IN THE SUPREME COURT OF FLORIDA. Case No. SC08- Lower Tribunal No. 3D BEATRICE PERAZA, Appellant, vs. CITIZENS PROPERTY INSURANCE CORPORATION,
|
|
- George Neal
- 5 years ago
- Views:
Transcription
1 IN THE SUPREME COURT OF FLORIDA Case No. SC08- Lower Tribunal No. 3D BEATRICE PERAZA, Appellant, vs. CITIZENS PROPERTY INSURANCE CORPORATION, Appellee. On Review of a Decision of the Third District Court of Appeal PETITIONER S JURISDICTIONAL BRIEF AND APPENDIX Thomas J. Korge, Esq. Korge & Korge 230 Palermo Avenue Coral Gables, Florida Attorney for Petitioner, Beatrice Peraza
2 TABLE OF CONTENTS TABLE OF AUTHORITIES... i STATEMENT OF THE CASE AND FACTS... 1 SUMMARY OF ARGUMENT... 1 ARGUMENT... 3 Conflict with the Fourth District Court s Decision... 3 Conflict with the Florida Supreme Court s Decisions... 5 CONCLUSION... 9
3 FLORIDA CASES TABLE OF AUTHORITIES Allstate Insurance Co. v. Suarez, 786 So.2d 645, 646 (3d DCA 2001), affd. per curiam, 833 So.2d 762 (Fla. 2002)... 7 Burnett v. Clarendon Select Insurance Co., 920 So.2d 188 (Fla. 5th DCA 2006)... 7 Fewox v. McMerit Construction Co., 556 So.2d 419, (2d DCA 1989)... 4 Insurance Co. of North America v. Lexow, 602 So.2d 528, 531 (Fla. 1992). 8 Peraza v. Citizens Property Ins. Corp., No. 3D (Fla. 3d DCA November 21, 2007)... passim Travelers Indemn. Ins. Co. v. Meadows MRI, 900 So.2d 676 (Fla. 4th DCA 2005)... passim Wiggins v. Wiggins, 446 So.2d 1078 (Fla. 1984)... passim Wilson v. Rose Printing Company, Inc., 624 So.2d 257, 258 (Fla. 1993)... 6 Wollard v. Lloyds and Companies of Lloyds, 439 So.2d 217, 218 (Fla. 1983), quashing 420 So.2d 940 (Fla. 3d DCA 1982)... passim FLORIDA STATUTES (1), Fla. Stat. (2006)... passim FLORIDA LAWS Ch , 11, at 35, Laws of Fla FLORIDA RULES Rule 1.420(d)... 1, 2, 6 i
4 STATEMENT OF THE CASE AND FACTS After denying the amount of a hurricane loss claimed by Beatrice Peraza ( Peraza ), Citizens Property Insurance Corporation ( Citizens ) petitioned the trial court to appoint a neutral umpire to decide the loss amount by appraisal. Peraza was thus forced to hire an attorney to protect her interests in court. After the court appointed an umpire, but before the umpire rendered an award in favor of Peraza, Citizens voluntarily dismissed its petition under Florida Rule of Civil Procedure 1.420(d), making Peraza the prevailing party as a matter of law. Peraza timely moved to tax costs, including a reasonable attorney s fee under section (1), Florida Statutes (2006), but only for costs and fees incurred solely in the court proceeding. The trial court denied the motion. The Third District Court held that the order appointing an umpire did not amount to an order against Citizens and in favor of Peraza for purposes of section (1), and therefore decided that Peraza is not entitled to the award of an attorney s fee. Peraza v. Citizens Property Ins. Corp., No. 3D (Fla. 3d DCA November 21, 2007), slip opinion p.3. Appendix 1. SUMMARY OF ARGUMENT The Third District Court s decision in this case expressly and directly conflicts with the Fourth District Court s decision in Travelers Indemn. Ins. 1
5 Co. v. Meadows MRI, 900 So.2d 676 (Fla. 4th DCA 2005), on the same question of law. In Travelers Indemn. Ins. Co., the Fourth District Court decided that under section (1), an insured is entitled to an award of an attorney s fee necessarily incurred during an appraisal to resolve a disputed valuation estimate. However, the Third District Court decided that Peraza is not entitled to an award for her attorney s fee necessarily incurred during an appraisal to resolve a disputed valuation estimate. The Third District Court s decision also expressly and directly conflicts with this Court s decisions in Wiggins v. Wiggins, 446 So.2d 1078 (Fla. 1984), and Wollard v. Lloyds and Companies of Lloyds, 439 So.2d 217, 218 (Fla. 1983), quashing 420 So.2d 940 (Fla. 3d DCA 1982), on the same question of law. In Wiggins, this Court decided that an attorney s fee must be awarded upon any voluntary dismissal under rule 1.420(d) if a statute authorizes the award of an attorney s fee. In Wollard, this Court decided that the statutory criteria to award an attorney s fee under section (1) do not require entry of an order or judgment in favor of the insured if the insured prevails by settlement or otherwise in the attendant court proceeding. However, the Third District Court decided that Peraza is not entitled to an attorney s fee award under section (1) upon Citizens voluntary dismissal before the umpire had entered an award in favor of Peraza because 2
6 ... the order [appointing the umpire] did not amount to an order against Citizens and in favor of Peraza and thus failed to satisfy the statutory criteria of section (1). Peraza, supra at slip opinion, p. 3. ARGUMENT Conflict with the Fourth District Court s Decision The Peraza decision conflicts with the Fourth District Court s decision in Travelers Indemn. Ins. Co., supra. In Travelers Indemn. Ins., the court affirmed an award under section (1) of attorney s fees incurred by an insured during an insurance loss appraisal. Meadows sought recovery under its insurance policy with Travelers for a loss from damage to Meadow s MRI equipment. Travelers admitted coverage, but disputed the loss amount, paid a lesser amount, and demanded to resolve the disputed excess amount by an appraisal. Before the appraisal began, Meadow s counsel sent Travelers a letter asking about the appraisal procedures, including entitlement to attorney s fees, and threatening a declaratory judgment action if Travelers did not promptly respond. Travelers did not respond. Both parties selected their appraisers. Meadows then filed a declaratory suit to assure, among other things, that Meadows would be entitled to attorney s fees under section (1) should Meadows prevail in the appraisal. The appraisal resulted in Travelers owing Meadows a 3
7 significant balance, which was timely paid once determined. After receiving payment of the award, Meadows filed a motion to confirm and the trial court entered a final judgment confirming the award. Subsequently, the trial court also awarded Meadows an attorney s fee under section (1). follows: Affirming the attorney s fee award, the Fourth District Court stated as Given that the goal of section (1) is to place Meadows in the place it would have been if Travelers had seasonably paid the claim without causing Meadows to retain counsel and incur obligations for attorney s fees, taken in conjunction with the rule of law that Meadows could have recovered any attorneys fees incurred in reaching a settlement of its lawsuit, had a settlement been reached, we see no reason for not extending section (1) to cover an award of attorney s fees associated with an expensive and drawn out appraisal due to Travelers disputed value estimation. See Fewox v. McMerit Construction Co., 556 So.2d 419, (2d DCA 1989) ( The legislative policy underlying section is served by requiring insurers to pay attorney s fees to a prevailing insured or beneficiary, regardless of whether the insurers contest coverage through arbitration or in the trial court. To hold otherwise would be to allow insurers to avoid paying attorney s fees in contested coverage cases merely by choosing arbitration. ). Were this court to rule otherwise, Meadows would not be made whole as it would have to apply a portion of the policy proceeds to compensate its attorneys. 4
8 Id., at 900 So.2d 679 (emphasis added). Thus, the Fourth District Court held that under section (1), the trial court must award attorney s fees necessarily incurred by the prevailing insured in the appraisal process. In this case, Peraza sought recovery under her insurance policy for windstorm damage to her residence. Citizens admitted coverage, but disputed the loss amount and demanded to resolve the disputed amount by appraisal. Both parties selected their appraisers and Citizens asked the trial court to appoint a neutral umpire. Before the court-appointed umpire rendered a decision in favor of Peraza, Citizens voluntarily dismissed its petition. Because the purpose of section is to place Peraza in the position she would have been if Citizens had timely paid the claim, and because Peraza was forced to hire an attorney to recover the benefit of her policy in the attendant court proceeding, Peraza is entitled to an award of an attorney s fee under the holding of Travelers Indemn. Ins. Co, supra. The Third District Court s decision thus expressly and directly conflicts with the Fourth District Court s decision in Travelers Indemn. Ins., supra. Conflict with the Florida Supreme Court s Decisions The Peraza decision also conflicts with this Court s decisions in Wiggins v. Wiggins, 446 So.2d 1078 (Fla. 1984), and Wollard v. Lloyds and Companies of Lloyds, 439 So.2d 217, 218 (Fla. 1983), quashing 420 So.2d 5
