The Real Deal? Are Performance Awards Really Paying for Performance? October 24, 2013
|
|
- Madeline Simmons
- 5 years ago
- Views:
Transcription
1 The Real Deal? Are Performance Awards Really Paying for Performance? October 24, 2013 Dan Kapinos Associate Director, Global Technical Shared Services Team, Aon Hewitt Laura Smith Global Compensation & Benefits, The Travelers Companies, Inc. Carl J. Stegman Sr. Vice President, Stock Plan Services Product Management, Fidelity Investments
2 Company Background Company Background: The Travelers Companies, Inc. (NYSE: TRV) is a leading provider of property casualty insurance for auto, home and business. The company s diverse business lines offer its global customers a wide range of coverage sold primarily through independent agents and brokers. A component of the Dow Jones Industrial Average, Travelers has more than 30,000 employees and operations in the United States and selected international markets. The company generated revenues of approximately $26 billion in Award Philosophy: Our compensation program is designed to reinforce a long term perspective, which is especially vital in the property and casualty insurance industry, where the periodic occurrence of catastrophes, changes in estimates of costs for claims and other economic conditions have historically produced results that vary significantly when measured year to year. The portion of total compensation attributable to stock based programs increases with successively higher levels of responsibility. Thus, the senior most executives who are responsible for the development and execution of our strategic and financial plans have the largest portion of their compensation tied to performance based incentives, including equity based compensation, the ultimate value of which is completely or partly dependent on changes in stock price and return on equity. Annual Revenue $26B Total Employees ~30k Employees Receiving Equity Stock delivered globally in ~6k 5 Countries % US Based 95% % Global (Non-US) 5% Award Types: Stock Option: Restricted Stock/Units Performance Shares Employee Stock Purchase Key Statistics VP & Above VP & Below VP & Above No
3 Why is Performance Equity Here to Stay?
4 The Say-on-Pay Web Proxy/CD&A Disclosure 2012 Say on Pay Results Proxy Advisory Firms SEC Rule Making 2013 Say on Pay Votes Institutional Shareholders Dodd Frank Performance (TSR) The Media Clawbacks & CEO Pay Ratios Consultant Independence Committee Conflicts Hedging & Pledging Policies
5 Evaluating the Impact of ISS ISS still holds the largest market share amongst investors Among companies with negative ISS recommendations, only 12.2% failed But, over half passed with less than 70% shareholder support, triggering additional ISS scrutiny next year The impact of Glass Lewis recommendations in 2011 was similar the 10% of firms earning an F grade from Glass Lewis received average shareholder support levels of 73% Voting Outcomes with Negative ISS Recommendations 12.2% 36.6% 51.2% Passed (Above 70%) Passed (Below 70%) Failed (Below 50%) Sources: Radford analysis of data from Institutional Shareholder Services (ISS) and Aon Hewitt s Hot Topics in Executive Compensation Webinar (July 2013)
6 What Drives Negative Say-on-Pay Recs? Pay-for-performance disconnects are the largest driver of negative Say-on-Pay recommendations for both Glass Lewis and ISS 100% 80% 85% Glass Lewis Drivers for Negative Say-on-Pay Recommendations % 40% 20% 41% 57% 23% 49% 33% 45% 43% 32% 32% 16% 16% 16% 18% 29% 28% 24% 25% 17% 8% 0% Source: Radford analysis of data from Institutional Shareholder Services (ISS)
7 Aon Hewitt s 2013 Hot Topics Survey What is your Top Priority? Competitiveness of the targeted total compensation 75% Redesign/implementation of compensation/benefit programs 24% Degree of pay for performance in executive compensation package 54% Impact of new policies/regulations (ISS Pay-for-Performance Policies) 23% Retention of current talent 53% Shareholder/say-on-pay concerns 18% Alignment of compensation & benefit levels of company performance 46% Drafting of Proxy/CD&A disclosures 15% Communication of compensation and benefit costs 38% Development of (an) appropriate peer group(s) 15% Control of compensation and benefit costs 32% Risk-levels impacting compensation programs 12% Attraction of new talent 26% Governance 9% Source: Aon Hewitt s Hot Topics in Executive Compensation Webinar (July 2013)
8 Broad-based Equity Granting Trends: Proportion of Participants by Award Type Proportion of Grant Value by Award Type Options Restricted Performance Options Restricted Performance Source: Fidelity Stock Plan Services Administration data,
