MOTION SHEET. MOTION 2 I move that the Council not adopt the proposed ordinances. City Council Members. FROM: Jennifer Bruno Deputy Director

Size: px
Start display at page:

Download "MOTION SHEET. MOTION 2 I move that the Council not adopt the proposed ordinances. City Council Members. FROM: Jennifer Bruno Deputy Director"

Transcription

1 MOTION SHEET CITY COUNCIL of SALT LAKE CITY TO: City Council Members FROM: Jennifer Bruno Deputy Director DATE: April 22, 2014 RE: MOTION SHEET Impact Fee Revisions Council Sponsor: Stan Penfold VIEW ADMINISTRATION S PROPOSAL The Administration has provided two ordinances for Council consideration that would implement changes to the City s impact fees discussed by the Council at the March 4, 2014 work session: Reduces park impact fees from $3,999 to $2,875 for 2 years, at which point they return to $3,999. Clarifies that Roadway fees shall be collected in the Westside industrial area only, Amends the City s consolidated fee schedule to reflect the changes to fees and clarification of fees for appeal. The Administration has confirmed that they will begin the process to re-open the Impact Fees Facility Plan shortly. The Administration indicates that they will include the following in the scope: establishing level of service, update service areas, creation/update of list of projects, modification of impact fees based on new service areas and projects, examination of program where developers can build public facilities in lieu of paying fee (would include discussion of long-term maintenance, liability, public usage, etc.), analysis of separation of roadway fees (to collect for roads in a separate area than for other modes of transportation) or collection citywide. MOTION 1 I move that the Council adopt the ordinances prepared by the Attorney s office that amend impact fees, clarify fees for appeals to impact fees, clarify collection areas for road fees, and update the City s consolidated fee schedule. MOTION 2 I move that the Council not adopt the proposed ordinances. CITY COUNCIL OF SALT LAKE CITY 451 SOUTH STATE STREET, ROOM 304 P.O. BOX , SALT LAKE CITY, UTAH TEL FAX CHARLIE LUKE DISTRICT 6 COUNCIL CHAIR LUKE GARROTT DISTRICT 4 COUNCIL VICE CHAIR JAMES ROGERS DISTRICT 1 KYLE LAMALFA DISTRICT 2 STAN PENFOLD DISTRICT 3 ERIN MENDENHALL DISTRICT 5 LISA ADAMS DISTRICT 7

2 SALT LAKE CITY ORDINANCE No. of 2014 (Amending the Salt Lake City Consolidated Fee Schedule to modify impact fees) WHEREAS, the Salt Lake City Consolidated Fee Schedule is proposed to be amended to modify impact fees as shown in the attached Exhibit A ; and WHEREAS, the Salt Lake City Council finds (i) the fees set forth in Exhibit A are necessary, reasonable, and equitable in relation to regulatory and service costs incurred by the City; (ii) that such fees are in accordance with Utah Code chapter 11-36a (Utah Impact Fees Act); and (iii) adoption of this ordinance reasonably furthers the health, safety, and general welfare of the, citizens of Salt Lake City. NOW, THEREFORE, be it ordained by the City Council of Salt Lake City, Utah: SECTION 1. The Salt Lake City Consolidated Fee Schedule shall be, and is hereby amended, in pertinent part, to reflect the fees set forth in the attached Exhibit A relating to impact fees SECTION 2. The official copy of the Salt Lake City Consolidated Fee Schedule shall be revised to include the fees set forth in the attached Exhibit A and a copy of thereof shall be published on the official Salt Lake City website. SECTION 3. This ordinance shall become effective on the date of its first publication. Passed by the City Council of Salt Lake City, Utah this day of, CHAIRPERSON ATTEST: CITY RECORDER Transmitted to Mayor on. Mayor s Action: Approved. Vetoed. MAYOR 1

3 CITY RECORDER (SEAL) Bill No. of APPROVED AS TO FORM Date: By: Published: 2

4 EXHIBIT A TO SALT LAKE CITY ORDINANCE NO. OF 2014 IMPACT FEES For questions regarding Impact fees contact: Service Fee Additional Information Section Appeals Process $ NEW Developers Independent Calculation $ Impact Fees Residential (Per dwelling unit, single or multifamily) Commercial / Industrial (per square foot, retail, office and industrial) Fire $ $ NEW Park $2, No charge Fee to increase after 2 years to $3, $3, Police $41.00 $ Roadway Residential Single Family $ Retail $3.28 Office $2.33 Industrial $2.26 Storm Water $374 Multi-Family $ Per dwelling unit Per square foot Per square foot Per square foot Per 1/4 acre

5 SALT LAKE CITY ORDINANCE No. of 2014 (Amending the Salt Lake City Consolidated Fee Schedule to modify impact fees) WHEREAS, the Salt Lake City Consolidated Fee Schedule is proposed to be amended to modify impact fees as shown in the attached Exhibit A ; and WHEREAS, the Salt Lake City Council finds (i) the fees set forth in Exhibit A are necessary, reasonable, and equitable in relation to regulatory and service costs incurred by the City; (ii) that such fees are in accordance with Utah Code chapter 11-36a (Utah Impact Fees Act); and (iii) adoption of this ordinance reasonably furthers the health, safety, and general welfare of the, citizens of Salt Lake City. NOW, THEREFORE, be it ordained by the City Council of Salt Lake City, Utah: SECTION 1. The Salt Lake City Consolidated Fee Schedule shall be, and is hereby amended, in pertinent part, to reflect the fees set forth in the attached Exhibit A relating to impact fees SECTION 2. The official copy of the Salt Lake City Consolidated Fee Schedule shall be revised to include the fees set forth in the attached Exhibit A and a copy of thereof shall be published on the official Salt Lake City website. SECTION 3. This ordinance shall become effective on the date of its first publication. Passed by the City Council of Salt Lake City, Utah this day of, CHAIRPERSON ATTEST: CITY RECORDER Transmitted to Mayor on. Mayor s Action: Approved. Vetoed. MAYOR 1

6 CITY RECORDER (SEAL) Bill No. of Published: 2

7 EXHIBIT A TO SALT LAKE CITY ORDINANCE NO. OF 2014 For questions regarding Impact fees contact: IMPACT FEES Service Fee Additional Information Section Appeals Process $50 Developers Independent $ Calculation Impact Fees Residential (Per dwelling unit, single or multifamily) Commercial/ Industrial (per square foot, retail, office and industrial) Fire $ $ Park $2, No charge Increase fee after 2 years to 3, Police $41.00 $ Road way Residential Single Family $ Multi-Family $ Per dwelling unit Retail $3.28 Per square foot Office $2.33 Per square foot Industrial $2.26 Per square foot Storm Water $374 Per 1/4 acre

8

9

10 SALT LAKE CITY ORDINANCE No. of 2014 (Amending impact fee service areas) AN ORDINANCE AMENDING SECTION , SALT LAKE CITY CODE, TO MODIFY THE ROADWAY FACILITIES IMPACT FEE SERVICE AREA. WHEREAS, it is proposed that Section , Service Areas, Salt Lake City Code, be amended to modify the roadway impact fee service area; and WHEREAS, the City Council finds adoption of this ordinance reasonably furthers the health, safety, and general welfare of the citizens of Salt Lake City. NOW, THEREFORE, be it ordained by the City Council of Salt Lake City, Utah: SECTION 1. Section , Salt Lake City Code is amended to read as follows: : SERVICE AREAS: A. The following impact fee service areas are hereby established: 1. For the purpose of park impact fees, the service area shall be all of the incorporated area of the city, including future annexed area. 2. For the purpose of fire impact fees, the service area shall be all of the incorporated area of the city, including future annexed area. 3. For the purpose of roadway facilities impact fees, the service area shall be all of the incorporated area of the city, including future annexed area.the Northwest Quadrant and the Westside Industrial Area. 4. For the purpose of police impact fees, the service area shall be all of the incorporated area of the city, including future annexed area. B. Impact fees shall be assessed only on development activity within the service area. C. Impact fees collected within a service area shall be spent within that service area. D. The appropriateness of the designation and boundaries of the service areas shall be reviewed periodically by the city as part of the impact fee revision process. Following such review and a public hearing, the service areas may be amended. SECTION 2. This ordinance shall become effective on the date of its first publication. Passed by the City Council of Salt Lake City, Utah this day of,

11 CHAIRPERSON ATTEST: CITY RECORDER Transmitted to Mayor on. Mayor s Action: Approved. Vetoed. MAYOR CITY RECORDER (SEAL) Bill No. of APPROVED AS TO FORM Date: By: Published: 2

12 ERIC O. S H... W M... "IY DE LA. "'... RE SCH... EF"ER "CPU' " ",RECT,," DEP... "ITMENT OF" COMMUNITY & ECONOMIC DEVELOPMENT OF"F"ICE OF" TH E DI"IECTD"I CITY COUNCIL TRANS MITT AL m[e [eoi!j[e~ W JAN By Date Received: ~ Date scnt to Coun.cil: ~ W C TO: Salt Lake City Council iduary 8, 2014 Charlie Luke, Chair FROM: SUBJECT: Eric D. Shaw, CEO Director Ten-Year Capital Frilities Plan and impact Fee Ordinance STAFF CONTACT: COUNCIL SPONSOR: DOCUMENT TYPE: RECOMMENDATION: Michael Akerlow, Director of Housing and Neighborhood Development (801) , michael.akerlow@slcgov.com Stan Penfold Ordinance That the City Council enact the attached ordinance. BUDGET IMPACT: The proposed ordinance would decrease the parks impact fee from the current amount to the Mayor's original proposed fee. This transmittal also clarifies the Administration's intent in collecting roadway impact fees pursuant to the existing ordinance. BACKGROUNDIDISCUSSION: On December 10,2013, an initial transmittal was submitted to the Council regarding impact fees. Since that submittal, additional infonnation has been received and included and this transmittal supplements and clarifies the original transmittal, and now stands as the most current transmittal from the Administration. In May the City Cowlcil voted to approve the 10-Year Capital Facilities Plan and an increase to the City'S impact fees. Galena Consulting, the impact fee consultant, was hired by the City to research and compile the 10-Year Plan. They presented three recommendations to the Mayor and the City Council regarding the impact fees. The Mayor chose an option with lower impact fees and fewer items on the fiscally constrained project list. The G:ouncil approved a different option which included various increases or 451 SOUTH ST... TE IITRii:ET, "100M P. O.!lOX 145,'86. S... LT LIII(E C ITY, UTIIH B4114'5486 TeLePHON e : D01'5::J~'6a::JO... x, D01'~::J5-600 ~ '"'ww... ~c<:l a".ca.. <.,~...

13 decreases to the fees and a more expansive project list. The most significant changes in the new impact fee schedule inclnde a) a change to the park fee which was increased from the Mayor's recommendation of $1,752 to $3,999 and b) an intended change in the way that roadway fees are collected. In the previous plan, fees for roadways were paid for projects within three areas: infill development, west side, and northwest quadrant; however, the Council intended to enact an ordinance requiring collection of roadway impact fees City-wide. Although the 10-Year Capital Facilities Plan was approved in 2012, the impact fees were put into effect beginning January I, Throughout 2013, various divisions within Community and Economic Development received several complaints and comments from the development community regarding the changes to the fees. The feedback received is that due to the change in impact fees, particularly the roadway and parks fees, many developers have or are threatening to move to other cities, choosing not to build, or are considering legal action against the City, all of which are affecting the economic health of the City. There is also an intemal issue to the City with the impact fee increase. Impact fees are required to be spent within a six-year period or be repaid to the developers who were charged the fees. Based on growth, a percentage of impact fees may be used for eligible projects, which means that the remaining funding must come from another source, typically the general fund or Class C. Due to the significant increase of impact fees as a result of the higher fee schedule, the City will not only need to have eligible projects for the use of the fimds but will also need to have additional funding available to malce up the difference in cost, or match, before the six-year expiration. Eligible projects are those identified in the constrained 10-Year Capital Facilities Plan. During the yearlong process to adopt the 10-Y eai' Capital Facilities Plan, the Council reviewed and approved a list of projects submitted by the Administration, such as park, bicycle and pedestrian, and roadway improvement projects. (A complete list of these projects maybe found in the 10-Year Capital Facilities Plan.) The consultant then prepared a fiscally constrained Sources and Uses that outlined what the projects are and how they should be funded using impact fees or other sources. However, a reduced impact fee schedule would result in proj ects not being full y-funded as outlined in the current Capital Facilities Plan. One other consideration is that the fiscally constrained plan is also based on a 7% on-going General Fund contribution. Finally, while the City Council intended to enact an ordinance requiring City-wide collection of roadway impact fees, the currently enacted ordinance exempts all areas of the City except the Northwest Quadrant and the Westside Industrial Area from collection of roadway impact fees. As the ordinance is currently written, the City's collection of roadway impact fees should be limited to the Northwest Quadrant and the Westside Industrial Area. This discrepancy between the City Council's intent and the language of the enacted ordinance was recently discovered, and the City collected roadway impact fees City-wide throughout Staff Comparison

