Southeastern Bankruptcy Law Institute Atlanta, Georgia. April 12-14, Barry Schermer United States Bankruptcy Judge Eastern District of Missouri
|
|
- Agnes Houston
- 6 years ago
- Views:
Transcription
1 The Hanging Paragraph and Secured Claims: The Impact of the Unnumbered Paragraph after Section 1325(a)(9) on the Treatment of Certain Claims in the Chapter 13 Context Southeastern Bankruptcy Law Institute Atlanta, Georgia April 12-14, 2007 Barry Schermer United States Bankruptcy Judge Eastern District of Missouri Susan M. Spraul Law Clerk to the Honorable Barry S. Schermer
2 The Hanging Paragraph and Secured Claims: The Impact of the Unnumbered Paragraph after Section 1325(a)(9) on the Treatment of Certain Claims in the Chapter 13 Context By Barry Schermer, United States Bankruptcy Judge for the Eastern District of Missouri, and Susan M. Spraul, Law Clerk to the Honorable Barry S. Schermer Introduction 1 BAPCPA created two new types of claims in the Chapter 13 context: a claim secured by a purchase money security interest in a vehicle purchased for the debtor s personal use within 910 days prior to the bankruptcy filing and a claim secured by a purchase money security interest in any other thing of value purchased within one year prior to the bankruptcy filing. At least that is one interpretation of what Congress did when it added certain language to the Bankruptcy Code after Section 1325(a)(9). Unfortunately the new language is not Congress finest work and has inspired divergent interpretations of its meaning. What do we call this new language? The first and most obvious problem with the new language is its orphan status. The language lacks a unique numeric or letter designation. Instead, it was inserted at the end of Section 1325(a)(9), which discusses the debtor s obligation to file tax returns and appears to have no substantive relation to the new language. As a result, the new language lacks a clear identifier and has therefore gained notoriety through various nicknames including the Hanging Paragraph, the 910 Language, the Unnumbered Paragraph, and the Flush Language. The language relates to more than 910 car claims purchase money claims secured by vehicles purchased within 910 days prior to the bankruptcy filing. It also includes purchase money claims relating to anything of value purchased within one year prior to the bankruptcy filing. Therefore, the new provision will be referred to as the Hanging Paragraph in these materials because this broader term does not inadvertently exclude claims secured by a purchase money security interest in anything of value acquired within the year preceding the bankruptcy filing. What does the new language say? The exact wording of the new language follows: For purposes of paragraph (5), section 506 shall not apply to a claim described in that paragraph if the creditor has a purchase money security 1 Please be advised that these materials were prepared on January 16, This area of the law is changing on a daily basis. Therefore, the law will have undoubtedly changed by the date of this seminar. Every effort will be made to include additional developments in this area during the oral presentation. 1
3 interest securing the debt that is the subject of the claim, the debt was incurred within the 910-day [sic.] preceding the date of the filing of the petition, and the collateral for that debt consists of a motor vehicle (as defined in section of title 49) acquired for the personal use of the debtor, or if collateral for that debt consists of any other thing of value, if the debt was incurred during the 1-year period preceding that filing. 11 U.S.C. 1325(a) Hanging Paragraph. What does the new language mean? The courts must answer this question. An obvious problem with the provision is the grammatical mistake within the 910 day preceding the date of the filing.... Does this mean the provision only applies to vehicles purchased on the 910 th day preceding the bankruptcy filing? No, we can safely assume this is merely a typographical error. Otherwise, Congress went to a lot of trouble to create a special class of claims secured by purchase money security interests in vehicles purchased exactly 910 days before a bankruptcy filing. Debtors could easily avoid this section by filing bankruptcy on any day other than the 910 th day after purchasing a car. Furthermore, while Congress is certainly free to discriminate among creditors in the Bankruptcy Code and in fact does so in the Hanging Paragraph discrimination in this context would be absurd. Therefore, the missing word period is generally read into the language, resulting in the language applying to debts incurred within the 910-day period preceding the date of the filing of the bankruptcy petition. This is consistent with the language concerning claims secured by a purchase money security interests in any thing of value if the debt was incurred during the 1-year period preceding that filing. What type of claims fall within the Hanging Paragraph? With respect to vehicles, the creditor must have a purchase money security interest for its claim to fall within the parameters of the Hanging Paragraph. Second, the debt must have been incurred within the 910 days preceding the filing of the bankruptcy petition. Third, the collateral must consist of a motor vehicle. Fourth, the motor vehicle must have been acquired for the personal use of the debtor. Each of these elements is necessary for a claim to fall within the ambit of the Hanging Paragraph. What is a purchase money security interest? This term is defined by state law. The Uniform Commercial Code defines a purchase money security interest in goods as follows: A security interest in goods is a purchase-money security interest to the extent that the goods are purchase-money collateral with respect to that security interest. 2
4 U.C.C (b)(1). The term purchase-money collateral means goods that secure a purchase-money obligation incurred with respect to that collateral. U.C.C (a)(1). A purchase-money obligation is an obligation incurred as all or part of the price of the collateral or for value given to enable the debtor to acquire rights in or the use of the collateral if the value is in fact so used. U.C.C (a)(2). It is generally accepted that a creditor who finances the purchase of a car and retains a lien on the vehicle is a purchase money secured creditor with respect to the vehicle. But what if the amount financed does not equal the purchase price? For example, what if the amount financed includes the purchase of a service contract or an extended warranty, or document and title fees? So far, courts have generally held that a lender s claim is a purchase money security interest even if the amount financed included funds attributable to title and document fees and service contracts which are commonly financed in conjunction with vehicle acquisitions. In re Johnson, 337 B.R. 269 (Bankr. M.D.N.C. 2006); In re Murray, 346 B.R. 237 (Bankr. M.D. Ga. 2006). Another court has acknowledged that the purchase price; sales tax; notary documentation; and license, title, registration, and recordation fees are included in a purchase money obligation. However, that court concluded that costs associated with extended warranties and insurance deficiency coverage are not purchase money obligations. In re White, 352 B.R. 633 (Bankr. E.D. La. 2006). A refinance with the extension of additional credit may eradicate purchase money security interest status. For example, where a lender finances the purchase of a vehicle and subsequently extends additional credit which is included in the refinance of the vehicle, all of which is secured by the vehicle, the lender no longer has a purchase money security interest in the vehicle and its claim does not fall within the ambit of the Hanging Paragraph. In re Horn, 338 B.R. 110 (Bankr. M.D. Ala. 2006). The Horn court relied on 11th Circuit precedent for the proposition that if an item of collateral secures