9 But Are Performance Awards Really Paying for Performance?
10 Description of Research Methodology Fidelity performance award data 131 clients Average participant size: 185 (Ranging from 1 2,270) Payouts over 6 years ( 08 13) 1-year to 3-year plans Data analysis compared payouts to a company s performance Benchmarked performance against S&P 500 focused on TSR & EPS Payout classification: Payout Above Target considered high pay; Below Target low pay Number of Employees Market Capitalization % of Employees Receiving Performance Award Vesting Years Performance Period Years <2.5K 2.5K 10K 10K 25K 25K 100K >100K <$1B $1B $5B $5B $10B $10B $25B >$25B <1% 1% 5% 5% 10% 10% 15% >15% year 2 years 3 years 4 years 5 years 15.2% 18.2% 56.7% 6.6% 3.2% 1 year 2 years 3 years 4 years 5 years 25.2% 15.2% 55.3% 2.8% 1.4% Past performance is no guarantee of future results. Source: Fidelity Stock Plan Services and ClearBridge Compensation Group Performance Plan Study, 2013
11 Research Highlights Payouts continue to be in directional alignment with relative performance High performing companies tend to demonstrate stronger alignment between performance and award payouts than low performing companies This is particularly true when comparing payouts for awards based on one year of performance vs. three years Raises questions as to whether companies are setting a floor when setting performance goals Performance award cycles ending in the last two years (2011 and 2012) have paid out better than cycles ending in earlier years Significant economic uncertainty at the time performance goals were set may be contributing to this outcome Across most data sets, TSR has risen to the top as the most prevalent performance measure, although earnings measures continue to be widely used Awards based on an earnings measure resulted in above target payouts more often than TSRbased awards Using absolute or relative measures do not result in any materially different payout, but using both resulted in max payouts a vast majority of the time Past performance is no guarantee of future results. Source: Fidelity Stock Plan Services and ClearBridge Compensation Group Performance Plan Study, 2013
12 Performance Plans Align Pay with TSR Performance Max TSR Performance Versus S&P 500 (n=155) Low Performance - High Pay (n= 31) High Performance - High Pay (n= 67) Overall, payouts aligned with TSR Performance 66% of the time Performance Share Payout Target Low Performance - Low Pay (n= 36) R² = High Performance - Low Pay (n= 21) Key Conclusions: Among high performing companies, 76% of payouts were aligned with performance In contrast, payouts among low performers were directionally aligned only 54% of the time 0% 25% 50% 75% 100% TSR Percentile Rank Relative to the S&P 500 Past performance is no guarantee of future results. Source: Fidelity Stock Plan Services and ClearBridge Compensation Group Performance Plan Study, 2013
13 Performance Plans Align Pay with EPS Growth Max EPS Growth Performance Versus S&P 500 (n=130) Low Performance - High Pay (n= 30) High Performance - High Pay (n= 52) Payouts aligned with EPS Performance 68% of the time Performance Share Payout Target Low Performance - Low Pay (n= 36) R² = High Performance - Low Pay (n= 12) Key Conclusions: EPS has a stronger statistical correlation to performance compared to TSR, with fewer significant outliers High Performance Low Pay outliers are almost entirely removed 0% 25% 50% 75% 100% EPS Growth Percentile Rank Relative to the S&P 500 Past performance is no guarantee of future results. Source: Fidelity Stock Plan Services and ClearBridge Compensation Group Performance Plan Study, 2013
14 Performance Plan Cycles Ending in Recent Years Paid Better than Years Prior The vast majority of performance plans ending in 2012 and 2011 paid at target or above Payouts for performance plan cycles ending in 2010 were more evenly distributed between above and below target Performance Plan Payouts by Years % 18% 7% 45% 17% n=55 Maximum Payouts have remained consistent Year over Year Approximately 17% % 22% 4% 53% 17% n=45 Above Target payouts significantly up ticked in recent years % 30% 30% 18% n=38 Approximately 70% Target or above last two years 0% 25% 50% 75% 100% Zero Below Target Target Between Target and Max Max Past performance is no guarantee of future results. Source: Fidelity Stock Plan Services and ClearBridge Compensation Group Performance Plan Study, 2013
15 Taking a Deeper Dive into Performance Plan Payouts Viewing the data into by performance quartile: Bottom, Middle, and Top Performers Past performance is no guarantee of future results. Source: Fidelity Stock Plan Services and ClearBridge Compensation Group Performance Plan Study, 2013
16 Performance Plan Cycles Starting to Trend Toward Above Target Payouts Performance vs. Benchmark Below Target Payouts Above Target Payouts Key Conclusions: Top Performers EPS TSR Top Quartile exceed above target payouts at higher rates than Bottom Quartile paid below target Middle Performers Bottom Performers EPS TSR EPS TSR Middle Quartile payouts mirrored the overall profile and paid above target approximately 66% of the time 100% 50% 0% 50% 100%
17 Performance Plan Cycles Ending in Recent Years Paid Significantly Better than Years Prior (cont d) Our hypothesis: Considering most plans have three-year performance cycles, performance goals for plans ending in 2011 and 2012 were set during a time of great economic uncertainty (in 2009 or 2010) In light of these economic conditions, company-specific outlooks were highly unpredictable, causing many companies to set goals at realistic levels rather than goals with stretch As the economy recovered, many companies faired better than expected S&P 500 TSR for the 3-year periods ending in 2011 and 2012 was significantly stronger than the 3-year period ending in 2010, returning to pre-recession levels Period when Goals Set S&P500 3 Year TSR Through 12/31 Performance Cycle S&P500 3 Year TSR Over Performance Cycle End of % % End of % % End of % %
18 Pay for What Performance? EPS continues to be a commonly used performance measure, while TSR has gained significant momentum in recent years TSR has outpaced EPS as the most widely used performance measure 60% 50% Prevalence of performance metrics utilized in plans 40% 30% 20% Fidelity CB100 Equilar 10% 0% TSR/Stk Price EPS/Net Inc/EBIT Returns Rev Cashflow Other Financial Non Financial Source: Fidelity Performance Plans 2012 Grants; Equilar.com/knowledge network/researcharticles/2013/pdfs/2013 equilar sp1500 metrics article.pdf; 2012 ClearBridge 100 Data PwC Equity Compensation Study, January 2011
19 What Influence Does the Performance Measure Selected Have on Payouts? Plans based on EPS and other earnings measures paid out at or above Target approximately twothirds of the time While TSR-based awards paid out above target only slightly more than half of the time Are companies cherrypicking performance measures? TSR 19% Performance Plan Payouts by Performance Measure 25% 56% n=16 Analysis suggests companies are better at predicting internal financial results, or have greater control over the performance outcome when an internal financial measure is used This gives some credibility to institutional investor/proxy advisory push for relative metrics, i.e., TSR EPS Other Earnings Revenue Returns Other Financial Past performance is no guarantee of future results. Source: Fidelity Stock Plan Services and ClearBridge Compensation Group Performance Plan Study, % 16% 22% 29% 38% 16% 27% 25% 43% 27% 56% 0% 25% 50% 75% 100% Zero Below Target Target Between Target and Max Max 64% 14% 38% 36% 22% 14% 4% n=25 n=8 n=7 n=11 n=9
20 What Influence Does the Performance Measure Selected Have on Payouts? continued There is little difference in how plans pay out when comparing absolute vs. relative plans Plans that are based on a combination of absolute and relative measures, however, paid between Target and Max 83% of the time Performance Plan Payouts Absolute vs. Relative Plans Relative 23% 15% 62% Absolute 14% 26% 2% 38% 19% Both 17% 83% 0% 25% 50% 75% 100% Source: Fidelity Stock Plan Services and ClearBridge Compensation Group Performance Plan Study, 2013
21 Performance Measurement Period: Implications of Short vs. Longer Term % of Payouts Aligned with Performance 86% 79% 80% 72% 74% 69% 59% 60% 50% 45% 40% 43% High Performers Low Performers 1 Year R 2 = EPS 3 Year R 2 = Year R 2 = TSR 3 Year R 2 = Year 3 Year R 2 = R 2 = Payouts Key Conclusions: 3 year measurement periods are generally better at creating Performance and Pay alignment across multiple categories versus 1 year periods 1 year measurement periods: Low performers pay low less than 50% of the time (i.e., the majority of payouts are misaligned) 3 year measurement generally reverses that alignment and Low Pay / Low Performance is ~60% of occurrences High Pay / High Performance is strongly aligned across all measurement periods: Over 70% of occurrences
22 When Business Conditions and Results Soften: How Do Plans Perform? Max Above Target Target Negative Positive Negative Positive Negative Positive Net Income Growth Do performance plans reward poor business performance? Shareholders expect that when business soften, performance plans will react accordingly Key Conclusions: Positive Net Income Growth continues to be strongly associated with Target thru Max Payouts. No Max payouts for negative Net Income Growth reduced Positive Growth below target payments increasing Target Payment Below Target Negative Positive Zero Payouts continues to be mostly aligned mostly with Negative Net Income Growth. Zero Negative Positive Number of Payouts Move to the Middle: Target payouts increase for both performance scenarios reducing Above Target Negative occurrences and Below Target Positive occurrences
