The Impact of Emerging Reimbursement Models on Physician Compensation
|
|
- Imogene Watson
- 6 years ago
- Views:
Transcription
1 The Impact of Emerging Reimbursement Models on Physician Compensation By: Beth Connor Guest, Chief Counsel, Cigna HealthSpring and Patricia O. Powers, Office of General Counsel, Vanderbilt University. Provider Consolidation. Since the millennium, the health care industry has experienced unprecedented consolidation of the providers of health care services. 1 Hospitals are buying other hospitals, urgent care clinics, primary care clinics and primary and specialty care practices. Physician groups are acquiring other physician practices. Private equity companies are consolidating, and then managing single specialties like anesthesiology practices, across a large geographic area. The wave of acquisitions shows no signs of slowing down. Health care spending has outpaced inflation 2 and MedPac and the payer community allege that the consolidation has contributed to the increases in medical expense. 3 With the enactment of the Patient Protection and Affordable Care Act of 2010 ( PPACA ), 4 governmental and commercial payers are now looking to hospitals and physicians to contain costs, improve access and demonstrate quality. Physicians and mid level providers are integral to achieving improved quality (i.e., demonstrated improvement of outcomes and reduced costs), but physician compensation arrangements have lagged in rewarding quality and improved outcomes. Production based compensation models are deep rooted in provider culture and difficult to shed under the current regulatory scheme that was borne out of a fee for service environment. Changes in the methodologies used by third party payers to pay for health care services, whether Medicare, Medicaid, commercial payers or employers, have outpaced the evolution of applicable health care laws and regulations. This paper explores some of the issues that are challenging hospitals with emerging reimbursement models and the impact on physician compensation. 1 Cutler DM, Scott Morton F. Hospitals, Market Share, and Consolidation. 310 JAMA. No , (2013) ( Both horizontal and vertical consolidation has increased in health care. Sixty percent of hospitals are now part of health systems, up 7 percentage points from a decade ago... [f]rom 2004 to 2011, hospital ownership of physician practices increased from 24% of practices to 49% ). 2 White House Council of Economic Advisors, Trends in Health Care Cost Growth and the Role of the Affordable Care Act, 1, 3 (2013) ( Over the three years since 2010, the real per capita annual growth rate of national health expenditures is percent ). 3 Medicare Payment Advisory Commission, Report to the Congress: Medicare and the Health Care Delivery System, 36 (June 2013) ( The growth of hospital employment of physicians is leading to higher spending by private plans outside of Medicare and higher cost sharing for their enrollees ) U.S.C , See,
2 Regulatory Framework. With respect to hospital physician compensation relationships, compensation paid to physicians must comply with the Anti Kickback provisions of the Social Security Act, 5 the federal physician referral law known as Stark, 6 state self referral and fee splitting laws and, if applicable, the IRS guidelines for tax exempt entities. 7 The bedrock of the policy underlying these laws is that such arrangements must be fair market value and on commercially reasonable terms to prevent influencing the physician s medical judgment related to the referral of patients for items or services reimbursable by a federal health care program. As payment for services moves away from fee for service toward value based compensation, those providers that demonstrate value by producing savings and a more healthy population will receive greater payment. For hospitals that participate in federal health care programs, hospital physician compensation arrangements, whether for employment, medical directorship, co management or other arrangements, must comply with Anti Kickback Statute, Stark Law, state fee splitting and self referral laws, and for tax exempt hospitals, IRS regulations. These laws and regulations are complex and differ in their application and reach; however, they generally share common elements: compensation must be fair market value and commercially reasonable. a. The Anti Kickback Statute prohibits any payment intending to induce the referral or purchase of items or services reimbursable by a federal health care program but the Employment Safe Harbor allows fair market value compensation to employees. 8 b. The Stark Law prohibits the submission of a claim for designated health services to Medicare (and now Medicaid 9 ) for a patient referred by a physician with which the provider has a financial relationship that does not fit into an exception. 10 The relevant exceptions generally used to pay physicians for services include the employment exception, which allows payment to a physician if the compensation is to a bona fide employee; fair market value; unrelated to volume or value of referrals; and commercially reasonable even if no referrals are made to the employer. 11 The second exception that permits payments to 5 42 U.S.C. 1320a 7b(b) U.S.C. 1395nn C.F.R (c)(3) 1(c)(2) C.F.R (i) U.S.C. 1396b(s); United States v. All Children's Health Sys., Inc., 2013 WL at *5 (M.D. Fla. Nov. 15, 2013) U.S.C. 1395nn nn; 42 C.F.R (c). 2
3 physicians for professional services is the personal services exception. 12 This exception also requires fair market value consideration, which is set in advance and unrelated to the volume or value of referrals. c. IRS rules for tax exempt entities to avoid proscribed private inurement issues, compensation to employees of tax exempt entities must be reasonable. 13 d. State Law Restrictions on corporate practice of medicine, state self referral prohibitions, state anti kickback, and fee splitting may: Prohibit general business corporations from employing physicians; 14 Prohibit physicians from referring a patient to an hospital or health care provider in which the referring physician has an investment interest; Prohibit a hospital from paying or receiving kickbacks for referring or soliciting patients; Prohibit anyone from paying or receiving any compensation or engaging in any split fee arrangement for referral of patients; Generally, arrangements that comply with federal anti kickback or self referral laws comply with the state counterpart. However, structuring arrangements to comply with state corporate practice laws means the arrangement cannot be an employment relationship and must be an independent contractor relationship, a practice management arrangement, or a foundation model. 15 In addition to the fraud and abuse laws that prohibit payment to influence referrals or the purchase of items or services, the Civil Monetary Penalties provisions of the Social Security Act 16, authorizes the federal government to assess a fee of $2,000 each time a hospital pays, or a physician, or a physician accepts a payment to reduce or limit services to a patient who is entitled to the services. Recent Enforcement Actions. While compensation paid to independent contractors has generally been carefully structured and closely monitored by the parties to the agreements, physician employment relationships were viewed as relatively straightforward. Over the past 5 years, however, there has been an increase in the type and frequency of enforcement actions related to C.F.R (d) CFR 1.501(a) 1(c), 1.501(c)(3) 1(c)(1)(ii). 14 See, e.g., Cal. Bus. & Prof. Code 2052(a); Tex. Occ. Code Ann Generally, the foundation model is one in which a not for profit corporation or professional corporation employs the physicians. Depending on state law, this entity is owned or controlled by physicians or employees of a hospital system U.S.C. 1320a 7a(b) 3
