Miller, Canfield, Paddock and Stone, P.L.C. One Michigan Avenue, Suite 900 Lansing, Michigan TEL (517) FAX (517)
|
|
- Marsha Matthews
- 5 years ago
- Views:
Transcription
1 Founded in 1852 by Sidney Davy Miller SHERRI A. WELLMAN TEL ( FAX ( Miller, Canfield, Paddock and Stone, P.L.C. One Michigan Avenue, Suite 900 Lansing, Michigan TEL ( FAX ( MICHIGAN: Ann Arbor Detroit Grand Rapids Kalamazoo Lansing Troy FLORIDA: Tampa ILLINOIS: Chicago NEW YORK: New York CANADA: Windsor CHINA: Shanghai MEXICO: Monterrey POLAND: Gdynia Warsaw Wrocław January 4, 2018 Ms. Kavita Kale Executive Secretary Michigan Public Service Commission 7109 West Saginaw Highway Lansing, MI Re: Northern States Power Company Case No. U Dear Ms. Kale: Enclosed for electronic filing are the Exceptions to Proposal for Decision of Northern States Power Company and Proof of Service. Very truly yours, Miller, Canfield, Paddock and Stone, P.L.C. SAW/kld Enclosures cc w/enc: ALJ Mark D. Eyster Bryan A. Brandenberg Margrethe Kearney Donald F. Reck Michelle Schlosser Deborah Erwin Mara K. Ascheman \ By: Sherri A. Wellman
2 STATE OF MICHIGAN BEFORE THE MICHIGAN PUBLIC SERVICE COMMISSION * * * * In the matter, on the Commission s own motion, establishing the method and avoided cost calculation for NORTHERN STATES POWER COMPANY to fully comply with the Public Utilities Regulatory Policy Act of 1978, 16 USC 2601 et seq. Case No. U NORTHERN STATES POWER COMPANY S EXCEPTIONS TO PROPOSAL FOR DECISION Dated January 4, 2018
3 NORTHERN STATES POWER COMPANY S EXCEPTIONS I. INTRODUCTION On November 21, 2017, Administrative Law Judge ( ALJ Mark D. Eyster issued his Proposal for Decision ( PFD in Michigan Public Service Commission ( MPSC or the Commission Case No. U Northern States Power Company ( NSP-W or the Company disagrees with several recommendations regarding the avoided cost calculation method and costs related to the Public Utility Regulatory Policies Act of 1978, PL ; 92 Sate 3117 ( PURPA made in the PFD. The Company files these Exceptions pursuant to the established schedule and with the knowledge that this Commission has already issued orders in three other PURPA proceedings. 1 NSP-W appreciates the desire for uniform, consistent application of methods and avoided cost calculations for the utilities of the state. However, NSP- W is very different than other Michigan utilities and therefore does not support a one-size-fitsall approach because it is not reflective of the Company s actual avoided costs. 2 The Company respectfully requests the Commission to adopt the Company s proposals regarding avoided cost methodology and its proposed Standard Offer Tariff as set forth in its testimony, exhibits, and briefs submitted in this case. 1 Consumers Energy Co, May 31, 2017 order in Case No. U-18090; DTE Electric Co, July 31, 2017 order in case No. U-18091; Upper Peninsula Power Co ( UPPCo, September 28, 2017 order in Case No. U Because the Commission initiated separate contested case proceedings for each electric utility providing service in the state, it gave the impression that a uniform approach was unwarranted. Certainly, the Commission Staff had this in mind when it supported an avoided cost proposal in Case No. U for Upper Michigan Energy Resources Corporation ( UMERC that is based on the energy and capacity rates contained in the power purchase agreement ( PPA between UMERC and Wisconsin Electric Power Company and the PPA between UMERC and Wisconsin Public Service Corporation. Like UMERC, the basis for NSP-W s position on avoided costs lies with its Interchange Agreement ( I/A with Northern States Power Company, a Minnesota Corporation, which serves as the Company s sole source of power supply. (NSP-W Reply Brief, p
4 II. EXCEPTIONS A. Avoided Cost Methodology Although the PFD offered detail to explain the proposal and positions of Staff and intervenors, it provided little detail to explain the proposal and position of NSP-W. The PFD Conclusion declares that any evidence and arguments not specifically addressed in the PFD were deemed irrelevant to the findings and conclusions of this matter. (PFD, p. 33 NSP-W respectfully advises that there is no basis for this declaration. Although NSP-W does not wish to cause undue burden by repeating the record within this Exception filing, the Company finds that it is warranted given the fact that much, if not all, of the PFD s Discussion regarding Avoided Cost Methodology (PFD, pp 20-22, is identical to the discussion section appearing in the Proposal for Decision issued regarding Indiana Michigan Power Company ( I&M in Case No. U (I&M PFD, pp This is so, despite the fact that the records in this case and in U are different as based on the unique characteristics of NSP-W and I&M. As such, the Company wishes to reiterate the relevance of Ms. Deborah Erwin s rebuttal testimony where she thoroughly described a number of facts that make NSP-W different than other electric providers in Michigan. First, NSP-W is a single operating company that serves load in multiple states Wisconsin and Michigan. Second, NSP-W s sole source of energy is an agreement between NSP-W and Northern States Power Company, a Minnesota corporation ( NSP-M, which allows the two companies (collectively, the NSP Companies to efficiently operate across five states (Michigan, Wisconsin, Minnesota, North Dakota and South Dakota as a single electric production and transmission system (collectively, the NSP system. Third, the NSP Companies submit their plans for future resource needs for review by the Minnesota Public Utilities 3
5 Commission through a formal Integrated Resource Planning ( IRP process. Fourth, resource additions to supply the needs of the NSP Companies are typically subject to competitive bidding processes, whether those resources will be owned or contracted. Fifth, NSP-W already provides its customers with renewable energy in excess of the newly enacted increased renewable energy standard requirements. (2 Tr This evidence supports the Company s avoided cost methodology proposal as the most appropriate for how the Company serves its customers, determines its resource needs, and its resource acquisition process. (2 Tr 63 The Company has clearly demonstrated that Staff s hybrid proxy method for determining avoided capacity costs and an NGCC plant that includes a fixed investment cost attributable to energy ( ICE for determining avoided energy costs does not comply with the PURPA requirements repeated in the PFD as same does not reflect NSP-W s true avoided costs, and adopting these methodologies, especially for the sake of consistency amongst the Michigan utilities, could result in unjust or unreasonable rates for NSP-W s customers. (NSP-W Initial Brief, pp While the goal of consistency is worthy where applicable, the Commission recently demonstrated that where utilities are not similarly situated, a difference in avoided cost methodology is appropriate. 3 In contrast to most other Michigan utilities, NSP-W rarely procures resources on its own; rather, all of NSP-W s energy and capacity needs are met through the I/A with NSP-M. (2 Tr 64 Additionally, the PFD fails to include any mention of NSP-W s disagreement with intervenors regarding the distinction between the concepts of embedded costs and avoided costs. (2 Tr The Company has demonstrated that it does not need capacity in 3 Although the PFD in each of the three other PURPA proceedings finds the Staff s hybrid proxy methodology as appropriate, the Commission agreed that, given UPPCo s unique circumstances, circumstances that are very different from Consumers and DTE Electric (Michigan s two largest utilities, the Staff s proposed hybrid proxy method may not truly reflect UPPCo s avoided costs. (Order in Case No. U-18094, p. 8. 4
