Table 4.A: PGCPS Central Support Team Level of Implementation for Table 4.A: Not Met

Size: px
Start display at page:

Download "Table 4.A: PGCPS Central Support Team Level of Implementation for Table 4.A: Not Met"

Transcription

1 Title I School Improvement Grant (SIG), section 1003(g) MSDE SIG Monitoring Teams Second Onsite Visit Feedback for Prince George s County Public Schools (PGCPS), Drew Freeman, G. James Gholson, Benjamin Stoddert, and Thurgood Marshall Middle Schools MSDE Onsite Monitoring Dates: February 2011 Title I School Improvement Grant (SIG): The School Improvement Grant (SIG) Program, authorized under section 1003(g) of Title I of the Elementary and Secondary Act of 1965, provides funding through State educational agencies (SEAs) to local educational agencies (LEAs) with the lowest-achieving schools that have the greatest need for the funds and demonstrate the strongest commitment to use the funds to raise significantly the achievement of students. The United States Department of Education (USDE) views the large infusion of Federal funds into the SIG program through the American Recovery and Reinvestment Act of 2009 (ARRA) as a historic opportunity to address one of the most intractable challenges for America s education system: turning around or closing down our Nation s persistently lowest-achieving schools. Purpose of the SIG Monitoring Teams Second Onsite Visit: As approved by USED, MSDE, through SIG Monitoring Teams, will conduct three onsite monitoring visits annually in each LEA that receives a school improvement grant to ensure that the LEA is implementing its intervention model fully and effectively in Maryland s Tier I and Tier II schools. The purpose of the SIG Teams second onsite visit is to review documentation that substantiates the LEA s implementation, both programmatic and fiscal, of its SIG Grant, as approved by MSDE. Once all documentation provided by the LEA has been reviewed, SIG Monitoring Teams will determine a level of implementation for each section/component/strategy/action that consists of being MET, PARTIALLY MET, or NOT MET. For areas that are MET in this feedback, MSDE will continue to monitor sustainability of the level of implementation. Based on the SIG Teams Onsite Visit Feedback, MSDE expects the LEA to review and analyze the feedback and make adjustments to its approved SIG application through the system s internal controls and submission of programmatic and fiscal amendments to MSDE. Table Organization of SIG Teams Second Onsite Visit Feedback Table 1 Section 4: LEA Commitments and Capacity Table 2 Levels of Implementation At -a -Glance for SIG Schools Table 3 Section 2: Drew Freeman Middle School, Tier II Table 4 Section 2: G. James Gholson Middle School, Tier II Table 5 Section 2: Benjamin Stoddert Middle School, Tier II Table 6 Section 2: Thurgood Marshall Middle School, Tier II Table 7 Section 5: SIG Consolidated Budget Table 8 Section 5: SIG LEA Budget Table 9 Section 5: SIG School Budget for Drew Freeman Middle School Table 10 Section 5: SIG School Budget for G. James Gholson Middle School Table 11 Section 5: SIG School Budget for Benjamin Stoddert Middle School Table 12 Section 5: SIG School Budget for Thurgood Marshall Middle School Division of Student, Family and School Support Page 1

2 TABLE 1: Section 4 LEA Commitments and Capacity by Prince George s County Public Schools MSDE SIG Monitoring Team Members: Jim Newkirk and Geri Taylor Lawrence Monitoring Date: February 23, 2011 Table 4.A: PGCPS Central Support Team Level of Implementation for Table 4.A: Not Met PGCPS Presented Evidence: As part of PGCPS SIG Application, Table 4.A identifies the names of its 1003(g) Central Support Team Members, Titles, Responsibilities, Tier II School Assignments, and Estimate Time Each Will Devote to Supporting Tier II Schools. PGCPS SIG Application was approved by MSDE on July 1, Since that approval, PGCPS made changes to its 1003(g) Central Support Team Members. PGCPS has implemented a SIG Turnaround Executive Committee that will perform the duties and responsibilities of the Central Support Team. MSDE informed PGCPS that Section 4: LEA Capacity and Commitment requires a SIG amendment as programmatic change. a. How often will the LEA 1003(g) central support team meet? Level of Implementation: PGCPS Presented Evidence: The central support team did not meet bi-weekly; however, the central support team has met once a month to discuss SIG. All individuals that are identified as of PGCPS Central Support Team did not meet as a total group. However, PGCPS has implemented a SIG Turnaround Executive Committee that will perform the duties and responsibilities of the Central Support Team. PGCPS is aware that this programmatic change requires a SIG amendment. PGCPS provided Turnaround Executive Committee Meeting Agendas from August-January. MSDE noted all agendas did not have sign-in sheets. PGCPS provided agendas that combined Turnaround Executive Committee with the MSDE Breakthrough Center meetings. At these meetings PGCPS turnaround schools were discussed. In the meeting notes for the SIG Turnaround Executive Committee, PGCPS outlined pressing issues (school hiring for next year, incentives, school and culture and climate, families in crisis, alternative placement for overage students, professional development) and identified required responses to the issues in the summary notes. b. How often will they report on their work and the work on Tier I, II and III schools to the Superintendent? Level of Implementation: Met PGCPS Presented Evidence: The Turnaround Director is part of the Central Support Team (Turnaround Executive Committee). At that time the Turnaround Director provided SIG updates to the team. PGCPS provided documentation of these monthly meetings. PGCPS provided documentation that the Deputy Superintendent attended January 2011 meeting as the Superintendent s designee. PGCPS provided documentation that the Deputy Superintendent met with the Turnaround Director in November 29, 2010 to discuss SIG Turnaround Support. Deputy Superintendent shared SIG information with Superintendent Hite. This documentation was not provided. PGCPS informed MSDE that Superintendent Hite has visited each of the 4 SIG schools twice during this current school year and met with the Division of Student, Family and School Support Page 2

3 principals. There was no documentation provided to substantiate this communication. In its SIG infrastructure, PGCPS convened SIG Steering Committee with members from major system departments that support each school. This group is led by the Turnaround Director. PGCPS provided documentation on their work from September through January. PGCPS provided its Turnaround Support Pyramid to guide their work when supporting each SIG school. PGCPS provided a newly developed Turnaround Framework Model (that is taken from the Maryland Instructional Leadership Framework and the Maryland Restructuring Implementation Technical Assistance Standards and Indicators). This model has become operational within the last month. This model addresses current needs for the SIG Schools, as well as planning and addressing those district and school needs for next school year. Inclusive with this model, PGCPS provided logic model documentation that included inputs, activities, short term outcomes, and long term outcomes to guide SIG implementation. c. How often will they report on their work and the work on Tier I, II and III schools Level of Implementation: Not Met to the Board of Education? PGCPS Presented Evidence: At this time, PGCPS has not presented to its Board of Education on the progress of its Tier II schools. PGCPS provided documentation that a 20 minute board presentation by the Turnaround Director is scheduled for March 10, PGCPS provided documentation of the Turnaround Director s powerpoint presentation that will be used by the Turnaround Director for his March 2011 presentation. d. Has the LEA 1003(g) central support team met prior to the submission of the grant Level of Implementation: Met application to review the individual school descriptions and to discuss how it will coordinate and manage the support, monitoring and assessment outlined in those plans? PGCPS Presented Evidence: PGCPS provided documentation that included MSDE s feedbacks to PGCPS first and second drafts of its SIG Application. In the feedback, PGCPS provided written documentation that addressed each MSDE Overarching Issue outlined in the feedback. PGCPS provided s from the Central Support Team respective departments that addressed issues in order to have its SIG Grant approved by MSDE. PGCPS requested technical assistance meetings by MSDE SIG Leads that focused on programmatic and fiscal issues. PGCPS provided agendas and sign-in sheets for those technical assistance meetings prior to PGCPS SIG Application that was approved by MSDE on July 1, PGCPS provided documentation of draft SIG Job Descriptions and Job Postings for the following: Turnaround Director; Turnaround Principal; Interdisciplinary Lead Teacher; Administrative Secretary Supervisor; and Academic Dean. PGCPS provided documentation that was entitled (g) Grant Proposal: Staffing Implications and Human Resource Processes. In the document, it outlined Principals Commitment, Area Office Commitments, Human Resources Commitment, Teacher Criteria, and Incentives. The documentation included a process timeline with person responsible. Division of Student, Family and School Support Page 3

4 e. What role has or will the LEA 1003(g) central support team play in the creation of annual Level of Implementation: Met goals for student achievement and annual review/assessment of progress based on these goals described in sections 2 and 3 of this proposal? PGCPS Presented Evidence: PGCPS provided documentation that how the system addressed the annual goals for student achievement prior to its SIG application approval. PGCPS provided documentation of the annual review/assessment of student progress that aligns to the specific goals. In that documentation, PGCPS shared benchmark targets for each quarter, specifically first and second quarter. The Chief Academic Officer shared this information with Cabinet Executives, SIG Turnaround Executive Committee, and Turnaround Principals. The documentation is part of the system s Performance, Management, and Planning Process (PMAPP). The dates this information was shared with the SIG schools are Feb. 15 (Drew Freeman); Feb. 18 (Benjamin Stoddert); Feb. 17 (Thurgood Marshall); and Feb. 17 (G. James Gholson). PGCPS provided documentation that specific benchmark targets were shared November 9, 2010 for the entire school year. f. What steps will the LEA take to ensure that the school improvement funds are utilized Level of Implementation: (1) in a timely way and (2) effectively and efficiently to support the required components of the selected intervention? Specifically, what assurances will the LEA make that schools and LEA support teams have access to these funds, even during annual rollover processes? How will the LEA support principals timely and effective use of these funds? PGCPS Presented Evidence: PGCPS provided documentation that the Turnaround Director provides leadership in the implementation of SIG Grant Funds, ensuring that all funds align with the goals and activities for each school. PGCPS has a procurement process for the Turnaround Office and Turnaround Schools to approve, purchase, and receive materials and services that align with PGCPS approved SIG application. PGCPS has hired an administrative budget specialist in the Turnaround Office to ensure fiscal accountability. PGCPS provided documentation that the budget specialist is responsible for 5 out of the 6 designated responsibilities that are listed above. The LEA made the decision not to have this specialist to conduct school-level audits on spending and share findings with turnaround principal because all expenditures are processed by the budget specialist in the Turnaround Office. PGCPS provided documentation of monthly spend down meetings from October through January, excluding the month of December. Attendees include representatives from Title I, Turnaround Office, and the Office of Finance and Budget. g. Within this proposal, the LEA identified actions taken or in the planning to support Level of Implementation: individual Tier I and Tier II schools implementation of the selected interventions. Looking across the commitments made for the schools, and considering as well the strategies selected by the LEA for identified Tier III schools, what additional actions will the LEA take to ensure that the selected interventions are implemented as designed and to make the other changes such as: (1) realignment of other resources; (2) removal of expectations that might run counter to the approach outlined in the selected intervention; (3) timely modification of practices and policies (those anticipated ahead of time and those that will emerge during implementation); and (4) engaging in reflective and sustained, collaborative conversation and planning to ensure that improvement efforts can be sustained once this funding ends? Division of Student, Family and School Support Page 4

