IN THE UNITED STATES BANKRUPTCY COURT FOR THE NORTHERN DISTRICT OF ILLINOIS WESTERN DIVISION
|
|
- George Hall
- 5 years ago
- Views:
Transcription
1 IN THE UNITED STATES BANKRUPTCY COURT FOR THE NORTHERN DISTRICT OF ILLINOIS WESTERN DIVISION IN RE: ) Chapter 11 Proceeding ) COMMERCIAL MORTGAGE AND ) Case No FINANCE, CO. ) ) Judge Manuel Barbosa Debtor. ) ) DEBTOR S RESPONSE TO MOTION FOR IMPOSITION OF LIENS AND ENCUMBRANCES Commercial Mortgage & Finance Co. (the Debtor ) respectfully opposes the relief sought by the Official Committee of Unsecured Creditors (the "Committee") in its Motion for Imposition of Liens and Encumbrances (the Motion ). THE COURT LACKS JURISDICTION TO ENTER THE ORDER EVEN IF THE DEBTOR SUPPORTED THE MOTION The Committee seeks to impose liens on the assets of four subsidiary corporations owned by the Debtor. The Committee does not indicate how this Court is empowered to exercise its jurisdiction over those entities to compel them to grant liens in favor of third parties, i.e., the unsecured creditors. Precedent indicates that bankruptcy courts are courts of limited jurisdiction. The jurisdiction of bankruptcy courts, like that of other federal courts, is grounded in, and limited by, statute. Celotex Corp. v. Edwards, 514 U.S. 300, 307, 115 S.Ct. 1493, 1498, 131 L.Ed.2d 403 (1995). Section 1334(b) of title 28 of the United States Code is the statutory source of bankruptcy jurisdiction and is thus the starting point for the bankruptcy judge to ascertain whether jurisdiction exists. In re Cary Metal Products, Inc., 152 B.R. 927, 930 (Bankr.N.D.Ill.1993), aff'd, Zerand-Bernal Group, Inc. v. Cox, 23 F.3d 159, 161 (7th Cir.1994) (citing In re Spaulding & Co., 131 B.R. 84 (N.D.Ill.1990)). In re Kmart Corp., 359 B.R. 189, 194 (Bankr. N.D.Ill. 2005). The Committee admits that Grandview Real Estate, CMF Real Estate, CMF Mortgage Notes and CMF Mortgages constitute significant assets of the Debtor's wholly owned
2 subsidiary corporations but are not a part of the Debtor's bankruptcy estate. 1 (Motion at 12). Since the entities who would grant the liens are not debtors and their assets are not estate assets, this Court does not have the power to compel CMF Mortgage Co., City Plaza Realty, Inc., Greater Grandview, Inc. or Security Safe Deposit, Inc. to grant liens on their assets for the benefit of parties to whom they are not in privity, i.e., the Debtor s unsecured creditors. While as a part of a plan of reorganization or through the filing of one or more separate cases, these entities may in the future fall within the parameters of this Court s jurisdiction; at this time, they operate independently. Since they are not debtors themselves, this Court cannot direct them to act in the fashion requested by the Committee. THE COMMITTEE IMPROPERLY SEEKS TO OPERATE THE DEBTOR S BUSINESS If jurisdiction existed, the Debtor still should not be compelled to take direction from the Committee. As a threshold matter, the decision whether the Debtor requires security for its loans is a decision left to the Debtor s management. The Debtor, as a debtor in possession, serves as a trustee for the benefit of all estate creditors. See, 1107 required security for its loans to its subsidiaries. As debtor in possession, the Debtor, through its management, is the party responsible for the operation of its business in the ordinary course including decisions such as requiring security for loans under (c)(1) provides: If the business of the debtor is authorized to be operated under 721, 1108, 1203, 1204, or 1304 of this title and unless the court orders otherwise, the trustee may enter into transactions, including the sale or lease of property of the estate, in the ordinary 2. The Debtor has historically not 1 The Committee incorrectly asserts that the City Plaza Real Estate and the City Plaza leases are owned by City Plaza Realty, Inc. As disclosed in the Debtor s Schedule A and Schedule G, these are estate property. 2 Unless otherwise indicated, all statutory references will be to the United States Bankruptcy Code, 11 U.S.C. 101 et.seq. -2-
3 course of business, without notice or a hearing, and may use property of the estate in the ordinary course of business without notice or a hearing. Id. The Northern District of Illinois has adopted the Reasonable Expectations Test to determine whether a transaction or a type of transaction falls or would fall within the ordinary course of business. Martino v. First National Bank of Harvey (In the Matter of Garofalo's Finer Foods, Inc.), 186 B.R. 414 (N.D.Ill. 1995). Under that test, a post-petition transaction undertaken by the debtor that is similar in size and nature to pre-petition transactions undertaken by the debtor would be within the ordinary course of business. Garofalo's Finer Foods, 186 B.R. at 426. Using this test provides the necessary standards to determine whether a specific transaction is within the ordinary course of business. The core of the reasonable expectations test is its analysis of the debtor's pre-petition conduct as a means to inform and develop expectations of its post-petition conduct. See, In re Johns-Manville, 60 B.R. at 617. The debtor's pre-petition conduct is not, however, the sole reference for defining these expectations. Id. In applying this test, the court must also consider the changing circumstances that are inherent in a debtor's efforts to operate its business under chapter 11. Id.; accord, In re Roth Am., Inc., 975 F.2d 949, 953 (3d Cir.1992). The test seeks to discern any significant alterations in a debtor's pre- and post-petition activities. Medical Malpractice Ins. Assoc. v. Hirsch ( In re Lavigne), 183 B.R. 65, 70 (Bankr.S.D.N.Y.1995). Garofalo's Finer Foods, 186 B.R. at 425. The Committee cannot dispute that the Debtor, if it were to make a new loan to one of its subsidiaries, which frankly is not contemplated, would fall in line with the expectations of creditors. The fact that the Debtor did not advise its unsecured creditors of the existence of any such loans does not alter their reasonable expectation of the Debtor s operation of its business. Garofalo's Finer Foods, 186 B.R. at 427. The Committee seeks to overturn the Debtor authority to use its property in the ordinary course in direct contravention of 363(c)(1). The relief -3-