4 compensation paid by hospitals to employed physicians. Of note, in United States ex. Rel. Drakeford v Tuomey Healthcare Sys. Inc., 2013 WL (D.S.C. Oct. 2, 2013), following a convoluted procedural history, the court awarded $237.5 million judgment against Tuomey Healthcare System because it found its employment contracts with several part time employed surgeons violated the Stark law. The Court found compensation exceeded fair market value, was not commercially reasonable and was based on the volume or value of referrals. 17 An additional case addressing physician compensation to employed physicians is United States ex rel. Elin Baklid Kunz, Relator v. Halifax Hospital Medical Center, 2013 WL (MD. Fla. Nov 13, 2013). 18 In Halifax, the Court granted a partial summary judgment and found the hospital violated the Stark law in the way the hospital determined the salary and incentive bonus for its employed physicians. 19 The bonuses were paid from an incentive compensation pool which included a percent of the operating margin of the medical oncology program, which program included revenue from the outpatient hospital service, the physician service and the outpatient pharmacy revenue. 20 The court rejected the hospital s argument that the revenue was appropriately included in the pool and was based on the services personally performed by the physicians, but held that the revenue was derived from referrals for designated health services. 21 These enforcement actions have created an uncertain environment for hospitalphysician compensation at the same time that hospitals are shifting to rewarding physicians for quality. Historical Compensation Methodologies. Historically, hospital physician compensation has been set in accordance with one or a combination of the following methodologies: a. Flat salary/fee + productivity bonus based on services personally performed b. Production (wrvus or other measure of production) c. Hourly rate for services performed 17 United States ex. Rel. Drakeford v Tuomey Healthcare Sys. Inc., 2013 WL at *(D.S.C. Oct. 2, 2013) 18 See also United States ex rel. Baklid Kunz v. Halifax Hospital Medical Center and Halifax Staffing, Inc., 2013 U.S. Dist. LEXIS (M.D. Fla. Nov. 18, 2013 (denying defendants' Motion for Summary Judgment in a case challenging a compensation arrangement, base salary and bonus, for neurosurgeons, as noncompliant with the Stark law); United States ex rel. Baklid Kunz v. Halifax Hospital Medical Center and Halifax Staffing, Inc., 2013 LEXIS (M.D. Fla. Nov. 26, 2013) (denying relator's Motion for Partial Summary Judgment challenging the incentive bonus payments to oncologists as noncompliant with the Anti Kickback statute). 19 United States ex.rel. Elin Baklid Kunz, Relator v. Halifax Hospital Medical Center, 2013 WL at *13 (MD. Fla. Nov 13, 2013). 20 Id. at *3. 21 Id. at *9. 4
5 d. Percentage of revenue generated from personally performed services e. Bonus for participation in certain quality programs (Payment for Quality) In each of the above methodologies, except for Payment for Quality, physicians are rewarded for increased productivity which often means increased services, procedures, and hospital admissions. Under the Affordable Care Act, the Medicare Shared Savings Program added a framework for an alternative payment model intended to reward providers financially for meeting or exceeding nationally recognized quality measures while decreasing health spending for a defined patient population, and in some cases, penalize providers financially for not meeting certain quality measures. Changes in Reimbursement Landscape 1. Medicare Shared Savings Program On October 20, 2011, CMS and OIG issued waivers under the Medicare Shared Savings Program ( MSSP ) which cover payments to ACO participants, including physicians with respect to compliance with the Anti Kickback Statute, Stark and Civil Monetary Penalties 22 : i. Pre participation Waiver The pre participation waiver protects arrangements that pre date the ACO participation agreement and is broadly defined to cover start up activities and expenses required to form the ACO, including in kind and financial contributions reasonably related to the purposes of the MSSP. This waiver may only be used one time by an ACO. If all the requirements of the waiver are met, it would begin one year prior to the MSSP application due date, and would end on either (i) the date the ACO is accepted into the program; (ii) the date the application was denied, or (iii) the date it submits a statement of reasons for failing to submit an application. ii. Participation Waiver The participation waiver begins at the beginning of a participation agreement. The requirements include: the ACO has entered into a participation agreement under the MSSP and is in good standing; the ACO meets the governance, leadership and management requirements of the MSSP; the ACO s governing body must make bona fide redetermination that the arrangement is reasonably related to the purpose of the MSSP; and there is documentation of the arrangement and the authorization by the governing body. Each must be 22 Medicare Program; Final Waivers in Connection With the Shared Savings Program 76 Fed. Reg , (Nov. 2, 2011) (amending 42 C.F.R. Chapter V). 5
6 contemporaneous and the documentation must be maintained for at least ten years. iii. Shared Savings Distribution Waiver This waiver has many of the requirements of the Participation waiver (signed agreement, documentation). The shared savings that are to be distributed must be earned by the ACO pursuant to and during the MSSP. In addition, the participants can use any method of distributing savings as long as the savings are either: (i) distributed to current participants (or participants the year the savings were earned) or (ii) used for activities reasonably related to the purposes of the MSSP. In addition, with respect to payments by hospitals to physicians, the payments are not made to induce physicians to reduce or limit medically necessary care. iv. Compliance with Self Referral Law Waiver This waiver protects any arrangement under the Anti Kickback Statute and CMP laws if the arrangement complies with a Stark exception. The criteria are the ACO has a participation agreement with CMS and is in good standing; the financial relationship is reasonably related to the purposes of the MSSP and the financial relationship fully complies with the Stark law. v. Patient Incentives Waiver This waiver protects from CMP and Anti Kickback scrutiny the provision of in kind items or services for free or below market to beneficiaries if the items or services are preventative or further a beneficiary s treatment, care plan, or chronic disease management, that are reasonably related to the beneficiary s care. Of note, these waivers do not contain a requirement of fair market value or commercially reasonableness because the policy underlying the MSSP is to reward quality (i.e., improved outcomes at lower cost while maintaining access). Accordingly, hospitals can share the MSSP dollars with physicians who participate in ACO quality initiatives in a compliant arrangement. However, the waivers only apply to the participants in a Medicare ACO and do not cover participants in commercial ACOs, nor do they apply to general payment for quality arrangements. 23 Thus, hospitals that participate in commercial ACOs and commercial Medicare Advantage capitation agreements face challenges in crafting compensation arrangements for employed physicians who are actively participating in quality programs. Such physicians may have compensation arrangements that are based on wrvus or other production based metrics. 23 Medicare Program; Final Waivers in Connection With the Shared Savings Program, 76 Fed. Reg , (Nov. 2, 2011) (amending 42 C.F.R. Chapter V). 6
