The Impact of Proposed Volcker Rule Regulations on Activities of Non-U.S. Banks Outside of the United States
|
|
- Edith Rice
- 5 years ago
- Views:
Transcription
1 October 18, 2011 The Impact of Proposed Volcker Rule Regulations on Activities of Non-U.S. Banks Outside of the United States Contents Last week, the Board of Governors of the Federal Reserve System (the Fed ), together with the other federal banking agencies and the Securities and Exchange Commission, approved the issuance of a notice of proposed rulemaking (the Proposal ) that would implement Section 619 of the Dodd-Frank Wall Street Reform and Consumer Protection Act (the Dodd-Frank Act ), commonly known as the Volcker Rule. 1 One of the Dodd-Frank Act s most controversial provisions, the Volcker Rule prohibits banking entities, including any non-u.s. bank with a U.S. presence, from engaging in proprietary trading or investing in or sponsoring hedge funds and private equity funds (together, Private Funds ), subject to certain exceptions. Although the Volcker Rule broadly exempts business conducted by a non-u.s. bank solely outside of the United States, that phrase is not defined in the Dodd-Frank Act itself, and there has been intense speculation about how the Agencies would interpret it. The Proposal is a clear indication that the Agencies intend to interpret the phrase solely outside of the United States very narrowly. Overview of the Volcker Rule and the Proposal... 2 The Impact of the Proprietary Trading Ban on Non-U.S. Banks... 3 The Impact of the Private Fund Prohibition on Non- U.S. Banks... 5 Systemic Risk and Competitive Parity... 6 Reporting, Recordkeeping and Compliance Obligations for Non-U.S. Banks... 7 Next Steps... 8 This note provides a high-level overview of the Volcker Rule as it would be implemented under the Proposal, describing very generally the activities that would be prohibited and those that would be exempted, with a particular focus on its extraterritorial impact on the global operations of non-u.s. banks Prohibitions and Restrictions on Proprietary Trading and Certain Interests in, and Relationships with, Hedge Funds and Private Equity Funds (Oct. 11, 2011), available at While the Dodd- Frank Act directs the Commodity Futures Trading Commission (the CFTC ) to adopt regulations implementing the Volcker Rule with respect to entities for which it is the primary financial regulatory agency, including futures commission merchants and swap dealers, the CFTC is not one of the agencies issuing the Proposal. The CFTC is considering its own Volcker Rule implementing regulations. While this note is focused on the effect of the Proposal on non-u.s. banking entities with a U.S. presence, it is worth noting that many banks based in the United States are of the view that the Volcker Rule and the Proposal treat them less fairly than they treat foreign banks because U.S. banks are not granted an exemption to the prohibitions for their proprietary trading and Private The Impact of Proposed Volcker Rule Regulations on the Non-U.S. Activities of Non-U.S. Banks 1
2 Overview of the Volcker Rule and the Proposal Scope The Volcker Rule bans proprietary trading and certain Private Fund activities, as described below, by banking entities, a term that includes U.S. banks and their holding companies, foreign banks with a U.S. branch or agency, and any affiliates of the foregoing. By its terms, the definition picks up all affiliates up, down and across an organization, whether they are organized in the United States or not. Except as specifically provided otherwise, the Volcker Rule s prohibitions are thus effective across a corporate group and around the globe. Proprietary Trading Prohibition Proprietary trading is a complex concept that is only made more so by the Proposal. Very briefly, proprietary trading under the Proposal includes both > purchases or sales of securities, derivatives and futures 3 by any banking entity acting as principal with the purpose of benefiting from short-term price changes, and > all principal trading, regardless of purpose, conducted by dealers in securities, swaps and certain other instruments. There are important exemptions, including exemptions for underwriting, marketmaking, risk-mitigating hedging, trading as a riskless principal on behalf of a customer, and, for non-u.s. banking entities only, trading conducted solely outside of the United States (the Foreign Bank Trading Exemption ). The Foreign Bank Trading Exemption is discussed in more detail below. The Proposal sets forth in detail the principles that the Agencies will use to interpret these exemptions and, in particular, to distinguish market-making from prohibited proprietary trading. Of critical concern to both U.S. and non-u.s. banking entities is that the Proposal would require them to implement burdensome documentation and compliance systems in order to invoke many of these statutory exemptions; in other words, and as just one example, they will not be free merely to self-identify which positions represent bona fide market making and which do not. Private Fund Prohibition The Volcker Rule also prohibits banking entities from investing in, sponsoring or having certain relationships with Private Funds, a term defined as any issuer that 3 Fund activity outside of the United States and foreign banks can avoid the effects of the Volcker Rule by closing their U.S. branches and selling their U.S. bank subsidiaries. The definition of covered financial position excludes loans, physical commodities and foreign exchange. Proposed Section 3(b)(3)(ii). The Impact of Proposed Volcker Rule Regulations on the Non-U.S. Activities of Non-U.S. Banks 2
3 would be considered an investment company but for the exemptions provided by Investment Company Act Section 3(c)(1) (which generally exempts private funds the securities of which are owned by fewer than 100 persons) or Section 3(c)(7) (which generally exempts private funds owned only by qualified purchasers), 4 along with any similar funds that the Agencies by rule treat as Private Funds. The Proposal would expand this definition to include offshore funds that, if they had been organized or offered in the United States, would have fallen within the definition of Private Funds. A banking entity that sponsors or offers a Private Fund, or serves as its investment adviser, is also completely barred from entering into a covered transaction, as defined in Section 23A of the Federal Reserve Act, with the 5 Private Fund. Among other things, this would preclude a banking entity from extending credit to an advised Private Fund or to a customer for the purpose of investing in the Private Fund. It would also bar a banking entity from accepting interests in a Private Fund as collateral for a loan to a customer. As with the ban on proprietary trading, there are important exemptions from the Private Fund ban. A banking entity may invest in a Private Fund that it organizes and offers as part of a bona fide investment advisory business, provided that it actively seeks unaffiliated investors for the fund, reduces its ownership stake in the fund to three percent or less within a year of the fund s establishment, and abides by a number of other requirements, including an aggregate limit on total investment in all Private Funds of three percent of the banking entity s tier 1 capital. The Volcker Rule also permits banks to make investments in Private Funds for risk-mitigating hedging purposes and permits non-u.s. banks to invest in or sponsor Private Funds solely outside of the United States (the Foreign Bank Fund Exemption ). The Foreign Bank Fund Exemption is discussed in more detail below. The Impact of the Proprietary Trading Ban on Non-U.S. Banks The Foreign Bank Trading Exemption, as implemented by the Proposal, would allow non-u.s. banking entities to engage in proprietary trading outside of the United States provided that > the non-u.s. banking entity is not directly or indirectly controlled by a U.S. banking entity, 4 5 If a fund is organized outside of the United States, it generally qualifies for one of these exemptions if no more than 100 U.S. persons own the fund or if all the U.S. persons that own the fund are qualified purchasers. 