Liquidity Analysis of Bond and Money Market Funds.
|
|
- Jasper Fox
- 6 years ago
- Views:
Transcription
1 Liquidity Analysis of Bond and Money Market Funds. Naoise Metadjer Kitty Moloney April 15, 2017 Abstract Monitoring liquidity risk of Money Market Funds and Investment Funds is an important tool for the identification and assessment of systemic vulnerabilities. The following paper highlight the importance of the definition of liquidity on the results of liquidity stress tests of investment funds and Money Market Funds (MMFs). We presents a prototype methodology for liquidity monitoring delineated on maturity, sector and credit ratings of securities held by a number of Irish-domiciled MMFs and bond funds. This methodology is inspired by Basel IIIs High Quality Liquid Assets (HQLA). We compare HQLA to expected monthly redemptions and find this method appropriate for MMFs and Advanced Sovereign bond funds, but less appropriate for more complex Emerging Market (EM) funds. By design EM funds are likely to fail this test. Future work will compare this methodology to a more market-based approach. 1 Introduction both market and liquidity risk. Following the International Monetary Fund (IMF) Financial Sector Assessment Programme (FSAP) for Ireland in 2016 (International Monetary Fund, 2016), the IMF recommends increased monitoring of liquidity risk in MMFs and IFs, referring to the need to monitor minimum weekly liquidity ratios and the characteristics and concentration of the investor base. In addition, the IMF also recommend the development of frequent stress testing of MMFs and IFs, with respect to In this letter, we present a simple methodology for assessing fund liquidity which builds upon the MMF liqudity risk analysis completed during the IMF FSAP. Our methodology is inspired by the Basel III High Quality Liquid Assets (HQLA) and Liquidity Coverage Ratio (LCR) methodologies (BCBS, 2013). The purpose of this exercise is to develop a liquidity metric which can be monitored at both a fund and aggregate level on a periodic basis and, thus, identify Central Bank of Ireland 0 Corresponding author: [Naoise.Metadjer]@centralbank.ie. The views expressed in this paper are those of the authors only and do not necessarily reflect the views of the Central Bank of Ireland. We thank Pierce Daly, Oisin Kenny and Brian Godfrey (MRA) and members of the Supervisory Risk Analysis team, MPD, Statistics and the Shadow Banking Task Force for comments on earlier drafts 1
2 potential liqudity mismatches at a fund level and general trends in liquidity at an aggregate level. Brunnermeier and Pedersen (2009) argue that feedback loops exist between market and funding liquidity 1 where market illiquidity leads to losses on existing positions and results in future funding difficulties. This loop is crucial for investment funds whose primary source of funding is through equity share issuance, which in many cases can be redeemed daily. If investors in the fund believe that a redemption shock will lead to a fire-sale of assets into an illiquid market and that resulting losses may trigger further redemptions, they have the opportunity to limit their losses by redeeming their shares (Chen, Goldstein and Jiang, 2010). This first mover advantage occurs as a significant portion of the costs related to redemptions are borne by the remaining investors in the fund and not by those who have cashed out. Taken on aggregate, however, the first mover advantage scenario can cause self-fulfilling cycles related to feedback loops between redemptions and asset price decreases, precipitated by market illiquidity and can lead to systemic events. The risk of such damaging dynamics is increased where funds offer daily redemptions while investing in markets or securities which may not offer daily liquidity during stressed market conditions. Our research highlights some potential hurdles to be overcome in order to meet the recommendation of the IMF FSAP with respect to monitoring minimum liquid asset ratios for MMFs and IFs. By analysing HQLA, net investor flows and LCR for different categories of bond funds, we find that HQLA and LCR type indicators may be most appropriate for monitoring liquidity risk in Advanced Sovereign bond funds and MMFs. Such measures appear to be less appropriate for other fund types such as High Yield and Advanced Financial bond funds. Deeper analysis into market depth and transaction costs may be required for these categories of funds. The Letter continues as follows: Section 2 describes our data; Section 3 outlines our fund categorisation methodology and liquidity indicators; Section 4 provides results of our liquidity analysis by category of fund; Section 5 concludes. 2 Data As of December 2016 Ireland has the largest share of Euro Area MMFs by Assets Under Management (AUM) and the third largest share of IFs, behind Luxembourg and Germany 2. Our analysis focuses on bond funds and MMFs which comprise over 46% of the total Irish IF and MMF sector (Figure 1). We restrict our sample to UCITS funds with daily dealing frequency, leaving a Q sample of 501 BN AUM for bond funds (79% of all bond fund assets) and 479 BN AUM for MMFs (99% of all MMF assets). Figure 2 displays the evolution of our sample size for our analysis from Q to Q The Statistics Division (STATS) of the Central Bank collects security by security holdings data from all Irish authorised investment funds on a quarterly basis and for money market funds on a monthly basis, matching this data to the Centralised Securi- 1 Borio (2000) provides a working definition of a liquid market as one in which transactions can take place quickly with little impact on prices. Teo (2011) define funding liquidity quite simply as the ease with which investors/asset managers can obtain financing. 2 Source: ECB Statistical Data Warehouse 2
3 ties Database (CSDB) maintained by the European Central Bank (ECB). This data allows us to build a point in time security by security balance sheet for investment and money market funds. Monthly data on total Net Asset Value (NAV) and investor subscriptions and redemptions of shares is also collected by STATS and allows us to calculate a monthly net subscription/redemption per fund. 3 Fund Categorisation and Liquidity Indicator 2. Advanced Financial - Advanced Economy, Investment Grade, Financial Sector. 3. Advanced Corporate - Advanced Economy, Investment Grade, Non-Financial Corporate. 4. Advanced Mixed - Advanced Economy, Investment Grade, Mixed Sector. 5. Emerging Markets - Emerging Markets. 6. High Yield - Advanced Economy, High Yield. 7. Other 3.1 Fund Categorisation In order to assess liquidity of assets for different categories of bond funds, we categorise assets into granular groupings based on their portfolio weightings in different bond classes. We use seven different groupings with a 70% threshold for inclusion in a particular category 3. The categorisation is completed based on each fund s Q portfolio. Completing the analysis based on the Q categorisation introduces a survivorship bias into the sample. However, having also completed the analysis by recategorising funds in each quarter, we find that this method leads to less volatile results while leaving the overall conclusions unchanged. Moreover, it removes the effect of changes in aggregate level liqudity caused by funds switching categories over time. The categories are as follows; 1. Advanced Sovereign - Advanced Economy, Investment Grade, Sovereign/Sub-Sovereign. Figure 3 displays the number of bond funds per category from Q Q The largest numbers of funds are in the Advanced Mixed, Advanced Sovereign and Advanced Financial categories. High Yield, Emerging Markets and Other all have similar numbers with between 40 and 75 funds in each category over the sample period. There are only a small number of funds (< 10) in the Advanced Corporate category. 