Oxford Historic Preservation Commission

Transcription

1 Oxford Historic Preservation Commission COA application: 273 Applicant: Address: COA History COA Request: Seeker Properties, LLC 1013 Jefferson Avenue COA Case #108 - May 2010 approval for the construction of a new 3-story boutique hotel; approved (Expired) Approval for construction of 3-story hotel Design Guideline References: Review of the following required by Historic Preservation Ordinance (Sec , 2, b-d) and Oxford Design Guidelines, Section 6 New Construction Compatibility (page 40): A. Setback and Lot Coverage G. Height B. Orientation H. Materials C. Scale I. Color D. Proportion J. Roof Shape E. Rhythm K. Details and Ornamentation F. Massing L. Landscape Features As in similar cases, a separate COA approval will be needed once actual products are known; i.e., details of final exterior materials finish details, signage and lighting details. Approval prior to construction is recommended. Comments:

2

3

4

5

6

7

8

9

10

11

12

13

14 HISTORIC PRESERVATION COMMISSION Be it remembered that the Oxford Historic Preservation Commission did meet in regular session on Tuesday, April 13, 2010 at 5:30 p.m. in the City Hall courtroom with the following members present: Jeff Asti, Chairman Kevin Frye Jack McKenzie Julie K. Spears Molissia Swaney Shawn Telford The following Commissioners were absent: Randy Barber, Building Official Katrina Hourin, Assistant City Planner Tiffany Smith, Historic Preservation Consultant Alicia Thompson, Secretary Campbell Best Harry Owens Sonia Weinburg Thompson The meeting was called to order by Chairman Asti. After the meeting was called to order, the following business was transacted: Approval of the Agenda Chairman Asti asked if there were any changes to the agenda. There being no changes made to the agenda, motion was made by Commissioner Frye and seconded by Commissioner Swaney to approve the agenda. All present voting aye. The motion was approved and the agenda was accepted. Approval of the Minutes from the March 9, 2010 Meeting The following modification was made to the minutes from the March 9, 2010 meeting: delete the erroneous listing of Commissioner Camp Best s name from the roll of present members. There being no further changes, motion was made by Commissioner McKenzie and seconded by Commissioner Swaney to approve the minutes from the March 9, 2010 meeting.

15 2 All present voting aye. The motion was approved. REGULAR AGENDA Public Hearing for Initial Review Section of the Demolition by Neglect procedure for property located at 1701 Jackson Avenue. Chairman Asti informed the Commission that correspondence had been received from the City Building Official, Randy Barber regarding the findings on the condition of property located at 1701 Jackson Avenue, Oxford, Mississippi. Chairman Asti informed the Commission that property owner John Shaw responded to the correspondence on April 13, 2010 by stating that he would be unable to attend the meeting due to business obligations. Commissioner Asti added that Mr. Shaw s correspondence stated that Ken Ash and Ann Fair would represent him in the discussion. At that point in the hearing, Ken Ash came before the Commission representing John Shaw to discuss the three items that were included in the March 11, 2010 correspondence sent by the City of Oxford. The items that were mentioned included: A) Commence work on repairs, B) Provide a plan for commencement of repairs and, if necessary, request an extension of time, or C) Provide an inspection report from a licensed professional stating that the property is not in a state of deterioration or neglect. Chairman Asti then stated that the Commission had not received any information from Mr. Shaw or a licensed professional denying deterioration of the property. Chairman Asti then read the correspondence that was forwarded to Mr. Shaw by the City Building Official Randy Barber on March 2, The letter addressed the following conditions: 1. Balcony: Deterioration of the balcony has led to disrepair and rotting in all structural members. The roof of the balcony has holes in the decking which lead to rotting in the rafters. Exposure to weather has led to deterioration in the cornice and also the band which holds the second floor. Beams and floor joists have lost structural integrity because of water damage causing the floor to break away from the house. 2. Chimney: Further inspection of the house revealed a large hole on the exterior of the chimney which is causing deterioration. Water enters the house and has damaged the interior of the structure, including the floors walls and ceilings. Repair of the chimney is necessary to prevent further damage to joists, beams and rafters. 3. Windows: Minimal maintenance has led to rotting of the window sashes and window frames in many rooms of the house. They are in need of replacement to become operable.

