Revisiting the Fama and French Valuation Formula
|
|
- Isabel Robertson
- 5 years ago
- Views:
Transcription
1 Revisiing he Fama and French Valuaion Formula Absrac Using he dividend discoun model Fama and French (2006) develop a relaion beween expeced profiabiliy, expeced invesmen, curren BM and expeced sock reurns. They examine hese predicions in he daa wih limied success. Specifically, he relaionship beween expeced invesmen and reurns ha is supposed o be negaive urns ou o be posiive and insignifican. We argue ha he above relaionships should be esed a he firm level and no a he per share level as done in he original paper. We examine his argumen empirically and find ha once variables are measured a he firm level he predicions of Fama and French's paper hold. 1. Inroducion The relaionships beween profiabiliy, invesmen, BM, and expeced reurns have been sudied exensively in he las wo decades. 1 Fama and French (2006) (henceforh F&F) provide an imporan insigh ino hese relaionships by examining hese reurn regulariies ogeher. Using he dividend discoun model, F&F sugges ha, ceeris paribus, fuure sock reurn should be posiively correlaed wih curren BM and expeced profiabiliy, and negaively correlaed wih expeced invesmen. F&F poin ou anoher ineresing aspec of working wih he valuaion formula. The above predicions should hold, regardless of wheher behavioral or raional financing prevail in he markes. In oher word, he relaionships beween expeced profiabiliy, expeced invesmen, curren BM, and sock reurns should hold independenly of he mechanism used by invesors o price firms. Therefore, he failure of F&F o find he above relaionship in he daa (F&F repor a posiive, insignifican coefficien for expeced invesmens) seems puzzling. 1 For example, Rosenberg e al. (1985) and Fama and French (1992) documen posiive relaionships beween curren book o marke and fuure sock reurns. Timan e al. (2004) and Cooper e al. (2008) documen a negaive relaionship beween curren invesmen and fuure sock reurns; Haugan and Baker (1996) documen ha profiabiliy is posiively correlaed wih fuure reurns, even afer conrolling for book o marke. Chen e al. (2010) sugges a new hree-facor model in which invesmen and profiabiliy are he main explanaory variables.
2 In his paper we revisi he work of F&F. We argue ha he failure of he F&F empirical work is largely relaed o heir choice of variables. We show ha he relaionship beween he four variables (expeced profiabiliy, expeced invesmen, expeced reurn, and curren BM) in he F&F valuaion formula is bes capured a he firm level, and no a he per-share level as in he F&F work. This is because changes in he number of shares in he firm, eiher by issuing or repurchasing, are likely o miigae he relaionship beween expeced invesmen and expeced reurns. For example, consider a firm ha increases is invesmens and finances hese new invesmens by issuing equiy. 2 When variables are measured a he firm level, he firm will regiser a large increase in invesmen. However, once we scale he invesmen by he oal number of shares (as done in F&F), he increase in invesmen per share is likely o be much less, if any a all. Indeed, our empirical work demonsraes ha he coefficien of expeced invesmen shows he greaes difference beween he firm and he per-share level. As in F&F, we find ha he coefficien of expeced invesmen is small and insignifican a he per-share level. However, a he firm level we find ha he coefficien becomes negaive and significan, as suggesed by he valuaion formula. Consisen wih our argumen, we also find ha he difference beween he wo coefficiens is driven by firms ha regiser an increase in invesmen and an increase in he number of shares ousanding. Valuaion formula a he per-share and he firm levels In his par we highligh he differences beween he F&F valuaion formula in he per-share level and he firm level. We use lower case for variables ha are in he per-share level and upper case for variables in he firm level (see he appendix for a deailed analysis). F&F use he dividend discoun model o derive he relaionship beween expeced profiabiliy, expeced invesmen, curren BM, and fuure reurn. According o he dividend discoun model: 2 Fama and French (2005) and Lyandres a al. (2008) boh show ha firms which increase heir invesmens are likely o be large issuers. 1
3 p E[ div ] (1) 1 1 r We can represen he equiy value a he firm level. Using clear surplus accouning, he value of he firm can be calculaed as he discouned value of he sum of fuure dividends minus he issuing in each period, so ha: M E ( Y db ), (2) 1 1 r where M is he curren marke value of he firm s equiy, Y is he firm s earnings a ime, db B B is he change in book equiy of he firm, and r is he required rae of equiy 1 reurns. Dividing boh sides by he book equiy: M B [ ] / (1 ) E Y 1 db r (3) B Equaion (3) is used o derive he relaionship a he firm level. As in F&F, he equaion suggess ha, ceeris paribus, here should be a posiive relaionship beween expeced profiabiliy and fuure sock reurns, a negaive relaionship beween expeced invesmens and fuure sock reurns, and a posiive relaionship beween curren BM and fuure sock reurns. Nex we examine hese relaionships in he per-share level. In order o do so we divide boh numeraor and denominaor by he number of shares a ime (n ) and muliply and divide he numeraor by he number of shares in each period (n +τ ), so ha: M B n Y db n [ ] / (1 ) E r E[ y ] / (1 ) 1 1 b r n n n n B n b (4) 2
4 Here, y Y is he per-share earnings a ime n, and B B 1 b is he per-share n change in book value. As one can see from equaion (4), when here is no share issuance, he equaion simplifies o: M B E [ y ] / (1 ) 1 db r, (5) b B B and db +τ. Equaion (5) leads o he same relaionship beween he variables a he n n per-share level as a he firm level and is similar o he one used by F&F. However, when here is sock issuance hese relaionships are also dependan on he expeced sock issuance as expressed in equaion (4). We noe ha a simple correcion by rying o accoun for E ( n / n ) is no enough; expeced sock issuance is likely o be correlaed wih expeced invesmen and migh be correlaed wih expeced profiabiliy. To illusrae, consider wo firms. Boh firms have he same BM and expeced profiabiliy bu he expeced invesmen of firm A is higher han firm B. Invesors also expec ha he firm will finance he new invesmen by raising equiy. A he firm level, equaion 3 suggess ha firm A should have lower reurns han Firm B does. However, if he researcher uses per-share analysis wihou accouning for sock issuance (equaion 5), i is no clear wheher he expeced invesmen increases or decreases. This is because he numeraor (invesmen) and he denominaor (number of shares) boh increase. As a resul is no clear which firm should have he higher expeced reurn. Fama and French (2008a) argue ha he limied success of he valuaion formula is because BM capures informaion abou boh expeced cash flows and discoun raes. They use wo variables in order o disenangle informaion abou expeced cash flows and expeced discoun raes. These variables are he evoluion of BM and ne issuing. However, hey do no use hese variables o improve he predicions abou expeced invesmen and expeced reurns, bu hey use heir curren 3
5 values as is done in mos of he asse-pricing lieraure. Novy-Marx (2010) argues ha using a profiabiliy measure higher up in he financial saemen leads o higher predicive abiliy of fuure profiabiliy. He shows ha gross profi is more correlaed wih fuure profiabiliy han is he commonly used ne income and ha gross profi is posiively correlaed wih fuure reurns. However, as wih Fama and French (2008a), Novy-Marx uses curren gross profiabiliy, raher han using i in he conex of he valuaion formula. Our paper differs from hese papers, as i examines he performance of he valuaion formula direcly. The res of he paper in organized as follows. Secion 2 describes he daa, mehodology, and summary saisics. Secion 3 presens our empirical resuls, and Secion 4 concludes. 2. Daa, Mehodology and Summary Saisics Our daa are drawn from he crsp and compusa annual daabases. Our sample period is Following F&F, we exclude firms from he sample wih he following characerisics: Financial firms (SIC code ); Firms ha do no have all he accouning and marke informaion necessary o calculae all he variables used in order o predic invesmen and profiabiliy; All firms wih oal asses less han 25 million dollar or book equiy less han 12.5 million dollar Our final sample includes 85,680 firm years. To reduce he effec of exreme observaions, we winsorize all independen variables in he 99.5% and 0.5% level. Our mehodology is similar o F&F. We firs esimae he relaionship beween various accouning and marke variables and fuure invesmen and profiabiliy. We refer o his par as firs pass regression. Using he esimaions from he firs pass regression, we calculae for each firm he expeced profiabiliy and invesmen. Finally, we examine he relaionship beween expeced 4
