Merit-Based Incentive Payment System (MIPS): Routine Cataract Removal with Intraocular Lens (IOL) Implantation Measure

Size: px
Start display at page:

Download "Merit-Based Incentive Payment System (MIPS): Routine Cataract Removal with Intraocular Lens (IOL) Implantation Measure"

Transcription

1 Merit-Based Incentive Payment System (MIPS): Routine Cataract Removal with Intraocular Lens (IOL) Implantation Measure Measure Information Form 2019 Performance Period 1

2 Table of Contents 1.0 Introduction Measure Name Measure Description Measure Rationale Measure Numerator Measure Denominator Data Sources Care Settings Cohort Overview of Measure Methodology Detailed Measure Methodology Trigger and Define an Episode Attribute Episodes to a Clinician Assign Costs of Services to an Episode and Calculate Total Observed Episode Cost Exclude Episodes Estimate Expected Costs through Risk Adjustment Calculate Measure Scores...11 Appendix A. How to Use the Measure Codes List File...13 Appendix B. Example of Measure Calculation...15 Routine Cataract Removal with Intraocular Lens (IOL) Implantation Measure Information Form (MIF) 2

3 1.0 Introduction This document details the methodology for the Routine Cataract Removal with Intraocular Lens (IOL) Implantation measure and should be reviewed along with the Routine Cataract Removal with Intraocular Lens (IOL) Implantation Measure Codes List file, which contains the medical codes used in constructing the measure. 1.1 Measure Name Routine Cataract Removal with Intraocular Lens (IOL) Implantation episode-based cost measure 1.2 Measure Description Episode-based cost measures represent the cost to Medicare for the items and services provided to a patient during an episode of care ( episode ). In all supplemental documentation, cost generally means the standardized Medicare allowed amount, which includes both Medicare and trust fund payments and any applicable beneficiary deductible and coinsurance amounts. 1,2 The Routine Cataract Removal with IOL Implantation episode-based cost measure evaluates a clinician s risk-adjusted cost to Medicare for beneficiaries who undergo a procedure for routine cataract removal with IOL implantation during the performance period. The cost measure score is the clinician s risk-adjusted cost for the episode group averaged across all episodes attributed to the clinician. This procedural measure includes costs of services that are clinically related to the attributed clinician s role in managing care during each episode from 60 days prior to the clinical event that opens, or triggers, the episode through 90 days after the trigger. 1.3 Measure Rationale Routine cataract surgery is the most common surgical procedure in the United States, including among Medicare beneficiaries, 3 and it was estimated that Medicare spends more than $3.4 billion annually on the treatment of cataracts, with cataract extraction with IOL implantation 1 Claims data from Medicare Parts A and B are used to construct the episode-based cost measures. 2 Claim payments are standardized to account for differences in Medicare payments for the same service(s) across Medicare providers. Payment standardized costs remove the effect of differences in Medicare payment among health care providers that are the result of differences in regional health care provider expenses measured by hospital wage indexes and geographic price cost indexes (GPCIs) or other payment adjustments such as those for teaching hospitals. For more information, please refer to the CMS Price (Payment) Standardization - Basics" and CMS Price (Payment) Standardization - Detailed Methods documents posted on QualityNet: Pershing, S., D. E. Morrison, and T. Hernandez-Boussard. Cataract Surgery Complications and Revisit Rates among Three States. [In eng]. Am J Ophthalmol 171 (Nov 2016): Routine Cataract Removal with Intraocular Lens (IOL) Implantation Measure Information Form (MIF) 3

4 specifically as the most common procedure. 4 The Routine Cataract Removal with IOL Implantation episode-based cost measure was recommended for development by an expert clinician committee the Ophthalmologic Disease Management Clinical Subcommittee because of its high impact in terms of patient population and Medicare spending, and the opportunity for incentivizing cost-effective, high-quality clinical care in this area. The Clinical Subcommittee provided extensive, detailed input on this measure. 1.4 Measure Numerator The cost measure numerator is the sum of the ratio of observed to expected 5 paymentstandardized cost to Medicare for all Routine Cataract Removal with IOL Implantation episodes attributed to a clinician. This sum is then multiplied by the national average observed episode cost to generate a dollar figure. 1.5 Measure Denominator The cost measure denominator is the total number of episodes from the Routine Cataract Removal with IOL Implantation episode group attributed to a clinician. 1.6 Data Sources The Routine Cataract Removal with IOL Implantation cost measure uses the following data sources: Medicare Parts A and B claims data from the Common Working File (CWF) Enrollment Data Base (EDB) Long Term Care Minimum Data Set (LTC MDS) 1.7 Care Settings Methodologically, the Routine Cataract Removal with IOL Implantation cost measure can be triggered based on claims data from the following settings: ambulatory surgical centers (ASC), ambulatory/office-based care, and hospital outpatient department (HOPD). 1.8 Cohort The cohort for this cost measure consists of patients who are Medicare beneficiaries enrolled in Medicare fee-for-service and who undergo a procedure for routine cataract removal with IOL implantation that triggers a Routine Cataract Removal with IOL Implantation episode. The cohort for this cost measure is also further refined by the definition of the episode group and measure-specific exclusions (see Section 0). 4 Brown, G. C., M. M. Brown, A. Menezes, B. G. Busbee, H. B. Lieske, and P. A. Lieke. Cataract Surgery Cost Utility Revisited in 2012: A New Economic Paradigm. [In eng]. Ophthalmology 120, no. 12 (Dec 2013): Expected costs refer to costs predicted by the risk adjustment model. For more information on expected costs and risk adjustment, please refer to Section 3.5. Routine Cataract Removal with Intraocular Lens (IOL) Implantation Measure Information Form (MIF) 4

5 2.0 Overview of Measure Methodology There are two overarching processes in calculating episode-based cost measure scores: episode construction (Steps 1-3) and measure calculation (Steps 4-6). This section provides a brief one-page summary of these processes for the Routine Cataract Removal with IOL Implantation cost measure, and Section 0 describes the processes in more detail. 1. Trigger and define an episode: Episodes are defined by billing codes that open, or trigger, an episode. The episode window starts 60 days before the trigger and ends 90 days after the trigger. To enable meaningful clinical comparisons, episodes are placed into more granular, mutually exclusive sub-groups based on clinical criteria. Some episodes may also be excluded based on other information available at the time of the trigger. 2. Attribute the episode to a clinician: For this procedural episode group, an attributed clinician is any clinician who bills a trigger code for the episode group on the day of the procedure. 3. Assign costs to the episode and calculate the episode observed cost: Clinically related services occurring during the episode window are assigned to the episode. The cost of the assigned services is summed to determine each episode s standardized observed cost. Figure 1. Diagram Showing an Example of a Constructed Episode 4. Exclude episodes: Exclusions remove unique groups of patients from cost measure calculation in cases where it may be impractical and unfair to compare the costs of caring for these patients to the costs of caring for the cohort at large. 5. Calculate expected costs for risk adjustment: Risk adjustment aims to isolate variation in clinician costs to only the costs that clinicians can reasonably influence (e.g., accounting for beneficiary age, comorbidities and other factors). A regression is run using the risk adjustment variables as covariates to estimate the expected cost of each episode. Then, statistical techniques are applied to reduce the effect of extreme outliers on measure scores. 6. Calculate the measure score: For each episode, the ratio of standardized total observed cost (from step 3) to risk-adjusted expected cost (from step 5) is calculated and averaged across all of a clinician or clinician group s attributed episodes to obtain the average episode cost ratio. The average episode cost ratio is multiplied by the national average observed episode cost to generate a dollar figure for the cost measure score. Routine Cataract Removal with Intraocular Lens (IOL) Implantation Measure Information Form (MIF) 5