some type of debt other than purchase money debt, such as antecedent debt, the security interest is not a purchase money security interest. See Snap-On Tools, Inc. v. Freeman, 956 F.2d 252 (11th Cir. 1992). What about other elements included in the original financing? For example, what if the debtor trades in a vehicle and receives less than the amount owed on the vehicle in connection with the trade-in? And what if the lender finances the balance due on the old vehicle in addition to the purchase price of the new vehicle, essentially rolling the old balance into the new loan? One court faced with this issue determined that if the amount financed in connection with the acquisition of the vehicle included funds to pay off a prior loan, such as a balance due on a trade-in vehicle, only that portion of the debt attributable to the acquisition of the new vehicle is a debt secured by a purchase money security interest falling within the ambit of the Hanging Paragraph. The excess debt covering the balance due on the prior vehicle is not entitled to purchase money treatment under the Hanging Paragraph. In re Vega, 344 B.R. 616 (Bankr. D. Kansas 2006). Other courts have refused to break down the debt into purchase money and non-purchase money components. One view classifies the entire debt, including the refinanced trade-in balance, as the cost of acquiring the new vehicle and, therefore, considers the entire debt secured by a purchase money security interest. In re 3
5 Graupner, 2006 WL (Bankr. M.D. Ga. 2006). Another view concludes that when the balance due on a trade-in is rolled into the loan for the new vehicle the entire debt is transformed into a non-purchase money debt. Under this view, the claim does not fall within the ambit of the Hanging Paragraph. In re Peaslee, 2006 WL (Bankr. W.D. N.Y.). See also In re Jackson, 2007 WL (Bankr. W.D. N.Y.)(followup to Peaslee discussing the respective burdens of proof where a balance due on a trade-in is rolled into the amount financed for the new vehicle). When in doubt as to what constitutes a purchase money security interest, attorneys should look to applicable state law because the Bankruptcy Code does not provide the answer to this question. The 910 day requirement is the simplest element, assuming we insert the word period so that we include the entire 910 days preceding the bankruptcy filing and not just the 910th day. This is a matter of counting and has not yet created a problem among the bankruptcy bar. The requirement that the collateral consist of a motor vehicle has not been problematic to date. The term motor vehicle is defined in Title 49 of the United States Code as a vehicle driven or drawn by mechanical power and manufactured primarily for use on public streets, roads, and highways, but does not include a vehicle operated only on a rail line. 49 U.S.C (a)(6). This definition was expressly incorporated into the Hanging Paragraph by BAPCPA. However, the phrase the collateral for that debt consists of a motor vehicle does raise the question of whether the Hanging Paragraph applies to a debt with other collateral in addition to a vehicle. Congress did not say the only collateral for that debt consists of a motor vehicle. In contrast, Congress singled out home mortgage claims which are secured only by a security interest in real property that is the debtor s principal residence as unmodifiable in the Chapter 13 plan context. See 11 U.S.C. 1322(b)((2). Presumably Congress was not limiting the Hanging Paragraph treatment to claims only secured by a motor vehicle. This is consistent with the opinions considering what constitutes a purchase money security interest discussed above. See In re Johnson, 337 B.R. 269 (Bankr. M.D.N.C. 2006); In re Murray, 346 B.R. 237 (Bankr. M.D. Ga. 2006); In re Vega, 344 B.R. 616 (Bankr. D. Kansas 2006). However, the language is subject to interpretation. Finally, the motor vehicle must have been acquired for the personal use of the debtor. What is personal use? Personal use is non-business use and generally includes travel to and from work. In re Solis, 2006 WL (Bankr. S.D. Tex.); In re White, 352 B.R. 633 (Bankr. E.D. La. 2006). Use is personal if it satisfies personal wants, personal needs, and family and other personal obligations. In re Solis, 2006 WL (Bankr. S.D. Tex.). The debtor need not be the driver of the vehicle in order for the use to be for his or her benefit. Id. The personal use must be significant and material; however personal use of the debtor need not be the exclusive use of the vehicle. Id. See also In re Wilson, 2006 WL (Bankr. D. Kan.). Who is the debtor for whom the use of the vehicle must be personal? Is it the debtor who signed the contract or the debtor who filed bankruptcy? Courts are split on this issue. Compare, e.g., In re Solis, 2006 WL (Bankr. S.D. Tex.)(debtor in 4
6 this context refers to the bankrupt), and In re Press, 2006 WL (Bankr. S.D. Fla.)(debtor refers to obligor on the loan). What if the vehicle was acquired for the use of a non-debtor family member? In such a situation the Hanging Paragraph does not apply. For example, a car purchased for use by a non-filing spouse does not fall within the Hanging Paragraph. In re Jackson, 338 B.R. 923 (Bankr. M.D. Ga. 2006); In re Davis, 2006 WL (Bankr. M.D. Ala. 2006). Likewise, a vehicle purchased for a non-debtor adult child does not fall within the Hanging Paragraph. In re Lewis, 347 B.R. 769 (Bankr. D. Kan. 2006). However, a vehicle purchased by one debtor for the personal use of a co-debtor spouse does fall within the Hanging Paragraph. In re Vagi, 351 B.R. 881 (Bankr. N.D. Ohio 2006). Where spouses file a joint bankruptcy case, the vehicle need not be purchased for the personal use of the acquiring debtor. It need only be acquired for the personal use of one of the co-debtors, regardless of which debtor obtained the financing. Id. What if the vehicle was purchased for use by a non-filing family member but the debtor is using the vehicle as of the petition date? Does the timing of usage matter under the Hanging Paragraph? The Jackson court acknowledged the question of timing as a potential issue in the context of use of the vehicle. In re Jackson, 338 B.R. at 926 n.1. On its face the language applies to a vehicle acquired for the personal use of the debtor. Therefore the relevant time for assessing usage is the time of acquisition. In re Solis, 2006 WL (Bankr. S.D. Tex.). Therefore, if a vehicle was acquired for use by the debtor but is not used by the debtor as of the petition date, the associated claim appears to fall within the Hanging Paragraph. In the alternative, if a vehicle was acquired for use by a non-debtor but is used by the debtor as of the petition date, the vehicle does not fall within the express language of the Hanging Paragraph. With respect to claims secured by non-vehicles, the creditor must have a purchase money security interest, but the collateral can be anything of value and the debt must have been incurred during the one-year period preceding the bankruptcy filing. If the claim fits within these criteria, it too is entitled to treatment under the Hanging Paragraph. Is a claim which falls within the Hanging Paragraph a secured claim? Most courts have concluded that a claim which falls within the Hanging Paragraph is a secured claim. In re Robinson, 338 B.R. 70 (Bankr. W.D. Mo. 2006); In re Wright, 338 B.R. 917 (Bankr. M.D. Ala. 2006); In re Parish, 2006 WL (Bankr. M.D. Fla.); In re Brown, 339 B.R. 818 (Bankr. S.D. Ga. 2006); In re Turner, 349 B.R. 437 (Bankr. D. S.C. 2006); In re Shaw, 341 B.R. 543 (Bankr. M.D. N.C. 2006); In re Brooks, 344 B.R. 417 (Bankr. E.D. N.C. 2006); In re Brown, 346 B.R. 246 (Bankr. M.D. Ga. 2006); In re Murray, 346 B.R. 237 (Bankr. M.D. Ga. 2006), reaffirmed on reh g, 352 B.R. 340; In re Henry, 353 BR. 261 (Bankr. D. Or. 2006); In re White, 352 B.R. 633 (Bankr. E.D. La. 2006); In re McCormick, 2006 WL (Bankr. E.D. Wis.). Other courts have held that a claim which falls within the Hanging Paragraph is not a secured claim. In re Carver, 338 B.R. 521 (Bankr. S.D. Ga. 2006)(Walker, Jr., J.); 5