6 invesmen and profiabiliy and fuure sock reurns, while conrolling for size and book o marke. We refer o his sage as second pass regression. We use his procedure boh a he firm level and a he per-share level. In some regressions, we replace he measure of invesmen from growh in oal asses o growh in book equiy. We define growh in book equiy as he percenage change in book equiy beween year and year -1. In Table 1 we presen he main variables ha are used in he firs pass regressions. For each variable we presen he iner-quarile break poin and he spread beween he values of he firms in he 90 h percen, o he value of he firm in he 10 h percen. We laer use his spread o demonsrae he imporance of various variables o he expeced invesmen and profiabiliy calculaions. In he firs wo rows we presen he wo main variables in our research: profiabiliy and invesmen. Profiabiliy is measured as income before exraordinary iems, scaled by oal asses. Invesmen is defined as he percenage change in oal asses beween he curren and previous years. TA inv TA 1 1 In Row 3 we presen invesmen per share, which is defined as invesmen divided by he number of shares ousanding in he same period. Resuls show ha invesmen per share has a much smaller spread han invesmen iself does (0.38 compared wih 0.59). Fama and French (2005) documen ha firms ha issue equiy end o increase heir invesmen before or afer he issuance. This suggess ha firms wih high asse growh are likely also o be large issuers leading o smaller spreads in invesmen per share. In unrepored resuls, we confirm his in our sample by documening ha high invesing firms also end o have high ne issuance. The res of Table 1 presens he oher variables used in he firs pass regression, excluding binary variables. The nex wo variables (P_acc and N_acc) measure he accruals of he firm. Posiive (negaive) accruals are accruals scaled by book equiy for all firms wih posiive (negaive) accruals 5
7 and zero oherwise. Div_be is oal dividends scaled by book equiy, whereas ne issuing (ns) is he change in he number of shares ousanding beween he curren and previous years. 6
8 3. Empirical Resuls 3.1. Valuaion formula in he firm level F&F use wo-sage regression o examine he predicions of he valuaion formula (equaion 3). Firs, hey esimae a regression ha examines he relaionships beween various accouning and marke variables and fuure invesmen and profiabiliy. They hen use he coefficiens from his regression o esimae he expeced invesmen and profiabiliy for each firm-year. In he second pass regression, hey use he expeced invesmen and profiabiliy, along wih he curren BM of he firm, and regress hem ogeher as predicors of fuure reurn. We use he same procedure in our paper, excep for one major difference. Our analyical derivaions sugges ha he relaionships beween expeced profiabiliy, expeced invesmen, BM, and reurn are bes expressed a he firm level. Therefore, we use all variables a he firm level and no a he per-share level as underlies he work of F&F. Resuls of he firs pass regressions are presened in he upper par of Table 2. For comparison reasons, our firs specificaion (Model 1) uses he same nine variables as F&F use. These variables include seven of he variables ha are described in Table 1 (excluding invesmen per share and ne issuing). Addiionally, we use wo binary variables: N_prof o which we assign he value of 1 if he firm regisers negaive earnings a ime ; and No_div o which we assign he value of 1 if he firm did no pay dividends in ha year. We use hese nine variables as independen variables in wo regressions. In he firs regression, he dependan variable is he invesmen (measured as change in oal asses) in he nex year. In he second regression he dependan variable is profiabiliy (measured as income before exraordinary iems, scaled by book value) in he nex year. Resuls for boh regressions are similar o hose repored by F&F. There is a srong negaive relaionship beween BM and expeced invesmen, and a posiive relaionship wih profiabiliy. These findings are consisen wih he F&F findings and he noion of low-bm firms as growh and glamour socks (e.g. Fama and French 1995). The effec of BM on fuure invesmen is he greaes 7
9 of all he variables used. For example, a firm in he 90 h percenile of BM is expeced o have higher invesmen han a firm in he 10 h percenile of BM. The coefficien of BM on profiabiliy is less han half han of ha on invesmen, suggesing ha BM will have a much lower influence on expeced profiabiliy. Size is also negaively correlaed wih fuure invesmen and is no correlaed wih fuure profiabiliy. The effec of size on invesmen is much less han BM, as he spread is roughly This small effec of size is in par because of he censoring of all iny firms. The coefficien of he binary variable N_prof is negaive in boh regressions, suggesing ha unprofiable firms have lower fuure invesmen and lower fuure profiabiliy. The coefficien of curren profiabiliy (ibbe) is posiive in boh regressions, suggesing ha curren profiabiliy is posiively correlaed o boh fuure invesmen and fuure profiabiliy. The effec of curren profiabiliy on fuure profiabiliy is he larges of all variables. A firm in he 90 h profiabiliy percenile is expeced o have a fuure profiabiliy ha is 0.22 higher han for a firm in he 10 h profiabiliy percenile. The effec of expeced invesmen is much smaller, and he spread is only The accruals variables (P_acc and N_acc) are significan boh in he invesmen and profiabiliy regressions. However, heir economic significance is very sligh. For example, he spread in expeced invesmen beween a firm in he 90 h percenile and 10 h percenile of posiive accruals is only Our resuls sugges a negaive relaionship beween dividends and expeced invesmen, and a posiive relaionship wih expeced profiabiliy. The binary variable No_div has lile effec on eiher expeced invesmen or expeced profiabiliy. Our resuls sugges a negaive relaionship beween curren dividends and fuure invesmen, and a posiive relaionship beween curren dividends and fuure profiabiliy. The variable oal dividends scaled by book equiy (Div_be) has a relaively large effec on expeced invesmen (spread of 0.06), and a very small effec on expeced profiabiliy (spread of 0.01).. Finally, curren invesmen is posiively correlaed wih fuure invesmen and is negaively correlaed wih fuure profiabiliy. The coefficien of curren 8
10 invesmen is more han double he one repored by F&F. The economic significance of curren invesmen is relaively low, and he difference in expeced invesmen beween he 90 h and he 10 h percenile firms is roughly 0.05 or less han one fifh of he effec of BM. In he second sage regression, we use he coefficien obained from he firs pass regressions o calculae he expeced invesmen and expeced profiabiliy. Then we esimae he following regression for each firm year in our sample. r ln _ BM Ln _Size Exp _ Inv Exp _ Prof ε i, 1 i, 1 1 Resuls of his esimaion are presened in he lower par of Table 2. Resuls show ha he coefficiens of he second pass regression are all consisen wih heir predicive signs. The coefficien of BM and expeced profiabiliy is posiive and significan, as prediced by he valuaion formula. Mos imporanly, he coefficien of expeced invesmen is negaive and significan ( 1.57; = 2.17). This resul is in sharp conras o F&F who repor a posiive and insignifican coefficien for expeced invesmen. Our sample period is five years longer han he one used by F&F. These five years ( ) include he global financial crises. Thus i may be ha he difference in resuls beween our and F&F esimaes are no relaed o he difference beween per-share and firm-level analysis bu o he end years in our sample. To examine his possibiliy, we censor from our sample he las five years and re-esimae boh firs and second pass regressions. Resuls for he esimaion (Model 2) show ha here are hardly any differences in he coefficiens of he firs pass regressions. The larges difference is in he coefficien of negaive accruals (N_acc) in he expeced profiabiliy regression. I changes from 0.10 o However, given he small influence of accruals on boh expeced invesmen and profiabiliy, his difference has lile economic implicaion. Resuls of he second pass regression confirm ha he difference in he sample periods is no driving he difference in 9
11 resuls beween he F&F work and ours. All he coefficiens in Model 2 are similar o hose of Model 1. Specifically, he coefficien of expeced invesmen remains negaive and significan. In Model 3 we add ne issuing (ns) o he variables used o predic invesmen and profiabiliy. Previous research shows ha firms ha issue equiy end o increase heir invesmen in he subsequen period (e.g. Fama and French (2005) Lyandres e al. (2008)). Loughran and Rier (1997) documen ha firms ha issue equiy suffer from a decrease in profiabiliy afer he issuance. A vas body of lieraure shows ha sock issuance is followed by subsequen low reurns. 3 Fama and French (2008a) argue ha he failure of heir valuaion formula is due o he fac ha book o marke is unable o separae an increase in cash flows and a decrease in he discoun rae. They argue ha ne issuing can serve as a variable ha helps o separae he wo effecs. Their resuls show ha ne issuing is negaively correlaed wih sock reurns, even afer conrolling for book o marke. We add o his lieraure by examining he effec of including ne issuing as a predicor in he valuaion formula. Resuls of Model 3 show ha, as expeced, ne issuing and fuure invesmen are posiively correlaed. The coefficien of ne issuing is posiive and highly significan. The economic effec of ns is relaively low (a spread of in expeced invesed). Ineresingly, he coefficien of invesmen is maerially decreasing once ne issuing is added as a predicor (from 0.09 o 0.06). The oher coefficiens are barely affeced by he inclusion of ne issuing. The coefficien of ne issuing in he expeced profiabiliy equaion is only slighly negaive ( 0.01) and saisically insignifican. Resuls for he second pass regression show ha he coefficien of expeced invesmen becomes more negaive compared wih Model 1 (from 1.53 in Model 1 o 1.94) and i is now significan a he 1% level. The increase in he predicive power of expeced invesmen is accompanied by a decrease in he predicive power of BM. The coefficien of BM falls from 0.22 in 3 See for example Loughran and Rier (1995); Brav e al (2000); Lyandres e al. (2008); Poniff and Woodgae (2008); Fama and French (2008b). 10