5 PGCPS Presented Evidence: PGCPS provided documentation that included the following: Turnaround Director s September 7, 2010 memorandum to Deputy Superintendent and Chief Academic Officer, outlining policies and practice changes for SIG during school year. Agenda and Sign-in for October 22, 2010, November 13, 2010, and December 6, 2010 meetings between Turnaround Director and Human Resources in preparation for SIG staffing for the school year. Agenda and Sign-in for November 19, 2010 meeting between Turnaround Director and a represented from the Prince George s County Educator Association (PGCEA) on teacher incentives and early notification discussion. Agenda and Sign-in for October 1, 2010 meeting between Chief Academic Officer, Employee and Labor Relations Director, PGCEA, ASASP, and the Turnaround Director to discuss extended day, incentive criteria for Turnaround Teacher, FIRST Participation, Three-Year Commitment, Staffing and Memorandum of Understanding for all groups at this meeting. Recruitment Posting entitled Teach in a TurnAround School. February 12, Teacher Career Fair at G. James Gholson Middle School. Contract between Mid-Atlantic Equity Consortium, Inc. (MAEC) and PGCPS. August Academy for students did not occur. The increase by 90 minutes to the school day did not occur. PGCPS decided to implement and Extending Learning Opportunity (ELO) for its SIG schools. The length of the ELO is 90 minutes for 4 days per week. PGCPS provided documentation that 2 of its SIG schools began in December 2010, and the remaining 2 SIG schools began January This programmatic change was included in PGCPS November 30, 2010 amendment that was approved by MSDE. This change must be included in Section 4: LEA Capacity and Commitment. PGCPS provided documentation of LEA coordination meetings with stakeholders from various departments within the school system. This documentation substantiated collaborative conversation to plan, modify, and improve the activities funded under this grant. PGCPS provided no documentation that included parent and community groups representing each school to explore strategies for success and sustainability of improvements once funding ends. PGCPS informed this documentation may have been provided at the school level when MSDE SIG Monitoring Teams conducted its 2 nd Onsite Monitoring February 1-10, MSDE reviewed the SIG Monitoring Teams preliminary reports for the 4 SIG Tier II Middle Schools and found: G. James Gholson Middle School: No documentation to support community engagement partnerships and no documentation to support strategies to increase parent engagement. It mentioned there is proposal in process to work with an outside organization to support this requirement. Drew Freeman Middle School: No documentation provided to support strategies to increase parent engagement. The school is in conversation with Suitland Family; Life Development Corporation and Promise Neighborhood; and another provider to support this requirement for next school year. Benjamin Stoddert Middle School: There is no evidence that a brochure has been developed detailing available school and community resources and services. There is no documentation to support on-going professional development with staff members regarding team building, whole-child development, behavior management, and effective parent/family/community engagement. Documents provided regarding partnership initiatives but no evidence that the partnerships have been formed. No document provided to support strategies to increase parent engagement. The school is in conversation with Maryland PIRC to support Family Engagement at Benjamin Stoddert. Thurgood Marshall Middle School: No document provided to support strategies to increase parent engagement. The school is in conversation with Maryland PIRC to support Family Engagement at Thurgood Marshall. Division of Student, Family and School Support Page 5

6 h. What are the major challenges to full and effective implementation of all components Level of Implementation: Met of the SIG grant that the LEA 1003 (g) central support team has identified and how will the team address these challenges in the early phases of the work? PGCPS Presented Evidence: PGCPS provided meeting notes from September 2010 through February 2011 of the Turnaround Executive Committee that outlined specific challenges to the implementation of the first year of its SIG grant at its 4 Tier II schools. Those major challenges included: Staffing: late start in hiring teachers Negotiations with Education Associations School Culture and Climate Limited District Turnaround Office Staff Division of Student, Family and School Support Page 6

7 TABLE 2: Levels of Implementation At a Glance on the Requirements for the Turnaround Intervention Model in PGCPS Tier II SIG Schools 1Replace the principal and grant the principal sufficient operational flexibility 2 Screen all existing staff and rehire no more than 50 percent; and select new staff 3 Implement such strategies as financial incentives, increased opportunities for promotion and career growth 4 Provide staff with ongoing, high quality, jobembedded professional development that is aligned with the school s comprehensive instructional program Drew Freeman Middle School Requirement Level of Implementation M-Met PM NM Not Met G. James Gholson Middle School Requirement Level of Implementation M-Met PM NM Not Met Benjamin Stoddert Middle School Requirement Level of Implementation M-Met PM NM Not Met Thurgood Marshall Middle School Requirement Level of Implementation M-Met PM NM Not Met PM PM PM PM PM M PM PM PM M PM PM M M PM M 5 Adopt a new governance structure PM PM PM PM PM PM M PM 6 Use data to identify and implement an instructional program that is research based and vertically aligned 7 Promote the continuous use of student data (such as from formative, interim, and summative assessments) to inform and differentiate instruction 8 Establish schedules and implement strategies that provide increased learning time 9 Provide appropriate social emotional and community oriented services and supports for students PM PM PM PM PM PM PM PM PM NM NM PM Division of Student, Family and School Support Page 7

8 TABLE 3: Drew Freeman Middle School, Tier II LEA: Prince George s County Public Schools MSDE SIG Monitoring Team: Carol Crouse, Kristine Angelis, Teresa Knott, Sally Dorman, Rhona Fisher Monitoring Dates: February 3-4, 2011 Division of Student, Family and School Support Page 8 Overall Level of Implementation: Comp # Description Requirement Level of Implementation Replace the principal and grant the principal sufficient 1 operational flexibility (including in staffing, calendars/time, and budgeting) to implement fully a comprehensive approach in order to substantially improve student achievement outcomes and increase high school graduation rates Use locally adopted competencies to measure the 2 effectiveness of staff who can work within the turnaround environment to meet the needs of students (A) Screen all existing staff and rehire no more than 50 percent; and (B) Select new staff Implement such strategies as financial incentives, increased opportunities for promotion and career growth, and more flexible work conditions that are designed to recruit, place, and retain staff with the skills necessary to meet the needs of the students in the turnaround school Provide staff with ongoing, high-quality, job-embedded professional development that is aligned with the school s comprehensive instructional program and designed with school staff to ensure that they are equipped to facilitate effective teaching and learning and have the capacity to successfully implement school reform strategies Adopt a new governance structure, which may include, but is not limited to, requiring the school to report to a new turnaround office in the LEA or SEA, hire a Met Insufficient Evidence by Component and Action Item 1.c-e: Provide evidence of the interview panel, the selection committee, and the recommendations for the Turnaround principal position. 1.2.a: Human Resources provided a roster of positions but no names were provided and we could not cross-walk the information for accuracy. 2.1.d: Provide evidence of individual teacher three year commitment to work at Drew Freeman. --Turnaround Director reports that it did not happen this year. The new Offer Letter will not include a three year commitment but will have conditions that teachers must satisfy in order to work in a Turnaround School. A Program Amendment will be forthcoming. 3.2.c.iv: Provide an explanation of why the decision was made to reduce the number of Instructional Learning Teachers (ILTs) from four, as stated in the grant, to two as presented on the school organization chart. --Turnaround Director indicated that the 0riginal grant language stated four ILTs but this was an error. It should have stated that schools will have two ILTs and have the flexibility of hiring two additional ILTs, as desired. Program Amendment is forthcoming. 3.3: Provide documentation of a succession plan for Academic Deans and ILTs. Dr. Ryan will provide a written explanation as to where the school/lea is in this process. 5.2.b: Performance Planning Conferences are occurring quarterly and not monthly as per the plan. Turnaround Director reports that a program amendment is forthcoming.