7 In re Green, 348 B.R. 601 (Bankr. M.D. Ga. 2006)(Walker, Jr., J.); In re Robinson, 2006 WL (Bankr. M.D. Ga.)(Walker, Jr., J.); In re Wampler, 345 B.R. 730 (Bankr. D. Kan. 2006); In re Taranto, 344 B.R. 857 (Bankr. N.D. Ohio 2006). Instead, it is a unique type of claim entitled to special treatment. To what treatment is a Hanging Paragraph claim entitled? The majority view is that a Hanging Paragraph claim is a secured claim which may not be stripped down. The value of the vehicle (or other purchase money collateral) is irrelevant. The holder of a Hanging Paragraph claim must receive the present value of the entire debt. Accordingly, the Hanging Paragraph claim must be repaid in full with interest at the rate set forth in Till v. SCS Credit Corp., 541 U.S. 465 (2004). In re Robinson, 338 B.R. 70 (Bankr. W.D. Mo. 2006); In re Wright, 338 B.R. 917 (Bankr. M.D. Ala. 2006); In re Fleming, 339 B.R. 716 (Bankr. E.D. Mo. 2006); In re Parish, 2006 WL (Bankr. M.D. Fla.); In re Brown. 339 B.R. 818 (Bankr. S.D. Ga. 2006); In re Turner, 349 B.R. 437 (Bankr. D. S.C. 2006); In re Shaw. 341 B.R. 543 (Bankr. M.D. N.C. 2006); In re Brooks, 344 B.R. 417 (Bankr. E.D. N.C. 2006); In re Brown, 346 B.R. 246 (Bankr. M.D. Ga. 2006); In re Murray, 346 B.R. 237 (Bankr. M.D. Ga. 2006), reaffirmed on reh g, 2006 WL ; In re Henry, 353 B.R. 261 (Bankr. D. Or. 2006); In re White, 352 B.R. 633 (Bankr. E.D. La. 2006); In re McCormick, 2006 WL (Bankr. E.D. Wis.)(applying Till, court found that no adjustment to prime rate of interest was necessary). Under the minority view, Hanging Paragraph claims are not allowed as secured claims. Courts that have reached this conclusion have differed on the treatment to which these claims are entitled. One judge has concluded that Hanging Paragraph claims are a new type of claim entitled to the greater of the full amount of the debt without interest, or the amount the creditor would receive if the claim was bifurcated and crammed down. In re Carver, 338 B.R. 521 (Bankr. S.D. Ga. 2006)(Walker, Jr., J.); In re Green, 348 B.R. 601 (Bankr. M.D. Ga. 2006)(Walker, Jr., J.); In re Robinson, 2006 WL (Bankr. M.D. Ga.)(Walker, Jr., J.). Another judge has concluded that the claim must be paid in full without interest over the life of the plan. In re Wampler, 345 B.R. 730 (Bankr. D. Kan. 2006). A third judge has decided that a Hanging Paragraph claim is entitled to fair treatment. In re Taranto, 344 B.R. 857 (Bankr. N.D. Ohio 2006). Where the original contract provided for no interest and the plan proposes payment in full without interest sooner than the claim would have been paid under the original contract, such treatment is fair under the Hanging Paragraph. Id. What if the debtor does not retain the collateral securing the Hanging Paragraph claim? Initially most courts determined that a debtor can surrender the collateral securing a Hanging Paragraph claim in full satisfaction of the debt. The value of the collateral is irrelevant and the creditor is not entitled to a deficiency claim. In re Ezell, 338 B.R. 330 (Bankr. E.D. Tenn. 2006); In re Long, 2006 WL (Bankr. E.D. Tenn. 2006); In re Brown, 346 B.R. 868 (Bankr. N.D. Fla. 2006); In re Pool, 351 B.R. 6
8 747 (Bankr. D. Or. 2006); In re Feddersen, 2006 WL (Bankr. S.D. Ill.); In re Turkowitch, 2006 WL (Bankr. E.D. Wis.). This result follows even when the plan proposes full payment of all unsecured claims. In re Bayless, 2006 WL (Bankr. E.D. Tenn.). However, a minority have found no anti-deficiency language in the Hanging Paragraph. These courts concluded that the surrender of the vehicle does not result in the full satisfaction of the claim, leaving the creditor whatever rights are available under state law including the pursuit of a deficiency as an unsecured claim in the Chapter 13 case. Dupaco Cmty. Credit Union v. Zehrung (In re Zehrung), 315 B.R. 675 (W.D. Wis. 2006); In re Duke, 345 B.R. 806 (Bankr. W.D. Ky. 2006); In re Particka, 2006 WL (Bankr. E.D. Mich.); In re Hoffman, 2006 WL (Bankr. E.D. Mich.). What impact does the Hanging Paragraph have on non-hanging Paragraph claims which are cross-collateralized with Hanging Paragraph claims? A lender extends funds to purchase a vehicle within the parameters of the Hanging Paragraph and later extends additional funds which are secured by other existing collateral as well as the vehicle purchased with the original funds. The first funds loaned form the basis of a Hanging Paragraph claim and the later funds loaned form the basis of a non-hanging Paragraph secured claim. The non-hanging Paragraph secured claim is not subject to the restrictions imposed by the Hanging Paragraph. Accordingly, it is subject to bifurcation. Does the Hanging Paragraph have any impact on the valuation of the collateral securing the non-hanging Paragraph claim? No. The value of the vehicle is determined and compared to the amount of the Hanging Paragraph claim. If any excess collateral value exists, it is added to the value of the other collateral securing the non-hanging Paragraph claim to determine how much of the non-hanging Paragraph claim is secured and how much, if any, is unsecured. In re Sanders, 2006 WL (Bankr. C.D. Ill.); see also In re White, 352 B.R. 633 (Bankr. E.D. La. 2006). The Sanders court rejected the argument that the Hanging Paragraph deemed the Hanging Paragraph claim fully secured and therefore no excess collateral value existed with respect to the vehicle to secure the non-hanging Paragraph claim. Conclusion The majority of courts have concluded that claims that fall within the ambit of the Hanging Paragraph are secured claims entitled to payment in full plus interest so that the creditor receives the present value of the full claim. Hanging Paragraph claims cannot be stripped down. Conversely, the collateral securing a Hanging Paragraph claim can be returned in full satisfaction of the debt. Deficiency claims no longer exist with respect to Hanging Paragraph claims. A minority of courts have concluded otherwise. Those attorneys who practice in the area of consumer bankruptcy law are advised to familiarize themselves with the views of the judges before whom they practice. All attorneys are also urged to look 7
9 closely at the facts and circumstances surrounding the transaction to determine if they create a claim which falls within the ambit of the Hanging Paragraph. If not, one must look beyond the Hanging Paragraph to determine what type of treatment the claim is entitled to receive in a Chapter 13 plan. That issue is beyond the scope of this article and shall be left for another day. 8
IN THE UNITED STATES BANKRUPTCY COURT FOR THE WESTERN DISTRICT OF MISSOURI
IN THE UNITED STATES BANKRUPTCY COURT FOR THE WESTERN DISTRICT OF MISSOURI IN RE: ) ) NATHAN L. OSBORN and ) Case No. 06-41015 CATHERINE C. OSBORN, ) ) Debtors. ) ORDER SUSTAINING DEBTORS OBJECTION TO
More informationNo UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE FOURTH CIRCUIT. In re Jerry Franklin Meadows, Sr. and Theresa Tucker Meadows, Debtors
No. 07-1968 UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE FOURTH CIRCUIT In re Jerry Franklin Meadows, Sr. and Theresa Tucker Meadows, Debtors DAIMLERCHRYSLER FINANCIAL SERVICES AMERICAS, LLC, Creditor/Appellant
More informationIN THE UNITED STATES BANKRUPTCY COURT FOR THE MIDDLE DISTRICT OF PENNSYLVANIA
IN THE UNITED STATES BANKRUPTCY COURT FOR THE MIDDLE DISTRICT OF PENNSYLVANIA IN RE: * Chapter 13 AMANDA LYNN PRICE fka * AMANDA LYNN CRAWFORD, and * Case No.: 1-06-bk-01457MDF WILLIAM FRANCES PRICE, JR.,
More informationIN THE UNITED STATES BANKRUPTCY COURT FOR THE MIDDLE DISTRICT OF PENNSYLVANIA
Main Document Page 1 of 11 IN THE UNITED STATES BANKRUPTCY COURT FOR THE MIDDLE DISTRICT OF PENNSYLVANIA IN RE: * CHAPTER 13 HOWARD ALBERT HAY, JR. and * CHRISTY ELIZABETH HAY, * Debtors * * CHARLES J.
