BEFORE THE SECURITIES AND EXCHANGE BOARD OF INDIA CORAM: PRASHANT SARAN, WHOLE TIME MEMBER ORDER IN RESPECT OF MPS GREENERY DEVELOPERS LIMITED
|
|
- Doreen Bennett
- 5 years ago
- Views:
Transcription
1 WTM/PS/21/CIS/ERO/DEC/2012 BEFORE THE SECURITIES AND EXCHANGE BOARD OF INDIA CORAM: PRASHANT SARAN, WHOLE TIME MEMBER ORDER IN RESPECT OF MPS GREENERY DEVELOPERS LIMITED Under Sections 11(4) and 11B of the Securities and Exchange Board of India Act, 1992 read with Regulations 65 and 73 of the Securities and Exchange Board of India (Collective Investment Schemes) Regulations, Securities and Exchange Board of India (hereinafter referred to as 'SEBI') received an application dated March 10, 2000 from one MPS Greenery Developers Limited (hereinafter referred to as 'MPS') for the grant of the certificate of registration under the SEBI (Collective Investment Schemes) Regulations, 1999 (hereinafter referred to as 'CIS Regulations'). Upon noticing that MPS was not complying with the circulars issued for regulating Collective Investment Schemes, SEBI issued an order dated September 03, 2002 (hereinafter referred to as the 'first order') directing MPS to comply with the requirements of Regulation 73 of the CIS Regulations, wind up its existing schemes and make repayments to the investors. The application for registration was also rejected vide this order of SEBI. 2. MPS had filed a Writ Petition no. 1971/2002 before the Hon'ble High Court at Calcutta, challenging the first order of SEBI. The Hon'ble High Court vide an interim order dated September 24, 2002, directed both the petitioner and the respondents to maintain status quo in respect of the affairs and functioning of MPS. SEBI noticed that MPS continued to raise funds from the schemes in violation of the status quo order of the Hon'ble High Court at Calcutta. Therefore, SEBI filed a Contempt Petition on January 31, 2007, against the failure of MPS to comply with the order of the Hon'ble High Court at Calcutta. While this Contempt Petition was pending, the Writ Petition no. 1971/2002 of MPS was disposed off by the Hon'ble High Court at Calcutta vide an order dated June 25, 2009, holding, interalia as under: "... Since the propriety of the order has not been gone into, the writ petitioners are permitted to furnish their best documents to SEBI within a period of four weeks from date for SEBI to reconsider the matter and revisit the issue as to whether the registration as sought by the petitioner company can be granted. The petitioners would be required to satisfy SEBI that the deposits obtained by the petitioners till date are secured and protected and that such funds have been deployed reasonably and keeping the interests of the depositors in mind.... Page 1 of 10
2 The interim order of September 24, 2002 stands vacated. The embargo imposed on the company by SEBI's order of September 03, 2001 will remain in force till SEBI reconsiders the matter..." 3. Pursuant to this, MPS had filed an appeal against the aforesaid order dated June 25, 2009, before the Division Bench of the Hon'ble High Court at Calcutta. However, the said appeal was dismissed as not pressed on August 26, 2009, since the appellants did not wish to proceed with the appeal. 4. Thereafter, MPS filed another application before SEBI for registration. The said application of MPS was considered by SEBI and a 'Provisional Registration' was granted to MPS under the provisions of Regulation 70(1) read with the Regulation 71(1) of the CIS Regulations. SEBI intimated MPS about the grant of Provisional Registration vide its letter dated August 21, In the said letter, SEBI instructed MPS not to launch any new scheme or raise money from the investors even under the existing scheme, till a certificate of registration is granted by the Board under Regulations 10 and 69 of the CIS Regulations. The said letter also mentioned that the Provisional Registration granted to MPS, is subject to the compliance of various conditions stipulated in Regulation 71 of the CIS Regulations. Such conditions for the Provisional Registration for MPS were as under: "a)... shall get your existing scheme(s) rated by a credit rating agency within two years from the date of grant of Provisional Registration; b)... shall get your existing scheme(s) audited by an auditor within a period of two years from the date of grant of Provisional Registration; c)... shall get your existing scheme(s) appraised by an appraising agency within a period of two years from the date of grant of Provisional Registration; d)... shall create a trust and appoint trustees in the manner specified in Chapter IV of the captioned Regulations within a period of two years from the date of grant of Provisional Registration; e)... shall comply with accounting and valuation norms, in respect of your existing scheme(s), as specified in Part-II of the Ninth Schedule to the captioned Regulations within a period of two years from the date of Provisional Registration; f)... shall meet the minimum net worth of Rupees one crore within one year from the date of grant of Provisional Registration which shall be increased by Rupees one crore each within two years, three years, four years and five years from the date of grant of Provisional Registration; g)... shall not dispose off the scheme property except for meeting obligations arising under the offer document of the scheme. h)... shall comply with the conditions specified in Regulation 11 of the CIS Regulations; you shall forthwith inform the Board of any material change in the information or particulars previously furnished which have a bearing on the Provisional Registration granted. i)... shall comply with the Code of Conduct as also other instructions and other operational guidelines/ directions/ instructions etc. as may be issued by SEBI from time to time in the interest of investors. Page 2 of 10
3 j)... shall maintain the books of accounts and documents as specified in Regulation 40 and such other documents as may be required by the Board under the said Regulation from time to time and shall preserve the same for the minimum period as specified in the Regulations. k)... shall abide by the SEBI (Collective Investment Schemes) Regulations, 1999 as amended from time to time in respect of the activities carried on." 5. However, MPS had failed to comply with certain important conditions laid down for the Provisional Registration issued vide SEBI's letter dated August 21, 2009 i.e., transfer the properties and assets in favour of the trust so created and not to raise money from the investors, till the certificate of registration is granted by the Board. Thereafter, the Provisional Registration granted to MPS expired on August 20, In the meantime, MPS vide its letter dated February 17, 2011, wrote to SEBI that it had raised 439 crores between August 21, 2009 and January 31, This was in clear disregard to the conditions of the Provisional Registration. 6. Subsequently, MPS had issued an 'advertorial' on March 30, 2012 in a business daily stating therein that the Hon ble High Court of Calcutta has permitted it to continue with its business. The said 'advertorial' also announced that MPS was allowed to raise money from the public and made disclosure about its intention to raise 80% of its targeted total amount of 30,000 crores through its Collective Investment Schemes. This advertisement by MPS further flouts the conditions of the Provisional Registration dated August 21, 2009, granted by SEBI and the order of Hon'ble High Court dated June 25, 2009 as well. 7. Taking cognizance of the flagrant disregard on the part of MPS, SEBI directed MPS vide an ex-parte order dated May 11, 2012 (hereinafter referred to as the 'second order') to deposit the amount of 1, crores, raised by MPS through its collective investment schemes. The second order also directed MPS not to collect money from the investors or to launch any schemes, not to dispose off the properties of the schemes which were acquired in violation of the provisions of the CIS Regulations and also prohibited MPS from accessing and operating in the capital market. Vide the said order, MPS was advised to file its reply, if any, within fifteen (15) days from the date of the second order and also avail opportunities of personal hearing, if they so desire. The second order also stated that the same shall be treated as a show cause notice to MPS and that it may show cause as to why an order for winding up of the schemes of MPS should not be issued under Regulation 73 of the CIS Regulations. Regulation 73 of the CIS Regulations reads as under: Page 3 of 10
