PROJECT DATA Project Title: Modena Union Street Bridge Project File : unionst.prj Run Date and Time: 9/6/03 7:47:22 AM. Project in English units

Size: px
Start display at page:

Download "PROJECT DATA Project Title: Modena Union Street Bridge Project File : unionst.prj Run Date and Time: 9/6/03 7:47:22 AM. Project in English units"

Transcription

1 HEC-RAS Version 3.1 November 2002 U.S. Army Corp of Engineers Hydrologic Engineering Center 609 Second Street, Suite D Davis, California (916) X X XXXXXX XXXX XXXX XX XXXX X X X X X X X X X X X X X X X X X X X XXXXXXX XXXX X XXX XXXX XXXXXX XXXX X X X X X X X X X X X X X X X X X X X X X XXXXXX XXXX X X X X XXXXX PROJECT DATA Project Title: Modena Union Street Bridge Project File : unionst.prj Run Date and Time: 9/6/03 7:47:22 AM Project in English units Project Union Street Bridge Analysis PLAN DATA Plan Title: mixed flows Plan File : C:\Program Files\HEC\Ras\modina\unionst.p02 Geometry Title: West Branch of Brandywine Creek Geometry File : C:\Program Files\HEC\Ras\modina\unionst.g01 Flow Title Flow File : Union Street Flow : C:\Program Files\HEC\Ras\modina\unionst.f01

2 Plan Summary Information: Number of: Cross Sections = 10 Mulitple Openings = 0 Culverts = 0 Inline Structures = 0 Bridges = 1 Lateral Structures = 0 Computational Information Water surface calculation tolerance = 0.01 Critical depth calculaton tolerance = 0.01 Maximum number of interations = 20 Maximum difference tolerance = 0.3 Flow tolerance factor = Computation Options Critical depth computed only where necessary Conveyance Calculation Method: At breaks in n values only Friction Slope Method: Average Conveyance Computational Flow Regime: Mixed Flow FLOW DATA Flow Title: Union Street Flow Flow File : C:\Program Files\HEC\Ras\modina\unionst.f01 Flow Data (cfs) River Reach RS 100 Yr 500 Yr West Branch Bran Boundary Conditions River Reach Profile Upstream Downstream West Branch Bran1 100 Yr Known WS = 98.4 Known WS = 0 West Branch Bran1 500 Yr Known WS = 0 Known WS = 0

3 GEOMETRY DATA Geometry Title: West Branch of Brandywine Creek Geometry File : C:\Program Files\HEC\Ras\modina\unionst.g01 REACH: 1 RS: 70 Station Elevation Data num= Bank Sta: Left Right Lengths: Left Channel Right Coeff Contr. Expan E.G. Elev (ft) Element Left OB Channel Right OB Vel Head (ft) 0.67 Wt. n-val W.S. Elev (ft) Reach Len. (ft) Crit W.S. (ft) Flow Area (sq ft) E.G. Slope (ft/ft) Area (sq ft) Q Total (cfs) Flow (cfs) Top Width (ft) Top Width (ft) Vel Total (ft/s) 5.07 Avg. Vel. (ft/s) Max Chl Dpth (ft) Hydr. Depth (ft) Conv. Total (cfs) Conv. (cfs) Length Wtd. (ft) Wetted Per. (ft) Min Ch El (ft) Shear (lb/sq ft) Alpha 1.69 Stream Power (lb/ft s)

4 Frctn Loss (ft) 0.22 Cum Volume (acre-ft) C & E Loss (ft) 0.01 Cum SA (acres) Warning: The cross-section end points had to be extended vertically for the computed water surface. REACH: 1 RS: 60 Station Elevation Data num= Bank Sta: Left Right Lengths: Left Channel Right Coeff Contr. Expan E.G. Elev (ft) Element Left OB Channel Right OB Vel Head (ft) 0.76 Wt. n-val W.S. Elev (ft) Reach Len. (ft) Crit W.S. (ft) Flow Area (sq ft) E.G. Slope (ft/ft) Area (sq ft) Q Total (cfs) Flow (cfs) Top Width (ft) Top Width (ft) Vel Total (ft/s) 5.43 Avg. Vel. (ft/s) Max Chl Dpth (ft) Hydr. Depth (ft) Conv. Total (cfs) Conv. (cfs) Length Wtd. (ft) Wetted Per. (ft) Min Ch El (ft) Shear (lb/sq ft) Alpha 1.66 Stream Power (lb/ft s) Frctn Loss (ft) 0.12 Cum Volume (acre-ft) C & E Loss (ft) 0.02 Cum SA (acres)

5 Warning: The cross-section end points had to be extended vertically for the computed water surface. REACH: 1 RS: 50 Station Elevation Data num= Bank Sta: Left Right Lengths: Left Channel Right Coeff Contr. Expan E.G. Elev (ft) Element Left OB Channel Right OB Vel Head (ft) 0.97 Wt. n-val W.S. Elev (ft) Reach Len. (ft) Crit W.S. (ft) Flow Area (sq ft) E.G. Slope (ft/ft) Area (sq ft) Q Total (cfs) Flow (cfs) Top Width (ft) Top Width (ft) Vel Total (ft/s) 6.85 Avg. Vel. (ft/s) Max Chl Dpth (ft) Hydr. Depth (ft) Conv. Total (cfs) Conv. (cfs) Length Wtd. (ft) Wetted Per. (ft) Min Ch El (ft) Shear (lb/sq ft) Alpha 1.34 Stream Power (lb/ft s) Frctn Loss (ft) 0.24 Cum Volume (acre-ft) C & E Loss (ft) 0.03 Cum SA (acres)

6 Warning: The cross-section end points had to be extended vertically for the computed water surface. REACH: 1 RS: 40 Station Elevation Data num= Bank Sta: Left Right Lengths: Left Channel Right Coeff Contr. Expan E.G. Elev (ft) Element Left OB Channel Right OB Vel Head (ft) 1.30 Wt. n-val W.S. Elev (ft) Reach Len. (ft) Crit W.S. (ft) Flow Area (sq ft) E.G. Slope (ft/ft) Area (sq ft) Q Total (cfs) Flow (cfs) Top Width (ft) Top Width (ft) Vel Total (ft/s) 8.03 Avg. Vel. (ft/s) Max Chl Dpth (ft) Hydr. Depth (ft) Conv. Total (cfs) Conv. (cfs) Length Wtd. (ft) Wetted Per. (ft) Min Ch El (ft) Shear (lb/sq ft) Alpha 1.30 Stream Power (lb/ft s) Frctn Loss (ft) 0.19 Cum Volume (acre-ft) C & E Loss (ft) 0.04 Cum SA (acres) Warning: The cross-section end points had to be extended vertically for the computed water surface.