9 turnaround leader who reports directly to the Superintendent or Chief Academic Officer, or enter into a multi-year contract with the LEA or SEA to obtain added flexibility in exchange for greater accountability Use data to identify and implement an instructional program that is research-based and vertically aligned from one grade to the next as well as aligned with State academic standards Promote the continuous use of student data (such as from formative, interim, and summative assessments) to inform and differentiate instruction in order to meet the academic needs of individual students Establish schedules and implement strategies that provide increased learning time Provide appropriate social-emotional and communityoriented services and supports for students 5.2.c-d: Detailed documentation as to the discussions held to support regular and ongoing Turnaround Director mentoring and coaching feedback to principals/ teachers was not provided. 5.2.f: Teacher evaluations have not yet occurred as per the FIRST timeline. 6.1.e: A Comprehensive Tool Kit Planning session was to occur in January. However, the contract was halted for this year and will be revisited for the future. The event was cancelled. -- Turnaround Director reports that a program amendment is forthcoming. 7.1.e: Documentation of a flex schedule for teachers was missing. Turnaround Director reports that a program amendment is forthcoming. 7.2: See comment on a-g: Aside from two teachers (ESOL and Sp. Ed.) attending an LEA training on Special Education and General Education, no other evidence was provided to support the implementation of this Requirement. 8.1.d: The Independent Reading Book Club is not a part of the extended learning opportunities. Turnaround Director reports that a program amendment is forthcoming. 8.4.a-c: The August Academy for 6 th /7 th grade did not take place during the summer of 2010 as reported in the grant. Turnaround Director reports that a program amendment is forthcoming. 8.5: Increased learning time for teachers is not occurring. Turnaround Director reports that a program amendment is forthcoming. 9.2.a: A baseline (buy-in) PBIS staff survey was not completed. A Statement of Intent was not provided. Turnaround Director reports that a program amendment is forthcoming Provide additional documentation (i.e. sign-in sheets, outcome and effectiveness information) to support the biweekly management and accountability meetings to analyze relevant student data. 9.9: No documentation provided to support strategies to increase parent engagement. -- The school is in conversation with Suitland Family and Life Development Corp. Promise Neighborhood and with another provider to support this requirement for next year. Division of Student, Family and School Support Page 9

10 TABLE 4: G. James Gholson Middle School, Tier II LEA: Prince George s County Public Schools MSDE SIG Monitoring Team: Carol Crouse, Kristine Angelis, Teresa Knott, Sally Dorman, Rhona Fisher Monitoring Dates: February 1-2, 2011 Division of Student, Family and School Support Page 10 Overall Level of Implementation: Comp # Description Requirement Level of Implementation Replace the principal and grant the principal sufficient 1 operational flexibility (including in staffing, calendars/time, and budgeting) to implement fully a comprehensive approach in order to substantially improve student achievement outcomes and increase high school graduation rates Use locally adopted competencies to measure the effectiveness of staff who can work within the turnaround environment to meet the needs of students (A) Screen all existing staff and rehire no more than 50 percent; and (B) Select new staff Implement such strategies as financial incentives, increased opportunities for promotion and career growth, and more flexible work conditions that are designed to recruit, place, and retain staff with the skills necessary to meet the needs of the students in the turnaround school Provide staff with ongoing, high-quality, job-embedded professional development that is aligned with the school s comprehensive instructional program and designed with school staff to ensure that they are equipped to facilitate effective teaching and learning and have the capacity to successfully implement school reform strategies Adopt a new governance structure, which may include, but is not limited to, requiring the school to report to a new turnaround office in the LEA or SEA, hire a turnaround leader who reports directly to the Superintendent or Chief Academic Officer, or enter into a multi-year contract with the LEA or SEA to obtain added flexibility in exchange for greater accountability Met Met Met Insufficient Evidence by Component and Action Item 1.c-e: LEA principal hiring documentation not available at the school. Turnaround Director reported that it is possibly housed in Human Resources at Central Office. 1.2.a. Staff roster for school year was missing that would have demonstrated the reported 68% staff change. Human Resources provided a roster of positions which we were unable to compare it since there were no names attached. 5.2.b: Performance Planning Conferences are occurring quarterly and not monthly as per the plan. Turnaround Director reports that program amendment is forthcoming. --Documentation for the Performance Planning Conference on November 17, 2010 lacked participant sign-in sheets. 5.2.c-d: Detailed documentation as to the discussions held to support regular and ongoing mentoring and coaching feedback to principals/teachers was missing. 5.2.e: All attendees must sign-in marking their attendance at Leadership Team meetings.

11 Use data to identify and implement an instructional program that is research-based and vertically aligned from one grade to the next as well as aligned with State academic standards Promote the continuous use of student data (such as from formative, interim, and summative assessments) to inform and differentiate instruction in order to meet the academic needs of individual students Establish schedules and implement strategies that provide increased learning time Provide appropriate social-emotional and communityoriented services and supports for students 5.2.f: Teacher evaluations have not yet occurred as per the FIRST timeline. 6.1.e: Comprehensive Tool Kit Planning session was to occur in January. However, the contract was halted and the event was cancelled. Turnaround Director reports that a program amendment is forthcoming. 6.3.a-f: AVID is not being implemented at this school. Turnaround Director reports that a program amendment is forthcoming. 7.1.d: Detailed student running records (September through December 2010) documenting the use of the Comprehensive Tool Kit were missing. 7.1.e: Documentation of a flex schedule for teachers was missing. Turnaround Director reports that a program amendment is forthcoming. 7.2: See comment on a-g: There are no ESOL students. Turnaround Director reports that a program amendment is forthcoming. 8.1.d: The Independent Reading Book Club is not a part of the extended learning opportunities. Turnaround Director reports that a program amendment is forthcoming. 8.4.a-c: The August Academy for 6 th /7 th grade did not take place during the summer of 2010 as reported in the grant. Turnaround Director reports that a program amendment is forthcoming. 8.5: Increased learning time for teachers is not occurring. Turnaround Director reports that a program amendment is forthcoming. 9.2.a: The 2010 PBIS Summer Institute was not attended by school personnel. Turnaround Director reports that a program amendment is forthcoming. 9.2.b: No documentation of the Statement of Intent and completion of Staff Survey was available. Turnaround Director reports that a program amendment is forthcoming. 9.7 & 8: No documentation to support the bi-weekly management and accountability meetings. 9.9: No documentation to support community engagement partnerships b-k: No documentation to support strategies to increase parent engagement. Proposal in process to work with an outside organization to support these requirements. Division of Student, Family and School Support Page 11

12 TABLE 5: Benjamin Stoddert Middle School, Tier II LEA: Prince George s County Public Schools MSDE SIG Monitoring Team: William Cohee, Robert Murphy, Young-chan Han, Scottie Griffin Monitoring Dates: February 7-8, 2011 Overall Level of Implementation: Comp # Description Requirement Level of Implementation Replace the principal and grant the principal sufficient 1 operational flexibility (including in staffing, calendars/time, and budgeting) to implement fully a comprehensive approach in order to substantially improve student achievement outcomes and increase high school graduation rates Use locally adopted competencies to measure the effectiveness of staff who can work within the turnaround environment to meet the needs of students (A) Screen all existing staff and rehire no more than 50 percent; and (B) Select new staff Implement such strategies as financial incentives, increased opportunities for promotion and career growth, and more flexible work conditions that are designed to recruit, place, and retain staff with the skills necessary to meet the needs of the students in the turnaround school Provide staff with ongoing, high-quality, job-embedded professional development that is aligned with the school s comprehensive instructional program and designed with school staff to ensure that they are equipped to facilitate effective teaching and learning and have the capacity to successfully implement school reform strategies Insufficient Evidence by Component and Action Item 1.b: There is no evidence that principal position was advertised beyond district s website. 1.c-e: There is no evidence of the interview panel, the selection committee, and the recommendations for the Turnaround principal position. 3a: Flowchart provided by the Turnaround department does not include the budget specialist/admin. assistant. 2.1.c: Evidence of teacher impact on student achievement as required when interviewing new staff. Please provide. 2.1.d: Provide evidence of individual teacher three year commitment to work at Benjamin Stoddert. --Turnaround Director reports that it did not happen this year. The new Offer Letter will not include a three year commitment but will have conditions that teachers must satisfy in order to work in a Turnaround School. A Program Amendment will be forthcoming. (via dated February 7, 2011) 3.2.c.iv: Provide an explanation of why the decision was made to reduce the number of ILTs from four to two, as stated in the final approved SIG plan. 3.4: Provide documentation of a succession plan for Academic Deans and ILTs. Dr. Ryan will provide a written explanation as to where the school/lea is in this process. (information from Team 5) 4.1.a: Signatures for original sign-in sheet (Mathematics Collaborative Planning, November 3, 10, 17, and December 8 th ) for teacher professional development-math collaborative planning-are identical/duplicate. 4.1.b.iv: There is no evidence that the Academic Deans met with MSDE staff at Breakthrough Center to establish protocols for collaborative planning. 4.1.c: There is no evidence to support an assistant principal s position designated for school operations and management. Division of Student, Family and School Support Page 12

13 Adopt a new governance structure, which may include, but is not limited to, requiring the school to report to a new turnaround office in the LEA or SEA, hire a turnaround leader who reports directly to the Superintendent or Chief Academic Officer, or enter into a multi-year contract with the LEA or SEA to obtain added flexibility in exchange for greater accountability Use data to identify and implement an instructional program that is research-based and vertically aligned from one grade to the next as well as aligned with State academic standards Promote the continuous use of student data (such as from formative, interim, and summative assessments) to inform and differentiate instruction in order to meet the academic needs of individual students Establish schedules and implement strategies that provide increased learning time Met 5.2.: Lack of documentation showing direct assistance provided to schools by Turnaround Director. 5.2.a: There is no evidence that the Turnaround Director is providing specific assistance to principals regarding completing the clinical observation cycle or supporting school leadership office. 5.2.b: There is no documentation indicating that Turnaround Director is in the process of conducting a performance planning conference per month. 5.2.c: There is no evidence of regular and ongoing feedback to principals and teachers regarding formative evaluation. 5.2.d: There is no documentation indicating that the Turnaround Director is providing mentoring and coaching to principal and teachers. 5.2.e: Though listed on the calendar (Nov. 5, 2010), there is no documentation (agenda/sign-in sheet) suggesting that the Turnaround Director is conducting leadership team meetings. 5.2.f: There is no evidence to show that teachers are being evaluated and provided meaningful feedback on their work. 5.3a: There is no evidence of new professional programs for Principals and APs. (Only referenced in Turnaround Director s schedule) 5.3.b: No documentation of the development and design of a teacher-leader program focused on specified area. 6.1.e: A Comprehensive Tool Kit Planning session was to occur in January. However, the contract was halted for this year and will be revisited for the future. The event was cancelled. Turnaround Director reports that a program amendment is forthcoming. (from Team 5) 7.1.d: Detailed student running records (September through December 2010) documenting student progress and the use of the Comprehensive Tool Kit were not provided. (from Team 5) 7.1.e: Documentation of a flex schedule for teachers was missing. Turnaround Director reports that a program amendment is forthcoming. (from team 5) 7.1.f: No documentation of formative data being discussed monthly during the Principal/Turnaround Director was provided. (from team 5) 7.2: There is no documentation of criteria for TAG. 8.4.a-c: The August Academy for 6 th /7 th grade did not take place during the summer of 2010 as reported in the grant. Turnaround Director reports that a program amendment is Division of Student, Family and School Support Page 13