6 3.0 Detailed Measure Methodology This section details the two overarching processes in calculating episode-based cost measure scores in more detail: Sections 0 through 0 describe episode construction and Sections 0 through 0 describe measure calculation. 3.1 Trigger and Define an Episode Routine Cataract Removal with IOL Implantation episodes are defined by Current Procedural Terminology / Healthcare Common Procedure Coding System (CPT/HCPCS) codes on Part B Physician/Supplier (Carrier) claims that open, or trigger, an episode. For the codes and logic relevant to this section please see the Triggers and Trigger_Exclusions tabs of the Routine Cataract Removal with IOL Implantation Measure Codes List. The steps for defining an episode for the Routine Cataract Removal with IOL Implantation episode group are as follows: Identify Part B Physician/Supplier claim lines with positive standardized payment that have a trigger code. Trigger an episode if all the following conditions are met for an identified Part B Physician/Supplier claim line: o It was billed by a clinician of a specialty that is eligible for MIPS. o It is the highest cost claim line across any Routine Cataract Removal with IOL Implantation trigger code billed for the beneficiary on that day. o It does not have a post-operative modifier code. 6 Establish the episode window as follows: o Establish the episode trigger date as the expense date of the trigger code. o Establish the episode start date as 60 days prior to the episode trigger date. o Establish the episode end date as 90 days after the episode trigger date. Define trigger exclusions based on information available at the time of the trigger, if applicable. Once a Routine Cataract Removal with IOL Implantation episode is triggered, the episode is placed into one of the episode sub-groups to enable meaningful clinical comparisons. Subgroups represent more granular, mutually exclusive patient populations defined by clinical criteria (e.g., information available on the beneficiary s claims at the time of the trigger). Subgroups are useful in ensuring clinical comparability so that the corresponding cost measure fairly compares clinicians with a similar patient case-mix. 6 Post-operative modifier codes indicate that a clinician billing the service was not involved in the main procedure but was involved in the post-operative care for that procedure, and as such the post-operative clinician would not be responsible for the trigger. Routine Cataract Removal with Intraocular Lens (IOL) Implantation Measure Information Form (MIF) 6

7 Codes used to define the sub-groups can be found in the Sub_Groups tab of the Routine Cataract Removal with IOL Implantation Measure Codes List file. This cost measure has four sub-groups: ASC / Bilateral ASC / Unilateral HOPD / Bilateral HOPD / Unilateral 3.2 Attribute Episodes to a Clinician Once an episode has been triggered and defined, it is attributed to one or more clinicians of a specialty that is eligible for MIPS. Clinicians are identified by Taxpayer Identification Number (TIN) and National Provider Identifier (NPI) pairs (TIN-NPI), and clinician groups are identified by TIN. Only clinicians of a specialty that is eligible for MIPS or clinician groups where the triggering clinician is of a specialty that is eligible for MIPS are attributed episodes. For codes relevant to this section, please see the Attribution tab of the Routine Cataract Removal with IOL Implantation Measure Codes List. The steps for attributing a Routine Cataract Removal with IOL Implantation episode are as follows: Identify claim lines with positive standardized payment for any trigger codes that occur on the episode trigger day. Designate a TIN-NPI as a main clinician if the following conditions are met: o No assistant modifier code is found on one or more claim lines billed by the clinician. o No exclusion modifier code is found on the same claim line. Designate a TIN-NPI as an assistant clinician if the following conditions are met: o The TIN-NPI was not designated as a main clinician. o An assistant modifier code is found. o No exclusion modifier code is found. Attribute an episode to any TIN-NPI designated as a main or assistant clinician. Attribute episodes to the TIN by aggregating all episodes attributed to NPIs that bill to that TIN. If the same episode is attributed to more than one NPI within a TIN, the episode is attributed only once to that TIN. Future attribution rules may benefit from the implementation of patient relationship category codes. CMS will consider how to incorporate the patient relationship categories into episodebased cost measurement methodology as clinicians and billing experts gain experience with them. Routine Cataract Removal with Intraocular Lens (IOL) Implantation Measure Information Form (MIF) 7

8 3.3 Assign Costs of Services to an Episode and Calculate Total Observed Episode Cost Services, and their Medicare costs, are assigned to an episode only when clinically related to the attributed clinician s role in managing patient care during the episode. Assigned services may include treatment and diagnostic services, ancillary items, services directly related to treatment, and those furnished as a consequence of care (e.g., complications, readmissions, unplanned care, and emergency department visits). Unrelated services are not assigned to the episode. For example, the cost of care for a chronic condition that occurs during the episode but not related to the clinical management of the patient relative to the routine cataract removal procedure with IOL implantation would not be assigned. To ensure that only clinically related services are included, services during the episode window are assigned to the episode based on a series of service assignment rules, which are listed in the SA_[Pre/Post]_[Service_Category] tabs of the Routine Cataract Removal with IOL Implantation Measure Codes List file. For the Routine Cataract Removal with IOL Implantation episode group, only services performed in the following service categories are considered for assignment to the episode costs: Outpatient (OP) Facility and Clinician Services As an overview, service assignment rules may be modified based on the service category in which the service is performed, as listed above. Service assignment rules may also vary based on (i) additional criteria determined by other diagnosis, procedure, or billing codes appearing alongside the service code, or (ii) the specific timing of the service. Services may be assigned to the episode based on the following additional criteria: Services may be assigned to the episode based on the following additional criteria: o Service code alone o Service code in combination with other diagnosis, procedure, or billing codes such as: The first three digits of the International Classification of Diseases Tenth Revision diagnosis code (3-digit ICD-10 DGN) The full ICD-10 DGN Additional service information Services may be assigned only with specific timing: o Services may be assigned based on whether or not the service and/or diagnosis is newly occurring o Services may be assigned only if they occur within a particular number of days from the trigger within the episode window, and services may be assigned for a period shorter than the full duration of the episode window. Routine Cataract Removal with Intraocular Lens (IOL) Implantation Measure Information Form (MIF) 8

9 The steps for assigning costs are as follows: Identify all services on claims with positive standardized payment that occur within the episode window. Assign identified services to the episode based on the types of service assignment rules described above. Sum standardized Medicare allowed amounts for all claims assigned to each episode to obtain the standardized total observed episode cost. Service Assignment Example This example is for the Routine Cataract Removal with IOL Implantation cost measure. It is provided here to illustrate how service assignment works, as this framework applies to all episode-based cost measures. Clinician A performs surgical treatment for routine cataract removal with an intraocular lens (IOL) implantation for Patient K on January 2, This service triggers a Routine Cataract Removal with IOL Implantation episode, which is attributed to Clinician A. Clinician B performs a lens repositioning procedure, which is considered a clinically related service, during the episode window on January 11, Because lens repositioning is considered to be clinically related to the surgical treatment for routine cataract removal with IOL implantation, the cost of the repositioning procedure will be assigned to Clinician A s Routine Cataract Removal with IOL Implantation episode. 3.4 Exclude Episodes Before measure calculation, episode exclusions are applied to remove certain episodes from measure score calculation. Certain exclusions are applied across all procedural episode groups to ensure that each episode has complete data available for measure calculation, and other exclusions are specific to this measure, based on consideration of the clinical characteristics of a homogenous patient cohort. The measure-specific exclusions are listed in the Exclusions and Exclusions_Details tabs in the Routine Cataract Removal with IOL Implantation Measure Codes List file. The steps for episode exclusion are as follows: Exclude episodes from measure calculation if: o The beneficiary has a primary payer other than Medicare for any time overlapping the episode window or 120-day lookback period prior to the trigger day. o The beneficiary was not enrolled in Medicare Parts A and B for the entirety of the lookback period plus episode window, or was enrolled in Part C for any part of the lookback plus episode window. o No main clinician is attributed the episode. Routine Cataract Removal with Intraocular Lens (IOL) Implantation Measure Information Form (MIF) 9

