Protecting the Legal Interests of Founders in a Startup Emerging Technology Company
|
|
- Lauren Phelps
- 5 years ago
- Views:
Transcription
1 Protecting the Legal Interests of Founders in a Startup Emerging Technology Company By Jonathan D. Gworek MORSE BARNES -BROWN PENDLETON PC The law firm built for business. SM mbbp.com Business Technology & IP Employment & Immigration Taxation Litigation
2 PROTECTING THE LEGAL INTERESTS OF FOUNDERS IN A STARTUP EMERGING TECHNOLOGY COMPANY 1 When a company is formed, the founders typically retain a law firm to advise them in connection with setting up the company. Most law firms that advise founders will require that they sign an engagement letter acknowledging that the company and not they are the client. This means simply that the founders do not have legal counsel that are protecting their individual interests. Founders typically conclude that there is no need for separate representation because, as the sole stockholders and directors, they essentially are the company, and what is good for the company is therefore good for them. While this is true for many purposes, it is not true in all situations. Moreover, as the company grows and adds employee and investor stockholders, founders often lose voting control of the company and blend into the broader class of common stockholders. At the same time, the issues that affect the founders as common stockholders become increasingly complicated. While in some situations the founder will be told by company counsel to retain separate counsel, it is not company counsel s obligation to do so unless a conflict exists. In addition, even when the founders may decide to rely on company counsel, this only works well when all founders are privy to the same conversations with company counsel, a dynamic that rarely exists in practice. This article describes a number of key legal issues that founders often confront in forming and building a company, and describes those situations in which separate legal counsel may be able to assist them in bringing about a more favorable result. In these cases and others that might arise, founders should seriously consider retaining separate counsel to advise them either individually or along with the larger group of common stockholders. Agreements With Prior Employers Often one or more founders were previously employed by a company with which they had a non-competition and/or assignment of inventions agreement. Issues may exist as to whether the intellectual property that the founders intend to build the new company around is free and clear of any claims a prior employer might have pursuant to an assignment of rights agreement, or whether starting and operating the new company would constitute a breach of a prior non-compete agreement. Clearing up such issues relating to prior employers is best addressed prior to leaving a job to start a new company. Often the momentum to start a new company builds to the point that it can be difficult to turn back even in the face of a possible breach of contract claim, or worse, an allegation that a founder has stolen trade secrets or other intellectual property rights. Prospective co-founders that do not have such constraints, and who are vested in seeing the new venture launch, have less at stake if a breach or other violation were to be alleged in the future, and therefore may be more inclined to push a co-founder to take such a risk. Any founder that has questions about rights and restrictions relative to a prior employer should consider seeking advice of counsel to fully understand the implications of this risk. Unlike other situations described below, this is a situation in which legal counsel for the prospective company should be able to represent the founder s interests as well as the
3 2 MORSE, BARNES-BROWN & PENDLETON, P.C. new company because their interests are aligned. However, it is critically important that company counsel be made aware of all the relevant facts, and that any founder that has risks related to prior employment be directly involved in discussions with company counsel. Contributions of Intellectual Property In a technology startup, intellectual property that has been developed by one or more founders will generally be contributed to the company in exchange for founders stock. Once the intellectual property is contributed, it becomes the property of the company and the contributing founder no longer has any personal rights in it. As a result, the contributing founder may want to consider (i) delaying the contribution of the intellectual property as late in the formation process as possible so as not give up rights prematurely, or (ii) structuring the contribution of intellectual property so that it reverts in certain situations, such as in the event the founder is terminated without cause or is divested of his or her stock, or in the event the company fails to move forward for any reason such as the failure to secure financing by a certain date. In addition, in some instances, the founder contributing the intellectual property may be the inventor of other intellectual property that he or she does not intend to contribute to the company. The contribution agreement should be carefully drafted and reviewed by counsel with this in mind so as to not unwittingly sweep in intellectual property that is not intended to be the property of the new company. In addition, all employees, including founders, are typically required to assign to the company all rights in work product, including all intellectual property they develop relating to their employer s business or based on company intellectual property, during their employment. For a founder that may continue to pursue innovation in his or her field, a broad assignment of rights agreement may result in the contribution to the company of technology that they develop on their own time and with their own resources, and which may not be directly related to the work of the new company. This can be particularly applicable to academics or industry luminaries who may be pioneers in a given field field. Founders should carefully consult with legal counsel to ensure that the scope of the ongoing assignment of rights agreement is reasonable in light of any ongoing work they may be doing on the side. The timing and scope of the assignment of rights is an area in which the interests of the company are likely not to be aligned with that of the individual founder. Founders should consider retaining separate legal counsel to advise them on these issues. Founder s Stock To ensure that stock issued to founders is properly earned by each founding stockholder, startup companies typically put in place stock restriction agreements with each founder. The primary purpose of this agreement is to give the company a right to purchase shares held by a founder in the event that the founder leaves the company for any reason. This purchase option generally applies only to shares that are unvested at any
4 PROTECTING THE LEGAL INTERESTS OF FOUNDERS IN A STARTUP EMERGING TECHNOLOGY COMPANY 3 given point in time, with shares becoming vested over a predetermined, usually timebased, schedule. There are several variables that need to be determined when putting in place stock restriction agreements. They include the overall duration of vesting, whether there is any up front vesting, what period of time, if any, must elapse before there is any additional vesting, and under what circumstances there may be additional or accelerated vesting for example in connection with a change of control of the company, or upon the termination of the founder. Venture capitalists have established certain acceptable ranges for these variables. From the founders perspective, one of the most important areas of concern is the basis upon which their shares accelerate in the event they are terminated. In the event the founder resigns voluntarily or is terminated for cause, no additional stock vests. However, if the founder is terminated without cause, or resigns for good reason (in other words, is forced out ), there arguably should be some compensation to the founder out of fairness, and to deter the board from terminating key people in order to recoup equity. Occasionally founders are able to negotiate for partial or even full acceleration. The definition of what constitutes cause for purposes of determining whether termination triggers acceleration is critical but subtle, and any common stockholder should be aware of the drafting options and seek advice of counsel to ensure his or her interests are protected. Related to the question of whether acceleration occurs upon termination is the issue of what happens upon a change of control. Full acceleration is often a reasonable starting point for negotiation. After all, if the company is sold, the founders who are still with the company likely made significant contributions to put the company in a position to be acquired. Venture capitalists and other stockholders who do not stand to realize any acceleration, however, are likely to oppose acceleration upon change of control. This acceleration will simply result in dilution to them and reduce their share of the consideration received in the acquisition. If full acceleration cannot be negotiated, an alternative is to request additional and possibly full acceleration if the founder is let go or resigns for good reason within one year following a change of control a mechanism that is sometimes called double trigger acceleration. However, this compromise position only works well in practice when the change of control calls for the founders to receive replacement equity with respect to their unvested stock. The double trigger concept does not translate as cleanly where the consideration received by the selling stockholders is cash, and specific provision should be made for this situation, again with advice of counsel. If full acceleration either at change of control or pursuant to a double trigger is not acceptable, then the company and the founder may agree to a mechanism that is simpler to apply, such as one year or 50% vesting upon a change of control. Founder s stock issues, especially as they relate to vesting, can be quite complex and assistance of legal counsel can help improve a founder s situation significantly. Founders should consider retaining separate legal counsel to advise them on these issues.
