ONLINE APPENDIX. Concentrated Powers: Unilateral Executive Authority and Fiscal Policymaking in the American States
|
|
- Emil Richard
- 5 years ago
- Views:
Transcription
1 ONLINE APPENDIX Concentrated Powers: Unilateral Executive Authority and Fiscal Policymaking in the American States As noted in Note 13 of the manuscript document, discrepancies exist between using Thad Beyle s gubernatorial budget powers index and the authors own coding when it comes to determining whether the governor has full or shared budget making powers/responsibility. 1 Specifically, the Beyle Index contains several coding errors regarding whether the governor has full or shared budget-making responsibility. This is a critical matter since this distinction is the foundational component of Beyle s five-point ordinal Governors Budget Powers Index that is widely used by scholars conducting research on American state politics and policymaking. Table SA-1 lists all relevant state-year observations in our sample where this is an issue. In addition, a spreadsheet file is included in the replication materials that contain both measures for all fifty states for the FY sample period for scholars to compare and utilize in their own research (gubernatorial budget making power comparison.krause & Melusky xlsx). In total, there are 156 state-year observations based on Beyle s index which are inconsistent with the authors own independent coding directly from the Book of the States for 1 The authors data comes from The Governors: Powers Budget Making Power Table in The Book of the States for various years, while Beyle s is generated from his five point ordinal gubernatorial budget powers index (Sources: for 1980, 1988, 1994, 1998, 2001 actual years in which this index was updated, for 2007, Thad Beyle and Margaret Ferguson. Chapter 7: Governors and the Executive Branch. Table 7-5: Governor's Institutional Powers, Pages In Politics in the American States: A Comparative Analysis. Virginia Gray and Russell L. Hanson, editors. Ninth Edition. Washington, D.C.: CQ Press. (2007)). 1
2 each year covered in their sample period (14.85%. of the overall sample). This discrepancy is nontrivial given that these measures are correlated at only in our overall sample. A subset of 118 state-year observations (11.24% of the overall sample) that were misclassified using the Beyle index occur in years in which this index was not updated (shaded as forest green cells in the corresponding spreadsheet). The remaining 38 state-year observations (3.61% of the overall sample) that were misclassified using the Beyle index occurred in years in which this index was, in fact, updated (shaded as orange cells in the corresponding spreadsheet). [Insert Table SA-1 About Here] A summary of the unilateral executive policy control variables are discussed on the bottom paragraph appearing on Page 10 of the manuscript. As noted in Note 14 of the manuscript, a more detailed descriptive breakdown of these measures appears in Table SA-2. State-year observations equal to 0 refer to an absence of unilateral executive policy control (i.e., the governor does not enjoy unilateral control over budget making or official revenue forecasts), 1 refers to state-year observations in which the governor only has unilateral (full) budget making responsibility, 1 refers to state-year observations in which the governor only has unilateral control over official revenue forecasts, and 2 refers to state-year observations where the governor has both unilateral (full) budget making responsibility and unilateral control over official revenue forecasts. [Insert Table SA-2 About Here] Table SA-3 lists the descriptive statistics for the dependent variable, as well as for the remaining covariates. 2 Information on each of these variables mean, standard deviation (SD), minimum (Min), and maximum (Max) are reported. Because of document space limitations in 2 The descriptive statistics for the unilateral executive policy control measures are discussed on the bottom portion of Page 10 in the manuscript. 2
3 the manuscript, this information is provided here. This information can be obtained in the STATA output file contained in the replication materials (concentrated powers JOP.smcl). [Insert Table SA-3 About Here] In Note 33 of the manuscript, we mention three sets of supplementary regression analyses that appear in the Online Appendix document. The results from these analyses appear in the STATA output file contained in the replication materials (concentrated powers JOP.smcl). Statistical analysis of the partisan governor distinctions disaggregating unilateral executive policy control into separate budget making and revenue forecast authority are presented in Table SA-4. These results indicate that Democratic governors possessing unilateral control over either official revenue forecasts or budget making produces significantly higher fiscal spending growth compared to when they have neither unilateral power at their disposal. Moreover, revenue forecasting authority offers Democratic governors a greater impetus for spending than compared to possessing full budget making responsibility (Model SA-1: 4.11 vs. 1.50). Democratic governors possessing both unilateral control over both fiscal policymaking tools result in trivial differences in fiscal spending growth compared to the baseline of an absence of unilateral control (Model SA-1: Full Effect: = 0.68). This inference is consistent with the results from the aggregated measure of unilateral executive policy control reported in Model 5 in Table 2 of the manuscript. This general pattern also holds in the trimmed sample of observations where seven extreme valued state-year observations are dropped from the analysis (Model SA-2). Similarly, the disaggregate results for Republican governors display a pattern that is quite consistent with aggregate results reported in Table 2. Only when governors unilaterally control both official revenue forecasts and budget making authority does one observe a significant increase in fiscal spending growth (Model SA-3: Full 3