4 "Manner of repayment and winding up 73. (1) An existing collective investment scheme which: (a) has failed to make an application for registration to the Board; or (b) has not been granted provisional registration by the Board; or (c) having obtained provisional registration fails to comply with the provisions of regulation 71; shall wind up the existing scheme. (2) The existing Collective Investment Scheme to be wound up under sub-regulation (1) shall send an information memorandum to the investors who have subscribed to the schemes, within two months from the date of receipt of intimation from the Board, detailing the state of affairs of the scheme, the amount repayable to each investor and the manner in which such amount is determined. (3) The information memorandum referred to in sub-regulation (2) shall be dated and signed by all the directors of the scheme. (4) The Board may specify such other disclosures to be made in the information memorandum, as it deems fit. (5) The information memorandum shall be sent to the investors within one week from the date of the information memorandum. (6) The information memorandum shall explicitly state that investors desirous of continuing with the scheme shall have to give a positive consent within one month from the date of the information memorandum to continue with the scheme. (7) The investors who give positive consent under sub-regulation (6), shall continue with the scheme at their risk and responsibility : Provided that if the positive consent to continue with the scheme, is received from only twenty-five per cent or less of the total number of existing investors, the scheme shall be wound up. (8) The payment to the investors, shall be made within three months of the date of the information memorandum. (9) On completion of the winding up, the existing collective investment scheme shall file with the Board such reports, as may be specified by the Board." 8. Thereafter, SEBI had issued public notices on May 15, 2012, in local dailies regarding the second order. MPS vide its letter dated May 18, 2012, requested for extension of time for replying to the second order cum show cause notice. In the meantime, one Sri Satya Ranjan Baidya filed a suit bearing no. 790/2012 before the City Civil Court at Calcutta and obtained a temporary injunction on May 25, 2012, restraining MPS, SEBI and their men, agents and employees from giving effect or further effect to the second order. Subsequently, the City Civil Court, while deciding the applications filed by SEBI in the said suit bearing no. 790/2012, vide its order dated October 12, 2012 modified the earlier temporary injunction order passed on May 25, 2012 to the extent that the said order is not binding upon SEBI. Further, the court also clarified that the order of injunction as against MPS will remain in force. Page 4 of 10
5 9. I note that MPS has not filed any written submissions with respect to the second order. However, before proceeding further in the matter, SEBI had afforded an opportunity of personal hearing to MPS on December 05, 2012, in compliance with the principles of natural justice. The notice for hearing issued by SEBI in this respect was received by 'Chief Trade Coordinator' at MPS. On the date fixed for the personal hearing, MPS has neither presented itself nor filed any written submission. I note that MPS has forwarded a letter dated November 30, 2012 to SEBI, wherein it was said that they (MPS) have been restrained by the order of City Civil Court at Calcutta from giving effect to the second order. MPS also requested for appropriate orders in the light of the order of City Civil Court at Calcutta. I note that MPS has not requested for another date for personal hearing and also that it has requested SEBI to pass appropriate orders. Therefore, I am of the view that no further opportunities for personal hearing are required to be granted, especially when MPS itself has not asked for it and the matter could be proceeded with, on the basis of the material available on record. 10. In the present case, it is an admitted fact that MPS is operating Collective Investment Schemes. SEBI has noticed that MPS is raising money from the public in complete disregard to the order of Hon'ble High Court and the directions issued by SEBI from time to time. Such continuous breach by MPS of the orders of SEBI is nothing but cocking a snook at the Regulator. 11. A brief background of the CIS Regulations which encapsulates the need for comprehensive supervision by SEBI in respect of CISs is given below:- During the late 1990s, the Government of India noticed that certain entities were operating in the securities market, who issued instruments against investments such as agro bonds, plantation bonds, etc. by offering very high rates of return, which were inconsistent with the normal rate of returns in such schemes. Such entities mobilized huge amounts from the public and then misutilized (misappropriated) these funds, for the purposes not disclosed at the time of soliciting these investments, thereby not only causing loss to the investors who lost their life savings to such unscrupulous entities, but also eroding the confidence of the general public. Considering the high element of risk associated with such schemes, the Central Government felt that it was necessary to set up appropriate Regulatory framework to regulate such entities. Hence, in order to protect the interest of the investors and to ensure that only legitimate investment activities are carried on, vide press release dated November 18, 1997, the Central Government communicated its decision that schemes through which Page 5 of 10
6 instruments such as agro bonds, plantation bonds, etc., are issued by different entities would be treated as Schemes under the provisions of the SEBI Act and directed SEBI to formulate Regulations for the purpose of regulating these Collective Investment Schemes. It was against this background that Section 11AA of the SEBI Act, 1992 and the CIS Regulations came to be framed. Thereafter, several press releases and newspaper advertisements/ notices were issued by SEBI from time to time in the leading newspapers of India bringing to the notice of the investors and the persons concerned, the various instructions issued by SEBI/ Central Government from time to time in respect of the functioning of the collective investment schemes. 12. Coming back to MPS, I note that MPS has failed to fulfil the conditions laid down in the Provisional Registration and continued to raise money from general public. I also observe from the available records that MPS has not applied for the extension of such Provisional Registration. Therefore, MPS is not registered with SEBI anymore and hence not authorised to operate Collective Investment Schemes. 13. Thus, MPS has mobilized huge funds from the public, despite its ineligibility to operate as CIS. The details of the aggregate funds raised by MPS available at the website of 'ICRA Limited', a Credit Rating Agency, who examined the audited results of MPS are given below: - as on March 31, crores - as on March 31, crores - as on January 25, , crores - as on March 31, , crores - as on July 31, , crores - as on September 30, ,520 crores From the above, it can be seen that MPS had raised funds from the public and is continuing to do so. MPS has thus collected approximately 1,520 crores, in the absence of any valid registration and moreover, ignoring the specific prohibition issued by SEBI vide its second order not to raise any money in any new or existing schemes. I also note that the credit rating agency, ICRA Limited, has downgraded the rating assigned to the existing Collective Investment Schemes of MPS from CS4 (pronounced C S four) to CS5 (pronounced C S five), which means Schemes rated CS5 are considered to have very high risks and are 'Extremely Speculative'. Huge public funds have been collected by MPS Page 6 of 10