7 Because a MSSP waiver only protects MSSP ACOs, quality based physician compensation by organizations that have not signed an ACO participation agreement must fit within a Stark exception and comply with the Anti Kickback Statute and CMPs, all of which require the arrangement be fair market value. Because traditional valuation models use productivity as a proxy for value, it can be difficult for payments for quality to fit neatly into a safe harbor or Stark exception. Pay for performance arrangements generally reward a physician for participating in quality initiatives such as electronic medical record adoption and having patient panels participate in preventative measures, such as mammograms, colonoscopies, and bone density screenings. While these initiatives are intended to achieve better clinical outcomes while decreasing overall medical costs associated with a covered patient population, a participating physician may not have additional wrvus or other production measures as a result. If a physician compensation arrangement is at the top of the fair market value scale and the arrangement is not covered by the MSSP waivers or managed care exceptions to the Anti Kickback Statute, 24 adding payments for quality may actually put the arrangement above fair market value and therefore, present an enforcement risk. The IRS also issued guidance for tax exempt entities that participate in the MSSP. While that IRS guidance does not strictly require ACO transactions to be at FMV, it does consider FMV as one of five factors used to determine if ACO transactions confer a private benefit or result in private inurement. 25 It is unclear how the IRS would treat those non profit MSSP participants that may have large numbers of transactions which are inconsistent with FMV, or those which have transactions that are inconsistent with FMV by large orders of magnitude. The IRS also indicated, with respect to non profits, that any MSSP shared savings payments must be distributed to the ACO members in proportion to their contributions to the ACO. Thus, the IRS guidance suggests that contributions of the ACO members must be measured, and though FMV is not strictly required, it is likely a prudent practice to measure contributions using the IRS version of the FMV standard (rather than the version used for Stark or the Anti Kickback Statute), to avoid any argument that a private benefit is conferred by payments that exceed FMV. 2. Re Admission Penalties. Another part of the Affordable Care Act that has started to influence physician compensation is the Hospital Readmissions Reduction Program which requires CMS to reduce C.F.R (t). 25 See IRS Notice , I.R.B. 652 (April 18, 2011), and the IRS Fact Sheet (FS , October 20, 2011) which clarified certain comments in the Notice. 7
8 payments to IPPS hospitals with excess readmissions, effective for discharges beginning on October 1, Excess readmissions are measured by a ratio, determined by dividing a hospital s number of predicted 30 day readmissions for heart attack, heart failure, and pneumonia by the number that would be expected, based on an average hospital with similar patients. A ratio greater than 1 indicates excess readmissions. The payment penalty began in October 2012, and began as a 1% reduction to Medicare reimbursement to a hospital determined to have excessive readmissions for the three measures. In October 2013, the penalty went up to 2% and in October 2014, it will go to 3%. In 2015, additional conditions/measures for the initial inpatient admission will be added. With strong incentives to reduce re admissions, hospitals are adding incentives for providers to engage in improved care coordination, discharge planning, education and follow up for discharged patients and to adoption of electronic medical records so that patient information can be shared across the continuum of health care providers to improve continuity of care. Under the current view of fair market value, a physician s effort to reduce readmissions may not generate sufficient value to support a meaningful payment, and therefore, it is unclear how a hospital could legally compensate physicians on its medical staff to prevent or reduce readmissions. 3. Payments for chronic care management. Medicare 2014 Physician Fee Schedule covers new physician services for managing patients with multiple chronic conditions in an effort to avoid further injury or illness. 27 Two additional services could be billed separately from patient visits. The services would be billed for managing care for a patient with two or more chronic conditions expected to last at least 12 months, or until death, and that place the patient at risk. The first complex chronic care management service would be billed for an initial visit and the second would be available for subsequent work. Improved Medicare reimbursement for primary care providers may take hold on the commercial side and the result may be overall increases in value of PCP compensation. 26 Section 3025 of the Affordable Care Act added section 1886(q) to the Social Security Act establishing the Hospital Readmissions Reduction Program, which requires CMS to reduce payments to IPPS hospitals with excess readmissions, effective for discharges beginning on October 1, The regulations that implement this provision are in subpart I of 42 CFR part 412 ( through ) 27 Revisions to Payment Policies under the Physician Fee Schedule, Clinical Laboratory Fee Schedule and Other Revisions to Part B for CY 2014 (CMS 1600 FC), 78 Fed. Reg , (Dec. 10, 2013). 8
9 Conclusion. Transition from a fee for service environment to a system that consistently rewards quality is in a state of flux. PPACA has created some regulatory safe guards to protect providers who participate in the MSSP; however, the private sector has forged ahead with commercial ACOs, clinically integrated networks and IPAs that use alternative payment methodologies to reward quality. With these new models, the regulatory framework and entrenched views of fair market value are ripe for reexamination. 9
Hospital Incentive Payments to Physicians for Quality and Cost Savings
Hospital Incentive Payments to Physicians for Quality and Cost Savings Implications under the Fraud and Abuse Laws March 1, 2011 Dennis S. Diaz Davis Wright Tremaine LLP dennisdiaz@dwt.com 213-633-6876
More informationBuilding a Strategic Plan for Physician Employment and Practice Acquisition
Building Practice Acquisition and Physician Employment Strategies that Will Last the Test of Time In a Changing Regulatory Environment David Lewis Vice President/Associate General Counsel LifePoint Hospitals
More informationOhio Hospital Association 2014 Annual Meeting. Compensating Employed Physicians In An Evolving Health Care Environment
Ohio Hospital Association 2014 Annual Meeting June 10, 2014 Compensating Employed Physicians In An Evolving Health Care Environment Kimberly Mobley, Sullivan, Cotter and Associates, Inc., kimmobley@sullivancotter.com
More informationPhysician Care: Physician Compensation. Presented by Albert R. Riviezzo, Esq. Fox Rothschild LLP Exton, PA
Physician Care: Physician Compensation Presented by Albert R. Riviezzo, Esq. Fox Rothschild LLP Exton, PA Overview Compensation trends for employed physicians Regulatory risks of physician compensation
More informationCo-Management Arrangements and Their Continuing Evolution Trends Issues Fair Market Value
Co-Management Arrangements and Their Continuing Evolution Trends Issues Fair Market Value Presented by: Gregory D. Anderson, CPA/ABV, CVA HORNE LLP 601.268.1040 greg.anderson@horne-llp.com Ann S. Brandt,
More informationCOMMERCIAL REASONABLENESS AND FINANCIAL ARRANGEMENTS WITH PHYSICIANS
COMMERCIAL REASONABLENESS AND FINANCIAL ARRANGEMENTS WITH PHYSICIANS Daniel H. Melvin, Partner, McDermott Will & Emery, in consultation with Daryl Johnson, Managing Partner, Health Care Appraisers, Inc.