4 Effect: = 5.88). This pattern still holds for the trimmed sample model, albeit it is somewhat attenuated (Model SA-4: Full Effect: = 4.31). [Insert Table SA-4 About Here] We further explore the issue of gubernatorial partisanship effects by estimating regression models that drop all 20 observations corresponding to 3 rd party or independent governors (see Note 26 in the manuscript). The logic here is that gubernatorial partisan effects are being obscured by governors whose preferences may not easily fit into a partisan-ideological space. These results appear in Supplementary Table SA-5. The evidence for both the aggregate and disaggregate measures of unilateral executive control over fiscal policymaking are substantively similar to the findings reported in Table 1 of the manuscript. [Insert Table SA-5 About Here] Finally, an additional robustness check is performed that allows for conditional unilateral executive policy control effects with five of the executive constraint and incentive covariates (see Note 33 in manuscript). These results appear in Supplementary Table SA 6. For the key results, the magnitude of the coefficients and level of statistical significance attained by Partial Unilateral Executive Policy Control, as well as for Dual Balanced Budget Restrictions, change very little between models. Yet, the impact of fiscal transparency on fiscal spending growth is strongly conditioned by whether the governor has full unilateral executive policy control. Otherwise, fiscal transparency has no tangible bearing on fiscal spending growth in these set of model specifications. The coefficients for Lame Duck Gubernatorial Term fail to reach a level of statistical significance in Models SA-7 & SA-8 compared to the results from our reported results based on Models 1 & 2 reported in Table 2 of the manuscript. The results obtained from this analysis appear to reveal significant conditional unilateral executive policy control effects in only a handful of instances. This should hardly be surprising 4
5 given that the relative paucity of cases in each particular case, coupled with problems arising from collinearity, should make it difficult to uncover significant conditional effects. One of these exceptions involves the interaction between Full Unilateral Executive Policy Control x Fiscal Transparency Index Score which attained statistical significance in Models SA-7 & SA-8 (p < 0.01). That is, governors possessing unilateral control over both official revenue projections and budget formulation decrease fiscal spending growth by an average of 3.02% in Model SA-7 (2.50% in Model SA-8) for each two standard deviation (0.34) increase in the fiscal transparency index score. Conversely, the conditional effect of lame duck governors serving in their final term in office substantially enhances their willingness to engage in myopic policymaking behavior when they have absolute control over fiscal policymaking. Lame duck governors under these circumstances will generate an extra 2.86% fiscal spending growth compared to when they remain viable for seeking re-election. It should be noted, however, that this inference is based on 41 observations (3.90% of the entire sample), and is estimated with much less precision in the trimmed sample model (Model SA-8). [Insert Table SA-6 About Here] The conditional effects results are not reported in the manuscript for three reasons. First, in the vast majority of instances, the interaction effects are not statistically discernible from zero, plus baseline effects are more pronounced (i.e., less conservative) to those reported in Table 1. Second, in the handful of instances when the interaction coefficients are statistically discernible, they are based on a relative paucity of observations, and thus should be interpreted with caution. Finally, the statistical models presented in Table 1 provide a more parsimonious fit to these data relative to the results reported in Table SA-6. For each comparative model, the Bayesian Information Criterion [BIC] statistic is lower for the estimated model reported in Table 1 (Models 1 & 2) compared to those reported in Table SA-6 (Models SA-7 & SA-8). 5
6 SUPPLEMENTARY TABLE SA-1 State Name (Fiscal Years) Governor Full Budget Governor Full Budget Responsibility (Authors) Responsibility (Beyle) Arkansas ( ) 0 1 Colorado (1988, , ) 0 1 Connecticut ( ) 0 1 Florida ( , ) 0 1 Georgia ( ) 0 1 Hawaii ( ) 0 1 Illinois ( ) 0 1 Indiana (2003) 0 1 Iowa ( ) 0 1 Kansas (1988) 1 0 Kentucky (1988, 1999) 0 1 Louisiana ( , 2008) 0 1 Maine ( ) 0 1 Michigan ( ) 0 1 Mississippi ( , 2008) 0 1 Montana (2003) 0 1 Nebraska ( ) 0 1 New Mexico (1988) 0 1 New Mexico ( ) 1 0 New York ( ) 0 1 North Carolina ( ) 0 1 Oklahoma ( ) 0 1 Oregon ( ) 0 1 Pennsylvania ( ) 0 1 Rhode Island ( ) 0 1 South Dakota ( ) 0 1 South Dakota (2008) 1 0 Tennessee ( ) 0 1 Texas ( ) 0 1 Utah ( ) 0 1 West Virginia ( ) 0 1 Wyoming ( ) 0 1 6
7 SUPPLEMENTARY TABLE SA-2 State Name Executive Fiscal Authority Fiscal Years Alabama Alaska Arizona Arkansas California Colorado , Connecticut Delaware Florida , , Georgia , Hawaii Idaho Illinois Indiana , Iowa Kansas Kentucky Louisiana Maine Maryland Massachusetts Michigan , Minnesota Mississippi Missouri Montana , Nebraska Nevada New Hampshire New Jersey New Mexico
8 New York North Carolina North Dakota Ohio Oklahoma Oregon Pennsylvania , Rhode Island South Carolina South Dakota , Tennessee Texas Utah Vermont Virginia Washington West Virginia , Wisconsin Wyoming Governor had an absence of UEC (neither budget making/formulation nor revenue forecast authority): coded 0, governor had UEC budget making/formulation only: coded 1, governor had UEC revenue forecast authority only: coded 1, and governor had full UEC (budget making/formulation and revenue forecast authority): coded 2. 8
9 SUPPLEMENTARY TABLE SA-3 Descriptive Statistics for Variables (Full Sample: N T = 1050) Variable Mean SD Min Max % Change Real Per Capita General Expenditure Growth Dual Balanced Budget Restrictions Fiscal Transparency Index Score Divided Government Legislative Veto Override Majority Lame Duck Gubernatorial Term Gubernatorial Election Year State Citizen Ideology Binding Forecast Governor s Party Partisan Control of the Legislature Bienniel Budget Process Real Average Legislative Salary Lagged % Per Capita Real Personal Income Growth Lagged Unemployment Rate Lagged Economic Growth Volatility % Reliance on Sales Tax Revenues Lagged % Per Capita Real Federal Aid Growth