5 4 MORSE, BARNES-BROWN & PENDLETON, P.C. Minority Shareholder Protections While the founders in most startups enjoy a high degree of mutual trust and camaraderie, their relationships can change and become strained over time. Any founder who is a minority stockholder is at risk of being terminated at any time by the board of directors. Depending on whether the founders have put in place stock restriction agreements, as discussed above, a minority stockholder could be terminated and be completely divested of his or her equity position as well. This would seem to be a particularly inequitable outcome if the terminated stockholder had previously contributed either cash or some other asset, such as core intellectual property, that is critical to getting the company launched and that may even serve as the cornerstone of the new company s business plan. Founders should understand basic corporate governance issues at the time of formation so that they are not unpleasantly surprised if an issue arises that may result in their separation from the new company. If a founder is concerned about the possibility of being oppressed by majority stockholders, consideration should be given to incorporating the company in Massachusetts, the law of which affords minority stockholders greater protections than Delaware. Sophisticated company counsel should be able to provide the legal framework necessary for founders to understand how they may be affected by decisions regarding corporate governance and fiduciary duty issues. Nonetheless, an in-depth discussion on these issues is outside the scope of what company counsel would typically be expected to do, and any founder that is sensitive to concerns in this area should consider retaining separate counsel to focus more deliberately on these considerations. Non-Compete Agreements Founders are typically asked to sign a non-competition agreement with the company, if not at the time of formation, then certainly at the time it becomes funded by outside investors. The terms of the non-competition agreement can have a chilling affect on the founder s ability to pursue gainful employment after leaving the company. For example, most non-competition agreements prohibit the employee from working in the same field for a period of time after leaving the company, regardless of the reason for departure, which could include termination without cause in connection with the bankruptcy of the company or as a result of a major reduction in force unrelated to performance. Wellinformed employees might seek to get the non-compete to terminate in the event that they are terminated without cause, or in the event the company goes into bankruptcy. Alternatively, an employee may seek some severance payment for a period of time that runs concurrently with the non-compete so that they do not bear the full economic burden that a restrictive non-compete poses. The scope of non-compete agreements is certainly an area in which the company s interests and those of the founders are not aligned. The company s interest is for the noncompete to be broad, while the employee would prefer that it be narrow so as not to restrict them upon their separation from the company. The key to negotiating a fair noncompetition agreement is to engage counsel prior to accepting the offer so as to better
6 PROTECTING THE LEGAL INTERESTS OF FOUNDERS IN A STARTUP EMERGING TECHNOLOGY COMPANY 5 understand what the areas of concern should be and what alternative proposals might enable the founder and the company to strike a balanced deal that addresses the legitimate business interests of the company without unduly burdening the employee. The Venture Capital Transaction Several issues arise in the context of venture capital financings in which the interests of the founders are not necessarily aligned with the interests of the company. For example, founders may be asked to give broad representations and warranties in their individual capacities as part of early rounds of financing. The company and its legal counsel may have no reason to object to such representations on behalf of the founder. But the founders may not be comfortable offering up some or all of the requested representations and warranties. In addition, the terms of a venture financing have a direct impact on the future returns that the founder stockholders can realistically expect to achieve on their founder stock. For example, venture capital firms often require a liquidation preference equal to their original investment (or even a multiple of this investment) plus some accruing dividend. This liquidation preference gets paid before any proceeds get paid out to the founders who are common stockholders. In a company that has raised tens of millions of dollars, common stockholders may not realize any return on their stock unless the company eventually goes public. Moreover, when a company needs to raise funding in a situation in which it has failed to achieve important milestones, the financing terms can be punishing to both the founders and the earlier stage investors. In such a situation common stockholders often have their equity positions washed out by subsequent investors. For these reasons, founders are advised to fully understand the impact that a prospective financing will have on them personally as common stockholders. Before a company commits to a transaction that has this impact on the founders interests, the founders should consider what leverage they have in the negotiation to improve their post-funding position, and be informed as to what protections they might seek in the transaction. Founders may in fact have a sufficient number of shares that their vote is required to close a subsequent round of financing. This is very likely for those companies that have only been through one round of venture financing. Founders at this stage can use this vote to influence the structure of a financing by threat of veto if they are concerned that the transaction stands to have an onerous impact on the holdings of the common stockholders, and the likelihood that they will some day participate to any significant degree in a liquidity event. Alternatively, common stockholders may use their collective leverage as the management of the company to affect the structuring of a transaction. By exercising their leverage, the founders may be able to negotiate for the right to participate in the liquidation preference at some higher level, thereby leaving them with a more realistic opportunity to achieve liquidity. Alternatively they might negotiate for a management bonus pool that entitles them to a contractual right of payment in the event that the company has a liquidity event. The important point is that founders often have a
