PRO-CYCLICALITY IMPLICATIONS OF IFRS9 AND THE RWA FRAMEWORK
|
|
- Bernadette Terry
- 6 years ago
- Views:
Transcription
1 PRO-CYCLICALITY IMPLICATIONS OF IFRS9 AND THE RWA FRAMEWORK Brad Carr, Senior Director, Regulatory Affairs Jonathan Ng, Policy Advisor, Regulatory Affairs Hassan Haddou, Policy Advisor, Regulatory Affairs
2 Slide number Title slide Slide number Title slide 3 Executive summary 13 Bank 2A retail 4-5 This analysis 14 Bank 2B diversified 6 Section 1 IRB banks 15 Detailed impact analysis 7 Bank 1A retail 16 Section 3 observations and conclusions 8 Bank 1B whole Observations and conclusions 9 Bank 1C cyclical wholesale 19 Section 4 appendix 10 Bank 1D diversified Methodology and assumptions 11 Detailed impact analysis 23 Reg EL shortfall sensitivity analysis 12 Section 2 SA banks 24 Other studies 2
3 At the 2009 G20 Pittsburgh Summit 1 pro-cyclicality was identified as a regulatory priority. Some initiatives have attempted to address this (CCyB and stress testing) The introduction of IFRS 9 (based on expected loss (EL)), in conjunction with the current risk-weighted asset (RWA) framework in a downturn period, may have unintended implications, in particular greater capital volatility Based on our IRB and SA bank stress scenario, IFRS9 provisioning can erode CET1 between ~ bps, while RWA inflation can erode CET1 between ~ bps. When aggregating both impacts, this has a doubling effect in CET1 erosion The absence of capital relief for holding a higher level of provisions brings additional pressure to banks CET1 ratios in a stressed environment A key consequence will likely be a tightening in credit availability, which prolongs the downturn and this feedback loop would have procyclical effects In addition, a new statement in the Basel III standards suggests ratings for RWA may become even more procyclical than the current framework, which is beyond the modeling performed in this analysis 2 Policy makers are urged to consider the loss-absorption capacity of the additional provisions in the capital framework In this analysis, a key assumption made is the classification of Stage 2 loans (see slide for more detail). We note that individual banks will have different assumptions, in particular staging of loans, which will produce different impacts 1. Leaders statement of the Pittsburgh Summit September, 25th 29th 2009, page 8 2. Ratings systems should be designed in such a way that idiosyncratic or industry-specific changes are a driver of migrations from one category to another, and business cycle effects may also be a driver Basel III: Finalizing post-crisis reforms, December 2017, page 86 3
4 To illustratively demonstrate the pro-cyclicality implications of the new accounting requirements compounded with the current RWA framework during a downturn, we have modelled the CET1 capital ratio impacts for: IFRS 9 estimates in a benign (e.g. current) environment; and IFRS 9 and RWA inflation estimates in a stressed environment across different bank balance sheet scenarios, under IRB and SA approaches The IIF understands there are other areas in the regulatory framework that may have pro-cyclical implications (e.g. initial margin in derivatives), but have focused on the two major frameworks (i.e. IFRS 9 and RWA) to demonstrate the potential impacts on banks The model is based on several simplified assumptions (e.g. PD doubling stress scenario, staging of loans, calculation of lifetime PDs and constant Reg EL to accounting provisions shortfall) to estimate the Day 1 and stressed CET1 impacts Note that the model is not intended to precisely estimate CET1 impacts of IFRS 9 for banks, but to: provide an illustrative example of potential CET1 impacts on our hypothetical bank balance sheets; and highlight the implications of having higher capital volatility for banks 4