14 9 Provide appropriate social-emotional and communityoriented services and supports for students Not Met forthcoming. (from team 5) 9.1: Documentation does not exist to support monthly parent meetings and training sessions in specified areas (one attendance meeting for teachers held on September 7, 2010 without sign-in sheet is provided) 9.1.a: No documentation that the Turnaround Director is monitoring the social-emotional support provided to students and families in Benjamin Stoddert. 9.2.a: There is no documentation indicating that the school team attended the two-day PBIS summer institute in : While social worker position is listed on staff roster, there is no evidence that a full-time social worker was hired. 9.4: There is no evidence that a brochure has been developed detailing available school and community resources and services. 9.5: There is no documentation to support on-going professional development with staff members regarding team building, whole-child development, behavior management, and effective parent/family/community engagement. 9.6: There is no documentation to support the bi-weekly management and accountability meetings to analyze relevant student data. 9.7: No documentation provided to support collaboration between school s management team and the LEA. 9.8: Documents provided regarding partnership initiatives no evidence that the partnerships have been formed. 9.9 a-h: No documentation provided to support strategies to increase parent engagement. The school is in conversation with Maryland PIRC to support Family Engagement at Benjamin Stoddert. Division of Student, Family and School Support Page 14

15 TABLE 6: Thurgood Marshall Middle School, Tier II LEA: Prince George s County Public Schools MSDE SIG Monitoring Team: William Cohee, Robert Murphy, Young-chan Han, Scottie Griffin Monitoring Dates: February 7-8, 2011 Division of Student, Family and School Support Page 15 Overall Level of Implementation: Comp # Description Requirement Level of Implementation Replace the principal and grant the principal sufficient 1 operational flexibility (including in staffing, calendars/time, and budgeting) to implement fully a comprehensive approach in order to substantially improve student achievement outcomes and increase high school graduation rates Use locally adopted competencies to measure the effectiveness of staff who can work within the turnaround environment to meet the needs of students (A) Screen all existing staff and rehire no more than 50 percent; and (B) Select new staff Implement such strategies as financial incentives, increased opportunities for promotion and career growth, and more flexible work conditions that are designed to recruit, place, and retain staff with the skills necessary to meet the needs of the students in the turnaround school Provide staff with ongoing, high-quality, job-embedded professional development that is aligned with the school s comprehensive instructional program and designed with school staff to ensure that they are equipped to facilitate effective teaching and learning and have the capacity to successfully implement school reform strategies Adopt a new governance structure, which may include, but is not limited to, requiring the school to report to a new turnaround office in the LEA or SEA, hire a turnaround leader who reports directly to the Superintendent or Chief Academic Officer, or enter into a multi-year contract with the LEA or SEA to obtain Met Insufficient Evidence by Component and Action Item 1.b: There is no evidence that principal position was advertised beyond district s website. 1.c-e: There is no evidence of the interview panel, the selection committee, and the recommendations for the Turnaround principal position. 3.a: Flowchart provided by the Turnaround department does not include the budget specialist/admin. assistant. 2.1.c: Evidence of teacher impact on student achievement as required when interviewing new staff. Please provide. 2.1.d: There is no evidence of individual teacher three year commitment to work at Thurgood Marshall. --Turnaround Director reports that it did not happen this year. The new Offer Letter will not include a three year commitment but will have conditions that teachers must satisfy in order to work in a Turnaround School. A Program Amendment will be forthcoming. (via dated February 7, 2011) 1.i: (PM) There is a list of participating staff noted (no evidence of teacher agreement). 1.a.iv.:(NM) There is no evidence of teachers being given opportunities for leadership projects. 2.: (PM) There was documentation showing that hiring bonus was received by administrators, but not for classroom teachers. 5.2.a: Lack of documentation showing direct assistance provided to schools by Director of Turnaround schools. 5.2.a-f: There is no evidence that the Turnaround Director is providing specific assistance to principals regarding completing the clinical observation cycle or supporting school leadership office.

16 added flexibility in exchange for greater accountability Use data to identify and implement an instructional program that is research-based and vertically aligned from one grade to the next as well as aligned with State academic standards Promote the continuous use of student data (such as from formative, interim, and summative assessments) to inform and differentiate instruction in order to meet the academic needs of individual students Establish schedules and implement strategies that provide increased learning time Provide appropriate social-emotional and communityoriented services and supports for students 5.3a: There is no evidence of new professional programs for Principals and APs. (Only referenced in Turnaround Director s schedule) 5.3.b: No documentation of the development and design of a teacher-leader program focused on specified area. 5.4: There is no evidence that PGCPS created multidisciplinary that meets with the school monthly. (There is evidence that individual LEA leadership team members do drop-ins and walk-throughs.) 6.3.a-f: There is no evidence of AVID training, AVID team staff meetings, or AVID coordinator at TMMS. 7.3.f: There is no evidence that the ESOL teacher collaborate with the content area teachers to design appropriate support for instruction. 7.3.g.: There is no evidence that teachers of ESOL participated in collaborative planning with general education teachers and also participated in systemic development around teaching and co-teaching. 8.4.a-c: The August Academy for 6 th /7 th grade did not take place during the summer of 2010 as reported in the grant. Turnaround Director reports that a program amendment is forthcoming. (from team 5) 9.1.a: No documentation that the Turnaround Director is monitoring the social-emotional support provided to students and families in Thurgood Marshall MS. 9.2.a: There is no documentation indicating that the school team attended the two-day PBIS summer institute in : No documentation provided to support collaboration between school s management team and the LEA. 9.8: Documents provided regarding partnership initiatives no evidence that the partnerships have been formed. 9.9 a-h: The school is currently consulting with Maryland PIRC to discuss possible partnership initiatives for supporting Family Engagement at Thurgood Marshall MS. Division of Student, Family and School Support Page 16

17 TABLE 7 Section 5: SIG Consolidated Budget LEA: Prince George s County Public Schools MSDE Reviewers: Geri Taylor Lawrence, Jim Newkirk Monitoring Date: February 23, 2011 Level of Implementation: NOT MET SIG 1003(g) ARRA SIG 1003(g) Title I, Part A Total Allocation $5,200,473 Total Allocation $1,013,314 Amount Spent $1,495,984 Amount Spent 0 Percent Spent 31% Percent Spent 0 Amount Encumbered $98,842 Amount Encumbered 0 Spend Down Data as of : February 22, 2011 Spend Down Data as of : February 22, 2011 Division of Student, Family and School Support Page 17

18 TABLE 8 Section 5: SIG LEA Budget LEA: Prince George s County Public Schools MSDE Reviewers: Geri Taylor Lawrence, Jim Newkirk Monitoring Date: February 23, 2011 Level of Implementation: NOT MET Total SIG LEA Allocation: $1,478,223 LEA Budget Spent: $452,804 Percent of LEA Budget Spent: 36% Spend Down Data as of: February 22, 2011 Salaries & Wages Contractual Services Supplies & Materials Other Budgeted: $549,806 Budgeted: $521,359 Budgeted: $9,000 Budgeted: Travel: $19,710 Equipment: $6,892 Encumbered: 0 Encumbered: 79,344 Encumbered: $454 Encumbered: Travel: $543 Equipment: 0 Spent: Travel $7,129 (39%) Equipment $4,073 (59%) Spent (amount): $198,824 Spent (amount): $210,622 Spent (amount): $4,612 Spent (%): 36% Spent (%): 56% Spent (%): 56% 1. How much of the LEA SIG 1003(g) ARRA budget, based on your system s approved application, has been expended to date (amount and percent)? PGCPS provided documentation that indicated that the LEA has spent $452,804. This amount is 36% of the LEA SIG budget. An additional amount of $84,414 has been encumbered. 2. How much of the LEA SIG 1003(g) Title I Part A, budget has been expended to date (amount and %)? PGCPS provided documentation that showed that no funds have been spent out of the SIG Title I, Part A budget of $1,013, Is the LEA spending consistent with budget timeline? If not, what steps are being taken to expend the funds as planned? PGCPS indicated that overall much of the LEA spending is consistent with the timeline outlined in the proposal. The budget amendment submitted in November 2010 realigned funds in several categories. 4. What action steps or planned activities have not taken place that would impact the LEA budget? PGCPS provided evidence that indicated that the recruitment and retention incentives for principals, assistant principals and teachers are the action steps that has not fully been implemented and impacts the LEA budget. 5. Has a budget amendment been submitted? If yes, what budget changes were requested for the LEA? PGCPS provided evidence that a budget amendment was submitted to MSDE on November 30, 2010 and subsequently approved. Budget changes for the LEA budget included an increase in incentive funds for principals and assistant principals. This increase covered the increase in the number of principals and assistant principals at the SIG schools. This budget amendment also included a substantial decrease in the incentive amount originally allocated for teachers. 6. How often are LEA expenditures monitored? Who monitors? PGCPS provided evidence that monthly spend down meetings are held to discuss the activities and spending of the LEA budget. Stakeholders in attendance at these meetings are Turnaround Director, Turnaround Budget Specialist, Title I specialists, Director of School and Leadership, and staff from Budget Management Services. This group is responsible for monitoring the SIG LEA and school budgets. Division of Student, Family and School Support Page 18