6 the near future and it is not clear that NSP-W will have any capacity needs in the latter years of the current ten-year planning horizon. There is enough uncertainty about its capacity needs during the ten-year horizon that it is reasonable to provide no capacity payment to QFs at this time, because it is not clear any capacity costs would be avoided by a QF. (2 Tr 67 Lastly, the PFD makes no mention of NSP-W s positions regarding other avoided costs. 4 Specifically, evaluating NSP-W s renewable energy needs (2 Tr 68, 74-75, technology-specific avoided cost calculations (2 Tr 76, and solar valuation studies (2 Tr 76 are all areas where NSP- W provided relevant evidence regarding other avoided costs. NSP-W respectfully disagrees that the intervenors proposals were well-reasoned and supported by the evidentiary record. The intervenors did not provide convincing evidence to justify including these other avoided costs in this case, and as stated above, NSP-W already provides renewable energy in excess of its Michigan renewable energy requirements. Further, the Commission, based on other records, has already found insufficient basis for including these avoided costs in other utilities PURPA orders, and should reject the PFD s recommendation 5 for a study of currently unaccounted for avoided costs for NSP-W. 6 B. Biennial Contested Case Review The PFD recommended a biennial contested case review. This recommendation is made absent recognition that NSP-W has (i a small number of Michigan customers, 7 (ii no immediate 4 Other Avoided Costs include items such as hedging value, avoided emissions, and environmental compliance. 5 Again, the recommendation and findings made on this account were identical to that appearing in the I&M proposal for decision. 6 Consumers Energy Co, May 31, 2017 order in Case No. U-18090, p, 26, 29; DTE Electric Co, July 31, 2017 order in case No. U-18091, p ; Upper Peninsula Power Co ( UPPCo, September 28, 2017 order in Case No. U , p NSP-W s Michigan jurisdiction represents only 2 percent of its retail load, or three-tenths of one percent of the NSP system load. In terms of the number of retail customers, NSP-W serves approximately 10,000 customers in Michigan. (NSP-W Initial Brief, pp
7 capacity needs within the current ten-year planning horizon, 8 and (iii advised that consistent with current federal and state regulations, 9 a biennial review through a contested case is an unnecessary regulatory and administrative burden to NSP-W. As such, the record evidence does not support conducting biennial contested cases. 10 Therefore, the Commission should reject the recommendation of the PFD for a biennial contested case review process, and adopt NSP-W s proposal to provide an annual report to update the LMP forecast and allow the Company the ability to obtain a waiver from updating the avoided capacity cost calculations until such time that the Company s capacity needs change. (NSP-W Initial Brief, pp C. Standard Offer Tariff Cap With respect to setting the Standard Offer Tariff Cap, the recommendation made in the PFD appears to be based solely on the amount and immediacy of the NSP system s planned resource additions to serve NSP-W and NSP-M s five Upper Midwest states, as outlined in NSP- M s most recent IRP filing. With that reasoning, it is imperative that the Commission consider the relevance of the Company s I/A and the IRP process with respect to how the Company determines and acquires its capacity or energy needs together with NSP-M. Factors come into play that are not necessarily associated with NSP-W s capacity needs, such as the Minnesota Public Utilities Commission order for NSP-M to procure additional Demand Response resources. (2 Tr Furthermore, the ALJ seems to interpret the NSP Companies plans to add 8 See NSP-W Reply Brief, pp Per 18 CFR (2(b of the PURPA regulations, the Company agrees to make avoided cost data available to the Commission at least every two years. MCL 460.6v of 2016 PA 341, which became effective on April 20, 2017, essentially reiterates the requirement to implement PURPA and provides that the procedures and rates associated with implementation of PURPA must be re-examined in a contested case at least every 5 years. However, after an initial contested case proceeding, for a utility serving less than 1,000,000 electric customers in Michigan, the Commission may conduct any periodic re-evaluation using notice and comment procedures instead of a full contested case. (NSP-W Initial Brief, pp. 8, The Commission in other proceedings has recognized the administrative time savings associated with the filing of reports only. See generally, Case Nos. U-14378, U (Main Replacement Programs. 6
8 renewable energy resources to their Upper Midwest system as a NSP-W capacity need, which is not the case. These resources are being added as an economic source of energy to replace higher cost energy sources or to meet Minnesota renewable energy standards, not to meet NSP-W s capacity needs. The Company asks the Commission to also consider the small size of the Company s Michigan service territory and the impact that a larger QF would have on NSP-W s customer costs. (2 Tr The Company requests the Commission adopt its proposed Standard Offer Tariff for generators 100 kw 11 and less as presented in Exhibit A-2 (MDS-2 and for large generators of greater than 100 kw and up to and including 20 MW as presented in Exhibit A-1 (MDS-1. D. Renewable Energy Credits ( RECs under Standard Offer Tariff The PFD relies on intervenors position for its recommendation that the QF may sell the RECs to the host utility or otherwise [dispose] of them at the QF s option. 12 NSP-W continues to support Staff s recommendation in this case that RECs be allocated to the utility under the Standard Tariff. Intervenors maintain that RECs must be valued separately from PURPA compensation, and that because NSP-W must comply with Michigan renewable energy requirements, a QF s RECs have separate value to NSP-W. The PFD again in this case fails to acknowledge the evidence provided by NSP-W that it already provides renewable energy in excess of its Michigan renewable energy requirements. If the Company would be required to purchase the RECs separately from the QF, the Company s electric customers would incur unnecessary and unreasonable costs related to the purchase of RECs. Therefore, the Commission 11 Federal regulations (18 CFR (c(1 only require a standard offer tariff for generators of this size category. 12 PFD at p. 29, citing Consumers Energy Co, May 31, 2017 order in Case No. U-18090, p, 26. 7