9 940 (Fla. 3d DCA 1982). In Wiggins, this Court held that an attorney s fee must be awarded, along with costs, upon any voluntary dismissal under rule 1.420(d) if a statute authorizes the court to award an attorney s fee. Because the non-dismissing party is treated as the prevailing party upon any voluntary dismissal, the non-dismissing party was entitled as a matter of law to an attorney s fee award against the dismissing party pursuant to the statute. See also Wilson v. Rose Printing Company, Inc., 624 So.2d 257, 258 (Fla. 1993) (where an agreement provides for an award of attorney s fees to the prevailing party, a non-dismissing party is the prevailing party entitled to an attorney s fee award under the agreement). In Wollard, this Court held that an order need not be formally entered in favor of the insured before an attorney s fee may be awarded under section (1) where the insured had prevailed by settlement. In this case, due to Citizens voluntary dismissal, Peraza is the prevailing party as a matter of law. See, e.g., Wiggins v. Wiggins, supra. Section (1) awards attorney s fees upon any judgment in favor of the insured and against the insurer. The Third District Court denied an attorney s fee because the order merely granted Citizens petition to appoint an umpire. The district court thus confused the form of the order with the substantive relief sought in the court proceeding, viz. adjudication of the 6
10 loss amount by the appraisal of a court-appointed umpire. Disregarding the substantive relief sought, the district court therefore concluded that... the order did not amount to an order against Citizens and in favor of Peraza for purposes of section (1). Peraza, supra at slip op., p. 3. However, in Wollard supra, this Court held that an order or judgment in favor of the insured need not be formally entered before an attorney s fee award may be made under section (1) where the insured in fact prevailed. Similarly, in Wiggins, supra, the Court held that upon a voluntary dismissal, the non-dismissing party is the prevailing party entitled to an award of any attorney s fee otherwise authorized by statute though no order is ever entered in favor of the insured. 1 More fundamental, the Third District Court s decision effectively defeats the legislative policy for the allowance of an attorney s fee under section (1). The statute is intended... to discourage the contesting 1 In any event, and more to the point, in the absence of Citizen s voluntary dismissal, Peraza would have been entitled to a final judgment confirming the appraisal award subsequently entered by the umpire in her favor. See, e.g., Allstate Insurance Co. v. Suarez, 833 So.2d 762, 763 (Fla. 2002), affg. per curiam, 786 So.2d 645, 646 (3d DCA 2001) (affirming a final judgment entered to confirm an umpire s appraisal award); Burnett v. Clarendon Select Insurance Co., 920 So.2d 188 (Fla. 5th DCA 2006) ( [a]fter the circuit court enters a final judgment [confirming any appraisal award], Ms. Burnett will be able to obtain review of her claim that Clarendon Select waived its right to appraisal ) (emphasis added). 7
11 of valid claims against insurance companies and to reimburse successful insureds for their attorney s fees when they are compelled to defend or sue to enforce their insurance contracts. Insurance Co. of North America v. Lexow, 602 So.2d 528, 531 (Fla. 1992) (emphasis added). As this Court stated in Wollard v. Lloyds and Companies of Lloyds, supra: Requiring the plaintiff to continue litigation in spite of an acceptable offer of settlement merely to avoid having to offset attorney s fees against compensation for the loss puts an unnecessary burden on the judicial system, fails to protect any interest the insured s, the insurer s or the public s and discourages any attempt at settlement. This literal requirement of the statute exalts form over substance to the detriment of public policy, and such a result is clearly absurd. 439 So.2d 218 (emphasis added). Moreover, as the Legislature recently made clear, its public policy discouraging insurers from contesting valid claims also applies to Citizens. See ch , 11, at 35, Laws of Fla. (the statutory immunity provided to Citizens by section (6)... does not apply to the corporation in any pending or future action for benefits under a policy issued by the corporation; the corporation shall be liable to policyholders under s ) (emphasis added). As a result of the Third District Court s decision, however, an insured, like Peraza, cannot be made whole when her disputed insurance claim is 8
12 resolved in her favor and against the insurance company by a courtappointed umpire. Although she was unquestionably compelled to defend her insurance claim by engaging an attorney to represent her in the court proceeding initiated by Citizens, Peraza must pay her attorney s fee out her insurance recovery though she ultimately prevailed. So, instead of receiving an award of reasonable attorney s fees necessarily incurred to protect her interests in the court proceeding initiated by Citizens, an insured like Peraza will have to apply a portion of her favorable award to pay those fees. Accordingly, the district court s literal reading of the statutory criteria... exalts form over substance to the detriment of public policy, Wollard v. Lloyds and Companies of Lloyds, supra; and thus conflicts with this Court s decision in Wollard. CONCLUSION The Third District Court s decision in Peraza, supra, expressly and directly conflict with the Fourth District Court s decision in Travelers Indemn. Ins. Co, supra, and with this Court s decisions in Wiggins, supra, and Wollard, supra, on the same questions of law. Peraza was entitled to recover her attorney s fee when Citizens voluntarily dismissed its court petition prior to an award favorable to Peraza because she is presumed to have been the prevailing party for purposes of section (1) and 9
13 because the formal entry of a final judgment is not required for the court to award an attorney s fee under section (1). As a result of the Third District Court s decision, Peraza must pay her attorney s fees out of her insurance recovery even though she has prevailed both as a matter of law (and in fact) against Citizens, which refused to pay her entire loss. The court s decision thus exalts form over substance to the detriment of clear public policy intended to discourage insurance companies from contesting valid insurance claims, as Citizens did in this case. For these reasons, the Court should accept jurisdiction of this appeal. Respectfully submitted, KORGE & KORGE 230 Palermo Avenue Coral Gables, Florida Phone: (305) Fax: (305) Counsel for Petitioner By: THOMAS J. KORGE Fla. Bar No
14 CERTIFICATE OF SERVICE AND COMPLIANCE I HEREBY CERTIFY that a copy of the foregoing was sent on March 6, 2008, by U.S. mail to Shaun Marker, Esq., Powers, McNalis, Torres & Teebagy, P.O. Box 21289, West Palm Beach, Florida , and that this brief complies with the font requirements of Florida Rule of Appellate Procedure 9.210(a)(2). By: THOMAS J. KORGE 11
Supreme Court of Florida
Supreme Court of Florida CASE NO. BASIK EXPORTS & IMPORTS, INC., Petitioner, v. PREFERRED NATIONAL INSURANCE COMPANY, Respondent. ON PETITION FOR DISCRETIONARY REVIEW FROM THE DISTRICT COURT OF APPEAL,
More informationIN THE DISTRICT COURT OF APPEAL OF THE STATE OF FLORIDA FIFTH DISTRICT JULY TERM v. Case No. 5D
IN THE DISTRICT COURT OF APPEAL OF THE STATE OF FLORIDA FIFTH DISTRICT JULY TERM 2007 STATE FARM FLORIDA INSURANCE COMPANY, Petitioner, v. Case No. 5D06-3147 JESSICA LORENZO F/K/A JESSICA DIBBLE, ET AL.,
More informationIn the Supreme Court of Florida
In the Supreme Court of Florida CASE NO.: SC11-258 STATE FARM FLORIDA INSURANCE COMPANY, Petitioner, v. LLOYD BEVERLY and EDITH BEVERLY, Respondents. ON DISCRETIONARY REVIEW FROM THE SECOND DISTRICT COURT
More informationCASE NO. 1D Roy W. Jordan, Jr., of Roy W. Jordan, Jr., P.A., West Palm Beach, for Appellant.