14 The Administration has created a comparison of the past and present fees. The following chart separates the comparison offees into three categories: Infill, Westside Industrial Area, and Northwest Quadrant to clarify the different fee increases or reductions in the two main commercial development areas of the City under the previous impact fee schedule. This comparison shows collection of roadway impact fees City-wide, despite the discrepancy in the ordinance. 'M'PACrFl:~S Iflrm NW New2011l Development Description Dev_elop. W!lttSlde Quadl'ant Old AWlr'~8e riles $ Chao8<! ~Cht/ll(lf1 Pab/{e Safety RC$:li;1e'otlal (Per Owetling'Untl:) $ $ 485,00- $ $ $ luj,o(i $,". 00) J$.5% decrem;e C.ommerdill!lnduSlr!<I[ (Per Sq. Ft.) $ S 0.3,2 $ 0.32 $ 0.32 $ Q,32 $ O.DU '10 dtang41 P"h/fa'Safety P(;ift;6 fell$ Resldel1.tful {P'er DWIlIlUnla Unit} $ 452,00 $ 452,,00 $ "52.00 $ ti5.1!.oo $ U,CO $ (41l.O1') ~90.9%,duc:rease Comm"/lr til.i/i'i'ldlliurhl~ (par Sq. ~t,) $ j),-30 $ 0.30 $ 0.30 $ D.30 $ 0.03 $ (0.27) 90.0! dl1l:n:<>se Rorufwoy F{Jf!$ 'ReSldentll.!! (P'er Sq, Ft. Dwe:lling Un1t) $ $ $ $ $ 421\,,0(1 $ 4Z4,O!) 424%_ fncrecl$f1 pc'.sq. /t. Re.!'lrdentlll~ jp'e"r Mu~f.~amlly Owcliina. Unit} $ $ $ $ $ Vl9.0<) $ % Wr,reOlte per unit Retail {Per SqU'Ir'6 Foot} $ $ 8.00 $ $ 2,(17 $ 3.28 $ 0.1)1 23.0% im::1i;tri~'e PlN'sr/.lt. Office (Ptr Square Foot, $ $ 3,$8 $ $ 1,19 $ z,a3 $ tl~ 95.3% I(u:fo:a~'f.' /Nt.stp'. ft, Indll,Mrl(lj tpersqljnt'l!- Foot) $ $ 1.3$ $ $ 0,46 $ $ l.m 391.9% locre(l~'e prtfsq./t, Porli PtlllJ Re::&ldlollntlal (Per PweilYoR Unit) $ 68I.()f} $ 681,00 $ 68J.00 $ 68J,OQ $ 3, $ 3, % Increasq pel unit Total Fell$. Resldemtral W.at Sq. ~t. OW6.lfing Unn) $1,{f:r8~{)(} $ J~ti18',OO $ ', :$ 1, $ 4,5.3,00 $ 2,9&$ % Inc-rem'ill R"esldentliJl' Wer Multi.Famlly Dwemn& UI'II~1 $ l,isj8.qd $ 1,1318,00 $.1,6".0<) $ 1,6UMO $ 4,408,00 $ 2,190,00 :J '% lo(;'ro(1~'fj: Relall{Per Squllre.fOOl) $ "~62 $ /1,62 $ 0.62 $ 3.29 $ 3m $.0,2; %, ir1ii'fegs't Otrlce (fll"lr Square ~oot) $ 4.20 $ 4,.;10 $ 4,20 $ 4.;m $ 2,Ei8 $ CI.S').J6.lU deerq(m; Industrll'll (Per Squire Fcot) $ 2.00 $ 2,,00 $ 2.00 $ :2.00 $ 2,61 $ Q,fH 30.5% ifjcfium'ij Administration Recommendation The primary concerns from the development community are that the fees increased significantly without any kind of incremental increase and that the parks and roadways fees in particular are not being fairly assessed, In effort to more fully tmderstand the impact fee schedule, staff prepared a comparison of Salt Lake City's impact fees to those of other municipalities in the state and region (see Attachment A). The results of that comparison indicate that the City's fees are consistent with or, in many instances, less than those of the municipalities outside ofthe state. Salt Lake City'S fees are slightly higher when compared to local municipalities. However, since the 2012 increase in impact fees is being perceived as extreme within the development community, the City might reconsider the method in which fees are collected and spent in accordance with the intent of the state Impact Fees Act. The Administration recommends the Council enact an ordinance which decreases the parks impact fee to the Mayor's original proposed amount of$1,752 and incrementally increases the fee armually over a five year period. The Administration recommends an automatic increase of $562 in the parks impact fee per year until it reaches the current amount of $3,999, The amounts per year would be as follows: in year 1 the fee would be $1752; in year 2, the fee would be $2314; in year 3 the fee would be $2876; in year 4, the fee would be $3438; and in year 5 the fee would be $3999. These increases would be written into the City's Consolidated Fee Schedule as automatic increases, so the City Council does not have to reconsider the fee on an annual basis.

15 The Administration recognizes that by decreasing the parks fee some projects in the Capital Facilities Plan may not be fully ftmded with impact fees and recommends that the City Council either fund these projects using other sources or open and amend the eligible projects in the 10-Year Capital Facilities Plan. In addition, because the parks fees will annually automatically increase, the City will, within five years, be close to the level of service and recommended parks impact fee under the 10-Year Capital Facilities Plan. Under state law, the Council has the right to enact an ordinance, Attachment B, decreasing the parks impact fees, and adding an automatic incremental increase, without revisiting the Capital Facilities Plan, so the Administration recommends that as the first step. Prior to reducing the parks impact fees, the City Council will be required to provide notice and hold a public hearing pursuant to Utah Code Ann a-504. While it was the City Council's intent to assess roadway impact fees Citywide, the current impact fee ordinance exempts all development within the City from roadway impact fees unless the development is within the Westside Industrial Area or the Northwest Quadrant. Upon discovery of this discrepancy between the City Council's intent and the language of the ordinance, the Administration stopped collecting roadway impact fees for projects located outside the Northwest Quadrant and the Westside Industrial Area. The Administration is also preparing to refund roadway impact fees that were collected in 2013 from developments outside these two areas. The Administration recommends keeping the language ofthe ordinance as it is currently written, and collecting roadway impact fees only for development in the Northwest Quadrant and Westside Industrial Areas of Salt Lal<e City where there is the most significant growth, and where most of the roadway projects identified in the Capital Facilities Plan are located. In the alternative, if the City Council would prefer to collect Citywide roadway impact fees, the ordinance must be amended to remove the exemption for development outside the Northwest Quadrant and Westside Industrial Area. If the City Council revises the ordinance to make the roadway impact fees Citywide, it must provide notice and hold a public hearing pursuant to Utah Code Ann. ll-36a-504. The Administration also recommends that the City set aside the difference between the decreased park fees and the currently adopted fees that were collected during 2013 and not allocate the difference in fees to a specific project until the current plan is amended or a new plan is adopted. Finally, the Impact FeeOrdiiiiihce also a1lbwsf()tappeals anof6r oevel6persto perform an independent calculation for development activity. The appeals process requires a $50 fee and the independent calculation requires a $150 fee to be paid. Neither fee is currently shown in the Consolidated Fee Schedule. The attached update to the Consolidated Fee Schedule will include those fees as per ordinance.

16 As outlined in the 10-Year Capital Facilities Plan there is great need in the City for capital improvements and impact fees playa vital role in providing those for the community. However, based on the comments from the development community, the City's current impact fee assessment may actually be a detriment to achieving the goals outlined in the plan if developers are truly taking their projects to other municipalities because of the City's impact fees. ATTACHMENTS A: Comparison of Impact Fees to Other Municipalities B: Proposed Ordinance to Amend Consolidated Fee Schednle with Clean Version

17 Attachment A Comparison of Impact Fees to Other Municipalities

18 Roads Impact Fees single family multi family retail/sf office/sf industrial/sf Salt Lake City - current $ - $ - $ 8.62 $ 4.20 $ 2.00 Salt Lake City mayor fee $ 450 $ 264 $ 2.91 $ 2.07 $ 2.01 Salt Lake City - council adopted fee $ 424 $ 249 $ 3.28 $ National Average Sample Size $ 3,227 $ 2,179 $ 5.95 $ 3.36 $ 2.06 Western States 1 Sample Size Arizona 30 $ 2,630 $ 1,818 $ 4.40 $ 2.11 $ 1.15 California 37 $ 6,499 $ 4,322 $ $ 6.76 $ 3.96 Colorado 17 $ 2,691 $ 1,897 $ $ 3.14 $ 1.93 Idaho 1 $ 3,456 $ 1,950 $ 8.86 $ 9.28 $ 2.13 Montana 1 $ 3,432 $ 2,124 $ 5.93 $ 1.96 $ 1.46 New Mexico 8 $ 2,932 $ 1,815 $ 3.80 $ 3.18 $ 2.32 Nevada 5 $ 2,151 $ 1,676 $ 3.21 $ 1.94 $ 1.48 Oregon 11 $ 3,573 $ 2,482 $ 7.90 $ 4.23 $ 2.88 Utah 18 $ 1,140 $ 1,073 $ 2.03 $ 1.04 $ 0.63 Washington 15 $ 1,889 $ 1,198 $ 4.72 $ 3.26 $ 2.15 average $ 3,039 $ 2,036 $ 6.24 $ 3.69 $ $ 2.26 Western Capital Cities Population Phoenix AZ 1,445,632 $ 650 $ 449 $ 0.99 $ 0.68 $ 0.41 Sacramento CA 486,189 $ 4,651 $ 3,851 $ 7.01 $ 6.55 $ 2.16 Boise ID 211,720 $ 3,456 $ 1,950 $ 8.86 $ 9.28 $ 2.13 Santa Fe NM 75,764 $ 2,100 $ 1,554 $ 4.60 $ 2.42 $ 1.61 Salem OR 156,690 $ 1,953 $ 1,274 $ 8.14 $ 2.09 $ 1.32 Olympia WA 42,514 $ 3,015 $ 1,957 $ 4.84 $ 6.46 $ 3.74 average $ 2,638 $ 1,839 $ 5.74 $ 4.58 $ 1.90 Similarly Sized-Cities 2 Chandler AZ 247,140 $ 3,983 $ 2,446 $ 7.39 $ 5.88 $ 1.66 Gilbert AZ 216,449 $ 423 $ 297 $ 1.59 $ 0.57 $ 0.41 Glendale AZ 251,522 $ 1,160 $ 591 $ 4.13 $ 2.17 $ 1.23 Boise ID 211,720 $ 3,535 $ 1,950 $ 8.86 $ 9.28 $ 2.13 Reno NV 218,000 $ 4,177 $ 2,845 $ 7.61 $ 4.00 $ 2.53 Salem OR 156,690 $ 1,953 $ 1,274 $ 8.14 $ 2.09 $ 1.32 Spokane WA 208,916 $ 638 $ 412 $ 2.65 $ 1.71 $ 0.68 average $ 2,267 $ 1,402 $ 5.77 $ 3.67 $ 1.42 Primary cities in similary-sized MSAs 3 Tucson AZ 541,811 $ 4,300 $ 2,150 $ 4.28 $ 5.09 $ 2.20 Fresno CA 495,913 per acre per acre per acre per acre per acre Albuquerque NM 528,497 $ 3,662 $ 1,520 $ 3.61 $ 3.42 $ 3.35 Utah Cities 4 5 average $ 3,981 $ 1,835 $ 3.95 $ 4.26 $ 2.78 Draper UT 42,274 $ 1,447 $ 994 $ $ 1.05 Herriman UT 21,785 $ - $ - $ - $ - $ - Layton UT 67,311 $ 2,399 $ 1,508 $ 3.73 $ 2.19 $ 2.55 Lehi UT 47,407 $ 1,513 $ 1,513 $ 1.04 $ 1.04 $ 0.21 Logan UT 48,174 $ 669 $ 461 $ 0.30 $ 0.14 $ 0.05 Park City UT 7,558 $ 315 $ 290 $ 0.41 $ 0.41 $ 0.32 Provo UT 112,488 $ 986 $ 657 $ 2.40 $ 0.61 $ 0.40 Riverton UT 38,753 $ 764 $ 2,675 $ 3.20 $ 1.60 $ 0.67 St George UT 72,897 $ 754 $ 754 unavailable unavailable unavailable Sandy UT 87,461 $ 986 $ - $ - $ - $ - South Jordan UT 50,418 $ 1,880 $ 1,316 $ 4.74 $ 2.94 $ 1.31 Tooele UT 31,605 $ 1,515 $ - $ - $ - $ - West Jordan UT 103,712 $ 1,891 $ 4,340 $ 4.34 $ 1.4 $ 0.77 West Valley UT 129,480 $ 846 $ 514 $ 1.34 $ 1.2 $ 0.81 average $ 1,140 $ 1,073 $ 2.03 $ 1.0 $ 0.63

