Court rejects statutory duty of utmost good faith
|
|
- Dina Chase
- 6 years ago
- Views:
Transcription
1 Court rejects statutory duty of utmost good faith Overview The recent decision of the Supreme Court of Queensland in Matton Developments Pty Ltd v CGU Insurance Limited (No 2) 1 provides useful guidance as to: the meaning of the phrase accidental, sudden and unforeseen ; the practical application of principles of policy construction including: o o the requirements that provisions be interpreted in the context of the policy as a whole and having regard to the commercial objectives which the policy is designed to achieve; the interaction between extensions and exclusions particularly where the application of particular exclusions to an extension may render the cover provided by the extension illusory; the operation of Section 54 of the Act in the context of acts of the insured which are capable of causing or contributing to the loss the subject of the claim; the operation and extent of the duty of utmost good faith in the context of claims handling. In relation to the duty of utmost good faith, the decision confirms that section 13 of the ICA gives rise to an implied term within the contract of insurance and as such, a breach of that duty only gives rise to damages for breach of contract. It does not give rise to any tortious or statutory duty. Background and factual findings Matton took out a Contractors & Plant Insurance policy with CGU in respect of a Liebherr LTR1100 Telescopic Crawler Crane (Crane). In January 2009, the Crane s boom collapsed resulting in a total loss of the Crane. At the time of the collapse the Crane was on hire to a third party and being operated under contract by a company related to Matton. Matton made a claim on the Policy alleging that the failure of the Crane was accidental, sudden and unforeseen and that: at the time of the incident the Crane was beyond operated on level, or near level, ground; the collapse was caused by the failure of the heel weld joints as a result of a preexisting defect. 1 [2015] QSC 752
2 CGU denied indemnity. It alleged that the Crane collapsed due to structural overload as a consequence of a side load induced by the Crane operating on a 7 degree slope. It was agreed that the land on which the Crane came to rest had a 7 degree slope. However, Matton contended that the Crane had been operating in a level position but was inadvertently driven forward by the Crane operator. After consideration of a considerable amount of lay and expert evidence, Flanagan J made factual findings as to the cause of the collapse, including that: at the time of the collapse the Crane had been operating on a 7 degree angle; such operation did not comply with the manufacturer s guidelines or Australian Standards; such operation caused the collapse of the Crane. Did the claim fall within the insuring clauses? The Court then turned to consider whether, on the proper construction of the Policy, the claim fell within the cover provided by the main insuring clauses, additional covers and optional extensions. The Court s reasoning provides a very useful overview and refinement of established principles relevant to the interpretation of policies generally and key terms commonly found insuring clauses within property insurance policies. These sections of the decision are worth close consideration for his Honour s detailed overview of prior authority. In the context of the particular Policy, the Court held that: 1. Was the damage caused by the collapse accidental, sudden and unforeseen Whether the collapse was accidental, sudden and unforeseen must be assessed from the point of the view of the crane operator applying a subjective test with objective qualifications. The object qualifications are that: where an assured gambles or courts a risk or takes a calculated risk with knowledge of its outcome, that is a deliberate acceptance of that risk; or where an assured voluntarily embarks on a foolhardy venture from which the loss or damage that resulted was the almost inevitable consequence. Applying the above test, the collapse of the Crane was not accidental, sudden and unforeseen because the operator of the Crane proceeded to embark on a dangerous course despite appreciating the risk and continued on that course even after the extent of the risk had become apparent. 2. Did the damage to the Crane occur while the Crane was located and in use in the manner in which it was designed to be used. Even if the damage was accidental, Matton would not be entitled to cover because the accidental damage to the Crane did not occur while the Crane was located and in use in the manner in which it was designed to be used.
3 3. Did the Additional Cover for Accidental Overload operate to provide cover? The Policy provided Additional Cover for Accidental Overload being accidental sudden and unforeseen physical loss of or damage to a machine caused by or resulting from accidental overloading which is non-deliberate and clearly unintentional. The additional cover did not apply because: the damage was not accidental, sudden and unforeseen (see findings 1 above); and on its proper interpretation the term overload refers to a situation where the Crane is physically overloaded with an excessive load when the Crane is first loaded (such as where the load is 45 tonnes instead of 40 tonnes). It does not refer to a situation where the operation of the Crane on a slope creates a structural overload. 4. Did the Optional Extension for Dry Hire operate to provide cover? The Crane was not on Dry Hire at the time of the incidents because the agreement between Matton and its customer required Matton to provide both the Crane and the operator. The fact that the operator supplied by Matton was employed by a related company and not by Matton itself was not relevant to the operation of the extension. Did the Exclusions apply? The Court held, based on the factual findings above, that, in the event that the insuring clause had been triggered, the claim would have been excluded because: the insured damage occurred while the Crane was being used in a manner other than that for which it was designed (Clause 21) at the time of the collapse of the boom the Crane was not being used in compliance with the relevant Australian Standards (Clause 26(d)) at the time of the collapse of the boom the Crane was being operated contrary to the manufacturer s guidelines (Clause 27). Section 54 It was accepted that the effect of each of the above exclusions was such that Section 54(2) of the Insurance Contracts Act 1984 (Cth) would apply. As such, in the event that Matton was able to prove that no part of the loss was caused by the acts constituting a breach of the exclusions (s54(3)) or that some part of the loss was not caused by those acts (s54(4)), then the CGU would not be able to refuse to pay the claim (or some part of it) by reason only of the application of the exclusions. The Court held that, given its factual findings, Matton had failed to discharge its onus of proof. Duty of Utmost Good Faith Matton also alleged that CGU was in breach of section 13 of the Insurance Contracts Act 1984 (Cth) (ICA), which deals with the duty of utmost good faith.
