Judge Holds UberBLACK Drivers Are Independent Contractors, Not Employees
|
|
- Mae Peters
- 5 years ago
- Views:
Transcription
1 Judge Holds UberBLACK Drivers Are Independent Contractors, Not Employees April 17, 2018 Susan K. Lessack On April 11, Judge Michael Baylson of the U.S. District Court for the Eastern District of Pennsylvania became the first judge to grant summary judgment on the issue of whether UberBLACK drivers are employees or independent contractors under the Fair Labor Standards Act (FLSA). Judge Baylson concluded that Uber correctly classified the plaintiffs drivers who provided black car limousine services for Uber as independent contractors. Razak v. Uber Techs., Inc., No (E.D. Pa. 2018). The plaintiffs intend to appeal. Although the analysis of independent contractor classification is fact-intensive and varies depending on the type of claim asserted by the plaintiffs, gig economy employers will find the Razak opinion helpful in structuring their independent contractor relationships. THIS PUBLICATION MAY CONTAIN ATTORNEY ADVERTISING The material in this publication was created as of the date set forth above and is based on laws, court decisions, administrative rulings and congressional materials that existed at that time, and should not be construed as legal advice or legal opinions on specific facts. The information in this publication is not intended to create, and the transmission and receipt of it does not constitute, a lawyer-client relationship. Please send address corrections to phinfo@pepperlaw.com Pepper Hamilton LLP. All Rights Reserved.
2 The Razak complaint was brought by three limousine drivers (on behalf of themselves and a putative class of drivers) who render services to Uber through Uber s mobile application. The plaintiffs each owned and operated their own transportation companies. They entered into written contracts with Uber on behalf of their companies, which included a driver addendum. The contract and addendum provide that the drivers are employees of the transportation companies, not of Uber. They also contain other language supporting independent contractor status. How the Uber App Works Uber drivers who are ready to pick up passengers log in to the Uber app and indicate that they are online. They can accept or reject trip requests by either pressing an accept button or doing nothing, in which case they have rejected the request. If a driver rejects three trips in a row, he or she is automatically moved to offline status, where he or she remains until going back online. Drivers may go to any location to be available for trips (except that there are special rules for certain locations like airports and train stations). While drivers are online, they are free to engage in personal activities, such as phone calls and business for their own transportation companies. The Parties Positions in Razak The drivers, who are classified as independent contractors, argued that they are legally employees and, therefore, should have received overtime pay under the FLSA and Pennsylvania law. According to the drivers, they are employees because Uber controls the way in which they perform services when they are on the Uber app, they do not have specialized skills, they are required to drive certain types and colors of cars, they perform an integral role in Uber s business, and many have driven for Uber over a long period of time. Uber asserted that the plaintiffs are independent contractors because they operate their own businesses, they are free to work for other companies, they can hire their own workers, they can work when and how often they want, and they pay their own substantial expenses. In evaluating whether the plaintiffs are employees under the FLSA, the court examined the factors articulated by the Third Circuit Court of Appeals in Donovan v. DialAmerica Marketing, Inc., 757 F.2d 1376 (3d Cir. 1985), for determining whether a worker is an employee under the FLSA: (1) the degree of the alleged employer s right to control the manner in which the work is to be performed; (2) the alleged employee s opportunity for profit or loss depending on his managerial skill; (3) the alleged employee s investment
3 in equipment or materials required for his task, or his employment of helpers; (4) whether the service rendered requires a special skill; (5) the degree of permanence of the working relationship; and (6) whether the service rendered is an integral part of the alleged employer s business. The Donovan opinion instructed courts to look at all of the circumstances and not rely on any particular factor. In analyzing the six Donovan factors, Judge Baylson found that four weighed heavily in favor of independent contractor status and only two supported employee status, neither of which the court found to carry much weight. Alleged Employer s Right to Control the Manner in Which the Work Is to be Performed The right to control how work is performed is generally viewed as the most significant factor in determining independent contractor status. The court concluded that Uber did not have the right to control the manner in which UberBLACK drivers performed services. The court observed that the written agreements between the plaintiffs and Uber, while not dispositive, illustrate a lack of control by Uber. For example, the agreements provide that the customers and drivers retain the sole right to determine when, where and for how long each of them will utilize the Driver App for the Uber Services and that Uber had no right to require a driver to display the company s name on the driver s vehicle or to wear anything with an Uber logo. The court was not persuaded by the drivers arguments that Uber exercises or has the right to exercise substantial control because it can terminate a driver s access to the Uber app; it can deactivate drivers for cancelling trips, for falling short of the required driver rating, or for soliciting payments outside of the Uber app; and it can limit the number of consecutive hours that a driver may work under its drowsy driving policy. Instead, the court focused on the facts that drivers are permitted to use subcontractors to drive (in which event Uber paid the plaintiffs businesses rather than the subcontractors directly), that the drivers can work for Uber s competitors, and that the drivers can determine their own working hours and days and can work as often or as seldom as they choose. Based on all of these considerations, the court concluded that the first Donovan factor weighs heavily in favor of independent contractor status.