7 6 MORSE, BARNES-BROWN & PENDLETON, P.C. legitimate reason to be concerned about the impact of a financing, and that they probably do, in most cases, have more leverage than they realize. The key is to raise the concern and exercise the leverage early in the negotiation process. Stay Incentives In venture-backed companies, founders are often members of the executive team and critical to the growth and success of the company, and to the company s ability to execute on important strategic initiatives such as a financing or sale of the company. In connection with either a significant down round financing or a change of control, certain key executives may begin to question whether it is in their best interests to remain with the company through such an event. Founders in this position might consider approaching the president or board of directors to request an incentive to keep them motivated through the closing of the transaction or some later date. Bonus arrangements, often referred to as stay bonuses, are one vehicle for accomplishing this objective. Another might be to provide a severance package that would give the concerned employee/founder a cash payment in the event he or she is let go following the financing or change of control. A third mechanism would be to provide for additional stock vesting upon the occurrence of the transaction. Most stay packages incorporate elements of cash and stock incentives. While having such an incentive in place may be in the best interest of the company and employee/founder alike, it may well be that the company does not recognize the issue or recognizes the issue but has decided not to be proactive in addressing it. As such, it may be incumbent upon the affected executives to protect their own interests by approaching the company with a proposal. While working through such stay incentives can often be done with the assistance of company counsel, founders should consider consulting with their own legal counsel as to the options available and the pros and cons of each. Acquisition Scenarios Acquisitions are often rife with issues that have a direct impact on the founders both as members of the broader group of common stockholders, and as prospective employees at the buyer company. For example, many employee incentive plans provide that the board of directors of a company can decide at the time of an acquisition whether to accelerate unvested stock options or restricted stock grants. Accelerating such grants would allow the employees to hold a greater number of shares at the time of the acquisition, and thereby result in more of the proceeds being paid out to the employee stockholders. Another consideration that arises in acquisitions is the extent to which the founders and other common stockholders will be required to indemnify the buyer company in the event that certain representations made by the target company in connection with the acquisition agreement turn out to be false resulting in damages to the buyer. As a final example, for those founders who will be offered employment with the buyer, a whole range of issues arise around the terms of employment going forward, including salary, equity and the scope of a new non-compete.
8 PROTECTING THE LEGAL INTERESTS OF FOUNDERS IN A STARTUP EMERGING TECHNOLOGY COMPANY 7 In all three of the cases described above, the company s interests are not aligned with the interests of the founders and separate legal counsel is advisable. With advice of counsel a well coordinated founder group may have the opportunity to interject itself into the negotiation process early, improving the outcome for the founders and other common stockholders alike. Summary While it is very common for founders to rely on the advice of company counsel at the outset of the formation of the company, there are certain situations that might suggest that founders should have separate counsel to protect their own interests. As a company grows and takes on outside investment, the interests of the founders diverge. Company counsel will inform any founder who raises an issue that may be contrary to the interests of the company that it represents the company, not the founder s interests, and that the founder should seek separate counsel. A founder should seriously consider engaging separate counsel at the time of the formation of the company to deal with a number of issues that are determined around the time of formation. Having legal counsel on retainer can then be helpful to a founder at future points in the lifestage of the company. Counsel can then point out to the founder when representation is necessary or advisable situations that might not be apparent to other than the most sophisticated founder.
The Making of a Winning Term Sheet: Understanding What Founders Want
The Making of a Winning Term Sheet: Understanding What Founders Want Part II. Vesting Acceleration, Reallocation of Founder s Stock, Option Pool Dilution and Founder Liquidity By Jonathan D. Gworek mbbp.com
More informationData Mining the Venture-Backed Company Charter
Data Mining the Venture-Backed Company Charter By Jonathan D. Gworek mbbp.com Corporate IP Licensing & Strategic Alliances Employment & Immigration Taxation Litigation 781-622-5930 Data Mining the Venture
More informationTerm Sheet for Series A Round of Financing of XCorp
Term Sheet for Series A Round of Financing of XCorp mbbp.com Morse, Barnes-Brown & Pendleton, PC Waltham, MA Cambridge, MA mbbp.com CityPoint 230 Third Avenue, 4th Floor Waltham, MA 02451 781-622-5930
More informationMore about Convertible Preferred Stock
More about Convertible Preferred Stock A startup company ("venture" in Korea) requires what seems like endless pools of capital to fund its operations as well as its research and development. Usually,
More informationPrivate Equity Carried Interest Arrangements: A Business Perspective. Amanda N. Persaud 1
Private Equity Carried Interest Arrangements: A Business Perspective Amanda N. Persaud 1 For stakeholders of private equity sponsors, the most lucrative potential payouts continue to be carried interest.
More informationThe Price of Growth: The Lifecycle of a Company from a Founder s Dilution Perspective. By Mary Beth Kerrigan
The Price of Growth: The Lifecycle of a Company from a Founder s Dilution Perspective By Mary Beth Kerrigan mbbp.com CityPoint 230 Third Avenue, 4th Floor Waltham, MA 02451 781-622-5930 mbbp.com The Price
More informationBusiness Transactions Solutions Chapter 156 Venture Capital Financing. 156:390 Business Counselor s Training Materials: Venture Capital Financing
Business Transactions Solutions Chapter 156 Venture Capital Financing 156:390 Business Counselor s Training Materials: Venture Capital Financing 1 Overview Venture capital is a unique source of funding.
