Formulas. Experience Rating Equity and Predictive Accuracy : Venter

Size: px
Start display at page:

Download "Formulas. Experience Rating Equity and Predictive Accuracy : Venter"

Transcription

1 Formulas B.1 Prospective Rating xperience Rating quity and Predictive Accuracy : Venter The formula that minimizes the expected squared error, subject to the linearly constraint A = Actual Loss = xpected Loss K = the credibility constant X = Loss amount Modification= A+K + K 1961 plan Primary loss amount X X +8000, X 2000 Modified xpected Loss (ML) in No-Split plan Z = Credibility factor Basic formula : ML=Z A+(1 Z ) if Z = +K K formula: ML= A+K +K Modified xpected Loss (ML) in Split plan ML=Z p A p +(1 Z p ) p +Z e A e +(1 Z e ) e.. p = for primary loss.. e = for excess loss Since there are two credibilities, two credibility constants are needed Z p = +B, Z = e + K then W = +B +K = Z e Z p ML=[ (A +W A +(1 W ) +B ) ] p e e (+B) transforming ML to

2 B = Ballast value W = Weighting WC R: What very Actuary Should Know : Gillam, W.R. The formula for the experience ration mod M = the risk modification M = (A p +W A e +(1 W ) e + B ) (+ B) A = the actual or rated loss for the risk = the expected loss for the risk.. p = for primary loss.. e = for excess loss W = weighting B = ballast value Computation of the value of = all classes i i = all classesi (Payroll i 100) LR i LR i = xpected loss rate for class i Computation for the value of p p = all classesi D i = D-ratio for class i D i i and e = p Computation for the value of A A= A n n A n : Individual loss indexed at n Computation of A p and A e A p = n A np and A e = A A p A np : Primary component of individual loss indexed at n Limited loss

3 SAL = SRP / 10 Multiple claim occurences limit = 2 * SAL Total disease loss for policy year limit = 3 * SAL * Risk's total expected loss for the experience period Primary component of a single loss = 5000$ Primary component of multiple claim occurences = 10000$ Primary component of disease loss for policy year = 10000$ * Risk's total expected primary loss for the experience period SRP = State reference point SAL = State accident limit Computation of the SRP SRP = 250 * SACC * Trend Trend Period rounded to nearest 5000$ SACC = State average cost per claim (no lim, 100k on L) Trend = Taken from the most recent countrywide Retrospective Rating xpected Loss Size Ranges update filing Computation of G G = SRP / G = Scale factor for credibilities varying by state B= G +700G B = Ballast value Computation of B = xpected loss of an insured C= G +5100G, subject to 7500$ minimum Computation for C, subject to $ minimum C = intermediate value used for the calculation of W W = + B +C Computation of W, rounded to nearest 0.01

4 W = Weighting Fundamentals of Individual Risk Rating Part 1 : Gillam and Snader Analysis of the basic formula in the no split plan Z ( A ) M =1+ M = the experience modification A = the actual or rated loss for the risk = the expected loss for the risk Z = credibility Unity represents standard rate Second term represents a debit/credit moderated by Z/ The Surety Association Plans (no split) M =(1 Z )+ P = the standard premium (1-Z) = the premium modifier Z / P A P Z / [ / P] = the adjusted loss multiplier A / P = the adjusted loss ratio Fundamental expression for credibility in the no split plan Z = credibility = xpected loss Z= +K K = determined from the swing desired in the plan K Formula for xperience Rating in the no slit plan A = Actual loss M = A+K +K Loss free modification in the no split plan M = K +K =(1 Z )

5 M tilt = Modification when there is no loss Analysis of the experience modification formula in the spit plan M = the risk modification M =1+Z p (A p p ) +Z e ( A e e ) A = the actual or rated loss for the risk = the expected loss for the risk Z = credibility factor.. p = for primary loss.. e = for excess loss If Z p = +K and Z e = + J then M =1+ (A p p ) +K + ( A e e ) +J K = credibility constant for primary loss (B above) J = credibility constant for excess loss (K above) Loss free modification in the split plan M =1 Z p p Z e e M tilt = modification when there is no loss Perryman's 1 st Formula (Q < < S) derivation (same as above, different notation) W = Q S Q M = the risk modification and B=(1 W ) K then M = (A p +W A e +(1 W ) e + B ) (+ B) A = the actual or rated loss for the risk = the expected loss for the risk.. p = for primary loss.. e = for excess loss W = weighting

6 B = ballast value S = self-rating point for total loss (Z p = Z e = 1) Q = self-rating point for primary loss (Z p = 1) The 1940 multi-split plan formula for primary component N I A<( N +1) I then A = loss amount I = width of each increments (500$ in 1940) N = number of increments in the loss d = rate of discount (1/3 in 1940) A p = primary component of loss, max is I / d The 1961 split plan formula for primary component A p = A (I +C) A+C A = loss amount C = constant (8000$ in 1960) I = split point (2000$ in 1960) A p = primary component of loss, max is (I+C) The 1998 Adjustment to the R Plan : NCCI Comparison R Plan Manual for WC and L : NCCI Formulas can be found under Gillam. xperience and Schedule Rating Plan of GL : ISO Present Average Company Rate Method when Dramatic Change BL premium for the policybeing rated Average annual per occurrence BL company rate= xposures on the special u/w basis Annual BL loss cost =(xposures on special u/w basis) ( BL rates) (Co. LR) Company Subject Loss Cost = Annual BL Loss cost PAF 1 PAF 2 Detrend sublines 3 years PAF 1 = Bring lost cost to full occurrence level for CM PAF 2 = liminate loss cost related to midi-tail cov. for CM

7 Historical xposures at Present Company Rates Method when Dramatic Change Annual BL loss cost=( Historical xposures) ( BL rates) ( ILF) (Co. LR) ILF = Increased limit factor Computation under rule 4A Company Subject Loss Cost= BL Prem current LR PAF 1 PAF 2 Detrend sublines 3 years Actual limited losses+ ARULL AR= Company Subject Loss Cost M = AR R Z R ARULL= Company Subject Loss Cost R LDF sublines 3 years LR = Current expected loss ratio AR = Actual experience ratio ARULL = Adjustments to reflect Ultimate Loss Levels R = xpected experience ratio M = Modification factor Z = Credibility MSL = Maximum Single Loss LDF = for occurrence policies only Company xpense Variation Factor LRUnderlying the company manual premium VF= Actual LR for the risk VF = xpense variation factor to apply to premium Computation of included loss amount Loss amount included= Minimum(Minimum(L, Basic Limit )+ ALA, MSL) Do not include loss payable due to midi-tail under CM B.2 Retrospective Rating Table M Construction : Brosius Table M ntry ratio

8 r= AL L r = entry ratio AL = actual loss (ratio) L = expected loss (ratio) Fundamentals of Individual Risk Rating Part 2 : Gillam and Snader Basic Formula for Retrospective Rating H = the minimum premium H R=(b+C L) T G R = the retrospective premium b = basic premium (basic factor * standard premium) c = loss conversion factor for expenses that vary with loss L = actual loss incurred subject to limitation T = tax multiplier G = the maximum premium Minimum premium H =(b+c r H ) T =(b+c L H ) T r H = L H r H = entry ratio at minimum premium L H = loss that will result in minimum premium Maximum premium G=(b+c r G ) T =(b+c L G ) T r G = L G r G = entry ratio at maximum premium L G = loss that will result in maximum premium b = basic premium Basic premium computation b=e (c 1) +cl

