2016/17 Quarter One Report to the Minister for Land Information

Transcription

1 2016/17 Quarter One Report to the Minister for Land Progress against LINZ Strategic Objectives Progress against Ministerial Priorities In increasing the use of geographic information we have: M1 In opening government data to create opportunities we have: Reviewed our work programme in the context of the current refresh of the business growth agenda and natural resources sector priorities. Held a strategic ideas session on how to contribute to Predator Free NZ In unlocking the value of property we have: Mapped the property system to better understand where we need to focus efforts to unlock the value of property. In improving resilience to natural events we have: Reviewed our existing data and information in the context of the 4Rs (reduction, readiness, response, recovery) resilience framework. Progressed elevation business case. Next quarter we will focus on how ASaTS, IPS and Māori Land Service help unlock the value of property; the links between our three strategic objectives; and land use data and information (with MfE). Customers and Stakeholders The stakeholders we have prioritised to work with are local government, Statistics New Zealand, Department of Internal Affairs, GNS Science and NIWA, iwi and Māori, property professionals, natural resource sector agencies and Christchurch agencies. Engagement in Q1 included: Increase the use of geographic information Attended the United Nations Committee of Experts on Global Geospatial in August (a forum for coordinating the development of global geospatial information and promoting its use to address key global challenges). Presentated at Geocart 2016 conference (an Australasian event to advance geographic capabilities e.g. cartography, geovisualisation, and GIS). Unlock the value of property CPCoE met with the 16 large land holding government agencies to discuss property planning, disposal of surplus property, and other opportunities. Worked with Statistics New Zealand on form design to capture property tax compliance data. ASaTS survey reference group had first meeting. Trained Te Tumu Paeroa representatives to extract property information from LDS, saving them money on unnecessary title searches. Completed tenure review protocol with Ngāi Tahu, and evaluated the 2015/16 work programme. Improving resilience to natural events Contributed to DPMC s Recovery Learning and Legacy Programme (sharing insights and information on disaster recovery). Completed consultation on adoption of the Open Data Charter. Progressed work on the Budget bid and business case development for the accelerated programme. Contributed to the Open Government Partnership plan to Minister Bennett. Published the NZGOAL software extension. Next quarter we will: Finalise the Budget bid and business case, to be sent to the Investment Panel in November. Analyse the public submissions on the Open Data Charter and provide advice. M2 In contributing to the Business Growth Agenda by working with regions and cities we have: Completed draft metadata standards and progressed the business case for the Metadata / 3 Waters project. Continued installation of the sensor technologies across Auckland, Wellington and Christchurch and continued to populate the Evaluation Hub to capture Smart Cities programme learnings. Successfully soft launched the Multi-city Forward Works Viewer in Auckland. Established governance and internal stakeholder groups for the Māori Land Service. Engaged with councils (as part of IPS) on property information and aligning with the Property Data Framework. Established the OIO Quality Programme, trialled a risk-based approach to assessing applications, developed a regular stakeholder newsletter. Next quarter we will: Finalise the Metadata / 3 Waters business case Review the final Smart Cities evaluation report and deliver the strategic business case. Hold November workshops with OIO stakeholders. M3 In leveraging LINZ s expertise across government we have: Successfully transferred Landbank properties. Completed ASaTS expression of interest findings and recommendations reports (approved by the Project Board and endorsed by ELT). Sold 57 Crown properties for a total value of $12.5 million. Worked with MSD to identify houses in CPCoE s portfolio suitable for their emergency housing project. Completed the first iteration of the elevation business case and started to consult on shortlisted options. Worked with Auckland Council to release their LiDAR data through the LDS and with MBIE and Northland councils to secure funding to capture LiDAR across Northland. Completed a draft outlining LINZ resilience datasets with a focus on flooding. Next quarter we will: Work on functionality for iwi to review Landbank properties online. Complete the business case for elevation data and socialise it with NRS and BGA ministers. Enter the supplier diligence and discovery phase of ASaTS; decide if Budget 2017 funding will be sought. Page 1

