Corporate Presentation

Transcription

1 Corporate Presentation February NYSE: DNR 1

2 Cautionary Statements Forward-Looking Statements: The data and/or statements contained in this presentation that are not historical facts are forward-looking statements that involve a number of risks and uncertainties. Such forward-looking statements may be or may concern, among other things, financial forecasts, future hydrocarbon prices and timing and degree of any price recovery versus the length or severity of the current commodity price downturn, current or future liquidity sources or their adequacy to support our anticipated future activities, our ability to further reduce our debt levels, possible future write-downs of oil and natural gas reserves, together with assumptions based on current and projected oil and gas prices and oilfield costs, current or future expectations or estimations of our cash flows, availability of capital, borrowing capacity, future interest rates, availability of advantageous commodity derivative contracts or the predicted cash flow benefits therefrom, forecasted capital expenditures, drilling activity or methods, including the timing and location thereof, estimated timing of commencement of CO 2 flooding of particular fields or areas, dates of completion of to-be-constructed industrial plants and the initial date of capture of CO 2 from such plants, timing of CO 2 injections and initial production responses in tertiary flooding projects, acquisition plans and proposals and dispositions, development activities, finding costs, anticipated future cost savings, capital budgets, interpretation or prediction of formation details, production rates and volumes or forecasts thereof, hydrocarbon reserve quantities and values, CO 2 reserves and supply and their availability, potential reserves, barrels or percentages of recoverable original oil in place, potential increases in regional or worldwide tariffs or other trade restrictions, the likelihood, timing and impact of increased interest rates, the impact of regulatory rulings or changes, anticipated outcomes of pending litigation, prospective legislation affecting the oil and gas industry, environmental regulations, mark-to-market values, competition, long-term forecasts of production, rates of return, estimated costs, changes in costs, future capital expenditures and overall economics, worldwide economic conditions and other variables surrounding our estimated original oil in place, operations and future plans. Such forward-looking statements generally are accompanied by words such as plan, estimate, expect, predict, forecast, to our knowledge, anticipate, projected, preliminary, should, assume, believe, may or other words that convey, or are intended to convey, the uncertainty of future events or outcomes. Such forward-looking information is based upon management s current plans, expectations, estimates, and assumptions and is subject to a number of risks and uncertainties that could significantly and adversely affect current plans, anticipated actions, the timing of such actions and our financial condition and results of operations. As a consequence, actual results may differ materially from expectations, estimates or assumptions expressed in or implied by any forward-looking statements made by us or on our behalf. Among the factors that could cause actual results to differ materially are fluctuations in worldwide oil prices or in U.S. oil prices and consequently in the prices received or demand for our oil and natural gas; decisions as to production levels and/or pricing by OPEC in future periods; levels of future capital expenditures; effects of our indebtedness; success of our risk management techniques; inaccurate cost estimates; availability of and fluctuations in the prices of goods and services; the uncertainty of drilling results and reserve estimates; operating hazards and remediation costs; disruption of operations and damages from well incidents, hurricanes, tropical storms, or forest fires; acquisition risks; requirements for capital or its availability; conditions in the worldwide financial, trade and credit markets; general economic conditions; competition; government regulations, including tax and environmental; and unexpected delays, as well as the risks and uncertainties inherent in oil and gas drilling and production activities or that are otherwise discussed in this presentation, including, without limitation, the portions referenced above, and the uncertainties set forth from time to time in our other public reports, filings and public statements including, without limitation, the Company s most recent Form 10-K. Statement Regarding Non-GAAP Financial Measures: This presentation also contains certain non-gaap financial measures. Any non-gaap measure included herein is accompanied by a reconciliation to the most directly comparable U.S. GAAP measure along with a statement on why the Company believes the measure is beneficial to investors, which statements are included at the end of this presentation. Note to U.S. Investors: Current SEC rules regarding oil and gas reserves information allow oil and gas companies to disclose in filings with the SEC not only proved reserves, but also probable and possible reserves that meet the SEC s definitions of such terms. We disclose only proved reserves in our filings with the SEC. Denbury s proved reserves as of December 31, 2015 and December 31, 2016 were estimated by DeGolyer and MacNaughton, an independent petroleum engineering firm. In this presentation, we may make reference to probable and possible reserves, some of which have been estimated by our independent engineers and some of which have been estimated by Denbury s internal staff of engineers. In this presentation, we also may refer to estimates of original oil in place, resource or reserves potential, barrels recoverable, or other descriptions of volumes potentially recoverable, which in addition to reserves generally classifiable as probable and possible (2P and 3P reserves), include estimates of resources that do not rise to the standards for possible reserves, and which SEC guidelines strictly prohibit us from including in filings with the SEC. These estimates, as well as the estimates of probable and possible reserves, are by their nature more speculative than estimates of proved reserves and are subject to greater uncertainties, and accordingly the likelihood of recovering those reserves is subject to substantially greater risk. 2