3.2 High Quality Liquid Assets The IMF (2016) methodology for defining liquid assets in MMFs broadly follows the credit rating agency convention (and IMMFA code of practice) by including overnight cash and repo, securities maturing within one week, and sovereign debt securities with a credit rating of AA or above. Liquid assets are then compared to large historical weekly redemption shocks experienced by the individual MMFs. While such a definition of liquid assets is appropriate for MMFs, due to their business model, it may be overly restrictive for other fund categories. Analysis 3 Each condition in the categorisation is treated separately e.g. Advanced Economy, Investment Grade is greater than 70% portfolio weighting in Advanced Economy bonds and greater than 70% protfolio weighting in Investment Grade bonds 3
4 completed by the European Banking Authority (EBA) (2013) finds that a wider range of assets can be defined as providing liquidity during stressed market conditions, provided an appropriate haircut is applied. Under Basel III and CRD IV 4 European banks are required to hold sufficient liquid assets to survive a significant period of stress. This is operationalized in the liquidity coverage ratio (LCR) which is defined as the stock of HQLA divided by the total expected cash outflow over the next thirty calendar days (Basel Committee on Banking Supervision (BCBS), 2013). HQLA stock consists of cash or assets that can be converted into cash at little or no loss of value in private markets. In order to assess the liquidity of investment funds, we categorise investment fund portfolios into liquid and illiquid assets using a method inspired by the the BCBS (2013) HQLA definition. For the purposes of the investment fund liquidity indicator, HQLA and the relevant haircuts are split into the following levels. Level 1 0% haircut: 1. Cash and cash equivalents 2. Assets maturing within the stress period 3. Debt securities issued or guaranteed by sovereigns, central banks, the BIS, the IMF, multilateral development banks and the European Community with a credit rating of at least AA- Level 2a 15% haircut: 1. Debt securities issued by or guaranteed by sovereigns, central banks, the BIS, the IMF, multilateral development banks and the European Community with a credit rating between A+ and A-. 2. Corporate debt securities not issued by financial institutions. Includes commercial paper and covered bonds with credit rating of at least AA- Level 2b 50% haircut: 4 Regulation 573/2013 of the European Parliament and of the Council. 1. Corporate debt securities not issued by financial institutions. Includes commercial paper and covered bonds with credit rating between A+ and BBB-. 2. Common equity shares in advanced economies which are not issued by financial institutions. A caveat of the methodology is that the classification is based on the country, sector, maturity and credit ratings information reported by the investment funds and MMFs. These data fields are not currently validated using third party data. Further refinements of the HQLA based classification will be completed as new data sources become available for validation and supplementation of reported data. The above HQLA levels are adapted from the BCBS (2013) definition. For example, Level 2 assets can only make up 40% of the total stock of HQLA for inclusion in the BCBS (2013) LCR, whereas, we include all HQLA eligible securities. We include all Level 2 assets as our methodology is not designed to be a liquidity stress test, rather it is a designed as an indicator for potential liquidity mismatches in open-ended funds. Thus, as Level 2 assets are deemed to provide liquidity (once an appropriate haircut is applied) it is appropriate to include them in a liquidity indicator. 4
5 3.3 Liquidity Coverage Ratio A fund level LCR can be calculated as the ratio of HQLA to expected funding outflows during a stress period. HighQualityLiquidAssets Expected30daysStressedOutf lows (1) The denominator of the LCR comprises LCR = the expected funding outflows over a stressed period of thirty calendar days. Funding outflow combines redemption shocks and run-off of liabilities which mature during the stress period 5. In the current version of the test derivative liabilities are not included in the funding outflow. A 10% monthly redemption shock is also applied. An initial analysis reveals that a 10% redemption shock is a sufficiently conservative for all categories of funds, and perhaps over conservative for certain categories of funds. Table 3.3 below provides a first and fifth percentile redemption shock for each category of funds. The shock was calculated by taking the Q categorisation of funds, tracking their monthly redemptions back to January 2007 and calculating a weighted average redemption 6 for each category in each month. As discussed above, keeping the Q sample constant introduces a significant survivorship bias. This is particularly pronounced due to the 10 year sample used to calculate the investor flows. However, it gives us some indication of the size of monthly shocks which were experienced in each category over the period from The largest shocks are experienced by MMFs, Advanced Corporate bond funds, High Yield bond funds and Other bond funds with first percentile shocks of 9.2%, 12.2%, 8.4% and 10.2% respectively. The result for Advanced Corporates is not robust as there are only four funds in this category. Therefore, the size of the shock will be heavily affected by idiosyncratic fund flows which may be unrelated to stress events. The magnitude of the MMF first percentile shock may be related to the fact that the period under analysis includes the run on money markets in September Alternately, it may be related to the use of MMFs for treasury operations by large corporations. In such cases, large redemptions are often signalled to the fund well in advance and, therefore, should not pose a liquidity risk. Table 1: Redemption Shock (% NAV) Category 1 st Percentile 5 th Percentile MMF 9.2% 2.9% Advanced Sovereign 3.2% 2.1% Advanced Financial 5.4% 3.0% Advanced Corporate 12.2% 4.3% Advanced Mixed 6.1% 2.7% Emerging 5.6% 2.5% High Yield 8.4% 4.8% Other 10.2% 2.9% 4 Results The results of the HQLA liquid asset classification are provided in Figure 4 from Q to Q Unsurprisingly, Advanced Sovereign bond funds and MMFs have the highest levels of liquid assets. Both categories of funds have experienced an increase in liquid asset over the past two years, with the trend particularly noticable for MMFs. High Yield funds tend to have the lowest levels of liquid assets, followed closely by Ad- 5 The run off of short term liabilities assumes that all debt securities, securities lending, overdrafts and loans which mature during the stress period cannot be replaced 6 individual fund redemption shocks are weighted by fund AUM as a percentage of AUM for the category 5