5 The model utilizes IRB credit risk data across a sample of banks Pillar 3 disclosures as a baseline to derive average PDs, LGDs, EAD and RWA density across the major Basel asset classes 1,2 The model assumes a severe downturn scenario for: EL provisioning to be approximately a 100% increase in PDs across all asset classes to estimate PIT PDs the RWA framework to be approximately a 75% increase in PDs across all asset classes to estimate a hybrid (PIT and TTC) approach 3 For more detail on our methodology and assumptions refer to the appendix (slides 20-22) The IIF intends to complete similar analysis on the CECL accounting requirements as a subsequent addendum in due course 1. The sample of banks used are six major banks from Europe, Canada and Australia 2. Major Basel asset classes are defined as residential mortgages, credit cards, other retail, corporates, sovereigns and financial institutions 3. Note that exposures are assumed to migrate commensurately to their scaled PD and therefore may be assigned higher risk weights 5
6 Section 1 IRB banks
7 Bank 1A is predominately retail focused with 65% of its exposures in mortgages and 20% in credit cards and other retail 14% Bank 1A (Retail focused) 14% Bank 1A (Retail focused) - Stressed environment 12% (80 bps) 12% (150 bps) (200 bps) 10% 10% 8% 8% 6% 12.0% 11.2% 6% 12.0% 4% 4% 8.5% 2% 2% 0% CET1 (pre IFRS9 impact) IFRS9 impact CET1 (post IFRS9 impact) 0% CET1 (pre stress impact) RWA inflation IFRS9 impact CET1 (post IFRS9 impact) Day 1 CET1 impact of IFRS 9 is 80 bps because of long tenor mortgages Incremental CET1 impact stressing the IFRS 9 provisioning is 120 bps (i.e. total of 200bps) In conjunction with RWA inflation during a stress, the CET1 impact is 270 bps 7
8 Bank 1B is predominately wholesale focused with 50% of its exposures in corporates, 20% in sovereigns and 15% financial institutions 14% Bank 1B (Wholesale focused) 14% Bank 1B (Wholesale focused) - Stressed environment 12% (30 bps) 12% (90 bps) (100 bps) 10% 10% 8% 8% 6% 12.0% 11.7% 6% 12.0% 10.1% 4% 4% 2% 2% 0% CET1 (pre IFRS9 impact) IFRS9 impact CET1 (post IFRS9 impact) 0% CET1 (pre RWA inflation IFRS9 impact CET1 (post stress impact) IFRS9 impact) Day 1 CET1 impact of IFRS 9 is 30 bps Incremental CET1 impact stressing the IFRS 9 provisioning is 70 bps (i.e. total of 100bps) In conjunction with RWA inflation during a stress the CET1 impact is 160 bps 8
9 Bank 1C has the same portfolio composition as Bank 1B, however all of its corporate exposures are with specialized lending activities (income producing commercial real estate) 1 14% Bank 1C (Cyclical wholesale focused) 14% Bank 1C (Cyclical wholesale focused) - Stressed environment 12% (30 bps) 12% (150 bps) 10% 10% (110 bps) 8% 8% 6% 12.0% 11.7% 6% 12.0% 4% 4% 9.4% 2% 2% 0% CET1 (pre IFRS9 impact) IFRS9 impact CET1 (post IFRS9 impact) Day 1 CET1 impact of IFRS 9 is 30 bps Incremental CET1 impact stressing the IFRS 9 provisioning is 80 bps (i.e. total of 110bps) In conjunction with RWA inflation during a stress the CET1 impact is 230 bps 1. The SL-IPRE calculations are on the assumption that RWA is IRB-modeled and not under the Slotting Criteria 0% CET1 (pre RWA inflation IFRS9 impact CET1 (post stress impact) IFRS9 impact) 9
