Case: 1:14-cv Document #: 101 Filed: 10/31/14 Page 1 of 19 PageID #:905
|
|
- Ronald Fleming
- 5 years ago
- Views:
Transcription
1 Case: 1:14-cv Document #: 101 Filed: 10/31/14 Page 1 of 19 PageID #:905 IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE NORTHERN DISTRICT OF ILLINOIS UNITED STATES SECURITIES AND EXCHANGE COMMISSION, v. Plaintiff, ROBERT G. PEARSON and ILLINOIS STOCK TRANSFER COMPANY (d/b/a IST SHAREHOLDER SERVICES), Case No. 14 C 3785 Hon. Rebecca R. Pallmeyer Magistrate Judge Young B. Kim Defendants. LIQUIDATION PLAN Jill L. Nicholson, not individually, but solely in her capacity as the court-appointed receiver for the estates of Illinois Stock Transfer Company d/b/a ist Shareholder Services and Robert G. Pearson hereby submits this liquidation plan as more fully described below. TABLE OF CONTENTS BACKGROUND...2 ARTICLE 1 - DEFINITIONS...3 ARTICLE 2 - TREATMENT OF CLAIMS...7 ARTICLE 3 - IMPLEMENTATION OF DISTRIBUTIONS...11 ARTICLE 4 - RELEASES...12 ARTICLE 5 - RECOVERIES BY THE RECEIVER...15 ARTICLE 6 - TERMINATION OF AGREEMENTS...17 ARTICLE 7 - RETENTION OF JURISDICTION
2 Case: 1:14-cv Document #: 101 Filed: 10/31/14 Page 2 of 19 PageID #:906 BACKGROUND This action was initiated by the Securities and Exchange Commission on May 22, That same day, the Court entered its Order Appointing Receiver, which named Jill L. Nicholson as the Receiver 1 for the Receivership Defendants. Pursuant to the Receiver Order, the Receiver is authorized, empowered and directed to develop a plan for the fair, reasonable, and efficient recovery and liquidation of all remaining, recovered, and recoverable Assets. (Receiver Order at 52.) The Receiver Order provides that [w]ithin ninety (90) days of the entry of this Order, the Receiver shall file the [Distribution] Plan..., with service copies to counsel of record; provided, however, that such 90-day period may be extended by further order of this Court. (Receiver Order at 53.) On August 4, 2014, the Court entered an order extending the time for the Receiver to file the Plan through and including October 31, See Docket No. 66. This Plan, upon approval by the Court, will establish the respective rights and obligations of various constituencies and will establish the order and priority of Distributions of Receivership Property to those who are determined to hold Allowed Claims. Further information about this case and the terms of this Plan is contained in the Receiver s Second Quarterly Status Report for the Period July 1, 2014 through September 30, 2014 (the Second Quarterly Report ). See Docket No The Receiver will provide a 21-day comment period (the Comment Period ) regarding the Plan to all entities and individuals who have filed Timely Claims. Anyone with a Timely Claim who wishes to comment on the Plan may provide comments directly to the Receiver by 1 Capitalized terms not otherwise defined herein shall have the meanings ascribed to them in Section To the extent there may be differences between the summary contained in the Second Quarterly Report and this Plan or any subsequently filed plan, the terms of any plan approved by the Court shall govern. -2-
3 Case: 1:14-cv Document #: 101 Filed: 10/31/14 Page 3 of 19 PageID #:907 submitting such comments in writing to istreceiver@foley.com. The Plan will be posted on the Receiver s website with information specifying that comments may be tendered to the Receiver s address. Upon the close of the Comment Period, the Receiver will consider the comments she has received from those with Timely Claims and will then either: (a) ask the Court to approve the Plan in its current form or (b) tender an amended plan for approval by the Court. The Comment Period is a courtesy to those with Timely Claims and is a vehicle for endeavoring to resolve any potential issues in advance of seeking the Court s final approval of the Plan. ARTICLE 1 - DEFINITIONS Section 1.01: All terms not defined in Section 1.02 but defined in this Plan shall have the meaning and/or meanings ascribed to them herein. Section 1.02: The following terms shall have the following meanings when used in their capitalized forms herein. Such meanings are equally applicable to both the singular and plural forms of the terms. Administrative Claim. Administrative Claim shall mean an Allowed Claim arising from the fees, costs, and/or expenses incurred by the Receiver on or after the Receivership Date in connection with preserving, enhancing, and/or administering the Receivership Estates including, but not limited to, professional fees, other fees, costs, wages, salaries, commissions, expenses, taxes, and/or all such other amounts. Administrative Reserve Cash. Administrative Reserve Cash shall mean cash in an amount determined by the Receiver to satisfy Administrative Claims that arise before, on, or after entry of the Approval Order. Allowed Claim. Allowed Claim shall mean either: (a) a Claim allowed by the Court pursuant to an order entered in the Receivership Case or (b) a Claim incurred by the Receiver in the ordinary course of business on or after the Receivership Date. Approval Order. Approval Order shall mean the order entered by the Court approving the Plan. Claim. Claim shall mean any right to or demand for payment whether or not such right is reduced to judgment, liquidated, unliquidated, contingent, matured, unmatured, disputed, undisputed, legal, equitable, secured, or unsecured. -3-
4 Case: 1:14-cv Document #: 101 Filed: 10/31/14 Page 4 of 19 PageID #:908 Claims Agent. Claims Agent shall mean KCC Class Action Services, LLC. Claims Bar Date. Claims Bar Date shall mean September 30, 2014 at 5:00 p.m. (CST). Claimant. Claimant shall mean any person or entity (including, without limitation, individuals, partnerships, corporations, joint ventures, estates, trusts, and governmental units) that holds an Allowed Claim. Claim Determination. Claim Determination shall mean the notice provided to the holder of a Timely Claim setting forth the Receiver s determination with respect to such Timely Claim and whether the Claim is categorized as an Allowed Claim, Disallowed Claim, or partially Allowed Claim. Company. Company shall mean Illinois Stock Transfer Company, d/b/a ist Shareholder Services. Company Estate. Company Estate shall mean the estate created by the Court as of the Receivership Date regarding the Company. Company Receivership Property. Company Receivership Property shall mean cash held by the Qualified Settlement Fund, after the payment of Administrative Claims and excluding Administrative Reserve Cash, under the sub-account designated for the Company Estate. Court. Court shall mean the United States District Court for the Northern District of Illinois. Customer. Customer shall mean an Issuer, Shareholder, or Paying Agent that is determined by the Receiver to hold an Allowed Claim against the Company under Estate 1 Class I and includes a holder of: (a) an Allowed Claim based on the exchange or redemption of shares of stock through the Company that was never completed by the Company; (b) an Allowed Claim based on cash tendered to the Company pursuant to a dividend reinvestment program that was never completed by the Company; (c) an Allowed Claim based on cash deposited with the Company to acquire shares that were never delivered by the Company; (d) an Allowed Claim based on cash tendered to the Company for dividends that were never delivered to a shareholder by the Company; (e) an Allowed Claim based on cash deposited with the Company from the sale of stock in a dividend reinvestment program that was never delivered by the Company; and (f) an Allowed Claim based on cash tendered to the Company by a Paying Agent that was never delivered to the persons identified by the Paying Agent. Disallowed Claim. Disallowed Claim shall mean: (a) a Claim disallowed by the Court pursuant to an order entered in the Receivership Case; (b) an Untimely Claim; (c) a Claim for which no Proof of Claim was filed with the Claims Agent; (d) a Claim pursuant to which the holder of such Claim has received a Claim Determination disallowing or partially disallowing such Claim and in which the Claimant has failed to submit a written Objection to such Claim Determination to the Receiver on or before the Objection Deadline; (e) a Claim of an Insider; (f) a Claim of any Issuer who has failed to pay in full all Issuer AR; (g) a Claim relating to taxes or -4-
5 Case: 1:14-cv Document #: 101 Filed: 10/31/14 Page 5 of 19 PageID #:909 tax penalties of any nature incurred by the Company prior to the Receivership Date; and/or (h) a Claim related to escheatment. Disputed Claim. Disputed Claim shall mean a Claim to which the Receiver has issued a Claim Determination indicating that such Claim is either disallowed or partially disallowed. Distribution. Distribution shall mean payment of any kind or nature from either the Company Receivership Property or the Pearson Receivership Property as set forth in the order and priority created under the Plan. Employee. Employee shall mean a person that is determined by the Receiver to hold an Allowed Claim against the Company under Estate 1 Class III and includes persons who were employees of the Company before, on, or after the Receivership Date. An Employee shall not include any Insiders of the Company. Employee Carve Out. Employee Carve Out shall mean the sum of five thousand dollars ($5,000.00), which shall be carved out from the Company Receivership Property for payment to Employees with Allowed Claims. Estate 1. Estate 1 shall mean the Company Estate. Estate 2. Estate 2 shall mean the Pearson Estate. General Company Claimant. General Company Claimant shall mean a person that is determined by the Receiver to hold an Allowed Claim against the Company under Estate 1 Class IV and excludes Claims by Customers, Vendors, Employees, and Insiders. Insider. Insider shall mean Pearson, immediate family members of Pearson, and/or businesses or other persons or entities in which Pearson had an interest as of the Receivership Date. Issuer. Issuer shall mean an entity which was an issuer of stock on or before the Receivership Date. Issuer AR. Issuer AR shall mean any and all amounts due and owing by an Issuer to the Company. Issuer AR Deadline. Issuer AR Deadline shall mean twenty (20) calendar days after the Claim Determination is mailed by the Receiver. Magnum. company. Magnum shall mean Magnum Holdings, LLC, an Illinois limited liability Objection. Objection shall mean the written objection submitted on or before the Objection Deadline by a holder of a Claim who has received a Claim Determination disallowing or partially disallowing the holder s Claim. Such Objection must be submitted in writing to the following address: Illinois Stock Transfer Company & Robert G. Pearson Receivership, P.O. Box 10352, Chicago, IL
