arxiv: v1 [q-fin.mf] 2 Apr 2015

Transcription

1 A Marke Model for VIX Fuures Alexander Badran and Beniamin Goldys April 3, 25 arxiv:54.428v [q-fin.mf] 2 Apr 25 Absrac A new modelling approach ha direcly prescribes dynamics o he erm srucure of VIX fuures is proposed in his paper. The approach is moivaed by he racabiliy enjoyed by models ha direcly prescribe dynamics o he VIX, pracices observed in ineres-rae modelling, and he desire o develop a plaform o beer undersand VIX opion implied volailiies. The main conribuion of he paper is he derivaion of necessary condiions for here o be no arbirage beween he join marke of VIX and equiy derivaives. The arbirage condiions are analogous o he well-known HJM drif resricions in ineres-rae modelling. The resricions also address a fundamenal open problem relaed o an exising modelling approach, in which he dynamics of he VIX are specified direcly. The paper is concluded wih an applicaion of he main resul, which demonsraes ha when modelling VIX fuures direcly, he drif and diffusion of he corresponding sochasic volailiy model mus be resriced o preclude arbirage. Keywords: VIX, VIX Fuures, VIX Opions, Marke Model, HJM Conens Inroducion 2 2 Preliminaries 5 2. Marke Convenions Theoreical Definiion of he VIX Index and VIX Fuures Dynamics Deriving he Dynamics of he VIX from he Index 3. An alernae represenaion of he diffusion erm Deriving he Dynamics of he VIX from he VIX Fuures 5 5 Consisency Condiions 7 6 Applicaion - Proporional volailiy 2 7 Conclusion 25 A Proof of Proposiion B Auxiliary Resuls 28

2 Inroducion The Chicago Board of Opions Exchange Volailiy Index, which is more commonly known as he VIX, is an approximaion of he markes expecaion of index volailiy over a 3-day ime period. Derivaives on he VIX provide marke paricipans wih a mechanism o inves in he markes expecaion of volailiy, wihou he need for purchasing index opions. Invesors can gain exposure o volailiy hrough he purchase of VIX fuures or VIX opions, which have become increasingly popular in recen years. In 24, fuures on he VIX began rading and were subsequenly followed by opions on he VIX in 26. Since producs are raded on boh he underlying index and he VIX, i is desirable o employ a model ha can simulaneously reproduce he observed characerisics of producs on boh indices, while remaining free from arbirage. In his paper, a new modelling approach ha direcly prescribes dynamics o he erm srucure of VIX fuures is proposed. The approach is moivaed by he racabiliy enjoyed by models ha direcly prescribe dynamics o he VIX, pracices observed in ineres-rae modelling and he desire o develop a plaform o beer undersand VIX opion implied volailiies. In he exising lieraure, many soluions have been proposed for he join-modelling ask. The exising approaches can be caegorised according o he assumpions made regarding he marke of raded insrumens. All exising models can generally be placed ino one of he following caegories: a The underlying index is he primary raded securiy. Index opions, VIX fuures and VIX opions are priced relaive o he underlying index. b The underlying index and a coninuum of variance swaps are he primary raded securiies. Index opions, VIX fuures and VIX opions are priced relaive o hese producs. c The VIX is modelled direcly. VIX fuures and VIX opions are priced relaive o he VIX. For models ha belong o caegory a, he dynamics for he underlying index are specified under a pricing measure and he discouned price of a derivaive is expressed as a local maringale. The square of he VIX is defined as he expeced realised variance of he index and he discouned price of a derivaive on he VIX is expressed as a local maringale under he same measure. The majoriy of he lieraure on VIX derivaives fall ino his caegory. Zhang and Zhu 26 derived an expression for VIX fuures assuming Heson 993 sochasic volailiy dynamics. Lin 27 presened an approximaion formula for VIX fuures based on a convexiy correcion, which was hen used o price VIX fuures when he S&P5 is modelled by a Heson diffusion process wih simulaneous jumps in he underlying index and he volailiy process SVJJ. A more general resul was presened in Zhu and Lian 22, who assumed he same dynamics for he S&P5 as Lin 27 and derived an exac formula o price a VIX fuures conrac. The lieraure on VIX opions is generally similar o ha of VIX fuures: affine sochasic-volailiy dynamics are usually assumed for he underlying index, which enable some racabiliy o be reained when deriving opion pricing formulae. A square-roo sochasic variance model wih variance jumps and ime-dependen parameers was considered for he evoluion of he S&P5 index in Sepp 28, while opion pricing formulae under he SVJJ dynamics were presened in Lian and Zhu 23. Sepp 2 and Papanicolaou and Sircar 2

3 23 aemped o capure empirically observed feaures of he implied skew for opions on he VIX. The former considered a range of parameric and non-parameric models, while he laer employed a regime-swiching sochasic-volailiy model. A non-affine 3/2 plus jumps model was considered in Baldeaux and Badran 24. Pricing formulae were derived for VIX derivaives and numerical resuls illusraed ha he 3/2 model is a good candidae for he join modelling of VIX and equiy derivaives. For models belonging o he second approach, i is assumed ha variance swap markes are liquid enough o jusify he use of variance swaps as a model inpu. The exended marke enables models o beer capure erm-srucure feaures observed in boh variance and volailiy markes. Similar o he previous class of models, he VIX is defined in erms of he primary insrumens and he discouned price of a derivaive on he VIX is expressed as a local maringale under he same pricing measure ha is used for pricing derivaives on he index. See Bergomi 25, Bergomi 28, Buehler 26 and Gaheral 28 for a furher discussion of models in his class. A firs sep in proposing any model is o make assumpions regarding he class of raded insrumens. In approaches a and b, i is assumed ha index insrumens and possibly variance swaps are liquidly raded. A model is assumed for he dynamics of he liquidly raded insrumens, which enables an expression for he VIX o be derived. By consrucion, hese approaches guaranee ha he assumed dynamics for he VIX are consisen wih hose assumed for he underlying securiies. Hedging VIX derivaives in his framework, however, is a nonrivial exercise. Unlike oher volailiy relaed producs, he VIX is no raded and i canno be saically replicaed, due o he non-linear ransformaion used in i s definiion, making hedging in pracice a non-rivial exercise in he seup of approaches a and b. A relaed modelling approach o he one proposed in his paper is ha of caegory c, in which he dynamics of he VIX are specified direcly. Dynamics are assumed under a pricing measure and derivaives are priced as discouned expecaions of heir fuure payoffs. There are several examples of his approach in he lieraure. Grunbichler and Longsaff 996 considered a mean-revering square-roo process for he evoluion of he VIX and presened closed-form pricing formulae for VIX derivaives. Psychoyios e al. 2 concluded ha a mean-revering logarihmic diffusion wih jumps is suppored by VIX ime-series daa and also derived closed-form formulae for VIX derivaives. A variey of model specificaions were considered by Kaeck and Alexander 2. The auhors evaluaed he performance of a wide range of models for risk managemen and derivaives pricing applicaions. An empirical analysis of onedimensional diffusions for he VIX was performed in Goard and Mazur 23 and he auhors concluded ha a pure-diffusion 3/2 model is bes suied o capure he dynamics of he VIX. Derivaives were hen priced relaive o he VIX under such a specificaion. Drimus and Farkas 22 aemped o replicae he concep of a local-volailiy surface, which originaed in Dupire 993, for VIX derivaives under he assumpion of linear mean-revering dynamics. The auhors jusify ignoring he dynamics of he underlying index wih he claim ha he VIX marke is maure enough for he pricing and hedging of VIX opions relaive o VIX fuures, which is he marke pracice. There are several complexiies associaed wih hese models. The firs challenge is in ensuring ha he join marke beween he underlying index and derivaives on he VIX is free from arbirage. To ensure ha he markes are arbirage free requires he derivaion of resricions 3