10 SUPPLEMENTARY TABLE SA-4 The Impact of Robust Executive Authority on Fiscal Spending Growth in the American States (FY 1988 FY 2008) Fixed Effects Estimation (Robust Standard Errors Clustered by State) --- Disaggregating Unilateral Executive Policy Control by Partisan Governors Democratic Governors Model SA-1 [Full Sample] Democratic Governors Model SA-2 [Trimmed Sample] Republican Governors Model SA-3 [Full Sample] Republican Governors Model SA-4 [Trimmed Sample] Coefficient Coefficient Coefficient Coefficient Level of Unilateral Executive Policy Control Unilateral Executive Revenue Forecast Control (+) 4.11*** (1.40) 3.18** (1.31) 0.39 (2.35) 1.58 (1.28) Unilateral Executive Budget Control (+) 1.50** (0.68) Combined Unilateral Executive Revenue Forecast & Budget Control (+) -4.93*** (1.65) Executive Constraints on Fiscal Spending Dual Balanced Budget Restrictions [Balanced Budget Law & No Deficit Carry Over Law] (-) Fiscal Transparency Index Score (-) (3.13) Divided Government (-) 1.69 (1.21) Governor Line-Item Veto Authority (-) 0.08 (1.26) Legislative Veto Override Majority (-) (1.10) Executive Incentives for Fiscal Spending Lame Duck Gubernatorial Term (+) 0.32 (0.43) Gubernatorial Election Year (+) (0.46) 1.67** (0.67) -3.05** (1.22) 0.67 (0.91) 4.82** (2.24) (2.79) 1.63 (1.23) 0.30 (1.27) (1.26) 0.16 (0.42) (0.49) (1.60) (5.13) (1.10) 1.54 (1.60) 0.33 (0.69) 1.42** (0.56) 0.30 (0.40) (0.80) 2.94*** (1.09) (1.62) 0.21 (4.38) (1.09) 0.68 (1.32) 0.55 (0.83) 0.52 (0.52) 0.15 (0.29) State Citizen Ideology (+) (0.04) (0.03) Ancillary Controls Binding Revenue Forecast (-) 0.02 (0.89) (0.94) 4.69*** (1.74) 3.80** (1.61) Partisan Control of the Legislature (+) (0.83) (0.82) (0.64) 1.25* (0.65) Bienniel Budget Process (-) -4.42*** (0.95) -3.67*** (0.80) 2.58*** (0.74) 1.18 (1.19) Real Average Legislative Salary (+) -0.24E-04 (0.39E-04) -0.12E-04 (0.42E-04) 0.33E-04 (0.42E-04) 0.29E-04 (0.41E-04) Lagged % Per Capita Real Personal Income Growth (+) 0.35** (0.13) 0.33** (0.12) 0.03 (0.13) (0.10) Lagged Unemployment Rate (-) -1.04*** (0.22) -0.82*** (0.20) -0.59*** (0.19) -0.54*** (0.20) Lagged Economic Growth Volatility (-) -0.39** (0.17) -0.39** (0.16) -0.41* (0.23) -0.41** (0.20) % Reliance on Sales Tax Revenues (+) (11.72) (9.99) (8.72) (9.54) Lagged % Per Capita Real Federal Aid Growth (+) 0.05*** (0.01) 0.05*** (0.01) 0.06*** 0.05* Constant 3.86 (4.22) 3.30 (3.84) (5.11) (3.83) Correlation (u i, Xβ) Overall R BIC Effective Sample Size Notes: Dependent variable is defined as the Annual Per Capita Real State Government General Expenditure Growth. Robust standard errors clustered by state appear inside parentheses. *significant at the 0.10 level **significant at the 0.05 level ***significant at the 0.01 level (two-tailed) + significant at the 0.10 level (one-tailed test). 10
11 SUPPLEMENTARY TABLE SA-5 The Impact of Robust Executive Authority on Fiscal Spending Growth in the American States (FY 1988 FY 2008) Fixed Effects Estimation (Robust Standard Errors Clustered by State) --- Excluding Third Party Governor Cases Aggregate Model SA-5 Disaggregate Model SA-6 Level of Unilateral Executive Policy Control Partial Unilateral Executive Policy Control (+) [Unilateral Executive Revenue Forecast Control] Coefficient 1.13** (0.46) Coefficient 1.72 (1.33) Full Unilateral Executive Policy Control (+) [Unilateral Executive Budget Control] Combined Unilateral Executive Revenue Forecast & Budget Control (+) (1.32) Executive Constraints on Fiscal Spending Dual Balanced Budget Restrictions [Balanced Budget Law & No Deficit Carry Over Law] (-) 1.31 (1.23) -2.62*** (0.68) Fiscal Transparency Index Score (-) (1.95) Divided Government (-) (0.34) Governor Line-Item Veto Authority (-) 0.68 (0.76) Legislative Veto Override Majority (-) Executive Incentives for Fiscal Spending (0.33) Lame Duck Gubernatorial Term (+) 0.66* (0.35) Gubernatorial Election Year (+) (0.29) 1.06** (0.48) -2.61*** (0.68) (1.97) (0.34) 0.70 (0.76) (0.34) 0.65* (0.36) (0.29) State Citizen Ideology (+) Ancillary Controls Binding Revenue Forecast (-) (0.72) Governor s Party (+) (0.18) Partisan Control of the Legislature (+) (0.31) Bienniel Budget Process (-) (0.67) Real Average Legislative Salary (+) 0.34E-04* (0.19E-04) Lagged % Per Capita Real Personal Income Growth (+) 0.21** (0.10) Lagged Unemployment Rate (-) -0.71*** (0.14) Lagged Economic Growth Volatility (-) -0.29** (0.13) % Reliance on Sales Tax Revenues (+) 16.95** (6.83) Lagged % Per Capita Real Federal Aid Growth (+) 0.05*** (0.01) Constant 0.06 (2.18) (0.68) (0.18) (0.31) (0.68) 0.34E-04* (0.19E-04) 0.21** (0.10) -0.72*** (0.14) -0.29** (0.13) 17.00** (6.80) 0.05*** (0.01) (2.23) Correlation (u i, Xβ) Overall R BIC Effective Sample Size Notes: Dependent variable is defined as the Annual Per Capita Real State Government General Expenditure Growth. Robust standard errors clustered by state appear inside parentheses. *significant at the 0.10 level **significant at the 0.05 level ***significant at the 0.01 level (two-tailed) + significant at the 0.10 level (one-tailed test). 11
12 SUPPLEMENTARY TABLE SA-6 The Impact of Robust Executive Authority on Fiscal Spending Growth in the American States (FY 1988 FY 2008) Fixed Effects Estimation (Robust Standard Errors Clustered by State) --- Allowing for Various Conditional Relationships Aggregate Model SA-7 [Full Sample] Aggregate Model SA-8 [Trimmed Sample] Level of Unilateral Executive Policy Control Coefficient Coefficient Partial Unilateral Executive Policy Control (+) 3.10*** (1.11) Full Unilateral Executive Policy Control (+) 7.38** (3.50) Executive Constraints on Fiscal Spending Dual Balanced Budget Restrictions [Balanced Budget Law & No Deficit Carry Over Law] (-) -2.14** (0.85) Fiscal Transparency Index Score (-) (1.83) Divided Government (-) 0.30 (0.81) Governor Line-Item Veto Authority (-) 0.44 (0.85) Legislative Veto Override Majority (-) (0.35) Executive Incentives for Fiscal Spending Lame Duck Gubernatorial Term (+) 0.06 (0.52) Gubernatorial Election Year (+) 0.52 (0.78) State Citizen Ideology (+) *** (1.07) 6.78** (2.76) -1.89** (0.81) 0.15 (1.65) 0.14 (0.80) (0.69) (0.42) (0.59) 