More informationHancock, Daniel & Johnson, P.C., P.O. Box 72050, Richmond, VA , ,
Hancock, Daniel & Johnson, P.C., P.O. Box 72050, Richmond, VA 23255-2050, 804-967-9604, www.hancockdaniel.com 2018 Hancock, Daniel & Johnson P.C. hancockdaniel.com Fraud and Abuse Enforcement 1.Anti-kickback
More informationCompensation Paid by Healthcare Providers
Compensation Paid by Healthcare Providers Physician compensation continues to be an especially important issue due to extensive integration of medical practices into larger healthcare systems and the severe
More informationTop 10 Issues in APM Contract Negotiations
Legal Issues in New Contracting and Risk Sharing Models - What To Know Before You Sign Alexis Finkelberg Bortniker Foley & Lardner LLP 617-226-3177 Abortniker@foley.com June 2, 2017 Top 10 Issues in APM
More informationInvestigator Compensation: Motivation vs. Regulatory Compliance
Vol. 12, No. 9, September 2016 Happy Trials to You Investigator Compensation: Motivation vs. Regulatory Compliance By Payal Cramer Physician-investigators play a central role in clinical research. Through
More informationValuation of Alternative Payment Models
Valuation of Alternative Payment Models No portion of this white paper may be used or duplicated by any person or entity for any purpose without the express written permission of PYA. I. Introduction:
More informationAHLA. CC. Cutting Edge Stark Issues. Julie E. Kass OBER KALER Washington, DC. David E. Matyas Epstein Becker & Green PC Washington, DC
AHLA CC. Cutting Edge Stark Issues Julie E. Kass OBER KALER Washington, DC David E. Matyas Epstein Becker & Green PC Washington, DC Institute on Medicare and Medicaid Payment Issues March 26-28, 2014 Advanced
More informationCheck Your Physician Contracts
Check Your Physician Contracts Publication 1/8/2014 Kim Stanger Partner 208.383.3913 Boise kcstanger@hollandhart.com Contracts and other financial arrangements with physicians and certain other healthcare
More informationStark and the Anti Kickback Statute. Regulating Referral Relationship. February 27-28, HCCA Board Audit Committee Compliance Conference.
Stark and the Anti Kickback Statute Ryan Meade, JD, CHRC, CHC F Director, Regulatory Compliance Studies Beazley Institute for Health Law and Policy Loyola University Chicago School of Law rmeade@luc.edu
More informationThis Webcast Will Begin Shortly
This Webcast Will Begin Shortly If you have any technical problems with the Webcast or the streaming audio, please contact us via email at: webcast@acc.com Thank You! 1 Accountable Care Organizations Under
More informationPHYSICIAN ALIGNMENT: LEGAL AND FAIR MARKET VALUE COMPLIANCE
PHYSICIAN ALIGNMENT: LEGAL AND FAIR MARKET VALUE COMPLIANCE Health Care Compliance Association 17 th Annual Compliance Institute April 22, 2013 Donnessa Vessakosol Strategic Value Group, LLC Cheryl Camin
More informationAuditing Physician Arrangements
Tuesday, October 24, 2017 1:00 P.M.- 2:30 P.M. Eastern Auditing Physician Arrangements Presented by: Allison Carty, JD, MBA Director Pinnacle Healthcare Consulting acarty@askphc.com Joseph N. Wolfe, Attorney/Shareholder
More information2014 Lathrop & Gage LLP Lathrop & Gage LLP Lathrop & Gage LLP
Legal Issues for Physician Owned Implant Manufacturer/Distribution Companies (PODs) October 24, 2014 Randal L. Schultz, Esq. 10851 Mastin Blvd, Building 82, Suite 1000 Overland Park, KS 66210-1669 913.451.5192
More informationAvoiding Regulatory Land Mines in Commercial ACOs
Avoiding Regulatory Land Mines in Commercial ACOs Robert Belfort, Partner Healthcare Industry Martin Thompson, Partner Healthcare Industry Manatt, Phelps & Phillips, LLP September 30, 2014 Agenda 1 Antitrust
More informationApproved Models to Align Incentives between Hospitals and their Physicians
Approved Models to Align Incentives between Hospitals and their Physicians Agenda I. Alignment Model Overview II. Co-Management III. Clinically Integrated Networks CIN Definition & Overview Network Development
More informationProvider and Provider Relationships. Primary Fraud and Abuse Issues
Provider and Provider Relationships Primary Fraud and Abuse Issues This document is intended to identify the primary healthcare fraud and abuse laws that may apply to contractual relationships between
More informationMar. 31, 2011 (202) Federal agencies address legal issues regarding Accountable Care Organizations
DEPARTMENT OF HEALTH & HUMAN SERVICES Centers for Medicare & Medicaid Services Room 352-G 200 Independence Avenue, SW Washington, DC 20201 Office of Media Affairs MEDICARE FACT SHEET FOR IMMEDIATE RELEASE
More informationSupplemental Special Advisory Bulletin: Independent Charity. Patients who cannot afford their cost-sharing obligations
Supplemental Special Advisory Bulletin: Independent Charity Patient Assistance Programs I. Introduction Patients who cannot afford their cost-sharing obligations for prescription drugs may be able to obtain
More informationPhysician Rockstars Toolkit - Common Models and Legal Considerations for Securing the Services of Rockstar physicians. Item 3
(1) Employment Agreements Stark Exception Requirements 1 42 U.S.C. 1395nn(e)(2)/ 42 CFR 411.357(c) There is a bona fide employment relationship and the employment is for identifiable services. The amount
More informationCOMPENSATING EMPLOYED PHYSICIANS Tax Law, Stark and Anti-Kickback Implications. AHLA Tax Issues for Healthcare Organizations October 20-22, 2013
AHLA B. Compensating Employed Physicians Tax Law, Stark, and Anti-Kickback Implications Linda Sauser Moroney Drinker Biddle & Reath LLP Milwaukee, WI Claire M. Turcotte Bricker & Eckler LLP West Chester,
More informationFundamentals of Healthcare Valuation