12 Model 1 o 0.16 in Model 3 and i is only significan a he 10% level. This may sugges ha he predicive powers of BM and expeced invesmen are driven by similar economic forces. Thus, an improvemen of one is likely o be a he expense of he oher. Finally, we noe ha he valuaion formula suggess ha here should be a relaionship beween change in book equiy and fuure sock reurns. However, in heir empirical work, F&F use he change in oal asses raher han he change in book equiy. F&F argue ha he use of asse growh raher han change in book equiy provides a beer predicor of oal invesmen, as i is less noisy. While we agree wih his saemen, we sill believe i is of ineres o examine he valuaion formula in using he change in book equiy, raher han he change in oal asses, as his reflecs he closes relaionship beween equaion (3) and he empirical procedures. Accordingly, in Model 4 we replace he change in oal asses wih he change in book equiy in boh he firs pass and second pass regressions. The resuls of he expeced invesmen regression sugges ha here are some major differences compared wih Model 3. Firs, he coefficien of profiabiliy is almos riple he 0.15 in Model 3 being 0.42 in Model 4. In conras, he coefficien of invesmen is reduced by wo-hirds from 0.06 o The coefficien of he binary variable No_div changes sign from negaive in Model 3 o posiive in Model 4. Similarly, boh coefficiens of accruals also change signs beween Model 3 and Model 4. Oher coefficiens remain largely he same. In conras o hese large changes in he expeced invesmen regression, he coefficien hardly changes in he expeced profiabiliy regression. The large changes in he firs pass regression lead also o changes in he second pass regression. The coefficien of expeced invesmen furher increases o However, consisen wih he F&F argumen, here is an increase in he sandard deviaion. As a resul, he -saisic falls slighly from 2.79 o Ineresingly, he increase in he coefficien of expeced invesmen is again a he expense of book o marke. The coefficien of BM is reduced by almos a half and i is saisically insignifican. This resul suggess ha BM may be relaed o fuure sock reurns, 11
13 because i is correlaed wih expeced changes in book equiy ha in urn are associaed wih fuure low reurns. 3.2 Sample-specific? Our resuls so far indicae ha he valuaion formulae of F&F are rue in he daa. While we aribue he success of he valuaion formula o he examinaion a he firm level, raher han in he pershare level, anoher possibiliy is ha our sample differs from he one used by F&F. To explore his possibiliy we examine he resuls in he per-share level by examining he predicion equaion (5). We use he wo pass regression as in previous ess and repor he resul in Table 3. Model 1 examines he per-share analysis for he enire sample period ( ). Resuls of he firs pass regression show ha he coefficiens are largely of he same sign as in Table 2. However, in he expeced invesmen regression here are some imporan differences in he values of he coefficiens. The coefficien of invesmen is roughly halved when compared wih he Table 2 resuls (0.04 o 0.09 respecively). The coefficien of profiabiliy is roughly 50 per cen larger compared wih he firm-level analysis. The coefficien of BM is slighly smaller in absolue erms han he coefficien of BM in Table 2 is ( 0.10 compared wih 0.13). The res of he coefficiens are similar o hose of Table 2. In conras, he coefficiens in he expeced profiabiliy regression are almos idenical in Table 2 and Table 3. In he lower par of Table 3 we presen he resuls for he second pass regressions. The resuls are considerably differen o hose of Table 2 and are much closer o he ones repored by F&F (see column 3, Table 3). Alhough he coefficien of expeced invesmen is negaive, i is a quarer of is value in Table 2 ( 0.39 compared wih 1.57) and saisically insignifican (= 0.48). In conras, he coefficien of BM is almos double he one repored in Table 2 (0.39 compared wih 0.21). The coefficien of expeced profiabiliy is almos idenical suggesing again ha profiabiliy is no affeced, wheher he variables are measured a he per-share level or he firm level. 12
14 In Model 2 we esimae he same regression afer censoring he las five years of our sample period. Our resuls show ha his leads o only small differences in he coefficiens of he firs pass regression. This model is of ineres, as i allows us o have direc comparison wih he F&F resuls. In he expeced invesmen regression, we noe ha all coefficiens have he same sign as in he F&F work. In eigh of he nine variables he magniude of he coefficien is similar. Only he coefficien of size is much larger in he F&F work han in ours ( 0.53 compared wih 0.01). 4 The second pass regression shows ha he coefficien of expeced profiabiliy is higher han in Model 1. All of he oher variables are of he same magniude as in Model 1. Specifically, he coefficien of expeced invesmen coninues o be small and insignifican. Again, comparing hese resuls o F&F, we find very similar resuls. The larges difference beween heir resuls and ours is in he expeced invesmen variables ( 0.43 compared wih 0.04 in F&F). However, his difference is relaively small and insignifican. The similariy beween our resuls and hose of F&F suggess ha our main resul he validaion of he valuaion formula in Table 2 is because of he differences in firm and per-share level analysis and is no due o differences in sample characerisics beween our work and heirs. To summarize, our resuls sugges ha he predicion of he valuaion formula does no hold when variables are measured in he per-share level. This is consisen wih boh our analysis and he F&F empirical resuls. 3.3 Valuaion formula across BM quiniles In he las par of our empirical work we examine he robusness of our resuls. The valuaion formula suggess ha here should be a relaionship beween expeced invesmen, expeced profiabiliy, and expeced reurn afer conrolling for curren BM. In Table 2 we esimae a linear 4 We noe ha he spread in he naural log of size beween firms in he 90 h and 10 h perceniles is The coefficien of F&F of 0.53 suggess ha small firms will have an invesmen of close o 250 per cen higher han a large firm. This number is oo high, as he spread beween firms in 90 h percenile of expeced invesmen and he 10 h percenile of expeced invesmen is only Furhermore, he -saisics of F&F and ours are of he same magniude ( 5 and 3). Since we use he naural log of size in he empirical research i canno be a simple magniude effec. 13
15 approximaion of hese relaionships by enering in he righ hand side expeced invesmen, profiabiliy, and curren BM. In he nex es we conrol for BM by dividing he sample ino quiniles of BM and hen esimaing in each BM quinile he following regression. r Ln(Size ) E(Inv ) E(Prof ) ε i, 1 i, 1 1 This es has wo main objecives. Firs, he es serves as a robusness es for our resuls in Table 2 in order o examine wheher expeced profiabiliy and, especially, expeced invesmen have predicive power afer conrolling for boh size and BM. Second, he es provides an insigh regarding he relaionship beween expeced invesmen and reurns. Specifically, he es can demonsrae wheher he negaive relaionship beween expeced invesmen and reurns is driven by a few firms wih very large expeced invesmen, or wheher he relaionship is more cenral. Resuls of he firs pass regression show ha BM is he mos significan variable in deermining expeced invesmen, suggesing a negaive correlaion beween he wo variables. Thus, if expeced invesmen will show up only among low-bm porfolios, hen i is likely ha only exreme values of expeced invesmen are followed by low realized reurns. In conras, if he negaive correlaion exiss for all BM quiniles, hen he relaionship is much more cenral. Resuls in Table 4 Column 1 confirm he above observaions by showing ha average expeced invesmen in he lowes BM quinile is more han wice as large as he average invesmen in he median quinile is. In he highes BM quinile, boh he average and he median expeced invesmen are negaive. Addiionally, we can repor ha less han 0.2 per cen of he firms in he high-bm porfolio have higher expeced invesmen han he average expeced invesmen in he low-bm porfolio. The nex column presens he average and median expeced profiabiliy across BM quiniles. There is a negaive monoonic relaionship beween BM and expeced invesmen. However, his spread in expeced profiabiliy is much lower han expeced invesmen. 14