23 Focused Look: Do Relative TSR Plans Really Pay for Performance?
24 Relative TSR Plans Payouts are based upon the company s Total Shareholder Return performance relative to the TSR performance of a peer group or index, aligning with shareholders and theoretically removing the impact of market forces. Target Share Award Relative TSR Peer X Group Performance = Multiplier From Schedule Actual Shares Earned However, Executives feel they have little control and influence on stock price performance, and that TSR is not indicative of actual company performance due to the influence of market forces. Relative TSR plans do not reward actual sustained long-term performance. It s all timing. Why am I being measured on a metric that easily affected by external market forces? I have no control over stock price.
25 Radford s Balance Study Radford analyzed over 800 public companies, comprising the following indices, studying historical data over a 13-year period, with the assumption that a new 3-year performance period begins every quarter creating 40 rolling performance periods. S&P 500 S&P Midcap 400 NASDAQ 100 Dow 30 We ranked each company s stock price performance against the respective companies in the index, using the 5 metrics below. Metric Definition 13-Year Index TSR TSR from October 1, 1997 to June 30, 2010 Best Average Rank The best average performance for the 40 periods (or the highest of the TSRs on average) Worst Average Rank The worst average performance for the 40 periods (or the lowest of the TSRs on average) Standard Deviation (SD) The square root of the variance. In this analysis, this represents the amount at which the ranks vary from the mean. The reciprocal relationship between the average ranks over the 40 periods and the rank Correlation of the specific 13-year TSR. Goal was to understand the relationship of the relative performance over the individual 3-year periods (hypothetical Relative TSR plans) and the company s long-term performance. Source: 2011 Radford Review Relative TSR Plans: The Balanced Approach to Equity
26 Balance Study Highlights Performance within Relative TSR plans (and subsequently payouts) is not necessarily skewed by shortterm market performance No consistently extreme performers skewing results Payouts tend to be normally distributed over a long-term period (13 years) Performance within Relative TSR plans (and subsequently payouts) is highly correlated with long-term company performance Essentially, a high performing company over the 13 year period tends to have outperformed the peers and received high payouts over the individual Relative TSR periods Likewise, a low performing company over the 13 year period tends to have underperformed the peers and received low payouts over the individual Relative TSR periods Best Average Rank Worst Average Rank Index 13-Year Index TSR Number of Cos. Standard Deviation Correlation S&P % S&P Midcap % NASDAQ % Dow % Source: 2011 Radford Review Relative TSR Plans: The Balanced Approach to Equity
27 Normally Distributed Payouts S&P 500 Source: 2011 Radford Review Relative TSR Plans: The Balanced Approach to Equity
28 Snap Shot High Performers in S&P 500 The awards are truly balanced, as long-term performance and Relative TSR performance are correlated, but the individual Relative TSR periods are not skewed. High performing companies over the 13-year period yielded high average ranks, which yielded high average payouts over that time period. Still, the companies ranged from a rank of 1 to 415, indicating that individual extreme performers did not skew the results. 13-Year Period 40 Relative TSR Periods Company TSR Rank Average Rank Best Rank Worst Rank Apple 4573% CarMax 624% FLIR Systems 1064% Jacobs Engineering 244% Public Storage 443% UnitedHealth 348% Urban Outfitters 1554% Valero Energy 244% Source: 2011 Radford Review Relative TSR Plans: The Balanced Approach to Equity
29 Snap Shot Low Performers in S&P 500 Balance is maintained with low performing companies. Low performing companies over the 13-year period yielded low average ranks, which yielded low average payouts over that time period. Ranks ranged from 3 to 418, so low performing companies do not skew results either. 13-Year Period 40 Relative TSR Periods Company TSR Rank Average Rank Best Rank Worst Rank Bristol-Myers Squibb -37% Dell -3% Eastman Kodak -92% JDS Uniphase -74% Motorola -66% New York Times -68% Sprint Nextel -86% Sara Lee -16% Source: 2011 Radford Review Relative TSR Plans: The Balanced Approach to Equity
30 Important Additional Information FOR PLAN SPONSOR USE ONLY. NOT FOR PLAN PARTICIPANT DISTRIBUTION. The tax information contained herein is general in nature and for informational purposes only. Fidelity does not provide legal or tax advice. Always consult an attorney or tax professional regarding your specific legal or tax situation. Stock plan recordkeeping and administrative services are provided by Fidelity Stock Plan Services, LLC. Aon Hewitt, The Travelers Companies, Inc., ClearBridge Compensation Group and Fidelity Investments are not affiliated. S&P 500 is a registered service mark of Standard & Poor's Financial Services LLC. Fidelity Brokerage Services LLC, Member NYSE, SIPC, 900 Salem Street, Smithfield, RI
31 Contacts Dan Kapinos Associate Director, Global Technical Shared Services Team Aon Hewitt Laura Smith Global Compensation & Benefits The Travelers Companies, Inc. Carl J. Stegman Sr. Vice President, Stock Plan Services Product Management Fidelity Investments
Relative TSR Plans: The Next Generation of Equity
Relative TSR Plans: The Next Generation of Equity October 21, 2009 Jon Burg and Matt Ward Agenda > The Case for Relative TSR Plans > The Current Equity Landscape > Plan Design and Trends > Question and
More information2018 Corporate Governance & Incentive Design Survey Fall 2018