4 requested is unnecessary. The Committee has recourse in the event the Debtor acts in violation of its obligations, which are governed by the business judgment rule. The Committee seeks to usurp the Debtor s obligation to operate the estate by seeking an order compelling the Debtor to act. Other than the fact that the Debtor s subsidiaries owe substantial obligations and indebtedness (Motion at 13) and that the imposition of liens would at least in the Committee s view be in the best interest of creditors and the Debtor's bankruptcy estate (Motion at 13), the Committee does not indicate why the relief is necessary. The Committee seeks control over the Debtor and its assets. This is contrary to the parties rights and obligations. A bankruptcy trustee in a reorganization case has the discretionary authority to exercise his business judgment in operating the debtor's business similar to the discretionary authority to exercise business judgment given to an officer or director of a corporation. State of Illinois, Department of Revenue v. Schechter, 195 B.R. 380, 384 (N.D.Ill. 1996); citing In re Holiday Isles, Ltd., 29 B.R. 827, 829 (S.S.Fla.1983). Unlike the Debtor, who has an obligation to all creditors, the Committee s fiduciary obligations are limited: We do not accept this contention, as it seems based on the erroneous assumption that the Official Unsecured Creditors' Committee is a fiduciary for the estate as a whole. While a creditors' committee and its members must act in accordance with the provisions of the Bankruptcy Code and with proper regard for the bankruptcy court, the committee is a fiduciary for those whom it represents, not for the debtor or the estate generally. In re Microboard Processing, Inc., 95 B.R. 283, 285 (Bankr.D.Conn.1989); In re Johns-Manville Corp., 60 B.R. 842, 853 (S.D.N.Y.), rev'd on other grounds, 801 F.2d 60 (2d Cir.1986). Thus the committee's fiduciary duty, as such, runs to the parties or class it represents. Markey v. Orr, No. G , 1990 WL at *4, 1990 U.S.Dist. LEXIS 3005 at *9-*10 (W.D.Mich.1990); Pension Benefit Guar. Corp. v. Pincus, Verlin, Hahn, Reich & Goldstein P.C., 42 B.R. 960, 963 (E.D.Pa.1984); Microboard, 95 B.R. at 285; Johns-Mansville, 60 B.R. at 853. It is charged with pursuing whatever lawful course best serves the interests of the class of creditors -4-
5 represented. In re Seaescape Cruises, Ltd., 131 B.R. 241, 243 (Bankr.S.D.Fla.1991). In re SPM Mfg. Corp., 984 F.2d 1305, (1 st Cir. 1993). The Committee s concern with protecting unsecured creditors is proper. The Debtor, however, can limit its decision-making to protecting only certain constituents in this case. THERE IS NO STATUTORY BASIS FOR THE MOTION UNDER THE BANKRUPTCY CODE NOR A BASIS UNDER ILLINOIS LAW The Debtor can discern no statutory basis for the motion. The Committee has no authority to compel the Debtor to grant a lien on its assets let alone force the Debtor s subsidiaries to do so. That power is held exclusively in the first instance by the Debtor, as to its assets, pursuant to 363 and in the latter instance by the subsidiaries under general corporate law. The Committee appears to ask the Court to utilize 105 to compel a result. Such an action is not appropriate under the Bankruptcy Code. The Seventh Circuit has stated that the grant of equitable power in 105 is limited in that it allows [bankruptcy] courts to use their equitable powers only as necessary to enforce the provisions of the Code, not to add on to the Code as they see fit. In re Fesco Plastics Corp., 996 F.2d 152, 156 (7th Cir.1993); The Supreme Court has taught that any grant of authority given to the bankruptcy courts under 105 must be exercised within the confines of the bankruptcy code. Gouveia v. Tazbir, 37 F.3d 295, 300 (7th Cir.1994) (citing Norwest Bank Worthington v. Ahlers, 485 U.S. 197, 108 S.Ct. 963, 99 L.Ed.2d 169 (1988)). The rights granted under 105 do not extend to directing the Debtor s subsidiary corporations to grant liens for the benefit of its parent s unsecured creditors. In a case involving a debtor s request for the extension of the automatic stay to a subsidiary, the Fourth Circuit declined to extend bankruptcy jurisdiction to a subsidiary corporation despite the debtor s urging. It is a fundamental precept of corporate law that each corporation is a separate legal entity with its own debts and assets, even when such corporation is -5-
6 wholly owned by another corporate entity. Kreisler v. Goldberg, 478 F.3d 20, 2139 (4 th Cir. 2007). This Court should arrive at the same result in this case. By granting the motion, the Court would have to ignore the separate legal existences apparent in this situation. Illinois law is similarly clear that a corporation and its subsidiaries are distinct entities. Under Illinois law, a corporation is presumed to be separate and distinct from its officers, shareholders, and directors, and those parties will not be held personally liable for the corporation's debts and obligations. Judson Atkinson Candies, Inc. v. Latini-Hohberger Dhimantec, 529 F.3d 371, 378 (7 th Cir. 2008) (quoting Tower Investors, LLC v. 111 E. Chestnut Consultants, Inc., 371 Ill.App.3d 1019, 864 N.E.2d 927, 941 (1 st Dist. 2007). As distinct entities, this Court should not require that they take actions that would give strangers, in this case the Debtor s unsecured creditors, rights that would be to their detriment and to the detriment of their own creditors. THE DEBTOR MUST MEET ITS FIDUCIARY OBLIGATION TO ALL CREDITORS The Debtor respects the Committee s role. It embraces the idea set forth in In re Together Development Corp., 262 B.R. 586, 593 (Bankr. D.Mass. 2001) that [t]he creditors' committee is not merely a conduit through whom the debtor speaks to and negotiates with creditors generally. However, unlike the Committee, the Debtor is a fiduciary for all constituents. Sometimes the Debtor cannot agree with the Committee s position. Here, the Debtor disagrees with the Committee regarding the need or propriety for the imposition of a lien on third parties assets. The Committee has not articulated why the liens are needed. Even if circumstances indicated otherwise, the Debtor would be wary with regard to agreeing, since the relief will effect other creditors rights. To agree with the Committee could give rise to a claim from administrative creditors that the Debtor failed in its fiduciary obligations to those parties. The Debtor would be a participant in granting one class of creditors lien rights that they did not -6-