12 U.S.C. 371c. Under Section 23A of the Federal Reserve Act, covered transaction is defined to include (1) loans or extensions of credit to an affiliate, (2) the purchase of an affiliate s securities, (3) asset purchases from an affiliate, (4) the acceptance of an affiliate s securities as collateral, and (5) the issuance of a guarantee, acceptance or letter of credit on behalf of an affiliate. 12 U.S.C. 371c(b)(7). Effective July 21, 2012, the term covered transaction will also include derivative transactions that create an exposure to an affiliate s creditworthiness. The Impact of Proposed Volcker Rule Regulations on the Non-U.S. Activities of Non-U.S. Banks 3
4 > the non-u.s. banking entity conducts the proprietary trading pursuant to Sections 4(c)(9) or 4(c)(13) of the Bank Holding Company Act (the BHC Act ), and > the trading occurs solely outside of the United States. The first of these prongs the requirement that the non-u.s. banking entity not be controlled by a U.S. banking entity is straightforward and broadly designed to prohibit U.S. banks from evading the Volcker Rule by pushing proprietary trading activities into offshore affiliates. 6 The Proposal implements the second prong by providing that a purchase or sale will be considered to have been conducted pursuant to Sections 4(c)(9) and 4(c)(13) of the BHC Act if the banking entity is a qualifying foreign banking organization (a QFBO ) and the transaction is conducted in compliance with Subpart B of the Fed s Regulation K. A foreign bank satisfies the QFBO test if more than half of its worldwide business is comprised of banking and more than half of its business is outside of the United States. The QFBO test is one with which most foreign banks are familiar and, as a practical matter, satisfy already. 7 The reference to compliance with Subpart B of Regulation K is more troubling, however, and is largely unexplained in the Proposal. Regulation K establishes a separate protocol for investment by QFBOs in companies that have a U.S. nexus, and it is not clear whether, to qualify for the Foreign Bank Trading Exemption, a foreign bank s proprietary trading must comply with both the Regulation K protocol and the solely outside of the United States test. If it does, the Foreign Bank Trading Exemption may not extend to all transactions in the securities of U.S. companies, even if such a transaction otherwise is completely outside of the United States. The solely outside of the United States prong will, in any event, likely be the most problematic for foreign banks. Under the Proposal, a transaction would be deemed to have occurred solely outside of the United States only if > the banking entity involved is organized under the laws of a foreign country, > no resident of the United States is a party to the transaction, 6 7 The Agencies have requested comment on whether they should use the authority granted them by Section 13(d)(1)(J) of the BHC Act to allow proprietary trading by U.S.-controlled banking entities outside of the United States pursuant to Section 4(c)(13) of the BHC Act. In addition, in recognition of the fact that the Volcker Rule extends to a foreign industrial company that controls a U.S. thrift or industrial loan company (even though such companies are not otherwise subject to the BHC Act), the Proposal would treat any such company as satisfying this prong it if meets two of the following tests: (1) its total assets held outside of the United States exceed its total assets within the United States, (2) its total revenue derived from its non-u.s. business exceeds its total revenue derived from its business within the United States, or (3) its total net income derived outside of the United States exceeds its total net income derived outside of the United States. The Impact of Proposed Volcker Rule Regulations on the Non-U.S. Activities of Non-U.S. Banks 4
5 > the personnel of the banking entity involved with the transaction (other than back office personnel) are not in the United States, and > the transaction is executed wholly outside of the United States. Restricting non-u.s. banking entities from transacting with U.S. residents (a term whose definition is close, but not identical, to the definition of U.S. person in Regulation S under the Securities Act of 1933) could effectively impose a Regulation S-like compliance regime on the secondary market proprietary trading of non-u.s. banking entities. As to the requirement that a transaction be executed wholly outside of the United States, the Agencies note that trades could not be conducted through U.S. execution facilities, but provide no further detail. It is not clear, for example, if the term execution facilities refers to stock exchanges and other trading platforms, payment systems, or securities clearing and settlement systems. Put together, these criteria would make the Foreign Bank Trading Exemption a great deal narrower than the interpretation foreign banks had sought. If adopted as proposed, the Proposal would significantly increase transaction costs and the compliance burden for the trading operations of non-u.s. banking entities, even those that book and conduct trades outside of the United States. The Impact of the Private Fund Prohibition on Non-U.S. Banks The Foreign Bank Funds Exemption allows a non-u.s. banking entity to sponsor or invest in a Private Fund if > the non-u.s. banking entity is not controlled, directly or indirectly, by a banking entity organized in the United States, > the transaction is conducted pursuant to Sections 4(c)(9) or 4(c)(13) of the BHC Act, > the investment or sponsorship is solely outside of the United States, and > no interests in the fund are offered or sold to residents of the United States. With respect to the first two prongs, the Proposal would apply the same test employed under the Foreign Bank Trading Exemption. As to the third prong, the investment in or sponsorship of a Private Fund would be deemed to have been solely outside of the United States if > the banking entity is not organized in the United States, > the banking entity s subsidiaries, affiliates and employees (other than back office employees) involved with the Private Fund are not located in the United States, and The Impact of Proposed Volcker Rule Regulations on the Non-U.S. Activities of Non-U.S. Banks 5