2 2016/17 Quarter One Report to the Minister for Land Financial Performance - Total Expenditure by Appropriation (Departmental Only) Policy Advice MCA MCA Regime MCA Christchurch Earthquake MCA MCA Policy Advice (23) (3%) 3,015 3, % Ministerial Services % 751 1, % Subtotal (136) (16%) 3,766 4, % 1 Survey and Title System 15,195 15, % 66,461 70,446 3,985 6% % 1,541 2, % 3 Subtotal 15,538 16, % 68,002 72,963 4,961 7% Investment Regime Infrastructure We are Forecasting a Year-End Underspend in Total Appropriation We are forecasting a $20.933m underspend against total appropriation at year end. The majority of this underspend is from third party funded expenditure and managing the Christchurch Earthquake Recovery multi category appropriation (MCA). Any underspend in the Christchurch Earthquake Recovery MCA will expected to be transferred to future years. Progress Against Our Operating Budgets Crown activities started the year over-programmed, putting pressure on this funding stream within some appropriations. Some savings have been made during quarter one and more savings are expected to be made throughout the year to ensure appropriations are met. The over-programming is reflected in the variance to the quarter one Budget. 1,160 1, % 5,254 5, % 5 3,143 4, % 22,368 23,936 1,568 7% 4 Geospatial Strategy 2,221 1,815 (406) (22%) 6,870 7, % 4 NZ Geographic Board % % Subtotal 5,549 6, % 30,073 32,492 2,419 7% Managing the Recovery 1,096 1, % 4,418 9,437 5,019 53% Acquisition and Disposal Expenses (ADE) (575) - 2,086 1,712 (374) (22%) Subtotal 1,671 1,109 (562) - 6,504 11,149 4,645 42% 6 of 4,510 3,568 (942) (26%) 25,206 26,525 1,319 5% NZ Biosecurity Programme (53) (11%) 3,513 4, % Centralised Clearance Service Actual Actual for Quarter One 2016/17 Budget % Forecast OBU Appropriation (5) (2%) 1,081 1, % 7 Land Disposal Services (69) (17%) 2,407 7,620 5,213 68% 8 Subtotal 5,792 4,723 (1,069) (23%) 32,208 39,579 7,371 19% Total Excl Admin In Use 30,698 30,270 (428) (1%) 145, ,740 20,933 13% Admin In Use from TPK ,908 1, Total 30,813 30,385 (428) (1%) 147, ,648 20,933 12% Strategic Risk Profile Forecast for Full Year 2016/17 Risks with a residual risk level of high : % 1. Inability to deliver on priorities, strategic objectives or business outcomes. 2. Failure to design new programmes and systems that meet current and future market needs. 3. Inability to influence key stakeholders and maintain credibility as a system leader. 4. Inability to maintain, develop and improve the capabilities and cultures. 5. A significant health and safety event that seriously injures one or more of LINZ s people or associated people. Note Notes to Total Expenditure by Appropriation (Departmental Only) The total Departmental appropriation of $ m reflects the October Baseline Update, which is yet to be confirmed. This figure excludes the Admin In Use from Te Puni Kōkiri. We are forecasting an underspend of $20.933m for the full year. The majority of this is from third party funding and the Christchurch Earthquake Recovery MCA. All appropriations are expected to be within baselines by year end. 1. Policy Advice ($0.800m underspend) The work programme will be reassessed prior to MBU and the funding reprioritised as necessary. 2. Survey and Title System ($3.985m underspend) Most of the variance is in third party funding. The balance in the memorandum account as at 31 Sept 2016 was $48.487m in underspend. A fees review is being considered. 3. ($0.976m underspend) This third party appropriation has historically been set at $2.517m to align with revenue received. We are considering options to reduce this underspend; this would require a change in legislation. 4. Infrastructure ($1.568m underspend), Geospatial Strategy ($0.702m underspend) The majority of the underspends are Crown funded and include $0.500m ROU from 2015/16 and IR Compliance surplus funding of $1.200m. This funding is expected to be allocated to current cost pressures and priority projects during 2016/ Investment Regime ($0.737m underspend). The appropriation has increased this financial year to accommodate increased capacity needs. The 2015/16 year end closing balance in the memorandum account was $1.511m in deficit. The new fee structure came into effect on 1 July 2016 and the account is projected to break even for the 2016/17 financial year. 6. Christchurch Earthquake Ownership and MCA ($4.645m underspend) This MCA holds both Departmental and Non Departmental categories. The Acquisition and Disposal Expenses category deficit of $0.374m can be managed within the total appropriation. 7. Centralised Clearance Service ($0.118m underspend) The year end closing balance in the memorandum account is $0.001m in deficit. Although we are forecasting an underspend in this appropriation, we are expecting an increase in the memorandum account deficit to $0.180m by year end. A fees review may be required to address the increasing deficit. 8. Land Disposal Services ($5.213m underspend) This variance is due to the disposal of certain properties not reaching particular milestones within the quarter. This will not affect the year end position. Page 2