4 Alleged Employee s Opportunity for Profit or Loss The court similarly concluded that the second Donovan factor strongly favored independent contractor status. Drivers can work whenever they choose and can decide whether to accept rides from Uber, from a competitor, or from private clients based on where their opportunity for profit was greater. The court disregarded the drivers argument that Uber determines through its app whether an individual driver receives a trip request, and that Uber decides how much passengers are charged. Because a driver has the sole discretion to decide when to log in to the Uber app and earn profit, Uber is not in control of the driver s opportunity to earn profits. Alleged Employee s Investment Noting that the drivers essentially conceded the factor of employee investment, the court concluded that this factor strongly supported independent contractor status because the drivers are required to obtain their own vehicles. Special Skills The court recognized that driving is not by itself a special skill, although UberBLACK drivers are expected to replicate the limousine experience, which requires a high level of customer service. The court concluded that this factor supported employee status, but did not carry much weight. Relationship Permanence A working relationship that has a degree of permanence typically suggests employee status, rather than independent contractor status. Although many of the drivers had provided services to Uber for several years, the court observed that the long-term nature of the relationships did not establish permanence when the drivers were in control of how long they wished to work for Uber. Because the drivers can work as little or as much as they want, the court concluded that the relationship permanence factor weighed heavily in favor of independent contractor status. Integrality of Service Finally, the court found that the drivers are an integral part of Uber s business and, therefore, the integrality of service factor supports employee status to a slight degree. Based on its analysis of the six Donovan factors and the totality of the circumstances, the court concluded that the drivers had not proved their burden of showing that they are employees. In reaching its conclusion, the court relied heavily on the independence
5 and control that UberBLACK drivers are able to exercise, especially in their freedom to determine when and how much to work and their ability to conduct business for their own companies and for competitors. Conclusion In Razak, the court easily determined that the workers were independent contractors under Uber s business model. The Razak decision is good news for gig economy employers and follows the recent victory for GrubHub in a case under California employment laws. A California district court found that GrubHub drivers were classified correctly as independent contractors because, among other reasons, GrubHub did not control when and whether the drivers worked and the drivers could also work for competitors. Lawson v. GrubHub, Inc., No (N.D. Cal. 2018). A contrary ruling in Razak (or GrubHub) would have had significant negative ramifications for the gig economy business model, which depends on using independent contractors to save employment-related expenses. Misclassification claims by drivers and other individuals who perform services by accepting assignments through an internet-based platform are likely to continue, and gig economy employers should review their independent contractor relationships carefully to maximize the existence of factors supporting independent contractor status. Berwyn Boston Detroit Harrisburg Los Angeles New York Orange County Philadelphia Pittsburgh Princeton Silicon Valley Washington Wilmington pepperlaw.com
Misclassification Claims Threaten Gig Economy Business
Misclassification Claims Threaten Gig Economy Business PEPPER@WORK November 6, 2017 Tracey E Diamond diamondt@pepperlaw.com Susan K. Lessack lessacks@pepperlaw.com Jessica X.Y. Rothenberg rothenbergj@pepperlaw.com
More informationLessons Unlearned: Franchise and Independent Contractor Agreements Can Be Kiss of Death
Lessons Unlearned: Franchise and Independent Contractor Agreements Can Be Kiss of Death CLIENT ALERT September 22, 2016 Richard J. Reibstein reibsteinr@pepperlaw.com A. Christopher Young youngac@pepperlaw.com
More informationRelated-Party Provisions Prevent Deduction by S Corp Shareholders
Related-Party Provisions Prevent Deduction by S Corp Shareholders Annette M. Ahlers ahlersa@pepperlaw.com Many routine transactions occur between related parties, including the payment or accrual of interest
More informationFocus on New Tax Law: Section 199A Pass-Through Deduction and Restrictions on Interest Deductions
Focus on New Tax Law: Section 199A Pass-Through Deduction and Restrictions on Interest Deductions TAX UPDATE Volume 2018, Issue 2 Annette M. Ahlers ahlersa@pepperlaw.com The Tax Cuts and Jobs Act (2017
More informationThe IRS s Stricter(?) Stance on Regulated Investment Company Investments in Commodities
The IRS s Stricter(?) Stance on Regulated Investment Company Investments in Commodities TAX UPDATE Volume 2017, Issue 1 Morgan Klinzing klinzingm@pepperlaw.com W. Roderick Gagné gagner@pepperlaw.com WHILE
