Tranche Warfare, CDOs in Default
|
|
- Matilda Bryan
- 5 years ago
- Views:
Transcription
1 2008 ANNUAL MEETING AND EDUCATION CONFERENCE American College of Investment Counsel New York, NY Tranche Warfare, CDOs in Default 9:30 a.m. - 10:30 a.m. October 24, 2008 MODERATOR: Cynthia J. Williams Dechert LLP PANELISTS: Richard F. Buckley, Jr. Massachusetts Mutual Life Insurance Company Amelia M. Charamba Nixon Peabody LLP Eric Saari TIAA-CREF
2 I. Introduction of Panelists 2008 ACIC Annual Meeting October 24 9:30 10:30 a.m. Tranche Warfare, CDOs in Default Presentation Outline II. III. Overview of recent history of the CDO/CLO market by size, sector and recent issuance Overview on the CDO market and the credit crunch A. Reliance on subprime RMBS and synthetic ABS/RMBS in many CDOs B. How subprime RMBS underperformed rating agency worst case scenarios 1. Incentives of major market participants: a. Mortgage bankers: front end compensation incentivized the origination of high yield RMBS and no skin in the game after origination. b. Warehouse loans provided by investment banks and commercial banks who earned fees and interest on the warehouse loans and, to the extent they took the risk of loss, also earned the excess spread above related warehouse loan interest/any gain on portfolio during the warehouse period. Sponsors, servicers, Collateral Managers and hedge funds sometimes took all or a portion of the risk of loss and related excess spread/gain. c. Investment banks earned investment banking fees at term securitization of the mortgage loans into RMBS and also upon repackaging of RMBS and ABS into CDOs. The investment banks and their affiliates could retain that portion of the transaction they wanted to retain (frequently retaining the super senior AAA rated tranche with its low regulatory capital requirements) and, as administrator to affiliated commercial paper conduits and SIVs, could invest in any commercial paper issued at the senior level of the transaction. d. For balance sheet transactions, loan originators achieved inexpensive long term financing for their portfolios while retaining management control. e. Rating agencies reviewed RMBS, synthetic and CDO structures, requiring revisions if needed to meet rating requirements, and earned up front fees and frequently ongoing fees for rating the rated securities issued in the transaction, as well as initial and ongoing fees for providing ratings or credit estimate for individual assets in certain of the transactions (such as loans in CLOs). f. Servicers/Collateral Managers earned senior, subordinate and sometimes incentive management fees and increased assets under management BUSINESS DRAFT
3 g. Trustees and their affiliates earned trustee fees, collateral administrator fees and back-up servicing fees. origination. 2. Relaxation (failure) of both underwriting and diligence standards at a. No documentation loans; no downpayment required; reach for yield/origination fees. b. Appraisals, some of them fraudulent, in an era which believed property values could only go up and employment/economy strong. appraisers. c. Residential speculation/fraud and abuse by mortgagors and 3. Relaxation (failure) of underwriting and diligence standards at securitization, particularly in transactions involving second lien loans and lower grade structured finance CDOs. a. Reliance by sponsors, investment banks, rating agencies and investors on models dependent on historical inputs during a real estate market spiraling upward in a good economy for residential mortgage loans whose underwriting and diligence standards were ever looser. b. Very limited diligence on underlying residential mortgage loans beyond review of tape data; no real auditing of the portfolio by going back to the mortgage borrower and confirming information provided. heavily on ratings. c. Limited or no investor diligence with some investors relying too 4. By mid 2007, actual delinquency and payment default experience on subprime mortgage loans in recently issued RMBS transactions was in excess of rating agency assumptions used to establish RMBS ratings in stress test models and residential real estate values were falling so that rating assumptions regarding historical realization on foreclosure also would not be met. Result: continuing downgrades of RMBS securities. 5. The downgrade of monoline insurers providing financial guarantees to the most senior tranches of RMBS securities which were underwritten by the rating agencies one notch below the monoline insurer s credit rating also resulted in downgrades. C. Many CDOs and SIVs were negatively impacted including: holdings. 1. Cash flow and market value CDOs/SIVs with substantial subprime RMBS 2
4 2. CDOs of CDOs and SIVs whose structures were modeled based on the ratings of their underlying assets (frequently AAA rated ABS and RMBS securities) so that as ratings were downgraded ( rating migration ), the assets were haircut for purposes of overcollateralization and interest coverage tests and, even before any payment default on the underlying assets, triggered (i) termination of reinvestment periods, (ii) redirection of waterfall cash flow to pay down the most senior securities first thus delevering the deal and reducing returns to the equity and/or (iii) events of default. IV. How CDOs are different than other bond private placements. A. Securities issued are dependent for payment primarily on the cash flow from the underlying assets. B. The securities are almost always sold in 144A transactions with a lengthy offering memorandum. 1. The offering memorandum describes the collateral in general, including eligibility criteria for permitted collateral and related risk factors, but typically does not include a description of the actual underlying securities in the CDO at closing since CDOs are trading vehicles (not static pool investment vehicles like U.S. CMBS/RMBS transactions) with 3 to 6 year reinvestment periods before amortization is required to commence, absent triggers built into the deal to start early amortization such as the overcollateralization and interest coverage tests. 2. The offering memorandum moves in tandem with the Indenture (i.e. as parties and rating agencies comment on the Indenture, corresponding changes are expected to be reflected in the final offering memorandum) and although the two documents should be consistent, they occasionally vary. In addition the offering memorandum includes other information not contained in the transaction documents including risk factors, conflicts of interest, descriptions of the issuer, the Collateral Manager and any monoline credit enhancer, a discussion of the tax treatment of the securities offered and the method of distribution of the securities. C. Most important structural features of a CDO: 1. Diversification of eligible assets; buckets. 2. Overcollateralization Test: the ratio of the aggregate value of the collateral (net of haircut amounts) compared to the outstanding principal balance of the rated classes of Notes. 3. Interest Coverage Test: the ratio of the aggregate amount of interest proceeds (including interest from the underlying assets and certain payments made by hedge counterparties to the issuer) and any interest reserves compared to interest due on the rated classes of Notes and certain administrative expenses and fees paid to service providers senior to the payment of such interest. 3