6 > ownership interests in the Private Fund are not offered or sold to U.S. residents. These criteria raise many of the same issues discussed above in the discussion of the Foreign Bank Trading Exemption, including the imperfect overlap of the U.S. resident definition with the Regulation S definition of U.S. person and the requirement that any decision-makers be physically located outside of the United States. The Foreign Bank Private Fund Exemption leaves unanswered other practical questions that arise in the particular context of Private Fund structures. For example, are foreign banks as would be a sensible interpretation of the statutory text of the Volcker Rule barred only from investing in foreign Private Funds that continue to sell investments to U.S. investors after the Volcker Rule s effective date? Or will they need to divest or restructure existing interests in Private Funds that were originally offered to U.S. residents, even if the investments are otherwise permissible? Can Private Funds utilize a side-by-side or master-feeder structure to allow foreign banks and U.S. investors to invest in a single adviser s trading strategy without running afoul of the Volcker Rule? The Proposal does not, on its face, appear to restrict non-u.s. banking entities from investing in or continuing to hold foreign Private Funds that themselves invest in U.S. portfolio companies or securities, although it is possible that the reference to compliance with Subpart B of Regulation K, discussed above, will essentially import some degree of restriction on a foreign bank making a controlling investment in a Private Fund that is itself invested in U.S. portfolio companies or assets. Systemic Risk and Competitive Parity In justifying the criteria employed by the Proposal to determine whether proprietary trading or a Private Fund investment would be considered to be solely outside of the United States, the Agencies assert that their goal is to preserve[e] competitive parity within U.S. markets. The Volcker Rule, however, has been justified as an effort to reduce the systemic risks associated with proprietary trading and Private Fund investments, not to protect U.S. banks from competition. Even though ensuring competitive parity among domestic and foreign banking entities does not seem to have been a factor animating Congress s passage of the Volcker Rule, the Agencies have used it to justify a narrow reading of the Foreign Bank Trading and Foreign Bank Funds Exemptions that would sweep in much activity that poses no systemic risk to the U.S. banking system. The Impact of Proposed Volcker Rule Regulations on the Non-U.S. Activities of Non-U.S. Banks 6
7 Reporting, Recordkeeping and Compliance Obligations for Non-U.S. Banks In addition to implementing the Volcker Rule s prohibitions, the Proposal would require the adoption of new compliance programs designed to detect and prevent violations. The Proposal s guidelines require banking entities to adopt written policies and procedures, internal controls, employee training, independent testing, recordkeeping and a management framework that assigns responsibility for Volcker Rule compliance. 8 The Proposal requires that a more elaborate and less flexible compliance system, as described in the Proposal s Appendix C, be implemented by banking entities that, together with their affiliates and subsidiaries (1) have trading assets and liabilities of at least $1 billion or which are at least 10 percent of the entity s total assets, or (2) have investments in Private Funds worth $1 billion or more, or sponsor or advise Private Funds with assets equal to or greater than $1 billion. These thresholds would be applied to a banking entity s assets on a worldwide consolidated basis, so that, for example, a non-u.s. banking entity with $1 billion in trading assets and liabilities around the globe would be subject to the heightened compliance obligations, even if only a small percentage of its trading book was booked in or through the United States. Similarly, the Proposal establishes complicated recordkeeping and reporting requirements for banking entities that engage in proprietary trading and that, with their affiliates and subsidiaries, have trading assets and liabilities of $1 billion or more on a worldwide consolidated basis. These obligations are described in Appendix A of the Proposal, and require regular reporting of measurements concerning risk management, sources of revenue, revenue relative to risk, customer facing activity, and payment of fees, commission and spreads. Appendix A also requires banking entities to make and retain records documenting the preparation and content of their reports for five years. Again, large non-u.s. banking entities may find themselves facing onerous reporting obligations whether or not their U.S. operations, standing alone, would trigger the relevant thresholds. Several other sections of the Proposal also impose new recordkeeping and compliance requirements. For instance, in order to rely on the risk-mitigating hedging exemption to the prohibition on proprietary trading, banking entities will be required to implement a compliance program that conforms to the requirements of Appendix D of the Proposal and document the risk-mitigating purpose, the risks of the positions being hedged, and other information for each such transaction. The effective date of the Volcker Rule is July 21, 2012, but Section 619 provides for a two-year period (through July 21, 2014) during which 8 Banking entities that engage in no proprietary trading and have no Private Fund investments or sponsorships would not be required to follow Section 20(b), though their existing compliance policies would need to have measures designed to prevent such trading and investments. The Impact of Proposed Volcker Rule Regulations on the Non-U.S. Activities of Non-U.S. Banks 7
8 banking entities may come into compliance, with further extensions possible at the discretion of the Agencies. The Proposal, however, would require that banking entities including non-u.s. banking entities comply with the recordkeeping and reporting requirements, and implement new compliance regimes, by the effective date. Next Steps If adopted as proposed, the Proposal would impose significant new restrictions and administrative burdens on the global banking industry. Non-U.S. banking entities, even those with a relatively small U.S. presence, would likely face burdens that are disproportionate to the systemic risk that they pose to the U.S. financial system. Further, non-u.s. banking entities may find some of their banking activities abroad significantly restricted as many of the limitations on the extraterritorial reach of the Volcker Rule put in place by Congress would arguably be narrowed by the proposed rulemaking. Both U.S. and non-u.s. banks, and their trade groups, have been very active in the Volcker Rule pre-rule-writing phase, and it is likely that the Agencies will receive hundreds of comments on the Proposal during the open comment period, which ends on January 13, Given the complexity of the issues and the volume of comments they are likely to receive, it is possible that the Agencies will be unable to release a final rule until shortly before the effective date of July 21, The Volcker Rule s restrictions will be effective on that date, with or without a final rule. The Impact of Proposed Volcker Rule Regulations on the Non-U.S. Activities of Non-U.S. Banks 8
