RECENT CASES OFFER INCREASED PROSPECTS FOR MERGERS BY COMPETING HOSPITALS
|
|
- Robert Lindsey
- 5 years ago
- Views:
Transcription
1 RECENT CASES OFFER INCREASED PROSPECTS FOR MERGERS BY COMPETING HOSPITALS July 19, 2016 Recent setbacks experienced by the Federal Trade Commission (FTC) in hospital merger challenges may embolden hospitals and health systems considering potential combinations, especially in light of the need for coordinated care under the Affordable Care Act. The following is a summary of recent developments. FTC Drops Challenge to Merger between West Virginia Hospitals On July 6, the FTC voted unanimously to dismiss its challenge to a proposed merger between Cabell Huntington Hospital and St. Mary s Medical Center in Huntington, West Virginia, as a result of the enactment of a new state law and the West Virginia Health Care Authority s resulting approval of a cooperative agreement between the two hospitals. The FTC had challenged the proposed merger in November In March 2016, the state approved the new law providing for cooperative agreements and exempting health institutions monitored by the state healthcare agency from federal antitrust scrutiny if the state agency signed off on the arrangement. Such laws have been enacted or considered in several other states and generally seek to replace federal antitrust enforcement with state regulation and supervision of healthcare provider combinations. Our People Beth E. Vessel Industries Served Hospitals & Health Systems Healthcare Legal Services Corporate Healthcare Healthcare Mergers & Acquisitions The FTC had challenged the proposed merger, claiming that it would give the resulting hospital a near monopoly over general acute inpatient hospital and outpatient surgery services in Cabell, Wayne and Lincoln County, West Virginia and Lawrence County, Ohio, resulting in higher prices and lower quality care. The new state law, S.B. 597, made the West Virginia Health Care Authority the sole decision maker with respect to healthcare provider consolidations. On March 24, the FTC withdrew the matter from adjudication for 30 days, and on April 22, the withdrawal from adjudication was extended until the end of the 14 th calendar day after issuance of a written decision with respect to the cooperative agreement by the West Virginia Health Care Authority. The FTC issued its written decision approving the cooperative agreement on June 22. This result might indicate more of a willingness to allow potentially competitive combinations, in an effort to effect the policy goals of the Affordable Care Act, such as the proposed Mountain States/Wellmont combination currently under state review in Tennessee and Virginia. However, the FTC said in its statement on July 6 that cooperative agreement laws actually undermine the
2 policy goals of the Affordable Care Act to improve quality and lower costs and emphasized that the ACA did not repeal the antitrust laws. The FTC went on to state that many of the purported benefits of hospital mergers including coordination of patient care, sharing information through electronic medical records, population health management, risk-based contracting, standardizing care and joint purchasing can often be achieved through alternative means that do not impair competition. The FTC vowed to continue to investigate and challenge anticompetitive mergers and said that its decision to dismiss this particular complaint without prejudice does not necessarily mean that it will not raise challenges in other cases in which a cooperative agreement is sought or approved, as such arrangements are unlikely to replicate the benefits of competition. Illinois Federal Judge Rules that FTC Cannot Block Chicago Hospital Merger On June 14, 2016, a U.S. District Court in Illinois ruled that the FTC could not block the merger of Advocate Health Care and NorthShore University Health System based on evidence presented during a week-long hearing, holding that the FTC had not provided sufficient evidence that the partnership would harm competition in the region. The FTC had argued that the transaction would threaten competition in Chicago s northern suburbs, with the merged entity controlling six out of the 11 hospitals in the area. The hospitals said that the government s market definition was too small and failed to consider how far patients will travel to receive inpatient hospital services, and stated that the merger would reduce costs for patients by moving NorthShore onto Advocate s more efficient healthcare management system. The FTC sued to stop the merger, which was announced in 2014, in December According to the complaint, the combined entity would control more than 50 percent of the general acute care inpatient services in the market. The FTC has appealed the district court ruling to the Seventh Circuit, and a motion for an injunction pending the appeal was granted. On June 28, the parties agreed that an evidentiary hearing in the FTC s administrative proceeding would commence 21 days after the Seventh Circuit ruling on the FTC s appeal. Pennsylvania District Court Denies Injunction against Penn State Hershey Medical Center and PinnacleHealth System Merger On May 9, the Middle District of Pennsylvania denied the FTC s and Commonwealth of Pennsylvania s motion for a preliminary injunction against the consummation of the proposed merger of Penn State Hershey Medical Center and PinnacleHealth System, pending the completion of the FTC s administrative trial on the merits of the transaction. The court rejected the FTC s request, finding that the geographic market definition suggested by the FTC was
3 unrealistically narrow, as a substantial number of patients of both facilities either reside in or travel to the hospitals from locations outside of the Harrisburg area, the FTC s suggested market. The court held that 19 other hospitals within a 65 minute drive of Harrisburg provide a realistic alternative for patients. The decision went on to criticize the FTC, expressing the view that the FTC s position could be considered ironic given that the federal government has created a climate that virtually compels providers to seek alliances similar to what the hospitals were seeking. The FTC has appealed the decision to the Third Circuit. One June 20, the parties agreed that an evidentiary hearing in the FTC s administrative proceeding would commence 21 days after the Third Circuit ruling. Penn State Hershey Medical Center and Pinnacle signed a letter of intent for a proposed merger in June Following a nine-month investigation, the FTC filed administrative and civil complaints to block the transaction in December 2015, asserting that the merged entity would control approximately 64 percent of the hospital market in Dauphin, Cumberland, Perry and Lebanon counties, which would likely lead to increased costs and reduced quality of care. The separate action in district court was also filed to block the merger on the grounds that it would substantially reduce competition in the market for general acute acre inpatient services sold to commercial health plans and their members. In addition to rejecting the FTC s market definition, the district court ruling discussed proposed efficiencies which might result from the merger. In particular, the court was impressed with the fact that the hospitals had executed long-term contracts with two of the biggest payors in the market, locking in existing