16 The nex four columns presen he resuls of equaion (6) for each BM quinile. Resuls show ha he coefficien of expeced invesmen is negaive in four of he quiniles and is significan in hree of hem. The coefficien of expeced profiabiliy is posiive in all quiniles and is significan in wo of hem. Imporanly, we find ha he coefficien of expeced invesmen is negaive and significan among high-bm firms. This suggess ha he success of he expeced invesmen is no driven by a few firms wih high-value expeced invesmen bu exiss among low and high-bm firms. 4. Conclusions The Fama and French valuaion formula suggess a basic relaionship beween four variables: curren BM, expeced profiabiliy, and expeced invesmen, and fuure sock reurns. However, he F&F empirical work had limied success, paricularly in failing o find a relaionship beween expeced invesmen and sock reurns. Our analyical derivaions imply ha he relaionships suggesed in he F&F valuaion formula do no necessarily hold in he per-share analysis. This is because issuing of new equiy changes he number of socks. The change in he number of socks can lead o miigaion of he relaionship suggesed in he valuaion formula. In conras, variables ha are measured a he firm level are no affeced by he number of socks, and hence he relaionship suggesed in F&F should hold. Our empirical work suppors he above argumen. We find ha he empirical predicions of he valuaion formula are rue in he daa, once variables are measured a he firm level. As prediced by he valuaion formula, we find a posiive relaionship beween BM and reurns, a posiive relaionship beween expeced profiabiliy and reurns, and a negaive relaionship beween expeced invesmen and reurns. Consisen wih he F&F empirical findings, our resuls show ha once variables are measured a he per-share level here is no significan relaionship beween expeced invesmen and reurns. We furher sudy he robusness of hese resuls. Our findings sugges ha hese resuls are no driven by he global financial crises. Furhermore, our resuls show ha he predicions of he 15
17 valuaion formula hold in mos BM quiniles. This ensures ha he success of he valuaion formula is no relaed o a few small socks wih exreme values of expeced invesmen. Moreover, he fac ha iny socks are censored from he sample furher emphasizes he cenraliy of our resuls. One of he ineresing feaures of he valuaion formula is he predicion ha he formula should hold regardless of he mechanism ha researchers use o price firms. This is boh a weakness and srengh of he valuaion formula. On he downside, working in he framework of he valuaion formula canno explain he cross-secional differences in sock reurns. Indeed, as F&F noed, he valuaion formula canno even disinguish wheher behavioral or risk-based explanaions lead o he differences in he cross-secional reurns. However, he upside is ha he basic naure of he predicions in he valuaion formula can provide researchers wih a guide o wha reurns should be, wihou going ino he ongoing debae abou invesors raionaliy. 16
18 References Anderson, Chrisopher W and Luis Garcia-Feigoo, 2006, Empirical evidence on capial invesmen, growh opions, and securiy reurns, Journal of Finance 61, Brav, Alon, Geczy, Chrisopher, and Paul Gompers (2000), Is he Abnormal Reurn Following Equiy Issuances Anomalous? Journal of Financial Economics 56, Chen, Long, Rober Novy-Marx, and Lu Zhang, 2010, An alernaive hree-facor model, Working Paper series Cooper Michael J, Gulen Huseyin and Michael J Schill, 2008, Asse growh and he cross-secion of sock reurns, Journal of Finance 63, Fama, Eugene F and James D MacBeh, 1973, Risk, reurn, and equilibrium: empirical ess, Journal of Poliical Economy 81, pp Fama, Eugene F and Kenneh R French, 1992, The cross-secion of expeced sock reurns, Journal of Finance 47, Fama, Eugene F and Kenneh R French, 1995, Size and book-o-marke facors in earnings and reurns, Journal of Finance 50, Fama, Eugene F and Kenneh R French, 2005, Financial decision: Who issues socks? Journal of Financial Economics 76, Fama, Eugene F. and Kenneh R. French, 2006, Profiabiliy, invesmen, and average reurns, Journal of Financial Economics 82, Fama, Eugene F and Kenneh R French, 2008a, Average Reurns, B/M, and Share Issues, The Journal of Finance 63, Fama, Eugene F and Kenneh R French, 2008b, Dissecing anomalies, The Journal of Finance 63, Haugen, R A and N L Baker, Commonaliy in he deerminans of expeced sock reurns. Journal of Financial Economics 41, Loughran Tim and Jay Rier, 1995, The new issue puzzle, Journal of Finance 50, Loughran Tim and Jay Rier, 1997, The operaing performance of firms conducing seasoned equiy offerings, Journal of Finance 52, Lyandres, Evgeny, Le Sun, and Lu Zhang, 2008, The new issues puzzle: Tesing he invesmenbased explanaion, Review of Financial Sudies 21, Novy-Marx Rober, 2010, The oher side of value, Working Paper series Poniff Jeffrey and Aremiza Woodgae, 2008, Share issuance and cross-secional reurns, Journal of Finance 63, Rosenberg, Barr, Kenneh Reid and Ronald Lansein, 1985, Persuasive evidence of marke inefficiency, Journal of Porfolio Managemen 11, 9 17 Timan, S, K C J Wei, and F Xie, 2004, Capial invesmens and sock reurns. Journal of Financial and Quaniaive Analysis 39,
19 Appendix: Derivaion of Valuaion Formula Accouning for Share Issuance In his appendix we derive he rivial bu suble valuaion formula wih he sock issuance. Noaion: M = value of firm's equiy a period ex any dividend a he end of period -1. p = ex - dividend price per share a he end of period. n = number of shares of record a he period. M = n p. d = dividend per share paid a he end of period o holders of record a he sar of period. D = oal dividend paid a he end of period -1/ begining of period o he holders of record a he sar of period 1 n d. 1 There are wo ways o price he sock value oday: a he firm level and a he per share level. We can value each share as he presen value of he fuure dividends payable o an invesor who buys and holds one share (for simpliciy of noaion, in he appendix all he fuure variables are expeced values). p 1 d 1 r, where r = he required reurn on equiy. M n p 1 nd 1 r. Noe ha he oal equiy value is only equal o he presen value of all fuure dividends paid by he firm if he firm is never o issue or repurchase any shares. A he firm level, noe ha if here is any equiy issuance over ime hen D n d. To link he curren oal equiy value o he expeced oal dividend, we need o consider he effec of ne issuance of equiy NE : 18
20 M 1 D NE 1 r. One can look a his as follows. Consider he shareholders as one group, hen he value of he oal equiy oday is equal o he presen value of he sum of expeced fuure cash inflow (oal dividend paid) and cash ouflow (oal equiy raised). To link he dividend o he book value of equiy, and o earnings when here is equiy issuance, noe ha: B book value of equiy a he sar of period B Y D NE B Y D m p 1 1. I follows ha a he firm level, M 1 D NE Y B B Y B 1 r 1 r 1 r To conver his o per-share iems, we can divide he oal number of shares oday on boh sides: p =1 n n y 1 r b, where y Y is he period n equiy earnings per beginning of period' share ousanding, B B 1 and b is period change in book equiy per beginning of period share n ousanding. Noe ha when here is a change in number of shares ousanding, B b n B n 1 1 One can see ha a he firm level, he relaionship beween curren marke value and expeced fuure earnings, change in book value, and required rae of reurn are similar o hose in F&F. Thus 19
21 all he predicions among he four variables will hold. Ye a he per-share level, one mus accoun for he change in he fuure shares. Furhermore, i is he sraigh forward expeced change in he number of shares ousanding, because he expecaion is aken wih respec o he whole of he erms in he sum. 20
22 Table 1: Disribuion of he Main Variables In his able we presen he disribuion of he main variables in our research. For each variable we presen he quadruple break poins and he spread beween he sock ha is ranked in he 90 h percenile and he socks ha is ranked in he 10 h percenile. The variables are: ibbe income before exraordinary iems scaled by oal asse value Inv defined as he percenage change in oal asse beween he curren and previous year Inv_per invesmen a ime divided by he number of shares a he same period log_bm he naural log of he book value of he previous fiscal year divided by he marke value of he same period Log_me he naural log of marke value a he end of he previous fiscal year N_prof a dummy variable o which we assign he value of 1 if he firm repors a negaive income before exraordinary variables P_acc posiive accruals scaled by oal asses N_acc negaive accruals scaled by oal asses Div_be is dividend divided by oal asses ns ne issuing of he firm defined as he number of socks 25% Median 75% Spread 90 10% Ibbe Inv Inv_per Log_bm Log_mef P_acc N_acc Div_be ns