19 Parks Impact Fees single family multi family Salt Lake City - current $ 681 $ 681 Salt Lake City Mayor Fee $ 1,752 $ 1,752 Salt Lake City - council adopted fee $ 3,999 $ 3,999 National Average Sample Size $ 2,955 $ 2,254 Western States 1 Sample Size Arizona 30 $ 2,385 $ 1,801 California 37 $ 8,622 $ 6,681 Colorado 17 $ 3,560 $ 2,774 Idaho 1 $ 1,355 $ 1,050 Montana 1 $ 738 $ 738 New Mexico 8 $ 1,747 $ 1,261 Nevada 5 $ 2,034 $ 1,625 Oregon 11 $ 5,095 $ 3,817 Utah 18 $ 2,781 $ 1,811 Washington 15 $ 2,244 $ 1,506 average $ 3,056 $ 2,306 Western Capital Cities Population Phoenix AZ 1,445,632 $ 4,018 $ 1,876 Sacramento CA 486,189 $ 5,191 $ 3,058 Boise ID 211,720 $ 1,355 $ 1,050 Santa Fe NM 75,764 $ 1,214 $ 971 Salem OR 156,690 $ 3,548 $ 1,937 Olympia WA 42,514 $ 2,930 $ 1,771 average $ 3,043 $ 1,777 Similarly Sized-Cities 2 Chandler AZ 247,140 $ 5,057 $ 3,873 Gilbert AZ 216,449 $ 4,547 $ 3,911 Glendale AZ 251,522 $ 2,072 $ 1,555 Boise ID 211,720 $ 1,355 $ 1,050 Reno NV 218,000 $ 1,000 $ 1,000 Salem OR 156,690 $ 3,548 $ 1,937 Spokane WA 208,916 $ - $ - average $ 2,511 $ 1,904 Primary cities in similary-sized MSAs 3 Tucson AZ 541,811 $ 1,720 $ 860 Fresno CA 495,913 $ 3,398 $ 2,764 Albuquerque NM 528,497 $ 3,990 $ 2,463 average $ 3,036 $ 2,029 Utah Cities 4 5 Draper UT 42,274 $ 3,990 $ 2,463 Herriman UT 21,785 $ 3,445 $ 3,445 Layton UT 67,311 $ 1,873 $ 1,381 Lehi UT 47,407 $ 3,819 $ 3,198 Logan UT 48,174 $ - $ - Park City UT 7,558 $ 3,855 $ 3,150 Provo UT 112,488 $ 3,088 $ 2,391 Riverton UT 38,753 $ 2,675 $ 469 St George UT 72,897 $ 2,730 $ 2,730 Sandy UT 87,461 $ 3,316 $ 1,841 South Jordan UT 50,418 $ 4,346 $ 2,850 Tooele UT 31,605 $ 2,125 $ - West Jordan UT 103,712 $ 1,633 $ - West Valley UT 129,480 $ 2,032 $ 1,429 average $ 2,781 $ 1,811

20 Police Impact Fees single family multi family retail/sf office/sf industrial/sf Salt Lake City - current $ 452 $ 452 $ 0.30 $ 0.30 $ 0.30 Salt Lake City Mayor Fee $ 357 $ 357 $ 0.24 $ 0.24 $ 0.24 Salt Lake City council adopted fee $ 41 $ 41 $ 0.03 $ $ National Average Sample Size $ 385 $ 303 $ 4.30 $ 0.26 $ 0.18 Western States 1 Sample Size Arizona 30 $ 467 $ 368 $ 0.59 $ 0.28 $ 0.20 California 37 $ 802 $ 635 $ 0.68 $ 0.52 $ 0.40 Colorado 17 $ 356 $ 325 $ 0.28 $ 0.26 $ 0.15 Idaho 1 $ 628 $ 628 $ - $ 0.08 $ 0.08 Montana 1 $ - $ - $ - $ - $ - New Mexico 8 $ 231 $ 123 $ 0.21 $ 0.06 $ 0.06 Nevada 5 $ - $ - $ - $ - $ - Oregon 11 $ - $ - $ - $ - $ - Utah 18 $ 181 $ 152 $ 0.12 $ 0.11 $ 0.10 Washington 15 $ 161 $ 134 $ 0.79 $ 0.11 $ 0.11 average $ 283 $ 236 $ 0.27 $ 0.14 $ 0.11 Western Capital Cities Population Phoenix AZ 1,445,632 $ 344 $ 153 $ $ 0.20 $ 0.22 Sacramento CA 486,189 $ - $ - $ - $ - $ - Boise ID 211,720 $ 628 $ 628 $ - $ 0.08 $ 0.08 Santa Fe NM 75,764 $ 48 $ 39 $ - $ 0.04 $ 0.03 Salem OR 156,690 $ - $ - $ - $ - $ - Olympia WA 42,514 $ - $ - $ - $ - $ - average $ 170 $ 137 $ 3.17 $ 0.05 $ 0.06 Similarly Sized-Cities 2 Chandler AZ 247,140 $ 268 $ 221 $ 0.37 $ 0.28 $ 0.09 Gilbert AZ 216,449 $ 643 $ 643 $ 0.34 $ 0.34 $ 0.34 Glendale AZ 251,522 $ 395 $ 297 $ 0.58 $ 0.30 $ 0.17 Boise ID 211,720 $ 628 $ 628 $ 0.08 $ 0.08 Reno NV 218,000 $ - $ - $ - $ - $ - Salem OR 156,690 $ - $ - $ - $ - Spokane WA 208,916 $ - $ - $ - $ - $ - average $ 276 $ 256 $ 0.26 $ 0.14 $ 0.10 Primary cities in similary-sized MSAs 3 Tucson AZ 541,811 $ 674 $ 499 $ 0.70 $ 0.70 $ 0.70 Fresno CA 495,913 $ 624 $ 508 $ 6.65 $ 6.65 $ 4.22 Albuquerque NM 528,497 $ 218 $ 71 $ 0.34 $ 0.08 $ 0.08 average $ 505 $ 359 $ 2.56 $ 2.48 $ 1.67 Utah Cities 4 5 Draper UT 42,274 $ 218 $ 71 $ $ 0.04 Herriman UT 21,785 $ - $ - $ - $ - $ - Layton UT 67,311 $ - $ - $ - $ - $ 0.07 Lehi UT 47,407 $ 340 $ 340 $ 0.07 $ 0.07 $ 0.07 Logan UT 48,174 $ 34 $ 28 $ 0.03 $ 0.03 $ 0.01 Park City UT 7,558 $ 605 $ 495 $ 0.56 $ 0.56 $ 0.45 Provo UT 112,488 $ - $ - $ - $ - $ - Riverton UT 38,753 $ 308 $ 308 $ 0.09 $ 0.02 $ 0.31 St George UT 72,897 $ 109 $ 109 $ 0.10 $ 0.07 $ 0.01 Sandy UT 87,461 $ 71 $ 40 $ - $ 0.21 $ 0.06 South Jordan UT 50,418 $ 323 $ 208 $ - $ - $ - Tooele UT 31,605 $ 350 $ 320 $ 0.32 $ 0.32 $ 0.32 West Jordan UT 103,712 $ 105 $ 160 $ 0.14 $ 0.08 $ 0.05 West Valley UT 129,480 $ 66 $ 45 $ 0.11 $ 0.08 $ 0.04 average $ 181 $ 152 $ 0.12 $ 0.11 $ 0.10

21 Fire Impact Fees single family multi family retail/sf office/sf industrial/sf Salt Lake City - current $ 485 $ 485 $ 0.32 $ 0.32 $ 0.32 Salt Lake City mayor fee $ 218 $ 218 $ 0.39 $ 0.39 $ 0.39 Salt Lake City adopted council fee $ 119 $ 119 $ 0.32 $ 0.32 $ 0.32 National Average Sample Size $ 512 $ 381 $ 4.19 $ 0.38 $ 0.26 Western States 1 Sample Size Arizona 30 $ 634 $ 511 $ 0.46 $ 0.53 $ 0.36 California 37 $ 1,022 $ 690 $ 0.58 $ 0.61 $ 0.36 Colorado 17 $ 644 $ 407 $ 0.33 $ 0.35 $ 0.25 Idaho 1 $ 479 $ 479 $ - $ 0.25 $ 0.25 Montana 1 $ 823 $ 692 $ 0.19 $ 0.19 $ 0.19 New Mexico 8 $ 477 $ 308 $ 0.57 $ 0.37 $ 0.36 Nevada 5 $ 1,780 $ 1,180 $ 0.80 $ 0.14 $ 0.57 Oregon 11 $ - $ - $ - $ - $ - Utah 18 $ 159 $ 119 $ 0.16 $ 0.14 $ 0.05 Washington 15 $ 634 $ 670 $ 0.38 $ 0.26 $ 0.26 average $ 665 $ 506 $ 0.35 $ 0.28 $ 0.26 Western Capital Cities Population Phoenix AZ 1,445,632 $ 322 $ 270 $ 0.10 $ 0.12 $ 0.17 Sacramento CA 486,189 $ - $ - $ - $ - $ - Boise ID 211,720 $ 479 $ 479 $ - $ 0.25 $ 0.25 Santa Fe NM 75,764 $ 136 $ 110 $ - $ 0.12 $ 0.07 Salem OR 156,690 $ - $ - $ - $ - $ - Olympia WA 42,514 $ - $ - $ - $ - $ - average $ 156 $ 143 $ 0.02 $ 0.08 $ 0.08 Similarly Sized-Cities 2 Chandler AZ 247,140 $ 577 $ 442 $ 0.72 $ 0.55 $ 0.18 Gilbert AZ 216,449 $ 1,100 $ 1,100 $ 0.59 $ 0.59 $ 0.59 Glendale AZ 251,522 $ 409 $ 307 $ 0.30 $ 0.45 $ 0.28 Boise ID 211,720 $ 479 $ 479 $ - $ 0.25 $ 0.25 Reno NV 218,000 $ - $ - $ - $ - $ - Salem OR 156,690 $ - $ - $ - $ - $ - Spokane WA 208,916 $ - $ - $ - $ - $ - average $ 366 $ 333 $ 0.23 $ 0.26 $ 0.19 Primary cities in similary-sized MSAs 3 Tucson AZ 541,811 $ 488 $ 360 $ 0.27 $ 0.27 $ 0.27 Fresno CA 495,913 $ 539 $ 439 $ 2.36 $ 2.36 $ 1.50 Albuquerque NM 528,497 $ 310 $ 107 $ - $ - $ - Utah Cities 4 5 average $ 446 $ 302 $ 0.88 $ 0.88 $ 0.59 Draper UT 42,274 $ 310 $ 107 $ 0.41 $ 0.54 $ 0.04 Herriman UT 21,785 $ - $ - $ - $ - $ - Layton UT 67,311 $ 501 $ 391 $ 0.65 $ 0.47 $ - Lehi UT 47,407 $ 576 $ 576 $ 0.25 $ 0.25 $ 0.25 Logan UT 48,174 $ 118 $ 85 $ 0.09 $ 0.10 $ 0.02 Park City UT 7,558 $ - $ - $ - $ - $ - Provo UT 112,488 $ - $ - $ - $ - $ - Riverton UT 38,753 $ - $ - $ - $ - $ - St George UT 72,897 $ 216 $ 216 $ 0.18 $ 0.19 $ 0.06 Sandy UT 87,461 $ 165 $ 92 $ 0.32 $ 0.09 $ 0.13 South Jordan UT 50,418 $ - $ - $ - $ - $ - Tooele UT 31,605 $ - $ - $ - $ - $ - West Jordan UT 103,712 $ 247 $ 140 $ 0.16 $ 0.20 $ 0.13 West Valley UT 129,480 $ 91 $ 62 $ 0.16 $ 0.11 $ 0.05 average $ 159 $ 119 $ 0.16 $ 0.14 $ 0.05