7 seek in extending credit. In essence, the Committee wants the unsecured creditors to receive an unbargained for benefit to the detriment of other creditors. The Committee implies that the unsecured creditors are the sole constituents in this case. They are not. The Debtor is operating its business on a going concern basis. As such, it incurs real estate tax, utility, payroll and other administrative expenses. To grant a lien in favor of the unsecured creditors would serve the purpose of defining how substantial assets of the estate are distributed. The imposition of the liens amounts to a sub rosa plan of reorganization. The proposal is similar to the transaction rejected in In re Braniff Airways, Inc., 700 F.2d 935 (5 th Cir. 1983). The Fifth Circuit determined that a sale of assets by Braniff was a plan sub rosa because it dictated some of the terms of any future reorganization plan, restructured the rights of creditors, and required all parties to release all claims against the debtor, its officers, directors, and secured creditors. In this instance, the same result occurs, other than the release of claims. The approval of the Committee s motion would give unsecured creditors priority rights in millions of dollars of assets to the detriment of administrative claimants. Once this Court entered an order granting the relief sought in the motion, the priorities would be altered. An official committee of unsecured creditors is a paradigm example of a party that is accountable to a limited constituency. This Committee owes a fiduciary duty to the class of unsecured creditors as a whole. 7 Collier on Bankruptcy [2] (15th ed. rev'd 2002). The Committee acts as the representative of the unsecured creditors for those claims owned exclusively by the Committee. The Debtor s mandate is broader. It is a fiduciary for all creditors. To serve that mandate, the Debtor cannot agree with the relief the Committee seeks in this instance. -7-
8 CONCLUSION The Committee while having a laudable goal of seeking to protect unsecured creditors seeks relief that the Court lacks the jurisdiction to grant. That relief is not available under the provisions of the Bankruptcy Code, nor contemplated under Illinois law. An order granting the motion would alter the priorities set forth in the Bankruptcy Code to the detriment of other creditors holding claims of a higher priority. Clearly, the Committee asks the Court to rewrite a lending relationship and thereby ignore the terms to which the parties entered. Finally, the Committee seeks to impose liens on nonparties to whom the unsecured creditors are not in privity and on whose assets they did not rely in extending credit. For these reasons, the Court should deny the motion. Gregory J. Jordan (ARDC# ) Louis Apostol (ARDC# ) Vernon Kowal (ARDC # ) Apostol, Kowal & Jordan, Ltd. 200 South Wacker Drive, 32 nd Floor Chicago, IL (312) (Telephone) (312) (Facsimile) COMMERCIAL MORTGAGE & FINANCE CO. By: /s/ Gregory J. Jordan One of Its Attorneys -8-
Case hdh11 Doc 223 Filed 12/26/17 Entered 12/26/17 15:19:42 Page 1 of 163
Case 17-33964-hdh11 Doc 223 Filed 12/26/17 Entered 12/26/17 15:19:42 Page 1 of 163 Gregory G. Hesse (Texas Bar No. 09549419) HUNTON & WILLIAMS LLP 1445 Ross Avenue Suite 3700 Dallas, Texas 75209 Telephone:
Commonly Asked Questions Regarding Bankruptcy
Commonly Asked Questions Regarding Bankruptcy What is the purpose of the automatic stay? To give the debtor (or trustee) time to catch its breath and to prevent dissipation of the debtor's assets before
IN THE UNITED STATES BANKRUPTCY COURT IN AND FOR THE SOUTHERN DISTRICT OF FLORIDA WEST PALM BEACH DIVISION
Case 09-11191-PGH Doc 428 Filed 04/01/09 Page 1 of 8 IN THE UNITED STATES BANKRUPTCY COURT IN AND FOR THE SOUTHERN DISTRICT OF FLORIDA WEST PALM BEACH DIVISION IN RE: MERCEDES HOMES, INC., et. al., Debtors.
UNITED STATES BANKRUPTCY COURT DISTRICT OF MASSACHUSETTS WESTERN DIVISION
UNITED STATES BANKRUPTCY COURT DISTRICT OF MASSACHUSETTS WESTERN DIVISION In re: Chapter 7 THOMAS J. FLANNERY, Case No. 12-31023-HJB HOLLIE L. FLANNERY, Debtors JOSEPH B. COLLINS, CHAPTER 7 TRUSTEE, Adversary
UNITED STATES BANKRUPTCY COURT NORTHERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA SAN FRANCISCO DIVISION
John D. Fiero (CA Bar No. ) Kenneth H. Brown (CA Bar No. 00) Miriam Khatiblou (CA Bar No. ) Teddy M. Kapur (CA Bar No. ) 0 California Street, th Floor San Francisco, California -00 Telephone: /-000 Facsimile:
UNITED STATES BANKRUPTCY COURT FOR THE DISTRICT OF OREGON MOTION
Michael Fuller, Oregon Bar No. 09357 UNITED STATES BANKRUPTCY COURT FOR THE DISTRICT OF OREGON In re Sheilah Kathleen Sherman, Debtor. Case No. 11-38681-rld13 DEBTOR S MOTION FOR ORDER OF CONTEMPT AND
Gifting & The Absolute Priority Rule. Brianna Walsh, J.D. Candidate 2016
Gifting & The Absolute Priority Rule 2015 Volume VII No. 29 Gifting & The Absolute Priority Rule Brianna Walsh, J.D. Candidate 2016 Cite as: Gifting & The Absolute Priority Rule, 7 ST. JOHN S BANKR. RESEARCH
Chapter VI. Credit Bidding s Impact on Professional Fees
Chapter VI Credit Bidding s Impact on Professional Fees American Bankruptcy Institute A. Should the Amount of the Credit Bid Be Included as Consideration Upon Which a Professional s Fee Is Calculated?
Case GLT Doc 577 Filed 06/23/17 Entered 06/23/17 14:22:20 Desc Main Document Page 1 of 8
Document Page 1 of 8 IN THE UNITED STATES BANKRUPTCY COURT FOR THE WESTERN DISTRICT OF PENNSYLVANIA In re: Case No. 17-22045 (GLT rue21, inc., et al., 1 Chapter 11 Debtors. (Jointly Administered Hearing
mg Doc 5285 Filed 10/04/13 Entered 10/04/13 16:34:28 Main Document Pg 1 of 7
Pg 1 of 7 STORCH AMINI & MUNVES PC 2 Grand Central Tower, 25 th Floor 140 East 45 th Street New York, New York 10017 Tel. (212 490-4100 Noam M. Besdin, Esq. nbesdin@samlegal.com Counsel for Simona Robinson
Case Document 1035 Filed in TXSB on 09/07/18 Page 1 of 12
Case 17-36709 Document 1035 Filed in TXSB on 09/07/18 Page 1 of 12 IN THE UNITED STATES BANKRUPTCY COURT FOR THE SOUTHERN DISTRICT OF TEXAS HOUSTON DIVISION In re: COBALT INTERNATIONAL ENERGY, INC., et
UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE DISTRICT OF MINNESOTA. Appellant, Appellee,
UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE DISTRICT OF MINNESOTA ACORN CAPITAL GROUP, LLC, v. Appellant, Case No. 09-cv-00996-JMR Judge James M. Rosenbaum UNITED STATES TRUSTEE, Appellee, POLAROID CORPORATION,
ENTERED TAWANA C. MARSHALL, CLERK THE DATE OF ENTRY IS ON THE COURT'S DOCKET
Case 14-42974-rfn13 Doc 45 Filed 01/08/15 Entered 01/08/15 15:22:05 Page 1 of 12 U.S. BANKRUPTCY COURT NORTHERN DISTRICT OF TEXAS ENTERED TAWANA C. MARSHALL, CLERK THE DATE OF ENTRY IS ON THE COURT'S DOCKET
to bid their secured debt at the auction.