3 2016/17 Quarter One Report to the Minister for Land Output Delivery: We met 50 of our of 55 performance measures (91%) Organisational Capability and Workforce Performance measure Budget standard Year End 15/16 Q1 16/17 As at 30 September 2016 our total occupied FTE was , down slightly from at the end of June. Our current establishment as agreed by ELT is FTE. We expect to receive the SSC s June capping update in November. Investment Regime Category 2 Applications - 50 working days or less 90% 60% 73% Category 3 Applications - 70 working days or less 90% 73% 88% Establishment vs FTE The influx of new applications prior to the fees changes ( the bulge ), time training new recruits and the reassignment of staff from core work to contribute to change processes, have all impacted on timeframes. The bulge is now under control and weekly decision target goals are focusing the team. The percentage of initial investigation reports completed within 60 working days of the investigation beginning. 90% 89% 60% Oct-15 Nov-15 Dec-15 Jan-16 Feb-16 Mar-16 Apr-16 May-16 Jun-16 Jul-16 Occupied FTE Current Establishment Establishment Reported by SSC Aug-16 Sep-16 Resourcing issues have resulted in delays to investigations starting. It is expected that the budget standard will be met in Q3 and Q4 once recently recruited staff begin work and receive training. : The number of working days to process 90% of cadastral survey datasets. 10 Working Days 23 Days 11 Days As at the end of Q1, the average annual unplanned turnover was 14.5% compared with 13.2% at the same time last year. Turnover is particularly high in Location System and Corporate and is being monitored. LINZ continues to be below the public service average both for days of annual leave accrued and days of sick leave taken. Gender Diversity Total LINZ staff Gender of managers (tiers 1-3) Gender of staff earning over $100K There has been an increase in the number of plans associated with the updating of national highway survey plans and plans associated with the Canterbury region following the introduction of the Canterbury Property Boundaries and Related Matters Act Staff have been diverted from other work to deal with these. Additional staff are being recruited and trained. 48% 24% 36% Men The percentage of title transactions requiring correction. 0.2% or less 0.17% 0.23% 52% 76% 64% Women We are currently investigating any potential causes for this measure being missed in the quarter, but are confident we will meet the budget standard at year end. Average length of service Key: Quarterly performance target met / Year-end target likely to be met Men Quarterly performance target not met, but year-end target likely to be met Quarterly performance target missed / Year-end target unable to be met. Women Years Page 3

4 Report to the Minister for Land Quarter Three 2016/17 Progress against Ministerial Priorities Quality In quarter three we: Implemented changes to the s structure to better align our resourcing with the work of the office. Introduced new templates for applications for consent. Improved website guidance for applicants and added a button for reporting breaches. Next quarter we will improve conditions of consent and update the s37 list of sensitive land. New Zealand s Property System In quarter three we: Progressed work to establish the programme governance structure for Integrated Property Services and articulate the case for change. Commenced the Advanced Survey and Title Services (ASaTS) design phase. Received and analysed the results of the ASaTS governance review. Next quarter we will implement the results of the ASaTS governance review, complete the pricing model and establish whole of life costs. Responding to Disaster In quarter three we: Other Quarter Highlights The Open Government and Data Programme transfer to Statistics New Zealand in March went smoothly. We negotiated the final data services syndicate agreement price with Koordinates, resulting in a 30% cost savings in 2017 and a 90% cost saving as we forecast to Joint work programme between LINZ and ECAN agreed (encompassing Canterbury Braided Rivers work). Joint project between ECAN, Landcare and Timaru District Council to digitally map and measure land classes for rural properties within Timaru successfully delivered, now ready to roll out across New Zealand. We rolled out a business survey to all staff, with 88% of staff participating. The survey questions align with the State Services Commission s Performance Improvement Framework and will provide useful performance information as well as insight into staff engagement. In future we will be able to benchmark our results against other public sector agencies. Results are currently being analysed and will be reported next quarter. People Capacity In June 2015, Hon Paula Bennett, as Minister of State Services, asked her Ministerial colleagues to confirm the Government s commitment to the capping of core government administration staff by ensuring chief executives are aware of their Ministers interest and gain the support of their Ministers for any increases. Establishment and Occupied FTE 700 Gazetted new cadastral rules for greater Christchurch made by the Surveyor-General; the new rules and guidance received very positive feedback from Canterbury land surveyors. Completed realignment of Landonline s digital boundary mapping in Canterbury. Provided