10 o The beneficiary s date of birth is missing. o The beneficiary s death date occurred before the episode ended. o The episode trigger claim was not performed in an ambulatory/office-based care, OP hospital, or ASC setting based on its place of service. Apply measure-specific exclusions, which check the beneficiary s Medicare claims history for certain billing codes (as specified in the Measure Codes List file) that indicate the presence of a particular procedure, condition, or characteristic. 3.5 Estimate Expected Costs through Risk Adjustment Risk adjustment is used to estimate expected episode costs in recognition of the different levels of care beneficiaries may require due to comorbidities, disability, age, and other risk factors. The risk adjustment model includes variables from the CMS Hierarchical Condition Category Version 22 (CMS-HCC V22) 2016 Risk Adjustment Model, 7 as well as other standard risk adjustors (e.g., beneficiary age) and variables for clinical factors that may be outside the attributed clinician's reasonable influence. A full list of risk adjustment variables can be found in the RA_Vars and RA_Vars_Details tabs of the Routine Cataract Removal with IOL Implantation Measure Codes List file. Steps for defining risk adjustment variables and estimating the risk adjustment model are as follows: Define HCC and episode group-specific risk adjustors using service and diagnosis information found on the beneficiary s Medicare claims history in the 120-day period prior to the episode trigger day (or the timing specified in the "RA_Vars_Details" tab of the Measure Codes List file) for certain billing codes that indicate the presence of a procedure, condition, or characteristic. Define other risk adjustors that rely upon Medicare beneficiary enrollment and assessment data as follows: o Identify beneficiaries who are originally Disabled without end-stage renal disease (ESRD) or Disabled with ESRD using the original reason for joining Medicare field in the Medicare beneficiary enrollment database. o Identify beneficiaries with ESRD if their enrollment indicates ESRD coverage, ESRD dialysis, or kidney transplant in the Medicare beneficiary enrollment database in the lookback period. o Identify beneficiaries who have spent at least 90 days in a long-term care institution without having been discharged to the community for 14 days, based on MDS assessment data. 7 CMS uses an HCC risk adjustment model to calculate risk scores. The HCC model ranks diagnoses into categories that represent conditions with similar cost patterns. Higher categories represent higher predicted healthcare costs, resulting in higher risk scores. There are over 9,500 ICD-10-CM codes that map to one or more of the 79 HCC codes included in the CMS-HCC V22 model. Routine Cataract Removal with Intraocular Lens (IOL) Implantation Measure Information Form (MIF) 10

11 Drop risk adjustors that are defined for less than 15 episodes nationally for each sub-group to avoid using very small samples. Categorize beneficiaries into age ranges using their date of birth information in the Medicare beneficiary enrollment database. If an age range has a cell count less than 15, collapse this with the next adjacent higher age range category. Run an ordinary least squares (OLS) regression model to estimate the relationship between all the risk adjustment variables and the dependent variable, the standardized observed episode cost, to obtain the risk-adjusted expected episode cost. A separate OLS regression is run for each episode sub-group nationally. Winsorize 8 expected costs as follows. o Assign the value of the 0.5 th percentile to all expected episode costs below the 0.5 th percentile. o Renormalize 9 values by multiplying each episode's winsorized expected cost by the subgroup's average expected cost, and dividing the resultant value by the sub-group's average winsorized expected cost. Exclude 10 episodes with outliers as follows. This step is performed separately for each subgroup. o Calculate each episode's residual as the difference between the re-normalized, winsorized expected cost computed above and the observed cost. o Exclude episodes with residuals below the 1 st percentile or above the 99 th percentile of the residual distribution. o Renormalize the resultant expected cost values by multiplying each episode s winsorized expected costs after excluding outliers by the sub-group's average standardized observed cost across all episodes originally in the risk adjustment model, and dividing by the sub-group's average winsorized expected cost after excluding outliers. 3.6 Calculate Measure Scores Measure scores are calculated for a TIN or TIN-NPI as follows: Calculate the ratio of observed to expected episode cost for each episode attributed to the clinician/clinician group. 8 Winsorization aims to limit the effects of extreme values on expected costs. Winsorization is a statistical transformation that limits extreme values in data to reduce the effect of possible outliers. Winsorization of the lower end of the distribution (i.e., bottom coding) involves setting extremely low predicted values below a predetermined limit to be equal to that predetermined limit. 9 Renormalization is performed after adjustments are made to the episode s expected cost, such as bottom-coding or residual outlier exclusion. This process multiplies the adjusted values by a scalar ratio to ensure that the resulting average is equal to the average of the original value. 10 This step excludes episodes based on outlier residual values from the calculation and renormalizes the resultant values to maintain a consistent average episode cost level. Routine Cataract Removal with Intraocular Lens (IOL) Implantation Measure Information Form (MIF) 11

12 Calculate the average ratio of observed to expected episode cost across the total number of episodes attributed to the clinician/clinician group. Multiply the average ratio of observed to expected episode cost by the national average observed episode cost to generate a dollar figure representing risk-adjusted average episode cost. The clinician-level or clinician group practice-level risk-adjusted cost for any attributed clinician (or clinician group practice) j can be represented mathematically as: where: Y ij Y ij n j n is the standardized payment for episode i and attributed clinician (or clinician group practice) j is the expected standardized payment for episode i and clinician (or clinician group practice) j, as predicted from risk adjustment is the number of episodes for clinician (or clinician group practice) j is the total number of TIN/TIN-NPI attributed episodes nationally is all episodes i in the set of episodes attributed to clinician (or clinician group practice) j A lower measure score indicates that the observed episode costs are lower than or similar to expected costs for the care provided for the particular patients and episodes included in the calculation, whereas a higher measure score indicates that the observed episode costs are higher than expected for the care provided for the particular patients and episodes included in the calculation. Routine Cataract Removal with Intraocular Lens (IOL) Implantation Measure Information Form (MIF) 12

13 Appendix A. How to Use the Measure Codes List File The Measure Codes List file is an Excel workbook that provides clinicians with the specific codes and logic that apply to this cost measure. It is intended to be reviewed along with the detailed measure methodology in Section 0. Overview The Overview tab provides introductory information on the measure, a Table of Contents with descriptions of and links to the tabs in the workbook, and a Key Terms and Acronyms section that introduces acronyms used throughout the file. Each tab has a hyperlink in the top right corner to proceed to the next tab and in the top left corner to return to the Overview tab. Trigger and Define an Episode The following tabs present the codes and logic that define an episode of the episode group, as well as those that specify the sub-groups that comprise the episode group if applicable, as described in Section 0. Triggers lists all of the codes which trigger (or open) the episode group, along with the logic accompanying those triggers. If applicable, Trigger_Exclusions lists codes that will cause the episode not to be triggered if they occur in conjunction with the trigger codes. If applicable, Sub_Groups contains all of the sub-groups for the episode group, as well as the codes and logic used to specify each sub-group. Clinician Attribution The Attribution tab presents the codes that aid in attributing episodes to clinicians, as described in Section 0. Service Assignment The service assignment (SA) tabs, with tab names containing the SA prefix, present the service assignment codes and logic for different service categories during either the pre-trigger period or the post-trigger period. These codes and logic determine services for which costs are assigned to an episode, as described in Section 0. SA_Pre_[Service_Category] tabs indicate services assigned in the pre-trigger period for various service categories/settings. SA_Post_[Service_Category] tabs indicate services assigned in the post-trigger period for various service categories/settings. Routine Cataract Removal with Intraocular Lens (IOL) Implantation Measure Information Form (MIF) 13

14 Risk Adjustment and Exclusions The following tabs present the variables used during measure calculation to ensure that clinician performance is being compared on a like-to-like basis, as described in Sections 0 and 0. RA_Vars contains the risk adjustment variables used in the construction of the measure s risk adjustment model, including variables used in the risk adjustment model for all episodebased cost measures and any measure-specific variables (if applicable). If applicable, RA_Vars_Details provides more detail on the risk adjustment variables that are specific to this measure. If applicable, Exclusions contains a list of measure-specific variables that indicate that an episode is not clinically comparable. If these variables are present in an episode, that episode will not be included in measure score calculation. If applicable, Exclusions_Details provides additional information on measure-specific exclusion variables, including the codes and logic used to define the variables. Routine Cataract Removal with Intraocular Lens (IOL) Implantation Measure Information Form (MIF) 14

