The mean-variance portfolio choice framework and its generalizations
|
|
- Darrell Fisher
- 5 years ago
- Views:
Transcription
1 The mean-variance portfolio choice framework and its generalizations Prof. Massimo Guidolin Theory of Finance, Part I (Sept. October) Fall 2014
2 Outline and objectives The backward, three-step solution to modern portfolio theory problems Exact and approximate foundations of mean-variance utility functionals The normality assumption applied to asset returns Building the mean-variance efficient frontier in the two-asset case Generalizing the MVF to the N-asset case and to the presence of a riskless asset Quadratic Programming construction and the role of constraints The separation theorem : univariate vs. multivariate Extensions and the power/log-normal case 2
3 Modern portfolio theory Consider the general problem of portfolio selection among N risky assets: This is equivalent to: Portfolio rate of return Modern Portfolio Theory (MPT) explores the details of a portfolio problem such as this under the mean-variance utility hypothesis o This is normally done for an arbitrary number of risky investments, with or without a risk-free asset Assume that utility is provided by bundles of consumption goods, where the indexing is cross dates and states 3
4 Modern portfolio theory: three steps o o States of nature are mutually exclusive For each date and state of nature ( ) there is a traditional budget constraint: where the indexing runs across goods for a given state ; the m quantities c i ; and the m prices p i ; (i = 1, 2,, m) correspond to the m goods available in state of nature o Y is the end of period wealth level available in that same state MPT summarizes an individual's decision problem as being undertaken sequentially, in three steps. 1 The Consumption-Savings Decision: how to split period zero income/wealth Y 0 between current consumption now C 0 and saving S 0 for consumption in the future where C 0 + S 0 = Y 0 : 2 The Portfolio Problem: choose assets in which to invest one's savings so as to obtain a desired pattern of end-of-period wealth across the various states of nature o This means allocating (Y 0, - C 0 ) btw. a risk-free and N risky assets 4
5 Modern portfolio theory: three steps 3 The Consumption Choice: Given the realized state of nature and the wealth level obtained, the choice of consumption bundles to maximize the utility function It is fruitful to work by backward induction, starting from step 3 Step 3 is a standard microeconomic problem and its solution can be summarized by a utility-of-money function U(Y ) representing the (maximum) level of utility that results from optimizing in step 3 given that the wealth available in state is Y : Maximizing EU(Y ) across all states of nature becomes the objective of step 2: 5
6 Modern portfolio theory: backward solution o The end-of-period wealth can be written as Clearly an appropriate redefinition of the utility function leads to The level of investable wealth, (Y 0 - C 0 ), becomes a parameter of the U-hat representation Finally, given the characteristics (e.g., expected return, standard deviation) of the optimally chosen portfolio, the optimal consumption and savings levels can be selected, step 1 From now on we work with utility functions defined on r P This utility index can be further constrained to be a function of the mean and variance of the probability distribution of r P This simplification can be accepted either as a working approximation or it may result from two further (alternative) hypotheses made within the expected utility framework 6
7 Mean-variance analysis: foundations In the exact case, we have two avenues: 1 A decision maker's utility function is quadratic, see Appendix A 2 Asset returns are (jointly) normally distributed, see Appendix B The main justification for using a mean-variance approximation is its tractability o Probability distributions are cumbersome to manipulate and difficult to estimate empirically o Summarizing them by their first two moments is appealing In the approximate case, using a simple Taylor series approximation, one can also see that the mean and variance of an agent's wealth distribution are critical to the determination of his expected utility for any distribution: 7
8 Mean-variance analysis: foundations Let us compute expected utility using this approximation: If U(Y) is quadratic, U ( ) is a constant and, as a result, EH 3 = 0, so E(Y) and σ 2 (Y) are all that matter. If Y is normally distributed, EH 3 can be expressed in terms of E(Y) and σ 2 (Y), so the approximation is exact in this case as well o See Appendices A and B for these claims in greater detail Under either of the above hypotheses, indifference curves in the mean-variance space are increasing and convex to the origin 8
9 Mean-variance analysis: does normality hold? Assuming U( ) is quadratic, however, is not fully satisfactory because it implies increasing absolute risk aversion (IARA) The normality hypothesis on returns is easy to test, but we know it cannot be satisfied exactly o E.g., limited liability instruments such as stocks can pay at worst a negative return of -100% (complete loss of the investment) o Option-based instruments, which are increasingly prevalent, are also characterized by asymmetric probability distributions o While the normal is perfectly symmetric about its mean, highfrequency returns are frequently skewed to the right and index returns appear skewed to the left o Sample high-frequency return distributions for many assets exhibit excess kurtosis or fat tails We now turn to use the basic insight of mean-variance analysis to illustrate the principle of diversification 9
10 Mean-variance dominance In a mean-variance (M-V) framework, an investor's wants to maximize a function U(µ R, P ), where U 1 U/ µ R > 0 and U 2 U/ P < 0 She likes expected return (µ R ) and dislikes standard deviation ( P ) From lecture 1, an asset (or portfolio) A is said to mean-variance dominate an asset (or portfolio) B if µ A µ B and A < B, or if µ A > µ B while A B 10
11 Mean-variance efficient frontier: two-asset case An asset (or portfolio) A is said to mean-variance dominate an asset (or portfolio) B if µ A µ B and A < B, or if µ A > µ B while A B We can then define the efficient frontier as the locus of all nondominated portfolios in the mean- standard deviation space By definition, no ( rational ) mean-variance investor would choose to hold a portfolio not located on the efficient frontier The shape of the efficient frontier is of primary interest; let us examine the efficient frontier in the two-asset case for a variety of possible asset return correlations Recall that the variance of a portfolio of two assets, 1 and 2, is: where w i is the weight allocated to asset I Theorem. In the case of two risky assets with perfectly positively correlated returns (ρ 1,2 = 1), the efficient frontier is linear; in that extreme case the two assets are essentially identical, there is no gain from diversification 11