22 Total Impact Fees (roads, parks, police and fire) single family multi family retail/sf office/sf industrial/sf Salt Lake City - current $ 1,618 $ 1,618 $ 9.24 $ 4.82 $ 2.62 Salt Lake City - mayor fee $ 2,777 $ 2,591 $ 3.54 $ 2.70 $ 2.64 Salt Lake City - Adopted Council Fee $ 4,583 $ 4,408 $ 3.63 $ 2.68 $ 2 61 National Average Sample Size $ 7,079 $ 5,617 $ $ 2.69 Western States 1 Sample Size Arizona 30 $ 6,116 $ 4,640 $ 5.22 $ 3.08 $ 1.89 California 37 $ 16,945 $ 15,496 $ $ $ 7.40 Colorado 17 $ 7,251 $ 4,759 $ $ 5.86 $ 3.07 Idaho 1 $ 5,918 $ 4,107 $ 8.86 $ 9.61 $ 2.46 Montana 1 $ 4,993 $ 2,816 $ 6.12 $ 2.15 $ 1.65 New Mexico 8 $ 5,387 $ 2,772 $ 4.40 $ 3.46 $ 2.97 Nevada 5 $ 5,965 $ 3,735 $ 2.65 $ 1.79 $ 1.30 Oregon 11 $ 8,668 $ 6,141 $ 7.82 $ 4.50 $ 3.17 Utah 18 $ 4,061 $ 3, Washington 15 $ 4,928 $ 4,120 $ 4.57 $ 3.19 $ 2.29 average $ 7,023 $ 5,174 $ 6.82 $ 4.53 $ 2.69 Western Capital Cities Population Phoenix AZ 1,445,632 $ 5,334 $ 2,748 $ $ 1.00 $ 0.80 Sacramento CA 486,189 $ 9,842 $ 6,909 $ 7.01 $ 6.55 $ 2.16 Boise ID 211,720 $ 5,918 $ 4,107 $ 8.86 $ 9.61 $ 2.46 Santa Fe NM 75,764 $ 3,498 $ 2,674 $ 4.60 $ 2.58 $ 1.71 Salem OR 156,690 $ 5,501 $ 3,211 $ 8.14 $ 2.09 $ 1.32 Olympia WA 42,514 $ 5,945 $ 3,728 $ 4.84 $ 6.46 $ 3.74 average $ 6,006 $ 3,896 $ 8.92 $ 4.72 $ 2.03 Similarly Sized-Cities 2 Chandler AZ 247,140 $ 9,885 $ 6,982 $ 8.48 $ 6.71 $ 1.93 Gilbert AZ 216,449 $ 6,713 $ 5,951 $ 2.52 $ 1.50 $ 1.34 Glendale AZ 251,522 $ 4,036 $ 2,750 $ 5.01 $ 2.92 $ 1.68 Boise ID 211,720 $ 5,997 $ 4,107 $ 8.86 $ 9.61 $ 2.46 Reno NV 218,000 $ 5,501 $ 3,845 $ 7.61 $ 4.00 $ 2.53 Salem OR 156,690 $ 5,501 $ 3,211 $ 8.14 $ 2.09 $ 1.32 Spokane WA 208,916 $ 638 $ 412 $ 2.65 $ 1.71 $ 0.68 average $ 5,467 $ 3,894 $ 6.18 $ 4.08 $ 1.71 Primary cities in similary-sized MSAs 3 Tucson AZ 541,811 $ 7,182 $ 3,869 $ 5.25 $ 6.06 $ 3.17 Fresno CA 495,913 $ 4,561 $ 3,711 $ 9.01 $ 9.01 $ 5.72 Albuquerque NM 528,497 $ 8,180 $ 4,161 $ 3.95 $ 3.50 $ 3.43 Utah Cities 4 5 average $ 6,641 $ 3,914 $ 6.07 $ 6.19 $ 4.11 Draper UT 42,274 $ 5,965 $ 3,635 $ 3.95 $ 2.58 $ 1.13 Herriman UT 21,785 $ 3,445 $ 3,445 $ - $ - $ - Layton UT 67,311 $ 4,773 $ 3,280 $ 4.38 $ 2.66 $ 2.62 Lehi UT 47,407 $ 6,248 $ 5,627 $ 1.36 $ 1.36 $ 0.53 Logan UT 48,174 $ 821 $ 574 $ 0.42 $ 0.27 $ 0.08 Park City UT 7,558 $ 4,775 $ 3,935 $ 0.97 $ 0.97 $ 0.77 Provo UT 112,488 $ 4,074 $ 3,048 $ 2.40 $ 0.61 $ 0.40 Riverton UT 38,753 $ 3,747 $ 3,452 $ 3.29 $ 1.62 $ 0.98 St George UT 72,897 $ 3,809 $ 3,809 $ 0.28 $ 0.26 $ 0.07 Sandy UT 87,461 $ 4,538 $ 1,973 $ 0.32 $ 0.30 $ 0.19 South Jordan UT 50,418 $ 6,549 $ 4,374 $ 4.74 $ 2.94 $ 1.31 Tooele UT 31,605 $ 3,990 $ 320 $ 0.32 $ 0.32 $ 0.32 West Jordan UT 103,712 $ 1,089 $ 4,640 $ 4.64 $ 1.75 $ 0.95 West Valley UT 129,480 $ 3,035 $ 2,050 $ 1.61 $ 1.44 $ 0.90 average $ 4,061 $ 3,154 $ 2.05 $ 1.22 $ 0.73

23 Roads Impact Fees Parks Impact Fees Police Impact Fees Fire Impact Fees Total Impact Fees (roads, parks, police and fire) single family multi family retail/sf office/sf industrial/sf single family multi family single family multi family retail/sf office/sf industrial/sf single family multi family retail/sf office/sf industrial/sf single family multi family retail/sf office/sf industrial/sf Salt Lake City - current $ - $ - $ 8.62 $ 4.20 $ 2.00 $ 681 $ 681 $ 452 $ 452 $ 0.30 $ 0.30 $ 0.30 $ 485 $ 485 $ 0.32 $ 0.32 $ 0.32 $ 1,618 $ 1,618 $ 9.24 $ 4.82 $ 2.62 Salt Lake City - draft update $ 450 $ 264 $ 2.91 $ 2.07 $ 2.01 $ 1,752 $ 1,752 $ 357 $ 357 $ 0.24 $ 0.24 $ 0.24 $ 218 $ 218 $ 0.39 $ 0.39 $ 0.39 $ 2,777 $ 2,591 $ 3.54 $ 2.70 $ 2.64 National Average $ 3,227 $ 2,179 $ 5.95 $ 3.36 $ 2.06 $ 2,955 $ 2,254 $ 385 $ 303 $ 4.30 $ 0.26 $ 0.18 $ 512 $ 381 $ 4.19 $ 0.38 $ 0.26 $ 7,079 $ 5,617 $ $ 2.69 Western States 1 $ 3,039 $ 2,036 $ 6.24 $ 3.69 $ 2.01 $ 3,056 $ 2,306 $ 283 $ 236 $ 0.27 $ 0.14 $ 0.11 $ 665 $ 506 $ 0.35 $ 0.28 $ 0.26 $ 7,023 $ 5,174 $ 6.82 $ 4.53 $ 2.69 Western Capital Cities $ 2,638 $ 1,839 $ 5.74 $ 4.58 $ 1.90 $ 3,043 $ 1,777 $ 170 $ 137 $ 3.17 $ 0.05 $ 0.06 $ 156 $ 143 $ 0.02 $ 0.08 $ 0.08 $ 6,006 $ 3,896 $ 8.92 $ 4.72 $ 2.03 Similarly Sized-Cities 2 $ 2,267 $ 1,402 $ 5.77 $ 3.67 $ 1.42 $ 2,511 $ 1,904 $ 276 $ 256 $ 0.26 $ 0.14 $ 0.10 $ 366 $ 333 $ 0.23 $ 0.26 $ 0.19 $ 5,467 $ 3,894 $ 6.18 $ 4.08 $ 1.71 Primary cities in similarysized MSAs 3 $ 3,981 $ 1,835 $ 3.95 $ 4.26 $ 2.78 $ 3,036 $ 2,029 $ 505 $ 359 $ 2.56 $ 2.48 $ 1.67 $ 446 $ 302 $ 0.88 $ 0.88 $ 0.59 $ 6,641 $ 3,914 $ 6.07 $ 6.19 $ 4.11 Utah Cities 4 5 $ 1,140 $ 1,073 $ 2.03 $ 1.04 $ 0.63 $ 2,781 $ 1,811 $ 181 $ 152 $ 0.12 $ 0.11 $ 0.10 $ 159 $ 119 $ 0.16 $ 0.14 $ 0.05 $ 4,061 $ 3,154 $ 2.05 $ 1.22 $ 0.73 Source: Galena Consulting Study Team; 2010 National Impact Fee Survey, Duncan Associates Notes: 1) State Average determined by 2010 National Impact Fee Survey, based on non-exhaustive sample of published fees. Average adjusted with the addition of other cities researched by Galena Consulting. Averages include cities that may not be comparable to Salt Lake City in size or circumstances. 2) Between 150,000 and 250,000 population 3) Approx. 1M population 4) Utah cities of similar size, and/or geographic proximity to Salt Lake City 5) Bountiful and Murray do not assess General Fund impact fees 6) Information could not be obtained for Ogden and Orem, but Ogden is believed to have fees

24 SALT LAKE CITY ORDINANCE No. of2014 (Amending the Consolidated Fee Schedule by Adding, Eliminating, or Modifying Certain Fees) AN ORDINANCE AMENDING THE SALT LAKE CITY CONSOLIDATED FEE SCHEDULE BY ADDING, ELIMINATING, OR MODIFYING VARIOUS FEES. WHEREAS, on May 17,2011 the City Council adopted Ordinances , and to authorize and create the Salt Lake City Consolidated Fee Schedule; and WHEREAS, the Salt Lake City Consolidated Fee Schedule has since been amended fro m time to time; and WHEREAS, it is now proposed that the Salt Lake City Consolidated Fee Schedule be amended to include, eliminate, or otherwise modify various fees as shown in the attached Exhibit "A"; and WHEREAS, the City Council finds (i) the fees set forth in Exhibit "A" are necessary, reasonable, and equitable in relation to regulatory and service costs incurred by the City; and (ii) adoption of this ordinance reasonably furthers the health, safety, and general welfare of the citizens of Salt Lake City. NOW, THEREFORE, be it ordained by the City Council of Salt Lake City, Utah: SECTION I. The Salt Lake City Consolidated Fee Schedule shall be, and hereby is, amended in pertinent part to reflect the fees set forth in the attached Exhibit "A". SECTION 2. The pertinent portions of the official copy of the Salt Lake City Consolidated Fee Schedule shall be revised to reflect the fees set forth in the attached Exhibit "A" and a copy of the entire Salt Lake City Consolidated Fee Schedule that incorporates such revisions shall be published on the official Salt Lake City website. SECTION 3. This ordinance shall become effective immediately upon publication.

25 Passed by the City Council of Salt Lake City, Utah this _ day of ATTEST: CHAIRPERSON CITY RECORDER Transmitted to Mayor on _ Mayor' s Action: Approved. Vetoed. MAYOR CITY RECORDER (SEAL) Bill No. -,-- of2014. Published: AI'PROVEO AS TO FORM Date: _ 8y: H 8_ A TTY -#34845-v I-Consolidated Jee _ Sciled u Ie_Update. DOC

26 EXHIBIT "A"

27 Cards and Passports Regular Junior (17 years old or younger) senio~ (65, I olde:) nd! ' :~ya_r:,e:.'formeriy Frequent $45 $30 $45 PI~yer) Discount Conls Plus tax. See Section "." n" A 6 IS 12 Q31 Par Passoorts NA $275. NA Plus tax, S.e SPctlon "." IA9 Birdie $1,195 NA $955 Plus tax. See Section",. n11 A 7 E.gle P.ssoorts NA $550 NA Plus tax. See Section",. n11 A 10 I 15, Double E.ole Passoorts $1,845 NA $1.475 IPho< "x. See Section A 13 lost I stolen discount card lor p.ssport $5 $5 $5 IS,1 Q31 I Double rider $14,28 I 1 ~ ;.031 Sinole rider $7 $14 'Priv.te cart tr.ii fee $5 $10 Cover rental $5 $10 I I Reoular $, $14 flemlum $1 5 $30 USGA orant lr, Clubs p $6 lord.n River Par-3 $3 NA Senior Season Golli '."e< 9 Holes 18 Holes I Base fee $401 See Section A2 I Resident ", ~h>r", $3 $6 On.11 D'SS rounds $4 $! IOn.11 DasS rou, Ids 15.16,03 1 Junior (1)(2) (17 years old I Green Fees Regular (2) -~'d- '" -)!6: ye.rs - II or older) I Course: u 9 9 Holes ~~ 1 18 Hole< 9 Holes 1B Hole< iu $18,50 $35 $15,50 $ $16 Fn, $14 NA $12 I NA $8 NA Glend.le $15 $30 $13 $26 $8 $16 lord.n River Par-3 $8 NA $7 NA $6 NA,Dell C.nvon $18.50 $35 $15,50 $29. S8 $16 I Mount.ln Dell L.ke I $18,50 $35 I $15,50 $29 $8 $16 I I Nibley P.rk $13 NA $11 NA $8 NA I Roso Pork SI. S28 $1; $24 $8 $16 IU6,031 $: $33 $14 $27 $8 $16 n;;~'~d ~~fu;~ i llees sn.1i >v.lio I a~~rorn~ri~~~n (2) As of J.nu.ry " 2012 $1.00 per ~ine hole ro,un~t~~:}~~~%:~~hteenhol~.'~~~;:;ii! be.1i0cated to. ded icated Golf CiP fund to be used r 001 i t prolects.t I courses I Group!See Section ",1. n1< Pull Cart Rental 9 Holes 18 Holes I Regular $2 $' [Premium $3,50 $ ~River Par-3 $1 NA Sm.1I bucket $5 Per bucket laroe bucket $8 Per bucket I Ranae Dass ;SO 10 laroe buckets IS,,.031 I holes $8 118 holes $16 I large bucket of range balls $5 I Per bucket 19 holes $5 minimum IPer person. plus oreen fees 118 holes $10 minimum I Per ".,r<nn nhl< nr.. n f, Ilord.n River Par-3 $3 minimum I Per oerson. olus oreen fees IMPAGTFEES I For_questions reaarding Impact fees contact: Service Fee Additional Information Section Ao~eals Precess SSO I!S..cS. 19r) Developers Ind~pend~ t Calculation Impact Fees S13D I ~3"C'"' t:u'l Residential (P" dwelling I comm"cial / lndu st,;~1 t ' I If f 'I) (per square foot, retail, unl I smg e or mu I ami Y! office and industrial) ~ Amended 6/ 18/2013 by Ord, % Increase to cover the costs to the City of accepting credit cards. Page 19