15 Appendix B. Example of Measure Calculation 1. Calculate the observed cost of each episode by summing all standardized allowed amounts for services assigned to episode cost. 2. Calculate the expected cost of each episode by running a risk adjustment model that includes only episodes within the same sub-group nationally. For measures with sub-groups, this ensures that expected cost for an episode in an intrinsically lower cost sub-group is estimated separately from the expected cost for an episode in an intrinsically higher cost sub-group. If a measure does not have sub-groups, the model includes all episodes within the episode group nationally. 3. Divide each episode s observed cost by the expected cost to obtain the observed to expected cost ratio for each episode. If the observed to expected cost ratio is greater than 1, this indicates that the episode s observed cost was greater than expected for the care provided for the particular patients and episodes included in the calculation. A ratio less than 1 indicates that the observed cost was less than expected for the care provided for the particular patients and episodes included in the calculation. For example, if an episode s observed cost is $5,000, and the expected cost for the episode is $3,000, then the ratio will be $5,000/$3,000 = 1.67, which would indicate that the episode cost is greater than expected. If an episode s observed cost is $3,000, and the expected cost for the episode is $5,000, the ratio would be 0.6, which would indicate that the episode cost is less than expected. 4. Sum the observed/expected ratios for all episodes across the entire episode group (i.e., across all sub-groups for applicable measures) and divide by the total number of episodes across the episode group to get the average observed/expected ratio for all episodes attributed to the clinician. For measures with sub-groups, because the expected cost is calculated for each subgroup (see step #2 above), the average ratio calculated in this step accounts for the episode sub-group breakdown. 5. Multiply the average observed/expected ratio by the average of the observed cost for all episodes nationally. This step is done to convert the average observed/expected ratio into a more meaningful figure to clinicians, by having the clinician s average cost measure score represented as a dollar amount rather than a ratio. Multiplying by the national average observed episode cost yields a measure score that is similar in scale to the amount a given episode might actually cost. Choosing to multiply by a different dollar constant would not affect clinicians rankings on the measure, but the national average cost is used for ease of interpretation. Routine Cataract Removal with Intraocular Lens (IOL) Implantation Measure Information Form (MIF) 15

Merit-Based Incentive Payment System (MIPS): Elective Outpatient Percutaneous Coronary Intervention (PCI) Measure

Merit-Based Incentive Payment System (MIPS): Elective Outpatient Percutaneous Coronary Intervention (PCI) Measure Merit-Based Incentive Payment System (MIPS): Elective Outpatient Percutaneous Coronary Intervention (PCI) Measure Measure Information Form 2019 Performance Period 1 Table of Contents 1.0 Introduction...

More information

Merit-Based Incentive Payment System (MIPS): ST-Elevation Myocardial Infarction (STEMI) with Percutaneous Coronary Intervention (PCI) Measure

Merit-Based Incentive Payment System (MIPS): ST-Elevation Myocardial Infarction (STEMI) with Percutaneous Coronary Intervention (PCI) Measure Merit-Based Incentive Payment System (MIPS): ST-Elevation Myocardial Infarction (STEMI) with Percutaneous Coronary Intervention (PCI) Measure Measure Information Form 2019 Performance Period 1 Table of

More information

Merit-Based Incentive Payment System (MIPS): Knee Arthroplasty Measure. Measure Information Form 2019 Performance Period

Merit-Based Incentive Payment System (MIPS): Knee Arthroplasty Measure. Measure Information Form 2019 Performance Period Merit-Based Incentive Payment System (MIPS): Knee Arthroplasty Measure Measure Information Form 2019 Performance Period 1 Table of Contents 1.0 Introduction... 3 1.1 Measure Name... 3 1.2 Measure Description...

More information

2019 Merit-based Incentive Payment System (MIPS) Cost Performance Category Fact Sheet

2019 Merit-based Incentive Payment System (MIPS) Cost Performance Category Fact Sheet 2019 Merit-based Incentive Payment System (MIPS) Cost Performance Category Fact Sheet What is the Quality Payment Program? The Medicare Access and CHIP Reauthorization Act of 2015 (MACRA) ended the Sustainable

More information

2018 Merit-based Incentive Payment System (MIPS) Cost Performance Category Fact Sheet

2018 Merit-based Incentive Payment System (MIPS) Cost Performance Category Fact Sheet 2018 Merit-based Incentive Payment System (MIPS) Cost Performance Category Fact Sheet What is the Quality Payment Program? The Medicare Access and CHIP Reauthorization Act of 2015 (MACRA) ended the Sustainable

More information

CPC+ PAYMENT METHODOLOGIES: BENEFICIARY ATTRIBUTION, CARE MANAGEMENT FEE, PERFORMANCE-BASED INCENTIVE PAYMENT, AND PAYMENT UNDER THE MEDICARE

CPC+ PAYMENT METHODOLOGIES: BENEFICIARY ATTRIBUTION, CARE MANAGEMENT FEE, PERFORMANCE-BASED INCENTIVE PAYMENT, AND PAYMENT UNDER THE MEDICARE CPC+ PAYMENT METHODOLOGIES: BENEFICIARY ATTRIBUTION, CARE MANAGEMENT FEE, PERFORMANCE-BASED INCENTIVE PAYMENT, AND PAYMENT UNDER THE MEDICARE PHYSICIAN FEE SCHEDULE Version 2 February 17, 2017 Table of

More information

Appendix B. LDO Financial Methodology (LDO CEC Model)

Appendix B. LDO Financial Methodology (LDO CEC Model) Appendix B LDO Financial Methodology (LDO CEC Model) TABLE OF CONTENTS Table of Contents... i Table of Exhibits... iii Glossary... iv List of Acronyms... viii 1. Introduction... 1 1.1 Identifying and Aligning

More information

Medicare Spending Per Beneficiary (MSPB) Measure

Medicare Spending Per Beneficiary (MSPB) Measure Medicare Spending Per Beneficiary (MSPB) Measure Audio for this event is available via INTERNET STREAMING. No telephone line is required. Computer speakers or headphones are necessary to listen to streaming

More information

2018 Merit-Based Incentive Payment System (MIPS) Scoring Overview

2018 Merit-Based Incentive Payment System (MIPS) Scoring Overview The Physicians Advocacy Institute s Medicare Quality Payment Program (QPP) Physician Education Initiative 2018 Merit-Based Incentive Payment System (MIPS) Scoring Overview 1 P a g e MEDICARE QPP PHYSICIAN

More information

Troubleshooting Audio

Troubleshooting Audio Welcome! Audio for this event is available via ReadyTalk Internet streaming. No telephone line is required. Computer speakers or headphones are necessary to listen to streaming audio. Limited dial-in lines

More information

Quality Payment Program Year 2

Quality Payment Program Year 2 Quality Payment Program Year 2 MIPS Highlights Raising the performance threshold to 15 points in Year 2 (from 3 points in the transition year). Allowing the use of 2014 Edition and/or 2015 Certified Electronic

More information

Predictive Qualifying Alternative Payment Model (APM) Participants (QPs) Methodology Fact Sheet What is the Predictive QP Status Analysis?

Predictive Qualifying Alternative Payment Model (APM) Participants (QPs) Methodology Fact Sheet What is the Predictive QP Status Analysis? Predictive Qualifying Alternative Payment Model (APM) Participants (QPs) Methodology Fact Sheet What is the Predictive QP Status Analysis? One of the Quality Payment Program s goals is to be clear about

More information

CY 2018 Quality Payment Program Final Rule Summary

CY 2018 Quality Payment Program Final Rule Summary CY 2018 Quality Payment Program Final Rule Summary On November 2, 2017, the Centers for Medicare and Medicaid Services (CMS) released its final rule outlining the requirements for year two of the Quality

More information

The MACRA Proposed Rule on MIPS and APMs: Summary and Key Takeaways

The MACRA Proposed Rule on MIPS and APMs: Summary and Key Takeaways The MACRA Proposed Rule on MIPS and APMs: Summary and Key Takeaways A White Paper May 2016 Impact Advisors LLC 400 E. Diehl Road Suite 190 Naperville IL 60563 1-800- 680-7570 Impact- Advisors.com Executive

More information

Pamela Ballou-Nelson, RN, MSPH, CMPE, PhD, Principal, MGMA Consulting April 10, , Telligen, Inc.