12 Mean-variance efficient frontier: two-asset case The portfolio's standard deviation is nothing other than the average of the standard deviations of the component assets: The equation of the efficient frontier is The algebra is as follows: 12
13 Mean-variance efficient frontier: two-asset case Theorem. In the case of two risky assets with imperfectly correlated returns (-1 < ρ 1,2 < 1), the standard deviation of the ptf. is necessarily smaller than it would be if the two component assets were perfectly correlated: (provided the weights are not 0 or 1) Thus the efficient frontier must stand left of the straight line for the case ρ 1,2 = 1 The smaller the correlation (further away from +1), the more to the left is the efficient frontier It is useful to distinguish the minimum variance frontier from the efficient frontier. 13
14 Mean-variance efficient frontier: two-asset case In the picture, all portfolios between P 1 and P 2 belong to the minimum variance frontier However, certain levels of expected returns are not efficient targets as higher levels of returns can be obtained for identical levels of risk Thus portfolio P 1 is minimum variance, but it is not efficient, being dominated by portfolio P 3 Theorem. If the two risky assets have returns that are perfectly P negatively correlated (ρ 1,2 = -1), 3 the minimum variance ptf. is risk free while the frontier is linear If one of the two assets is risk free, then the efficient frontier is a straight line originating on the vertical axis at the level of the risk-free return 14
15 Mean-variance efficient frontier: multi-asset case o In the absence of a short sales restriction, the overall ptf. can be made riskier than the riskiest among the existing assets o In other words, it can be made riskier than the one risky asset and it must be that the efficient frontier is projected to the right of the (µ 2, 2 2) point o See Appendix C for details Because a portfolio is also an asset fully defined by its expected return, its standard deviation, and its correlation with other existing assets or portfolios o The previous analysis with 2 assets is more general than it appears as it can easily be repeated with one of the two assets being a ptf. Theorem. In the general, N-asset case, as long as these are imperfectly correlated, the efficient frontier will have a curved shape 15
16 Mean-variance efficient frontier: the risk-free rate o Adding an extra asset to the 2-asset framework implies that the diversification possibilities are improved o The efficient frontier may move up, to the left Theorem. With N risky assets and a risk-free one, the efficient frontier is a straight line To arrive to this conclusion, pick one portfolio on the efficient frontier, say P T in the picture The new efficient frontier collects all possible ptfs combining P T and the risk-free asset, on the line joining the point (0, r f ) to P T Notice that if we had picked any other efficient portfolio different from P T, the resulting line would be dominated 16
17 Mean-variance efficient frontier : the risk-free rate 17
18 Mean-variance efficient frontier : the risk-free rate We call P T the tangency portfolio o As before, if we allow short position in the risk-free asset, the efficient frontier extends beyond P T With N assets (possibly one of them risk free), the EF is obtained as the relevant (non-dominated) portion of the MVF, the latter being the solution, for all possible expected returns, to the following quadratic program (QP): o In (QP) we search for the vector of weights that minimizes the variance of the portfolio under the constraint that the expected return on the portfolio must be µ; this defines one point on the MVF o One can then change the value of µ equating it successively to all plausible levels of portfolio expected return 18
19 Quadratic programming construction o In this way one effectively draws the MVF o Program (QP) is the simplest version of a family of similar quadratic programs used in practice because (QP) includes only equality, natural constrains Many other constraints can be added to customize the ptf. selection process without altering the basic structure of problem (QP) o One might maximize a ptf. expected return for given levels of standard deviation, but it is more efficient to do the reverse The most common implicit or explicit constraint for an investor involves limiting her investment universe o Example 1: home bias, local investment constrains o Example 2: ethical mutual funds o Example 3: non-negativity constraints (w i 0), indicating the impossibility of short selling some or all assets We now ask whether and how the MVF construction can be put to service to inform actual portfolio practice: one result is surprising 19
20 The separation theorem The optimal portfolio is naturally defined as that portfolio maximizing the investor's (mean-variance) utility That portfolio for which he is able to reach the highest indifference curve in MV space Such curves will be increasing and convex from the origin They are increasing because additional risk needs to be compensated by higher means They are convex iff the investor is characterized by increasing absolute risk aversion (IARA), which is the case under MV preferences, as we have claimed 20
21 The separation theorem Any risk averse investor, independently of her risk aversion, will diversify between a risky (tangency ptf.) fund and the riskless asset However, it is natural to realize that if there is a risk-free asset, then all tangency points must lie on the same EF, irrespective of the coefficient of risk aversion of each specific investor o Let there be two investors sharing the same perceptions as to expected returns, variances, and return correlations but differing in their willingness to take risks o The relevant efficient frontier will be identical for these two investors, although their optimal portfolios will be represented by different points on the same line o With differently shaped indifference curves the tangency points must differ. However, it is a fact that our two investors will invest in the same two funds, the risk-free asset on the one hand, and the risky portfolio (P T ) identified by the tangency point between the straight line originating from the vertical axis and the EF 21