28 IFi.. $ $0.32 Park S1,752.OO ri'.) c.'>i!:--;e Y_""l'"~~;';;~~ y.,,, c"s02. F,. no< I Y"',!=~ ssolco y..., or"".,. ~er ',~-::-, m ~!5 IPolice $41.00 $0.300 Single Family $ I., $ Per dwelling unit I Retail ;3.28 Per square foot Office ;2.33 I Per square foot '.26! Per sauare foot Pl4,Per 1/4 acre ~ I n2~!'i~ ~ 190 S rl=',', 3,S~".CO PARKING AND TRAFFIC For questions regarding Parking and Traffic contact: Service Fee Additional Information Administrative Fee For Collection of Past Due Debts $45 Area Re ular Parkin Pe rmits One vear $36 I 9-11 months $27 I 5-8 months $18 I 1-4 Months $9 I Area Seasonal Parkin Collection Is - 8 months $ months $9 Barricade Permit $27.50 Freight Curb Loading Zone Permit Base business license fee Annual; plus sticker fee Vehl :le sticker $35 Ann al Vehicle sticker reolacement $5 Vehicle sticker transfer of vehicle $5 House Number Certificate (Dublic w orks) $10.00 Library Parking Fees Loading Zone & Restricted Parking $1.50/half hour or $lz/day First half hour Is free Loading zone & restricted parking I $25/vehlcle per day For provisions and exemptions see Section Events $10/vehicle per day For provisions and exemptions see Section Filming (movie, television series or commerdal) $10/vehicle per day For provisions and exemptions see Section Parking Meter Rates Shall not exceed $2.00 per hour Street Name Change Application $250 I Traffic School $50 Per course Temporary Closure - Parkinq Meters $25 Per meter, per day Tem orary PlacinQ of BaQs on Parking Meters $27.50 Per day During filming of a movie/television series! commercial I $11 I Per day For an event that continues for not less than 3 Per day/ must Significantly foster area business promotion $11 days and have an expected attendance exceeding 5/000 For a religious or charitable organization No charge limited to 30 days per calendar year For use under the direction of the dty In I connection with a cltv sdonsared event No charge Section 12,56, Q90 12 :4 Q2Q 1254 Q2Q U :4 Q2Q 12.64,090 U 54 Q2Q JJO lz Sg,33Q lz S : JlQ 4 lz, ~~, ~eq lz S~ ~Z~ 12 S~ JZ~ lz S~, H~ lz SfI 17Q OtS lz QS lsq lz 56.21Q lz S ZlQ l' S ZlQ l' ~ ZlQ lz S Z1Q PARKS AND RECREATION For questions regarding Parks and Recreation contact: Service I Fee I Add itional Information After School Programs I Formula based ISpe Spction 1S.16.0QO Athletic Facility Reservations Recreational $10.37 Per hour/two hour minimum Organized league use: Non-profit youth oroanlzations $2.07 Per hour per field ~~~tt:,youth oroanlzatlons $4.15 Per hour per field, orn'ni"hn", $5.19 Per hour oer field ITournaments with season reservation $ Per dav ITournaments without season reservation $ I Per dav Any cleanino required after usaqe $36.30 I Per staff hour Section l S 1.09Q ls 1 Q1Q I IS.1.QlQ IS 16.Q1Q.01 0 IS 1 Q2Q UQJ11ll ls Amended 6/ 18/2013 by Ord % Increase to cover the costs to the City of accepting credit cards. Page 20

29 SALT LAKE CITY ORDINANCE No. of2014 (Amending the Consolidated Fee Schedule by Adding, Eliminating, or Modifying Certain Fees) AN ORDINANCE AMENDING THE SALT LAKE CITY CONSOLIDATED FEE SCHEDULE BY ADDING, ELIMINATING, OR MODIFYING VARIOUS FEES. WHEREAS, on May 17, 2011 the City Council adopted Ordinances , and to authorize and create the Salt Lake City Consolidated Fee Schedule; and WHEREAS, the Salt Lake City Consolidated Fee Schedule has since been amended from time to time; and WHEREAS, it is now proposed that the Salt Lake City Consolidated Fee Schedule be amended to include, eliminate, or otherwise modify various fees as shown in the attached Exhibit "A"; and WHEREAS, the City Council finds (i) the fees set forth in Exhibit "A" are necessary, reasonable, and equitable in relation to regulatory and service costs incurred by the City; and (ii) adoption of this ordinance reasonably furthers the health, safety, and general welfare of the citizens of Salt Lake City. NOW, THEREFORE, be it ordained by the City Council of Salt Lake City, Utah: SECTION 1. The Salt Lake City Consolidated Fee Schedule shall be, and hereby is, amended in pertinent part to reflect the fees set forth in the attached Exhibit "A". SECTION 2. The pertinent portions of the official copy of the Salt Lake City Consolidated Fee Schedule shall be revised to reflect the fees set forth in the attached Exhibit "A" and a copy of the entire Salt Lake City Consolidated Fee Schedule that incorporates such revisions shall be published on the official Salt Lake City website. SECTION 3. This ord inance shall become effective immediately upon publication.

30 Passed by the City Council of Salt Lake City, Utah this _ day of ATIEST: CHAIRPERSON CITY RECORDER Transmitted to Mayor on Mayor's Action: Approved. Vetoed. MAYOR CITY RECORDER (SEAL) Bi ll No. of2014. Published: APPROVED AS TO FORM HB_A lty -#34845-" I-Consolidated Jee_Schedule_ Update. DOC

31 EXHIBIT "A"

32 IPremium $15 $30 I 15,16,031 USGA orant Jr, Clubs $3 $6 IJordan River Par, 3_ $3 NA I IGoif,>asses I Senior Season 9 Holes 18 Holes Base fee $40C See Section IS, 160" A 2 I $3 I $6 On all Dass rounds $4 J $8 On all pass rounds :Green Fees Regular (2) Course: 9 18,.,,,ur,(1)(') (65 years old or older) Junior (1)(2) (17 years old or 9 Holes 18 Holes 9 Holes 18 Holes II $18,50 $35 $15.50 $29 $8 I $16, I Forest Dale $14 NA $12 NA $8 NA )31 $15 $30 $13 $26 $8 $16 l' lqr,dal1.river.p.m.] $8 NA $7 NA $6 NA, I Dell canyon $18.50 $35 $15,50 $29 $8 $16 Mn"n','o Dell Lake i $18.50 $35 $15,50 I $29 $8 $16 Niblev Park $13 NA $11 NA $8 NA, Rose Park $14 $28 $12 $24 $8 $16 i $17 $33 $14 $27 $8 $16 II a ~~%~~~~,and JUni O~!~~~~ts ~~~~iz~'~~~~~:~~;~,~i~o!jr~day_ (2) As of January 1, 2012 $1.00 per nine ~ ro~n~v:i~~jr2;~~:~e r- eighte-e,;'hol e round will be,<'" I : oroiects at a I courses to a dedicated Golf CIP fund to be used Group I See Section 15,16,035 Pull Cart Rental 9 Holes 18 Holes Reoular $2 $4 $3,50 $7 15,16, 13l Jordan River Par ] $1 NA,Rang, Balls Small bucket $5 Per bucket Laroe bucket $8 Per bucket $50 10 laroe buckets " 160" I~a ss $8 118 holes $16 Large bucket of range balls $5 I Per bucket, 19 holes $5 IPer oerson. Dlus oreen fees 118 holes $10! Per oerson, olus areen fees IJardan River Par 3 $3 'Per person, plus greed f ees_ IMPACT FEES For questions regarding Impact fees contact: Service I Fee Additional Information Section Anneals Process $50 18, Developers Independent Calculation Impact Fees Residential (Per dwelling unit, single or multi-family) $150 16,2B, 12Q Commercialj Industrial (per square foot, retail, office and industrial) Fire $119,00 $0.32 H.Vz!3 t20 Park I $1,752,00 No charge Yeady Increase $562,00 No charge Yearly increase for 5 years of $562. Fee not to exceed $3, Yearlv increase Der ordinance startina FY2015 1!3.2B. 12Q 18,98,12Q Police I $41.00 $ ,2S,12Q Roadwa Residential I Sinole Family $424,00 I Multi Family $249,00 Per dwelling _unit 16,28, 12Q Retail I $3,28 Per square foot IB S!a 19Q Office I $2.33 Per SQuare foot 16,26, 12Q Industrial $2,26 Per square foot IB 98.19Q Storm Water I $374 Per 1/4 acre QQ Amended 6/ 18/2013 by Ord, % Increase to cover the costs to the City of accepting credit cards. Page 21

COUNCIL STAFF REPORT. City Council Members. FROM: Jennifer Bruno, Deputy Director Sean Murphy, Policy Analyst

COUNCIL STAFF REPORT. City Council Members. FROM: Jennifer Bruno, Deputy Director Sean Murphy, Policy Analyst COUNCIL STAFF REPORT CITY COUNCIL of SALT LAKE CITY TO: City Council Members FROM: Jennifer Bruno, Deputy Director Sean Murphy, Policy Analyst DATE: January 30, 2014 at 3:23 PM RE: IMPACT FEE REVISIONS

More information

COUNCIL BUDGET STAFF REPORT

COUNCIL BUDGET STAFF REPORT COUNCIL BUDGET STAFF REPORT CITY COUNCIL of SALT LAKE CITY www.slccouncil.com/city-budget TO: City Council Members Project Timeline: FROM: Jennifer Bruno, Sylvia Richards, Sean Murphy, Lehua Weaver Budget

More information

ANNUAL REPORT

ANNUAL REPORT 2018 ANNUAL REPORT 1 2018 ANNUAL REPORT 3 TABLE OF CONTENTS PRESIDENT S REPORT 4 CHAIRPERSON S REPORT 6 SUPERVISORY AUDITS 8 BOARD OF DIRECTORS 9 SUPERVISORY COMMITTEE 9 IMPROVING MEMBERS LIVES 10 HONORING

More information

Salt Lake City Golf Fund Analysis and Recommendations. Presentation to the Salt Lake City Council

Salt Lake City Golf Fund Analysis and Recommendations. Presentation to the Salt Lake City Council Salt Lake City Golf Fund Analysis and Recommendations Presentation to the Salt Lake City Council January 20 2015 Project Scope of Work Evaluate current and historic financial performance of the Golf Fund.