IN THE DISTRICT COURT OF APPEAL FIRST DISTRICT, STATE OF FLORIDA SUSAN GENA, v. Appellant, NOT FINAL UNTIL TIME EXPIRES TO FILE MOTION FOR REHEARING AND DISPOSITION THEREOF IF FILED CASE NO. 1D11-1783
More informationThird District Court of Appeal State of Florida, July Term, A.D. 2011
Third District Court of Appeal State of Florida, July Term, A.D. 2011 Opinion filed December 07, 2011. Not final until disposition of timely filed motion for rehearing. No. 3D11-334 Lower Tribunal No.
More informationIN THE SUPREME COURT OF FLORIDA CASE NO. SC THIRD DISTRICT CASE NO. 3D BRASS & SINGER, D.C., P.A., A/A/O MILDRED SOLAGES, Petitioner,
IN THE SUPREME COURT OF FLORIDA CASE NO. SC06-283 THIRD DISTRICT CASE NO. 3D05-951 BRASS & SINGER, D.C., P.A., A/A/O MILDRED SOLAGES, Petitioner, vs. UNITED AUTOMOBILE INSURANCE COMPANY, A Florida corporation,
More informationIn the Supreme Court of Florida
In the Supreme Court of Florida CASE NO.: SC09-401 STATE FARM FLORIDA INSURANCE COMPANY, Petitioner, v. CHAD GOFF and CAROL GOFF, Respondents. ON DISCRETIONARY REVIEW FROM THE SECOND DISTRICT COURT OF
More informationIN THE SUPREME COURT OF FLORIDA CASE NO. SC THIRD DISTRICT CASE NO. 3D
IN THE SUPREME COURT OF FLORIDA CASE NO. SC11-726 THIRD DISTRICT CASE NO. 3D09-3370 COMPREHENSIVE HEALTH CENTER, INC. (a/a/o Erla Telusnor), vs. Petitioner, UNITED AUTOMOBILE INSURANCE COMPANY, Respondent.
More informationIN THE SUPREME COURT OF FLORIDA. CASE NO. SC d DCA CASE NO. 3D05-951
IN THE SUPREME COURT OF FLORIDA CASE NO. SC06-283 3d DCA CASE NO. 3D05-951 BRASS & SINGER, P.A., (a/o/a Mildred Solages) vs. Petitioner, UNITED AUTOMOBILE INSURANCE COMPANY, Respondent. / PETITIONER=S
More informationIN THE SUPREME COURT OF FLORIDA CASE NO.:
IN THE SUPREME COURT OF FLORIDA CASE NO.: ARNALDO VELEZ, an individual, TAYLOR, BRION, BUKER & GREENE, a general partnership, vs. Petitioners, BIRD LAKES DEVELOPMENT CORP., a Panamanian corporation, Respondent.
More informationAppellant, Lower Court Case No.: CC O
IN THE CIRCUIT COURT OF THE NINTH JUDICIAL CIRCUIT IN AND FOR ORANGE COUNTY, FLORIDA STATE FARM MUTUAL AUTO- MOBILE INSURANCE COMPANY, CASE NO.: CVA1-06 - 19 vs. CARRIE CLARK, Appellant, Lower Court Case
More informationIN THE SUPREME COURT OF FLORIDA. L.T. CASE NO.: 2D v. L.T. CASE NO.: 2D THE HARTFORD FIRE INSURANCE COMPANY, a Connecticut corporation,
IN THE SUPREME COURT OF FLORIDA OWNERS INSURANCE COMPANY, a Michigan Corporation, Petitioner, CASE NO.: SC04-1977 L.T. CASE NO.: 2D03-2188 v. L.T. CASE NO.: 2D03-3182 THE HARTFORD FIRE INSURANCE COMPANY,
More informationIN THE SUPREME COURT OF FLORIDA CASE NO. SC THIRD DISTRICT CASE NO. 3D COMPREHENSIVE HEALTH CENTER, INC., a/a/o ERLA TELUSNOR,
IN THE SUPREME COURT OF FLORIDA CASE NO. SC11-726 THIRD DISTRICT CASE NO. 3D09-3370 COMPREHENSIVE HEALTH CENTER, INC., a/a/o ERLA TELUSNOR, Petitioner, vs. UNITED AUTOMOBILE INSURANCE COMPANY, A Florida
More informationIN THE DISTRICT COURT OF APPEAL OF THE STATE OF FLORIDA FIFTH DISTRICT
IN THE DISTRICT COURT OF APPEAL OF THE STATE OF FLORIDA FIFTH DISTRICT NOT FINAL UNTIL TIME EXPIRES TO FILE MOTION FOR REHEARING AND DISPOSITION THEREOF IF FILED EXPLORER INSURANCE COMPANY, Appellant,
More informationIN THE DISTRICT COURT OF APPEAL OF THE STATE OF FLORIDA FIFTH DISTRICT JANUARY TERM v. Case No. 5D05-935
IN THE DISTRICT COURT OF APPEAL OF THE STATE OF FLORIDA FIFTH DISTRICT JANUARY TERM 2006 STATE FARM MUTUAL AUTOMOBILE INSURANCE COMPANY, Petitioner, v. Case No. 5D05-935 RONNIE T. WIGGINS, Respondent.