rates for fee-for-service contracts and preserving rate differentials between the facilities for five and 10 years, respectively. The court stated that it refused to block a merger based on predictions of what might happen several years after such restrictions expired. The court noted that Hershey needed additional capacity and could receive immediate benefits from the merger, avoiding the need for large capital expenditures to expand. The court also treated other facilities in the market which had repositioned their product lines as new entrants and noted that the merged entity would be better able to spread out expected costs of population health management needed for risk-sharing arrangements. Notably, the court stated that the decision recognized a need to adapt to an evolving landscape of healthcare that includes the institution of the Affordable Care Act, fluctuations in Medicare and Medicaid reimbursement and the adoption of riskbased contracting, and said that the ruling reflects the healthcare world as it is, not as the FTC wishes it to be. Some courts seem to be taking more note of the changing environment than the FTC, as reflected in recent decisions. Other Recent Developments
4 There have also been recent cases involving anticompetitive effects of contractual relationships, involving payor agreements and joint operating agreements executed by competing hospitals. These cases provide insight into material considerations with respect to contractual arrangements with payors and among competitors. Ongoing Challenge of Carolina Health System s Use of Steering Provisions in Managed Care Contracts On June 9, 2016, the Department of Justice and the State of North Carolina filed suit in the Western District of North Carolina seeking an injunction to prevent Carolinas Health System from continuing to require steering restrictions in its payor contracts. Carolinas has a 50 percent market share in Charlotte, and the complaint alleged that its market power results from its large size, the comprehensive range of services it offers and insurers need to include access to its facilities in at least some of their provider networks covering patients in the Charlotte area. The complaint went on to allege that the health system has required steering restrictions in its contracts with insurers that impede insurers from providing financial incentives to patients to encourage them to consider utilizing lowercost but comparable or higher-quality alternative providers. Specifically, Carolinas has prevented insurers from offering tiered networks that feature hospitals that compete with Carolinas facilities in top tiers (with lower premiums and out of pocket costs) or from offering narrow networks that include only competitors of Carolinas. Because such restrictions prevent competitors from attracting patients through lower prices, competitors have less incentive to lower prices or become more efficient, and competition in the market is allegedly reduced. The complaint relies on the allegation that an insurer selling health plans in the Charlotte area must have a Carolinas facility as a participant in at least some of its provider networks in order to have a viable health insurance business in the Charlotte market. Because building a hospital with a strong reputation is difficult, time consuming and expensive, and new facilities and expansions of existing facilities are subject to lengthy licensing and certificate of need requirements, entry by other competitors does not counteract the likely competitive harms resulting from the steering restrictions. The complaint goes on to allege that any arguable benefits of the steering restrictions are outweighed by their actual and likely anticompetitive effects. Lawyers representing Carolinas have indicated that the system will vigorously defend the suit, claiming that the health system is being sued for something that takes place on a regular basis across the country. The results of this lawsuit will likely effect the conduct of dominant providers in other markets. Sixth Circuit Reinstates Challenge to Hospital Joint Operating Agreement In March of 2016, the Sixth Circuit reversed a district court finding
5 and held that a complaint alleging anticompetitive conduct by a group of hospitals in the Dayton, Ohio area, collaborating through a joint operating agreement, could proceed under Section 1 of the Sherman Act. A physician-owned hospital in Dayton filed the suit alleging that an operating company, Premier Health Partners, and participating hospitals harmed competition by entering into network contracts with commercial insurers on the condition that new hospitals be kept out of the network. The district court had ruled that the venture was a single entity and its actions could therefore not violate Section 1, as Section 1 does not proscribe unreasonable restraints on trade by a single entity. The Sixth Circuit reversed and held that the record raised a genuine issue of material fact as to whether the hospitals should be considered a single entity for purposes of the antitrust laws. In this case, previously independent hospitals were operating as a hospital network and had entered into the joint operating agreement merging some of their functions, while the individual hospitals retained others. The plaintiff hospital offered proof that the group engaged in concerted action by coercing commercial health insurers representing at least 70 percent of the market to refuse to negotiate contracts with the plaintiff hospital, by threatening punitive financial consequences to physicians who affiliated with the plaintiff hospital and by compelling physicians to refuse to admit patients to the plaintiff hospital. The court first looked to the actual conduct of the parties, rather than to the structure and organizing documents of the venture, and found the intention to keep the plaintiff hospital from entering the market. The court then discussed the business relationships as reflected in governing documents and concluded that, while there was some degree of unitary management, questions remained as to whether the hospitals retained their separate corporate consciousness. The court focused on evidence that the hospitals remained separate legal entities, held their own assets, filed their own tax returns, competed with one another for physicians and patients, marketed certain hospital service to the public and made material independent decisions concerning their respective operations. The court noted that the fact that the venture required hospital revenue sharing under an agreed formula was insufficient to create single-entity status. Such ventures will presumably face a fact-intensive level of scrutiny to determine if conduct among competitors is concerted or unilateral, and the results of the case on remand may provide additional insight. This decision likely increases the potential risk of antitrust liability relating to joint venture relationships, in which hospitals may attempt to enjoy the benefits of a merger without actually consolidating management or combining asset ownership. For additional information, please contact Beth Vessel in Waller's Healthcare department at
6 The opinions expressed in this bulletin are intended for general guidance only. They are not intended as recommendations for specific situations. As always, readers should consult a qualified attorney for specific legal guidance.