9 e = the provision in the Guaranteed cost premium for total expense and profit, excluding taxes, expresses as a ratio to Standard Premium c = Loss conversion factor for expenses which vary with loss cl = the converted insurance charge Insurance Charge Computation cl=c ( X G S H ) X G = the table M charge at entry ratio r G S H = the table M savings at entry ratio r H Restated Basic Premium Formula b=e (c 1) +c ( X G S H ) xpense Ratio Computation e= (1 D) T Guaranteed Cost Premium computation e = the expense ratio T (e+ ) SP=(1 D) SP D = the applicable discount for a given risk T = the Tax Multiplier = xpected Loss (as % of standard premium) SP = Standard premium T = Tax Multiplier = permissible loss ratio Tax Multiplier Computation T = 0.2+ (1+μ) τ τ=τ 1 +τ μ=μ 1 +μ τ = various taxes (premium-based levies) μ = assessments Table M entry difference

10 r G r H = G H c T Table M value difference e+ H /T X H X G = c For any entry ratio r, the savings are S = savings at entry ratio r X = charge at entry ratio r S r = X r +r 1 Insurance Charge Reflecting Loss Limitations (ICRLL) using a limited loss table H R=(b'+cF +c L ') T G F = LR r ' G r ' H = G H c ' T e+ H /T X ' H X ' G = c ' ' = LR 1 LR = F / 1 F / r' r = entry ratios of actual limited loss to expected limited loss X' r = limited insurance charge ' = expected limited loss RR Plan Manual for WC and mployers Liability : NCCI The Retrospective Premium Formula RP = [BP + CL] * TM BP = SP * BPF RP = Retrospective Premium BP = Basic Premium BPF = Basic Premium Factor SP = Standard Premium CL = Converted Loss TM = Tax Multiplier Computation of the elective element (1) xcess Loss Premium

11 LP = SP * LPF * LCF LP = xcess Loss Premium LPF = xcess Loss Premium Factor LCF = Loss Conversion Factor Computation of the second elective element (2) Retrospective Development Premium RDP = SP * RDPF * LCF RDP = Retrospective Development Premium RDPF = Retrospective Development Premium Factor LCF = Loss Conversion Factor The Retrospective Formula when the two elective elements are included RP = [BP + CL + LP + RDP] * TM The Mathematics of XOL Coverages and RR : Lee Description of the Table M charge and savings in term of functions A = Actual loss of the risk = [A], the expected loss ϕ(r)= ( y r)df ( y) r r ψ(r)= (r y)df ( y) 0 Y = A/, the actual loss in units of expected loss F(Y) = the cumulative distribution function of Y φ(r) = Table M charge (X r ) ψ(r) = Table M savings (S r ) Properties of these functions ϕ' (r)= G(r) ψ' (r)=f (r) ϕ' ' (r)= f (r) ψ' ' (r)= f (r) ϕ' ' (r)= f (r)=ψ ' ' (r) ψ(r)=ϕ(r)+r 1

12 r = entry ratio G(r) = 1 F(r) ' = first derivative '' = second derivative A More General result 1 Let L={r A r 2 A r 1 r 1 A r 2 r 2 A [ L]/ ψ(r 1 )+ϕ(r 2 )=1 [ L]= (1+ψ(r 1 ) ϕ(r 2 ))= I I = (ϕ(r 2 ) ψ(r 1 )) r 1 = entry ratio at lower bound r 2 = entry ratio at upper bound = expected loss [L] = expected ratable loss I = net insurance charge of the Table M Balance equation (1) : charge difference formula e = total expenses = expected loss H = minimum premium C = loss conversion factor (e+ ) H =C (ϕ(r H ) ϕ(r G )) r H = entry ratio at the minimum r G = entry ratio at the maximum Balance equation (2) : entry ratio difference formula G = maximum premium G H =C (r G r H ) Description of the Table L charge and savings in term of functions ϕ*(r)= ( y r)df *( y)+k r

13 [ A *] k= r ψ*(r)= (r y)df *( y) 0 A* = Actual limited loss of the risk A = Actual loss of the risk = [A], the expected loss k = loss elimination ratio Y = A*/, the entry ratio F*(Y) = the cumulative distribution function of Y φ(r) = Table M charge (X r ) ψ(r) = Table M savings (S r ) The California Table L : Skurnick Computation of the net Table L insurance charge I *= (ϕ *(r G ) ψ*(r H )) H A * L H Let L={L A * L H A* L G L G L G A * [ L]= I * I* = net Table L insurance charge A* = actual limited loss L H = actual limited loss that produces minimum premium L G = actual limited loss that produces maximum premium The expected value of loss portion of the retrospective premium when the plan is in balance RP = [L + I*] = [L] + I* = I* + I* = RP = Retrospective premium The expected value of the expense portion of the retrospective premium when the plan is in balance RP = { SP(1 D) C + (C 1)*(I* + L) } = SP(1 D) SP = standard premium

14 D = expense gradation in the plan as a ratio to SP C = loss conversion factor The incremental Charge on Table M due to superimposing a per case limit Table L Charge = Table M Charge + Incremental charge Incremental Charge=ϕ *(r) ϕ(r)=ψ *(r) ψ(r) The California Table L : Skurnick Discussion by Gillam Formula shift in Table M column to approximate a limited loss table of charges ' = xpected loss used to find the expected loss group Hazard Group Differential applied to update xpected Loss Size m(s /H )= CWS SWS m(s/h) = Hazard Group Differential CWS = Country Wide Total Severity (all Hazard Groups) SWS = State Wide Severity (a Hazard Group) The premium impact of an update to xpected Loss Size ranges in the retro rating plans RP = Retrospective premium ' [RP ] [RP ] Impact= [RP ] '[RP] = expectation according to the updated loss distribution B.3 Loss Sensitive Rating Fundamentals of Individual Risk Rating Part 3 : Gillam and Snader r = the retention k = the loss elimination ratio Straight deductible formula k= L r+(n n)r = [ x ;r ] L [x] N = total number of claims in the study

15 n = number of claims that do not exceed r L = total losses in the study L r = losses due to claims which do not exceed r [x;d] = expected loss limited at d Disappearing deductible formula L' = indemnification amount λ = claim amount r = retention lower bound R = retention upper bound 0 λ r L R '={(λ r)[ R r ] r<λ< R λ λ R Aggregate payment for losses between r and R R (L R rn R ) [ R r ] L R = total losses in the study between r and R N R = number of claims in the study between r and R Amount saved on losses between r and R R L R (L R rn R ) [ R r ] Loss elimination ratio R L r +L R (L R rn R ) [ R r ] LR=k = L All notation can be found above Discount Formula for Deductible Coverage Full Coverage Premium Formula P=P+nP+( A+T + p) P e=n+a P=( a)p+ep+( A+T + p) P

16 f = safety factor ( a) P+e P P= 1 A T p Deductible Coverage Premium P ' =(1 fk )( a) P+eP+(A+T + p) P ' (1 fk)( a) P+e P P ' = 1 A T p Discount for Deductible Coverage k = loss elimination ratio D=1 P ' P fk ( a) D= 1 A T p Notation for xpense and Profit Provisions n = provision for expense other than acquisition, taxes, profit and ALA e = provision for expense other than acquisition, taxes, profit. (e = n + a) A = provision for acquisition T = provision for taxes p = provision for profit Notation for Premium and Loss Components = xpected Loss ratio including ALA a = provision of ALA P = full coverage premium P' = deductible coverage premium D = discount for deductible coverage Discount Formulas for xcess Coverage Case 1 : inspection expense, ULA, home office expense vary with premium Full Coverage Premium Formula P=P+eP +( A+T + p+i+u+gh)p P+eP P= 1 A T p i u gh xcess Coverage Premium P ' =(1 fk ) P+eP+(A+T + p+i+u+gh) P '