mariners with updated Kaikoura hydrographic survey data collected by the New Zealand Defence Force. Next quarter we will commence a project to manage interim surveys in greater Christchurch with potential boundary conflicts. Optimising Land Use In quarter three we: Mar-15 Jun-15 Sep-15 Dec-15 Mar-16 Jun-16 Sep-16 Dec-16 Mar-17 Total Positions Establishment Reported by SSC Occupied FTE Assisted Te Puni Kōkiri to prepare a Supplementary Order paper for Te Ture Whenua Māori Land Bill. Our occupied FTE of is still significantly under the State Services Commission cap of 656 FTE. Began ICT solution analysis for Māori Land Service. We will continue to monitor this closely to ensure we do not breach our cap. Next quarter we will deliver vendor business requirements for the Māori Land Service. 1 Page 1

5 Report to the Minister for Land Quarter Three 2016/17 Non-Financial Performance Please refer to Attachment One for the full list of LINZ s 2016/17 Statement of Performance Expectation (SPE) measures. We are currently meeting 48 of our 55 Statement of Performance Expectation measures (87%). At year end 2016/17, we will not be reporting results for two of our seven Canterbury Earthquake measures, as the activity measured is not within our control or is captured by another measure. The following five measures are off track, with only one likely to be achieved at year end: Performance measure Budget standard Investment Regime The percentage of applications screened for registration within 5 working days of receipt. The percentage of accepted applications processed within the timeline specified: Category 2 Applications - 50 working days or The percentage of accepted applications processed within the timeline specified: Category 3 Applications - 70 working days or The percentage of initial investigation reports completed within 60 working days of the investigation beginning. YTD result Year end forecast 90% 89% 90% 81% 90% 81% 90% 88% : The number of working days to process 90% of cadastral survey datasets. 10 working days 11 working days Not Not Not Not Comment Our new application process puts more resource and focus into the quality of applications during the screening stage. While the initial screening of applications now takes longer, we expect overall timeliness of accepted applications to improve as a result. A number of legacy applications from the 2015/16 continue to impact on 2016/17 results. Otherwise, timeliness of processing applications is improving significantly. The (now resolved) resourcing issues from Q1 continue to impact our ability to meet budget standard at year end. Cadastral survey datasets are waiting longer to be processed due to a lack of resourcing and increased demand. Additional resourcing and continuous improvement work is expected to bring efficiencies in future. We have reviewed our SPE measures for Investment Regime and and are implementing new measures in 2017/18 that better reflect the outcomes we are trying to achieve and our new processes. Financial Performance Please refer to Attachment Two for an overview of Vote Lands and LINZ s financial appropriations. All appropriations are forecast to be within approved spending limits at year end. The forecast underspend to 31 March 2017 is $14m, made up of $7.6m third party and $6.4m Crown funding. $3.3m of in-principle transfers were requested during March Baseline Update. Further in-principle transfers will be requested in May 2017 for significant underspends that are due to changes in projected activities in the last quarter. Expenditure by Appropriation (Departmental only) Appropriation Actual ($m) Year to Date 2016/17 Full Year 2016/17 Budget Forecast Appropriation ($m) ($m) ($m) ($m) ($m) Investment Regime (0.6) MCA (2.1) Christchurch Earthquake MCA MCA Policy Advice MCA MCA Total Departmental Appropriations Admin in Use - Te Puni Kōkiri funding Total Departmental Expenditure Investment Regime ($0.2m forecast full year underspend) Although the appropriation is overspent year to date, this is expected to reverse by year end. A deficit of $2.2m is forecast in the memorandum account. 2. MCA ($8.8m forecast full year underspend) Although the appropriation is overspent year to date due to the timing of project work, costs are forecast to be underspent at year end. $5.4m of this underspend is third party. In-principle transfers will be requested in May 2017 for unspent Crown funding. 3. Christchurch Earthquake MCA ($0.6m forecast full year underspend) There is a high level of variability associated with the timing of acquisitions and disposals of properties before 30 June 2017 and we expect to request in-principle transfers. 4. MCA ($2.2m forecast full year underspend) Scheduled hydrographic surveying activity has been delayed until next year due to reallocation of resources for the Kaikoura earthquake and subsequent unsuitable weather conditions. In-principle transfers will be requested in May Policy Advice MCA ($0.4m forecast full year underspend) The forecast underspend is across many activities and not in relation to any significant items. An expense transfer may be requested in May 2017 if necessary. 6. MCA ($1.8m forecast full year underspend) The ASaTS project activity has significantly increased since December and a fiscally neutral adjustment has been requested to cover additional expenditure in Q4 2016/17. Page 2 2 Note