3 A Different Kind of Oil Company CO 2 enhanced oil recovery ( CO 2 EOR ) is our core focus We have uniquely long-lived & lower-risk assets with extraordinary resource potential Owning and controlling the CO 2 supply and infrastructure provides our strategic advantage We bring old oil fields back to life! Reserves YE 2016 CO 2 Supply Production 4Q16 Proved 254 MMBOE (58% CO 2 EOR, 97% Oil) Proved + Potential ~800 MMBOE Proved Reserves 6.5 Tcf Pipelines >1,100 miles Plus significant quantities of industrial-sourced CO 2 60,685 BOE/d (62% CO 2 EOR, 96% Oil) Rocky Mountain Region Headquarters Gulf Coast Region OPERATING AREAS Experience Nearly 2 decades of CO 2 EOR Production Produced over 155 million gross barrels from CO 2 EOR 3

4 Recovery of Original Oil in Place ( OOIP ) CO 2 EOR Process CO 2 Pipeline CO 2 Injection Well Production Well CO 2 EOR delivers almost as much production as primary or secondary recovery (1) Oil Formation Primary Secondary (Waterfloods) CO 2 EOR (Tertiary) ~ 20% ~ 18% ~ 17% Remaining oil CO 2 moves through formation mixing with oil, expanding and moving it toward producing wells (1) Based on OOIP at Denbury s Little Creek Field 4

5 U.S. Lower-48 CO 2 EOR Potential Up to 83 Billion Barrels of Technically Recoverable Oil (1)(2) Billion of Technically Recoverable Oil (1,2) (amounts in billions of barrels) Permian 9-21 East & Central Texas 6-15 Mid-Continent 6-13 California 3-7 South East Gulf Coast 3-7 Rockies 2-6 Other 0-5 Michigan/Illinois 2-4 Williston 1-3 Appalachia 1-2 1) Source: 2013 DOE NETL Next Gen EOR. 2) Total estimated recoveries on a gross basis utilizing CO 2 EOR. 5

6 Up to 16 Billion Gross Barrels Recoverable (1) in Our Two CO 2 EOR Target Areas 2.8 to 6.6 Billion Barrels Estimated Recoverable in Rocky Mountain Region (2) MT WY ND Denbury-operated fields represent ~10% of total potential (3) Existing Denbury CO 2 Pipelines Proposed Denbury CO 2 Pipelines TX LA MS AL Denbury owned oil fields Existing or Proposed CO 2 Source Owned or Contracted 1) Total estimated recoveries on a gross basis utilizing CO 2 EOR, based on a variety of recovery factors. 2) Source: 2013 DOE NETL Next Gen EOR 3) Using approximate mid-points of ranges, based on a variety of recovery factors. 3.7 to 9.1 Billion Barrels Estimated Recoverable in Gulf Coast Region (2) 6

7 Responding to Oil Price Volatility Down-Cycle Focus Reduce costs Optimize business Reduce debt Preserve cash and liquidity Looking Ahead Stabilize production and resume growth as oil prices improve Continue to improve balance sheet Maintain and enhance efficiencies gained through the down-cycle Pursue opportunities to increase or accelerate growth 7

8 2017 Capital Budget & Production Guidance 2017 Development Capital Budget (1) Primarily focused on expanding existing CO 2 floods and other infill opportunities Tertiary Projects Phase development at Hastings, Heidelberg, Delhi and Bell Creek Conformance work Non-Tertiary Projects Cedar Creek Anticline Other exploitation opportunities 2017 Production Guidance Expect 2017 full-year production to be relatively flat with 2016 exit rate on capital spending of ~$300 million DEVELOPMENT CAPITAL BUDGET (in millions) ~$300 Million Total Spending expected to be slightly more than currently estimated cash flow $10 $60 $55 $175 Tertiary Non-Tertiary CO2 Sources & Other Capitalized Items CONTINUING PRODUCTION (BOE/D) (3) 62,998 60,000 58,000-62,000 ~ (2) Anticipate slight production growth for 2018 based on current assumptions and expectations 2016 CapEx (1) ~$209 MM FY Exit Rate 2017E 2017E CapEx (1) ~$300 MM 1) 2016 development capital spending and 2017 estimated development capital budget presented exclude acquisitions and capitalized interest capitalized interest currently estimated at ~$20 million. 2) Includes capitalized internal acquisition, exploration and development costs and pre-production tertiary startup costs. 3) Continuing production excludes production from properties sold in See slide 27 for more detail on continuing production. 8

9 2016 Reserves Update (1) Oil (MMBbl) Gas (Bcf) Total MMBOE PV-10 Value (2) SEC Oil Pricing (1) Proved reserves at December 31, $2.3 Billion $50.28 Revisions of previous estimates (9) 16 (7) 2016 production (22) (6) (23) Sales of minerals or other revisions (4) (4) (5) Proved reserves at December 31, $1.5 Billion $42.75 PDP % PNP 32 12% PUD 45 18% Total MMBOE % 1) Estimated proved reserves and PV-10 Value for year-end 2016 were computed using first-day-of-the-month 12-month average prices of $42.75 per Bbl for oil (based on NYMEX prices) and $2.55 per million British thermal unit ( MMBtu ) for natural gas (based on Henry Hub cash prices), adjusted for prices received at the field. Comparative prices for year-end 2015 were $50.28 per Bbl of oil and $2.63 per MMBtu for natural gas, adjusted for prices received at the field. 2) PV-10 Value is an estimated discounted net present value of Denbury s proved reserves at December 31, 2015 and 2016, before projected income taxes, using a 10% per annum discount rate (a non-gaap measure). See the Form 8-K filed February 14, 2017, as well as slide 34 indicating why the Company believes this non-gaap measure is useful to investors. 9