9 should reject the recommendation of the PFD and adopt the Staff s proposal for treatment of RECs under the Standard Offer Tariff as supported by NSP-W. E. Standard Offer Tariff Term The PFD makes claims that NSP-W s proposal to offer only a five-year term for the Standard Offer Tariff is discriminatory as longer-term contracts provide financial stability for QFs and NSP-W s customers and falls in line with the expectations of project financiers. (PFD, p 32 Financial stability of QFs is not a requirement under PURPA regulations. (18 CFR Furthermore, PURPA does not mandate long-term enforceable obligations. There is no benefit to NSP-W s customers for taking on the risk associated with a long-term contract. (NSP-W Reply Brief pp Although it may be true that longer contract terms provide financial stability for QFs, it is not necessarily true that it will provide a benefit for NSP-W s customers. Therefore, the Commission should reject the recommendation of the PFD and adopt NSP-W s proposal for a five-year Standard Offer contract term. III. CONCLUSION AND RELIEF REQUESTED Based on the foregoing, NSP-W requests that the Commission reject the recommendations made in the PFD as identified supra, and adopt the Company s proposals regarding avoided cost methodology and its proposed Standard Offer tariff as set forth in its testimony, exhibits, and briefs submitted in this case. 8
10 Respectfully submitted, NORTHERN STATES POWER COMPANY Dated: January 4, 2018 By: Its Attorney Sherri A. Wellman (P38989 Miller, Canfield, Paddock & Stone, P.L.C. One Michigan Avenue, Suite 900 Lansing, MI ( \
11 STATE OF MICHIGAN BEFORE THE MICHIGAN PUBLIC SERVICE COMMISSION * * * * In the matter, on the Commission s own motion, establishing the method and avoided cost calculation for NORTHERN STATES POWER COMPANY, a Wisconsin corporation and wholly owned subsidiary of Xcel Energy, Inc., to fully comply with the Public Utilities Regulatory Policy Act of 1978, 16 USC 2601 et seq. STATE OF MICHIGAN ss COUNTY OF INGHAM PROOF OF SERVICE Case No. U Kim L. Delinescheff, being first duly sworn, deposes and says that on January 4, 2018, she served a copy of Northern States Power Company s Exceptions to Proposal For Decision on the persons below via electronic mail as follows: The Honorable Mark D. Eyster Administrative Law Judge Michigan Public Service Commission 7109 W. Saginaw Hwy. Lansing, MI eysterm@michigan.gov Bryan A. Brandenburg Assistant Attorney General Public Service Division 7109 West Saginaw Highway 3rd Floor Lansing, MI brandenburgb@michigan.gov Margrethe Kearney Environmental Law & Policy Center 1514 Wealthy Street SE, Suite 256 Grand Rapids, MI mkearney@elpc.org Subscribed and sworn before me on this 4 th day of January, Kim L. Delinescheff Crystal L. Abbott, Notary Public State of Michigan, County of Eaton My Commission Expires: May 25, 2018 Acting in Ingham County \
Miller, Canfield, Paddock and Stone, P.L.C. One Michigan Avenue, Suite 900 Lansing, Michigan TEL (517) FAX (517)
Founded in 1852 by Sidney Davy Miller SHERRI A. WELLMAN TEL (517) 483-4954 FAX (517) 374-6304 E-MAIL wellmans@millercanfield.com Miller, Canfield, Paddock and Stone, P.L.C. One Michigan Avenue, Suite 900
More informationFebruary 1, Enclosed for electronic filing is Michigan Gas Utilities Corporation s Revised Exhibit A-16 (GWS-1) in the case mentioned above.
Founded in 1852 by Sidney Davy Miller PAUL M. COLLINS TEL (517) 483-4908 FAX (517) 374-6304 E-MAIL collinsp@millercanfield.com Miller, Canfield, Paddock and Stone, P.L.C. One Michigan Avenue, Suite 900
More informationMiller, Canfield, Paddock and Stone, P.L.C. One Michigan Avenue, Suite 900 Lansing, Michigan TEL (517) FAX (517)
Founded in 1852 by Sidney Davy Miller SHERRI A. WELLMAN TEL (517 483-4954 FAX (517 374-6304 E-MAIL wellmans@millercanfield.com Miller, Canfield, Paddock and Stone, P.L.C. One Michigan Avenue, Suite 900
More informationMiller, Canfield, Paddock and Stone, P.L.C. One Michigan Avenue, Suite 900 Lansing, Michigan TEL (517) FAX (517)
Founded in 1852 by Sidney Davy Miller SHERRI A. WELLMAN TEL (517) 483-4954 FAX (517) 374-6304 E-MAIL wellmans@millercanfield.com Miller, Canfield, Paddock and Stone, P.L.C. One Michigan Avenue, Suite 900
More informationMiller, Canfield, Paddock and Stone, P.L.C. One Michigan Avenue, Suite 900 Lansing, Michigan TEL (517) FAX (517)
Founded in 1852 by Sidney Davy Miller SHERRI A. WELLMAN TEL (517) 483-4954 FAX (517) 374-6304 E-MAIL wellmans@millercanfield.com Miller, Canfield, Paddock and Stone, P.L.C. One Michigan Avenue, Suite 900
More informationMiller, Canfield, Paddock and Stone, P.L.C. One Michigan Avenue, Suite 900 Lansing, Michigan TEL (517) FAX (517)
Founded in 1852 by Sidney Davy Miller SHERRI A. WELLMAN TEL (517) 483-4954 FAX (517) 374-6304 E-MAIL wellmans@millercanfield.com Miller, Canfield, Paddock and Stone, P.L.C. One Michigan Avenue, Suite 900
More informationMiller, Canfield, Paddock and Stone, P.L.C. One Michigan Avenue, Suite 900 Lansing, Michigan TEL (517) FAX (517)
Founded in 1852 by Sidney Davy Miller SHERRI A. WELLMAN TEL (517 483-4954 FAX (517 374-6304 E-MAIL wellmans@millercanfield.com Miller, Canfield, Paddock and Stone, P.L.C. One Michigan Avenue, Suite 900
More informationMiller, Canfield, Paddock and Stone, P.L.C. One Michigan Avenue, Suite 900 Lansing, Michigan TEL (517) FAX (517)
Founded in 1852 by Sidney Davy Miller MICHAEL C. RAMPE TEL (517) 483-4941 FAX (517) 374-6304 E-MAIL rampe@millercanfield.com Miller, Canfield, Paddock and Stone, P.L.C. One Michigan Avenue, Suite 900 Lansing,
More informationMiller, Canfield, Paddock and Stone, P.L.C. One Michigan Avenue, Suite 900 Lansing, Michigan TEL (517) FAX (517)
Founded in 1852 by Sidney Davy Miller MICHAEL C. RAMPE TEL (517) 483-4941 FAX (517) 374-6304 E-MAIL rampe@millercanfield.com Miller, Canfield, Paddock and Stone, P.L.C. One Michigan Avenue, Suite 900 Lansing,
More informationMiller, Canfield, Paddock and Stone, P.L.C. One Michigan Avenue, Suite 900 Lansing, Michigan TEL (517) FAX (517)
Founded in 1852 by Sidney Davy Miller SHERRI A. WELLMAN TEL (517) 483-4954 FAX (517) 374-6304 E-MAIL wellmans@millercanfield.com Miller, Canfield, Paddock and Stone, P.L.C. One Michigan Avenue, Suite 900
More informationMiller, Canfield, Paddock and Stone, P.L.C. One Michigan Avenue, Suite 900 Lansing, Michigan TEL (517) FAX (517)
Founded in 185 by Sidney Davy Miller SHERRI A. WELLMAN TEL (517) 8-95 FAX (517) 7-60 E-MAIL wellmans@millercanfield.com Miller, Canfield, Paddock and Stone, P.L.C. One Michigan Avenue, Suite 900 Lansing,
More informationS T A T E OF M I C H I G A N BEFORE THE MICHIGAN PUBLIC SERVICE COMMISSION * * * *