7 under its collective investment schemes, which carry a high risk. As discussed above, MPS is continuing to collect huge public funds in total disregard for the directions of SEBI. Such acts of MPS in shrugging off the regulators and making a mockery of the judicial system, definitely call for the immediate intervention by SEBI. 14. I note that MPS had earlier issued letters to its agents, inter alia asking them to refrain from collecting any money on its behalf. Upon this, a few persons claiming to be the marketing agents/ development executives of MPS filed suits at different civil courts in West Bengal, against MPS for granting injunction against the said letters of MPS so that the agents could continue to mobilize money from the investors. However, these civil suits appear to be collusive in nature, as in one of these cases, the suit was filed by none other than two directors of MPS. These were clearly aimed at circumventing the restrictions imposed by SEBI and seem to be tactics to collect money further from the innocent public. Taking note of the fact that MPS and its marketing agents/ development executives were filing collusive suits in different courts by abusing the process of law, SEBI has preferred a Criminal Contempt Petition before the Hon'ble High Court of Calcutta. At this stage, I also note that while vacating the interim order of injunction and rejecting the plaint in one of the cases filed by two of the directors of MPS, bearing Title Suit No. TS 02/2009, the learned Civil Judge, Garbeta, West Midnapore has viewed as under: "In view of the provision of Section 188 of the Indian Contract Act, this court is of the considered opinion that the plaintiffs being an agent of the defendant company, has no authority to raise any fund from the market when there is embargo on its principal/ defendant no. 1 (MPS) imposed by SEBI vide order dated 03/09/2001 and dated 21/08/2009, and particularly when the embargo has been authenticated by Hon'ble High Court Calcutta vide its order dated 25/06/2009 in WP 1971 of 2001." In the same matter, the Learned Judge has also observed that the Civil Court has no jurisdiction to entertain and try the present suit as it is barred by the provisions of Section 15Y and Section 20A of the SEBI Act, The continuous collection of funds by MPS during the conditional Provisional Registration granted to MPS, was clearly in breach of the terms that are statutorily mandated under the provisions of CIS Regulations. The Provisional Registration specifically prohibited MPS from launching any new scheme or raising money from the investors even under the existing schemes, unless a certificate of registration is granted by SEBI. I note that an existing Collective Investment Scheme, after obtaining Provisional Registration, is bound to comply with the conditions of such registration. On its failure to do so, it does not have Page 7 of 10
8 any option other than to wind up its existing schemes in terms of Regulation 73(1)(c) of CIS Regulations. In the instant case, MPS has not only failed to comply with the conditions of Provisional Registration but also violated the specific mandate of SEBI as required under the CIS Regulations i.e., not to raise any further funds. 16. SEBI has mandated, in terms of the Section 12(1B) of the SEBI Act, 1992 that no person, shall sponsor or cause to be sponsored or carry on or caused to be carried on any Collective Investment Scheme unless it obtains a certificate of registration from SEBI in accordance with the CIS Regulations. Thus, MPS has failed to comply with the direction issued vide the second order of SEBI and the provisions of Section 12(1B) of the SEBI Act, MPS is clearly continuing with the business of collective investment schemes and raising funds from the public in blatant violation of the SEBI Act, 1992 and the CIS Regulations, thus damaging the faith of the general public in the securities market, which if not checked, will have disastrous consequences. SEBI cannot remain a silent spectator in such a case, whereas unscrupulous market participants cause immense jeopardy caused by them to the integrity of the securities market. This is the right time, where SEBI has to step in and protect the interest of innumerable investors as required by law. 18. As noted in the preceding paragraphs, MPS has not co-operated in the instant proceedings before SEBI. SEBI has not received any reply from the noticee to the second order. It appears that MPS seems to be short of any further submissions in the instant proceedings. Further, on December 04, 2012, SEBI received a fax message (i.e. on the eve of the hearing scheduled for December 05, 2012) wherein one Mr. Kanai Lal Biswas, Advocate from Krishnagar, Nadia has addressed a letter to MPS and SEBI. This letter refers to a suit bearing no. TS No. 618/2012 filed by one Mr. Biswajyoti Mukhopadhyay wherein the court is stated to have issued an order in respect of MPS and Mr. Santanu Choudury for maintaining status quo and also notice to SEBI among others, in the suit seeking an injunction against MPS and SEBI. However, SEBI has not received any such notice from the Court. This appears to be another attempt in the series of tactics for delaying the proceedings before SEBI as already mentioned in para 14 above. The several litigations filed by the marketing agents/ development executives appear to be a game plan for benefiting MPS and thus seems to be vexatious in nature for which SEBI has already filed a Criminal Contempt Petition in the High Court of Calcutta accusing MPS of inter alia abusing the judicial process. Page 8 of 10
9 19. MPS is in the continuous process of collection of funds in breach of the order of Hon'ble High Court, terms of the Provisional Registration and the second order of SEBI. Therefore, I am of the considered view that each day of delay will cause irreparable loss and damage to the unwary investors and the securities market, if MPS continues to further indulge in its activities of collecting funds from the public. Hence, it is necessary that such schemes of MPS are immediately directed to be wound up and the monies of the investors, which have been invested in the schemes, are refunded with promised interest due to them by it. In view of the above, I am of the considered opinion that ends of justice would be amply met, by proceeding ex-parte especially when the party remains absent and does not even seek any adjournment. The representation of MPS dated November 30, 2012 has been examined and I find that there is no impediment for SEBI to proceed further in the matter. The civil dispute between the principal and the agent regarding the continuation or otherwise of its agency is a matter between the principal and the agent and SEBI is not restrained from proceeding further with matter, irrespective of the bilateral dispute. In this context, I reiterate the observation of Learned Civil Judge, Garbeta, that the agent has no authority to raise money from the public when there is an embargo on the principal i.e. MPS. 20. I also note that SEBI vide its second order dated May 11, 2012 had directed MPS to deposit the money collected from the investors under its collective investment schemes in an escrow account within a period of fifteen days from the date of the said order. I note that MPS has not complied with the same and did not deposit a single rupee out of the 1, crore, which it was directed to deposit. 21. In view of the foregoing, I, in exercise of the powers conferred upon me under Sections 11(4), 11B and 19 of the Securities and Exchange Board of India Act, 1992 read with the Regulations 65 and 73 of the Securities and Exchange Board of India (Collective Investment Schemes) Regulations, 1999, hereby direct MPS Greenery Developers Limited to wind up its scheme(s) identified as Collective Investment Schemes and refund the money collected by it under the scheme(s) with returns which are due to the investors as per the terms of the offer within a period of one month from the date of this order, failing which: a. SEBI would initiate prosecution proceedings under Section 24 of the Securities and Exchange Board of India Act, 1992, against MPS Greenery Developers Limited/ its promoters/ its directors/ managers/ persons in charge of the business of its scheme(s). Page 9 of 10