Pamela Ballou-Nelson, RN, MSPH, CMPE, PhD, Principal, MGMA Consulting April 10, , Telligen, Inc. MIPS 2018 Cost Reporting and Your QRUR Pamela Ballou-Nelson, RN, MSPH, CMPE, PhD, Principal, MGMA Consulting April 10, 2018 2016, Telligen, Inc. Quality Payment Program Cost Reporting Quality Payment Program

More information

AAOS MACRA Proposed Rule Summary (Short)

AAOS MACRA Proposed Rule Summary (Short) AAOS MACRA Proposed Rule Summary (Short) Merit-Based Incentive Payment System (MIPS), Advanced Alternative Payment Model (APM) Incentive, and Criteria for Physician-Focused Payment Models Ref: CMS-5517-P

More information

DRG Payment Method Options

DRG Payment Method Options DRG Payment Method Options Prepared for: Florida Agency for Health Care Administration July 23, 2012 Draft and For Discussion Purposes Only navigant.com/healthcare Table of Contents Introduction... 5 1

More information

AMGA MIPS Collaborative. June 21, 2017

AMGA MIPS Collaborative. June 21, 2017 AMGA MIPS Collaborative June 21, 2017 Calculating the MIPS score The MIPS composite performance score will include four weighted categories: MIPS Composite Performance Score Quality Cost Improvement activities

More information

2018 Quality Measure Benchmarks Overview

2018 Quality Measure Benchmarks Overview 2018 Quality Benchmarks Overview What Are Quality Benchmarks? When a clinician or group submits measures for the Merit-based Incentive Payment System (MIPS) quality performance category, each measure is

More information

For the RRU Index Ratio, an EXC is displayed if the denominator is <200 for the condition or if the calculated indexed ratio is <0.33 or >3.00.

For the RRU Index Ratio, an EXC is displayed if the denominator is <200 for the condition or if the calculated indexed ratio is <0.33 or >3.00. General Questions What changes were made for HEDIS 2016? RRU specification changes: - We removed the Use of Appropriate Medications for People With Asthma (ASM) measure from the Relative Resource Use for

More information

RRU Frequently Asked Questions

RRU Frequently Asked Questions RRU Frequently Asked Questions General Questions What changes were made for HEDIS 2015? RRU specification changes: We removed the Cholesterol Management for Patients With Cardiovascular Conditions (CMC)

More information

2019 Quality Payment Program (QPP) Measure Specification and Measure Flow Guide for MIPS Clinical Quality Measures (CQMs)

2019 Quality Payment Program (QPP) Measure Specification and Measure Flow Guide for MIPS Clinical Quality Measures (CQMs) 2019 Quality Payment Program (QPP) Measure Specification and Measure Flow Guide for MIPS Clinical Quality Measures (CQMs) Utilized by Merit-based Incentive Payment System (MIPS) Eligible Clinicians, Groups,

More information

Comprehensive Care for Joint Replacement Payment Model Final Rule Fact Sheet

Comprehensive Care for Joint Replacement Payment Model Final Rule Fact Sheet Comprehensive Care for Joint Replacement Payment Model Final Rule Fact Sheet 1 Description: This document provides an overview of the final rule to implement a new Comprehensive Care for Joint Replacement

More information

Illinois & Wisconsin Chapter: Proposed Fee schedule Getting ready for 2019

Illinois & Wisconsin Chapter: Proposed Fee schedule Getting ready for 2019 Illinois & Wisconsin Chapter: Proposed Fee schedule Getting ready for 2019 Cathleen Biga President/CEO Cardiovascular Management of Illinois cbiga@cardiacmgmt.com "The nine most terrifying words in the

More information

Health Industry Forum Key Policy Issues in the Evolution of Medicare ACO Programs

Health Industry Forum Key Policy Issues in the Evolution of Medicare ACO Programs Health Industry Forum Key Policy Issues in the Evolution of Medicare ACO Programs June 3, 2014 7 ACO Policy Issues 1. Assignment 2. Financial Benchmarks 3. Minimum Savings Rate 4. Pathway to Higher Risk

More information

Understanding the 2020 Medicare Advantage Advance Notice Part I

Understanding the 2020 Medicare Advantage Advance Notice Part I Understanding the 2020 Medicare Advantage Advance Notice Part I Jennifer Carioto, FSA, MAAA Jennifer Carioto is a consulting actuary with the New York office of Milliman. She specializes in Medicare Advantage

More information

PRINCIPAL ACCOUNTABLE PROVIDER MANUAL

PRINCIPAL ACCOUNTABLE PROVIDER MANUAL Health Care Payment Improvement Building a healthier future for all Arkansans Arkansas Payment Improvement Initiative Episodes of Care PRINCIPAL ACCOUNTABLE PROVIDER MANUAL Cholecystectomy Episode Reimbursement

More information

USES AND LIMITATIONS OF THE CLAIM AND CLAIM LINE FEED (CCLF)

USES AND LIMITATIONS OF THE CLAIM AND CLAIM LINE FEED (CCLF) Medicare Shared Savings Program USES AND LIMITATIONS OF THE CLAIM AND CLAIM LINE FEED (CCLF) User Guide February 2017 Version #3 Revision History VERSION DATE REVISION/ CHANGE DESCRIPTION AFFECTED AREA

More information

Health Information Technology and Management

Health Information Technology and Management Health Information Technology and Management CHAPTER 9 Healthcare Coding and Reimbursement Pretest (True/False) CPT-4 codes are used to bill for disease and illness. Medicare Part B provides medical insurance

More information

Patient Protection and Affordable Care Act: HHS Notice of Benefit and Payment Parameters for 2014 Final Rule Summary.

Patient Protection and Affordable Care Act: HHS Notice of Benefit and Payment Parameters for 2014 Final Rule Summary. Patient Protection and Affordable Care Act: HHS Notice of Benefit and Payment Parameters for 2014 Final Rule Summary March 21, 2013 On March 11, 2013, the Centers for Medicare & Medicaid Services (CMS)

More information

Click this button to place your order.

Click this button to place your order. 2018 Medicare 35th Edition What you need to know about Medicare in simple, practical terms. Click this button to place your order. 2018 MEDICARE CONTENTS 1 2 3 4 5 6 Published By PAGE INTRODUCTION Are

More information

September 14, Dear Administrator Verma:

September 14, Dear Administrator Verma: September 14, 2018 Seema Verma Administrator Centers for Medicare and Medicaid Services Dept. of Health and Human Services Attention: CMS-1695-P P.O. Box 8013 Baltimore, MD 21244-1850 Re: CMS-1695-P; Medicare

More information

Volume to Value The Great Transformation of American Medicine

Volume to Value The Great Transformation of American Medicine Volume to Value The Great Transformation of American Medicine 2010-2020 Richard I. Fogel, MD FHRS Chief Clinical Officer St. Vincent Health October 2015 Fee for Service You get paid for what you do The

More information

Introduction to the Centers for Medicare & Medicaid Services (CMS) Payment Process

Introduction to the Centers for Medicare & Medicaid Services (CMS) Payment Process Introduction to the Centers for Medicare & Medicaid Services (CMS) Payment Process Thomas Barker, Foley Hoag LLP tbarker@foleyhoag.com (202) 261-7310 October 1, 2009 Overview Medicare Basics Paths to Medicare

More information

2019 Quality Payment Program (QPP) Measure Specification and Measure Flow Guide for Medicare Part B Claims Measures

2019 Quality Payment Program (QPP) Measure Specification and Measure Flow Guide for Medicare Part B Claims Measures 2019 Quality Payment Program (QPP) Measure Specification and Measure Flow Guide for Medicare Part B Claims Measures Utilized by Merit-based Incentive Payment System (MIPS) Eligible Clinicians 11/20/2018

More information

Chapter 7 General Billing Rules

Chapter 7 General Billing Rules 7 General Billing Rules Reviewed/Revised: 10/10/2017, 07/13/2017, 02/01/2017, 02/15/2016, 09/16/2015, 09/18/2014 General Information This chapter contains general information related to Health Choice Arizona

More information

Medicare s Shared Savings Program: Accountable Care Organizations Proposed Rule

Medicare s Shared Savings Program: Accountable Care Organizations Proposed Rule Medicare s Shared Savings Program: Accountable Care Organizations Proposed Rule On March 31, 2011, the Centers for Medicare and Medicaid Services (CMS) issued its proposed rule on Medicare s Shared Savings