A Sweet Win for Hershey Medical Center s Proposed Merger: District Court Denies FTC s Attempt to Block Pennsylvania Hospital Merger
A Sweet Win for Hershey Medical Center s Proposed Merger: District Court Denies FTC s Attempt to Block Pennsylvania Hospital Merger CLIENT ALERT May 16, 2016 Barbara T. Sicalides sicalidesb@pepperlaw.com
More informationPROVIDER AFFILIATIONS SHORT
2016 Antitrust in Healthcare Conference PROVIDER AFFILIATIONS SHORT OF FULL-FLEDGED MERGERS May 12, 2016 R. Dale Grimes The primary source of authority is Statement 8 of the 1996 DOJ and FTC Statements
More informationAntitrust Rules for Provider Collaboration: How to Form and Operate a Network of Competing Providers
Antitrust Rules for Provider Collaboration: How to Form and Operate a Network of Competing Providers By Mitchell D. Raup, Shareholder, Polsinelli PC, Washington DC I. Introduction: A. Many forms of provider
More informationBEFORE THE DEPARTMENT OF JUSTICE FOR THE STATE OF MONTANA ) ) ) ) ) ) SECTION ONE
BEFORE THE DEPARTMENT OF JUSTICE FOR THE STATE OF MONTANA In the Matter of the Application by Benefis Healthcare for Repeal of the Certificate of Public Advantage ) ) ) ) ) ) FINDINGS OF FACT SECTION ONE
More informationRecent Government Enforcement Actions and Private Antitrust Litigation Arthur N. Lerner Christine L. White
Antitrust Action: New Enforcement Moves in the Health Care Arena Recent Government Enforcement Actions and Private Antitrust Litigation Arthur N. Lerner Christine L. White Recent Government Enforcement
More informationStatements of Antitrust Enforcement Policy in Health Care. Issued by the U.S. Department of Justice and the Federal Trade Commission
Statements of Antitrust Enforcement Policy in Health Care Issued by the U.S. Department of Justice and the Federal Trade Commission August 1996 TABLE OF CONTENTS Introduction........................ 1
More informationHealthcare Antitrust Issues
Quick Hit on Healthcare Antitrust Sponsored By The Association of Corporate Counsel, Health Law Committee September 10, 2013 Mark J. Horoschak, Partner WOMBLE CARLYLE SANDRIDGE & RICE, LLP Healthcare Antitrust
More informationQ UPDATE EXECUTIVE RISK SOLUTIONS CASES OF INTEREST D&O FILINGS, SETTLEMENTS AND OTHER DEVELOPMENTS
EXECUTIVE RISK SOLUTIONS Q1 2018 UPDATE CASES OF INTEREST U.S. SUPREME COURT FINDS STATE COURTS RETAIN JURISDICTION OVER 1933 ACT CLAIMS STATUTORY DAMAGES FOR VIOLATION OF TCPA FOUND TO BE PENALTIES AND
More informationFTC/DOJ ISSUE JOINT PROPOSED STATEMENT OF ANTITRUST ENFORCEMENT POLICY RELATING TO ACOs
FTC/DOJ ISSUE JOINT PROPOSED STATEMENT OF ANTITRUST ENFORCEMENT POLICY RELATING TO ACOs April 20, 2011 Boston Brussels Chicago Düsseldorf Houston London Los Angeles Miami Milan Munich New York Orange County
More informationInsurance Antitrust. DOJ and States Challenge Health Insurer Mergers. This is an advertisement. September By James M. Burns
DOJ and States Challenge Health Insurer Mergers Following more than a year of regulatory review, in late July 2016 the Department of Justice (DOJ) Antitrust Division and a number of states filed actions
More informationAmEx Ruling May Have Big Impact On Health Insurance
Portfolio Media. Inc. 111 West 19 th Street, 5th Floor New York, NY 10011 www.law360.com Phone: +1 646 783 7100 Fax: +1 646 783 7161 customerservice@law360.com AmEx Ruling May Have Big Impact On Health
More informationCPI Antitrust Chronicle April 2015 (2)
CPI Antitrust Chronicle April 2015 (2) FTC v. St. Luke s: Is the Efficiencies Defense Dead or Alive? Deirdre A. McEvoy & Kathrina Szymborski Patterson Belknap Webb & Tyler www.competitionpolicyinternational.com
More informationFiscal Quarterly Financial Report. Second Quarter Ended December 31, 2017
Fiscal 2018 Quarterly Financial Report Second Quarter Ended December 31, 2017 Notice to Readers The quarterly financial reports of MedStar Health, Inc. (MedStar) are intended to reasonably reflect the
More informationServices and Capabilities. Health Care
Services and Capabilities Health Care Our team of experts offers an unmatched combination of economic credentials, industry expertise, and testifying experience. Health Care and Antitrust Introduction/Overview
More informationInsurance Antitrust. Health Insurers Announce Merger Plans; Congress Announces Intention to Review. This is an advertisement.
Health Insurers Announce Merger Plans; Congress Announces Intention to Review In the last few months, several of the largest commercial health insurers in the nation have announced their intentions to
More informationANTITRUST &! TRADE REGULATION REPORT
A BNA s ANTITRUST &! TRADE REGULATION REPORT Reproduced with permission from Antitrust & Trade Regulation Report, 100 ATRR 441, 04/22/2011. Copyright 2011 by The Bureau of National Affairs, Inc. (800-372-1033)
More informationFEDERAL TRADE COMMISSION/DEPARTMENT OF JUSTICE PROPOSED STATEMENT OF ANTITRUST ENFORCEMENT POLICY REGARDING ACCOUNTABLE CARE ORGANIZATIONS
FEDERAL TRADE COMMISSION/DEPARTMENT OF JUSTICE PROPOSED STATEMENT OF ANTITRUST ENFORCEMENT POLICY REGARDING ACCOUNTABLE CARE ORGANIZATIONS On March 31, 2011, the Federal Trade Commission ( FTC ) and the
More informationMedCath Corporation, a Dissolved Delaware Corporation. Consolidated Financial Statements as of and for the Year Ended September 30, 2013
MedCath Corporation, a Dissolved Delaware Corporation Consolidated Financial Statements as of and for the Year Ended September 30, 2013 TABLE OF CONTENTS Page INDEPENDENT AUDITORS REPORT 1 CONSOLIDATED
More informationA History of Evanston and Analysis of the Merger Remedy
MAY 2008, RELEASE TWO A History of Evanston and Analysis of the Merger Remedy Dionne C. Lomax Vinson & Elkins LLP A History of Evanston and Analysis of the Merger Remedy Dionne C. Lomax he Evanston case
More informationUS MERGER CONTROL MARCH 1, 2003
US MERGER CONTROL KENNETH R. LOGAN AND JACK D ANGELO SIMPSON THACHER & BARTLETT LLP MARCH 1, 2003 Antitrust planning typically is a central part of every transaction and public takeover bids are no exception.