7 REACH: 1 RS: 36 Station Elevation Data num= Bank Sta: Left Right Lengths: Left Channel Right Coeff Contr. Expan E.G. Elev (ft) Element Left OB Channel Right OB Vel Head (ft) 1.15 Wt. n-val W.S. Elev (ft) Reach Len. (ft) Crit W.S. (ft) Flow Area (sq ft) E.G. Slope (ft/ft) Area (sq ft) Q Total (cfs) Flow (cfs) Top Width (ft) Top Width (ft) Vel Total (ft/s) 7.96 Avg. Vel. (ft/s) Max Chl Dpth (ft) Hydr. Depth (ft) Conv. Total (cfs) Conv. (cfs) Length Wtd. (ft) 1.00 Wetted Per. (ft) Min Ch El (ft) Shear (lb/sq ft) Alpha 1.17 Stream Power (lb/ft s) Frctn Loss (ft) 0.00 Cum Volume (acre-ft) C & E Loss (ft) 0.16 Cum SA (acres) Warning: The cross-section end points had to be extended vertically for the computed water surface. BRIDGE

8 REACH: 1 RS: 35 Existing Bridge Structure Distance from Upstream XS = 1 Deck/Roadway Width = 33 Weir Coefficient = 2.6 Upstream Deck/Roadway Coordinates num= 7 Sta Hi Cord Lo Cord Sta Hi Cord Lo Cord Sta Hi Cord Lo Cord Upstream Bridge Cross Section Data Station Elevation Data num= Bank Sta: Left Right Coeff Contr. Expan Downstream Deck/Roadway Coordinates num= 7 Sta Hi Cord Lo Cord Sta Hi Cord Lo Cord Sta Hi Cord Lo Cord Downstream Bridge Cross Section Data Station Elevation Data num=

9 Bank Sta: Left Right Coeff Contr. Expan Upstream Embankment side slope = 0 horiz. to 1.0 vertical Downstream Embankment side slope = 0 horiz. to 1.0 vertical Maximum allowable submergence for weir flow =.95 Elevation at which weir flow begins = Energy head used in spillway design = Spillway height used in design = Weir crest shape = Broad Crested Number of Piers = 1 Pier Data Pier Station Upstream= 0 Downstream= 0 Upstream num= 2 Width Elev Width Elev Downstream num= 2 Width Elev Width Elev Number of Bridge Coefficient Sets = 1 Low Flow Methods and Data Energy Momentum Cd = 1.33 Yarnell KVal =.9 Selected Low Flow Methods = Highest Energy Answer High Flow Method Energy Only Additional Bridge Parameters Add Friction component to Momentum Do not add Weight component to Momentum Class B flow critical depth computations use critical depth inside the bridge at the upstream end Criteria to check for pressure flow = Upstream energy grade line

10 BRIDGE OUTPUT Profile #100 Yr E.G. US. (ft) Element Inside BR US Inside BR DS W.S. US. (ft) E.G. Elev (ft) Q Total (cfs) W.S. Elev (ft) Q Bridge (cfs) Crit W.S. (ft) Q Weir (cfs) Max Chl Dpth (ft) Weir Sta Lft (ft) Vel Total (ft/s) Weir Sta Rgt (ft) Flow Area (sq ft) Weir Submerg Froude # Chl Weir Max Depth (ft) Specif Force (cu ft) Min El Weir Flow (ft) Hydr Depth (ft) Min El Prs (ft) W.P. Total (ft) Delta EG (ft) 1.18 Conv. Total (cfs) Delta WS (ft) 1.47 Top Width (ft) BR Open Area (sq ft) Frctn Loss (ft) BR Open Vel (ft/s) C & E Loss (ft) Coef of Q Shear Total (lb/sq ft) Br Sel Method Energy only Power Total (lb/ft s) Note: Yarnell answer is not valid if the water surface is above the low chord or if there is weir flow. The Yarnell answer has been disregarded. Note: Momentum answer is not valid if the water surface is above the low chord or if there is weir flow. The momentum answer has been disregarded. REACH: 1 RS: 34 Station Elevation Data num=

11 Bank Sta: Left Right Lengths: Left Channel Right Coeff Contr. Expan E.G. Elev (ft) Element Left OB Channel Right OB Vel Head (ft) 1.45 Wt. n-val W.S. Elev (ft) Reach Len. (ft) Crit W.S. (ft) Flow Area (sq ft) E.G. Slope (ft/ft) Area (sq ft) Q Total (cfs) Flow (cfs) Top Width (ft) Top Width (ft) Vel Total (ft/s) 9.31 Avg. Vel. (ft/s) Max Chl Dpth (ft) Hydr. Depth (ft) Conv. Total (cfs) Conv. (cfs) Length Wtd. (ft) Wetted Per. (ft) Min Ch El (ft) Shear (lb/sq ft) Alpha 1.08 Stream Power (lb/ft s) Frctn Loss (ft) 0.32 Cum Volume (acre-ft) C & E Loss (ft) 0.05 Cum SA (acres) Warning: The cross-section end points had to be extended vertically for the computed water surface. REACH: 1 RS: 30 Station Elevation Data num=

12 Bank Sta: Left Right Lengths: Left Channel Right Coeff Contr. Expan E.G. Elev (ft) Element Left OB Channel Right OB Vel Head (ft) 1.30 Wt. n-val W.S. Elev (ft) Reach Len. (ft) Crit W.S. (ft) Flow Area (sq ft) E.G. Slope (ft/ft) Area (sq ft) Q Total (cfs) Flow (cfs) Top Width (ft) Top Width (ft) Vel Total (ft/s) 8.37 Avg. Vel. (ft/s) Max Chl Dpth (ft) Hydr. Depth (ft) Conv. Total (cfs) Conv. (cfs) Length Wtd. (ft) Wetted Per. (ft) Min Ch El (ft) Shear (lb/sq ft) Alpha 1.20 Stream Power (lb/ft s) Frctn Loss (ft) 0.38 Cum Volume (acre-ft) C & E Loss (ft) 0.16 Cum SA (acres) Warning: The cross-section end points had to be extended vertically for the computed water surface. REACH: 1 RS: 20 Station Elevation Data num= Bank Sta: Left Right Lengths: Left Channel Right Coeff Contr. Expan

13 E.G. Elev (ft) Element Left OB Channel Right OB Vel Head (ft) 0.75 Wt. n-val W.S. Elev (ft) Reach Len. (ft) Crit W.S. (ft) Flow Area (sq ft) E.G. Slope (ft/ft) Area (sq ft) Q Total (cfs) Flow (cfs) Top Width (ft) Top Width (ft) Vel Total (ft/s) 5.24 Avg. Vel. (ft/s) Max Chl Dpth (ft) Hydr. Depth (ft) Conv. Total (cfs) Conv. (cfs) Length Wtd. (ft) Wetted Per. (ft) Min Ch El (ft) Shear (lb/sq ft) Alpha 1.77 Stream Power (lb/ft s) Frctn Loss (ft) 0.28 Cum Volume (acre-ft) C & E Loss (ft) 0.12 Cum SA (acres) Warning: The cross-section end points had to be extended vertically for the computed water surface. REACH: 1 RS: 10 Station Elevation Data num= Bank Sta: Left Right Lengths: Left Channel Right Coeff Contr. Expan

14 E.G. Elev (ft) Element Left OB Channel Right OB Vel Head (ft) 1.93 Wt. n-val W.S. Elev (ft) Reach Len. (ft) Crit W.S. (ft) Flow Area (sq ft) E.G. Slope (ft/ft) Area (sq ft) Q Total (cfs) Flow (cfs) Top Width (ft) Top Width (ft) Vel Total (ft/s) 8.86 Avg. Vel. (ft/s) Max Chl Dpth (ft) Hydr. Depth (ft) Conv. Total (cfs) Conv. (cfs) Length Wtd. (ft) Wetted Per. (ft) Min Ch El (ft) Shear (lb/sq ft) Alpha 1.59 Stream Power (lb/ft s) Frctn Loss (ft) 0.59 Cum Volume (acre-ft) C & E Loss (ft) 0.05 Cum SA (acres) Warning: The cross-section end points had to be extended vertically for the computed water surface. REACH: 1 RS: 0 Station Elevation Data num= Bank Sta: Left Right Coeff Contr. Expan E.G. Elev (ft) Element Left OB Channel Right OB