4 on he dynamics of he VIX, which is a problem ha has no been addressed in he lieraure. The derivaion of resricions ha ensure no dynamic arbirage is a well-known problem in oher areas of finance. In ineres-rae modelling, he HJM drif condiions Heah e al. 992 ensure ha here is no arbirage when forward raes are modelled direcly. Variance curve models for variance swap markes are analogous o forward-rae models for ineres-rae markes. Buehler 26 derived variance curve arbirage condiions as well as addressing he problems of finie-dimensional realisaions and model consisency. Many aemps have been made o produce similar resuls for opion marke models by direcly prescribing dynamics o Black-Scholes implied volailiies see for example Schönbucher 999, Brace e al. 2 and Schweizer and Wissel 28. The siuaion is much more complex for opions, however, due o he higher dimensionaliy of he sae space and he non-lineariy of Black-Scholes implied volailiies. The main conribuions of his paper are Theorem 5.3 and Theorem 5.4, which sae necessary condiions for here o be no arbirage beween he join marke of VIX and equiy derivaives. Anoher complexiy associaed wih his modelling approach is in he appropriae specificaion of a marke price of risk. Since he VIX is no radable and canno be replicaed, he usual relaionships ha connec a derivaive o is underlying are no ypically observed. VIX fuures are no resriced by radiional cos-of-carry relaionships and VIX opions violae pu-callpariy relaionships when compared o he spo. By modelling VIX fuures direcly, as opposed o he VIX iself, complexiies involved wih he appropriae choice of he marke price of risk are avoided. This is similar o he comparison of shor-rae models o forward-curve models in ineres-rae modelling. The final moivaing facor for modelling VIX fuures, as opposed o he VIX direcly, is he concep of VIX opion implied volailiy. To properly undersand mahemaical feaures of VIX opion implied volailiies, a framework ha connecs he dynamics of he VIX fuures o he underlying index is required. Cox and Hobson25 and Roper2 provide a comprehensive discussion of no-arbirage resricions for radiional opion and implied volailiy surfaces. To do so, he auhors relied on he noion of an equivalen maringale measure. In order o exend hese conceps o he join marke of VIX and equiy derivaives, necessary condiions for he exisence of such a measure are required. The remainder of his paper is se ou as follows. Marke convenions, he modelling framework and mahemaical preliminaries for he paper are specified in Secion 2. In Secion 3, a general semi-maringale represenaion for he VIX index is derived. The dynamics are saed in Proposiion 3.4. The represenaion is quie edious and an alernae form of he diffusion erm in a simplified seing is provided in Corollary 3.6. Secion 4 is concerned wih he implicaions of modelling he erm srucure of VIX fuures direcly. The dynamics of a process ha represens he VIX as implied by he family of equaions for he VIX fuures is derived in Proposiion 4.. Secion 5 is concerned wih he implicaions of he join modelling of he underlying index and he erm srucure of VIX fuures. Resricions on he dynamics saed in Secion 3 and Secion 4 are derived so ha here is no arbirage beween he join marke of VIX and equiy derivaives. The resricions are saed in Theorem 5.3. The paper is concluded wih Secion 6, where an applicaion of he main heorem is provided. The applicaion demonsraes ha by modelling he VIX fuures direcly, he drif and diffusion of he corresponding sochasic volailiy model mus be resriced o preclude arbirage. 4

5 2 Preliminaries Marke convenions and he modelling framework adoped hroughou he paper are described in his secion. The marke definiion of he VIX is firs saed, followed by he heoreical definiion of he VIX and he assumpions ha are made regarding he dynamics of he raded insrumen. 2. Marke Convenions The VIX aemps o provide invesors wih a model-free measure of he markes expecaion of 3-day volailiy of he S&P5 index. The marke definiion of he VIX is based on a represenaion of expeced realised variance in erms of opion conracs and is saed below. Definiion 2.. The CBOE VIX is calculaed using he formula where ṼIX mrk T := 2erT T j I T : is he ime horizon ypically 3 days. Θ j k j j FPCP T k r: is he risk-free ineres rae ha applies from ime ill ime T. 2 ; k : ishe a-he-money srikeandisgivenbyhesrikehaminimizeshedifferencebeween pu and call opion prices a ime wih expiry a ime T. k j : is he j h srike and k j < k j. Θ j : is he price of an ou-of-he-money opion a ime wih srike k j and expiry a ime T, compued as he average of he bid-ask spread. If j < pu opions are used, if j > call opions are used and for j = he average of he pu and call price is used. I: is he se of all j, ordered by srike, for which quoed srikes exis in he marke wih he provisos ha: if he bid price for Θ j is zero, he j / I; he summaion sops if wo consecuive zero bid prices are me. k j : is he cenral symmeric difference 2 k j k j, excep for he firs and las srikes in he sum where a one-sided difference, whichever of k j k j or k j k j is appropriae, is used. F PCP : is he forward index level, compued using F PCP := k e rt C P, where C and P are he mid-prices of he call and he pu opions a ime wih srike k and expiry a ime T. 5