17 (1 fk ) P+eP P ' = 1 A T p i u gh Discount for xcess Coverage D=1 P ' P fk D= 1 A T p i u gh i = inspection expense (vary with premium) u = ULA (vary with premium) gh = home office expense (vary with premium) e = provision for all other expenses Discount Formulas for xcess Coverage Case 2 : inspection expense, ULA, home office expense vary with excess losses end ALA Full Coverage Premium Formula P=P (1+i +u + gh )+ep +( A+T + p) P P= P(1+i +u +gh )+ep 1 A T p xcess Coverage Premium P ' =(1 fk ) P(1+i +u +gh )+ep+( A+T + p) P ' P ' = (1 fk) P (1+i +u + gh )+ep 1 A T p Discount for xcess Coverage D=1 P ' P D= fk(1+i +u +gh ) 1 A T p i = inspection expense (vary with XS losses and ALA) u = ULA (vary with XS losses and ALA) gh = home office expense (vary with XS losses and ALA) e = provision for all other expenses Discount Formula for Workers Compensation x-medical Coverage Full Coverage Premium Formula P=P+eP +( A+T ) P

18 P= +e P 1 A T = 1 A T e x-medical Premium P ' = k M +ep+( A+T ) P ' P ' = k M +e P 1 A T Discount for x-medical Coverage D=1 P ' P D= k M +ep Notation for xpense Provisions e = provision for expense other than acquisition, taxes A = provision for acquisition T = provision for taxes Notation for Premium and Loss Components = xpected Loss or Total pure premium excluding ALA M = the medical pure premium k = portion of medical pure premium eliminated (determined by judgement) P = full coverage premium P' = ex-medical premium D = ex-medical discount Loss Conversion Factor Adjustments Under Retrospective Rating J =c 1 J ' =c' 1 J (1 A T e) J ' =J =...= k M (1 D)(1 A T ) e J ' =c' 1>J =c 1 c = loss conversion factor for the ex-medical retro plan c' = adjusted loss conversion factor for the ex-medical retro plan

19 Pricing WC Large Deductible and xcess Ins : Teng Pricing Formula for LDD Premium [ L ( XL+ULA+ LBA)+SP (GO+CR) ] LDD Premium= 1 A T P L = xpected Total Loss (include ALA load if used when calculating the deductible) XL = xpected excess loss as a % of total loss (excess on a per occurrence or aggregate basis) LBA = Loss based assessment factor (for states requiring payment to 2 nd injury funds on losses below the deductible) ULA = Ratio of ULA to Loss SP = Standard Premium GO = Ratio of General Overhead to Standard Premium CR = Ratio of Credit Risk Compensation to Standard Premium A = Ratio of Acquisition xpense to Net LDD Premium T = Tax and Assessment Rate Ratio based on Net LDD Premium P = Ratio of Profit and Contingency to Net LDD Premium xcess Loss Cost for per occurrence deductible XSLC = xcess loss cost L = xpected total loss XSLC = L * LPPF LPPF = xcess loss pure premium factor (listed by deductible and by WC Hazard Group) Insurance charge for aggregate deductible IC = Insurance charge IC = XS / L XS = xpected amount of loss above an aggregate deductible level L = total loss Pricing Formula for xcess WC Premium

20 [ L XL (1+ULA )+SP GO ] xcesswc Premium= 1 A T P A = Ratio of Acquisition xpense to Net xcess WC Premium T = Tax and Assessment Rate Ratio based on Net xcess WC Premium P = Ratio of Profit and Contingency to Net xcess WC Pricing Aggregates on Deductible Policies : Fisher

Pricing Aggregates on Deductible Policies. Ginda Kaplan Fisher, for the Casualty Actuarial Society May 2012

Pricing Aggregates on Deductible Policies. Ginda Kaplan Fisher, for the Casualty Actuarial Society May 2012 Pricing Aggregates on Deductible Policies Ginda Kaplan Fisher, for the Casualty Actuarial Society May 2012 Reduce, Reuse, Recycle government slogan Abstract The same methods used to price retrospectively

More information

Florida Office of Insurance Regulation I-File Workflow System. Filing Number: Request Type: Entire Filing

Florida Office of Insurance Regulation I-File Workflow System. Filing Number: Request Type: Entire Filing Florida Office of Insurance Regulation I-File Workflow System Filing Number: 18-10407 Request Type: Entire Filing NATIONAL COUNCIL ON COMPENSATION INSURANCE, INC. FLORIDA VOLUNTARY MARKET RATES AND RATING

More information

Mock CAS Exam 9 Fall Solutions

Mock CAS Exam 9 Fall Solutions Mock CAS Exam 9 Fall 2009 - Solutions 1. a. i. Not differentiate unfairly between risks ii. Based upon relevant data iii. Respect personal privacy iv. Risks identify naturally with classification b. Can

More information

Lesson 3 Experience Rating

Lesson 3 Experience Rating Lesson 3 Experience Rating 1. Objective This lesson explains the purpose and process of experience rating and how it impacts the premium of workers compensation insurance. 2. Introduction to Experience

More information

SOCIETY OF ACTUARIES Advanced Topics in General Insurance. Exam GIADV. Date: Thursday, May 1, 2014 Time: 2:00 p.m. 4:15 p.m.

SOCIETY OF ACTUARIES Advanced Topics in General Insurance. Exam GIADV. Date: Thursday, May 1, 2014 Time: 2:00 p.m. 4:15 p.m. SOCIETY OF ACTUARIES Exam GIADV Date: Thursday, May 1, 014 Time: :00 p.m. 4:15 p.m. INSTRUCTIONS TO CANDIDATES General Instructions 1. This examination has a total of 40 points. This exam consists of 8

More information

Solutions to the New STAM Sample Questions

Solutions to the New STAM Sample Questions Solutions to the New STAM Sample Questions 2018 Howard C. Mahler For STAM, the SOA revised their file of Sample Questions for Exam C. They deleted questions that are no longer on the syllabus of STAM.

More information

SCHEDULE P: MEMORIZE ME!!!

SCHEDULE P: MEMORIZE ME!!! SCHEDULE P: MEMORIZE ME!!! NOTE: This skips all the prior years row calculation stuff, since it is covered pretty well by TIA (and I m sure any other manual). What are the cross-checks performed by the

More information

RE: New York Workers Compensation Experience Rating Plan Revisions Effective October 1, 2013

RE: New York Workers Compensation Experience Rating Plan Revisions Effective October 1, 2013 B U L L E T I N 733 Third Ave New York, New York 10017 Tel: (212) 697-3535 www.nycirb.org May 1, 2013 Contact: Mr. Ziv Kimmel Vice President & Chief Actuary Ext. 117, Zkimmel@nycirb.org R.C. 2334 To: The

More information

Actuarial Memorandum: F-Classification and USL&HW Rating Value Filing

Actuarial Memorandum: F-Classification and USL&HW Rating Value Filing TO: FROM: The Honorable Jessica K. Altman Acting Insurance Commissioner, Commonwealth of Pennsylvania John R. Pedrick, FCAS, MAAA Vice President, Actuarial Services DATE: November 29, 2017 RE: Actuarial

More information

Benefits of having a Return-to-Work program. Andrew Justice, Underwriting Analyst

Benefits of having a Return-to-Work program. Andrew Justice, Underwriting Analyst Benefits of having a Return-to-Work program Andrew Justice, Underwriting Analyst Return-to-Work Program A plan established by an employer to help reintegrate injured workers into the workplace through

More information

Introduction to Increased Limits Ratemaking

Introduction to Increased Limits Ratemaking Introduction to Increased Limits Ratemaking Joseph M. Palmer, FCAS, MAAA, CPCU Assistant Vice President Increased Limits & Rating Plans Division Insurance Services Office, Inc. Increased Limits Ratemaking

More information

Antitrust Notice. Copyright 2010 National Council on Compensation Insurance, Inc. All Rights Reserved.