15 Vel Head (ft) 2.43 Wt. n-val W.S. Elev (ft) Reach Len. (ft) Crit W.S. (ft) Flow Area (sq ft) E.G. Slope (ft/ft) Area (sq ft) Q Total (cfs) Flow (cfs) Top Width (ft) Top Width (ft) Vel Total (ft/s) 9.79 Avg. Vel. (ft/s) Max Chl Dpth (ft) Hydr. Depth (ft) Conv. Total (cfs) Conv. (cfs) Length Wtd. (ft) Wetted Per. (ft) Min Ch El (ft) Shear (lb/sq ft) Alpha 1.63 Stream Power (lb/ft s) Frctn Loss (ft) Cum Volume (acre-ft) C & E Loss (ft) Cum SA (acres) SUMMARY OF MANNING'S N VALUES River:West Branch Bran Reach River Sta. n1 n2 n Bridge SUMMARY OF REACH LENGTHS River: West Branch Bran

16 Reach River Sta. Left Channel Right Bridge SUMMARY OF CONTRACTION AND EXPANSION COEFFICIENTS River: West Branch Bran Reach River Sta. Contr. Expan Bridge

Plan Title: Proposed(24x48 beam) Plan File : h:\padot 8-0\SR York\Str\Design\H&H\2002\SR4017.p05

Plan Title: Proposed(24x48 beam) Plan File : h:\padot 8-0\SR York\Str\Design\H&H\2002\SR4017.p05 HEC-RAS September 1998 Version 2.2 U.S. Army Corp of Engineers Hydrologic Engineering Center 609 Second Street, Suite D Davis, California 95616-4687 (916) 756-1104 X X XXXXXX XXXX XXXX XX XXXX X X X X

More information

If you have any questions or require additional information, please feel free to contact me.

If you have any questions or require additional information, please feel free to contact me. July 12, 2018 Attn: Matt Siekielski NexBank SSB 2515 McKinney Ave, Ste 1100 Dallas, Texas 75201 Re: Flood Reclamation Feasibility Study - Limited Mr. Siekielski, We have completed a limited flood reclamation

More information

APPENDIX F SCOUR ANALYSIS

APPENDIX F SCOUR ANALYSIS APPENDIX F SCOUR ANALYSIS Lichtenstein CONSULTING ENGINEERS JOB Otter St. over Otter Creek SHEET NO. 1 OF 3 CALC. BY CAF DATE 4/24/2007 CHECKED BY GM DATE 4/25/2007 SCALE Variables for Scour Equations

More information

SR-210 MIXED FLOW LANE ADDITION PROJECT EA NO. 0C7000 FROM HIGHLAND AVENUE TO SAN BERNARDINO AVENUE. Prepared for. December 2012.

SR-210 MIXED FLOW LANE ADDITION PROJECT EA NO. 0C7000 FROM HIGHLAND AVENUE TO SAN BERNARDINO AVENUE. Prepared for. December 2012. S A N T A A N A R I V E R L O C A T I O N H Y D R A U L I C S T U D Y SR-210 MIXED FLOW LANE ADDITION PROJECT FROM HIGHLAND AVENUE TO SAN BERNARDINO AVENUE EA NO. 0C7000 Prepared for San Bernardino Associated

More information

SR-210 MIXED FLOW LANE ADDITION PROJECT EA NO. 0C7000 FROM HIGHLAND AVENUE TO SAN BERNARDINO AVENUE. Prepared for. December 2012.

SR-210 MIXED FLOW LANE ADDITION PROJECT EA NO. 0C7000 FROM HIGHLAND AVENUE TO SAN BERNARDINO AVENUE. Prepared for. December 2012. C I T Y C R E E K L O C A T I O N H Y D R A U L I C S T U D Y SR-210 MIXED FLOW LANE ADDITION PROJECT FROM HIGHLAND AVENUE TO SAN BERNARDINO AVENUE EA NO. 0C7000 Prepared for San Bernardino Associated

More information

CRISP COUNTY, GEORGIA AND INCORPORATED AREAS

CRISP COUNTY, GEORGIA AND INCORPORATED AREAS CRISP COUNTY, GEORGIA AND INCORPORATED AREAS Community Name Community Number ARABI, CITY OF 130514 CORDELE, CITY OF 130214 CRISP COUNTY (UNINCORPORATED AREAS) 130504 Crisp County EFFECTIVE: SEPTEMBER 25,

More information

Trinity River Restoration Program

Trinity River Restoration Program Trinity River Restoration Program Trinity River Bridges: Hydraulic, Scour, and Riprap Sizing Analysis US DEPARTMENT OF THE INTERIOR BUREAU OF RECLAMATION TECHNICAL SERVICE CENTER Prepared by Kent L. Collins

More information

APPENDIX K Drainage Study

APPENDIX K Drainage Study APPENDIX K Drainage Study Storm Drainage Study For Project 65 Sacramento, California Prepared for: Capital Station 65, LLC Prepared by: Nolte Associates, Inc. 2495 Natomas Park Drive, Fourth Floor Sacramento,

More information

SPILLWAY ADEQUACY ANALYSIS ROUGH RIVER LAKE LOUISVILLE DISTRICT

SPILLWAY ADEQUACY ANALYSIS ROUGH RIVER LAKE LOUISVILLE DISTRICT SPILLWAY ADEQUACY ANALYSIS OF ROUGH RIVER LAKE LOUISVILLE DISTRICT RICHARD PRUITT (502) 315-6380 Louisville District COE richard.l.pruitt@lrl02.usace.army.mil Spillway ROUGH RIVER LAKE PERTINENT DATA Construction

More information

The maximum allowable valley storage decrease for the 100-year flood and Standard Project Flood are 0.0% and 5.0%, respectively.

The maximum allowable valley storage decrease for the 100-year flood and Standard Project Flood are 0.0% and 5.0%, respectively. 2.1.1.2 HYDRAULIC IMPACTS VALLEY The maximum allowable valley storage decrease for the 100-year flood and Standard Project Flood are 0.0% and 5.0%, respectively. General. The computation of valley storage

More information

Chapter 5 Floodplain Management

Chapter 5 Floodplain Management Chapter 5 Floodplain Management Contents 1.0 Introduction... 1 2.0 Floodplain Management and Regulation... 1 2.1 City Code... 1 2.2 Floodplain Management... 1 2.3 Level of Flood Protection... 2 2.3.1 Standard

More information

BUTTS COUNTY, GEORGIA AND INCORPORATED AREAS

BUTTS COUNTY, GEORGIA AND INCORPORATED AREAS BUTTS COUNTY, GEORGIA AND INCORPORATED AREAS Butts County Community Name Community Number BUTTS COUNTY (UNICORPORATED AREAS) 130518 FLOVILLA, CITY OF 130283 JACKSON, CITY OF 130222 JENKINSBURG, TOWN OF

More information

DECATUR COUNTY, GEORGIA AND INCORPORATED AREAS

DECATUR COUNTY, GEORGIA AND INCORPORATED AREAS DECATUR COUNTY, GEORGIA AND INCORPORATED AREAS Community Name Community Number ATTAPULGUS, CITY OF 130541 BAINBRIDGE, CITY OF 130204 BRINSON, TOWN OF 130670 CLIMAX, CITY OF 130542 DECATUR COUNTY (UNINCORPORATED

More information

HOLMES COUNTY, FLORIDA AND INCORPORATED AREAS

HOLMES COUNTY, FLORIDA AND INCORPORATED AREAS HOLMES COUNTY, FLORIDA AND INCORPORATED AREAS Community Name Community Number BONIFAY, CITY OF 120116 ESTO, TOWN OF 120630 HOLMES COUNTY (UNINCORPORATED AREAS) 120420 NOMA, TOWN OF 120631 PONCE DE LEON,