More informationNew York Employers Take Note: Federal Court Injunction Blocking the Federal Overtime Regulations Means Little in New York
New York Employers Take Note: Federal Court Injunction Blocking the Federal Overtime Regulations Means Little in New York CLIENT ALERT November 30, 2016 Richard J. Reibstein reibsteinr@pepperlaw.com Jessica
More informationU.S. District Court Upholds CLO Risk Retention Rule
U.S. District Court Upholds CLO Risk Retention Rule FINANCIAL SERVICES January 12, 2017 Todd R. Kornfeld kornfeldt@pepperlaw.com John P. Falco falcoj@pepperlaw.com INVESTMENT MANAGERS THAT WISH TO MANAGE
More informationCFPB Issues Long-Awaited Short-Term Lending Final Rule
CFPB Issues Long-Awaited Short-Term Lending Final Rule CLIENT ALERT October 9, 2017 Richard P. Eckman eckmanr@pepperlaw.com THE REAL IMPACT ON THE HIGH-COST LOAN INDUSTRY IS RESTRICTING THE ABILITY TO
More informationPrivate Equity Investments in Health Care Practices
Private Equity Investments in Health Care Practices August 28, 2017 Yale H. Bohn bohny@pepperlaw.com PRIVATE EQUITY FUNDS ARE GENERALLY PROHIBITED FROM OWNING ENTITIES THAT EMPLOY LICENSED PROFESSIONALS
More informationCase 2:16-cv MMB Document 124 Filed 04/11/18 Page 1 of 38 IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE EASTERN DISTRICT OF PENNSYLVANIA
Case 2:16-cv-00573-MMB Document 124 Filed 04/11/18 Page 1 of 38 IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE EASTERN DISTRICT OF PENNSYLVANIA ALI RAZAK, KENAN SABANI, and KHALDOUN CHERDOUD v. UBER TECHNOLOGIES,
More informationShedding Light on the AAA s Streamlined Three-Arbitrator Panel Option
Shedding Light on the AAA s Streamlined Three-Arbitrator Panel Option July 2018 Michael P. Subak subakm@pepperlaw.com R. Zachary Torres-Fowler torresr@pepperlaw.com This article was published in the July
More informationTax Treatment of Employee Hardship and Disaster Relief
Tax Treatment of Employee Hardship and Disaster Relief TAX UPDATE Volume 2017, Issue 6 Lisa B. Petkun petkunl@pepperlaw.com Recent hurricanes and fires have caused employers to focus on how to help employees
More informationUber Hits a Speed Bump in California: Labor Commissioner Rules Driver is an Employee
Client Alert Corporate & Securities Corporate & Securities - Technology Employment June 24, 2015 Uber Hits a Speed Bump in California: Labor Commissioner Rules Driver is an Employee By Paula M. Weber and
More informationNew Revenue Recognition Standards Reinforce Need for Precise Accounting Definitions in Transaction Documents
New Revenue Recognition Standards Reinforce Need for Precise Accounting Definitions in Transaction Documents June 22, 2017 Scott R. Jones jonessr@pepperlaw.com Joseph F. Kadlec kadlecj@pepperlaw.com ALL
More informationCharitable Contributions: Acknowledgements, Appraisals and the IRS s Strict Rules
Charitable Contributions: Acknowledgements, Appraisals and the IRS s Strict Rules W. Roderick Gagné gagner@pepperlaw.com Lisa B. Petkun petkunl@pepperlaw.com UPON AUDIT, IF A TAXPAYER DOES NOT HAVE A CONTEMPORANEOUS
More informationInvestment ManagementAlert
February 22, 2013 Berwyn Boston Detroit Harrisburg Los Angeles New York Orange County Philadelphia Pittsburgh Princeton Washington, D.C. Wilmington Form PF Filing Deadlines Loom for Midsized Hedge and
More informationSEC Releases New Form ADV To Be Used for Filings After October 1, 2017
SEC Releases New Form ADV To Be Used for Filings After October 1, 2017 CLIENT ALERT September 7, 2017 Gregory J. Nowak nowakg@pepperlaw.com MANY OF THE CHANGES TO FORM ADV ARE HOUSEKEEPING CHANGES AND
More informationMCA Participations and Security Laws: Recognizing and Managing a Looming Threat
MCA Participations and Security Laws: Recognizing and Managing a Looming Threat ALERT December 10, 2018 Gregory J. Nowak nowakg@pepperlaw.com Mark T. Dabertin dabertinm@pepperlaw.com Due to the high volume
More informationA Sweet Win for Hershey Medical Center s Proposed Merger: District Court Denies FTC s Attempt to Block Pennsylvania Hospital Merger
A Sweet Win for Hershey Medical Center s Proposed Merger: District Court Denies FTC s Attempt to Block Pennsylvania Hospital Merger CLIENT ALERT May 16, 2016 Barbara T. Sicalides sicalidesb@pepperlaw.com
More informationTHE LONG AND WINDING ROAD OF ARBITRATION IN INDIA: Examining 20 Years of the Indian Arbitration and Conciliation Act of 1996
THE LONG AND WINDING ROAD OF ARBITRATION IN INDIA: Examining 20 Years of the Indian Arbitration and Conciliation Act of 1996 January 29, 2016 James D. Rosener rosenerj@pepperlaw.com Sanam Tripathi* tripathis@pepperlaw.com
More informationADVISORY. Misclassification of Independent Contractors: A Challenge for Massachusetts Companies in the Delivery, Taxi, and Livery Sectors
ADVISORY Labor & Employment August 2014 Misclassification of Independent Contractors: A Challenge for Massachusetts Companies in the Delivery, Taxi, and Livery Sectors Summary In 2008, the Massachusetts
More informationDanger: Misclassifying Employees Can Lead to Huge Liability!
Danger: Misclassifying Employees Can Lead to Huge Liability! Paying your workers and laborers as independent contractors? Avoiding paying overtime just because certain employees are on salary? Think twice.