6 Attachment One Appropriation / MCA Category Measure Name 2016/17 Plan Budget standard YTD result Forecast result Investment Investment Investment Investment Investment Investment Investment The percentage of applications screened for registration within 5 working days of receipt. The percentage of accepted applications under active consideration by the that are processed within the timeline specified: Category 1 Applications - 30 working days or The percentage of accepted applications under active consideration by the that are processed within the timeline specified: Category 2 Applications - 50 working days or The percentage of accepted applications under active consideration by the that are processed within the timeline specified: Category 3 Applications - 70 working days or The satisfaction score given by the Minister for Land for the quality of advice on overseas investment matters. The percentage of monitoring reports assessed within 40 working days of receipt. The percentage of public alerts about potential breaches assessed for possible investigation within 10 working days of receipt. N/A 90% 89% N/A 90% 100% N/A 90% 81% Not N/A 90% 81% Not N/A 90% 95% N/A 90% 100% Investment The percentage of initial investigation reports completed within 60 working days of the investigation beginning. N/A 90% 88% Not Capital Expenditure Land Tenure Reform Acquisitions Capital Expenditure Land Tenure Reform Acquisitions Capital expenditure is in accordance with the Capital Asset Plan. Pastoral lease acquisitions comply with the Crown Pastoral Land Act 1998 N/A Measured annually N/A 100% Ministerial satisfaction with Land New Zealand s Residential Red Zone activities Acquisition and Disposal Expenses The number of properties acquired is in accordance with the agreed plan 0 properties Not Reported Not Reported Clearance of built structures and associated works Clearances completed on Crown-owned properties in the flat land Residential Red Zone. Changes Within 2% of the agreed plan Clearance of built structures and associated works Clearances completed on Crown-owned properties in the Port Hills Residential Red Zone. Changes and Clearance of Land Land clearance and treatment completed on Crown-owned properties in the flat land Residential Red Zone. Changes Within 2% of the agreed plan and Clearance of Land Land clearance and treatment completed on Crown-owned properties in the Port Hills Residential Red Zone. N/A Not Reported Not Reported

7 Appropriation / MCA Category Measure Name 2016/17 Plan Budget standard YTD result Forecast result and Clearance of Land Insurance and Earthquake Commission recoveries received from Crown-owned properties in the Residential Red Zone. Changes Centralised clearance service for acquisitions and disposals Centralised clearance service for acquisitions and disposals Land disposal services for other agencies Land disposal services for other agencies Land New Zealand Biosecurity Programme of Stakeholder satisfaction with Land New Zealand's Crown land performance. The percentage of recommendations on reports received from certified suppliers approved, declined or responded to within 10 working days. The percentage of statutory decisions that meet regulatory and statutory requirements. Realised disposal value of properties is in accordance with agreed plan (other agencies). Disposal of properties is within agreed timeframes (other agencies). Infestation at key sites is controlled in accordance with agreed plan. Realised disposal value of properties is in accordance with agreed plan (LINZ owned properties). of Rental collection from properties is within agreed plan. N/A 95% 98.18% N/A 100% 100% No less than 90% CMV 100% average no more than 36 months N/A 100% Measured annually No less than 90% CMV 100% outstanding rent no more than 4% total revenue 100% Customer satisfaction with Land New Zealand's location based information products and services Data released by Land New Zealand has been assessed under NZGOAL and appropriately licensed N/A 100% Administration of the New Zealand Geographic Board Nga Pou Taunaha o Aotearoa New Zealand Geographic Board (Ngā Pou Taunaha o Aotearoa) satisfaction with the support provided by the Secretariat. Land New Zealand Infrastructure New allocated addresses are processed within agreed timeframes 95% within 5 working days 96.01% Land New Zealand Infrastructure Maintenance of topographic products is in accordance with agreed timeframes hi vis 30 working days, road corridor 12 working days 100% Land New Zealand Infrastructure Survey mark defects are rectified in accordance with agreed timeframes 2 working days 100% Land New Zealand Infrastructure Availability of Global Navigation Satellite System data is in accordance with agreed timeframes 95% available Land New Zealand Infrastructure The percentage of cadastral surveys that are connected to geodetic marks. N/A 98% 99% Land New Zealand Infrastructure Maritime hazards and critical information are notified within agreed timeframes 1 working day 100% Land New Zealand Infrastructure Sea level data is transmitted and received within agreed timeframes 10 minutes 95% 98.8% Land New Zealand Infrastructure New information from hydrographic surveys is available on charting products within agreed timeframes 12 months Measured annually Page 2