5 4. Haircuts which reduce the aggregate value of the collateral for purposes of the overcollateralization test and which may reduce interest for purposes of the interest coverage test: a. Definition of Defaulted Asset: Default is frequently defined to include (i) payment default, (ii) insolvency of the underlying obligor or (iii) any other event which, with notice or passage of time or both, could constitute an event of default under the underlying instrument whether or not called and whether or not the underlying instrument is accelerated and results in a haircut in value to the lower of fair market value or the lowest rating agency recovery rate for that type of asset or a 100% haircut if the asset has not been disposed of within a certain period of time. b. Market Value Haircuts: If an asset is acquired at less than a certain percentage of par (usually a high percentage determined by the rating agencies), the asset is valued at its fair market value, not par, even if performing and expected to pay par in full. c. Ratings Migration Haircuts: For certain transactions, increasing haircuts as the underlying asset is further downgraded. 5. If tests not met: compliance a. Senior most class of Notes is paid first until tests are back in b. If the overcollateralization test gets too far out of whack (typically less than 100%), an Event of Default occurs. 6. Waterfall: Underlying asset collections, proceeds and reserve amounts (if applicable) flow through a waterfall which varies depending on: a. whether the transaction is behaving normally with no problems: interest is typically paid on all classes of Notes and excess spread may be paid to the equity; principal collections may be used to invest and reinvest in additional eligible assets or held for such purpose or, under certain circumstances, may be paid either sequentially or pro rata for some period of time across multiple classes of Notes depending on the structure of the deal, b. whether the reinvestment period is over: during the reinvestment period, principal collections and principal proceeds may be used to invest and reinvest in additional eligible assets whereas after the reinvestment period principal collections and principal proceeds must be used to repay principal on the Notes either sequentially or pro rata for some period of time across multiple classes of Notes depending on the structure of the deal, c. whether an overcollateralization test trigger or interest coverage test trigger has been tripped in which case interest collections and proceeds and principal collections and proceeds or both are diverted to pay down the senior most class of Notes until the 4
6 tests are once again met, or if the overcollateralization ratio is less than 100%, an Event of Default occurs, and d. whether an Event of Default exists in which case all cash flow, after payment of certain capped administrative expenses and service provider fees and payment of interest on the most senior rated class or classes of Notes (for example, on all AAA rated Notes), is used to pay down principal on each class of Notes sequentially. 7. Events of Default. a. The less senior classes of Notes are structured so that if interest is not paid, it is deferred and paid when cash is available. Failure to pay this interest does not constitute an Event of Default. Principal is not due and owing on any class of Notes until its maturity date which is typically several years after the longest maturity asset in the underlying portfolio (which is significantly longer than anyone expects such classes of Notes to actually be outstanding). b. Failure to meet the eligibility criteria when selecting assets and the asset acquisition and sale covenants may not result in an Event of Default under the Indenture; instead such failure may constitute an Event of Default under the Collateral Management Agreement permitting the removal and replacement of the Collateral Manager. c. Except for certain balance sheet deals in which the originator of the assets sells them to the CDO issuer with representations and warranties regarding the assets which, if breached, requires the repurchase or substitution of the asset, CDOs typically do not include asset level representations except for ownership of the assets free and clear of all encumbrances other than the security interest created by the Indenture. d. Failure to meet certain financial tests (other than having an overcollateralization ratio of less than 100%) does not result in an Event of Default; rather these tests function as triggers diverting cash flow in the waterfall to pay down typically the most senior class of Notes until the tests are once again met. e. Thus the Events of Default under the Indenture typically include: (1) Failure to pay interest on those senior rated classes of Notes which do not have interest deferral features; (2) Breaches of transaction level representations, warranties and covenants (other than those mentioned above which are typically carved out) after notice and cure period; (3) An overcollateralization ratio of less than 100%; and 5
7 (4) Actions taken in connection with an insolvency or bankruptcy of the issuer, which is a bankruptcy remote entity and with respect to which all involved in the transaction agree not to initiate bankruptcy proceedings. 8. Remedies upon an Event of Default. a. The Controlling Class determines whether or not to accelerate. The Controlling Class is either the senior most class of Noteholders or, if a monoline has wrapped the senior most class of Notes, the monoline insurer so long as it has not defaulted on its financial guarantee and is not itself insolvent. b. The reinvestment period terminates automatically. c. Even after acceleration, the Trustee must continue to hold the collateral, the Collateral Manager must manage it and cash continues to be paid out under the applicable waterfall provisions unless the Trustee determines that the collateral may be sold at a price sufficient to pay all Noteholders in full under the applicable waterfall or the Trustee is directed by a certain percentage of one or more classes of Noteholders to sell the collateral (typically all classes of rated Notes participate in this decision, not just the Controlling Class). V. Real Life Problems with CDOs during the Credit Crunch. A. Noteholders 1. Notes are held by the DTC (or by the DTC for Euroclear or Clearstream) so it may be impossible for the Issuer, Collateral Manager or Trustee to know who the beneficial owners of the Notes are. Usually the investment bank that structured and sold the original deal and makes the secondary market in the transaction keeps track of who buys but many of these investment banks have fired the people who worked on these deals and lost this institutional knowledge. It is very difficult to restructure or amend transactions or create consensus on when to liquidate after an Event of Default and acceleration when you cannot work directly with the beneficial owners but must work through the DTC. 2. The beneficial owners of any particular class of Notes may not have the same economic interests since many of these Notes have been sold in the secondary market to buyers of distressed securities at deeply reduced prices who may want a liquidation at less than par since that will result in a gain for them. 3. If the beneficial owner of a Note has entered into a credit default swap in which it has bought credit protection from a credit worthy counterparty with respect to the Note, such beneficial owner may not pay attention to requests relating to the Note and the credit default swap counterparty does not receive this information nor have any right to act with respect to it if it does receive it. B. Difficulties in valuing assets. 6