6 vanced Financials. There is very little difference, on average, between Advanced Corporate, Advanced Mixed and Other bond funds. Liquid assets also appear to be trending upwards in Advanced Mixed and Advanced Corporate bond funds over recent quarters. Low levels of liquid assets in High Yield funds using this methodology is not surprising since sub-investment grade assets are not included in the HQLA classification. Advanced Financial bond funds also appear to have quite low levels of liquid assets. Similarly to sub-investment grade bonds, debt securities issued by the financial sector are deemed not to have sufficient liqudity during stress periods and are not included in HQLA. Advanced Financial bond funds, however, have higher levels of liquidity buffers on average than High Yield bond funds. Figure 5 provides a breakdown of HQLA per fund category by Level 1 and Level 2 liquid assets. Level 1 can be seen as the narrow definition of liquid assets, those which are included with no haircut 7. Advanced Sovereigns and MMFs hold very high levels of Level 1 assets and therefore can be seen as highly liquid. Liquid assets held by Advanced Corporate and Emerging Market bond funds are predominantly Level 2, and are included with a haircut to reflect the potential for negative market movements during stress periods. The results of the LCR analysis are presented in Figure 6. Each point on the graph represents an individual fund, with the size of the point representing the AUM of that fund. The black line in the chart indicates LCR = 1, with funds below the line having a potential liquidity mismatch. The largest funds by AUM are predominantly in the MMF and Advanced Mixed categories of funds. In most fund categories, the majority of funds reside above the LCR = 1 line, indicating relatively low levels of liquidity mismatches. High Yield bond funds again stand out due to their high levels of liquidity transformation, with the vast majority of funds in this category residing below the black line in all time periods. However, even for Advanced Mixed and Advanced Financial bond funds, a significant minority of funds have LCR < 1. We suggest future work would measure the liquidity of these funds using market and trading information (such as bid ask spreads, daily volumes etc.), and the comparison of these results with the analysis here. The results indicate that, particularly for High Yield funds, a simple liquid assets classification methodology based on credit ratings, maturity and sector may not be appropriate for ongoing liquidity monitoring. 5 Conclusion A key finding of this analysis is the clear delineation of Advanced Sovereign and High Yield bond funds from the other bond fund categories, in terms of both HQLA and LCR. While this finding is not entirely surprising given a certain level of overlap in the HQLA classification and the fund categorisation methodologies, it highlights the need for separate methods for analysing liquidity mismatches in these categories. A simple liquid assets ratio such as that proposed in IMF (2016) appears to be appropriate for Advanced Sovereign bond funds and MMFs but is less appropriate for High Yield bond funds. Liquidity indicators based on credit ratings and sector do not take into account market depth, trading volume, price impact 7 Level 1 assets are broadly consistent with the IMF (2016) definition of liquid assets 6
7 or transaction costs; which are common elements of liquidty metrics in the literature 8. Thus, a HQLA type classification methodology may be too blunt to capture the liqudity of complex debt security portfolios, for example excluding all securities issued by financial sector companies. Further research is required into more appropriate measures of portfolio liquidity, particularly for funds focusing on sub-investment grade and financial sector debt securities. References Basel Committee on Banking Supervision (2013), Basel III: The Liquidity Coverage Ratio and Liquidity Risk monitoring tools, Bank of International Settlements, available: Borio, C. (2000), Market Liquidity and Stress: Selected Issues and Policy Implications, BIS Quarterly Review, November (2000) Brunnermeier, M. and Pederson, L. H. (2011), Market Liquidity and Funding Liquidity, Review of Financial Studies, 22(6), pp Chen, Q., Goldstein, I. and Jiang, W. (2010), Payoff Complementarities and Financial Fragility: Evidence from Mutual Fund Outflows, Journal of Financial Economics, 97(2), pp European Banking Authority (2013), Report on appropriate uniform definitions of extremely high quality liquid assets (extremely HQLA) and high quality liquid assets (HQLA) and on operational requirements for liquid assets under Article 509(3) and (5) CRR, European Banking Authority, 20 December 2013, available: documents/10180/16145/eba+bs report+on+definition+of+hqla.pdf International Monetary Fund (2015), Ireland Financial Sector Assessment Program. Technical Note Asset Management and Financial Stability, IMF Country Report, No. 16/312. Lybek, T., and Sarr, A. (2002). Measuring Liquidity in Financial Markets, International Monetary Fund, No Teo, M. (2011), The Liquidity Risk of Liquid Hedge Funds, Journal of Financial Economics, 100(1), pp See for Sarr and Lybek (2002) 7
8 Figure 1: Irish Domiciled Investment Funds: Q Figure 2: UCITS Investment and Money Market Funds (daily dealing) 8
9 Figure 3: No. Funds per Category Figure 4: Average HQLA (% AUM) 9
10 Figure 5: HQLA Breakdown Figure 6: Liquidity Coverage Ratio 10
Vol [2017], No. [10] Abstract
Liquidity analysis of Bond and Money Market Funds Naoise Metadjer 1 & Kitty Moloney Economic Letter Series Vol [2017], No. [10] Abstract Monitoring liquidity risk of Money Market Funds (MMFs) and Investment
European Association of Co-operative Banks Groupement Européen des Banques Coopératives Europäische Vereinigung der Genossenschaftsbanken
Brussels, 21 March 2013 EACB draft position paper on EBA discussion paper on the process to define highly liquid assets in the LCR The voice of 3.800 local and retail banks, 55 million members, 216 million
DWS USA Corporation. U.S. Liquidity Coverage Ratio Disclosures. For the quarter ended December 31, 2018
DWS USA Corporation U.S. Liquidity Coverage Ratio Disclosures For the quarter ended December 31, 2018 1 Table of Contents The Liquidity Coverage Ratio (LCR) 3 U.S. Disclosure Requirements 4 U.S. Qualitative
2017 Seminar for Senior Bank Supervisors from Emerging Economies. Implementation of Basel III Liquidity Requirements in Emerging Markets
2017 Seminar for Senior Bank Supervisors from Emerging Economies Implementation of Basel III Liquidity Requirements in Emerging Markets Christopher Wilson Monetary and Capital Markets Department International
May Guidelines on LCR Calculation for the Interim Observation Period
May 2014 Guidelines on LCR Calculation for the Interim Observation Period Contents 1 Overview... 3 2 Context... 4 3 Liquidity Coverage Ratio... 7 4 Definition of High Quality Liquid Assets ( HQLA )...