19 TABLE 9 Section 5: SIG School Budget for Drew Freeman Middle School, Tier II MSDE Reviewers: Geri Taylor Lawrence, Jim Newkirk Monitoring Date: February 23, 2011 Level of Implementation: NOT MET Total SIG Allocation: $916,071 School Budget Spent: $255,054 Percent of School Budget Spent: 28% Spend Down Data as of: February 22, 2011 Salaries & Wages Contractual Services Supplies & Materials Other Budgeted: $504,322 Budgeted: $122,727 Budgeted: $147,754 Budgeted: $21,000 Conference Registration &Travel Encumbered: 0 Encumbered: 0 Encumbered: $4,424 Encumbered: 0 Spent (amount): $158,170 Spent (amount): $13,363 Spent (amount): $37,932 Spent (amount): 0 Spent (%): 31% Spent (%): 11% Spent (%): 29% Spent (%): 0 1. How much of the school budget, based on the LEA s approved application, has been expended to date (amount and %)? PGCPS provided documentation that showed that Drew Freeman has spent $255, 054. This amount is 28% of their approved SIG budget. An additional amount of $4,424 has been encumbered. 2. Is school spending consistent with budget timeline? If not, what steps are being taken to expend the funds as planned? PGCPS indicated that much of the school spending is not consistent with the budget timeline denoted in the SIG proposal. Some activities that have not occurred have been rescheduled and the LEA will be submitting a budget and programmatic amendment. 3. What action steps or planned activities have not taken place that would impact the budget? PGCPS indicated that the following activities have not occurred or were delayed in starting. All of the below activities or action steps resulted in substantial amounts of money remaining in different categories of their budget. Avid Conference for teachers August Academy for teachers Late start of the ELO PBIS Training for teachers Financial Incentives for teachers 4. Has a budget amendment been submitted? If yes, what budget changes were requested for this school? PGCPS provided evidence that a budget amendment was submitted to MSDE on November 30, 2010 and subsequently approved. Budget changes for Drew Freeman in this amendment included an increase in salaries & wages which would cover stipends for teachers participating in the ELO, and an increase in transportation for students participating in the ELO. PGCPS indicated that another budget amendment would be submitted to MSDE in March This amendment will include additional changes for Drew Freeman s SIG budget. 5. How often are school expenditures monitored by the LEA? Who monitors? PGCPS outlined the procurement process that is used by SIG schools. All materials and services are submitted to the Turnaround Office and the administrative budget specialist reviews the plan, approves or disapproves the expenditure and enters the procurement information into the Oracle Financial System. PGCPS provided evidence that monthly spend down meetings are held to discuss the activities and spending of the school. Stakeholders in attendance at these meetings are Turnaround Director, Turnaround Budget Specialist, Title I specialists, Director of School and Leadership, and staff from Budget Management Services. This group is responsible for monitoring the SIG school budgets. Division of Student, Family and School Support Page 19

MSDE Priority Schools Monitoring Teams Second Onsite Visit Feedback for: LEA SIG Priority Cohort I Schools

MSDE Priority Schools Monitoring Teams Second Onsite Visit Feedback for: LEA SIG Priority Cohort I Schools MSDE Priority Schools 2013-2014 Monitoring Teams Second Onsite Visit Feedback for: LEA SIG Priority Cohort I Schools SIG Priority Cohort II Schools Non-SIG Priority Schools SIG Priority Cohort I School

More information

Division of Human Resources

Division of Human Resources B o a r d o f E d u c a t i o n A P P R O V E D A n n u a l O p e r a t i n g B u d g e t Division of Human Resources Chief Administrator for Human Resources Employee & Labor Relations ADA Compliance Labor

More information

SMCPS will establish, implement, and communicate timelines that comply with standards for certification of teachers who are highly qualified

SMCPS will establish, implement, and communicate timelines that comply with standards for certification of teachers who are highly qualified Objective 1: Strategy 1: Comply with federal and state mandates of No Child Left Behind guidelines. SMCPS will establish, implement, and communicate timelines that comply with standards for certification

More information

O RGANIZATION SUMMARY

O RGANIZATION SUMMARY DEPUTY SUPERINTENDENT FOR TEACHING AND LEARNING Family, Community & Business Engagement Arts Integration Curriculum & Instruction Academic Programs Career Academy Programs College & Career Ready ESOL Early

More information

ORGANIZATION OVERVIEW & ANALYSIS O RGANIZATION SUMMARY. PGCPS Board of Education FY 2016 Approved Annual Operating Budget Page 237

ORGANIZATION OVERVIEW & ANALYSIS O RGANIZATION SUMMARY. PGCPS Board of Education FY 2016 Approved Annual Operating Budget Page 237 O RGANIZATION SUMMARY PGCPS Board of Education FY 2016 Approved Annual Operating Budget Page 237 Deputy Superintendent MISSION To support the Chief Executive Officer and County in providing highly effective

More information

O RGANIZATION SUMMARY

O RGANIZATION SUMMARY PGCPS Board of Education FY 2016 Requested Annual Budget ORGANIZATIONAL OVERVIEW & ANALYSIS DEPUTY SUPERINTENDENT FOR TEACHING AND LEARNING Family, Community & Business Engagement Arts Integration Curriculum

More information

FY 2012 School Improvement Grant -Section 1003(g) Budget Development

FY 2012 School Improvement Grant -Section 1003(g) Budget Development FY 2012 School Improvement Grant -Section 1003(g) Budget Development Illinois State Board of Education Innovation & Improvement February 23, 2011 10:00 to 11:30 a.m. (Updated March 29, 2011) Budget Webinar

More information

Mequon-Thiensville School District Releases Administrative Action Plan

Mequon-Thiensville School District Releases Administrative Action Plan Please direct inquiries to: Dr. Demond Means, Superintendent (262) 238-8502 dmeans@mtsd.k12.wi.us FOR IMMEDIATE RELEASE: October 29, 2012 Mequon-Thiensville School District Releases Administrative MEQUON,

More information

O RGANIZATION SUMMARY

O RGANIZATION SUMMARY PGCPS Board of Education FY 2016 Requested Annual Budget ORGANIZATIONAL OVERVIEW & ANALYSIS Charter & Contract Schools DEPUTY SUPERINTENDENT Continuous Systemic Improvement State & Federal Programs Talent

More information

Differentiated Pay Plan Submission Template

Differentiated Pay Plan Submission Template 2014-15 Differentiated Pay Plan Submission Template In June 2013, the State Board of Education passed a revised set of guidelines pursuant to Tenn. Code Ann. 49-3-306(h), which requires districts to create

More information

Henrico County Public Schools FY2017 Annual Financial Plan January 28, 2016

Henrico County Public Schools FY2017 Annual Financial Plan January 28, 2016 Henrico County Public Schools FY2017 Annual Financial Plan January 28, 2016 1 Agenda Budget Development Process General Fund All Funds Next Steps 2 HCPS Four Priorities 3 Budget Process Stakeholders Input

More information

Budget Workshop FY

Budget Workshop FY Budget Workshop FY2016-2017 May 17, 2016 Agenda Introductory Statement on Budget Goals and Process -- Mr. James T. Russell, Superintendent Presentation on Academic Achievement Plan in Context of Budget

More information

B o a r d o f E d u c a t i o n A P P R O V E D A n n u a l O p e r a t i n g B u d g e t FY 2017 CHIEF EXECUTIVE OFFICER

B o a r d o f E d u c a t i o n A P P R O V E D A n n u a l O p e r a t i n g B u d g e t FY 2017 CHIEF EXECUTIVE OFFICER B o a r d o f E d u c a t i o n A P P R O V E D A n n u a l O p e r a t i n g B u d g e t CHIEF EXECUTIVE OFFICER Monitoring, Accountability & Compliance Diversity Officer Interpreting & Translations Services

More information

NEW JERSEY QUALITY SINGLE ACCOUNTABLITY CONTINUUM DISTRICT PERFORMANCE REVIEW (DPR)

NEW JERSEY QUALITY SINGLE ACCOUNTABLITY CONTINUUM DISTRICT PERFORMANCE REVIEW (DPR) INSTRUCTION AND PROGRAM 1. a. The district meets the current district definition of Adequate Yearly Progress (AYP) in language arts literacy. b. The district meets the third grade New Jersey state benchmark

More information

Division of Business Management Services

Division of Business Management Services Chief Executive Officer s PROPOSED Annual Operating Budget FY 2017 Division of Business Management Services O RGANIZATION SUMMARY *Contains a Non-Operating Budget componet. See the Supplemental Information

More information

Atlanta Public Schools Board of Education Budget Commission. September 20, 2018

Atlanta Public Schools Board of Education Budget Commission. September 20, 2018 Atlanta Public Schools Board of Education Budget Commission September 20, 2018 1 Agenda FY2020 Budget Timeline Anticipated Challenges for FY2020 FY2020 Resource and Expenditure Parameters 2 Goals To align

More information

School Year Budget Planning BUDGET FORUM

School Year Budget Planning BUDGET FORUM School Year Budget Planning BUDGET FORUM Administration Building June 8, 2016 Agenda Welcome and Introductions Budget Information Presentation Budget Forum Next Steps Budget Planning Calendar October 28

More information

ADMINISTRATOR SALARY SCHEDULE. FY18 ( School Year)

ADMINISTRATOR SALARY SCHEDULE. FY18 ( School Year) ADMINISTRATOR SALARY SCHEDULE FY18 (2017-2018 School Year) Board Approved and Adopted: March 27, 2018 Signatures of Superintendent of Schools and School Board Chairman on File Table of Contents PREAMBLE...