More information

Measure Information Form Collected For: CMS Efficiency Measures (Claims Based) Performance Measure Name: Medicare Spending Per Beneficiary (MSPB)

Measure Information Form Collected For: CMS Efficiency Measures (Claims Based) Performance Measure Name: Medicare Spending Per Beneficiary (MSPB) Last Updated: New Measure: Version 4.4 Measure Information Form Collected For: CMS Efficiency Measures (Claims Based) Measure Set: CMS Payment Measures Set Measure ID#: MSPB-1 Performance Measure Name:

More information

Payment for Covered Services

Payment for Covered Services A WellCare Company Payment for Covered Services Today s Options PFFS reimburses deemed (non-contracted) providers at 100% of the current Medicare-approved amount for all Medicare-covered services, less

More information

Fact Sheet: 2019 Merit-based Incentive Payment System (MIPS) Payment Adjustments based on 2017 MIPS Final Scores

Fact Sheet: 2019 Merit-based Incentive Payment System (MIPS) Payment Adjustments based on 2017 MIPS Final Scores Fact Sheet: 2019 Merit-based Incentive Payment System (MIPS) Payment Adjustments based on 2017 MIPS Final Scores The Medicare Access and CHIP Reauthorization Act of 2015 (MACRA) repealed the Medicare sustainable

More information

Medicare Made Simple

Medicare Made Simple Medicare Made Simple Important: The information provided in this document is for informational purposes only and is not intended to be legal advice. You should not rely on any statements provided herein

More information

Building Actuarial Cost Models from Health Care Claims Data for Strategic Decision-Making. Introduction. William Bednar, FSA, FCA, MAAA

Building Actuarial Cost Models from Health Care Claims Data for Strategic Decision-Making. Introduction. William Bednar, FSA, FCA, MAAA Building Actuarial Cost Models from Health Care Claims Data for Strategic Decision-Making William Bednar, FSA, FCA, MAAA Introduction Health care spending across the country generates billions of claim

More information

Contents. Page. Chapter

Contents. Page. Chapter Contents Chapter I. Summary and Policy Options........................................ 3 2. Physician Payment Under the Medicare Program: Problems and Changing Context...................................................

More information

RE: Patient Protection and Affordable Care Act; 2017 Notice of Benefit and Payment Parameters

RE: Patient Protection and Affordable Care Act; 2017 Notice of Benefit and Payment Parameters December 18, 2015 Andrew Slavitt Acting Administrator Centers for Medicare and Medicaid Services 7500 Security Boulevard Baltimore, MD 21244 RE: Patient Protection and Affordable Care Act; 2017 Notice

More information

PAGE OF CREATION DATE TOTALS

PAGE OF CREATION DATE TOTALS 1 2 3a PAT. CNTL # b MED. REC. # 5 FED TAX NO 6 STATEMENT COVERS PERIOD FROM THROUGH 7. 4 TYPE OF BILL 8 PATIENT NAME a 9 PATIENT ADDRESS a b b c d e 10 BIRTHDATE 11 SEX ADMISSION 12 DATE 13 HR 14 TYPE

More information

What You Need to Know About CMS Quality and Resource Use Report

What You Need to Know About CMS Quality and Resource Use Report What You Need to Know About CMS Quality and Resource Use Report Heidy Robertson-Cooper, MPA Maryland Family Medicine Summit June 24, 2016 Learning Objectives Describe the purpose of CMS Quality Resource

More information

Neutrality risk management in ICD-10 remediation

Neutrality risk management in ICD-10 remediation Neutrality risk management in ICD-10 remediation Minimize the loss, maximize the gain The concept of neutrality risk management is of particular concern for payers and providers as the U.S. moves to adopt

More information

GLOSSARY: HEALTH CARE. Glossary of Health Care Terms

GLOSSARY: HEALTH CARE. Glossary of Health Care Terms GLOSSARY: HEALTH CARE Glossary of Health Care Terms About East Coast O&P Established in 1997, East Coast Orthotic & Prosthetic Corp. has become a Leader in Custom Orthotics, Prosthetics and rehabilitation

More information

Arkansas DRG Conversion Plan

Arkansas DRG Conversion Plan Arkansas DRG Conversion Plan Prepared for: Arkansas Department of Human Services December 29, 2017 navigant.com/healthcare Arkansas DRG Conversion Plan Table of Contents 1 Introduction... 1 2 Evaluating

More information

Session 1: Mandated Report: Medicare Payment for Ambulance Services

Session 1: Mandated Report: Medicare Payment for Ambulance Services Medicare Payment Advisory Committee Meeting, Nov. 1 2 Session 1: Mandated Report: Medicare Payment for Ambulance Services Session 2: Reducing the Hospitalization Rate for Medicare Beneficiaries Receiving

More information

Final Rule Summary. Medicare Advancing Care Coordination through Episode Payment Models Program Years: October 1, December 31, 2021

Final Rule Summary. Medicare Advancing Care Coordination through Episode Payment Models Program Years: October 1, December 31, 2021 Final Rule Summary Medicare Advancing Care Coordination through Episode Payment Models Program Years: October 1, 2017- December 31, 2021 April 2017 1 TABLE OF CONTENTS Overview and Resources... 3 Model

More information

The Kidney Health Care Program Fiscal Year 2012 Annual Report

The Kidney Health Care Program Fiscal Year 2012 Annual Report The Kidney Health Care Program Fiscal Year 2012 Annual Report Division of Family and Community Health Services Texas Department of State Health Services Legislative Authority The Kidney Health Care Act

More information

One or More Sessions Policy

One or More Sessions Policy One or More Sessions Policy Policy Number 2017R0118B Annual Approval Date 7/12/2017 Approved By Reimbursement Policy Oversight Committee IMPORTANT NOTE ABOUT THIS REIMBURSEMENT POLICY You are responsible

More information

MACRA: Redefining How CMS Pays Doctors. White Paper ELLIS MAC KNIGHT, MD DAN KIEHL, JD CONTACT. Senior Vice President/CMO. Associate Consultant

MACRA: Redefining How CMS Pays Doctors. White Paper ELLIS MAC KNIGHT, MD DAN KIEHL, JD CONTACT. Senior Vice President/CMO. Associate Consultant MACRA: Redefining How CMS Pays Doctors White Paper ELLIS MAC KNIGHT, MD Senior Vice President/CMO DAN KIEHL, JD Associate Consultant June 2016 CONTACT For further information about Coker Group and how

More information

Frequently Asked Questions (FY 2018)

Frequently Asked Questions (FY 2018) Frequently Asked Questions (FY 2018) As of January 2017 On February 17, 2017, all Massachusetts specialists were sent details of their Clinical Performance Improvement Initiative tiering designations.

More information

Beneficiary co-insurance for OPPS services is projected to decrease from 19.9 percent in CY 2015 to 19.3 percent in CY 2016.

Beneficiary co-insurance for OPPS services is projected to decrease from 19.9 percent in CY 2015 to 19.3 percent in CY 2016. CMS Finalizes Hospital Outpatient and Ambulatory Surgical Center Policy and Payment Changes, Including Changes to the Two-Midnight Rule and Quality Reporting for 2016 The Centers for Medicare & Medicaid

More information

Chapter 6 Section 2. Hospital Reimbursement - TRICARE DRG-Based Payment System (General Description Of System)

Chapter 6 Section 2. Hospital Reimbursement - TRICARE DRG-Based Payment System (General Description Of System) Diagnostic Related Groups (DRGs) Chapter 6 Section 2 Hospital Reimbursement - TRICARE DRG-Based Payment System (General Description Of System) Issue Date: October 8, 1987 Authority: 32 CFR 199.14(a)(1)

More information

(1) Ambulatory surgical center (ASC) means any center, service, office facility, or other entity that:

(1) Ambulatory surgical center (ASC) means any center, service, office facility, or other entity that: .1 Definitions. Subtitle 09 WORKERS' COMPENSATION COMMISSION 14.09.08 Guide of Medical and Surgical Fees Authority: Labor and Employment Article, 9-309, 9-663 and 9-731, Annotated Code of Maryland Effective