22 The separation theorem This result is also called the two-fund theorem, or separation theorem It implies that the optimal portfolio of risky assets can be identified separately from the knowledge of the risk preference of an investor This result will play a significant role when constructing the CAPM Notice that this important result applies regardless of the (possibly non normal) probability distributions of returns representing the subjective expectations of the particular investor Can view financial analysis as providing plausible figures for the relevant inputs to MV calculations 22
23 Myopic portfolio choice: canonical case The risky share should equal the risk premium, divided by conditional variance times the coefficient capturing aversion to risk Suppose the conditional mean of a single risky portfolio is E t [r t+1 ] and the conditional variance is 2 t The investor only cares for conditional mean and conditional variance, The problem has the classical solution: The portfolio share in the risky asset should equal the expected excess return, or risk premium, divided by conditional variance times the coefficient that represents aversion to variance 23
24 Myopic portfolio choice: canonical case If we define the Sharpe ratio of the risk asset as: then the MV solution to the problem can be written as: The corresponding risk premium and Sharpe ratio for the optimal portfolio are as follows: Hence all portfolios have the same Sharpe ratio because they all contain the same risky asset in greater or smaller amount 24
25 Myopic portfolio choice: multivariate case These results extend straightforwardly to the case where there are many risky assets o We define the portfolio return in the same manner except that we use boldfaced letters to denote vectors and matrices o R t+1 is now a vector of risky returns with N elements. o It has conditional mean vector E t [R t+1 ] and conditional covariance matrix t Var t [R t+1 ] o We want to find the optimal allocation w t The maximization problem now becomes Vector of 1s repeated N times with solution 25
26 Myopic portfolio choice: multivariate case A straightforward generalization of the single risky asset case o The single risk premium return is replaced by the vector of risk premia and the reciprocal of variance is replaced by -1 t, the inverse of the covariance matrix of returns o Investors preferences enter the solution only through the scalar Thus investors differ only in the overall scale of their risky asset portfolio, not in the composition of that portfolio o This is the two-fund, separation theorem of Tobin (1958) again The results extend to the case where there is no completely riskless asset: we call still define a benchmark asset with return R 0,t We now develop portfolio choice results under the assumption that investors have power utility and that asset returns are lognormal We apply a result about the expectation of a log-normal random variable X: 26
27 The power utility log-normal case o The log is a concave function and therefore the mean of the log of a random variable X is smaller than the log of the mean, and the difference is increasing in the variability of X Assume that the return on an investor s portfolio is lognormal, so that next-period wealth is lognormal Under of power utility, the objective is Maximizing this expectation is equivalent to maximizing the log of the expectation, and the scale factor 1/(1 - ) can be omitted Because next-period wealth is lognormal, we can apply the earlier result to rewrite the objective as The standard budget constraint can be rewritten in log form: (*) 27
28 The power utility log-normal case Under power utility and log-normal portfolio returns (hence, terminal wealth), a mean-variance result applies under appropriate definition of the mean of portfolio returns relevant to the portfolio choice Dividing (*) by (1 - ) and using the new constraint, we have: Just as in mean-variance analysis, the investor trades-off mean against variance in portfolio returns Notice that this can be further transformed as: so that 28
29 The power utility log-normal case o The appropriate mean is the simple return, or arithmetic mean return, and the investor trades off the log of this mean linearly against the variance of the log return o When = 1, under log utility, the investor selects the portfolio with the highest available log return (the "growth optimal portfolio) o When > 1, the investor seeks a safe portfolio by penalizing the variance of ln(1 + R p t+1) o When < 1, the investor actually seeks a riskier portfolio because a higher variance, with the same mean log return, corresponds to a higher mean simple return o The case = 1 is the boundary where these two opposing considerations balance out exactly Problem: To proceed further, we would need to relate the log ptf. return to the log returns on the underlying assets But while the simple return on a ptf. is a linear combination of the simple returns on the risky and riskless assets, the log ptf. return is not the same as a linear combination of logs 29
30 Summary In this lecture we have learned a number of things 1. There is no contradiction between the way in which an economist looks at portfolio problems and what is typically done in practice in finance 2. We have defined mean-variance preferences and analyzed their microeconomic foundations, which may be exact (quadratic utility, jointly normally distributed returns) or approximated (Taylor) 3. We have built the minimum variance and mean-variance efficient frontiers for a variety of cases, with and without constrains 4. We have examine how a risk-averse, IARA investor should be optimizing her portfolio with and without a riskless asset 5. The separation, aka two-fund theorem emerged rather naturally from our work; we have discussed its implications for the asset management industry 6. We developed mean-variance closed-form asset allocation formulas 7. We have seen that under special definitions of mean returns, also power utility leads to mean-variance reults 30
31 Appendix A: Quadratic utility functions If the utility function is quadratic, it can be written as: where r P is the portfolio's rate of return Let the constant a = 0 because it does not play any role For this functioto make sense we must have b > 0 and c < 0 The first and second derivatives are, respectively, Expected utility is then of the following form: that is, of the form g(µ P, P ) This function is strictly concave. But it must be restricted to ensure positive marginal utility: Moreover, the coefficient of absolute risk aversion is increasing These two characteristics are unpleasant 31