More informationNON-PRECEDENTIAL DECISION - SEE SUPERIOR COURT I.O.P Appellee No. 940 WDA 2014
NON-PRECEDENTIAL DECISION - SEE SUPERIOR COURT I.O.P. 65.37 TELETRACKING TECHNOLOGIES, INC. Appellant IN THE SUPERIOR COURT OF PENNSYLVANIA FRANK J. GORI, MARK JULIANO, GENE NACEY, LORRAINE NACEY, STEPHEN
More informationYear in Review 2016: Recent Trends and Updates in Managed Care
ACI s 8 th Annual Advanced Forum on Managed Care Disputes and Litigation Year in Review 2016: Recent Trends and Updates in Managed Care May 2-3, 2017 Edwin E. Brooks Partner McGuire Woods James J. McCarrie,
More informationAntitrust Issues in the Managed Care World Matthew Roberts Tim Hewson
Antitrust Issues in the Managed Care World Matthew Roberts Tim Hewson MRoberts@NexsenPruet.com THewson@NexsenPruet.com July 15, 2010 Society of Managed Care Professionals Trends in Health Care Industry
More informationIN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE NORTHERN DISTRICT OF TEXAS WICHITA FALLS DIVISION
IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE NORTHERN DISTRICT OF TEXAS WICHITA FALLS DIVISION UNITED STATES OF AMERICA and STATE OF TEXAS, v. Plaintiffs, UNITED REGIONAL HEALTH CARE SYSTEM, Case No.: 7:11-cv-00030
More informationKeeping the Trust: Holding Nonprofit Hospitals to Their Charitable Missions
Keeping the Trust: Holding Nonprofit Hospitals to Their Charitable Missions Introduction: Over the past several years, attorneys general have been exercising increased regulatory scrutiny over nonprofit
More informationBASICS OF MANAGED LONG TERM CARE CONTRACTING
Cadwalader, Wickersham & Taft LLP www.cadwalader.com BASICS OF MANAGED LONG TERM CARE CONTRACTING LeadingAge New York Jewish Home Lifecare New York, New York DECEMBER 16, 2011 Brian T. McGovern, Esq. Stephanie
More informationU.S. DISTRICT COURT FOR THE NORTHERN DISTRICT OF ILLINOIS Williams v. Wells Fargo, Case No. 1:14-cv-01981
U.S. DISTRICT COURT FOR THE NORTHERN DISTRICT OF ILLINOIS Williams v. Wells Fargo, Case No. 1:14-cv-01981 If you worked as a Financial Advisor Trainee for Wells Fargo, you may receive a payment from a
More informationNavigating the Briar Patch: Addressing Regulatory Compliance in an Alternative Payment World Business of Healthcare Symposium, March 5, 2018 Barry S.
Navigating the Briar Patch: Addressing Regulatory Compliance in an Alternative Payment World Business of Healthcare Symposium, March 5, 2018 Barry S. Herrin, JD, FACHE Founder, Herrin Health Law, P.C.
More informationUNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE DISTRICT OF MARYLAND (BALTIMORE DIVISION) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) )
UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE DISTRICT OF MARYLAND (BALTIMORE DIVISION ARLENE HODGES, CAROLYN MILLER and GARY T. BROWN, on behalf of themselves, individually, and on behalf of the Bon Secours Plans,
More informationYou Could Get Money From a New Class Action Settlement If You Paid for Medical Services at a Michigan Hospital From January 1, 2006 to June 23, 2014.