9 Contacts Please contact the individuals at the right or any of your usual Linklaters contacts with questions or for more information. For further information please contact: Robin Maxwell (+1) Jacques Schillaci (+1) This publication is intended merely to highlight issues and not to be comprehensive, nor to provide legal advice. Should you have any questions on issues reported here or on other areas of law, please contact one of your regular contacts, or contact the editors. Linklaters LLP. All Rights reserved 2011 Linklaters in the U.S. provides leading global financial organizations and corporations with legal advice on a wide range of domestic and cross-border deals and cases. Our offices are located at 1345 Avenue of the Americas, New York, New York Linklaters LLP is a multinational limited liability partnership registered in England and Wales with registered number OC The term partner in relation to Linklaters LLP is used to refer to a member of Linklaters LLP or an employee or consultant of Linklaters LLP or any of its affiliated firms or entities with equivalent standing and qualifications. A list of the names of the members of Linklaters LLP and of the non-members who are designated as partners and their professional qualifications is open to inspection at its registered office, One Silk Street, London EC2Y 8HQ, England or on Please refer to for important information on our regulatory position. We currently hold your contact details, which we use to send you newsletters such as this and for other marketing and business communications. We use your contact details for our own internal purposes only. This information is available to our offices worldwide and to those of our associated firms. If any of your details are incorrect or have recently changed, or if you no longer wish to receive this newsletter or other marketing communications, please let us know by ing us at marketing.database@linklaters.com Avenue of the Americas New York, NY Telephone (+1) Facsimile (+1) Linklaters.com The Impact of Proposed Volcker Rule Regulations on the Non-U.S. Activities of Non-U.S. Banks 9 A /0.11/21 Oct 2011
July 16, Key Takeaways: Contents
July 16, 2012 CFTC Proposes Interpretative Guidance on the Extraterritorial Reach of Title VII of the Dodd-Frank Act and Exemptive Relief to Extend Compliance Deadlines for Many Title VII Requirements,
More informationProjected Compliance Timelines for the CFTC s Trading Documentation Rules and Uncleared Swap Margin Rules
September 20, 2011 Projected Compliance Timelines for the CFTC s Trading Documentation Rules and Uncleared Swap Margin Rules Contents On September 8, 2011, the Commodity Futures Trading Commission (the
More informationCFTC Staff Grants Relief from Clearing for Multilateral Compression Exercises and Partial Novation and Termination of Certain Swaps
March 22, 2012 CFTC Staff Grants Relief from Clearing for Multilateral Compression Exercises and Partial Novation and Termination of Certain Swaps Key Takeaways: > CFTC staff grants no-action relief permitting
More informationCFTC Staff Issues Time-Limited No-Action Relief from Some Swap Data Reporting Requirements for Certain Counterparties
April 12, 2013 CFTC Staff Issues Time-Limited No-Action Relief from Some Swap Data Reporting Requirements for Certain Counterparties Key Takeaways: > Non-SD/MSP financial entities now have until May 29,
More informationProposed Regulations Implementing the Volcker Rule
Legal Report Proposed Regulations Implementing the Volcker Rule The US bank and securities regulatory agencies have issued for public comment their much anticipated proposal to implement the Volcker Rule
More informationIRS Provides Initial Guidance under Foreign Accounts Legislation.
September 2010 IRS Provides Initial Guidance under Foreign Accounts Legislation. On August 27, 2010, the US Internal Revenue Service ( IRS ) released Notice 2010-60 (the Notice ), which contains guidance
More informationFATCA IRS Proposes Extending Certain Deadlines and Grandfathering Provisions.
November 2012 FATCA IRS Proposes Extending Certain Deadlines and Grandfathering Provisions. The US Internal Revenue Service released Announcement 2012-42 (the Announcement ) on October 24, 2012 containing
More informationProposed Revisions to the Volcker Rule s Implementing Rules Select Proposals and Open Questions
STROOCK & STROOCK & LAVAN LLP Proposed Revisions to the Volcker Rule s Implementing Rules Select Proposals and Open Questions July 2, 2018 On May 30, 2018, the Board of Governors of the Federal Reserve
More informationESMA publishes Part II Technical Advice on Retail Cascades and certain provisions of the Prospectus Regulation
March 2012 ESMA publishes Part II Technical Advice on Retail Cascades and certain provisions of the Prospectus Regulation Overview On 20 January 2011, the European Commission mandated the European Securities
More informationINSTITUTE OF INTERNATIONAL BANKERS IMPLEMENTATION OF THE DODD-FRANK ACT KEY ISSUES FOR INTERNATIONAL BANKS
November 28, 2011 INSTITUTE OF INTERNATIONAL BANKERS IMPLEMENTATION OF THE DODD-FRANK ACT KEY ISSUES FOR INTERNATIONAL BANKS The Volcker Rule Cross-border Issues Affecting Proprietary Trading I. Executive
More informationVolcker Rule: An Initial Look at Significant Changes
Latham & Watkins Financial Institutions Group Number 1626 December 23, 2013 Volcker Rule: An Initial Look at Significant Changes On December 10, 2013 the US federal banking agencies, 1 along with the Securities
More informationA User s Guide to The Volcker Rule February 2014
2014 Morrison & Foerster LLP All Rights Reserved mofo.com Last updated Feb. 18, 2014 A User s Guide to The Volcker Rule February 2014 Table of Contents Summary...3 SUBPART B Proprietary Trading...5 SUBPART
More informationIRS Provides Further Guidance for Foreign Accounts Reporting.
April 2011 IRS Provides Further Guidance for Foreign Accounts Reporting. On April 8, 2011, the U.S. Internal Revenue Service ( IRS ) released Notice 2011-34 (the Notice ), which contains a second round
More informationImpact of Volcker Rule on Foreign Banking Organizations
2014 Morrison & Foerster LLP All Rights Reserved mofo.com Impact of Volcker Rule on Foreign Banking Organizations Henry M. Fields hfields@mofo.com Barbara R. Mendelson bmendelson@mofo.com February 2014
More informationU.S. Securities Law Briefing. SEC Raises Exchange Act Registration, Termination and Suspension Thresholds to Conform with JOBS Act and FAST Act
May 2016 U.S. Securities Law Briefing. SEC Raises Exchange Act Registration, Termination and Suspension Thresholds to Conform with JOBS Act and FAST Act Yesterday, the U.S. Securities and Exchange Commission
More informationCommittee of European Securities Regulators consults on client classification under MiFID
July 2010 Stop Press Committee of European Securities Regulators consults on client classification under MiFID The Committee of European Securities Regulators ( CESR ) published on 12 July a consultation
More informationDC Governance: Chair s statement
DC Governance: Chair s statement February 2016 1 DC Governance: Chair s statement New governance standards apply to trustees of most occupational pension schemes which provide defined contribution benefits
More informationWhat should be of interest in Dodd-Frank to non-u.s. banks wanting to do business in the United States?