0.33 (0.81) Conditional Effects Partial Unilateral Executive Policy Control Dual Balanced Budget Restrictions Full Unilateral Executive Policy Control Dual Balanced Budget Restrictions Partial Unilateral Executive Policy Control Fiscal Transparency Index Score Full Unilateral Executive Policy Control Fiscal Transparency Index Score Partial Unilateral Executive Policy Control Divided Government Full Unilateral Executive Policy Control Divided Government Partial Unilateral Executive Policy Control Lame Duck Gubernatorial Term Full Unilateral Executive Policy Control Lame Duck Gubernatorial Term Partial Unilateral Executive Policy Control Gubernatorial Election Year Full Unilateral Executive Policy Control Gubernatorial Election Year (0.83) (2.97) (1.73) -8.87*** (2.85) (0.84) (1.07) 0.50 (0.58) 2.86*** (0.95) (0.86) (0.94) Constant (2.17) (0.67) (2.00) (1.65) -7.36*** (2.46) (0.83) (1.02) 0.19 (0.66) (1.34) (0.84) (0.89) (1.77) Correlation (u i, Xβ) Overall R BIC Effective Sample Size Notes: Dependent variable is defined as the Annual Per Capita Real State Government General Expenditure Growth. Robust standard errors clustered by state appear inside parentheses. *significant at the 0.10 level **significant at the 0.05 level ***significant at the 0.01 level (two-tailed) + significant at the 0.10 level (one-tailed test). 12
Income from U.S. Government Obligations
Baird s ----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------- --------------- Enclosed is the 2017 Tax Form for your account with
More informationKentucky , ,349 55,446 95,337 91,006 2,427 1, ,349, ,306,236 5,176,360 2,867,000 1,462
TABLE B MEMBERSHIP AND BENEFIT OPERATIONS OF STATE-ADMINISTERED EMPLOYEE RETIREMENT SYSTEMS, LAST MONTH OF FISCAL YEAR: MARCH 2003 Beneficiaries receiving periodic benefit payments Periodic benefit payments
More informationState Individual Income Taxes: Personal Exemptions/Credits, 2011
Individual Income Taxes: Personal Exemptions/s, 2011 Elderly Handicapped Blind Deaf Disabled FEDERAL Exemption $3,700 $7,400 $3,700 $7,400 $0 $3,700 $0 $0 $0 $0 Alabama Exemption $1,500 $3,000 $1,500 $3,000
More informationAnnual Costs Cost of Care. Home Health Care
2017 Cost of Care Home Health Care USA National $18,304 $47,934 $114,400 3% $18,304 $49,192 $125,748 3% Alaska $33,176 $59,488 $73,216 1% $36,608 $63,492 $73,216 2% Alabama $29,744 $38,553 $52,624 1% $29,744
More informationUndocumented Immigrants are:
Immigrants are: Current vs. Full Legal Status for All Immigrants Appendix 1: Detailed State and Local Tax Contributions of Total Immigrant Population Current vs. Full Legal Status for All Immigrants
More informationCheckpoint Payroll Sources All Payroll Sources
Checkpoint Payroll Sources All Payroll Sources Alabama Alaska Announcements Arizona Arkansas California Colorado Connecticut Source Foreign Account Tax Compliance Act ( FATCA ) Under Chapter 4 of the Code
More informationFederal Registry. NMLS Federal Registry Quarterly Report Quarter I
Federal Registry NMLS Federal Registry Quarterly Report 2012 Quarter I Updated June 6, 2012 Conference of State Bank Supervisors 1129 20 th Street, NW, 9 th Floor Washington, D.C. 20036-4307 NMLS Federal
More informationMapping the geography of retirement savings
of savings A comparative analysis of retirement savings data by state based on information gathered from over 60,000 individuals who have used the VoyaCompareMe online tool. Mapping the geography of retirement
More informationPay Frequency and Final Pay Provisions
Pay Frequency and Final Pay Provisions State Pay Frequency Minimum Final Pay Resign Final Pay Terminated Alabama Bi-weekly or semi-monthly No Provision No Provision Alaska Semi-monthly or monthly Next
More informationState Income Tax Tables
ALABAMA 1 st $1,000... 2% Next 5,000... 4% Over 6,000... 5% ALASKA... 0% ARIZONA 1 1 st $10,000... 2.87% Next 15,000... 3.2% Next 25,000... 3.74% Next 100,000... 4.72% Over 150,000... 5.04% ARKANSAS 1
More informationUnion Members in New York and New Jersey 2018
For Release: Friday, March 29, 2019 19-528-NEW NEW YORK NEW JERSEY INFORMATION OFFICE: New York City, N.Y. Technical information: (646) 264-3600 BLSinfoNY@bls.gov www.bls.gov/regions/new-york-new-jersey
More informationThe Effect of the Federal Cigarette Tax Increase on State Revenue
FISCAL April 2009 No. 166 FACT The Effect of the Federal Cigarette Tax Increase on State Revenue By Patrick Fleenor Today the federal cigarette tax will rise from 39 cents to $1.01 per pack. The proceeds
More informationAIG Benefit Solutions Producer Licensing and Appointment Requirements by State
3600 Route 66, Mail Stop 4J, Neptune, NJ 07754 AIG Benefit Solutions Producer Licensing and Appointment Requirements by State As an industry leader in the group insurance benefits market, AIG is firmly
More informationTermination Final Pay Requirements
State Involuntary Termination Voluntary Resignation Vacation Payout Requirement Alabama No specific regulations currently exist. No specific regulations currently exist. if the employer s policy provides
More informationAbility-to-Repay Statutes
Ability-to-Repay Statutes FEDERAL ALABAMA ALASKA ARIZONA ARKANSAS CALIFORNIA STATUTE Truth in Lending, Regulation Z Consumer Credit Secure and Fair Enforcement for Bankers, Brokers, and Loan Originators
More informationThe Costs and Benefits of Half a Loaf: The Economic Effects of Recent Regulation of Debit Card Interchange Fees. Robert J. Shapiro
The Costs and Benefits of Half a Loaf: The Economic Effects of Recent Regulation of Debit Card Interchange Fees Robert J. Shapiro October 1, 2013 The Costs and Benefits of Half a Loaf: The Economic Effects
More informationSales Tax Return Filing Thresholds by State
Thanks to R&M Consulting for assistance in putting this together Sales Tax Return Filing Thresholds by State State Alabama Alaska Arizona Arkansas California Colorado Connecticut Delaware Filing Thresholds
More informationState Corporate Income Tax Collections Decline Sharply
Corporate Income Tax Collections Decline Sharply Nicholas W. Jenny and Donald J. Boyd The Rockefeller Institute Fiscal News: Vol. 1, No. 3 July 26, 2001 According to a report from the Congressional Budget
More informationMEDICAID BUY-IN PROGRAMS