More information

Council of Great City Schools CFO Conference. November 12,

Council of Great City Schools CFO Conference. November 12, Council of Great City Schools CFO Conference November 12, 2014 1 Knox County Schools "Our willingness to make hard financial decisions, evaluate programs, reallocate dollars from administrative to instructional

More information

Summary of Proposed Budget for FY June 11, 2013

Summary of Proposed Budget for FY June 11, 2013 Summary of Proposed Budget for FY 2013-14 June 11, 2013 1 SFUSD s Overall Goals Achievement: Engage high achieving, joyful learners Student Success Access and Equity: Make social justice a reality Accountability:

More information

Executive Administration. Office of Community Engagement

Executive Administration. Office of Community Engagement Harford County Public Schools Fiscal 2020 Budget Program Overview Summary The Superintendent, Chief of Administration, and Assistant Superintendents must provide leadership, direction, motivation, and

More information

O RGANIZATION SUMMARY

O RGANIZATION SUMMARY PGCPS Board of Education FY 2016 Requested Annual Budget ORGANIZATIONAL OVERVIEW & ANALYSIS Board Liaison Diversity Officer Chief School Health Policy, Services & Innovation Health Services O RGANIZATION

More information

Warren Hills Regional School District. NJQSAC Quality Single Accountability Continuum. Dawn A. Moore Director of Curriculum and Instruction

Warren Hills Regional School District. NJQSAC Quality Single Accountability Continuum. Dawn A. Moore Director of Curriculum and Instruction Warren Hills Regional School District NJQSAC Quality Single Accountability Continuum Dawn A. Moore Director of Curriculum and Instruction November 2015 WHAT IS QSAC The NJ Department of Education s monitoring

More information

ADMINISTRATOR SALARY SCHEDULE FY18. Board Approved

ADMINISTRATOR SALARY SCHEDULE FY18. Board Approved ADMINISTRATOR SALARY SCHEDULE Adopted this 14 th Day of November, 2017 The School Board of Lee County, Florida Signature on File Superintendent of Schools Signature on File School Board Chairman Board

More information

District-level Set Asides in Support of School Improvement

District-level Set Asides in Support of School Improvement District-level Set Asides in Support of School Improvement What funds are available to schools identified for improvement in Oregon? In the summer of 2012, the Oregon Department of Education (ODE) applied

More information

NJ Single Accountability Continuum (NJQSAC) District Performance Review - School Year

NJ Single Accountability Continuum (NJQSAC) District Performance Review - School Year NJ Single Accountability Continuum (NJQSAC) Performance Review - School Year 2016-17 Information and Summary Name and CDS # Name Superintendent Name Mailing Address Superintendent Email Address Elizabeth

More information

Budget Draft Dated: 3/1/18 William Hogan, Deputy Superintendent of Business and Finance. Revised

Budget Draft Dated: 3/1/18 William Hogan, Deputy Superintendent of Business and Finance. Revised 2018-2019 Budget Draft Dated: 3/1/18 William Hogan, Deputy Superintendent of Business and Finance Revised Agenda Budget Calendar Stakeholder Expectations District Vision, Mission, and Goals Budget Priorities

More information

School Year Budget Planning BUDGET FORUM #2

School Year Budget Planning BUDGET FORUM #2 2018-2019 School Year Budget Planning BUDGET FORUM #2 Administration Building August 1, 2018 Agenda Welcome and Introductions Budget Information Presentation Budget Forum Questions & Comments Next Steps

More information

VISION 2020 The School District of Lee County s Strategic Plan for achieving our Vision: To Be a World Class School System

VISION 2020 The School District of Lee County s Strategic Plan for achieving our Vision: To Be a World Class School System VISION 2020 The School District of Lee County s Strategic Plan for achieving our Vision: To Be a World Class School System Board Approved: September 19, 2017 Vision 2020 is the School District of Lee County

More information

QUITMAN COUNTY SCHOOL DISTRICT REQUEST FOR PROPOSAL Professional Development Services

QUITMAN COUNTY SCHOOL DISTRICT REQUEST FOR PROPOSAL Professional Development Services QUITMAN COUNTY SCHOOL DISTRICT REQUEST FOR PROPOSAL Professional Development Services Overview 1. Introduction: The (QCSD) is located in Marks, MS. School facilities consist of four schools and one central

More information

Local District South Title I Meeting

Local District South Title I Meeting Local District South Title I Meeting Robert Oye robert.oye@lausd.net (310) 354-3452 Lorraine Torres lms0920@lausd.net (310) 354-3531 Agenda Equipment Inventory Unrestricted Funds Restricted Funds Program

More information

Questions from the Prince George s County Advocates for Better Schools

Questions from the Prince George s County Advocates for Better Schools P r i n c e G e o r g e s C o u n t y P u b l i c S c h o o l s 1 4 2 0 1 S c h o o l L a n e, U p p e r M a r l b o r o, M D 2 0 7 7 2 w w w. p g c p s. o r g Raymond H. Brown Chief Financial Officer

More information

Single Plan for Student Achievement Plan Summary. (SPSA) Template THE STORY. Draft. School Name Contact Name and Title.

Single Plan for Student Achievement Plan Summary. (SPSA) Template THE STORY. Draft. School Name Contact Name and Title. Draft Single Plan for Student Achievement (SPSA) Template SPSA Year 2017 18 192018 202019 Addendum: General instructions & regulatory requirements. Appendix A: Priorities 5 and 6 Rate Calculations Appendix

More information

William Floyd School District Budget Presentation #4

William Floyd School District Budget Presentation #4 William Floyd School District 2016-17 Budget Presentation #4 Overview q Budget Advisory Committee (BAC) q Budget Timeline q School Budget q Tax Levy Cap Calculation q State Aid Governor s Proposal q Revenue

More information

Guilford County Schools Budget for

Guilford County Schools Budget for Guilford County Schools Budget for 2011-12 Board of Education Retreat October 2, 2010 Presented by Sharon Ozment, CFO 2009-10 BUDGET DEVELOPMENT PHILOSOPHY Use Board of Education s Mission, Core Values

More information

FINANCIAL PLAN F I N A N C I A L P L A N. Prince George s County Public Schools Page 27

FINANCIAL PLAN F I N A N C I A L P L A N. Prince George s County Public Schools Page 27 B o a r d o f E d u c a t i o n A P P R O V E D A n n u a l O p e r a t i n g B u d g e t FY 2017 FINANCIAL PLAN Prince George s County Public Schools Page 27 FY 2017 B o a r d o f E d u c a t i o n A

More information

Request for Proposals for Providers of Principal Professional Development to Participate in an Impact Evaluation

Request for Proposals for Providers of Principal Professional Development to Participate in an Impact Evaluation Request for Proposals for Providers of Principal Professional Development to Participate in an Impact Evaluation September 2014 RFP #40412-001 Mathematica Policy Research American Institutes for Research

More information

Okaloosa Schools The Budgeting Process School Year Developing Budgets for Schools and District Operated Programs for Fiscal Year

Okaloosa Schools The Budgeting Process School Year Developing Budgets for Schools and District Operated Programs for Fiscal Year Okaloosa Schools The Budgeting Process School Year 2013-2014 Developing Budgets for Schools and District Operated Programs for Fiscal Year 2013-2014 Mary Beth Jackson, Superintendent Rita R. Scallan, Chief

More information

VOLUSIA COUNTY SCHOOL DISTRICT. DeLand Administrative Complex Board Room 9:00 am to 12:00 pm

VOLUSIA COUNTY SCHOOL DISTRICT. DeLand Administrative Complex Board Room 9:00 am to 12:00 pm VOLUSIA COUNTY SCHOOL DISTRICT DeLand Administrative Complex Board Room 9:00 am to 12:00 pm AGENDA Goal: Protect student instructional programs, services and activities and class size requirements from

More information

South Orange-Maplewood School District. February 27, 2017

South Orange-Maplewood School District. February 27, 2017 South Orange-Maplewood School District February 27, 2017 2/27/2017 1 Budget Development process Anticipated Revenue Sources Zero Based Budgeting Appropriations (Anticipated Expenditures) Determine Deficit

More information

UNDERSTANDING THE BUDGET

UNDERSTANDING THE BUDGET Welcome to Harford County Public Schools Program-based Budget The program-based budget presents a different view of how funds are allocated. This format is part of the continuing effort to produce a more

More information

Achievement and Integration Revenue FY 2017 Budget Workbook

Achievement and Integration Revenue FY 2017 Budget Workbook Remember, one of the most important steps is having a district's program and fiscal staff collaborate on this budget. As always, proposed expenditures that align with budget requirements will be approved

More information

O r g a n i z a t i o n s

O r g a n i z a t i o n s Board of Education APPROVED FY 2018 Annual Operating Budget 133 Business Management Services Chief Financial Officer Benefits Administration Payroll Services Budget & Management Services Purchasing & Supply

More information

M E M O R A N D U M. FY 2017 Approved

M E M O R A N D U M. FY 2017 Approved Dorothy H. Galo, Ph.D. Superintendent of Schools Item 7.3 HINGHAM PUBLIC SCHOOLS 220 Central Street Hingham, Massachusetts 02043 781-741-1500 VOICE 781-749-7457 FAX dgalo@hinghamschools.org www.hinghamschools.com

More information

Preliminary Recommended Budget for School Year. School Board Meeting June 22, 2011

Preliminary Recommended Budget for School Year. School Board Meeting June 22, 2011 Preliminary Recommended Budget for 2011-2012 School Year School Board Meeting June 22, 2011 as of June 22, 2011 Agenda Context for recommended 2011-12 general fund budget Review budget challenge and estimated

More information

Article I: School of Social Work Graduate Student Organization (GSO) By-Laws

Article I: School of Social Work Graduate Student Organization (GSO) By-Laws University of Connecticut School of Social Work Graduate Student Organization By-Laws By-laws were ratified via a vote of the Steering Committee on September 18, 2018 Article I: School of Social Work Graduate

More information

South Orange-Maplewood School District. February 25, 2013

South Orange-Maplewood School District. February 25, 2013 South Orange-Maplewood School District February 25, 2013 1 Budget development process Alignment of budget to district goals and strategy Budget resource assumptions Anticipated expenditures Redirect resources

More information

Division of Human Resources

Division of Human Resources Division of Human Resources O RGANIZATION SUMMARY PGCPS Board of Education FY 2016 Approved Annual Operating Budget Page 263 Chief Administrator for Human Resources MISSION To recruit, select, develop,

More information

Exhibit B BALTIMORE COUNTY PUBLIC SCHOOLS

Exhibit B BALTIMORE COUNTY PUBLIC SCHOOLS Exhibit B BALTIMORE COUNTY PUBLIC SCHOOLS DATE: February 14, 2006 TO: FROM: SUBJECT: ORIGINATOR: RESOURCE PERSON(S): BOARD OF EDUCATION Dr. Joe A. Hairston, Superintendent FY2007 PROPOSED OPERATING BUDGET

More information

The School District of Clayton s Budget Planning Guide. Zero-Based Budgeting An Overview. Helpful Definitions

The School District of Clayton s Budget Planning Guide. Zero-Based Budgeting An Overview. Helpful Definitions The s Zero-Based Budgeting An Overview Transition to Zero-Based Budgeting (ZBB) is a major outcome within the Resource Management theme of the District s strategic plan. It is not a budget reduction process.