Dodd-Frank Update Full title of the law is The Dodd-Frank Wall Street Reform and Consumer Protection Act Public Law 111-203 was signed into law on July 21, 2010 Major changes made to financial regulation
More informationRelaxation of PRC regulatory restrictions on cross-border security and guarantees
May 2014 Relaxation of PRC regulatory restrictions on cross-border security and guarantees 1 Introduction After much anticipation 1, SAFE has finally published the Regulation on Foreign Exchange Administration
More informationU.S. Securities Law Briefing.
March 2010 U.S. Securities Law Briefing. SEC Adopts Circuit Breaker Plus Alternative Uptick Rule Limiting Short Sales. Following a strongly divided vote by its Commissioners, the U.S. Securities and Exchange
More informationVolcker: The Final Rule
DECEMBER 20, 2013 BANKING AND FINANCIAL SERVICES UPDATE Volcker: The Final Rule On December 10, 2013, the five agencies principally responsible for banking and financial market regulation in the United
More informationThe U.S. Margin Requirements: The Treasury Affiliate Exclusion and the Captive Finance Company Exclusion
April, 2017 The U.S. Margin Requirements: The Treasury Affiliate Exclusion and the Captive Finance Company Exclusion Key Takeaways: > The Prudential Regulators and the CFTC approved final rules establishing
More informationAdjustment and claw back of bonuses: new rules since 1 January 2014
January 2014 Adjustment and claw back of bonuses: new rules since 1 January 2014 Introduction With immediate effect as from 1 January 2014, long-awaited legislation on the adjustment and claw back of bonuses
More informationFederal Agencies Approve Final Volcker Rule
December 23, 2013 Federal Agencies Approve Final Volcker Rule Executive Summary On December 10, 2013, the Board of Governors of the Federal Reserve System (the Federal Reserve ), the Federal Deposit Insurance
More informationTowards a New Prospectus Regulation.
December 2016 Towards a New Prospectus Regulation. Key features for Debt Capital Markets. Political agreement has been reached on a new prospectus regime, which will take the form of a regulation and have
More informationWhat's in a Name? The Volcker Rule's Impact on ABS Issuers that are Covered Funds. Contents. November 17, 2011
November 17, 2011 What's in a Name? The Volcker Rule's Impact on ABS Issuers that are Covered Funds. Contents Speed Read 2 Why the Volcker Rule Matters to ABS Issuers 3 What's in a Name? 4 Sponsorship
More informationHow to compute the one-month period under Article 346,3rd indent Income Tax Code, as applicable before 7 June 2010, in pending tax litigations?
April 2011 How to compute the one-month period under Article 346,3rd indent Income Tax Code, as applicable before 7 June 2010, in pending tax litigations? Contents The Tax Administration has to respect
More informationICB Interim Report on UK Banking Reform. 12 April 2011
ICB Interim Report on UK Banking Reform. 12 April 2011 The UK Independent Commission on Banking (the ICB ), chaired by Sir John Vickers, yesterday published its interim report on reforms to the UK banking
More informationDodd-Frank Title VII: Reforms for the Swaps Marketplace
Dodd-Frank Title VII: Reforms for the Swaps Marketplace August 13, 2010 On July 21, 2010, President Obama signed into law the Dodd-Frank Act ( Act ), which institutes sweeping reforms across the financial
More informationMandatory Clearing in Singapore Noteworthy next step
July 2015 Mandatory Clearing in Singapore Noteworthy next step Introduction On 1 July 2015, the Monetary Authority of Singapore ( MAS ) issued a consultation paper entitled Draft Regulations for Mandatory
More informationTakeover Code: September changes to profit forecasts and merger benefit statements regime
September 2013 Takeover Code: September changes to profit forecasts and merger benefit statements regime On 30 September 2013 changes will be made to the Takeover Code s rules on profit forecasts and merger
More informationThe Volcker Rule: Impact of the Final Rule on Banking Institutions
2014 Morrison & Foerster LLP All Rights Reserved mofo.com The Volcker Rule: Impact of the Final Rule on Banking Institutions West Legal Webcast January 6, 2014 Presented by Jay G. Baris Oliver I. Ireland
More informationThe Dodd-Frank Act implementation of the Volcker Rule
AUGUST 12, 2010 The Dodd-Frank Act implementation of the Volcker Rule By: Lloyd H. Spencer and William E. Kelly The Dodd-Frank Wall Street Reform and Consumer Protection Act, signed into law by President
More informationADVISORY Dodd-Frank Act
ADVISORY Dodd-Frank Act May 7, 2012 CFTC AND SEC JOINTLY ADOPT FINAL SWAP ENTITY DEFINITION RULES On April 18, 2012, the Commodity Futures Trading Commission ( CFTC ) and the Securities and Exchange Commission
More informationNew legal framework for funds in Germany
July 2012 New legal framework for funds in Germany German law-maker uses AIFMD to propose comprehensive new draft law on funds Draft Capital Investment Act introduces uniform and comprehensive legal framework
More informationThe Volcker Rule: Impact of the Final Rule on Securitization Investors and Sponsors
Client Alert December 26, 2013 The Volcker Rule: Impact of the Final Rule on Securitization Investors and Sponsors On December 10, 2013, the Federal Reserve, FDIC, OCC, SEC and CFTC (the Agencies ) issued
More informationA Lexis Practice Advisor Practice Note by Eric S. Yoon, Partner at K&L Gates LLP
A Lexis Practice Advisor Practice Note by Eric S. Yoon, Partner at K&L Gates LLP Eric S. Yoon IntroductIon This practice note provides an overview of the, which was enacted in 2010 as Section 619 of the
More informationBond Connect - Frequently Asked Questions for the Buy Side Investors
1 September 2017 Bond Connect - Frequently Asked Questions for the Buy Side Investors What is Bond Connect? Bond Connect is a new mutual market access scheme that is established to allow Mainland China
More informationClient Update Volcker Rule: Temporary Relief for Foreign Excluded Funds
1 Client Update Volcker Rule: Temporary Relief for Foreign Excluded Funds On Friday, the Federal Reserve and other federal banking agencies (the Agencies ) issued interpretive relief from the Volcker Rule
More informationThe Volcker Rule. Charles M. Horn Christopher Laursen Matthew Richardson Dwight Smith. July 7, 2011 DC
DC-648839 The Volcker Rule Charles M. Horn Christopher Laursen Matthew Richardson Dwight Smith July 7, 2011 2010 Morrison & Foerster LLP All Rights Reserved mofo.com The Volcker Rule Basics and Some History
More information2017 DERIVATIVES END-USER RELIEF ACT DISCUSSION DRAFT
2017 DERIVATIVES END-USER RELIEF ACT DISCUSSION DRAFT Despite the efforts of many in Congress to provide end-users with relief from some of the costliest regulations promulgated under Title VII of the
More informationDematerialised securities under Luxembourg law.