MEDICAID BUY-IN PROGRAMS Under federal law, states have the option of creating Medicaid buy-in programs that enable employed individuals with disabilities who make more than what is allowed under Section
More informationImpacts of Prepayment Penalties and Balloon Loans on Foreclosure Starts, in Selected States: Supplemental Tables
THE UNIVERSITY NORTH CAROLINA at CHAPEL HILL T H E F R A N K H A W K I N S K E N A N I N S T I T U T E DR. MICHAEL A. STEGMAN, DIRECTOR T 919-962-8201 OF PRIVATE ENTERPRISE CENTER FOR COMMUNITY CAPITALISM
More informationMotor Vehicle Sales/Use, Tax Reciprocity and Rate Chart-2005
The following is a Motor Vehicle Sales/Use Tax Reciprocity and Rate Chart which you may find helpful in determining the Sales/Use Tax liability of your customers who either purchase vehicles outside of
More informationQ Homeowner Confidence Survey Results. May 20, 2010
Q1 2010 Homeowner Confidence Survey Results May 20, 2010 The Zillow Homeowner Confidence Survey is fielded quarterly to determine the confidence level of American homeowners when it comes to the value
More informationForecasting State and Local Government Spending: Model Re-estimation. January Equation
Forecasting State and Local Government Spending: Model Re-estimation January 2015 Equation The REMI government spending estimation assumes that the state and local government demand is driven by the regional
More informationFederal Rates and Limits
Federal s and Limits FICA Social Security (OASDI) Base $118,500 Medicare (HI) Base No Limit Social Security (OASDI) Percentage 6.20% Medicare (HI) Percentage Maximum Employee Social Security (OASDI) Withholding
More informationFingerprint, Biographical Affidavit and Third-Party Verification Reports Requirements
Updates to the State Specific Information Fingerprint, Biographical Affidavit and Third-Party Verification Reports Requirements State Requirements For Licensure Requirements After Licensure (Non-Domestic)
More informationRecourse for Employees Misclassified as Independent Contractors Department for Professional Employees, AFL-CIO
Recourse for Employees Misclassified as Independent Contractors Department for Professional Employees, AFL-CIO State Relevant Agency Contact Information Online Resources Online Filing Alabama Department
More informationPAY STATEMENT REQUIREMENTS
PAY MENT 2017 PAY MENT Alabama Alaska Arizona Arkansas California Colorado Connecticut Delaware District of Columbia Florida Georgia No generally applicable wage payment law for private employers. Rate
More informationUnderstanding Oregon s Throwback Rule for Apportioning Corporate Income
Understanding Oregon s Throwback Rule for Apportioning Corporate Income Senate Interim Committee on Finance and Revenue January 12, 2018 2 Apportioning Corporate Income Apportionment is a method of dividing
More informationATHENE Performance Elite Series of Fixed Index Annuities
Rates Effective August 8, 05 ATHE Performance Elite Series of Fixed Index Annuities State Availability Alabama Alaska Arizona Arkansas Product Montana Nebraska Nevada New Hampshire California PE New Jersey
More informationThe table below reflects state minimum wages in effect for 2014, as well as future increases. State Wage Tied to Federal Minimum Wage *
State Minimum Wages The table below reflects state minimum wages in effect for 2014, as well as future increases. Summary: As of Jan. 1, 2014, 21 states and D.C. have minimum wages above the federal minimum
More informationChapter D State and Local Governments
Chapter D State and Local Governments State and Local Governments contains detailed information on the taxes, revenues, and expenditures of states and localities. The public finances of these two levels
More informationFAPRI Analysis of Dairy Policy Options for the 2002 Farm Bill Conference
FAPRI Analysis of Dairy Policy Options for the 2002 Farm Bill Conference FAPRI-UMC Report #04-02 April 11, 2002 Food and Agricultural Policy Research Institute University of Missouri 101 South Fifth Street
More informationMetrics and Measurements for State Pension Plans. November 17, 2016 Greg Mennis
Metrics and Measurements for State Pension Plans November 17, 2016 Greg Mennis Fiscal Sustainability Metrics Net Amortization Measures whether contributions are sufficient to reduce pension debt if plan
More informationMedia Alert. First American CoreLogic Releases Q3 Negative Equity Data
Contact Information Below Media Alert First American CoreLogic Releases Q3 Negative Equity Data First American CoreLogic, the first company to develop a national, state and city-level negative equity report,
More information2012 RUN Powered by ADP Tax Changes
2012 RUN Powered by ADP Tax Changes Dear Valued ADP Client, Beginning with your first payroll with checks dated in 2012, you and your employees may notice changes in your paychecks due to updated 2012
More informationNOTICE TO MEMBERS CANADIAN DERIVATIVES CORPORATION CANADIENNE DE. Trading by U.S. Residents
NOTICE TO MEMBERS CANADIAN DERIVATIVES CORPORATION CANADIENNE DE CLEARING CORPORATION COMPENSATION DE PRODUITS DÉRIVÉS NOTICE TO MEMBERS No. 2002-013 January 28, 2002 Trading by U.S. Residents This is
More informationFingerprint and Biographical Affidavit Requirements
Updates to the State-Specific Information Fingerprint and Biographical Affidavit Requirements State Requirements For Licensure Requirements After Licensure (Non-Domestic) Alabama NAIC biographical affidavit
More informationA d j u s t e r C r e d i t C E I n f o r m a t i o n S T A T E. DRI Will Submit Credit For You To Your State Agency. (hours ethics included)
A d j u s t e r C r e d i t C E I n f o r m a t i o n INSURANCE COVERAGE AND CLAIMS INSTITUTE APRIL 3 5, 2019 CHICAGO, IL Delaware Georgia Louisiana Mississippi New Hampshire North Carolina (hours ethics
More informationThe Starting Portfolio is divided into the following account types based on the proportions in your accounts. Cash accounts are considered taxable.
Overview Our Retirement Planner runs 5,000 Monte Carlo simulations to deliver a robust, personalized retirement projection. The simulations incorporate expected return and volatility, annual savings, income,
More informationHow Much Would a State Earned Income Tax Credit Cost in Fiscal Year 2018?