6 Case: 1:14-cv Document #: 101 Filed: 10/31/14 Page 6 of 19 PageID #:910 Objection Deadline. Objection Deadline shall mean twenty (20) calendar days after the Claim Determination is mailed by the Receiver. Paying Agent. Paying Agent shall mean an entity that tendered funds to the Company for payment to third parties on or before the Receivership Date. Pearson. Pearson shall mean Robert G. Pearson. Pearson Carve Out. Pearson Carve Out shall mean the sum of five thousand dollars ($5,000.00), which shall be carved out from the Pearson Receivership Property for payment to Pearson General Creditors with Allowed Claims. Pearson Estate. The Pearson Estate shall mean the estate created by the Court as of the Receivership Date regarding Pearson. Pearson General Creditor. Pearson General Creditor shall mean a person that is determined by the Receiver to hold an Allowed Claim against Pearson under Estate 2 Class VI. Pearson Receivership Property. Pearson Receivership Property shall mean cash held by the Qualified Settlement Fund after the Payment of Administrative Claims and excluding Administrative Reserve Cash, under the sub-account designated for the Pearson Estate. Plan. supplemented. Plan shall mean this liquidation plan, as it may be amended, modified, or Proof of Claim. Proof of Claim shall mean the form required to be submitted to the Claims Agent on or before the Claims Bar Date. Pro Rata Share. Pro Rata Share shall mean a proportionate share such that the ratio of the consideration distributed on account of an Allowed Claim to the amount of such Allowed Claim is the same as the ratio of the consideration distributed on account of all Allowed Claims to the amount of all Allowed Claims in a particular class of Claims. Qualified Settlement Fund. Qualified Settlement Fund shall mean the qualified settlement fund held at the Bank of Montreal. Receiver. Receiver shall mean Jill L. Nicholson, not individually, but solely in her capacity as the court-appointed receiver for the Receivership Estates of the Company and Pearson. Receivership Case. Receivership Case shall mean that certain case pending in the Court, known as United States Securities and Exchange Commission v. Robert G. Pearson and Illinois Stock Transfer Company (d/b/a IST Shareholder Services), United States District Court, Northern District of Illinois, Case No. 14 C Receivership Date. Receivership Date shall mean May 22,
7 Case: 1:14-cv Document #: 101 Filed: 10/31/14 Page 7 of 19 PageID #:911 Receivership Defendants. Pearson. Receivership Defendants shall mean the Company and Receivership Estates. Pearson Estate. Receivership Estates shall mean the Company Estate and the Receivership Order. Receivership Order shall mean the order entered by the Court on May 22, 2014 appointing the Receiver. Receivership Property. Receivership Property shall mean, collectively, all Company Receivership Property and all Pearson Receivership Property. SEC. SEC shall mean the United States Securities and Exchange Commission. SEC Billing Instructions. SEC Billing Instructions shall mean the Billing Instructions for Receivers in Civil Actions Commenced by the U.S. Securities and Exchange Commission. Shareholder. Shareholder shall mean a person who was a shareholder of an Issuer on or before the Receivership Date. Timely Claim. Timely Claim shall mean a Claim that was received by the Claims Agent on or before the Claims Bar Date. Untimely Claim. Untimely Claim shall mean a Claim that was received by the Claims Agent after the Claims Bar Date. Vendor. Vendor shall mean a person that is determined by the Receiver to hold an Allowed Claim against Estate 1 Class II and includes persons who provided goods and services to the Company on or before the Receivership Date and have not received payment for such goods and services as specified in such persons contracts with the Company. Vendor Carve Out. Vendor Carve Out shall mean the sum of twenty-five thousand dollars ($25,000.00), which shall be carved out from the Company Estate, for payment to Vendors with Allowed Claims. Wheaton Real Estate. Wheaton Real Estate shall mean the real estate and fixtures appurtenant thereto located at 433 South Carlton, Wheaton, Illinois. Winfield Real Estate. Winfield Real Estate shall mean the real estate and fixtures appurtenant thereto located at 26W309 Thorngate Lane, Winfield, Illinois. ARTICLE 2 - TREATMENT OF CLAIMS Section 2.01: Administrative Claims. Administrative Claims shall have priority over all classes of Claims in both Estate 1 and Estate 2. Administrative Claims shall be entitled to payment in full from the Receivership Property. Administrative Claims, not including fees and -7-
8 Case: 1:14-cv Document #: 101 Filed: 10/31/14 Page 8 of 19 PageID #:912 costs of the Receiver and her professionals, that represent liabilities incurred in the ordinary course of administration of the Receivership Estates shall be paid by the Receiver in the ordinary course and without further approval of the Court. Upon entry of the Approval Order, the Receiver may set aside Administrative Reserve Cash, in an amount to be determined by the Receiver in her sole discretion, to satisfy Administrative Claims arising before, on, and after the Approval Order. In the event that any Administrative Reserve Cash is not used to satisfy Administrative Claims, the Receiver, in her sole discretion, may distribute such Administrative Reserve Cash in accordance with the terms of this Plan. Section 2.02: Untimely Claims. All Untimely Claims are Disallowed Claims. Untimely Claims shall not be entitled to any Distribution from either of the Receivership Estates. Section 2.03: Classes of Claims Against Estate 1 the Company. The Receiver is hereby authorized to pay Allowed Claims against Estate 1 from Company Receivership Property to the following classes of Allowed Claims: Class I: Class II: Class III: Class IV: Allowed Claims of Customers Allowed Claims of Vendors Allowed Claims of Employees Allowed Claims of General Company Claimants Section 2.04: Treatment of Allowed Claims against Estate 1. The Receiver is authorized to treat Allowed Claims with respect to Estate 1 in the following manner: (A) Treatment of Allowed Claims in Class I. With the exception of the Vendor Carve Out and the Employee Carve Out, Customers with Allowed Claims shall receive a Pro Rata Share of the Company Receivership Property in one or more Distributions until such Allowed Claims are paid in full; provided that, to the extent there is insufficient Company -8-
9 Case: 1:14-cv Document #: 101 Filed: 10/31/14 Page 9 of 19 PageID #:913 Receivership Property to pay Customers with Allowed Claims, such Allowed Claims will not be paid in full. (B) Treatment of Allowed Claims in Class II. Vendors with Allowed Claims shall receiver a Pro Rata Share of the Vendor Carve Out. In the event Customers with Allowed Claims are paid in full, Vendors with Allowed Claims shall receive a Pro Rata Share of the remaining Company Receivership Property in one or more Distributions until such Allowed Claims are paid in full; provided that, to the extent there is insufficient remaining Company Receivership Property to pay Vendors with Allowed Claims, such Allowed Claims will not be paid in full. Under no circumstances shall Vendors with Allowed Claims receive more than their Pro Rata Share of the Vendor Carve Out unless and until Customers with Allowed Claims are paid in full. (C) Treatment of Allowed Claims in Class III. Employees with Allowed Claims shall receiver a Pro Rata Share of the Employee Carve Out. In the event Customers and Vendors with Allowed Claims receive payment in full, Employees with Allowed Claims shall receive a Pro Rata Share of the Company Receivership Property until such Allowed Claims are paid in full; provided that, to the extent there is insufficient remaining Company Receivership Property to pay Employees with Allowed Claims, such Allowed Claims will not be paid in full. Under no circumstances shall Employees with Allowed Claims receive more than their Pro Rata Share of the Employee Carve Out unless and until Customers and Vendors with Allowed Claims are paid in full. (D) Treatment of Allowed Claims in Class IV. General Company Claimants with Allowed Claims may not receive any Distributions under the Plan unless and until Customers, Vendors, and Employees with Allowed Claims receive payment in full. In the event -9-
10 Case: 1:14-cv Document #: 101 Filed: 10/31/14 Page 10 of 19 PageID #:914 Customers, Vendors, and Employees with Allowed Claims receive payment in full, General Company Claimants with Allowed Claims shall receive a Pro Rata Share of the Company Receivership Property until such Allowed Claims are paid in full; provided that, to the extent there is insufficient remaining Company Receivership Property to pay General Company Claimants with Allowed Claims, such Allowed Claims will not be paid in full. Section 2.05: Classes of Claims Against Estate 2 Pearson. The Receiver is hereby authorized to pay Allowed Claims against Estate 2 from the Pearson Receivership Property to the following classes of Allowed Claims: Class V: Allowed Claims of Pearson General Creditors Section 2.06: Treatment of Allowed Claims against Estate 2. The Receiver is authorized to treat Allowed Claims with respect to Estate 2 in the following manner: (A) Treatment of Allowed Claims in Class V. Pearson General Creditors with Allowed Claims shall receiver a Pro Rata Share of the Pearson Carve Out. Section 2.07: Excess Pearson Receivership Property. In the event Pearson Receivership Property exists after the payment of the Pearson Carve Out, such remaining property shall be distributed to those with Allowed Claims against Estate 1 in the order and priority as set forth under this Plan. Section 2.08: Treatment of Claims of Insiders. Insiders shall not receive any Distributions under the Plan from either the Company Receivership Property and/or the Pearson Receivership Property. Section 2.09: Disallowed Claims. Disallowed Claims shall not receive any Distributions under the Plan from Receivership Property. Disallowed Claims shall be fully and completely discharged, and no liability shall attach whatsoever with respect to Disallowed -10-