10 Bank 1D has a diversified portfolio with 48% of exposures in retail and 52% of exposures in non-retail Bank 1D (Diversified) Bank 1D (Diversified) - Stressed environment 14% 14% 12% (50 bps) 12% (90 bps) (150 bps) 10% 10% 8% 8% 6% 12.0% 11.5% 6% 12.0% 4% 4% 9.6% 2% 2% 0% CET1 (pre IFRS9 impact) IFRS9 impact CET1 (post IFRS9 impact) Day 1 CET1 impact of IFRS 9 is 50 bps Incremental CET1 impact stressing the IFRS 9 provisioning is 100 bps (i.e. total of 150bps) In conjunction with RWA inflation during a stress the CET1 impact is 190 bps 0% CET1 (pre RWA inflation IFRS9 impact CET1 (post stress impact) IFRS9 impact) 10
11 Detailed dollar breakdown of: (1) Day 1 CET1 impact of IFRS 9, (2) IFRS 9 provisioning in stress and (3) RWA inflation in stress Banks CET1 (after Reg EL adjustment) 1,2 ($m) IFRS 9 impact 3 ($m) CET1 (post IFRS 9 impact ($m) 4 RWA ($m) Bank 1A Base case 42,622 (2,867) 39, ,180 Bank 1A stressed environment 42,622 (8,221) 34, ,007 Change - (5,354) (5,354) 50,827 Bank 1B Base case 50,748 (1,154) 49, ,899 Bank 1B stressed environment 50,748 (4,521) 46, ,955 Change - (3,367) (3,367) 36,056 Bank 1C Base case 52,093 (1,401) 50, ,109 Bank 1C stressed environment 52,093 (5,280) 46, ,181 Change - (3,879) (3,879) 64,072 Bank 1D Base case stress 47,129 (2,100) 45, ,740 Bank 1D stressed environment 47,129 (6,449) 40, ,991 Change - (4,349) (4,349) 30, All banks are assumed to have a $2,000m regulatory EL shortfall to accounting provisions ( shortfall ). We note the shortfall varies with each individual bank and in some recent examples (i.e. Canadian banks) has absorbed most of the IFRS 9 CET1 impacts. In the appendix (slide 23) we have provided sensitivity analysis as to how the shortfall changes the day 1 IFRS 9 CET1 impact of our hypothetical banks. We further note that the shortfall will also change for individual banks in a stressed period, but have kept this constant for comparability across the benign and stressed scenarios. 2. All banks CET1($) starting point are back solved to achieve a 12% CET1 target ratio 3. IFRS 9 impact is the $ impact on CET1. The IFRS 9 impact is the increase in provisioning from the incurred loss approach and in excess of the regulatory EL to accounting provisions 4. All banks are assumed to already exceed their deferred tax asset (DTA) threshold (10% of CET1). As such, the additional DTA created by the higher provisions will be fully deducted from CET1 (i.e. neutralize any benefits from additional DTA on CET1 ratios). 11
12 Section 2 SA banks
13 Bank 2A is predominately retail focused with 70% of its exposures in mortgages 2, 20% in other retail, 5% in SME corporates and 5% in sovereigns 14% Bank 2A (Retail focused) 14% Bank 2A (Retail focused) - Stressed environment 12% (80 bps) 12% (60 bps) (160 bps) 10% 10% 8% 8% 6% 4% 12.0% 11.2% 6% 4% 12.0% 9.8% 2% 2% 0% CET1 (pre IFRS9 impact) IFRS9 impact CET1 (post IFRS9 impact) Day 1 CET1 impact of IFRS 9 is 80 bps Incremental CET1 impact stressing the IFRS 9 provisioning is 80 bps (i.e. total 160bps) In conjunction with RWA inflation during a stress the CET1 impact is 140 bps 1. Only two bank balance sheet scenarios are presented given that the balance sheets commonly observed in SA banks are akin to 2A and 2B examples 2. Approximately 70% of the mortgage exposures have a LTV ratios less than 80%; under stressed conditions, it is assumed that this proportion drops to 50% 0% CET1 (pre RWA inflation IFRS9 impact CET1 (post stress impact) IFRS9 impact) 13