32 Appendix B: Normally distributed returns If individual asset returns r i are normally distributed, is normally distributed as well Let r P have density f(r P ), where The standard normal variate Z is: Thus, r P = P Z + µ P, The quantity E(U(r P )) is again a function of µ P and P An indifference curve in the mean-variance space is defined as the set: for some utility level k This can be rewritten as This defines the set of points (µ P, P ) located in the circle of radius 32
33 Appendix C: The case of perfect negative correlation The case is defined by and it implies: As a result, we have: 33
34 Appendix C: The case of perfect negative correlation The presence of coefficients preceded by ± indicates the existence of two (linear) branches characterizing the MVF, as shown in the now familiar picture 34
Financial Economics: Risk Aversion and Investment Decisions, Modern Portfolio Theory
Financial Economics: Risk Aversion and Investment Decisions, Modern Portfolio Theory Shuoxun Hellen Zhang WISE & SOE XIAMEN UNIVERSITY April, 2015 1 / 95 Outline Modern portfolio theory The backward induction,
More informationExpected utility theory; Expected Utility Theory; risk aversion and utility functions
; Expected Utility Theory; risk aversion and utility functions Prof. Massimo Guidolin Portfolio Management Spring 2016 Outline and objectives Utility functions The expected utility theorem and the axioms
More informationPORTFOLIO THEORY. Master in Finance INVESTMENTS. Szabolcs Sebestyén
PORTFOLIO THEORY Szabolcs Sebestyén szabolcs.sebestyen@iscte.pt Master in Finance INVESTMENTS Sebestyén (ISCTE-IUL) Portfolio Theory Investments 1 / 60 Outline 1 Modern Portfolio Theory Introduction Mean-Variance
More informationAversion to Risk and Optimal Portfolio Selection in the Mean- Variance Framework
Aversion to Risk and Optimal Portfolio Selection in the Mean- Variance Framework Prof. Massimo Guidolin 20135 Theory of Finance, Part I (Sept. October) Fall 2018 Outline and objectives Four alternative
More informationAversion to Risk and Optimal Portfolio Selection in the Mean- Variance Framework
Aversion to Risk and Optimal Portfolio Selection in the Mean- Variance Framework Prof. Massimo Guidolin 20135 Theory of Finance, Part I (Sept. October) Fall 2017 Outline and objectives Four alternative
More informationLecture 2: Fundamentals of meanvariance
Lecture 2: Fundamentals of meanvariance analysis Prof. Massimo Guidolin Portfolio Management Second Term 2018 Outline and objectives Mean-variance and efficient frontiers: logical meaning o Guidolin-Pedio,
More informationFinancial Mathematics III Theory summary
Financial Mathematics III Theory summary Table of Contents Lecture 1... 7 1. State the objective of modern portfolio theory... 7 2. Define the return of an asset... 7 3. How is expected return defined?...
More informationCharacterization of the Optimum
ECO 317 Economics of Uncertainty Fall Term 2009 Notes for lectures 5. Portfolio Allocation with One Riskless, One Risky Asset Characterization of the Optimum Consider a risk-averse, expected-utility-maximizing
More informationChapter 7: Portfolio Theory
Chapter 7: Portfolio Theory 1. Introduction 2. Portfolio Basics 3. The Feasible Set 4. Portfolio Selection Rules 5. The Efficient Frontier 6. Indifference Curves 7. The Two-Asset Portfolio 8. Unrestriceted
More informationLecture 3: Factor models in modern portfolio choice
Lecture 3: Factor models in modern portfolio choice Prof. Massimo Guidolin Portfolio Management Spring 2016 Overview The inputs of portfolio problems Using the single index model Multi-index models Portfolio
More informationECON FINANCIAL ECONOMICS
ECON 337901 FINANCIAL ECONOMICS Peter Ireland Boston College April 26, 2018 These lecture notes by Peter Ireland are licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommerical-ShareAlike 4.0 International
More informationECO 317 Economics of Uncertainty Fall Term 2009 Tuesday October 6 Portfolio Allocation Mean-Variance Approach
ECO 317 Economics of Uncertainty Fall Term 2009 Tuesday October 6 ortfolio Allocation Mean-Variance Approach Validity of the Mean-Variance Approach Constant absolute risk aversion (CARA): u(w ) = exp(
More informationFIN 6160 Investment Theory. Lecture 7-10
FIN 6160 Investment Theory Lecture 7-10 Optimal Asset Allocation Minimum Variance Portfolio is the portfolio with lowest possible variance. To find the optimal asset allocation for the efficient frontier
More informationLecture 6 Introduction to Utility Theory under Certainty and Uncertainty
Lecture 6 Introduction to Utility Theory under Certainty and Uncertainty Prof. Massimo Guidolin Prep Course in Quant Methods for Finance August-September 2017 Outline and objectives Axioms of choice under
More informationKey investment insights
Basic Portfolio Theory B. Espen Eckbo 2011 Key investment insights Diversification: Always think in terms of stock portfolios rather than individual stocks But which portfolio? One that is highly diversified
More informationMean-Variance Analysis
Mean-Variance Analysis Mean-variance analysis 1/ 51 Introduction How does one optimally choose among multiple risky assets? Due to diversi cation, which depends on assets return covariances, the attractiveness
More informationLecture 1: The Econometrics of Financial Returns
Lecture 1: The Econometrics of Financial Returns Prof. Massimo Guidolin 20192 Financial Econometrics Winter/Spring 2016 Overview General goals of the course and definition of risk(s) Predicting asset returns:
More informationRisk and Return and Portfolio Theory
Risk and Return and Portfolio Theory Intro: Last week we learned how to calculate cash flows, now we want to learn how to discount these cash flows. This will take the next several weeks. We know discount
More informationQuantitative Risk Management
Quantitative Risk Management Asset Allocation and Risk Management Martin B. Haugh Department of Industrial Engineering and Operations Research Columbia University Outline Review of Mean-Variance Analysis
More informationLecture 6: Non Normal Distributions
Lecture 6: Non Normal Distributions and their Uses in GARCH Modelling Prof. Massimo Guidolin 20192 Financial Econometrics Spring 2015 Overview Non-normalities in (standardized) residuals from asset return
More informationAdvanced Financial Economics Homework 2 Due on April 14th before class
Advanced Financial Economics Homework 2 Due on April 14th before class March 30, 2015 1. (20 points) An agent has Y 0 = 1 to invest. On the market two financial assets exist. The first one is riskless.