More informationOF FLORIDA THIRD DISTRICT
NOT FINAL UNTIL TIME EXPIRES TO FILE REHEARING MOTION AND, IF FILED, DISPOSED OF. IN THE DISTRICT COURT OF APPEAL OF FLORIDA THIRD DISTRICT JANUARY TERM, A.D. 2003 MAGNETIC IMAGING SYSTEMS, ** I, LTD.,
More informationSUPREME COURT OF FLORIDA. v. Case No. SC DCA Case No. 2D WILMA SMITH, individually, and on behalf of all others similarly situated,
SUPREME COURT OF FLORIDA FOREMOST INSURANCE COMPANY and AMERICAN FEDERATION INSURANCE COMPANY, Petitioners, v. Case No. SC04-2003 DCA Case No. 2D03-286 WILMA SMITH, individually, and on behalf of all others
More informationRESPONDENT CDC BUILDERS, INC. S RESPONSE TO PETITIONERS RIVIERA BILTMORE, LLC AND RIVIERA SEVILLA LLC S JURISDICTIONAL BRIEF
2070625 IN THE SUPREME COURT OF FLORIDA RIVIERA ALMERIA, LLC, RIVIERA BILTMORE, LLC, RIVIERA SEVILLA, LLC, Petitioner(s) CASE NO.: SC11-503 LOWER TRIBUNAL CASE NOS: 3D10-1197, 08-2763CA10 vs. CDC BUILDERS,
More informationThird District Court of Appeal State of Florida
Third District Court of Appeal State of Florida Opinion filed April 13, 2016. Not final until disposition of timely filed motion for rehearing. No. 3D15-1047 Lower Tribunal No. 08-3100 Florida Insurance
More informationIN THE SUPREME COURT OF FLORIDA CASE NO. SC08-1. MARK FREEMAN and RAPHAEL RODRIGUEZ. Petitioners, vs. BLOSSOM COHEN and ABRAHAM COHEN, Respondents
IN THE SUPREME COURT OF FLORIDA CASE NO. SC08-1 MARK FREEMAN and RAPHAEL RODRIGUEZ Petitioners, vs. BLOSSOM COHEN and ABRAHAM COHEN, Respondents RESPONDENTS ANSWER BRIEF ON JURISDICTION ALVIN N. WEINSTEIN
More informationIN THE SUPREME COURT OF FLORIDA PETITIONER S BRIEF ON JURISDICTION
HERBERT KINDL, Petitioner, IN THE SUPREME COURT OF FLORIDA Case No. v. 5 th DCA CASE NO. 5D10-1722 UNITED SERVICES AUTOMOBILE ASSOCIATION, Respondent. / PETITION FOR DISCRETIONARY REVIEW OF A DECISION
More informationIN THE SUPREME COURT OF FLORIDA TALLAHASSEE, FLORIDA CASE NO.: SC RESPONDENTS BRIEF ON JURISDICTION
IN THE SUPREME COURT OF FLORIDA TALLAHASSEE, FLORIDA STATE FARM FLORIDA INSURANCE COMPANY, Petitioner, vs. CASE NO.: SC09-401 CHAD GOFF and CAROL GOFF, Respondents, / RESPONDENTS BRIEF ON JURISDICTION
More informationIN THE SUPREME COURT OF FLORIDA CASE NO.: SC SERVICE INSURANCE COMPANY, Appellant, vs. OFFICE OF INSURANCE REGULATION AND
IN THE SUPREME COURT OF FLORIDA CASE NO.: SC11-299 SERVICE INSURANCE COMPANY, Appellant, vs. OFFICE OF INSURANCE REGULATION AND THE FINANCIAL SERVICES COMMISSION, Appellees. BRIEF ON JURISDICTION OF APPELLEES
More informationIN THE SUPREME COURT OF FLORIDA. CASE NO. SC d DCA CASE NO. 3D05-951
IN THE SUPREME COURT OF FLORIDA CASE NO. SC06-283 3d DCA CASE NO. 3D05-951 BRASS & SINGER, P.A., (a/o/a Mildred Solages) vs. Petitioner, UNITED AUTOMOBILE INSURANCE COMPANY, Respondent. / PETITIONER=S
More informationOF FLORIDA. ** Appellant, ** vs. CASE NO. 3D ** LOWER TRIBUNAL NO TRIPP CONSTRUCTION, INC., ** Appellee. **
NOT FINAL UNTIL TIME EXPIRES TO FILE REHEARING MOTION AND, IF FILED, DISPOSED OF. AUTO OWNERS INSURANCE COMPANY, IN THE DISTRICT COURT OF APPEAL OF FLORIDA THIRD DISTRICT JULY TERM, A.D. 2002 Appellant,
More informationIN THE SUPREME COURT STATE OF FLORIDA. Petitioner, Case No.: SC LT Case No.: 1D PETITIONER'S AMENDED BRIEF ON JURISDICTION
IN THE SUPREME COURT STATE OF FLORIDA GREGG L. BLANN, Vs. Petitioner, Case No.: SC08-197 LT Case No.: 1D07-100 ANNETTE BLANN, Respondent, / PETITIONER'S AMENDED BRIEF ON JURISDICTION William S. Graessle
More informationJURISDICTIONAL BRIEF OF RESPONDENT
Electronically Filed 07/17/2013 02:38:44 PM ET RECEIVED, 7/17/2013 14:43:35, Thomas D. Hall, Clerk, Supreme Court IN THE SUPREME COURT OF FLORIDA CASE NO.: SC13-1244 BENJAMIN and BETH ERGAS, FOURTH DISTRICT
More informationIN THE SUPREME COURT OF FLORIDA. Case No. 1D
IN THE SUPREME COURT OF FLORIDA Case No. 1D07-6027 FLORIDA DEPARTMENT OF FINANCIAL SERVICES, AS RECEIVER FOR AMERICAN SUPERIOR INSURANCE COMPANY, INSOLVENT, vs. Petitioner, IMAGINE INSURANCE COMPANY LIMITED
More informationDISTRICT COURT OF APPEAL OF THE STATE OF FLORIDA FOURTH DISTRICT July Term 2007
DISTRICT COURT OF APPEAL OF THE STATE OF FLORIDA FOURTH DISTRICT July Term 2007 J.P. MORGAN TRUST COMPANY, N.A., and JPMORGAN CHASE BANK, N.A., Appellants, v. DANIEL G. SIEGEL, individually, and SIMON
More informationDISTRICT COURT OF APPEAL OF THE STATE OF FLORIDA FOURTH DISTRICT
DISTRICT COURT OF APPEAL OF THE STATE OF FLORIDA FOURTH DISTRICT RICHARD B.WEBBER, II, as the Chapter 7 Trustee for FREDERICK J. KEITEL, III, and FJK IV PROPERTIES, INC., a Florida corporation, Jointly
More informationCircuit Court for Frederick County Case No.: 10-C UNREPORTED IN THE COURT OF SPECIAL APPEALS OF MARYLAND. No September Term, 2017
Circuit Court for Frederick County Case No.: 10-C-02-000895 UNREPORTED IN THE COURT OF SPECIAL APPEALS OF MARYLAND No. 1100 September Term, 2017 ALLAN M. PICKETT, et al. v. FREDERICK CITY MARYLAND, et
More informationCase 2:08-cv CEH-SPC Document 38 Filed 03/30/10 Page 1 of 9 UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT MIDDLE DISTRICT OF FLORIDA FT.