820 First Street NE, Suite 510 Washington, DC 20002 Tel: 202-408-1080 Fax: 202-408-1056 center@cbpp.org www.cbpp.org Updated February 8, 2017 How Much Would a State Earned Income Tax Cost in Fiscal Year?
More information# of Credit Unions As of March 31, 2011
# of Credit Unions # of Credit Unins # of Credit Unions As of March 31, 2011 8,600 8,400 8,200 8,000 8,478 8,215 7,800 7,909 7,600 7,400 7,651 7,442 7,200 7,000 6,800 # of Credit Unions -Trend By Asset-Based
More informationJ.P. Morgan Funds 2018 Distribution Notice
J.P. Morgan Funds 2018 Distribution Notice To assist you in preparing your 2018 Tax returns, we re pleased to provide this distribution notice for your J.P.Morgan Fund investment. If you are unclear about
More informationSTATE MINIMUM WAGES 2017 MINIMUM WAGE BY STATE
STATE MINIMUM WAGES 2017 MINIMUM WAGE BY STATE The table below, created by the National Conference of State Legislatures (NCSL), reflects current state minimum wages in effect as of January 1, 2017, as
More informationSTATE BOND COMMISSION DEPARTMENT OF TREASURY. March 15, 2018
STATE BOND COMMISSION DEPARTMENT OF TREASURY March 15, 2018 1 Overview In accordance with the Comprehensive Capital Outlay Budget, cash lines of credit provide a mechanism to cash flow capital outlay projects
More informationS T A T E INSURANCE COVERAGE AND PRACTICE SYMPOSIUM DECEMBER 7 8, 2017 NEW YORK, NY. DRI Will Submit Credit For You To Your State Agency
A d j u s t e r C r e d i t C E I n f o r m a t i o n INSURANCE COVERAGE AND PRACTICE SYMPOSIUM DECEMBER 7 8, 2017 NEW YORK, NY Delaware Pending Georgia Pending Louisiana Pending Mississippi 12.00 New
More informationProviding Subprime Consumers with Access to Credit: Helpful or Harmful? James R. Barth Auburn University
Providing Subprime Consumers with Access to Credit: Helpful or Harmful? James R. Barth Auburn University FICO Scores: Identifying Subprime Consumers Category FICO Score Range Super-prime 740 and Higher
More informationCLMS BRIEF 2 - Estimate of SUI Revenue, State-by-State
CLMS BRIEF 2 - Estimate of SUI Revenue, State-by-State Estimating the Annual Amounts of Unemployment Insurance Tax Collections From Individual States for Financing Adult Basic Education/ Job Training Programs
More informationNotice on Reallotment of Workforce Investment Act (WIA) Title I Formula Allotted Funds
This document is scheduled to be published in the Federal Register on 05/14/2014 and available online at http://federalregister.gov/a/2014-11045, and on FDsys.gov DEPARTMENT OF LABOR Employment and Training
More informationTax Recommendations and Actions in Other States. Joel Michael House Research Department June 9, 2011
Tax Recommendations and Actions in Other States Joel Michael House Research Department June 9, 2011 Governors FY 2012 Recommendations 12 governors recommend net revenue (tax and fee) increases 12 governors
More informationRequired Training Completion Date. Asset Protection Reciprocity
Completion Alabama Alaska Arizona Arkansas California State Certification: must complete initial 16 hours (8 hrs of general LTC CE and 8 hrs of classroom-only CE specifically on the CA for LTC prior to
More informationS T A T E TURNING THE TABLES ON PLAINTIFFS IN TRUCKING LITIGATION APRIL 26 27, 2018 CHICAGO, IL. DRI Will Submit Credit For You To Your State Agency
A d j u s t e r C r e d i t C E I n f o r m a t i o n TURNING THE TABLES ON PLAINTIFFS IN TRUCKING LITIGATION APRIL 26 27, 2018 CHICAGO, IL Delaware Georgia Louisiana Mississippi New Hampshire North Carolina
More information# of Credit Unions As of September 30, 2011
# of Credit Unions # of Credit Unions # of Credit Unions As of September 30, 2011 8,400 8,200 8,000 7,800 7,600 7,400 7,200 8,332 8,065 7,794 7,556 7,325 7,000 6,800 9,000 8,000 7,000 6,000 5,000 4,000
More informationDFA INVESTMENT DIMENSIONS GROUP INC. DIMENSIONAL INVESTMENT GROUP INC. Institutional Class Shares January 2018
DFA INVESTMENT DIMENSIONS GROUP INC. DIMENSIONAL INVESTMENT GROUP INC. Institutional Class Shares January 2018 Supplementary Tax Information 2017 The following supplementary information may be useful in
More informationA d j u s t e r C r e d i t C E I n f o r m a t i o n S T A T E. DRI Will Submit Credit For You To Your State Agency. (hours ethics included)
A d j u s t e r C r e d i t C E I n f o r m a t i o n STRIKING BACK AGAINST THE REPTILE IN MEDICAL MALPRACTICE AND LONG TERM CARE CASES JUNE 13, 2018 CHICAGO, IL S T A T E Delaware Georgia Louisiana Mississippi
More informationA d j u s t e r C r e d i t C E I n f o r m a t i o n S T A T E. Pending. DRI Will Submit Credit For You To Your State Agency.
A d j u s t e r C r e d i t C E I n f o r m a t i o n STRIKING BACK AGAINST THE REPTILE IN MEDICAL MALPRACTICE AND LONG TERM CARE CASES JUNE 13, 2018 CHICAGO, IL P O S T S E M I N A R A C T I O N Delaware
More informationResidual Income Requirements
Residual Income Requirements ytzhxrnmwlzh Ch. 4, 9-e: Item 44, Balance Available for Family Support (04/10/09) Enter the appropriate residual income amount from the following tables in the guideline box.
More informationIMPORTANT TAX INFORMATION
IMPORTANT TAX INFORMATION The following information about your enclosed 1099-DIV from s should be used when preparing your 2017 tax return. Form 1099-DIV reports dividends, exempt-interest dividends, capital
More informationSECTION 109 HOST STATE LOAN-TO-DEPOSIT RATIOS. The Board of Governors of the Federal Reserve System, the Federal Deposit Insurance
SECTION 109 HOST STATE LOAN-TO-DEPOSIT RATIOS The Board of Governors of the Federal Reserve System, the Federal Deposit Insurance Corporation, and the Office of the Comptroller of the Currency (the agencies)
More informationA d j u s t e r C r e d i t C E I n f o r m a t i o n S T A T E. DRI Will Submit Credit For You To Your State Agency. (hours ethics included)
A d j u s t e r C r e d i t C E I n f o r m a t i o n NURSING HOME/ALF LITIGATION SEPTEMBER 13 14, 2018 NEW ORLEANS, LA Delaware Georgia Louisiana Mississippi New Hampshire North Carolina (hours ethics
More informationAiming. Higher. Results from a Scorecard on State Health System Performance 2015 Edition. Douglas McCarthy, David C. Radley, and Susan L.