Seventh Circuit Disagrees With Philadelphia Newspapers And Finds That Credit Bidding Required For Asset Sales In Bankruptcy Plans By Josef Athanas, Caroline Reckler, Matthew Warren and Andrew Mellen the
Case Doc 36 Filed 12/16/14 Entered 12/16/14 16:15:00 Desc Main Document Page 1 of 21
Document Page 1 of 21 IN THE UNITED STATES BANKRUPTCY COURT FOR THE NORTHERN DISTRICT OF ILLINOIS EASTERN DIVISION In re: GOPICNIC BRANDS, INC., Debtor. Chapter 11 Hon. Jacqueline P. Cox Case No. 14-43382
IN THE UNITED STATES BANKRUPTCY COURT FOR THE NORTHERN DISTRICT OF TEXAS DALLAS DIVISION
Jennifer C. DeMarco (JD-9284) Sara M. Tapinekis (ST-4382) CLIFFORD CHANCE US LLP 31 West 52nd Street New York, New York 10019 Telephone: (212) 878-8000 Facsimile: (212) 878-8375 Joseph J. Wielebinski State
UNITED STATES BANKRUPTCY COURT SOUTHERN DISTRICT OF NEW YORK In re: MARK RICHARD LIPPOLD, Debtor. 1 FOR PUBLICATION Chapter 7 Case No. 11-12300 (MG) MEMORANDUM OPINION AND ORDER DENYING MOTION FOR RELIEF
Case Document 290 Filed in TXSB on 02/17/16 Page 1 of 8
Case 16-20012 Document 290 Filed in TXSB on 02/17/16 Page 1 of 8 IN THE UNITED STATES BANKRUPTCY COURT FOR THE SOUTHERN DISTRICT OF TEXAS CORPUS CHRISTI DIVISION IN RE: SHERWIN ALUMINA COMPANY, LLC et
smb Doc Filed 09/27/18 Entered 09/27/18 13:05:26 Main Document Pg 1 of 12
Pg 1 of 12 Baker & Hostetler LLP Hearing Date: October 31, 2018 45 Rockefeller Plaza Hearing Time: 10:00 a.m. (EST) New York, New York 10111 Objections Due: October 23, 2018 Telephone: (212) 589-4200 Objection
No Surcharge for You: Third Circuit Rules That Section 506(c) Surcharge Is "Sharply Limited" January/February Lauren M. Buonome Mark G.
No Surcharge for You: Third Circuit Rules That Section 506(c) Surcharge Is "Sharply Limited" January/February 2014 Lauren M. Buonome Mark G. Douglas The ability to "surcharge" a secured creditor's collateral
Case reg Doc 1076 Filed 04/27/18 Entered 04/27/18 15:10:04
ZUCKERMAN SPAEDER LLP 485 Madison Avenue, 10 th Floor New York, New York 10022 Telephone: (212) 704-9600 Facsimile: (917) 261-5864 Shawn P. Naunton Attorneys for Ira Machowsky KRAUSS PLLC 41 Madison Avenue,
SOUTHEASTERN BANKRUPTCY LAW INSTITUTE: THIRTY-FIRST ANNUAL SEMINAR ON BANKRUPTCY LAW. SECTION 506(c) SURCHARGE OF COLLATERAL
SOUTHEASTERN BANKRUPTCY LAW INSTITUTE: THIRTY-FIRST ANNUAL SEMINAR ON BANKRUPTCY LAW SECTION 506(c) SURCHARGE OF COLLATERAL Presented by Honorable Allan L. Gropper United States Bankruptcy Judge United
Case bjh11 Doc 7 Filed 09/13/11 Entered 09/13/11 18:48:12 Desc Main Document Page 1 of 10
Document Page 1 of 10 Stephen A. McCartin (TX 13374700) Holland Neff O Neil (TX 14864700) Virgil Ochoa (TX 24070358) GARDERE WYNNE SEWELL LLP 3000 Thanksgiving Tower 1601 Elm Street Dallas, TX 75201-4761
Case: SDB Doc#:26 Filed:02/28/18 Entered:02/28/18 16:24:33 Page:1 of 7
Case:18-10274-SDB Doc#:26 Filed:02/28/18 Entered:02/28/18 16:24:33 Page:1 of 7 IN THE UNITED STATES BANKRUPTCY COURT FOR THE SOUTHERN DISTRICT OF GEORGIA AUGUSTA DIVISION In re: Chapter 11 FIBRANT, LLC,
In re Luedtke, Case No svk (Bankr. E.D. Wis. 7/31/2008) (Bankr. E.D. Wis., 2008)
Page 1 In re: Dawn L. Luedtke, Chapter 13, Debtor. Case No. 02-35082-svk. United States Bankruptcy Court, E.D. Wisconsin. July 31, 2008. MEMORANDUM DECISION AND ORDER SUSAN KELLEY, Bankruptcy Judge. Dawn
IN THE UNITED STATES BANKRUPTCY COURT FOR THE DISTRICT OF MARYLAND (Greenbelt Division)
IN THE UNITED STATES BANKRUPTCY COURT FOR THE DISTRICT OF MARYLAND (Greenbelt Division In re: USGen New England, Inc., Case No. 03-30465 (PM Debtor. Chapter 11 MOTION FOR AUTHORITY TO REJECT POWER PURCHASE
UNITED STATES BANKRUPTCY COURT SOUTHERN DISTRICT OF NEW YORK
Harvey R. Miller Stephen Karotkin Joseph H. Smolinsky WEIL, GOTSHAL & MANGES LLP 767 Fifth Avenue New York, New York 10153 Telephone: (212) 310-8000 Facsimile: (212) 310-8007 Attorneys for Debtors and
UNITED STATES BANKRUPTCY COURT NORTHERN DISTRICT OF GEORGIA ATLANTA DIVISION
UNITED STATES BANKRUPTCY COURT NORTHERN DISTRICT OF GEORGIA ATLANTA DIVISION IN RE: JAMES WESLEY GRADY, III JOCELYN VANIESA GRADY Debtors. CASE NO. 06-60726CRM CHAPTER 13 JUDGE MULLINS ORDER THIS MATTER
INDIVIDUAL CHAPTER 11: A HOW-TO
INDIVIDUAL CHAPTER 11: A HOW-TO Thomas Flynn and Steven Kinsella March 15, 2016 Chapter 11 of title 11 of the United States Code (the Bankruptcy Code ) has never been particularly well-suited to individual
Case dd Doc 110 Filed 10/16/14 Entered 10/16/14 09:03:37 Desc Main Document Page 1 of 10
Document Page 1 of 10 Peter A. Orville, Esq. Peter A. Orville, P.C. 30 Riverside Drive Binghamton, New York 13905 Patrick G. Radel, Esq. Getnick Livingston Atkinson & Priore, LLP 258 Genesee Street, Suite
Case BLS Doc 131 Filed 05/24/18 Page 1 of 12 IN THE UNITED STATES BANKRUPTCY COURT FOR THE DISTRICT OF DELAWARE.