10 b. The promoters/ directors/ managers/ persons in charge of the business of the scheme(s) of MPS Greenery Developers Limited including Mr. Pramatha Nath Manna, Mr. Santanu Chowdhury, Mr. Arup Kumar Roy Gupta, Mr. Subrata Basu, Prabir Kumar Chanda, Mr. Madhusudhan Adhikari and Mr. Sukumar Ghosal would be restrained from accessing the capital market and prohibited from buying, selling or otherwise dealing in the securities market till all the monies are refunded. c. A reference would be made to the State Government/ local police to register a civil/ criminal case against MPS Greenery Developers Limited and its promoters/ directors for apparent offences of fraud, cheating, criminal breach of trust and misappropriation of public funds, and d. A reference would be made to the Ministry of Corporate Affairs, to initiate the process of winding up of MPS Greenery Developers Limited. 22. The second order (order dated May 11, 2012) restraining MPS Greenery Developers Limited from accessing or dealing in the securities market shall continue, till the schemes are wound up and all the monies are refunded by it to the investors, to the satisfaction of SEBI. 23. This order shall come into force with immediate effect. PLACE : MUMBAI DATE : DECEMBER 06, 2012 PRASHANT SARAN WHOLE TIME MEMBER SECURITIES AND EXCHANGE BOARD OF INDIA Page 10 of 10
BEFORE THE SECURITIES AND EXCHANGE BOARD OF INDIA CORAM: PRASHANT SARAN, WHOLE TIME MEMBER ORDER
WTM/PS/75/CIS-NRO/LKO/OCT/2015 BEFORE THE SECURITIES AND EXCHANGE BOARD OF INDIA CORAM: PRASHANT SARAN, WHOLE TIME MEMBER ORDER Under Sections 11(1), 11(4) and 11B of the Securities and Exchange Board
More informationBEFORE THE SECURITIES AND EXCHANGE BOARD OF INDIA CORAM: PRASHANT SARAN, WHOLE TIME MEMBER ORDER
WTM/PS/129/CIS/ILO-WRO-II/JAN/216 BEFORE THE SECURITIES AND EXCHANGE BOARD OF INDIA CORAM: PRASHANT SARAN, WHOLE TIME MEMBER ORDER Under Sections 11(1), 11(4) and 11B of the Securities and Exchange Board
More information[ADJUDICATION ORDER NO. PKB/AO 37/2011]
BEFORE THE ADJUDICATING OFFICER SECURITIES AND EXCHANGE BOARD OF INDIA [ADJUDICATION ORDER NO. PKB/AO 37/2011] UNDER SECTION 15-I OF SECURITIES AND EXCHANGE BOARD OF INDIA ACT, 1992 READ WITH RULE 5 OF
More informationWTM/PS/120/CFD/DEC/2015 BEFORE THE SECURITIES AND EXCHANGE BOARD OF INDIA CORAM: PRASHANT SARAN, WHOLE TIME MEMBER
WTM/PS/120/CFD/DEC/2015 BEFORE THE SECURITIES AND EXCHANGE BOARD OF INDIA CORAM: PRASHANT SARAN, WHOLE TIME MEMBER ORDER Under Sections 11(1), 11(2)(j), 11(4) and 11B of the Securities and Exchange Board
More informationBEFORE THE SECURITIES AND EXCHANGE BOARD OF INDIA ORDER
WTM/GM/EFD/40/2017-18 BEFORE THE SECURITIES AND EXCHANGE BOARD OF INDIA ORDER Under sections 11(1), 11(4) and 11B of the Securities and Exchange Board of India Act, 1992 read with regulation 65 of the
More informationMOOT PROBLEM. 5 TH GNLU MOOT ON SECURITIES & INVESTMENT LAW, 2019 Page 1 of 8
MOOT PROBLEM 1. In January 2009, the Forward Markets Commission (the FMC ) had granted approval to the Bharat Commodity Exchange (the BCX ), a national level multicommodity derivative exchange which was
More informationBEFORE THE SECURITIES AND EXCHANGE BOARD OF INDIA ORDER
WTM/GM/EFD/47/2018-19 BEFORE THE SECURITIES AND EXCHANGE BOARD OF INDIA ORDER Under sections 11(1), 11(4) and 11B of the Securities and Exchange Board of India Act, 1992 read with regulation 65 of the
More informationCIN: U70101MP2008PLC Director(s) 2. Santoshi Lal Rathore AEXPR6319A 3. Kanchan Rajawat
WTM/GM/EFD/ 35 /2017-18 SECURITIES AND EXCHANGE BOARD OF INDIA ORDER Under Sections 11(1), 11(4) and 11B of Securities and Exchange Board of India Act, 1992 read with Regulation 65 of the Securities and
More informationBEFORE THE SECURITIES AND EXCHAGNE BOARD OF INDIA CORAM: PRASHANT SARAN, WHOLE TIME MEMBER IN THE MATTER OF NGHI DEVELOPERS INDIA LIMITED
WTM/PS/19/CIS/WRO/NOV/2012 BEFORE THE SECURITIES AND EXCHAGNE BOARD OF INDIA CORAM: PRASHANT SARAN, WHOLE TIME MEMBER IN THE MATTER OF NGHI DEVELOPERS INDIA LIMITED In respect of NGHI Developers India
More informationBEFORE THE SECURITIES AND EXCHANGE BOARD OF INDIA CORAM: PRASHANT SARAN, WHOLE TIME MEMBER ORDER
WTM/PS/33/EFD/MAY/2016 BEFORE THE SECURITIES AND EXCHANGE BOARD OF INDIA CORAM: PRASHANT SARAN, WHOLE TIME MEMBER ORDER Under Sections 11(1), 11(4) and 11B of the Securities and Exchange Board of India
More informationBEFORE THE ADJUDICATING OFFICER SECURITIES AND EXCHANGE BOARD OF INDIA [ADJUDICATION ORDER NO: EAD-2/AO/ /2013]
BEFORE THE ADJUDICATING OFFICER SECURITIES AND EXCHANGE BOARD OF INDIA [ADJUDICATION ORDER NO: EAD-2/AO/134-139/2013] UNDER SECTION 15 I OF THE SECURITIES AND EXCHANGE BOARD OF INDIA ACT, 1992 READ WITH
More informationSECURITIES AND EXCHANGE BOARD OF INDIA ORDER
SECURITIES AND EXCHANGE BOARD OF INDIA ORDER WTM/RKA/EFD/135/2016 Under Sections 11 (1), 11(4), 11A and 11B of the Securities and Exchange Board of India Act, 1992 and regulation 28 of the Securities and
More informationSECURITIES AND EXCHANGE BOARD OF INDIA
WTM/GM/EFD/DRAIII/76/2017-18 SECURITIES AND EXCHANGE BOARD OF INDIA ORDER Under Sections 11 and 11B of the Securities and Exchange Board of India Act, 1992 read with regulation 107 of SEBI (Issue of Capital
More informationBEFORE THE SECURITIES AND EXCHANGE BOARD OF INDIA CORAM : PRASHANT SARAN, WHOLE TIME MEMBER ORDER
WTM/PS/49/CFD/DEC/2014 BEFORE THE SECURITIES AND EXCHANGE BOARD OF INDIA CORAM : PRASHANT SARAN, WHOLE TIME MEMBER ORDER Under sections 11(1), 11(2)(j), 11(4) and 11B of the Securities and Exchange Board
More informationNoticees DIN/CIN PAN No. Company 1. MGH PROJECT INDIA U45400WB2010PLC AAGCM8612H
WTM/GM/SEBI/ERO/IMD/37/2017-18 SECURITIES AND EXCHANGE BOARD OF INDIA INTERIM ORDER CUM SHOW CAUSE NOTICE UNDER SECTIONS 11(1), 11(4) AND 11B OF THE SECURITIES AND EXCHANGE BOARD OF INDIA ACT, 1992, IN
More informationOrder Under Section 29A of the National Housing Bank Act, 1987 in respect of M/s Kerala Housing Finance Limited
1. Background Order Under Section 29A of the National Housing Bank Act, 1987 in respect of M/s Kerala Housing Finance Limited Kerala Housing Finance Limited, a company having its registered office at II
More informationIN THE HIGH COURT OF DELHI AT NEW DELHI SUBJECT : SUIT FOR PERPETUAL INJUNCTION FAO (OS) NO. 157 OF Date of Decision : 10th July, 2007.
CORAM: IN THE HIGH COURT OF DELHI AT NEW DELHI SUBJECT : SUIT FOR PERPETUAL INJUNCTION FAO (OS) NO. 157 OF 2007 Date of Decision : 10th July, 2007. RASEEL G. ANSAL... Appellant. Through Mr. Arvind K. Nigam
More informationBEFORE THE SECURITIES AND EXCHANGE BOARD OF INDIA CORAM: S RAMAN, WHOLE TIME MEMBER
SEBI/WTM/SR/CFD/ 42 /07/2017 BEFORE THE SECURITIES AND EXCHANGE BOARD OF INDIA CORAM: S RAMAN, WHOLE TIME MEMBER ORDER Under Sections 11(1), 11(2)(j), 11(4) and 11B of the Securities and Exchange Board
More informationBEFORE THE SECURITIES AND EXCHANGE BOARD OF INDIA CORAM: PRASHANT SARAN, WHOLE TIME MEMBER ORDER
WTM/PS/119/IMD-ERO/DEC/2015 BEFORE THE SECURITIES AND EXCHANGE BOARD OF INDIA CORAM: PRASHANT SARAN, WHOLE TIME MEMBER ORDER Under sections 11, 11(4), 11A and 11B of the Securities and Exchange Board of
More informationWTM/PS/145/ERO/JAN/2016
WTM/PS/145/ERO/JAN/2016 BEFORE THE SECURITIES AND EXCHANGE BOARD OF INDIA CORAM: PRASHANT SARAN, WHOLE TIME MEMBER ORDER Under Sections 11(1), 11(4), 11A and 11B of the Securities and Exchange Board of
More information5TH NLIU JURIS CORP NATIONAL CORPORATE LAW MOOT COURT COMPETITION 2014 MOOT PROBLEM
1 Jeevani Limited ( Jeevani ) is a listed public company incorporated in the year 1990 under the Companies Act, 2013 with its registered office in New Delhi. Its equity shares are listed on the Bombay
More informationNATIONAL COMPANY LAW APPELLATE TRIBUNAL NEW DELHI COMPANY APPEAL(AT) NO.340 OF 2018
1 NATIONAL COMPANY LAW APPELLATE TRIBUNAL NEW DELHI COMPANY APPEAL(AT) NO.340 OF 2018 (ARISING OUT OF ORDER DATED 02.05.2018 PASSED BY NATIONAL COMPANY LAW TRIBUNAL, NEW DELHI BENCH, NEW DELHI IN COMPANY
More informationDELHI DEVELOPMENT AUTHORITY Through: Mr Ajay Verma, Adv. Through: Mr R.K. Saini, Adv with Mr Sitab Ali Chaudhary, Adv. AND LPA 709/2012.
IN THE HIGH COURT OF DELHI AT NEW DELHI SUBJECT : ALLOTMENT OF LAND Judgment reserved on : 01.03.2013 Judgment pronounced on : 05.03.2013 LPA 670/2012 DELHI DEVELOPMENT AUTHORITY Through: Mr Ajay Verma,
More informationSECURITIES AND EXCHANGE BOARD OF INDIA ORDER
SECURITIES AND EXCHANGE BOARD OF INDIA ORDER WTM/RKA/ERO/173/2016 Under Sections 11 (1), 11(4), 11A and 11B of the Securities and Exchange Board of India Act, 1992, in respect of: 1. KKDIL Nidhi Limited,
More information2011-TIOL-443-HC-MAD-CUS IN THE HIGH COURT OF MADRAS. C.M.A.No.3727 of 2004, W.P of 2011 and W.P of 1998 and CMP.No.