6 In he even ha no opions have exacly 3 days ill expiraion, as is ordinarily he case, he CBOE inerpolaes beween he CBOE VIX squared calculaed a he wo closes mauriies, ha is, VIX mrk := 365 T ṼIX 2 3 T N T 2 3 T 2 ṼIX 2 N T2 N T 2 3 N T T N T2 N T where < T < 3 days < T 2 and N T denoes he number of days from ill ime T. Since he CBOE VIX is always defined for a 3-day ime horizon, he dependence on T is omied. The VIX is defined using liquidly quoed index opions, however, he index iself is no radable. Invesors are able o ake a posiion on he value of he VIX index via VIX fuures and European opions on he VIX, which are liquidly raded insrumens. VIX fuures and VIX opions deliver a cash selemen amoun ha is relaed o he value of he VIX index a expiry. Tradiional relaionships ha are usually observed beween an opion and is underlying do no hold for VIX opions, as a consequence of he fac ha he VIX index is no radable. The relaionships, however, are observed beween VIX opions and he VIX fuures. For more informaion on he marke definiion of he VIX and on VIX derivaives, he reader is referred o he CBOE 29 Whie Paper. Since he definiion of he VIX is raher cumbersome, simplificaions are adoped in he lieraure o enable mahemaical racabiliy. In he following secion, he definiions adoped in his paper and he simplificaions ofen observed in he lieraure are presened. 2.2 Theoreical Definiion of he VIX In his paper, he VIX is defined in erms of European opions. This is done o avoid a poenial loss in generaliy, since here are no implici model assumpions associaed wih such a definiion. The definiion is independen of any assumpions regarding a risk-neural measure and absence of arbirage. Upon making addiional assumpions, a represenaion in erms of expeced realised variance may be recovered. Unil such assumpions are made, however, he represenaion may no hold. This is suble poin and i is illusraed in he forhcoming Lemma 2.5. Remar.. The convenion hroughou is o use a circumflex o denoe processes ha are in erms of a fixed expiraion dae, while no accen is used o denoe processes ha are in erms of ime-ill expiry. Remar.2. For he following definiion, furher assumpions are required o ensure ha ˆV is well behaved. For example, ou-of-he-money pu opions need o decay fas enough as k ց o ensure ha ˆV does no explode. Addiional assumpions are generally made o ensure ha ˆV is well defined. 2 Definiion 2.2. For all T >, le ˆV T := T ˆΘ k,t; ˆF T mdk, < T, 3 where ˆF T is an index fuure a ime expiring a ime T, ˆΘ k,t; ˆF T is an ou-of-hemoney index opion wih srike k and mauriy T, and m is an unspecified measure. 6

7 Remar.3. The behaviour of ˆV T as T ց is dependen on he behaviour of ˆΘ,T; ˆF T as T ց. While being of mahemaical imporance, his limiing behaviour is no invesigaed in his paper, since he VIX is defined for fixed T >. Definiion 2.3. For all and for fixed τ >, he VIX is given by V := ˆV τ, >. 4 Since τ is a fixed consan hroughou, here is no loss in generaliy incurred by suppressing i as an argumen o he process V. For simpliciy, he dependence of he fuures conrac on τ is suppressed in he forhcoming analysis. A differen choice of m can be made depending on he specific applicaion. In paricular, o recover a discree-srike definiion of he VIX, one would choose some form of discree measure, whereas for a coninuous-srike seup, one would chose he Lebesgue measure. The following definiion is moivaed by he coninuous-srike definiion of he VIX, which is a common simplificaion observed in he lieraure. Definiion 2.4. Suppose ha he measure m is chosen as m = N m L, where N 2 2 and m L denoes he Lebesgue measure. Then he VIX is given by V = N Θ k,τ ;F τ τ dk and his quaniy is referred o as he coninuous-srike definiion of he VIX. Under he specificaion given in Definiion 2.4 and upon making addiion assumpions regarding he underlying index, a simpler represenaion for he VIX can be derived. Such a represenaion is he ypical saring poin for mos models and is he subjec of he following lemma. Lemma 2.5. Suppose ha he measure m is chosen as specified in Definiion 2.4. Furher suppose ha here exiss a measure Q, such ha index fuures and opions are Q-maringales. Then he VIX can be wrien as V = Nτ EQ [ ln Fτ F F ]. 5 Proof. For fixed, fix ω Ω. Since F τ ω R, ω Ω, for fs = lns and X = F τ ω, Lemma B. yields lnf τ ω = lnf E F τ ω E E F τ ω k dk E k F τ ω dk. 7

8 Since ω is arbirary, he above equaion is rue for any ω Ω. Taking condiional expecaions wih respec o F under he measure Q and rearranging gives E E C k,τ ;F dk Pk,τ ;F dk = E Q [lnf τ F ]lnf E F E. 6 Evaluaing he above equaion for E = F and muliplying boh sides by 2 2 /τ complees he proof. The convenion is o approximae he square of he VIX by he risk-neural expecaion of he realised variance of he underlying index. The VIX a ime is ofen approximaed by V E Q [lnf] τ τ [lnf] F τ=3 days, 7 where [ ] is used o denoe quadraic variaion and F denoes an index fuure expiring a ime τ. There are many differen represenaions of he expeced realised variance of a sochasic processes and one of hese represenaions, such as he logarihmic represenaion presened in Lemma 2.5, is ypically chosen for he definiion of he VIX. A consequence of defining he VIX in erms of expeced realised variance is ha model assumpions are implici in he definiion. These model assumpions are fundamenal o he origins of he VIX, however, he marke definiion of he VIX a any fixed poin in ime is simply a funcion of observed marke prices and is independen of any previously made assumpions. Lemma 2.5 may no hold, for example, if he index is a sric-local maringale as opposed o a rue maringale. 2.3 Index and VIX Fuures Dynamics The modelling framework and he assumpions made regarding he class of raded insrumens are saed in his secion. The seup is raher general; he asses are assumed o be coninuous processes ha admi a finie-dimensional realisaion of arbirary size. Consider a coninuous-ime economy wih rading inerval [,T ] for a fixed horizon dae T >. Le W = W,W,...,Wd T bead-dimensional Brownian moion on Ω,F,F,P, where F = F T is he P-augmened filraion generaed by W. Assumpion 2.6. AFor each i =,...,d, le σ i : [,T ] Ω R d andµi : [,T ] Ω R be F-adaped processes, wih T µ i s ds < and T σ i s 2 ds <, P-a.s.. The vecor of processes X = X,X,...,Xd T Rd is assumed o saisfy X i = X i X i sµ i sds X i sσ i s dw P s, 8 for each i =,...,d. Le F X, so ha he underlying index fuure F = X T is 8

9 assumed o be a sochasic process wih dynamics given by F = F F s µ sds F s σ s dw P s. 9 The moivaion for such a seup is o allow for exising models, such as sochasic volailiy models, o be examined wihin he proposed framework. Assumpion 2.7. A2 For all imes [,T ], he marke conains call and pu opions for all srikes k [, and ime-ill expiries τ,t ]. The price of an opion a ime [,T ] wih srike k [, and expiry τ,t ] is derived from X and is assumed o be a deerminisic funcion, denoed by Ck,τ,,X for a call and Pk,τ,,X for a pu. For all T T, le ˆF V,T denoe he value of a VIX fuure a ime expiring a ime T. The following assumpion is concerned wih he dynamics of he VIX fuures. The purpose of he following assumpion is o allow for a very general specificaion for he VIX fuures and no inerpreaion or conex for he measure P is iniially provided. Assumpion 2.8. A3 For all T T, le ν,t : [,T] Ω R d and µ V,T : [,T] Ω R be F-adaped processes. For all < T T, he family of equaions for he VIX fuures is assumed o saisfy ˆF V,T = ˆF V,T ˆF V u,tµ V u,tdu ˆF V u,tνu,t dw P u. Remar.4. For resuls on he he exisence and uniqueness of soluions o equaions of he form of Equaion, he reader is referred o Secion 4.6 of Moron 988. Furher assume ha, for any T T, and ha he limi T T µ V u,t du νu,t 2 du <, P-a.s., ˆF V, = lim ˆFV,T Tց = ˆF V, ˆF V u,µ V u,du ˆF V u,νu, dw P u, is well defined for all < T, P-a.s.. Given he above family of equaions, one can inroduce he following process ha represens he VIX as implied by he VIX fuures. Definiion 2.9. The implied VIX is given by for all [,T ]. Ṽ := ˆF V,, 9