S T A T E OF M I C H I G A N BEFORE THE MICHIGAN PUBLIC SERVICE COMMISSION * * * * In the matter on the Commission s own ) motion, to consider changes in the rates ) of all the Michigan rate-regulated
More informationMiller, Canfield, Paddock and Stone, P.L.C. One Michigan Avenue, Suite 900 Lansing, Michigan TEL (517) FAX (517)
Founded in 1852 by Sidney Davy Miller SHERRI A. WELLMAN TEL (517) 83-95 FAX (517) 37-30 E-MAIL wellmans@millercanfield.com Miller, Canfield, Paddock and Stone, P.L.C. One Michigan Avenue, Suite 900 Lansing,
More informationSTATE OF MICHIGAN BEFORE THE MICHIGAN PUBLIC SERVICE COMMISSION
STATE OF MICHIGAN BEFORE THE MICHIGAN PUBLIC SERVICE COMMISSION In the matter, on the Commission's own motion, to consider changes in the rates of all Michigan rate regulated electric, Case No. U-18494
More information201 North Washington Square Suite 910 Lansing, Michigan Timothy J. Lundgren Direct: 616 /
201 North Washington Square Suite 910 Lansing, Michigan 48933 Telephone 517 / 482-6237 Fax 517 / 482-6937 www.varnumlaw.com Timothy J. Lundgren Direct: 616 / 336-6750 tjlundgren@varnumlaw.com January 19,
More informationMiller, Canfield, Paddock and Stone, P.L.C. One Michigan Avenue, Suite 900 Lansing, Michigan TEL (517) FAX (517)
Founded in 1852 by Sidney Davy Miller SHERRI A. WELLMAN TEL (517) 48-4954 FAX (517) 74-04 E-MAIL wellmans@millercanfield.com Miller, Canfield, Paddock and Stone, P.L.C. One Michigan Avenue, Suite 900 Lansing,
More information2 BEFORE THE MICHIGAN PUBLIC SERVICE COMMISSION. 8 Proceedings held in the above-entitled. 9 matter before Suzanne D. Sonneborn, Administrative
STATE OF MICHIGAN BEFORE THE MICHIGAN PUBLIC SERVICE COMMISSION In the matter, on the Commission's Own Motion, establishing the method and Case No. U- avoided cost calculation for Upper Peninsula Power
More informationMiller, Canfield, Paddock and Stone, P.L.C. One Michigan Avenue, Suite 900 Lansing, Michigan TEL (517) FAX (517)
Founded in 1852 by Sidney Davy Miller SHERRI A. WELLMAN TEL (517) 483-4954 FAX (517) 374-6304 E-MAIL wellmans@millercanfield.com Miller, Canfield, Paddock and Stone, P.L.C. One Michigan Avenue, Suite 900
More informationOctober 29, Ms. Mary Jo Kunkle Executive Secretary Michigan Public Service Commission 6545 Mercantile Way Lansing, MI 48911
Founded in 1852 by Sidney Davy Miller SHERRI A. WELLMAN TEL (517) 483-4954 FAX (517) 374-6304 E-MAIL wellmans@millercanfield.com Miller, Canfield, Paddock and Stone, P.L.C. One Michigan Avenue, Suite 900
More informationOctober 1, Northern States Power Company a Wisconsin corporation Tax Reform Calculation C - Gas Case No. U
Founded in 1852 by Sidney Davy Miller SHERRI A. WELLMAN TEL (517) 4834954 FAX (517) 3746304 EMAIL wellmans@millercanfield.com Miller, Canfield, Paddock and Stone, P.L.C. One Michigan Avenue, Suite 900
More informationS T A T E O F M I C H I G A N BEFORE THE MICHIGAN PUBLIC SERVICE COMMISSION * * * * *
S T A T E O F M I C H I G A N BEFORE THE MICHIGAN PUBLIC SERVICE COMMISSION * * * * * In the matter, on the Commission s own motion ) establishing the method and avoided cost ) calculation for WISCONSIN
More informationS T A T E O F M I C H I G A N BEFORE THE MICHIGAN PUBLIC SERVICE COMMISSION * * * * *
S T A T E O F M I C H I G A N BEFORE THE MICHIGAN PUBLIC SERVICE COMMISSION * * * * * In the matter of the application of ) NORTHERN STATES POWER COMPANY, ) a Wisconsin corporation, and wholly owned )
More informationApril 7, Kavita Kale Executive Secretary Michigan Public Service Commission 7109 West Saginaw Highway, 3 rd Floor Lansing MI 48909
Dykema Gossett PLLC Capitol View 201 Townsend Street, Suite 900 Lansing, MI 48933 WWW.DYKEMA.COM Tel: (517) 374-9100 Fax: (517) 374-9191 Richard J. Aaron Direct Fax: (855) 230-2517 Email: RAaron@dykema.com
More informationS T A T E O F M I C H I G A N BEFORE THE MICHIGAN PUBLIC SERVICE COMMISSION * * * * *
S T A T E O F M I C H I G A N BEFORE THE MICHIGAN PUBLIC SERVICE COMMISSION * * * * * In the matter, on the Commission s own ) Motion Establishing the Method and ) Avoided Cost Calculation for Northern
More informationMiller, Canfield, Paddock and Stone, P.L.C. One Michigan Avenue, Suite 900 Lansing, Michigan TEL (517) FAX (517)
Founded in 1852 by Sidney Davy Miller PAUL M. COLLINS TEL (517) 483-4908 FAX (517) 374-6304 E-MAIL collinsp@millercanfield.com Miller, Canfield, Paddock and Stone, P.L.C. One Michigan Avenue, Suite 900
More informationSTATE OF MICHIGAN BEFORE THE MICHIGAN PUBLIC SERVICE COMMISSION
STATE OF MICHIGAN BEFORE THE MICHIGAN PUBLIC SERVICE COMMISSION In the matter, on the Commission s own motion, establishing the method and avoided cost Case No. U-18090 calculation for CONSUMERS ENERGY
More informationNovember 1, 2018 VIA ELECTRONIC CASE FILING
Clark Hill PLC 212 East Grand River Avenue Lansing, Michigan 48906 Bryan A. Brandenburg T 517.318.3100 T 517.318.3011 F 517.318.3099 F 517.318.3099 Email: bbrandenburg@clarkhill.com clarkhill.com VIA ELECTRONIC
More informationOctober 4, Ms. Kavita Kale Executive Secretary Michigan Public Service Commission 7109 W. Saginaw Highway Lansing, Michigan 48917
DTE Gas Company One Energy Plaza, 1635 WCB Detroit, MI 48226-1279 David S. Maquera (313) 235-3724 david.maquera@dteenergy.com October 4, 2018 Ms. Kavita Kale Executive Secretary Michigan Public Service
More informationJuly 3, Northern States Power Company Wisconsin Energy Waste Reduction Biennial Plan MPSC Case No. U-18264
Founded in 185 by Sidney Davy Miller SHERRI A. WELLMAN TEL (517 483-4954 FAX (517 374-6304 E-MAIL wellmans@millercanfield.com Miller, Canfield, Paddock and Stone, P.L.C. One Michigan Avenue, Suite 900
More informationSTATE OF MICHIGAN BEFORE THE MICHIGAN PUBLIC SERVICE COMMISSION. In the matter of the application of Case No. U UPPER PENINSULA POWER COMPANY
STATE OF MICHIGAN BEFORE THE MICHIGAN PUBLIC SERVICE COMMISSION In the matter of the application of Case No. U-18467 UPPER PENINSULA POWER COMPANY (e-file paperless) for approval of depreciation rates
More informationS T A T E OF M I C H I G A N BEFORE THE MICHIGAN PUBLIC SERVICE COMMISSION * * * *
S T A T E OF M I C H I G A N BEFORE THE MICHIGAN PUBLIC SERVICE COMMISSION * * * * In the matter on the Commission s own ) motion, to consider changes in the rates ) of all the Michigan rate-regulated
More informationS T A T E O F M I C H I G A N BEFORE THE MICHIGAN PUBLIC SERVICE COMMISSION * * * * *
S T A T E O F M I C H I G A N BEFORE THE MICHIGAN PUBLIC SERVICE COMMISSION * * * * * In the matter of the application of ) UPPER PENINSULA POWER COMPANY ) seeking ex parte approval of deferred accounting
More informationJanuary 19, Kavita Kale Executive Secretary Michigan Public Service Commission 7109 West Saginaw Highway 3rd Floor Lansing, MI 48917
Dykema Gossett PLLC Capitol View 201 Townsend Street, Suite 900 Lansing, MI 48933 WWW.DYKEMA.COM Tel: (517) 374-9100 Fax: (517) 374-9191 Richard J. Aaron Direct Dial: (517) 374-9198 Direct Fax: (855) 230-2517
More informationJune 19, Ms. Kavita Kale Michigan Public Service Commission 7109 W. Saginaw Hwy. P. O. Box Lansing, MI RE: MPSC Case No.