Antitrust Notice. Copyright 2010 National Council on Compensation Insurance, Inc. All Rights Reserved. Antitrust Notice The Casualty Actuarial Society is committed to adhering strictly to the letter and spirit of the antitrust laws. Seminars conducted under the auspices of the CAS are designed solely to

More information

Solutions to the Fall 2013 CAS Exam 5

Solutions to the Fall 2013 CAS Exam 5 Solutions to the Fall 2013 CAS Exam 5 (Only those questions on Basic Ratemaking) Revised January 10, 2014 to correct an error in solution 11.a. Revised January 20, 2014 to correct an error in solution

More information

State of Florida Office of Insurance Regulation Financial Services Commission

State of Florida Office of Insurance Regulation Financial Services Commission State of Florida Office of Insurance Regulation Actuarial Peer Review and Analysis of the Ratemaking Processes of the National Council on Compensation Insurance, Inc. January 21, 2010 January 21, 2010

More information

INDIVIDUAL RISK RATING Study Note, April 2017

INDIVIDUAL RISK RATING Study Note, April 2017 INDIVIDUAL RISK RATING Study Note, April 2017 Ginda Kaplan Fisher, FCAS, MAAA Lawrence McTaggart, FCAS, MAAA Jill Petker, FCAS, MAAA Rebecca Pettingell, FCAS, MAAA Casualty Actuarial Society, 2017 Individual

More information

Assigned Risk Rates and Rating Values for the Michigan Workers' Compensation Placement Facility (2013)

Assigned Risk Rates and Rating Values for the Michigan Workers' Compensation Placement Facility (2013) Assigned Risk Rates and Rating Values for the Michigan Workers' Compensation Placement Facility (2013) Table of Contents 1. Circular Letter 2. Class Code Rating Values 3. Miscellaneous Values 4. Footnotes

More information

Solutions to the Fall 2015 CAS Exam 8

Solutions to the Fall 2015 CAS Exam 8 Solutions to the Fall 2015 CAS Exam 8 (Incorporating what I found useful in the CAS Examinerʼs Report) The Exam 8 is copyright 2015 by the Casualty Actuarial Society. The exam is available from the CAS.

More information

January 1, 2013 Pure Premium Rate Filing Actuarial and C & R Committee Recommendations

January 1, 2013 Pure Premium Rate Filing Actuarial and C & R Committee Recommendations W o r k e r s C o m p e n s a t i o n I n s u r a n c e R a t i n g B u r e a u o f C a l i f o r n i a January 1, 2013 Pure Premium Rate Filing Actuarial and C & R Committee Recommendations Governing

More information

Workers Compensation Ratemaking An Overview

Workers Compensation Ratemaking An Overview Antitrust Notice The Casualty Actuarial Society is committed to adhering strictly to the letter and spirit of the antitrust laws. Seminars conducted under the auspices of the CAS are designed solely to

More information

Solutions to the Fall 2017 CAS Exam 8

Solutions to the Fall 2017 CAS Exam 8 Solutions to the Fall 2017 CAS Exam 8 (Incorporating what I found useful in the CAS Examinerʼs Report) The Exam 8 is copyright 2017 by the Casualty Actuarial Society. The exam is available from the CAS.

More information

NCCI s New ELF Methodology

NCCI s New ELF Methodology NCCI s New ELF Methodology Presented by: Tom Daley, ACAS, MAAA Director & Actuary CAS Centennial Meeting November 11, 2014 New York City, NY Overview 6 Key Components of the New Methodology - Advances

More information

Schedule P Schedule P- Summary. Schedule P- Part 1: Current Valuation. Description Org By Net/Gross Data Fields direct & Current

Schedule P Schedule P- Summary. Schedule P- Part 1: Current Valuation. Description Org By Net/Gross Data Fields direct & Current Schedule P- Summary Part 1 Part 2 Part 3 Part 4 Part5 Part 6 Part 7 Description Org By Net/Gross Data Fields Current premiums: CY Valuation loss & exp: AY and ceded Incurred Losses Paid Losses Bulk Reserves

More information

Data Collection Agency Workers Compensation Insurances Statewide Average Pure Premium Michigan (2018)

Data Collection Agency Workers Compensation Insurances Statewide Average Pure Premium Michigan (2018) Data Collection Agency Workers Compensation Insurances Statewide Average Pure Premium Michigan (2018) Table of Contents 1. Circular Letter 2. Class Code Rating Values 3. Footnotes 4. Miscellaneous Values

More information

Overview of Tennessee s Workers Compensation Market Conditions and Environment

Overview of Tennessee s Workers Compensation Market Conditions and Environment Overview of Tennessee s Workers Compensation Market Conditions and Environment Advisory Council on Workers Compensation August 23, 2012 Presented by Mike Shinnick - TDCI 1 $800 $700 $600 $500 $400 $300

More information

Data Collection Agency Workers Compensation Insurances Statewide Average Pure Premium Michigan (2016)

Data Collection Agency Workers Compensation Insurances Statewide Average Pure Premium Michigan (2016) Data Collection Agency Workers Compensation Insurances Statewide Average Pure Premium Michigan (2016) Table of Contents 1. Circular Letter 2. Class Code Rating Values 3. Miscellaneous Values 4. Footnotes

More information

Data Collection Agency Workers Compensation Insurances Statewide Average Pure Premium Michigan (2017)

Data Collection Agency Workers Compensation Insurances Statewide Average Pure Premium Michigan (2017) Data Collection Agency Workers Compensation Insurances Statewide Average Pure Premium Michigan (2017) Table of Contents 1. Circular Letter 2. Class Code Rating Values 3. Miscellaneous Values 4. Footnotes

More information

California Small Deductible Plan Effective January 1, 2019

California Small Deductible Plan Effective January 1, 2019 Workers Compensation Insurance Rating Bureau of California California Small Deductible Plan Effective January 1, 2019 This California Small Deductible Plan (Plan) was developed by the Workers Compensation

More information

Workers Compensation Insurance Rating Bureau of California. July 1, 2015 Pure Premium Rate Filing REG

Workers Compensation Insurance Rating Bureau of California. July 1, 2015 Pure Premium Rate Filing REG Workers Compensation Insurance Rating Bureau of California Workers Compensation Insurance Rating Bureau of California July 1, 2015 Pure Premium Rate Filing REG-2015-00005 Submitted: April 6, 2015 WCIRB

More information

2011 RPM Basic Ratemaking Workshop. Agenda. CAS Exam 5 Reference: Basic Ratemaking Chapter 11: Special Classification *

2011 RPM Basic Ratemaking Workshop. Agenda. CAS Exam 5 Reference: Basic Ratemaking Chapter 11: Special Classification * 2011 RPM Basic Ratemaking Workshop Session 3: Introduction to Increased Limit Factors Li Zhu, FCAS, MAAA Increased Limits & Rating Plans Division Insurance Services Office, Inc. Agenda Increased vs. Basic

More information

Pricing Excess of Loss Treaty with Loss Sensitive Features: An Exposure Rating Approach

Pricing Excess of Loss Treaty with Loss Sensitive Features: An Exposure Rating Approach Pricing Excess of Loss Treaty with Loss Sensitive Features: An Exposure Rating Approach Ana J. Mata, Ph.D Brian Fannin, ACAS Mark A. Verheyen, FCAS Correspondence Author: ana.mata@cnare.com 1 Pricing Excess

More information

California Joint Powers Insurance Authority

California Joint Powers Insurance Authority An Actuarial Analysis of the Self-Insurance Program as of June 30, 2018 October 26, 2018 Michael L. DeMattei, FCAS, MAAA Jonathan B. Winn, FCAS, MAAA Table of Contents INTRODUCTION... 1 Purpose of Report...