United States District Court For The Eastern District Of Michigan You Could Get Money From a New Class Action Settlement If You Paid for Medical Services at a Michigan Hospital From January 1, 2006 to
More informationLDD «Barcode» Postal Service: Please do not mark barcode Claim#: LDD-«Claim8» - «CkDig» «First1» «Last1» «Addr2» «Addr1» «City», «St» «Zip»
Lidoderm End-Payor Notice Administrator c/o KCC Class Action Services P.O. Box 43491 Providence, RI 02940-3491 LDD «Barcode» Postal Service: Please do not mark barcode Claim#: LDD-«Claim8» - «CkDig» «First1»
More informationBanister Financial, Inc. ( Charlotte, North Carolina Business Valuations. Medical Practice: Sample Deposition Questions
Note- This sample list is based on typical questions involving a divorce. These are sample questions only and will need to be tailored to deal with specific issues present in a particular practice valuation
More informationThe Antitrust Implications of Health Care Reform
The Antitrust Implications of Health Care Reform Dallas Bar Association Antitrust & Trade Regulation Section November 15, 2011 Bill Morrison Health Care Reform Patient Protection and Affordable Care Act
More informationEmerging Disputes Over Risk Sharing Under The ACA
Portfolio Media. Inc. 111 West 19 th Street, 5th Floor New York, NY 10011 www.law360.com Phone: +1 646 783 7100 Fax: +1 646 783 7161 customerservice@law360.com Emerging Disputes Over Risk Sharing Under
More informationAntitrust Battles in Two Parts: Attacking Meritless Litigation. Powerful Providers and Powerful Plans. Arthur Lerner
Antitrust Battles in Two Parts: Attacking Meritless Litigation and Powerful Providers and Powerful Plans Arthur Lerner Part I: Attacking the Meritless Lawsuit -- A Case Study RP Health Care, Inc. v. Pfizer,
More informationAEP Generating Company
AEP Generating Company 2012 Third Quarter Report Financial Statements TABLE OF CONTENTS Page Number Glossary of Terms 1 Condensed Statements of Income Unaudited 2 Condensed Statements of Changes in Common
More informationANNUAL REPORT REQUIRED UNDER MASTER CONTINUING DISCLOSURE AGREEMENT ADVOCATE HEALTH CARE NETWORK AND SUBSIDIARIES
ANNUAL REPORT REQUIRED UNDER MASTER CONTINUING DISCLOSURE AGREEMENT ADVOCATE HEALTH CARE NETWORK AND SUBSIDIARIES For the Fiscal Year Ended December 31, 2016 1. Definitions. Capitalized terms used but
More informationPRIVATE PAYOR OUTLOOK KELLI BACK, ATTORNEY AND APMA CONSULTANT
PRIVATE PAYOR OUTLOOK KELLI BACK, ATTORNEY AND APMA CONSULTANT Insurance Coverage by Source (2015) Employer Group 49% Non-group (individual and association) 7% Medicaid 20% (includes dual eligibles) Medicare
More informationRecent Developments in California Law Regarding Noncompetition Agreements
Recent Developments in California Law Regarding Noncompetition Agreements Employment Law Commentary, Vol. 18, No. 10 Eric Akira Tate October 2006 Employment + Labor Newsletter PDF VERSION In many states,
More informationIN THE UNITED STATES COURT OF FEDERAL CLAIMS
IN THE UNITED STATES COURT OF FEDERAL CLAIMS If you offered Qualified Health Plans under the Patient Protection and Affordable Care Act in the 2014 and 2015 benefit years, and your allowable costs were
More informationThis is an appeal by plaintiffs, Midwest Emergency Associates-Elgin, Ltd., and Sullivan
FOURTH DIVISION MAY 15, 2008 No. 1-07-0039 MIDWEST EMERGENCY ASSOCIATES-ELGIN LTD., ) Appeal from the and SULLIVAN URGENT AID CENTERS, LTD., ) Circuit Court of d/b/a Sullivan Urgent Care Centers, Ltd.,
More informationArbitration Study. Report to Congress, pursuant to Dodd Frank Wall Street Reform and Consumer Protection Act 1028(a)
Arbitration Study Report to Congress, pursuant to Dodd Frank Wall Street Reform and Consumer Protection Act 1028(a) Consumer Financial Protection Bureau March 2015 1.4 Executive Summary Our report reaches
More information5/7/2013. CMS Part B Inpatient Rebilling Rules
CMS Part B Inpatient Rebilling Rules Appeal Academy s Special Report on CMS-1455-R, posted 03/13/2013 1 Background Hospitals currently allowed to "rebill" denied Part A claim for IP admission But only
More information[Cite as Oh v. Anthem Blue Cross & Blue Shield, 2004-Ohio-565.] STATE OF OHIO, MAHONING COUNTY IN THE COURT OF APPEALS SEVENTH DISTRICT
[Cite as Oh v. Anthem Blue Cross & Blue Shield, 2004-Ohio-565.] STATE OF OHIO, MAHONING COUNTY IN THE COURT OF APPEALS SEVENTH DISTRICT KONG T. OH, M.D., d.b.a. ) CASE NO. 02 CA 142 OH EYE ASSOCIATES )
More informationNOTICE OF CLASS ACTION SETTLEMENT AND FAIRNESS HEARING
UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT MIDDLE DISTRICT OF NORTH CAROLINA Karolyn Kruger, M.D., et al., Plaintiffs, v. Novant Health Inc., et al., Defendants. Case No. 14-cv-208 Judge William Osteen, Jr. NOTICE OF
More informationCPI Antitrust Journal October 2010 (1)
CPI Antitrust Journal October 2010 (1) The Interplay Between Competition and Clinical Integration: Why the Antitrust Agencies Care About Medical Care Delivery Styles Gregory Vistnes Charles River Associates
More informationThe Anesthesia Company Model: Frequently Asked Questions
The Anesthesia Company Model: Frequently Asked Questions 1. What is the situation in Florida? Florida-specific Issues For several years, FSA members have been contacting the society with reports of company
More informationIN THE COMMONWEALTH COURT OF PENNSYLVANIA
IN THE COMMONWEALTH COURT OF PENNSYLVANIA Theodore R. Robinson, : Petitioner : : v. : : State Employees' Retirement Board, : No. 1136 C.D. 2014 Respondent : Submitted: October 31, 2014 BEFORE: HONORABLE
More informationIN THE COURT OF APPEALS OF MONTGOMERY COUNTY, OHIO. Plaintiffs-Appellants : C.A. CASE NO vs. : T.C. CASE NO. 03CV5624
[Cite as Stumpff v. Harris, 2012-Ohio-1239.] IN THE COURT OF APPEALS OF MONTGOMERY COUNTY, OHIO KENNETH M. STUMPFF, et al. : Plaintiffs-Appellants : C.A. CASE NO. 24562 vs. : T.C. CASE NO. 03CV5624 RICHARD
More informationIN THE UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE ELEVENTH CIRCUIT. No D.C. Docket No. 6:15-cv CEM-DCI. versus
Case: 17-11181 Date Filed: 08/22/2018 Page: 1 of 16 IN THE UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE ELEVENTH CIRCUIT No. 17-11181 D.C. Docket No. 6:15-cv-00718-CEM-DCI [DO NOT PUBLISH] HEALTH FIRST, INC.,
More informationProperty Tax and Sales Tax Issues for Not-For-Profit Hospitals and Healthcare Organizations The Illinois Experience Outlier or Harbinger
Property Tax and Sales Tax Issues for Not-For-Profit Hospitals and Healthcare Organizations The Illinois Experience Outlier or Harbinger Issues For Healthcare Organizations October 15-16, 2012 Presenter:
More informationRobert Patel v. Meridian Health Systems Inc
2013 Decisions Opinions of the United States Court of Appeals for the Third Circuit 9-4-2013 Robert Patel v. Meridian Health Systems Inc Precedential or Non-Precedential: Non-Precedential Docket No. 12-3020
More informationD. Brian Hufford. Partner
D. Brian Hufford Partner D. Brian Hufford leads a national practice representing patients and health care providers in disputes with health insurance companies. Brian developed innovative and successful
More informationAntitrust Update. Washington State Society of Health Care Attorneys November 3, Douglas Ross Davis Wright Tremaine, LLP
Antitrust Update Washington State Society of Health Care Attorneys November 3, 2012 Douglas Ross Davis Wright Tremaine, LLP douglasross@dwt.com (206) 757-8135 Overview Provider consolidation Exclusionary
More informationIN THE DISTRICT COURT OF APPEAL OF THE STATE OF FLORIDA FIFTH DISTRICT JULY TERM v. Case No. 5D
IN THE DISTRICT COURT OF APPEAL OF THE STATE OF FLORIDA FIFTH DISTRICT JULY TERM 2007 THE PLUMBING SERVICE COMPANY, Appellant, v. Case No. 5D06-1586 TRAVELER'S CASUALTY & SURETY COMPANY, etc., Appellee.