More informationChapter 1 Microeconomics of Consumer Theory
Chapter Microeconomics of Consumer Theory The two broad categories of decision-makers in an economy are consumers and firms. Each individual in each of these groups makes its decisions in order to achieve
More informationPortfolio Management
MCF 17 Advanced Courses Portfolio Management Final Exam Time Allowed: 60 minutes Family Name (Surname) First Name Student Number (Matr.) Please answer all questions by choosing the most appropriate alternative
More informationECON FINANCIAL ECONOMICS
ECON 337901 FINANCIAL ECONOMICS Peter Ireland Boston College Fall 2017 These lecture notes by Peter Ireland are licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommerical-ShareAlike 4.0 International
More informationECON FINANCIAL ECONOMICS
ECON 337901 FINANCIAL ECONOMICS Peter Ireland Boston College Spring 2018 These lecture notes by Peter Ireland are licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommerical-ShareAlike 4.0 International
More informationRandom Variables and Probability Distributions
Chapter 3 Random Variables and Probability Distributions Chapter Three Random Variables and Probability Distributions 3. Introduction An event is defined as the possible outcome of an experiment. In engineering
More informationLecture 3: Utility-Based Portfolio Choice
Lecture 3: Utility-Based Portfolio Choice Prof. Massimo Guidolin Portfolio Management Spring 2017 Outline and objectives Choice under uncertainty: dominance o Guidolin-Pedio, chapter 1, sec. 2 Choice under
More informationMean-Variance Portfolio Theory
Mean-Variance Portfolio Theory Lakehead University Winter 2005 Outline Measures of Location Risk of a Single Asset Risk and Return of Financial Securities Risk of a Portfolio The Capital Asset Pricing
More informationLECTURE NOTES 3 ARIEL M. VIALE
LECTURE NOTES 3 ARIEL M VIALE I Markowitz-Tobin Mean-Variance Portfolio Analysis Assumption Mean-Variance preferences Markowitz 95 Quadratic utility function E [ w b w ] { = E [ w] b V ar w + E [ w] }
More informationChapter 8. Markowitz Portfolio Theory. 8.1 Expected Returns and Covariance
Chapter 8 Markowitz Portfolio Theory 8.1 Expected Returns and Covariance The main question in portfolio theory is the following: Given an initial capital V (0), and opportunities (buy or sell) in N securities
More informationQR43, Introduction to Investments Class Notes, Fall 2003 IV. Portfolio Choice
QR43, Introduction to Investments Class Notes, Fall 2003 IV. Portfolio Choice A. Mean-Variance Analysis 1. Thevarianceofaportfolio. Consider the choice between two risky assets with returns R 1 and R 2.
More informationDiversification. Finance 100
Diversification Finance 100 Prof. Michael R. Roberts 1 Topic Overview How to measure risk and return» Sample risk measures for some classes of securities Brief Statistics Review» Realized and Expected
More informationCHOICE THEORY, UTILITY FUNCTIONS AND RISK AVERSION
CHOICE THEORY, UTILITY FUNCTIONS AND RISK AVERSION Szabolcs Sebestyén szabolcs.sebestyen@iscte.pt Master in Finance INVESTMENTS Sebestyén (ISCTE-IUL) Choice Theory Investments 1 / 65 Outline 1 An Introduction
More informationMean Variance Portfolio Theory
Chapter 1 Mean Variance Portfolio Theory This book is about portfolio construction and risk analysis in the real-world context where optimization is done with constraints and penalties specified by the
More informationModels and Decision with Financial Applications UNIT 1: Elements of Decision under Uncertainty
Models and Decision with Financial Applications UNIT 1: Elements of Decision under Uncertainty We always need to make a decision (or select from among actions, options or moves) even when there exists
More informationLeverage Aversion, Efficient Frontiers, and the Efficient Region*
Posted SSRN 08/31/01 Last Revised 10/15/01 Leverage Aversion, Efficient Frontiers, and the Efficient Region* Bruce I. Jacobs and Kenneth N. Levy * Previously entitled Leverage Aversion and Portfolio Optimality:
More informationSolution Guide to Exercises for Chapter 4 Decision making under uncertainty
THE ECONOMICS OF FINANCIAL MARKETS R. E. BAILEY Solution Guide to Exercises for Chapter 4 Decision making under uncertainty 1. Consider an investor who makes decisions according to a mean-variance objective.