More informationENTERED TAWANA C. MARSHALL, CLERK THE DATE OF ENTRY IS ON THE COURT'S DOCKET
Case 14-42974-rfn13 Doc 45 Filed 01/08/15 Entered 01/08/15 15:22:05 Page 1 of 12 U.S. BANKRUPTCY COURT NORTHERN DISTRICT OF TEXAS ENTERED TAWANA C. MARSHALL, CLERK THE DATE OF ENTRY IS ON THE COURT'S DOCKET
More informationChapter 13 Plan Provisions: The Impact of Till on Payment of Secured Claims
SOUTHEASTERN BANKRUPTCY LAW INSTITUTE Thirty-Third Annual Seminar on Bankruptcy Law and Rules April 12-14, 2007 Atlanta, Georgia Chapter 13 Plan Provisions: The Impact of Till on Payment of Secured Claims
More informationIn re Luedtke, Case No svk (Bankr. E.D. Wis. 7/31/2008) (Bankr. E.D. Wis., 2008)
Page 1 In re: Dawn L. Luedtke, Chapter 13, Debtor. Case No. 02-35082-svk. United States Bankruptcy Court, E.D. Wisconsin. July 31, 2008. MEMORANDUM DECISION AND ORDER SUSAN KELLEY, Bankruptcy Judge. Dawn
More informationDetermining When Projected Disposable Income Test May Be a Basis for a Post- Confirmation Modification. Steven Ching, J.D.
2014 Volume VI No. 6 Determining When Projected Disposable Income Test May Be a Basis for a Post- Confirmation Modification Steven Ching, J.D. Candidate 2015 Cite as: Determining When Projected Disposable
More informationNo UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE SECOND CIRCUIT. In re Faith Ann Peaslee. GEORGE M. REIBER, Trustee/Appellant
No. 07-3962 UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE SECOND CIRCUIT In re Faith Ann Peaslee GEORGE M. REIBER, Trustee/Appellant v. GMAC, LLC, et al., Creditor/Appellee Brief of Amicus Curiae National Association
More informationCHAPTER 11 CRAMDOWN FOR AN INDIVIDUAL AND THE ABSOLUTE PRIORITY RULE (as of 2015)
CHAPTER 11 CRAMDOWN FOR AN INDIVIDUAL AND THE ABSOLUTE PRIORITY RULE (as of 2015) Lee M. Kutner KUTNER BRINEN GARBER, P.C. 1660 Lincoln St., Suite 1825 Denver, CO 80264 303-832-2400 lmk@kutnerlaw.com CHAPTER
More informationBack to the Basics: Leaving the Hanging Paragraph Hanging
DePaul Business and Commercial Law Journal Volume 7 Issue 2 Winter 2009 Article 6 Back to the Basics: Leaving the Hanging Paragraph Hanging Nicholas M. Hudalla Follow this and additional works at: https://via.library.depaul.edu/bclj
More informationNo Submitted: May 12, Filed: November 4, Before LOKEN, Circuit Judge, HENLEY, Senior Circuit Judge, and HANSEN, Circuit Judge.
No. 93-3981 In re: Clarice Morris Groves, Ethyl Mae Davis, Joyce Belle Harvel-Barney, Debtors. -------------------- Clarice Morris Groves, Ethyl * Appeal from the United States Mae Davis, Joyce Belle Harvel-
More informationUNITED STATES BANKRUPTCY COURT WESTERN DISTRICT OF KENTUCKY
UNITED STATES BANKRUPTCY COURT WESTERN DISTRICT OF KENTUCKY In re: DANIEL WILBUR BENNETT and CASE NO. 04-40564 SANDRA FAYE BENNETT, CHAPTER 13 JOHN W. JOHNSON and CASE NO. 04-40593 KATHY S. JOHNSON, CHAPTER
More informationPresentation will focus on three major topic areas:
Presentation will focus on three major topic areas: Secured Creditors and Vehicles What actions can a secured creditor take upon the debtor s stated intention to surrender the vehicle? For what actions
More informationPresentation will focus on three major topic areas:
1 Presentation will focus on three major topic areas: Secured Creditors and Vehicles What actions can a secured creditor take upon the debtor s stated intention to surrender the vehicle? For what actions
More informationRide Through Option for Real Property Survived BAPCPA
Ride Through Option for Real Property Survived BAPCPA James Lynch, J.D. Candidate 2010 The Bankruptcy Abuse Protection Act of 2005 ( BAPCPA ) largely eliminated the socalled ride through option for security
More informationAN INTRODUCTION TO EPAY AND ISSUES OF IMPORTANCE IN CHAPTER 13 CASES
AN INTRODUCTION TO EPAY AND ISSUES OF IMPORTANCE IN CHAPTER 13 CASES Jeffrey P. Norman Standing Chapter 13 Trustee Southern District of Ohio Eastern Division One Columbus 10 West Broad Street Suite 900
More informationINDIVIDUAL CHAPTER 11: A HOW-TO
INDIVIDUAL CHAPTER 11: A HOW-TO Thomas Flynn and Steven Kinsella March 15, 2016 Chapter 11 of title 11 of the United States Code (the Bankruptcy Code ) has never been particularly well-suited to individual
More informationLife Insurance Summary of State Exemptions 1 for Cash Value 2 and Proceeds 3
Life Insurance Summary of State Exemptions 1 for Cash Value 2 and Proceeds 3 State Statute Cash Value Exempt? Proceeds Exempt? Alabama Ala. Code 6-10-8, 27-14-29(c) insured or person effecting insurance
More informationLien Avoidance: Questions, Answers & Conundrums
Lien Avoidance: Questions, Answers & Conundrums Long before consumer bankruptcy became embroiled in issues surrounding stripping consensual liens from property, the Bankruptcy Code provided for avoiding
More informationONGOING MORTGAGE POLICY IN CHAPTER 13 CASES ADMINISTERED BY CHRISTOPHER MICALE
ONGOING MORTGAGE POLICY IN CHAPTER 13 CASES ADMINISTERED BY CHRISTOPHER MICALE I. Ongoing Mortgage Policy A. This policy will be effective for all cases filed on or after October 1, 2015. This date was
More informationUNITED STATES BANKRUPTCY COURT FOR THE WESTERN DISTRICT OF PENNSYLVANIA
UNITED STATES BANKRUPTCY COURT FOR THE WESTERN DISTRICT OF PENNSYLVANIA IN RE : BANKRUPTCY NO. 05-13361 : CHAPTER 13 JOHN F.K. ARMSTRONG, DEBTOR : : JOHN F.K. ARMSTRONG, Movant : DOCUMENT NO. 48 vs. :
More informationChapter 4. 1:05 2:05pm. The Chapter 13 Plan and Saving Your Client s Home. William F. Malaier Jr. Nagler & Malaier, P.S.