16 3 Chairman Asti asked Mr. Ash if there was a plan to repair or replace the balcony. Mr. Ash replied that the balcony has been braced and that the homeowner feels that it is safe since it has been braced. Mr. Ash further stated that the balcony could be repaired, but the repairs would be expensive. Mr. Ash stated that there were not any current plans to repair or replace the balcony. Commissioner Swaney asked Mr. Ash if the balcony would continue to deteriorate if the repairs were not made. Mr. Ash stated that the balcony is unsafe in its current condition. Further discussion was made between Commissioner Swaney and Mr. Ash about the condition of the porch and the balcony. Chairman Asti asked Mr. Ash if there was a plan to repair or replace the chimney. Mr. Ash replied that the chimney currently has dead mortar which is causing the bricks to fall out. Mr. Ash also stated that the chimney needs to be reconstructed from the ground up. Mr. Ash also stated that if the chimney were reconstructed it would only be for aesthetics. Further discussion was made between Mr. Ash and the Commission regarding the condition of the chimney. Mr. Ash informed the Commission that the chimney is currently covered with a tarp and that there is a plan in the works for an estimate to remove the chimney. Chairman Asti asked Mr. Ash if there was a plan to repair or replace the windows. Discussion was made between Mr. Ash and the Commission about repairing the windows. Mr. Ash informed the Commission that the applicant would like to repair some of the windows and replace the windows on the east side. Commissioner Frye asked Mr. Ash if the repairs would be a temporary fix. Mr. Ash replied that some of the windows could be fixed with caulk. Chairman Asti asked Mr. Ash if Mr. Shaw had authorized him to repair the windows. Mr. Ash replied that Mr. Shaw had authorized him to make repairs to the windows. Discussion was also made between Mr. Ash and the Commission about the condition of the roof in the rear of the structure. Mr. Ash explained to the Commission that the least expensive way to repair the roof would be to recover the existing roof. Chairman Asti asked Mr. Ash what the square footage of the roofing was. Mr. Ash replied that it was probably square feet and presented the Commission with three samples of possible roofing materials. Commissioner Frye posed a question to the Commission asking if the discussion on the roof was a matter that needed a Certificate of Appropriateness. Commissioner Frye also posed a question to the Commission asking if the correspondence from the City Building Official included language that discussed the condition of the roof. It was determined that the correspondence did not include language discussing the condition of the roof. There being no further questions or comments from the public or the Commission, motion was made by Commissioner Frye and seconded by Commissioner McKenzie to table a decision on the proposed repairs to the roof until a later date. All present voting aye. The motion was approved.

17 4 Chairman Asti informed the Commission that it needed to discuss the March 2, 2010 correspondence to John Shaw from City Building Official Randy Barber and make a determination on demolition by neglect per Section of the City Oxford s Historic Preservation Ordinance. Commissioner Frye reiterated that there were three primary areas of concern noted on the correspondence. Commissioner Frye also noted that Ken Ash had addressed those three areas by noting the following: 1. Balcony: There is currently no plan of repair. 2. Chimney: There is currently no plan of repair. 3. Windows: There is currently a plan of repair in place. There being no further questions or comments from the public or the Commission, motion was made by Commissioner Frye and seconded by Commissioner Spears to determine that there is evidence of demolition by neglect to the balcony and chimney on the current structure per Section of the City of Oxford s Historic Preservation Ordinance located at 1701 Jackson Avenue, Oxford, Mississippi. All present voting aye. The motion was approved. Chairman Asti informed Mr. Ash that the Commission will issue further findings from the City of Oxford to property owner John Shaw. Chairman Asti also informed Mr. Ash that the roof would be considered separately and that the property owner would need to submit an application for a Certificate of Appropriateness for the proposed repairs to the roof. Public Hearing for Case #100A 1209 South 16 th Street. Edye Conkerton of Eco Architecture, PLLC came before the Commission representing George Haymans of Agrivest, LLC seeking a Certificate of Appropriateness to demolish an existing residential structure on property located at 1209 South 16 th Street, Oxford, Mississippi. Ms. Conkerton presented the Commission with additional documentation in the form of a massing study for the current structure and a massing study of the homes located within the neighborhood. Ms. Conkerton informed the Commission that the applicant was seeking to demolish the current structure and construct a new one and one half (1½) story structure in its place. Ms. Conkerton further added that the applicant s original plan was to retain the current structure and construct two new residences in the rear of the property, however that plan was modified after it was determined that the current structure had been badly neglected by the previous property owner. Discussion was made regarding the applicant s request. Chairman Asti informed the Commission that it should vote on the appropriateness of the structure as noted in Section 54-26(4) of the City of Oxford s Historic Preservation Ordinance regarding demolitions. Commissioner Spears offered comments stating that in her opinion the structure was not historically significant. Commissioner Spears added that the structure did not contain any character defining elements or materials nor was there any historical event tied to the structure. George Haymans provided the Commission with a property value spreadsheet (Exhibit E) and gave letters supporting the demo from the surrounding neighbors (Exhibit G). Mr. Haymans also