10 Secion 3 is concerned wih he derivaion of he dynamics of he VIX from he underlying index and he seup specified in A and A2 is assumed. In Secion 4, he seup of A3 is all ha is assumed. The implied dynamics of he VIX is he focus of his secion and he analysis is independen of any specificaion for he underlying index. The focus of Secion 5 and Secion 6 is on he complee framework of A - A3. 3 Deriving he Dynamics of he VIX from he Index In his secion, a general semi-maringale represenaion of he VIX is derived under he measure P, which is used o denoe he real-world or saisical measure. A ypical saring poin for mos marke models is o direcly specify he dynamics of he modelled quaniies under an equivalen maringale measure. This is done o avoid he complexiies involved wih he specificaion of a marke price of risk and wih a change in measure. The reason for performing an analysis of he real-world dynamics is ha he VIX is ofen used in empirical invesigaions, due o is role as an indicaor for marke senimen. Saring under he real-world measure also avoids complexiies regarding he exisence of a risk-neural measure. The ulimae goal, however, is o provide a framework for he pricing and hedging of derivaives, which is ypically done under an equivalen risk-neural measure. The exisence of such a measure is no discussed in his secion, raher, i is he subjec of Theorem 5.3 and Theorem 5.4 in he forhcoming Secion 5. This secion is srucured as follows. The Io-Venzel formula is firs applied o derive he dynamicsof hesquareofhevix whendefinedinermsof opions wihfixedexpiry. A Musielalike parameerisaion in erms of fixed ime-ill mauriy is hen inroduced, which allows for he derivaion of a governing sochasic differenial equaion for he VIX. The represenaion is presened in Proposiion 3.4. In Corollary 3.5, he dynamics implied by he specificaion in Secion 2. are saed. Proposiion 3.. Suppose ha he seup of A and A2 in Secion 2. are assumed, ha is, a ime pus and calls on he index wih srike k and expiry a ime T are given by he funcions ˆPk,T,,X and Ĉk,T,,X. Furher assume ha, for all T,T ], ˆP,T,,, Ĉ,T,, C and ˆP,T,,, Ĉ,T,, C,,2 on R [,T R d, for all k,,x R [,T R d, ˆPk,,,x, Ĉk,,,x C on,t ], for all x R d and < T T, ˆΘk,T,,xmdk <, ˆΘ k,t,,x mdk <, and for all x R d, < T T and i,j =,...,d, ˆΘ 2ˆΘ k,t,,x mdk <, and k,t,,x mdk <. x j

11 Then, for all T,T ] and [,T, he dynamics of he process ˆV 2 T are given by dˆv 2 T = T ˆV 2 Td T T Proof. See Appendix A. i= 2T i,j= ˆΘ k,t,,x mdkd ˆΘ k,t,,x mdkdx i d F,F 2T 2ˆΘ x j k,t,,x mdkd X j,x i. Remark 3.. The quadraic variaion erm and he lack of symmery in Equaion are due o an applicaion of pu-call pariy. Since he VIX is defined for a fixed ime horizon, i is useful o inroduce a Musiela-like parameerisaion, which is he purpose of he following lemma. One may argue ha such a represenaion is unnecessary for τ,t ], due o he fac ha he VIX is always defined for a 3-day ime horizon. The represenaion is no enirely worhless, however, as i provides a saring poin for he analysis of he dynamics of he VIX when he definiion is based on a rolling porfolio see Equaion 2. Lemma 3.2. For all τ >, le Y τ := ˆV 2 τ, >. 2 F 2 Then dy τ = τ Θ 2τ F 2 d F,F τ 2τ i,j= k,τ,,x Θ i= τ k,τ,,x mdk Y τ d Θ k,τ,,x mdkdx i 2 Θ x j k,τ,,x mdkd X j,x i, P-a.s..

12 Proof. Equaion and Equaion 2 imply he dynamics Y τ = Y τ = Y τ = Y τ 2 2 i= τ dy s τ dˆv s 2 sτ s τds τ ˆV 2 i,j= τf 2 s τ ˆV s 2 T sτds τ ˆΘ k,sτ,s,x s mdkdxs i d F,F s 2ˆΘ ˆΘ k,sτ,s,x smdkds x j k,sτ,s,x s mdkd X j,x i s T τ ˆΘk,sτ,s,X s mdkds. Wriing he opion prices as a funcion of ime-ill expiry and differeniaing under he inegral, which is a consequence of he Dominaed Convergence Theorem, yields Y τ = Y τ τ Y sτds τ 2τ Fs 2 d F,F s i= 2 τ i,j= τ Θ k,τ,s,x s Θ τ k,τ,s,x s mdk ds Θ k,τ,s,x s mdkdxs i 2 Θ k,τ,s,x s mdkd X j,x i x s. j Expressing he above equaion in he corresponding sochasic differenial equaion form complees he proof. Definiion 3.3. Le Y = Y τ. Since τ is a fixed, he dependence of Y on τ is suppressed. The objec of concern is he VIX, no he square of he VIX, and he following proposiion provides he dynamics of he VIX. Proposiion 3.4. Le vy := y, y >. Therefore V = vy, >, and he dynamics of V are given by dv = u V du 2 V d F,F i,j= u i,j V d X j,x i i= w i V dx i, 3 2

13 where he drif and diffusion coefficiens of V are given by he equaions u = 2τ Θ 2τ V 2 k,τ,,x Θ τ k,τ,,x mdk, 4 u 2 = 4τ V 2 5 u i,j = 4τ V 2 F2 2 Θ w j k,τ,,x mdk wi x j 2, 6 w i = Θ 2τ V 2 k,τ,,x mdk, 7 P-a.s., for all >. Proof. By Io s formula, where Therefore dv = 2τ V Θ 4τ V F 2 d F,F 4τ V 8τ 2 V 3 2τ V i= i,j= dv = v y Y dy 2 2 v y 2Y d Y,Y, v y Y = and 2 v 2V y 2Y = 4V 3. k,τ,,x Θ i,j= Θ k,τ,,x mdk τ k,τ,,x mdk V 2 Θ x j k,τ,,x mdk Θ k,τ,,x mdkdx i x, P-a.s.. i d d X j,x i Θ k,τ,,x mdk d X j,x i x j Inroducing u, u 2, u i,j and w i, as defined in Equaions 4-7, complees he proof. Corollary 3.5. The dynamics of he index as specified in A in Secion 2. imply ha V saisfies dv V = u d i= w i X i σi dwp, 8 3