Carol Carden, CPA/ABV, ASA, CFE Page 0 Agenda Healthcare Industry Overview Healthcare Valuation Approaches Healthcare Valuation Considerations and Trends Recent Reform Initiatives Page 1 Healthcare Industry
More informationOverview of Pay For Performance
STARK AND ITS APPLICATION TO: PAY FOR PERFORMANCE Charles B. Oppenheim FOLEY & LARDNER LLP 2029 Century Park East, Suite 3500 Los Angeles, CA 90067-3021 coppenheim@foley.com 310.975.7790 HCCA 2007 Pacific
More informationAnti-Kickback Statute Jess Smith
Anti-Kickback Statute Jess Smith Overview 1972 - Enacted 1977 - Violation became a felony 1996 - Expanded to include all Federal Health Care Programs 2009 - Health Care Fraud Prevention and Enforcement
More information3/22/2016 THE STARK TRIFECTA. How Legal, Compliance, and Outside Counsel Work Together on Stark Compliance
THE STARK TRIFECTA How Legal, Compliance, and Outside Counsel Work Together on Stark Compliance 1 1. Understand the risks posed by any financial relationship between a hospital and a physician group, and
More informationEvaluating the Fair Market Value of Pay for Performance
April 2014 healthcare financial management FEATURE STORY Jen Johnson Alexandra Higgins Evaluating the Fair Market Value of Pay for Performance 1 AT A GLANCE When assessing a pay-for-performance arrangement,
More informationFMV Considerations for Bundled Payment Arrangements
FMV Considerations for Bundled Payment Arrangements Matthew J. Milliron, MBA HealthCare Appraisers, Inc. Becker s CEO + CFO Roundtable November 8, 2016 Today s Roadmap Healthcare Transactions Refresh Bundled
More informationTNT Law Group, LLC (Team 22) Recommendations on Due Diligence Findings: Transaction Between Pearson & Caring Health Systems
: Transaction Between Pearson & Caring Health Systems (Team 22) 123 N. Washington Ave., Suite 400 Beazley, Loyola 12345 Phone: (333) 122-4566 Fax: (333) 122-6677 Email: team22@tntlawgroup.com TABLE OF
More informationHHS Issues Final ACO Regulations
Client Alert October 25, 2011 HHS Issues Final ACO Regulations On Oct. 20, 2011, the Department of Health and Human Services (HHS) and the Centers for Medicare and Medicaid Services (CMS) released the
More informationPresenting a live 90--minute webinar with interactive Q&A. Today s faculty features:
Presenting a live 90--minute webinar with interactive Q&A Physician Compensation: New Paradigms in the Post-ACA World, Part II- The 2015 Perspective Structuring Payment Models for Cost Reduction, Quality
More informationIDN Goals (cont d) Integrated Delivery Networks and What They Mean for Compliance. Integrated Delivery Network (IDN) Goals
Integrated Delivery Networks and What They Mean for Compliance Chris Rossman, Esq. Foley & Lardner LLP Detroit, Michigan Attorney Advertising Prior results do not guarantee a similar outcome Models used
More informationMANAGING HOSPITAL/PHYSICIAN FINANCIAL RELATIONSHIPS
MANAGING HOSPITAL/PHYSICIAN FINANCIAL RELATIONSHIPS James D. Horwitz, Esq. HCCA Annual Compliance Institute April 27, 2009 AGENDA Laws and Environment Application of laws, agency actions and guidance to
More informationTelemedicine Fraud and Abuse Under the Microscope
Telemedicine Fraud and Abuse Under the Microscope Session 232, February 14, 2019 Douglas Grimm, Esq., Arent Fox LLP Hillary Stemple, Esq., Arent Fox LLP 1 Conflicts of Interest Douglas Grimm, Esq. Has
More informationAdvancing Risk Capability in 2015: Medicare Shared Savings Program and ACO Investment Model. March 23, 2015 // 12:00 P.M. 1:00 P.M.
Advancing Risk Capability in 2015: Medicare Shared Savings Program and ACO Investment Model March 23, 2015 // 12:00 P.M. 1:00 P.M. EST CENTER FOR INDUSTRY TRANSFORMATION The DHG Healthcare Center for Industry
More informationH e a l t h C a r e Compliance Adviser
March 2001 Volume 5 Number 1 H e a l t h C a r e Compliance Adviser OIG Issues New Advisory Opinion on Gainsharing Reversing July 1999 Special Advisory Bulletin In a welcome departure from its former position,
More informationShared Savings Program ACOs and Payors: Opportunities and Challenges in a New Era of Accountable Care
APRIL 2012 EXECUTIVE SUMMARY PAYORS, PLANS, AND MANAGED CARE PRACTICE GROUP Shared Savings Program ACOs and Payors: Opportunities and Challenges in a New Era of Accountable Care Amy J. Davis, Esquire Lumeris
More informationFederal Fraud and Abuse Enforcement in the ASC Space
Federal Fraud and Abuse Enforcement in the ASC Space SCOTT R. GRUBMAN, ESQ. PARTNER CHILIVIS COCHRAN LARKINS & BEVER, LLP (ATLANTA GA) Fraud & Abuse Enforcement Landscape FBI CMS OCR MFCU DCIS DOJ HHS-OIG
More informationCHAPTER 32. AN ACT concerning health insurance and health care providers and supplementing various parts of the statutory law.
CHAPTER 32 AN ACT concerning health insurance and health care providers and supplementing various parts of the statutory law. BE IT ENACTED by the Senate and General Assembly of the State of New Jersey:
More informationevaluating the fair market value of pay for performance
REPRINT April 2014 Jen Johnson Alexandra Higgins healthcare financial management association hfma.org evaluating the fair market value of pay for performance A critical test for determining whether a pay-for-performance
More informationGainsharing Is it Still Feasible? May 14, 2010
7 th Annual Illinois Chapter ACC Practice Management Symposium Gainsharing Is it Still Feasible? May 14, 2010 W. Kenneth Davis, Jr. Partner Katten Muchin Rosenman LLP 525 W. Monroe Chicago, Illinois 312.902.5573
More informationCaught between Scylla and Charibdis: Regulatory Parameters for Designing P4P and Gainsharing Programs
Caught between Scylla and Charibdis: Regulatory Parameters for Designing P4P and Gainsharing Programs Bruce J. Toppin, Esq. Vice President and General Counsel North Mississippi Health Services Daniel F.