2018 Corporate Governance & Incentive Design Survey Fall 2018 Contents Executive Summary 2 Corporate Governance Practices 3 Proxy Disclosure 12 Company Policies 19 Annual Incentive Plan Design Practices
More informationCAP 100 Company Research
Industry Report // 2016-2017 CAP 100 Company Research The CAP 100 Company Research consists of 100 companies from 9 industries, selected to provide a broad representation of market practice among large
More informationLong-Term Incentives Gone Wild?:
Long-Term Incentives Gone Wild?: Lessons Learned and Emerging Trends Jon Burg, Radford Brett Harsen, Radford May 14, 2010 Copyright 2010 Aon Corporation Any use of these Results by non-radford survey participants
More informationIn the Weeds with Performance Share Accounting
In the Weeds with Performance Share Accounting Jon W. Burg, FSA, CEP, Partner at Aon Radford Mike Palermo, CEP, Vice President at Fidelity Investments Paul R. Moore, CEP, Accounting Manager at Cisco Systems
More informationRadford Review: 2013 Say-on-Pay Results and Trends for the US Life Sciences Sector. One Firm. Complete Solutions.
Radford Review: 2013 Say-on-Pay Results and Trends for the US Life Sciences Sector One Firm. Complete Solutions. 2013 Say-on-Pay Snapshot Overall Russell 3000 Index Results Among Russell 3000 companies
More informationINCENTIVE PLAN SERIES
INCENTIVE PLAN SERIES Long-Term Incentive Plans Michael Sherry, Managing Director Sandra Pace, Managing Director 650 Fifth Avenue, 33 rd Floor, New York, New York 10019 www.shallpartners.com (212) 488-5400
More informationHold. Flip. Split Acrobatics of Employee Ownership
Hold. Flip. Split Acrobatics of Employee Ownership Alice Chang, First American Financial Corporation Carolyn Belamide, Trimble Navigation Limited Mike Alicea, Fidelity Stock Plan Services Agenda Company
More informationRadford Review: 2013 Say-on-Pay Results and Trends for the US Technology Sector. One Firm. Complete Solutions.
Radford Review: 2013 Say-on-Pay Results and Trends for the US Technology Sector One Firm. Complete Solutions. 2013 Say-on-Pay Snapshot Overall Russell 3000 Index Results Among Russell 3000 companies with
More informationHOW DOES YOUR LTI PROGRAM MEASURE UP?
HOW DOES YOUR LTI PROGRAM MEASURE UP? istockphoto.com/hohojirozame 04 2015 The Magazine of WorldatWork Updating Data from 2013, a New Survey Looks at Where We Are Now Finding the right balance is key to
More informationDispatches from the Proxy Front: A Preview of the 2013 Annual Meeting Season. Steven M. Pantina Managing Director January 18, 2013
Dispatches from the Proxy Front: A Preview of the 2013 Annual Meeting Season Steven M. Pantina Managing Director January 18, 2013 A Look Back at Say-on-Pay Votes in the 2012 Proxy Season Nearly 2,000 ballots
More informationTHE ISS PAY FOR PERFORMANCE MODEL. By Stephen F. O Byrne, Shareholder Value Advisors, Inc.
THE ISS PAY FOR PERFORMANCE MODEL By Stephen F. O Byrne, Shareholder Value Advisors, Inc. Institutional Shareholder Services (ISS) announced a new approach to evaluating pay for performance in late 2011
More informationEven before the five-year EGC limit expires, a company can lose EGC treatment by tripping any one of the following triggers, including:
June 2017 Once a company exits the JOBS Act, it must hold Say-on-Pay votes and disclose a host of new governance and compensation information planning early makes for a much easier transition. The JOBS
More informationDiscussion Draft: Overview of Issues, Proposed Definitions, and a Conceptual Framework
Discussion Draft: Overview of Issues, Proposed Definitions, and a Conceptual Framework The Conference Board Working Group on Alternative Pay Disclosure A JOINT PROJECT WITH: Alternative Pay Disclosure
More informationDriving Performance - Linking Equity Compensation Design with FAS 123(R) Valuation, Jeff Bacher and Terry Adamson, Aon Consulting
Aon Consulting Executive Compensation + Employee Benefits Driving Performance - Linking Equity Compensation Design with FAS 123(R) Valuation, Jeff Bacher and Terry Adamson, Aon Consulting November 6, 2006
More informationComp Talks Proxy Season Rundown Scrutinizing 2017 to Improve 2018
Comp Talks Proxy Season Rundown Scrutinizing 2017 to Improve 2018 Reid Pearson, Alliance Advisors Megan Arthur Schilling, Cooley Moderated by Amy Wood, Cooley attorney advertisement Copyright Cooley LLP,
More informationCLIENT ALERT. ISS Publishes Evaluating Pay for Performance Alignment White Paper
December 28, 2011 CLIENT ALERT Last week, ISS published a white paper detailing its new pay-for-performance methodology. As in the past, a significant misalignment between pay and company performance may
More informationImplementing a Relative TSR Plan: It's New To Me - An Issuer's Story October 24, 2013
Implementing a Relative TSR Plan: It's New To Me - An Issuer's Story October 24, 2013 Christopher Jensen Vice President, Global Compensation, Benefits and HR Operations, Freescale Semiconductor Claudia
More informationExecutive Compensation
Executive Compensation Bulletin Long-Term Incentives The Continuing Shift to Performance-Based Awards David Wrangham, Towers Watson March 10, 2014 As the largest component of the typical executive compensation
More informationSmall Pharma/Biotech
Industry Report // 2017-2018 Small Pharma/Biotech This report summarizes 2017 CEO pay and performance and incentive compensation practices for a sample of 19 public Small Pharmaceutical and Biotechnology
More information2015 Activist Investors and Executive Pay WHAT WE FOUND
flash NEWSLETTER ISSUE #78 FEBRUARY 1, 2016 2015 Activist Investors and Executive Pay By Shaun Bisman and Matt McLaughlin Shareholders can voice their support for, or concerns with, a s executive compensation
More informationSay On Pay Best Practices For 2012