4 Specifically, Matton alleged that: As the duty of utmost good faith was an implied term into the policy of insurance, Matton alleged that as a result of CGU s breach of that duty, it was entitled to damages for breach of contract (Breach of Contract Claim). Section 13 of the ICA created a concurrent statutory duty on CGU and as a result of CGU s breach, Matton alleged that it was entitled to damages in tort (Breach of Alleged Statutory Duty Claim). Matton relied on the wording of section 13(2) of the ICA, which provided that a breach of section 13(1) is a breach of the ICA. The Court held that CGU s decision to deny indemnity under the policy did not breach section 13 of the ICA. The Court reviewed various well established principles that identified an insurer is entitled to a reasonable period of time to make inquiries of the insured and circumstances of the claim and to come to a position on indemnity. The Court reiterated the principle that an insurer s decision to deny indemnity does not, by default, cause that insurer to be in breach of section 13 of the ICA. In dealing with the Breach of Alleged Statutory Duty Claim, the Court had to first consider whether section 13 of the ICA gives rise to a statutory duty. CGU made the following submissions regarding section 13 of the ICA: The section was solely implemented to remedy breach of contractual terms and is not a standalone provision that gives rise to a statutory duty. This was evident through the decision of Australian Courts to reject the implementation of a tort of bad faith, which exists in the US and other jurisdictions. As such, there were no other causes of action available to increase the contractual remedies otherwise available for a breach of section 13 of the ICA. The Court held that a breach of the duty of utmost good faith only gives rise to contractual damages and no concurrent tortious or statutory duty arises. 2 This reflects with the purpose behind the enactment of section 13 of the ICA, namely to fill a significant gap in the prior common law by requiring that both the insured and insurer conduct themselves with utmost good faith in all their contractual dealings and providing the insured with an effective contractual remedy in the event of a breach of that duty by the insurer. The Court held that the mere implication of a term into a contract of insurance by statute does not, in itself, give rise to a statutory duty - more is required. An action for breach of statutory duty might be more readily inferred if there was no alternative cause of action available. 3 In coming to its decision, the Court indicated that section 13(2) of the ICA, which was introduced as part of the 2013 amendments to the Act 4, did not support the existence of a statutory duty. The intention of those amendments was to provide regulatory sanctions for a contravention of the duty and to allow ASIC to provide assistance to affected insureds in seeking contractual remedies. 2 Ibid at [268] per Flanagan J. 3 Ibid at [263] per Flanagan J. 4 Insurance Contracts Amendment Act 2013 (Cth)
5 Flanagan J proceeded to determine whether the contractual duty of utmost good faith had been breached. In doing so his Honour provides a useful overview of the relevant authorities on breach of duty of utmost good faith. Specifically, the Court considered whether, having regard to the claims handling process, CGU had breached the duty (as Matton asserted) by selectively relying on information which would allow the insurer to decline cover and improperly disregarding evidence which might lead to the opposite conclusion. After reviewing the evidence of CGU s claims officer Flanagan J, concluded: I found [CGU s claims manager] to be an impressive witness. He was an experienced claims manager who gave detailed consideration to the claim. The detailed consideration included the appointment of loss adjusters and assessors, receiving reports from engineering and metallurgist experts and giving consideration to the eye witness accounts. I accept the defendant s submission that the decision to decline was one which evolved and was made after careful consideration of the available evidence including the lay evidence. His Honour held that CGU had not breached its duty of utmost good faith and reiterated the pre-existing authority that an insurer, acting in good faith, is perfectly entitled to deny indemnity where it has bona fide reservations concerning its obligations to indemnify the insured 5. Indeed, Flanagan J noted that the assessments made by CGU s claims manager and assessors had been shown to be correct by the Court s findings on those issues. What does this mean for insurers? The decision is important as it is the first time that the courts have considered the issue since the 2013 amendments which introduces the new sub-section 13(2) (which some commentators had speculated might be used by the courts to imply a new statutory or tortious duty of good faith). That argument has been firmly and persuasively rejected. The result is of practical importance in that the characterisation of damages for breach of contract is conceptually narrower than the damages available for breach of a tortious duty. Specifically, damages for breach of contract are characterised as losses that are reasonably contemplated by the parties to the contract. Damages recoverable in tort claims are potentially wider as they encompass all losses that are held to be reasonably foreseeable. As such, an insurer s liability for breach of the duty of utmost good faith in the context of claims handling leading to a denial of indemnity would require the insured to prove its entitlement to indemnity under the policy. The duty does not provide a basis whereby, independent of that contractual entitlement, the court could order that the insurer indemnify the insured as a form of punitive sanction for not acting in good faith. This case summary was drafted by Andrew Sharpe and Ahrani Ranjitkumar. For enquiries, please contact: Andrew Sharpe Principal e: a.sharpe@mccabes.com.au t: Ahrani Ranjitkumar Associate e: a.ranjitkumar@mccabes.com.au t: CGU Insurance Limited v AMP Financial Planning Pty Ltd (2007)235 CLR 1, per Kirby J at [72]
Proportionate liability and a case on denial of indemnity
JANUARY 2005 INSURANCE & REINSURANCE www.aar.com.au Inside: Proportionate liability provisions have now commenced in a number of Australian jurisdictions and their practical effects will be of great interest
More informationCase Note September 2007
Case Note September 2007 CGU Limited v AMP Financial Planning Pty Ltd On Wednesday 29 August 2007 Chief Justice Gleeson and Justices Kirby, Callinan, Heydon and Crennan handed down the judgement of the
More informationTHE YEAR THAT WAS. Important High Court Insurance Cases In 2010
AUSTRALIAN INSURANCE LAW ASSOCIATION (WESTERN AUSTRALIAN BRANCH) Cases presented at Annual General Meeting on 15 December 2010 THE YEAR THAT WAS Important High Court Insurance Cases In 2010 High Court
More informationTHE THIRD RUNWAY CASE: BAULDERSTONE HORNIBROOK ENGINEERING PTY LIMITED V GORDIAN RUNOFF LIMITED
THE THIRD RUNWAY CASE: BAULDERSTONE HORNIBROOK ENGINEERING PTY LIMITED V GORDIAN RUNOFF LIMITED On 12 th April 2006 Einstein J delivered his judgment in Baulderstone Hornibrook Engineering Pty Ltd v Gordian
More informationTHE SUPREME COURT OF APPEAL REPUBLIC OF SOUTH AFRICA JUDGMENT IMPERIAL GROUP (PTY) LIMITED NCS RESINS (PTY) LIMITED
THE SUPREME COURT OF APPEAL REPUBLIC OF SOUTH AFRICA JUDGMENT Reportable Case no: 197/06 In the matter between: IMPERIAL GROUP (PTY) LIMITED APPELLANT and NCS RESINS (PTY) LIMITED RESPONDENT CORAM: SCOTT,
More informationENTREPRENEUR S STARTUP SCALEUP IPO GUIDE.