18 5 provided the Commission with an estimate from Massey Construction comparing the cost of renovation to the cost of demolishing the current structure and constructing a new one. Mr. Haymans stated that the figures for renovation were $352,000 versus $235,790 for demolition and new construction. Mr. Haymans further stated that he had spoken with several reputable contractors and Massey Construction was the only company that was comfortable in providing him with a quote to renovate the structure. Lengthy discussion and debate was made between Mr. Haymans and the Commission regarding the proposed demolition. Chairman Asti added that he respected Commissioner Spears' opinion, but he argued that the structure s features are distinctive even though they might not be individually distinctive. Chairman Asti also reminded the applicant that the features don t have to qualify in order for a structure to be in the historic district. Commissioner Swaney added that she agreed with Chairman Asti that the structure is distinctive and adds to the character of the neighborhood that it is located in. Ms. Conkerton argued that consideration should be given to the sustainability of the district and stated that the structure is an economic waste in its current state. Further debate was made between Ms. Conkerton and Commissioner Swaney regarding the significance of the structure to the neighborhood. Chairman Asti added that the structure has been criminally neglected and cautioned the Commission to figure out a practical solution. After further discussion was made, Chairman Asti asked for a motion on the applicant s request. There being no further questions or comments from the public or the Commission, motion was made by Commissioner McKenzie and seconded by Commissioner Spears to approve the request for a Certificate of Appropriateness to demolish an existing residential structure per Section 54-26(4) of the City of Oxford s Historic Preservation Ordinance on property located at 1209 South 16 th Street, Oxford, Mississippi. The vote was as follows: The motion was approved. Asti Aye Frye Abstained McKenzie Aye Swaney Nay Spears Aye Telford Aye Public Hearing for Case #100B 1209 South 16 th Street. Edye Conkerton of Eco Architecture, PLLC came before the Commission representing George Haymans and Agrivest, LLC seeking a Certificate of Appropriateness to construct a new one and one half (1½) story residential structure (Building 1) located at 1209 South 16 th Street, Oxford, Mississippi. Ms. Conkerton explained the applicant s request and presented a massing study, photographs, elevations and a floor plan for Building 1. Ms. Conkerton added that the original plan was to construct a two story residence but that plan was modified to construct a one and one half (1½) structure due to some Commissioners concerns that a two story structure would appear too imposing. Discussion was made regarding the modifications and Commissioner Spears commended the applicant on successfully breaking up the massing of the structure. Historic Preservation Consultant Tiffany Smith asked Ms. Conkerton about the type of materials to be