8 1. Difficulties for the Collateral Manager valuing assets for purposes of the transaction document covenants when market prices or bids (firm or otherwise) are unavailable or unreliable. 2. Difficulties for the Trustee in determining the market value of assets after an Event of Default and acceleration, especially in the current market environment. Determining the market value of assets is outside the scope of the traditional role of the trustee and trustees do not have this expertise. Many rely on the Collateral Manager (when the Controlling Class permits them to) or must hire liquidation agents. Current market conditions further exacerbate this situation as market prices and bids (firm or otherwise) are frequently unavailable and may be unreliable. Even when bids are obtained, Trustees do not have the expertise to determine whether the bid price is either reasonable or market. C. Conflicts of Interest: 1. CDO Sponsor. 2. Collateral Manager. 3. Investment Bank. 4. Monoline Credit Enhancer. 5. Major Investors. D. Selective disclosure of material non-public information by Collateral Manager and/or Trustee. E. Trustee concerns 1. How to determine what is a commercially reasonable sale of assets for UCC purposes in today s market. 2. Indemnification of the Trustee by the Noteholders. F. Waterfall v. Subordination Provision Documentation Inconsistencies. 1. A number of CDOs include a specific waterfall which applies after an Event of Default to all collections and proceeds and requires that interest be paid on all AAA rated classes of Notes prior to the payment of principal on the most senior AAA rated class of Notes whereas the boilerplate subordination language at the end of the Indenture states that the senior most class of AAA rated notes is to be paid in full before any payment is made on any other class of Notes (which may include other AAA rated classes of Notes whose principal payments are subordinated under the waterfall but not their interest payments). 7
9 2. Trustees have instituted interpleader actions so that a court will determine ambiguous or conflicting provisions in transaction documents, including intercreditor disputes and issues relating to which provisions control payment; commonly at issue is the relationship between the priority of payments provisions and the subordination provisions in the indenture. VI. Lessons Learned A. Reliance on rating agencies v. independent due diligence. 1. Do rating agencies still play a valuable role? 2. Will changes and proposed changes in the rating process introduced by the rating agencies and/or SEC have a meaningful effect on the value of the ratings? B. Assumptions and stress tests used in models. 1. Do you use internal models? 2. How have they changed in light of the credit crunch? C. Diligence 1. How do you diligence transactions and has that changed in light of the credit crunch? 2. What diligence should be required by whom? To whom should such diligence be available? Is the market willing to pay for the additional diligence? D. Valuation 1. How has mark to market accounting effected valuations? 2. How do you value assets for which there is no public market? E. What changes should be made in documenting/structuring transactions? 1. Make sure complicated documents are internally consistent and consistent with the offering memo. Investment Bank) a. Role of outside counsel (Issuer, Trustee, Collateral Manager, b. Business people and lawyers involved in the deal should actually read all of the documents at least once when close to being final. 8
10 2. Rating agencies should revise restrictions which are so tight that they create unintended consequences and those negotiating the documents with the rating agencies should insist on this including: a. Defaulted Assets should include payment defaults, insolvency and other defaults provided acceleration has occurred with respect to such other defaults; b. Documents should permit sales of assets at less than par without requiring that amounts be reinvested equal to the par amount of the asset sold; c. Documents should contain separate waterfalls for application of proceeds post default or post acceleration to avoid ambiguities resulting from the interplay between the waterfall provisions and the subordination provisions. The subordinations provisions should clearly reflect that the post default/post acceleration waterfall controls the priority of these payments. 3. The Indenture should include the concept not only of the registered owner of the securities (frequently the DTC for the Notes) but also of the beneficial owners thereof which should be identified to the Trustee at closing and upon each transfer as part of the transfer restrictions with the Issuer and the Collateral Manager being permitted to obtain a list of beneficial owners and the beneficial owners being permitted to vote their economic interest in the deal for consents, amendments, etc. F. What improvements should be made in the investment process? Is it realistic to expect them to be made? review. 1. Very complex documents with investors given a very limited time to 2. What can deal sponsors, the investment banks placing the securities and the rating agencies do to assist investors while at the same time permitting investors to do their own independent due diligence and review? 3. How to deal with the exigencies of narrow spread windows for issuing the securities which create very tight time frames for investor diligence and review. 9
CDOs October 19, 2006
2006 Annual Meeting & Education Conference New York, NY CDOs Ozgur K. Bayazitoglu AIG Global Investment Group Keith M. Ashton TIAA-CREF Michael Lamont Deutsche Bank Securities Inc. Vicki E. Marmorstein
More information$500,000,000 CarMax Auto Owner Trust
PROSPECTUS SUPPLEMENT (To Prospectus dated September 5, 2007) $500,000,000 CarMax Auto Owner Trust 2007-3 Issuing Entity Initial Principal Amount Interest Rate (1) Final Scheduled Payment Date Class A-1
More information$479,000,000 CarMax Auto Owner Trust
PROSPECTUS SUPPLEMENT (To Prospectus dated January 7, 2008) $479,000,000 CarMax Auto Owner Trust 2008-1 Issuing Entity Initial Principal Amount Interest Rate Final Scheduled Payment Date Class A-1 Asset
More informationPROSPECTUS SUPPLEMENT TO PROSPECTUS DATED SEPTEMBER 4, 2014
PROSPECTUS SUPPLEMENT TO PROSPECTUS DATED SEPTEMBER 4, 2014 $734,070,000 World Omni Automobile Lease Securitization Trust 2014-A Issuing Entity $104,910,000 Class A-1 Asset Backed Notes, Series 2014-A
More information13APR $1,750,000,000 Toyota Auto Receivables 2014-A Owner Trust
Prospectus Supplement to Prospectus Dated March 5, 2014 13APR201216440855 $1,750,000,000 Toyota Auto Receivables 2014-A Owner Trust Issuing Entity Toyota Auto Finance Receivables LLC Depositor Toyota Motor
More informationFord Credit Auto Owner Trust 2016-A Issuing Entity or Trust (CIK: )
Ford Credit Auto Receivables Two LLC Depositor (CIK: 0001129987) Before you purchase any notes, be sure you understand the structure and the risks. You should read carefully the risk factors beginning
More informationLearning Curve. Structured Finance and Securitisation: an overview of the key participants in a transaction. Ketul Tanna YieldCurve.