More informationPayer-Provider Consolidation Post-ACA Comes With New Risks
Portfolio Media. Inc. 860 Broadway, 6th Floor New York, NY 10003 www.law360.com Phone: +1 646 783 7100 Fax: +1 646 783 7161 customerservice@law360.com Payer-Provider Consolidation Post-ACA Comes With New
More information1. Company/Organization/Individual named in the determination ( Appellant ) Name Address Postal Code
APPEAL FORM (Form 1) This Appeal Form, along with the required attachments, must be delivered to the Employment Standards Tribunal within the appeal period. See Rule 18(3) of the Tribunal s Rules of Practice
More informationSTATE OF LOUISIANA COURT OF APPEAL, THIRD CIRCUIT **********
STATE OF LOUISIANA COURT OF APPEAL, THIRD CIRCUIT 07-1282 DR. FAYEZ K. SHAMIEH (RUDOLPH JACKSON) VERSUS LIQUID TRANSPORT CORP., ET AL. ********** APPEAL FROM THE OFFICE OF WORKERS' COMPENSATION - # 3 PARISH
More informationClient Alert. FTC Sues Cephalon for Reverse Payment Patent Settlements with Four Generic. the payments cause delayed entry by the generic firm.
Client Alert february 2008 FTC Sues Cephalon for Reverse Payment Patent Settlements with Four Generic Pharmaceutical Firms Last week, the Federal Trade Commission (FTC or commission) brought the latest
More informationHome Mortgage Foreclosures in Maine
Home Mortgage Foreclosures in Maine Find more easy-to-read legal information at www.ptla.org Important Note: This is very general information about home mortgage and foreclosure rules in Maine. It is not
More informationIN THE COMMONWEALTH COURT OF PENNSYLVANIA
IN THE COMMONWEALTH COURT OF PENNSYLVANIA Selective Insurance : Company of America, : Petitioner : : v. : No. 613 C.D. 2013 : Submitted: October 4, 2013 Bureau of Workers' Compensation : Fee Review Hearing
More informationAchieving Scale: Legal Perspectives on Affiliation Options
Achieving Scale: Legal Perspectives on Affiliation Options HFMA 2013 Thought Leadership Retreat October 3, 2013 Doug Hastings Chair, Board of Directors, Epstein Becker & Green, P.C. The Payment and Delivery
More informationCAN MY DEALERSHIP BE SUED FOR FAILING TO GIVE AN ADVERSE ACTION NOTICE? By: David R. Missimer
CAN MY DEALERSHIP BE SUED FOR FAILING TO GIVE AN ADVERSE ACTION NOTICE? By: David R. Missimer A question often asked is whether a dealership may be sued by a consumer for failing to provide an adverse
More informationSTATE OF MICHIGAN COURT OF APPEALS
STATE OF MICHIGAN COURT OF APPEALS ST. JOHN MACOMB OAKLAND HOSPITAL, Plaintiff-Appellant, FOR PUBLICATION December 8, 2016 9:00 a.m. v No. 329056 Macomb Circuit Court STATE FARM MUTUAL AUTOMOBILE LC No.
More informationv. Record No OPINION BY JUSTICE BARBARA MILANO KEENAN September 17, 1999 ANNETTE E. SCOTT
Present: All the Justices C. BENSON CLARK, ET AL. v. Record No. 982377 OPINION BY JUSTICE BARBARA MILANO KEENAN September 17, 1999 ANNETTE E. SCOTT FROM THE CIRCUIT COURT OF FAIRFAX COUNTY Thomas S. Kenny,
More informationHealth Care IN THIS ISSUE. Cyber-Attacks in the Health Care Industry By Daniel B. Garrie, Esq.