ENTREPRENEUR S GUIDE www.smeguide.org STARTUP SCALEUP IPO DOWNLOAD THE ELECTRONIC VERSION OF THE GUIDE AT: www.smeguide.org 20 DIRECTORS AND OFFICERS INSURANCE: INSURING YOURSELF AND YOUR COMPANY CLYDE
More informationAllens Arthur Robinson Insurance & Reinsurance Forums 2005 February. Directors' and Officers' Insurance
Allens Arthur Robinson Insurance & Reinsurance Forums 2005 February Directors' and Officers' Insurance This paper considers a number of issues arising in relation to D & O Policies and the liability of
More information9 March Geoffrey Hancy. Barrister Mezzanine Level, 28 The Esplanade, Perth
9 March 2016 TRAVELLING SECTION 54 WITH A WESTERN AUSTRALIAN ROAD MAP Geoffrey Hancy Barrister Mezzanine Level, 28 The Esplanade, Perth 6000 geoff@hancy.net www.hancy.net Introduction 1 The Insurance Contracts
More information+ Notification under Professional Indemnity Policies: How much knowledge is enough?
Notification under Professional Indemnity Policies: How much knowledge is enough? Notification under Professional Indemnity Policies The High Court s decision in Euro Pools plc (in administration) v Royal
More informationCase Note. Michele Muscillo * The Lesser of Two Evils: FAI General Insurance Co Ltd v Australian Hospital Care Pty Ltd
Case Note Michele Muscillo * The Lesser of Two Evils: FAI General Insurance Co Ltd v Australian Hospital Care Pty Ltd 1. INTRODUCTION The High Court s decision in FAI General Insurance Co Ltd v Australian
More informationAustralian Licenced Aircraft Engineers Association, The v Qantas Airways Limited (RE2013/1470) VICE PRESIDENT WATSON SYDNEY, 24 JANUARY 2014
DECISION Fair Work Act 2009 s.505 Right of entry Australian Licenced Aircraft Engineers Association, The v Qantas Airways Limited (RE2013/1470) Airline operations VICE PRESIDENT WATSON SYDNEY, 24 JANUARY
More informationRelevant Person Mr Fulford participated in the hearing by telephone link and represented himself and the Firm.
Disciplinary Panel Hearing Case of Mr Alan Fulford BSc FRICS [0059587] and Alderney Estates (the Firm) Guernsey GY9 On Thursday 4 October 2018 at 10.00 At RICS, 55 Colmore Row, Birmingham Chair Sally Ruthen
More informationThe Insurer s Duty to Defend After Swagger
The Insurer s Duty to Defend After Swagger I. Introduction On September 9, 2005, the Supreme Court of British Columbia delivered Reasons for Judgment in Swagger Construction Ltd. v. ING Insurance Company
More informationHIGH COURT OF AUSTRALIA
HIGH COURT OF AUSTRALIA FRENCH CJ, GUMMOW, HAYNE, HEYDON, CRENNAN, KIEFEL AND BELL JJ PETER JAMES SHAFRON APPELLANT AND AUSTRALIAN SECURITIES AND INVESTMENTS COMMISSION RESPONDENT Shafron v Australian
More informationCALIFORNIA WORKERS COMPENSATION SUBROGATION
CALIFORNIA WORKERS COMPENSATION SUBROGATION WORK COMP LAW GROUP, APC ADDRESS 4921 E Olympic Blvd., E Los Angeles, CA 90022 TELEPHONE (888) 888-0082 EMAIL info@workcomplawgroup.com 2016 Work Comp Law Group,
More informationDouble Insurance and the effect of Section 45 of the Insurance Contracts Act
Double Insurance and the effect of Section 45 of the Insurance Contracts Act 1. Why "Double Insure"? Double insurance is a curious phenomenon. It is a significant topic in insurance practice and notwithstanding
More informationBOARD OF BENDIGO REGIONAL INSTITUTE OF TECHNICAL AND FURTHER EDUCATION V BARCLAY
BOARD OF BENDIGO REGIONAL INSTITUTE OF TECHNICAL AND FURTHER EDUCATION V BARCLAY THE HONOURABLE JUSTICE SHANE MARSHALL * & AMANDA CAVANOUGH** I INTRODUCTION On 7 September 2012, the High Court of Australia
More informationHEARING DISCIPLINARY COMMITTEE OF THE ASSOCIATION OF CHARTERED CERTIFIED ACCOUNTANTS
DISCIPLINARY COMMITTEE OF THE ASSOCIATION OF CHARTERED CERTIFIED ACCOUNTANTS REASONS FOR DECISION In the matter of: Mr Jawad Raza Heard on: Thursday 7 and Friday 8 June 2018 Location: ACCA Head Offices,
More informationExclusion Clauses. Welcome
Welcome Managing risk by limiting liability under a commercial contract is a concept most clients welcome, but does it really work? Exclusion clauses can be effective, but careful consideration of the
More informationNegotiating and Enforcing Complex IP Indemnification Provisions. Eleanor M. Yost Shareholder Carlton Fields Jordan Burt, PA
Negotiating and Enforcing Complex IP Indemnification Provisions Eleanor M. Yost Shareholder Carlton Fields Jordan Burt, PA eyost@carltonfields.com Agenda General Considerations Definitions Implied Warranty
More informationContract Based Claims under the Fair Work Act Post Barker