More information

FINANCIAL MANAGEMENT FOR GEORGIA LOCAL UNITS OF ADMINISTRATION. 10/30/91 II Financial Reporting. 1 March 2017 II-7 QBE Program Reporting/Budgeting

FINANCIAL MANAGEMENT FOR GEORGIA LOCAL UNITS OF ADMINISTRATION. 10/30/91 II Financial Reporting. 1 March 2017 II-7 QBE Program Reporting/Budgeting FINANCIAL MANAGEMENT FOR GEORGIA LOCAL UNITS OF ADMINISTRATION Date Issued Effective Date Section Title: 10/30/91 10/30/91 II Financial Reporting Revision No. Date Revised Chapter Title: 1 March 2017 II-7

More information

ALBANY UNIFIED SCHOOL DISTRICT BOARD AGENDA BACKUP. Regular Meeting of March 28, 2017 BUDGET PRIORITY TIMELINE AND PROCESS

ALBANY UNIFIED SCHOOL DISTRICT BOARD AGENDA BACKUP. Regular Meeting of March 28, 2017 BUDGET PRIORITY TIMELINE AND PROCESS ALBANY UNIFIED SCHOOL DISTRICT BOARD AGENDA BACKUP Regular Meeting of March 28, 2017 ITEM: PREPARED BY: TYPE OF ITEM: BUDGET PRIORITY TIMELINE AND PROCESS ALLAN GARDE, CHIEF BUSINESS OFFICIAL REVIEW AND

More information

Community Budget Forum

Community Budget Forum Community Budget Forum June 2, 2014 Garfield Elementary www.spokaneschools.org Agenda Welcome and Introductions Budget Information Presentation Next Steps 2 Budget Planning Calendar 2014-2015 October 16

More information

Board of Education Meeting

Board of Education Meeting Board of Education Meeting 2015-16 Budget Draft 2 nd Part Instructional Technology Staffing 2015-16 Budget Draft 3 nd Part Transportation Bus purchase Benefits, Debt Service Transfers Budget Savings 2015-2016

More information

O RGANIZATION SUMMARY

O RGANIZATION SUMMARY CHIEF EXECUTIVE OFFICER Board Liaison Chief School Health Policy, Services & Innovation Health Services Diversity Officer O RGANIZATION SUMMARY FY 2016 FY 2016 Proposed Proposed Organization FTE Funding

More information

Budget Development Update. January 16, 2018

Budget Development Update. January 16, 2018 Budget Development Update January 16, 2018 Input Process 4 Community forums have been held -One forum focused on new American families -Two forums focused on families of students with special needs Public

More information

HINGHAM PUBLIC SCHOOLS BUDGET OVERVIEW FOR FY 20. Operating Budget Proposal from the Administration to the School Committee January 3, 2019

HINGHAM PUBLIC SCHOOLS BUDGET OVERVIEW FOR FY 20. Operating Budget Proposal from the Administration to the School Committee January 3, 2019 HINGHAM PUBLIC SCHOOLS BUDGET OVERVIEW FOR FY 20 Operating Budget Proposal from the Administration to the School Committee January 3, 2019 BUDGET PROCESS for FY 2020 School Committee meets in a planning

More information

IDENTIFICATION AR II /15/06 THE PLANNING, BUDGETING, AND ASSESSMENT CYCLE. Part 1. THE PLANNING, BUDGETING, AND ASSESSMENT CYCLE

IDENTIFICATION AR II /15/06 THE PLANNING, BUDGETING, AND ASSESSMENT CYCLE. Part 1. THE PLANNING, BUDGETING, AND ASSESSMENT CYCLE UNIVERSITY OF KENTUCKY ADMINISTRATIVE REGULATIONS IDENTIFICATION AR II-1.0-6 DATE EFFECTIVE PAGE 1 SUPERSEDES REGULATIONS DATED II-1.5-1 (1/01/01); II-1.5-2 (1/01/01); II-1.0-6 (8/23/93) THE PLANNING,

More information

Achievement and Integration Revenue FY 2016 Budget Worksheet

Achievement and Integration Revenue FY 2016 Budget Worksheet 1 Achievement and Integration Revenue FY 2016 Budget Worksheet Use this worksheet to list proposed expenditures of FY 2016 Achievement and Integration revenue. Address general questions on budget submission

More information

TC Williams Transformation- Year 3 Update

TC Williams Transformation- Year 3 Update TC Williams Transformation- Year 3 Update Key Components of the Transformation Individual Achievement Plans (IAP s) Professional Learning Plans (PLP s) Related School Support Programs and Structures Accounting

More information

Staff Budget Reduction Recommendation. Board of Education Meeting January 11, 2011

Staff Budget Reduction Recommendation. Board of Education Meeting January 11, 2011 Staff Budget Reduction Recommendation Board of Education Meeting January 11, 2011 1 Recommendation Staff s budget reduction recommendation is based on the most current data available. Factors such as the

More information

Milton Public Schools SEL NEEDS ASSESSMENT Findings and Recommendations PRESENTED BY

Milton Public Schools SEL NEEDS ASSESSMENT Findings and Recommendations PRESENTED BY Milton Public Schools SEL NEEDS ASSESSMENT Findings and Recommendations PRESENTED BY LAURIE STILLMAN 9/6/17 Components of Social Emotional Learning A+=Academics Plus ATTENDING TO THE WHOLE CHILD IN A WHOLE

More information

Budget Update Jaime Alicea Superintendent of Schools April 11, 2018

Budget Update Jaime Alicea Superintendent of Schools April 11, 2018 2018-19 Budget Update Jaime Alicea Superintendent of Schools April 11, 2018 #SCSDBudget AGENDA I. City, State & Federal Budget Updates II. State Budget Impact on Syracuse City School District III. Changes

More information

April 8, Volusia County School Board DeLand Administrative Complex

April 8, Volusia County School Board DeLand Administrative Complex April 8, 2015 Volusia County School Board DeLand Administrative Complex 1 2 3 4 5 Introductory Statement on Budget Goals and Process -- Mr. James T. Russell, Interim Superintendent Presentation on Academic

More information

Proposed Budget

Proposed Budget 2018-19 Proposed Budget #SCSDBudget Jaime Alicea Superintendent of Schools February 14, 2018 New Budget Book Design 2 Agenda Foundations, Priorities & Focus Budget Investments and Spending Plan Revenue

More information

Henrico County Public Schools 2017/2018 Annual Financial Plan January 26, 2017

Henrico County Public Schools 2017/2018 Annual Financial Plan January 26, 2017 Henrico County Public Schools 2017/2018 Annual Financial Plan January 26, 2017 1 Agenda Budget Development Process General Fund Special Revenue Fund Debt Service Fund Next Steps 2 HCPS Four Cornerstones

More information

21 st Century Community Learning Centers Grant Compliance and Performance Assessment (CAPA) Binder Review & Site Visit

21 st Century Community Learning Centers Grant Compliance and Performance Assessment (CAPA) Binder Review & Site Visit Binder Review & Site Visit ODE Monitoring Team: Site Visit Date: Program Review Date: Fiscal Review Date: Sub-recipient Name: Sub-recipient IRN: Sub-recipient Address: Sub-recipient Monitoring Visit Coordinator

More information

American Recovery and Reinvestment Act (ARRA) Funding Questions & Answers

American Recovery and Reinvestment Act (ARRA) Funding Questions & Answers American Recovery and Reinvestment Act (ARRA) Funding Questions & Answers Index I. General Information II. Title I Part A Funds A. Carryover Limitation B. Supplement Not Supplant C. Maintenance of Effort

More information

I. INTRODUCTION II. ROLES & RESPONSIBILITIES

I. INTRODUCTION II. ROLES & RESPONSIBILITIES Page 1 I. INTRODUCTION The District implements a broad-based comprehensive and integrated planning system that is a foundation for strategic directions and resource allocation decisions. The Superintendent/President

More information

Table of Contents PAYROLL CALENDAR FOR SUBSTITUTE TEACHERS AND SUBSTITUTE PARAPROFESSIONALS... 14

Table of Contents PAYROLL CALENDAR FOR SUBSTITUTE TEACHERS AND SUBSTITUTE PARAPROFESSIONALS... 14 Table of Contents POSITION SUPPLEMENTS... 1 SUBSTITUTE TEACHERS... 8 SUBSTITUTE PARAPROFESSIONALS... 10 SUBSTITUTE BUS DRIVERS... 10 TEMPORARY EMPLOYEES... 10 HIGH SCHOOL ATHLETIC SUPPLEMENTS... 11 MIDDLE

More information

East Hartford Public Schools

East Hartford Public Schools East Hartford Public Schools Budget Overview BOE Session II November 29, 2018 Expectations Matter Effort Matters Competence Matters Solutions Matter Relationships Matter VISION: Schools that are the Pride

More information

Budget Draft Dated: 2/25/16 February 25, William Hogan, Assistant Superintendent for Business Affairs. Agenda for Presentation

Budget Draft Dated: 2/25/16 February 25, William Hogan, Assistant Superintendent for Business Affairs. Agenda for Presentation 2016-2017 Budget Draft Dated: 2/25/16 February 25, 2016 William Hogan, Assistant Superintendent for Business Affairs 1 Agenda for Presentation Budget Calendar Goal of the Budget Process Opportunities for

More information

Budget Process and Details

Budget Process and Details Budget Process and Details Budget Process Overview The District s fiscal year runs from September 1 through August 31. The budgeting cycle begins in the fall, ten months before the adoption of the budget

More information

STRATEGIC PLANNING/ BUDGET PROCESS

STRATEGIC PLANNING/ BUDGET PROCESS STRATEGIC PLANNING/ BUDGET PROCESS MAY 8, 2017 Work/Study Session Purpose 2 Discussion Decision Information Direction 3 Strategic Goals Session Overview 4 Update on 2016-17 budget picture Review of potential