More information

Re: Revised Florida Workers Compensation Rates and Rating Values Effective December 1, 2016

Re: Revised Florida Workers Compensation Rates and Rating Values Effective December 1, 2016 National Council on Compensation Insurance Chris Bailey State Relations Executive Regulatory Services Division (P) 850-322-4047 (F) 561-893-5106 Email: Chris_Bailey@ncci.com October 4, 2016 The Honorable

More information

Assigned Risk Rates and Rating Values for the Michigan Workers' Compensation Placement Facility (2018)

Assigned Risk Rates and Rating Values for the Michigan Workers' Compensation Placement Facility (2018) Assigned Risk Rates and Rating Values for the Michigan Workers' Compensation Placement Facility (2018) Table of Contents 1. Circular Letter 2. Class Code Rating Values 3. Footnotes 4. Miscellaneous Values

More information

PENNSYLVANIA COMPENSATION RATING BUREAU NCCI Filing Memorandum

PENNSYLVANIA COMPENSATION RATING BUREAU NCCI Filing Memorandum Exhibit 32 As Filed PENNSYLVANIA COMPENSATION RATING BUREAU NCCI Filing Memorandum Attached are selected portions of an NCCI Filing Memorandum ( ITEM R-1396-2007 Update to Retrospective Rating Plan Parameters).

More information

NEW YORK COMPENSATION INSURANCE RATING BOARD Loss Cost Revision

NEW YORK COMPENSATION INSURANCE RATING BOARD Loss Cost Revision NEW YORK COMPENSATION INSURANCE RATING BOARD 2010 Loss Cost Revision Effective October 1, 2010 2010 New York Compensation Insurance Rating Board All rights reserved. No portion of this filing may be reproduced

More information

PENNSYLVANIA COMPENSATION RATING BUREAU NCCI Filing Memorandum

PENNSYLVANIA COMPENSATION RATING BUREAU NCCI Filing Memorandum Exhibit 32 As Filed PENNSYLVANIA COMPENSATION RATING BUREAU NCCI Filing Memorandum Attached are selected portions of an NCCI Filing Memorandum ( ITEM B-1403-Revision to Basic Manual and Retrospective Rating

More information

January 1, 2015 Pure Premium Rate Filing Summary of Actuarial Committee Recommendations

January 1, 2015 Pure Premium Rate Filing Summary of Actuarial Committee Recommendations WCIRB Actuarial Committee Meeting of June 11, 214 W o r k e r s C o m p e n s a t i o n I n s u r a n c e R a t i n g B u r e a u o f C a l i f o r n i a January 1, 215 Pure Premium Rate Filing Summary

More information

California Retrospective Rating Plan Effective January 1, 2013 Updated April 2, 2015

California Retrospective Rating Plan Effective January 1, 2013 Updated April 2, 2015 Workers Compensation Insurance Rating Bureau of California California Retrospective Rating Plan Effective January 1, 2013 Notice This California Retrospective Rating Plan (Plan) was developed by the Workers

More information

Tennessee. Voluntary Loss Costs, Assigned Risk Rates, and Rating Values Filing Proposed Effective March 1, 2018

Tennessee. Voluntary Loss Costs, Assigned Risk Rates, and Rating Values Filing Proposed Effective March 1, 2018 Tennessee Voluntary Loss Costs, Assigned Risk Rates, and Rating Values Filing Proposed Effective March 1, 2018 National Council on Compensation Insurance Amy Quinn State Relations Executive Regulatory

More information

ABCs of Experience Rating

ABCs of Experience Rating ABCs of Experience Rating Introduction This booklet is designed to further your understanding of experience rating and how it affects your workers compensation costs. NCCI s Experience Rating Plan Manual

More information

Workers Compensation Exposure Rating Gerald Yeung, FCAS, MAAA Senior Actuary Swiss Re America Holding Corporation

Workers Compensation Exposure Rating Gerald Yeung, FCAS, MAAA Senior Actuary Swiss Re America Holding Corporation Workers Compensation Exposure Rating Gerald Yeung, FCAS, MAAA Senior Actuary Swiss Re America Holding Corporation Table of Contents NCCI Excess Loss Factors 3 WCIRB Loss Elimination Ratios 7 Observations

More information

Florida Approval of Voluntary Rates and Rating Values to Be Effective December 1, 2016 Implementation of Florida Rate Increase

Florida Approval of Voluntary Rates and Rating Values to Be Effective December 1, 2016 Implementation of Florida Rate Increase National Council on Compensation Insurance State Relations Regulatory Services OCTOBER 11, 2016 LOSS COSTS OR RATE FILING APPROVAL FL-2016-07 Florida Approval of Voluntary Rates and Rating Values to Be

More information

Revised Educational Note. Premium Liabilities. Committee on Property and Casualty Insurance Financial Reporting. March 2015.

Revised Educational Note. Premium Liabilities. Committee on Property and Casualty Insurance Financial Reporting. March 2015. Revised Educational Note Premium Liabilities Committee on Property and Casualty Insurance Financial Reporting March 2015 Document 215017 Ce document est disponible en français 2015 Canadian Institute of

More information

Solutions to the Spring 2018 CAS Exam Five

Solutions to the Spring 2018 CAS Exam Five Solutions to the Spring 2018 CAS Exam Five (Only those questions on Basic Ratemaking) There were 26 questions worth 55.5 points, of which 15.5 were on ratemaking worth 29.25 points. (Question 8a covered

More information

CENTRAL OHIO RISK MANAGEMENT ASSOCIATION (CORMA) ACTUARIAL REPORT ON UNPAID LOSS AND LOSS ADJUSTMENT EXPENSES AS OF SEPTEMBER 30, 2017

CENTRAL OHIO RISK MANAGEMENT ASSOCIATION (CORMA) ACTUARIAL REPORT ON UNPAID LOSS AND LOSS ADJUSTMENT EXPENSES AS OF SEPTEMBER 30, 2017 CENTRAL OHIO RISK MANAGEMENT ASSOCIATION (CORMA) ACTUARIAL REPORT ON UNPAID LOSS AND LOSS ADJUSTMENT EXPENSES AS OF SEPTEMBER 30, 2017 October 25, 2017 October 25, 2017 Sent Via Email Ms. Angel Mumma Director

More information

GI IRR Model Solutions Spring 2015

GI IRR Model Solutions Spring 2015 GI IRR Model Solutions Spring 2015 1. Learning Objectives: 1. The candidate will understand the key considerations for general insurance actuarial analysis. Learning Outcomes: (1l) Adjust historical earned

More information

Institute of Actuaries of India. March 2018 Examination

Institute of Actuaries of India. March 2018 Examination Institute of Actuaries of India Subject ST8 General Insurance: Pricing March 2018 Examination INDICATIVE SOLUTION Introduction The indicative solution has been written by the Examiners with the aim of