Contract Based Claims under the Fair Work Act Post Barker A seminar jointed hosted by the Law Society of Tasmania and the Law Council of Australia 1 Ingmar Taylor SC, State Chambers Thursday, 26 March
More informationCONSTRUCTION CLAIMS DISCLOSURE (NRS )
CONSTRUCTION CLAIMS DISCLOSURE (NRS 113.135) This Construction Claims Disclosure is made as required by NRS 113.135 in contemplation of a Purchase and Sale Agreement (the "Agreement") which may be entered
More informationUse of Corporate Partner Stock and Options to Compensate Service Partners -- Part 1 by: Sheldon I. Banoff
Use of Corporate Partner Stock and Options to Compensate Service Partners -- Part 1 by: Sheldon I. Banoff Many corporations conduct subsidiary business operations or joint ventures through general or limited
More informationsp rts Sports Coaching & Clinics Insurance Application Form Underwriting Australia Sports Leisure Licensed Clubs
sp rts Underwriting Australia Insurance Application Form Sports Leisure Licensed Clubs Please use this application for occupations relating to the including: Sports Clinics Sports Coaches School Sports
More informationThe Insurance Act 2015: An overview
The Insurance Act 2015: An overview The Insurance Act 2015: An overview Introduction Act comes into force on 12 August 2016 No retrospective effect Will apply to all commercial insurance contracts, where
More informationSTANDARD TERMS AND CONDITIONS FOR THE SALE OF GOODS ALL MARKETS EXCEPT OIL AND GAS
STANDARD TERMS AND CONDITIONS FOR THE SALE OF GOODS ALL MARKETS EXCEPT OIL AND GAS 1. Scope of Application These terms and conditions of sale ( T&C ) apply to all sales by our company ( Supplier ) of goods
More informationHEARING PARTLY HEARD IN PRIVATE
HEARING PARTLY HEARD The Committee has made a determination in this case that includes some private information. That information has been omitted from this text. GARNETT, Dean Andrew Registration No:
More informationProfessional Indemnity Insurance - Claims made and notified policies - Sections 54 and 40(3) of the Insurance Contracts Act 1984 (Cth)
UPDATE TO CN CONSTRUCTIVE NOTES May 2010 Professional Indemnity Insurance - Claims made and notified policies - Sections 54 and 40(3) of the Insurance Contracts Act 1984 (Cth) The draft reform package
More informationDEFENDING BAD FAITH CLAIMS - - THE INSURER S PERSPECTIVE
DEFENDING BAD FAITH CLAIMS - - THE INSURER S PERSPECTIVE Eric A. Portuguese Lester Schwab Katz & Dwyer LLP Updates and Hot Trending Topics Affecting Insurance Coverage NYSBA May 12, 2017 INTRODUCTION Expanding
More informationGeneral Insurance Code of Practice: Overview of the Year
General Insurance Code of Practice: Overview of the Year 2012 2013 FOS Code Compliance and Monitoring Team April 2014 Page 1 of 55 Contents 1 This Annual Report 4 2 About the General Insurance Code of
More informationHEARING DISCIPLINARY COMMITTEE OF THE ASSOCIATION OF CHARTERED CERTIFIED ACCOUNTANTS. The Adelphi, 1-11 John Adam Street, London WC2N 6AU
DISCIPLINARY COMMITTEE OF THE ASSOCIATION OF CHARTERED CERTIFIED ACCOUNTANTS REASONS FOR DECISION In the matter of: Mr Burhan Ahmad Khan Lodhi Heard on: Tuesday, 21 August 2018 Location: The Adelphi, 1-11
More informationHeadland Machinery Pty Ltd ( Headland ) Sale and Installation of Parts Terms and Conditions
Headland Machinery Pty Ltd ( Headland ) Sale and Installation of Parts Terms and Conditions These are the terms and conditions upon which Headland (as named in section 1.1(o) below) sell and quote for
More informationSTANDARD TERMS AND CONDITIONS FOR THE COMMERCIAL HIRE OF GOODS AND EQUIPMENT
STANDARD TERMS AND CONDITIONS FOR THE COMMERCIAL HIRE OF GOODS AND EQUIPMENT These Standard Terms and Conditions together with the Offer to Hire Form, Payment Terms and Special Conditions, the Offer by
More informationOpposing Applications to Wind Up a Company in Insolvency
Opposing Applications to Wind Up a Company in Insolvency by Sam Chizik, Member of the Victorian Bar 1. This paper is about how a company, which has failed to set aside a statutory demand, can oppose an
More informationPitfalls of Adding Clients or Other Design Professionals as Additional Insureds
BluePrint For Design Professionals Pitfalls of Adding Clients or Other Design Professionals as Additional Insureds By Thomas Hay and Kevin Kieffer Architects and engineers who obtain professional liability
More informationCurrent Trends: The Unintended Results of the Absolute Exclusion REPRINTED WITH THE PERMISSION OF MyNewMarkets.com, An Insurance Journal Company.