More informationConsumption- Savings, Portfolio Choice, and Asset Pricing
Finance 400 A. Penati - G. Pennacchi Consumption- Savings, Portfolio Choice, and Asset Pricing I. The Consumption - Portfolio Choice Problem We have studied the portfolio choice problem of an individual
More informationUniversity 18 Lessons Financial Management. Unit 12: Return, Risk and Shareholder Value
University 18 Lessons Financial Management Unit 12: Return, Risk and Shareholder Value Risk and Return Risk and Return Security analysis is built around the idea that investors are concerned with two principal
More informationAnalytical Problem Set
Analytical Problem Set Unless otherwise stated, any coupon payments, cash dividends, or other cash payouts delivered by a security in the following problems should be assume to be distributed at the end
More informationMaximization of utility and portfolio selection models
Maximization of utility and portfolio selection models J. F. NEVES P. N. DA SILVA C. F. VASCONCELLOS Abstract Modern portfolio theory deals with the combination of assets into a portfolio. It has diversification
More informationSDMR Finance (2) Olivier Brandouy. University of Paris 1, Panthéon-Sorbonne, IAE (Sorbonne Graduate Business School)
SDMR Finance (2) Olivier Brandouy University of Paris 1, Panthéon-Sorbonne, IAE (Sorbonne Graduate Business School) Outline 1 Formal Approach to QAM : concepts and notations 2 3 Portfolio risk and return
More informationPAULI MURTO, ANDREY ZHUKOV
GAME THEORY SOLUTION SET 1 WINTER 018 PAULI MURTO, ANDREY ZHUKOV Introduction For suggested solution to problem 4, last year s suggested solutions by Tsz-Ning Wong were used who I think used suggested
More informationMarket Risk Analysis Volume I
Market Risk Analysis Volume I Quantitative Methods in Finance Carol Alexander John Wiley & Sons, Ltd List of Figures List of Tables List of Examples Foreword Preface to Volume I xiii xvi xvii xix xxiii
More informationNotes II: Consumption-Saving Decisions, Ricardian Equivalence, and Fiscal Policy. Julio Garín Intermediate Macroeconomics Fall 2018
Notes II: Consumption-Saving Decisions, Ricardian Equivalence, and Fiscal Policy Julio Garín Intermediate Macroeconomics Fall 2018 Introduction Intermediate Macroeconomics Consumption/Saving, Ricardian
More informationMean Variance Analysis and CAPM
Mean Variance Analysis and CAPM Yan Zeng Version 1.0.2, last revised on 2012-05-30. Abstract A summary of mean variance analysis in portfolio management and capital asset pricing model. 1. Mean-Variance
More informationLecture 10-12: CAPM.
Lecture 10-12: CAPM. I. Reading II. Market Portfolio. III. CAPM World: Assumptions. IV. Portfolio Choice in a CAPM World. V. Minimum Variance Mathematics. VI. Individual Assets in a CAPM World. VII. Intuition
More informationKevin Dowd, Measuring Market Risk, 2nd Edition
P1.T4. Valuation & Risk Models Kevin Dowd, Measuring Market Risk, 2nd Edition Bionic Turtle FRM Study Notes By David Harper, CFA FRM CIPM www.bionicturtle.com Dowd, Chapter 2: Measures of Financial Risk
More informationMicroeconomics of Banking: Lecture 3
Microeconomics of Banking: Lecture 3 Prof. Ronaldo CARPIO Oct. 9, 2015 Review of Last Week Consumer choice problem General equilibrium Contingent claims Risk aversion The optimal choice, x = (X, Y ), is
More informationMean-Variance Portfolio Choice in Excel
Mean-Variance Portfolio Choice in Excel Prof. Manuela Pedio 20550 Quantitative Methods for Finance August 2018 Let s suppose you can only invest in two assets: a (US) stock index (here represented by the
More informationBUSM 411: Derivatives and Fixed Income
BUSM 411: Derivatives and Fixed Income 3. Uncertainty and Risk Uncertainty and risk lie at the core of everything we do in finance. In order to make intelligent investment and hedging decisions, we need
More informationMean-Variance Theory at Work: Single and Multi-Index (Factor) Models
Mean-Variance Theory at Work: Single and Multi-Index (Factor) Models Prof. Massimo Guidolin Portfolio Management Spring 2017 Outline and objectives The number of parameters in MV problems and the curse
More information1 Asset Pricing: Bonds vs Stocks
Asset Pricing: Bonds vs Stocks The historical data on financial asset returns show that one dollar invested in the Dow- Jones yields 6 times more than one dollar invested in U.S. Treasury bonds. The return
More informationECON Micro Foundations
ECON 302 - Micro Foundations Michael Bar September 13, 2016 Contents 1 Consumer s Choice 2 1.1 Preferences.................................... 2 1.2 Budget Constraint................................ 3
More informationFINC3017: Investment and Portfolio Management
FINC3017: Investment and Portfolio Management Investment Funds Topic 1: Introduction Unit Trusts: investor s funds are pooled, usually into specific types of assets. o Investors are assigned tradeable
More informationLog-Robust Portfolio Management
Log-Robust Portfolio Management Dr. Aurélie Thiele Lehigh University Joint work with Elcin Cetinkaya and Ban Kawas Research partially supported by the National Science Foundation Grant CMMI-0757983 Dr.
More informationLearning Objectives = = where X i is the i t h outcome of a decision, p i is the probability of the i t h
Learning Objectives After reading Chapter 15 and working the problems for Chapter 15 in the textbook and in this Workbook, you should be able to: Distinguish between decision making under uncertainty and
More informationGMM Estimation. 1 Introduction. 2 Consumption-CAPM
GMM Estimation 1 Introduction Modern macroeconomic models are typically based on the intertemporal optimization and rational expectations. The Generalized Method of Moments (GMM) is an econometric framework
More informationSolutions to questions in Chapter 8 except those in PS4. The minimum-variance portfolio is found by applying the formula:
Solutions to questions in Chapter 8 except those in PS4 1. The parameters of the opportunity set are: E(r S ) = 20%, E(r B ) = 12%, σ S = 30%, σ B = 15%, ρ =.10 From the standard deviations and the correlation
More informationContinuous random variables
Continuous random variables probability density function (f(x)) the probability distribution function of a continuous random variable (analogous to the probability mass function for a discrete random variable),
More information1 Consumption and saving under uncertainty
1 Consumption and saving under uncertainty 1.1 Modelling uncertainty As in the deterministic case, we keep assuming that agents live for two periods. The novelty here is that their earnings in the second
More informationPh.D. Preliminary Examination MICROECONOMIC THEORY Applied Economics Graduate Program June 2017
Ph.D. Preliminary Examination MICROECONOMIC THEORY Applied Economics Graduate Program June 2017 The time limit for this exam is four hours. The exam has four sections. Each section includes two questions.