More information

Burlington, Massachusetts

Burlington, Massachusetts Stormwater Management Summary Proposed Restaurant Burlington, Massachusetts Prepared for ND Burlington South Avenue LLC C/O National Development 2310 Washington Street Newton, MA 02462 Prepared by /Vanasse

More information

UPDATE ON DALLAS FLOODWAY

UPDATE ON DALLAS FLOODWAY UPDATE ON DALLAS FLOODWAY ENVIRONMENTAL IMPACT STATEMENT [ EIS ] Transportation and Trinity River Project Committee Rob Newman Director, Trinity River Corridor Project, Fort Worth District 28 April 2014

More information

Model Development to Support Assessment of Flood Risk for the Columbia River Treaty Review

Model Development to Support Assessment of Flood Risk for the Columbia River Treaty Review Model Development to Support Assessment of Flood Risk for the Columbia River Treaty Review 2012 AWRA Washington State Conference Sara Marxen, P.E. U.S. Army Corps of Engineers Seattle District September,

More information

Requirements for Mapping Levees Complying with Section of the NFIP Regulations

Requirements for Mapping Levees Complying with Section of the NFIP Regulations FACT SHEET Requirements for Mapping Levees Complying with Section 65.10 of the NFIP Regulations As part of a mapping project, it is the levee owner s or community s responsibility to provide data and documentation

More information

SENECA COUNTY, OHIO AND INCORPORATED AREAS

SENECA COUNTY, OHIO AND INCORPORATED AREAS SENECA COUNTY, OHIO AND INCORPORATED AREAS COMMUNITY NAME COMMUNITY NUMBER ATTICA, VILLAGE OF* 390991 BETTSVILLE, VILLAGE OF 390500 BLOOMFIELD, VILLAGE OF* 390989 NEW RIEGEL, VILLAGE OF* 390990 REPUBLIC,

More information

Kentucky Division of Water Permitting Floodplain Overview and Considerations

Kentucky Division of Water Permitting Floodplain Overview and Considerations Kentucky Division of Water Permitting Floodplain Overview and Considerations Presentation to: 2014 KAMM Conference Lake Barkley State Resort Park by Solitha Dharman Department for Environmental Protection

More information

July 31, 2017 NFIP Flood Map Open House Flood Maps 101 Flood Mapping acronyms History of the NFIP Flood Mapping Updates Flood Insurance Fairhope,

July 31, 2017 NFIP Flood Map Open House Flood Maps 101 Flood Mapping acronyms History of the NFIP Flood Mapping Updates Flood Insurance Fairhope, July 31, 2017 NFIP Flood Map Open House Flood Maps 101 Flood Mapping acronyms History of the NFIP Flood Mapping Updates Flood Insurance Fairhope, Alabama Flood Maps Fairhope Permitting Jurisdiction Coastal

More information

FINAL TECHNICAL MEMORANDUM AWD FLOWS THROUGH FLOOD DAMAGE REDUCTION AREA July 16, 2012

FINAL TECHNICAL MEMORANDUM AWD FLOWS THROUGH FLOOD DAMAGE REDUCTION AREA July 16, 2012 FINAL TECHNICAL MEMORANDUM AWD-00002 FLOWS THROUGH FLOOD DAMAGE REDUCTION AREA July 16, 2012 Table of Contents TABLE OF CONTENTS Table of Contents... 1 Executive Summary... 2 1 Objective... 4 2 Study Approach...

More information

Skagit County Flood Insurance Study Update. Ryan Ike, CFM FEMA Region 10

Skagit County Flood Insurance Study Update. Ryan Ike, CFM FEMA Region 10 Skagit County Flood Insurance Study Update Ryan Ike, CFM FEMA Region 10 Skagit County Flood Insurance Study Process Overview Process, Schedule, & Deliverables Base Flood Elevations, Modeling, & Levees

More information

Dealing With Unnumbered A Zones in Maine Floodplain Management

Dealing With Unnumbered A Zones in Maine Floodplain Management Dealing With Unnumbered A Zones in Maine Floodplain Management The following is a list of acceptable methods that the State Floodplain Management Coordinator and the Federal Emergency Management Agency

More information

SUBJECT: EXECUTIVE DIRECTOR'S REPORT FOR JANUARY 19, 2017 WATER INFRASTRUCTURE IMPROVEMENTS FOR THE NATION (WIIN) ACT

SUBJECT: EXECUTIVE DIRECTOR'S REPORT FOR JANUARY 19, 2017 WATER INFRASTRUCTURE IMPROVEMENTS FOR THE NATION (WIIN) ACT ITEM 2 Agenda of January 19, 2017 TO: FROM: Board of Directors Sacramento Area Flood Control Agency Richard M. Johnson, Executive Director (916) 874-7606 SUBJECT: EXECUTIVE DIRECTOR'S REPORT FOR JANUARY

More information

Flood Risk Assessment for Planning

Flood Risk Assessment for Planning Flood Risk Assessment for Planning Report on: Sample Property, Sample Town, Sample Postcode Report prepared for: Report Reference: Report Date: Sample AEL-XXXX-FRA-XXXX 28 th October 2016 Client Reference:

More information

APPENDIX A-3: Cost Engineering

APPENDIX A-3: Cost Engineering APPENDIX A-3: Cost Engineering ALISO CREEK MAINSTEM ECOSYSTEM RESTORATION STUDY Orange County, California September 217 Orange County Public Works Environmental Resources Department This page intentionally

More information

Subject: Upper Merrimack and Pemigewasset River Study Task 9 - Water Supply Evaluation

Subject: Upper Merrimack and Pemigewasset River Study Task 9 - Water Supply Evaluation Memorandum To: From: Barbara Blumeris, USACE Ginger Croom and Kirk Westphal, CDM Date: April 14, 2008 Subject: Upper Merrimack and Pemigewasset River Study Task 9 - Water Supply Evaluation Executive Summary

More information

Development Fee Program: Comparative risk analysis

Development Fee Program: Comparative risk analysis Development Fee Program: Comparative risk analysis January 2008 Sacramento Area Flood Control Agency David Ford Consulting Engineers, Inc. 2015 J Street, Suite 200 Sacramento, CA 95811 Ph. 916.447.8779

More information

The SAS System 11:03 Monday, November 11,

The SAS System 11:03 Monday, November 11, The SAS System 11:3 Monday, November 11, 213 1 The CONTENTS Procedure Data Set Name BIO.AUTO_PREMIUMS Observations 5 Member Type DATA Variables 3 Engine V9 Indexes Created Monday, November 11, 213 11:4:19

More information

Region N 1371 Pcachtree Street, NE, Suite 700 Atlanta, GA 30309

Region N 1371 Pcachtree Street, NE, Suite 700 Atlanta, GA 30309 Region N 1371 Pcachtree Street, NE, Suite 700 Atlanta, GA 30309 Section 60.3 (d) (3) of the National Flood nsurance. Program (NFP) regulations states that a community-shall "prohibit encroachments, including

More information

Bucks County, PA Flood Risk Review Meeting. November 2014

Bucks County, PA Flood Risk Review Meeting. November 2014 Bucks County, PA Flood Risk Review Meeting November 2014 Agenda for Today Risk MAP Program overview Overview of non-regulatory Flood Risk Products and datasets Discuss mitigation action Technical overview