Chapter 4 1:05 2:05pm The Chapter 13 Plan and Saving Your Client s Home William F. Malaier Jr. Nagler & Malaier, P.S. PowerPoint distributed at the program and also available for download in electronic
More informationIN THE UNITED STATES BANKRUPTCY COURT FOR THE MIDDLE DISTRICT OF TENNESSEE
Dated: 10/01/09 IN THE UNITED STATES BANKRUPTCY COURT FOR THE MIDDLE DISTRICT OF TENNESSEE In Re: ) ELLIOT and DEBORAH RAMSEY ) CASE NO. 309-06086 Debtors. ) Chapter 13 ) Judge Marian F. Harrison ) MEMORANDUM
More informationChapter 13 from the Trustee s Perspective- The Plan
Is the Debtor Above median? Chapter 13 from the Trustee s Perspective- The Plan 1. Yes, a. The plan must be 60 months. b. The plan must pay line 59 to the unsecured. i. May be reduced for a Lanning change
More informationSECURED AUTOMOBILE CLAIMS
SECURED AUTOMOBILE CLAIMS 2009 Southeastern Bankruptcy Law Institute Atlanta April 23-25 Barkley Clark Partner, Stinson Morrison Hecker LLP Washington, D.C. DB03/./9042891.1 A portion of these materials
More informationUnited States Bankruptcy Appellate Panel For the Eighth Circuit
United States Bankruptcy Appellate Panel For the Eighth Circuit No. 13-6023 In re: Wilma M. Pennington-Thurman llllllllllllllllllllldebtor ------------------------------ Wilma M. Pennington-Thurman llllllllllllllllllllldebtor
More informationChapter VI. Credit Bidding s Impact on Professional Fees
Chapter VI Credit Bidding s Impact on Professional Fees American Bankruptcy Institute A. Should the Amount of the Credit Bid Be Included as Consideration Upon Which a Professional s Fee Is Calculated?
More informationUNITED STATES BANKRUPTCY COURT EASTERN DISTRICT OF LOUISIANA CHAPTER 13 PLAN
UNITED STATES BANKRUPTCY COURT EASTERN DISTRICT OF LOUISIANA IN RE: Debtor s Counsel: CASE NO. CHAPTER 13 Section A CHAPTER 13 PLAN Original (1 st, 2 nd,...) Amended Plan filed : (1 st, 2 nd,...) Modified
More informationELECTRONIC CITATION: 14 FED App.0005P (6th Cir.) File Name: 14b0005p.06 BANKRUPTCY APPELLATE PANEL OF THE SIXTH CIRCUIT ) ) ) )
ELECTRONIC CITATION: 14 FED App.0005P (6th Cir.) File Name: 14b0005p.06 BANKRUPTCY APPELLATE PANEL OF THE SIXTH CIRCUIT In re: ANDREA M. CAIN, Debtor. ) ) ) ) No. 13-8045 Appeal from the United States
More informationFrom the Bankruptcy Courts: Cram-Down of the Unsecured Creditor: Section 1111(B)(2) Relief
Maurice A. Deane School of Law at Hofstra University Scholarly Commons at Hofstra Law Hofstra Law Faculty Scholarship 1983 From the Bankruptcy Courts: Cram-Down of the Unsecured Creditor: Section 1111(B)(2)
More informationUNITED STATES BANKRUPTCY COURT NORTHERN DISTRICT OF OHIO ) ) ) ) ) ) MEMORANDUM OF OPINION 1
The court incorporates by reference in this paragraph and adopts as the findings and orders of this court the document set forth below. This document was signed electronically on April 02, 2007, which
More informationCaveat Creditor: Section 506(b) Limits Recoverable Fees, Costs and Charges
In This Issue Volume 7, Number 6 / August 2010 New Decision Bars Debtor's Choice of Counsel Despite the Retention of Conflicts Counsel It's in the Contract: Allowance of Post-Petition Claims for Attorneys'
More informationOBJECTIONS TO CHAPTER 13 PLAN CONFIRMATION AND POST-CONFIRMATION MODIFICATIONS
OBJECTIONS TO CHAPTER 13 PLAN CONFIRMATION AND POST-CONFIRMATION MODIFICATIONS Frank J. Santoro, Esq. Kelly M. Barnhart, Esq. Marcus, Santoro & Kozak, P.C. 1435 Crossways Blvd., Suite 300 Chesapeake, VA
More informationUNITED STATES BANKRUPTCY COURT NORTHERN DISTRICT OF GEORGIA ATLANTA DIVISION
UNITED STATES BANKRUPTCY COURT NORTHERN DISTRICT OF GEORGIA ATLANTA DIVISION IN RE: JAMES WESLEY GRADY, III JOCELYN VANIESA GRADY Debtors. CASE NO. 06-60726CRM CHAPTER 13 JUDGE MULLINS ORDER THIS MATTER
More informationELIZABETH ROTUNDA CASE NO LAWRENCE D. ROTUNDA
UNITED STATES BANKRUPTCY COURT NORTHERN DISTRICT OF NEW YORK -------------------------------------------------------- IN RE: ELIZABETH ROTUNDA CASE NO. 06-60054 LAWRENCE D. ROTUNDA Debtors Chapter 13 ---------------------------------------------------------
More informationCases in Review June, 2018
Cases in Review June, 2018 Cases in Review highlights recent cases that may be of particular interest to consumer bankruptcy practitioners. It is brought to you by Consumer Bankruptcy Abstracts & Research
More informationAnother Thorn in the "Semantic Briar Patch" of the Hanging Paragraph: Is Negative Equity a Purchase Money Security Interest?
Marquette Law Review Volume 93 Issue 3 Article 8 Another Thorn in the "Semantic Briar Patch" of the Hanging Paragraph: Is Negative Equity a Purchase Money Security Interest? Rachel M. Helmers Follow this
More informationTake My House PLEASE!: Getting Rid of Encumbered Property in Consumer Cases
Educational Materials Monday, September 28, 2015 11:45 AM 12:45 PM Take My House PLEASE!: Getting Rid of Encumbered Property in Consumer Cases Presented by: TAKE MY HOUSE PLEASE!! Getting Rid of Encumbered
More informationCase 3:05-bk rs Doc 63 Filed 03/13/06 Entered 03/13/06 14:01:32 Desc Main Document Page 1 of 23
Main Document Page 1 of 23 In re IN THE UNITED STATES BANKRUPTCY COURT FOR THE EASTERN DISTRICT OF TENNESSEE LARRY E. EZELL Case No. 05-38219 REGINA A. EZELL Debtors MEMORANDUM ON OBJECTION TO CONFIRMATION
More informationCase grs Doc 48 Filed 01/06/17 Entered 01/06/17 14:33:25 Desc Main Document Page 1 of 9
Document Page 1 of 9 IN RE UNITED STATES BANKRUPTCY COURT EASTERN DISTRICT OF KENTUCKY FRANKFORT DIVISION BRENDA F. PARKER CASE NO. 16-30313 DEBTOR MEMORANDUM OPINION AND ORDER This matter is before the
More informationSOUTHEASTERN BANKRUPTCY LAW INSTITUTE. March 18 20, 2010 Atlanta, Georgia. Disposable Income and Related Issues March 18, 2010
SOUTHEASTERN BANKRUPTCY LAW INSTITUTE 36 th Annual Seminar on Bankruptcy Law and Rules March 18 20, 2010 Atlanta, Georgia Disposable Income and Related Issues March 18, 2010 Honorable Frank J. Santoro
More informationIN THE UNITED STATES BANKRUPTCY COURT FOR THE NORTHERN DISTRICT OF TEXAS DIVISION
BTXN222 10/16 IN THE UNITED STATES BANKRUPTCY COURT FOR THE NORTHERN DISTRICT OF TEXAS DIVISION In re: * Case No.: * Date: * * Chapter 13 Debtor(s) * Last 4 # SSN or TIN: DEBTOR S (S ) CHAPTER 13 PLAN
More informationFantastic Form Plans, Related Amendments, and Where To Find Them
Fantastic Form Plans, Related Amendments, and Where To Find Them National Chapter 13 Form Plan (Official Form 113) and Related Amendments to Federal Rules of Bankruptcy Procedure Effective December 1,
More informationLEWISTON STATE BANK V. GREENLINE EQUIPMENT, L.L.C. 147 P.3d 951 (Utah Ct. App. 2006)