Case 18-11092-BLS Doc 131 Filed 05/24/18 Page 1 of 12 IN THE UNITED STATES BANKRUPTCY COURT FOR THE DISTRICT OF DELAWARE In re: RMH FRANCHISE HOLDINGS, INC., et al., 1 Debtors. Chapter 11 Case No. 18-11092
United States Court of Appeals
In the United States Court of Appeals For the Seventh Circuit No. 06-1719 IN RE: ABC-NACO, INC., and Debtor-Appellee, OFFICIAL COMMITTEE OF UNSECURED CREDITORS OF ABC-NACO, INC., APPEAL OF: Appellee. SOFTMART,
Case Document 3876 Filed in TXSB on 11/08/16 Page 1 of 10
Case 12-36187 Document 3876 Filed in TXSB on 11/08/16 Page 1 of 10 IN THE UNITED STATES BANKRUPTCY COURT FOR THE SOUTHERN DISTRICT OF TEXAS HOUSTON DIVISION IN RE: Case No. 12-36187 ATP OIL & GAS CORPORATION,
Selective Payment of Prepetition Claims in Chapter 11 Before Distributions to Creditors Generally
Selective Payment of Prepetition Claims in Chapter 11 Before Distributions to Creditors Generally 33 rd Annual Southeastern Bankruptcy Law Institute Atlanta, Georgia April 12-14, 2007 David Neier Winston
Case KKS Doc 174 Filed 02/03/15 Page 1 of 10 UNITED STATES BANKRUPTCY COURT NORTHERN DISTRICT OF FLORIDA PENSACOLA DIVISION
Case 12-31658-KKS Doc 174 Filed 02/03/15 Page 1 of 10 UNITED STATES BANKRUPTCY COURT NORTHERN DISTRICT OF FLORIDA PENSACOLA DIVISION IN RE: KEN D. BLACKBURN, Case No. 12-31658-KKS LAUREN A. BLACKBURN,
UNITED STATES BANKRUPTCY COURT DISTRICT OF NEW HAMPSHIRE. Chapter 11
UNITED STATES BANKRUPTCY COURT DISTRICT OF NEW HAMPSHIRE In re: KINGSBURY CORPORATION, Debtor. Chapter 11 Case No. 11-13671 MOTION FOR APPROVAL OF CASH MANAGEMENT SYSTEM AND FOR AUTHORIZATION OF USE OF
In re: : Case No (JMP) (Jointly Administered)
Hearing Date: August 9, 2011 at 2:00 p.m. (ET) Dennis F. Dunne Evan R. Fleck MILBANK, TWEED, HADLEY & M c CLOY LLP 1 Chase Manhattan Plaza New York, NY 10005 Telephone: (212) 530-5000 Facsimile: (212)
Presentation will focus on three major topic areas:
Presentation will focus on three major topic areas: Secured Creditors and Vehicles What actions can a secured creditor take upon the debtor s stated intention to surrender the vehicle? For what actions
Presentation will focus on three major topic areas:
1 Presentation will focus on three major topic areas: Secured Creditors and Vehicles What actions can a secured creditor take upon the debtor s stated intention to surrender the vehicle? For what actions
Case: SDB Doc#:13 Filed:02/23/18 Entered:02/23/18 20:43:28 Page:1 of 7
Case:18-10274-SDB Doc#:13 Filed:02/23/18 Entered:02/23/18 20:43:28 Page:1 of 7 IN THE UNITED STATES BANKRUPTCY COURT FOR THE SOUTHERN DISTRICT OF GEORGIA AUGUSTA DIVISION In re: Chapter 11 FIBRANT, LLC,
Case ast Doc 673 Filed 01/22/18 Entered 01/22/18 17:46:18
Case 8-14-70593-ast Doc 673 Filed 01/22/18 Entered 01/22/18 17:46:18 GARFUNKEL WILD, P.C. 111 Great Neck Road Great Neck, New York 11021 Telephone: (516) 393-2200 Fax: (516) 466-5964 Burton S. Weston Adam
rdd Doc 162 Filed 05/12/14 Entered 05/12/14 18:17:14 Main Document Pg 1 of 9
Pg 1 of 9 David S. Heller Paul E. Harner Matthew L. Warren (appearing pro hac vice) LATHAM & WATKINS LLP 885 Third Avenue New York, New York 10022-4834 Telephone: (212) 906-1200 Facsimile: (212) 751-4864
Credit Suisse AG, Cayman Islands Branch (the First Lien Agent ), as First Lien
WACHTELL, LIPTON, ROSEN & KATZ Scott K. Charles David C. Bryan Alexander B. Lees 51 West 52nd Street New York, New York 10019 Telephone: (212) 403-1000 Facsimile: (212) 403-2000 Attorneys for Credit Suisse
Case cjf Doc 35 Filed 03/30/18 Entered 03/30/18 13:46:32 Desc Main Document Page 1 of 11
Document Page 1 of 11 UNITED STATES BANKRUPTCY COURT WESTERN DISTRICT OF WISCONSIN In re: Case No.: 17-14180-13 VICTORIA SUE FISHEL, Debtor. MEMORANDUM DECISION Victoria Sue Fishel ( Debtor ) is a consumer
Case Doc 2394 Filed 10/06/15 Entered 10/06/15 13:20:04 Desc Main Document Page 1 of 6
Document Page 1 of 6 IN THE UNITED STATES BANKRUPTCY COURT FOR THE NORTHERN DISTRICT OF ILLINOIS EASTERN DIVISION IN RE: ) Chapter 11 )` Case No. 15-01145 (ABG) CAESARS ENTERTAINMENT ) Jointly Administered
rk Doc 14 FILED 08/07/17 ENTERED 08/07/17 10:27:14 Page 1 of 12
UNITED STATES BANKRUPTCY COURT NORTHERN DISTRICT OF OHIO EASTERN DIVISION, CANTON ----------------------------------------------------------x In re Case No. 17-61735 SCI DIRECT, LLC Chapter 11 Debtor and
Alert. Fifth Circuit Orders Mandatory Subordination of Contractual Guaranty Claims. June 5, 2015
Alert Fifth Circuit Orders Mandatory Subordination of Contractual Guaranty Claims June 5, 2015 A creditor s guaranty claim arising from equity investments in a debtor s affiliate should be treated the
PUBLISHED UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE FOURTH CIRCUIT. No EDWIN MICHAEL BURKHART; TERESA STEIN BURKHART, f/k/a Teresa S.