More information

Linear Programming: Simplex Method

Linear Programming: Simplex Method Mathematical Modeling (STAT 420/620) Spring 2015 Lecture 10 February 19, 2015 Linear Programming: Simplex Method Lecture Plan 1. Linear Programming and Simplex Method a. Family Farm Problem b. Simplex

More information

FLOOD HAZARD AND RISK MANAGEMENT UTILIZING HYDRAULIC MODELING AND GIS TECHNOLOGIES IN URBAN ENVIRONMENT

FLOOD HAZARD AND RISK MANAGEMENT UTILIZING HYDRAULIC MODELING AND GIS TECHNOLOGIES IN URBAN ENVIRONMENT Proceedings of the 14 th International Conference on Environmental Science and Technology Rhodes, Greece, 3-5 September 2015 FLOOD HAZARD AND RISK MANAGEMENT UTILIZING HYDRAULIC MODELING AND GIS TECHNOLOGIES

More information

Upper Joachim Creek Public Survey on Potential Flood Risk Reduction

Upper Joachim Creek Public Survey on Potential Flood Risk Reduction Upper Joachim Creek Public Survey on Potential Flood Risk Reduction This survey is intended to help the interagency planning committee to receive public feedback on specific flood risk reduction techniques,

More information

JANUARY 13, ILL. ADM. CODE CH. I, SEC TITLE 17: CONSERVATION CHAPTER I: DEPARTMENT OF NATURAL RESOURCES SUBCHAPTER h: WATER RESOURCES

JANUARY 13, ILL. ADM. CODE CH. I, SEC TITLE 17: CONSERVATION CHAPTER I: DEPARTMENT OF NATURAL RESOURCES SUBCHAPTER h: WATER RESOURCES TITLE 17: CONSERVATION CHAPTER I: DEPARTMENT OF NATURAL RESOURCES SUBCHAPTER h: WATER RESOURCES PART 3702 CONSTRUCTION AND MAINTENANCE OF DAMS Section Page No. 3702.10 Purpose 2 3702.20 Definitions 3 3702.30

More information

INSTRUCTIONS FOR COMPLETING THE APPLICATION FORMS FOR CONDITIONAL LETTERS OF MAP REVISION AND LETTERS OF MAP REVISION

INSTRUCTIONS FOR COMPLETING THE APPLICATION FORMS FOR CONDITIONAL LETTERS OF MAP REVISION AND LETTERS OF MAP REVISION INSTRUCTIONS FOR COMPLETING THE APPLICATION FORMS FOR CONDITIONAL LETTERS OF MAP REVISION AND LETTERS OF MAP REVISION GENERAL In 1968, the U.S. Congress passed the National Flood Insurance Act, which created

More information

JONES COUNTY GEORGIA AND INCORPORATED AREAS. Effective: May 4, 2009 FLOOD INSURANCE STUDY NUMBER 13169CV000A

JONES COUNTY GEORGIA AND INCORPORATED AREAS. Effective: May 4, 2009 FLOOD INSURANCE STUDY NUMBER 13169CV000A JONES COUNTY, GEORGIA AND INCORPORATED AREAS JONES COUNTY COMMUNITY NAME COMMUNITY NUMBER GRAY, CITY OF 130237 JONES COUNTY 130434 (UNINCORPORATED AREAS) Effective: May 4, 2009 FLOOD INSURANCE STUDY NUMBER

More information

The AIR Inland Flood Model for Great Britian

The AIR Inland Flood Model for Great Britian The AIR Inland Flood Model for Great Britian The year 212 was the UK s second wettest since recordkeeping began only 6.6 mm shy of the record set in 2. In 27, the UK experienced its wettest summer, which

More information

PUTNAM COUNTY, GEORGIA

PUTNAM COUNTY, GEORGIA PUTNAM COUNTY, GEORGIA AND INCORPORATED AREAS Community Name Community Number Eatonton, City of 130218 Putnam County 130540 (Unincorporated Areas) Putnam County Effective: September 26, 2008 FLOOD INSURANCE

More information

BRIDGE ALTERNATE STUDY No. 1

BRIDGE ALTERNATE STUDY No. 1 BRIDGE ALTERNATE STUDY No. 1 RURAL STREAM CROSSING Prepared for U. S. Bridge Cambridge, Ohio Prepared by RICHLAND ENGINEERING LIMITED 29 North Park Street, Mansfield, Ohio 44902-1769 419/524-0074 FAX 419/524-1812

More information

DuPage County East Branch DuPage River Resiliency Project. Benefit Cost Analysis

DuPage County East Branch DuPage River Resiliency Project. Benefit Cost Analysis DuPage County East Branch DuPage River Resiliency Project Benefit Cost Analysis 1.0 Benefit Cost Analysis Preparation The BCA for this proposal was a collaborative effort between DuPage County, V3 engineering

More information

7. Understand effect of multiple annual exposures e.g., 30-yr period and multiple independent locations yr event over 30 years 3%

7. Understand effect of multiple annual exposures e.g., 30-yr period and multiple independent locations yr event over 30 years 3% I. FLOOD HAZARD A. Definition 1. Hazard: probability of water height 2. At a Specific XY floodplain location; 3. Z can be expressed as elevation (NAVD88); gauge height; height above ground (depth). 4.

More information

Corps Water Management System (CWMS)

Corps Water Management System (CWMS) Corps Water Management System (CWMS) Real-Time Decision Support Modeling & Mapping Inter-Agency Flood Risk Characterization Workshop Christopher N. Dunn, P.E., D. WRE, Director Hydrologic Engineering Center

More information

Action Items for Flood Risk Management on Wildcat Creek Interagency success with floodplain management plans and flood forecast inundation maps

Action Items for Flood Risk Management on Wildcat Creek Interagency success with floodplain management plans and flood forecast inundation maps Presentation to USACE 2012 Flood Risk Management and Silver Jackets Joint Workshop, Harrisburg, Pennsylvania Action Items for Flood Risk Management on Wildcat Creek Interagency success with floodplain

More information

Understanding and Using NFIP Data

Understanding and Using NFIP Data Understanding and Using NFIP Data The understanding of those who provide information and of those who have to act responsibly in using that information is often very much misunderstood. Old Proverb Overview

More information

APPENDIX E ECONOMICS

APPENDIX E ECONOMICS APPENDIX E ECONOMICS American River Watershed Common Features General Reevaluation Report Draft Economics Appendix E February 2015 Cover Photos courtesy of the Sacramento District: Sacramento Weir during

More information

Opinion of Probable Cost

Opinion of Probable Cost Appendix E Opinion of Probable Cost 01054/8410233/14/Rohner_Alt_Analysis_Report Rohner Creek Flood Control, Habitat and Seismic Improvement Project Alternatives Analysis Cost Alternative 1: Improved Channel

More information

JENKINS COUNTY, GEORGIA

JENKINS COUNTY, GEORGIA JENKINS COUNTY, GEORGIA AND INCORPORATED AREAS Community Name Community Number Jenkins County JENKINS COUNTY 130118 (UNINCORPORATED AREAS) MILLEN, CITY OF 130119 Revised: August 5, 2010 FLOOD INSURANCE

More information

MONTGOMERY COUNTY, NEW YORK (ALL JURISDICTIONS)

MONTGOMERY COUNTY, NEW YORK (ALL JURISDICTIONS) MONTGOMERY COUNTY, NEW YORK Montgomery County COMMUNITY NAME COMMUNITY NUMBER COMMUNITY NAME COMMUNITY NUMBER AMES, VILLAGE OF 360439 GLEN, TOWN OF 361295 AMSTERDAM, CITY OF 360440 HAGAMAN, VILLAGE OF