19 6 used for the project. Ms. Conkerton provided the Commission with a materials list and explained the materials to be used in the project. Ms. Conkerton also added that the landscaping plan was the same as the previously submitted plan. Discussion was made between Ms. Conkerton and the Commission regarding the applicant s request. There being no further questions or comments from the public or the Commission, motion was made by Commissioner Frye and seconded by Commissioner McKenzie to approve the request for a Certificate of Appropriateness to construct a new one and one half (1½) story residential structure (Building 1) located at 1209 South 16 th Street, Oxford, Mississippi. The vote was as follows: The motion was approved. Asti Aye Swaney Abstained Frey Aye McKenzie Aye Spears Aye Telford Aye Public Hearing for Case # Pierce Avenue. Edye Conkerton of Eco Architecture, PLLC came before the Commission representing George Haymans and Blackacre Properties, LLC seeking a Certificate of Appropriateness to make exterior renovations to property located at 1339 Pierce Avenue, Oxford, Mississippi. Ms. Conkerton presented the Commission with photographs, elevations, a floor plan, and a materials list for the proposed project. Ms. Conkerton also explained that the applicant s proposal included renovations to the porches, adding Hardiboard siding, removal of the existing roofline and replacing it with a higher pitched gabled roof and the addition of a rear porch over the rear parking. Ms. Conkerton also explained that the existing brick veneer would have a slurry coat added over it to resemble a painted look. Commissioner McKenzie asked Ms. Conkerton was she meant by slurry coat over the brick. Ms. Conkerton explained that it was a thick coating put over brick that resembled stucco. Chairman Asti informed Ms. Conkerton that her current proposal appeared to completely alter the façade of the existing structure. Discussion was made between Ms. Conkerton and the Commission regarding proposed changes to the front façade of the current structure. Commissioner Spears stated that she would like to see the structure s front picture window remain intact. Other Commissioners also stated that they would like to see the structure s front picture remain. Further discussion was made regarding the front picture window and Ms. Smith asked Ms. Conkerton if she could sketch in the front picture window as an addendum to her application. Ms. Conkerton sketched in the front picture window as an addendum to her application and further discussion was made regarding the windows. Mr. Haymans commented on the landscaping plan and added that no trees would be removed from the site. Further discussion was made regarding the applicant s request. There being no further questions or comments from the public or the Commission, motion was made by Commissioner Frye and seconded by Commissioner McKenzie to approve the request for a Certificate of Appropriateness to construct a one and one half (1½) story structure with an addendum to the front picture window on property located at 1209 South 16 th Street, Oxford, Mississippi.

20 7 All present voting aye. The motion was approved. Ms. Conkerton informed the Commission that she was also seeking to modify the plan to allow for an alternate door than the one previously submitted. Discussion was regarding the type of alternate door to be used in the project. There being no further questions or comments from the public or the Commission, motion was made by Commissioner Frye and seconded by Commissioner McKenzie to modify the plan to allow for an alternate door than the one previously submitted for Case #102. All present voting aye. The motion was approved. Public Hearing for Case # Buchanan Avenue. (Prior to the hearing, Commissioner McKenzie recused himself) Ernest Lowe came before the Commission seeking a Certificate of Appropriateness to install a picket fence to coordinate with a previously approved picket fence on property located at 1209 South 16 th Street, Oxford, Mississippi. Mr. Lowe informed the Commission that he was seeking approval to install a picket fence on the west side property line that would coordinate with the previously approved fence. Discussion was made regarding the previously approved fence. There being no further questions or comments from the public or the Commission, motion was made by Commissioner Frye and seconded by Commissioner Spears to approve the request for a Certificate of Appropriateness to install a picket fence to coordinate with a previously approved picket fence on property located at 1209 South 16 th Street, Oxford, Mississippi. All present voting aye. The motion was approved. Preliminary Conference 1013 Jefferson Avenue. Jeff Williams of Williams Engineering came before the Commission representing Seeker Properties, LLC seeking preliminary review for a proposed 26 room 3 story boutique hotel. Mr. Williams presented the Commission with a site plan and elevations and informed the Commission that he was seeking their feedback on the proposed project. Discussion was made between Mr. Williams and the Commission regarding the site plan and elevations. Mr. Williams also presented the Commission with a combination layout for the hotel and parking lot to be located across the street from the hotel. Discussion was made regarding the proposed parking lot. Mr. Williams also informed the Commission that the proposal still has to meet the City s landscaping requirements and discussion was made regarding the proposed landscaping plan and landscape buffer. Discussion was also made regarding the materials list, height, and massing of the proposed project. Further discussion was regarding the setback of the proposed project.

21 8 There being no further questions or comments from the public or the Commission no action was taken. There being no further business to come before the Commission, motion was made by Commissioner Spears and seconded by Commissioner McKenzie to adjourn the meeting. All present voted aye. The meeting was adjourned.