Guideline. Liquidity Adequacy Requirements (LAR) Chapter 5 Liquidity Monitoring Tools Date: May 2014
Guideline Subject: Liquidity Adequacy Requirements (LAR) Chapter 5 Date: May 2014 Subsection 485(1) and 949(1) of the Bank Act (BA), subsection 473(1) of the Trust and Loan Companies Act (TLCA) and subsection
12. LIQUIDITY RISK LIQUIDITY RISK MANAGEMENT AND ASSESSMENT MANAGEMENT MODEL
12. LIQUIDITY RISK 12.1. LIQUIDITY RISK MANAGEMENT AND ASSESSMENT LIQUIDITY MANAGEMENT The BCP Group liquidity management is globally accompanied and the supervision is coordinated at a consolidated level
Euro area financial regulation: where do we stand?
Euro area financial regulation: where do we stand? Benoît Cœuré Member of the Executive Board European Central Bank Paris, 18 January 2013 1 Euro area banking sector - What has been done? 2 Large amounts
Basel III: The Liquidity Coverage Ratio and Liquidity Risk Monitoring Tools
P2.T7. Operational & Integrated Risk Management Basel III: The Liquidity Coverage Ratio and Liquidity Risk Monitoring Tools Bionic Turtle FRM Study Notes By David Harper, CFA FRM CIPM www.bionicturtle.com
Liquidity Coverage Ratio Disclosures Report. For the Quarterly Period Ended September 30, 2017
Liquidity Coverage Ratio Disclosures Report For the Quarterly Period Ended September 30, 2017 U.S. LCR DISCLOSURES REPORT For the quarterly period ended September 30, 2017 Table of Contents Page 1 Morgan
DB USA Corporation U.S. LIQUIDITY COVERAGE RATIO DISCLOSURES
DB USA Corporation U.S. LIQUIDITY COVERAGE RATIO DISCLOSURES For the quarter ended 1 Table of Contents The Liquidity Coverage Ratio (LCR)... 3 U.S. Disclosure Requirements... 3 U.S. Qualitative Disclosures...
Policy Statement PS2/18 Pillar 2 liquidity. February 2018
Policy Statement PS2/18 Pillar 2 liquidity February 2018 Prudential Regulation Authority 20 Moorgate London EC2R 6DA Policy Statement PS2/18 Pillar 2 liquidity February 2018 Bank of England 2018 Contents
ECB-PUBLIC. Sensitivity Analysis of Liquidity Risk Stress Test 2019
Sensitivity Analysis of Liquidity Risk Stress Test 2019 6 February 2019 Background & Objectives Executive summary The ECB will perform a sensitivity analysis of liquidity risk (LiST) as the annual supervisory
Assessing possible sources of systemic risk from hedge funds
Financial Services Authority Assessing possible sources of systemic risk from hedge funds A report on the findings of the hedge fund as counterparty survey and hedge fund survey February 2010 This paper
Basel Committee on Banking Supervision. Liquidity coverage ratio disclosure standards
Basel Committee on Banking Supervision Liquidity coverage ratio disclosure standards January 2014 This publication is available on the BIS website (www.bis.org). Bank for International Settlements 2014.
REPORT FROM THE COMMISSION TO THE EUROPEAN PARLIAMENT AND THE COUNCIL
EUROPEAN COMMISSION Brussels, 19.10.2017 COM(2017) 604 final REPORT FROM THE COMMISSION TO THE EUROPEAN PARLIAMENT AND THE COUNCIL under Article 29(3) of Regulation (EU) 2015/2365 of 25 November 2015 on
CRR II and CRD V: Basel IV implementation on European level
April 12 th, 2017 : Basel IV implementation on European level Background. Last November the EU Commission published its proposal for amending the CRR (Regulation (EU) 575/2013) and the CRD (Directive 2013/36/EU).