More information

Non Regulatory Risk MAP Products Flood Depth and Probability Grids

Non Regulatory Risk MAP Products Flood Depth and Probability Grids Non Regulatory Risk MAP Products Flood Depth and Probability Grids Virginia Floodplain Management Association 2015 Floodplain Management Workshop October 29th, 2015 Nabil Ghalayini, P.E., PMP, D.WRE, CFM

More information

ENGINEERING REPORT FREEBOARD ANALYSIS. HOUSATONIC RIVER and NAUGATUCK RIVER FLOOD PROTECTION PROJECTS SECTION 1. ANSONIA and DERBY, CONNECTICUT

ENGINEERING REPORT FREEBOARD ANALYSIS. HOUSATONIC RIVER and NAUGATUCK RIVER FLOOD PROTECTION PROJECTS SECTION 1. ANSONIA and DERBY, CONNECTICUT ENGINEERING REPORT FREEBOARD ANALYSIS HOUSATONIC RIVER and NAUGATUCK RIVER FLOOD PROTECTION PROJECTS SECTION 1 ANSONIA and DERBY, CONNECTICUT December 2010 MMI #1560-119 and #3118-03 Prepared for: City

More information

Maricopa County DOT. Transportation Asset Management (TAM) Planning. March 1, 2018 DYE MANAGEMENT GROUP, INC.

Maricopa County DOT. Transportation Asset Management (TAM) Planning. March 1, 2018 DYE MANAGEMENT GROUP, INC. Maricopa County DOT Transportation Asset Management (TAM) Planning March 1, 2018 DYE MANAGEMENT GROUP, INC. Transportation Asset Management (TAM) A strategic and systematic process of operating, maintaining,

More information

Chicopee River CSO Project Springfield Water & Sewer Commission. APWA Congress September 9, CSO Control Plan. CSO Control

Chicopee River CSO Project Springfield Water & Sewer Commission. APWA Congress September 9, CSO Control Plan. CSO Control Chicopee River CSO Project Springfield Water & Sewer Commission APWA Congress September 9, 2007 CSO Control Plan Typical Approach Different Thinking on Controlling Costs Case Example Springfield MA CSO

More information

Dynamic Response of Jackup Units Re-evaluation of SNAME 5-5A Four Methods

Dynamic Response of Jackup Units Re-evaluation of SNAME 5-5A Four Methods ISOPE 2010 Conference Beijing, China 24 June 2010 Dynamic Response of Jackup Units Re-evaluation of SNAME 5-5A Four Methods Xi Ying Zhang, Zhi Ping Cheng, Jer-Fang Wu and Chee Chow Kei ABS 1 Main Contents

More information

FREQUENTLY ASKED QUESTION ABOUT FLOODPLAINS Michigan Department of Environmental Quality

FREQUENTLY ASKED QUESTION ABOUT FLOODPLAINS Michigan Department of Environmental Quality FREQUENTLY ASKED QUESTION ABOUT FLOODPLAINS Michigan Department of Environmental Quality WHAT IS A FLOOD? The National Flood Insurance Program defines a flood as a general and temporary condition of partial

More information

Paschali Stauroula Karanika Chrisoula Kokovinos Konstantinos Koujianos Ioannis Vatistas Panagiotis

Paschali Stauroula Karanika Chrisoula Kokovinos Konstantinos Koujianos Ioannis Vatistas Panagiotis Evros River Flood Lavara Case Study Chouvardas Konstantinos (Coordinator) Papapostolou Christos Chamitidou Maria Partsias Christos Doulgeraki Chrisoula Paschali Stauroula Paschali Stauroula Karanika Chrisoula

More information

LUMPKIN COUNTY, GEORGIA

LUMPKIN COUNTY, GEORGIA LUMPKIN COUNTY, GEORGIA AND INCORPORATED AREAS Lumpkin County COMMUNITY NAME COMMUNITY NUMBER DAHLONEGA, CITY OF 130129 LUMPKIN COUNTY 130354 (UNINCORPORATED AREAS) SEPTEMBER 26, 2008 FLOOD INSURANCE STUDY

More information

Scottish Planning Policy (SPP) Compensatory Flood Storage / Flood Mitigation

Scottish Planning Policy (SPP) Compensatory Flood Storage / Flood Mitigation Scottish Planning Policy (SPP) Compensatory Flood Storage / Flood Mitigation Marc Becker SEPA Flood Unit Manager Joint SHG / SHGS meeting 8 th September 2010 Smith Art Gallery and Museum, Dumbarton Road,

More information

VOLUME 1 OF 1 CARROLL COUNTY, IOWA AND INCORPORATED AREAS

VOLUME 1 OF 1 CARROLL COUNTY, IOWA AND INCORPORATED AREAS VOLUME 1 OF 1 CARROLL COUNTY, IOWA AND INCORPORATED AREAS COMMUNITY NAME NUMBER ARCADIA, CITY OF 190694 BREDA, CITY OF* 190926 CARROLL, CITY OF 190041 CARROLL COUNTY UNINCORPORATED AREAS 190039 COON RAPIDS,

More information

MONROE COUNTY, GEORGIA

MONROE COUNTY, GEORGIA MONROE COUNTY, GEORGIA AND INCORPORATED AREAS Monroe County Community Name Community Number *CULLODEN, CITY OF 130543 FORSYTH, CITY OF 130359 MONROE COUNTY 130138 (UNINCORPORATED AREAS) *No Flood Hazard

More information

Public Information Meeting Rahway River Basin, New Jersey Flood Risk Management Feasibility Study

Public Information Meeting Rahway River Basin, New Jersey Flood Risk Management Feasibility Study Public Information Meeting Rahway River Basin, New Jersey Flood Risk Management Feasibility Study U.S. Army Corps of Engineers, New York District New Jersey Department of Environmental Protection 11 &

More information

IN THE LITTLE APPLE A PRESENTATION FOR THE 2017 ASFPM ANNUAL CONFERENCE IN KANSAS CITY, MO, MANAGING FLOOD RISK IN THE HEARTLAND

IN THE LITTLE APPLE A PRESENTATION FOR THE 2017 ASFPM ANNUAL CONFERENCE IN KANSAS CITY, MO, MANAGING FLOOD RISK IN THE HEARTLAND A PRESENTATION FOR THE 2017 ASFPM ANNUAL CONFERENCE IN KANSAS CITY, MO, MANAGING FLOOD RISK IN THE HEARTLAND NONSTRUCTURAL 237 217 200 ASSESSMENT 80 252 237 217 200 119 174 237 217 200 27.59 IN THE LITTLE

More information

Peter Brett Associates. Assessing Flood Risk and River Modelling Doulton Brook Development, West Midlands

Peter Brett Associates. Assessing Flood Risk and River Modelling Doulton Brook Development, West Midlands Peter Brett Associates Assessing Flood Risk and River Modelling Doulton Brook Development, West Midlands PLANNING POLICY INTRODUCTION For any proposed residential development close to a river or watercourse

More information

REVISED: MARCH 7, 2019 VOLUME 1 OF 3 MISSOULA COUNTY, MONTANA AND INCORPORATED AREAS COMMUNITY NUMBER COMMUNITY NAME

REVISED: MARCH 7, 2019 VOLUME 1 OF 3 MISSOULA COUNTY, MONTANA AND INCORPORATED AREAS COMMUNITY NUMBER COMMUNITY NAME VOLUME 1 OF 3 MISSOULA COUNTY, MONTANA AND INCORPORATED AREAS COMMUNITY NAME MISSOULA COUNTY, UNINCORPORATED AREAS COMMUNITY NUMBER 300048 MISSOULA, CITY OF 300049 REVISED: MARCH 7, 2019 FLOOD INSURANCE

More information

Flood Insurance and Levees

Flood Insurance and Levees Flood Insurance and Levees NFIP Requirements are found in 44 (CFR) Section 65.10 General Requirements 65.10(a) Design Criteria 65.10(b) Operation Plans and Criteria 65.10(c) Maintenance Plans and Criteria

More information

1 Interest: Investing Money

1 Interest: Investing Money 1 Interest: Investing Money Relating Units of Time 1. Becky has been working at a flower shop for 2.1 yr. a) How long is this in weeks? Round up. 2.1 yr 3 wk/yr is about wk b) How long is this in days?