Current Trends: The Unintended Results of the Absolute Exclusion REPRINTED WITH THE PERMISSION OF MyNewMarkets.com, An Insurance Journal Company. 2010 Two mutually exclusive goals are beginning to result
More informationSnapshot Own Motion Inquiry Investigation of Claims and Outsourced Services
2014 General Insurance Code of Practice Snapshot Own Motion Inquiry Investigation of Claims and Outsourced Services 1 May 2017 Page 1 of 16 Chair s message I am proud to present the Code Governance Committee
More informationTaranis Power Group Pty Ltd ACN EC
Taranis Power Group Pty Ltd ACN 601 067 243 EC 011336 Terms and Conditions of Rental and Sale 1. Agreement The contract between Taranis Power Group Pty Ltd (ACN 601 067 243) (Taranis Power) and the customer
More informationSUPREME COURT OF QUEENSLAND
SUPREME COURT OF QUEENSLAND CITATION: S J Sanders Pty Ltd v Schmidt [2012] QCA 358 PARTIES: S J SANDERS PTY LTD ACN 074 002 163 (appellant) v HEINZ JOHANN SCHMIDT (respondent) FILE NO/S: Appeal No 6370
More informationHEARING DISCIPLINARY COMMITTEE OF THE ASSOCIATION OF CHARTERED CERTIFIED ACCOUNTANTS. The Adelphi, 1-11 John Adam Street, London WC2N 6AU
DISCIPLINARY COMMITTEE OF THE ASSOCIATION OF CHARTERED CERTIFIED ACCOUNTANTS REASONS FOR DECISION In the matter of: Ms Hazima Naseem Akhtar Heard on: Tuesday, 21 August 2018 Location: The Adelphi, 1-11
More informationDECISION ON A MOTION
Financial Services Commission of Ontario Commission des services financiers de l Ontario BETWEEN: KAMALAVELU VADIVELU Applicant and STATE FARM MUTUAL AUTOMOBILE INSURANCE COMPANY Insurer DECISION ON A
More informationFinal Port of Discharge: actual or contractual? AWB (International) Ltd v Tradesmen International (PVT) Ltd [2006] VSCA 210
Final Port of Discharge: actual or contractual? AWB (International) Ltd v Tradesmen International (PVT) Ltd [2006] VSCA 210 Facts Kylie Weir AWB (International) Ltd (the Appellant) contracted in writing
More informationHIRE AGREEMENT. Between Chesterfield Australia Pty Ltd ACN and the party named below as the Hirer. Hirer Details
HIRE AGREEMENT This Agreement is dated the day of Between Chesterfield Australia Pty Ltd ACN 001 654 762 and the party named below as the Hirer. Hirer Details Legal/Trustee ABN: Item 1: Hirer s Details
More informationBC s New Apology Act: Saying I m Sorry Has Never Been So Easy
BC s New Apology Act: Saying I m Sorry Has Never Been So Easy By: George K. Bryce, BCACC legal counsel Originally published in 18:3 Insights at pages 15, 16, 26 & 27 (Winter 2007) INTRODUCTION BC s new
More informationYou are also unhappy that Enforcement refused to say whether or not you were identifiable in JP Morgan s Financial Notice.
19 June 2017 Dear Mr Iksil Complaint against the Financial Conduct Authority Our reference: FCA00106 Thank you for your email of 8 March 2017. I have completed further enquiries of the FCA, and can now
More informationSUPREME COURT OF QUEENSLAND
SUPREME COURT OF QUEENSLAND CITATION: Squires v President of Industrial Court Qld [2002] QSC 272 PARTIES: FILE NO: S3990 of 2002 DIVISION: PHILLIP ALAN SQUIRES (applicant/respondent) v PRESIDENT OF INDUSTRIAL
More informationAUTO INSURACE BAD FAITH CLAIMS IN VIRGINIA
AUTO INSURACE BAD FAITH CLAIMS IN VIRGINIA PRESENTED BY JEREMY FLACHS, ESQUIRE LAW OFFICES OF JEREMY FLACHS 6601 LITTLE RIVER TURNPIKE SUITE 315 ALEXANDRIA, VIRGINIA 22312 September 30, 2016 BAD FAITH-AUTO
More information27 February Higher People s Court of Fujian Province:
Supreme People s Court Reply Regarding First Investment Corp (Marshall Island) s Application for Recognition and Enforcement of an Arbitral Award Made in London by an ad hoc Arbitral Tribunal 27 February
More informationTable of vi B Opting out of and into the CISG 65 1 Opting out 65 2 Opting in 73 IV Excluded issues 75 A Liability for personal injury 75 B Article 4 s
Table of Preface page xi 1 The CISG: history, methodology, and construction 1 I The CISG as a set of commercial default rules 1 II The history and structure of the CISG 4 III CISG methodology and the limits
More informationDISCIPLINARY COMMITTEE OF THE ASSOCIATION OF CHARTERED CERTIFIED ACCOUNTANTS. ACCA s Offices, 29 Lincoln s Inn Fields, London, WC2A 3EE
DISCIPLINARY COMMITTEE OF THE ASSOCIATION OF CHARTERED CERTIFIED ACCOUNTANTS REASONS FOR DECISION In the matter of: Mr David Peter Lowe Heard on: 21 August 2015 Location: ACCA s Offices, 29 Lincoln s Inn
More informationAhmed Muhsen Ikbarieh. Osama (Sam) Hammadieh
BEFORE THE IMMIGRATION ADVISERS COMPLAINTS AND DISCIPLINARY TRIBUNAL Decision No: [2014] NZIACDT 49 Reference No: IACDT 0048/12 IN THE MATTER of a referral under s 48 of the Immigration Advisers Licensing
More information26 th February Final report by the Complaints Commissioner Complaint number FCA00376
Final report by the Complaints Commissioner Complaint number FCA00376 26 th February 2018 The complaint 1. On 23 rd July 2017 you asked me to investigate a complaint about the FCA. I carefully reviewed
More informationMANUFACTURE AND SALE OF GOODS
Regulations and Product Standards 59 Consumer Protection 60 Product Liability 61 By Caroline Zayid Manufacture and Sale of Goods 59 Regulations and Product Standards The Canada Consumer Product Safety
More informationERISA Litigation. ERISA Statute Fundamentals. What is ERISA, and where is the ERISA statute located? What is an ERISA plan?