11 Case: 1:14-cv Document #: 101 Filed: 10/31/14 Page 11 of 19 PageID #:915 Claims against the Receivership Estates, Receivership Property, the Receiver, and the Receiver s attorneys, other professionals, agents, and any other representatives or employees. Section 2.10: Disallowed Claims and Issuer AR. All Issuers have previously received copies of invoices detailing their respective Issuer AR. An Issuer who receives a Claims Determination disallowing the Issuer s Claim as a result of the Issuer s failure to pay Issuer AR may pay to the Receiver the full amount of its Issuer AR by the Issuer AR Deadline. In the event the Issuer pays the Issuer AR on or before the Issuer AR Deadline, the Receiver will consider the substantive merits of the Issuer s Claim and issue a new Claim Determination. In the event the Issuer fails to pay its Issuer AR by the Issuer AR Deadline, all of the Issuer s Claims shall be treated as Disallowed Claims pursuant to Section 2.09 herein. The Receiver is authorized to settle and compromise Issuer AR without approval of the Court. ARTICLE 3 - IMPLEMENTATION OF DISTRIBUTIONS Section 3.01: Multi-Class Claims. The Receiver may classify a Claim into more than one class. The Receiver may divide a Claim and treat a part of the Claim as an Allowed Claim and treat the balance as either a Disallowed Claim or reserve determination with respect to the balance of the Claim. Section 3.02: Manner in Which Payment of Claims Shall Be Made. Claimants with Allowed Claims shall receive an initial Distribution from Receivership Property pursuant to the terms of this Plan as soon as practicable, in the sole discretion of the Receiver, after the Court has entered the Approval Order. All Distributions shall be made in cash in the form of a check in U.S. dollars. Distributions shall be directed to the name and address stated on the Proof of Claim submitted by a Claimant holding an Allowed Claim. The Receiver may make periodic -11-
12 Case: 1:14-cv Document #: 101 Filed: 10/31/14 Page 12 of 19 PageID #:916 Distributions to pay certain Allowed Claims in accordance with this Plan at such intervals as the Receiver, in her sole discretion, determines to be prudent. Section 3.03: Disputed Claims. Notwithstanding any provision otherwise in the Plan, no Distributions shall be made with respect to any Disputed Claim until all Disputed Claims held by the holder of such Disputed Claims have become Allowed Claims. The Receiver shall establish any necessary reserves to provide for payments of the Pro Rata Share under this Plan to holders of Disputed Claims that become Allowed Claims. Section 3.04: Unclaimed Distributions. Any Claimant who fails to claim any Distribution within one-hundred and eighty (180) days from any payment date shall forfeit all rights thereto. Section 3.05: Disposition of Remaining Receivership Property. Should the Receiver ultimately determine that there exists a surplus of Receivership Property in excess of all Allowed Claims which can be reasonably identified, the Receiver shall so notify the Court and the SEC, and the Receiver shall seek the Court s approval for final disposition of the remaining Receivership Property. ARTICLE 4 - RELEASES Section 4.01: General Release. In exchange for the rights, liabilities and obligations under this Plan, any and all claims, demands, rights, and causes of action of any nature whatsoever, whether arising at law or in equity, known or unknown, asserted or unasserted, for all damages (whether actual or punitive, known or unknown, latent or patent, foreseen or unforeseen, direct or indirect or consequential, matured or unmatured, and accrued or not accrued), and debts, and liabilities of whatever nature that are or could be asserted against the Company, the Receiver, her attorneys, other professionals, agents, and any other representatives -12-
13 Case: 1:14-cv Document #: 101 Filed: 10/31/14 Page 13 of 19 PageID #:917 or employees of the Receiver (collectively, the Released Claims ), are hereby discharged, released, extinguished, and satisfied. The Receiver shall be deemed to have provided reasonable and sufficient notice to all persons of the release contained herein. The Receiver shall have no liability for any action taken under or relating to this Plan or arising out of the processing of any Claim, including, but not limited to, any act or omission in connection with or arising out of the administration of Claims or this Plan or Receivership Property to be distributed hereby. In the event any Released Claim is made against the Receiver, her attorneys or other professionals, her agents, any other representatives or employees of the Receiver for such matters, whether or not willful misconduct is alleged, the Receiver shall be entitled to a defense by counsel of her choice, payable as any other Administrative Claim herein, and the provisions of the Receiver Order shall apply, in addition to the defenses available at law or in equity. Section 4.02: Release of Liability for Non-Escheated Funds. In addition to any releases provided in the Plan, to the extent that the Receivership Defendants or any Issuers failed to properly escheat funds to the relevant states or state agencies to which such funds, under applicable law, are or were required to be escheated, whether at the direction of such Issuers or otherwise, any and all claims, demands, rights, and causes of action of any nature whatsoever, whether arising at law or in equity, known or unknown, asserted or unasserted, for all damages (whether actual or punitive, known or unknown, latent or patent, foreseen or unforeseen, direct or indirect or consequential, matured or unmatured, and accrued or not accrued), and debts, and liabilities of whatever nature that are or could be asserted by any person against the Company, the Receiver, her attorneys and other professionals, her agents, and any other representatives or employees of the Receiver, are hereby discharged, released, extinguished, and satisfied. The Receiver shall be deemed to have provided reasonable and sufficient notice to all persons of the -13-
14 Case: 1:14-cv Document #: 101 Filed: 10/31/14 Page 14 of 19 PageID #:918 release contained herein. Customers, Issuers, governmental agencies or authorities, or any other person with an interest in funds that are or were required to be escheated, under applicable law, are hereby enjoined from collecting from the Receiver, her attorneys and other professionals, her agents, and any other representatives or employees of the Receiver, or any Receivership Property, amounts that may have been required to be escheated under applicable law. Section 4.03: Release of Liability Regarding Tax Liability. In addition to any releases provided in the Plan, to the extent that the Receivership Defendants failed to submit tax returns or failed to make tax payments relating to taxes incurred prior to the Receivership Date, any and all claims, demands, rights, and causes of action of any nature whatsoever, whether arising at law or in equity, known or unknown, asserted or unasserted, for all damages (whether actual or punitive, known or unknown, latent or patent, foreseen or unforeseen, direct or indirect or consequential, matured or unmatured, and accrued or not accrued), and debts, and liabilities of whatever nature that are or could be asserted by any person against the Receiver, her attorneys and other professionals, her agents, and any other representatives or employees of the Receiver, are hereby discharged, released, extinguished, and satisfied. The Receiver shall be deemed to have provided reasonable and sufficient notice to all persons of the release contained herein. All governmental agencies, governmental authorities, or any other persons with an interest in taxes, tax penalties, or other such amounts that are or were required to be paid, under applicable law, are hereby enjoined from collecting from the Receiver, her attorneys and other professionals, her agents, and any other representatives or employees of the Receiver, or any Receivership Property, taxes, tax penalties, or other such amounts that are or were required to be paid under applicable law. While a governmental agency, governmental authority, or any other person with an interest in taxes, tax penalties, or other such amounts that are or were required to be paid, -14-
15 Case: 1:14-cv Document #: 101 Filed: 10/31/14 Page 15 of 19 PageID #:919 under applicable law, may not pursue the Receiver or the Receivership Property, such governmental agency, government authority, or any other person within an interest in taxes, tax penalties or such others amounts that are or were required to be paid by Pearson, under applicable law, may pursue Pearson in his individual capacity. Nothing in this Plan shall discharge Pearson from his individual tax liabilities. Pearson shall be required to timely file all tax returns while the Receivership Case is open and shall provide the Receiver with copies of all such tax returns on or before April 15 of each calendar year. Failure by Pearson to timely file tax returns shall be deemed a violation of the Plan and a contempt order shall issue from the Court directing Pearson to file such tax returns by a date set by the Court. The Receiver may also seek such other and further relief as may be appropriate from the Court in connection with any contempt proceedings. Neither the Receiver nor the Receivership Estates shall have any liability whatsoever for tax returns filed by Pearson or for Pearson s failure to timely file tax returns. ARTICLE 5 - RECOVERIES BY THE RECEIVER Section 5.01: Litigation and Turnover. The Receiver is authorized to pursue causes of action and litigation and/or seek turnover from any third parties as deemed in the Receiver s sole discretion, subject to the SEC Billing Instructions. The Receiver is also authorized to settle and/or compromise such causes of action, litigation, or turnover for the benefit of the Receivership Estates without further approval of the Court. Section 5.02: (A) Recovery from the Wheaton Real Estate. The Receiver shall have a second mortgage against the Wheaton Real Estate in the amount of $1 million. Magnum is hereby directed to execute all such documents necessary to give rise and effect to the second mortgage. In the event Magnum successfully sells the Wheaton Real Estate, the Receiver s second mortgage lien will attach to Pearson s 50% interest in the sale proceeds that are generated after the payment of Suburban Bank & Trust s -15-