Guidance to completing the LCR module of Form LCR
Guidance to completing the LCR module of Form LCR LIQUIDITY COVERAGE RATIO GUIDANCE Introduction The Liquidity Coverage Ratio ( LCR ) promotes the short-term resilience of the liquidity risk profile of
ECB Guide to the internal liquidity adequacy assessment process (ILAAP)
ECB Guide to the internal liquidity adequacy assessment process (ILAAP) March 2018 Contents 1 Introduction 2 1.1 Purpose 3 1.2 Scope and proportionality 3 2 Principles 5 Principle 1 The management body
Guidelines Guidelines on stress tests scenarios under Article 28 of the MMF Regulation
Guidelines Guidelines on stress tests scenarios under Article 28 of the MMF Regulation 21/03/2018 ESMA34-49-115 Table of Contents 1 Scope... 3 2 Purpose... 4 3 Compliance and reporting obligations... 5
Shadow Banking Out of the Shadows and Into the Light
2013 Morrison & Foerster (UK) LLP All Rights Reserved mofo.com Shadow Banking Out of the Shadows and Into the Light Presented By Peter Green Jeremy Jennings-Mares 19 September 2013 LN2-11206v1 Today s
Operationalizing the Selection and Application of Macroprudential Instruments
Operationalizing the Selection and Application of Macroprudential Instruments Presented by Tobias Adrian, Federal Reserve Bank of New York Based on Committee for Global Financial Stability Report 48 The
COPYRIGHTED MATERIAL. Bank executives are in a difficult position. On the one hand their shareholders require an attractive
chapter 1 Bank executives are in a difficult position. On the one hand their shareholders require an attractive return on their investment. On the other hand, banking supervisors require these entities
EBA final draft implementing technical standards
EBA/ITS/2013/04/rev1 24/07/2014 EBA final draft implementing technical standards On asset encumbrance reporting under Article 100 of Capital Requirements Regulation (CRR) EBA final draft implementing technical
Strengthening the Oversight and Regulation of Shadow Banking
16 April 2012 Strengthening the Oversight and Regulation of Shadow Banking Progress Report to G20 Ministers and Governors I. Introduction At the Cannes Summit in November 2011, the G20 Leaders agreed to
Response to discussion paper of the Basel Committee on the regulatory treatment of sovereign exposures
THE CENTRAL BANK OF HUNGARY Contact person: Ms Anikó Szombati Executive Director for Macroprudential Policy Email: szombatia@mnb.hu Phone: +36(1) 2600 2662 Response to discussion paper of the Basel Committee
Appendix B: HQLA Guide Consultation Paper No Basel III: Liquidity Management
Appendix B: HQLA Guide Consultation Paper No.3 2017 Basel III: Liquidity Management [Draft] Guide on the calculation and reporting of HQLA Issued: 26 April 2017 Contents Contents Overview... 3 Consultation...
Northern Trust Corporation Liquidity Coverage Ratio Public Disclosure
Northern Trust Corporation Liquidity Coverage Ratio Public Disclosure For the quarterly period ended June 30, 2018 1 Northern Trust Corporation Liquidity Coverage Ratio Public Disclosure For the quarterly
Capital Requirements Directive IV Framework Liquidity Requirements. Allen & Overy Client Briefing Paper 15 January
Capital Requirements Directive IV Framework Liquidity Requirements Allen & Overy Client Briefing Paper 15 January 2014 2 CRD IV Framework: Liquidity Requirements January 2014 CRD IV Framework: Liquidity
Consultation Paper EBA/CP/2016/ November 2016
EBA/CP/2016/22 16 November 2016 Consultation Paper Draft Implementing technical standards amending Implementing Regulation (EU) No 680/2014 with regard to additional monitoring metrics for liquidity reporting
IMMFA Fact Sheet on MMF
IMMFA Fact Sheet on MMF Money Market Funds Money Market Funds (MMF) are collective investment schemes. IMMFA funds are all UCITS although some MMF domiciled in Europe are AIFs. Currently MMFs in Europe
Recent Developments in the Austrian Banking System s Liquidity Situation and the International Regulatory Debate
Special Topics Recent Developments in the Austrian Banking System s Liquidity Situation Stefan W. Schmitz, Florian Weidenholzer 1 Given the tense situation in international money markets, the Austrian
White Paper. Basel III Liquidity Risk. Perspectives on the implementation challenges facing banks
White Paper Basel III Liquidity Risk Perspectives on the implementation challenges facing banks Contents New Liquidity Risk Management Regime... 1 Implementation Challenges of Basel III Liquidity Risk
SSM Comprehensive Assessment Key issues from a market perspective
SSM Comprehensive Assessment Key issues from a market perspective Bond Market Contact Group Frankfurt am Main, 1 July 2014 Jukka Vesala DG Micro-Prudential Supervision III Agenda 1 Introduction 2 Key issues
14. What Use Can Be Made of the Specific FSIs?
14. What Use Can Be Made of the Specific FSIs? Introduction 14.1 The previous chapter explained the need for FSIs and how they fit into the wider concept of macroprudential analysis. This chapter considers
African Bank Holdings Limited and African Bank Limited
African Bank Holdings Limited and African Bank Limited Public Pillar III Disclosures in terms of the Banks Act, Regulation 43 CONTENTS 1. Executive summary... 3 2. Basis of compilation... 7 3. Supplementary
Annex I - SUPERVISORY REPORTING REQUIREMENTS FOR LIQUIDITY COVERAGE AND STABLE FUNDING RATIO
20 December 2012 Annex I - SUPERVISORY REPORTING REQUIREMENTS FOR LIQUIDITY COVERAGE AND STABLE FUNDING RATIO Feedback on the public consultation and on the opinion of the BSG On 7 June 2012, the EBA publicly
Guidance on leveraged transactions
Guidance on leveraged transactions May 2017 Contents 1 Introduction 2 2 Scope of the guidance on leveraged transactions 3 3 Definition of leveraged transactions 4 4 Risk appetite and governance 6 5 Syndication
Project Editor, Yale Program on Financial Stability (YPFS), Yale School of Management
yale program on financial stability case study 2014-1b-v1 november 1, 2014 Basel III B: 1 Basel III Overview Christian M. McNamara 2 Michael Wedow 3 Andrew Metrick 4 Abstract In the wake of the financial
EBF Response to the EBA Consultations on currencies with constrained availability of Liquid Assets
EBF_005646 Brussels, 13 December 2013 Launched in 1960, the European Banking Federation is the voice of the European banking sector from the European Union and European Free Trade Association countries.