14 Bank 2B has a diversified portfolio with 30% of its exposures in mortgages 2, 20% in other retail, 20% of exposures in SME corporates, and 20% in rated corporates and 10% of sovereigns. 14% Bank 2B (Diversified) 14% Bank 2B (Diversified) - Stressed environment 12% (70 bps) 12% (40 bps) (150 bps) 10% 10% 8% 8% 6% 4% 12.0% 11.3% 6% 4% 12.0% 10.1% 2% 2% 0% CET1 (pre IFRS9 impact) IFRS9 impact CET1 (post IFRS9 impact) Day 1 CET1 impact of IFRS 9 is 70 bps Incremental CET1 impact stressing the IFRS 9 provisioning is 80 bps (i.e. total 150bps) In conjunction with RWA inflation during a stress the CET1 impact is 120 bps 1. Only two bank balance sheet scenarios are presented, given that the balance sheets commonly observed in SA banks are akin to 2A and 2B examples. For comparison to our other scenarios, the 2B example relatively aligns to 1D 2. Approximately 70% of the mortgage exposures have a LTV ratios less than 80%; under stressed conditions, it is assumed that this proportion drops to 50% 0% CET1 (pre RWA inflation IFRS9 impact stress impact) CET1 (post IFRS9 impact) 14
15 Detailed dollar breakdown of: (1) Day 1 CET1 impact of IFRS 9, (2) IFRS 9 provisioning in stress and (3) RWA inflation in stress Banks CET1 1 ($m) IFRS 9 impact ($m) CET1 (post IFRS 9 impact ($m) RWA ($m) Bank 2A Base case 73,934 (5,042) 68, ,119 Bank 2A stressed environment 73,934 (10,585) 63, ,901 Change - (5,543) (5,543) 31,782 Bank 2B Base case 92,425 (5,693) 86, ,211 Bank 2B stressed environment 92,425 (11,776) 80, ,368 Change - (6,083) (6,083) 25, IFRS 9 impact is the $ impact on CET1. The IFRS 9 impact is the increase in provisioning from the incurred loss approach and in excess of the regulatory EL to accounting provisions 15
16 Section 3 Observations and conclusions
17 IRB Banks In summary, the estimated results show that: Day 1 CET1 impacts: ranges between 30-80bps Incremental CET1 impact of stressing the provisioning: ranges between bps Combined with RWA inflation, the CET1 erosion can range between bps under severe conditions SA Banks In summary, the estimated results show that: Day 1 CET1 impacts: ranges between 70-80bps Incremental CET1 impact of stressing the provisioning: ~80 bps Combined with the RWA inflation, the CET1 erosion can range between bps under severe conditions CET1 impacts for IRB and SA banks are more severe for retail focused banks in comparison to wholesale focused banks due to the longer maturities of retail products If rating systems in RWA become fully subject to business cycles (per the final Basel III standards 1 ), then we would have to revise our PD assumption up from 75% to 100%, further compounding these impacts 1. Ratings systems should be designed in such a way that idiosyncratic or industry-specific changes are a driver of migrations from one category to another, and business cycle effects may also be a driver Basel III: Finalizing post-crisis reforms, December 2017, page 86 17
18 In the event of a downturn, regulators may relax capital buffers (for e.g. CCyB) and/or regulatory minima, however this may give limited confidence to the market and its CET1 expectations for banks Impacts of this magnitude on CET1 ratios (even if still complying with regulatory minima) include potential downgrades, increasing banks funding cost and tightening credit availability in order to reduce RWA For example, if Bank 1A s CET1 minimum is 12.0% and during the downturn its CET1 ratio falls to 8.5%, regulators may relax the minimum to 8%. However, the market and its investors would be more concerned that its CET1 ratios eroded by ~350 bps, despite being compliant with regulatory requirements What considerations need to be made by policy makers? Review the treatment of the new provisioning requirements under the capital framework o o neutralization and/or addback to CET1 for the additional provisioning amounts in times of stress; and review the appropriateness of the current DTA threshold limit Further review the stability of the RWA framework continuation of TTC versus PIT nature of the RWA framework, which builds on the work the EBA and the IIF RWA Task Force has conducted 18
19 Section 4 - Appendix