10 Gulf Coast Region Control of CO 2 Sources & Pipeline Infrastructure Provides a Strategic Advantage Cumulative Production MMBOE MMBOE > 100 MMBOE Summary (1) Tertiary Reserves: Proved 130 Potential 313 Non-Tertiary Reserves: Proved 22 Total MMBOE (2) 465 Pipelines Denbury Operated Pipelines Denbury Proposed Pipelines Denbury Owned Fields Current CO 2 Floods Denbury Owned Fields Future CO 2 Floods Fields Owned by Others CO 2 EOR Candidates 1) Proved tertiary and non-tertiary oil and natural gas reserves based upon year-end 12/31/16 SEC pricing. Potential includes probable and possible tertiary reserves estimated by the Company as of 12/31/16, using the mid-point of ranges, based upon a variety of recovery factors and long-term oil price assumptions, which also may include estimates of resources that do not rise to the standards of possible reserves. 2) Total reserves in this table represent total proved plus potential tertiary reserves, using the mid-point of ranges, plus proved nontertiary reserves, but excluding additional potential related to nontertiary exploitation opportunities. 3) Field reserves shown are estimated proved plus potential tertiary reserves. TX (2) Houston Area (3) Hastings MMBbls Webster MMBbls Thompson MMBbls Manvel 8-12 MMBbls MMBbls Conroe Webster Thompson Manvel Hastings Conroe (3) 130 MMBbls ~90 Miles Cost: ~$220MM Oyster Bayou Mature Area (3) 60 MMBbls Oyster Bayou (3) 20 MMBbls Green Pipeline ~325 Miles Delhi (3) 30 MMBOEs Jackson Dome 10 LA Delhi Tinsley Davis HeidelbergQuitma Martinville n West Gwinville Sandersville Summerland Cypress Pipeline Soso Eucutta Yellow Creek Creek Brookhaven Cranfield Mallalieu Olive Little Creek Citronelle Smithdale McComb Lockhart Crossing Donaldsonville Tinsley (3) 25 MMBbls Free State Pipeline MS Heidelberg (3) 30 MMBbls AL

11 Rocky Mountain Region Control of CO 2 Sources & Pipeline Infrastructure Provides a Strategic Advantage Tertiary Reserves: Proved Potential Pipelines & CO 2 Sources Denbury Pipelines Denbury Proposed Pipelines Pipelines Owned by Others Existing or Proposed CO 2 Source - Owned or Contracted Cumulative Production MMBOE MMBOE > 100 MMBOE Summary (1) Non-Tertiary Reserves: Proved 84 Total MMBOEs (2) 439 Denbury Owned Fields Current CO 2 Floods Denbury Owned Fields Future CO 2 Floods Fields Owned by Others CO 2 EOR Candidates 1) Proved tertiary and non-tertiary oil and natural gas reserves based upon year-end 12/31/16 SEC pricing. Potential includes probable and possible tertiary reserves estimated by the Company as of 12/31/16, using the mid-point of ranges, based upon a variety of recovery factors and long-term oil price assumptions, which also may include estimates of resources that do not rise to the standards of possible reserves. 2) Total reserves in this table represent total proved plus potential tertiary reserves, using the mid-point of ranges, plus proved non-tertiary reserves, but excluding additional potential related to non-tertiary exploitation opportunities. 3) Field reserves shown are estimated proved plus potential tertiary reserves. 4) The JV arrangement provides for the Company s joint venture partner to fund up to $55 million of the remaining estimated capital to complete development of the facility and fieldwork in exchange for a 14% higher working interest and a disproportionate sharing of revenue from the first 2 million barrels of production. Currently anticipate production startup by mid Shute Creek (XOM) WY Riley Ridge (DNR) ~250 Miles Cost:~$400MM 11 Elk Basin Existing CO2 Pipeline MT MONTANA Lost Cabin (COP) Bell Creek (3) MMBbls Gas Draw (3) 10 MMBbls Grieve (3) 5 MMBbls August 2016 JV Arrangement (4) Greencore Pipeline 232 Miles Hartzog Draw (3) MMBbls Cedar Creek Anticline Area (3) DGC Beulah MMBbls ~110 Miles Cost:~$150MM ND NORTH DAKOTA SD NE