Case 2:08-cv-00277-CEH-SPC Document 38 Filed 03/30/10 Page 1 of 9 UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT MIDDLE DISTRICT OF FLORIDA FT. MYERS DIVISION NATIONWIDE MUTUAL FIRE INSURANCE COMPANY, Petitioner, v. CASE
More informationIN THE SUPREME COURT OF FLORIDA. Petitioner, L.T. Nos.: 3D PETITIONER S JURISDICTIONAL BRIEF
IN THE SUPREME COURT OF FLORIDA MIGUEL A. FONSECA, v. Petitioner, Case No.: SC09-732 L.T. Nos.: 3D08-1465 06-18955 06-10636 MERCURY INSURANCE COMPANY OF FLORIDA, Respondent. / PETITIONER S JURISDICTIONAL
More informationIN THE CIRCUIT COURT OF THE NINTH JUDICIAL CIRCUIT, IN AND FOR ORANGE COUNTY, FLORIDA
IN THE CIRCUIT COURT OF THE NINTH JUDICIAL CIRCUIT, IN AND FOR ORANGE COUNTY, FLORIDA Orlando Orthopaedic Center a/a/o Jennifer Chapman, Appellant, CASE NO.: 2015-CV-64-A-O Lower Court Case No.: 2014-SC-2566-O
More informationOF FLORIDA. An Appeal of a non-final order from the Circuit Court for Miami-Dade County, Jeri B. Cohen, Judge.
NOT FINAL UNTIL TIME EXPIRES TO FILE REHEARING MOTION AND, IF FILED, DISPOSED OF. IN THE DISTRICT COURT OF APPEAL OF FLORIDA THIRD DISTRICT JULY TERM A.D., 2004 MALKE DUNAEVESCHI, vs. Appellant, AMERICAN
More informationSTAND-UP MRI OF ORLANDO, CASE NO.: CVA
IN THE CIRCUIT COURT OF THE NINTH JUDICIAL CIRCUIT, IN AND FOR ORANGE COUNTY, FLORIDA STAND-UP MRI OF ORLANDO, CASE NO.: CVA1 06-58 a/a/o Eusebio Isaac, LOWER COURT CASE NO.: 2005-SC-4899-O Appellant,
More informationIN THE SUPREME COURT OF FLORIDA. Case No.: SC E. MARIE BOTHE, Petitioner, -vs- PAMELA JEAN HANSEN. Respondent.
IN THE SUPREME COURT OF FLORIDA Case No.: SC09-901 E. MARIE BOTHE, Petitioner, -vs- PAMELA JEAN HANSEN Respondent. ON PETITION FOR DISCRETIONARY REVIEW FROM THE DISTRICT COURT OF APPEAL, SECOND DISTRICT
More informationThird District Court of Appeal State of Florida, July Term, A.D. 2009
Third District Court of Appeal State of Florida, July Term, A.D. 2009 Opinion filed July 15, 2009. Not final until disposition of timely filed motion for rehearing. No. 3D08-2376 Lower Tribunal No. 07-5548
More informationDISTRICT COURT OF APPEAL OF THE STATE OF FLORIDA FOURTH DISTRICT July Term 2013
MAY, J. DISTRICT COURT OF APPEAL OF THE STATE OF FLORIDA FOURTH DISTRICT July Term 2013 PALM BEACH POLO HOLDINGS, INC., a Florida corporation, Appellant, v. STEWART TITLE GUARANTY COMPANY, a Texas corporation,
More informationSUPREME COURT OF FLORIDA TALLAHASSEE, FLORIDA
SUPREME COURT OF FLORIDA TALLAHASSEE, FLORIDA NATIONWIDE MUTUAL FIRE INSURANCE : COMPANY, : : Petitioner, : CASE NO.: SC : v. : : HOWARD J. BEVILLE, JR., et al., : : Respondent. : : : ON DISCRETIONARY
More informationIN THE SUPREME COURT OF FLORIDA
IN THE SUPREME COURT OF FLORIDA BRUCE BERNSTEIN, Petitioner, v. CASE NO. SC05-1586 HARVEY GOLDMAN, Respondent. / RESPONDENT S BRIEF ON JURISDICTION On Petition To Invoke Discretionary Review Of A Decision
More informationIN THE SUPREME COURT, STATE OF FLORIDA
IN THE SUPREME COURT, STATE OF FLORIDA ASSOCIATED UNIFORM RENTAL & LINEN SUPPLY, INC., Petitioner, Case No. SC09-134 3DCA Case No.: 3D05-2130 v. RKR MOTORS, INC., Respondent. On Discretionary Review From
More informationIN THE SUPREME COURT OF FLORIDA CASE NO.: SC THIRD DCA CASE NO.: 3D06-458
IN THE SUPREME COURT OF FLORIDA THIRD DCA CASE NO.: 3D06-458 CUSTER MEDICAL CENTER, (a/a/o Maximo Masis), vs. Petitioner, UNITED AUTOMOBILE INSURANCE COMPANY, Respondent. / PETITIONER=S REPLY BRIEF On
More informationSupreme Court of Florida
Supreme Court of Florida No. SC09-1914 DONALD WENDT, et al, Petitioners, vs. LA COSTA BEACH RESORT CONDOMINIUM ASSOCIATION, INC., Respondent. PER CURIAM. [June 9, 2011] This case is before the Court for
More informationFINAL ORDER AFFIRMING TRIAL COURT. the trial court s Final Judgment entered July 16, 2014, in favor of Appellee, Emergency
IN THE CIRCUIT COURT OF THE NINTH JUDICIAL CIRCUIT, IN AND FOR ORANGE COUNTY, FLORIDA PROGRESSIVE AMERICAN INSURANCE COMPANY, CASE NO.: 2014-CV-000054-A-O Lower Case No.: 2011-SC-008737-O Appellant, v.
More informationDISTRICT COURT OF APPEAL OF THE STATE OF FLORIDA FOURTH DISTRICT July Term 2014
DISTRICT COURT OF APPEAL OF THE STATE OF FLORIDA FOURTH DISTRICT July Term 2014 JOSEPH CAMMARATA and JUDY CAMMARATA, Appellants, v. STATE FARM FLORIDA INSURANCE COMPANY, Appellee. No. 4D13-185 [September
More informationIN THE DISTRICT COURT OF APPEAL OF THE STATE OF FLORIDA FIFTH DISTRICT
IN THE DISTRICT COURT OF APPEAL OF THE STATE OF FLORIDA FIFTH DISTRICT OMEGA INSURANCE COMPANY, NOT FINAL UNTIL TIME EXPIRES TO FILE MOTION FOR REHEARING AND DISPOSITION THEREOF IF FILED Appellant, v.
More informationIN THE DISTRICT COURT OF APPEAL OF THE STATE OF FLORIDA FIFTH DISTRICT. v. Case No. 5D
IN THE DISTRICT COURT OF APPEAL OF THE STATE OF FLORIDA FIFTH DISTRICT OMEGA INSURANCE COMPANY, NOT FINAL UNTIL TIME EXPIRES TO FILE MOTION FOR REHEARING AND DISPOSITION THEREOF IF FILED Appellant, v.