20 DATA The model uses IRB credit risk data from a sample of banks Pillar 3 disclosures to derive a PD band matrix across the major Basel asset classes 1,2 Within each PD band of each Basel asset class, an average PD, LGD, EAD and RWA density is derived using the bank sample data PD bands are categorized using the standardized EBA PD bands Estimated maturity profile is derived from available bank sample disclosures Effective interest rates used for discounting EL in each asset class are based on approximated market rates KEY ASSUMPTIONS IRB All banks are assumed to have a constant regulatory EL shortfall to accounting provisions All banks starting point is assumed to already exceed their deferred tax asset (DTA) threshold (10% of CET1) All banks are assumed to have the same and constant level of other risk RWA (i.e. operational and market risk) All banks are assumed to have a target CET1 capital ratio of 12% Maturity profile is consistent across the bank balance sheet scenarios 1. The sample of banks used are six major banks from Europe, Canada and Australia 2. Major Basel asset classes are defined as residential mortgages, credit cards, other retail, corporates, sovereigns and financial institutions 20
21 The maximum residual maturity is 5 years for all exposures with the exception of mortgages, which assumes the majority of exposures are between 5 years and 10 years The PD band matrix is constant across the case studies All exposures with PDs less than 2.5% is assumed to be Stage 1, all exposures with PDs greater than 2.5% and less than 100% is assumed to be Stage 2 and exposures with PDs equal to 100% is assumed to be Stage 3 Lifetime PDs are assumed to have a marginal linear increase of 20% from 1yr PDs Cyclical wholesale bank balance sheet scenarios assumes corporate PDs are that of corporate IPREs PDs The model uses regulatory LGDs for calculating EL Discount factors (based on the asset class effective interest rate) are used to calculate EL for stage 1, stage 2 exposures (lifetime exposures) The model assumes a severe downturn scenario for: EL provisioning to be approximately a 100% increase in PDs across all asset classes to estimate PIT PDs. Thus a scaling factor of 2 is applied to the base case PDs RWA framework to be approximately a 75% increase in PDs across all asset classes to estimate a hybrid PD (PIT and TTC). Thus a scaling factor of 1.75 is applied to the base case PDs 1 1. Note that exposures are assumed to migrate down the credit curve in line with their assigned average PD 21
22 KEY ASSUMPTIONS SA For each asset class, SA and IRB have similar profiles in terms of credit quality and maturity The model applies for each exposure the appropriate SA risk-weight (current Basel rules) For a given exposure, IFRS 9 calculations are assumed to be identical for SA and IRB banks Regulatory EL shortfall does not apply to SA banks All banks starting point is assumed to already exceed their deferred tax asset (DTA) threshold (10% of CET1) The model assumes a severe downturn scenario consistent with the one used for IRB banks The model assumes that under stressed conditions, the proportion of mortgages with a LTV less than 80% drops from 70% to 50% of the overall portfolio 22