14 where he drif and diffusion coefficiens of V are given by he equaions u = i= w i X i µi 2τ 2τ V 2 i,j= X i Xj 4τ V 2 2 Θ Θ k,τ,,x Θ k,τ,,x mdk wi x j 2 τ k,τ,,x w j σ i σj mdk σ σ 4τ V 2 9 and w i = Θ 2τ V 2 k,τ,,x mdk. 2 Proof. The resul is an immediae consequence of Proposiion 3.4, Equaion 8 and Equaion 9. Remark 3.2. Given he form of he coefficiens, i is no immediaely obvious ha here exis soluions o he Equaion 8. Under very mild assumpions, however, V is a sricly-posiive process and will consequenly possess a semi-maringale represenaion wih local soluions. To ensure ha V has global soluions and a finie expecaion, which are useful for pracical purposes, addiional assumpions are required. Remark 3.3. Many modelling approaches begin by assuming a semi-maringale represenaion for he VIX. To obain such a represenaion from firs principles, assumpions mus be made regarding he opion price processes o ensure ha fundamenal quaniies exis and are well defined, as illusraed by he analysis performed in his secion. Despie having an appearance of simpliciy, he resuls of his secion demonsrae ha here are hidden complexiies associaed wih modelling he VIX direcly. In modelling he VIX direcly, many implici assumpions regarding fundamenal quaniies are made. 3. An alernae represenaion of he diffusion erm Proposiion 3.4 provides a represenaion of he VIX dynamics given very general dynamics for he index fuure and index opions. In wha follows, an alernae represenaion of he diffusion coefficiens, w i = Θ 2τ V 2 k,τ,,x mdk, given in Equaion 7, is proposed. The following analysis is no affeced by an applicaion of Girsanov s heorem, due o he fac ha he muliplicaive erm is measure invarian, and is hence independen of any assumpions regarding marke compleeness and he marke price of risk. The following corollary offers an alernae represenaion of he diffusion erm and is required for he forhcoming analysis in Secion 5. Corollary 3.6. Suppose ha he measure m is chosen as specified in Definiion 2.4. Furher suppose ha here exiss a measure Q, such ha index fuures and opions are Q-maringales. 4

15 Then he diffusion erm for he VIX can be expressed as w i = N 2τ V 2 E Q [lnf τ X = x] lnf. Proof. The proof is almos idenical o ha of Lemma 2.5. Equaion 6 in he proof of Lemma 2.5 implies ha E E Ck,τ,,X dk Pk,τ,,X dk = E Q [lnf τ F ]lnf E F E. The condiional expecaion on he righ-hand side can be expressed in erms of he value of he process X a ime, as a consequence of he Markov propery. Choosing E = F and differeniaing wih respec o x i yields Θk,τ,,xdk = E Q [lnf τ X = x] lnf. x=x Muliplying boh sides by N, dividing by 2τ V 2, and differeniaing under he inegral, which valid as a consequence of he Dominaed Convergence Theorem, complees he proof. Remark 3.4. The marke pracice is heavily dependen on he noion of Black implied volailiy, which is a convenion ha has carried across from more radiional derivaive producs. Tradiional implied volailiy is well sudied and i has many well-documened complexiies. VIX implied volailiies come wih many addiional complexiies, due o he connecion beween he underlying index and he VIX, and lile progress in he way of mahemaical resuls has been made. The represenaion of he diffusion erm in Corollary 3.6 provides a poenial firs sep for such an analysis. 4 Deriving he Dynamics of he VIX from he VIX Fuures In his secion, he objec of concern is he family of equaions presened in Equaion for he VIX fuures. The implied dynamics of he VIX is he focus of his secion and he analysis is independen of any specificaion for he underlying index. To derive arbirage resricions on he join marke of VIX and equiy derivaives, he dynamics of he VIX implied by he VIX fuures mus firs be derived. In he following proposiion, he dynamics of he VIX are derived from he family of equaions for he VIX fuures. The procedure is analogous o he recovery of he shor-erm ineres rae from he forward-rae curve, which is a well known resul in ineres-rae modelling. Proposiion 4.. Suppose ha he seup of A3 in Secion 2. is assumed and ha he coefficiens µ V,T, ν,t and he iniial VIX fuures erm srucure, ˆFV,T, are differeniable wih respec o T, wih bounded parial derivaives µ V T,T, ν T,T and ˆF T V,T. Then he dynamics of he implied VIX are given by Ṽ = Ṽ ξ u Ṽ u du Ṽ u νu,u dw P u, 2 5

16 where ξ denoes he following process ξ = ˆF T V, ˆF V, ˆF V, ˆF V, Proof. Recall ha he implied VIX saisfies Therefore Ṽ = ˆF V, = ˆF V, Ṽ = ˆF V, = ˆF V, µ V u,ˆf V u,du ˆF V u,ν T u, ˆF V T u,νu, dwp u. 22 µ V u, ˆF V u,du µ V u, ˆF V u,du ˆFV u,νu, ˆF V u,uνu,u For fixed u > and for each i =,...,d, µ V u, ˆF V u,du ˆFV u,νu, ˆF V u,uνu,u ˆF V u,νu, ˆF V u,uνu,u ˆF V u,νu, dw P u. ˆF V u,uνu,u dw P u dw P u Ṽ u νu,u dw P u dw P u. = = u u d ds [ˆF V u,sνu,s]ds [ˆFV u,sν T u,s ˆF T u,sνu,s] V ds. Therefore Ṽ = ˆF V, u = ˆF V, s µ V u, ˆF V u,du Ṽ u νu,u dw P u [ˆFV u,sν T u,s ˆF V T u,sνu,s] ds dw P u µ V u, ˆF V u,du Ṽ u νu,u dw P u [ˆFV u,sν T u,s ˆF T u,sνu,s] V dwu P ds, where sochasic Fubini s heorem has been used o inerchange he order of inegraion. Wriing ˆF V, = Ṽ ˆF V T,udu and inroducing he process ξ as defined in Equaion 22 complees he proof. 6

17 5 Consisency Condiions In his secion, resricions on he dynamics of he underlying index and he family of processes for he VIX fuures are derived. These resricions are necessary for here o be no arbirage beween he join marke of VIX and equiy derivaives and are referred o as consisency condiions. The condiions are formulaed precisely in he following wo definiions. Condiion 5. C. PV = Ṽ =, for all T, P a.s., where Ṽ is he process given in Equaion 2. Condiion 5.2 C2. There exiss an equivalen maringale measure, Q P, for he underlying index and he VIX, such ha fuures and opions on he index and fuures on he VIX are Q- maringales. The firs condiion is a consequence of he resricion ha he VIX and he dynamics implied by he VIX fuures mus be versions of he same process. This condiion simply requires he wo differen processes ha one could derive for he VIX o be in agreemen. The second condiion is a sandard no arbirage condiion and i is obained hrough an applicaion of Girsanov s heorem. The consisency condiions are equivalen o he forhcoming Theorem 5.3 and Theorem 5.4. The saring poin for Theorem 5.3 is an equivalen maringale measure, from which he drif and diffusion resricions are derived. Theorem 5.4 sars wih he drif and diffusion resricions and is concerned wih he exisence of an equivalen maringale measure. Theorem 5.3. Suppose ha here exiss a measure Q P such ha fuures on he index and fuures on he VIX are Q-maringales. Then here exiss a marke price of risk, λ, wih T λ s 2 ds <, P-a.s., such ha for all T [,T τ ] and [,T], µ = λ σ, 23 for each j =,...,d, µ V,T = λ ν,t, 24 ν j, = i= X i Θ 2τ V 2 k,τ,,x mdkσ i,j, 25 wih σ i = σ i,,σ i,2,...,σ i,d T and 2τ σ σ 4τ V 2 i,j= 2 Xi X j wi w j σ i σ j λ = ˆF V, ˆF V, wx i i σ i i= λ ν, ˆF V u,du ˆF T V, ˆF V, ˆF V u,ν T u, ˆF V T u,νu, dw P u, P-a.s

