs Prooosed $ $ {$46,574)!5267,12) (5313,586) (12) Total 1st PIR vs Proposed Transportation-PVS Savings: $397,559 (This number added to the Executive Summary) (13) Notes: rev 1/8!28 27 PIR Transportation- PVS

29 Transportation - HCR Last Saved: March 27, 214 Losing Facility: Reading PA P&DF PIR Type: 1st PIR Type of Distribution Consolidated: Destinating Data of HCR Data File: CT for Outbound Dock: (4) (6) (7) (1) Route# PreAMP Annual 1st PIR 1st PIR Annual Cost PreAMP 1st PIR 28 PIR Transportation HCR- Losing

30 Change Analysis 1st PIR vs Pre AMP I 1st PIR vs Proposed Notes: Transportation saving for this AMP were not realized due to_providi[lg overnight service to the AO's for111_erly serviced from the losing site. Route 186L2 was listed in error, therefore should be removed. This route servicesbetween the Scranton Plantand the Wilkes-Barre PO. The cost for "additional Load time" for 179 transportation was not incurred. 29 PIR Transportation HCR- Losing

31 Gaining Facility: Harrisburg PA P&DC Type of Distribution Consolidated: Destinating Date of HCR Data File: (1) (3) (4) 1st PIR Route# Transportation - HCR Last Saved: March 27, 214 CET for Inbound Dock: CET for Cancellations: (5) (6) (7) Proposed I 1st PIR Annual Annual Cost Cost PIR Type: 1st PIR CETforOGP: CT for Outbound Dock: PreAMP (1) 1st PIR Annual Cost/Mile

32 Change Analysis Summary HCR Losing & Gaining (12) (13) 1 (14) 1st PIR vs Pre AMP I 1st PIR vs Proposed 1st PIR vs Proposed Losing Gaining (13) Total 1st PIR vs Pre AMP Transportation-HeR Savings: (from losing and gaining facilities) (14) Total 1st PIR vs Proposed Transportation-HeR Savings: (from losing and gaining facilities) $26,739 Total Transportation HCR PVS (15) 1st PIR vs Pre AMP (16) 1st PIR vs Proposed $26,739 $397,559 (15) Total 1st PIR vs Pre AMP Transportation (PVS & HeR): (This number carried forward to the Executive Summary) Notes: (16) Total 1st PIR vs Proposed Transportation (PVS & HeR): (This number carried forward to the Executive Summary) $64,298 The converstion to HCR from MVS, a national initiative, did not occur. 31 PIR Transportation HCR- Gaining

33 MPE Inventory Last Saved: March 27, 214 Data Extraction Date: 1/1/14 PIR Type: 1st PIR Date Range of Data: Jul to- Dec Losing Facility: Reading PA P&DF Gaining Facility: Harrisburg PA P&DC (1) (2) (3) (4) (5) (6) (7) (8) (9) Proposed 1st PIR Variance in PreAMP Proposed 1st PIR PreAMP Proposed 1st PIR Relocation Relocation Costs Equipment Equipment Costs Costs... AFCS AFCS $ $ $() AFSM- ALL 1 AFSM $87,773 $91, $() APPS. APPS $ $ $() ClOSS. ClOSS o... $ $ $ CSBCS CSBCS $ $ so DBCS 4.. DBCS.... ZQ < $16,12 $ ($HU2) DBCS-OSS 3 >.. DBCS-OSS 9 $ $ $.. >. 3 DIOSS t <.2 DIOSS $8,6 $1,842 ($6,218) FSS... FSS $ $ $ < SPBS SPBS o... $ $ $ UFSM UFSM. o. $ $ $ FC I MICRO MARK FC I MICRO MARK $ $ $ ROBOT GANTRY.. ROBOT GANTRY $ $ $ HSTS/HSUS I HSTS/ HSUS D <... $ $ $ LCTS/LCUS LCTS/ LCUS.1... <. 1 3 $ $ $ LIPS LIPS.... $ $ $ MLOCR-ISS.. oi:;-. EAA $ $ $ MPBCS-OSS <.. MPBCS-OSS. $ $ $ TABBER... TABBER (I > $ $ $ INDUSTRIAL... INDUSTRIAL o... $ $ so LCREM LCREM $ $ so >.... < > < > > o.. Totals 5 < $111,953 $92,842 ($22,338) ;,.....:;'"'~ (1) Notes: Movement of AFSM from Reading to Harrisburg = $91, DBCSs & DIOSSs moved via local maintenance personnel and HCR 1 ransp >ortation at a total cost of $1842 Carried to Space Evaluation and Other Costs 32 PIR MPE Inventory