More information

Comprehensive Primary Care Payment Calculator User s Guide

Comprehensive Primary Care Payment Calculator User s Guide 1 Comprehensive Primary Care Payment Calculator User s Guide Prepared by Health Data Decisions August 2017 Disclaimer: Information provided in connection with this calculator by FMAHealth and its contributors

More information

Bundled Payments for Care Improvement Advanced

Bundled Payments for Care Improvement Advanced Centers for Medicare & Medicaid Services Center for Medicare and Medicaid Innovation Patient Care Models Group Bundled Payments for Care Improvement Advanced Request for Applications (RFA) Last Modified:

More information

District of Columbia Medicaid A New Outpatient Hospital Payment Method

District of Columbia Medicaid A New Outpatient Hospital Payment Method District of Columbia Medicaid A New Outpatient Hospital Payment Method Version Date: Frequently Asked Questions UPDATE: The District of Columbia (DC) Department of Health Care Finance (DHCF) submitted

More information

Basics of Medicare Coverage and Payment. Tom Ault Health Policy Alternatives April 20, 2007

Basics of Medicare Coverage and Payment. Tom Ault Health Policy Alternatives April 20, 2007 Basics of Medicare Coverage and Payment Tom Ault Health Policy Alternatives April 20, 2007 Two Pathways for Medicare Coverage Decisions National coverage decisions (NCDs( NCDs) Developed by CMS Only 10%

More information

CMS PROPOSES KEY PROVISIONS OF MACRA PHYSICIAN PAYMENT SYSTEM FOR 2019

CMS PROPOSES KEY PROVISIONS OF MACRA PHYSICIAN PAYMENT SYSTEM FOR 2019 Thursday, April 28, 2016 CMS PROPOSES KEY PROVISIONS OF MACRA PHYSICIAN PAYMENT SYSTEM FOR 2019 The Centers for Medicare & Medicaid Services (CMS) late yesterday issued a proposed rule implementing key

More information

Claims Data Snapshot. Ophthalmology

Claims Data Snapshot. Ophthalmology Claims Data Snapshot Ophthalmology Introduction This publication contains an analysis of the aggregated data from MedPro Group s Ophthalmology claims closed between 2007 and 2016. All claims included in

More information

Measure Information Form

Measure Information Form Measure Information Form Project Title: Vascular Access Project Overview: Date: The Centers for Medicare & Medicaid Services (CMS) has contracted with the University of Michigan Kidney Epidemiology and

More information

2018 Quality Payment Program (QPP) Measure Specification and Measure Flow Guide for Registry Submission of Individual Measures

2018 Quality Payment Program (QPP) Measure Specification and Measure Flow Guide for Registry Submission of Individual Measures 2018 Quality Payment Program (QPP) Measure Specification and Measure Flow Guide for Registry Submission of Individual Measures Utilized by Individual Eligible Clinicians for Registry Submissions or Clinical

More information

Savings Impact of Community Care of North Carolina: A Review of the Evidence

Savings Impact of Community Care of North Carolina: A Review of the Evidence Data Brief July 27, 2017 Issue No. 11 Savings Impact of Community Care of North Carolina: A Review of the Evidence Author: C. Annette DuBard, MD, MPH KEY POINTS FROM THIS BRIEF: Since 2011, five published

More information

PRINCIPAL ACCOUNTABLE PROVIDER MANUAL

PRINCIPAL ACCOUNTABLE PROVIDER MANUAL Health Care Payment Improvement Building a healthier future for all Arkansans Arkansas Payment Improvement Initiative Episodes of Care PRINCIPAL ACCOUNTABLE PROVIDER MANUAL Pneumonia in the ED Episode

More information

Measure Information Form

Measure Information Form Measure Information Form Measure Name Descriptive Information Measure Name (Measure Title De.2.) Minimum spkt/v for Pediatric Hemodialysis Patients Measure Type De.1. Intermediate Outcome Brief Description

More information

Chapter 6 Section 2. Hospital Reimbursement - TRICARE DRG-Based Payment System (General Description Of System)

Chapter 6 Section 2. Hospital Reimbursement - TRICARE DRG-Based Payment System (General Description Of System) Diagnostic Related Groups (DRGs) Chapter 6 Section 2 Hospital Reimbursement - TRICARE DRG-Based Payment System (General Description Of System) Issue Date: October 8, 1987 Authority: 32 CFR 199.14(a)(1)

More information

Chapter 6 Section 2. Hospital Reimbursement - TRICARE Diagnosis Related Group (DRG)-Based Payment System (General Description Of System)

Chapter 6 Section 2. Hospital Reimbursement - TRICARE Diagnosis Related Group (DRG)-Based Payment System (General Description Of System) Diagnosis Related Groups (DRGs) Chapter 6 Section 2 Hospital Reimbursement - TRICARE Diagnosis Related Group (DRG)-Based Payment System (General Issue Date: October 8, 1987 Authority: 32 CFR 199.14(a)(1)

More information

(Cont.) FORM CMS Line For cost reporting periods that overlap October 1, 2013 and subsequent years, enter the amount of the

(Cont.) FORM CMS Line For cost reporting periods that overlap October 1, 2013 and subsequent years, enter the amount of the 11-16 FORM CMS-2552-10 4030.1 4030. WORKSHEET E - CALCULATION OF REIMBURSEMENT SETTLEMENT Worksheet E, Parts A and B, calculate title XVIII settlement for inpatient hospital services under the inpatient

More information

QUALITY PAYMENT PROGRAM YEAR 3 (2019) FINAL RULE OVERVIEW NOVEMBER 15, 2018

QUALITY PAYMENT PROGRAM YEAR 3 (2019) FINAL RULE OVERVIEW NOVEMBER 15, 2018 QUALITY PAYMENT PROGRAM YEAR 3 (2019) FINAL RULE OVERVIEW NOVEMBER 15, 2018 Disclaimers This presentation was prepared as a tool to assist providers and is not intended to grant rights or impose obligations.

More information

Medicare Advantage (MA) Proposed Benchmark Update and Other Adjustments for CY2020: In Brief

Medicare Advantage (MA) Proposed Benchmark Update and Other Adjustments for CY2020: In Brief Medicare Advantage (MA) Proposed Benchmark Update and Other Adjustments for CY2020: In Brief February 7, 2019 Congressional Research Service https://crsreports.congress.gov R45494 Contents Introduction...

More information

Improving your ASC s performance in 2018

Improving your ASC s performance in 2018 Improving your ASC s performance in 2018 The ASC guide to major trends that will impact your practice Marilyn Denegre Rumbin, JD MBA Director, Payer & Reimbursement Strategy February 2018 1 Welcome Marilyn

More information

EDUCATIONAL: WADING THROUGH MEDICARE

EDUCATIONAL: WADING THROUGH MEDICARE EDUCATIONAL: WADING THROUGH MEDICARE Medicare is a federal government program that provides health insurance for people age 65 and older, people under age 65 with certain disabilities, and people with

More information

District of Columbia Medicaid Outpatient Hospital Payment Method EAPG Frequently Asked Questions

District of Columbia Medicaid Outpatient Hospital Payment Method EAPG Frequently Asked Questions District of Columbia Medicaid Outpatient Hospital Payment Method EAPG Frequently Asked Questions Version Date: Updates for October 1, 2018 DHCF will continue to use three conversion factors for EAPGs:

More information

CMS Quality Payment Program

CMS Quality Payment Program CMS Quality Payment Program Guide for Managed Care Organizations Providing State Medicaid Agencies with Information and Documentation for Submitting Medicaid Requests for Other Payer Advanced APM Determinations

More information

Technical Appendix. This appendix provides more details about patient identification, consent, randomization,

Technical Appendix. This appendix provides more details about patient identification, consent, randomization, Peikes D, Peterson G, Brown RS, Graff S, Lynch JP. How changes in Washington University s Medicare Coordinated Care Demonstration pilot ultimately achieved savings. Health Aff (Millwood). 2012;31(6). Technical

More information

Opportunities for Orthopedic Specialists in BPCI Advanced

Opportunities for Orthopedic Specialists in BPCI Advanced Opportunities for Orthopedic Specialists in BPCI Advanced January 13 th, 2018 Introduction CMS announced the voluntary Bundled Payment for Care Improvement (BPCI) Advanced program on Tuesday, Jan 9 th