More informationFinancial Economics: Capital Asset Pricing Model
Financial Economics: Capital Asset Pricing Model Shuoxun Hellen Zhang WISE & SOE XIAMEN UNIVERSITY April, 2015 1 / 66 Outline Outline MPT and the CAPM Deriving the CAPM Application of CAPM Strengths and
More informationChapter 2 Portfolio Management and the Capital Asset Pricing Model
Chapter 2 Portfolio Management and the Capital Asset Pricing Model In this chapter, we explore the issue of risk management in a portfolio of assets. The main issue is how to balance a portfolio, that
More informationChapter 23: Choice under Risk
Chapter 23: Choice under Risk 23.1: Introduction We consider in this chapter optimal behaviour in conditions of risk. By this we mean that, when the individual takes a decision, he or she does not know
More informationMotif Capital Horizon Models: A robust asset allocation framework
Motif Capital Horizon Models: A robust asset allocation framework Executive Summary By some estimates, over 93% of the variation in a portfolio s returns can be attributed to the allocation to broad asset
More informationChapter 6: Supply and Demand with Income in the Form of Endowments
Chapter 6: Supply and Demand with Income in the Form of Endowments 6.1: Introduction This chapter and the next contain almost identical analyses concerning the supply and demand implied by different kinds
More informationConsumption-Savings Decisions and State Pricing
Consumption-Savings Decisions and State Pricing Consumption-Savings, State Pricing 1/ 40 Introduction We now consider a consumption-savings decision along with the previous portfolio choice decision. These
More informationMaking Hard Decision. ENCE 627 Decision Analysis for Engineering. Identify the decision situation and understand objectives. Identify alternatives
CHAPTER Duxbury Thomson Learning Making Hard Decision Third Edition RISK ATTITUDES A. J. Clark School of Engineering Department of Civil and Environmental Engineering 13 FALL 2003 By Dr. Ibrahim. Assakkaf
More informationCHAPTER II LITERATURE STUDY
CHAPTER II LITERATURE STUDY 2.1. Risk Management Monetary crisis that strike Indonesia during 1998 and 1999 has caused bad impact to numerous government s and commercial s bank. Most of those banks eventually
More informationSAC 304: Financial Mathematics II
SAC 304: Financial Mathematics II Portfolio theory, Risk and Return,Investment risk, CAPM Philip Ngare, Ph.D April 25, 2013 P. Ngare (University Of Nairobi) SAC 304: Financial Mathematics II April 25,
More informationTaxation and Efficiency : (a) : The Expenditure Function
Taxation and Efficiency : (a) : The Expenditure Function The expenditure function is a mathematical tool used to analyze the cost of living of a consumer. This function indicates how much it costs in dollars
More informationu (x) < 0. and if you believe in diminishing return of the wealth, then you would require
Chapter 8 Markowitz Portfolio Theory 8.7 Investor Utility Functions People are always asked the question: would more money make you happier? The answer is usually yes. The next question is how much more
More information1 Two Period Exchange Economy
University of British Columbia Department of Economics, Macroeconomics (Econ 502) Prof. Amartya Lahiri Handout # 2 1 Two Period Exchange Economy We shall start our exploration of dynamic economies with
More informationEconomics 483. Midterm Exam. 1. Consider the following monthly data for Microsoft stock over the period December 1995 through December 1996:
University of Washington Summer Department of Economics Eric Zivot Economics 3 Midterm Exam This is a closed book and closed note exam. However, you are allowed one page of handwritten notes. Answer all
More informationTHEORY & PRACTICE FOR FUND MANAGERS. SPRING 2011 Volume 20 Number 1 RISK. special section PARITY. The Voices of Influence iijournals.