January 11, Japanese Bankers Association
January 11, 2013 Comments on the Financial Stability Board s Consultative Document: A Policy Framework for Addressing Shadow Banking Risks in Securities Lending and Repos Japanese Bankers Association We,
BASEL II & III IMPLEMENTATION FRAMEWORK. Gift Chirozva Chief Bank Examiner Bank Licensing, Supervision & Surveillance Reserve Bank of Zimbabwe
BASEL II & III IMPLEMENTATION 1 FRAMEWORK Gift Chirozva Chief Bank Examiner Bank Licensing, Supervision & Surveillance Reserve Bank of Zimbabwe email: gchirozva@rbz.co.zw 9/16/2016 giftezh@gmail.com Outline
Opinion of the EBA on Good Practices for ETF Risk Management
EBA-Op-2013-01 7 March 2013 Opinion of the EBA on Good Practices for ETF Risk Management Table of contents Table of contents 2 Introduction 4 I. Good Practices for ETF business 6 II. Considerations for
Questions and Answers Application of the AIFMD
Questions and Answers Application of the AIFMD 5 October 2017 ESMA34-32-352 Date: 5 October 2017 ESMA34-32-352 Contents Section I: Remuneration...5 Section II: Notifications of AIFs...9 Section III: Reporting
FINANCIAL INSTITUTIONS
1/27 FINANCIAL INSTITUTIONS A Research Publication by DZ BANK AG EU Commission s finalised LCR rules spring no surprises» The EU Commission has published a delegated act setting out the details of how
Guideline on Liquidity Risk Management
BOM/BSD 4/January 2000 BANK OF MAURITIUS Guideline on Liquidity Risk Management January 2000 Revised October 2009 Revised August 2010 Revised October 2017 Table of Contents INTRODUCTION... 1 Authority...
Liquidity Coverage Ratio Disclosures Report. For the Quarterly Period Ended March 31, 2018
Liquidity Coverage Ratio Disclosures Report For the Quarterly Period Ended March 31, 2018 LCR DISCLOSURES REPORT For the quarterly period ended March 31, 2018 Table of Contents Page 1 Morgan Stanley 1
ABI Response to EBA Discussion Paper On Defining Liquid Assets in the LCR under the draft CRR
ABI Response to EBA Discussion Paper On Defining Liquid Assets in the LCR under the draft CRR March 2013 POSITION PAPER Index General considerations...3 Proposals to EBA... 3 Arguments in favor of proposal
An update of regulatory developments and impact on banks regulatory compliance
[Please select] [Please select] Michael Grill Pär Torstensson Michael Wedow DG-Macro-Prudential Policy and Financial Stability An update of regulatory developments and impact on banks regulatory compliance
CREDIT PORTFOLIO SECTOR CONCENTRATION AND ITS IMPLICATIONS FOR CAPITAL REQUIREMENTS
131 Libor Holub, Michal Nyklíček, Pavel Sedlář This article assesses whether the sector concentration of the portfolio of loans to resident and non-resident legal entities according to information from
African Bank Holdings Limited and African Bank Limited
African Bank Holdings Limited and African Bank Limited Public Pillar III Disclosures in terms of the Banks Act, Regulation 43 CONTENTS 1. Executive summary... 3 2. Basis of compilation... 7 3. Supplementary
ANNEX 4 MAIN DOCUMENTS PUBLISHED 1 BY THE INTERNATIONAL SUPERVISORY FORA: FSB, BCBS, EBA, ESRB AND ECB IN THE FRAMEWORK OF FINANCIAL STABILITY
ANNEX 4 MAIN DOCUMENTS PUBLISHED 1 BY THE INTERNATIONAL SUPERVISORY FORA: FSB, BCBS, EBA, ESRB AND ECB IN THE FRAMEWORK OF FINANCIAL STABILITY 1 The complete list of the documents published are on their
GL ON COMMON PROCEDURES AND METHODOLOGIES FOR SREP EBA/CP/2014/14. 7 July Consultation Paper
EBA/CP/2014/14 7 July 2014 Consultation Paper Draft Guidelines for common procedures and methodologies for the supervisory review and evaluation process under Article 107 (3) of Directive 2013/36/EU Contents
Nic Nicandrou. Group
Nic Nicandrou Group Drivers of high quality earnings, resilient capital and robust balance sheet Growing and resilient earnings drivers Capital is strong and highly accretive Defensive and robust balance
Collateralized Banking
Collateralized Banking A Post-Crisis Reality Dr. Matthias Degen Senior Manager, KPMG AG ETH Risk Day 2014 Zurich, 12 September 2014 Definition Collateralized Banking Totality of aspects and processes relating
PERIODIC INFORMATION CONCERNING LIQUIDITY RISK IN ACCORDANCE WITH FFFS 2010:7
2016-09-30 2017-03-31 2017-09-30 2018-03-31 2018-09-30 2019-03-31 2019-09-30 2020-03-31 2020-09-30 2021-03-31 2021-09-30 2022-03-31 2022-09-30 2023-03-31 2023-09-30 2024-03-31 2024-09-30 2025-03-31 2025-09-30
TABLE 2: CAPITAL STRUCTURE - December 31, 2015
Frequency : Quarterly Location : Quarterly Financial Statement TABLE 2: CAPITAL STRUCTURE - December 31, 2015 Balance sheet - Step 1 (Table 2(b)) All figures are in SAR '000 Assets Balance sheet in Published
Guideline. Liquidity Adequacy Requirements (LAR) Chapter 2 Liquidity Coverage Ratio Date: June 2017
Guideline Subject: Liquidity Adequacy Requirements (LAR) Chapter 2 Date: June 2017 Subsection 485(1) and 949(1) of the Bank Act (BA), subsection 473(1) of the Trust and Loan Companies Act (TLCA) and subsection
BBA Response to EBA Discussion Paper: retails deposits subject to higher outflows for the purposes of liquidity reporting under the CCR
BBA Response to EBA Discussion Paper: retails deposits subject to higher outflows for the purposes of liquidity reporting under the CCR Introduction The British Bankers Association ( BBA ) is the leading
EBA FINAL draft Regulatory Technical Standards
EBA FINAL DRAFT RTS ON ADDITIONAL LIQUIDITY OUTFLOWS CORRESPONDING TO COLLATERAL NEEDS RESULTING FROM THE IMPACT OF AN ADVERSE MARKET SCENARIO ON THE INSTITUTION S DERIVATIVES TRANSACTIONS, FINANCING TRANSACTIONS