18 Proof. Le Q P be an equivalen maringale measure on Ω,F T. Then he exisence of a λ, wih T λ s 2 ds <, P-a.s., is a direc consequence of he Radon-Nikodým heorem. By Girsanov s heorem W Q = W P defines a Brownian moion under Q. Therefore and dˆθk,t,,x = ˆΘ k,t,,x d = ˆΘ k,t,,x d 2 i,j= = ˆΘ k,t,,x d 2 i,j= df = µ F dσ dw Q λ d = µ λ σ dσ dw Q i= i= ˆΘ k,t,,x dx i 2 ˆΘ k,t,,x X i µ i d λ s ds 27 i,j= 2ˆΘ x j k,t,,x d X j,x i 2ˆΘ k,t,,x d X j,x i x ˆΘ k,t,,x X i j x σi dwp i i= i= ˆΘ k,t,,x µ i λ σ X i d 2ˆΘ k,t,,x d X j,x i x ˆΘ k,t,,x X i j x σi dwq. i The no-arbirage condiion, saed as Condiion 5.2 C2, implies ha, for all [,T ], and ha for all k > and each T,T ], ˆΘ k,t,s,x sds 2 i,j= i= i= µ = λ σ, Q a.s., ˆΘ k,t,s,x s X i s µi s ds 2ˆΘ k,t,s,x s d X j,x i = x s j λ s i= ˆΘ k,t,s,x s X i x sσs i ds, i Q a.s.. Inroducing he change of variable T := τ and expressing opion prices as a funcion 8

19 of ime-ill expiry, Θ,τ,, := ˆΘ,τ,,, for all τ [,T ] and [,T τ], gives Θ k,τ,s,x sds Θ τ k,τ,s,x sds i= 2 Θ k,τ,s,x s d X j,x i = 2 x s j i,j= Θ k,τ,s,x s X i s µi s ds for all k >. Corollary 3.5 and Equaion 28 evaluaed a τ = τ imply ha dv = V 2τ σ σ 4τ V 2 i= i,j= λ s i= 2 Xi Xj wi w j σ i σj λ Θ k,τ,s,x s X i x sσs i ds, i i= w i Xi σi d 28 w i X i σi dwp. 29 The VIX fuures dynamics given by he family of processes in Equaion saisfy, under he risk-neural measure Q, dˆf V,T = µ V,Tλ ν,t ˆFV,Td ˆF V,Tν,T dw Q. The no-arbirage condiion, saed as Condiion 5.2 C2, again implies ha, for all [,T], µ V,T = λ ν,t, Q a.s.. 3 Proposiion 4. and Equaion 3 imply ha he VIX saisfies he dynamics where he process ξ is defined by ξ = ˆF T V, ˆF V, ˆF V, ˆF V, dṽ = ξ Ṽ dṽν, dw Q, 3 λ ν, ˆF V u,du ˆF V u,ν T u, ˆF V T u,νu, dw P u. Condiion 5. C requires for he VIX and he dynamics of he implied VIX o be versions of he same process. Imposing he condiion ha he drif and diffusion coefficiens in Equaion29 and Equaion 3 mus be equal complees he proof. Theorem 5.4. Suppose ha µ, σ, ξ and ν saisfy, as funcions of F and ˆF V, Equaions 23-26, for all T [,T τ ] and all [,T], P-a.s., for some process λ, wih T λ s 2 ds <, P-a.s., and ] E [E P λ s dws P F =. Furher suppose ha here exiss an adaped process F on [,T τ ] and a family of adaped 9 T

20 processes ˆF V,T, for all T [,T τ ], on [,T] saisfying Equaion 9 and Equaion. Then here exiss an equivalen measure, Q P, on F T, for F T and ˆF V,T T, for all T [,T ], such ha fuures on he index and fuures on he VIX are Q-maringales. Remark 5.. One such measure is given by dq dp := E λ s dws P, 32 T where E denoes he sochasic exponenial. Proof. The exisence of a measure Q P is obained hrough a direc applicaion of Girsanov s Theorem. The proof of he remainder of Theorem 5.4 follows from he proof of Theorem 5.3. Remark 5.2. The maringale measure of Theorem 5.4 may no be unique due o he fac ha here may be sources of risk ha are no raded. From a pracical perspecive, he abiliy o replicae coningen claims is poenially of more ineres han he heoreical compleeness of a model. Theorem 5.3 and Theorem 5.4 provide an arbirage-free represenaion ha enables he direc hedging of VIX opions wih VIX fuures conracs. Remark 5.3. Resricions on boh he drif and diffusion coefficiens of he index and VIX fuures are imposed in Theorem 5.3 and Theorem 5.4. The non-uniqueness of he maringale measure eners he heorem hrough he presence of λ in he drif resricions. The diffusion coefficien, however, is no affeced by an applicaion of Girsanov s heorem, due o he fac ha he muliplicaive erm is measure invarian. An analysis of he diffusion coefficiens is hence independen of any assumpions regarding marke compleeness and he marke price of risk. The resricions on he diffusion erms are raher non-sandard and he inerpreaion is no immediaely clear, due o he presence of he erm V. The forhcoming Theorem 5.6 is concerned wih he implicaions of Theorem 5.3 and Theorem 5.4 on he diffusion erm for he VIX. Before inroducing he heorem, consider he following assumpion regarding he diffusion erms. The funcional form is moivaed from he perspecive of specifying a model for he VIX fuures. The reason ha he diffusion coefficien for he index is dependen upon V, is ha his may be an implici consequence from he assumed dynamics for he VIX fuures. Assumpion 5.5. The diffusion coefficien σ is a funcion of he processes X and V, and he process ν is a funcional of he VIX fuures curve ˆF V, such ha σ = σ,x,v, and ν,t = ν,t, ˆF V,T. The parial-differenial equaion PDE in he following heorem provides a resricion on he choice of he diffusion coefficiens, σ and ν, so ha he join dynamics are in agreemen. The resul is somewha of an inverse problem; he soluion o he equaion is given, while he coefficiens are unknown. Theorem 5.6. Suppose ha he measure m is chosen as specified in Definiion 2.4. Then, for here o be no join arbirage in he sense of Theorem 5.3 and Theorem 5.4, for all 2