Learning Curve Structured Finance and Securitisation: an overview of the key participants in a transaction Ketul Tanna YieldCurve.com February 2004 Structured Finance and Securitisation: an overview of
More informationSecurity Capital Assurance Ltd Structured Finance Investor Call. August 3, 2007
Security Capital Assurance Ltd Structured Finance Investor Call August 3, 2007 Important Notice This presentation provides certain information regarding Security Capital Assurance Ltd (SCA). By accepting
More informationCNH Equipment Trust 2013-D Issuing Entity
Prospectus Supplement to Prospectus dated November 7, 2013 CNH Equipment Trust 2013-D Issuing Entity CNH Capital Receivables LLC Depositor CNH Capital America LLC New Holland Credit Company, LLC Sponsor
More informationFinancial Guaranty Insurance Company RMBS and ABS CDOs as of June 30, October 9, 2007
Financial Guaranty Insurance Company RMBS and ABS CDOs as of June 30, 2007 October 9, 2007 Table of Contents Overview 3-5 Part I MBS 6 Underwriting 7-9 Portfolio 10-16 Performance 17-19 Part II ABS CDOs
More informationCredit Suisse First Boston
Prospectus supplement to prospectus dated March 1, 2005 $1,360,291,000 (Approximate) Asset Backed Securities Corporation Depositor Select Portfolio Servicing, Inc. Servicer Wells Fargo Bank, N.A. Master
More informationRegulation AB II September 19, 2014 Presented By: Kenneth E. Kohler Jerry R. Marlatt
Regulation AB II September 19, 2014 Presented By: Kenneth E. Kohler Jerry R. Marlatt 2014 Morrison & Foerster LLP All Rights Reserved mofo.com Regulation AB II On August 27, 2014, the SEC adopted changes
More informationCitigroup Merrill Lynch & Co. Goldman, Sachs & Co. December 11, 2006 TABLE OF CONTENTS. SUMMARY OF PARTIES TO THE TRANSACTION iv
Prospectus Supplement to Prospectus dated November 28, 2006 $3,054,755,000 SLC Private Student Loan Trust 2006-A Issuing Entity SLC Student Loan Receivables I, Inc. Depositor The Student Loan Corporation
More information$609,547,000 CarMax Auto Owner Trust
PROSPECTUS SUPPLEMENT (To Prospectus dated January 19, 2007) $609,547,000 CarMax Auto Owner Trust 2007-1 Issuing Entity Initial Principal Amount Interest Rate Final Scheduled Payment Date Class A-1 Asset
More informationASF RMBS Reporting Standard - Data Requirements ASF RMBS Pre-Issuance Disclosure
Transaction 001 Transaction Name Full name of the RMBS transaction. Contact Information 002 Contact Name Name of the department or the point person/s of the information source. 003 Contact Address Mailing
More informationDeutsche Bank Securities J.P. Morgan RBC Capital Markets
PROSPECTUS SUPPLEMENT TO PROSPECTUS DATED MARCH 7, 2014 Ally Master Owner Trust Issuing Entity $975,000,000 Class A Asset Backed Notes, Series 2014-4 Ally Wholesale Enterprises LLC Depositor Ally Bank
More information$1,967,896,000. Mercedes-Benz Auto Lease Trust 2017-A. Issuer (CIK: )
PROSPECTUS $1,967,896,000 Mercedes-Benz Auto Lease Trust 2017-A Issuer (CIK: 0001700323) $439,000,000 (1) 1.15000% Class A-1 Asset Backed Notes $675,000,000 1.53% Class A-2A Asset Backed Notes $225,000,000
More informationA Guide to the SEC s Proposed Revisions to the Rules and Forms for Offerings of Asset-Backed Securities
Alert > Financial Services Area / Structured Transactions A Guide to the SEC s Proposed Revisions to the Rules and Forms for Offerings of Asset-Backed Securities April 20, 2010 Disclosure in SEC-Registered
More informationProperty Tax Lien. U.S. Structured Finance. ABS Rating Methodology. Analytical Contacts: Patrick McShane, Director
U.S. Structured Finance ABS Rating Methodology Property Tax Lien ABS Rating Methodology Analytical Contacts: Patrick McShane, Director pmcshane@kbra.com, 646-731-2376 Anthony Nocera, Managing Director
More informationCRE FinanCE W. The Voice of Commercial Real Estate Finance. Autumn 2012 Volume 14 No.3. A publication of CRE Finance Council
A publication of CRE Finance Council CRE FinanCE W The Voice of Commercial Real Estate Finance Rld Autumn Issue 2012 is Sponsored by Autumn 2012 Volume 14 No.3 CMBS Opportunities: Any Floating-Rate Port
More informationPalmer Square Loan Funding Ltd./Palmer Square Loan Funding LLC
Presale: Palmer Square Loan Funding 2016-1 Ltd./Palmer Square Loan Funding 2016-1 LLC Primary Credit Analyst: Christopher R Davis, New York (1) 212-438-3019; christopher.davis@standardandpoors.com Secondary
More informationAtrium XII/Atrium XII LLC
Presale: Atrium XII/Atrium XII LLC Primary Credit Analyst: Alexander Dennis, CFA, Chicago (1) 312-233-7069; alexander.dennis@standardandpoors.com Secondary Contact: Andrew J Loken, New York (1) 212-438-2755;
More informationBofA Merrill Lynch Credit Agricole Securities RBS
PROSPECTUS SUPPLEMENT TO PROSPECTUS DATED FEBRUARY 10, 2012 Ally Master Owner Trust Issuing Entity $175,000,000 Class A Fixed Rate Asset Backed Notes, Series 2012-4 Ally Wholesale Enterprises LLC Depositor
More informationPROSPECTUS SUPPLEMENT (To Prospectus Dated April 20, 2011) Santander Drive Auto Receivables Trust Issuing Entity
PROSPECTUS SUPPLEMENT (To Prospectus Dated April 20, 2011) You should carefully read the risk factors beginning on page S-11 of this prospectus supplement and page 5 of the prospectus. The notes are asset
More information$902,000,000 Ford Credit Auto Lease Trust 2016-A Issuing Entity or Trust (CIK: )
Ford Credit Auto Lease Two LLC Depositor (CIK: 0001519881) $902,000,000 Ford Credit Auto Lease Trust 2016-A Issuing Entity or Trust (CIK: 0001667967) Ford Motor Credit Company LLC Sponsor and Servicer
More informationBlack Diamond CLO Designated Activity Company
Presale: Black Diamond CLO 2015-1 Designated Activity Company Primary Credit Analyst: Sandeep Chana, London (44) 20-7176-3923; sandeep.chana@standardandpoors.com Secondary Contact: Prayagraj C Patel, London
More informationTaiwan Ratings. An Introduction to CDOs and Standard & Poor's Global CDO Ratings. Analysis. 1. What is a CDO? 2. Are CDOs similar to mutual funds?