More information

CITY OF SACRAMENTO CALIFORNIA. April 27, 2012

CITY OF SACRAMENTO CALIFORNIA. April 27, 2012 OFFICE OF THE CITY MANAGER CALIFORNIA April 27, 2012 CITY HALL 5 th FLOOR 915 I STREET SACRAMENTO, CA 95814-2684 PH 916-808-5704 FAX 916-808-7618 Honorable Mayor and City Council Sacramento, California

More information

COMMERCIAL PROPERTY ASSESSED CLEAN ENERGY (C-PACE) DISTRICT

COMMERCIAL PROPERTY ASSESSED CLEAN ENERGY (C-PACE) DISTRICT COMMERCIAL PROPERTY ASSESSED CLEAN ENERGY (C-PACE) DISTRICT - Participation Agreement with the Governor s Office of Energy Development Adopt or Not Adopt Resolution The Council will consider a resolution

More information

Proposed Rate Changes

Proposed Rate Changes COUNCIL BUDGET STAFF REPORT CITY COUNCIL of SALT LAKE CITY www.slccouncil.com/city-budget TO: City Council Members FROM: Lehua Weaver Budget & Policy Analyst Project Timeline: Briefing: June 3, 2014 Budget

More information

Update: 50-State Survey of Retiree Health Care Liabilities Most recent data show changes to benefits, funding policies could help manage rising costs

Update: 50-State Survey of Retiree Health Care Liabilities Most recent data show changes to benefits, funding policies could help manage rising costs A fact sheet from Dec 2018 Update: 50-State Survey of Retiree Health Care Liabilities Most recent data show changes to benefits, funding policies could help manage rising costs Getty Images Overview States

More information

Age of Insured Discount

Age of Insured Discount A discount may apply based on the age of the insured. The age of each insured shall be calculated as the policyholder s age as of the last day of the calendar year. The age of the named insured in the

More information

OGDEN CITY FY BUDGET SALARY SCHEDULES

OGDEN CITY FY BUDGET SALARY SCHEDULES OGDEN CITY FY2017-18 BUDGET SALARY SCHEDULES Adopt or Not Adopt Ordinance The Council will consider adopting the Salary Schedules for Fiscal Year 2017-2018. Each year the Council approves a salary schedule

More information

PRIME DEVELOPMENT OPPORTUNITY

PRIME DEVELOPMENT OPPORTUNITY FOR SALE > PARCEL > WHOLE FOODS ANCHORED CENTER PRIME DEVELOPMENT OPPORTUNITY 350 EAST MYRTLE 83702 Development Land > Hotel, Multifamily, Student Housing, Office/Medical This 1.7 acre parcel is located

More information

MINIMUM WAGE INCREASE GUIDE

MINIMUM WAGE INCREASE GUIDE 2017-2018 MINIMUM WAGE INCREASE GUIDE The Federal minimum wage has been $7.25 since 2009, but many states and localities have passed their own minimum wage laws. Employers must pay non-exempt employees

More information

MINIMUM WAGE INCREASE GUIDE

MINIMUM WAGE INCREASE GUIDE 2017-2018 MINIMUM WAGE INCREASE GUIDE The Federal minimum wage has been $7.25 since 2009, but many states and localities have passed their own minimum wage laws. Employers must pay non-exempt employees

More information

NASRA Issue Brief: Employee Contributions to Public Pension Plans

NASRA Issue Brief: Employee Contributions to Public Pension Plans NASRA Issue Brief: Employee Contributions to Public Pension Plans September 2017 Unlike in the private sector, nearly all employees of state and local government are required to share in the cost of their

More information

ORDINANCE NO WHEREAS, the City anticipates revising its SDCs in light of growth trends and infrastructure needs within the next two years.

ORDINANCE NO WHEREAS, the City anticipates revising its SDCs in light of growth trends and infrastructure needs within the next two years. ORDINANCE NO. 1440 AN ORDINANCE OF THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF BONNEY LAKE, PIERCE COUNTY, WASHINGTON, AMENDING SECTIONS 13.04.070 AND 13.12.100 OF THE BONNEY LAKE MUNICIPAL CODE RELATING TO WATER

More information

917 S. LUSK STREET BOISE, ID LEW MANGLOS, MBA, CCIM, SIOR

917 S. LUSK STREET BOISE, ID LEW MANGLOS, MBA, CCIM, SIOR 917 S. LUSK STREET BOISE, ID 83607 LEW MANGLOS, MBA, CCIM, SIOR 208 472 2841 lew.manglos@colliers.com 917 S LUSK ST Table of Contents Property Overview Valuation Location Layout Images Demographics Area

More information

University of New Mexico Bureau of Business and Economic Research. New Mexico Women s Agenda Lobbying Workshop. State of the Economy: US, New Mexico

University of New Mexico Bureau of Business and Economic Research. New Mexico Women s Agenda Lobbying Workshop. State of the Economy: US, New Mexico University of New Mexico Bureau of Business and Economic Research New Mexico Women s Agenda Lobbying Workshop State of the Economy: US, New Mexico January 11, 2013 Dr. Lee A. Reynis, Director lreynis@unm.edu

More information

HOW TO APPLY FOR LCO MANAGEMENT POSITIONS

HOW TO APPLY FOR LCO MANAGEMENT POSITIONS U.S. DEPARTMENT OF COMMERCE Bureau of the Census Denver Regional Census Center http://www.census.gov/roden/www/emply.html (cut and paste) HOW TO APPLY FOR LCO MANAGEMENT POSITIONS The Census Bureau will

More information

FORMER MACY S DEPARTMENT STORE 1406 N GALLERIA DR NAMPA, ID

FORMER MACY S DEPARTMENT STORE 1406 N GALLERIA DR NAMPA, ID FORMER MACY S DEPARTMENT STORE 1406 N GALLERIA DR NAMPA, ID DAVID CADWELL 208 472 3857 david.cadwell@colliers.com MIKE CHRISTENSEN 208 472 2866 mike.christensen@colliers.com This document has been prepared

More information

REQUEST FOR COUNCIL ACTION

REQUEST FOR COUNCIL ACTION REQUEST FOR COUNCIL ACTION To: From: RDA Chairperson & Committee Members Bob Wylie, Finance Director Date: November 20, 2018 Subject: Draper City RDA Annual Report 2018 Applicant Presentation: None Staff

More information

GRASS VALLEY TRANSPORTATION IMPACT FEE PROGRAM NEXUS STUDY

GRASS VALLEY TRANSPORTATION IMPACT FEE PROGRAM NEXUS STUDY HEARING REPORT GRASS VALLEY TRANSPORTATION IMPACT FEE PROGRAM NEXUS STUDY Prepared for: City of Grass Valley Prepared by: Economic & Planning Systems, Inc. March 2008 EPS #17525 S A C R A M E N T O 2150

More information

LEGEND Bridges Parks Fire Stations Project Locations Libraries Schools A

LEGEND Bridges Parks Fire Stations Project Locations Libraries Schools A LEGEND Bridges Parks Fire Stations Project Locations Libraries Schools A Aid to Construction Fund The Aid to Construction Fund (Water) are funds received from customers for requested water service and

More information

ORDINANCE # NOW THEREFORE, The City Council of the City of Ferndale do ordain as follows:

ORDINANCE # NOW THEREFORE, The City Council of the City of Ferndale do ordain as follows: ORDINANCE # AN ORDINANCE OF THE CITY OF FERNDALE WASHINGTON, SETTING RATES AND FREQUENCY OF BILLINGS FOR WATER AND SEWER SERVICE AND REPEALING ALL PRIOR ORDINANCES IN CONFLICT HEREWITH. WHEREAS, it is

More information

Licenses. Arizona California Colorado New Mexico Washington

Licenses. Arizona California Colorado New Mexico Washington Licenses Arizona California Colorado New Mexico Washington SFBR - 0115848 This document is evidence that: Checkmate Express Corporation(SF-0910900) has complied with the provisions of Title 44, Chapter

More information

Health Insurance Price Index for October-December February 2014

Health Insurance Price Index for October-December February 2014 Health Insurance Price Index for October-December 2013 February 2014 ehealth 2.2014 Table of Contents Introduction... 3 Executive Summary and Highlights... 4 Nationwide Health Insurance Costs National

More information

kaiser medicaid and the uninsured commission on The Cost and Coverage Implications of the ACA Medicaid Expansion: National and State-by-State Analysis

kaiser medicaid and the uninsured commission on The Cost and Coverage Implications of the ACA Medicaid Expansion: National and State-by-State Analysis kaiser commission on medicaid and the uninsured The Cost and Coverage Implications of the ACA Expansion: National and State-by-State Analysis Executive Summary John Holahan, Matthew Buettgens, Caitlin

More information

Highlights. Percent of States with a Decrease in MH Expenditures from Prior Year: FY2001 to 2010

Highlights. Percent of States with a Decrease in MH Expenditures from Prior Year: FY2001 to 2010 FY 2010 State Mental Health Revenues and Expenditures Information from the National Association of State Mental Health Program Directors Research Institute, Inc (NRI) Sept 2012 Highlights SMHA Funding

More information

CITY OF GOODYEAR CITY COUNCIL ACTION FORM

CITY OF GOODYEAR CITY COUNCIL ACTION FORM CITY OF GOODYEAR CITY COUNCIL ACTION FORM AGENDA ITEM # DATE: 11/28/11 COAC NUMBER: 11-4729 SUBJECT: Approve and Adopt Resolution No. 11-1460 Approving and Authorizing the City Manager to Execute Job Creation

More information

State Retiree Health Care Liabilities: An Update Increased obligations in 2015 mirrored rise in overall health care costs

State Retiree Health Care Liabilities: An Update Increased obligations in 2015 mirrored rise in overall health care costs A brief from Sept 207 State Retiree Health Care Liabilities: An Update Increased obligations in 205 mirrored rise in overall health care costs Overview States paid a total of $20.8 billion in 205 for nonpension

More information

Work Session Agenda Bill

Work Session Agenda Bill Work Session Agenda Bill Date: April 1, 2019 To: From: Russ Axelrod, Mayor Members, West Linn City Council Morgan Coffie, Management Analyst Through: Lance Calvert, P.E., Public Works Director/City Engineer

More information

AGENDA OF THE COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF FORT COLLINS, COLORADO. October 19, Proclamations and Presentations 5:30 p.m.

AGENDA OF THE COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF FORT COLLINS, COLORADO. October 19, Proclamations and Presentations 5:30 p.m. AGENDA OF THE COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF FORT COLLINS, COLORADO October 19, 2004 Proclamations and Presentations 5:30 p.m. A. Proclamation Proclaiming October 23, 2004 as Make a Difference Day. B. Proclamation

More information

City Council Report 915 I Street, 1 st Floor

City Council Report 915 I Street, 1 st Floor Meeting Date: 1/28/2014 Report Type: Public Hearing Report ID: 2014-00113 08 City Council Report 915 I Street, 1 st Floor www.cityofsacramento.org Title: Ordinance: Sacramento Library Parcel Tax Measure

More information

ALAMEDA COUNTY REGISTRAR OF VOTERS LIST OF LOCAL MEASURES November 6, 2012 GENERAL ELECTION MEASURE I

ALAMEDA COUNTY REGISTRAR OF VOTERS LIST OF LOCAL MEASURES November 6, 2012 GENERAL ELECTION MEASURE I MEASURE I Chabot-Las Positas Community College District Parcel Tax To provide Chabot and Las Positas Community Colleges funds that cannot be taken by the state, ensure affordable quality education, prepare

More information

ORDINANCE NO

ORDINANCE NO AN ORDINANCE OF THE CITY OF DRY RIDGE, KENTUCKY CREATING AND AUTHORIZING A TAX INCREMENT FINANCE LOCAL DEVELOPMENT AREA TO BE KNOWN AS THE "FERGUSON BOULEVARD TAX INCREMENT FINANCE DEVELOPMENT AREA"; DESIGNATING

More information

City of Grand Island Tuesday, September 11, 2012 Council Session

City of Grand Island Tuesday, September 11, 2012 Council Session City of Grand Island Tuesday, September 11, 2012 Council Session Item E12 Public Hearing on Proposed FY 2012-2013 Community Redevelopment Authority (CRA) and City of Grand Island Budget Staff Contact:

More information

Uinta Basin Energy Summit Economic Overview September 10, 2015

Uinta Basin Energy Summit Economic Overview September 10, 2015 Uinta Basin Energy Summit Economic Overview September 10, 2015 Overview National Economic Conditions Utah Economic Conditions Utah is One of the Fastest Growing CA States in the Country Percent Change

More information

Non-Financial Change Form

Non-Financial Change Form Non-Financial Change Form Please Print All Information Below Section 1. Contract Owner s Information Administrative Offices: PO BOX 19097 Greenville, SC 29602-9097 Phone number (800) 449-0523 Overnight

More information

Financial Transaction Form for IRA and Non-Qualified Contracts Only

Financial Transaction Form for IRA and Non-Qualified Contracts Only Financial Transaction Form for IRA and Non-Qualified Contracts Only (Note: See Form ZA-8642 dealing with Financial Transactions for 403(b)/TSA s) Please Print All Information Below Zurich American Life

More information

Corporate Income Tax and Policy Considerations

Corporate Income Tax and Policy Considerations Corporate Income Tax and Policy Considerations Presentation by Richard Anklam, Executive Director, New Mexico Tax Research Institute To The Interim Revenue Stabilization and Tax Policy Committee September

More information

Quigley Canyon Ranch Cost/Benefit Study Update

Quigley Canyon Ranch Cost/Benefit Study Update Quigley Canyon Ranch Cost/Benefit Study Update April 26, 2012 RICHARD CAPLAN & ASSOCIATES Mayor Fritz Haemmerle Hailey City Council 115 Main Street Hailey, ID 83333 April 26, 2012 Dear Mayor Haemmerle