July 2013 Dematerialised securities under Luxembourg law. The law on (the Law ) of 6 April 2013 has the aim of modernising the Luxembourg law by introducing the possibility to issue. The Law only applies
More informationThe Volcker Rule as Proposed: Questions For Comment Nos and SEC Questions Nos October 11, 2011
The Volcker Rule as Proposed: Questions For Comment Nos. 1-383 and SEC Questions Nos. 1-11 October 11, 2011 2011 Morrison & Foerster LLP All Rights Reserved mofo.com THE VOLCKER RULE AS PROPOSED: QUESTIONS
More informationTable of Contents. August 2010 Arnold & Porter LLP
Rulemakings under the Dodd-Frank Act The Dodd-Frank Wall Street Reform and Consumer Protection Act (Act) requires the federal financial regulators to promulgate more than 180 new rules. The Act also permits
More informationUK Tax Flash. Reform of the UK CFC Rules: The Next Chapter.
27 January 2010 UK Tax Flash. Reform of the UK CFC Rules: The Next Chapter. The long-awaited discussion document on the reform of the UK s controlled foreign company rules has at last been published by
More informationKey Dodd-Frank Regulatory Issues for International Banks: Over-the-Counter Derivatives and the Volcker Rule
Key Dodd-Frank Regulatory Issues for International Banks: Over-the-Counter Derivatives and the Volcker Rule Lisa M. Ledbetter December 7, 2016 1 Presenter Lisa M. Ledbetter Partner, Jones Day Financial
More informationHong Kong regulators publish proposed rules for mandatory clearing and expanded mandatory reporting
October 2015 Hong Kong regulators publish proposed rules for mandatory clearing and expanded mandatory reporting On 30 September, the HKMA and SFC published their proposed next steps in the regulation
More informationThe Volcker Rule Hedge Funds and Private Equity Funds
The Volcker Rule Hedge Funds and Private Equity Funds Presentation by Randall D. Guynn Davis Polk & Wardwell LLP Annual Risk Management and Regulatory Examination Compliance Issues Seminar October 20,
More informationSummary of the Volcker Rule Study Hedge Funds and Private Equity Funds
Summary of the Volcker Rule Study Hedge Funds and Private Equity Funds Summary as of January 19, 2011 The study by the Financial Stability Oversight Council ( FSOC ) 1 of the funds portion of the Volcker
More informationSummary of Final Volcker Rule Regulation Proprietary Trading
Memorandum Summary of Final Volcker Rule Regulation Proprietary Trading January 7, 2014 On Dec. 10, 2013, the Commodity Futures Trading Commission ( CFTC ), Federal Deposit Insurance Corporation ( FDIC
More informationEMIR Update - ESMA Publishes Finalised Technical Standards
October 2012 EMIR Update - ESMA Publishes Finalised Technical Standards Introduction The European Securities and Markets Authority ( ESMA ) published on 27 September its technical standards and final report
More informationShanghai International Energy Exchange: Direct Trading Access for Overseas Participants
September 2017 Shanghai International Energy Exchange: Direct Trading Access for Overseas Participants Introduction After nearly two years of preparation, the Shanghai International Energy Exchange Corporation
More informationThe 2009 China Inter-bank Market Financial Derivative Transactions Master Agreement
Hot topic. March 2009 The 2009 China Inter-bank Market Financial Derivative Transactions Master Agreement 1. Background On 16 March 2009, the National Association of Financial Market Institutional Investors
More informationReform of the Trustee Ordinance Consultation Conclusions.
November 2012 Reform of the Trustee Ordinance Consultation Conclusions. The Financial Services and the Treasury Bureau (the FSTB ) published the conclusions (the Conclusions ) to the Consultation on Detailed
More informationPractical guidance at Lexis Practice Advisor
Lexis Practice Advisor offers beginning-to-end practical guidance to support attorneys work in specific legal practice areas. Grounded in the real-world experience of expert practitioner-authors, our guidance
More informationCFTC and SEC Issue Final Swap-Related Rules Under Title VII of Dodd-Frank
CFTC and SEC Issue Final Swap-Related Rules Under Title VII of Dodd-Frank CFTC and SEC Issue Final Rules and Guidance to Further Define the Terms Swap Dealer, Security-Based Swap Dealer, Major Swap Participant,
More informationProposed Amendments to the Volcker Rule Regulations June 18, 2018
Proposed Amendments to the Volcker Rule Regulations June 18, 2018 2018 Davis Polk & Wardwell LLP 450 Lexington Avenue New York, NY 10017 This communication, which we believe may be of interest to our clients
More informationReform proposed by PRC SAFE
March 2014 Reform proposed by PRC SAFE Relaxation of PRC regulatory restrictions on cross-border security and guarantees 1 Introduction SAFE is considering making sweeping changes to the regulatory regime
More informationThe Volcker Rule: Proprietary Trading and Private Fund Restrictions
Legal Update June 30, 2010 The Volcker Rule: Proprietary Trading and Private Fund Restrictions On June 25, 2010, the House-Senate Conferees agreed to a final version of the Volcker Rule. Along with the
More informationImplementation of the PD Amending Directive in Luxembourg.