June 19, 2018 Ms. Kavita Kale Michigan Public Service Commission 7109 W. Saginaw Hwy. P. O. Box 30221 Lansing, MI 48909 RE: MPSC Case No. U-18419 Dear Ms. Kale: The following is attached for paperless
More informationSTATE OF MICHIGAN BEFORE THE MICHIGAN PUBLIC SERVICE COMMISSION. In the matter of the application of Case No. U CONSUMERS ENERGY COMPANY
STATE OF MICHIGAN BEFORE THE MICHIGAN PUBLIC SERVICE COMMISSION In the matter of the application of Case No. U-20164 CONSUMERS ENERGY COMPANY (e-file paperless) for reconciliation of its 2017 demand response
More informationReply Brief on behalf of the Environmental Law & Policy Center, the Ecology Center, the Union of Concerned Scientists, and Vote Solar.
January 11, 2019 Ms. Kavita Kale Michigan Public Service Commission 7109 W. Saginaw Hwy. P. O. Box 30221 Lansing, MI 48909 RE: MPSC Case No. U-20165 Dear Ms. Kale: The following is attached for paperless
More informationSTATE OF MICHIGAN BEFORE THE MICHIGAN PUBLIC SERVICE COMMISSION * * * * *
EXHIBIT A STATE OF MICHIGAN BEFORE THE MICHIGAN PUBLIC SERVICE COMMISSION * * * * * In the Matter, on the Commission's own motion, ) establishing the method and avoided cost calculation ) for ALPENA POWER
More informationMiller, Canfield, Paddock and Stone, P.L.C. One Michigan Avenue, Suite 900 Lansing, Michigan TEL (517) FAX (517)
Founded in 1852 by Sidney Davy Miller SHERRI A. WELLMAN TEL (517) 483-4954 FAX (517) 374-6304 E-MAIL wellmans@millercanfield.com Miller, Canfield, Paddock and Stone, P.L.C. One Michigan Avenue, Suite 900
More informationS T A T E O F M I C H I G A N BEFORE THE MICHIGAN PUBLIC SERVICE COMMISSION * * * *
S T A T E O F M I C H I G A N BEFORE THE MICHIGAN PUBLIC SERVICE COMMISSION * * * * In the matter of the Application of ) CONSUMERS ENERGY COMPANY for ) Approval of Amendments to ) Case No. U-00 Gas Transportation
More informationS T A T E O F M I C H I G A N BEFORE THE MICHIGAN PUBLIC SERVICE COMMISSION * * * * QUALIFICATIONS AND DIRECT TESTIMONY OF NICHOLAS M.
S T A T E O F M I C H I G A N BEFORE THE MICHIGAN PUBLIC SERVICE COMMISSION * * * * In the matter of the application of ) CONSUMERS ENERGY COMPANY for a ) financing order approving the securitization )
More informationSTATE OF MICHIGAN BEFORE THE MICHIGAN PUBLIC SERVICE COMMISSION. (e-file paperless) related matters. /
STATE OF MICHIGAN BEFORE THE MICHIGAN PUBLIC SERVICE COMMISSION In the matter of the application of DTE ELECTRIC COMPANY for approval Case No. U-18150 of depreciation accrual rates and other (e-file paperless)
More informationSTATE OF MICHIGAN BEFORE THE MICHIGAN PUBLIC SERVICE COMMISSION
STATE OF MICHIGAN BEFORE THE MICHIGAN PUBLIC SERVICE COMMISSION In the matter of the application of DTE ELECTRIC COMPANY for approval of Certificates of Necessity pursuant to Case No. U-18419 MCL 460.6s,
More informationS T A T E OF M I C H I G A N BEFORE THE MICHIGAN PUBLIC SERVICE COMMISSION * * * *
S T A T E OF M I C H I G A N BEFORE THE MICHIGAN PUBLIC SERVICE COMMISSION * * * * In the matter of the application of ) DTE ELECTRIC COMPANY ) for reconciliation of its Power Supply Cost ) Case No. U-009
More informationS T A T E O F M I C H I G A N BEFORE THE MICHIGAN PUBLIC SERVICE COMMISSION * * * * *
S T A T E O F M I C H I G A N BEFORE THE MICHIGAN PUBLIC SERVICE COMMISSION * * * * * In the matter of the application of ) CONSUMERS ENERGY COMPANY for ) approval of a power supply cost recovery plan
More informationCITY of NOVI CITY COUNCIL
CITY of NOVI CITY COUNCIL Agenda Item C June 22, 2015 SUBJECT: Approval of resolution authorizing the issuance of Limited Tax General Obligation Refunding Bonds, Series 2015. SUBMITTING DEPARTMENT: Finance
More informationS T A T E O F M I C H I G A N BEFORE THE MICHIGAN PUBLIC SERVICE COMMISSION * * * *
S T A T E O F M I C H I G A N BEFORE THE MICHIGAN PUBLIC SERVICE COMMISSION * * * * In the matter of the Commission s own ) motion, to consider changes in the rates ) of all the Michigan rate-regulated
More informationSTATE OF MICHIGAN MICHIGAN PUBLIC SERVICE COMMISSION ) ) ) ) ) PETITION TO INTERVENE OF THE ENVIRONMENTAL LAW & POLICY CENTER
April 5, 2016 Ms. Mary Jo. Kunkle Michigan Public Service Commission 7109 W. Saginaw Hwy. P. O. Box 30221 Lansing, MI 48909 RE: MPSC Case No. U-17990 Dear Ms. Kunkle: Attached for paperless electronic
More informationMiller, Canfield, Paddock and Stone, P.L.C. One Michigan Avenue, Suite 900 Lansing, Michigan TEL (517) FAX (517)
Founded in 1 by Sidney Davy Miller SHERRI A. WELLMAN TEL (17) 9 FAX (17) 76 EMAIL wellmans@millercanfield.com Miller, Canfield, Paddock and Stone, P.L.C. One Michigan Avenue, Suite 9 Lansing, Michigan
More informationSTATE OF MICHIGAN BEFORE THE MICHIGAN PUBLIC SERVICE COMMISSION
STATE OF MICHIGAN BEFORE THE MICHIGAN PUBLIC SERVICE COMMISSION In the matter, on the Commission's own motion, to consider changes in the rates of all Michigan rate regulated electric, steam, and natural
More informationS T A T E O F M I C H I G A N BEFORE THE MICHIGAN PUBLIC SERVICE COMMISSION * * * * *
S T A T E O F M I C H I G A N BEFORE THE MICHIGAN PUBLIC SERVICE COMMISSION * * * * * In the matter of the application of ) ELIGO ENERGY MI, LLC, ) Case No. U-17697 for a license as an alternative electric