An Introduction to CDOs and Standard & Poor's Global CDO Ratings Analysts: Thomas Upton, New York Standard & Poor's Ratings Services has been rating collateralized debt obligation (CDO) transactions since
More informationProspectus Supplement to Prospectus dated November 18, GE Capital Credit Card Master Note Trust Issuing Entity
Prospectus Supplement to Prospectus dated November 18, 2009 RFS Holding, L.L.C. Depositor GE Capital Credit Card Master Note Trust Issuing Entity Series 2009-4 Asset Backed Notes (1) GE Money Bank Sponsor
More information$600,000,000 Nissan Auto Receivables 2008-C Owner Trust
Prospectus Supplement (To Prospectus Dated December 1, 2008) You should review carefully the factors set Forth under Risk Factors beginning on page S-13 of this prospectus supplement and page 8 in the
More informationThe Proposed Rule also imposes further. clarifies that, when acting as conservator or receiver, the FDIC would consent
FDIC SEEKS STRONGER, SUSTAINABLE SECURITIZATIONS BY IMPOSING ADDITIONAL CONDITIONS TO ELIGIBILITY FOR SECURITIZATION SAFE HARBOR VOL. 11 NO. 10 P E T E R D O D S O N, M I C H A E L G A M B R O, A N D L
More informationBlack Diamond CLO DAC
Presale: Black Diamond CLO 2017-2 DAC This presale report is based on information as of Nov. 15, 2017. The ratings shown are preliminary. This report does not constitute a recommendation to buy, hold,
More informationThe issuing entity is offering the following classes of notes: Class A-1 Notes. Class A-2 Notes. Class A-3 Notes
Prospectus Supplement to Prospectus dated April 11, 2014. CAPITAL AUTO RECEIVABLES ASSET TRUST 2014-2 Issuing Entity $643,200,000 Asset Backed Notes, Class A $38,190,000 Asset Backed Notes, Class B $36,180,000
More informationStructured Finance Alert
Skadden, Arps, Slate, Meagher & Flom LLP Structured Finance Alert October 2013 Proposed Rule to Implement Dodd-Frank Risk Retention Requirement If you have any questions regarding the matters discussed
More informationThe Arbitrage CDO Market
Global Markets Research Relative Value March 21, 2000 Table of Contents Introduction: Lay of the land... 2 Cash Flow CDOs: Managing Default Risk. 4 Market Value CDOs: Managing Price Risk... 13 Risk & Return:
More informationCNH Equipment Trust 2011-A Issuing Entity
Prospectus Supplement to Prospectus dated May 2, 2011 CNH Equipment Trust 2011-A Issuing Entity CNH Capital Receivables LLC Depositor CNH Capital America LLC New Holland Credit Company, LLC Sponsor and
More informationNissan Auto Lease Trust 2007-A
Prospectus Supplement NALT 2007-A (To Prospectus Dated July 24, 2007) Prospectus Supplement $1,090,079,000 Nissan Auto Lease Trust 2007-A Issuing Entity Nissan Auto Leasing LLC II Depositor Nissan Motor
More informationSeller and Master Servicer
Prospectus Supplement dated November 25, 2005 (To Prospectus dated February10, 2004) $2,081,692,000 (Approximate) LONG BEACH MORTGAGE LOAN TRUST 2005-WL3 ASSET-BACKED CERTIFICATES, SERIES 2005-WL3 LONG
More informationFIRST LIEN/SECOND LIEN INTERCREDITOR AGREEMENTS AND RELATED ISSUES
FIRST LIEN/SECOND LIEN INTERCREDITOR AGREEMENTS AND RELATED ISSUES An Introduction to the ABA Model Intercreditor Agreement Presented by: Michael S. Himmel, Chapman and Cutler LLP ABA Business Law Section
More informationPreliminary Ratings As Of July 25, Prelim. amount (mil. )
Presale: Sinepia DAC 647.77 Million Floating-Rate Notes (Including 323.97 Million Unrated Notes This presale report is based on information as of July 25, 2016. The ratings shown are preliminary. This
More informationSunTrust Auto Receivables Trust
Presale: SunTrust Auto Receivables Trust 2015-1 Primary Credit Analyst: Jennie P Lam, New York (1) 212-438-2524; jennie.lam@standardandpoors.com Secondary Contact: Ines A Beato, New York (1) 212-438-9372;
More informationPage 1 of 117 424B2 1 d424b2.htm FINAL PROSPECTUS SUPPLEMENT Filed Pursuant to Rule 424(b)(2) File Nos. 333-135006 and 333-135006-01 Title of Each Class of Securities Offered Maximum Aggregate Offering
More informationcovered bonds in the us
covered bonds in the us In this tight credit market, US banks looking for new sources of funding for their loan originations may find covered bonds a viable alternative. If proposed legislation is adopted,
More informationFILED: NEW YORK COUNTY CLERK 10/10/ :31 PM INDEX NO /2017 NYSCEF DOC. NO. 745 RECEIVED NYSCEF: 10/10/2018 EXHIBIT B
EXHIBIT B Internal Revenue Service Number: 201731001 Release Date: 8/4/2017 Index Number: 860D.00-00 ------ ------------- ------------ -------------- --------- -- ------------- Department of the Treasury
More informationInsurance. Financial Guarantors Subprime Risks: From RMBS to ABS CDOs. Special Comment. Moody s Global. Summary Opinion.