LEWISTON STATE BANK V. GREENLINE EQUIPMENT, L.L.C. 147 P.3d 951 (Utah Ct. App. 2006) GREENWOOD, Associate Presiding Judge: Defendant Greenline Equipment, L.L.C. (Greenline) appeals the trial court s grant
More informationUNITED STATES BANKRUPTCY COURT EASTERN DISTRICT OF MICHIGAN SOUTHERN DIVISION
UNITED STATES BANKRUPTCY COURT EASTERN DISTRICT OF MICHIGAN SOUTHERN DIVISION In re: Gendenna Loretta Comps, Case No. 05-45305 Debtor. Chapter 7 Hon. Marci B. McIvor / K. Jin Lim, Trustee, v. Plaintiff,
More informationORDERED PUBLISHED UNITED STATES BANKRUPTCY APPELLATE PANEL
FILED 1 1 1 1 0 1 ORDERED PUBLISHED UNITED STATES BANKRUPTCY APPELLATE PANEL OF THE NINTH CIRCUIT MAY 0 SUSAN M. SPRAUL, CLERK U.S. BKCY. APP. PANEL OF THE NINTH CIRCUIT In re: BAP No. NC---DKiTa LIONEL
More informationTHE UNITED STATES BANKRUPTCY COURT NORTHERN DISTRICT OF OHIO CHAPTER 13 PROCEEDING ) ) ) ) ) )
THE UNITED STATES BANKRUPTCY COURT NORTHERN DISTRICT OF OHIO IN RE: CHAPTER 13 PROCEEDING ORDER CONFIRMING PLAN CASE NO. JUDGE Alan M. Koschik Pursuant to 11 USC 1324, the above-captioned Debtor(s most-recently
More informationCase cjf Doc 35 Filed 03/30/18 Entered 03/30/18 13:46:32 Desc Main Document Page 1 of 11
Document Page 1 of 11 UNITED STATES BANKRUPTCY COURT WESTERN DISTRICT OF WISCONSIN In re: Case No.: 17-14180-13 VICTORIA SUE FISHEL, Debtor. MEMORANDUM DECISION Victoria Sue Fishel ( Debtor ) is a consumer
More informationIN THE UNITED STATES BANKRUPTCY COURT IN AND FOR THE SOUTHERN DISTRICT OF FLORIDA WEST PALM BEACH DIVISION
Case 09-11191-PGH Doc 428 Filed 04/01/09 Page 1 of 8 IN THE UNITED STATES BANKRUPTCY COURT IN AND FOR THE SOUTHERN DISTRICT OF FLORIDA WEST PALM BEACH DIVISION IN RE: MERCEDES HOMES, INC., et. al., Debtors.
More informationSubrogating Fully-Insured ERISA AND NON-ERISA Employee Welfare Benefit Plans
Subrogating Fully-Insured ERISA AND NON-ERISA Employee Welfare Benefit Plans by Elizabeth A. Co, Matthiesen, Wickert & Lehrer, S.C., Hartford, Wisconsin Today, a growing number of health plans fall outside
More informationCreditors Rights Section Newsletter SPRING 2005
Creditors Rights Section Newsletter SPRING 2005 CREDITOR S RIGHTS SECTION LEADERSHIP 2004-2005 BAR YEAR CO-CHAIRS: Harriet C. Isenberg, Isenberg & Hewitt, P.C., Atlanta, Georgia Janis L. Rosser, Roswell,
More informationIN THE UNITED STATES BANKRUPTCY COURT FOR THE DISTRICT OF KANSAS STANDING ORDER NO ORDER ADOPTING FORM CHAPTER 13 PLAN
IN THE UNITED STATES BANKRUPTCY COURT FOR THE DISTRICT OF KANSAS STANDING ORDER NO. 10-2 ORDER ADOPTING FORM CHAPTER 13 PLAN The Bench Bar Committee has recommended the adoption of a form Chapter 13 Plan,
More informationUNITED STATES BANKRUPTCY COURT MIDDLE DISTRICT OF ALABAMA. Case No WRS Chapter 13 MEMORANDUM OPINION
UNITED STATES BANKRUPTCY COURT MIDDLE DISTRICT OF ALABAMA In re JEFFREY L. OCHAB, Case No. 16-12205-WRS Chapter 13 Debtor MEMORANDUM OPINION These Chapter 13 cases concern the question of whether a debtor
More informationHOT TOPICS IN CREDITORS RIGHTS AND BANKRUPTCY LAW BRIAN ANDERSON & SUZI GRIGG FEBRUARY 2, 2018
HOT TOPICS IN CREDITORS RIGHTS AND BANKRUPTCY LAW BRIAN ANDERSON & SUZI GRIGG FEBRUARY 2, 2018 Auto loans becoming larger part of CU portfolio Refinancing auto loans presents unique problems Problems amplified
More informationCase AJC Doc 229 Filed 06/18/09 Page 1 of 7. CASE NO AJC DB ISLAMORADA, LLC, Chapter 11 DEBTOR S MOTION TO DISMISS CASE
Case 07-20537-AJC Doc 229 Filed 06/18/09 Page 1 of 7 In re: UNITED STATES BANKRUPTCY COURT SOUTHERN DISTRICT OF FLORIDA www.flsb.uscourts.gov CASE NO. 07-20537-AJC DB ISLAMORADA, LLC, Chapter 11 Debtor-in-Possession.
More informationPLAINTIFF S MEMORANDUM OF LAW IN SUPPORT OF MOTION FOR PARTIAL SUMMARY JUDGMENT
UNITED STATES BANKRUPTCY COURT SOUTHERN DISTRICT OF NEW YORK In re MOTORS LIQUIDATION COMPANY, et al., Debtors. OFFICIAL COMMITTEE OF UNSECURED CREDITORS OF MOTORS LIQUIDATION COMPANY f/k/a GENERAL MOTORS
More informationUNITED STATES BANKRUPTCY COURT DISTRICT OF NEW JERSEY
UNITED STATES BANKRUPTCY COURT DISTRICT OF NEW JERSEY IMPORTANT NOTICE TO THE BAR AND PUBLIC CONCERNING REVISION AND IMPLEMENTATION OF LOCAL FORMS, CHAPTER 13 PLAN AND MOTIONS AND NOTICE OF CHAPTER 13
More informationQualified education loans and the dischargeability of student loans in bankruptcy
Qualified education loans and the dischargeability of student loans in bankruptcy By Stanley Love Tate III Copyright Licensed under the Creative Commons Attribution Non-Commercial Share Alike 3.0 License.
More informationUNITED STATES BANKRUPTCY COURT EASTERN DISTRICT OF MICHIGAN SOUTHERN DIVISION. In re: Case No
UNITED STATES BANKRUPTCY COURT EASTERN DISTRICT OF MICHIGAN SOUTHERN DIVISION In re: Case No. 03-42585 DAVID L. HARRIS and, Chapter 13 DAWN A. HARRIS, Judge Thomas J. Tucker Debtors. / OPINION CONFIRMING
More informationThe Effect Of Philly News On Credit Bidding
Portfolio Media, Inc. 860 Broadway, 6 th Floor New York, NY 10003 www.law360.com Phone: +1 646 783 7100 reprints@portfoliomedia.com The Effect Of Philly News On Credit Bidding Law360, New York (July 08,
More informationUNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE SECOND CIRCUIT. August Term, 2013
13 2187 In Re: Motors Liquidation Co. UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE SECOND CIRCUIT August Term, 2013 (Argued: March 25, 2014 Question Certified: June 17, 2014 Question Answered: October 17, 2014
More informationCase BFK Doc 17 Filed 10/03/13 Entered 10/03/13 10:52:37 Desc Main Document Page 1 of 8
Document Page 1 of 8 UNITED STATES BANKRUPTCY COURT EASTERN DISTRICT OF VIRGINIA Alexandria Division In re: ) ) ROBERT A. WOLF ) Case No. 13-13174-BFK ) Chapter 13 Debtor ) ORDER OVERRULING CHAPTER 13
More informationIN THE UNITED STATES BANKRUPTCY COURT FOR THE MIDDLE DISTRICT OF PENNSYLVANIA
IN THE UNITED STATES BANKRUPTCY COURT FOR THE MIDDLE DISTRICT OF PENNSYLVANIA IN RE: * Chapter 13 WILLIAM E. KRAPE and DONNA R. * Case No.: 1-06-bk-02287MDF KRAPE, dba WILLIAM and DONNA * KRAPE TRUCKING,
More informationUnited States Bankruptcy Court Eastern District of Michigan Southern Division. Debtors Chapter 7 / Opinion Regarding Motion to Dismiss
United States Bankruptcy Court Eastern District of Michigan Southern Division In re: John and Laura Siemen, Case No. 02-62606-R Debtors Chapter 7 / Opinion Regarding Motion to Dismiss The matter before
More informationThe Possibility of Discharging Student Loan Debt and Assessing the Differing Standards Applied by the Courts. Maria Casamassa, J.D.