23 Each of the hypothetical banks shown in our analysis have a constant regulatory EL shortfall ( shortfall ). However, in reality the shortfall varies with each individual bank and in some recent examples (i.e. Canadian banks reporting in November 2017) this has partially absorbed the day 1 CET1 impacts for IFRS 9 provisions The below table provides sensitivity analysis as to how different shortfall levels change the day 1 IFRS 9 CET1 impact for our hypothetical bank balance sheets Banks CET1 (pre Reg EL adjustment) ($) Reg EL shortfall ($) IFRS 9 impact ($) CET1 (post Reg EL adjustment and IFRS 9 impact ($) RWA ($) CET1 (%) CET1 change from base case (bps) Bank 1A Base case 44,622 (2,000) (2,867) 39, , % - Bank 1A no Reg EL shortfall 42,622 0 (4,867) 37, , % (60) Bank 1A higher Reg EL shortfall 46,622 (4,000) (867) 41, , % 60 Bank 1B Base case 52,748 (2,000) (1,154) 49, , % - Bank 1B no Reg EL shortfall 50,748 0 (3,154) 47, , % (40) Bank 1B higher Reg EL shortfall 54,748 (4,000) (846) 49, , % 10 Bank 1C Base case 54,093 (2,000) (1,401) 50, , % - Bank 1C no Reg EL shortfall 52,093 0 (3,401) 48, , % (50) Bank 1C higher Reg EL shortfall 56,093 (4,000) (599) 51, , % 20 Bank 1D Base case 49,129 (2,000) (2,100) 45, , % - Bank 1D no Reg EL shortfall 47,129 0 (4,100) 43, , % (50) Bank 1D higher Reg EL shortfall 51,129 (4,000) (100) 47, , % (0) 23
24 While there are still a couple of years until CECL will be effective for GAAP compliant banks around the world, IFRS 9 was effective from 1 January 2018 There have been studies completed by Deloitte, EY and the rating agencies projecting the day 1 CET1 impacts of IFRS 9 to be relatively low (ranging between bps) 1 which agrees with our estimates. This can be partially due to the regulatory EL shortfall to accounting provisions cushioning 2 However, the pro-cyclicality nature of IFRS 9 is an area of concern for the market as highlighted in the European Systemic Risk Board paper 3 and Barclays study 4 The Barclays study estimates a bps CET1 erosion due to additional provisioning in a typical downturn Note that Barclays assumes a typical downturn would experience 5x increase in PDs to normalized levels, which is more severe compared to our model assumptions 1. Sixth Global IFRS Banking Survey, Deloitte, May 2016 Moody s Survey: Capital impact of IFRS 9 adoption will be modest for most banks, Moody s, March 2017 EY IFRS 9 Impairment Banking Survey, EY, August IFRS 9 impact cushioned by regulatory buffer, Fitch Ratings, March Financial stability implications of IFRS 9, European Systemic Risk Board, July IFRS 9 Bigger than Basel IV, Barclays, January
Basel III Pillar 3. Capital Adequacy and Risks Disclosures as at 31 December 2017
Basel III Pillar 3 Capital Adequacy and Risks Disclosures as at 31 December 2017 Commonwealth Bank of Australia ACN 123 123 124 7 February 2018 Images Mastercard is a registered trademark and the circles
More informationBCBS Discussion Paper: Regulatory treatment of accounting provisions
12 January 2017 EBF_024875 BCBS Discussion Paper: Regulatory treatment of accounting provisions Key points: The regulatory framework must ensure that the same potential losses are not covered both by capital
More informationBasel III Pillar 3. Capital Adequacy and Risks Disclosures as at 31 December 2016
Basel III Pillar 3 Capital Adequacy and Risks Disclosures as at 31 December 2016 COMMONWEALTH BANK OF AUSTRALIA ACN 123 123 124 15 FEBRUARY 2017 This page has been intentionally left blank Table of Contents
More informationThe new bank provisioning standards: Implementation challenges and financial stability implications
The new bank provisioning standards: Implementation challenges and financial stability implications Panel 3: Implementation issues Model complexity and supervisory capacity Adam Farkas Executive Director
More informationPILLAR3 AS AT31MARCH 2016
BASEL I PILLAR3 CAPITALADEQUACY AND RISKS DISCLOSURES AS AT31MARCH 2016 COMMONWEALTH BANK OFAUSTRALIA ACN 123123124 9MAY2016 This page has been intentionally left blank Table of Contents 1 Introduction