July 2012 Implementation of the PD Amending Directive in Luxembourg. The aim hereof is to provide you with a short overview of the main changes and new requirements that will be relevant for issuers making
More informationFinal text of European Market Infrastructure Regulation released.
March 2012 Final text of European Market Infrastructure Regulation released. Final text of European Market Infrastructure Regulation released On 29 March 2012, the European Parliament (the Parliament )
More informationDOJ s New Policy Incentivizes Voluntary Self- Disclosure of Criminal Export Controls and Sanctions Violations.
October 2016 DOJ s New Policy Incentivizes Voluntary Self- Disclosure of Criminal Export Controls and Sanctions Violations. The Department of Justice ( DOJ ) recently issued new guidance (the Guidance
More informationINSTITTUTE OF INTERNATIONAL BANKERS SEMINAR ON THE U.S. TAXATION OF INTERNATIONAL BANKS JUNE 14, 2011
INSTITTUTE OF INTERNATIONAL BANKERS SEMINAR ON THE U.S. TAXATION OF INTERNATIONAL BANKS JUNE 14, 2011 LEGISLATIVE AND REGULATORY DEVELOPMENTS: TAX IMPLICATIONS OF CERTAIN DODD-FRANK ACT PROVISIONS Richard
More informationConflicts of Interest in Securitizations
SEC Proposes Rule under Section 621 of the Dodd-Frank Act to Prohibit Securitization Participants from Engaging in Transactions Involving Material Conflicts of Interest with ABS Investors SUMMARY On September
More informationDodd-Frank Act Section PROHIBITION AGAINST FEDERAL GOVERNMENT BAILOUTS OF SWAPS ENTITIES. [As amended by Omnibus Spending Bill]
Dodd-Frank Act Section 716 -- PROHIBITION AGAINST FEDERAL GOVERNMENT BAILOUTS OF SWAPS ENTITIES. [As amended by Omnibus Spending Bill] (a) PROHIBITION ON FEDERAL ASSISTANCE. Notwithstanding any other provision
More informationOmnibus 3 - EU proposes centralized approval of certain prospectuses
September 2017 Omnibus 3 - EU proposes centralized approval of certain prospectuses On 20 September, 2017 the European Commission published a package of legislative proposals to further strengthen and
More informationCorporate Social Responsibility under the New Companies Act.
April 2014 Corporate Social Responsibility under the New Companies Act. 1 Introduction The recently enacted Companies Act, 2013 seeks to encourage large companies to invest in developmental activities
More informationClearing Exemption for Inter-Affiliate Swaps
CFTC Proposes Rule to Exempt Swaps between Certain Affiliated Entities from the Clearing Requirement under Dodd-Frank SUMMARY On August 16, 2012, the CFTC issued a proposed rule to exempt swaps between
More informationNegative interest determined not to be payable under an ISDA Credit Support Annex
August 2018 Negative interest determined not to be payable under an ISDA Credit Support Annex On 25 July 2018, the English High Court handed down its judgment in The State of the Netherlands v Deutsche
More informationU.S. Securities Law Briefing.
April 2010 U.S. Securities Law Briefing. Court Modifies Global Research Analyst Settlement. Judge William Pauley of the Southern District of New York recently agreed to modifications to the settlement
More informationRegulation of Private Funds and Their Advisers Under the Dodd-Frank Wall Street Reform and Consumer Protection Act
Regulation of Private Funds and Their Advisers Under the Dodd-Frank Wall Street Reform and Consumer Protection Act August 3, 2010 I. INTRODUCTION On July 21, 2010, President Obama signed into law the Dodd-Frank
More informationFCA calls for the unbundling of research from dealing commissions
July 2014 FCA calls for the unbundling of research from dealing commissions Introduction On 10 July 2014 the Financial Conduct Authority ("FCA") published a discussion paper (DP14/3) on the use of dealing
More informationThe Volcker Rule and Capital Markets Offerings
Client Alert December 27, 2013 The Volcker Rule and Capital Markets Offerings Summary Final regulations under the section of the Dodd-Frank Act known as the Volcker Rule 1 were enacted in December 2013
More informationU.S. Banking Law and the FBO What You Need to Know
U.S. Banking Law and the FBO What You Need to Know U.S. Regulatory/Compliance Orientation Program Institute of International Bankers Derek M. Bush December 5, 2016 2015 Cleary Gottlieb Steen & Hamilton
More informationThe Volcker Rule: A Legal Analysis
David H. Carpenter Legislative Attorney M. Maureen Murphy Legislative Attorney March 27, 2014 Congressional Research Service 7-5700 www.crs.gov R43440 Summary This report provides an introduction to the
More informationVolcker Rule: Past the Compliance Date, but Not Over the Hump
Volcker Rule: Past the Compliance Date, but Not Over the Hump November 6, 2015 Oliver Ireland Jay Baris 2015 Morrison & Foerster LLP All Rights Reserved mofo.com Volcker Rule Overview 2 Volcker Rule The
More informationSAIC Releases Guidelines on the Enforcement of the Anti-Monopoly Law with Respect to IP Rights.