The Possibility of Discharging Student Loan Debt and Assessing the Differing Standards Applied by the Courts 2017 Volume IX No. 5 The Possibility of Discharging Student Loan Debt and Assessing the Differing
More informationSOUTHEASTERN BANKRUPTCY LAW INSTITUTE: THIRTY-FIRST ANNUAL SEMINAR ON BANKRUPTCY LAW. SECTION 506(c) SURCHARGE OF COLLATERAL
SOUTHEASTERN BANKRUPTCY LAW INSTITUTE: THIRTY-FIRST ANNUAL SEMINAR ON BANKRUPTCY LAW SECTION 506(c) SURCHARGE OF COLLATERAL Presented by Honorable Allan L. Gropper United States Bankruptcy Judge United
More informationUNITED STATES BANKRUPTCY COURT DISTRICT OF MASSACHUSETTS WESTERN DIVISION
UNITED STATES BANKRUPTCY COURT DISTRICT OF MASSACHUSETTS WESTERN DIVISION In re: Chapter 7 THOMAS J. FLANNERY, Case No. 12-31023-HJB HOLLIE L. FLANNERY, Debtors JOSEPH B. COLLINS, CHAPTER 7 TRUSTEE, Adversary
More informationrk Doc 14 FILED 08/07/17 ENTERED 08/07/17 10:27:14 Page 1 of 12
UNITED STATES BANKRUPTCY COURT NORTHERN DISTRICT OF OHIO EASTERN DIVISION, CANTON ----------------------------------------------------------x In re Case No. 17-61735 SCI DIRECT, LLC Chapter 11 Debtor and
More informationDelaware Bankruptcy Court Creates Vendor-Friendly Forum by Preserving Reclamation Rights in the Face of DIP Lenders Liens
Delaware Bankruptcy Court Creates Vendor-Friendly Forum by Preserving Reclamation Rights in the Face of DIP Lenders Liens 2017 Volume IX No. 12 Delaware Bankruptcy Court Creates Vendor-Friendly Forum by
More informationIN THE UNITED STATES BANKRUPTCY COURT FOR THE DISTRICT OF MONTANA. Case No.
Mont. LBF 19. CHAPTER 13 PLAN. [Mont. LBR 9009-1(b)] Name of Attorney Office Mailing Address Telephone Number Facsimile Number E-Mail Address State Bar I.D. Number (Attorney for Debtor(s)) IN THE UNITED
More informationCase grs Doc 66 Filed 02/12/16 Entered 02/12/16 09:54:31 Desc Main Document Page 1 of 10
Document Page 1 of 10 IN RE UNITED STATES BANKRUPTCY COURT EASTERN DISTRICT OF KENTUCKY LEXINGTON DIVISION ROBIN LEE SNOWDEN and JULIA ANN SNOWDEN CASE NO. 15-51308 CHAPTER 13 DEBTORS MEMORANDUM OPINION
More informationDetermining the Proper Cramdown Rate of Interest in Agricultural Bankruptcies Post-Till v. SCS Credit Corp.
A research project from The National Center for Agricultural Law Research and Information of the University of Arkansas NatAgLaw@uark.edu (479) 575-7646 An Agricultural Law Research Article Determining
More informationDEBTORS, LOOK BEFORE YOU LEAP!
THE ORANGE COUNTY BANKRUPTCY FORUM presents its June 29, 2017 "Brown Bag"* Program: DEBTORS, LOOK BEFORE YOU LEAP! SECTION 724 DECODED; A PRIMER FOR CHAPTER 7 TRUSTEES AND ATTORNEYS This program will address
More informationChapter 6. 3:30 4:30pm. How to Get Paid in Chapter 13; Claims Objections Litigation. Jeffrey B. Wells Law Offices of Jeffrey B.
Chapter 6 3:30 4:30pm How to Get Paid in Chapter 13; Claims Objections Litigation Jeffrey B. Wells Law Offices of Jeffrey B. Wells Emily Jarvis Law Offices of Jeffrey B. Wells Electronic format only: 1.
More informationPANKRUPTCY LAW AND PRACTICE. The Eleventh Amendment and Bankruptcy Jurisdiction Over States Janet A. Flaccus
O U R N A L O F PANKRUPTCY LAW AND PRACTICE MARCH/APRIL 2001 (Vol. 10. No. 3) The Eleventh Amendment and Bankruptcy Jurisdiction Over States Janet A. Flaccus When Conflicts Become Crimes: Professionals
More informationIN THE UNITED STATES BANKRUPTCY COURT NORTHERN DISTRICT OF TEXAS FORT WORTH DIVISION
(Debtor Attorney Name) (Address) (Telephone No.) (Fax No) IN RE: IN THE UNITED STATES BANKRUPTCY COURT NORTHERN DISTRICT OF TEXAS FORT WORTH DIVISION (Debtor s Name) xxx-xx-**** (Debtor s Name) xxx-xx-****
More informationLEO STEPHEN ROBERT and Chapter 7 NANCY JEAN ROBERT, Case No.:
UNITED STATES BANKRUPTCY COURT NORTHERN DISTRICT OF NEW YORK ------------------------------------------------------------ In re: LEO STEPHEN ROBERT and Chapter 7 NANCY JEAN ROBERT, Case No.: 03-18304 Debtors.
More informationThe Section 1111(b) Election: A Primer
The Section 1111(b) Election: A Primer By M. Jonathan Hayes and Roksana D. Moradi* INTRODUCTION Section 1111(b) of the Bankruptcy Code was enacted to resolve two age old issues in the sphere of Chapter
More informationIn Re Lee and Amanda Anderson Main Case # aer13 2/12/08 Radcliffe Published
USC (i) USC 1(b)() USC 1(b)() USC 1(b)() USC 1(e) USC 1 General Order -1.(b) General Order -1 LBR 01-1.B. In Re Lee and Amanda Anderson Main Case # 0-0-aer1 //0 Radcliffe Published Two creditors secured
More informationlaw are made pursuant to Federal Rule of Bankruptcy Procedure IN RE: MICHAEL A. SCOTT and PATRICIA J. SCOTT, Debtors.
IN RE: MICHAEL A. SCOTT and PATRICIA J. SCOTT, Debtors. PATRICIA J. SCOTT, Plaintiff, v. CALIBER HOME LOANS, INC., Defendant. Case No. 09-11123-M Adv. No. 14-01040-M UNITED STATES BANKRUPTCY COURT FOR
More informationBankruptcy Court Recognizes the Doctrine of Reverse Preemption
Bankruptcy Court Recognizes the Doctrine of Reverse Preemption Written by: Gilbert L. Hamberg Gilbert L. Hamberg, Esq.; Yardley, Pa. Ghamberg@verizon.net In In re Medical Care Management Co., 361 B.R.