More informationSUPREME COURT OF THE STATE OF FLORIDA
SUPREME COURT OF THE STATE OF FLORIDA JOHN D. DUDLEY, Petitioner, CASE NO.: SC 07-1747 vs. DCA CASE NO.: 5D06-3821 ELLEN F. SCHMIDT, Respondent. / PETITIONER S AMENDED JURISDICTIONAL BRIEF Richard J. D
More informationARKANSAS COURT OF APPEALS
ARKANSAS COURT OF APPEALS DIVISION II No. CV-15-293 UNIFIRST CORPORATION APPELLANT V. LUDWIG PROPERTIES, INC. D/B/A 71 EXPRESS TRAVEL PLAZA APPELLEE Opinion Delivered December 2, 2015 APPEAL FROM THE SEBASTIAN
More informationNo. 1D Petition for Writ of Prohibition Original Jurisdiction. July 25, 2018
FIRST DISTRICT COURT OF APPEAL DAN SOWELL, as Property Appraiser of Bay County, Florida, Petitioner, v. STATE OF FLORIDA No. 1D17-3365 FAITH CHRISTIAN FAMILY CHURCH OF PANAMA CITY BEACH, INC., Respondent.
More informationDISTRICT COURT OF APPEAL OF THE STATE OF FLORIDA FOURTH DISTRICT January Term 2014
DISTRICT COURT OF APPEAL OF THE STATE OF FLORIDA FOURTH DISTRICT January Term 2014 ROBERTO SOLANO and MARLENE SOLANO, Appellants, v. STATE FARM FLORIDA INSURANCE COMPANY, Appellee. No. 4D12-1198 [May 14,
More informationIN THE SUPREME COURT OF THE STATE OF FLORIDA. CASE NO: SC v. THIRD DCA CASE NO.: 3D Lower Tribunal No.:
IN THE SUPREME COURT OF THE STATE OF FLORIDA RICHARD GRAY, Plaintiff/Petitioner, CASE NO: SC04-1579 v. THIRD DCA CASE NO.: 3D03-1587 Lower Tribunal No.: 98-27005 DANIEL CASES, Defendant/Respondent. PETITIONER
More informationIN THE SUPREME COURT OF FLORIDA HERBERT KINDL, PETITIONER, UNITED SERVICES AUTOMOBILE ASSOCIATION, RESPONDENT. CASE NO.: SC11-146
IN THE SUPREME COURT OF FLORIDA HERBERT KINDL, PETITIONER, v. UNITED SERVICES AUTOMOBILE ASSOCIATION, RESPONDENT. CASE NO.: SC11-146 L.T. NO.: 5D10-1722; 09-CA-5209-A5-L ON DISCRETIONARY REVIEW FROM THE
More informationSUPREME COURT OF FLORIDA
SUPREME COURT OF FLORIDA THE HARTFORD INSURANCE COMPANY OF THE MIDWEST, for itself and on behalf of WILLIE BRADHAM, LILLIE BRADHAM and CEDRICK FRASIER, CASE NO: SC03-220 Petitioners, vs. CYNTHIA NICHOLS
More informationIN THE SUPREME COURT OF THE STATE OF FLORIDA CIVIL DIVISION CASE NUMBER SC
IN THE SUPREME COURT OF THE STATE OF FLORIDA CIVIL DIVISION CASE NUMBER SC07-2071 APPELLATE CASE NO: 3D06-1175 SUSAN PARKER FEIN, Circuit Case Numbers: 03-13889 CA 22 03-11222 CA 22 04-10875 CA 22 Consolidated
More informationv. CASE NO.: CVA Lower Court Case No.: 2003-SC-598-O
IN THE CIRCUIT COURT OF THE NINTH JUDICIAL CIRCUIT, IN AND FOR ORANGE COUNTY, FLORIDA REGIONAL MRI OF ORLANDO, INC., as assignee of Lorraine Gerena, Appellant, v. CASE NO.: CVA1 09-38 Lower Court Case
More informationSUPREME COURT OF FLORIDA CASE NO. SC U.S. SECURITY INSURANCE COMPANY, Petitioner, vs. CARMEN MARIA CONTRERAS, ETC., Respondent.
SUPREME COURT OF FLORIDA CASE NO. SC06-1259 U.S. SECURITY INSURANCE COMPANY, Petitioner, vs. CARMEN MARIA CONTRERAS, ETC., Respondent. Express & Direct Conflict Jurisdiction Fourth District Court of Appeal
More informationIN THE SUPREME COURT OF FLORIDA STATE OF FLORIDA PETITIONERS AMENDED JURISDICTIONAL BRIEF 1
IN THE SUPREME COURT OF FLORIDA STATE OF FLORIDA RIVIERA ALMERIA RIVERIA BILTMORE, LLC, and RIVIERA SEVILLA, LLC, CASE NO.: SC 11-503 DCA CASE NO: 3D10-1197 L.T. Case No.: 08-2763 CA 40 v. Petitioners,
More informationIN THE SUPREME COURT OF FLORIDA CASE NO. SC05-856
IN THE SUPREME COURT OF FLORIDA CASE NO. SC05-856 RICHARD SNELL, Vs. Appellant/Petitioner ALLSTATE INDEMNITY CO., et al. Appellee/Respondent. / PETITIONER S THIRD AMENDED BRIEF ON JURISDICTION BOIES, SCHILLER
More informationIN THE SUPREME COURT OF FLORIDA. v. CASE NO. SC ON DISCRETIONARY REVIEW FROM THE FIFTH DISTRICT COURT OF APPEAL
IN THE SUPREME COURT OF FLORIDA RICHARD DUCHARME, Petitioner, v. CASE NO. SC05-290 STATE OF FLORIDA, Respondent. / ON DISCRETIONARY REVIEW FROM THE FIFTH DISTRICT COURT OF APPEAL JURISDICTIONAL BRIEF OF
More informationOF FLORIDA THIRD DISTRICT JULY TERM, 2004
NOT FINAL UNTIL TIME EXPIRES TO FILE REHEARING MOTION AND, IF FILED, DISPOSED OF. IN THE DISTRICT COURT OF APPEAL OF FLORIDA THIRD DISTRICT JULY TERM, 2004 LIBERTY MUTUAL FIRE ** INSURANCE COMPANY, **
More informationIN THE FIRST DISTRICT COURT OF APPEAL OF THE STATE OF FLORIDA
IN THE FIRST DISTRICT COURT OF APPEAL OF THE STATE OF FLORIDA Security First Insurance Company, Case No. 1D14-1864 Lower Case No. 149960-14 Appellant, v. State of Florida, Office of Insurance Regulation,
More informationPEGGY WARD CASE NO.: CVA LOWER COURT CASE NO.: 06-CC-3986 Appellant,
IN THE CIRCUIT COURT OF THE NINTH JUDICIAL CIRCUIT, IN AND FOR ORANGE COUNTY, FLORIDA PEGGY WARD CASE NO.: CVA1 06-46 LOWER COURT CASE NO.: 06-CC-3986 Appellant, v. RAK CHARLES TOWNE LIMITED PARTNERSHIP
More informationIN THE CIRCUIT COURT FOR THE NINETEENTH JUDICIAL CIRCUIT IN AND FOR ST LUCIE COUNTY, FLORIDA. APPELLATE DIVISION
IN THE CIRCUIT COURT FOR THE NINETEENTH JUDICIAL CIRCUIT IN AND FOR ST LUCIE COUNTY, FLORIDA. APPELLATE DIVISION Circuit Case No. 16-AP-20 Lower Tribunal No. 15-SC-1894 LILIANA HERNANDEZ, Appellant, Not
More informationThird District Court of Appeal State of Florida
Third District Court of Appeal State of Florida Opinion filed October 13, 2016. Not final until disposition of timely filed motion for rehearing. No. 3D14-2986 Lower Tribunal No. 99-993 Mario Gonzalez,
More informationDecided: April 20, S15Q0418. PIEDMONT OFFICE REALTY TRUST, INC. v. XL SPECIALTY INSURANCE COMPANY.