23 Table 2: Firs and Second Pass Regressions: Firm level This able presens he resuls of he firs and second pass regressions in order o examine wheher he prediced relaionships in he valuaion formula are rue in he daa. The firs pass regressions examine he relaionship beween invesmen and profiabiliy in he nex year (+1) o various accouning and marke variables in he curren period (year ). We esimae he Fama-MacBeh regression for he 40 years in our sample. The independen variables ha are used are: log_bm, Log_mef, ibbe, P_acc, N_acc, Div_be, Inv, ns (see he definiions in Table 1). Addiionally we use wo binary variables: N_prof o which we assign he value of 1 if he firm repors negaive earnings in he curren fiscal year, and No_Div o which we assign he value of 1 if he firm didn pay dividends in he curren fiscal year. Thus we esimae in Model 1 he following wo regressions: INV Ln _ BM Ln N ibbe P N No Div inv 1 mef Prof acc acc Div be Prof L n( BM ) Ln( mef ) NProf ibbe P N NoDiv Div / be inv 1 acc, acc, Model 1 examines hese variables for he enire sample period; Model 2 examines he same regression equaions bu wihou he las five years in he sample. In Model 3 we add ne issuing (ns) as a predicor. In Model 4 we replace invesmen from change in oal asses o change in book equiy. *; ** denoe ha he coefficien is significan a he 5% and 1% levels respecively. In he second pass regression we esimae he following regression: r ln _ BM Ln _Size Exp _ Inv Exp _ Prof ε i, 1 i, 1 1 Sock reurns are from July of year +1 o June of year +2. Size is he marke value a he end of June of year +1 and book o marke is he book value a he end of he previous fiscal year divided by he marke value of December of year. Exp_Inv and Exp_Prof are calculaed using he coefficiens obained from he firs pass regressions. The numbers in brackes are he -saisics. 22
24 Firs Pass Regression Model 1 Model 2 Model 3 Model 4 Ex_Inv Ex_prof Ex_Inv Ex_prof Ex_Inv Ex_prof Ex_Inv Ex_prof Ln BM 0.13 ** 0.05 ** 0.13 ** 0.05 ** 0.13 ** 0.05 ** ** 0.05 ** Ln mef 0.01 ** ** ** ** 0.00 N_Prof 0.07 ** 0.03 ** 0.07 ** 0.02 * 0.07 ** 0.03 ** ** 0.03 ** Ib_be 0.13 ** 0.64 ** 0.14 ** 0.66 ** 0.15 ** 0.64 ** 0.42 ** 0.63 ** P_acc 0.10 ** 0.03 * 0.10 ** 0.05 ** 0.10 ** 0.03 * * N_acc 0.07 ** 0.10 ** 0.05 * 0.19 ** 0.06 ** ** ** 0.11 ** No_Div ** 0.01 * 0.02 ** 0.01 * 0.02 ** 0.02 ** 0.02 ** Div_be 0.99 ** 0.20 ** 1.05 ** 0.18 ** 1.01 ** 0.20 ** ** 0.20 ** Inv 0.09 ** 0.03 ** 0.09 ** 0.02 ** 0.06 ** 0.03 ** 0.02 * 0.01 Ns 0.15 ** ** 0.03 * R Second Pass Regression Model 1 Model 2 Model 3 Model 4 Inercep 1.67 (4.25) 1.72 (4.13) 1.73 (4.41) 1.71 (4.71) Log_BM 0.21 (2.29) 0.22 (2.17) 0.16 (1.80) 0.09 (1.11) Log_Size 0.07 ( 1.77) 0.07 ( 1.60) 0.08 ( 1.93) 0.09 ( 2.44) Exp_Prof (2.36) Exp_Inv 1.57 ( 2.17) (2.37) 1.64 ( 2.09) (2.39) 1.93 ( 2.79) (2.52) 2.23 ( 2.52) 23
25 Table 3: Per Share Analysis In his able we esimae firs and second pass regressions in he per-share level as is done in he F&F work. In he firs pass regression we esimae he same variables as in Table 2. In Model 1 we use he enire sample period ( ), whereas in Model 2 we censored he las five years from he sample. In he hird column we presen he original resuls repored in he F&F research resuls. Finally in Model 4 we use he firs pass coefficiens obained by F&F and esimae he second pass regression on our sample. Firs Pass Regression Model 1 Model 2 F&F Ex_Inv Ex_prof Ex_Inv Ex_prof Ex_Inv Ex_prof Ln BM 0.10 ** 0.05 ** 0.10 ** 0.05 ** 0.12 ** 0.04 ** Ln me 0.01 ** ** ** 0.00 N_Prof 0.08 ** 0.03 ** 0.07 ** 0.03 * 0.09 ** 0.07 ** Ib_be 0.17 ** 0.60 ** 0.18 ** 0.62 ** 0.19 ** 0.78 ** P_acc 0.12 ** 0.04 * 0.12 ** 0.06 ** 0.09 ** 0.07 * N_acc 0.06 ** 0.10 ** 0.05 * 0.09 ** ** No_Div 0.01 ** 0.02 ** 0.02 ** 0.02 ** 0.01 * 0.03 ** Div_be 0.94 ** 0.20 ** 1.00 ** 0.20 ** 1.13 ** 0.02 Inv 0.04 ** 0.03 ** 0.05 ** 0.03 ** 0.05 ** 0.00 R Second Pass Regression Model 1 Model 2 F&F Inercep 1.87 (2.19) 1.94 (2.07) 1.61 (2.06) Log_BM 0.39 (4.21) 0.41 (4.05) 0.37 (3.42) Log_Size 0.05 ( 1.24) 0.05 ( 1.09) 0.08 ( 1.92) Exp_Prof (2.05) Exp_Inv 0.39 ( 0.48) (2.07) 0.43 ( 0.47) (2.03) 0.04 (0.05) 24
26 Table 4: The Valuaion Formula across BM Porfolios In his able we examine he performance of he valuaion formula across BM quiniles. For each BM quinile we esimae he following regression: r Ln _Size Exp _ Inv Exp _ Prof ε i, 1 i, 1 1 We use he coefficiens obained from Table 2, Model 1 o calculae expeced invesmen and expeced profiabiliy. The firs column is he BM quinile; Column 2 and Column 3 presen he average and median (in brackes) of expeced invesmen and expeced profiabiliy in each of he BM quiniles. Columns 4 o 7 presen he inercep and he coefficiens of size, expeced invesmen, and expeced profiabiliy for he above regressions. Numbers in brackes are he -saisics. Characerisics Regression esimaion qbm Exp_Inv Exp_Prof Inercep Ln_size Exp_Inv Exp_prof (0.26) 0.13 (0.18) 1.15 (2.248) 0.01 ( 0.282) 2.43 ( 3.743) 1.87 (3.342) (0.17) 0.09 (0.13) 1.58 (3.435) 0.06 ( 1.471) 1.98 ( 2.156) 1.58 (3.436) (0.12) 0.07 (0.10) 1.51 (3.584) 0.05 ( 1.198) 0.83 ( 0.734) 1.10 (1.214) (0.07) 0.03 (0.07) 1.58 (4.04) 0.06 ( 1.417) (0.329) 0.76 (0.671) ( 0.00) 0.03 (0.01) 2.20 (5.824) 0.15 ( 3.237) 2.23 ( 2.296) 0.83 (0.839) 25
FINAL EXAM EC26102: MONEY, BANKING AND FINANCIAL MARKETS MAY 11, 2004
FINAL EXAM EC26102: MONEY, BANKING AND FINANCIAL MARKETS MAY 11, 2004 This exam has 50 quesions on 14 pages. Before you begin, please check o make sure ha your copy has all 50 quesions and all 14 pages.
More informationCapital Strength and Bank Profitability
Capial Srengh and Bank Profiabiliy Seok Weon Lee 1 Asian Social Science; Vol. 11, No. 10; 2015 ISSN 1911-2017 E-ISSN 1911-2025 Published by Canadian Cener of Science and Educaion 1 Division of Inernaional
More informationPortfolio investments accounted for the largest outflow of SEK 77.5 billion in the financial account, which gave a net outflow of SEK billion.
BALANCE OF PAYMENTS DATE: 27-11-27 PUBLISHER: Saisics Sweden Balance of Paymens and Financial Markes (BFM) Maria Falk +46 8 6 94 72, maria.falk@scb.se Camilla Bergeling +46 8 6 942 6, camilla.bergeling@scb.se
More informationRational Expectation and Expected Stock Returns
aional Expecaion and Expeced Sock eurns Chia-Cheng Ho Deparmen of Finance Naional Chung Cheng Universiy Chia-Yi Taiwan epublic of China fincch@ccu.edu.w Chien-Ting Lin* School of Commerce Universiy of
More informationIndustry Profitability Dispersion and Market-to-book Ratio
Indusry Profiabiliy Dispersion and Marke-o-book Raio Jia Chen *, Kewei Hou, and René M. Sulz 30 January 2014 Absrac Firms in indusries ha have high indusry-level dispersion of profiabiliy have on average
More informationSTABLE BOOK-TAX DIFFERENCES, PRIOR EARNINGS, AND EARNINGS PERSISTENCE. Joshua C. Racca. Dissertation Prepared for Degree of DOCTOR OF PHILOSOPHY
STABLE BOOK-TAX DIFFERENCES, PRIOR EARNINGS, AND EARNINGS PERSISTENCE Joshua C. Racca Disseraion Prepared for Degree of DOCTOR OF PHILOSOPHY UNIVERSITY OF NORTH TEXAS Augus 0 APPROVED: Teresa Conover,
More information2. Quantity and price measures in macroeconomic statistics 2.1. Long-run deflation? As typical price indexes, Figure 2-1 depicts the GDP deflator,
1 2. Quaniy and price measures in macroeconomic saisics 2.1. Long-run deflaion? As ypical price indexes, Figure 2-1 depics he GD deflaor, he Consumer rice ndex (C), and he Corporae Goods rice ndex (CG)
More informationStock Market Behaviour Around Profit Warning Announcements
Sock Marke Behaviour Around Profi Warning Announcemens Henryk Gurgul Conen 1. Moivaion 2. Review of exising evidence 3. Main conjecures 4. Daa and preliminary resuls 5. GARCH relaed mehodology 6. Empirical
More informationEstimating Earnings Trend Using Unobserved Components Framework
Esimaing Earnings Trend Using Unobserved Componens Framework Arabinda Basisha and Alexander Kurov College of Business and Economics, Wes Virginia Universiy December 008 Absrac Regressions using valuaion
More informationIntroduction. Enterprises and background. chapter
NACE: High-Growh Inroducion Enerprises and background 18 chaper High-Growh Enerprises 8 8.1 Definiion A variey of approaches can be considered as providing he basis for defining high-growh enerprises.
More informationRevenues and Earnings as Key Value Drivers in Various Contexts: Implications for Financial Management and Statement Analysis
Revenues and Earnings as Key Value Drivers in Various Conexs: Implicaions for Financial Managemen and Saemen Analysis Iay Kama Graduae School of Business Adminisraion Tel Aviv Universiy Tel Aviv 69978,
More informationProblem Set 1 Answers. a. The computer is a final good produced and sold in Hence, 2006 GDP increases by $2,000.
Social Analysis 10 Spring 2006 Problem Se 1 Answers Quesion 1 a. The compuer is a final good produced and sold in 2006. Hence, 2006 GDP increases by $2,000. b. The bread is a final good sold in 2006. 2006
More informationEVA NOPAT Capital charges ( = WACC * Invested Capital) = EVA [1 P] each
VBM Soluion skech SS 2012: Noe: This is a soluion skech, no a complee soluion. Disribuion of poins is no binding for he correcor. 1 EVA, free cash flow, and financial raios (45) 1.1 EVA wihou adjusmens
More informationDocumentation: Philadelphia Fed's Real-Time Data Set for Macroeconomists First-, Second-, and Third-Release Values
Documenaion: Philadelphia Fed's Real-Time Daa Se for Macroeconomiss Firs-, Second-, and Third-Release Values Las Updaed: December 16, 2013 1. Inroducion We documen our compuaional mehods for consrucing
More informationDOES EVA REALLY HELP LONG TERM STOCK PERFORMANCE?
DOES EVA REALLY HELP LONG TERM STOCK PERFORMANCE? Wesley M. Jones, Jr. The Ciadel wes.jones@ciadel.edu George Lowry, Randolph Macon College glowry@rmc.edu ABSTRACT Economic Value Added (EVA) as a philosophy
More informationAppendix B: DETAILS ABOUT THE SIMULATION MODEL. contained in lookup tables that are all calculated on an auxiliary spreadsheet.