More information201 North Washington Square Suite 910 Lansing, Michigan June 7, 2017
0 North Washington Square Suite 0 Lansing, Michigan Telephone / - Fax / - www.varnumlaw.com Timothy J. Lundgren tjlundgren@varnumlaw.com June, 0 Ms. Kavita Kale Executive Secretary Michigan Public Service
More informationS T A T E O F M I C H I G A N BEFORE THE MICHIGAN PUBLIC SERVICE COMMISSION * * * * *
S T A T E O F M I C H I G A N BEFORE THE MICHIGAN PUBLIC SERVICE COMMISSION * * * * * In the matter of the application of ) DTE ELECTRIC COMPANY s request for ) approval to have solid-state polyphase meters
More informationDecember 20, Dear Ms. Kale:
A CMS Energy Company December 20, 2017 Ms. Kavita Kale Executive Secretary Michigan Public Service Commission 7109 West Saginaw Highway Post Office Box 30221 Lansing, MI 48909 General Offices: LEGAL DEPARTMENT
More informationS T A T E O F M I C H I G A N BEFORE THE MICHIGAN PUBLIC SERVICE COMMISSION * * * * *
S T A T E O F M I C H I G A N BEFORE THE MICHIGAN PUBLIC SERVICE COMMISSION * * * * * In the matter, on the Commission s own motion, ) to open a docket to implement the provisions of ) Section 6w of 2016
More informationGILLARD, BAUER, MAZRUM, FLORIP, SMIGELSKI & GULDEN ATTORNEYS AT LAW 109 E. CHISHOLM STREET ALPENA, MICHIGAN March 29, 2018
ROGER C. BAUER JAMES L. MAZRUM JAMES D. FLORIP WILLIAM S. SMIGELSKI TIMOTHY M. GULDEN JOEL E. BAUER DANIEL J. FLORIP GILLARD, BAUER, MAZRUM, FLORIP, SMIGELSKI, & GULDEN ATTORNEYS AT LAW 109 E. CHISHOLM
More informationS T A T E O F M I C H I G A N BEFORE THE MICHIGAN PUBLIC SERVICE COMMISSION * * * * *
S T A T E O F M I C H I G A N BEFOE THE MICHIGAN PUBLIC SEVICE COMMISSION * * * * * In the matter of the application of ) UPPE PENINSULA POWE COMPANY ) Case No. for authority to increase retail electric
More informationS T A T E OF M I C H I G A N BEFORE THE MICHIGAN PUBLIC SERVICE COMMISSION * * * *
S T A T E OF M I C H I G A N BEFORE THE MICHIGAN PUBLIC SERVICE COMMISSION * * * * In the matter of the application of ) CONSUMERS ENERGY COMPANY ) for the Reconciliation of Power Supply ) Case No. U--R
More informationFISCHER, FRANKLIN & FORD Attorneys and Counsellors GUARDIAN BUILDING, SUITE GRISWOLD STREET DETROIT, MICHIGAN
ARTHUR J. LeVASSEUR MATTHEW M. PECK TROY C. OTTO SIDNEY M. BERMAN* * Of Counsel FISCHER, FRANKLIN & FORD Attorneys and Counsellors GUARDIAN BUILDING, SUITE 3500 500 GRISWOLD STREET DETROIT, MICHIGAN 48226-3808
More informationS T A T E O F M I C H I G A N BEFORE THE MICHIGAN PUBLIC SERVICE COMMISSION * * * * *
S T A T E O F M I C H I G A N BEFORE THE MICHIGAN PUBLIC SERVICE COMMISSION * * * * * In the matter of the application of ) DTE ELECTRIC COMPANY for authority to increase ) its rates, amend its rate schedules
More informationMiller, Canfield, Paddock and Stone, P.L.C. One Michigan Avenue, Suite 900 Lansing, Michigan TEL (517) FAX (517)
Founded in 1852 by Sidney Davy Miller MICHAEL C. RAMPE TEL (517) 483-4941 FAX (517) 374-6304 E-MAIL rampe@millercanfield.com Miller, Canfield, Paddock and Stone, P.L.C. One Michigan Avenue, Suite 900 Lansing,
More informationOctober 20, Dear Ms. Kale:
A CMS Energy Company October 20, 2017 Ms. Kavita Kale Executive Secretary Michigan Public Service Commission 7109 West Saginaw Highway Post Office Box 30221 Lansing, MI 48909 General Offices: LEGAL DEPARTMENT
More informationJune 8, Enclosed find the Attorney General s Direct Testimony and Exhibits and related Proof of Service. Sincerely,
STATE OF MICHIGAN DEPARTMENT OF ATTORNEY GENERAL P.O. BOX 30755 LANSING, MICHIGAN 48909 BILL SCHUETTE ATTORNEY GENERAL June 8, 2018 Ms. Kavita Kale Michigan Public Service Commission 7109 West Saginaw
More informationSTATE OF MICHIGAN DEPARTMENT OF ATTORNEY GENERAL BILL SCHUETTE ATTORNEY GENERAL. November 16, 2018
STATE OF MICHIGAN DEPARTMENT OF ATTORNEY GENERAL P.O. BOX 30755 LANSING, MICHIGAN 48909 BILL SCHUETTE ATTORNEY GENERAL November 16, 2018 Ms. Kavita Kale Michigan Public Service Commission 7109 West Saginaw
More informationSTATE OF MICHIGAN BEFORE THE MICHIGAN PUBLIC SERVICE COMMISSION * * * * *
STATE OF MICHIGAN BEFORE THE MICHIGAN PUBLIC SERVICE COMMISSION * * * * * In the matter, on the ) Commission s own motion, ) Case No. regarding the regulatory reviews, ) revisions, determinations, and/or
More informationOctober 11, Ms. Kavita Kale Executive Secretary Michigan Public Service Commission 7109 W. Saginaw Highway Lansing, Michigan 48917
DTE Gas Company One Energy Plaza, 1635 WCB Detroit, MI 48226-1279 Lauren D. Donofrio (313) 235-4017 lauren.donofrio@dteenergy.com October 11, 2018 Ms. Kavita Kale Executive Secretary Michigan Public Service
More informationJune 27, 2018 VIA ELECTRONIC CASE FILING
Clark Hill PLC East César E. Chávez venue Lansing, Michigan 90 Bryan. Brandenburg T..00 T..0 F..099 F..0 Email: bbrandenburg@clarkhill.com clarkhill.com VI ELECTRONIC CSE FILING Ms. Kavita Kale Executive
More informationJanuary 10, Ms. Kavita Kale Michigan Public Service Commission 7109 W. Saginaw Hwy. P. O. Box Lansing, MI RE: MPSC Case No.