21 and x R d, i= wih h,x = V 2. x i σ i,j,x, h,x h,x = 2h,xν j,, h,x, j =,...,d, 33 Proof. Equaion 25 in Theorem 5.3 saes ha for each j =,...,d, ν j,,v = i= X i Θ 2τ V 2 k,τ,,x mdkσ i,j, 34 wih σ i = σ i,,σ i,2,...,σ i,d T. Recall Corollary 3.6, which saes he following alernae represenaion of he diffusion erm 2τ V 2 Θ k,τ,,x mdk = N 2τ V 2 E Q [lnf τ X = x] lnf. Lemma 2.5 and he Markov propery imply ha he VIX can be represened as V 2 = N Fτ [ln τ EQ X = x] =: h,x, for some funcion h : [,T ] R d R, and hence ν j,, h,x = F x i 2h,x σi,j,x, h,x h,x, j =,...,d. 35 i= Muliplying boh sides by 2h, x complees he proof. 6 Applicaion - Proporional volailiy In his secion, an applicaion of he main resul is provided. A class of model for he erm srucure of VIX fuures is considered and Theorem 5.6 is used o derive he implicaions of he model assumpions on he dynamics of he underlying index, such ha he join marke remains free from arbirage. The example demonsraes ha here are unavoidable complexiies involved when modelling he join dynamics of he underlying index and VIX fuures, and ha care mus be aken o avoid arbirage. The model is a special case of models ha saisfy he resricions derived in Secion 5, excep ha he risk-neural measure Q is assumed o be fixed and he dynamics are direcly specified under such a measure. The simples non-negaive class of model for he erm srucure of VIX fuures is geomeric Brownian moion. The influence of randomness is o shif he enire fuures erm srucure up or down in a muliplicaive fashion and opions are priced hrough a sraigh-forward applicaion of Black s formula. The example provides a good illusraion of he implicaions of he modelling approach, as well as a firs sep in an analysis of VIX implied volailiies, since hese are calculaed using Black s formula. 2

22 In wha follows, i is assumed ha he underlying index is driven by a one-facor sochasicvolailiy model. More precisely, le µ : [, R and σ : [, R be wo funcions. We assume ha he dynamics of he index process F is defined by a sysem of equaions df = X dw F dx = µx dσx dz, where W and Z are correlaed F-adaped Brownian moions under he measure Q. We assume ha for every X = x and F = f here exiss a unique srong soluion F,X o he sysem 36 such ha PX > =, for all, Q-a.s. In paricular, µx s ds σx s 2 ds < Q a.s. Corollary 6.. Suppose ha VIX fuures saisfy he family of equaions 36 dˆf V,T = β,tˆf V,TdZ, < T T, 37 for some β : U R where U = {,T < T T }, and ha he dynamics of he underlying index are given by he sochasic volailiy model 36. Then, for here o be no arbirage, β,, µx and σx mus saisfy β, γ and µx = σx [ ] σ 2 x x γ, for some γ R and for all and x. Proof. By Corollary 2.5, he VIX saisfies V = Nτ EQ [ ln Fτ The dynamics specified in Equaion 36 furher imply ha V = N = = N τ EQ [τ [τ 2τ EQ [τ N 2τ EQ F τ df s F s ] X s ds F F ]. 2F 2 s ] X s ds X = x =: hx, d F,F s F ] for some funcion h : R R. The funcion hx is independen of due o he Markovian 22

23 srucure of X, which can be observed by inroducing a simple change of variable, [ hx = N τ ] X s ds X = x 2τ EQ [ = N τ ] 2τ EQ X s ds X = x [ = N τ ] 2τ EQ X r dr X = x. To proceed, inroduce he funcion [ H,x := N τ ] 2τ EQ X r dr X = x, τ, 38 such ha H,x hx and he funcion H,x is he unique soluion o he Cauchy problem see Theorem 7.6 in Karazas and Shreve 99 H,xµx H x,x 2 σ2 x 2 H x 2,xx =, < τ, Hτ,x =. Differeniaing Equaion 38 and aking he limi ց implies ha H,x = x. Evaluaing he above equaion a = implies ha hx saisfies Theorem 5.6 implies ha σx and hx mus joinly saisfy µx h x x 2 σ2 x 2 h x2x =. 39 σx h x = 2β,hx, 4 x for all and x. Using he fac ha hx is consan in ime implies ha β, γ, for some γ >. Differeniaing Equaion 4 wih respec o x yields and hence σ x x h h x xσx 2 x2x = 2γ h x x 2 σ2 x 2 h x 2x = 2 σx h = γhx [ x x 2γ σ ] x x [ 2γ σ ] x x. 4 Equaions 39-4 imply ha [ µx 2γ hx σx γ ] σ 2 x x = 42 23

24 and hence Solving for µx complees he proof. µx σx γ σ x =. 2 x In he following corollary and example, i is shown ha he assumpions of Corollary 6. are saisfied for a nonrivial class of volailiies σ. Corollary 6.2. Assume ha σx = xσ x, where σ : R R is coninuously differeniable and sup σ x σ x <, x R. x R Then, for every X >, here exiss a unique global non-negaive soluion of he equaion dx = σx 2 σ X γ dσx dz. 43 Moreover, he process F defined in Equaion 36 is posiive maringale for every F >. Proof. The assumpions of he corollary yield he exisence and uniqueness of soluions o he Equaion 43 for every x R. Moreover, X = exp I is easy o check ha hence F is a square-inegrable maringale. σ X s 2 σ X s γ 2 σ2 X s ds T E X s ds <, σ X s dz s. Example. For a cerain α >, consider Equaion 43 wih σx = α x, for x. Then he equaion akes he form dx = α2 4 dα X γddz. Recall ha he equaion dy = α2 4 dα Y dz, Y >, has unique srong soluion ha is insananeously refleced a zero, hence PY = for every >. Using equivalen change of measure, Equaion 43 has a unique weak soluion X, such ha PX = for every >. Since γ > and EX αγ E X s ds = EX α2 4 he maringale propery of F follows. In Corollary 6., he plausible dynamics for he insananeous variance process are derived from he associaed dynamics for he erm-srucure of VIX fuures. A similar analysis was performed in Carr and Sun 27 in he conex of variance swaps. The auhors propose a 24