More information

Your Experience Modification Factor Why is this Important for You? Presented by: Colburn Group

Your Experience Modification Factor Why is this Important for You? Presented by: Colburn Group Your Experience Modification Factor Why is this Important for You? Presented by: Colburn Group Experience Modification Factor In this presentation: Overview of Workers Compensation Coverage Overview of

More information

NEW YORK COMPENSATION INSURANCE RATING BOARD General Rate Revision

NEW YORK COMPENSATION INSURANCE RATING BOARD General Rate Revision NEW YORK COMPENSATION INSURANCE RATING BOARD 2007 General Rate Revision Effective October 1, 2007 NEW YORK WORKERS COMPENSATION DERIVATION OF APPROVED OCTOBER 1, 2007 RATE REVISION Original Proposed Rate

More information

PORTFOLIO THEORY. Master in Finance INVESTMENTS. Szabolcs Sebestyén

PORTFOLIO THEORY. Master in Finance INVESTMENTS. Szabolcs Sebestyén PORTFOLIO THEORY Szabolcs Sebestyén szabolcs.sebestyen@iscte.pt Master in Finance INVESTMENTS Sebestyén (ISCTE-IUL) Portfolio Theory Investments 1 / 60 Outline 1 Modern Portfolio Theory Introduction Mean-Variance

More information

National Council on Compensation Insurance, Inc. Excess Loss Factors

National Council on Compensation Insurance, Inc. Excess Loss Factors National Council on Compensation Insurance, Inc. Excess Loss Factors This is the documentation of the calculation of Excess Loss Factors for a particular state. An Excess Loss Factor (ELF) is the ratio

More information

WCIRB Actuarial Committee Meeting

WCIRB Actuarial Committee Meeting W o r k e r s C o m p e n s a t i o n I n s u r a n c e R a t i n g B u r e a u o f C a l i f o r n i a WCIRB Actuarial Committee Meeting Materials Presented at the WCIRB Actuarial Committee Meeting June

More information

Patrik. I really like the Cape Cod method. The math is simple and you don t have to think too hard.

Patrik. I really like the Cape Cod method. The math is simple and you don t have to think too hard. Opening Thoughts I really like the Cape Cod method. The math is simple and you don t have to think too hard. Outline I. Reinsurance Loss Reserving Problems Problem 1: Claim report lags to reinsurers are

More information

Exam-Style Questions Relevant to the New Casualty Actuarial Society Exam 5B G. Stolyarov II, ARe, AIS Spring 2011

Exam-Style Questions Relevant to the New Casualty Actuarial Society Exam 5B G. Stolyarov II, ARe, AIS Spring 2011 Exam-Style Questions Relevant to the New CAS Exam 5B - G. Stolyarov II 1 Exam-Style Questions Relevant to the New Casualty Actuarial Society Exam 5B G. Stolyarov II, ARe, AIS Spring 2011 Published under

More information

SERFF Tracking #: INCR State Tracking #: Company Tracking #: 1/1/2018 RATES

SERFF Tracking #: INCR State Tracking #: Company Tracking #: 1/1/2018 RATES SERFF Tracking #: INCR-131200706 State Tracking #: Company Tracking #: 1/1/2018 RATES State: Indiana Filing Company: Indiana Compensation Rating Bureau TOI/Sub-TOI: 16.0 Workers Compensation/16.0004 Standard

More information

NEW YORK COMPENSATION INSURANCE RATING BOARD Loss Cost Revision

NEW YORK COMPENSATION INSURANCE RATING BOARD Loss Cost Revision NEW YORK COMPENSATION INSURANCE RATING BOARD 2009 Loss Cost Revision Effective October 1, 2009 2009 New York Compensation Insurance Rating Board All rights reserved. No portion of this filing may be reproduced

More information

Superiority by a Margin Tests for the Ratio of Two Proportions

Superiority by a Margin Tests for the Ratio of Two Proportions Chapter 06 Superiority by a Margin Tests for the Ratio of Two Proportions Introduction This module computes power and sample size for hypothesis tests for superiority of the ratio of two independent proportions.

More information

Mary Jean King, FCAS, FCA, MAAA Consulting Actuary 118 Warfield Road Cherry Hill, NJ P: F:

Mary Jean King, FCAS, FCA, MAAA Consulting Actuary 118 Warfield Road Cherry Hill, NJ P: F: Mary Jean King, FCAS, FCA, MAAA Consulting Actuary 118 Warfield Road Cherry Hill, NJ 08034 P:856.428.5961 F:856.428.5962 mking@bynac.com September 27, 2012 Mr. David H. Lillard, Jr., Tennessee State Treasurer

More information

GIIRR Model Solutions Fall 2015

GIIRR Model Solutions Fall 2015 GIIRR Model Solutions Fall 2015 1. Learning Objectives: 1. The candidate will understand the key considerations for general insurance actuarial analysis. Learning Outcomes: (1k) Estimate written, earned

More information

Quarterly Call for Fourth Quarter of Calendar Year 2012 (CA-QT-4Q12) Due Date: February 14, 2013

Quarterly Call for Fourth Quarter of Calendar Year 2012 (CA-QT-4Q12) Due Date: February 14, 2013 December 10, 2012 525 Market Street, Suite 800 San Francisco, CA 94105-2767 Voice 415.778.7008 www.wcirbonline.org escad@wcirbonline.org David M. Bellusci Senior Vice President and Chief Actuary To: Primary

More information

DRAFT 2011 Exam 5 Basic Ratemaking and Reserving

DRAFT 2011 Exam 5 Basic Ratemaking and Reserving 2011 Exam 5 Basic Ratemaking and Reserving The CAS is providing this advanced copy of the draft syllabus for this exam so that candidates and educators will have a sense of the learning objectives and

More information

Iowa. Voluntary and Assigned Risk Rates and Rating Values Filing Proposed Effective January 1, 2018

Iowa. Voluntary and Assigned Risk Rates and Rating Values Filing Proposed Effective January 1, 2018 Iowa Voluntary and Assigned Risk Rates and Rating Values Filing Proposed Effective January 1, 2018 National Council on Compensation Insurance Carla Townsend State Relations Executive Regulatory Division

More information

ALL 10 STUDY PROGRAM COMPONENTS

ALL 10 STUDY PROGRAM COMPONENTS ALL 10 STUDY PROGRAM COMPONENTS CAS EXAM 8 ADVANCED RATEMAKING Classification Ratemaking, Excess, Deductible, and Individual Risk Rating and Catastrophic and Reinsurance Pricing SYLLABUS SECTION A: CLASSIFICATION

More information

SOCIETY OF ACTUARIES Introduction to Ratemaking & Reserving Exam GIIRR MORNING SESSION. Date: Wednesday, April 29, 2015 Time: 8:30 a.m. 11:45 a.m.

SOCIETY OF ACTUARIES Introduction to Ratemaking & Reserving Exam GIIRR MORNING SESSION. Date: Wednesday, April 29, 2015 Time: 8:30 a.m. 11:45 a.m. SOCIETY OF ACTUARIES Exam GIIRR MORNING SESSION Date: Wednesday, April 29, 2015 Time: 8:30 a.m. 11:45 a.m. INSTRUCTIONS TO CANDIDATES General Instructions 1. This examination has a total of 100 points.