12 Ample CO 2 Supply & No Significant Capital Required for Several Years Gulf Coast CO 2 Supply Jackson Dome Proved CO 2 reserves as of 12/31/16: ~5.3 Tcf (1) Additional probable and possible CO2 reserves as of 12/31/16: ~1.2 Tcf Currently producing at less than 60% of capacity Industrial-Sourced CO 2 Air Products: hydrogen plant - ~45 MMcf/d PCS Nitrogen: ammonia products - ~20 MMcf/d Mississippi Power: power plant - ~160 MMcf/d (2) Rocky Mountain CO 2 Supply LaBarge Area Estimated field size: 750 square miles Estimated recoverable CO 2 : 100 Tcf Shute Creek - ExxonMobil Operated Proved reserves as of 12/31/16: ~1.2 Tcf Denbury has a 1/3 overriding royalty interest and could receive up to ~115 MMcf/d of CO 2 by 2021 at current plant capacity Riley Ridge Denbury Operated Future potential source of CO2: ~2.8 Tcf Gas processing facility shut-in since mid-2014 due to facility issues and sulfur build-up in gas supply wells Evaluation of issues and corrective options ongoing Lost Cabin ConocoPhillips Operated Denbury could receive up to ~40 MMcf/d of CO 2 at current plant capacity 1) Reported on a gross (8/8th s) basis. 2) Estimated startup in first half of Volumes presented are based upon preliminary projections from Mississippi Power and represent maximum volumes once the power plant is running at full capacity, which is currently estimated to occur in ~

13 CO 2 Costs per BOE Total Company Injected Volumes (MMcf/d) Sustained Improvement in CO 2 Efficiency 1, % 18% Jackson Dome CO 2 Industrial-sourced CO % REDUCTION SINCE 1Q15 1Q15 2Q15 3Q15 4Q15 1Q16 2Q16 3Q16 4Q % REDUCTION SINCE 4Q % 22% $4.00 $3.00 $2.00 $1.00 $ Q15 2Q15 3Q15 4Q15 1Q16 2Q16 3Q16 4Q16 1) CO 2 costs in 4Q15 include workovers carried out at Jackson Dome of $3 million, or $0.46 per BOE. (1) 13 $0.50 $0.40 $0.30 $0.20 $0.10 $- CO 2 Costs per Mcf of CO 2

14 Continued Improvement of Cash Operating Costs 21% REDUCTION FY 2016 vs. FY 2014 CORPORATE CASH COSTS $42.81 $36.16 $ % REDUCTION FY 2016 vs. FY 2015 $/BOE FY 2014 FY 2015 FY 2016 G&A - Cash (1) Interest - Cash(2) Corporate Total Production & Ad Valorem Taxes Marketing Expenses LOE(1)(3) Field Level Total FIELD LEVEL CASH COSTS Avg. Realized Price per BOE (4) $87.33 $45.61 $39.95 Note: The numbers presented within this table may not agree to per-boe data presented in our consolidated financial statements due to certain amounts not settled in cash. 1) Amounts presented exclude stock compensation. 2) Amounts include capitalized interest for all periods presented. In addition, interest expense for YTD 2016 includes interest on our new 9% Senior Secured Notes, accounted for as debt for financial reporting purposes. 3) Amounts in YTD 2015 exclude a reimbursement for a retroactive utility rate adjustment ($10MM) and an insurance reimbursement for previous well control costs ($4MM). 4) Amounts exclude derivative settlements. 14

15 Competitive Operating Margin 3Q16 Peer Operating Margins ($/BOE) $25 $20 Peer Average $15 $10 $5 $- Peer A Peer B Peer C Peer D Peer E DNR Peer F Peer G Peer H Peer I Peer J Peer K Peer L Peer M Peer N Peer O Operating Margin per BOE (1) (2) Lifting Cost per BOE (3) Revenue per BOE Source: Bloomberg and Company filings for period ended 9/30/2016. Peers include CLR, COP, CRC, CXO, DVN, MRO, MUR, NBL, NFX, OAS, OXY, PXD, RRC, SM, and WLL. 1) Operating margin calculated as revenues less lifting costs. 2) Lifting cost calculated as lease operating expenses, marketing/transportation expenses and production and ad valorem taxes. 3) Revenues exclude gain/loss on derivative settlements. Highest revenue per BOE in the peer group 15

16 Ample Liquidity & Significant Debt Reductions Ample Liquidity & No Near-Term Maturities (1) $ in millions Borrowing Base Undrawn & Available LC s Drawn $1,050 $674 $615 $773 $622 $215 $ % 9% 6.375% 5.50% 4.625% Sr. Secured Bank Credit Facility $ in millions Sr. Secured Second Lien Notes Sr. Subordinated Notes Bank Credit Facility: $674 million in liquidity as of 12/31/16 $385 million basket for additional junior lien debt No near-term covenant concerns at current strip prices $530 Million Total Debt Principal Reduction during 2016 $3,571 12/31/14 Total Debt Principal $(105) $3,310 $(443) 12/31/15 Total Debt Principal Open-Market Debt Purchases (net) Debt Exchanges (net) Change in Bank Revolver & Other Debt Reductions (as of 12/31/16): 16% reduction in total debt principal since YE15 22% reduction in total debt principal since YE14 16 $18 $2,780 12/31/16 Total Debt Principal (2) 1) All balances presented as of 12/31/16. 2) Excludes $229 million of future interest payable on the 9% Senior Secured Second Lien Notes due 2021 accounted for as debt for financial reporting purposes.