ERISA Litigation Our expert attorneys have substantial experience representing third-party administrators, insurers, plans, plan sponsors, and employers in an array of ERISA litigation and benefits-related
More informationDIRECTORS DUTIES PREPARED FOR THE VICTORIAN COMMERCIAL TEACHERS ASSOCIATION
DIRECTORS DUTIES PREPARED FOR THE VICTORIAN COMMERCIAL TEACHERS ASSOCIATION Level 7, 422 Little Collins Street, Melbourne VIC 3000 PO Box 394, Collins Street West, Melbourne, VIC 8007 T 1 300 724 395 F
More informationSample Integrated Liability Clauses
Getting the Most of Other People's Insurance: Sample Integrated Liability Clauses November 19, 2015 Webinar Lawrence G. Theall David Badurina Brian Rosenbaum CAUTION TO READER: The sample clauses in this
More informationUnfair contract terms and small business: have you checked your contracts?
Unfair contract terms and small business: have you checked your contracts? Andrea Beatty and Gabor Papdi, KEYPOINT LAW There has been a major change in the law affecting those that enter into standard
More informationInsurance Industry Regulation. Unfair Claims Settlement Practices. Insurance Code (h) 1 & 2
Insurance Industry Regulation The Insurance Code established The California Department of Insurance to regulate the practice of insurance in California. To a large extent they are involved in financial
More informationIN THE LABOUR COURT OF SOUTH AFRICA HELD AT. JOHANNESBURG Case No: J3298/98
IN THE LABOUR COURT OF SOUTH AFRICA HELD AT JOHANNESBURG Case No: J3298/98 In the matter between FABBRICIANI Applicant and COMMISSION FOR CONCILIATION, MEDIATION & ARBITRATION J CAMPANELLA, COMMISSIONER
More informationUpdate Issue The Insurance Act 2015 Caroline Hedley, Associate. UK property & liability. Contents
UK property & liability Update Issue 1. 2015 Contents Page 1 Case update: Hufford v Samsung Electronics (UK) Ltd Page 3 Caroline Hedley, Associate received Royal Assent on 12 February 2015 and will come
More informationWHEN A FALSE STATEMENT VITIATES A CLAIM:
The Law Bulletin Volume 11, April 20 19 WHEN A FALSE STATEMENT VITIATES A CLAIM: Pinder v. Farmers Mutual Insurance Company Part I Introduction Although the reciprocal duty of good faith is the legal principle
More informationUNFAIR CLAIMS SETTLEMENT PRACTICES. 1. What insurer practices are addressed by statute, regulation and/or insurance department advisory?
UNFAIR CLAIMS SETTLEMENT PRACTICES New Hampshire Law 1. What insurer practices are addressed by statute, regulation and/or insurance department advisory? a. Misrepresentation of facts or policy provisions.
More informationTariq. The effect of S. 12 (1) of the Motor Vehicles Insurance (Third Party Risks) Act Ch. 48:51 The Act is agreed. That term is void as against third
REPUBLIC OF TRINIDAD AND TOBAGO HCA No. CV 2011-00701 IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUSTICE BETWEEN GULF INSURANCE LIMITED AND Claimant NASEEM ALI AND TARIQ ALI Defendants Before The Hon. Madam Justice C. Gobin
More informationClaims Examples Errors and Omissions Agents and Brokers
Claims Examples Errors and Omissions Agents and Brokers 1. Broker Failed to Increase Policy Limit as Instructed by Client ENCON Group Inc. 500-1400 Blair Place Ottawa, Ontario K1J 9B8 Telephone 613-786-2000
More informationIN THE COMMONWEALTH COURT OF PENNSYLVANIA. Appellant :
IN THE COMMONWEALTH COURT OF PENNSYLVANIA Northeast Bradford School District, : : Appellant : : v. : No. 2007 C.D. 2016 : Argued: June 5, 2017 Northeast Bradford Education : Association, PSEA/NEA : BEFORE:
More informationTHE CIRCULAR - Issue 3 - July 2010
THE CIRCULAR - Issue 3 - July 2010 Introduction from Colin Neave Welcome to the Financial Ombudsman Service Circular. The Circular is designed to facilitate dispute resolution by providing practical information
More informationCase 2:15-cv BJR Document 15 Filed 08/09/15 Page 1 of 6 UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE WESTERN DISTRICT OF WASHINGTON AT SEATTLE
Case :-cv-00-bjr Document Filed 0/0/ Page of 0 0 UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE WESTERN DISTRICT OF WASHINGTON AT SEATTLE LARRY ANDREWS, ) ) Plaintiff, ) CASE NO. CV- BJR ) v. ) ) ORDER GRANTING
More informationOdessa Marine Pty Ltd ACN Terms & Conditions of Trade
Odessa Marine Pty Ltd ACN 620 372 474 Terms & Conditions of Trade 1. Definitions and Interpretation 1.1 Unless otherwise specified the following words and phrases have the following meanings in these Terms:
More informationIn this paper my focus will be on the Court s application and interpretation of section 85 in summary judgement against immovable property.