16 Case: 1:14-cv Document #: 101 Filed: 10/31/14 Page 16 of 19 PageID #:920 first mortgage. Pearson is directed and required to turn over his 50% interest in the sale proceeds at the closing of any sale of the Wheaton Real Estate. In the event the Wheaton Real Estate is not sold during the pendency of the Receivership Case, the second mortgage will survive the closure of the Receivership Case and shall remain on the Wheaton Real Estate. The Receiver is authorized to sell the second mortgage lien prior to the closure of the Receivership Case to a second lien purchaser. Any sale proceeds shall become Company Receivership Property. The Receiver is authorized in her sole discretion to accept satisfaction of the Receiver s second mortgage in an amount less than $1 million. (B) The Receiver s second mortgage on the Wheaton Real Estate shall also constitute a cash flow mortgage, meaning that the Receiver shall be entitled to collect Pearson s 50% interest in the rental proceeds paid by a tenant occupying the Wheaton Real Property after the payment of expenses, including Suburban Bank & Trust s mortgage, real estate taxes, insurance, and utilities. Pearson shall be required to true up income and expenses (including providing copies of all receipts to the Receiver) related to the Wheaton Real Estate on or before March 10, June 10, September 10, and December 10 of each calendar year while the Receivership Case is open. Pearson shall also be required to pay to the Receiver his 50% interest in the rental proceeds on or before March 10, June 10, September 10, and December 10 of each calendar year while the Receivership Case is open. (C) Recovery from the Winfield Real Estate. The Receiver shall have a first mortgage against the Winfield Real Estate in the amount of $1 million. Pearson is hereby directed to execute all such documents necessary to give rise and effect to the first mortgage. In the event Pearson successfully sells the Winfield Real Estate, the Receiver s first mortgage lien will attach to Pearson s 50% interest in the sale proceeds that are generated. Pearson is directed -16-
17 Case: 1:14-cv Document #: 101 Filed: 10/31/14 Page 17 of 19 PageID #:921 and required to turn over his 50% interest in the sale proceeds at the closing of any sale of the Winfield Real Estate. In the event the Winfield Real Estate is not sold during the pendency of the Receivership Case, the first mortgage will survive the closure of the Receivership Case and shall remain on the Winfield Real Estate. The Receiver is authorized to sell the first mortgage lien prior to the closure of the Receivership Case by to a first lien purchaser. Any sale proceeds shall become Pearson Receivership Property. The Receiver is authorized in her sole discretion to accept satisfaction of the Receiver s first mortgage in an amount less than $1 million. Section 5.03: Settlement with Pearson. The Receiver is currently in discussions with Pearson regarding the turnover of assets currently in Pearson s possession. In the event the Receiver cannot reach a consensual agreement with Pearson, the Receiver is authorized to seek a turnover order from the Court in connection with Pearson s assets. Section 5.04: Abandonment. The Receiver is authorized to abandon any property: (a) that is of inconsequential value to the Receivership Estates, as determined by the Receiver in her sole discretion, or (b) whose value would not generate a net benefit to the Receivership Estates after the costs of collection and/or recovery, as determined by the Receiver in her sole discretion. ARTICLE 6 - TERMINATION OF AGREEMENTS Section 6.01: Agreements, Contracts, and Licenses with the Company. All agreements, contracts, or licenses entered into by the Company (whether by agreement or by operation of law) that have not been previously terminated by the Receiver shall be deemed to be terminated nunc pro tunc as of the date of the entry of the Receiver Order. Section 6.02: No Effect on Receiver Agreements. Nothing in this Article shall be deemed to have terminated any agreements, contracts, or licenses entered into by the Receiver on behalf of the Receivership Estates. -17-
18 Case: 1:14-cv Document #: 101 Filed: 10/31/14 Page 18 of 19 PageID #:922 ARTICLE 7 - RETENTION OF JURISDICTION Section 7.01: Exclusive Jurisdiction. The Court has had and shall continue to have exclusive jurisdiction over the Receiver, the Receivership Property, and the Receivership Estates. Section 7.02: Continuing Jurisdiction. This Plan and the Approval Order, when entered, shall not be deemed to be either a final adjudication of the Receivership Case or a termination, limitation, reduction, waiver or relinquishment of this Court s exclusive jurisdiction with regard to all Receivership Property, all matters in controversy in the Receivership Case, or any causes of action that the Receiver may prosecute in connection with the Receivership Case. This Court shall continue to have and retain exclusive jurisdiction over all matters existing or arising in this Receivership Case or related in any way thereto, including, but not limited to, all causes of action, as well as matters related to approving or denying Claims, making Distributions on Allowed Claims, and locating, recovering, settling claims against, and liquidating Receivership Property. Furthermore, this Court, upon the request of the Receiver or the SEC, or upon its own motion, may make further modifications to this Plan or the Approval Order. Section 7.03: Other Orders Not Abrogated. Nothing in this Plan shall abrogate any other order of the Court. Rather, this Plan is designed to supplement the powers granted to the Receiver. -18-
19 Case: 1:14-cv Document #: 101 Filed: 10/31/14 Page 19 of 19 PageID #:923 Dated: October 31, 2014 JILL L. NICHOLSON, Receiver for the estates of Illinois Stock Transfer Company d/b/a ist Shareholder Services and Robert G. Pearson By: /s/ Geoffrey Goodman Counsel to the Receiver Geoffrey S. Goodman (ARDC # ) Joanne Lee (ARDC # ) Foley & Lardner LLP 321 North Clark Street, Suite 2800 Chicago, IL Phone: (312) Fax: (312) ggoodman@foley.com jlee@foley.com -19-
Case: 1:14-cv Document #: 226 Filed: 10/30/15 Page 1 of 18 PageID #:2201
Case: 1:14-cv-03785 Document #: 226 Filed: 10/30/15 Page 1 of 18 PageID #:2201 UNITED STATES SECURITIES AND EXCHANGE COMMISSION, UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT NORTHERN DISTRICT OF ILLINOIS EASTERN DIVISION
More informationCUMMINS INC. S RESPONSE TO DEBTORS 110TH OMNIBUS OBJECTION TO CLAIMS (CONTINGENT CO-LIABILITY CLAIMS)
FOLEY & LARDNER LLP 321 N. Clark Street, Suite 2800 Chicago, IL 60654 Phone: (312) 832-4500 Fax: (312) 832-4700 Jill L. Nicholson nee Murch (JM2728) Joanne Lee Attorneys for Cummins Inc. UNITED STATES
More informationIndex No /1986 LIQUIDATION PLAN FOR MIDLAND INSURANCE COMPANY
SUPREME COURT OF THE STATE OF NEW YORK COUNTY OF NEW YORK: IAS PART 7 -------------------------------------------------------------------X In the Matter of the Liquidation of MIDLAND INSURANCE COMPANY
More informationCase 3:09-cv N-BQ Document 201 Filed 05/16/17 Page 1 of 13 PageID 3204
Case 3:09-cv-01736-N-BQ Document 201 Filed 05/16/17 Page 1 of 13 PageID 3204 IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE NORTHERN DISTRICT OF TEXAS DALLAS DIVISION CERTAIN UNDERWRITERS AT LLOYD S OF LONDON
More informationDoc#: 475 Filed: 03/05/15 Entered: 03/05/15 15:51:03 Page 1 of 18 UNITED STATES BANKRUPTCY COURT FOR THE DISTRICT OF MONTANA.
14-60074 Doc#: 475 Filed: 03/05/15 Entered: 03/05/15 15:51:03 Page 1 of 18 UNITED STATES BANKRUPTCY COURT FOR THE DISTRICT OF MONTANA In Re: Roman Catholic Bishop of Helena, Montana, a Montana Religious
More informationCase 8:10-bk TA Doc 662 Filed 12/22/11 Entered 12/22/11 16:11:05 Desc Main Document Page 1 of 60
Main Document Page of 0 RON BENDER (SBN ) TODD M. ARNOLD (SBN ) JOHN-PATRICK M. FRITZ (SBN 0) LEVENE, NEALE, BENDER, YOO & BRILL L.L.P. 00 Constellation Boulevard, Suite 00 Los Angeles, California 00 Telephone:
More information) Case No (SMB) ) ) (Jointly Administered) )
UNITED STATES BANKRUPTCY COURT SOUTHERN DISTRICT OF NEW YORK ) In re: ) Chapter 11 ) AVAYA INC., et al. 1 ) Case No. 17-10089 (SMB) ) Debtors. ) (Jointly Administered) ) NOTICE OF DEADLINES FOR THE FILING
More informationIN THE UNITED STATES BANKRUPTCY COURT FOR THE WESTERN DISTRICT OF TEXAS SAN ANTONIO DIVISION
IN THE UNITED STATES BANKRUPTCY COURT FOR THE WESTERN DISTRICT OF TEXAS SAN ANTONIO DIVISION IN RE: LEAD CASE NO. 18-50788-RBK THE HJH CONSULTING GROUP, INC., D/B/A THE SALT GROUP, DEBTOR IN RE: SECOND
More informationCase rlj11 Doc 110 Filed 02/21/14 Entered 02/21/14 16:58:33 Page 1 of 25
Case 13-20393-rlj11 Doc 110 Filed 02/21/14 Entered 02/21/14 16:58:33 Page 1 of 25 IN THE UNITED STATES BANKRUPTCY COURT FOR THE NORTHERN DISTRICT OF TEXAS AMARILLO DIVISION IN RE: AMARILLO BIOSCIENCES,
More informationWalter Energy, Inc. $50,000,000 Debtor-in-Possession Term Loan Facility Summary of Terms and Conditions
Walter Energy, Inc. $50,000,000 Debtor-in-Possession Term Loan Facility Summary of Terms and Conditions Borrower: Guarantors: Backstop Parties: DIP Agent: DIP Lenders: Walter Energy, Inc. (the Borrower
More informationUNITED STATES BANKRUPTCY COURT EASTERN DISTRICT OF NORTH CAROLINA. IN THE MATTER OF: Case No Fountain Powerboat Industries, Inc.