17 Debt Structure Total Debt Principal Reduction during 2016 $530 million 1) Included in the exchange were 40.7 million shares of Denbury common stock. 2) Represents future interest payable on the 9% Senior Secured Second Lien Notes due 2021 accounted for as debt for financial reporting purposes. Debt ($ in millions) 12/31/2015 Open-Market Debt Purchases Debt Exchanges (1) Other 12/31/2016 Senior Secured Bank Credit Facility % Senior Secured Second Lien Notes due Total senior secured debt ⅜% Senior Subordinated Notes due (10) (175) 215 5½% Senior Subordinated Notes due ,250 (66) (411) 773 4⅝% Senior Subordinated Notes due ,200 (106) (472) 622 Other subordinated notes 2 2 Total subordinated debt 2,852 (182) (1,058) 1,612 Pipeline financings 212 (9) 203 Capital lease obligations 71 (22) 49 Total principal balance 3,310 (106) (443) 19 2,780 Future interest payable on 9% Senior Secured Second Lien Notes due 2021 (2) 255 (26) 229 Issuance costs on senior subordinated notes (32) (16) Total debt, net of debt issuance costs on senior subordinated notes 3,278 (104) (177) (4) 2,993 17

18 Collars Swaps Oil Hedge Protection Detail as of February 22, Q17 2Q17 3Q17 4Q17 WTI NYMEX Fixed-Price Swaps Argus LLS Fixed-Price Swaps WTI NYMEX Collars WTI NYMEX 3-Way Collars Argus LLS Collars Argus LLS 3-Way Collars Volumes Hedged (Bbls/d) 22,000 22,000 Swap Price (1) $42.67 $43.99 Volumes Hedged (Bbls/d) 10,000 7,000 Swap Price (1) $43.77 $45.35 Volumes Hedged (Bbls/d) 4,000 1,000 Floor/Ceiling Price (1) $40/$54.80 $40/$70 Volumes Hedged (Bbls/d) 14,500 11,000 Sold Put Price/Floor/Ceiling Price (1)(2) $30/$40/$69.09 $30/$40/$69.67 Volumes Hedged (Bbls/d) 3,000 Floor/Ceiling Price (1) $40/$57.23 Volumes Hedged (Bbls/d) 2,000 1,000 Sold Put Price/Floor/Ceiling Price (1)(2) $31/$41/$69.25 $31/$41/$70.25 Total Volumes Hedged 39,000 29,000 16,500 13,000 1) Averages are volume weighted. 2) If oil prices were to average less than the sold put price, receipts on settlement would be limited to the difference between the floor price and sold put price. 18

19 Delhi NGL Plant In Service Late December 2016 Extracts NGLs from our gas stream to be sold separately Improves the Delhi flood with a purer CO 2 recycle stream Self-generates power using extracted methane Delhi Field 2016 CapEx: ~$55 million Delhi Field 19

20 Key Takeaways Looking Ahead Stabilize production and resume growth as oil prices improve Continue to improve balance sheet Maintain and enhance efficiencies gained through the down-cycle Pursue opportunities to increase or accelerate growth Our Advantages Long-Term Visibility CO 2 EOR is a proven process Long-lived and lower-risk assets Tremendous resource potential Capital Flexibility Relatively low capital intensity Able to adjust to the oil price environment Competitive Advantages Large inventory of oil fields Strategic CO 2 supply and over 1,100 miles of CO 2 pipelines 20

21 Appendix

22 MBbls/d CO 2 EOR is a Proven Process Significant CO 2 EOR Operators by Region Gulf Coast Region» Denbury Resources Permian Basin Region» Occidental» Kinder Morgan Rocky Mountain Region» Denbury Resources» Devon» FDL» Chevron Canada» Cenovus» Apache Significant CO 2 Supply by Region Gulf Coast Region» Jackson Dome, MS (Denbury Resources)» Port Arthur, TX (Denbury Resources)» Geismar, LA (Denbury Resources)» Mississippi Power (Denbury Resources) Permian Basin Region» Bravo Dome, NM (Kinder Morgan, Occidental)» McElmo Dome, CO (ExxonMobil, Kinder Morgan)» Sheep Mountain, CO (ExxonMobil, Occidental) Rocky Mountain Region» LaBarge, WY (ExxonMobil, Denbury Resources)» Lost Cabin, WY (ConocoPhillips) Canada» Dakota Gasification (Cenovus, Apache) Gulf Coast/Other Mid-Continent Rocky Mountains Permian Basin LaBarge McElmo Dome Naturally Occurring CO 2 Source Industrial-Sourced CO 2 CO 2 EOR Oil Production by Region (1) DGC Lost Cabin Sheep Mountain Bravo Dome Port Arthur Geismar MS Power (2) Jackson Dome 1) Source: Advanced Resources International 2) Estimated startup in 2017.