More informationUnited States Court of Appeals
In the United States Court of Appeals For the Seventh Circuit Nos. 16 1422 & 16 1423 KAREN SMITH, Plaintiff Appellant, v. CAPITAL ONE BANK (USA), N.A. and KOHN LAW FIRM S.C., Defendants Appellees. Appeals
More informationUNITED STATES BANKRUPTCY COURT NORTHERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA SAN FRANCISCO DIVISION
John D. Fiero (CA Bar No. ) Kenneth H. Brown (CA Bar No. 00) Miriam Khatiblou (CA Bar No. ) Teddy M. Kapur (CA Bar No. ) 0 California Street, th Floor San Francisco, California -00 Telephone: /-000 Facsimile:
More informationUNITED STATES BANKRUPTCY COURT FOR THE EASTERN DISTRICT OF KENTUCKY DIVISION IN RE: CASE NO. Original Amended Date:
UNITED STATES BANKRUPTCY COURT FOR THE EASTERN DISTRICT OF KENTUCKY DIVISION IN RE: CASE NO. DEBTOR(S) CHAPTER 13 PLAN AND MOTIONS Original Amended Date: NOTICE TO CREDITORS: This Plan may modify your
More informationUNITED STATES BANKRUPTCY COURT EASTERN DISTRICT OF MICHIGAN SOUTHERN DIVISION. Debtor. Case No Chapter 13 Hon. Marci B.
UNITED STATES BANKRUPTCY COURT EASTERN DISTRICT OF MICHIGAN SOUTHERN DIVISION In re Cleopatra Jones, / Debtor. Case No. 03-62325 Chapter 13 Hon. Marci B. McIvor OPINION DENYING CONFIRMATION OF CHAPTER
More informationReaffirmations: To Sign or Not to Sign? 1.5 Hour CLE Training. Friday, September 25, :30 am 1:00 pm
Reaffirmations: To Sign or Not to Sign? 1.5 Hour CLE Training Friday, September 25, 2015 11:30 am 1:00 pm Presenters: Chief Judge Mike K. Nakagawa Judge August B. Landis Susan L. Myers, Esq., Legal Aid
More informationUNITED STATES BANKRUPTCY COURT FOR THE EASTERN DISTRICT OF NORTH CAROLINA DIVISION CHAPTER 13 PLAN
UNITED STATES BANKRUPTCY COURT FOR THE EASTERN DISTRICT OF NORTH CAROLINA DIVISION IN RE: CASE NO: Debtor (in a joint case, "debtor" shall include "debtors") CHAPTER 13 PLAN The format of this chapter
More informationPUBLISHED UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE FOURTH CIRCUIT. No EDWIN MICHAEL BURKHART; TERESA STEIN BURKHART, f/k/a Teresa S.
PUBLISHED UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE FOURTH CIRCUIT No. 16-1971 EDWIN MICHAEL BURKHART; TERESA STEIN BURKHART, f/k/a Teresa S. Barham, v. Debtors Appellants, NANCY SPENCER GRIGSBY, and Trustee
More informationSigned January 17, 2019 United States Bankruptcy Judge
Case 18-50214-rlj11 Doc 865 Filed 01/17/19 Entered 01/17/19 16:51:55 Page 1 of 7 The following constitutes the ruling of the court and has the force and effect therein described. Signed January 17, 2019
More informationIN THE UNITED STATES BANKRUPTCY COURT FOR THE WESTERN DISTRICT OF MISSOURI
IN THE UNITED STATES BANKRUPTCY COURT FOR THE WESTERN DISTRICT OF MISSOURI IN RE: ) ) KEITH ALLEN PORTELL and ) Case No. 12-44058-13 MICHELE LYNN PORTELL, ) ) Debtors. ) ORDER GRANTING MOTION TO SPEND
More informationIN THE DISTRICT COURT OF THE UNITED STATES FOR THE MIDDLE DISTRICT OF ALABAMA, NORTHERN DIVISION
Case 2:09-cv-00579-MHT Document 16 Filed 09/24/10 Page 1 of 19 IN THE DISTRICT COURT OF THE UNITED STATES FOR THE MIDDLE DISTRICT OF ALABAMA, NORTHERN DIVISION IN RE: ) ) ROBERT L. WASHINGTON, III ) and
More informationIN THE UNITED STATES BANKRUPTCY COURT FOR THE DISTRICT OF NEBRASKA
IN THE UNITED STATES BANKRUPTCY COURT FOR THE DISTRICT OF NEBRASKA IN THE MATTER OF: ) CASE NO. BK06-80666 ) CONNIE LYNN MITCHELL, ) CH. 13 ) Debtor. ) MEMORANDUM Hearing was held in Omaha, Nebraska on
More informationFINAL APPLICATION FOR COMPENSATION AND FOR REIMBURSEMENT OF EXPENSES OF THE OFFICIAL UNSECURED CREDITORS COMMITTEE OF WARNACO GROUP, INC. ET AL.
UNITED STATES BANKRUPTCY COURT FOR THE SOUTHERN DISTRICT OF NEW YORK - - - - -- - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - X : Chapter 11 In Re: : Warnaco Group, Inc. et al., : Case Nos. 01-41643
More informationRULE CHANGES: WHERE ARE WE NOW? THIRTY-NINTH ANNUAL SOUTHEASTERN BANKRUPTCY LAW SEMINAR MARCH 21-23, 2013
RULE 3002.1 CHANGES: WHERE ARE WE NOW? THIRTY-NINTH ANNUAL SOUTHEASTERN BANKRUPTCY LAW SEMINAR MARCH 21-23, 2013 John Rao National Consumer Law Center, Inc. In response to long-standing problems with mortgage
More informationMEMORANDUM of DECISION
08-61666-RBK Doc#: 30 Filed: 03/12/09 Entered: 03/12/09 08:18:47 Page 1 of 12 UNITED STATES BANKRUPTCY COURT FOR THE DISTRICT OF MONTANA In re RICHARD D KNECHT, Case No. 08-61666-13 Debtor. MEMORANDUM
More informationUNITED STATES BANKRUPTCY COURT DISTRICT OF NEW MEXICO MEMORANDUM OPINION
UNITED STATES BANKRUPTCY COURT DISTRICT OF NEW MEXICO In re: KACHINA VILLAGE, LLC, Case No. 15-10140-t11 Debtor. MEMORANDUM OPINION Before the Court are a secured creditor s motion to designate its collateral
More informationHanging on to Till: Interpretations of BAPCPA's Hanging Paragraph
Missouri Law Review Volume 72 Issue 2 Spring 2007 Article 4 Spring 2007 Hanging on to Till: Interpretations of BAPCPA's Hanging Paragraph Kaitlin A. Bridges Follow this and additional works at: http://scholarship.law.missouri.edu/mlr
More informationMAKE-WHOLE CLAIMS AND BANKRUPTCY POLICY
MAKE-WHOLE CLAIMS AND BANKRUPTCY POLICY Douglas P. Bartner and Robert A. Britton* Loan agreements and bond indentures frequently contain make-whole or yield maintenance provisions that are designed to
More informationCommercial Law: Priorities of "Future Advances" Under Previously Perfected Security Interests and Article 9 of the U.C.C.
Marquette Law Review Volume 58 Issue 4 1975 (Number 4) Article 6 Commercial Law: Priorities of "Future Advances" Under Previously Perfected Security Interests and Article 9 of the U.C.C. C. Judley Wyant
More information