More informationMajor Changes Looming for HMDA Reporting
Major Changes Looming for HMDA Reporting CLIENT ALERT September 25, 2017 Scott D. Samlin samlins@pepperlaw.com Mark T. Dabertin dabertinm@pepperlaw.com In this article, we review the requirements of the
More informationManaging Misclassification Mysteries: A Refresher on Classifying Employees & Independent Contractors
Managing Misclassification Mysteries: A Refresher on Classifying Employees & Independent Contractors April 28, 2016 Today s elunch Presenters Monique Ngo-Bonnici Labor & Employment Practice Partner Los
More informationCorporate and Securities Law Update
www.pepperlaw.com January 2008 SEC Amends Requirements for Smaller Reporting Companies On December 19, 2007, the Securities and Exchange Commission (SEC) issued final amendments to its disclosure requirements
More informationTEANA July Independent Contractor Legal Review. Jeffrey E. Cox, Esq. Seaton & Husk, LP
TEANA July 2018 Independent Contractor Legal Review Jeffrey E. Cox, Esq. Seaton & Husk, LP 1 Jeffrey E. Cox, Esq. Jeffrey E. Cox is a graduate of The American University (B.A. 2003) and the George Mason
More informationNelly Home Care Sues the IRS for Refund of Employment Taxes
Nelly Home Care Sues the IRS for Refund of Employment Taxes IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE EASTERN DISTRICT OF PENNSYLVANIA NELLY HOME CARE, INC : CIVIL ACTION UNITED STATES OF AMERICA : NO.
More informationUNPUBLISHED UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE FOURTH CIRCUIT. No
UNPUBLISHED UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE FOURTH CIRCUIT No. 07-1965 KIMBERLY HOPKINS, individually and on behalf of all others similarly situated, v. Plaintiff - Appellant, HORIZON MANAGEMENT
More informationVol. 2014, No. 11 November 2014 Michael C. Sullivan, Editor-in-Chief
Vol. 2014, No. 11 November 2014 Michael C. Sullivan, Editor-in-Chief California Supreme Court Provides Guidance on the Commissioned Salesperson Exemption KARIMAH J. LAMAR... 415 CA Labor & Employment Bulletin
More informationCrowdfunding under the JOBS Act. Brian Korn November 27, 2012
Crowdfunding under the JOBS Act Brian Korn November 27, 2012 Crowdfunding background Capital Raising Online While Deterring Fraud and Unethical Non- Disclosure Comprises Title III of the Jumpstart Our
More informationBiography. Mary B. Hevener Washington, D.C. T F
Biography Mary B. Hevener Washington, D.C. T +1.202.739.5982 F +1.202.739.3001 Mary B. Handy Hevener helps US and multinational enterprises minimize corporate payroll taxes and maximize benefits related
More informationDepartment of Labor Reverses Course: Mortgage Loan Officers Do Not Meet the Administrative Exemption s Requirements
A Timely Analysis of Legal Developments A S A P In This Issue: March 2010 In a development that may have significant implications for mortgage lenders and other financial services employers, the Department
More informationA Practical Guide to U.S. Tax Compliance Issues for Hedge Fund of Funds
A Practical Guide to U.S. Tax Compliance Issues for Hedge Fund of Funds www.pepperlaw.com October 2008 This memorandum is intended to provide a quick reference guide to the key U.S. income tax issues that
More informationBarry Dooley v. CPR Restoration & Cleaning Ser
2014 Decisions Opinions of the United States Court of Appeals for the Third Circuit 10-29-2014 Barry Dooley v. CPR Restoration & Cleaning Ser Precedential or Non-Precedential: Non-Precedential Docket No.
More informationUnited States Court of Appeals
In the United States Court of Appeals For the Seventh Circuit No. 15 1318 MELISSA CALLAHAN, Plaintiff Appellant, v. CITY OF CHICAGO, ILLINOIS, Defendant Appellee. Appeal from the United States District
More informationCase: 1:18-cv Document #: 1 Filed: 06/29/18 Page 1 of 15 PageID #:1 UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT NORTHERN DISTRICT OF ILLINOIS
Case: 1:18-cv-04538 Document #: 1 Filed: 06/29/18 Page 1 of 15 PageID #:1 UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT NORTHERN DISTRICT OF ILLINOIS ) CARMEN WALLACE ) and BRODERICK BRYANT, ) individually and on behalf
More informationInsurance Coverage for Property Damage Caused by Defective Workmanship
Insurance Coverage for Property Damage Caused by Defective Workmanship CLIENT ALERT April 2017 James D. Hollyday hollydayj@pepperlaw.com ONE OF THE PRINCIPAL POINTS OF CONTENTION BETWEEN INSURERS AND INSUREDS
More informationAppeals Court Strikes Down Labor Department s Interpretation Regarding Exempt Status of Mortgage Loan Officers
July 11, 2013 Practice Groups: Labor, Employment and Workplace Safety, Consumer Financial Services, and Global Government Solutions UPDATED TO REFLECT FILING OF PETITION FOR REHEARING Appeals Court Strikes
More informationCase 3:17-cv JSC Document 1 Filed 01/19/17 Page 1 of 13
Case :-cv-00-jsc Document Filed 0// Page of 0 0 DAVID C. SHONKA Acting General Counsel KATHERINE WORTHMAN, DC Bar No. 00 IOANA RUSU, DC Bar No. 000 Federal Trade Commission 00 Pennsylvania Avenue, NW Mailstop
More informationCITY COUNCIL UNFINISHED BUSINESS FEBRUARY 2, 2015 SHARED ECONOMY TASK FORCE RECOMMENDATIONS
CITY COUNCIL UNFINISHED BUSINESS FEBRUARY 2, 2015 SUBJECT: INITIATED BY: SHARED ECONOMY TASK FORCE RECOMMENDATIONS CITY MANAGER'S DEPARTMENT -ARTS & ECONOMIC DEVELOPMENT DIVISION (Paul Arevalo, City Manager)
More informationHTC Annual Legal Review November 5, 2015 Presented by Cameron Roberts and Sean Brew, Roberts & Kehagiaras LLP
HTC Annual Legal Review November 5, 2015 Presented by Cameron Roberts and Sean Brew, Roberts & Kehagiaras LLP UBER puts willing passengers together with independent drivers. UBER s smartphone app is essential
More informationLyft Class Action Settlement Settlement Administrator c/o GCG P.O. Box Seattle, WA
Lyft Class Action Settlement Settlement Administrator c/o GCG P.O. Box 35129 Seattle, WA 98124-5129 LYT U.S. DISTRICT COURT FOR THE NORTHERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA If you used the Lyft smartphone application
More informationEmployee Relations. Lytle v. Lowe s Home Centers, Inc.: A Case Study in ERISA and Employee Classification Issues. Craig C. Martin and Amanda S.