www.moodys.com Special Comment Moody s Global Insurance September 2007 Table of Contents: Summary Opinion 1 Where to Find Subprime Mortgages: A Primer on Financial Engineering 3 Risks of Direct Subprime
More informationSponsor and Servicer. The following notes are being offered by this prospectus supplement:
PROSPECTUS SUPPLEMENT (To Prospectus Dated August 6, 2007) $600,000,000 Santander Drive Auto Receivables Trust 2007-2 Issuing Entity Santander Drive Auto Receivables LLC Depositor Sponsor and Servicer
More informationHonda Auto Receivables Owner Trust, Issuing Entity. American Honda Receivables LLC, Depositor
Prospectus Supplement (To Prospectus Dated November 17, 2014) Honda Auto Receivables 2014-4 Owner Trust, Issuing Entity American Honda Receivables LLC, Depositor American Honda Finance Corporation, Sponsor,
More informationPrime Trust Conduit Overview Report, November 2016
Prime Trust Conduit Overview Report, November 2016 This report was produced on November 14, 2016 and, unless stated otherwise herein, the information in this report is current as of that date. For a copy
More informationFEDERAL HOME LOAN MORTGAGE CORPORATION Structured Agency Credit Risk (STACR ) Debt Notes, Series 2014-DN2
FEDERAL HOME LOAN MORTGAGE CORPORATION Structured Agency Credit Risk (STACR ) Debt Notes, Series 2014-DN2 STACR DEBT AGREEMENT STACR DEBT AGREEMENT (the Agreement ), dated as of April 9, 2014, between
More informationCalculated using the initial principal amount of the underwritten notes.
You should review carefully the factors described under Risk Factors beginning on page 22 of this prospectus. The primary assets of the issuing entity will include a pool of fixed rate motor vehicle retail
More information$475,100,000 Nissan Auto Lease Trust 2008-A
ACEBOWNE OF LOS ANGELES 04/17/2008 21:31 NO MARKS NEXT PCN: 002.00.00.00 -- Page/graphics valid 04/17/2008 21:31 BLA A38269 001.00.00.00 41 Prospectus Supplement (To Prospectus Dated April 14, 2008) You
More informationBasel Committee Proposes Simple, Transparent and Comparable Securitisation Framework for Short-Term Securitisations
July 27, 2017 Current Issues Relevant to Our Clients Basel Committee Proposes Simple, Transparent and Comparable Securitisation Framework for Short-Term Securitisations On July 6, 2017, the Basel Committee
More informationChimeraARCover:ChimeraARCover 3/24/08 9:05 PM Page C Annual Report
2007 Annual Report Letter from the CEO and President Dear Fellow Shareholders: It gives me great pleasure to write my first annual letter to the shareholders of Chimera Investment Corporation. Chimera
More informationUNITED STATES SECURITIES AND EXCHANGE COMMISSION WASHINGTON, D.C FORM S-3 REGISTRATION STATEMENT UNDER THE SECURITIES ACT OF 1933
As filed with the Securities and Exchange Commission on April 20, 2007 REGISTRATION NO. 333- UNITED STATES SECURITIES AND EXCHANGE COMMISSION WASHINGTON, D.C. 20549 FORM S-3 REGISTRATION STATEMENT UNDER
More informationABS Shelf Eligibility Criteria
SEC Re-proposes Shelf Eligibility Criteria for Asset-Backed Securities SUMMARY On July 26, 2011, the Securities and Exchange Commission re-proposed eligibility criteria for shelf registration of asset-backed
More informationZeus Receivables Trust Conduit Overview Report, November 2016
Zeus Receivables Trust Conduit Overview Report, November 2016 This report was produced on November 14, 2016 and, unless stated otherwise herein, the information in this report is current as of that date.
More informationImplications of Final Volcker Rule
Implications of Final Volcker Rule Final Rule On December 10, 2013, the Federal Reserve (Fed), Federal Deposit Insurance Corporations (FDIC), Office of the Comptroller of the Currency (OCC), Securities
More informationThe Benefits of Gearing/Leverage Facilities to EU, UK and U.S. Private and Listed Credit Funds
The Benefits of Gearing/Leverage Facilities to EU, UK and U.S. Private and Listed Credit Funds November 03, 2016 At Dechert's seminar on Private and Listed Credit Funds, the The Benefits of Gearing/Leverage
More informationSTRUCTURED ASSET INVESTMENT LOAN TRUST Mortgage Pass-Through Certificates, Series
PROSPECTUS SUPPLEMENT (To Prospectus dated June 27, 2005) $2,257,738,000 (Approximate) STRUCTURED ASSET INVESTMENT LOAN TRUST Pass-Through Certificates, Series 2005-6 Lehman Brothers Holdings Inc. Sponsor
More informationWhat are Covered Bonds and Why Should Anyone Care?