More informationOrganization. 4 Health Texas Senior Centers. VP, Internal Audit Team of 11 Auditors
Organization Regional Non-Profit Acute Care Hospital System 26 Owned/Operated/Ventured/Affiliated Hospitals 21 Joint Ventured Ambulatory Surgical Centers 41 Satellite Outpatient Facilities 136 Health Texas
More informationMedicare Parts C & D Fraud, Waste, and Abuse Training
Medicare Parts C & D Fraud, Waste, and Abuse Training IMPORTANT NOTE All persons who provide health or administrative services to Medicare enrollees must satisfy FWA training requirements. This module
More informationELIMINATING THE MYSTERY OF FAIR MARKET VALUE. Learning Objectives SECTION I 9/17/2012 THE CONTRACTING AND COMPLIANCE ENVIRONMENT
Health Care Compliance Association Midwest Regional Area Compliance Conference September 21, 2012 ELIMINATING THE MYSTERY OF FAIR MARKET VALUE Daniel P. Stech & Kelly McFadden Pinnacle Healthcare Consulting
More informationStark Law Exceptions and Anti-Kickback Safe Harbors
Law Exceptions and Safe Harbors Price Reductions Offered to Health Plans [No comparable exception] Safe harbor for a reduction in price a contract health care provider offers to a health plan for the sole
More informationThe ACO Effort: A Status Report
1 The ACO Effort: A Status Report J. Mark Waxman mwaxman@foley.com 617-342-4055 2 Whats the fuss about? A need for accountability for cost and quality A belief that the system can improve if: Provider
More informationWORKING DRAFT 8/10/2016
DISCLAIMER PHYSICIAN PRACTICE LOSSES THE ELEPHANT IN THE ROOM HFMA Arkansas Chapter Summer Conference August 18, 2016 Herd Midkiff, CVA Partner Director of Consulting Services Haley Adams, CVA Senior Manager,
More informationGifts to Referral Sources. Kim C. Stanger (11-17)
Gifts to Referral Sources Kim C. Stanger (11-17) Overview Some relevant laws Applying those laws to common situations Gifts to or from referral sources Gifts to physicians Gifts to or from patients Gifts
More informationDEPARTMENT OF HEALTH AND HUMAN SERVICES. Office of Inspector General s Use of Agreements to Protect the Integrity of Federal Health Care Programs
United States Government Accountability Office Report to Congressional Requesters April 2018 DEPARTMENT OF HEALTH AND HUMAN SERVICES Office of Inspector General s Use of Agreements to Protect the Integrity
More informationContracting with Specialty Pharmacies and Hubs 17 th Annual Pharma and Medical Device Compliance Congress. October 20, 2016
Contracting with Specialty Pharmacies and Hubs 17 th Annual Pharma and Medical Device Compliance Congress October 20, 2016 Thomas Beimers Hogan Lovells Thomas.beimers@hoganlovells.com Sarah Franklin Covington
More informationLaissez les Bons Temps Rouler: Hope for Potential Stark Law Changes
AMERICAN BAR ASSOCIATION HEALTH LAW SECTION 18 TH ANNUAL EMERGING ISSUES IN HEALTHCARE LAW Laissez les Bons Temps Rouler: Hope for Potential Stark Law Changes New Orleans, Louisiana Friday, March 10, 2017
More informationFAIR MARKET VALUE & COMMERCIAL REASONABLENESS
FAIR MARKET VALUE & COMMERCIAL REASONABLENESS Insight from the C-Suite August 17, 2017 Tammy Walsh Director twalsh@bkd.com Neil Giannini, CPA/ABV Senior Managing Consultant ngiannini@bkd.com Overview of
More informationDisclaimer. The materials and views expressed in this presentation are the views of the presenters and not necessarily the views of Northwell Health
Helpful Tips for Value Based Payment (VBP) Compliance Programs Greg Radinsky Vice President & Chief Corporate Compliance Officer Aaron Lund Director of Corporate Compliance & Privacy Officer Disclaimer
More informationFraud and Abuse Laws. Kim C. Stanger. Compliance Bootcamp (5/18)
Fraud and Abuse Laws Kim C. Stanger Compliance Bootcamp (5/18) This presentation is similar to any other legal education materials designed to provide general information on pertinent legal topics. The
More informationNew Frontiers in AMC Funding: Mission Support Alternatives Post-Halifax. Thomas N. Bulleit Partner, Ropes & Gray LLP
New Frontiers in AMC Funding: Mission Support Alternatives Post-Halifax I. Introduction Thomas N. Bulleit Partner, Ropes & Gray LLP Lisa T. Wahler Associate Vice President and Deputy General Counsel Rutgers,
More informationDETERMINING FAIR MARKET VALUE FOR SERVICES RENDERED BY A DESIGNATED COLLABORATING ORGANIZATION
DETERMINING FAIR MARKET VALUE FOR SERVICES RENDERED BY A DESIGNATED COLLABORATING ORGANIZATION One of the most important features of any commercial contract is the type of consideration the payment that
More informationHEALTH CARE FRAUD. EXPERT ANALYSIS HHS OIG Adopts New Anti-Kickback Safe Harbor and Civil Monetary Penalty Exceptions
Westlaw Journal HEALTH CARE FRAUD Litigation News and Analysis Legislation Regulation Expert Commentary VOLUME 22, ISSUE 7 / JANUARY 2017 EXPERT ANALYSIS HHS OIG Adopts New Anti-Kickback Safe Harbor and
More informationPHASE II OF THE FINAL STARK REGULATIONS: WHAT DO THEY MEAN FOR HEALTHCARE PROVIDERS
Kean Miller Health Care Industry Business Group PHASE II OF THE FINAL STARK REGULATIONS: WHAT DO THEY MEAN FOR HEALTHCARE PROVIDERS April 28, 2004 Linda G. Rodrigue, Esq. and Clay J. Countryman, Esq. Kean,
More informationACO LEGAL ISSUES. Carson P. Porter Rimon Law Group
ACO LEGAL ISSUES Carson P. Porter Rimon Law Group The Patient Protection and Affordable Care of Act of 2010 (the Act ) provides for shared savings between the Medicare program and healthcare providers
More informationGAINSHARING & PAY FOR PERFORMANCE -- P4P UPDATE ON RECENT DEVELOPMENTS AND INITIATIVES
GAINSHARING & PAY FOR PERFORMANCE -- P4P UPDATE ON RECENT DEVELOPMENTS AND INITIATIVES presented by Robert D. Girard, Esq. Davis Wright Tremaine LLP A. Gain-Sharing B. Provider P4P programs C. Government
More informationCutting Edge Issues Related to. April 16, Payments to Physicians Under P4P Compensation Models
Cutting Edge Issues Related to Payments to Physicians Under P4P Compensation Models April 16, 2014 2515 McKinney Avenue, Suite 1500 Dallas, Texas 75201 Telephone: 214.369.4888 Fax: 214.369.0541 3100 West
More informationN R a v e n s w o o d A v e, S t e C h i c a g o, I L w w w. a e g i s - c o m p l i a n c e.