More informationcorporate advisor Hale and Dorr LLP Directors of Financially Troubled Companies Face Special Duties and Risks
Hale and Dorr LLP March 2002 Directors of Financially Troubled Companies Face Special Duties and Risks In today s difficult economic environment, many companies, both public and private, are encountering
More informationEmployee Incentive Planning White Paper
Employee Incentive Planning White Paper Before they can sell or exit their businesses with financial security, most owners need to grow their companies cash flow and transferable value significantly. Without
More informationJoint Ventures and Strategic Alliances: Key Considerations for Negotiation, Structuring & Drafting Terri Krivosha Maslon LLP
Joint Ventures and Strategic Alliances: Key Considerations for Negotiation, Structuring & Drafting Terri Krivosha Maslon LLP 1. What is a Joint Venture or Strategic Alliance? a. A relationship between
More informationCooley U: Stock Options & Equity Compensation
Cooley U: Stock Options & Equity Compensation attorney advertisement Copyright Cooley LLP, 3175 Hanover Street, Palo Alto, CA 94304. The content of this packet is an introduction to Cooley LLP s capabilities
More informationTOPICAL ISSUES IN PRIVATE EQUITY JOINT VENTURES TIPS FOR A CLEAN EXIT
TOPICAL ISSUES IN PRIVATE EQUITY JOINT VENTURES TIPS FOR A CLEAN EXIT 30 March 2015 Australia Legal Briefings By Damien Hazard and Mark Currell SUMMARY The shareholders agreement for a private equity joint
More informationVENTURE CAPITAL INVESTMENTS
VENTURE CAPITAL INVESTMENTS November 1, 2008 Jeffrey C. Hart Robinson, Bradshaw & Hinson, P.A. 5915 Farrington Road, Suite 201 Chapel Hill, North Carolina 27517 Phone: 919.328.8801 Email: jhart@rbh.com
More informationDIVERSIFICATION AND THE PRIVATELY HELD BUSINESS
DIVERSIFICATION AND THE PRIVATELY HELD BUSINESS STRATEGIC CONSIDERATIONS FOR A HIGHLY CONCENTRATED ASSET CLASS For many of the world s most successful entrepreneurs, the creation of significant wealth
More informationEMPLOYEE INCENTIVE PLANNING
EMPLOYEE INCENTIVE PLANNING WHITE PAPER Chuck Baldwin Baldwin & Clarke Advisory Services, Inc. 116 A South River Road Coldstream Park Bedford, NH 03110 Phone: 603-668-4353 http://www.baldwinclarke.com
More informationNegotiating a Settlement with an Activist Investor
Ismagilov/Shutterstock.com Negotiating a Settlement with an Activist Investor In his regular column, Frank Aquila drafts a sample memo to a board explaining the issues to consider when negotiating a settlement
More informationEmployee Incentive Compensation: A Primer
Employee Incentive Compensation: A Primer All rights reserved. Table of contents. OVERVIEW... 4. KEY ISSUES... 4.2 DOMESTIC BUSINESSES... 4.3 INTERNATIONAL BUSINESSES... 4 2. QUALIFYING INCENTIVE STOCK
More informationCase Study: Life Cycle of a Successful VC- Funded Global High-Tech Venture
Case Study: Life Cycle of a Successful VC- Funded Global High-Tech Venture 2015 Bierce & Kenerson, P.C. CASE STUDY Life Cycle of a Successful VC-Funded Global High-Tech Venture or How a small, privately
More informationAlternative business entities: liability and insurance issues
Alternative business entities: liability and insurance issues TABLE OF CONTENTS I. PARTNERSHIPS...2 II. LIMITED LIABILITY COMPANIES...9 III. COVERAGE FOR AFFILIATES...12 i For liability, tax and operating
More informationPRIVATE EQUITY AND MERGER CONTROL THE RULES OF THE GAME ARE CHANGING
PRIVATE EQUITY AND MERGER CONTROL THE RULES OF THE GAME ARE CHANGING BY PONTUS LINDFELT & MATTEO GIANGASPERO 1 1 Pontus Lindfelt, Partner, and Matteo Giangaspero, Associate in the EU competition law practice
More informationA COMMUNITY BANKER S NUTS AND BOLTS APPROACH TO MERGERS AND ACQUISITIONS
A COMMUNITY BANKER S NUTS AND BOLTS APPROACH TO MERGERS AND ACQUISITIONS By: Dave Muchnikoff, a partner at Silver Freedman & Taff, L. L.P., Washington, D.C., representing financial institutions and their
More informationPresenting a live 90-minute webinar with interactive Q&A. Today s faculty features: Elizabeth A. Gartland, Esq., Fenwick & West, San Francisco
Presenting a live 90-minute webinar with interactive Q&A Structuring Management Carve-Out Plans for Privately Held Corporations: Mechanics, Tax Obstacles and Optimization Guidance for Employee Benefits
More informationTop Legal Issues for Healthcare Investors and Business Development Teams
Top Legal Issues for Healthcare Investors and Business Development Teams Ryan Johnson Marguerite Ahmann April 11, 2018 Overview Introductions Health Care Investment Trends Digital Health Significant Growth
More informationVenture Capital Term Sheet (Long Form) The form is very pro-investor oriented.
Form: Venture Capital Term Sheet (Long Form) Description: This is a long form annotated Venture Capital Term Sheet, proposing deal terms for investment by a venture capitalist in an early stage company.