More information

WASHINGTON COUNTY, KENTUCKY AND INCORPORATED AREAS

WASHINGTON COUNTY, KENTUCKY AND INCORPORATED AREAS WASHINGTON COUNTY, KENTUCKY AND INCORPORATED AREAS COMMUNITY NAME COMMUNITY NUMBER *MACKVILLE, CITY OF 210475 SPRINGFIELD, CITY OF 210220 WASHINGTON COUNTY (UNINCORPORATED AREAS) 210365 *WILLISBURG, CITY

More information

Mexican Gold Corp. (TSX-V: MEX) Recommendation - BUY Target Price - C$ QUARTERLY UPDATE (November 26, 2018) comprehensiveresearch.

Mexican Gold Corp. (TSX-V: MEX) Recommendation - BUY Target Price - C$ QUARTERLY UPDATE (November 26, 2018) comprehensiveresearch. Mexican Gold Corp. (TSX-V: MEX) Recommendation - BUY Target Price - C$ 0.75 QUARTERLY UPDATE (November 26, 2018) comprehensiveresearch.ca Maintaining Our Buy Rating and Adjusting Target Price to C$ 0.75

More information

Chapter 6 - Floodplains

Chapter 6 - Floodplains Chapter 6 - Floodplains 6.1 Overview The goal of floodplain management is to reduce the potential risks to both existing and future developments, and infrastructure, in the 100-year floodplain. Over the

More information

Flood Risk Management

Flood Risk Management Flood Risk Management COUNTY SUMMARY COUNTY: MONAGHAN (Information correct as of 31/12/2017) CONTENTS: 1. OPW Capital Investment to 31 December 2017 a. Major Flood Relief Schemes 1995 2017 b. Minor Flood

More information

SECTION 9: MAPS AND DATA

SECTION 9: MAPS AND DATA SECTION 9: MAPS AND DATA Contents 9.1. NFIP Maps and Data... 9-2 9.1.1. Adopting and enforcing NFIP floodplain maps and data... 9-2 9.1.2. Adopting and enforcing more restrictive data... 9-2 9.1.3. Annexations...

More information

DES MOINES CITY OF TWO RIVERS. Flooding Risk & Impact to Development

DES MOINES CITY OF TWO RIVERS. Flooding Risk & Impact to Development DES MOINES CITY OF TWO RIVERS Flooding Risk & Impact to Development River System Des Moines Flood Protection Des Moines Flood Protection cont. Infrastructure Over 24 miles of levees 21stormwater pump stations

More information

BRITISH COLUMBIA DAM SAFETY REGULATION 44/2000

BRITISH COLUMBIA DAM SAFETY REGULATION 44/2000 PDF Version [Printer friendly ideal for printing entire document] BRITISH COLUMBIA DAM SAFETY REGULATION 44/2000 Published by Important: Quickscribe offers a convenient and economical updating service

More information

EXST7015: Multiple Regression from Snedecor & Cochran (1967) RAW DATA LISTING

EXST7015: Multiple Regression from Snedecor & Cochran (1967) RAW DATA LISTING Multiple (Linear) Regression Introductory example Page 1 1 options ps=256 ls=132 nocenter nodate nonumber; 3 DATA ONE; 4 TITLE1 ''; 5 INPUT X1 X2 X3 Y; 6 **** LABEL Y ='Plant available phosphorus' 7 X1='Inorganic

More information

Empirical Rule (P148)

Empirical Rule (P148) Interpreting the Standard Deviation Numerical Descriptive Measures for Quantitative data III Dr. Tom Ilvento FREC 408 We can use the standard deviation to express the proportion of cases that might fall

More information

DEPARTMENT OF WATER AFFAIRS. No. R February 2012 NATIONAL WATER ACT, 1998

DEPARTMENT OF WATER AFFAIRS. No. R February 2012 NATIONAL WATER ACT, 1998 STAATSKOERANT, 24 FEBRUARIE 2012 No. 35062 3 GOVERNMENT NOTICE DEPARTMENT OF WATER AFFAIRS No. R. 139 24 February 2012 NATIONAL WATER ACT, 1998 REGULATIONS REGARDING THE SAFETY OF DAMS IN TERMS OF SECTION

More information

Request for Removal of Lands from Floodplain & City Floodplain Map Amendment Madison Metropolitan Sewerage District Pump Station 18, Monona, WI

Request for Removal of Lands from Floodplain & City Floodplain Map Amendment Madison Metropolitan Sewerage District Pump Station 18, Monona, WI 999 Fourier Drive, Suite 201 Madison, Wisconsin 53517 (608) 826-0532 phone (608) 826-0530 FAX www.vierbicher.com September 6, 2016 Ms. Sonja Reichertz Planning & Community Development Coordinator Plan

More information

Subsoil Exploration. Foundation Engineering. Solution Givens:

Subsoil Exploration. Foundation Engineering. Solution Givens: Problems: 1. Site investigation is to be made for a structure of 100m length and 70m width. The soil profile is shown below, if the structure is subjected to 200 KN/m 2 what is the approximate depth of

More information

(24 February to date) NATIONAL WATER ACT 36 OF (Gazette No , Notice No See Act for commencement dates)

(24 February to date) NATIONAL WATER ACT 36 OF (Gazette No , Notice No See Act for commencement dates) (24 February 2012 - to date) NATIONAL WATER ACT 36 OF 1998 (Gazette No. 19182, Notice No. 1091. See Act for commencement dates) REGULATIONS REGARDING THE SAFETY OF DAMS IN TERMS OF SECTION 123(1) OF THE

More information

DES MOINES COUNTY, IOWA AND INCORPORATED AREAS

DES MOINES COUNTY, IOWA AND INCORPORATED AREAS VOLUME 1 OF 1 DES MOINES COUNTY, IOWA AND INCORPORATED AREAS COMMUNITY NAME CID CITY OF BURLINGTON 190114 CITY OF DANVILLE 190115 DES MOINES COUNTY (UNINCORPORATED AREAS) 190113 CITY OF MEDIAPOLIS 190615

More information

WOOD COUNTY, WV FLOODPLAIN ORDINANCE TABLE OF CONTENTS

WOOD COUNTY, WV FLOODPLAIN ORDINANCE TABLE OF CONTENTS WOOD COUNTY, WV FLOODPLAIN ORDINANCE TABLE OF CONTENTS ARTICLE I - GENERAL PROVISIONS 3 Section 1.1 Intent 3 Section 1.2 Abrogation and Greater Restrictions 3 Section 1.3 Applicability 3 Section 1.4 Matters

More information

SMALL RENEWABLE ENERGY (HYDRO) INSURANCE PROPOSAL FORM

SMALL RENEWABLE ENERGY (HYDRO) INSURANCE PROPOSAL FORM SMALL RENEWABLE ENERGY (HYDRO) INSURANCE PROPOSAL FORM Contact Name: Company / Organisation: Address: Telephone: email: Insured Parties (Parties to be named in the policy as insured) PLEASE NOTE: Contract