Electronically reprinted from Autumn 2014 Employee Relations L A W J O U R N A L ERISA Litigation Lytle v. Lowe s Home Centers, Inc.: A Case Study in ERISA and Employee Classification Issues Craig C. Martin
More informationIF YOU BOUGHT A PLAYSTATION 3 CONSOLE BETWEEN NOVEMBER 1, 2006, AND APRIL 1, 2010, THIS CLASS ACTION SETTLEMENT MAY AFFECT YOUR RIGHTS.
IF YOU BOUGHT A PLAYSTATION 3 CONSOLE BETWEEN NOVEMBER 1, 2006, AND APRIL 1, 2010, THIS CLASS ACTION SETTLEMENT MAY AFFECT YOUR RIGHTS. A federal court authorized this notice. This is not a solicitation
More informationAffordable Care Act Tasks:
Affordable Care Act Tasks: Shared Responsibility Reporting February 5, 2015 Presenters: Andy R. Anderson Kimberly J. Boggs www.morganlewis.com Today s Material Our assumptions for today: Calendar-year
More informationState Tax Return. Sooner Rather Than Later: Oklahoma Court of Civil Appeals Upholds Distinct Withholding Requirements For Nonresident Royalty Owners
September 2007 Volume 14 Number 9 State Tax Return Sooner Rather Than Later: Oklahoma Court of Civil Appeals Upholds Distinct Withholding Requirements For Nonresident Royalty Owners Laura A. Kulwicki Columbus
More information119 T.C. No. 5 UNITED STATES TAX COURT. JOSEPH M. GREY PUBLIC ACCOUNTANT, P.C., Petitioner v. COMMISSIONER OF INTERNAL REVENUE, Respondent
119 T.C. No. 5 UNITED STATES TAX COURT JOSEPH M. GREY PUBLIC ACCOUNTANT, P.C., Petitioner v. COMMISSIONER OF INTERNAL REVENUE, Respondent Docket No. 4789-00. Filed September 16, 2002. This is an action
More informationREDEFINING EMPLOYEE IN THE GIG ECONOMY: SHIELDING WORKERS FROM THE UBER MODEL
REDEFINING EMPLOYEE IN THE GIG ECONOMY: SHIELDING WORKERS FROM THE UBER MODEL Ben Z. Steinberger * ABSTRACT Increasingly, companies in the gig-economy utilize independent contractors, rather than traditional
More informationPERSINGER & COMPANY OPINION BY JUSTICE LAWRENCE L. KOONTZ, JR. v. Record No November 1, 1996
Present: All the Justices PERSINGER & COMPANY OPINION BY JUSTICE LAWRENCE L. KOONTZ, JR. v. Record No. 952160 November 1, 1996 MICHAEL D. LARROWE FROM THE CIRCUIT COURT OF ALLEGHENY COUNTY Duncan M. Byrd,
More informationWe continue to get questions on this topic so I thought it might be a good time to re issue this detailed advisory from the Attorney General s office.
MEMORANDUM TO: Parish/School Business Managers/Administrators FROM: Jim DiFrancesco, Human Resources Manager RE: Staff Classifications (Employee vs. Independent Contractor) Date: March 3, 2014 We continue
More informationNationwide Mutual Insurance Co v. David Randall Associates Inc
2014 Decisions Opinions of the United States Court of Appeals for the Third Circuit 1-9-2014 Nationwide Mutual Insurance Co v. David Randall Associates Inc Precedential or Non-Precedential: Non-Precedential
More informationYou Could Get Money From a New Class Action Settlement If You Paid for Medical Services at a Michigan Hospital From January 1, 2006 to June 23, 2014.
United States District Court For The Eastern District Of Michigan You Could Get Money From a New Class Action Settlement If You Paid for Medical Services at a Michigan Hospital From January 1, 2006 to
More informationGig economy and the ECJ
Gig economy and the ECJ HSI-meeting 29 September 2017 Amsterdam, LL.M. Hugo Sinzheimer Institute for Labour Law, Frankfurt/Main Agenda 1. Introduction Gig Economy (especially Uber) 2. Pending Cases at
More informationGreen Machine Corp v. Zurich Amer Ins Grp
2002 Decisions Opinions of the United States Court of Appeals for the Third Circuit 12-20-2002 Green Machine Corp v. Zurich Amer Ins Grp Precedential or Non-Precedential: Precedential Docket No. 01-3635
More informationADDITIONAL INSURED COVERAGE
ADDITIONAL INSURED COVERAGE MAXIMIZING COVERAGE IN A POST-BURLINGTON WORLD JEFFREY J. VITA, ESQ. Saxe Doernberger & Vita, P.C. January 31, 2018 Additional Insured Coverage Maximizing Coverage in a Post-Burlington
More informationVan Camp & Bennion v. United States 251 F.3d 862 (9th Cir. Wash. 2001).