Say On Pay Best Practices For 2012 by John K. Wilson and Joshua A. Agen Most public U.S. corporations faced their first shareholder say on pay vote last proxy season, and the results were mixed. While
More informationA JOINT PROJECT WITH:
Supplemental Pay Disclosure: Overview of Issues, Proposed Definitions, and a Conceptual Framework The Conference Board Working Group on Supplemental Pay Disclosure A JOINT PROJECT WITH: Supplemental Pay
More informationThere are a number of
October 2015 Share Authorization Requestss in Canada: What s Required and What s Recommended There are a number of parties that have influence overr a company s share plan design as well as obtaining investor
More informationDesigning and Implementing an Effective Pay for Performance Program in a Say on Pay World
Designing and Implementing an Effective Pay for Performance Program in a Say on Pay World David Allegood, Director of Global Compensation, Jabil Circuit, Inc., (US) Maura Ann McBreen, Partner, Baker &
More informationRadford Review: 2014 Say-on-Pay Results and Governance Trends in the US Technology Sector. One Firm. Complete Solutions.
Radford Review: 2014 Say-on-Pay Results and Governance Trends in the US Technology Sector One Firm. Complete Solutions. Summary Findings 2014 Say-on-Pay Voting Results In the fourth year of mandatory Say-on-Pay
More informationDemystifying margin loans
Demystifying margin loans The goal of today s session is to help you better understand a margin loan what it is and how it can be used. This is intended to be an introductory session to provide you with
More informationSTUDY OF 2015 SHORT- AND LONG-TERM INCENTIVE DESIGN CRITERIA AMONG TOP 200 S&P 500 COMPANIES
STUDY OF 2015 SHORT- AND LONG-TERM INCENTIVE DESIGN CRITERIA AMONG TOP 200 S&P 500 COMPANIES December 2016 By James F. Reda, David M. Schmidt & Kimberly A. Glass Arthur J. Gallagher & Co. Human Resources
More informationInto focus. FTSE 350 Executive and Board remuneration report. January 2016
Into focus FTSE 350 Executive and Board remuneration report January 2016 Introduction Executive salaries continue to increase and the median of 2015/16 proposed salary increases is 2.2% Welcome and introduction
More informationRelative TSR Plans: Expert Insight
July 2016 Relative TSR Plans: Expert Insight Relative TSR Valuation #105: How to Forecast the Valuation Effect from Stub Periods Introduction In the past, our team has discussed at length the technical
More informationBuilding A Compensation Peer Group: A Step-by-Step Approach
Building A Compensation Peer Group: A Step-by-Step Approach Presentation for: Executive Compensation Webinar Series August 11, 2016 Presented by: Anthony J. Eppert 713.220.4276 AnthonyEppert@AndrewsKurth.com
More informationCompensation of Executive Board Members in European Health Care Companies. HCM Health Care
Compensation of Executive Board Members in European Health Care Companies HCM Health Care CONTENTS 4 EXECUTIVE SUMMARY 5 DATA SAMPLE 6 MARKET DATA OVERVIEW 6 Compensation level 10 Compensation structure
More informationCalifornia Bankers Association 126 th Annual Convention
California Bankers Association 126 th Annual Convention Compensation Strategies in an Evolving Environment May 4, 2017 Dan Wetzel Managing Director Pearl Meyer Bob Gotelli SVP, Director Human Resources
More informationThe value of equity-based compensation
The value of equity-based compensation VALUATION AND ACCOUNTING FOR TOTAL SHAREHOLDER RETURN (TSR) PLANS By David Howell and David Grubb Overview Performance-based equity compensation plans continue to
More informationThe Impact of Performance on Equity Utilization
The Impact of Performance on Equity Utilization By David Knopping and Matthew Lopez AS GOVERNANCE STANDARDS HAVE TIGHTENED OVER THE PAST SEVERAL YEARS, COMPANIES HAVE WORKED TO create a sustainable balance
More informationDodd-Frank Update Overview of Remaining Open Items
Dodd-Frank Update Overview of Remaining Open Items Pay Ratio Companies required to disclose the ratio of the CEO pay to that of the median employee wherever summary compensation table data is disclosed,
More informationUtility Industry. Industry Report //
Industry Report // 2016-2017 Utility Industry Compensation Advisory Partners (CAP) examined 2016 executive pay and company performance at 29 companies in the utility industry with median revenue of approximately
More informationMandatory Post-Vest Holding Requirements: Maximize Your Investment in Equity Compensation and be a Good Corporate Citizen at the Same Time
Mandatory Post-Vest Holding Requirements: Maximize Your Investment in Equity Compensation and be a Good Corporate Citizen at the Same Time By: Daniel Coleman, Associate Partner; Jon Burg, Partner and Terry
More informationMay 3, Dear Fellow Morgan Stanley Shareholder:
May 3, 2011 Dear Fellow Morgan Stanley Shareholder: Morgan Stanley s Board of Directors recommends that shareholders approve two key proposals at our upcoming annual shareholders meeting: the amendment
More informationSalesforce. Supplemental Proxy Materials. May NYSE: CRM San Francisco, CA
Salesforce Supplemental Proxy Materials May 2016 NYSE: CRM San Francisco, CA A Complete Platform for Customer Success Salesforce Success Services Success Community Success Ecosystem Customer Success Managers
More informationA Push for More Diverse Metrics
October 2017 Some firms are trading in their performance shares in favor of restricted stock with longer vesting and holding periods as critics say performance plans have become overly complicated. Starting
More informationToday s Compensation Environment 2010 (9 th Edition)
Today s Compensation Environment 2010 (9 th Edition) August 4, 2010 Introduction This is the 9 th edition of Corporate and Consumer Banking Consulting Practice White Paper on current compensation trends
More informationFREDERIC W. COOK & CO., INC.