22 HISTORIC PRESERVATION COMMISSION Be it remembered that the Oxford Historic Preservation Commission did meet in regular session on Tuesday, May 11, 2010 at 5:30 p.m. in the City Hall courtroom with the following members present: Jeff Asti, Chairman Campbell Best Kevin Frye Jack McKenzie Harry Owens Julie K. Spears Molissia Swaney Shawn Telford Sonia Weinburg Thompson Katrina Hourin, Assistant City Planner Tiffany Smith, Historic Preservation Consultant Alicia Thompson, Secretary The meeting was called to order by Chairman Asti. After the meeting was called to order, the following business was transacted: Approval of the Agenda Chairman Asti asked if there were any changes to the agenda. The following changes were made to the agenda: 1. The addition of Item #9 Complimentary Review for 1339 Pierce Avenue. 2. Correct Item #4 to reflect Rebecca Fedar as the property owner for 602 S. 11 th Street. There being no further modifications to the agenda, motion was made by Commissioner McKenzie and seconded by Commissioner Frye to approve the amended agenda. All present voting aye. The motion was approved and the agenda was accepted. Approval of the Minutes from the April 13, 2010 Meeting There being no changes to the minutes, motion was made by Commissioner McKenzie and seconded by Commissioner Swaney to approve the minutes from the April 13, 2010 meeting. All present voting aye.

23 2 The motion was approved. REGULAR AGENDA Public Hearing for Case # S. 11 th Street. Rebecca Fedar came before the Commission seeking a Certificate of Appropriateness to install a new metal roof on property located at 602 S. 11 th Street. Ms. Fedar presented the Commission with photos of the existing roof that was in need of repair. Ms. Fedar further explained that the proposed new roof carried a 30 year warranty. Commissioner Asti Ms. Fedar what color roof she was proposing to install. Ms. Fedar replied that she was was desirous of installing a natural colored metal roof. Further discussion was made between the Commission and Ms. Fedar regarding her request. There being no further questions or comments from the public or the Commission motion was made by Commissioner Owens and seconded by Commissioner McKenzie to approve the request for Certificate of Appropriateness to install a new metal roof on property located at 602 S. 11 th Street. All present voting aye. The motion was approved. Public Hearing for Case # N. 16 th Street. John Dollarhide came before the Commission representing Bill & Betty Duke seeking a Certificate of Appropriateness to make modifications to a previously approved plan for property located at 309 N. 16 th Street. Mr. Dollarhide presented the Commission with photos, elevations, and a scope of work detailing the proposed modifications. Mr. Dollarhide explained to the Commission that the modifications included: 1. Reducing the approved kitchen window from three units to two units to achieve more kitchen cabinet space. 2. A master bath remodel that will require the removal of an existing window and the installation of a glass block window in the master shower. 3. The removal of a plum tree whose tree roots have damaged the clay tile sewer line. 4. Installation of a new sewer line. Discussion was made between Mr. Dollarhide and the Commission regarding the applicants request. There being no questions from the public or the Commission, motion was made by Commissioner Frye and seconded by Commissioner Owens to approve the request for Certificate of Appropriateness to make modifications to a previously approved plan for property located at 309 N. 16 th Street. All present voting aye.

24 3 The motion was approved. Public Hearing for Case # Lincoln Avenue. Macel Juergens came before the Commission representing John Glass seeking a Certificate of Appropriateness to make exterior renovations to property located at 814 Lincoln Avenue. Ms. Juergens presented the Commission with a site plan, photos of the existing property, and photos of the proposed changes and explained that the renovations would include the following: 1. Replacement of the front door; 2. Adding a fence to enclose the back yard; 3. Enlarging the side deck; 4. Relocating the deck steps; and 5. Replacing the mailbox. Ms. Juergens further stated that the existing front storm door would be removed and replaced with a custom made heart pine door. Ms. Juergens also explained that the applicant was desirous of constructing a four foot (4 ) tall privacy fence to secure the back yard, extending the current deck by three and a half feet (3½ ), and relocating the deck steps to the rear. Ms. Juergens further explained that the proposed fence would be constructed of wrought iron and the proposed deck and steps would be constructed of treated wood. Discussion was made between Ms. Juergens and the Commission regarding the applicant s request. There being no questions or comments from the public or the Commission, motion was made by Commissioner Frye and seconded by Commissioner Owens to approve the request for Certificate of Appropriateness to make exterior renovations to property located at 814 Lincoln Avenue. All present voting aye. The motion was approved. Public Hearing for Case # Buchanan. Macel Juergens came before the Commission representing Tim Phillips seeking a Certificate of Appropriateness to make exterior renovations to property located at 1604 Buchanan. Ms. Juergens presented the Commission with a site plan, photos of the existing property, and photos of the proposed modifications and explained that the renovations would include the following: 1. Adding a gas lantern to each side of the front door; 2. Adding a concrete block retaining wall to the right side of the driveway; 3. Replacing the existing back yard fence with a treated wood privacy fence; and 4. Replacing the existing front yard fence with a short treated wood fence. Ms. Juergens explained that the applicant was desirous of adding a gas lantern on each side of the front door, replacing the dog wire fence on the west of the house with a six foot (6 ) shadow box style privacy fence, installing a four foot (4 ) see thru wooden picket fence to the front of the house, and installing a retaining wall. Ms. Juergens further explained that the shadow box style