Case 09-07132-8-RDD Doc 273 Filed 01/29/10 Entered 01/29/10 12:55:47 Page 1 of UNITED STATES BANKRUPTCY COURT EASTERN DISTRICT OF NORTH CAROLINA IN THE MATTER OF: Case No. 09-7132-8 Fountain Powerboat
More informationSUPERIOR COURT OF CALIFORNIA COUNTY OF FRESNO
SUPERIOR COURT OF CALIFORNIA COUNTY OF FRESNO MARY BARBER and ISABEL FERNANDEZ, Case No. 14CEG00166 KCK as individuals and on behalf of all others similarly situated NOTICE OF PENDENCY OF CLASS ACTION
More informationIN THE UNITED STATES BANKRUPTCY COURT FOR THE DISTRICT OF DELAWARE
IN THE UNITED STATES BANKRUPTCY COURT FOR THE DISTRICT OF DELAWARE ) In re ) Chapter 11 ) WCI COMMUNITIES, INC., et al., 1 ) Case No. 08-11643 (KJC) ) ) Jointly Administered Debtors. ) ) SECOND AMENDED
More informationIN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE WESTERN DISTRICT OF NORTH CAROLINA CHARLOTTE DIVISION ) ) ) No. 3:12-CV-519
IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE WESTERN DISTRICT OF NORTH CAROLINA CHARLOTTE DIVISION SECURITIES AND EXCHANGE COMMISSION, Plaintiff, vs. REX VENTURE GROUP, LLC d/b/a ZEEKREWARDS.COM, and PAUL
More informationTRONOX INCORPORATED TORT CLAIMS TRUST DISTRIBUTION PROCEDURES
TRONOX INCORPORATED TORT CLAIMS TRUST DISTRIBUTION PROCEDURES Capitalized terms not otherwise defined in these Tort Claims Trust Distribution Procedures ( TDPs ) shall have the meaning ascribed to such
More informationUNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT SOUTHERN DISTRICT OF FLORIDA CASE NO.:
UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT SOUTHERN DISTRICT OF FLORIDA CASE NO.: CONSUMER FINANCIAL PROTECTION BUREAU, Plaintiff, v. GENWORTH MORTGAGE INSURANCE CORPORATION, Defendant. / PROPOSED FINAL CONSENT JUDGMENT
More informationLOCAL FORM 4 August 1, IN THE UNITED STATES BANKRUPTCY COURT FOR THE WESTERN DISTRICT OF NORTH CAROLINA [insert correct division name] DIVISION
LOCAL FORM 4 August 1, 2010 IN THE UNITED STATES BANKRUPTCY COURT FOR THE WESTERN DISTRICT OF NORTH CAROLINA [insert correct division name] DIVISION In re: Case No. - - - Chapter 13 Debtor(s DETAILS OF
More informationCase Document 824 Filed in TXSB on 12/21/18 Page 1 of 39
Case 18-30197 Document 824 Filed in TXSB on 12/21/18 Page 1 of 39 IN THE UNITED STATES BANKRUPTCY COURT FOR THE SOUTHERN DISTRICT OF TEXAS HOUSTON DIVISION In re: LOCKWOOD HOLDINGS, INC., et al., 1 Debtors.
More informationAN ESTIMATE OF YOUR SHARE OF THE SETTLEMENT IS SET FORTH ON THE GREEN CLAIM FORM.
UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT CENTRAL DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA NOTICE OF CLASS ACTION AND PROPOSED SETTLEMENT LAWRENCE WEINSTEIN, individually and on behalf of all others similarly situated, v. Plaintiffs,
More informationUNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT CENTRAL DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA
UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT CENTRAL DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA KEVIN KNOX; NOE BAROCIO; SALVADOR BAROCIO; CINDY CONYBEAR, each individually and on behalf of all others similarly situated, v. Plaintiffs, Master
More information~ ~ ~.~D. sup~ ~~' ~ ~U~~~ i (~F NJ. ~~~~t~~'~~ ~~C~~AGE
CHRISTOPHER S. PORRINO ATTORNEY GENER.A.L OF NEW JERSEY Richard J. Hughes Justice Complex 25 Market Street P.O. Box 1~7 Trenton, New Jersey 08625 Attorney for Plaintiff,. Commissioner of the Department
More informationIN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE WESTERN DISTRICT OF NORTH CAROLINA CHARLOTTE DIVISION ) ) ) No. 3:12-CV-519
IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE WESTERN DISTRICT OF NORTH CAROLINA CHARLOTTE DIVISION SECURITIES AND EXCHANGE COMMISSION, Plaintiff, vs. REX VENTURE GROUP, LLC d/b/a ZEEKREWARDS.COM, and PAUL
More informationIN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE DISTRICT OF NEW JERSEY (NEWARK) : : : : : : : : : : : : : : : : : : : : : : : : : :
Case 213-cv-06272-MCA-MAH Document 262-4 284-9 Filed 09/09/16 04/05/17 Page 1 of 12 PageID 5109 5676 EXHIBIT 4 Case 213-cv-06272-MCA-MAH Document 284-9 262-4 Filed 04/05/17 09/09/16 Page 2 of 12 PageID
More informationUNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT SOUTHERN DISTRICT OF FLORIDA CASE NO CIV-DIMITROULEAS
In re DS Healthcare Group, Inc. Securities Litigation / UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT SOUTHERN DISTRICT OF FLORIDA CASE NO. 16-60661-CIV-DIMITROULEAS NOTICE OF PENDENCY AND PROPOSED SETTLEMENT OF CLASS
More informationNOTICE OF PROPOSED CLASS ACTION SETTLEMENT
NOTICE OF PROPOSED CLASS ACTION SETTLEMENT Elizabeth Ortiz, et al. v. Ghirardelli Chocolate Company Superior Court of California, Alameda County, Case No. RG15764300 It is your responsibility to change
More informationNOTICE OF PENDENCY OF CLASS ACTION, PROPOSED SETTLEMENT AND HEARING DATE FOR COURT APPROVAL
ATTENTION: NOTICE OF PENDENCY OF CLASS ACTION, PROPOSED SETTLEMENT AND HEARING DATE FOR COURT APPROVAL BANK BRANCH STORE MANAGERS EMPLOYED BY WELLS FARGO BANK, NA ( DEFENDANT ) WHO: WORKED IN A LEVEL 1
More informationCase 5:16-cv NC Document Filed 04/20/18 Page 1 of 9 EXHIBIT 1
Case 5:16-cv-03698-NC Document 142-4 Filed 04/20/18 Page 1 of 9 EXHIBIT 1 Case 5:16-cv-03698-NC Document 142-4 Filed 04/20/18 Page 2 of 9 IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE NORTHERN DISTRICT OF
More informationThe only way to get a payment. NO LATER THAN MARCH 10, 2011 EXCLUDE YOURSELF NO LATER THAN MARCH 10, 2011 SUBMIT A CLAIM FORM
United States District Court Southern District Of New York IN RE FUWEI FILMS SECURITIES LITIGATION Case No. 07-CV-9416 (RJS) NOTICE OF PENDENCY AND SETTLEMENT OF CLASS ACTION If you purchased or otherwise
More informationCase: 1:18-cv Document #: 300 Filed: 03/29/19 Page 1 of 9 PageID #:5178
Case: 1:18-cv-05587 Document #: 300 Filed: 03/29/19 Page 1 of 9 PageID #:5178 UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT NORTHERN DISTRICT OF ILLINOIS EASTERN DIVISION _ ) U.S. SECURITIES AND EXCHANGE ) COMMISSION,
More informationTRONOX INCORPORATED TORT CLAIMS TRUST DISTRIBUTION PROCEDURES
CONFORMED COPY TRONOX INCORPORATED TORT CLAIMS TRUST DISTRIBUTION PROCEDURES Capitalized terms not otherwise defined in these Tort Claims Trust Distribution Procedures ( TDPs ) shall have the meaning ascribed
More informationCase 3:14-cv JAG-RCY Document Filed 05/30/17 Page 1 of 7 PageID# 9155