Van Camp & Bennion v. United States 251 F.3d 862 (9th Cir. Wash. 2001). CLICK HERE to return to the home page No. 96-36068. United States Court of Appeals, Ninth Circuit. Argued and Submitted September
More informationUNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE SOUTHERN DISTRICT OF OHIO
UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE SOUTHERN DISTRICT OF OHIO IF YOU PURCHASED PROCTER & GAMBLE S PROBIOTIC SUPPLEMENT ALIGN IN CALIFORNIA, ILLINOIS, NORTH CAROLINA, FLORIDA OR NEW HAMPSHIRE, A CLASS
More informationSENATE BILL 541: Regulate Transportation Network Companies
2015-2016 General Assembly SENATE BILL 541: Regulate Transportation Network Companies Committee: Senate Finance Date: July 21, 2015 Introduced by: Sens. Rabon, McKissick Prepared by: Greg Roney Analysis
More informationMarianne Gallagher v. Ohio Casualty Insurance Co
2015 Decisions Opinions of the United States Court of Appeals for the Third Circuit 1-29-2015 Marianne Gallagher v. Ohio Casualty Insurance Co Follow this and additional works at: http://digitalcommons.law.villanova.edu/thirdcircuit_2015
More informationIn the United States Court of Federal Claims
In the United States Court of Federal Claims No. 04-1513T (Filed: February 28, 2006) JONATHAN PALAHNUK and KIMBERLY PALAHNUK, v. Plaintiffs, THE UNITED STATES, Defendant. I.R.C. 83; Treas. Reg. 1.83-3(a)(2);
More information2012 Winston & Strawn LLP
2012 Winston & Strawn LLP Employee or Independent Contractor? Brought to you by Winston & Strawn s Labor and Employment Relations Practice Group 2012 Winston & Strawn LLP Today s elunch Presenters Jennifer
More informationREQUIREMENTS AND HIGHLIGHTS OF THE VOLCKER RULE AND ITS REGULATIONS
REQUIREMENTS AND HIGHLIGHTS OF THE VOLCKER RULE AND ITS REGULATIONS July 1, 2015 Charles Horn, Partner Steve Stone, Partner Melissa Hall, Of Counsel Monique Botkin, Investment Adviser Association (Moderator)
More informationAlfred Seiple v. Progressive Northern Insurance
2014 Decisions Opinions of the United States Court of Appeals for the Third Circuit 6-12-2014 Alfred Seiple v. Progressive Northern Insurance Precedential or Non-Precedential: Non-Precedential Docket No.
More informationUNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE THIRD CIRCUIT. No
Case: 14-1628 Document: 003112320132 Page: 1 Date Filed: 06/08/2016 UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE THIRD CIRCUIT No. 14-1628 FREEDOM MEDICAL SUPPLY INC, Individually and On Behalf of All Others
More informationNOTICE OF CLASS ACTION SETTLEMENT:
NOTICE OF SETTLEMENT UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT CENTRAL DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA You are receiving this notice because a settlement has been reached in the case of Ian Freeman v. Zillow, Inc., Case No.
More informationNOTICE OF PROPOSED CLASS ACTION SETTLEMENT YOU MAY BE REQUIRED TO FILE A CLAIM FORM. NOT ALL CLASS MEMBERS ARE REQUIRED TO FILE A CLAIM FORM.
The Superior Court of the State of California authorized this Notice. This is not a solicitation from a lawyer. NOTICE OF PROPOSED CLASS ACTION SETTLEMENT If you are a lawyer or law firm that has paid,
More informationPersonal Injury Claims for Uber and Lyft Accidents: Navigating Complex Liability and Insurance Coverage Issues
Presenting a live 90-minute webinar with interactive Q&A Personal Injury Claims for Uber and Lyft Accidents: Navigating Complex Liability and Insurance Coverage Issues WEDNESDAY, JUNE 20, 2018 1pm Eastern
More informationRecent Developments in California Law Regarding Noncompetition Agreements
Recent Developments in California Law Regarding Noncompetition Agreements Employment Law Commentary, Vol. 18, No. 10 Eric Akira Tate October 2006 Employment + Labor Newsletter PDF VERSION In many states,
More informationRyan et al v. Flowers Foods, Inc. et al Doc. 53. Case 1:17-cv TWT Document 53 Filed 07/16/18 Page 1 of 15
Ryan et al v. Flowers Foods, Inc. et al Doc. 53 Case 1:17-cv-00817-TWT Document 53 Filed 07/16/18 Page 1 of 15 IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE NORTHERN DISTRICT OF GEORGIA ATLANTA DIVISION
More informationNOTICE OF CLASS ACTION SETTLEMENT in WAWA ESOP LITIGATION Pfeifer v. Wawa, Inc. et al, Case No (E.D. Pa.)