25 4 fence would only be installed on the west side of the house for privacy. Commissioner Spears asked Ms. Juergens if a three foot (3 ) fence would work at the front of the house. Ms. Juergens replied that the applicant was desirous of installing a four foot (4 ) fence at the front of the house to contain the dog. Ms. Juergens also informed the Commission that the applicant was desirous of installing a concrete retaining wall near the driveway of the property. Discussion was made regarding the applicant s request and Commissioner Spears commented that the proposed concrete retaining wall would be nicer if stucco slurry was applied over the open face concrete blocks or split face concrete blocks were used as materials for the wall. Discussion was made regarding the proposed concrete retaining wall. There being no further questions from the public or the Commission, motion was made by Commissioner Swaney and seconded by Commissioner Best to approve the request for Certificate of Appropriateness to make exterior renovations to property located at 1604 Buchanan Avenue with the following conditions: All present voting aye. The motion was approved. That the retaining wall will be constructed using either: 1. Retaining wall blocks; 2. Split face concrete blocks; or 3. Stucco slurry applied over open faced concrete blocks. Public Hearing for Case # Jefferson Avenue. Jeff Williams of Williams Engineering Consultants came before the Commission representing Seeker Properties, LLC seeking a Certificate of Appropriateness for a proposed elevation for a three story boutique hotel to be located at 1013 Jefferson Avenue. Mr. Williams informed the Commission that his client had retained an architectural design firm that has significant experience in historical construction for the project. Mr. Williams introduced Brad Jones of the LeBatard, Denmark, Jones Architectural Firm, Biloxi, Mississippi, and presented the Commission with the firm s credentials. Brad Jones presented the Commission with a site plan, construction plans, elevations, and a photo of the proposed site. Mr. Jones informed the Commission that his client was desirous of constructing a three story boutique hotel. Mr. Jones further discussed the scale of the proposed project and the materials to be used in the project. Mr. Jones also discussed the proposed height of the building in relation to the Isom House and stated that the project would contain the same architectural details as the Isom House. Lengthy discussion was made between Mr. Jones and the Commission regarding the height and scale of the proposed project. Commissioner Asti expressed his concerns about the gross volume of the proposed project and asked Mr. Jones about the square footage of the structure that had been previously demolished. Mr. Jones replied that he did not have information for the structure because it was demolished before he was retained by Seeker Properties. Debate was made between Mr. Jones and