2011-TIOL-443-HC-MAD-CUS IN THE HIGH COURT OF MADRAS C.M.A.No.3727 of 2004, W.P.21054 of 2011 and W.P.12403 of 1998 and CMP.No.20013 of 2004 VETCARE ORGANIC PVT LTD Vs CESTAT, CHENNAI COMMISSIONER OF CUSTOMS,
More informationIN THE HIGH COURT OF DELHI AT NEW DELHI. Judgment Reserved On: Judgment Pronounced On: CO.PET. 991/2016 IN THE MATTER OF:-
IN THE HIGH COURT OF DELHI AT NEW DELHI CO.PET. 991/2016 IN THE MATTER OF:- Judgment Reserved On: 14.12.2016 Judgment Pronounced On: 18.01.2017 GEOMETRIC LIMITED Non-Petitioner/Demerged/Transferor Company
More informationIN THE NATIONAL COMPANY LAW TRIBUNAL CHANDIGARH BENCH, CHANDIGARH. Under Section 14 (1) of the Companies Act, 2013
1 IN THE NATIONAL COMPANY LAW TRIBUNAL CHANDIGARH BENCH, CHANDIGARH Under Section 14 (1) of the Companies Act, 2013 In the matter of : Daffodil Software Limited having its registered office at 15 th Floor,
More informationTHE HIGH COURT OF DELHI AT NEW DELHI
THE HIGH COURT OF DELHI AT NEW DELHI % Judgment delivered on: 13.05.2013 + W.P.(C) 8562/2007 & CM Nos. 16150/2007 & 17153/2007 MARUTI SUZUKI INDIA LTD... Petitioner versus DEPUTY COMMISSIONER OF INCOME
More informationIN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAY ORDINARY ORIGINAL CIVIL JURISDICTION
ASN 1/16 WP-3174-13.sxw IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAY ORDINARY ORIGINAL CIVIL JURISDICTION WRIT PETITION (L) NO.3174 OF 2013 The Director of Income Tax (Exemption), Mumbai, Having his office
More informationCORAM: HONOURABLE MR.JUSTICE AKIL
IN THE HIGH COURT OF GUJARAT AT AHMEDABAD SPECIAL CIVIL APPLICATION NO. 5848 of 2010 TO SPECIAL CIVIL APPLICATION NO. 5850 of 2010 FOR APPROVAL AND SIGNATURE: HONOURABLE MR.JUSTICE AKIL KURESHI and HONOURABLE
More informationSECURITIES AND EXCHANGE BOARD OF INDIA (ALTERNATIVE INVESTMENT FUNDS) REGULATIONS, 2012 CHAPTER I PRELIMINARY
THE GAZETTE OF INDIA EXTRAORDINARY PART III SECTION 4 PUBLISHED BY AUTHORITY NEW DELHI, MAY 21, 2012 SECURITIES AND EXCHANGE BOARD OF INDIA NOTIFICATION Mumbai, the 21 st May, 2012 SECURITIES AND EXCHANGE
More informationCASE NO. 55 of Coram. Shri Azeez M. Khan, Member Shri Deepak Lad, Member. M/s Shah Promoters and Developers
Before the MAHARASHTRA ELECTRICITY REGULATORY COMMISSION World Trade Centre, Centre No.1, 13th Floor, Cuffe Parade, Mumbai 400005 Tel. 022 22163964/65/69 Fax 22163976 Email: mercindia@merc.gov.in Website:
More information* HIGH COURT OF DELHI AT NEW DELHI + RSA 221/2014 & CM APPL.13917/2014. Through: Nemo. CORAM: HON BLE MR. JUSTICE V.K. SHALI
* HIGH COURT OF DELHI AT NEW DELHI + RSA 221/2014 & CM APPL.13917/2014 Decided on: 12 th January, 2016 DELHI DEVELOPMENT AUTHORITY... Appellant Through: Mr. Pawan Mathur, Standing Counsel for the DDA.
More informationIN THE HIGH COURT OF JHARKHAND AT RANCHI W.P. (PIL) No of 2012 With I.A. No of 2014
IN THE HIGH COURT OF JHARKHAND AT RANCHI W.P. (PIL) No. 1667 of 2012 With I.A. No. 3855 of 2014 Prem Kataruka, son of Late S.S. Kataruka, Resident of Vishnu Talkies Lane, P.O. : G.P.O., P.S.: Kotwali,
More informationCIVIL APPELLATE/ORIGINAL JURISDICTION CIVIL APPEAL Nos OF 2004
IN THE SUPREME COURT OF INDIA CIVIL APPELLATE/ORIGINAL JURISDICTION CIVIL APPEAL Nos. 516-527 OF 2004 Brij Lal & Ors.... Appellants versus Commissioner of Income Tax, Jalandhar... Respondents with Civil
More informationCASE No. 113 of Coram. Shri. Azeez M. Khan, Member Shri. Deepak Lad, Member
Before the MAHARASHTRA ELECTRICITY REGULATORY COMMISSION World Trade Centre, Centre No.1, 13th Floor, Cuffe Parade, Mumbai 400005. Tel. 022 22163964/65/69 Fax 22163976 Email: mercindia@merc.gov.in Website:
More informationIN THE HIGH COURT OF KARNATAKA AT BENGALURU PRESENT THE HON BLE MR.JUSTICE VINEET SARAN AND THE HON BLE MRS.JUSTICE S SUJATHA
1 IN THE HIGH COURT OF KARNATAKA AT BENGALURU R DATED THIS THE 18 TH DAY OF MARCH 2015 PRESENT THE HON BLE MR.JUSTICE VINEET SARAN AND THE HON BLE MRS.JUSTICE S SUJATHA WRIT APPEAL NOS. 989-1009/2015 (T-RES)
More information$~ * IN THE HIGH COURT OF DELHI AT NEW DELHI. Advocate. Versus
$~ * IN THE HIGH COURT OF DELHI AT NEW DELHI + CRL.M.C. 1990/2010 PREM KUMAR Judgment delivered on:08 th February, 2016 Represented by: Advocate. Versus... Petitioner Mr. Yogesh Verma, CUSTOMS... Respondent
More informationIN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT MADRAS (Ordinary Original Civil Jurisdiction) IN APPEAL NO. OF IN THE MATTER OF: The Income-tax Act, 1961
IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT MADRAS (Ordinary Original Civil Jurisdiction) IN APPEAL NO. OF 2014 IN THE MATTER OF: The Income-tax Act, 1961 And IN THE MATTER OF: Section 260A of the Income-tax Act,
More informationOF AUDITED STANDALONE FINANCIAL RESULTS FOR THE QUARTER AND YEAR ENDED MARCH
DLF Limited Regd. Office: Shopping Mall 3rd Floor, Arjun Marg, Phase I DLF City, Gurgaon - 122 022 (Haryana), India STATEMENT OF AUDITED STANDALONE FINANCIAL RESULTS FOR THE QUARTER AND YEAR ENDED MARCH
More informationIN THE HIGH COURT OF DELHI AT NEW DELHI SUBJECT : SERVICE MATTER Judgment delivered on: W.P.(C) 2331/2011
IN THE HIGH COURT OF DELHI AT NEW DELHI SUBJECT : SERVICE MATTER Judgment delivered on:07.11.2012 W.P.(C) 2331/2011 SURAJ MAL... Petitioner Through: Mr.K.G.Mishra, Advocate with Petitioner in person. Versus
More information$~ * IN THE HIGH COURT OF DELHI AT NEW DELHI CUSAA 4/2013. Versus
$~ * IN THE HIGH COURT OF DELHI AT NEW DELHI 16. + CUSAA 4/2013 COMMISSIONER OF CUSTOMS... Appellant Through Mr Rahul Kaushik, Senior Standing Counsel. Versus ORION ENTERPRISES... Respondent Through Mr
More informationSecurities and Exchange Board of India ( Alternative Investment Funds ) Regulations,2012
Securities and Exchange Board of India ( Alternative Investment Funds ) Regulations,2012 Preliminary Short Title and Commencement 1. (1) These Regulation shall be called the Securities And Exchange Board
More informationNATIONAL COMPANY LAW APPELLATE TRIBUNAL NEW DELHI. Company Appeal (AT) No of 2018