FREDERIC W. COOK & CO., INC. NEW YORK CHICAGO LOS ANGELES SAN FRANCISCO ATLANTA HOUSTON BOSTON December 9, 2014 Proxy Advisory Firms Release 2015 Policy Updates In November, Institutional Shareholder Services
More informationAbout Meridian Compensation Partners, LLC
About Meridian Compensation Partners, LLC Meridian Compensation Partners, LLC is one of the largest independent executive compensation and corporate governance consulting firms in North America. Meridian
More informationEquity Compensation Trends
Equity Compensation Trends An Equilar Publication August 2018 Featuring Commentary From Contents CONTENTS Executive Summary 4 About the Contributors 7 Methodology 8 Key Findings 8 Equity Grant Practices
More informationUtility Industry. Industry Report //
Industry Report // 2017-2018 Utility Industry Compensation Advisory Partners (CAP) examined 2017 pay levels and financial performance across forty-two companies in the utility industry with median revenue
More informationBoard Committee Forum: Compensation
Board Committee Forum: Compensation National Harbor, Maryland / Oct. 13, 2013 ADVANCING EXEMPLARY BOARD LEADERSHIP Welcome and Objectives National Harbor, Maryland / Oct. 13, 2013 Jannice Koors Managing
More informationEquity Compensation All Stars Game: Silicon Valley vs. The Rest of the World
Equity Compensation All Stars Game: Silicon Valley vs. The Rest of the World A SUMMARY REVIEW OF THE 2016 DOMESTIC STOCK PLAN DESIGN SURVEY RESULTS CO-SPONSORED BY DELOITTE CONSULTING LLP AND THE NASPP
More informationThe Value Proposition
The 9th Annual New England NASPP Regional Conference co-hosted by the Boston and Connecticut NASPP Chapters July 14 th, 2017 Which Value is This Again? Sandra Pace, Steven Hall & Partners Ted Manley, Dunkin
More informationRisks and Returns of Relative Total Shareholder Return Plans Andy Restaino Technical Compensation Advisors Inc.
Risks and Returns of Relative Total Shareholder Return Plans Andy Restaino Technical Compensation Advisors Inc. INTRODUCTION When determining or evaluating the efficacy of a company s executive compensation
More informationRewarding Key Employees for Driving Corporate Growth: Long-Term Incentives for Private Employers
Rewarding Key Employees for Driving Corporate Growth: Long-Term Incentives for Private Employers Stephen D. Mann, Area Senior VP, Arthur J.Gallagher & Co Rob Ivy, Chief Financial Officer, Lee Company Why
More informationHOSPITALITY INDUSTRY ANNUAL AND LONG-TERM INCENTIVE PRACTICES
DECEMBER 2017 2017 EXECUTIVE COMPENSATION REPORT: HOSPITALITY INDUSTRY ANNUAL AND LONG-TERM INCENTIVE PRACTICES ANNUAL AND LONG-TERM INCENTIVE PRACTICES FOR EXECUTIVES IN THE HOSPITALITY INDUSTRY DECEMBER
More informationCapital Idea: Expect More From the Core.
SM Capital Idea: Expect More From the Core. Investments are not FDIC-insured, nor are they deposits of or guaranteed by a bank or any other entity, so they may lose value. Core equity strategies, such
More informationCapital Idea: Expect More From the Core.
SM Capital Idea: Expect More From the Core. Investments are not FDIC-insured, nor are they deposits of or guaranteed by a bank or any other entity, so they may lose value. Core equity strategies, such
More informationHot Topics 2013 Proxy season highlights
Hot Topics 2013 Proxy season highlights Recent governance trends, regulatory developments, and the expectation of future governance-related legislation were highlighted in the June 25 Deloitte Dbriefs
More informationSubject: Comments regarding Incentive-based Compensation Arrangements Section 956(e) of the Dodd-Frank Act 12 CFR Part 236
July 22, 2016 Board of Governors of the Federal Reserve System Subject: Comments regarding Incentive-based Compensation Arrangements Section 956(e) of the Dodd-Frank Act 12 CFR Part 236 Compensation Advisory
More information2017 PROXY SEASON REVIEW & OTHER TOPICS. Hugessen Breakfast Seminar June 15 &
2017 PROXY SEASON REVIEW & OTHER TOPICS Hugessen Breakfast Seminar June 15 & 20 2017 Agenda for Today s Event Welcome Highlights from 2017 Proxy Season Comments from Guests Open Discussion Closing Remarks
More informationRelative Total Shareholder Return Plans: Valuation 103 How Design Decisions Impact the Cost of Relative Total Shareholder Return Awards
November 2016 Relative Total Shareholder Return Plans: Valuation 103 How Design Decisions Impact the Cost of Relative Total Shareholder Return Awards Long-term incentive plans based on Relative Total Shareholder
More informationFidelity Large Cap Growth Enhanced Index Fund
Fidelity Large Cap Growth Enhanced Index Fund Key Takeaways The fund gained 7.04% for the six months ending August 3, 207 the period since our last annual report lagging the 0.69% increase in the benchmark
More informationASC Topic 718 Accounting Valuation Report. Company ABC, Inc.