In the Supreme Court of Georgia Decided: April 20, 2015 S15Q0418. PIEDMONT OFFICE REALTY TRUST, INC. v. XL SPECIALTY INSURANCE COMPANY. THOMPSON, Chief Justice. Piedmont Office Realty Trust, Inc. ( Piedmont
More informationCASE NO. 1D Appellant seeks relief from the trial court s order that incorporated the
IN THE DISTRICT COURT OF APPEAL FIRST DISTRICT, STATE OF FLORIDA COLE D. FAHEY, v. Appellant, NOT FINAL UNTIL TIME EXPIRES TO FILE MOTION FOR REHEARING AND DISPOSITION THEREOF IF FILED CASE NO. 1D16-910
More informationIN THE SUPREME COURT OF FLORIDA CASE NO. 94,135 (CI 98-CI 1137)
IN THE SUPREME COURT OF FLORIDA CASE NO. 94,135 (CI 98-CI 1137) STATE OF FLORIDA, Appellant, vs. VALIDATION OF NOT EXCEEDING $35,000,000 OSCEOLA COUNTY, OSCEOLA COUNTY, FLORIDA, a FLORIDA TOURIST DEVELOPMENT
More informationIN THE FIRST DISTRICT COURT OF APPEAL OF THE STATE OF FLORIDA
IN THE FIRST DISTRICT COURT OF APPEAL OF THE STATE OF FLORIDA Security First Insurance Company, Case No. 1D14-1864 Lower Case No. 149960-14 Appellant, v. State of Florida, Office of Insurance Regulation,
More informationIN THE DISTRICT COURT OF APPEAL OF THE STATE OF FLORIDA FIFTH DISTRICT. v. Case No. 5D
IN THE DISTRICT COURT OF APPEAL OF THE STATE OF FLORIDA FIFTH DISTRICT NOT FINAL UNTIL TIME EXPIRES TO FILE MOTION FOR REHEARING AND DISPOSITION THEREOF IF FILED USAA CASUALTY INSURANCE COMPANY, Petitioner,
More informationSUPREME COURT STATE OF FLORIDA DCA CASE NO.: 5D08-98
SUPREME COURT STATE OF FLORIDA CHARLENE M. BIFULCO CASE NO: SC09-172 DCA CASE NO.: 5D08-98 Petitioner, v. PATIENT BUSINESS & FINANCIAL SERVICES, INC. Respondent. BRIEF OF AMICUS CURIAE NATIONAL EMPLOYMENT
More informationIN THE COURT OF APPEALS OF THE STATE OF MISSISSIPPI CAUSE NO CA APPEAL FROM THE CIRCUIT COURT OF ATTALA COUNTY, MISSISSIPPI
E-Filed Document Jun 30 2016 11:18:49 2015-CA-01772 Pages: 11 IN THE COURT OF APPEALS OF THE STATE OF MISSISSIPPI BROOKS V. MONAGHAN VERSUS ROBERT AUTRY APPELLANT CAUSE NO. 2015-CA-01772 APPELLEE APPEAL
More informationIN THE UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE ELEVENTH CIRCUIT. No Non-Argument Calendar. D.C. Docket No. 1:12-cv GRJ.
James Brannan v. Geico Indemnity Company, et al Doc. 1107526182 Case: 13-15213 Date Filed: 06/17/2014 Page: 1 of 10 [DO NOT PUBLISH] IN THE UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE ELEVENTH CIRCUIT No. 13-15213
More informationThird District Court of Appeal State of Florida
Third District Court of Appeal State of Florida Opinion filed August 02, 2017. Not final until disposition of timely filed motion for rehearing. No. 3D16-2672 Lower Tribunal No. 12-15813 Dev D. Dabas and
More informationIn the Supreme Court of Florida
In the Supreme Court of Florida CASE NO.: SC10-116 STATE FARM MUTUAL AUTOMOBILE INSURANCE COMPANY, Petitioner, v. GILDA MENENDEZ, FABIOLA G. LLANES, FABIOLA P. LLANES and ROGER LLANES, Respondents. DISCRETIONARY
More informationIN THE DISTRICT COURT OF APPEAL OF THE STATE OF FLORIDA FIFTH DISTRICT JANUARY TERM v. CASE NO. 5D00-111
IN THE DISTRICT COURT OF APPEAL OF THE STATE OF FLORIDA FIFTH DISTRICT JANUARY TERM 2001 SCOTTSDALE INSURANCE COMPANY, Appellant, v. CASE NO. 5D00-111 RUTH W. HAYNES, etc., et al., Appellees. / Opinion
More informationCASE NO. 1D Appellant, Paul Hooks, appeals from the trial court s order dismissing his
IN THE DISTRICT COURT OF APPEAL FIRST DISTRICT, STATE OF FLORIDA PAUL HOOKS, v. Appellant, NOT FINAL UNTIL TIME EXPIRES TO FILE MOTION FOR REHEARING AND DISPOSITION THEREOF IF FILED CASE NO. 1D11-1287
More informationIN THE UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE ELEVENTH CIRCUIT. No Non-Argument Calendar. D. C. Docket No CV-T-17MAP.
IN THE UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE ELEVENTH CIRCUIT No. 08-11973 Non-Argument Calendar D. C. Docket No. 05-00073-CV-T-17MAP [DO NOT PUBLISH] FILED U.S. COURT OF APPEALS ELEVENTH CIRCUIT NOV
More informationIN THE APPELLATE DIVISION OF THE CIRCUIT COURT ELEVENTH JUDICIAL CIRCUIT IN AND FOR MIAMI-DADE COUNTY. Circuit Court Case No.
IN THE APPELLATE DIVISION OF THE CIRCUIT COURT ELEVENTH JUDICIAL CIRCUIT IN AND FOR MIAMI-DADE COUNTY Warren Redlich, Appellant vs. Circuit Court Case No. 2016-000045-AC-01 State of Florida, Appellee /
More informationDISTRICT COURT OF APPEAL OF THE STATE OF FLORIDA FOURTH DISTRICT
DISTRICT COURT OF APPEAL OF THE STATE OF FLORIDA FOURTH DISTRICT JAMES T. GELSOMINO, Appellant, v. ACE AMERICAN INSURANCE COMPANY and BROWN & BROWN, INC., Appellees. No. 4D14-4767 [November 9, 2016] Appeal
More informationentered an order denying the motion for reconsideration, rehearing and
SUPREME COURT STATE OF FLORIDA CASE NO. 13-9999 DANNY'S BACKHOE SERVICE, LLC, Appellant/Petitioner, First District Court of Appeals -vs- Case No. 1D12-5142 AUTO OWNERS INSURANCE COMPANY, Appellee/Respondent.