January 10, 2018 Ms. Kavita Kale Michigan Public Service Commission 7109 W. Saginaw Hwy. P. O. Box 30221 Lansing, MI 48909 RE: MPSC Case No. U-18090 Dear Ms. Kale: The following is attached for paperless
More informationJune 29, Ms. Mary Jo Kunkle Executive Secretary Michigan Public Service Commission 6545 Mercantile Way, P.O. Box Lansing, MI 48909
Founded in 1852 by Sidney Davy Miller SHERRI A. WELLMAN TEL (517) 483-4954 FAX (517) 374-6304 E-MAIL wellmans@millercanfield.com Miller, Canfield, Paddock and Stone, P.L.C. One Michigan Avenue, Suite 900
More informationJanuary 18, Dear Ms. Kale:
A CMS Energy Company January 18, 2019 Ms. Kavita Kale Executive Secretary Michigan Public Service Commission 7109 West Saginaw Highway Post Office Box 30221 Lansing, MI 48909 General Offices: LEGAL DEPARTMENT
More informationNovember 27, Dear Ms. Kale:
A CMS Energy Company November 27, 2018 Ms. Kavita Kale Executive Secretary Michigan Public Service Commission 7109 West Saginaw Highway Post Office Box 30221 Lansing, MI 48909 General Offices: LEGAL DEPARTMENT
More informationS T A T E O F M I C H I G A N BEFORE THE MICHIGAN PUBLIC SERVICE COMMISSION * * * * *
S T A T E O F M I C H I G A N BEFORE THE MICHIGAN PUBLIC SERVICE COMMISSION * * * * * In the matter of the application of ) WISCONSIN ENERGY CORPORATION and ) INTEGRYS ENERGY GROUP, INC., for approval,
More informationS T A T E O F M I C H I G A N MICHIGAN ADMINISTRATIVE HEARING SYSTEM FOR THE MICHIGAN PUBLIC SERVICE COMMISSION * * * * *
S T A T E O F M I C H I G A N MICHIGAN ADMINISTRATIVE HEARING SYSTEM FOR THE MICHIGAN PUBLIC SERVICE COMMISSION * * * * * In the matter of the application of ) CONSUMERS ENERGY COMPANY ) for approval of
More informationGILLARD, BAUER, MAZRUM, FLORIP, SMIGELSKI & GULDEN ATTORNEYS AT LAW 109 E. CHISHOLM STREET ALPENA, MICHIGAN May 12, 2015
ROGER C. BAUER JAMES L. MAZRUM JAMES D. FLORIP WILLIAM S. SMIGELSKI TIMOTHY M. GULDEN JOEL E. BAUER DANIEL J. FLORIP GILLARD, BAUER, MAZRUM, FLORIP, SMIGELSKI, & GULDEN ATTORNEYS AT LAW 109 E. CHISHOLM
More informationSTATE OF MICHIGAN DEPARTMENT OF ATTORNEY GENERAL BILL SCHUETTE ATTORNEY GENERAL. February 12, 2013
STATE OF MICHIGAN DEPARTMENT OF ATTORNEY GENERAL P.O. BOX 30755 LANSING, MICHIGAN 48909 BILL SCHUETTE ATTORNEY GENERAL February 12, 2013 Ms. Mary Jo Kunkle Executive Secretary Michigan Public Service Commission
More informationMarch 13, MPSC Case No. U-18124: Consumers Energy Company s 2016 Gas General Rate Case
Clark Hill PLC 212 East Grand River Avenue Lansing, Michigan 48906 Sean P. Gallagher T 517.318.3100 T 517.318.3060 F 517.318.3099 F 517.318.3085 Email: sgallagher@clarkhill.com clarkhill.com VIA ELECTRONIC
More informationDecember 20, Dear Ms. Kale:
A CMS Energy Company December 20, 2017 Ms. Kavita Kale Executive Secretary Michigan Public Service Commission 7109 West Saginaw Highway Post Office Box 30221 Lansing, MI 48909 General Offices: LEGAL DEPARTMENT
More information2 BEFORE THE MICHIGAN PUBLIC SERVICE COMMISSION
STATE OF MICHIGAN BEFORE THE MICHIGAN PUBLIC SERVICE COMMISSION In the matter, on the Commission's Own Motion to consider changes in the rates of all of the Michigan rate-regulated Case U- electric, steam,
More informationS T A T E O F M I C H I G A N BEFORE THE MICHIGAN PUBLIC SERVICE COMMISSION * * * * *
S T A T E O F M I C H I G A N BEFORE THE MICHIGAN PUBLIC SERVICE COMMISSION * * * * * In the matter of the application of ) UPPER PENINSULA POWER COMPANY for ) Case No. approval of depreciation rates and
More informationS T A T E O F M I C H I G A N MICHIGAN ADMINISTRATIVE HEARING SYSTEM FOR THE MICHIGAN PUBLIC SERVICE COMMISSION * * * * *
S T A T E O F M I C H I G A N MICHIGAN ADMINISTRATIVE HEARING SYSTEM FOR THE MICHIGAN PUBLIC SERVICE COMMISSION * * * * * In the matter of the application of ) Consumers Energy Company for ) approval of
More informationJanuary 19, Dear Ms. Kale:
A CMS Energy Company January 19, 2018 Ms. Kavita Kale Executive Secretary Michigan Public Service Commission 7109 West Saginaw Highway Post Office Box 30221 Lansing, MI 48909 General Offices: LEGAL DEPARTMENT
More information153 FERC 61,248 UNITED STATES OF AMERICA FEDERAL ENERGY REGULATORY COMMISSION
153 FERC 61,248 UNITED STATES OF AMERICA FEDERAL ENERGY REGULATORY COMMISSION Before Commissioners: Norman C. Bay, Chairman; Cheryl A. LaFleur, and Tony Clark, Tilden Mining Company L.C. and Empire Iron
More informationBEFORE THE PUBLIC UTILITIES COMMISSION OF THE STATE OF CALIFORNIA APPLICATION OF LIBERTY UTILITIES (CALPECO ELECTRIC) LLC (U 933 E)
BEFORE THE PUBLIC UTILITIES COMMISSION OF THE STATE OF CALIFORNIA Application of Liberty Utilities (CalPeco Electric) LLC (U 933 E) for Authority to Update Rates Pursuant to Its Energy Cost Adjustment
More informationAnswer of the Environmental Law & Policy Center to Petition for Rehearing
November 26, 2018 Ms. Kavita Kale Michigan Public Service Commission 7109 W. Saginaw Hwy. P. O. Box 30221 Lansing, MI 48909 RE: MPSC Case No. U-18351 Dear Ms. Kale: The following is attached for paperless
More informationBEFORE THE PUBLIC UTILITIES COMMISSION OF THE STATE OF COLORADO * * * * *
BEFORE THE PUBLIC UTILITIES COMMISSION OF THE STATE OF COLORADO * * * * * IN THE MATTER OF THE VERIFIED APPLICATION OF PUBLIC SERVICE COMPANY OF COLORADO TO CONDUCT A SECOND SHORT-TERM MEDICAL EXEMPTION
More informationFebruary 21, Sincerely,
STATE OF MICHIGAN DEPARTMENT OF ATTORNEY GENERAL P.O. BOX 0 LANSING, MICHIGAN 0 DANA NESSEL ATTORNEY GENERAL February, 0 Ms. Kavita Kale Michigan Public Service Commission 0 West Saginaw Highway Lansing,
More information2 BEFORE THE MICHIGAN PUBLIC SERVICE COMMISSION
STATE OF MICHIGAN BEFORE THE MICHIGAN PUBLIC SERVICE COMMISSION In the matter, on the Commission's Own Motion regarding the regulatory reviews, Case No. U- revisions, determinations, and/or approvals necessary
More informationCase: Doc #:8 Filed: 01/25/16 Page 1 of 10 UNITED STATES BANKRUPTCY COURT FOR THE WESTERN DISTRICT OF MICHIGAN
Case:16-00290 Doc #:8 Filed: 01/25/16 Page 1 of 10 UNITED STATES BANKRUPTCY COURT FOR THE WESTERN DISTRICT OF MICHIGAN In re: Chapter 11 GREAT LAKES COMNET, INC. Case No. 16-00290 ( ) Debtor. In re: Chapter
More informationBEFORE THE NEW MEXICO PUBLIC REGULATION COMMISSION ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) DIRECT TESTIMONY RUTH M. SAKYA.