ASC Topic 718 Accounting Valuation Report Company ABC, Inc. Monte-Carlo Simulation Valuation of Several Proposed Relative Total Shareholder Return TSR Component Rank Grants And Index Outperform Grants
More informationidea mind. half of your 4-digit GICS code in TSR performance can severely penalizee TSRs of thee compensation plan. lead to ISS So why do some very
RADFORD REVIEW: Should GICS Codes Be Used In Comparisons? Pay-For-Performance Falling in the bottom half of your 4-digit GICS code in TSR performance can severely penalizee your executive compensation
More informationPrudential/PLANSPONSOR
Prudential/PLANSPONSOR PRUDENTIAL/PLANSPONSOR - 2017 EXECUTIVE BENEFIT SURVEY 2017 EXECUTIVE BENEFIT SURVEY Summary of Results INTRODUCTION In 2017, Prudential and PLANSPONSOR magazine co-sponsored our
More informationREIT Executive Compensation Trends
REIT Executive Compensation Trends Compensation and Corporate Governance Report and Analysis August 2017 Index Page v Executive Summary Key Findings 3 v 2016 Compensation Adjustments 7 v Executive Compensation
More informationTrailing PE -- Forward PE Hold 31 Analysts. 1-Year Return: -12.6% 5-Year Return: 38.9%
Last Close 291.23 (USD) Avg Daily Vol 6.6M 52-Week High 387.46 Trailing PE -- Annual Div -- ROE -38.8% LTG Forecast -- 1-Mo -3.6% 2019 February 21 NASDAQ Exchange Market Cap 52.9B 52-Week Low 244.59 Forward
More informationFive Things to Know about Today s ESPPs
FIDELITY STOCK PLAN SERVICES Five Things to Know about Today s ESPPs Employee Stock Purchase Plans (ESPPs) have long been an ideal way to share ownership on a broad basis. In today s competitive labor
More informationChanging Times: Quantifying Research An analysis based off a selection of the largest global bulge bracket investment banks
Changing Times: Quantifying Research An analysis based off a selection of the largest global bulge bracket investment banks By Peter Bentley & Tyrone Jansen May 2014 Research continues to form an integral
More informationGetting Smart About Beta
Getting Smart About Beta December 1, 2015 by Sponsored Content from Invesco Due to its simplicity, market-cap weighting has long been a popular means of calculating the value of market indexes. But as
More informationTotal Shareholder Return How does it really add value?
Total Shareholder Return How does it really add value? Total Shareholder Return: How does it really add value? BY BRIAN HOLMEN & JELENA JOVIC An increasing number of companies are incorporating total shareholder
More informationDirectors remuneration in FTSE SmallCap companies. March 2017
Directors remuneration in FTSE SmallCap companies March 2017 Introduction This report provides analysis of trends in directors remuneration within the FTSE SmallCap market. The report provides analysis
More informationCompensation & Governance Outlook Report
Compensation & Governance Outlook Report 2014 About Equilar Equilar is the leading provider of executive compensation and corporate governance data for corporations, nonprofits, consulting firms, institutional
More informationExecutive Compensation
Executive Compensation Bulletin Research Reveals Equity Award Practices at Companies Completing Private Equity-Backed IPOs Jacob O Neill, Scott Oberstaedt and Todd Lippincott, Towers Watson August 5, 2014
More informationInsights on Single Family Office Executive Compensation
Insights on Single Family Office Executive Compensation Research Provides Peer Group Comparisons of Compensation and Benefits Practices Appropriate and competitive compensation is a key component of recruiting
More informationCan performance restricted stock units deliver a better payday for executives?
Can performance restricted stock units deliver a better payday for executives? istockphoto.com/ Graphic_deluxe By Seymour Burchman, Semler Brossy 09 2015 The Magazine of WorldatWork Performance Restricted
More informationStockholder Engagement: Executive Compensation. May 2017
Stockholder Engagement: Executive Compensation May 2017 Cautionary Statement The following presentation includes forwardlooking statements. These statements relate to future events, such as anticipated
More informationDefensive Equity Sector Model Portfolios Methodology
What is a Model Portfolio? Defensive Equity Sector Model Portfolios Methodology A model portfolio is an investment strategy that attempts to closely match the asset allocation of a selected Target Asset
More informationINSTITUTIONAL SHAREHOLDER SERVICES (ISS) AND GLASS LEWIS PROXY VOTING POLICIES AND OTHER DEVELOPMENTS FOR THE 2013 PROXY SEASON
January 29, 2013 INSTITUTIONAL SHAREHOLDER SERVICES (ISS) AND GLASS LEWIS PROXY VOTING POLICIES AND OTHER DEVELOPMENTS FOR THE 2013 PROXY SEASON To Our Clients and Friends: Institutional Shareholder Services
More informationEquity Best Practices The Case for Performance-Based Incentive Plans. CBIA s 2014 Compensation & Benefits Conference November 4, 2014
Equity Best Practices The Case for Performance-Based Incentive Plans CBIA s 2014 Compensation & Benefits Conference November 4, 2014 Your Discussion Leaders Heather Royce, CEP Director, Compensation, The
More informationTrailing PE Forward PE Buy 49 Analysts. 1-Year Return: 52.0% 5-Year Return: 255.6%
APPLE INC (-O) Last Close 128.95 (USD) Avg Daily Vol 54.0M 52-Week High 134.54 Trailing PE 16.0 Annual Div 2.08 ROE 38.4% LTG Forecast 13.2% 1-Mo 2.1% May 14, 2015 NASDAQ Exchange Market Cap 735.2B 52-Week
More information2016 EXECUTIVE COMPENSATION REPORT: HOMEBUILDERS ANNUAL AND LONG-TERM INCENTIVE PRACTICES
OCTOBER 2016 2016 EXECUTIVE COMPENSATION REPORT: HOMEBUILDERS ANNUAL AND LONG-TERM INCENTIVE PRACTICES ANNUAL AND LONG-TERM INCENTIVE PRACTICES FOR EXECUTIVES AT THE TOP 20 HOMEBUILDERS CRITICAL THINKING
More informationTrailing PE 7.5. Forward PE 9.6. Hold 7 Analysts. 1-Year Return: -15.4% 5-Year Return: -52.0%
AGF MANAGEMENT (-T) Last Close 6.30 (C) Avg Daily Vol 59,659 52-Week High 8.47 Trailing PE 7.5 Annual Div 0.32 ROE 7.2% LTG Forecast 8.7% 1-Mo -3.5% August 21 TORONTO Exchange Market Cap 507M 52-Week Low
More informationDetailed Stock Report
Updated March 8, 2013 ROSS STORES INCORPORATED (-O) Retailers / Other Specialty Retailers / Apparel Retailers Description The Average Score combines the quantitative analysis of six widely-used investment
More informationWhy Are Fixed Income ETFs Growing?