Health Care VOL. II, Summer 2016 IN THIS ISSUE Special Masters in Health Care Antitrust Merger Cases: Resolving the Conflicting Interests... page 1 Cyber-Attacks in the Health Care Industry... page 1 Why
More informationARKANSAS COURT OF APPEALS
ARKANSAS COURT OF APPEALS DIVISION II No. CV-15-293 UNIFIRST CORPORATION APPELLANT V. LUDWIG PROPERTIES, INC. D/B/A 71 EXPRESS TRAVEL PLAZA APPELLEE Opinion Delivered December 2, 2015 APPEAL FROM THE SEBASTIAN
More informationNOTICE OF PROPOSED CLASS ACTION SETTLEMENT
NOTICE OF PROPOSED CLASS ACTION SETTLEMENT Elizabeth Ortiz, et al. v. Ghirardelli Chocolate Company Superior Court of California, Alameda County, Case No. RG15764300 It is your responsibility to change
More informationCase 3:17-cv RS Document 96 Filed 03/23/17 Page 1 of 7
Case :-cv-00-rs Document Filed 0// Page of UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT NORTHERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA SECURITIES AND EXCHANGE COMMISSION, v. Plaintiff, SAN FRANCISCO REGIONAL CENTER LLC, et al., Defendants.
More informationCommentary: Professional Peer Review and the Antitrust Laws
Case Western Reserve Law Review Volume 36 Issue 4 1986 Commentary: Professional Peer Review and the Antitrust Laws William G. Kopit Follow this and additional works at: http://scholarlycommons.law.case.edu/caselrev
More informationLegal Issues in Healthcare Reimbursement Medicare Advantage ERISA MOON Section /9/2017
8/9/2017 Legal Issues in Healthcare Reimbursement Elizabeth S. Richards, Esq. August 17, 2017 1 Legal Issues in Healthcare Reimbursement Medicare Advantage ERISA MOON Section 1557 2 1 What is Medicare
More informationIN THE COURT OF APPEALS OF OHIO TENTH APPELLATE DISTRICT
[Cite as State v. Boschulte, 2003-Ohio-1276.] IN THE COURT OF APPEALS OF OHIO TENTH APPELLATE DISTRICT State of Ohio, : Plaintiff-Appellee, : v. : No. 02AP-1053 (C.P.C. No. 01CR-100215) Mary Boschulte,
More informationAntitrust and ACOs: What the Antitrust Enforcement Agencies Have in Store for ACOs Tuesday, April 26, :00-2:30 pm Eastern
Antitrust and ACOs: What the Antitrust Enforcement Agencies Have in Store for ACOs Tuesday, April 26, 2011 1:00-2:30 pm Eastern This webinar is brought to you by the Antitrust Practice Group and the Accountable
More informationHome Mortgage Foreclosures in Maine
Home Mortgage Foreclosures in Maine Find more easy-to-read legal information at www.ptla.org Important Note: This is very general information about home mortgage and foreclosure rules in Maine. It is not
More informationIN THE GENERAL ASSEMBLY STATE OF. Physician Profiling Programs and Network Determination Act
IN THE GENERAL ASSEMBLY STATE OF Physician Profiling Programs and Network Determination Act 1 1 1 1 Be it enacted by the People of the State of, represented in the General Assembly: Section 1. Title. This
More informationMANAGEMENT S DISCUSSION AND ANALYSIS OF FINANCIAL CONDITION AND RESULTS OF OPERATIONS FOR ASCENSION
MANAGEMENT S DISCUSSION AND ANALYSIS OF FINANCIAL CONDITION AND RESULTS OF OPERATIONS FOR ASCENSION As of and for the six months ended December 31, 2014 and 2013 The following information should be read
More informationCircuit Court for Frederick County Case No.: 10-C UNREPORTED IN THE COURT OF SPECIAL APPEALS OF MARYLAND. No September Term, 2017
Circuit Court for Frederick County Case No.: 10-C-02-000895 UNREPORTED IN THE COURT OF SPECIAL APPEALS OF MARYLAND No. 1100 September Term, 2017 ALLAN M. PICKETT, et al. v. FREDERICK CITY MARYLAND, et
More informationInformation Exchange in the Formation of an ACO. Karen Kazmerzak Sidley Austin LLP Washington, DC
MAY 2013 EXECUTIVE SUMMARY ACCOUNTABLE CARE ORGANIZATION TASK FORCE, ANTITRUST PRACTICE GROUP Information Exchange in the Formation of an ACO Karen Kazmerzak Sidley Austin LLP Washington, DC Amy Garrigues
More informationDO NOTHING EXCLUDE YOURSELF FROM THE CLASS
SUPERIOR COURT OF CALIFORNIA, COUNTY OF SAN FRANCISCO California Entities That Compensated Sutter Health for Their Members Health Care Could Be Included in a Class Action Lawsuit A court authorized this
More informationThis matter is before this Court pursuant to Appellant s Motion For Suspension of The
Franklin County Ohio Clerk of Courts of the Common Pleas- 2015 Dec 10 3:46 PM-15CV010030 IN THE COURT OF COMMON PLEAS FRANKLIN COUNTY, OHIO ANTHONY V. DALLAS, M.D., : APPELLANT, : CASE NO. 15 CVF 10030
More informationIN THE UNITED STATES DISCTRICT COURT FOR THE MIDDLE DISTRICT OF GEORGIA MACON DIVISION
IN THE UNITED STATES DISCTRICT COURT FOR THE MIDDLE DISTRICT OF GEORGIA MACON DIVISION UROLOGY CENTER OF GEORGIA, LLC ) ) Plaintiff, ) ) v. ) CIVIL ACTION FILE ) BLUE CROSS BLUE SHIELD ) NO. HEALTHCARE
More informationCase 4:14-cv Document 1 Filed in TXSD on 06/17/14 Page 1 of 16 UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT SOUTHERN DISTRICT OF TEXAS HOUSTON DIVISION
Case 4:14-cv-01691 Document 1 Filed in TXSD on 06/17/14 Page 1 of 16 UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT SOUTHERN DISTRICT OF TEXAS HOUSTON DIVISION FEDERAL TRADE COMMISSION, v. Plaintiff, Case No. JUDGE RTB
More informationPhysicians and Antitrust Issues With Respect to Accountable Care Organizations Health Reform Update
Physicians and Antitrust Issues With Respect to Accountable Care Organizations Health Reform Update Henry Allen, JD, MPA American Medical Association Disclaimer: This presentation is not intended to serve
More informationSUPREME COURT OF THE UNITED STATES
Cite as: 538 U. S. (2003) 1 NOTICE: This opinion is subject to formal revision before publication in the preliminary print of the United States Reports. Readers are requested to notify the Reporter of
More informationNOTICE OF CLASS ACTION SETTLEMENT:
NOTICE OF SETTLEMENT UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT CENTRAL DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA You are receiving this notice because a settlement has been reached in the case of Ian Freeman v. Zillow, Inc., Case No.