More information

Putting Nevada in Perspective: State and Local Budgets in Recession and Recovery

Putting Nevada in Perspective: State and Local Budgets in Recession and Recovery Putting Nevada in Perspective: State and Local Budgets in Recession and Recovery Tracy M. Gordon Fellow, Economic Studies Prepared for Brookings Mountain West at UNLV September 17-21, 2011 1 Outline of

More information

LIFE AND ACCIDENT AND HEALTH

LIFE AND ACCIDENT AND HEALTH 201 FOR THE YEAR ENDED DECEMBER 1, 201 LIFE AND ACCIDENT AND HEALTH 201 Schedule A - Part 1 - Real Estate Owned Schedule A - Part 2 - Real Estate Acquired and Additions Made Schedule A - Part - Real Estate

More information

States and Medicaid Provider Taxes or Fees

States and Medicaid Provider Taxes or Fees March 2016 Fact Sheet States and Medicaid Provider Taxes or Fees Medicaid is jointly financed by states and the federal government. Provider taxes are an integral source of Medicaid financing governed

More information

BY THE NUMBERS 2016: Another Lackluster Year for State Tax Revenue

BY THE NUMBERS 2016: Another Lackluster Year for State Tax Revenue BY THE NUMBERS 2016: Another Lackluster Year for State Tax Revenue Jim Malatras May 2017 Lucy Dadayan and Donald J. Boyd 2016: Another Lackluster Year for State Tax Revenue Lucy Dadayan and Donald J. Boyd

More information

medicaid a n d t h e How will the Medicaid Expansion for Adults Impact Eligibility and Coverage? Key Findings in Brief

medicaid a n d t h e How will the Medicaid Expansion for Adults Impact Eligibility and Coverage? Key Findings in Brief on medicaid a n d t h e uninsured July 2012 How will the Medicaid Expansion for Adults Impact Eligibility and Coverage? Key Findings in Brief Effective January 2014, the ACA establishes a new minimum Medicaid

More information

Town of Prescott Valley 2014 Development Impact Fee Report. Raftelis Financial Consultants, Inc.

Town of Prescott Valley 2014 Development Impact Fee Report. Raftelis Financial Consultants, Inc. Town of Prescott Valley 2014 Development Impact Fee Report Raftelis Financial Consultants, Inc. February 13, 2014 Table of Contents Purpose of this Report... 1 Existing Development Impact Fees... 1 Summary

More information

Richard Pearson, Community Development Director Tim Tucker, City Engineer

Richard Pearson, Community Development Director Tim Tucker, City Engineer CITY OF MARTINEZ CITY COUNCIL AGENDA February 21, 2007 TO: FROM: PREPARED BY: SUBJECT: Mayor and City Council Don Blubaugh, City Manager Richard Pearson, Community Development Director Tim Tucker, City

More information

Salt Lake County. Townships and Unincorporated Islands Fiscal Evaluation

Salt Lake County. Townships and Unincorporated Islands Fiscal Evaluation Salt Lake County Townships and Unincorporated Islands Fiscal Evaluation September 11, 2015 Table of Contents Executive Summary... 4 Background Information... 5 Township Service Provision Options... 5 Remaining

More information

RESOLUTION NO

RESOLUTION NO RESOLUTION NO. 8-2014 A Resolution Of The Port Of Vancouver Board Of Commissioners, Clark County, Washington, Amending The Port Of Vancouver Comprehensive Scheme Of Harbor Improvements And Industrial Development

More information

Offering Memorandum 1041 S. ANCONA AVE EAGLE, ID 83616

Offering Memorandum 1041 S. ANCONA AVE EAGLE, ID 83616 Offering Memorandum 1041 S. ANCONA AVE EAGLE, ID 83616 MIKE CHRISTENSEN 208 472 2866 mike.christensen@colliers.com SCOTT RAEBER, MBA, CCIM 208 472 2817 scott.raeber@colliers.com This document has been

More information

C APITA L IMPRO VEMENTS S CHEDULE (FIGURE CI-14)

C APITA L IMPRO VEMENTS S CHEDULE (FIGURE CI-14) August 20, 2018 Staff Report to the Municipal Planning Board G M P 2 0 1 8-1 0 0 2 0 I TEM 6 S U M M A RY Applicant City of Orlando Requested Actions 1. Amend Figure CI-14 and Policy 2.2.30 of the Capital

More information

SAN RAFAEL CITY COUNCIL AGENDA REPORT

SAN RAFAEL CITY COUNCIL AGENDA REPORT Agenda Item No: 6.a Meeting Date: May 1, 2017 Department: FINANCE SAN RAFAEL CITY COUNCIL AGENDA REPORT From: Mark Moses Finance Director City Manager Approval: TOPIC: PARAMEDIC TAX FY 17-18 SUBJECT: CONSIDERATION

More information

TAUSSIG DEVELOPMENT IMPACT FEE JUSTIFICATION STUDY CITY OF ESCALON. Public Finance Public Private Partnerships Urban Economics Clean Energy Bonds

TAUSSIG DEVELOPMENT IMPACT FEE JUSTIFICATION STUDY CITY OF ESCALON. Public Finance Public Private Partnerships Urban Economics Clean Energy Bonds DAVID TAUSSIG & ASSOCIATES, INC. DEVELOPMENT IMPACT FEE JUSTIFICATION STUDY CITY OF ESCALON B. C. SEPTEMBER 12, 2016 Public Finance Public Private Partnerships Urban Economics Clean Energy Bonds Prepared

More information

Required Minimum Distribution Election Form for IRA s, 403(b)/TSA and other Qualified Plans

Required Minimum Distribution Election Form for IRA s, 403(b)/TSA and other Qualified Plans Required Minimum Distribution Election Form for IRA s, 403(b)/TSA and other Qualified Plans For Policyholders who have not annuitized their deferred annuity contracts Zurich American Life Insurance Company

More information

US Geological Survey Streamflow Information Program. Western States Water Council Meeting 07/17/2014

US Geological Survey Streamflow Information Program. Western States Water Council Meeting 07/17/2014 US Geological Survey Streamflow Information Program Western States Water Council Meeting 07/17/2014 Streamgage Network Budget National Streamflow Information Program and the Cooperative Water Program Historical

More information

Planning Commission Work Meeting Minutes Thursday, August 4, 2016 City Council Chambers 220 East Morris Avenue Time 6:30 p.m.

Planning Commission Work Meeting Minutes Thursday, August 4, 2016 City Council Chambers 220 East Morris Avenue Time 6:30 p.m. Planning Commission Work Meeting Minutes Thursday, City Council Chambers 220 East Morris Avenue Time 6:30 p.m. Commission Members Present: Staff Members Present: Jeremy Carter, Presiding Holly Carson Laura

More information

50-State Property Tax Comparison Study: For Taxes Paid in Executive Summary

50-State Property Tax Comparison Study: For Taxes Paid in Executive Summary 50-State Property Tax Comparison Study: For Taxes Paid in 2017 Executive Summary By Lincoln Institute of Land Policy and Minnesota Center for Fiscal Excellence April 2018 As the largest source of revenue

More information

2017 UTILITY RATE STUDY WORK SESSION #2: BACKGROUND, EDUCATIONAL/INFORMATIONAL

2017 UTILITY RATE STUDY WORK SESSION #2: BACKGROUND, EDUCATIONAL/INFORMATIONAL 2017 UTILITY RATE STUDY WORK SESSION #2: BACKGROUND, EDUCATIONAL/INFORMATIONAL Receive a presentation from Lewis Young Robertson & Burningham regarding the 2017 Utility Rate Study The purpose of the Council

More information

ROSEBURG URBAN RENEWAL AGENCY BOARD MEETING AGENDA June 13, 2016

ROSEBURG URBAN RENEWAL AGENCY BOARD MEETING AGENDA June 13, 2016 ROSEBURG URBAN RENEWAL AGENCY BOARD MEETING AGENDA June 13, 2016 f\.u 7:00. m. Ci Hall Council Chambers (Immediately following City Council meeting) 1 CALL TO ORDER: Larry Rich, Chairperson ROLL CALL OF

More information

EXHIBIT 1. Salt Lake City

EXHIBIT 1. Salt Lake City EXHIBIT 1 Salt Lake City DRAFT Cost-Benefit and Financial Need Analysis Stadler Development March 5, 2018 COST-BENEFIT AND FINANCIAL NEED ANALYSIS STADLER DEVELOPMENT Zions Public Finance, Inc., has conducted

More information

Household Income for States: 2010 and 2011

Household Income for States: 2010 and 2011 Household Income for States: 2010 and 2011 American Community Survey Briefs By Amanda Noss Issued September 2012 ACSBR/11-02 INTRODUCTION Estimates from the 2010 American Community Survey (ACS) and the

More information

PLEASANT GROVE, UTAH TRANSPORTATION IMPACT FEE FACILITIES PLAN AND ANALYSIS

PLEASANT GROVE, UTAH TRANSPORTATION IMPACT FEE FACILITIES PLAN AND ANALYSIS PLEASANT GROVE, UTAH TRANSPORTATION IMPACT FEE FACILITIES PLAN AND OCTOBER 2012 PREPARED BY: LEWIS YOUNG ROBERTSON & BURNINGHAM IMPACT FEE CERTIFICATION Impact Fee Facilities Plan (IFFP) Certification

More information

Ashley Koehler, Planning & Zoning Administrator

Ashley Koehler, Planning & Zoning Administrator Planning and Zoning Department STAFF REPORT To: City Council From: Ashley Koehler, Planning & Zoning Administrator Report Date: March 16, 2017 Meeting Date: March 21, 2017 RE: Special Event Permit Ordinance

More information

Utah Taxpayers Association 2009 Property Tax Report

Utah Taxpayers Association 2009 Property Tax Report Utah Taxpayers Association 2009 Property Tax Report Utah Property Tax Revenues Increase 5% in 2009 Total property tax revenues in Utah will reach $2.55 billion in 2009, up 5% from 2008, according to calculations

More information

City of La Palma Agenda Item No. 5

City of La Palma Agenda Item No. 5 City of La Palma Agenda Item No. 5 MEETING DATE: January 19, 2016 TO: FROM: SUBMITTED BY: CITY COUNCIL CITY MANAGER Mike Belknap, Community Services Director AGENDA TITLE: Adopt a Resolution Approving

More information

SPECIAL MEETING AGENDA OF THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF EL MONTE

SPECIAL MEETING AGENDA OF THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF EL MONTE LOCATION: El Monte City Hall East City Council Chambers 11333 Valley Boulevard El Monte, CA 91731 DATE AND TIME: Tuesday, April 10, 2018 6:00 p.m. SPECIAL MEETING AGENDA OF THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY

More information

City of Boise Mayor s Recommendation Summary FY 2006

City of Boise Mayor s Recommendation Summary FY 2006 City of Boise Mayor s Recommendation Summary FY 2006 Overview The City of Boise continues to reap the benefits of a robust local economy and prudent municipal budget practices. The rigorous business planning

More information

National Employment Law Project UNEMPLOYMENT INSURANCE FINANCING: STATE TRUST FUNDS IN RECESSION AS OF SEPTEMBER 30, 2008

National Employment Law Project UNEMPLOYMENT INSURANCE FINANCING: STATE TRUST FUNDS IN RECESSION AS OF SEPTEMBER 30, 2008 National Employment Law Project UNEMPLOYMENT INSURANCE FINANCING: STATE TRUST FUNDS IN RECESSION AS OF SEPTEMBER 30, 2008 Introduction In May 2008, NELP issued a briefing paper (Unemployment Insurance

More information

To: Honorable City Council D_ A f Date: Nov. 9, 2010

To: Honorable City Council D_ A f Date: Nov. 9, 2010 ATTACHMENT 2 CITY OF WOODINVILLE, WA REPORT TO THE CITY COUNCIL 17301 133 rd Avenue NE, Woodinville, WA 98072 WWW.CI.WOODINVILLE.WA.US To: Honorable City Council D_ A f Date: Nov. 9, 2010 From: Richard

More information

WHEREAS, after due notice, the City Planning Commission and the City Council did conduct public hearings on this matter; and,

WHEREAS, after due notice, the City Planning Commission and the City Council did conduct public hearings on this matter; and, ORDINANCE NO. An ordinance authorizing the execution of the development agreement by and between the City of Los Angeles and Sunset Studios Holdings, LLC, a Delaware limited liability company relating

More information

DEVELOPMENT IMPACT FEE ADVISORY COMMITTEE Wednesday, September 9, 2015 Boise Depot - Meeting Station

DEVELOPMENT IMPACT FEE ADVISORY COMMITTEE Wednesday, September 9, 2015 Boise Depot - Meeting Station DEVELOPMENT IMPACT FEE ADVISORY COMMITTEE Wednesday, Boise Depot - Meeting Station MINUTES I. Call to Order Committee Chair, David Yorgason, called the meeting to order at 12:05 p.m. II. III. Attendance:

More information

Summary of Ratepayer-Funded Electric Efficiency Impacts, Budgets, and Expenditures

Summary of Ratepayer-Funded Electric Efficiency Impacts, Budgets, and Expenditures Summary of Ratepayer-Funded Electric Efficiency Impacts, Budgets, and Expenditures IEE Brief January 2012 Summary of Ratepayer-Funded Electric Efficiency Impacts, Budgets and Expenditures (2010-2011)

More information

Zions Bank Economic Overview

Zions Bank Economic Overview Zions Bank Economic Overview Utah Institute of Real Estate Management Economic Summit September 12, 2017 National Economic Conditions August Job Indicators Indicator Expectation Actual Total Nonfarm Payrolls

More information

CITY OF MOUNTLAKE TERRACE RESOLUTION NO.