Fixed Income ETFs Why Are Fixed Income ETFs Growing? Lee Sterne, CFA Vice President, ETF Strategy Angus Stewart, CFP Director, Investment Product Michael Hodapp Fixed Income Regional Brokerage Consultant
More informationRelative Total Shareholder Return Plans: Valuation 102 The Impact of Volatility on Valuation
November 2016 Relative Total Shareholder Return Plans: Valuation 102 The Impact of Volatility on Valuation Just choosing an Index to use as peers can significantly alter the cost of a Relative TSR plan.
More informationEXECUTIVE REMUNERATION PERSPECTIVE
EXECUTIVE REMUNERATION PERSPECTIVE US ISSUE 99 JANUARY 2013 TEN TIPS FOR A TROUBLE-FREE 2013 PROXY SEASON This Perspective was adapted from a more in-depth article from Mercer Select. Mercer Select is
More informationA Closer Look at the SEC s Proposed Pay Versus Performance Disclosure Rules
May 14, 2015 Client Alert A Closer Look at the SEC s Proposed Pay Versus Performance Disclosure Rules EXEQUITY Independent Board and Management Advisors On April 29, 2015, the U.S. Securities and Exchange
More informationAustralia. Pay-for-Performance Model. Frequently Asked Questions. Effective for Meetings on or after October 1, Published August 2017
Australia Pay-for-Performance Model Frequently Asked Questions Effective for Meetings on or after October 1, 2017 Published August 2017 www.issgovernance.com 2017 ISS Institutional Shareholder Services
More informationREMUNERATION REPORT REMUNERATION REPORT
REPORT The SGS carbon neutrality strategy contributes to minimizing the impact of business processes and operations on the environment. REPORT 91 The SGS Remuneration Report provides an overview of the
More informationU.S. Stocks: Can We Capture Acceptable Returns From Here?
March 2015 For discretionary use by investment professionals. U.S. Stocks: Can We Capture Acceptable Returns From Here? Editor s Note: The following commentary was written by Litman Gregory co founder
More informationS&P 1500 Board Profile: Board Fees (Part 1)
S&P 1500 Board Profile: Board Fees (Part 1) 2013 Featuring Commentary From: About Equilar Equilar is the leading provider of executive compensation and corporate governance data for corporations, nonprofits,
More informationFidelity Real Estate Investment Portfolio
QUARTERLY FUND REVIEW AS OF DECEMBER 31, 2017 Fidelity Real Estate Investment Investment Approach Fidelity Real Estate Investment seeks above-average income and long-term capital growth, consistent with
More informationPreparing Your Savings for Retirement Miguel Salazar
Preparing Your Savings for Retirement Miguel Salazar The Retirement Income Series Part 1: Preparing Your Savings for Retirement Identify sources of income, including Social Security Assess the impact of
More informationGlobal Buyout & Growth Equity Index and Selected Benchmark Statistics. September 30, 2015
Global Buyout & Growth Equity Index and Selected Benchmark Statistics Note on Methodology Changes: Beginning this quarter, we have updated our approach for the calculation and display of select data points
More informationPersistence of Australian Active Funds
RESEARCH Active Versus Passive CONTRIBUTOR Priscilla Luk Senior Director Global Research & Design priscilla.luk@spglobal.com Persistence of Australian Active Funds EXECUTIVE SUMMARY While comparing active
More informationTHE U.S. MIDDLE MARKET
THE U.S. MIDDLE MARKET An alternative source of income, growth and diversification ALTERNATIVE THINKING FS Investment Solutions, LLC (member FINRA/SIPC) is an affiliated broker-dealer that serves as the
More information2018 Executive Compensation Overview
218 Executive Compensation Overview Letter to Shareholders Fellow Shareholders, As you consider your vote on Management Resolution Item 3 Advisory Vote to Approve Executive Compensation, the members of
More information52-Week High Trailing PE Week Low Forward PE Buy 8 Analysts. 1-Year Return: 1.1% 5-Year Return: 73.1%
FIERA CAPITAL CORP (-T) Last Close 13.07 (CAD) Avg Daily Vol 115,974 52-Week High 15.20 Trailing PE 76.9 Annual Div 0.72 ROE 2.8% LTG Forecast -- 1-Mo -8.0% November 28 TORONTO Exchange Market Cap (Consol)
More informationThe next era of aerospace and defense: How to outperform in an environment of innovative disruption 2017 Company performance update
The next era of aerospace and defense: How to outperform in an environment of innovative disruption 2017 Company performance update Introduction In 2016, Deloitte released the Next era of aerospace and
More informationPerformance Metrics and Incentive Compensation
1 Performance Metrics and Incentive Compensation Appropriate alignment of executive compensation with company performance is a central component of overall compensation philosophy at many companies. By
More informationCOMPENSATION VOTES ITEMS 1.2, 5.1 AND 5.2 OF THE AGENDA
COMPENSATION VOTES ITEMS 1.2, 5.1 AND 5.2 OF THE AGENDA Shareholder information on the compensation votes at the Annual General Meeting 2018 DEAR SHAREHOLDER, 3 We would like to acknowledge the shareholder
More informationRelative TSR Prevalence and Design of S&P 500 Companies 2016
September 7, 206 Relative TSR Prevalence and Design of S&P 500 Companies 206 EXEQUITY Independent Board and Management Advisors Over the last several years as compensation committees and executives strive
More information