34 Maintenance Last Saved March PIR Type :...:1-=.st:...:P...:I:...:R Date Range of Data: Jul Dec Losing Facility: Reading PA P&DF Gaining Facility: Harrisburg PA P&DC LOC 36 I LOC 37 LOC 38 Workhour Activity Building Equipment $ Building Services $ (Custodial Cleaning) 785,65 $ LOC39 $ $ -- E Mainten~~ce $ 22;32 $ LOC 93 Trammg $ $ I"~ C>--- ~ % -~ "' -, --4 $ 3,426,178 (2) Proposed ~ $ ,7 $ ,82 $ -- 81,32 $ --- (3) (4) Variance 1 stj 1st PIR PIR to Pre I Costs AMP $ 232,975 $ 559,927 $ --- (5) Variance 1st PIRto Proposed 642, ,92 $ 149,927 LOC 36 LOC 38 Workhour Activity Mail Processing $ Eauipment Building Equipment $ Building Services $ (Custodial Cleaning) PreAMP (:Qsts 6,425,!189 $ 1,92,142 $ LOC Maintenance Operations $ 39 Support LDC 93 I Maintenance Training$ _:_:_:...:_:...:_ $ - $ (7) Proposed Costs 7,121,448 $ 2,28,679 $ 3,348,418 $ 768,669 $ (8) 1st PIR Costs I $. 1, $ 2,732,625 $ 824,932 $ $ 137,596 $ 32,559 $ (9) Variance 1st PIR to Pre AMP Vi ,348;379 $ 13,45,1 $ 14,198,35 $ 1,849,926 $ (1) Variance 1st PIR to Pre Proposed 1,74, ,295 Parts and Supplies Parts and Supplies Maintenance Stockroom $ and Supplies 552,326 $ 337,66 $ 225,28 $ $ 2,468,2.$ Adjul)tments s $ $ $ $ $ () $ 11,328 Grand Total $ 3,9,54 $ 9,63 1,17,93 $ Grand Total $ 16,242,44 $ 16,666,55 $ 1,46$,44 424,11 {11) 1st PIR vs Pre AMP- Maintenance Savings: (12) 1st PIR vs Proposed- Maintenance Savings: $461,968 (These numbers carried forward to the Executive Summary) (These numbers carried forward to the Execullve Summary) (13) Notes: Maintenance cost at the Gaining site increased beyond the AMP Study due to concurrent AMP( Williamsport), two prior Outgoing only AMP (Required additional AFCS, 5 to 8), and the continuation of ovemig_~~?i3y<:~jequired additional MPE fj(lt mentioned in the AMP study {6 additional DBCS) ~Data 1n P!R columns IS annua!jzed for Flfst PiR!'li:V PIR Maintenance

35 Distribution Changes Last Saved: March 27, 214 Losing Facility : Reading PA P&DF PIR Type: 1st PIR Type of Distribution Consolidated: Destinating Date Range of Data: Jul to-- Dec (1) Place a "X" next to the DMM labeling list(s) revised as result of the approved AMP. DMM L1 DMM L11 X DMM L2 DMM L21 DMM L3 DMM L61 X DMM L4 DMM L62 X DMM L5 DMM L63 Identify the date of the Postal Bulletin that contained DMM labeling list revisions. ( 2 l PB Jun Was the Service Standard Directory updated for the approved AMP? ( 3 l Yes DMM L6 DMM L7 DMM L64 DMM L65 DMM LOOB X DMM L66 DMM L9 DMM L67 DMM L1 X DMM L81 (4) Drop Shipments for Destination Entry Discounts FAST Appointment Summary Report NASS Total No-Show Late Arrival Open Closed Facility Name Month Losinq I Gaininq Facility Code Schd Count % Count % Count % Count Nov '13 Losing Facility 195 Reading N/A Dec '13 Losing Facility 195 Reading N/A Nov '13 Gaining Facility 17 Harrisburg % %.% % Dec '13 Gaining Facility 17 Harrisburg % %.% % % Unschd Count 3 18 {5) Notes: Reading dropped at Harrisburg. ADC volume previously sent to Southeatern moved to Harrisburg prioir to the AMP, July PIR Distribution Changes