1. Introduction The National Credit Act (the Act) came into operation at a time where consumer laws were somewhat unheard of in South Africa. Prior to the Act, the Credit Agreements Act and the Usury Act
More informationSUPREME COURT OF QUEENSLAND
SUPREME COURT OF QUEENSLAND CITATION: RJK Enterprises P/L v Webb & Anor [2006] QSC 101 PARTIES: FILE NO: 2727 of 2006 DIVISION: PROCEEDING: ORIGINATING COURT: RJK ENTERPRISES PTY LTD ACN 055 443 466 (applicant)
More informationHEARING PARTLY HEARD IN PRIVATE*
HEARING PARTLY HEARD IN PRIVATE* *The Committee has made a determination in this case that includes some private information. That information has been omitted from this text. TIWANA, Sukhjinder Singh
More informationThe applicable law in direct claims against insurers: an analysis of the decision in Maher v Groupama Grand Est [2009] EWHC 38 (QB),23 rd January 2009
The applicable law in direct claims against insurers: an analysis of the decision in Maher v Groupama Grand Est [2009] EWHC 38 (QB),23 rd January 2009 The recent decision of the European Court of Justice
More informationTHE FUTURE OF FINANCIAL ADVICE REFORMS: RESTORING PUBLIC TRUST AND CONFIDENCE IN FINANCIAL ADVISERS AN UNFINISHED PUZZLE
Canberra Law Review (2011) Vol. 10, Issue 3 188 THE FUTURE OF FINANCIAL ADVICE REFORMS: RESTORING PUBLIC TRUST AND CONFIDENCE IN FINANCIAL ADVISERS AN UNFINISHED PUZZLE MARCUS AP I INTRODUCTION In a media
More informationINDEX. Actual cash value. See Loss evaluation. Apportionment, 4:50. Appraiser. See Loss evaluation. Arson, 7:180 see also Fire; Perils, excluded
Accident defective work, liability policy, 4:30.10 meaning of, 4:30, 4:30.10, 4:110 onus of proof re, 4:30 resultant or concomitant accidents, 10:50 Actual cash value. See Loss evaluation Apportionment,
More informationIN THE COMMONWEALTH COURT OF PENNSYLVANIA
IN THE COMMONWEALTH COURT OF PENNSYLVANIA Joseph C. Bongivengo, : Appellant : : v. : No. 877 C.D. 2018 : Argued: February 11, 2019 City of New Castle Pension Plan : Board and The City of New Castle : BEFORE:
More information2011 BCSECCOM 197. Mutual Fund Dealers Association of Canada Tony Tung-Yuan Lin. Section 28 of the Securities Act, RSBC 1996, c.
Mutual Fund Dealers Association of Canada Tony Tung-Yuan Lin Section 28 of the Securities Act, RSBC 1996, c. 418 Hearing and Review Panel Brent W. Aitken Bradley Doney Don Rowlatt Vice Chair Commissioner
More informationWORLD TRADE ORGANIZATION
WORLD TRADE ORGANIZATION WT/DS46/AB/RW 21 July 2000 (00-2990) Original: English BRAZIL EXPORT FINANCING PROGRAMME FOR AIRCRAFT RECOURSE BY CANADA TO ARTICLE 21.5 OF THE DSU AB-2000-3 Report of the Appellate
More informationRestructuring Environmental Liabilities Spin-off of Profitable Business Found To Be A Fraudulent Transfer Tronox v. Kerr-McGee
Restructuring Environmental Liabilities Spin-off of Profitable Business Found To Be A Fraudulent Transfer Tronox v. Kerr-McGee Vincent J. Roldan Vandenberg & Feliu About the Author: Vincent J. Roldan 98
More informationInterim Report Review of the financial system external dispute resolution and complaints framework
EDR Review Secretariat Financial System Division Markets Group The Treasury Langton Crescent PARKES ACT 2600 Email: EDRreview@treasury.gov.au 25 January 2017 Dear Sir/Madam Interim Report Review of the
More information$ LAKE COUNTY, FLORIDA INDUSTRIAL DEVELOPMENT REVENUE BONDS (CRANE S VIEW LODGE PROJECT) SERIES 2012 BOND PURCHASE AGREEMENT.
EXHIBIT "B" PSW Draft #1 $ LAKE COUNTY, FLORIDA INDUSTRIAL DEVELOPMENT REVENUE BONDS (CRANE S VIEW LODGE PROJECT) SERIES 2012 BOND PURCHASE AGREEMENT November, 2012 Lake County, Florida Tavares, Florida
More informationInsurance Litigation in Germany
Christian Drave, Dr. Fabian Herdter March 2016 Insurance Litigation in Germany 1. PRELIMINARY AND JURISDICTIONAL CONSIDERATIONS IN INSURANCE LITIGATION 1.1 In what fora are insurance disputes litigated?