CITY OF MOUNTLAKE TERRACE RESOLUTION NO. CITY OF MOUNTLAKE TERRACE RESOLUTION NO. A RESOLUTION OF THE CITY OF MOUNTLAKE TERRACE ESTABLISHING FEES AND DEPOSITS APPLICABLE TO CIVIL ENGINEERING CONSTRUCTION APPLICATIONS AND PERMITS, AND ESTABLISHING

More information

MOTION SHEET. MOTION 1 I move that the Council adopt the ordinance. MOTION 2 I move that the Council not adopt the ordinance. City Council Members

MOTION SHEET. MOTION 1 I move that the Council adopt the ordinance. MOTION 2 I move that the Council not adopt the ordinance. City Council Members MOTION SHEET CITY COUNCIL of SALT LAKE CITY TO: City Council Members FROM: Sean Murphy Public Policy & Budget Analyst DATE: February 26, 2015 RE: MOTION SHEET Franchise Agreement for Google Fiber Utah

More information

[Business and Tax Regulations, Planning Codes - Central South of Market Housing Sustainability District]

[Business and Tax Regulations, Planning Codes - Central South of Market Housing Sustainability District] FILE NO. ORDINANCE NO. 1 [Business and Tax Regulations, Planning Codes - Central South of Market Housing Sustainability District] Ordinance amending the Business and Tax Regulations and Planning Codes

More information

Mountain Monitor Tracking Economic Recession and Recovery in the Intermountain West s Metropolitan Areas

Mountain Monitor Tracking Economic Recession and Recovery in the Intermountain West s Metropolitan Areas Mountain Monitor Tracking Economic Recession and Recovery in the Intermountain West s Metropolitan Areas Kenan Fikri and Jonathan Rothwell March 2011 The metros of the Intermountain West largely fell into

More information

DEFINITION OF REVENUE SOURCES GENERAL FUND

DEFINITION OF REVENUE SOURCES GENERAL FUND GENERAL FUND PROPERTY TAX: The valuation of property in the City is determined by the Los Angeles County Tax Assessor, except for Public Utility property, which is assessed by the State Board of Equalization.

More information

FY2017 BUDGET AMENDMENT YEAR END ADJUSTMENTS ($4,919,075)

FY2017 BUDGET AMENDMENT YEAR END ADJUSTMENTS ($4,919,075) FY2017 BUDGET AMENDMENT YEAR END ADJUSTMENTS ($4,919,075) To discuss the proposed year-end budget amendments. The City Council will receive a presentation from the Administration for the FY2017 year-end

More information

Legal Counsel and Representation of the Long-Term Care Ombudsman Program

Legal Counsel and Representation of the Long-Term Care Ombudsman Program Legal Counsel and Representation of the Long-Term Care Ombudsman Program Prepared by the National Association of State Units on Aging National Long-Term Care Ombudsman Resource Center National Citizens'

More information

General Fund Revenues

General Fund Revenues Budget Overview General Fund Revenues $16.9 $4.0 $15.9 $54.5 Property Taxes Franchise & TLT State Rev Sharing Other Sources Total Revenues - $91.3 million Property Taxes 60% of total revenue Franchise

More information

CITIZEN S POPULAR ANNUAL FINANCIAL REPORT

CITIZEN S POPULAR ANNUAL FINANCIAL REPORT Clearfield City 1 CITIZEN S POPULAR ANNUAL FINANCIAL REPORT A Summary Financial Report of the 2013 Fiscal Year (July 1, 2012 through June 30, 2013) 2 Clearfield City Purpose Statement The intent of the

More information

MEDICARE PART D SPOTLIGHT

MEDICARE PART D SPOTLIGHT MEDICARE PART D SPOTLIGHT Part D Plan Availability in 20 and Key Changes Since 2006 Jack Hoadley, Juliette Cubanski, Elizabeth Hargrave, Laura Summer, and Tricia Neuman 1 NOVEMBER 200 (Updated 2 ) The

More information

ACORD Forms in ebixasp (03/2004)

ACORD Forms in ebixasp (03/2004) ACORD Forms in ebixasp (03/2004) Form number Form Name Edition Date 1 Property Loss Notice 2002/1 2 Automobile Loss Notice 2002/1 3 General Liability Notice of Occurrence/Claim 2002/1 4 Workers Compensation

More information

U.S. HOUSE PRICE APPRECIATION RATE STEADIES

U.S. HOUSE PRICE APPRECIATION RATE STEADIES Office of Federal Housing Enterprise Oversight (OFHEO) NEWS RELEASE FOR IMMEDIATE RELEASE March 1, 2007 CONTACT: Corinne Russell (202) 414-6921 Stefanie Mullin (202) 414-6376 U.S. HOUSE PRICE APPRECIATION

More information

State, Local and Net Tuition Revenue Supporting General Operating Expenses of Higher Education, U.S., Fiscal Year 2010, Current (unadjusted) Dollars

State, Local and Net Tuition Revenue Supporting General Operating Expenses of Higher Education, U.S., Fiscal Year 2010, Current (unadjusted) Dollars State, Local and Net Tuition Revenue Supporting General Operating Expenses of Higher Education, U.S., Fiscal Year 2010, Current (unadjusted) Dollars Net Tuition $51.3 Billion 37% All State Support $73.7

More information

2007 Utah Property Tax Report

2007 Utah Property Tax Report 2007 Utah Property Tax Report Utah Property Tax Revenues Increase 10.4% in 2007 Total property tax collections in Utah including age-based vehicle fee-in-lieu (FIL) will approach $2.3 billion in 2007,

More information

The series 2008 Water & Sewer Revenue Bonds Feasibility Report recommended the City perform and implement a rate study for the following reasons:

The series 2008 Water & Sewer Revenue Bonds Feasibility Report recommended the City perform and implement a rate study for the following reasons: Additional Background Information Water and Wastewater The City of Fort Lauderdale supplies water and sewer services on a regional basis to over 250,000 residents of central Broward County. The areas serviced

More information

Recommendation for Council action, SUBJECT TO THE APPROVAL OF THE MAYOR:

Recommendation for Council action, SUBJECT TO THE APPROVAL OF THE MAYOR: Los Angeles City Council, Supplemental Agenda Tuesday, January 19, 2016 JOHN FERRARO COUNCIL CHAMBER ROOM 340, CITY HALL 200 NORTH SPRING STREET, LOS ANGELES, CA 90012-10:00 AM Click here for the entire

More information

ORDINANCE NO. CID-3193

ORDINANCE NO. CID-3193 ORDINANCE NO. CID-3193 AN ORDINANCE MAKING FINDINGS AS TO THE NATURE AND ADVISABILITY OF CREATING A COMMUNITY IMPROVEMENT DISTRICT AT THE NORTHWEST CORNER OF 93 RD STREET AND METCALF AVENUE; CREATING SAID

More information

36 Million Without Health Insurance in 2014; Decreases in Uninsurance Between 2013 and 2014 Varied by State

36 Million Without Health Insurance in 2014; Decreases in Uninsurance Between 2013 and 2014 Varied by State 36 Million Without Health Insurance in 2014; Decreases in Uninsurance Between 2013 and 2014 Varied by State An estimated 36 million people in the United States had no health insurance in 2014, approximately

More information

CITY OF SONOMA 2017 FEE SCHEDULE INDEX EFFECTIVE FEBRUARY 13, 2017

CITY OF SONOMA 2017 FEE SCHEDULE INDEX EFFECTIVE FEBRUARY 13, 2017 ADMINISTRATION CA-00 Copy fee - ALL DEPARTMENTS - Unless specific document copy fee is stated. This applies to all printed material i.e. Development Code, General Plan, Minutes, Staff Reports, Agendas

More information

ORDINANCE NO NOW, THEREFORE, BE IT ORDAINED BY THE CITY COUNCIL OF DRAPER CITY, STATE OF UT AH, AS FOLLOWS:

ORDINANCE NO NOW, THEREFORE, BE IT ORDAINED BY THE CITY COUNCIL OF DRAPER CITY, STATE OF UT AH, AS FOLLOWS: ORDINANCE NO. 1294 AN ORDINANCE AMENDING SECTION 9-11-1 OF THE DRAPER CITY MUNICIPAL CODE AS IT PERTAINS TO THE PERMITTED USES IN THE COMMERCIAL ZONING DISTRICTS WHEREAS, Utah State law grants to Draper

More information

FINDINGS. The Board of Supervisors finds that: Resolution No declaring its intention to form Community Facilities District No.

FINDINGS. The Board of Supervisors finds that: Resolution No declaring its intention to form Community Facilities District No. ORDINANCE NO. 879 AN ORDINANCE OF THE COUNTY OF RIVERSIDE AUTHORIZING THE LEVY OF SPECIAL TAXES IN IMPROVEMENT AREA NO. 2 OF COMMUNITY FACILITIES DISTRICT NO. 07-1(NEWPORT/I-215 INTERCHANGE) OF THE COUNTY

More information

ORDINANCE NUMBER 1174

ORDINANCE NUMBER 1174 ORDINANCE NUMBER 1174 AN ORDINANCE OF THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF PERRIS, COUNTY OF RIVERSIDE, STATE OF CALIFORNIA, ACTING IN ITS CAPACITY AS THE LEGISLATIVE BODY OF COMMUNITY FACILITIES DISTRICT NO.

More information

TOWNSHIP OF MONTCLAIR. SALARY ORDINANCE FOR THE MANAGEMENT (NON-UNION) GROUP FOR YEAR 2015 THROUGH YEAR 2018 May 22, 2018 (date of introduction)

TOWNSHIP OF MONTCLAIR. SALARY ORDINANCE FOR THE MANAGEMENT (NON-UNION) GROUP FOR YEAR 2015 THROUGH YEAR 2018 May 22, 2018 (date of introduction) Page 1 of 5 H TOWNSHIP OF MONTCLAIR SALARY ORDINANCE FOR THE MANAGEMENT (NON-UNION) GROUP FOR YEAR 2015 THROUGH YEAR 2018 May 22, 2018 (date of introduction) BE IT ORDAINED by the Mayor and Council of

More information

ORDINANCE NO

ORDINANCE NO ORDINANCE NO. 4-217 AN ORDINANCE OF THE CITY OF SEMINOLE, FLORIDA, AMENDING THE CITY OF SEMINOLE COMPREHENSIVE PLAN, GOALS OBJECTIVES AND POLICIES OF THE CAPITAL IMPROVEMENTS ELEMENT; REPEALING THE PUBLIC

More information

CITY OF ROCK ISLAND ORDINANCE NO. O AN ORDINANCE OF THE CITY OF ROCK ISLAND, ROCK ISLAND COUNTY, ILLINOIS, ADOPTING TAX INCREMENT ALLOCATION FI

CITY OF ROCK ISLAND ORDINANCE NO. O AN ORDINANCE OF THE CITY OF ROCK ISLAND, ROCK ISLAND COUNTY, ILLINOIS, ADOPTING TAX INCREMENT ALLOCATION FI CITY OF ROCK ISLAND ORDINANCE NO. O- -2014 AN ORDINANCE OF THE CITY OF ROCK ISLAND, ROCK ISLAND COUNTY, ILLINOIS, ADOPTING TAX INCREMENT ALLOCATION FINANCING FOR THE LOCKS REDEVELOPMENT PROJECT AREA WHEREAS,

More information

COMMUNITY FACILITIES DISTRICT NO.

COMMUNITY FACILITIES DISTRICT NO. DAVID TAUSSIG & ASSOCIATES, INC. CITY OF ANAHEIM COMMUNITY FACILITIES DISTRICT NO. 1989-2 ADMINISTRATION REPORT FISCAL YEAR 2015-16 AUGUST 10, 2015 Public Finance Urban Economics Newport Beach Riverside

More information