PUBLISHED UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE FOURTH CIRCUIT No. 16-1971 EDWIN MICHAEL BURKHART; TERESA STEIN BURKHART, f/k/a Teresa S. Barham, v. Debtors Appellants, NANCY SPENCER GRIGSBY, and Trustee
UNITED STATES BANKRUPTCY COURT DISTRICT OF MINNESOTA. Debtors. Polaroid Consumer Electronics, LLC; Polaroid Latin America I Corporation;
UNITED STATES BANKRUPTCY COURT DISTRICT OF MINNESOTA In re: POLAROID CORPORATION, ET AL., Debtors. (includes: Polaroid Holding Company; Polaroid Consumer Electronics, LLC; Polaroid Capital, LLC; Polaroid
UNITED STATES BANKRUPTCY COURT NORTHERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA SAN FRANCISCO DIVISION
1 1 1 1 STEVEN H. FELDERSTEIN, State Bar No. 0 THOMAS A. WILLOUGHBY, State Bar No. 1 FELDERSTEIN FITZGERALD WILLOUGHBY & PASCUZZI LLP 00 Capitol Mall, Suite Sacramento, CA 1 Telephone: () -00 Facsimile:
UNITED STATES BANKRUPTCY COURT EASTERN DISTRICT OF MICHIGAN SOUTHERN DIVISION
UNITED STATES BANKRUPTCY COURT EASTERN DISTRICT OF MICHIGAN SOUTHERN DIVISION In re Electra D. Rice-Etherly, Case No. 01-60533 Debtor. Chapter 13 Hon. Marci B. McIvor / Electra D. Rice-Etherly, Plaintiff,
THE UNITED STATES BANKRUPTCY COURT NORTHERN DISTRICT OF OHIO CHAPTER 13 PROCEEDING ) ) ) ) ) )
THE UNITED STATES BANKRUPTCY COURT NORTHERN DISTRICT OF OHIO IN RE: CHAPTER 13 PROCEEDING ORDER CONFIRMING PLAN CASE NO. JUDGE Alan M. Koschik Pursuant to 11 USC 1324, the above-captioned Debtor(s most-recently
Case grs Doc 48 Filed 01/06/17 Entered 01/06/17 14:33:25 Desc Main Document Page 1 of 9
Document Page 1 of 9 IN RE UNITED STATES BANKRUPTCY COURT EASTERN DISTRICT OF KENTUCKY FRANKFORT DIVISION BRENDA F. PARKER CASE NO. 16-30313 DEBTOR MEMORANDUM OPINION AND ORDER This matter is before the
Case Doc 117 Filed 06/07/16 Entered 06/07/16 16:16:35 Desc Main Document Page 1 of 13
Case 15-11833 Doc 117 Filed 06/07/16 Entered 06/07/16 16:16:35 Desc Main Document Page 1 of 13 UNITED STATES BANKRUPTCY COURT DISTRICT OF MASSACHUSETTS EASTERN DIVISION IN RE U.S. EDGE, INC. Chapter 11
DEBTORS, LOOK BEFORE YOU LEAP!
THE ORANGE COUNTY BANKRUPTCY FORUM presents its June 29, 2017 "Brown Bag"* Program: DEBTORS, LOOK BEFORE YOU LEAP! SECTION 724 DECODED; A PRIMER FOR CHAPTER 7 TRUSTEES AND ATTORNEYS This program will address
Case CSS Doc 16 Filed 08/26/14 Page 1 of 9 IN THE UNITED STATES BANKRUPTCY COURT FOR THE DISTRICT OF DELAWARE
Case 14-11987-CSS Doc 16 Filed 08/26/14 Page 1 of 9 IN THE UNITED STATES BANKRUPTCY COURT FOR THE DISTRICT OF DELAWARE In re: FCC Holdings, Inc., et al., 1 Debtors. Chapter 11 Case No. 14-11987 (CSS) (Joint
Case Document 671 Filed in TXSB on 03/29/18 Page 1 of 10 UNITED STATES BANKRUPTCY COURT SOUTHERN DISTRICT OF TEXAS HOUSTON DIVISION
Case 17-36709 Document 671 Filed in TXSB on 03/29/18 Page 1 of 10 UNITED STATES BANKRUPTCY COURT SOUTHERN DISTRICT OF TEXAS HOUSTON DIVISION IN RE: Chapter 11 COBALT INTERNATIONAL ENERGY, CASE NO. 17-36709
Case 8:14-bk CPM Doc 101 Filed 12/01/14 Page 1 of 28
Case 8:14-bk-07040-CPM Doc 101 Filed 12/01/14 Page 1 of 28 UNITED STATES BANKRUPTCY COURT MIDDLE DISTRICT OF FLORIDA TAMPA DIVISION www.flmb.uscourts.gov In re: HOPEWELL BUSINESS CENTER, LLC HOPEWELL ENTERPRISES,
law are made pursuant to Federal Rule of Bankruptcy Procedure IN RE: MICHAEL A. SCOTT and PATRICIA J. SCOTT, Debtors.
IN RE: MICHAEL A. SCOTT and PATRICIA J. SCOTT, Debtors. PATRICIA J. SCOTT, Plaintiff, v. CALIBER HOME LOANS, INC., Defendant. Case No. 09-11123-M Adv. No. 14-01040-M UNITED STATES BANKRUPTCY COURT FOR
Take My House PLEASE!: Getting Rid of Encumbered Property in Consumer Cases
Educational Materials Monday, September 28, 2015 11:45 AM 12:45 PM Take My House PLEASE!: Getting Rid of Encumbered Property in Consumer Cases Presented by: TAKE MY HOUSE PLEASE!! Getting Rid of Encumbered
Case KG Doc 495 Filed 06/20/18 Page 1 of 8 IN THE UNITED STATES BANKRUPTCY COURT FOR THE DISTRICT OF DELAWARE. Debtors.
Case 18-10055-KG Doc 495 Filed 06/20/18 Page 1 of 8 IN THE UNITED STATES BANKRUPTCY COURT FOR THE DISTRICT OF DELAWARE In re: HOBBICO, INC., et al., 1 Chapter 11 Case No. 18-10055 (KG) Debtors. Jointly
IN THE UNITED STATES BANKRUPTCY COURT FOR THE WESTERN DISTRICT OF MISSOURI
IN THE UNITED STATES BANKRUPTCY COURT FOR THE WESTERN DISTRICT OF MISSOURI IN RE: ) ) NATHAN L. OSBORN and ) Case No. 06-41015 CATHERINE C. OSBORN, ) ) Debtors. ) ORDER SUSTAINING DEBTORS OBJECTION TO
Case Document 555 Filed in TXSB on 10/10/18 Page 1 of 7 UNITED STATES BANKRUPTCY COURT SOUTHERN DISTRICT OF TEXAS HOUSTON DIVISION
Case 18-33836 Document 555 Filed in TXSB on 10/10/18 Page 1 of 7 UNITED STATES BANKRUPTCY COURT SOUTHERN DISTRICT OF TEXAS HOUSTON DIVISION In re: NEIGHBORS LEGACY HOLDINGS, INC., et al., Debtors. 1 Chapter
IN THE UNITED STATES BANKRUPTCY COURT FOR THE MIDDLE DISTRICT OF PENNSYLVANIA
Main Document Page 1 of 7 IN THE UNITED STATES BANKRUPTCY COURT FOR THE MIDDLE DISTRICT OF PENNSYLVANIA IN RE CHAPTER THIRTEEN FRANK HARRISON BIEGE, BANKRUPTCY NO. 5-01-bk-03669 DEBRA ANN BIEGE, DEBTORS
Case KRH Doc 676 Filed 11/25/15 Entered 11/25/15 14:41:58 Desc Main Document Page 1 of 23
Document Page 1 of 23 IN THE UNITED STATES BANKRUPTCY COURT FOR THE EASTERN DISTRICT OF VIRGINIA RICHMOND DIVISION In re: HEALTH DIAGNOSTIC LABORATORY, INC., et al., Chapter 11 Case No. 15-32919 (KRH)
alg Doc 4468 Filed 07/29/13 Entered 07/29/13 16:17:20 Main Document Pg 1 of 17. UNITED STATES BANKRUPTCY COURT Hearing Date: August 5, 2013
Pg 1 of 17 UNITED STATES BANKRUPTCY COURT Hearing Date: August 5, 2013 SOUTHERN DISTRICT OF NEW YORK Hearing Time: 11:00 a.m. ------------------------------------------------------x : In re : Chapter 11
FINAL APPLICATION FOR COMPENSATION AND FOR REIMBURSEMENT OF EXPENSES OF THE OFFICIAL UNSECURED CREDITORS COMMITTEE OF WARNACO GROUP, INC. ET AL.