COMMISSION DELEGATED REGULATION (EU) No /.. of XXX
EUROPEAN COMMISSION Brussels, XXX [ ](2016) XXX draft COMMISSION DELEGATED REGULATION (EU) No /.. of XXX supplementing Regulation (EU) No 648/2012 of the European Parliament and of the Council on OTC derivatives,
Template for comments
Template for comments ECB Guide to the internal liquidity adequacy assessment process (ILAAP) Institution/Company German Banking Industry Committee (GBIC) Contact person Mr/Ms Mr First name Leon Surname
Liquidity Risk Management. Thomas Schmale, Solution Management Analytical Banking, SAP AG, 29 th May 2014
Liquidity Risk Management Thomas Schmale, Solution Management Analytical Banking, SAP AG, 29 th May 2014 Agenda Introduction Regulatory challenges in Liquidity Risk Management Further derived challenges
Deutsche Bank Annual Report 2017 https://www.db.com/ir/en/annual-reports.htm
Deutsche Bank Annual Report 2017 https://www.db.com/ir/en/annual-reports.htm in billions 2007 2008 2009 2010 2011 2012 2013 2014 2015 2016 2017 Assets: 1,925 2,202 1,501 1,906 2,164 2,012 1,611 1,709 1,629
Template for notifying intended measures to be taken under Article 458 of the Capital Requirements Regulation (CRR)
Template for notifying intended measures to be taken under Article 458 of the Capital Requirements Regulation ( Please send this template to notifications@esrb.europa.eu when notifying the ESRB; macropru.notifications@ecb.europa.eu
RISK DASHBOARD. April
RISK DASHBOARD April 2017 1 Risks Level Trend 1. Macro risks High 2. Credit risks Medium 3. Market risks Medium 4. Liquidity and funding risks Medium 5. Profitability and solvency Medium 6. Interlinkages
Liquidity instruments for macroprudential purposes
Sinaia, October 2015 Liquidity instruments for macroprudential purposes Gabriel Gaiduchevici Antoaneta Amza National Bank of Romania The opinions expressed in this presentation are those of the author
New rules for Money Market Funds proposed Frequently Asked Questions
EUROPEAN COMMISSION MEMO Brussels, 4 September 2013 New rules for Money Market Funds proposed Frequently Asked Questions 1. What is a Money Market Fund? A Money Market Fund (MMF) is a mutual fund that
Supervisory Formula Method (SFM) and Significant Risk Transfer (SRT)
Financial Services Authority Finalised guidance Supervisory Formula Method and Significant Risk Transfer September 2011 Supervisory Formula Method (SFM) and Significant Risk Transfer (SRT) Introduction
Insurance industry's perspective on the project on systemic risk
Insurance industry's perspective on the project on systemic risk 2nd OECD-Asia Regional Seminar on Insurance Statistics 26-27 January 2012, Bangkok, Thailand Contents Introduction Insurance is different
January 13, Submitted electronically Secretary Brent J. Fields U.S. Securities and Exchange Commission 100 F Street, N.E. Washington, D.C.
January 13, 2016 Submitted electronically Secretary Brent J. Fields U.S. Securities and Exchange Commission 100 F Street, N.E. Washington, D.C. 20549 Re: File No. S7-16-15 Open-End Fund Liquidity Risk
Basel Committee on Banking Supervision. Consultative document. Guidelines for Computing Capital for Incremental Risk in the Trading Book
Basel Committee on Banking Supervision Consultative document Guidelines for Computing Capital for Incremental Risk in the Trading Book Issued for comment by 15 October 2008 July 2008 Requests for copies
EBA FINAL draft Implementing Technical Standards
EBA/ITS/2015/04 23 June 2015 EBA FINAL draft Implementing Technical Standards amending Commission Implementing Regulation (EU) No 680/2014 (ITS on supervisory reporting) with regard to the Liquidity Coverage
Luxembourg, 7 August 2017
ALFI responses to ESMA consultation paper on draft technical advice, implementing technical standards and guidelines under the Money Market Fund Regulation Luxembourg, 7 August 2017 The Association of
Irish Retail Interest Rates: Why do they differ from the rest of Europe?
Irish Retail Interest Rates: Why do they differ from the rest of Europe? By Rory McElligott * ABSTRACT In this paper, we compare Irish retail interest rates with similar rates in the euro area, and examine
EBA/GL/2013/ Guidelines
EBA/GL/2013/01 06.12.2013 Guidelines on retail deposits subject to different outflows for purposes of liquidity reporting under Regulation (EU) No 575/2013, on prudential requirements for credit institutions
Bank of Ireland Presentation October As at 1 Oct 2014
Bank of Ireland Presentation October 2014 As at 1 Oct 2014 1 Forward-Looking statement This document contains certain forward-looking statements within the meaning of Section 21E of the US Securities Exchange
Money Market Funds in Ireland
Money Market Funds in Ireland Crane s European Money Fund Symposium Pat Lardner, Chief Executive Patrick Rooney, Regulatory Affairs Manager 18 September 2015, Dublin 1 Why Ireland for money market funds
/ v8. A Guide to Money Market Funds under the MMFR
A Guide to Money Market Funds under the MMFR Table of Contents Page 1. INTRODUCTION 2 2. KEY ELEMENTS OF THE MMFR 4 2.1 Scope 4 2.2 Types of MMFs 4 2.3 Investment Policy Requirements 6 2.3.1 Eligible Assets
Wells Fargo & Company. Liquidity Coverage Ratio Disclosure
Wells Fargo & Company Liquidity Coverage Ratio Disclosure For the quarter ended September 30, 2017 1 Table of Contents Introduction... 3 Executive Summary... 3 Company Overview... 4 LCR Rule Overview...