23 Actual Industry Recovery Curves Range of Recovery 10%-18% An auditor s view, Mike Stell, Ryder Scott, Permian Basin Study Group, April 4, 2011 Reserve booking guidelines, Mike Stell, Ryder Scott, CO 2 Conference, Midland December 8, 2005 What is important in the reservoir, Richard Baker, Appega Conference, April 22,

24 Actual Curves Denbury Mature Fields Range of Recovery 11%-20+% 24

25 (In millions) 2016 Change in Bank Credit Facility $350 Adjusted Cash Flow (1) $264 Development Capital Expenditures (209) $300 $250 Acquisitions (11) Capitalized Interest (26) Total $18 $(65) $301 $200 $(59) $150 $175 $18 $57 $(77) $100 $50 $0 YE2015 Bank Facility Ending Balance Adjusted Cash Flow From Operations (1), Net of CapEx Proceeds From Asset Divestitures (3) Note Repurchases Changes in Working & Accrued Capital Capital Lease Payments & Other YE2016 Bank Facility Ending Balance 1) Cash flow from operations before working capital changes (a non-gaap measure). See press release attached as Exhibit 99.1 to the Form 8-K filed February 23, 2017 for additional information, as well as slide 33 indicating why the Company believes this non-gaap measure is useful to investors. 2) Represents proceeds realized (after closing adjustments) from the Williston asset sale and other minor property divestitures during the period. 25

26 Senior Secured Bank Credit Facility Info Commitments & borrowing base $1.05 billion Redetermination Maturity date December 9, 2019 Semi-annually May 1 st and November 1 st Permitted bond repurchases Up to $225 million of bond repurchases (~$148 million remaining as of 12/31/2016) Junior lien debt Allows for the incurrence of up to $1 billion of junior lien debt (subject to customary requirements) ($615 million issued to date as of 12/31/2016) Anti-hoarding provisions Pricing grid If > $250 million borrowed, unrestricted cash held in accounts is limited to $225 million Utilization Libor margin (bps) ABR margin (bps) Undrawn pricing (bps) Based X >90% >=75% X <90% >=50% X <75% >=25% X <50% X <25% Financial Performance Covenants 2017 Q1 Q2 Q3 Q Total net debt to EBITDAX (max) (1) N/A 6.0x 5.5x 5.0x 5.0x 4.25x Senior secured debt (2) to EBITDAX (max) 3.0x N/A N/A N/A N/A N/A EBITDAX to interest charges (min) 1.25x N/A N/A N/A N/A N/A Current ratio (min) 1.0x 1.0x 1.0x 1.0x 1.0x 1.0x 1) For purposes of the total net debt to EBITDAX calculation, EBITDAX will be annualized for each of the first three quarters of 2018, building to a full trailing twelve months by the fourth quarter of ) Based solely on bank debt. 26

27 Production by Area Average Daily Production (BOE/d) Field Q15 2Q15 3Q15 4Q Q16 2Q16 3Q16 4Q Mature area (1) 11,817 10,801 11,170 10,946 10,403 10,830 9,666 9,415 8,653 8,440 9,040 Delhi (2) 4,340 3,551 3,623 3,676 3,898 3,688 3,971 3,996 4,262 4,387 4,155 Hastings 4,777 4,694 5,350 5,114 5,082 5,061 5,068 4,972 4,729 4,552 4,829 Heidelberg 5,707 6,027 5,885 5,600 5,635 5,785 5,346 5,246 5,000 4,924 5,128 Oyster Bayou 4,683 5,861 5,936 5,962 5,831 5,898 5,494 5,088 4,767 4,988 5,083 Tinsley 8,507 8,928 8,740 7,311 7,522 8,119 7,899 7,335 6,756 6,786 7,192 Bell Creek 1,248 1,965 1,880 2,225 2,806 2,221 3,020 3,160 3,032 3,269 3,121 Total tertiary production 41,079 41,827 42,584 40,834 41,177 41,602 40,464 39,212 37,199 37,346 38,548 Gulf Coast non-tertiary 9,138 8,797 8,153 8,511 8,647 8,526 7,370 5,577 5,735 6,457 6,284 Cedar Creek Anticline 18,834 18,522 18,089 17,515 17,875 17,997 17,778 16,325 16,017 15,186 16,322 Other Rockies non-tertiary 3,106 3,107 2,872 2,593 2,407 2,743 2,070 1,862 1,763 1,696 1,844 Total non-tertiary production 31,078 30,426 29,114 28,619 28,929 29,266 27,218 23,764 23,515 23,339 24,450 Total continuing production 72,157 72,253 71,698 69,453 70,106 70,868 67,682 62,976 60,714 60,685 62,998 Williston assets (3) 1,744 1,643 1,561 1,522 1,473 1,549 1,364 1, Other property divestitures Total production 74,432 74,356 73,716 71,410 72,002 72,861 69,351 64,506 61,533 60,685 64,003 1) Mature area includes Brookhaven, Cranfield, Eucutta, Little Creek, Lockhart Crossing, Mallalieu, Martinville, McComb, and Soso fields. 2) Beginning with the fourth quarter of 2014, average daily Delhi Field production amounts reflect the reversionary assignment of approximately 25% of our interest in that field effective November 1, ) Includes non-tertiary production in the Rocky Mountain region related to the sale of remaining non-core assets in the Williston Basin of North Dakota and Montana, which closed in the third quarter of