NOTICE OF CLASS ACTION SETTLEMENT in WAWA ESOP LITIGATION Pfeifer v. Wawa, Inc. et al, Case No. 16-0497 (E.D. Pa.) Please read this notice carefully and completely. If you are a member of the Class, the
More informationIN THE DISTRICT COURT OF APPEAL OF THE STATE OF FLORIDA FIFTH DISTRICT JULY TERM v. Case No. 5D
IN THE DISTRICT COURT OF APPEAL OF THE STATE OF FLORIDA FIFTH DISTRICT JULY TERM 2007 THE PLUMBING SERVICE COMPANY, Appellant, v. Case No. 5D06-1586 TRAVELER'S CASUALTY & SURETY COMPANY, etc., Appellee.
More informationWhen Trouble Knocks, Will Directors and Officers Policies Answer?
When Trouble Knocks, Will Directors and Officers Policies Answer? Michael John Miguel Morgan Lewis & Bockius LLP Los Angeles, California The limit of liability theory lies within the imagination of the
More informationEMPLOYMENT & COMPLIANCE ISSUES & PITFALLS IN CROSS- BORDER M&A TRANSACTIONS
EMPLOYMENT & COMPLIANCE ISSUES & PITFALLS IN CROSS- BORDER M&A TRANSACTIONS Todd Liao, Partner (Shanghai) & K. Lesli Ligorner, Partner (Shanghai) January 16, 2018 2018 Morgan, Lewis & Bockius LLP Agenda
More informationIN THE OFFICE OF ADMINISTRATIVE HEARINGS
IN THE OFFICE OF ADMINISTRATIVE HEARINGS 0 In the Matter of: TODD JOSEPH HASELHORST licensee of the Department of Weights and Measures. In the Matter of: DAVID DONALD SENA licensee of the Department of
More information.ARMED SERVICES BOARD OF CONTRACT APPEALS
.ARMED SERVICES BOARD OF CONTRACT APPEALS Appeal of -- ) ) Centerra Group, LLC f/k/a The Wackenhut ) Services, Inc. ) ) Under Contract No. NNA06CD65C ) APPEARANCES FOR THE APPELLANT: APPEARANCES FOR THE
More informationSUPERIOR COURT OF CALIFORNIA COUNTY OF SAN BERNARDINO
SUPERIOR COURT OF CALIFORNIA COUNTY OF SAN BERNARDINO RICARDO SANCHEZ, on behalf of himself, all others similarly situated, and on behalf of the general public, CASE NO. CIVDS1702554 v. Plaintiffs, NOTICE
More informationLisa B. Petkun
TaxUpdate Vol. 2014, Issue 4 Berwyn Boston Detroit Harrisburg Los Angeles New York Orange County Philadelphia Pittsburgh Princeton Silicon Valley Washington, D.C. Wilmington Follow Us on Twitter http://twitter.com/peppertax
More informationCase: 1:15-cv Document #: 34 Filed: 10/18/16 Page 1 of 6 PageID #:654
Case: 1:15-cv-10798 Document #: 34 Filed: 10/18/16 Page 1 of 6 PageID #:654 IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE NORTHERN DISTRICT OF ILLINOIS EASTERN DIVISION PHILADELPHIA INDEMNITY INSURANCE COMPANY,
More informationAlert Labor & Employment
Alert Labor & Employment Closing the Salary Gap & Practical Tips for Employers November 2017 Given the national spotlight on pay equity, in 2016 there was a radical change in the equal pay legal landscape,
More informationUNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE DISTRICT OF MASSACHUSETTS
UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE DISTRICT OF MASSACHUSETTS If you are or were the owner of a participating policy of the Massachusetts Mutual Life Insurance Company at any time between January 1, 2001
More informationNOTICE FOR PRODCO, FTP, MARVEL, HOP SKIP & JUMP, ABC STUDIOS & FILM 49 PRODUCTIONS, INC. PARKING PRODUCTION ASSISTANT CLASS ACTION SETTLEMENT
PRODCO, FTP, MARVEL, HOP SKIP & JUMP, ABC STUDIOS & FILM 49 PRODUCTIONS, INC. PARKING PRODUCTION ASSISTANT CLASS ACTION SETTLEMENT THIS NOTICE FORM AFFECTS YOUR LEGAL RIGHTS; PLEASE READ IT CAREFULLY United
More informationNOT FOR PUBLICATION WITHOUT THE APPROVAL OF THE APPELLATE DIVISION
BOB MEYER COMMUNITIES, INC., v. Plaintiff-Appellant, NOT FOR PUBLICATION WITHOUT THE APPROVAL OF THE APPELLATE DIVISION JAMES R. SLIM PLASTERING, INC., B&R MASONRY, and T.R.H. BUILDERS, INC., and Defendants,
More informationUNPUBLISHED UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE FOURTH CIRCUIT. No
UNPUBLISHED UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE FOURTH CIRCUIT No. 17-1789 CAPITOL PROPERTY MANAGEMENT CORPORATION, v. Plaintiff - Appellant, NATIONWIDE PROPERTY AND CASUALTY INSURANCE COMPANY; NATIONWIDE
More informationA court authorized this notice. This is not a solicitation from a lawyer.