What are Covered Bonds and Why Should Anyone Care? Michael S. Gambro, Anna H. Glick, Frank Polverino, Patrick T. Quinn, and Jordan M. Schwartz The authors believe that, given the current political impetus
More informationRatings Assigned To Further Issuances From German ABS Transaction VCL Master Residual Value, Compartment 2
Ratings Assigned To Further Issuances From German ABS Transaction VCL Master Residual Value, Compartment Primary Credit Analyst: Matthew S Mitchell, CFA, London (44) 0-7176-8581; matthew.mitchell@spglobal.com
More informationU.S. CREDIT RISK RETENTION RULES:
U.S. CREDIT RISK RETENTION RULES: Will CLOs Survive? On 21 October and 22 October 2014, the Agencies 1 adopted a final rule (the Final Rule) implementing the Risk Retention Requirement. 2 The Final Rule
More information$1,515,396,000 (Approximate) SOUNDVIEW HOME LOAN TRUST 2005-OPT4 ASSET-BACKED CERTIFICATES, SERIES 2005-OPT4
PROSPECTUS SUPPLEMENT dated November 22, 2005 (to Prospectus dated September 26, 2005) $1,515,396,000 (Approximate) SOUNDVIEW HOME LOAN TRUST 2005-OPT4 ASSET-BACKED CERTIFICATES, SERIES 2005-OPT4 FINANCIAL
More informationStructured Product CHAPTER 6
Structured Product CHAPTER 6 Concept of Structured Products Benefits to Investors Risks of Structured Products Types of Structured Products Special Purpose Vehicle/Entity Benefits and Risks to Sponsoring
More informationRating Methodology. Structured Finance. Global Credit-Linked Note and Repackaging Vehicle Rating Criteria. Updated May 2017
Rating Methodology Structured Finance Global Credit-Linked Note and Repackaging Vehicle Rating Criteria Related Research Updated May 2017 Each transaction will be accompanied with a transaction specific
More informationTelos CLO Ltd./Telos CLO LLC
Presale: Telos CLO 2016-7 Ltd./Telos CLO 2016-7 LLC Primary Credit Analyst: Timothy J Walsh, New York (1) 212-438-3663; timothy.walsh@standardandpoors.com Secondary Contact: Kyle S Rose, Charlottesville
More informationUnderstanding Investments in Collateralized Loan Obligations ( CLOs )
Understanding Investments in Collateralized Loan Obligations ( CLOs ) Disclaimer This document contains the current, good faith opinions of Ares Management Corporation ( Ares ). The document is meant for
More informationGreat Lakes CLO Ltd./Great Lakes CLO LLC
Presale: Great Lakes CLO 2014-1 Ltd./Great Lakes CLO 2014-1 LLC Primary Credit Analyst: Timothy J Walsh, New York (1) 212-438-3663; timothy.walsh@standardandpoors.com Secondary Contact: Kyle S Rose, New
More informationExample:(Schweser CFA Note: Automobile Loans Securitization)
The Basic Structural Features of and Parties to a Securitization Transaction. ABS are most commonly backed by automobile loans, credit card receivables, home equity loans, manufactured housing loans, student
More informationHedge Fund. Collateralized Loan Obligations. The LAW REPORT. The definitive source of actionable intelligence on fund law and regulation
hedge LAW REPORT fund law and regulation Volume 6, Number 25 Collateralized Loan Obligations CLO 2.0: How Can Managers Navigate the Practical and Legal Challenges of Establishing and Managing Collateralized
More informationThe CLO Deep. Discount Dilemma. by Greg B. Cioffi and David H. Sagalyn, asset securitization and global restructuring group, Seward & Kissel LLP
Asset May 25, 2009 Volume 9, Number 12 securitization The Premier Guide to Asset and Mortgage-Backed Securitization The CLO Deep REPORT Discount Dilemma by Greg B. Cioffi and David H. Sagalyn, asset securitization
More informationSTRUCTURED ASSET SECURITIES CORPORATION
PROSPECTUS SUPPLEMENT (To Prospectus dated January 25, 2005) $706,107,000 (Approximate) STRUCTURED ASSET SECURITIES CORPORATION Pass-Through Certificates, Series 2005-NC1 Aurora Loan Services LLC Master
More informationCredit Card Receivable-Backed Securities
Credit Card Receivable-Backed Securities Analysts: Thomas Upton, New York The securitization of credit card receivables presents the issuer with several potential benefits, including the efficient use
More informationStructured Finance. Global Rating Criteria for Structured Finance CDOs. Structured Credit / Global. Sector-Specific Criteria. Key Rating Drivers
Structured Credit / Global Global Rating Criteria for Structured Finance CDOs Sector-Specific Criteria Inside This Report Page Key Rating Drivers 1 Key Changes in this Criteria 2 Quantitative Models and
More informationOCP EURO CLO DAC
Presale: OCP EURO CLO 2017-1 DAC This presale report is based on information as of March 30, 2017. The ratings shown are preliminary. This report does not constitute a recommendation to buy, hold, or sell
More informationNissan Master Owner Trust Receivables
Prospectus Supplement (To Prospectus dated July 12, 2005) $800,000,000 Nissan Master Owner Trust Receivables Issuer Nissan Wholesale Receivables Corporation II, Transferor Nissan Motor Acceptance Corporation,
More informationThe Fund s investment objective is to seek a high level of current income.
SUMMARY PROSPECTUS July 31, 2015 DoubleLine Floating Rate Fund DoubleLine F U N D S Share Class (Ticker): Class I (DBFRX) Class N (DLFRX) Before you invest, you may wish to review the Fund s Prospectus,
More informationDefining Issues. Regulators Finalize Risk- Retention Rule for ABS. November 2014, No Key Facts. Key Impacts
Defining Issues November 2014, No. 14-50 Regulators Finalize Risk- Retention Rule for ABS Contents Summary of Final Rule... 2 Qualified Residential Mortgage Exemption... 4 Other Exemptions... 4 Risk Retention...
More informationStructured Finance. College Loan Corp. Trust I, Series Asset-Backed New Issue. Ratings
Asset-Backed New Issue College Loan Corp. Trust I, Series 2003-2 Ratings $345,000,000 Class 2A-1 Student Loan Asset-Backed Senior Notes... AAA $646,800,000 Class 2A-2 Student Loan Asset-Backed Senior Notes...
More informationAccrued Interest A currently unpaid amount of interest that has accumulated since the last payment on a bond or other fixed-income security.