NATIONAL COMPANY LAW APPELLATE TRIBUNAL NEW DELHI IN THE MATTER OF: Ariizona Real Estate Pvt. Ltd. & Ors. Versus Union of India Present : Appellants Respondent For Appellants : Mr. Mihir Thakore, Senior
More informationCase No. 129 of Shri V.P. Raja, Chairman Shri Vijay L. Sonavane, Member
Before the MAHARASHTRA ELECTRICITY REGULATORY COMMISSION World Trade Centre, Centre No.1, 13th Floor, Cuffe Parade, Mumbai 400 005 Tel. 022 22163964/65/69 Fax 22163976 Email: mercindia@mercindia.org.in
More informationIN THE HIGH COURT OF DELHI AT NEW DELHI SUBJECT : Central Excise Act, 1944 DECIDED ON: CEAC 22/2012
IN THE HIGH COURT OF DELHI AT NEW DELHI SUBJECT : Central Excise Act, 1944 DECIDED ON: 23.07.2012 CEAC 22/2012 COMMISSIONER OF CUSTOMS (EXPORT)... Petitioner Through: Dr.Ashwani Bhardwaj, Advocate versus
More informationIN THE HIGH COURT OF DELHI AT NEW DELHI
* IN THE HIGH COURT OF DELHI AT NEW DELHI + W.P.(C) 6732/2015 T.T. LTD. Versus Through: Date of Decision: 7 th January, 2016... Petitioner Ms.Shilpi Jain Sharma, Adv. UNION OF INDIA & ANR... Respondents
More informationARMED FORCES TRIBUNAL, CHANDIGARH REGIONAL BENCH AT CHANDIMANDIR. TA No.1139 of 2010 (arising out of C.W.P. No.8469 of 2004) Versus
1 ARMED FORCES TRIBUNAL, CHANDIGARH REGIONAL BENCH AT CHANDIMANDIR TA No.1139 of 2010 ( C.W.P. No.8469 of 2004) Kishan Singh Union of India & others For the petitioner For the Respondent(s) Versus : Mr.Arun
More informationARTECH POWER PRODUCTS LIMITED CODE OF CORPORATE DISCLOSURE PRACTICES CODE OF CONDUCT FOR PREVENTION OF INSIDR TRADING
ARTECH POWER PRODUCTS LIMITED CODE OF CORPORATE DISCLOSURE PRACTICES AND CODE OF CONDUCT FOR PREVENTION OF INSIDR TRADING ARTECH POWER PRODUCTS LIMTED Code of practices and procedures for fair disclosure
More informationNATIONAL COMPANY LAW APPELLATE TRIBUNAL, NEW DELHI. Company Appeal (AT) (Insolvency) No. 327 of 2018
1 NATIONAL COMPANY LAW APPELLATE TRIBUNAL, NEW DELHI (Arising out of Order dated 24 th April, 2018 passed by the Adjudicating Authority (National Company Law Tribunal), Principal Bench, New Delhi in Company
More information* IN THE HIGH COURT OF DELHI AT NEW DELHI % Date of decision: August 25, RFA(OS) 50/2015. versus HOUSING DEVELOPMENT FINANCE
* IN THE HIGH COURT OF DELHI AT NEW DELHI % Date of decision: August 25, 2015 + RFA(OS) 50/2015 SANDEEP KUMAR Represented by: versus HOUSING DEVELOPMENT FINANCE CORPORATION LIMITED & ANR Represented by:
More informationIN THE HIGH COURT OF DELHI AT NEW DELHI SUBJECT : CODE OF CIVIL PROCEDURE Date of decision: 16th December, 2013 RFA No.581/2013.
IN THE HIGH COURT OF DELHI AT NEW DELHI SUBJECT : CODE OF CIVIL PROCEDURE Date of decision: 16th December, 2013 RFA No.581/2013 SUNIL GUPTA Through: Mr. Amrit Pal Singh, Adv.... Appellant Versus HARISH
More informationCIRCULAR. CFD/DIL3/CIR/2017/21 March 10, All Listed Entities who have listed their equity and convertibles All the Recognized Stock Exchanges
CIRCULAR CFD/DIL3/CIR/2017/21 March 10, 2017 All Listed Entities who have listed their equity and convertibles All the Recognized Stock Exchanges Dear Sir/Madam, Sub: Schemes of Arrangement by Listed Entities
More information* IN THE HIGH COURT OF DELHI AT NEW DELHI. % Judgment delivered on: INTERNATIONAL ASSET RECONSTRUCTION COMPANY LTD
* IN THE HIGH COURT OF DELHI AT NEW DELHI % Judgment delivered on: 06.11.2009 + W.P.(C) 12965/2009 KRIMPEX SYNTHETICS LTD... Petitioner -versus- INTERNATIONAL ASSET RECONSTRUCTION COMPANY LTD AND ORS...
More informationASN 1/18 WP-2632.doc. vs. 1. The Director of Income Tax (International Taxation) 11, having his office at Scindia House, Mumbai.
ASN 1/18 WP-2632.doc IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAY ORDINARY ORIGINAL CIVIL JURISDICTION WRIT PETITION NO.2632 OF 2012 Mahindra BT Investment Co. (Mauritius) Ltd. A company incorporated and
More informationIN THE COURT OF APPEAL. ARCELORMITTAL POINT LISAS LIMITED (formerly CARIBBEAN ISPAT LIMITED) Appellant AND
TRINIDAD AND TOBAGO IN THE COURT OF APPEAL Civil Appeal No: 211 of 2009 BETWEEN ARCELORMITTAL POINT LISAS LIMITED (formerly CARIBBEAN ISPAT LIMITED) Appellant AND STEEL WORKERS UNION OF TRINIDAD AND TOBAGO
More informationCENTRAL INFORMATION COMMISSION Appeal No.CIC/OK/C/2007/00040 Right to Information Act 2005 Section 18
CENTRAL INFORMATION COMMISSION Appeal No.CIC/OK/C/2007/00040 Right to Information Act 2005 Section 18 Appellant - Shri B. R. Manhas Respondent - Jawahar Lal Nehru Memorial Fund Facts: By an application
More informationTHE HIGH COURT OF DELHI AT NEW DELHI % Judgment delivered on: ITA 232/2014 COMMISSIONER OF INCOME TAX-VI
THE HIGH COURT OF DELHI AT NEW DELHI % Judgment delivered on: 21.05.2014 + ITA 232/2014 COMMISSIONER OF INCOME TAX-VI... Appellant versus WORLDWIDE TOWNSHIP PROJECTS LTD... Respondent Advocates who appeared
More informationBEFORE THE ADJUDICATING OFFICER SECURITIES AND EXCHANGE BOARD OF INDIA [ADJUDICATION ORDER NO. VSS/AO- 27/2009]
BEFORE THE ADJUDICATING OFFICER SECURITIES AND EXCHANGE BOARD OF INDIA [ADJUDICATION ORDER NO. VSS/AO- 27/2009] UNDER SECTION 15-I OF SECURITIES AND EXCHANGE BOARD OF INDIA ACT, 1992 READ WITH RULE 5 OF
More informationWTM/GM/EFD/ 65 / SECURITIES AND EXCHANGE BOARD OF INDIA ORDER
WTM/GM/EFD/ 65 /2017-18 SECURITIES AND EXCHANGE BOARD OF INDIA ORDER Under Sections 11(1), 11(4) and 11B of Securities and Exchange Board of India Act, 1992 read with Regulation 65 of the Securities and
More informationWTM/GM/ISD/09/JAN/2017
WTM/GM/ISD/09/JAN/2017 SECURITIES AND EXCHANGE BOARD OF INDIA ORDER In continuation of orders dated December 19, 2014 and August 25, 2016 passed under sections 11 and 11B of the Securities and Exchange
More information2009 NTN 40) [ALLAHABAD HIGH COURT]
2009 NTN (Vol. 40) - 368 [ALLAHABAD HIGH COURT] Hon ble R.K.Agarwal & Hon ble S.K.Gupta, JJ. Civil Misc. Writ Petition No. 943 of 2000 M/s Swati Menthol and Allied Chemicals Pvt. Limited vs. Assistant
More informationIN THE SUPREME COURT OF INDIA CIVIL APPELLATE JURISDICTION. CIVIL APPEAL NO.360 of 2016 (Arising from the SLP(Civil) No.