More informationCAVEAT DOMINUS: A COMPARISON OF POST- EMPLOYMENT ENTITLEMENTS IN THE U.S. AND ITALY WHEN EXECUTIVE EMPLOYMENT IS TERMINATED WITHOUT CAUSE
CAVEAT DOMINUS: A COMPARISON OF POST- EMPLOYMENT ENTITLEMENTS IN THE U.S. AND ITALY WHEN EXECUTIVE EMPLOYMENT IS TERMINATED WITHOUT CAUSE Authors George Birnbaum Ariane Rauber Fabio Tavecchia Tags Contract
More informationUses and Advantages of Delaware Statutory Trusts and Delaware Limited Liability Companies in Structured Finance Transactions
Uses and Advantages of Delaware Statutory Trusts and Delaware Limited Liability Companies in Structured Finance Transactions Business Transactions, Strategic Planning and Counseling Group Introduction
More informationJapan TRANSACTIONS. Asa Shinkawa and Masaki Noda. Nishimura & Asahi
Japan Asa Shinkawa and Masaki Noda 1 Types of private equity transactions What different types of private equity transactions occur in your jurisdiction? What structures are commonly used in private equity
More informationLegal Organization of Technology Start Ups
Legal Organization of Technology Start Ups By Michael Prozan 650 348-1500 mike@mgcgroup.com This presentation provides a general overview and should not be taken as legal advice for any individual situation.
More informationI. VENTURE CAPITAL DEAL TALK
I. VENTURE CAPITAL DEAL TALK People often accuse lawyers of using too many words. I recently accepted a challenge to summarize the primary terms of a venture capital investment deal in 100 words or less.
More informationUnderstanding employer-granted stock options
Understanding employer-granted stock options Important information for option holders Employee stock options can be one of the most valuable benefits companies provide as part of a benefits package. However,
More informationThe Board s Role in Merger and Acquisition Transactions
The Board s Role in Merger and Acquisition Transactions American Bankers Association Annual Convention Director Boot Camp Nashville, Tennessee October 16, 2016 John J. Gorman, Esq. Lawrence M. F. Spaccasi,
More informationGuide to Negotiating a Venture Capital Round. 201 Fourth Avenue North Suite 1870 Nashville, TN (615)
Guide to Negotiating a Venture Capital Round 201 Fourth Avenue North Suite 1870 Nashville, TN 37219 (615) 436-3005 Table of Contents Introduction... 2 Binding vs. Non-Binding Provisions... 2 Valuation,
More informationOwnership Structures and Incentive Programs for Design Professional Firms
Ownership Structures and Incentive Programs for Design Professional Firms May 10, 2018 Authors: Michael Strogoff, FAIA, Strogoff Consulting, Inc. Karen Kauh, Strogoff Consulting, Inc. With contributions
More informationDefault Remedies under Subscription Credit Facilities: Guide to the Foreclosure Process
Default Remedies under Subscription Credit Facilities: Guide to the Foreclosure Process Kiel Bowen Sean Scott Alexander Righi Although the growing market for subscriptionbacked credit facilities (each,
More informationPractical Lessons in Using Intellectual Property as Collateral
Practical Lessons in Using Intellectual Property as Collateral By Richard D. Crawford In a 2001 survey, Equipment Leasing Association members said they needed a better understanding of the intellectual
More informationWiped-Out Common Stockholders:
Wiped-Out Common Stockholders: Delaware Chancery Court Finds Foul But No Harm in the Sale of a Venture- Backed Company B y J. D. W e i n b e r g a n d D a n i e l N a z a r J. D. Weinberg is a partner,
More informationTax Increases and the ESOP Alternative: Motivation for Close Corporation Owners
ESOP Independent Financial Adviser Insights Tax Increases and the ESOP Alternative: Motivation for Close Owners David Burdette Significant increases in capital gain tax rates are expected in 2011. An employee
More informationNEGOTIATING THE PURCHASE AGREEMENT FOR A CLOSELY HELD BUSINESS. Elliott V. Stein
NEGOTIATING THE PURCHASE AGREEMENT FOR A CLOSELY HELD BUSINESS Elliott V. Stein Imagine that your client calls you and tells you that he has just agreed to purchase a closely held business. You are asked
More informationTechnology Transfer Office as a Business Unit
Page 1 Currently,, is vice president, technology transfer, at the M. D. Anderson Cancer Center in Houston, Texas. However, he wrote this chapter while he was director of technology management at the University
More information2009: A Turning Point in Change-in-Control Excise Tax Gross-Ups? Do Companies Need to Explore New Strategies?
2009: A Turning Point in Change-in-Control Excise Tax Gross-Ups? Do Companies Need to Explore New Strategies? by Marshall T. Scott * Watson Wyatt Worldwide Chicago, IL and Mark S. Weisberg, Esq. * Winston
More informationNumerous Proposed 2009 Amendments to the Delaware General Corporation Law Reflect Heightened Focus on Governance Issues
ClientAdvisory Numerous Proposed 2009 Amendments to the Delaware General Corporation Law Reflect Heightened Focus on Governance Issues March 10, 2009 Lawmakers in the state of Delaware may soon be addressing
More informationSTRUCTURING INVESTMENTS. Amit Singh Shareholder Stradling Yocca Carlson & Rauth, P.C IN STARTUPS November 7, 2018
STRUCTURING INVESTMENTS Amit Singh Shareholder Stradling Yocca Carlson & Rauth, P.C. 858.926.3012 asingh@sycr.com IN STARTUPS November 7, 2018 Amit Singh, Esq. Corporate Shareholder Amit is a shareholder
More informationCarving Up the Pie: Using Change in Control Carve-Out Plans to Incentivize Startup Employees
Resource ID: w-010-6750 Carving Up the Pie: Using Change in Control Carve-Out Plans to Incentivize Startup Employees MARSHALL MORT, TAYLOR CASHWELL, AND SHAWN LAMPRON, FENWICK & WEST LLP, WITH PRACTICAL
More informationACCELERANT VENTURES, L.P. AUGUST, (the Company ) a. The closing is expected to occur on or before, 2014 (the Closing ).
ACCELERANT VENTURES, L.P. DBA TRIANGLE STARTUP FACTORY SUMMARY OF TERMS COMMON STOCK PURCHASE AUGUST, 2014 Issuer: Founders: Purchaser: (the Company ) a.,, and (the Founders ). Accelerant Ventures, L.P.