More information

Table 1: Federal, State and Local Government Rules applicable to LOMRs/CLOMRS submittal

Table 1: Federal, State and Local Government Rules applicable to LOMRs/CLOMRS submittal MnDNR LOMC Guide This document has been prepared by the Minnesota Department of Natural Resources floodplain staff and is intended to provide assistance with LOMR/CLOMR submittals. This information is

More information

MEIGS COUNTY UNINCORPORATED AREAS

MEIGS COUNTY UNINCORPORATED AREAS VOLUME 1 MEIGS COUNTY, OHIO AND INCORPORATED AREAS COMMUNITY NAME COMMUNITY NUMBER MEIGS COUNTY UNINCORPORATED AREAS 390387 MIDDLEPORT, VILLAGE OF 390388 POMEROY, VILLAGE OF 390389 RACINE, VILLAGE OF 390390

More information

Federal Emergency Management Agency

Federal Emergency Management Agency Page 1 of 6 Issue Date: September 27, 2010 Effective Date: February 14, 2011 Follows Conditional Case No.: 08-08-0873R DETERMINATION DOCUMENT COMMUNITY AND REVISION INFORMATION PROJECT DESCRIPTION BASIS

More information

Frequently Asked Questions Oxbow / Hickson / Bakke Ring Levee Option

Frequently Asked Questions Oxbow / Hickson / Bakke Ring Levee Option Frequently Asked Questions Oxbow / Hickson / Bakke Ring Levee Option October 16, 2012 Q1. Why has the position on a ring-levee changed? The feasibility study recommended buy-outs for areas with staging

More information

Herkimer County, New York Flood Hazard Mapping Status Report for Property Owners

Herkimer County, New York Flood Hazard Mapping Status Report for Property Owners Herkimer County, New York Flood Hazard Mapping Status Report for Property Owners Herkimer County, New York Flood Hazard Mapping Status Report for Property Owners FLOOD INSURANCE Who Should Purchase Flood

More information

VOLUME 1 OF 1 GONZALES COUNTY, TEXAS AND INCORPORATED AREAS GONZALES COUNTY, UNINCORPORATED AREAS

VOLUME 1 OF 1 GONZALES COUNTY, TEXAS AND INCORPORATED AREAS GONZALES COUNTY, UNINCORPORATED AREAS VOLUME 1 OF 1 GONZALES COUNTY, TEXAS AND INCORPORATED AREAS COMMUNITY NAME GONZALES COUNTY, UNINCORPORATED AREAS COMMUNITY NUMBER 480253 GONZALES, CITY OF 480254 NIXON, CITY OF 481114 SMILEY, CITY OF*

More information

Abstract. An assessment of the benefits of DWR s levee inspection program in California s Central Valley

Abstract. An assessment of the benefits of DWR s levee inspection program in California s Central Valley An assessment of the benefits of DWR s levee inspection program in California s Central Valley At left: Crew members place sandbags during flood fighting effors (DWR). By David Ford, PhD, PE, D.WRE; Joanna

More information

Public Notice. Activity: Fort Worth District Mitigation Banks. Date: January 24, 2019

Public Notice. Activity: Fort Worth District Mitigation Banks. Date: January 24, 2019 Public Notice Number: CESWF-18-MITB Activity: Fort Worth District Mitigation Banks Date: January 24, 2019 Purpose The purpose of this Public Notice is to inform you of mitigation banking guidelines being

More information

LAURENS COUNTY, GEORGIA

LAURENS COUNTY, GEORGIA LAURENS COUNTY, GEORGIA AND INCORPORATED AREAS Community Name Community Number Laurens County ALLENTOWN, TOWN OF 130605 CADWELL, TOWN OF 130606 DEXTER, TOWN OF 130607 DUBLIN, CITY OF 130217 DUDLEY, CITY

More information

Modeling Surfzone Tracer Plumes AGU Meeting of the Americas Falk Feddersen, David B. Clark, & R.T. Guza Scripps Institution of Oceanography

Modeling Surfzone Tracer Plumes AGU Meeting of the Americas Falk Feddersen, David B. Clark, & R.T. Guza Scripps Institution of Oceanography Modeling Surfzone Tracer Plumes 21 AGU Meeting of the Americas Falk Feddersen, David B. Clark, & R.T. Guza Scripps Institution of Oceanography HB6 Experiment HB6 Experiment Y (m) ï 1K m h (m) ï ï ï ï ï

More information

USACE Levee Screening Tool Understanding the Classification

USACE Levee Screening Tool Understanding the Classification USACE Levee Screening Tool Understanding the Classification Richard J. Varuso, Ph.D., P.E. Deputy Chief, Geotechnical Branch Levee Safety Program Manager USACE - New Orleans District 17 Nov 2011 US Army

More information

Marin County Flood Control & Water Conservation District. Zone No. 3 Advisory Board Meeting

Marin County Flood Control & Water Conservation District. Zone No. 3 Advisory Board Meeting Marin County Flood Control & Water Conservation District Zone No. 3 Advisory Board Meeting May 26, 2010 6:30 8:30 pm Mill Valley City Hall Council s Chambers PG&E Utilities at Bothin Marsh PG&E Utilities

More information

King County, WA DFIRM Update and Seclusion Process. Webinar June 14, 2016

King County, WA DFIRM Update and Seclusion Process. Webinar June 14, 2016 King County, WA DFIRM Update and Seclusion Process Webinar June 14, 2016 Agenda King County DFIRM Study History What is/has been done Process for moving forward Seclusion Seclusion mapping process Seclusion

More information

EFFINGHAM COUNTY, GEORGIA

EFFINGHAM COUNTY, GEORGIA EFFINGHAM COUNTY, GEORGIA AND INCORPORATED AREAS Effingham County COMMUNITY NAME COMMUNITY NUMBER EFFINGHAM COUNTY 130076 (UNINCORPORATED AREAS) GUYTON, CITY OF 130456 RINCON, CITY OF 130426 SPRINGFIELD,

More information

1 Adda247 No. 1 APP for Banking & SSC Preparation Website: bankersadda.com sscadda.com store.adda247.com

1 Adda247 No. 1 APP for Banking & SSC Preparation Website: bankersadda.com sscadda.com store.adda247.com 1 Adda247 No. 1 APP for Banking & SSC Preparation Q41. The upstream speed of a boat is 18 km/hr which is 500% more than the speed of stream. Find how much distance boat will cover in 3 hours while travelling

More information

Technical Memorandum 3.4 E Avenue NW Watershed Drainage Study. Appendix E Floodplain Impacts and Implications Memo

Technical Memorandum 3.4 E Avenue NW Watershed Drainage Study. Appendix E Floodplain Impacts and Implications Memo Technical Memorandum 3.4 E Avenue NW Watershed Drainage Study Appendix E Floodplain Impacts and Implications Memo September 8, 2017 City of Cedar Rapids E Avenue Watershed Drainage Study Memo Date: Tuesday,

More information

CHAPTER TOPICS STATISTIK & PROBABILITAS. Copyright 2017 By. Ir. Arthur Daniel Limantara, MM, MT.

CHAPTER TOPICS STATISTIK & PROBABILITAS. Copyright 2017 By. Ir. Arthur Daniel Limantara, MM, MT. Distribusi Normal CHAPTER TOPICS The Normal Distribution The Standardized Normal Distribution Evaluating the Normality Assumption The Uniform Distribution The Exponential Distribution 2 CONTINUOUS PROBABILITY

More information