More information

2016 Updates: MSSP Savings Estimates

2016 Updates: MSSP Savings Estimates 2016 Updates: MSSP Savings Estimates Program Financial Performance 2013-2016 Submitted to: National Association of ACOs Submitted by: Dobson DaVanzo Allen Dobson, Ph.D. Sarmistha Pal, Ph.D. Alex Hartzman,

More information

QUALITY PAYMENT PROGRAM YEAR 3 (2019) FINAL RULE OVERVIEW

QUALITY PAYMENT PROGRAM YEAR 3 (2019) FINAL RULE OVERVIEW QUALITY PAYMENT PROGRAM YEAR 3 (2019) FINAL RULE OVERVIEW NEAL LOGUE, HEALTH INSURANCE SPECIALIST, DIVISION OF FINANCIAL MANAGEMENT & FEE FOR SERVICE OPERATIONS DECEMBER 12, 2018 Disclaimers This presentation

More information

CMS Web Interface Data Submission Frequently Asked Questions

CMS Web Interface Data Submission Frequently Asked Questions CMS Web Interface Data Submission Frequently Asked Questions Quality Reporting for Performance Year 2018: Overview Activity ACOs and MIPS groups provide care to patients during the performance period Estimated*

More information

A unified payment system for post-acute care. Carol Carter September 25, 2017

A unified payment system for post-acute care. Carol Carter September 25, 2017 A unified payment system for post-acute care Carol Carter September 25, 2017 Concerns about post-acute care Overlap in the patients treated in SNFs, HHAs, IRFs, and LTCHs Separate payment systems can result

More information

TRICARE Operations Manual M, February 1, 2008 Claims Processing Procedures. Chapter 8 Section 6

TRICARE Operations Manual M, February 1, 2008 Claims Processing Procedures. Chapter 8 Section 6 Claims Processing Procedures Chapter 8 Section 6 1.0 GENERAL 1.1 Pursuant to National Defense Authorization Act for Fiscal Year 2007 (NDAA FY 2007), Section 731(b)(2) where services are covered by both

More information

Coverage Expansion [Sections 310, 323, 324, 341, 342, 343, 344, and 1701]

Coverage Expansion [Sections 310, 323, 324, 341, 342, 343, 344, and 1701] Summary of the U.S. House of Representatives Health Reform Bill October 2009 The following summarizes the major hospital and health system provisions included in the U.S. House of Representatives health

More information

Sent via electronic transmission to:

Sent via electronic transmission to: March 3, 2017 Patrick Conway, MD Acting Administrator Centers for Medicare and Medicaid Services US Department of Health and Human Services 200 Independence Avenue, SW Washington, DC 20201 Sent via electronic

More information

Health Information Technology and Management

Health Information Technology and Management Health Information Technology and Management CHAPTER 11 Health Statistics, Research, and Quality Improvement Pretest (True/False) Children s asthma care is an example of one of the core measure sets for

More information

TRICARE Operations Manual M, February 1, 2008 Claims Processing Procedures. Chapter 8 Section 6

TRICARE Operations Manual M, February 1, 2008 Claims Processing Procedures. Chapter 8 Section 6 Claims Processing Procedures Chapter 8 Section 6 1.0 GENERAL 1.1 Pursuant to National Defense Authorization Act for Fiscal Year 2007 (NDAA FY 2007), Section 731(b)(2) where services are covered by both

More information

FY 2018 DRG Updates. Under both the Medicare PPS and the TRICARE DRG-based payment system, cases are

FY 2018 DRG Updates. Under both the Medicare PPS and the TRICARE DRG-based payment system, cases are FY 2018 DRG Updates I. Medicare PPS Changes Which Affect the TRICARE DRG-Based Payment System Following is a discussion of the changes CMS has made to the Medicare PPS that affect the TRICARE DRG-based

More information

UB-92 BILLING INSTRUCTIONS

UB-92 BILLING INSTRUCTIONS UB-92 BILLING INSTRUCTIONS Locator # Description Instructions *1 Provider Name, Address, Telephone # Enter the name and address of the facility 2 Unlabeled Field (State) Leave blank 3 Patient Control No.

More information

MACRA: APPLICATIONS & IMPLICATIONS September 13, /13/2016. Mark Blessing, CPA, FHFMA Partner

MACRA: APPLICATIONS & IMPLICATIONS September 13, /13/2016. Mark Blessing, CPA, FHFMA Partner MACRA: APPLICATIONS & IMPLICATIONS September 13, 2016 Mark Blessing, CPA, FHFMA Partner mblessing@bkd.com Zach Remmich Managing Consultant zremmich@bkd.com 1 TO RECEIVE CPE CREDIT Participate in entire

More information

2019 ADVANCE NOTICE: CHANGES TO MEDICARE ADVANTAGE PAYMENT METHODOLOGY AND THE POTENTIAL EFFECT ON MEDICARE ADVANTAGE ORGANIZATIONS

2019 ADVANCE NOTICE: CHANGES TO MEDICARE ADVANTAGE PAYMENT METHODOLOGY AND THE POTENTIAL EFFECT ON MEDICARE ADVANTAGE ORGANIZATIONS February 6, 2014 GLENN GIESE FSA, MAAA KELLY BACKES FSA, MAAA 2019 ADVANCE NOTICE: CHANGES TO MEDICARE ADVANTAGE PAYMENT METHODOLOGY AND THE POTENTIAL EFFECT ON MEDICARE ADVANTAGE ORGANIZATIONS February

More information

CMS 1500 Claim Filing Instructions. 1 Not Required Type of health insurance coverage applicable to claim. Patient s type of coverage.

CMS 1500 Claim Filing Instructions. 1 Not Required Type of health insurance coverage applicable to claim. Patient s type of coverage. Field Locator Requirements CMS 1500 Claim Filing Instructions Field Description 1 Not Required Type of health insurance coverage to claim Patient s type of coverage. 1a Required Insured s ID Number Identification

More information

Quality Payment Program Year 3

Quality Payment Program Year 3 Quality Payment Program Year 3 Final Rule Overview The Medicare Access and CHIP Reauthorization Act of 2015 (MACRA) ended the Sustainable Growth Rate (SGR) formula for clinician payment, and established

More information

Medicare payment policy and its impact on program spending

Medicare payment policy and its impact on program spending Medicare payment policy and its impact on program spending James E. Mathews, Ph.D. Deputy Director, Medicare Payment Advisory Commission February 8, 2013 Outline of today s presentation Brief background

More information

hcrnews Risk Adjustment is a big part of the Affordable Care Act s provider RISK ADJUSTMENT and PREDICTIVE MODELING

hcrnews Risk Adjustment is a big part of the Affordable Care Act s provider RISK ADJUSTMENT and PREDICTIVE MODELING hcrnews provider New Rules, New Challenges, New Opportunities Provider HCR (health care reform) News is a monthly special edition publication for network providers from the Network Administration Division

More information

Review of Administrative and Registry Data on Eye Health

Review of Administrative and Registry Data on Eye Health Review of Administrative and Registry Data on Eye Health Vision & Eye Health Surveillance System DATE MARCH 26 2018 PRESENTED TO: Jinan Saaddine, Division of Diabetes Translation, Centers for Disease Control

More information

UB04 Billing Instructions for Hospital Services

UB04 Billing Instructions for Hospital Services UB04 Billing Instructions for Hospital Services Locator # Description Instructions Alerts 1 Provider Name, Address, Telephone # 2 Pay to Name/Address/ID Required. Enter the name and address of the facility

More information

Visual Services Administrative Rulebook. Chapter 410, Division 140. Effective March 1, Health Systems Division Integrated Health Programs

Visual Services Administrative Rulebook. Chapter 410, Division 140. Effective March 1, Health Systems Division Integrated Health Programs Visual Services Administrative Rulebook Health Systems Division Integrated Health Programs Table of Contents Chapter 410, Division 140 Effective March 1, 2016 410-140-0020 Service Delivery... 1 410-140-0040

More information