BEFORE THE NEW MEXICO PUBLIC REGULATION COMMISSION IN THE MATTER OF SOUTHWESTERN PUBLIC SERVICE COMPANY S APPLICATION REQUESTING: (1) ACKNOWLEDGEMENT OF ITS FILING OF THE 2016 ANNUAL RENEWABLE ENERGY PORTFOLIO
More informationBEFORE THE PUBLIC UTILITIES COMMISSION OF THE STATE OF CALIFORNIA APPLICATION OF PACIFIC GAS AND ELECTRIC COMPANY ANN H. KIM GAIL L.
BEFORE THE PUBLIC UTILITIES COMMISSION OF THE STATE OF CALIFORNIA Application of Pacific Gas and Electric Company for Approval of Economic Development Rate for 2013-2017 (U 39 E) Application No. 12-03-
More informationSTATE OF MICHIGAN BEFORE THE MICHIGAN PUBLIC SERVICE COMMISSION REPLY BRIEF OF THE RESIDENTIAL CUSTOMER GROUP
STATE OF MICHIGAN BEFORE THE MICHIGAN PUBLIC SERVICE COMMISSION In the matter on the Commission s own motion, to consider changes in the rates of all the Michigan rate-regulated electric, steam, and natural
More informationSTATE OF MICHIGAN BEFORE THE MICHIGAN PUBLIC SERVICE COMMISSION
STATE OF MICHIGAN BEFORE THE MICHIGAN PUBLIC SERVICE COMMISSION In the matter, on the Commission s own motion, to open a docket for certain regulated electric Case No. U-20147 utilities to file their five-year
More informationJuly 31, Mr. Bill Stosik, Director Financial Analysis and Audit Division Michigan Public Service Commission 4300 W Saginaw Hwy Lansing, MI 48917
One Energy Plaza, Detroit, MI 48226-1279 DTE Gas Company July 31, 2014 Mr. Bill Stosik, Director Financial Analysis and Audit Division Michigan Public Service Commission 4300 W Saginaw Hwy Lansing, MI
More informationResponse of Cypress Creek Renewables, LLC in Opposition to Consumers Energy Company s Motion to Stay Capacity Purchase Obligation
124 West Allegan Street, Suite 1000 Lansing, Michigan 48933 T (517) 482-5800 F (517) 482-0887 www.fraserlawfirm.com Douglas J. Austin Michael E. Cavanaugh David E.S. Marvin Stephen L. Burlingame Darrell
More informationSTATE OF MICHIGAN BEFORE THE MICHIGAN PUBLIC SERVICE COMMISSION REPLY BRIEF OF THE GREAT LAKES RENEWABLE ENERGY ASSOCIATION
STATE OF MICHIGAN BEFORE THE MICHIGAN PUBLIC SERVICE COMMISSION In the matter of the Application of DTE Electric Company for authority to increase its rates, amend its rate schedules and rules governing
More informationBEFORE THE NEW MEXICO PUBLIC REGULATION COMMISSION ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) APPLICATION
BEFORE THE NEW MEXICO PUBLIC REGULATION COMMISSION IN THE MATTER OF SOUTHWESTERN PUBLIC SERVICE COMPANY S APPLICATION REQUESTING: (1 ACKNOWLEDGEMENT OF ITS FILING OF THE 2016 ANNUAL RENEWABLE ENERGY PORTFOLIO
More informationS T A T E O F M I C H I G A N BEFORE THE MICHIGAN PUBLIC SERVICE COMMISSION * * * * *
S T A T E O F M I C H I G A N BEFORE THE MICHIGAN PUBLIC SERVICE COMMISSION * * * * * In the matter of the application of ) DTE ELECTRIC COMPANY for authority to increase ) its rates, amend its rate schedules
More informationBOEHM, KURTZ & LOWRY ATTORNEYS AT LAW 36 EAST SEVENTH STREET, SUITE 1510 CINCINNATI, OHIO TELEPHONE (513) TELECOPIER (513)
BOEHM, KURTZ & LOWRY ATTORNEYS AT LAW 36 EAST SEVENTH STREET, SUITE 1510 CINCINNATI, OHIO 45202 TELEPHONE (513 421-2255 TELECOPIER (513 421-2764 VIA ELECTRONIC CASE FILING April 5, 2019 Kavita Kale, Executive
More informationNovember 14, Please contact the undersigned if you have any questions.
JACK C. DAVIS PC JAMES R. NEAL MICHAEL G. OLIVA MICHAEL H. RHODES JEFFREY L. GREEN JEFFREY S. THEUER 1 KEVIN J. RORAGEN RICHARD W. PENNINGS TED S. ROZEBOOM SARA L. CUNNINGHAM JAMES F. ANDERTON, V 3 MICHAEL
More informationAugust 29, 2018 VIA ELECTRONIC CASE FILING
Clark Hill PLC 212 East César E. Chávez Avenue Lansing, Michigan 48906 Bryan A. Brandenburg T 517.318.3100 T 517.318.3011 F 517.318.3099 F 517.318.3077 Email: bbrandenburg@clarkhill.com clarkhill.com VIA
More informationBEFORE THE FEDERAL COMMUNICATIONS COMMISSION WASHINGTON D.C REPLY COMMENTS OF THE MICHIGAN PUBLIC SERVICE COMMISSION
BEFORE THE FEDERAL COMMUNICATIONS COMMISSION WASHINGTON D.C. 20554 In the Matter of: ) ) WC Docket No. 12-61 Petition of US Telecom for Forbearance ) Under 47 U.S.C. 160(c) From Enforcement ) of Certain
More information