Appendix B: DETAILS ABOUT THE SIMULATION MODEL The simulaion model is carried ou on one spreadshee and has five modules, four of which are conained in lookup ables ha are all calculaed on an auxiliary
More informationCHAPTER CHAPTER18. Openness in Goods. and Financial Markets. Openness in Goods, and Financial Markets. Openness in Goods,
Openness in Goods and Financial Markes CHAPTER CHAPTER18 Openness in Goods, and Openness has hree disinc dimensions: 1. Openness in goods markes. Free rade resricions include ariffs and quoas. 2. Openness
More informationThe Relationship between Money Demand and Interest Rates: An Empirical Investigation in Sri Lanka
The Relaionship beween Money Demand and Ineres Raes: An Empirical Invesigaion in Sri Lanka R. C. P. Padmasiri 1 and O. G. Dayarana Banda 2 1 Economic Research Uni, Deparmen of Expor Agriculure 2 Deparmen
More informationThe Impact of Interest Rate Liberalization Announcement in China on the Market Value of Hong Kong Listed Chinese Commercial Banks
Journal of Finance and Invesmen Analysis, vol. 2, no.3, 203, 35-39 ISSN: 224-0998 (prin version), 224-0996(online) Scienpress Ld, 203 The Impac of Ineres Rae Liberalizaion Announcemen in China on he Marke
More informationEmpirical analysis on China money multiplier
Aug. 2009, Volume 8, No.8 (Serial No.74) Chinese Business Review, ISSN 1537-1506, USA Empirical analysis on China money muliplier SHANG Hua-juan (Financial School, Shanghai Universiy of Finance and Economics,
More informationSubdivided Research on the Inflation-hedging Ability of Residential Property: A Case of Hong Kong
Subdivided Research on he -hedging Abiliy of Residenial Propery: A Case of Hong Kong Guohua Huang 1, Haili Tu 2, Boyu Liu 3,* 1 Economics and Managemen School of Wuhan Universiy,Economics and Managemen
More informationFinal Exam Answers Exchange Rate Economics
Kiel Insiu für Welwirhschaf Advanced Sudies in Inernaional Economic Policy Research Spring 2005 Menzie D. Chinn Final Exam Answers Exchange Rae Economics This exam is 1 ½ hours long. Answer all quesions.
More informationOn the Impact of Inflation and Exchange Rate on Conditional Stock Market Volatility: A Re-Assessment
MPRA Munich Personal RePEc Archive On he Impac of Inflaion and Exchange Rae on Condiional Sock Marke Volailiy: A Re-Assessmen OlaOluwa S Yaya and Olanrewaju I Shiu Deparmen of Saisics, Universiy of Ibadan,
More informationA Method for Estimating the Change in Terminal Value Required to Increase IRR
A Mehod for Esimaing he Change in Terminal Value Required o Increase IRR Ausin M. Long, III, MPA, CPA, JD * Alignmen Capial Group 11940 Jollyville Road Suie 330-N Ausin, TX 78759 512-506-8299 (Phone) 512-996-0970
More informationMacroeconomics II A dynamic approach to short run economic fluctuations. The DAD/DAS model.
Macroeconomics II A dynamic approach o shor run economic flucuaions. The DAD/DAS model. Par 2. The demand side of he model he dynamic aggregae demand (DAD) Inflaion and dynamics in he shor run So far,
More informationAn Accounting-Based Characteristic Model for Asset Pricing
An Accouning-Based Characerisic Model for Asse ricing Sephen H. enman Columbia Business School shp38@columbia.edu Francesco Reggiani Bocconi Universiy francesco.reggiani@unibocconi.i Sco A. Richardson
More informationImplied Cost of Capital Based Investment Strategies
Implied Cos of Capial Based Invesmen Sraegies Florian Eserer Swisscano David Schröder CREST * and BGSE ** This version: 14.1.2006 Absrac In he recen lieraure on esimaing expeced sock reurns, one of he
More informationSupplement to Chapter 3
Supplemen o Chaper 3 I. Measuring Real GD and Inflaion If here were only one good in he world, anchovies, hen daa and prices would deermine real oupu and inflaion perfecly: GD Q ; GD Q. + + + Then, he
More informationWatch out for the impact of Scottish independence opinion polls on UK s borrowing costs
Wach ou for he impac of Scoish independence opinion polls on UK s borrowing coss Cosas Milas (Universiy of Liverpool; email: cosas.milas@liverpool.ac.uk) and Tim Worrall (Universiy of Edinburgh; email:
More information(1 + Nominal Yield) = (1 + Real Yield) (1 + Expected Inflation Rate) (1 + Inflation Risk Premium)
5. Inflaion-linked bonds Inflaion is an economic erm ha describes he general rise in prices of goods and services. As prices rise, a uni of money can buy less goods and services. Hence, inflaion is an
More informationCURRENCY CHOICES IN VALUATION AND THE INTEREST PARITY AND PURCHASING POWER PARITY THEORIES DR. GUILLERMO L. DUMRAUF
CURRENCY CHOICES IN VALUATION AN THE INTEREST PARITY AN PURCHASING POWER PARITY THEORIES R. GUILLERMO L. UMRAUF TO VALUE THE INVESTMENT IN THE OMESTIC OR FOREIGN CURRENCY? Valuing an invesmen or an acquisiion
More informationBalance of Payments. Second quarter 2012
Balance of Paymens Second quarer 2012 Balance of Paymens Second quarer 2012 Saisics Sweden 2012 Balance of Paymens. Second quarer 2012 Saisics Sweden 2012 Producer Saisics Sweden, Balance of Paymens and
More informationCross-Sectional Asset Pricing with Individual Stocks: Betas versus Characteristics. Tarun Chordia, Amit Goyal, and Jay Shanken
Cross-Secional Asse Pricing wih Individual Socks: Beas versus Characerisics Tarun Chordia, Ami Goyal, and Jay Shanken Main quesion Are expeced reurns relaed o Risk/beas, OR Characerisics If boh, which
More informationAccruals and the performance of stock returns following external financing activities *
Accruals and he performance of sock reurns following exernal financing aciviies * Georgios Papanasasopoulos Deparmen of Banking and Financial Managemen of he Universiy of Piraeus Deparmen of Economics
More informationUCLA Department of Economics Fall PhD. Qualifying Exam in Macroeconomic Theory
UCLA Deparmen of Economics Fall 2016 PhD. Qualifying Exam in Macroeconomic Theory Insrucions: This exam consiss of hree pars, and you are o complee each par. Answer each par in a separae bluebook. All
More informationAccounting Anomalies, Risk and Return
Accouning Anomalies, Risk and Reurn Sephen H. enman* Columbia Business School shp38@columbia.edu Julie Zhu Boson Universiy juliezhu@bu.edu *Corresponding auhor. We hank Seve Monahan and Sco Richardson
More informationFinance Solutions to Problem Set #6: Demand Estimation and Forecasting
Finance 30210 Soluions o Problem Se #6: Demand Esimaion and Forecasing 1) Consider he following regression for Ice Cream sales (in housands) as a funcion of price in dollars per pin. My daa is aken from
More informationThe Mathematics Of Stock Option Valuation - Part Four Deriving The Black-Scholes Model Via Partial Differential Equations
The Mahemaics Of Sock Opion Valuaion - Par Four Deriving The Black-Scholes Model Via Parial Differenial Equaions Gary Schurman, MBE, CFA Ocober 1 In Par One we explained why valuing a call opion as a sand-alone
More informationAn Improved Earnings Forecasting Model. Richard D. F. Harris Pengguo Wang 1
An Improved Earnings Forecasing Model Richard D. F. Harris r.d.f.harris@exeer.ac.uk Pengguo Wang 1 p.wang@exeer.ac.uk Xfi Cenre for Finance and Invesmen Universiy of Exeer Business School Sreaham Cour
More informationBond Prices and Interest Rates
Winer erm 1999 Bond rice Handou age 1 of 4 Bond rices and Ineres Raes A bond is an IOU. ha is, a bond is a promise o pay, in he fuure, fixed amouns ha are saed on he bond. he ineres rae ha a bond acually
More informationBalance of Payments. Third quarter 2009
Balance of Paymens Third quarer 2009 Balance of Paymens Third quarer 2009 Saisics Sweden 2009 Balance of Paymens. Third quarer 2009 Saisics Sweden 2009 Producer Saisics Sweden, Balance of Paymens and
More informationA Note on Missing Data Effects on the Hausman (1978) Simultaneity Test:
A Noe on Missing Daa Effecs on he Hausman (978) Simulaneiy Tes: Some Mone Carlo Resuls. Dikaios Tserkezos and Konsaninos P. Tsagarakis Deparmen of Economics, Universiy of Cree, Universiy Campus, 7400,
More informationThe Rodney L. White Center for Financial Research. The Book-to-Price Effect in Stock Returns: Accounting for Leverage
The Rodney L. Whie Cener for Financial Research The Book-o-rice Effec in Sock Reurns: Accouning for Leverage Sephen H. enman Sco A. Richardson Irem Tuna 05-05 The Book-o-rice Effec in Sock Reurns: Accouning
More informationANSWER ALL QUESTIONS. CHAPTERS 6-9; (Blanchard)
ANSWER ALL QUESTIONS CHAPTERS 6-9; 18-20 (Blanchard) Quesion 1 Discuss in deail he following: a) The sacrifice raio b) Okun s law c) The neuraliy of money d) Bargaining power e) NAIRU f) Wage indexaion
More informationReconciling Gross Output TFP Growth with Value Added TFP Growth
Reconciling Gross Oupu TP Growh wih Value Added TP Growh Erwin Diewer Universiy of Briish Columbia and Universiy of New Souh Wales ABSTRACT This aricle obains relaively simple exac expressions ha relae
More informationUnderstanding the Cash Flow-Fundamental Ratio
Inernaional Journal of Economics and Financial Issues Vol. 5, No., 05, pp.48-57 ISSN: 46-438 www.econjournals.com Undersanding he Cash Flow-Fundamenal Raio Chyi-Lun Chiou Deparmen of Business Adminisraion,
More informationCHAPTER 3 How to Calculate Present Values. Answers to Practice Questions
CHAPTER 3 How o Calculae Presen Values Answers o Pracice Quesions. a. PV $00/.0 0 $90.53 b. PV $00/.3 0 $9.46 c. PV $00/.5 5 $ 3.5 d. PV $00/. + $00/. + $00/. 3 $40.8. a. DF + r 0.905 r 0.050 0.50% b.