28 NYMEX Oil Differential Summary Crude Oil Differentials $ per barrel Q15 2Q15 3Q15 4Q Q16 2Q16 3Q16 4Q Tertiary Oil Fields Gulf Coast Region $2.11 $(0.22) $2.04 $0.98 $(0.97) $0.60 $(1.95) $(0.98) $(0.82) $(0.81) $(1.35) Rocky Mountain Region (11.10) (2.09) (2.81) (1.30) (1.81) (2.74) (3.09) (2.43) (2.01) (1.74) (2.16) Gulf Coast Non-Tertiary (0.28) (0.71) (0.34) (0.19) (1.95) (3.16) (0.36) (0.79) (1.89) Cedar Creek Anticline (9.78) (7.95) (6.48) (4.55) (3.08) (5.49) (4.82) (3.77) (2.90) (2.04) (3.77) Other Rockies Non-Tertiary (12.03) (9.84) (8.48) (8.10) (6.91) (8.12) (8.90) (7.66) (6.33) (3.44) (8.63) Denbury Totals $(2.21) $(2.81) $(0.89) $(0.96) $(1.74) $(1.55) $(3.02) $(2.18) $(1.57) $(1.22) $(2.29) 28

29 Analysis of Total Operating Costs Total Operating Costs $/BOE Q15 2Q15 3Q15 4Q Q16 2Q16 3Q16 4Q CO 2 Costs $3.79 $3.03 $2.71 $2.17 $2.70 (1) $2.66 $1.97 $2.13 $2.17 $2.40 $2.16 Power & Fuel Labor & Overhead Repairs & Maintenance Chemicals Workovers Other Total Normalized LOE (2) $24.10 $21.08 $19.62 $19.21 $19.31 $19.81 $16.23 $17.04 $18.23 $18.98 $17.56 Special or Unusual Items (3) (0.26) (2.09) (0.51) Thompson Field Repair Costs (4) Total LOE $23.84 $21.08 $19.70 $17.34 $19.31 $19.37 $16.23 $17.04 $18.82 $18.98 $17.71 Oil Pricing NYMEX Oil Price $92.95 $48.83 $57.81 $46.70 $42.15 $48.85 $33.73 $45.56 $45.02 $49.25 $43.41 Realized Oil Price (5) $90.74 $46.02 $56.92 $45.74 $40.41 $47.30 $30.71 $43.38 $43.45 $48.03 $ ) CO 2 costs in 4Q15 include workovers carried out at Jackson Dome of $3 million, or $0.46 per BOE. 2) Normalized LOE excludes special or unusual items and Thompson Field repair costs (see footnote 3 and 4 below), but includes $12MM of workover expenses at Riley Ridge during ) Special or unusual items consist of Delhi remediation charges, net of insurance reimbursements of ($7MM) in 2014, and a reimbursement for a retroactive utility rate adjustment ($10MM) and an insurance reimbursement for previous well control costs ($4MM) in 3Q15. 4) Represents repair costs to return Thompson Field to production following weather-related flooding in 2Q16 and 2Q15. 5) Excludes derivative settlements. 29

30 Analysis of Tertiary Operating Costs Tertiary Operating Costs $/Bbl Q15 2Q15 3Q15 4Q Q16 2Q16 3Q16 4Q CO 2 Costs $6.87 $5.39 $4.69 $3.79 $4.72 (1) $4.65 $3.38 $3.51 $3.59 $3.89 $3.59 Power & Fuel Labor & Overhead Repairs & Maintenance Chemicals Workovers Other Total Normalized LOE (2) $25.68 $22.70 $20.52 $19.62 $20.25 $20.77 $16.89 $17.68 $18.07 $19.04 $17.90 Special or Unusual Items (3) (0.47) (3.64) (0.90) Total LOE $25.21 $22.70 $20.52 $15.98 $20.25 $19.87 $16.89 $17.68 $18.07 $19.04 $17.90 Oil Pricing NYMEX Oil Price $92.95 $48.83 $57.81 $46.70 $42.15 $48.85 $33.73 $45.56 $45.02 $49.25 $43.41 Realized Oil Price (4) $94.65 $48.52 $59.63 $47.56 $41.13 $49.27 $31.70 $44.46 $44.11 $48.35 $ ) CO 2 costs in 4Q15 include workovers carried out at Jackson Dome of $3 million, or $0.80 per Bbl. 2) Normalized LOE excludes special or unusual items. See footnote (3) below. 3) Special or unusual items consist of Delhi remediation charges, net of insurance reimbursements of ($7MM) in 2014, and a reimbursement for a retroactive utility rate adjustment ($10MM) and an insurance reimbursement for previous well control costs ($4MM) in 3Q15. 4) Excludes derivative settlements. 30