8 Appropriation / MCA Category Measure Name 2016/17 Plan Budget standard YTD result Forecast result Policy Advice and Related Services Policy Advice and Related Services Policy Advice and Related Services Policy Advice and Related Services Leading the New Zealand Geospatial Strategy Ministerial Services, Appointments, Implementation and Operational Policy Policy Advice Policy Advice The number of government agencies releasing their geospatial data for reuse that complies with the recommended standards for finding, sharing and reuse. Ministerial satisfaction with Land New Zealand's ministerial support services. The average rating for policy papers as assessed by the external reviewer. Ministerial satisfaction with Land New Zealand's policy advice Policy Advice The total cost per output hour of producing policy advice. N/A N/A 12 or more 14 Up to $140 per output hour $ Customer satisfaction with survey and title services N/A 7 out of 10 Measured annually The percentage of upheld High Court challenges under section 216 of the Land Transfer Act Public complaints to the Valuer General are screened and initial investigation reports are produced within 9 months of receipt. Valuers Registration Board satisfaction with support provided by Land New Zealand. The percentage of applications for registration as a Valuer that meet the statutory requirements that will be examined at the next available date. The percentage of certification decisions that meet regulatory and statutory standards. The percentage of objections to Territorial Local Authority valuations settled within 30% of the original notified valuation. The number of working days to process 90% of cadastral survey datasets. The number of working days to process 90% of manually processed title transactions. The number of working days to satisfy 90% of customer requests for survey and title records. The number of working days taken to adjust 90% of datasets into the cadastral survey network following approval. N/A Less than 10% of those lodged 0% N/A 80% 90% N/A 100% 100% N/A 100% 100% N/A 80% Measured annually N/A 10 working days 11 Not N/A 10 working days 10 N/A 3 working days 2 N/A 20 working days 15 The percentage of survey transactions requiring correction. N/A 2% or less 0.81% The percentage of title transactions requiring correction. N/A 0.2% or less 0.19% Landonline system is available to customers in accordance with agreed times. N/A 99.50% 99.68% Page 3

9 LINZ Appropriations Funding Vote $75m $295m Cabinet gives LINZ money through appropriations 5.9m Multi Category Appropriations (MCA) 39.6m Policy Advice and Related Services MCA MCA Note: This is operating expenditure only Fees received from third parties such as lawyers and OIO applicants Christchurch Earthquake Recovery MCA* $91m Investment Regime MCA Document Departmental Categories 11.0m Managing the Recovery 9.4m Acquisition and Disposal Expenses 1.7m 32.5m 4.6m Non-departmental Categories Clearance of Built Structures and Associated Works and Clearance of Land 72.9m Mass Movement of Land Purchase of Land and Improvements Operating 80.0m 16.6m 49.2m 3.6m 10.0m Four Year Plan (includes proposed Budget Bids) Non-Departmental funding is where LINZ is acting on behalf of the Crown/ Ministers on a particular decision. e.g. Land Tenure Review Vote Lands $370m Departmental $156m Appropriations Third Party Funding Crown Funding Departmental funding is for our core business and running the Department under the CE control. e.g. Infrastructure As Minister, you are responsible for: 0.4m Forestry Plantation Activity 1.3m Bad and Doubtful Debts 0.1m Crown Forest 0.4m Depreciation 4.0m Land Liabilities 0.8m Sale of NZTA Properties March Baseline update Estimates and Supplementary Estimates of Appropriations Non-Departmental $123m Contaminated Sites Budget Bids October Baseline update Annual Report Due Dec (draft) May (final) Role Endorse January Own and signoff to Minister of Finance March Own and signoff to Minister of Finance April Own and signoff to Minister of Finance October Own and signoff to Minister of Finance October Review and present in the House 100.0m Rates on 1.5m Residual Crown Leasehold rents 0.7m Soil Conservation 0.4m Tangoio Catchment 0.1m Loss on Sale of Landbank Properties** 2.3m Impairment of Land for Treaty Settlements** 11.5m * The Minister supporting Greater Christchurch Regeneration. ** The responsible Minister for these appropriations is the Minister for Treaty of Waitangi Negotiations. Estimates of Appropriations: The Vote Lands for the department. Approved in May for the following financial year. Baseline updates: An opportunity for departments to seek changes that Joint Ministers can approve. Supplementary Estimates of Appropriations: The final Vote Lands for the current financial year, incorporating baseline update changes. Approved in May.