Jorge Pérez-Casellas, JD, LLM, CHC jpcasellas@aegis-compliance.com Miglisa Capó-Suria, JD, LLM mcapo@metropaviahealth.com A Presentation for the 2017 HCCA San Juan Regional Conference May 19, 2017 / 8:30AM
More informationFlorida Health Law Traps -
and Gassman Law Associates, P.A. present Lester Perling lperling@broadandcassel.com Alan S. Gassman agassman@gassmanpa.com Florida Health Law Traps - 5 Hypotheticals and Discussion of Important Medical
More informationHealth Care Contracting
Health Care Contracting Best Practices Toolkit and Three Tenets of Defensibility Presented by Presented at The Alaska State Hospital and Nursing Home Association Annual Conference September 27, 2017 Barbra
More informationHealth Law 101: Issue-Spotting In Dealing With Health-Care Providers. by William H. Hall Jr.
Health Law 101: Issue-Spotting In Dealing With Health-Care Providers by William H. Hall Jr. The anti-kickback statute prohibits arrangements that might be common in other industries. Health care is among
More informationRe: Medicare Program; Request for Information Regarding the Physician Self-Referral Law [CMS NC]
August 24, 2018 The Honorable Seema Verma Administrator Centers for Medicare & Medicaid Services Department of Health & Human Services Attention: CMS-1693-P P.O. Box 8016 Baltimore, MD 21244-8016 Submitted
More informationWHAT EVERY NEW PRACTITIONER SHOULD CONSIDER
WHAT EVERY NEW PRACTITIONER SHOULD CONSIDER January 24, 2017 Andrew N. Meyercord Gray Reed & McGraw 1601 Elm Street Suite 4600 Dallas, Texas 75201 214.954.4135 ameyercord@grayreed.com 129 attorneys Full-service,
More informationProposed ACO Rule: A Giant Step Toward Reform or a Leap of Faith for Providers? April 27, 2011
Proposed ACO Rule: A Giant Step Toward Reform or a Leap of Faith for Providers? April 27, 2011 Barbara Eyman Ropes & Gray Barbara.Eyman@ropesgray.com 202.508.4760 Ropes & Gray LLP Stephen Warnke Ropes
More informationLessons Learned from Recent Enforcement Actions
Developing Compliant Physician Compensation Arrangements in the Current Enforcement Environment Anna M. Grizzle Bass, Berry & Sims PLC Lessons Learned from Recent Enforcement Actions 1 Physician Remuneration
More informationPROPOSED STARK LAW REVISIONS COULD AFFECT MANY EXISTING BUSINESS ARRANGEMENTS BETWEEN PHYSICIANS AND HOSPITALS AND OTHER PROVIDERS
PROPOSED STARK LAW REVISIONS COULD AFFECT MANY EXISTING BUSINESS ARRANGEMENTS BETWEEN PHYSICIANS AND HOSPITALS AND OTHER PROVIDERS Publication PROPOSED STARK LAW REVISIONS COULD AFFECT MANY EXISTING BUSINESS
More informationPhysician Contracting An Overview of Legal Policy No. 9
Physician Contracting An Overview of Legal Policy No. 9 Learning Objectives To Understand: CHI policy requirements for physician contracting Recent updates to Legal Policy No. 9 How to obtain review and
More informationStark, AKS, FCA Primer
Stark, AKS, FCA Primer December 1, 2016 Christine Savage (csavage@choate.com, 617-248-4084) by any measure CHOATE HALL & STEWART LLP choate.com Physician Self-Referral Prohibition (the Stark Law ): History
More informationLaw Department Policy No. L-8. Title:
I. SCOPE: Title: Page: 1 of 13 This policy applies to (1) Tenet Healthcare Corporation and its wholly-owned subsidiaries and affiliates (each, an Affiliate ); (2) any other entity or organization in which
More informationHEALTHCARE BULLETIN. July 8, 2008 CMS PROPOSES NEW STARK EXCEPTION FOR INCENTIVE PAYMENT AND SHARED SERVICES PROGRAMS
HEALTHCARE BULLETIN July 8, 2008 CMS PROPOSES NEW STARK EXCEPTION FOR INCENTIVE PAYMENT AND SHARED SERVICES PROGRAMS The Centers for Medicare and Medicaid Services ( CMS ) issued a proposed rule that would
More informationTelemedicine Agreements: FMV, Commercial Reasonableness Compliance in Compensation Arrangements
Presenting a live 90-minute webinar with interactive Q&A Telemedicine Agreements: FMV, Commercial Reasonableness Compliance in Compensation Arrangements WEDNESDAY, AUGUST 8, 2018 1pm Eastern 12pm Central
More informationFundamentals of Healthcare Valuation for Health Lawyers and Compliance Officers
Fundamentals of Healthcare Valuation for Health Lawyers and Compliance Officers Theresa Carnegie, Esq. Albert Chip Hutzler, JD, MBA, CVA AHLA/HCCA Fraud and Compliance Forum September 30, 2013 1 Agenda:
More informationFair Market Value and Commercial Reasonableness Primer: Why Is It Important and How to Mitigate Risk
Fair Market Value and Commercial Reasonableness Primer: Evangeline Lalangas Attorney, Gray Reed & McGraw LLP Dallas, Texas John Meindl Director, VMG Health Dallas, Texas Brad Parker Manager, VMG Health
More informationAgenda. 4. ACO Relationships: Department of Justice/Federal Trade Commission Policy on Contracting Robert McCann
The Medicare Shared Savings Program: Accountable Care Organizations Agenda 1. Introductory Remarks & Speaker Introductions Julie Allen 2. ACO Governance Structure Matthew Amodeo 3. ACO Operational Requirements
More informationAnti-Kickback Statute: Are Per-Patient Referral Fee Arrangements Permissible?