May 2015 SAIC Releases Guidelines on the Enforcement of the Anti-Monopoly Law with Respect to IP Rights. Contents On 7 April 2015, the State Administration for Industry and Commerce ( SAIC ) released its
More informationDodd-Frank Act: Derivatives as Credit Extensions of Banks
FINANCIAL INSTITUTIONS ADVISORY & FINANCIAL REGULATORY CLIENT PUBLICATION August 16, 2010... Dodd-Frank Act: Derivatives as Credit Extensions of Banks... Overview The regulation of the over-the-counter
More informationFinancial Institutions (Resolution) Ordinance the derivatives angle
July 2016 Financial Institutions (Resolution) Ordinance the derivatives angle Introduction Following two rounds of public consultation on proposals to establish a resolution regime for financial institutions
More informationThe Volcker Rule: A Legal Analysis
Cornell University ILR School DigitalCommons@ILR Federal Publications Key Workplace Documents 3-27-2014 The Volcker Rule: A Legal Analysis David H. Carpenter Congressional Research Service M. Maureen Murphy
More informationFINAL VOLCKER RULE REGULATIONS: SECURITIZATIONS AND OTHER STRUCTURED TRANSACTIONS. Published January 13, 2014 Updated January 13, 2014
FINAL VOLCKER RULE REGULATIONS: SECURITIZATIONS AND OTHER STRUCTURED TRANSACTIONS Published January 13, 2014 Updated January 13, 2014 TABLE OF CONTENTS Final Volcker Rule Regulations: Securitizations and
More informationNew Data Regulation, Brexit and the Pensions Industry.
December 2016 New Data Regulation, Brexit and the Pensions Industry. Thanks to high profile news coverage of data breaches and increasingly sophisticated cyber-crime, the public s awareness of privacy
More information> NPR 2 represents significant improvement over NPR 1, but still leaves open many issues
October 2013 A Roadmap to the Second Notice of Proposed Rulemaking regarding U.S. Credit Risk Retention Requirements ( RRRs ) under Section 15G of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934 (added by Section
More informationChina Banking Regulatory Commission s Reply to Questions on Close-Out Netting.
August 2017 China Banking Regulatory Commission s Reply to Questions on Close-Out Netting. Contents Introduction With the global implementation of variation margin (VM) for non-centrally cleared derivatives,
More informationDERIVATIVES & STRUCTURED PRODUCTS
DERIVATIVES & STRUCTURED PRODUCTS A Corporate End User s Handbook for Dodd-Frank Derivatives Compliance 31 JANUARY 2018 IN THIS ISSUE: I. Introduction II. Eligible Contract Participant Requirement III.Mandatory
More informationIs your investment management company regulated by the US CFTC?
Invited Editorial Is your investment management company regulated by the US CFTC? Received (in revised form): 2nd May 2012 Julia Lu is a partner in Richards Kibbe & Orbe LLP s New York office. Using her
More informationProposed Rules for End-User Exception to Clearing of Swaps
CRAVATH, SWAINE & MOORE LLP Please feel free to contact us if we can provide further information on these matters. John W. White 212-474-1732 jwhite@cravath.com B. Robbins Kiessling 212-474-1500 bkiessling@cravath.com
More informationSEC Proposes Conflict-of-Interest Rule for Asset-Backed Securities
Legal Update October 3, 2011 SEC Proposes Conflict-of-Interest Rule for Asset-Backed Securities Executive Summary The SEC has issued proposed Rule 127B pursuant to Section 621 of the Dodd-Frank Act. Rule
More informationSFC Consults on Structured Products Marketing Regime
5 November 2009 SFC Consults on Structured Products Marketing Regime Introduction As part of the ongoing reforms anticipated in the Consultation Paper on Proposals to Enhance Protection for the Investing
More informationSummary of the Dodd-Frank Wall Street Reform and Consumer Protection Act
Summary of the Dodd-Frank Wall Street Reform and Consumer Protection Act October 12, 2010 The Dodd-Frank Wall Street Reform and Consumer Protection Act (the Act ) was signed into law on July 21, 2010.
More informationUS legal and regulatory developments Registration under the Investment Advisers Act of 1940 of certain hedge fund advisers
US legal and regulatory developments Registration under the Investment Advisers Act of 1940 of certain hedge fund advisers Ian Cuillerier Hunton & Williams, 200 Park Avenue, 53rd Floor, New York, NY 10166-0136,
More informationThe Market Abuse Regulation in Belgium
April 2016 The Market Abuse Regulation in Belgium Will you be ready? The new Market Abuse Regulation ( MAR ) will apply as from 3 July 2016. It will replace the existing Market Abuse Directive and the
More informationComments on Volcker Rule Proposed Regulations
Ms. Jennifer J. Johnson Secretary Board of Governors of the Federal Reserve System 20th Street and Constitution Avenue, NW Washington, DC 20551 Office of the Comptroller of the Currency 250 E Street, SW.
More informationOn July 21, 2010, President Obama signed into law the Dodd-Frank
S k a d d e n, A r p s, S l a t e, M e a g h e r & F l o m L L P & A f f i l i a t e s If you have any questions regarding the matters discussed in this memorandum, please contact the following attorneys
More informationChina Finalises Rules on Cross-Border Transfer
20 May 2017 China Finalises Rules on Cross-Border Transfer of Personal Information and Important Data Important Clarifications Included; Basic Structure Unaffected Contents Measures on the Security Assessment
More informationThe Effects of the Dodd-Frank Act on Foreign Banks: Where We Are in 2013
2012 Morrison & Foerster LLP All Rights Reserved mofo.com The Effects of the Dodd-Frank Act on Foreign Banks: Where We Are in 2013 Charles M. Horn Morrison & Foerster LLP July 16, 2013 NY#1044532 Dodd-Frank
More informationRegulatory Implementation Slides
Regulatory Implementation Slides Table of Contents 1. Nonbank Financial Companies: Path to Designation as Systemically Important 2. Systemic Oversight of Bank Holding Companies 3. Systemic Oversight of
More informationINSTITUTE OF INTERNATIONAL BANKERS
Sarah A. Miller Chief Executive Officer E-mail: smiller@iib.org 299 Park Avenue, 17th Floor New York, N.Y. 10171 Direct: (646) 213-1147 Facsimile: (212) 421-1119 Main: (212) 421-1611 www.iib.org By Electronic
More informationUnderstanding the Requirements and Impact of the Volcker Rule and the Final Regulations. February 11, 2014
Understanding the Requirements and Impact of the Volcker Rule and the Final Regulations Please note that any advice contained in this communication is not intended or written to be used, and should not
More informationNew Investor ID Regime for China Connect how big is the impact?
8 December 2017 New Investor ID Regime for China Connect how big is the impact? Contents Introduction Earlier in the year, there has been speculation that some form of investor ID system will be implemented
More information