1 Non-Reportable IN THE SUPREME COURT OF INDIA CIVIL APPELLATE JURISDICTION CIVIL APPEAL NO.360 of 2016 (Arising from the SLP(Civil) No.527 of 2015) State of Gujarat and Another.Appellants Versus Shree
More informationBEFORE THE SECURITIES AND EXCHANGE BOARD OF INDIA CORAM: MADHABI PURI BUCH, WHOLE TIME MEMBER ORDER
WTM/MPB/EFD1- DRAIV-122/2018 BEFORE THE SECURITIES AND EXCHANGE BOARD OF INDIA CORAM: MADHABI PURI BUCH, WHOLE TIME MEMBER ORDER Under Sections 11(1), 11(4), 11B and 11D of the Securities and Exchange
More information¼ããÀ ããè¾ã ¹ãÆãä ã¼ãîãä ã ããõà ãäìããä ã½ã¾ã ºããñ Ã
CIRCULAR CIR/CFD/CMD/16/2015 November 30, 2015 To All Listed Entities who have listed their equity and convertibles All the Recognized Stock Exchanges Dear Sir/Madam, Sub: Schemes of Arrangement by Listed
More informationThe Appellant was present at the NIC Studio, Kolkata.
Central Information Commission, New Delhi Right to Information Act-2005-Under Section (19) Date of hearing Date of decision : : 17 th November 2016 23 rd November 2016 Name of the Appellant : SHRI ANIL
More informationNATIONAL COMMODITY CLEARING LIMITED
NATIONAL COMMODITY CLEARING LIMITED Circular to all Members of the Clearing Corporation Circular No. : NCCL/MEMBERSHIP-002/2018 Date : September 26, 2018 Subject : NCCL Membership - Submission of Undertaking
More informationSTATEMENT OF AUDITED CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL RESULTS FOR THE QUARTER ENDED JUNE 30, 2018 (` in crores) SL NO. PARTICULARS QUARTER ENDED
DLF Limited Regd. Office: Shopping Mall 3rd Floor, Arjun Marg, Phase I DLF City, Gurgaon - 122 022 (Haryana), India CIN L70101HR1963PLC002484,Website : www.dlf.in Tel.: +91-124-4769000, Fax:+91-124-4769250
More informationBEFORE THE SECURITIES AND EXCHANGE BOARD OF INDIA CORAM: MADHABI PURI BUCH, WHOLE TIME MEMBER FINAL ORDER
WTM/MPB/EFD-1-DRA-IV/ 34/2018 BEFORE THE SECURITIES AND EXCHANGE BOARD OF INDIA CORAM: MADHABI PURI BUCH, WHOLE TIME MEMBER FINAL ORDER Under Sections 11, 11(4),11A and 11B of the Securities and Exchange
More information, , Other income Profit from ordinary activities before finance costs and
DLF Limited Regd. Office:Shopping Mall 3rd Floor, Arjun Marg, Phase I DLF City, Gurgaon - 122 022 (Haryana) STATEMENT OF AUDITED CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL RESULTS FOR THE QUARTER AND YEAR ENDED MARCH 31,
More informationForm-73 APPEAL TO BE FILED BEFORE THE STATE CONSUMER DISPUTES REDRESSAL COMMISSION
Form-73 APPEAL TO BE FILED BEFORE THE STATE CONSUMER DISPUTES REDRESSAL COMMISSION BEFORE THE HON BLE STATE CONSUMER DISPUTES REDRESSAL COMMISSION AT ----------. Appellant -Vs- Respondent Appeal under
More informationIN THE SUPREME COURT OF INDIA CIVIL APPELLATE JURISDICTION CIVIL APPEAL NO. 830 OF 2018 SPECIAL LEAVE PETITION (C) NOS.
1 NON-REPORTABLE IN THE SUPREME COURT OF INDIA CIVIL APPELLATE JURISDICTION CIVIL APPEAL NO. 830 OF 2018 [@ SPECIAL LEAVE PETITION (C) NOS. 28172 OF 2015] SMT.SUBHADRA APPELLANT (S) VERSUS THE MINISTRY
More informationForm-38. APPLICATION FOR GARNISHEE ORDER ( under Sec 9 of ARBITRATION AND CONCILATION ACT, 1996) ASSET CONFISCATED
Form-38 APPLICATION FOR GARNISHEE ORDER ( under Sec 9 of ARBITRATION AND CONCILATION ACT, 1996) ASSET CONFISCATED BEFORE THE HON BLE DISTRICT COUR / HIGH COURT AT I.A.NO. / O.A. No.. / 20. IN THE MATTER
More informationSECURITIES AND EXCHANGE BOARD OF INDIA ORDER
SECURITIES AND EXCHANGE BOARD OF INDIA ORDER Order under Regulation 13 of the of Securities and Exchange Board of India (Procedure for holding enquiry by Enquiry Officer and imposing penalty) Regulations,
More informationIN THE INCOME TAX APPELLATE TRIBUNAL MUMBAI B BENCH MUMBAI BENCHES, MUMBAI BEFORE SHRI VIJAY PAL RAO, JM & SHRI N. K. BILLAIYA, AM ORDER
IN THE INCOME TAX APPELLATE TRIBUNAL MUMBAI B BENCH MUMBAI BENCHES, MUMBAI BEFORE SHRI VIJAY PAL RAO, JM & SHRI N. K. BILLAIYA, AM STAY APPLICATION No. 293/Mum/2013 (Arising out of ITA No.6678/M/2013 Asst
More informationBE it enacted by Parliament in the Fifty-sixth Year of the Republic of India as follows:-
~ THE CREDIT INFORMATION COMPANIES (REGULATION) ACT, 2005 # NO. 30 OF 2005 $ [23rd June 2005.] + An Act to provide for regulation of credit information companies and to facilitate efficient distribution
More informationARDEE INFRASTRUCTURE PVT. LTD... Appellant Through: Mr.Anil Kr.Mishra, Advocate alongwith Mr.Saurabh Mishra, Advocate. versus
IN THE HIGH COURT OF DELHI AT NEW DELHI SUBJECT : Arbitration and Conciliation Act ARB.A. 21/2014 Judgment reserved on: 01.12.2014 Judgment pronounced on: 09.12.2014 ARDEE INFRASTRUCTURE PVT. LTD.... Appellant
More informationMoot Court Problem THE BACKGROUND
Moot Court Problem THE BACKGROUND 1. Around 2009, when internal government reports were predicting a steady rise in inflation, the Government of Maharashtra noticed a rather strange trend: limestone prices
More informationBEFORE THE SECURITIES APPELLATE TRIBUNAL MUMBAI
BEFORE THE SECURITIES APPELLATE TRIBUNAL MUMBAI Order Reserved on: 27.06.2017 Date of Decision : 28.07.2017 Misc. Application No. 188 of 2017 And Appeal No. 428 of 2015 1. Sahara Asset Management Company
More informationIN THE HIGH COURT OF DELHI : NEW DELHI SUBJECT : INCOME TAX MATTER. ITA No-160/2005. Judgment reserved on: 12th March, 2007
IN THE HIGH COURT OF DELHI : NEW DELHI SUBJECT : INCOME TAX MATTER ITA No-160/2005 Judgment reserved on: 12th March, 2007 Judgment delivered on: 24th May, 2007 COMMISSIONER OF INCOME TAX DELHI-I, NEW DELHI...