Case 3:14-cv-00682-JAG-RCY Document 217-2 Filed 05/30/17 Page 1 of 7 PageID# 9155 UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT EASTERN DISTRICT OF VIRGINIA RICHMOND DIVISION IN RE GENWORTH FINANCIAL, INC., SECURITIES
More informationSUPERIOR COURT OF THE STATE OF CALIFORNIA COUNTY OF LOS ANGELES CENTRAL CIVIL WEST ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) )
SUPERIOR COURT OF THE STATE OF CALIFORNIA COUNTY OF LOS ANGELES CENTRAL CIVIL WEST MICHELLE COX, individually and on behalf of all others similarly situated; MARYANNE TIERRA, individually and on behalf
More informationUNITED STATES BANKRUPTCY COURT EASTERN DISTRICT OF LOUISIANA CHAPTER 13 PLAN
UNITED STATES BANKRUPTCY COURT EASTERN DISTRICT OF LOUISIANA IN RE: Debtor s Counsel: CASE NO. CHAPTER 13 Section A CHAPTER 13 PLAN Original (1 st, 2 nd,...) Amended Plan filed : (1 st, 2 nd,...) Modified
More informationNOTICE OF PROPOSED CLASS ACTION SETTLEMENT AND SETTLEMENT HEARING
UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT WESTERN DISTRICT OF NEW YORK JOANNE BERGEN, ANDREW C. MATTELIANO, NANCY A. MATTELIANO, KEVIN KARLSON, BARBARA KARLSON, ROBERT BRADSHAW, on Behalf of Themselves and Others Similarly
More informationDOW CORNING/ BRITISH COLUMBIA AND OTHER PROVINCES BREAST IMPLANT LITIGATION SETTLEMENT AGREEMENT
C A N A D A PROVINCE OF BRITISH COLUMBIA In re: Silicone Gel Breast Implants Products Liability Class Action Litigation in British Columbia This Agreement Relates to: IN THE SUPREME COURT OF BRITISH COLUMBIA
More informationLIMITED LIABILITY COMPANY CODE (As adopted January 13, 2010) SUMMARY OF CONTENTS. 1. TABLE OF REVISIONS ii. 2. TABLE OF CONTENTS iii
TITLE 11B TITLE 11B LIMITED LIABILITY COMPANY CODE (As adopted January 13, 2010) SUMMARY OF CONTENTS SECTION ARTICLE-PAGE 1. TABLE OF REVISIONS ii 2. TABLE OF CONTENTS iii 3. ARTICLE 1: GENERAL PROVISIONS
More informationRECEIVER S MOTION TO APPROVE FORBEARANCE AGREEMENT WITH AFF II DENVER, LLC. Harvey Sender, the duly-appointed receiver ( Receiver ) for Gary Dragul
DISTRICT COURT, DENVER COUNTY, STATE OF COLORADO Denver District Court 1437 Bannock St. Denver, CO 80202 (720) 865-8612 Plaintiff: Gerald Rome, Securities Commissioner for the State of Colorado v. Defendants:
More informationPROOF OF CLAIM AND RELEASE. Co-Beneficial Owner s First Name MI Co-Beneficial Owner s Last Name
Resource Capital Corp. Securities Litigation Toll Free Number: 844-659-0615 Claims Administrator Website: www.resourcecapitalsecuritieslitigation.com P.O. Box 4850 Email: info@resourcecapitalsecuritieslitigation.com
More informationCase Doc 785 Filed 01/18/13 Entered 01/18/13 11:59:55 Desc Main Document Page 1 of 114 UNITED STATES BANKRUPTCY COURT DISTRICT OF MINNESOTA
Document Page 1 of 114 In re: UNITED STATES BANKRUPTCY COURT DISTRICT OF MINNESOTA Lyman Holding Company, et al., Debtors. 1 Chapter 11 Case No. 11-45190 (Jointly Administered) SECOND AMENDED JOINT CHAPTER
More informationProcedural Considerations For Insurance Coverage Declaratory Judgment Actions
Procedural Considerations For Insurance Coverage Declaratory Judgment Actions New York City Bar Association October 24, 2016 Eric A. Portuguese Lester Schwab Katz & Dwyer, LLP 1 Introduction Purpose of
More informationCase MFW Doc 665 Filed 04/27/16 Page 1 of 2 IN THE UNITED STATES BANKRUPTCY COURT FOR THE DISTRICT OF DELAWARE.
Case 16-10223-MFW Doc 665 Filed 04/27/16 Page 1 of 2 IN THE UNITED STATES BANKRUPTCY COURT FOR THE DISTRICT OF DELAWARE In re: RCS CAPITAL CORPORATION, et al., Debtors. 1 Chapter 11 Case No. 16-10223 (MFW)
More informationTHE UNITED STATES BANKRUPTCY COURT NORTHERN DISTRICT OF OHIO CHAPTER 13 PROCEEDING ) ) ) ) ) )
THE UNITED STATES BANKRUPTCY COURT NORTHERN DISTRICT OF OHIO IN RE: CHAPTER 13 PROCEEDING ORDER CONFIRMING PLAN CASE NO. JUDGE Alan M. Koschik Pursuant to 11 USC 1324, the above-captioned Debtor(s most-recently
More informationUNITED STATES BANKRUPTCY COURT, SOUTHERN DISTRICT OF NEW YORK
UNITED STATES BANKRUPTCY COURT, SOUTHERN DISTRICT OF NEW YORK In re: ANGELICA CORPORATION, et al., Debtors. Chapter 11 Case Nos.: 17-10869 (JLG) Through 17-10873 (JLG) (Jointly Administered) NOTICE OF
More informationLiquidation Company (f/k/a General Motors Corporation) and its affiliated debtors, as debtors in
UNITED STATES BANKRUPTCY COURT SOUTHERN DISTRICT OF NEW YORK ---------------------------------------------------------------x In re Chapter 11 Case No. MOTORS LIQUIDATION COMPANY, et al., 09-50026 (REG)
More informationUNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT SOUTHERN DISTRICT OF TEXAS HOUSTON DIVISION
UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT SOUTHERN DISTRICT OF TEXAS HOUSTON DIVISION IN RE TETRA TECHNOLOGIES, INC. ) SECURITIES LITIGATION ) Civil Action No. 4:08-CV-00965 ) ) JUDGE KEITH P. ELLISON NOTICE OF PROPOSED
More informationDORAL FINANCIAL CREDITORS TRUST FIRST SEMI-ANNUAL STATUS REPORT FOR THE PERIOD FROM OCTOBER 28, 2016 (THE PLAN EFFECTIVE DATE) THROUGH APRIL 30, 2017
DORAL FINANCIAL CREDITORS TRUST FIRST SEMI-ANNUAL STATUS REPORT FOR THE PERIOD FROM OCTOBER 28, 2016 (THE PLAN EFFECTIVE DATE) THROUGH APRIL 30, 2017 Background The Doral Financial Creditors Trust (the
More informationUNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT DISTRICT OF OREGON EUGENE DIVISION
DAVID R. ZARO (California Bar No. 124334) STEPHEN S. WALTERS (OSB No. 80120) FRANCIS N. SCOLLAN (California Bar No. 186262) ALLEN MATKINS LECK GAMBLE MALLORY & NATSIS LLP Three Embarcadero Center, 12th
More informationFIDUCIARY LIABILITY COVERAGE PART
FIDUCIARY LIABILITY COVERAGE PART I. INSURING AGREEMENTS Fiduciary Liability The Insurer shall pay Loss on behalf of the Insureds resulting from a Fiduciary Claim first made against the Insureds during
More informationSUPERIOR COURT OF CALIFORNIA COUNTY OF SAN BERNARDINO
SUPERIOR COURT OF CALIFORNIA COUNTY OF SAN BERNARDINO RICARDO SANCHEZ, on behalf of himself, all others similarly situated, and on behalf of the general public, CASE NO. CIVDS1702554 v. Plaintiffs, NOTICE
More informationUNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT SOUTHERN DISTRICT OF NEW YORK ECF CASE PLAN OF ALLOCATION
UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT SOUTHERN DISTRICT OF NEW YORK IN RE MF GLOBAL HOLDINGS LIMITED SECURITIES LITIGATION THIS DOCUMENT RELATES TO: All Securities Actions (DeAngelis v. Corzine) Civil Action No.
More informationUNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT SOUTHERN DISTRICT OF NEW YORK PROOF OF CLAIM AND RELEASE
UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT SOUTHERN DISTRICT OF NEW YORK In re: INDYMAC MORTGAGE-BACKED SECURITIES LITIGATION CLASS ACTION MASTER DOCKET NO. 09-Civ-04583 (LAK) GENERAL INSTRUCTIONS PROOF OF CLAIM AND
More informationSUPERIOR COURT OF THE STATE OF CALIFORNIA FOR THE COUNTY OF LOS ANGELES
SUPERIOR COURT OF THE STATE OF CALIFORNIA FOR THE COUNTY OF LOS ANGELES EDUARD SHAMIS, ) Case No.: BC662341 ) Plaintiffs, ) Assigned for All Purposes to ) The Hon. Maren E. Nelson, Dept. 17 v. ) ) NOTICE
More informationCase MFW Doc 284 Filed 09/08/16 Page 1 of 6 IN THE UNITED STATES BANKRUPTCY COURT FOR THE DISTRICT OF DELAWARE. x : : : : : : : : x
Case 16-11566-MFW Doc 284 Filed 09/08/16 Page 1 of 6 IN THE UNITED STATES BANKRUPTCY COURT FOR THE DISTRICT OF DELAWARE - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - In re TRIANGLE
More information<<mail id>> <<Name1>> <<Name2>> <<Address1>> <<Address2>> <<City>><<State>><<Zip>> <<Foreign Country>>
RAST 2006-A8 MBS Settlement Claims Administrator PO Box 2876 Portland, OR 97208-2876 PROOF
More informationscc Doc 731 Filed 07/31/18 Entered 07/31/18 14:35:02 Main Document Pg 1 of 15
Pg 1 of 15 UNITED STATES BANKRUPTCY COURT SOUTHERN DISTRICT OF NEW YORK - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - x : In re: : Chapter 11 : TOISA LIMITED, et al., : Case No. 17-10184
More informationCLAIMS ADMINISTRATION SERVICES AGREEMENT
CLAIMS ADMINISTRATION SERVICES AGREEMENT This Claims Administration Services Agreement (the "Agreement") is made and entered into by and between XYZ School District ("Client") and Keenan & Associates ("Keenan").
More informationUNITED STATES BANKRUPTCY COURT DISTRICT OF NEW JERSEY
UNITED STATES BANKRUPTCY COURT DISTRICT OF NEW JERSEY Last revised 9/1/10 In Re: Case No.: Judge: Chapter: 13 Debtor(s) Chapter 13 Plan and Motions Original Modified/Notice Required Discharge Sought Motions
More informationCase: 1:14-cv Document #: 252 Filed: 01/28/16 Page 1 of 17 PageID #:2427
Case: 1:14-cv-03785 Document #: 252 Filed: 01/28/16 Page 1 of 17 PageID #:2427 UNITED STATES SECURITIES AND EXCHANGE COMMISSION, UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT NORTHERN DISTRICT OF ILLINOIS EASTERN DIVISION
More informationCase PJW Doc 762 Filed 07/29/13 Page 1 of 20 IN THE UNITED STATES BANKRUPTCY COURT FOR THE DISTRICT OF DELAWARE
Case 13-10061-PJW Doc 762 Filed 07/29/13 Page 1 of 20 IN THE UNITED STATES BANKRUPTCY COURT FOR THE DISTRICT OF DELAWARE ------------------------------------------------------x In re : Chapter 11 : Penson
More informationIN THE UNITED STATES BANKRUPTCY COURT FOR THE WESTERN DISTRICT OF LOUISIANA LAFAYETTE DIVISION
IN THE UNITED STATES BANKRUPTCY COURT FOR THE WESTERN DISTRICT OF LOUISIANA LAFAYETTE DIVISION IN RE: KNIGHT ENERGY HOLDINGS, LLC, ET AL. DEBTORS 1 CASE NO. 17-51014 (JOINTLYADMINISTERED) CHAPTER 11 JUDGE
More informationCase KJC Doc 881 Filed 08/25/15 Page 1 of 6 EXHIBIT A. RLF v.1
Case 15-10952-KJC Doc 881 Filed 08/25/15 Page 1 of 6 EXHIBIT A RLF1 12885616v.1 Case 15-10952-KJC Doc 881 Filed 08/25/15 Page 2 of 6 RETAINED CAUSES OF ACTION Pursuant to Section XII.A.1 of the Combined
More informationCase RLM-11 Doc 832 Filed 04/19/17 EOD 04/19/17 18:03:39 Pg 1 of 15
Case 17-01302-RLM-11 Doc 832 Filed 04/19/17 EOD 04/19/17 18:03:39 Pg 1 of 15 IN THE UNITED STATES BANKRUPTCY COURT FOR THE SOUTHERN DISTRICT OF INDIANA INDIANAPOLIS DIVISION In re: hhgregg, Inc., et al.,
More informationSHORT FORM STANDARD SUBCONTRACT. This Agreement is made this day of, 20, between
SHORT FORM STANDARD SUBCONTRACT This Agreement is made this day of, 20, between (Contractor) and (Subcontractor). The work described in Section I below shall be performed in accordance with the prime contract
More informationIN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE WESTERN DISTRICT OF NORTH CAROLINA CHARLOTTE DIVISION ) ) ) No. 3:12-CV-519
IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE WESTERN DISTRICT OF NORTH CAROLINA CHARLOTTE DIVISION SECURITIES AND EXCHANGE COMMISSION, Plaintiff, vs. REX VENTURE GROUP, LLC d/b/a ZEEKREWARDS.COM, and PAUL
More informationUNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE NORTHERN DISTRICT OF GEORGIA ATLANTA DIVISION
Case 1:07-cv-00767-WSD Document 251 Filed 08/18/10 Page 1 of 8 UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE NORTHERN DISTRICT OF GEORGIA ATLANTA DIVISION SECURITIES AND EXCHANGE COMMISSION, Plaintiff, vs. GLOBAL
More informationUpon the motion, dated May 26, 2009 (the Motion ), 1 of Lehman Brothers
UNITED STATES BANKRUPTCY COURT SOUTHERN DISTRICT OF NEW YORK -------------------------------------------------------------------x : In re : Chapter 11 Case No. : LEHMAN BROTHERS HOLDINGS INC., et al.,
More informationMotors Liquidation Company GUC Trust
UNITED STATES SECURITIES AND EXCHANGE COMMISSION WASHINGTON, DC 20549 FORM 8-K CURRENT REPORT Pursuant to Section 13 or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934 Date of report (Date of earliest event
More informationIN THE UNITED STATES BANKRUPTCY COURT FOR THE DISTRICT OF DELAWARE
PLEASE CAREFULLY REVIEW THIS OBJECTION AND THE ATTACHMENTS HERETO TO DETERMINE WHETHER THIS OBJECTION AFFECTS YOUR CLAIMS. SUBSTANTIVE RIGHTS MAY BE AFFECTED BY THIS OBJECTION. IN THE UNITED STATES BANKRUPTCY
More informationCase BLS Doc 201 Filed 01/12/18 Page 1 of 113 IN THE UNITED STATES BANKRUPTCY COURT FOR THE DISTRICT OF DELAWARE. x : : : : : x.
Case 17-12377-BLS Doc 201 Filed 01/12/18 Page 1 of 113 IN THE UNITED STATES BANKRUPTCY COURT FOR THE DISTRICT OF DELAWARE ----------------------------------------------------- In re: ExGen Texas Power,
More informationLOAN SERVICING AND EQUITY INTEREST AGREEMENT
LOAN SERVICING AND EQUITY INTEREST AGREEMENT THIS LOAN SERVICING AND EQUITY INTEREST AGREEMENT ( Agreement ) is made as of, 20 by and among Blackburne & Sons Realty Capital Corporation, a California corporation
More informationDOW CORNING/ONTARIO BREAST IMPLANT LITIGATION SETTLEMENT AGREEMENT
C A N A D A PROVINCE OF ONTARIO In re: Silicone Gel Breast Implants Products Liability Class Action Litigation in Ontario This Agreement Relates to Class Actions Certified and/or Authorized in the Following
More informationD sa et al. v. Amber India Corp., et al San Francisco Superior Court Case No. CGC
NOTICE TO CLASS MEMBERS RE: PENDENCY OF A CLASS ACTION AND NOTICE OF HEARING ON PROPOSED SETTLEMENT. THIS NOTICE MAY AFFECT YOUR RIGHTS. PLEASE READ IT CAREFULLY. D sa et al. v. Amber India Corp., et al
More informationFrequently Asked Questions About ReliaMax Surety Company in Liquidation
Frequently Asked Questions About ReliaMax Surety Company in Liquidation The Sixth Circuit Court of Hughes County, South Dakota (Court) declared ReliaMax Surety Company, (ReliaMax) insolvent and ordered
More informationUNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE EASTERN DISTRICT OF MICHIGAN SOUTHERN DIVISION PROOF OF CLAIM AND RELEASE
IMPORTANT INFORMATION & KEY DATES General Motors Securities Litigation Claims Administrator PO Box 4068 Portland OR 97208-4068 CLAIMS ADMINISTRATION TOLL FREE NUMBER: 1-866-879-0481 CLAIMS ADMINISTRATION
More informationA class action settlement involving property insurance claims may provide payments to those who qualify.
IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT WESTERN DISTRICT OF ARKANSAS, TEXARKANA DIVISION A class action settlement involving property insurance claims may provide payments to those who qualify. There is a
More informationCase cjf Doc 149 Filed 12/19/17 Entered 12/19/17 21:57:43 Desc DEBTOR S CHAPTER 11 PLAN OF REORGANIZATION (DATED DECEMBER 19, 2017)
UNITED Main STATES Document BANKRUPTCY Page 1 of COURT 34 WESTERN DISTRICT OF WISCONSIN In re: CRANBERRY GROWERS COOPERATIVE, (d/b/a CranGrow) Case No. 17-13318-cjf Debtor. Chapter 11 DEBTOR S CHAPTER
More informationLIMITED PARTNERSHIP AGREEMENT CRT ENTERPRISES, LP
LIMITED PARTNERSHIP AGREEMENT CRT ENTERPRISES, LP This Limited Partnership Agreement of CRT Enterprises, LP ( The Limited Partnership or The Company ), is entered into and shall be effective as of the
More informationUNITED STATES BANKRUPTCY COURT FOR THE EASTERN DISTRICT OF LOUISIANA. * Case No
UNITED STATES BANKRUPTCY COURT FOR THE EASTERN DISTRICT OF LOUISIANA * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * Case No. 05-17697 IN RE: * * Chapter 11 ENTERGY NEW ORLEANS, INC. * * Section B Debtor * * * *
More informationSPECIMEN. of Financial Impairment of the issuers of such Underlying Insurance;
In consideration of payment of the premium and subject to the Declarations, limitations, conditions, provisions and other terms of this Policy, the Company and the Insured Person agree as follows: Insuring
More informationIN THE UNITED STATES BANKRUPTCY COURT FOR THE DISTRICT OF KANSAS STANDING ORDER NO ORDER ADOPTING FORM CHAPTER 13 PLAN
IN THE UNITED STATES BANKRUPTCY COURT FOR THE DISTRICT OF KANSAS STANDING ORDER NO. 10-2 ORDER ADOPTING FORM CHAPTER 13 PLAN The Bench Bar Committee has recommended the adoption of a form Chapter 13 Plan,
More informationTOTAL FINANCE INVESTMENT INC., ) (Jointly Administered) et al., ) Chapter: 11
Case 19-03734 Doc 175 Filed 03/07/19 Entered 03/07/19 14:02:34 Desc Main Document Page 1 of 4 UNITED STATES BANKRUPTCY COURT NORTHERN DISTRICT OF ILLINOIS Eastern Division In Re: ) BK No.: 19-03734 TOTAL
More informationTHIS NOTICE IS DIRECTED TO:
THIS NOTICE IS DIRECTED TO: United States District Court for the Northern District of California NOTICE OF CLASS ACTION SETTLEMENT Goertzen v. Great American Life Insurance Co., Case No. 4:16-cv-00240
More informationCase BLS Doc 26 Filed 11/07/17 Page 1 of 108
Case 17-12377-BLS Doc 26 Filed 11/07/17 Page 1 of 108 IN THE UNITED STATES BANKRUPTCY COURT FOR THE DISTRICT OF DELAWARE ----------------------------------------------------------------- In re: ExGen Texas
More informationCASE 0:17-cv PAM-DTS Document 243 Filed 07/20/18 Page 1 of 15 UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT DISTRICT OF MINNESOTA
CASE 0:17-cv-00166-PAM-DTS Document 243 Filed 07/20/18 Page 1 of 15 UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT DISTRICT OF MINNESOTA Consumer Financial Protection Bureau, Case No. 17-cv-00166-PAM-DTS Plaintiff, vs.
More informationIN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE WESTERN DISTRICT OF NORTH CAROLINA CHARLOTTE DIVISION ) ) ) No. 3:12-CV-519 ) )
IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE WESTERN DISTRICT OF NORTH CAROLINA CHARLOTTE DIVISION SECURITIES AND EXCHANGE COMMISSION, Plaintiff, vs. REX VENTURE GROUP, LLC d/b/a ZEEKREWARDS.COM, and PAUL
More informationCase Doc 585 Filed 09/02/15 Page 1 of 35. IN THE UNITED STATES BANKRUPTCY COURT FOR THE DISTRICT OF MARYLAND (Baltimore Division)
Case 13-25370 Doc 585 Filed 09/02/15 Page 1 of 35 IN THE UNITED STATES BANKRUPTCY COURT FOR THE DISTRICT OF MARYLAND (Baltimore Division) In re: CITY HOMES III LLC CITY HOMES, INC. CITY HOMES BRETTON LLC
More informationLOAN SERVICING AND EQUITY INTEREST AGREEMENT
LOAN SERVICING AND EQUITY INTEREST AGREEMENT THIS LOAN SERVICING AND EQUITY INTEREST AGREEMENT ( Agreement ) is made as of, 20 by and among Cushman Rexrode Capital Corporation, a California corporation
More informationSUMMARY OF YOUR OPTIONS AND THE LEGAL EFFECT OF EACH OPTION APPROVE THE
Manwaring v. The Golden 1 Credit Union NOTICE OF PENDING CLASS ACTION AND PROPOSED SETTLEMENT READ THIS NOTICE FULLY AND CAREFULLY; THE PROPOSED SETTLEMENT MAY AFFECT YOUR RIGHTS! IF YOU HAD A CHECKING
More informationCase Document 338 Filed in TXSB on 01/29/18 Page 1 of 39
Case 17-36709 Document 338 Filed in TXSB on 01/29/18 Page 1 of 39 IN THE UNITED STATES BANKRUPTCY COURT FOR THE SOUTHERN DISTRICT OF TEXAS HOUSTON DIVISION ) In re: ) Chapter 11 ) COBALT INTERNATIONAL
More informationmg Doc Filed 02/13/17 Entered 02/13/17 20:23:37 Main Document Pg 1 of 23. Attorneys for the Motors Liquidation Company GUC Trust
Pg 1 of 23 Attorneys for the Motors Liquidation CompanyGUC Trust et al. et al. Pg 2 of 23 Attorneys for the Motors Liquidation Company GUC Trust Pg 3 of 23 Pg 4 of 23 Pg 5 of 23 Pg 6 of 23 Motors Liquidation
More informationIN THE UNITED STATED BANKRUPTCY COURT FOR THE EASTERN DISTRICT OF TEXAS SHERMAN DIVISION. Civil Action No. 4:11-cv-655
Case 4:11-cv-00655-MHS -ALM Document 50 Filed 02/07/12 Page 1 of 9 PageID #: 1053 IN THE UNITED STATED BANKRUPTCY COURT FOR THE EASTERN DISTRICT OF TEXAS SHERMAN DIVISION SECURITIES AND EXCHANGE COMMISSION
More informationORDER OF THE COURT NOTICE OF PROPOSED CLASS ACTION SETTLEMENT; SETTLEMENT HEARING; AND CLAIM AND EXCLUSION PROCEDURES
ORDER OF THE COURT NOTICE OF PROPOSED CLASS ACTION SETTLEMENT; SETTLEMENT HEARING; AND CLAIM AND EXCLUSION PROCEDURES Jose H. Solano et al. v. Kavlico Corporation, et al. Ventura County Superior Court
More informationMotors Liquidation Company GUC Trust
UNITED STATES SECURITIES AND EXCHANGE COMMISSION Washington, D.C. 20549 FORM 10-Q QUARTERLY REPORT PURSUANT TO SECTION 13 OR 15(d) OF THE SECURITIES EXCHANGE ACT OF 1934 For the quarterly period ended
More informationDate Published 9/20/2017. WMI LIQUIDATING TRUST FREQUENTLY ASKED QUESTIONS ( FAQS ) REGARDING TAX RELATED MATTERS (Please read carefully.
Date Published 9/20/2017 WMI LIQUIDATING TRUST FREQUENTLY ASKED QUESTIONS ( FAQS ) REGARDING TAX RELATED MATTERS (Please read carefully.) PLEASE NOTE THAT THESE FAQs PROVIDE A SUMMARY OF CERTAIN FEATURES
More informationIMPORTANT LEGAL NOTICE
IMPORTANT LEGAL NOTICE MAIL THE COMPLETED AND SIGNED FORM AND ALL OF YOUR DOCUMENTATION TO: SAN ANTONIO INDEMNITY COMPANY IN RECEIVERSHIP MILFORD CONSULTING, LLC, SPECIAL DEPUTY RECEIVER P.O. Box 279,
More informationUNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE DISTRICT OF MARYLAND (BALTIMORE DIVISION) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) )
UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE DISTRICT OF MARYLAND (BALTIMORE DIVISION ARLENE HODGES, CAROLYN MILLER and GARY T. BROWN, on behalf of themselves, individually, and on behalf of the Bon Secours Plans,
More informationCase 2:08-cv ES-JAD Document 454 Filed 12/17/14 Page 1 of 6 PageID: 28178
,day Case 2:08-cv-00397-ES-JAD Document 454 Filed 12/17/14 Page 1 of 6 PageID: 28178 UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT DISTRICT OF NEW JERSEY IN RE SCHERING-PLOUGH CORPORATION / ENHANCE SECURIflES LITIGATION
More informationIN THE UNITED STATES BANKRUPTCY COURT FOR THE DISTRICT OF DELAWARE. Chapter 11
IN THE UNITED STATES BANKRUPTCY COURT FOR THE DISTRICT OF DELAWARE In re: DBSI INC., et al., Chapter 11 Case No. 08-12687 (PJW) Jointly Administered Debtors. SECOND AMENDED JOINT CHAPTER 11 PLAN OF LIQUIDATION
More informationNY CLS Gen Oblig (2004)
For more information please visit Strategic Capital Corporation at www.strategiccapital.com, or contact us at Toll Free: 1-866-256-0088 or email us at info@strategiccapital.com. NEW YORK CONSOLIDATED LAW
More informationIC Chapter 3.1. Liquidation of Financial Institutions
IC 28-1-3.1 Chapter 3.1. Liquidation of Financial Institutions IC 28-1-3.1-1 Definitions Sec. 1. (a) The definitions set forth in this section apply throughout this chapter. (b) "Federal deposit insurance
More information