More informationMERGERS & ACQUISITIONS: A MINEFIELD FOR DIRECTORS
MERGERS & ACQUISITIONS: A MINEFIELD FOR DIRECTORS When a company becomes involved in an actual or proposed merger or acquisition ( M&A ), its directors are thrust into a highly volatile and dangerous claims
More informationThe Micro-MBA for Attorneys Strategy, Startups and Virtual Corporations Course #BU Instructor Hugh Taylor
The Micro-MBA for Attorneys Strategy, Startups and Virtual Corporations Course #BU031009 Instructor Hugh Taylor Course Series Overview The Micro-MBA for Attorneys Based on the course I co-each with Barry
More informationUsing Short-Term Key Employee Incentives to Increase Sale Price
Kyle P. Mooney, ChFC, AEP, CEPA Managing Partner/Certified Exit Planning Advisor 4190 Belfort Road, Suite 351 Jacksonville, FL 32216 (o) 904 551 3536 (e) kyle@exitadvisors.net (w) EXITadvisors.net Using
More informationFREQUENTLY ASKED QUESTIONS ABOUT REGULATION FD
FREQUENTLY ASKED QUESTIONS ABOUT REGULATION FD Background What is Regulation FD? Regulation FD (for Fair Disclosure ), promulgated by the SEC under the Securities Exchange Act of 1934, as amended (the
More informationShares of Common Stock offered under the Denny s Corporation 2004 Omnibus Incentive Plan
PROSPECTUS DENNY S CORPORATION Shares of Common Stock offered under the Denny s Corporation 2004 Omnibus Incentive Plan This prospectus relates to shares of common stock of Denny s Corporation that may
More informationeskbook Emerging Life Sciences Companies second edition Chapter 22 Protective Provisions in Biotech Strategic Alliances
eskbook Emerging Life Sciences Companies second edition Chapter 22 Protective Provisions in Biotech Strategic Alliances Chapter 22 PROTECTIVE PROVISIONS IN BIOTECH STRATEGIC ALLIANCES Strategic alliances
More informationEDUCATIONAL NOTES TO THE SIMPLE AGREEMENT FOR FUTURE EQUITY (SAFE) April 2017
EDUCATIONAL NOTES TO THE SIMPLE AGREEMENT FOR FUTURE EQUITY (SAFE) April 2017 The SAFE as investment instrument came into being at the Y Combinator accelerator in Silicon Valley in late 2013. It addressed
More informationMultiple generations in one SMSF a great idea or a disaster waiting to happen?
Multiple generations in one SMSF a great idea or a disaster waiting a great idea or a disaster waiting 1 / Introduction Most SMSFs have just one or two members (typically a couple). However, the law allows
More informationIESBA Agenda Paper 5-E October 2007 Toronto, Canada
SECTION 290 Independence Audit and Review Engagements Objective and Structure of this Section 290.1 This section addresses the independence requirements for audit engagements* and review engagements*,
More informationUSING SHORT-TERM KEY- EMPLOYEE INCENTIVES TO INCREASE SALE PRICE
USING SHORT-TERM KEY- EMPLOYEE INCENTIVES TO INCREASE SALE PRICE WHITE PAPER Jim Carlisle Dinsmore & Shohl LLP 1300 Six PPG Place Pittsburgh, PA 15222 Phone: 412-230-8984 Learn more about our GEXP Practice
More informationFidelity Investments Canada Limited
Fidelity Investments Canada Limited 483 Bay Street, Suite 200 Toronto, Ontario M5G 2N7 October 17, 2002 David S. Burbach Tel: (416) 307-7178 Fax: (416) 307-5535 Email: david.burbach@fmr.com Denise Brousseau
More informationRemuneration Report For the year ended 31 March 2014
Remuneration Report For the year ended 31 March 2014 INTRODUCTION This report is on the activities of the Remuneration Committee for the period from 1 April 2013 to 31 March 2014. It sets out the remuneration
More informationExcess Layers of D&O Insurance: Peeling the Onion
Excess Layers of D&O Insurance: Peeling the Onion TABLE OF CONTENTS TABLE OF CONTENTS... I A. EXCESS DIC SIDE-A POLICY... 1 1. STACKING MULTIPLE EXCESS SIDE A POLICIES... 3 2. QUOTA SHARE SIDE A PROGRAMS...
More informationESOP Opportunities A White Paper
ESOP Opportunities A White Paper James R. Carlisle, II, Esq., CExP (412) 288-2229 carlisle@hh-law.com Erin C. Farabaugh, Esq. (412) 288-2266 farabaughec@hh-law.com An Employee Stock Ownership Plan (ESOP)
More informationDon t Fear the Phantom Stock
Don t Fear the Phantom Stock In a prior article, we discussed the benefits of issuing stock options as part of an employee compensation package and outlined common pitfalls for entrepreneurs to avoid when
More informationTax matters: what should the board be thinking about?
January 2017 Tax matters: what should the board be thinking about? Tax issues how pay is taxed, when, and whether that tax can be deferred can be a key driver in designing executive pay packages. The potential
More informationMany of the financing obstacles outlined above can be avoided through somewhat more creative capitalization of the proposed ESOP transaction.