IMPORTANT NOTICE OF A RED BULL CLASS ACTION SETTLEMENT AND YOUR RIGHT TO PAYMENT ( CLASS NOTICE ) SUPERIOR COURT OF THE STATE CALIFORNIA FOR THE COUNTY OF LOS ANGELES CENTRAL DISTRICT MICHELLE ROACH (
More informationIN THE COURT OF APPEAL OF THE STATE OF CALIFORNIA SECOND APPELLATE DISTRICT DIVISION FIVE
Filed 12/5/12 CERTIFIED FOR PUBLICATION IN THE COURT OF APPEAL OF THE STATE OF CALIFORNIA SECOND APPELLATE DISTRICT DIVISION FIVE GEMINI INSURANCE COMPANY, Plaintiff and Respondent, v. B239533 (Los Angeles
More informationCalifornia Supreme Court Rejects the Federal Narrow Restraint Exception
California Supreme Court Rejects the Federal Narrow Restraint Exception And Holds That Employment Non- Competition Agreements Are Invalid Unless They Fall Within Limited Statutory Exceptions On August
More informationSECTION 4062(e) PLANT SHUTDOWN LIABILITY
PLAN SPONSOR BASICS: SECTION 4062(e) PLANT SHUTDOWN LIABILITY Presenters: April 29, 2015 Althea R. Day Brian J. Dougherty 2015 Morgan, Lewis & Bockius LLP PBGC Plant Shutdown Liability Before 2015 Statutory
More informationTWO AUTOMOBILES INSURED UNDER FAMILY POLICY DOUBLES STATED MEDICAL PAYMENTS COVERAGE LIMIT OF LIABILITY
TWO AUTOMOBILES INSURED UNDER FAMILY POLICY DOUBLES STATED MEDICAL PAYMENTS COVERAGE LIMIT OF LIABILITY Central Surety & Insurance Corp. v. Elder 204 Va. 192,129 S.E. 2d 651 (1963) Mrs. Elder, plaintiff
More informationUNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS
07-4074-cv Halpert v. Manhattan Apartments Inc. 1 UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS 3 FOR THE SECOND CIRCUIT 4 5 6 7 August Term, 008 8 9 (Argued: August 4, 009 Decided: September 10, 009) 10 11 Docket No.
More informationFrancis Guglielmelli v. State Farm Mutual Automobile I
2015 Decisions Opinions of the United States Court of Appeals for the Third Circuit 10-6-2015 Francis Guglielmelli v. State Farm Mutual Automobile I Follow this and additional works at: http://digitalcommons.law.villanova.edu/thirdcircuit_2015
More informationUNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE NINTH CIRCUIT
FOR PUBLICATION UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE NINTH CIRCUIT ROBERT REICHERT, an individual, Plaintiff-Appellee, v. No. 06-15503 NATIONAL CREDIT SYSTEMS, INC., a D.C. No. foreign corporation doing
More informationNOT PRECEDENTIAL UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE THIRD CIRCUIT. No
NOT PRECEDENTIAL UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE THIRD CIRCUIT No. 03-4459 KIMBERLY BRUUN; ASHLEY R. EMANIS, on behalf of themselves and all other similarly situated persons Appellant, v. PRUDENTIAL
More informationUNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE NINTH CIRCUIT
FOR PUBLICATION UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE NINTH CIRCUIT FELICIA D. DAVIS, for herself and for all others similarly situated, No. 07-56236 Plaintiffs-Appellants, D.C. No. v. CV-07-02786-R PACIFIC
More informationNOT FINAL UNTIL TIME EXPIRES FOR REHEARING AND, IF FILED, DETERMINED
County Civil Court: ATTORNEY S FEES. The trial court correctly found the relevant market required the possibility of a multiplier in order for Appellee to obtain representation in this matter. The trial
More information*Barcode39* - <<SequenceNo>>
CITRUS VALLEY HEALTH PARTNERS, INC. SETTLEMENT ADMINISTRATOR C/O RUST CONSULTING - 4790 P.O. BOX 2396 FARIBAULT, MN 55021-9096 IMPORTANT LEGAL MATERIALS *Barcode39* -
More informationIN THE COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE STATE OF WASHINGTON
IN THE COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE STATE OF WASHINGTON SAFECO INSURANCE COMPANY OF ILLINOIS, No. 65924-3-I Appellant, v. ORDER GRANTING MOTION TO PUBLISH COUNTRY MUTUAL INSURANCE COMPANY, Respondent. Plaintiff/Appellant
More informationALAN FRANKLIN, Appellant, v. WALTER C. PETERSON, as City Clerk etc., et al., Respondents
87 Cal. App. 2d 727; 197 P.2d 788; 1948 Cal. App. LEXIS 1385 ALAN FRANKLIN, Appellant, v. WALTER C. PETERSON, as City Clerk etc., et al., Respondents Civ. No. 16329 Court of Appeal of California, Second
More informationJanuary 2005 Bulletin Labor Department Issues Guidance on Fiduciary Responsibilities of Directed Trustees
January 2005 Bulletin 05-01 Labor Department Issues Guidance on Fiduciary Responsibilities of Directed Trustees If you have questions or would like additional information on the material covered in this
More informationLABOR & BENEFITS UPDATE
January 2016 LABOR & BENEFITS UPDATE In this issue: Seventh Circuit affirms NLRB Order Granting Union Access to Employer Facility to Examine Fatal Accident Site NLRB Holds an Individual Filing a Collective
More informationUNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE EASTERN DISTRICT OF PENNSYLVANIA NOTICE OF CLASS CERTIFICATION AND PARTIAL PROPOSED BIOVAIL SETTLEMENT
UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE EASTERN DISTRICT OF PENNSYLVANIA NOTICE OF CLASS CERTIFICATION AND PARTIAL PROPOSED BIOVAIL SETTLEMENT If You Bought Wellbutrin XL or its Generic Equivalent, You May
More information