25 raher general framework in which he underlying index and a single variance swap are modelled. Plausible risk-neural dynamics for he insananeous variance process are derived so ha he dynamics of he underlying are consisen wih ha of he variance swap. Their resricions are differen o hose obained here, however, due o he fac ha he objec of concern is a variance swap, no he VIX. The auhors examine he limiing case as he variance swap approaches expiry and, ogeher wih PDE argumens, obain ineresing resricions from a raher general seup. The analogous argumens presened in Corollary 6. for he VIX also make use of PDE argumens, however, where limiing argumens were used for variance swaps, ime-invarian argumens were used, since he VIX is defined over a fixed ime horizon. 7 Conclusion In his paper, a new modelling approach ha prescribes dynamics o he erm srucure of VIX fuures was proposed. The main conribuions were Theorem 5.3 and Theorem 5.4, which saed necessary condiions for here o be no arbirage beween he join marke of VIX and equiy derivaives. No surprisingly, he resricions are raher complex, as a consequence of he complexiies involved in he definiion of he VIX. An applicaion of he main resul was provided, which demonsraes ha when modelling VIX fuures direcly, he drif and diffusion of he corresponding sochasic volailiy model mus be resriced o preclude arbirage. This is similar o he well-known drif resricions in ineres-rae modelling. There are several direcions in which he research could be exended. The analysis performed in his paper provides a plaform for he analysis of he exising lieraure. For models ha direcly prescribe dynamics o he VIX, he affec of assuming a specific form for he VIX drif and diffusion coefficiens can be assessed. Moreover, he newly developed framework provides a saring poin for he analysis of VIX opion implied volailiies, which are a fundamenal quaniy for boh academics and praciioners. A Proof of Proposiion 3. Proof. For < T T and fixed f >, le Gf,T,,X = f and wrie G f := Gf,T,,X. Then By he assumpion ha G is wice differeniable, k ˆPk,T,,X 2 mdk f Ĉk,T,,X mdk ˆV 2 T = T G F. 44 G f f = ˆPf,T,,X f 2 Ĉf,T,,X f 2 25

26 and 2 G f 2 f = ˆPf,T,,X f f 2 Ĉf,T,,X f 2. Then, by Io s Lemma and sochasic Fubini s heorem, f G f = G f and f = G f i= dˆpk,t,s,x s mdk ˆP k,t,s,x sds i,j= f i= dĉk,t,s,x smdk ˆP k,t,s,x s dx i s 2 ˆP k,t,s,x s d X j,x i Ĉ mdk 2 x i,j= i x s j f k,t,s,x sds Ĉ k,t,s,x s dxs i 2 Ĉ k,t,s,x s d X j,x i mdk 2 x s j = G f 2 2 i,j= f i,j= f f ˆP k,t,s,x smdkds i= f 2 ˆP x j k,t,s,x s mdkd X j,x i s Ĉ k,t,s,x smdkds f i= 2 Ĉ x j k,t,s,x s mdkd X j,x i s ˆV 2 2 T = ˆV T By he Io-Venzel formula Lemma B.2, G F = G F 2 j= Fs T s ˆV 2 s Tds dˆpk,t,s,x s f mdk dĉk,t,s,x s G s F s mdk f F sdf s ˆP F s,t,s,x s Ĉ F s,t,s,x s x j x j F 2 s 2 G s f 2 F sd F,F s. ˆP k,t,s,x s mdkdx i s Ĉ k,t,s,x s mdkdx i s T s dg sf s. 45 d X j,f s 26

27 Therefore G F = G F 2 F 2 j= Fs To simplify furher, observe ha dˆpk,t,s,x s mdk dĉk,t,s,x s F s ˆPFs,T,s,X s ĈF s,t,s,x s df s ˆP F 2 F s,t,s,x s Ĉ F s,t,s,x s d X j,f x j x s j ˆPf,T,s,Xs Ĉf,T,s,X s f f 2 d F,F s. f=fs ˆPF,T,,X ĈF,T,,X =, mdk and f j= ˆP F 2 F,T,,X Ĉ F,T,,X d X j,f x j x j = F 2 F x x d F,F x =F = d F,F, ˆPf,T,,X Ĉf,T,,X f 2 F 2 f=f = 2 F 3 F 2 = F 2 = F 2, ˆPf,T,,X Ĉf,T,,X f=f f ˆPf,T,,X Ĉf,T,,X f=f f f F f=f 27

28 for all F by pu-call pariy. Finally, G F = G F Fs dˆpk,t,s,x s mdk dĉk,t,s,x s F s mdk 2 Fs 2 d F,F s = G F dˆθk,t,s,x s mdk 2 Fs 2 d F,F s ˆΘ = G F k,t,s,x smdkds 2 i,j= i= 2ˆΘ x j k,t,s,x s mdkd X j,x i s 2 ˆΘ k,t,s,x s mdkdx i s F 2 s d F,F s. 46 Combining Equaion 45 and Equaion 46 complees he proof. The sochasic differenial equaion version of he resul is saed in Equaion. B Auxiliary Resuls Lemma B.. Baldeaux and Rukowski 2 Le f : R R be wice differeniable almos everywhere wih respec o he Lebesgue measure, so ha m2 m f k dk <, m, m 2 R, s.. m 2 > m >, and fix y R. Then for any x R, and y y fx = fyf yx y x k f k dk <, k x f k dk < y x k f kdk y k x f kdk. Lemma B.2. Io-Vensel Formula Le G x be a family of sochasic processes, coninuous in,x R R d P-a.s. saisfying: i For each >, x G x is C 2 from R d o R. ii For each x, G x, is a coninuous semi-maringale dg x = n g j xdmj j= where M j are coninuous semi-maringales, and g j x are sochasic processes coninuous in,x, such ha s >, x g j sx are C 2 maps, and x, g j x are adaped processes. 28

29 Le X = X,...,X d be a coninuous semi-maringale. Then G X = G X n i= j= n j= g j s X sdm j s i= g j s X s d M j,x i s 2 G s X s dx i s i,k= 2 G s X s d X k,x i x. k s Proof. The version saed above is aken from Jeanblanc e al. 29. For he original resul see Venzel 965. References J. Baldeaux and A. Badran. Consisen modelling of VIX and equiy derivaives using a 3/2 plus jumps model. Applied Mahemaical Finance, 24. DOI:.8/35486X J. Baldeaux and M. Rukowski. Saic replicaion of forward-sar claims and realized-variance swaps. Applied Mahemaical Finance, 72:99 3, 2. L. Bergomi. Smile dynamics II. Risk, 8:67 73, 25. L. Bergomi. Smile dynamics III. Risk, pages 9 96, Ocober 28. A. Brace, B. Goldys, F. Klebaner, and R. Womersley. Marke model of sochasic implied volailiy wih applicaion o he BGM model. Working Paper: Universiy of New Souh Wales, 2. H. Buehler. Consisen variance curve models. Finance and Sochasics, :78 23, 26. P. Carr and J. Sun. A new approach for opion pricing under sochasic volailiy. Review of Derivaives Research, :87 5, 27. CBOE. The CBOE volailiy index - VIX. Whie Paper, 29. A. Cox and D. Hobson. Local maringales, bubbles and opion prices. Finance and Sochasics, 94: , 25. G. Drimus and W. Farkas. Local volailiy of volailiy for he VIX marke. Working Paper, 22. B. Dupire. Model ar. Risk, pages 8 24, 993. J. Gaheral. Consisen modeling of SPX and VIX opions. In The Fifh World Congress of he Bachelier Finance Sociey, 28. J. Goard and M. Mazur. Sochasic volailiy models and he pricing of VIX opions. Mahemaical Finance, 233: , 23. A. Grunbichler and F. Longsaff. Valuing fuures and opions on volailiy. Journal of Banking & Finance, 26:985, 996. D. Heah, R. Jarrow, and A. Moron. Bond pricing and he erm srucure of ineres raes: A new mehodology for coningen claims valuaion. Economerica: Journal of he Economeric Sociey, pages 77 5,