Aiming Higher Results from a Scorecard on State Health System Performance Edition Douglas McCarthy, David C. Radley, and Susan L. Hayes December The COMMONWEALTH FUND overview On most of the indicators,
More informationUpdate: Obamacare s Impact on Small Business Wages and Employment Sam Batkins, Ben Gitis
Update: Obamacare s Impact on Small Business Wages and Employment Sam Batkins, Ben Gitis Executive Summary Research from the American Action Forum (AAF) finds regulations from the Affordable Care Act (ACA)
More informationMutual Fund Tax Information
2008 Mutual Fund Tax Information We have provided this information as a service to our shareholders. Thornburg Investment Management cannot and does not give tax or accounting advice. If you have further
More informationMutual Fund Tax Information
Mutual Fund Tax Information We have provided this information as a service to our shareholders. Thornburg Investment Management cannot and does not give tax or accounting advice. If you have further questions
More information2014 STATE AND FEDERAL MINIMUM WAGES HR COMPLIANCE CENTER
2014 STATE AND FEDERAL MINIMUM WAGES HR COMPLIANCE CENTER The federal Fair Labor Standards Act (FLSA), which applies to most employers, establishes minimum wage and overtime requirements for the private
More informationADDITIONAL REQUIRED TRAINING before proceeding. Annuity Carrier Specific Product Training
American Equity REQUIRED CARRIER SPECIFIC TRAINING (CST) INSTRUCTIONS Annuity Carrier Specific Product Training and state mandated NAIC Annuity Training (see STATE ANNUITY SUITABILITY TRAINING REQUIREMENT
More informationState Tax Treatment of Social Security, Pension Income
State Tax Treatment of Social Security, Pension Income The following chart Provides a general overview of how states treat income from Social Security and pensions for the 2016 tax year unless otherwise
More informationNation s Uninsured Rate for Children Drops to Another Historic Low in 2016
Nation s Rate for Children Drops to Another Historic Low in 2016 by Joan Alker and Olivia Pham The number of uninsured children nationwide dropped to another historic low in 2016 with approximately 250,000
More informationPut in place to assist the unemployed or underemployed.
By:Erin Sollund The federal government Put in place to assist the unemployed or underemployed. Medicaid, The Women, Infants, and Children (WIC) Program, and Aid to Families with Dependent Children (AFDC)
More informationWhite Paper 2018 STATE AND FEDERAL MINIMUM WAGES
White Paper STATE AND FEDERAL S White Paper STATE AND FEDERAL S The federal Fair Labor Standards Act (FLSA) establishes minimum wage and overtime requirements for most employers in the private sector and
More informationAetna Individual Direct Pay Commissions Schedule
Aetna Individual Direct Pay Commissions Schedule Cards Issued Broker Rate Broker Tier Per Year 1st Yr 2nd Yr 3+ Yrs Levels 11-Jan 4.00% 4.00% 3.00% Bronze 24-Dec 6.00% 4.00% 3.00% Silver 25-49 8.00% 4.00%
More informationEBRI Databook on Employee Benefits Chapter 6: Employment-Based Retirement Plan Participation
EBRI Databook on Employee Benefits Chapter 6: Employment-Based Retirement Plan Participation UPDATED July 2014 This chapter looks at the percentage of American workers who work for an employer who sponsors
More informationTA X FACTS NORTHERN FUNDS 2O17
TA X FACTS 2O17 Northern Funds Tax Facts provides specific information about your Northern Funds investment income and capital gain distributions for 2017. If you have any questions about how to apply
More informationIntroduction to the U.S. K-12 Instructional Materials Industry
Introduction to the U.S. K-12 Instructional Materials Industry Objective For the benefit of creditors of McGraw-Hill School Education, we have prepared a primer on the U.S. K-12 Instructional Materials
More information8, ADP,
2013 Tax Changes Beginning with your first payroll with checks dated in 2013, employees may notice changes in their paychecks due to updated 2013 federal and state tax requirements. This document will
More informationS T A T E MEDICAL LIABILITY AND HEALTH CARE LAW MARCH 2 3, 2017 LAS VEGAS, NV. DRI Will Submit Credit For You To Your State Agency
A d j u s t e r C r e d i t C E I n f o r m a t i o n MEDICAL LIABILITY AND HEALTH CARE LAW MARCH 2 3, 2017 LAS VEGAS, NV Delaware Pending Georgia 12.00 Louisiana Pending Mississippi 13.00 New Hampshire
More informationFISCAL FACT Top Marginal Effective Tax Rates By State under Rival Tax Plans from Congressional Democrats and Republicans
September 22, 2010 No. 246 FISCAL FACT Top Marginal Effective Tax Rates By State under Rival Tax Plans from Congressional Democrats and Republicans By Gerald Prante Introduction One of biggest news stories
More informationMINIMUM WAGE WORKERS IN HAWAII 2013
WEST INFORMATION OFFICE San Francisco, Calif. For release Wednesday, June 25, 2014 14-898-SAN Technical information: (415) 625-2282 BLSInfoSF@bls.gov www.bls.gov/ro9 Media contact: (415) 625-2270 MINIMUM
More informationMINIMUM WAGE WORKERS IN TEXAS 2016
For release: Thursday, May 4, 2017 17-488-DAL SOUTHWEST INFORMATION OFFICE: Dallas, Texas Contact Information: (972) 850-4800 BLSInfoDallas@bls.gov www.bls.gov/regions/southwest MINIMUM WAGE WORKERS IN
More informationFiscal Fact. By Kail Padgitt and Alicia Hansen
Fiscal Fact May 5, 2011 No. 268 Nation Works until 11:13 AM to Pay All Taxes, Lunchtime to Pay off the Deficit Putting the Cost of Government on the Clock: 2011 s Tax Bite in the Eight-Hour Day By Kail
More informationSTATE AND FEDERAL MINIMUM WAGES
2017 STATE AND FEDERAL MINIMUM WAGES STATE AND FEDERAL MINIMUM WAGES The federal Fair Labor Standards Act (FLSA) establishes minimum wage and overtime requirements for most employers in the private sector
More informationAmerican Economics Group Clear and Effective Economic Analysis. American Economics Group
Presentation for: Federation Clear of and Tax Effective Administrators Economic Analysis 9/22/03 Charles W. de Seve, Ph.D. www.americaneconomics.com The Economy is Recovering : The National Economic Setting
More informationMainStay Funds Income Tax Information Notice
MainStay Funds Income Tax Information Notice The information contained in this brochure is being furnished to shareholders of the MainStay Funds for informational purposes only. Please consult your own
More informationQ309 NATIONAL DELINQUENCY SURVEY FROM THE MORTGAGE BANKERS ASSOCIATION. Data as of September 30, 2009
NATIONAL DELINQUENCY SURVEY FROM THE MORTGAGE BANKERS ASSOCIATION Q309 Data as of September 30, 2009 2009 Mortgage Bankers Association (MBA). All rights reserved, except as explicitly granted. Data are
More informationState Social Security Income Pension Income State computation not based on federal. Social Security benefits excluded from taxable income.