More informationARMED FORCES TRIBUNAL, CHANDIGARH REGIONAL BENCH AT CHANDIMANDIR -.- OA 1989 of 2012
ARMED FORCES TRIBUNAL, CHANDIGARH REGIONAL BENCH AT CHANDIMANDIR OA 1989 of 2012 Jainarain Shivrain Petitioner(s) Vs Union of India and others Respondent(s) For the Petitioner (s) : Mr Surinder Sheoran,
More informationIN THE HIGH COURT OF DELHI AT NEW DELHI SUBJECT : CENTRAL EXCISE ACT, 1944 CEAC 2/2012 DATE OF DECISION : FEBRUARY 01, 2012
IN THE HIGH COURT OF DELHI AT NEW DELHI SUBJECT : CENTRAL EXCISE ACT, 1944 CEAC 2/2012 DATE OF DECISION : FEBRUARY 01, 2012 SRI SAI ENTERPRISES & ANR. Through Mr. R. Krishnan, Advocate.... Petitioners
More informationCWP No of 2011 (O&M) -1- IN THE HIGH COURT OF PUNJAB AND HARYANA AT CHANDIGARH. versus
CWP No.19387 of 2011 (O&M) -1- IN THE HIGH COURT OF PUNJAB AND HARYANA AT CHANDIGARH CWP No.19387 of 2011 (O&M) Date of Decision : 19.10.2011 Union of India & others... Petitioners versus Raj Pal & another...
More informationDe Jure. May 4, 2016 NEW LAW ON PONZI SCHEMES AND UNAUTHORISED DEPOSIT TAKING ACTIVITIES
De Jure May 4, 2016 NEW LAW ON PONZI SCHEMES AND UNAUTHORISED DEPOSIT TAKING ACTIVITIES INTRODUCTION The NDA Government has proposed a new bill which seeks to clamp down illegal Ponzi schemes and other
More informationCompanies Act 2013 Sections List
1 Short title, extent,commencement and application 2 Definitions 3 Formation of company 4 Memorandum 5 Articles 6 Act to override memorandum, articles, etc 7 Incorporation of company 8 Formation of companies
More informationOn behalf of the Respondents, Shri Dinesh Kumar S. Parmar, Deputy Zonal
Central Information Commission, New Delhi File No. Right to Information Act-2005-Under Section (19) Date of first hearing Date of first order Date of second hearing Date of second order Date of third hearing
More informationIN THE NATIONAL COMPANY LAW APPELLATE TRIBUNAL. Company Appeal (AT) (Insolvency) No. 485 of 2018
IN THE NATIONAL COMPANY LAW APPELLATE TRIBUNAL [arising out of Order dated 6 th July, 2018 by National Company Law Tribunal, Chandigarh Bench in C.P (IB) No. 35/CHD/HP/2018] IN THE MATTER OF : Lalan Kumar
More informationBEFORE THE ELECTRICITY OMBUDSMAN (Appointed by the Maharashtra Electricity Regulatory Commission under Section 42(6) of the Electricity Act, 2003)
BEFORE THE ELECTRICITY OMBUDSMAN (Appointed by the Maharashtra Electricity Regulatory Commission under Section 42(6) of the Electricity Act, 2003) 606, KESHAVA, Bandra Kurla Complex, Bandra (East), Mumbai
More informationA FORTNIGHTLY VAT/GST LAW REPORTER 2003 NTN 22)-7 [ALLAHABAD HIGH COURT]
2003 (Vol. 22)-7 [ALLAHABAD HIGH COURT] Hon'ble Shyamal Kumar Sen, C.J. & Hon'ble R.K. Agrawal, J. Civil Misc. Writ Petition No. 1338 OF 1991 M/s Mukund Lal Banarasi Lal vs. Commissioner of Sales Tax,
More informationIn the matter of: (Amended Memo of Parties)
1 IN THE NATIONAL COMPANY LAW TRIBUNAL CHANDIGARH BENCH, CHANDIGARH (EXERCISING THE POWERS OF ADJUDICATING AUTHORITY UNDER THE INSOLVENCY AND BANKRUPTCY CODE, 2016) In the matter of: (Amended Memo of Parties)
More informationSTRIDES PHARMA SCIENCE LIMITED POLICY ON DETERMINATION OF MATERIALITY OF EVENTS/ INFORMATION FOR DISCLOSURE TO STOCK EXCHANGES
STRIDES PHARMA SCIENCE LIMITED POLICY ON DETERMINATION OF MATERIALITY OF EVENTS/ INFORMATION FOR DISCLOSURE TO STOCK EXCHANGES 1 POLICY ON DETERMINATION OF MATERIALITY OF EVENTS/ INFORMATION FOR DISCLOSURE
More informationNATIONAL COMPANY LAW APPELLATE TRIBUNAL NEW DELHI. Company Appeal (AT) (Insolvency) Nos. 32 & 50 of 2018
NATIONAL COMPANY LAW APPELLATE TRIBUNAL NEW DELHI (arising out of order dated 8 th January, 2018 passed by National Company Law Tribunal, New Delhi Bench in C.A. No. 233(PB)/2017 IN C.P. No. (IB)- 84(PB)/2017)
More informationBEFORE THE SECURITIES AND EXCHANGE BOARD OF INDIA CORAM: PRASHANT SARAN, WHOLE TIME MEMBER ORDER
WTM/PS/81/CIS-NRO/NOV/2015 BEFORE THE SECURITIES AND EXCHANGE BOARD OF INDIA CORAM: PRASHANT SARAN, WHOLE TIME MEMBER ORDER Under Sections 11(1), 11(4) and 11B of the Securities and Exchange Board of India
More informationIN THE HIGH COURT OF KARNATAKA AT BANGALORE PRESENT THE HON'BLE MR.JUSTICE DILIP B.BHOSALE AND THE HON'BLE MR.JUSTICE B.MANOHAR ITA NO.
1 IN THE HIGH COURT OF KARNATAKA AT BANGALORE DATED THIS THE 05 TH DAY OF MARCH 2014 PRESENT THE HON'BLE MR.JUSTICE DILIP B.BHOSALE AND THE HON'BLE MR.JUSTICE B.MANOHAR BETWEEN: ITA NO.828/2007 H.Raghavendra
More informationVersus P R E S E N T HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE PRASHANT KUMAR This writ application has been filed for the following. reliefs:
CIVIL WRIT JURISDICTION CASE No. 33 of 1994 (R) In the matter of an application under Articles 226 and 227 of the Constitution of India. ---- M/S Tata Engineering & Locomotive Company Limited,Singhbhum(East),
More informationSUMMARY OF KEY RECOMMENDATIONS OF THE COMPANIES LAW COMMITTEE Recommending Amendments to the Companies Act of 2013
SUMMARY OF KEY RECOMMENDATIONS OF THE COMPANIES LAW COMMITTEE Recommending Amendments to the Companies Act of 2013 1. BACKGROUND The Report by the Companies Law Committee (CLC) recommending amendments
More informationIN THE HIGH COURT AT CALCUTTA Civil Appellate Jurisdiction (Original Side) I.T.A. No.264 of 2003
1 IN THE HIGH COURT AT CALCUTTA Civil Appellate Jurisdiction (Original Side) Present: The Hon ble Mr. Justice Bhaskar Bhattacharya And The Hon ble Mr. Justice Sambuddha Chakrabarti I.T.A. No.264 of 2003
More informationIN THE HIGH COURT OF DELHI AT NEW DELHI SUBJECT : CHARTERED ACCOUNTANTS ACT, Reserved on : October 30, Date of Decision : November 6, 2006
IN THE HIGH COURT OF DELHI AT NEW DELHI SUBJECT : CHARTERED ACCOUNTANTS ACT, 1949 Reserved on : October 30, 2006 Date of Decision : November 6, 2006 CHAT.A.REF.No. 6 of 2005 COUNCIL OF THE INSTITUTE OF
More informationTHE GAZETTE OF INDIA EXTRAORDINARY. PART II - SECTION 3 - SUB-SECTION (ii) PUBLISHED BY AUTHORITY NOTIFICATION. MUMBAI, THE 16th DAY OF MAY, 1996
THE GAZETTE OF INDIA EXTRAORDINARY PART II - SECTION 3 - SUB-SECTION (ii) PUBLISHED BY AUTHORITY NOTIFICATION MUMBAI, THE 16th DAY OF MAY, 1996 SECURITIES AND EXCHANGE BOARD OF INDIA (DEPOSITORIES AND
More informationImportant provisions of the Companies Act, 2013 Regarding Deposits
Important provisions of the Companies Act, 2013 Regarding Deposits When we look at the various provisions of deposits in the Companies Act, 2013(CA 2013 or the Act), there is no much difference in the
More information