More informationReturn-Volume Dynamics of Individual Stocks: Evidence from an Emerging Market
Reurn-Volume Dynamics of Individual Socks: Evidence from an Emerging Marke Cein Ciner College of Business Adminisraion Norheasern Universiy 413 Hayden Hall Boson, MA 02214 Tel: 617-373 4775 E-mail: c.ciner@neu.edu
More informationInternet Appendix for The dark side of analyst coverage: The case of innovation
Inerne Appendix for The dark side of analys coverage: The case of innovaion This inerne appendix provides robusness ess and supplemenal analyses o he main resuls presened in The Dark Side of Analys Coverage:
More informationIdiosyncratic Volatility and Cross-section of Stock Returns: Evidences from India
Asian Journal of Finance & Accouning Idiosyncraic Volailiy and Cross-secion of Sock Reurns: Evidences from India Prashan Sharma Assisan Professor and Area Chair (Finance and Accouns) Jaipuria Insiue of
More informationCh. 10 Measuring FX Exposure. Is Exchange Rate Risk Relevant? MNCs Take on FX Risk
Ch. 10 Measuring FX Exposure Topics Exchange Rae Risk: Relevan? Types of Exposure Transacion Exposure Economic Exposure Translaion Exposure Is Exchange Rae Risk Relevan?? Purchasing Power Pariy: Exchange
More informationINSTITUTE OF ACTUARIES OF INDIA
INSIUE OF ACUARIES OF INDIA EAMINAIONS 23 rd May 2011 Subjec S6 Finance and Invesmen B ime allowed: hree hours (9.45* 13.00 Hrs) oal Marks: 100 INSRUCIONS O HE CANDIDAES 1. Please read he insrucions on
More informationFundamental Basic. Fundamentals. Fundamental PV Principle. Time Value of Money. Fundamental. Chapter 2. How to Calculate Present Values
McGraw-Hill/Irwin Chaper 2 How o Calculae Presen Values Principles of Corporae Finance Tenh Ediion Slides by Mahew Will And Bo Sjö 22 Copyrigh 2 by he McGraw-Hill Companies, Inc. All righs reserved. Fundamenal
More informationEssays on Stock Market Liquidity and Liquidity Risk Premium
Universiy of New Orleans ScholarWorks@UNO Universiy of New Orleans Theses and Disseraions Disseraions and Theses 5-14-2010 Essays on Sock Marke Liquidiy and Liquidiy Risk Premium Shu Tian Universiy of
More informationMacroeconomics. Part 3 Macroeconomics of Financial Markets. Lecture 8 Investment: basic concepts
Macroeconomics Par 3 Macroeconomics of Financial Markes Lecure 8 Invesmen: basic conceps Moivaion General equilibrium Ramsey and OLG models have very simple assumpions ha invesmen ino producion capial
More informationPredictive Ability of Three Different Estimates of Cay to Excess Stock Returns A Comparative Study for South Africa and USA
European Research Sudies, Volume XVII, Issue (1), 2014 pp. 3-18 Predicive Abiliy of Three Differen Esimaes of Cay o Excess Sock Reurns A Comparaive Sudy for Souh Africa and USA Noha Emara 1 Absrac: The
More informationPrinciples of Finance CONTENTS
Principles of Finance CONENS Value of Bonds and Equiy... 3 Feaures of bonds... 3 Characerisics... 3 Socks and he sock marke... 4 Definiions:... 4 Valuing equiies... 4 Ne reurn... 4 idend discoun model...
More informationHedge Funds and Earnings Momentum
Inernaional Journal of Economics and Finance; Vol. 9, No. 10; 2017 ISSN 1916-971X E-ISSN 1916-9728 Published by Canadian Cener of Science and Educaion Hedge Funds and Earnings Momenum Daniel T. Lawson
More informationSingle Stock Futures Trading and Stock Price Volatility: Empirical Analysis
The Pakisan Developmen Review 48 : 4 Par II (Winer 2009) pp. 553 563 Single Sock Fuures Trading and Sock Price Volailiy: Empirical Analysis SAFI ULLAH KHAN and SYED TAHIR HIJAZI * 1. INTRODUCTION A large
More informationJonathan W. Lewellen. Submitted in Partial Fulfillment. of the. Requirements for the Degree. Doctor of Philosophy. Supervised by Professor Jay Shanken
On he Predicabiliy of Sock Reurns: Theory and Evidence by Jonahan W. Lewellen Submied in Parial Fulfillmen of he Requiremens for he Degree Docor of Philosophy Supervised by Professor Jay Shanken William
More informationChapter Outline CHAPTER
8-0 8-1 Chaper Ouline CHAPTER 8 Sraegy and Analysis in Using Ne Presen Value 8.1 Decision Trees 8.2 Sensiiviy Analysis, Scenario Analysis, and Break-Even Analysis 8.3 Mone Carlo Simulaion 8. Opions 8.5
More informationAsymmetry and Leverage in Stochastic Volatility Models: An Exposition
Asymmery and Leverage in Sochasic Volailiy Models: An xposiion Asai, M. a and M. McAleer b a Faculy of conomics, Soka Universiy, Japan b School of conomics and Commerce, Universiy of Wesern Ausralia Keywords:
More informationThe relation between U.S. money growth and inflation: evidence from a band pass filter. Abstract
The relaion beween U.S. money growh and inflaion: evidence from a band pass filer Gary Shelley Dep. of Economics Finance; Eas Tennessee Sae Universiy Frederick Wallace Dep. of Managemen Markeing; Prairie
More informationAsian Journal of Empirical Research
Asian Journal of Empirical Research journal homepage: hp://aessweb.com/journal-deail.php?id=5004 ASSOCIATION BETWEEN ASIAN EQUITY MARKETS AND WESTERN MARKETS: EVIDENCE FROM THE INDEXES OF EQUITY MARKETS
More informationUnemployment and Phillips curve
Unemploymen and Phillips curve 2 of The Naural Rae of Unemploymen and he Phillips Curve Figure 1 Inflaion versus Unemploymen in he Unied Saes, 1900 o 1960 During he period 1900 o 1960 in he Unied Saes,
More informationDo Changes in Pension Incentives Affect Retirement? A Longitudinal Study of Subjective Retirement Expectations
Do Changes in Pension Incenives Affec Reiremen? A Longiudinal Sudy of Subjecive Reiremen Expecaions February 2001 Sewin Chan Rober F. Wagner School of Public Service New York Universiy sewin.chan@nyu.edu
More informationProblem 1 / 25 Problem 2 / 25 Problem 3 / 11 Problem 4 / 15 Problem 5 / 24 TOTAL / 100
Deparmen of Economics Universiy of Maryland Economics 35 Inermediae Macroeconomic Analysis Miderm Exam Suggesed Soluions Professor Sanjay Chugh Fall 008 NAME: The Exam has a oal of five (5) problems and
More informationA NOTE ON BUSINESS CYCLE NON-LINEARITY IN U.S. CONSUMPTION 247
Journal of Applied Economics, Vol. VI, No. 2 (Nov 2003), 247-253 A NOTE ON BUSINESS CYCLE NON-LINEARITY IN U.S. CONSUMPTION 247 A NOTE ON BUSINESS CYCLE NON-LINEARITY IN U.S. CONSUMPTION STEVEN COOK *
More informationRajiv Banker a,* Sudipta Basu a Dmitri Byzalov a Janice Y.S. Chen a
Direcion of Sales Change and Asymmeric Timeliness of Earnings Rajiv Banker a,* Sudipa Basu a Dmiri Byzalov a Janice Y.S. Chen a a Fox School of Business, Temple Universiy, Aler Hall, Philadelphia, PA 19122,
More informationSTATIONERY REQUIREMENTS SPECIAL REQUIREMENTS 20 Page booklet List of statistical formulae New Cambridge Elementary Statistical Tables
ECONOMICS RIPOS Par I Friday 7 June 005 9 Paper Quaniaive Mehods in Economics his exam comprises four secions. Secions A and B are on Mahemaics; Secions C and D are on Saisics. You should do he appropriae
More informationINSTITUTE OF ACTUARIES OF INDIA
INSTITUTE OF ACTUARIES OF INDIA EXAMINATIONS 05 h November 007 Subjec CT8 Financial Economics Time allowed: Three Hours (14.30 17.30 Hrs) Toal Marks: 100 INSTRUCTIONS TO THE CANDIDATES 1) Do no wrie your
More informationOn the Intraday Relation between the VIX and its Futures
On he Inraday Relaion beween he VIX and is Fuures Bar Frijns a, *, Alireza Tourani-Rad a and Rober I. Webb b a Deparmen of Finance, Auckland Universiy of Technology, Auckland, New Zealand b Universiy of
More informationa. If Y is 1,000, M is 100, and the growth rate of nominal money is 1 percent, what must i and P be?