Do ESOP transactions ever fail to close? Absolutely. ESOP transactions are not that dissimilar to M&A transactions in that both transaction types may stall as a result of various issues including valuation
More informationTop Ten Tips and Current Issues for Mergers and Acquisitions
Top Ten Tips and Current Issues for Mergers and Acquisitions David W. Healy, Co-Chair, M&A Group Fenwick & West LLP SVAGC Presentation February 17, 2006 Recent proposed change to SEC "best price" rule
More informationIdea to Liquidity & Beyond: Financing
Seminar Series: Startup Law 101 for Entrepreneurs Idea to Liquidity & Beyond: Financing Patrick Pohlen and Ben Potter, Latham & Watkins LLP October 10, 2017 Latham & Watkins operates worldwide as a limited
More informationAvoiding Tax Inefficiencies in M&A Integration. By Elan P. Keller, Kaye Scholer LLP
Avoiding Tax Inefficiencies in M&A Integration By Elan P. Keller, Kaye Scholer LLP All legal documents are signed, covenants and conditions precedent are met, and a delicious dinner is had by all. Another
More informationSmarter, Faster, Stronger: A New Suite of VC Model Docs
May 2018 Follow @Paul_Hastings Smarter, Faster, Stronger: A New Suite of VC Model Docs By Samuel A. Waxman, Jordan L. Goldman & Tyler Thiret In March 2018, for the first time in four years, the National
More informationPrivate Equity Guide for Businesses
December 2017 Private Equity Guide for Businesses PRIVATE EQUITY GUIDE FOR BUSINESS OWNERS IN ETHIOPIA Private Equity (PE) is fast becoming an important source of finance for small and medium sized businesses
More informationPart 2: Remuneration Policy
72 Corporate governance QinetiQ Group plc Annual Report and Accounts 2017 Directors Remuneration Report continued Part 2: Remuneration Policy The policy will be put forward for binding vote at the AGM
More informationWHEN CAN YOU STOP WORK FOR NONPAYMENT?
WHEN CAN YOU STOP WORK FOR NONPAYMENT? PLANNING AHEAD When an owner or general contractor has not paid a roofing contractor the sums it is owed under the contract, the roofing contractor is faced with
More information30 June 2011 practicallaw.com
30 June 2011 practicallaw.com Article photo from: istockphoto.com/djclaassen. STRUCTURING WATERFALL PROVISIONS Waterfall provisions in partnership and limited liability company agreements specify the priority
More informationANALYZING POTENTIAL OWNERSHIP TRANSITION OPTIONS UTILIZING DEFERRED COMPENSATION ARRANGEMENTS
ANALYZING POTENTIAL OWNERSHIP TRANSITION OPTIONS UTILIZING DEFERRED COMPENSATION ARRANGEMENTS by Ronald J. Adams, CPA, CVA, ABV, CBA, CFF, FVS, CGMA Many smaller companies want to share ownership with
More informationStandard forms of partnering contracts The ultimate contractual commitment? Part 4
Standard forms of partnering contracts The ultimate contractual commitment? Part 4 This is the fourth in a series of articles being published in CES comparing the terms of some of the different standard
More informationSAFE PRIMER. Why. When
SAFE PRIMER A safe is a Simple Agreement for Future Equity. An investor makes a cash investment in a company, but gets company stock at a later date, in connection with a specific event. A safe is not
More informationNegotiating Series A Term Sheets
Negotiating Series A Term Sheets Benjamin M. Hron Bhron@mccarter.com 617.449.6584 @HronEsq Part I: 10.06.16 Part II: 10.20.16 What is a Term Sheet Control Terms v. Economic Terms Standard Agreements Stock
More informationThe Entrepreneur's Guide to Early Stage Financing. The Entrepreneur's Guide to Early Stage Financing
The Entrepreneur's Guide to Early Stage Financing The Entrepreneur's Guide to Early Stage Financing Table of Contents The Entrepreneur's Guide to Early Stage Financing Introduction... 3 The Lawyer s Role...
More informationNegotiating Series A Term Sheets
Negotiating Series A Term Sheets Benjamin M. Hron Bhron@mccarter.com 617.449.6584 @HronEsq James F. Coffey jcoffey@mccarter.com 617.449.6533 @hopbos Twitter #mecic 11.20.13 Refresher: What is a Term Sheet
More informationEquity Compensation in Troubled Times
Equity Compensation in Troubled Times Richard E. Wood Kirkpatrick & Lockhart LLP I. Introduction Stock options were the currency of the new economy. Without stock options, it was widely believed, many
More informationNew York State Bar Association. Tax Section. Report on Uncertain Tax Positions in the Context of Mergers, Acquisitions and Spin-offs
New York State Bar Association Tax Section Report on Uncertain Tax Positions in the Context of Mergers, Acquisitions and Spin-offs December 20, 2010 TABLE OF CONTENTS Page I. Introduction and General Recommendations...1
More informationIncorporating Your Startup: Choice of Entity and Tax Considerations
Incorporating Your Startup: Choice of Entity and Tax Considerations Presentation to Boston ENET December 6, 2011 Mark A. Haddad Partner 617-832-1724 mhaddad@foleyhoag.com www.emergingenterprisecenter.com
More informationORGANIZING A MUTUAL FUND 1 I. SELECTING THE ORGANIZATION FORM CORPORATIONS AND BUSINESS TRUSTS
ORGANIZING A MUTUAL FUND 1 I. SELECTING THE ORGANIZATION FORM CORPORATIONS AND BUSINESS TRUSTS Registered investment companies are organized as corporations or business trusts (or, occasionally, limited
More informationCHOICE OF ENTITY FOR A STARTUP BUSINESS AFTER TAX REFORM
Insights on: TAX LAW AND ENTITY FORMATION August 2018 CHOICE OF ENTITY FOR A STARTUP BUSINESS AFTER TAX REFORM By Jim Browne, Barnes & Thornburg LLP When an entrepreneur makes the decision to form a legal
More informationSUMMARY OF TERMS OF THE SIMPLE AGREEMENT FOR FUTURE TOKENS ISSUED BY BLOXABLE, INC. [Month] [Day], Background Information
SUMMARY OF TERMS OF THE SIMPLE AGREEMENT FOR FUTURE TOKENS ISSUED BY BLOXABLE, INC. [Month] [Day], 2018 Background Information This Summary of Terms of the Simple Agreement for Future Tokens (the SAFT
More informationCUEd In: The Law and Business of Employee Benefits for Credit Union Executives. In this Issue
CUEd In: The Law and Business of Employee Benefits for Credit Union Executives In this Issue 2 4 5 6 How Big Is This?: Health Care Reform May Impact Your Executive Employment and Severance Agreements Will
More informationBy Alexander B. Johnson and Roberto Zapata 1
Optima is Optimal: Sidestepping Omnicare in Private Company M&A Transactions By Alexander B. Johnson and Roberto Zapata 1 The general controversy surrounding the Delaware Supreme Court s decision in Omnicare,
More informationIndemnification: Forgotten D&O Protection
Indemnification: Forgotten D&O Protection In the current post-enron environment, directors and officers increasingly realize, perhaps more than ever before, that absent strong financial protection, their
More informationFiduciary Duties of Buy-Side Directors: Recent Lessons Learned
June 2018 Fiduciary Duties of Buy-Side Directors: Recent Lessons Learned Significant acquisitions always present risks to the acquiring entity and its stockholders. These risks may arise from, among other
More informationusing the statutory rates of the current year (i.e, year t).