Draft Guideline. Liquidity Adequacy Requirements (LAR) Chapter 2 Liquidity Coverage Ratio Date: June 2017February 2019
Draft Guideline Subject: Liquidity Adequacy Requirements (LAR) Chapter 2 Date: June 2017February 2019 Subsection 485(1) and 949(1) of the Bank Act (BA), subsection 473(1) of the Trust and Loan Companies
African Bank Holdings Limited and African Bank Limited
African Bank Holdings Limited and African Bank Limited Public Pillar III Disclosures in terms of the Banks Act, Regulation 43 CONTENTS 1. Executive summary... 3 2. Basis of compilation... 9 3. Supplementary
STANDARD CHARTERED BANK (HONG KONG) LIMITED. Liquidity Coverage Ratio Current Period. Table 1: Average LCR for the quarter ended 31 st December 2015
Liquidity Coverage Ratio Current Period Table 1: Average LCR for the quarter ended 31 st December 2015 Table 2: Average LCR for the quarter ended 30 th September 2015 Table 3: Average LCR for the quarter
VOLUNTARY GUIDELINES FOR THE MANAGEMENT OF STABLE NET ASSET VALUE (NAV) LOCAL GOVERNMENT INVESTMENT POOLS
VOLUNTARY GUIDELINES FOR THE MANAGEMENT OF STABLE NET ASSET VALUE (NAV) LOCAL GOVERNMENT INVESTMENT POOLS Recommended Best Practices for Stable NAV LGIPs FEBRUARY 26, 2016 This document offers best practices
Wells Fargo & Company. Liquidity Coverage Ratio Disclosure
Wells Fargo & Company Liquidity Coverage Ratio Disclosure For the quarter ended September 30, 2018 1 Table of Contents Introduction... 3 Executive Summary... 3 Company Overview... 4 LCR Rule Overview...
DFSA OUTREACH SESSION Prudential Supervision 25 June 2018
DFSA OUTREACH SESSION Prudential Supervision 25 June 2018 Prudential Risks Agenda Opening Remarks Arvind Baghel, Director, Supervision Banking Supervision Update Arvind Baghel, Director, Supervision Overview
The BBA is pleased to respond to this consultation on the net stable funding ratio. Please find below are comments on the key issues in the paper.
BBA response to BCBS 271: Basel III: The Net Stable Funding Ratio Introduction The British Bankers Association ( BBA ) is the leading association for UK banking and financial services for the UK banking
Secretariat of the Basel Committee on Banking Supervision Bank for International Settlements CH-4002 Basel Switzerland.
SunTrust Banks, Inc. Mail Code: GA-Atlanta-0635 P.O. Box 4418 Atlanta, GA 30302 Secretariat of the Basel Committee on Banking Supervision Bank for International Settlements CH-4002 Basel Switzerland April
Revista Economică 67:Supplement (2015) THE BASEL III APPROACH ON LIQUIDITY RISK
THE BASEL III APPROACH ON LIQUIDITY RISK SBÂRCEA Ioana Raluca 1 Lucian Blaga University of Sibiu Abstract The Basel III agreement has emerged due to the need for a more efficient risk management in banking
Draft reports on the impact of the LCR and on uniform definitions of liquidity under Article 509 CRR
Draft reports on the impact of the LCR and on uniform definitions of liquidity under Article 509 CRR London, 23 October 2013 EBA European Banking Authority Disclaimer This presentation intends to inform
Feedback statement. Responses to the public consultation on a draft Guideline and Recommendation of the European Central Bank
Feedback statement Responses to the public consultation on a draft Guideline and Recommendation of the European Central Bank On the exercise of options and discretions available in Union law for less significant
Analysis of the first phase of the Funding for Growth Scheme
Analysis of the first phase of the Funding for Growth Scheme Summary The Magyar Nemzeti Bank announced the Funding for Growth Scheme (FGS) in April 2013. The first two pillars of the three-pillar Scheme
Consultation paper on CEBS s Guidelines on Liquidity Cost Benefit Allocation
10 March 2010 Consultation paper on CEBS s Guidelines on Liquidity Cost Benefit Allocation (CP 36) Table of contents 1. Introduction 2 2. Main objectives.. 3 3. Contents.. 3 4. The guidelines. 5 Annex
Regulatory change and monetary policy
Regulatory change and monetary policy 23 November 2015 Bill Nelson* Federal Reserve Board Conference on Financial Stability: Developments, Challenges and Policy Responses South African Reserve Bank *These
(Text with EEA relevance)
L 271/10 COMMISSION DELEGATED REGULATION (EU) 2018/1620 of 13 July 2018 amending Delegated Regulation (EU) 2015/61 to supplement Regulation (EU) No 575/2013 of the European Parliament and the Council with
Tailored to Small Markets: Implementation of Basel III Liquidity Requirements
Tailored to Small Markets: Implementation of Basel III Liquidity Requirements Christopher h Wilson Financial Supervision and Regulation Division Monetary and Capital Markets Department October 2015 Outline
29 January Dear Commissioner, Re: Call for evidence on EU regulatory framework for financial services
29 January 2016 Jonathan Hill, Lord Hill of Oareford Commissioner Financial Stability, Financial Services and Capital Markets Union European Commission Rue de la Loi / Wetstraat 200 1049 Brussels Belgium
European Money Market Fund Reform. A long time in the making. February 2017 For Professional Clients Only
European Money Market Fund Reform A long time in the making February 2017 For Professional Clients Only Executive summary After many years of debate the finishing line for the new European money market
LIQUIDITY MANAGEMENT UNDER BASEL III & KEY CHALLENGES FACED IN THE IMPLEMENTATION OF BASEL III
LIQUIDITY MANAGEMENT UNDER BASEL III & KEY CHALLENGES FACED IN THE IMPLEMENTATION OF BASEL III SUMMARY Basel III is a comprehensive set of reform BASEL III, which was introduced in January 2013, measures
UPDATE ON THE EBA REPORT ON LIQUIDITY MEASURES UNDER ARTICLE 509(1) OF THE CRR RESULTS BASED ON DATA AS OF 30 JUNE 2018.
UPDATE ON THE EBA REPORT ON LIQUIDITY MEASURES UNDER ARTICLE 509(1) OF THE CRR RESULTS BASED ON DATA AS OF 30 JUNE 2018 20 March 2019 Contents List of figures 3 List of tables 4 Abbreviations 5 Executive