More information

RETROSPECTIVE RATING PLAN PREMIUM ENDORSEMENT WISCONSIN LARGE RISK ALTERNATIVE RATING OPTION (LRARO)

RETROSPECTIVE RATING PLAN PREMIUM ENDORSEMENT WISCONSIN LARGE RISK ALTERNATIVE RATING OPTION (LRARO) This Endorsement Changes the Policy. Please Read It Carefully. RETROSPECTIVE RATING PLAN PREMIUM ENDORSEMENT WISCONSIN LARGE RISK ALTERNATIVE RATING OPTION (LRARO) This endorsement modifies coverage provided

More information

November 29, 2011 VIA HAND DELIVERY

November 29, 2011 VIA HAND DELIVERY VIA HAND DELIVERY The Honorable Michael F. Consedine Insurance Commissioner Insurance Department 1311 Strawberry Square Harrisburg, PA 17120 Attention: Mark Lersch, Director Bureau of Property & Casualty

More information

Signature of Company Officer/Filings Department Head Date

Signature of Company Officer/Filings Department Head Date NORTH CAROLINA DEPARTMENT OF INSURANCE RATE FILING QUESTIONNAIRE ADOPTION OF RATING ORGANIZATION PROSPECTIVE LOSS COSTS INSURER S NAME CONTACT PERSON FOR FILING TITLE TELEPHONE NUMBER ( ) EXT. 1. INSURER

More information

WORKERS COMPENSATION AND EMPLOYERS LIABILITY INSURANCE POLICY RETROSPECTIVE RATING PLAN PREMIUM ENDORSEMENT THREE-YEAR PLAN MULTIPLE LINES

WORKERS COMPENSATION AND EMPLOYERS LIABILITY INSURANCE POLICY RETROSPECTIVE RATING PLAN PREMIUM ENDORSEMENT THREE-YEAR PLAN MULTIPLE LINES RETROSPECTIVE RATING PLAN PREMIUM ENDORSEMENT THREE-YEAR PLAN MULTIPLE LINES This endorsement is issued because you chose to have the cost of the insurance rated retrospectively. This endorsement explains

More information

Quarterly Call for First Quarter of Calendar Year 2013 (CA-QT-1Q13) Due Date: May 7, 2013

Quarterly Call for First Quarter of Calendar Year 2013 (CA-QT-1Q13) Due Date: May 7, 2013 February 1, 2013 525 Market Street, Suite 800 San Francisco, CA 94105-2767 Voice 415.778.7008 www.wcirbonline.org escad@wcirbonline.org David M. Bellusci Executive Vice President, COO & Chief Actuary To:

More information

Exploring the Fundamental Insurance Equation

Exploring the Fundamental Insurance Equation Exploring the Fundamental Insurance Equation PATRICK STAPLETON, FCAS PRICING MANAGER ALLSTATE INSURANCE COMPANY PSTAP@ALLSTATE.COM CAS RPM March 2016 CAS Antitrust Notice The Casualty Actuarial Society

More information

WCIRB Financial Call Data Certification through March 31, 2018 (CA-DC-2017)

WCIRB Financial Call Data Certification through March 31, 2018 (CA-DC-2017) WCIRB Financial Call Data Certification through March 31, 2018 (CA-DC-2017) Due Date: May 31, 2018 This Data Certification form must be completed by (a) a Company Officer or (b) an Actuary (who is a member

More information

CASUALTY ACTUARIAL SOCIETY. Exam 9. Advanced Ratemaking, Rate of Return, and Individual Risk Rating Plans

CASUALTY ACTUARIAL SOCIETY. Exam 9. Advanced Ratemaking, Rate of Return, and Individual Risk Rating Plans Mary Frames Miller Vice President-Adm ssions ThomaSG.Myers Chairpenon Examih~on committee November 1,200O CASUALTY ACTUARIAL SOCIETY Exam 9 Advanced Ratemaking, Rate of Return, and Individual Risk Rating

More information

Second Revision Educational Note. Premium Liabilities. Committee on Property and Casualty Insurance Financial Reporting. July 2016.

Second Revision Educational Note. Premium Liabilities. Committee on Property and Casualty Insurance Financial Reporting. July 2016. Second Revision Educational Note Premium Liabilities Committee on Property and Casualty Insurance Financial Reporting July 2016 Document 216076 Ce document est disponible en français 2016 Canadian Institute

More information

Actuarial Review of the Self-Insured Liability & Property Program

Actuarial Review of the Self-Insured Liability & Property Program Actuarial Review of the Self-Insured Liability & Property Program Outstanding Liabilities as of June 30, 2017 Forecast for Program Year 2017-18 Presented to Santa Clara County Schools Insurance Group March

More information

To Members of the Actuarial Committee, WCIRB Members and All Interested Parties:

To Members of the Actuarial Committee, WCIRB Members and All Interested Parties: Meeting Agenda Date Time Location Staff Contact August 1, 2018 9:30 AM WCIRB California David M. Bellusci 1221 Broadway, Suite 900 Oakland, CA 1221 Broadway, Suite 900 Oakland, CA 94612 415.777.0777 Fax

More information

CIRCULAR LETTER NO. 2332

CIRCULAR LETTER NO. 2332 March 29, 2018 CIRCULAR LETTER NO. 2332 To All Members and Subscribers of the WCRIBMA: GUIDELINES FOR WORKERS COMPENSATION RATE DEVIATION FILINGS TO BE EFFECTIVE ON OR AFTER JULY 1, 2018 -----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------

More information

Ratemaking by Charles L. McClenahan

Ratemaking by Charles L. McClenahan Mahler s Guide to Ratemaking by Charles L. McClenahan See CAS Learning Objectives: B2, D1-D6. Prepared by Howard C. Mahler. hmahler@mac.com Including some questions prepared by J. Eric Brosius. Copyright

More information

Anti-Trust Notice. The Casualty Actuarial Society is committed to adhering strictly

Anti-Trust Notice. The Casualty Actuarial Society is committed to adhering strictly Anti-Trust Notice The Casualty Actuarial Society is committed to adhering strictly to the letter and spirit of the antitrust laws. Seminars conducted under the auspices of the CAS are designed solely to

More information

June 13, Circular Letter No (originally released as No in error)

June 13, Circular Letter No (originally released as No in error) Minnesota Workers Compensation Insurers Association, Inc. 7701 France Avenue South Suite 450 Minneapolis, MN 55435-3200 June 13, 2000 To: ALL ASSOCIATION MEMBERS Circular Letter No. 00-1341(originally

More information

The Honorable Teresa D. Miller, Pennsylvania Insurance Commissioner. John R. Pedrick, FCAS, MAAA, Vice President Actuarial Services

The Honorable Teresa D. Miller, Pennsylvania Insurance Commissioner. John R. Pedrick, FCAS, MAAA, Vice President Actuarial Services To: From: The Honorable Teresa D. Miller, Pennsylvania Insurance Commissioner John R. Pedrick, FCAS, MAAA, Vice President Actuarial Services Date: Subject: Workers Compensation Loss Cost Filing April 1,

More information

Obtaining Predictive Distributions for Reserves Which Incorporate Expert Opinions R. Verrall A. Estimation of Policy Liabilities

Obtaining Predictive Distributions for Reserves Which Incorporate Expert Opinions R. Verrall A. Estimation of Policy Liabilities Obtaining Predictive Distributions for Reserves Which Incorporate Expert Opinions R. Verrall A. Estimation of Policy Liabilities LEARNING OBJECTIVES 5. Describe the various sources of risk and uncertainty

More information

Reinsurance Structures and Pricing Pro-Rata Treaties. Care Reinsurance Boot Camp Josh Fishman, FCAS, MAAA August 12, 2013