7 Chapter 7 The Importance of Marginal Tax Rates and Dynamic Tax-Planning Considerations: Efficient investment decisions with long horizons may become inefficient if tax positions change over time. Shorter
More informationMay 3, McDermott Health Care HR Center
May 3, 2017 McDermott Health Care HR Center Ruth M. Wimer Mary K. Samsa, CPA, MST, JD Joseph K. Urwitz Direct: (202) 756-8614 Direct: (312) 984-2142 Direct: (617) 535-3854 Email: rwimer@mwe.com Email:
More informationESOP Opportunities Business Enterprise Institute, Inc. rev 01/08
ESOP Opportunities An Employee Stock Ownership Plan (ESOP) is a tool business owners use to achieve three common Exit Objectives: 1.) To leave the business soon; 2.) To leave the business with cash adequate
More informationBosses Behaving Badly: Scope of Liability and Mitigating the Risks of Executive Misbehavior. Mark Whitney June 9, 2014
Bosses Behaving Badly: Scope of Liability and Mitigating the Risks of Executive Misbehavior Mark Whitney June 9, 2014 Common Exec Misbehavior - Execs leave to join competitor with playbook knowledge -
More informationTERM SHEET FOR SERIES A ROUND OF FINANCING OF [your team name here] INC. your VC here ( Investor )
TERM SHEET FOR SERIES A ROUND OF FINANCING OF [your team name here] INC. Amount of Investment: $4,000,000 Investor: your VC here ( Investor ) Type of Security: Series A Convertible Preferred Stock Pre-Money
More informationPublic Disclosure Authorized. Public Disclosure Authorized. Public Disclosure Authorized. cover_test.indd 1-2 4/24/09 11:55:22
cover_test.indd 1-2 4/24/09 11:55:22 losure Authorized Public Disclosure Authorized Public Disclosure Authorized Public Disclosure Authorized 1 4/24/09 11:58:20 What is an actuary?... 1 Basic actuarial
More informationVENTURE CAPITAL MOCK NEGOTIATION October 22, 2007
VENTURE CAPITAL MOCK NEGOTIATION October 22, 2007 PLAYERS Jim Fulton Erik Edwards Gordon Ho Eric Anderson Founder of InfiniteWisdom, Inc., a startup seeking venture capital financing Attorney representing
More informationModule 1: Accounting Information in Capital Markets
Module 1: Accounting Information in Capital Markets INFORMATION THEORY - What is it? Theory on the usefulness of accounting information in investment decisions [Previously there was dissatisfaction with
More informationThe Ten Commandments of Design Professionals. Contracts (Vol.1) By Matthew C. Ryan. December 2018 Volume 8 / Issue 4.
BluePrint For Design Professionals The Ten Commandments of Design Professionals Contracts (Vol.1) By Matthew C. Ryan The last two-plus decades have seen a massive rise in the importance of contracts in
More informationThe European syndicated loan market: current market trends and documentation issues
Eversheds Sutherland The Legal 500 & The In-House Lawyer Legal Briefing Finance The Legal 500 Victoria Read, Partner victoriaread@eversheds.com The European syndicated loan market: current market trends
More informationM&A ACADEMY CHOOSING AN ACQUISITION STRUCTURE AND STRUCTURING A DEAL
M&A ACADEMY CHOOSING AN ACQUISITION STRUCTURE AND STRUCTURING A DEAL Agenda Overview of the Acquisition Process Basic Forms of Acquisitions Basic Issues To Consider In Structuring The Deal Select Public
More information2014 Thomson Reuters. No Claim to Orig. US Gov. Works.
Page 1 ABA Formal Op. 93-379 A.B.A. ABA Comm. on Ethics and Professional Responsibility, Formal Op. 93-379 American Bar Association BILLING FOR PROFESSIONAL FEES, DISBURSEMENTS AND OTHER EXPENSES December
More informationIRS and Treasury Issue Proposed Regulations Easing Some of the Burden of the Fractions Rule
Tax Practice Group December 1, 2016 IRS and Treasury Issue Proposed Regulations Easing Some of the Burden of the Fractions Rule For more information, contact: Jonathan Talansky +1 212 790 5321 jtalansky@kslaw.com
More informationNonqualified Deferred Compensation Programs
Nonqualified Deferred Compensation Programs Is One Right for Your Organization? Many employers use nonqualified deferred compensation programs to help attract, retain, and reward executives or other highly
More informationMANAGING WEALTH FROM A LIQUIDITY EVENT Pre, During, and Post Transaction Considerations
MANAGING WEALTH FROM A LIQUIDITY EVENT Pre, During, and Post Transaction Considerations + INTRODUCTION Entrepreneurs and corporate executives put an immeasurable amount of time and energy into building
More information