More informationFor the quarterly period ended June 30, [ ] TRANSITION REPORT PURSUANT TO SECTION 13 OR 15 (d) OF THE. Commission file number HUMANA INC.
UNITED STATES SECURITIES AND EXCHANGE COMMISSION WASHINGTON, D.C. 20549 FORM 10-Q [X] QUARTERLY REPORT PURSUANT TO SECTION 13 OR 15 (d) OF THE SECURITIES EXCHANGE ACT OF 1934 For the quarterly period ended
More informationDated: September 19, 2014
[Cite as Huntington v. Yeager, 2014-Ohio-4151.] STATE OF OHIO, HARRISON COUNTY IN THE COURT OF APPEALS SEVENTH DISTRICT THE HUNTINGTON NATIONAL BANK SUCCESSOR BY MERGER TO SKY BANK, V. PLAINTIFF, NATHAN
More informationCase 5:16-cv NC Document Filed 04/20/18 Page 1 of 9 EXHIBIT 1
Case 5:16-cv-03698-NC Document 142-4 Filed 04/20/18 Page 1 of 9 EXHIBIT 1 Case 5:16-cv-03698-NC Document 142-4 Filed 04/20/18 Page 2 of 9 IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE NORTHERN DISTRICT OF
More informationDebt Collection Report Recommendations
Debt Collection Report Recommendations The ACLU makes the following recommendations to preserve the integrity of the courts and protect alleged debtors against the unconstitutional and abusive debt collection
More informationState Approaches to Addressing the Effects of Provider Consolidation at. Healthcare Consolidation: Winners, Losers, and Policy Implications
State Approaches to Addressing the Effects of Provider Consolidation at Healthcare Consolidation: Winners, Losers, and Policy Implications Robert A. Berenson, M.D. Institute Fellow, The Urban Institute
More informationThe Impact of Dudenhoeffer on Lower Court Stock-Drop Cases
The Impact of Dudenhoeffer on Lower Court Stock-Drop Cases ALYSSA OHANIAN The Supreme Court recently held in Fifth Third Bancorp v. Dudenhoeffer, 134 S. Ct. 2459 (2014), that employer stock ownership plan
More informationNON-PRECEDENTIAL DECISION - SEE SUPERIOR COURT I.O.P
NON-PRECEDENTIAL DECISION - SEE SUPERIOR COURT I.O.P. 65.37 BOCHETTO & LENTZ, P.C. Appellant IN THE SUPERIOR COURT OF PENNSYLVANIA v. A. HAROLD DATZ, ESQUIRE, AND A. HAROLD DATZ, P.C. Appellee No. 3165
More informationERISA. Representative Experience
ERISA RMKB s ERISA practice group has extensive experience representing insurance carriers, employers, plan administrators, claims administrators, and benefits plans against claims brought under the Employee
More informationOrthodontic Practice: Sample Deposition Questions
Note- This sample list is based on typical questions involving a divorce valuation where both valuation of the professional s interest and active-passive appreciation issues pertaining to the change in
More informationFEDERAL CIRCUIT HOLDS EN BANC REHEARING OF PATENT MISUSE CASE AFFECTING PATENT POOLS AND OTHER JOINT VENTURES
CLIENT MEMORANDUM FEDERAL CIRCUIT HOLDS EN BANC REHEARING OF PATENT MISUSE CASE AFFECTING PATENT POOLS AND OTHER JOINT VENTURES On March 3, 2010, the U.S. Court of Appeals for the Federal Circuit heard
More informationDISTRICT COURT OF APPEAL OF THE STATE OF FLORIDA FOURTH DISTRICT July Term 2013
MAY, J. DISTRICT COURT OF APPEAL OF THE STATE OF FLORIDA FOURTH DISTRICT July Term 2013 PALM BEACH POLO HOLDINGS, INC., a Florida corporation, Appellant, v. STEWART TITLE GUARANTY COMPANY, a Texas corporation,
More informationSUPERIOR COURT OF CALIFORNIA COUNTY OF FRESNO
SUPERIOR COURT OF CALIFORNIA COUNTY OF FRESNO MARY BARBER and ISABEL FERNANDEZ, Case No. 14CEG00166 KCK as individuals and on behalf of all others similarly situated NOTICE OF PENDENCY OF CLASS ACTION
More informationST. ALPHONSUS MEDICAL CENTER V. ST
ST. ALPHONSUS MEDICAL CENTER V. ST. LUKE S HEALTH SYSTEM: THE UNCERTAIN APPLICATION OF THE EFFICIENCIES DEFENSE IS LEADING TO UNPREDICTABLE OUTCOMES IN HEALTHCARE MERGERS JAMIE L. BJORKLUND Jamie L. Bjorklund,
More informationClaim Procedure Manual
Claim Procedure Manual Liability Program December 2010 INTRODUCTION This manual was prepared for PARSAC members as a guide for processing claims and lawsuits presented to your entity where there is potential
More informationWhat Bazaarvoice Tells Us About Section 7 Litigation
What Bazaarvoice Tells Us About Section 7 Litigation Law360, New York (January 14, 2014, 9:33 PM ET) -- On Jan. 8, 2014, the U.S. Department of Justice prevailed in its challenge to Bazaarvoice s consummated
More information