More informationBERLINWASSER INTERNATIONAL AG MAURITIUS v BENYDIN L.R IN THE SUPREME COURT OF MAURITIUS. Berlinwasser International AG Mauritius
BERLINWASSER INTERNATIONAL AG MAURITIUS v BENYDIN L.R 2017 SCJ 120 Record No. 6823 IN THE SUPREME COURT OF MAURITIUS In the matter of:- Berlinwasser International AG Mauritius Appellant v L.R. Benydin
More informationProcedural Considerations For Insurance Coverage Declaratory Judgment Actions
Procedural Considerations For Insurance Coverage Declaratory Judgment Actions New York City Bar Association October 24, 2016 Eric A. Portuguese Lester Schwab Katz & Dwyer, LLP 1 Introduction Purpose of
More informationGUIDELINES FOR THE ADMINISTRATION OF MONETARY PENALTIES
SUPERVISORY AND REGULATORY GUIDELINES Administrative Monetary Penalties Guidelines Issued: 19 th May, 2016 Last Amended 20 th June, 2016 GUIDELINES FOR THE ADMINISTRATION OF MONETARY PENALTIES 1. INTRODUCTION
More informationRACING APPEALS TRIBUNAL IN THE MATTER OF A STAY APPLICATION BY DEAN MCDOWELL
RACING APPEALS TRIBUNAL IN THE MATTER OF A STAY APPLICATION BY DEAN MCDOWELL 1. Mr McDowell a licensed trainer, has lodged an appeal against the decision of 12 March 2015 of the Stewards appointed under
More informationCivil Design Consultants, Inc.
Civil Design Consultants, Inc. AGREEMENT FOR PROFESSIONAL ENGINEERING SERVICES Project: CLIENT: Dakota Ridge waterline replacement Dakota Ridge Homeowner s Association ENGINEER: Civil Design Consultants,
More informationTHE STANDARD BANK OF SOUTH AFRICA LIMITED
521/82 N v H EMERGENCY TRUCK AND CAR HIRE JAGATHESAN JOHN CHETTY and THE STANDARD BANK OF SOUTH AFRICA LIMITED SMALBERGER, JA :- 521/82 N v H IN THE SUPREME COURT OF SOUTH AFRICA (APPELLATE DIVISION) In
More informationSUPREME COURT OF QUEENSLAND
SUPREME COURT OF QUEENSLAND CITATION: Woods v Australian Taxation Office & Ors [2017] QCA 28 PARTIES: SONYA JOANNE WOODS (applicant) v AUSTRALIAN TAXATION OFFICE ABN 51 824 753 556 (first respondent) ROBERT
More informationCompanion Directors and Officers Defence Costs and Expenses Insurance. Policy Wording
Companion Directors and Officers Defence Costs and Expenses Insurance Policy Wording Important Statutory Notice Section 40 Insurance Contracts Act 1984 (Cth) This notice is provided in connection with
More informationOutflanked High Court of Australia goes behind Bankruptcy Court Judgment
Outflanked High Court of Australia goes behind Bankruptcy Court Judgment September 18, 2017 Written by JHK Legal Senior Associate Daniel Johnston On 17 August 2017, the High Court of Australia delivered
More informationContractual Liability Claim Form IMPORTANT NOTES
Contractual Liability Claim Form IMPORTANT NOTES FOR YOUR INFORMATION PRIVACY 1 Ensure you: a. observe the principles of Utmost Good Faith, b. comply with your Duty of Disclosure, c. comply with the General
More informationAccording to the Explanatory Memorandum, the Vulnerable Worker Bill provisions relating to franchisor entities aim:
26 April 2017 Committee Secretary Senate Education and Employment Committees PO Box 6100 Parliament House Canberra ACT 2600 Dear Committee Secretary, Response to questions on notice: Vulnerable Workers
More informationConveyancing and property
Editor: Peter Butt STATUTORY WARFARE, ROUND 2: HAS THE HIGH COURT CONFUSED THE LAW OF ILLEGALITY? In an earlier note in this column ( Statutory warfare? What happens when retail lease legislation collides
More informationOrder F09-22 THE BOARD OF EDUCATION OF SCHOOL DISTRICT 35 (LANGLEY) Jay Fedorak, Adjudicator. November 12, 2009
Order F09-22 THE BOARD OF EDUCATION OF SCHOOL DISTRICT 35 (LANGLEY) Jay Fedorak, Adjudicator November 12, 2009 Quicklaw Cite: [2009] B.C.I.P.C.D. No. 28 Document URL: http://www.oipc.bc.ca/orders/2009/orderf09-22.pdf
More informationCALIFORNIA CODES CIVIL CODE SECTION This title may be cited as the "Song-Beverly Credit Card Act of 1971."
CALIFORNIA CODES CIVIL CODE SECTION 1747-1748.95 1747. This title may be cited as the "Song-Beverly Credit Card Act of 1971." 1747.01. It is the intent of the Legislature that the provisions of this title
More informationWhat amounts to good faith conduct or repudiation on construction projects?
BuildLaw - Good Faith Conduct or Repudiation on Construction Projects 1 What amounts to good faith conduct or repudiation on construction projects? When is a building contract a joint venture and what
More informationVICTORIAN CIVIL AND ADMINISTRATIVE TRIBUNAL CIVIL DIVISION DOMESTIC BUILDING LIST VCAT Reference: D202/2004. Noreen Cosgriff.
VICTORIAN CIVIL AND ADMINISTRATIVE TRIBUNAL CIVIL DIVISION DOMESTIC BUILDING LIST VCAT Reference: D202/2004 APPLICANT: FIRST RESPONDENT: SECOND RESPONDENT: WHERE HELD: BEFORE: HEARING TYPE: Noreen Cosgriff
More informationGOVERNMENT EMPLOYEES PENSION FUND
IN THE HIGH COURT OF SOUTH AFRICA EASTERN CAPE LOCAL DIVISION, PORT ELIZABETH CASE NO: 228/2015 Date heard: 30 July 2015 Date delivered: 4 August 2015 In the matter between NOMALUNGISA MPOFU Applicant
More informationSOUTHERN CROSS AUSTEREO STANDARD ADVERTISING TERMS AND CONDITIONS. The definitions set out below apply in the Agreement.
SOUTHERN CROSS AUSTEREO STANDARD ADVERTISING TERMS AND CONDITIONS 1. DEFINITIONS The definitions set out below apply in the Agreement. Advertising means communication of any Advertising Material during
More information