More information

Scarsdale Public Schools School Budget Study Sessions #1 & #2

Scarsdale Public Schools School Budget Study Sessions #1 & #2 Scarsdale Public Schools 2016-17 School Budget Study Sessions #1 & #2 February 8, 2016 Budget Focus for 8 February 2016 Budget Study Session # 1 1. Budget Process & Timeline 2. Affirmations Staffing Recommendations

More information

CMS Proposed Budget September 14, 2010

CMS Proposed Budget September 14, 2010 CMS 2010-11 Proposed Budget September 14, 2010 2010-11 Proposed Budget vs. 2009-10 Adopted d Budget 2010-11 Proposed Budget $ 1,150,186,045,, 2009-10 Adopted Budget $ 1,140,509,220 Increase $ 9,676,825

More information

Paso Robles Joint Unified School District Budget Questions and Answers

Paso Robles Joint Unified School District Budget Questions and Answers Paso Robles Joint Unified School District 2018-19 Budget Questions and Answers Question. Did the Superintendent receive a 20% raise? Answer. The Superintendent received the same 1.5% raise that all district

More information

Anacortes School District Budget. Budget Hearing August 11, 2016

Anacortes School District Budget. Budget Hearing August 11, 2016 Anacortes School District 2016-2017 2017 Budget Budget Hearing August 11, 2016 2016-2017 2017 Budget Investment in People: Workload relief Competitive salary and benefits Professional development Time

More information

FY Superintendent s Proposed Budget. Dr. Catherine Magouyrk Superintendent February 13, 2018

FY Superintendent s Proposed Budget. Dr. Catherine Magouyrk Superintendent February 13, 2018 FY2018-2019 Superintendent s Proposed Budget Dr. Catherine Magouyrk Superintendent February 13, 2018 FY 2018-2019 Proposed Budget Presentation Overview State and Local Funding History and Student Per Pupil

More information

LCAP / Supplemental and Concentration Regulations

LCAP / Supplemental and Concentration Regulations LCAP / Supplemental and Concentration Regulations LCAP Overview The Local Control and Accountability Plan (LCAP) represents a fundamental shift in how LEAs will plan for, and be held accountable for, LCFF

More information

Dare County Schools Local Academically or Intellectually Gifted (AIG) Plan Effective

Dare County Schools Local Academically or Intellectually Gifted (AIG) Plan Effective Local AIG Plan, 2016-2019 Page 1 of 23 Dare County Schools Local Academically or Intellectually Gifted (AIG) Plan Effective 2016-2019 Approved by local Board of Education on: 14-JUN-16 LEA Superintendent's

More information

CALVERT COUNTY PUBLIC SCHOOLS Prince Frederick, Maryland. FINANCIAL STATEMENTS June 30, 2013

CALVERT COUNTY PUBLIC SCHOOLS Prince Frederick, Maryland. FINANCIAL STATEMENTS June 30, 2013 Prince Frederick, Maryland FINANCIAL STATEMENTS TABLE OF CONTENTS INDEPENDENT AUDITORS REPORT... 1 MANAGEMENT S DISCUSSION AND ANALYSIS... 3 FINANCIAL STATEMENTS... 19 Government wide Financial Statements:

More information

Introduction. Evidence from Three California Districts. Categorical System. LCFF System & Continuous Improvement. Education Resource Strategies (ERS)

Introduction. Evidence from Three California Districts. Categorical System. LCFF System & Continuous Improvement. Education Resource Strategies (ERS) PACE Continuous Improvement Brief 02-17 - October 2017 Promising Practices in School District Budgeting Under LCFF Mark Murphy Stanford University The implementation of the Local Control Funding Formula

More information

UNDERSTANDING THE BUDGET

UNDERSTANDING THE BUDGET Welcome to Harford County Public Schools Program-based Budget The program-based budget presents a different view of how funds are allocated. This format is part of the continuing effort to produce a more

More information

Superintendent's Budget

Superintendent's Budget 2017-2018 Superintendent's Budget April 6, 2017 Presented by: Anthony Taibi, Superintendent Jeffrey Miriello, Business Administrator 1 Mission: What We Do The Cairo-Durham Central School District, in partnership

More information

SUPERINTENDENT S BUDGET ADVISORY COMMITTEE

SUPERINTENDENT S BUDGET ADVISORY COMMITTEE SUPERINTENDENT S BUDGET ADVISORY COMMITTEE Pasadena Unified School District Report to the Board of Trustees January 25, 2018 Coachman-Moore & Associates Inc. Committee Composition The SBAC was comprised

More information

AREA ASSOCIATE SUPERINTENDENTS. AREA 3 School Performance

AREA ASSOCIATE SUPERINTENDENTS. AREA 3 School Performance PGCPS Board of Education FY 2016 Requested Annual Budget ORGANIZATIONAL OVERVIEW & ANALYSIS AREA ASSOCIATE SUPERINTENDENTS AREA 1 School Performance AREA 2 School Performance AREA 3 School Performance

More information

Budget Overview Daniel G. Lowengard, Interim Superintendent of Schools Everton Sewell, Chief Financial Officer March 19,

Budget Overview Daniel G. Lowengard, Interim Superintendent of Schools Everton Sewell, Chief Financial Officer March 19, Budget Overview 2019-2020 Daniel G. Lowengard, Interim Superintendent of Schools Everton Sewell, Chief Financial Officer March 19, 2019 1 Our Mission The mission of the Rochester City School District is

More information

Budget Development for Budget Forums May 23 and 24, 2011

Budget Development for Budget Forums May 23 and 24, 2011 Budget Development for 2011-2012 Budget Forums May 23 and 24, 2011 as of May 23, 2011 Agenda Welcome and introductions Meeting format Budget presentation Input Context for Budget Development Unprecedented

More information

Superintendent s Proposed Budget TABLE OF CONTENTS

Superintendent s Proposed Budget TABLE OF CONTENTS Revised 11-16-09 Superintendent s Proposed Budget 2010-2011 TABLE OF CONTENTS Introduction Superintendent s Message Page 1 2009-12 Three Year Strategic Improvement Plan Overview Page 4 Major Object Code

More information

Fiscal Year 2016 Superintendent s Proposed Operating Budget Board of Education of Charles County Public Schools January 13, 2015

Fiscal Year 2016 Superintendent s Proposed Operating Budget Board of Education of Charles County Public Schools January 13, 2015 Fiscal Year 2016 Superintendent s Proposed Operating Budget Board of Education of Charles County Public Schools January 13, 2015 1 Agenda Objectives Revenue Increases Requested Cost Increases Financial

More information

$283.1m 100% $300.8m 100% Includes parcel tax revenue District obligations(state trustee, audit findings, $17m 6.0% $20.6.m 6.9%

$283.1m 100% $300.8m 100% Includes parcel tax revenue District obligations(state trustee, audit findings, $17m 6.0% $20.6.m 6.9% February 8, 2014 To: Board of Education From: Gary Yee Re: Update on Board Policy 3150 Results Based Budgeting Since adoption of the RBB policy(bp 3150 January 15, 2014), we have begun to evaluate and

More information

TABLE 1 SUMMARY OF RESOURCES BY OBJECT OF EXPENDITURE

TABLE 1 SUMMARY OF RESOURCES BY OBJECT OF EXPENDITURE TABLE 1 SUMMARY OF RESOURCES BY OBJECT OF EXPENDITURE OBJECT OF EXPENDITURE FY2009 FY2010 FY 2010 ACTUAL BUDGET CURRENT FY 2011 FY 2011 BUDGET CHANGE POSITIONS Administrative Business/Operations Admin.

More information

Board of Education Work Session Division of Supporting Services

Board of Education Work Session Division of Supporting Services Board of Education Work Session Division of Supporting Services Lawrence W. Fryer, Jr. February 2, 2009 PRINCE GEORGE S COUNTY PUBLIC SCHOOLS www.pgcps.org Prince George s County Board of Education Verjeana

More information

Budget Development Update. December 18, 2018

Budget Development Update. December 18, 2018 Budget Development Update December 18, 2018 The mission of the Burlington School District is to graduate students who: Value different cultures Engage with the community Communicate effectively Think creatively

More information

STRATEGIC PLAN

STRATEGIC PLAN AUSTIN INDEPENDENT SCHOOL DISTRICT STRATEGIC PLAN 2015-2020 (Revised December 2017) REINVENTING THE URBAN SCHOOL EXPERIENCE TOGETHER Dear Austin Community Partner, The Austin ISD Strategic Plan 2015-2020

More information

QUESTION/ANSWER SHEET

QUESTION/ANSWER SHEET Winchester School District Deliberative Session February 8, 2018, 7:00 P.M. School Gymnasium Winchester Deliberative Session Question/Answer Why do line items in the School Budget change after the budget

More information

SASKATOON PUBLIC SCHOOLS BUDGET REPORT

SASKATOON PUBLIC SCHOOLS BUDGET REPORT SASKATOON PUBLIC SCHOOLS BUDGET REPORT SEPTEMBER 1, 2018 TO AUGUST 31, 2019 TABLE OF CONTENTS PROPOSED RESOLUTION... 1 BOARD PRIORITIES... 2 GOVERNANCE... 3 SASKATOON PUBLIC SCHOOLS ACTION PLAN 2018-2019...

More information

The Public Schools of Brookline Town Hall 333 Washington Street, 5 th Floor Brookline, Massachusetts

The Public Schools of Brookline Town Hall 333 Washington Street, 5 th Floor Brookline, Massachusetts Andrew J. Bott Superintendent The Public Schools of Brookline Town Hall 333 Washington Street, 5 th Floor Brookline, Massachusetts 02445 617.730.2401 TO: FROM: Brookline School Committee Andrew J. Bott

More information

Long Range Financial Plan

Long Range Financial Plan Long Range Financial Plan 2018 Table of Contents SUMMARY... 2 BUDGETING PHILOSOPHY AND CURRENT BUDGET... 3 FORECASTING ASSUMPTIONS... 4 HISTORICAL & PROJECTED DATA... 5 Revenues... 5 Local Revenue... 5

More information