36 Losing Facility: Reading PA P&DF 5-DigitZIP Code: Data Extraction Date: -=o-"1"':/1'""o""t1'"'4 Customer Service Issues last Saved March 27, Digit ZIP Code: Digit ZIP Code: 195 PreAMP PIR PreAMP PIR 1. Collection Points Mon. ~f'ri. Sat. Mon.-Fri. Sat. Mon.-l'rl. Sat. Mon.-Fri. Number picked up before 1 p.m. -53_ ' Number picked up between 1-5 p.m Number picked up after 5 p.m ,' Total Number of Collection Points ,,,,, ' ,'' How many collection boxes are currently designated for "local delivery"? I -o-] 3. How many "local delivery" boxes were removed as a result of AMP? I --o-] 3-Digit ZIP Code: 196 PreAMP Sat. Mon.-F'rl. Sat. Mon.-Fri ' ' ' PIR 3-Digit ZIP Code: PreAMP PIR Sal Mon.-Fri. Sat. Mon. -Fri. Sat Delivery Performance Report PreAMP 1st PIR QuarteriFY Percent Quarter/FY Percent % Carriers returning after 17 Q % Q _1 /o :6% % Q a% ~ ~.5% L Retail Unit Inside Losing Facility (Window Service Times) 6. Business (Bulk) Mail Acceptance Hours Pre. AMP Proposed 1st PIR PreAMP Proposed 1st PIR Start End Start End Start End Start End Start End Start End M y 8:_ 1S:OO 8: 17: Monda y 8:3 5: 8:3 5: 83 5 Tu y --- 8: 1S:OO 8: 17: Tuesda y 8:3o 5: 8:3 5: 8:3 5: Wedn y 6: 18: 8: 17: Wednesd.a y 8ro. 5: 8:3 5: 83 5 Th y 8: 18: 8: 17:3 8 18: Thursda y 8:3o 5: 8:3 5 8:3 5 y 8: 18: 8: 17:3 8 18: Frida y S:3 5: 8:3 5: 83 5: Saturdavl 8: I 15: ll 8: s-oo I 15: II ' :.._ ~~ 8 I 15 I Saturda y dosed dosed closed closed dosed dosed 7. Can customers obtain a tocat postmark in accordance with applicable policies in the Postal Operations Manual? Yes 8. Notes: Losing fcaillty still maintains Window Service, Box Section, and BMEU. Gaining Facility: Harrisburg PA P&DC 9. What postmark is printed on collection mail? 35 rev -1/9f2COS PIR Customer Service Issues

37 Space Evaluation and Other Costs Last Saved March 27, 214 Losing Facility: Reading PA P&DF Date: '"'3"'/2=-4"-/'-14' Affected Facility 2. One-Time Costs Enter any one-time costs:_..:::;$3:,:3:::6.;:,:::::..._ $4,782,536 $4,446,536 (These numbers shown below under One-Time Costs section_) 3. Savings Information Space Savings ($):...::;$::,... $ $ (These numbers carried forward to the Execullve Summary) 4. Did you utilize the acquired space as planned? Explain. Yes. Reading currently remains a Post Office with hub operations. 5. Notes: Employee relocation costs below contain costs for both Reading and Williamsport employees relocation to Harrisburg. One-time costs include the following work pertormed at Harrisburg: tear down of walls, expansion of wkrm floor, electrical changes, relocation of RCS and expansion and modification of tray line system. Costs shared between Reading, Williamsport & Lancaster AMPs. Cost above is $162,994 (approx 6.9% of facil ebuys of $2,377,) + $4,619,542 (approx 67.3% of equip ebuys of $6,863,377) Reading AMP had total one-time costs of $653,253 + Deviation of $4,2, = $4,853,253 Employee Relocation Costs Mail Processing Equipment Relocation Costs (from MPE Inventory) Facility Costs (from above) Total One-Time Costs $152,253 $336, $653,253 Losing Facility: Reading PA P&DF Pre-AMP FY 212 Range of Report Gaining Facility: Harrisburg PA P&DC PIR FY 213 (1) (2) (3) (4) (5) Product Pte AMP As-sociated REC PreAMP Cost pet 1, ttn.agfi. 1st PIR Associated REC 1st PIR Cost per 1, Images rev 1/912$ 36 PIR Space Evaluation and Other Costs