REFERRAL COMPENSATION GREGORY S. SAIK.IN/NATHANIEL C. KUMMERFELD* Anti-Kickback Statute: Are Per-Patient Referral Fee Arrangements Permissible? Federal Judge's Decision in United States v. Crinel Allows
More informationAHLA. F. Anti-Kickback Primer. David E. Matyas Epstein Becker & Green PC Washington, DC
AHLA F. Anti-Kickback Primer David E. Matyas Epstein Becker & Green PC Washington, DC Martha J. Talley Chief, Industry Guidance Branch Office of the Inspector General US Department of Health and Human
More informationFair Market Value in Hospital and Physician Transactions: Complying With Anti-Kickback and Self-Referral Laws
Presenting a live 90-minute webinar with interactive Q&A Fair Market Value in Hospital and Physician Transactions: Complying With Anti-Kickback and Self-Referral Laws WEDNESDAY, MARCH 7, 2018 1pm Eastern
More informationUNDERSTANDING AND WORKING WITH THE LATEST STARK LAW DEVELOPMENTS
26 th Annual National CLE Conference Law Education Institute January 3-7, 3 2009 UNDERSTANDING AND WORKING WITH THE LATEST STARK LAW DEVELOPMENTS By JONELL B. WILLIAMSON January 5, 2009 1 Stark Prohibition
More informationFraud and Abuse Compliance for the Health IT Industry
Fraud and Abuse Compliance for the Health IT Industry Session 89, March 6, 2018 James A. Cannatti III, Senior Counselor for Health Information Technology, U.S. Department of Health and Human Services (HHS),
More informationFundamentals of Healthcare Valuation for Health Lawyers and Compliance Officers
Fundamentals of Healthcare Valuation for Health Lawyers and Compliance Officers Joseph Wolfe, Esq. Albert Chip Hutzler, JD, MBA, CVA AHLA Fraud and Compliance Forum October 7, 2014 1 Agenda: Why Fair Market
More informationPHYSICIAN PRACTICES IN A STARK WORLD. David E. Matyas. A. The Statutory Prohibition (Social Security Act 1877; 42 U.S.C. 1395nn)
PHYSICIAN PRACTICES IN A STARK WORLD David E. Matyas I. OVERVIEW OF THE STARK LAW A. The Statutory Prohibition (Social Security Act 1877; 42 U.S.C. 1395nn) The federal physician self-referral statute prohibits
More informationPHYSICIAN INVESTMENT COMPLIANCE
PHYSICIAN INVESTMENT COMPLIANCE Dr. NICK OBERHEIDEN LYNETTE BYRD 1-800-810-0259 Available on Weekends page 1 INTRODUCTION Many physicians are tempted to develop income from ancillary services. While there
More informationIn Stark Contrast: ACA Payment Reforms and The Physician Self-Referral Law
In Stark Contrast: ACA Payment Reforms and The Physician Self-Referral Law Washington Health Law Summit December 12, 2016 Rachel A. Seifert, Executive Vice President and General Counsel, Community Health
More informationMcKinney s Public Health Law 2999-n n. Accountable care organizations; findings; purpose. Effective: October 3, 2012
2999-n. Accountable care organizations; findings; purpose, NY PUB HEALTH 2999-n McKinney s Consolidated Laws of New York Annotated Public Health Law (Refs & Annos) Chapter 45. Of the Consolidated Laws
More informationConflicts of Interest 9/10/2017. Everything a Health Care Executive Needs to Know about the Anti-Kickback Statute. May 2, 2017 Article from JAMA:
Everything a Health Care Executive Needs to Know about the Anti-Kickback Statute Matthew Krueger Assistant United States Attorney E.D. of Wisconsin Stacy Gerber Ward von Briesen & Roper, S.C. Conflicts
More informationFEDERAL TRADE COMMISSION/DEPARTMENT OF JUSTICE PROPOSED STATEMENT OF ANTITRUST ENFORCEMENT POLICY REGARDING ACCOUNTABLE CARE ORGANIZATIONS
FEDERAL TRADE COMMISSION/DEPARTMENT OF JUSTICE PROPOSED STATEMENT OF ANTITRUST ENFORCEMENT POLICY REGARDING ACCOUNTABLE CARE ORGANIZATIONS On March 31, 2011, the Federal Trade Commission ( FTC ) and the
More informationAHLA. X. Fundamentals of Health Care Valuation for Health Lawyers and Compliance Officers
AHLA X. Fundamentals of Health Care Valuation for Health Lawyers and Compliance Officers Albert D. Hutzler, IV HealthCare Appraisers Inc Delray Beach, FL Joseph N. Wolfe Hall Render Killian Heath & Lyman
More informationSENATE, No. 485 STATE OF NEW JERSEY
SENATE BUDGET AND APPROPRIATIONS COMMITTEE STATEMENT TO [First Reprint] SENATE, No. 485 STATE OF NEW JERSEY DATED: APRIL 5, 2018 The Senate Budget and Appropriations Committee reports favorably Senate
More informationPractical Considerations for Medical Practices Considering Converting Their Vascular Access Centers Into Medicare-Certified Ambulatory Surgery Centers
Practical Considerations for Medical Practices Considering Converting Their Vascular Access Centers Into Medicare-Certified Ambulatory Surgery Centers James B. Riley, Partner +1 312 750 8665 jriley@mcguirewoods.com
More informationThe Anesthesia Company Model: Frequently Asked Questions
The Anesthesia Company Model: Frequently Asked Questions 1. What is the situation in Florida? Florida-specific Issues For several years, FSA members have been contacting the society with reports of company
More informationa publication of the health care compliance association MARCH 2018
hcca-info.org Compliance TODAY a publication of the health care compliance association MARCH 2018 On improv and improving communication an interview with Alan Alda This article, published in Compliance
More informationPI Compensation: Methods, Documentation, and Execution
PI Compensation: Methods, Documentation, and Execution David B. Russell, CRCP Director, Site Strategy Liz Christianson Client engagement manager PFS CLINICAL 2018 PharmaSeek Financial Services, LLC d.b.a.
More information