Reinsurance Structures and Pricing Pro-Rata Treaties. Care Reinsurance Boot Camp Josh Fishman, FCAS, MAAA August 12, 2013 Reinsurance Structures and Pricing Pro-Rata Treaties Care Reinsurance Boot Camp Josh Fishman, FCAS, MAAA August 12, 2013 Motivations for Purchasing Reinsurance 1) Limiting Liability [on specific risks]

More information

1 Parameterization of Binomial Models and Derivation of the Black-Scholes PDE.

1 Parameterization of Binomial Models and Derivation of the Black-Scholes PDE. 1 Parameterization of Binomial Models and Derivation of the Black-Scholes PDE. Previously we treated binomial models as a pure theoretical toy model for our complete economy. We turn to the issue of how

More information

Quarterly Call for Third Quarter of Calendar Year 2014 (CA-QT-3Q14) Due Date: October 31, 2014

Quarterly Call for Third Quarter of Calendar Year 2014 (CA-QT-3Q14) Due Date: October 31, 2014 September 8, 2014 525 Market Street, Suite 800 San Francisco, CA 94105-2767 Voice 415.777.0777 www.wcirb.com escad@wcirb.com David M. Bellusci Executive Vice President, COO & Chief Actuary To: Primary

More information

Quarterly Call for Third Quarter of Calendar Year 2015 (CA-QT-3Q15) Due Date: October 29, 2015

Quarterly Call for Third Quarter of Calendar Year 2015 (CA-QT-3Q15) Due Date: October 29, 2015 September 8, 2015 1221 Broadway, Suite 900 Oakland, CA 94612 Voice 415.777.0777 www.wcirb.com escad@wcirb.com David M. Bellusci Executive Vice President, COO & Chief Actuary To: Primary Contacts for WCIRB

More information

Reinsurance Optimization GIE- AXA 06/07/2010

Reinsurance Optimization GIE- AXA 06/07/2010 Reinsurance Optimization thierry.cohignac@axa.com GIE- AXA 06/07/2010 1 Agenda Introduction Theoretical Results Practical Reinsurance Optimization 2 Introduction As all optimization problem, solution strongly

More information

Transactions and Money Demand Walsh Chapter 3

Transactions and Money Demand Walsh Chapter 3 Transactions and Money Demand Walsh Chapter 3 1 Shopping time models 1.1 Assumptions Purchases require transactions services ψ = ψ (m, n s ) = c where ψ n s 0, ψ m 0, ψ n s n s 0, ψ mm 0 positive but diminishing

More information

Barbara Thurston, FCAS, MAAA Actuary and Risk Administrator, APEI

Barbara Thurston, FCAS, MAAA Actuary and Risk Administrator, APEI Barbara Thurston, FCAS, MAAA Actuary and Risk Administrator, APEI General info on Workers Compensation Rate Development Classifications Experience Modifications Other Debits or Credits affecting Rates

More information

New Jersey Automobile Insurance Risk Exchange (NJAIRE) Answers to Commonly Asked Questions

New Jersey Automobile Insurance Risk Exchange (NJAIRE) Answers to Commonly Asked Questions New Jersey Automobile Insurance Risk Exchange (NJAIRE) Answers to Commonly Asked Questions I. "I Don't Understand NJAIRE" Operations To help you understand NJAIRE, you can contact Insurance Services Office,

More information

Comparing the Means of. Two Log-Normal Distributions: A Likelihood Approach

Comparing the Means of. Two Log-Normal Distributions: A Likelihood Approach Journal of Statistical and Econometric Methods, vol.3, no.1, 014, 137-15 ISSN: 179-660 (print), 179-6939 (online) Scienpress Ltd, 014 Comparing the Means of Two Log-Normal Distributions: A Likelihood Approach

More information

WCIRBCalifornia. California Workers Compensation Experience Rating Overview

WCIRBCalifornia. California Workers Compensation Experience Rating Overview California Workers Compensation Experience Rating verview WCIRBCalifornia W R K E R S C M P E N S A T I N I N S U R A N C E R A T I N G B U R E A U C A L I R N I A 2010 Workers Compensation Insurance Rating

More information

Equilibrium Asset Returns

Equilibrium Asset Returns Equilibrium Asset Returns Equilibrium Asset Returns 1/ 38 Introduction We analyze the Intertemporal Capital Asset Pricing Model (ICAPM) of Robert Merton (1973). The standard single-period CAPM holds when

More information

A. 11 B. 15 C. 19 D. 23 E. 27. Solution. Let us write s for the policy year. Then the mortality rate during year s is q 30+s 1.

A. 11 B. 15 C. 19 D. 23 E. 27. Solution. Let us write s for the policy year. Then the mortality rate during year s is q 30+s 1. Solutions to the Spring 213 Course MLC Examination by Krzysztof Ostaszewski, http://wwwkrzysionet, krzysio@krzysionet Copyright 213 by Krzysztof Ostaszewski All rights reserved No reproduction in any form

More information

Subject CS2A Risk Modelling and Survival Analysis Core Principles

Subject CS2A Risk Modelling and Survival Analysis Core Principles ` Subject CS2A Risk Modelling and Survival Analysis Core Principles Syllabus for the 2019 exams 1 June 2018 Copyright in this Core Reading is the property of the Institute and Faculty of Actuaries who

More information

GI ADV Model Solutions Fall 2016

GI ADV Model Solutions Fall 2016 GI ADV Model Solutions Fall 016 1. Learning Objectives: 4. The candidate will understand how to apply the fundamental techniques of reinsurance pricing. (4c) Calculate the price for a casualty per occurrence

More information

Reinsurance Loss Reserving Patrik, G. S. pp

Reinsurance Loss Reserving Patrik, G. S. pp Section Description Reinsurance Loss Reserving 1 Reinsurance Loss Reserving Problems 2 Components of a Reinsurer s Loss Reserve 3 Steps in Reinsurance Loss Reserving Methodology 4 Methods for Short, Medium

More information

Ratemaking by Charles L. McClenahan

Ratemaking by Charles L. McClenahan Mahler s Guide to Ratemaking by Charles L. McClenahan See CAS Learning Objectives: B2, D1-D6. My Questions are in Study Guide 1B. Past Exam Questions are in Study Guide 1C. Prepared by Howard C. Mahler.

More information

ACORD 130 FL (2015/02) - FLORIDA WORKERS COMPENSATION APPLICATION

ACORD 130 FL (2015/02) - FLORIDA WORKERS COMPENSATION APPLICATION ACORD 130 FL (2015/02) - FLORIDA WORKERS COMPENSATION APPLICATION ACORD 130 FL, Florida Workers Compensation Application, is a Commercial Lines application that is self-contained, as it does not require

More information

WORKERS COMPENSATION AND EMPLOYERS LIABILITY POLICY ENDORSEMENT

WORKERS COMPENSATION AND EMPLOYERS LIABILITY POLICY ENDORSEMENT WORKERS COMPENSATION AND EMPLOYERS LIABILITY POLICY ENDORSEMENT POLICY NUMBER: WISCONSIN RETROSPECTIVE RATING PLAN PREMIUM ENDORSEMENT LARGE RISK ALTERNATIVE RATING OPTION This endorsement is added to

More information

Understanding Worker s Compensation

Understanding Worker s Compensation Understanding Worker s Compensation Gabrielle Zimmer & Stephanie Perry Agenda What is an Experience Rating Experience Rating Eligibility Purpose & Benefits of Experience Rating Basic Promulgation of an

More information