Accrued Interest A currently unpaid amount of interest that has accumulated since the last payment on a bond or other fixed-income security. Ad Valorem Tax Translated as according to value, it is a levy
More informationMaiden Lane III LLC (A Special Purpose Vehicle Consolidated by the Federal Reserve Bank of New York)
(A Special Purpose Vehicle Consolidated by the Federal Reserve Bank of New York) Financial Statements for the Year Ended December 31, 2009, and for the Period October 31, 2008 to December 31, 2008, and
More informationProspectus Supplement dated September 12, 2006 (To Prospectus dated June 29, 2006)
Prospectus Supplement dated September 12, 2006 (To Prospectus dated June 29, 2006) $768,119,000 (Approximate) Citigroup Loan Trust 2006-NC2 Issuing Entity Asset-Backed Pass-Through Certificates, Series
More informationFEDERAL HOME LOAN MORTGAGE CORPORATION Structured Agency Credit Risk (STACR ) Debt Notes, Series 2016-HQA1
FEDERAL HOME LOAN MORTGAGE CORPORATION Structured Agency Credit Risk (STACR ) Debt Notes, Series 2016-HQA1 STACR DEBT AGREEMENT STACR DEBT AGREEMENT (the Agreement ), dated as of March 15, 2016, between
More informationTerm Asset-Backed Securities Loan Facility: Terms and Conditions 1. Printer version Changes from October November 130 Terms and Conditions
Term Asset-Backed Securities Loan Facility: Terms and Conditions 1 Effective November July 21, 201013, 2009 Printer version Changes from October November 130 Terms and Conditions General Terms and Conditions
More informationWest Virginia Housing Development Fund. Debt Management Policy
West Virginia Housing Development Fund Debt Management Policy Approved December 21, 2017 Table of Contents Debt Management Policy... 1 Variable Rate Debt and Interest Rate Swap Management Plan... 5 Variable
More informationCompany Profile. Company Information
Company Profile Ambac Financial Group, Inc. ( Ambac ), headquartered in New York City, is a holding company whose affiliates provided financial guarantees and financial services to clients in both the
More informationSTRUCTURED ASSET INVESTMENT LOAN TRUST Mortgage Pass-Through Certificates, Series
PROSPECTUS SUPPLEMENT (To Prospectus dated January 25, 2005) $2,485,384,000 (Approximate) STRUCTURED ASSET INVESTMENT LOAN TRUST Pass-Through Certificates, Series 2005-5 Aurora Loan Services LLC Master
More informationCountrywide Securities Corporation
PROSPECTUS SUPPLEMENT (To Prospectus dated August 13, 2007) $1,356,326,100 (Approximate) CWABS, Inc. Depositor Sponsor and Seller Countrywide Home Loans Servicing LP Master Servicer CWABS Asset-Backed
More information2010 Quarterly Operating Supplement Financial Highlights
2010 Quarterly Operating Supplement Q3 Financial Highlights Share price Market capitalization Net income Net income per diluted share $0.56 $167.7 million $76.0 million $0.25 N e w Yo r k L o n d o n S
More informationALME Loan Funding V B.V.
Presale: ALME Loan Funding V B.V. Primary Credit Analyst: Thomas Mclaren, London 020 7176 3488; thomas.mclaren@spglobal.com Secondary Contacts: Bjoern Schurich, Frankfurt (49) 69-33-999-237; bjoern.schurich@spglobal.com
More information$1,505,580,000 Mercedes-Benz Auto Receivables Trust Issuing Entity
PROSPECTUS SUPPLEMENT (To Prospectus dated July 9, 2015) $1,505,580,000 Mercedes-Benz Auto Receivables Trust 2015-1 Issuing Entity $369,000,000 0.39000% Class A-1 Asset Backed Notes $323,000,000 0.82%
More informationKBW Diversified Financials Conference Douglas Renfield-Miller Executive Vice President, Ambac Financial Group. June 4, 2008
KBW Diversified Financials Conference Douglas Renfield-Miller Executive Vice President, Ambac Financial Group June 4, 2008. Key Messages Strong capital and liquidity Exceed Moody s and S&P s Triple-A target
More information$1,302,710,000 Nissan Auto Receivables 2015-B Owner Trust, Nissan Auto Receivables Corporation II, Nissan Motor Acceptance Corporation,
Prospectus Supplement (To Prospectus Dated July 9, 2015) You should review carefully the factors set forth under Risk Factors beginning on page S-16 of this Prospectus Supplement and page 13 in the accompanying
More informationGE Capital Credit Card Master Note Trust
Prospectus Supplement to Prospectus dated October 1, 2012 GE Capital Credit Card Master Note Trust Issuing Entity RFS Holding, L.L.C. Depositor $563,091,483 Series 2012-7 Asset Backed Notes (1) GE Capital
More informationProspectus Supplement (To Prospectus dated September 1, 2005)
Prospectus Supplement (To Prospectus dated September 1, 2005) JPMorgan Chase Capital XXIII $750,000,000 Floating Rate Capital Securities, Series W (Liquidation amount $1,000 per capital security) Fully
More informationSMART ABS Series Trusts
SMART ABS Series Trusts Issuing Entities or Trusts Asset Backed Notes Perpetual Trustee Company Limited (ABN 42 000 001 007) Issuer Trustee Macquarie Leasing Pty Limited (ABN 38 002 674 982) Depositor,
More informationFEDERAL HOME LOAN MORTGAGE CORPORATION Structured Agency Credit Risk (STACR) Debt Notes, Series 2013-DN1
FEDERAL HOME LOAN MORTGAGE CORPORATION Structured Agency Credit Risk (STACR) Debt Notes, Series 2013-DN1 STACR DEBT AGREEMENT STACR DEBT AGREEMENT (the Agreement ), dated as of July 26, 2013, between the
More informationTax-Free Puerto Rico Fund, Inc.
OFFERING CIRCULAR Tax-Free Puerto Rico Fund, Inc. Tax-Free Secured Obligations The Tax-Free Secured Obligations (the "Notes") are offered by Tax-Free Puerto Rico Fund, Inc. (the "Fund") which is a non-diversified,
More informationTHE ROYAL BANK OF SCOTLAND PLC
ISSUE MEMORANDUM LUNAR FUNDING V PLC US$5,000,000,000 SECURED ASSET-BACKED MEDIUM TERM NOTE PROGRAMME arranged by THE ROYAL BANK OF SCOTLAND PLC SERIES 2006-27 USD 30,000,000 Limited Recourse Secured Floating
More informationSUMMARY PROSPECTUS SIIT Dynamic Asset Allocation Fund (SDLAX) Class A
September 30, 2018 SUMMARY PROSPECTUS SIIT Dynamic Asset Allocation Fund (SDLAX) Class A Before you invest, you may want to review the Fund s prospectus, which contains information about the Fund and its
More informationDebt Policy City of Aurora, Colorado
Debt Policy City of Aurora, Colorado The following policies are adopted to establish conditions for the use of debt and to create procedures and policies that minimize the City's debt service and issuance
More information