T H E J O U R N A L O F THEORY & PRACTICE FOR FUND MANAGERS SPRING 0 Volume 0 Number RISK special section PARITY The Voices of Influence iijournals.com Risk Parity and Diversification EDWARD QIAN EDWARD
More informationRisk and Return. Nicole Höhling, Introduction. Definitions. Types of risk and beta
Risk and Return Nicole Höhling, 2009-09-07 Introduction Every decision regarding investments is based on the relationship between risk and return. Generally the return on an investment should be as high
More informationFoundations of Finance
Lecture 5: CAPM. I. Reading II. Market Portfolio. III. CAPM World: Assumptions. IV. Portfolio Choice in a CAPM World. V. Individual Assets in a CAPM World. VI. Intuition for the SML (E[R p ] depending
More informationAnswers to Concepts in Review
Answers to Concepts in Review 1. A portfolio is simply a collection of investment vehicles assembled to meet a common investment goal. An efficient portfolio is a portfolio offering the highest expected
More informationProblem Set 2. Theory of Banking - Academic Year Maria Bachelet March 2, 2017
Problem Set Theory of Banking - Academic Year 06-7 Maria Bachelet maria.jua.bachelet@gmai.com March, 07 Exercise Consider an agency relationship in which the principal contracts the agent, whose effort
More informationMathematics of Finance Final Preparation December 19. To be thoroughly prepared for the final exam, you should
Mathematics of Finance Final Preparation December 19 To be thoroughly prepared for the final exam, you should 1. know how to do the homework problems. 2. be able to provide (correct and complete!) definitions
More informationQuantitative Portfolio Theory & Performance Analysis
550.447 Quantitative ortfolio Theory & erformance Analysis Week February 18, 2013 Basic Elements of Modern ortfolio Theory Assignment For Week of February 18 th (This Week) Read: A&L, Chapter 3 (Basic
More informationValue-at-Risk Based Portfolio Management in Electric Power Sector
Value-at-Risk Based Portfolio Management in Electric Power Sector Ran SHI, Jin ZHONG Department of Electrical and Electronic Engineering University of Hong Kong, HKSAR, China ABSTRACT In the deregulated
More informationModeling Portfolios that Contain Risky Assets Risk and Reward III: Basic Markowitz Portfolio Theory
Modeling Portfolios that Contain Risky Assets Risk and Reward III: Basic Markowitz Portfolio Theory C. David Levermore University of Maryland, College Park Math 420: Mathematical Modeling January 30, 2013
More informationPortfolio Investment
Portfolio Investment Robert A. Miller Tepper School of Business CMU 45-871 Lecture 5 Miller (Tepper School of Business CMU) Portfolio Investment 45-871 Lecture 5 1 / 22 Simplifying the framework for analysis
More informationCh. 8 Risk and Rates of Return. Return, Risk and Capital Market. Investment returns
Ch. 8 Risk and Rates of Return Topics Measuring Return Measuring Risk Risk & Diversification CAPM Return, Risk and Capital Market Managers must estimate current and future opportunity rates of return for
More informationAn Intertemporal Capital Asset Pricing Model
I. Assumptions Finance 400 A. Penati - G. Pennacchi Notes on An Intertemporal Capital Asset Pricing Model These notes are based on the article Robert C. Merton (1973) An Intertemporal Capital Asset Pricing
More informationSolving dynamic portfolio choice problems by recursing on optimized portfolio weights or on the value function?
DOI 0.007/s064-006-9073-z ORIGINAL PAPER Solving dynamic portfolio choice problems by recursing on optimized portfolio weights or on the value function? Jules H. van Binsbergen Michael W. Brandt Received:
More information20135 Theory of Finance Part I Professor Massimo Guidolin
MSc. Finance/CLEFIN 2014/2015 Edition 20135 Theory of Finance Part I Professor Massimo Guidolin A FEW SAMPLE QUESTIONS, WITH SOLUTIONS SET 2 WARNING: These are just sample questions. Please do not count
More informationPortfolio Selection with Quadratic Utility Revisited
The Geneva Papers on Risk and Insurance Theory, 29: 137 144, 2004 c 2004 The Geneva Association Portfolio Selection with Quadratic Utility Revisited TIMOTHY MATHEWS tmathews@csun.edu Department of Economics,
More informationModeling Portfolios that Contain Risky Assets Risk and Reward III: Basic Markowitz Portfolio Theory
Modeling Portfolios that Contain Risky Assets Risk and Reward III: Basic Markowitz Portfolio Theory C. David Levermore University of Maryland, College Park Math 420: Mathematical Modeling March 26, 2014
More informationOptimizing Portfolios
Optimizing Portfolios An Undergraduate Introduction to Financial Mathematics J. Robert Buchanan 2010 Introduction Investors may wish to adjust the allocation of financial resources including a mixture
More informationBloomberg. Portfolio Value-at-Risk. Sridhar Gollamudi & Bryan Weber. September 22, Version 1.0
Portfolio Value-at-Risk Sridhar Gollamudi & Bryan Weber September 22, 2011 Version 1.0 Table of Contents 1 Portfolio Value-at-Risk 2 2 Fundamental Factor Models 3 3 Valuation methodology 5 3.1 Linear factor
More informationMeasuring and managing market risk June 2003
Page 1 of 8 Measuring and managing market risk June 2003 Investment management is largely concerned with risk management. In the management of the Petroleum Fund, considerable emphasis is therefore placed
More informationMicroeconomics of Banking: Lecture 2
Microeconomics of Banking: Lecture 2 Prof. Ronaldo CARPIO September 25, 2015 A Brief Look at General Equilibrium Asset Pricing Last week, we saw a general equilibrium model in which banks were irrelevant.
More informationPortfolio models - Podgorica
Outline Holding period return Suppose you invest in a stock-index fund over the next period (e.g. 1 year). The current price is 100$ per share. At the end of the period you receive a dividend of 5$; the
More informationCopyright 2009 Pearson Education Canada
Operating Cash Flows: Sales $682,500 $771,750 $868,219 $972,405 $957,211 less expenses $477,750 $540,225 $607,753 $680,684 $670,048 Difference $204,750 $231,525 $260,466 $291,722 $287,163 After-tax (1
More informationDerivation of zero-beta CAPM: Efficient portfolios
Derivation of zero-beta CAPM: Efficient portfolios AssumptionsasCAPM,exceptR f does not exist. Argument which leads to Capital Market Line is invalid. (No straight line through R f, tilted up as far as
More informationResolution of a Financial Puzzle
Resolution of a Financial Puzzle M.J. Brennan and Y. Xia September, 1998 revised November, 1998 Abstract The apparent inconsistency between the Tobin Separation Theorem and the advice of popular investment
More informationLecture 10: Performance measures
Lecture 10: Performance measures Prof. Dr. Svetlozar Rachev Institute for Statistics and Mathematical Economics University of Karlsruhe Portfolio and Asset Liability Management Summer Semester 2008 Prof.
More information