31 2017 Capital Budget Highlights Tertiary $MM Non-Tertiary $MM Bell Creek $25 Cedar Creek Anticline $25 Development Capital Budget (1) Heidelberg $30 Exploitation $15 ~$300 MM Total Hastings $30 Other $20 Tinsley $15 Total $60 Delhi $20 Tertiary Non-Tertiary Other $55 CO2 Sources & Other Capitalized Items (2) Total $175 $10 $60 $55 $175 Hastings Fault Block B/C Upper Frio Development Fault Block A (Current) 2017 Fault Blocks B/C Fault Blocks D/E Fault Blocks G-M Bell Creek Phase 5 CO 2 EOR Development Phase 9 1) 2017 estimated development capital budget presented excludes acquisitions and capitalized interest. 2) Includes capitalized internal acquisition, exploration and development costs and pre-production tertiary startup costs Phase 5 Phases 1-4 (Current) Phase 8 31 Phase 7 Phase 6 Heidelberg Christmas Yellow Sand Ph1 & Ph2 Development Christmas Red & Green Sand Reconfigurations Future Future Future

32 NYMEX Crude Oil Price / Bbl CO 2 Cost & NYMEX Oil Price CO2 Costs / Mcf (1) $0.55 $0.50 $0.45 $0.40 $0.35 $0.30 $0.25 $0.20 $0.15 $0.10 $0.05 $0.00 Q1 13 Q2 13 Q3 13 Q4 13 Q1 14 Q2 14 Q3 14 Q4 14 Q1 15 Q2 15 Q3 15 Q4 15 Q1 16 Q2 16 Q3 16 Q4 16 Industrial-Sourced Sourced CO 2 % 4% 10% 12% 14% 16% 16% 15% 15% 18% 22% 22% 23% 23% 25% 22% 22% Tax Purchases OPEX NYMEX Crude Oil Price $ ) Excludes DD&A on CO 2 wells and facilities; includes Gulf Coast & Rocky Mountain industrial-source CO 2 costs. 2) CO 2 costs in 4Q15 include workovers carried out at Jackson Dome of $3 million, or $0.05 per Mcf. 32 (2) $110 $100 $90 $80 $70 $60 $50 $40 $30 $20 $10 $0

33 Non-GAAP Measures Reconciliation of net loss (GAAP measure) to adjusted cash flows from operations (non-gaap measure) to cash flows from operations (GAAP measure) In millions Q1 Q2 Q3 Q4 FY Q1 Q2 Q3 Q4 FY Net loss (GAAP measure) $(108) $(1,148) $(2,244) $(885) $(4,385) $(185) $(381) $(25) $(386) $(976) Adjustments to reconcile to adjusted cash flows from operations Depletion, depreciation, and amortization Deferred income taxes (66) (634) (732) (500) (1,932) (95) (223) (14) (212) (543) Stock-based compensation Noncash fair value adjustments on commodity derivatives (29) (5) 212 Gain on debt extinguishment (95) (12) (8) - (115) Write-down of oil and natural gas properties 146 1,706 1,761 1,327 4, Impairment of goodwill - - 1,262-1, Other - - (2) Adjusted cash flows from operations (non-gaap measure) $195 $252 $243 $129 $819 $57 $93 $62 $53 $264 Net change in assets and liabilities relating to operations (57) (55) (32) 34 7 (45) Cash flows from operations (GAAP measure) $138 $289 $273 $165 $864 $2 $61 $96 $60 $219 Adjusted cash flows from operations is a non-gaap measure that represents cash flows provided by operations before changes in assets and liabilities, as summarized from the Company s Consolidated Statements of Cash Flows. Adjusted cash flows from operations measures the cash flows earned or incurred from operating activities without regard to the collection or payment of associated receivables or payables. Management believes that it is important to consider this additional measure, along with cash flows from operations, as it believes the non-gaap measure can often be a better way to discuss changes in operating trends in its business caused by changes in production, prices, operating costs and related factors, without regard to whether the earned or incurred item was collected or paid during that period. 33

34 Non-GAAP Measures (Cont.) Reconciliation of the standardized measure of discounted estimated future net cash flows after income taxes (GAAP measure) to PV-10 Value (non- GAAP measure) December 31, In millions Standardized Measure (GAAP measure) $1,890 $1,399 Discounted estimated future income tax PV-10 Value (non-gaap measure) $2,319 $1,542 PV-10 Value is a non-gaap measure and is different from the Standardized Measure in that PV-10 Value is a pre-tax number and the Standardized Measure is an after-tax number. Denbury s 2015 and 2016 year-end estimated proved oil and natural gas reserves were prepared by the independent reservoir engineering firm of DeGolyer and MacNaughton. The information used to calculate PV-10 Value is derived directly from data determined in accordance with FASC Topic 932. Management believes PV-10 Value is a useful supplemental disclosure to the Standardized Measure because the Standardized Measure can be impacted by a company s unique tax situation, and it is not practical to calculate the Standardized Measure on a property-by-property basis. Because of this, PV-10 Value is a widely used measure within the industry and is commonly used by securities analysts, banks and credit rating agencies to evaluate the estimated future net cash flows from proved reserves on a comparative basis across companies or specific properties. PV-10 Value is commonly used by management and others in the industry to evaluate properties that are bought and sold, to assess the potential return on investment in the Company s oil and natural gas properties, and to perform impairment testing of oil and natural gas properties. PV-10 Value is not a measure of financial or operating performance under GAAP, nor should it be considered in isolation or as a substitute for the Standardized Measure. PV-10 Value and the Standardized Measure do not purport to represent the fair value of the Company s oil and natural gas reserves. 34