UNITED STATES BANKRUPTCY COURT FOR THE SOUTHERN DISTRICT OF NEW YORK - - - - -- - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - X : Chapter 11 In Re: : Warnaco Group, Inc. et al., : Case Nos. 01-41643
PLEASE TAKE NOTICE that a hearing on the annexed Motion (the Motion ) of
Hearing Date and Time: May 18, 2011 at 10:00 a.m. (Prevailing Eastern Time) Objection Date and Time: May 11, 2011 at 4:00 p.m. (Prevailing Eastern Time) WEIL, GOTSHAL & MANGES LLP 767 Fifth Avenue New
Case bjh11 Doc 307 Filed 01/10/19 Entered 01/10/19 16:32:52 Page 1 of 7
Case 18-33967-bjh11 Doc 307 Filed 01/10/19 Entered 01/10/19 16:32:52 Page 1 of 7 Kevin M. Lippman Texas Bar No. 00784479 Deborah M. Perry Texas Bar No. 24002755 MUNSCH HARDT KOPF & HARR, P.C. 500 N. Akard
THE BASICS OF CASH COLLATERAL AND DIP FINANCING by Kevin M. Lippman and Jonathan L. Howell
I. Generally A. Importance THE BASICS OF CASH COLLATERAL AND DIP FINANCING by Kevin M. Lippman and Jonathan L. Howell In most Chapter 11 bankruptcy cases, a debtor 1 will need to use cash that is subject
Narrowing the Scope of Auditor Duties
Narrowing the Scope of Auditor Duties David Margulies, J.D. Candidate 2010 The tort of deepening insolvency refers to an action asserted by a representative of a bankruptcy estate against directors, officers,
UNITED STATES BANKRUPTCY COURT FOR THE DISTRICT OF ALASKA MEMORANDUM ON MOTION TO EXTEND EXCLUSIVITY PERIOD
Document Page 1 of 5 UNITED STATES BANKRUPTCY COURT FOR THE DISTRICT OF ALASKA In re: CATHOLIC BISHOP OF NORTHERN ALASKA, an Alaska religious corporation sole, Debtor. Case No. F08-00110-DMD Chapter 11
IN THE UNITED STATES BANKRUPTCY COURT FOR THE MIDDLE DISTRICT OF PENNSYLVANIA
Main Document Page 1 of 9 IN THE UNITED STATES BANKRUPTCY COURT FOR THE MIDDLE DISTRICT OF PENNSYLVANIA IN RE: * CHAPTER 11 GPI AVIATION, INC. * Debtor * * GPI AVIATION, INC. * CASE NO. 1-05-bk-06047MDF
KORNFIELD, PAUL & NYBERG Harrison Street, Suite 800 Oakland, California Telephone: (510) Facsimile: (510) or 8681
KORNFIELD, PAUL & NYBERG 1999 Harrison Street, Suite 800 Oakland, California 94612 Telephone: (510) 763-1000 Facsimile: (510) 273-8669 or 8681 Memorandum TO: Frances Medema - League of California Cities
United States Bankruptcy Appellate Panel For the Eighth Circuit
United States Bankruptcy Appellate Panel For the Eighth Circuit No. 13-6023 In re: Wilma M. Pennington-Thurman llllllllllllllllllllldebtor ------------------------------ Wilma M. Pennington-Thurman llllllllllllllllllllldebtor
Signed January 17, 2019 United States Bankruptcy Judge
Case 18-50214-rlj11 Doc 865 Filed 01/17/19 Entered 01/17/19 16:51:55 Page 1 of 7 The following constitutes the ruling of the court and has the force and effect therein described. Signed January 17, 2019
Case 1:12-bk Doc 261 Filed 03/07/13 Entered 03/07/13 17:19:21 Desc Main Document Page 1 of 10
Document Page 1 of 10 UNITED STATES BANKRUPTCY COURT DISTRICT OF RHODE ISLAND ) Chapter 11 In re ) ) Case No. 12-10602 (WCH) PAWTUCKET ASPHALT CORP. et al. ) ) Jointly Administered Debtors. ) ) OBJECTION
IRS Trust Fund Lien (26 U.S.C. 7501) Validity and Priority Issues
IRS Trust Fund Lien (26 U.S.C. 7501) Validity and Priority Issues Joseph M. Selba, Esq. Tydings & Rosenberg LLP Maryland Bankruptcy Bar Association March 2017 Lunch Meeting A 7501 trust is, therefore,
UNITED STATES BANKRUPTCY COURT WESTERN DISTRICT OF KENTUCKY
UNITED STATES BANKRUPTCY COURT WESTERN DISTRICT OF KENTUCKY In re: DANIEL WILBUR BENNETT and CASE NO. 04-40564 SANDRA FAYE BENNETT, CHAPTER 13 JOHN W. JOHNSON and CASE NO. 04-40593 KATHY S. JOHNSON, CHAPTER
The Effect Of Philly News On Credit Bidding
Portfolio Media, Inc. 860 Broadway, 6 th Floor New York, NY 10003 www.law360.com Phone: +1 646 783 7100 reprints@portfoliomedia.com The Effect Of Philly News On Credit Bidding Law360, New York (July 08,
IN THE UNITED STATES BANKRUPTCY COURT FOR THE DISTRICT OF DELAWARE
IN THE UNITED STATES BANKRUPTCY COURT FOR THE DISTRICT OF DELAWARE In re: : Chapter 11 : A123 SYSTEMS, INC., et al., : Case No. 12-12859 (KJC) : Debtors. 1 : Hearing Date: 11/8/12 at 10:00 a.m. : Objection
Information & Instructions: Response to a Motion To Lift The Automatic Stay Notice and Proof of Service
Defense Or Response To A Motion To Lift The Automatic Stay Information & Instructions: Response to a Motion To Lift The Automatic Stay Notice and Proof of Service 1. Use this form to file a response to
Case hdh11 Doc 69 Filed 11/03/17 Entered 11/03/17 18:59:23 Page 1 of 48
Case 17-33964-hdh11 Doc 69 Filed 11/03/17 Entered 11/03/17 18:59:23 Page 1 of 48 Gregory G. Hesse (Texas Bar No. 09549419) HUNTON & WILLIAMS LLP 1445 Ross Avenue Suite 3700 Dallas, Texas 75209 Telephone:
Case AJC Doc 229 Filed 06/18/09 Page 1 of 7. CASE NO AJC DB ISLAMORADA, LLC, Chapter 11 DEBTOR S MOTION TO DISMISS CASE
Case 07-20537-AJC Doc 229 Filed 06/18/09 Page 1 of 7 In re: UNITED STATES BANKRUPTCY COURT SOUTHERN DISTRICT OF FLORIDA www.flsb.uscourts.gov CASE NO. 07-20537-AJC DB ISLAMORADA, LLC, Chapter 11 Debtor-in-Possession.