26 5 Commissioner Asti regarding the volume of the demolished structure. Mr. Williams informed Commissioner Asti that that information could not be provided because the structure was demolished prior to his client purchasing the lot. Further lengthy debate was made about the previously demolished structure. Commissioner Asti further asked questions about the footprint of the lot for the proposed project. Lengthy discussion was made regarding the footprint of the proposed project. Lengthy discussion was also made about the lot size, height, setbacks, and elevations of the proposed project. Commissioner Swaney asked Mr. Jones if a sidewalk would be part of the proposed project. Mr. Jones replied that a sidewalk would be part of the proposed project with landscaping added to soften the look. Commissioner Asti asked questions about the tree located along the western property line. Mr. Williams came back forward and informed the Commission that the tree received shots and was being fertilized to help keep it alive. Mr. Williams also stated that his client was working with an arborist to protect the tree. Commissioner Asti asked further questions about the pruning done on the tree. Stefano Capomazza informed the Commission that the tree had been pruned to fit the proposed building. Commissioner Frye added that he had spoken with the arborist and neighbors on the street and that everyone he had spoken with liked the proposed project. Commissioner Frye also added that he liked and enjoyed the design of the proposed building. Commissioner Frye then asked Commissioner Spears for her opinion as an architect about the proposed building. Commissioner Spears added that she was torn about the proposed project. Commissioner Spears stated that she loved the design of the building but was hesitant about the scale of the proposed three story structure. Further discussion was made by Mr. Jones and Mr. Williams about the scale of the proposed building. Commissioner Frye further stated that he looked at the Ordinance based on the facts presented to the Commission. Commissioner Frye then read Article II Statement of Purpose of the Oxford Historic Preservation Ordinance stated that there was no building on the lot to preserve. Commissioner Frye commented on the Statement of Purpose and made a motion to approve the request for a Certificate of Appropriateness for a proposed elevation for a three story boutique hotel to be located at 1013 Jefferson Avenue. Mr. Williams added letters of recommendation from FNC Park, the Oxford Convention & Visitors Bureau, and the Economic Development Foundation. Commissioner Frye s motion was seconded by Commissioner McKenzie. Prior to a vote being taken, public comment came from Joyce Freeland voicing her opposition to the project. Ms. Freeland stated that the proposed project will negatively affect the Jefferson Avenue streetscape and the Isom House. Ms. Freeland also stated that the Commission should consider the effect that the project would have on the mature trees located on the lot of the Isom House. Ms. Freeland further expressed her concern about the impact the additional traffic would have on North 11 th Street. Debate was made between Ms. Freeland and Commissioner Frye regarding the proposed project.

27 6 Public comment also came from Santos Arico, a 25 year resident that lives on Sivley Street, opposing the project. The resident commented that the proposed hotel would detract from the country style living of the neighborhood and that the small town street characteristics would be lost if the project were approved. The resident also expressed his concerns about the impact that increased traffic would have on the area. Other public comments also came opposing the proposed project. Commissioner Asti expressed comments opposing the motion. Commissioner Asti discussed the scale, rhythm, orientation, and gross volume of the proposed project and voiced his opposition to the proposed project. Mr. Williams came back before the Commission and addressed Ms. Freeland s concerns. Mr. Williams stated that traffic from the hotel site would exit off of Jefferson Avenue rather than North 11 th Street. Further debate was made between the Commissioners and Mr. Williams about the proposed project. Candis Varnell came before the Commission and expressed her opposition to the proposed project. Ms. Varnell stated that the scale of the proposed building was too large for that corner. Commissioner Thompson asked the applicant if any discussion had been made to scale the building down. Stefano Capomazza replied that the project would not work with less than 26 rooms. Other public comments came opposing the project and Commissioner Asti presented data to support the historical significance of the tree located on the lot of the Isom House making it part of the record. At this point in the meeting, Commissioner Asti asked for a vote on the motion made by Commissioner Frye and seconded by Commissioner McKenzie to approve the request for Certificate of Appropriateness for a proposed elevation for a three story boutique hotel to be located at 1013 Jefferson Avenue. The vote was as follows: The motion was approved. Asti Nay Best Aye Owens Nay Frye Aye Spears Nay McKenzie Aye Thompson Nay Swaney Aye Telford Aye Complimentary Review for property located at 1339 Pierce Avenue. George Haymans came before the Commission seeking complimentary review of modifications to a previously approved plan for 1339 Pierce Avenue. Mr. Haymans informed the Commission a termite infestation caused the brick on the house to fall down in the process of applying the slurry coat. He stated

28 7 that seeking their feedback about installing Hardi siding to the structure. Mr. Haymans also stated that he was seeking feedback about modifications to the originally approved roof on the rear of the house. Discussion was made and feedback was provided to Mr. Haymans. There being no questions or comments from the public or the Commission, motion was made Commissioner Frye and seconded by Commissioner McKenzie to adjourn the meeting. The meeting was adjourned.