Problem Se 4 ECN 101 Inermediae Macroeconomics SOLUTIONS Numerical Quesions 1. Assume ha he demand for real money balance (M/P) is M/P = 0.6-100i, where is naional income and i is he nominal ineres rae.
More informationCHAPTER CHAPTER26. Fiscal Policy: A Summing Up. Prepared by: Fernando Quijano and Yvonn Quijano
Fiscal Policy: A Summing Up Prepared by: Fernando Quijano and vonn Quijano CHAPTER CHAPTER26 2006 Prenice Hall usiness Publishing Macroeconomics, 4/e Olivier lanchard Chaper 26: Fiscal Policy: A Summing
More informationComparison of back-testing results for various VaR estimation methods. Aleš Kresta, ICSP 2013, Bergamo 8 th July, 2013
Comparison of back-esing resuls for various VaR esimaion mehods, ICSP 3, Bergamo 8 h July, 3 THE MOTIVATION AND GOAL In order o esimae he risk of financial invesmens, i is crucial for all he models o esimae
More informationExam 1. Econ520. Spring 2017
Exam 1. Econ520. Spring 2017 Professor Luz Hendricks UNC Insrucions: Answer all quesions. Clearly number your answers. Wrie legibly. Do no wrie your answers on he quesion shees. Explain your answers do
More informationDoes default probability matter in Latin American Emerging markets?
Does defaul probabiliy maer in Lain American Emerging markes? Isabel Abinzano, Luis Muga and Rafael Sanamaría January, 2013 Absrac: We analyse he impac of defaul probabiliy in four leading Lain American
More informationTrends in Earnings Volatility, Earnings Quality and Idiosyncratic Return. Volatility: Managerial Opportunism or Economic Activity
Trends in Earnings Volailiy, Earnings Qualiy and Idiosyncraic Reurn Volailiy: Managerial Opporunism or Economic Aciviy Absrac This paper examines he causes for he increasing earnings volailiy and he deerioraing
More informationHuman Capital, Capital Structure, and Employee Pay: An Empirical Analysis
Human Capial, Capial Srucure, and Employee Pay: An Empirical Analysis Thomas J. Chemmanur a, * Yingmei Cheng b Tianming Zhang c a Boson College, Carroll School of Managemen, USA b The Florida Sae Universiy,
More informationForecasting Cross-Section Stock Returns using The Present Value Model. April 2007
Forecasing Cross-Secion Sock Reurns using The Presen Value Model George Bulkley 1 and Richard W. P. Hol 2 April 2007 ABSTRACT We conribue o he debae over wheher forecasable sock reurns reflec an unexploied
More informationDoes Gold Love Bad News? Hedging and Safe Haven of Gold against Stocks and Bonds
Does Gold Love Bad News? Hedging and Safe Haven of Gold agains Socks and Bonds Samar Ashour* Universiy of Texas a Arlingon samar.ashour@mavs.ua.edu (682) 521-7675 January 23 2015 *Corresponding auhor:
More informationThis specification describes the models that are used to forecast
PCE and CPI Inflaion Differenials: Convering Inflaion Forecass Model Specificaion By Craig S. Hakkio This specificaion describes he models ha are used o forecas he inflaion differenial. The 14 forecass
More informationDEBT INSTRUMENTS AND MARKETS
DEBT INSTRUMENTS AND MARKETS Zeroes and Coupon Bonds Zeroes and Coupon Bonds Ouline and Suggesed Reading Ouline Zero-coupon bonds Coupon bonds Bond replicaion No-arbirage price relaionships Zero raes Buzzwords
More informationECONOMIC GROWTH. Student Assessment. Macroeconomics II. Class 1
Suden Assessmen You will be graded on he basis of In-class aciviies (quizzes worh 30 poins) which can be replaced wih he number of marks from he regular uorial IF i is >=30 (capped a 30, i.e. marks from
More informationMarket timing and capital structure: Evidence from a decomposition of the market-to-book ratio. Salma Kasbi 1. Université Paris-Dauphine, DRM-CEREG
Marke iming and capial srucure: Evidence from a decomposiion of he marke-o-book raio Salma Kasbi 1 Universié Paris-Dauphine, DRM-CEREG This sudy examines he impac of marke iming on capial srucure. Using
More informationYou should turn in (at least) FOUR bluebooks, one (or more, if needed) bluebook(s) for each question.
UCLA Deparmen of Economics Spring 05 PhD. Qualifying Exam in Macroeconomic Theory Insrucions: This exam consiss of hree pars, and each par is worh 0 poins. Pars and have one quesion each, and Par 3 has
More informationFinancial Econometrics Jeffrey R. Russell Midterm Winter 2011
Name Financial Economerics Jeffrey R. Russell Miderm Winer 2011 You have 2 hours o complee he exam. Use can use a calculaor. Try o fi all your work in he space provided. If you find you need more space
More informationAre Accounting Standards Diversifiable? Evidence of the Aggregate Valuation Effects of Standards ΓF
Are Accouning Sandards Diversifiable? Evidence of he Aggregae Valuaion Effecs of Sandards ΓF Bjorn N. Jorgensen, Jing Li, Gil Sadka April 3, 2009 Absrac Prior research documens ha individual sock reurns
More informationMarket Timing Behavior of the Secondary Equity Offerings of REITs
Marke Timing Behavior of he Secondary Equiy Offerings of REITs Ying Li Naional Universiy of Singapore Deparmen of Real Esae 4 Archiecure Drive, Singapore 117566 Tel: (65) 9695 5816 ying@nus.edu.sg Seow
More informationPRESS RELEASE EURO AREA ECONOMIC AND FINANCIAL DEVELOPMENTS BY INSTITUTIONAL SECTOR - FIRST QUARTER August 2012
1 Augus 212 PRESS RELEASE EURO AREA ECONOMIC AND FINANCIAL DEVELOPMENTS BY INSTITUTIONAL SECTOR - FIRST QUARTER 212 In he firs quarer of 212, he annual growh rae 1 of households gross disposable income
More informationAn Innovative Thinking on the Concepts of Ex-Ante Value, Ex-Post Value and the Realized Value (Price)
RISUS - Journal on Innovaion and Susainabiliy Volume 6, número 1 2015 ISSN: 2179-3565 Edior Cienífico: Arnoldo José de Hoyos Guevara Ediora Assisene: Leícia Sueli de Almeida Avaliação: Melhores práicas
More informationInventory Investment. Investment Decision and Expected Profit. Lecture 5
Invenory Invesmen. Invesmen Decision and Expeced Profi Lecure 5 Invenory Accumulaion 1. Invenory socks 1) Changes in invenory holdings represen an imporan and highly volaile ype of invesmen spending. 2)
More informationThe Study and Test Dividend Policy Based on Models Ohlson: Case Iran Market
The Sudy and Tes Dividend Policy ased on Models Ohlson: Case Iran Marke Jalil Rahimi Shiraz Municipaliy ICT Organizaion Absrac This sudy invesigaes he effecs of dividend policy on marke value. empirically
More informationFinancial Econometrics (FinMetrics02) Returns, Yields, Compounding, and Horizon
Financial Economerics FinMerics02) Reurns, Yields, Compounding, and Horizon Nelson Mark Universiy of Nore Dame Fall 2017 Augus 30, 2017 1 Conceps o cover Yields o mauriy) Holding period) reurns Compounding
More informationOutput: The Demand for Goods and Services
IN CHAPTER 15 how o incorporae dynamics ino he AD-AS model we previously sudied how o use he dynamic AD-AS model o illusrae long-run economic growh how o use he dynamic AD-AS model o race ou he effecs
More informationLi Gan Guan Gong Michael Hurd. April, 2006
Ne Inergeneraional Transfers from an Increase in Social Securiy Benefis Li Gan Guan Gong Michael Hurd April, 2006 ABSTRACT When he age of deah is uncerain, individuals will leave bequess even if hey have
More informationInternational Review of Business Research Papers Vol. 4 No.3 June 2008 Pp Understanding Cross-Sectional Stock Returns: What Really Matters?
Inernaional Review of Business Research Papers Vol. 4 No.3 June 2008 Pp.256-268 Undersanding Cross-Secional Sock Reurns: Wha Really Maers? Yong Wang We run a horse race among eigh proposed facors and eigh
More informationAssessing Earnings and Accruals Quality: U.S. and International Evidence
ssessing Earnings and ccruals Qualiy: U.S. and Inernaional Evidence Peer D. Wysocki * MIT Sloan School of Managemen E5-5 50 Memorial Drive ambridge M 0 US wysockip@mi.edu This version: January 009 bsrac
More informationMarket and Information Economics
Marke and Informaion Economics Preliminary Examinaion Deparmen of Agriculural Economics Texas A&M Universiy May 2015 Insrucions: This examinaion consiss of six quesions. You mus answer he firs quesion
More informationMODELLING THE US SWAP SPREAD
MODEING THE US SWAP SPREAD Hon-un Chung, School of Accouning and Finance, The Hong Kong Polyechnic Universiy, Email: afalan@ine.polyu.edu.hk Wai-Sum Chan, Deparmen of Finance, The Chinese Universiy of
More information