Case hdh11 Doc 12 Filed 09/02/16 Entered 09/02/16 08:06:14 Page 1 of 16
Case 16-33437-hdh11 Doc 12 Filed 09/02/16 Entered 09/02/16 08:06:14 Page 1 of 16 Robert D. Albergotti State Bar No. 009790800 Ian T. Peck State Bar No. 24013306 Jarom J. Yates State Bar No. 24071134 HAYNES
Case Document 195 Filed in TXSB on 03/31/15 Page 1 of 8
Case 15-31086 Document 195 Filed in TXSB on 03/31/15 Page 1 of 8 IN THE UNITED STATES BANKRUPTCY COURT FOR THE SOUTHERN DISTRICT OF TEXAS HOUSTON DIVISION IN RE: UNIVERSITY GENERAL HEALTH SYSTEM, INC.,
Case AJC Doc 10 Filed 02/26/13 Page 1 of 7. UNITED STATES BANKRUPTCY COURT SOUTHERN DISTRICT OF FLORIDA Miami Division
Case 13-13954-AJC Doc 10 Filed 02/26/13 Page 1 of 7 UNITED STATES BANKRUPTCY COURT SOUTHERN DISTRICT OF FLORIDA Miami Division www.flsb.uscourts.gov In re: BANAH INTERNATIONAL GROUP, INC. Case No. 13-13954-AJC
UNITED STATES BANKRUPTCY COURT EASTERN DISTRICT OF MICHIGAN SOUTHERN DIVISION
UNITED STATES BANKRUPTCY COURT EASTERN DISTRICT OF MICHIGAN SOUTHERN DIVISION --------------------------------------------------------------x In re Chapter 9 CITY OF DETROIT, MICHIGAN, Case No. 13-53846
Case bjh11 Doc 690 Filed 03/15/19 Entered 03/15/19 16:32:45 Page 1 of 7
Case 18-33967-bjh11 Doc 690 Filed 03/15/19 Entered 03/15/19 16:32:45 Page 1 of 7 James S. Brouner Texas Bar No. 03087285 12770 Coit Rd., Suite 541 Dallas, Texas 75251 Phone: (972) 628-4902 jbrouner@weisbartlaw.net
UNITED STATES BANKRUPTCY COURT FOR THE DISTRICT OF OREGON MOTION. Pursuant to 11 U.S.C. 105 and 524, and this Court s inherent power, Evan Bowers
Michael Fuller, Oregon Bar No. 09357 Special Counsel for Debtor OlsenDaines, P.C. US Bancorp Tower 111 SW 5th Ave., 31st Fl. Portland, Oregon 97204 michael@underdoglawyer.com Direct 503-201-4570 UNITED
Case CSS Doc 106 Filed 05/23/18 Page 1 of 11 UNITED STATES BANKRUPTCY COURT DISTRICT OF DELAWARE. Chapter 11
Case 18-10679-CSS Doc 106 Filed 05/23/18 Page 1 of 11 UNITED STATES BANKRUPTCY COURT DISTRICT OF DELAWARE In re CCI LIQUIDATION, INC., Debtor. 1 Chapter 11 Case No. 18-10679 (CSS) Hearing Date: June 19,
Case bjh11 Doc 689 Filed 03/15/19 Entered 03/15/19 16:31:59 Page 1 of 7
Case 18-33967-bjh11 Doc 689 Filed 03/15/19 Entered 03/15/19 16:31:59 Page 1 of 7 James S. Brouner Texas Bar No. 03087285 12770 Coit Rd., Suite 541 Dallas, Texas 75251 Phone: (972) 628-4902 jbrouner@weisbartlaw.net
UNITED STATES BANKRUPTCY COURT FOR THE WESTERN DISTRICT OF PENNSYLVANIA
UNITED STATES BANKRUPTCY COURT FOR THE WESTERN DISTRICT OF PENNSYLVANIA IN RE : BANKRUPTCY NO. 05-13361 : CHAPTER 13 JOHN F.K. ARMSTRONG, DEBTOR : : JOHN F.K. ARMSTRONG, Movant : DOCUMENT NO. 48 vs. :
Case DMW Doc 50 Filed 03/07/16 Entered 03/07/16 15:17:26 Page 1 of 5
Case 13-02289-8-DMW Doc 50 Filed 03/07/16 Entered 03/07/16 15:17:26 Page 1 of 5 SO ORDERED. SIGNED this 7 day of March, 2016. David M. Warren United States Bankruptcy Judge UNITED STATES BANKRUPTCY COURT
Case Doc 143 Filed 08/04/16 Entered 08/04/16 12:45:04 Desc Main Document Page 1 of 13
Document Page 1 of 13 UNITED STATES BANKRUPTCY COURT DISTRICT OF MASSACHUSETTS EASTERN DIVISION In re: ABC DISPOSAL SERVICE, INC., et al. Debtors Chapter 11 Case No: 16-11787-JNF Jointly-Administered 1
Case Doc 2020 Filed 02/10/14 Entered 02/10/14 16:13:24 Desc Main Document Page 1 of 8
Document Page 1 of 8 UNITED STATES BANKRUPTCY COURT FOR THE NORTHERN DISTRICT OF ILLINOIS EASTERN DIVISION ) In re: ) ) EDISON MISSION ENERGY, et al., ) ) Case No. 12-49219 (JPC) Debtors. ) Chapter 11
UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT EASTERN DISTRICT OF KENTUCKY SOUTHERN DIVISION PIKEVILLE ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) *** *** *** ***
Case: 7:15-cv-00096-ART Doc #: 56 Filed: 02/05/16 Page: 1 of 11 - Page ID#: 2240 UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT EASTERN DISTRICT OF KENTUCKY SOUTHERN DIVISION PIKEVILLE In re BLACK DIAMOND MINING COMPANY,
Case KG Doc 1 Filed 08/10/18 Page 1 of 12 IN THE UNITED STATES BANKRUPTCY COURT FOR THE DISTRICT OF DELAWARE
Case 18-50687-KG Doc 1 Filed 08/10/18 Page 1 of 12 IN THE UNITED STATES BANKRUPTCY COURT FOR THE DISTRICT OF DELAWARE In re: SUNIVA, INC., Chapter 11 Case No. 17-10837 (KG) Debtor. SQN ASSET SERVICING,
Creditors Cannot Contract Around Their Fiduciary Duties and Withhold Their Consent from a Debtor to File for Bankruptcy
Creditors Cannot Contract Around Their Fiduciary Duties and Withhold Their Consent from a Debtor to File for Bankruptcy 2017 Volume IX No. 10 Creditors Cannot Contract Around Their Fiduciary Duties and
Circuit Court for Prince George s County Case No. CAL UNREPORTED
Circuit Court for Prince George s County Case No. CAL-16-38707 UNREPORTED IN THE COURT OF SPECIAL APPEALS OF MARYLAND No. 177 September Term, 2017 DAWUD J. BEST v. COHN, GOLDBERG AND DEUTSCH, LLC Berger,