More informationIN THE UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE ELEVENTH CIRCUIT. No D.C. Docket No. 0:15-cv RNS
Deborah Johnson, et al v. Catamaran Health Solutions, LL, et al Doc. 1109519501 Case: 16-11735 Date Filed: 05/02/2017 Page: 1 of 12 [DO NOT PUBLISH] IN THE UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE ELEVENTH
More informationIn this PIP case, State Farm Mutual Auto Insurance Co. (State Farm), the Defendant below,
IN THE CIRCUIT COURT OF THE NINTH JUDICIAL CIRCUIT, IN AND FOR ORANGE COUNTY, FLORIDA STATE FARM MUTUAL AUTOMOBILE INSURANCE COMPANY, Appellant, v. WORLD HEALTH WELLNESS, INC. a/a/o Glenda Pinero, Appellee.
More informationUNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT DISTRICT OF NEVADA. Plaintiff, ) )
Case :-cv-00-hdm-wgc Document Filed // Page of 0 Wes Williams Jr. (Nevada Bar # L AW O FFICES OF W ES W ILLIAMS J R. A P ROFESSIONAL C ORPORATION LAKE PASTURE RD. P.O. BOX 0 SCHURZ, NEVADA TELEPHONE (-
More informationIN THE UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE ELEVENTH CIRCUIT. No Non-Argument Calendar. D. C. Docket No CV-KLR.
[DO NOT PUBLISH] IN THE UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE ELEVENTH CIRCUIT No. 08-11336 Non-Argument Calendar D. C. Docket No. 07-80310-CV-KLR FILED U.S. COURT OF APPEALS ELEVENTH CIRCUIT MARCH 11,
More informationIN THE SUPREME COURT OF FLORIDA. v. Case No.: SC ANSWER BRIEF ON JURISDICTION OF RESPONDENTS BARBARA REIS AND JOSEPH REIS
IN THE SUPREME COURT OF FLORIDA STATE FARM MUTUAL AUTOMOBILE INSURANCE COMPANY, a foreign corporation, Petitioner, v. Case No.: SC06-962 BARBARA REIS and JOSEPH REIS, Respondents. / ANSWER BRIEF ON JURISDICTION
More informationIN THE SUPREME COURT OF FLORIDA CASE NO: DCA CASE NO.: 2D
Electronically Filed 04/18/2013 01:20:31 PM ET RECEIVED, 4/25/2013 15:07:31, Thomas D. Hall, Clerk, Supreme Court IN THE SUPREME COURT OF FLORIDA HARCO NATIONAL INSURANCE COMPANY, vs. Petitioner, LARRY
More informationReese J. Henderson, Jr., Esq., B.C.S
Altman Contractors, Inc. v. Crum & Forster Specialty Ins. Co.: Balancing the Interests Surrounding Potential Insurance Coverage for Chapter 558 Notices of Claim February 23, 2018 Reese J. Henderson, Jr.,
More informationNOT FINAL UNTIL TIME EXPIRES FOR REHEARING AND, IF FILED, DETERMINED
County Civil Court: CONTRACTS. The agreement between the parties to submit to binding arbitration unambiguously states the parties retain the right to bring claims within the jurisdiction of small claims
More informationv No Wayne Circuit Court
S T A T E O F M I C H I G A N C O U R T O F A P P E A L S CITY OF DETROIT, Plaintiff-Appellant, UNPUBLISHED March 15, 2018 v No. 337705 Wayne Circuit Court BAYLOR LTD, LC No. 16-010881-CZ Defendant-Appellee.
More informationIN THE SUPREME COURT OF FLORIDA TALLAHASSEE, FLORIDA. Petitioner, S.C. Case No.: SC DCA Case No.: 5D v. L.T. Case No.
Filing # 12738024 Electronically Filed 04/21/2014 04:09:09 PM RECEIVED, 4/21/2014 16:13:38, John A. Tomasino, Clerk, Supreme Court STATE FARM FLORIDA INSURANCE COMPANY, IN THE SUPREME COURT OF FLORIDA
More informationALABAMA COURT OF CIVIL APPEALS
REL: 07/22/2016 Notice: This opinion is subject to formal revision before publication in the advance sheets of Southern Reporter. Readers are requested to notify the Reporter of Decisions, Alabama Appellate
More informationCASE NO. SC L.T. CASE NO. 1D JAMON A. JOHNSON and CHAKA JOHNSON, Petitioners, UNIVERSAL PROPERTY AND CASUALTY INSURANCE COMPANY,
Electronically Filed 09/09/2013 11:18:02 AM ET RECEIVED, 9/9/2013 11:18:39, Thomas D. Hall, Clerk, Supreme Court 122373 IN THE SUPREME COURT OF FLORIDA CASE NO. SC13-1427 L.T. CASE NO. 1D12-0891 JAMON
More informationNo. 1D On appeal from the Circuit Court for Alachua County. Monica J. Brasington, Judge. February 8, 2018
FIRST DISTRICT COURT OF APPEAL EDWARD A. CRAPO, as Alachua County Property Appraiser, Appellant, v. STATE OF FLORIDA No. 1D17-280 PROVIDENT GROUP - CONTINUUM PROPERTIES, L.L.C., a Florida not-for-profit
More informationSupreme Court of Florida
Supreme Court of Florida POLSTON, J. No. SC10-2097 DIANE PETTY, et al., Petitioners, vs. FLORIDA INSURANCE GUARANTY ASSOCIATION, Respondent. [January 19, 2012] We review the decision of the Second District
More informationThird District Court of Appeal State of Florida
Third District Court of Appeal State of Florida Opinion filed November 1, 2017. Not final until disposition of timely filed motion for rehearing. No. 3D17-725 Lower Tribunal No. 15-14380 Lucky Star Horses,
More informationRUSSELL L. HALL, CASE NO.: CVA LOWER COURT CASE NO.: CEB
IN THE CIRCUIT COURT OF THE NINTH JUDICIAL CIRCUIT, IN AND FOR ORANGE COUNTY, FLORIDA RUSSELL L. HALL, CASE NO.: CVA1 07-07 LOWER COURT CASE NO.: CEB 2007-614622 v. Appellant, ORANGE COUNTY, FLORIDA, Appellee.
More informationIN THE SUPREME COURT OF FLORIDA. Petitioner, CASE NO. v. DCA CASE NO. 3D Lower Tribunal Case No
IN THE SUPREME COURT OF FLORIDA SANDRA CARTER, Petitioner, CASE NO. v. DCA CASE NO. 3D10-326 Lower Tribunal Case No. 07-882 MONROE COUNTY, Respondent. / PETITIONER CARTER S BRIEF ON JURISDICTION On Review
More informationThird District Court of Appeal State of Florida
Third District Court of Appeal State of Florida Opinion filed November 29, 2017. Not final until disposition of timely filed motion for rehearing. No. 3D16-2706 Lower Tribunal No. 14-30116 Fist Construction,
More information