State Tax Treatment of Social Security, Pension Income The following CCH analysisi provides a general overview of how states treat income from Social Security and pensions for the 2013 tax year unless
More informationState Resources for Employees Misclassified as Independent Contractors Department for Professional Employees, AFL CIO December 2015
State Resources for Employees Misclassified as Independent Contractors Department for Professional Employees, AFL CIO December 2015 State Relevant Agency Contact Information Online Resources Online Filing
More informationEstimating the Number of People in Poverty for the Program Access Index: The American Community Survey vs. the Current Population Survey.
Background Estimating the Number of People in Poverty for the Program Access Index: The American Community Survey vs. the Current Population Survey August 2006 The Program Access Index (PAI) is one of
More informationIncome Inequality and Household Labor: Online Appendicies
Income Inequality and Household Labor: Online Appendicies Daniel Schneider UC Berkeley Department of Sociology Orestes P. Hastings Colorado State University Department of Sociology Daniel Schneider (Corresponding
More informationSTATE AND LOCAL TAXES A Comparison Across States
STATE AND LOCAL TAXES A Comparison Across States INDEPENDENT FISCAL OFFICE FEBRUARY 2018 Methodology This report uses data from the U.S. Census Bureau, the Internal Revenue Service (IRS), the U.S. Bureau
More informationQ209 NATIONAL DELINQUENCY SURVEY FROM THE MORTGAGE BANKERS ASSOCIATION. Data as of June 30, 2009
NATIONAL DELINQUENCY SURVEY FROM THE MORTGAGE BANKERS ASSOCIATION Q209 Data as of June 30, 2009 2009 Mortgage Bankers Association (MBA). All rights reserved, except as explicitly granted. Data are from
More informationDo you charge an expedite fee for online filings?
Topic: Expedite Fees and Online Filings Question by: Allison A. DeSantis : Ohio Date: March 14, 2012 Manitoba Corporations Canada Alabama Alaska Arizona Yes. The expedite fee is $35. We currently offer
More informationFHA Manual Underwriting Exceeding 31% / 43% DTI Eligibility Quick Reference
Credit Score/ Compensating Factor(s)* No Compensating Factor One Compensating Factor Two Compensating Factors No Discretionary Debt Maximum DTI 31% / 43% 37% / 47% 40% / 50% 40% / 40% *Acceptable compensating
More informationADDITIONAL REQUIRED TRAINING before proceeding. Annuity Carrier Specific Product Training
Reliance Standard REQUIRED CARRIER SPECIFIC TRAINING (CST) INSTRUCTIONS Annuity Carrier Specific Product Training and state mandated NAIC Annuity Training (see STATE ANNUITY SUITABILITY TRAINING REQUIREMENT
More informationJANUARY 30 DATA RELEASE WILL CAPTURE ONLY A PORTION OF THE JOBS CREATED OR SAVED BY THE RECOVERY ACT By Michael Leachman
820 First Street NE, Suite 510 Washington, DC 20002 Tel: 202-408-1080 Fax: 202-408-1056 center@cbpp.org www.cbpp.org January 29, 2010 JANUARY 30 DATA RELEASE WILL CAPTURE ONLY A PORTION OF THE JOBS CREATED
More informationCLE/CE Credit Pro cedure
CLE/CE Credit Pro cedure D R I H a s G o n e D i g i t a l! To receive continuing legal education (CLE) and claims adjusters (CE) credit for your attendance at the DRI Insurance Coverage and Claims Institute,
More informationIntroduction... 1 Survey Methodology... 1 Industry Breakouts... 2 Organization Size Breakouts... 3 Geographic Breakouts
Introduction... 1 Survey Methodology... 1 Industry Breakouts... 2 Organization Size Breakouts... 3 Geographic Breakouts... 3... 4... 8 148 282 414 536 662... 8 148 282 414 536 662... 8 148 282 414 536
More informationChild Care Assistance Spending and Participation in 2016
Policy solutions that work for low-income people Child Care Assistance Spending and Participation in 2016 i Background The Child Care and Development Block Grant (CCDBG) is the primary federal funding
More informationTaxes and Economic Competitiveness. Dale Craymer President, Texas Taxpayers and Research Association (512)
Taxes and Economic Competitiveness Dale Craymer President, Texas Taxpayers and Research Association (512) 472-8838 dcraymer@ttara.org www.ttara.org Presented to the Committee on Economic Competitiveness
More informationDATA AS OF SEPTEMBER 30, 2010
NATIONAL DELINQUENCY SURVEY Q3 2010 DATA AS OF SEPTEMBER 30, 2010 2010 Mortgage Bankers Association (MBA). All rights reserved, except as explicitly granted. Data are from a proprietary paid subscription
More informationState Minimum Wage Chart (See below for Local/City Minimum Wage Chart)
State Current Minimum Wage State Minimum Wage Chart (See below for Local/City Minimum Wage Chart) Maximum Tip Credit Allowed for Tipped Employees Federal $7.25 $5.12 $2.13 Minimum Cash Wage for Tipped
More informationCLE/CE Credit Procedure
CLE/CE Credit Procedure D R I H a s G o n e D i g i t a l! To receive continuing legal education (CLE) and claims adjusters (CE) credit for your attendance at the DRI Insurance Coverage and Claims Institute,
More information