More informationBank Economic Capital An Australian Perspective. Bob Allen APRA Bank of Japan - Economic Capital Management Workshop 11 th July, 2007
Bank Economic An Australian Perspective Bob Allen APRA Bank of Japan - Economic Management Workshop 11 th July, 2007 1 Outline Overview of Australian bank practice -Risk coverage - Relationship between
More informationBasel IV: finalizing post-crisis reforms
December 2017 Basel IV: finalizing post-crisis reforms Summary December 2017 Basel IV: finalizing post-crisis reforms Client briefing On December 7, 2017, the Basel Committee on Banking Supervision (BCBS)
More information2016 RISK AND PILLAR III REPORT SECOND UPDATE AS OF JUNE 30, 2017
2016 RISK AND PILLAR III REPORT SECOND UPDATE AS OF JUNE 30, 2017 NATIXIS - 2016 Risk & Pillar III Report second update as of June 30, 2017 2 TABLE OF CONTENTS Update by chapter of the Risk and Pillar
More informationActuaries Bringing Value to Banks by Implementing IFRS 9. International Actuarial Association Banking Working Group Webinar, 19 September 2017
Actuaries Bringing Value to Banks by Implementing IFRS 9 International Actuarial Association Banking Working Group Webinar, 19 September 2017 Speakers Ania Botha Ania Botha has been working in banking
More informationWells Fargo & Company. Basel III Pillar 3 Regulatory Capital Disclosures
Wells Fargo & Company Basel III Pillar 3 Regulatory Capital Disclosures For the quarter ended September 30, 2017 1 Table of Contents Disclosure Map... 3 Introduction... 6 Executive Summary... 6 Company
More informationWells Fargo & Company. Basel III Pillar 3 Regulatory Capital Disclosures
Wells Fargo & Company Basel III Pillar 3 Regulatory Capital Disclosures For the quarter ended June 30, 2017 1 Table of Contents Disclosure Map... 3 Introduction... 6 Executive Summary... 6 Company Overview...
More informationWells Fargo & Company. Basel III Pillar 3 Regulatory Capital Disclosures
Wells Fargo & Company Basel III Pillar 3 Regulatory Capital Disclosures For the quarter ended December 31, 2017 1 Table of Contents Disclosure Map... 3 Introduction... 5 Executive Summary... 5 Company
More informationImplementing IFRS 9 Impairment Key Challenges and Observable Trends in Europe
Implementing IFRS 9 Impairment Key Challenges and Observable Trends in Europe Armando Capone 30 November 2016 Experian and the marks used herein are service marks or registered trademarks of Experian Limited.
More informationBasel II Pillar 3 Capital Adequacy and Risk Disclosures. Determined to be better than we ve ever been. as at 31 December 2009
Determined to be better than we ve ever been. Basel II Pillar 3 Capital Adequacy and Risk Disclosures as at 3 December 2009 Commonwealth Bank of Australia Table of Contents Introduction... 2 Scope of
More informationBasel II and Financial Stability: Singapore s Experience
Basel II and Financial Stability: Singapore s Experience Bank Indonesia Seminar on Financial Stability 22 September 2006 Chia Der Jiun Executive Director, Prudential Policy Monetary Authority of Singapore
More informationSUPPLEMENTARY REGULATORY CAPITAL DISCLOSURE FIRST QUARTER 2018
SUPPLEMENTARY REGULATORY CAPITAL DISCLOSURE FIRST QUARTER (unaudited) For more information: Ghislain Parent, Chief Financial Officer and Executive Vice-President Finance and Treasury, Tel: 514 394-6807
More informationWells Fargo & Company. Basel III Pillar 3 Regulatory Capital Disclosures
Wells Fargo & Company Basel III Pillar 3 Regulatory Capital Disclosures For the quarter ended June 30, 2018 1 Table of Contents Disclosure Map.. 3 Introduction... 6 Executive Summary... 6 Company Overview
More informationWells Fargo & Company. Basel III Pillar 3 Regulatory Capital Disclosures
Wells Fargo & Company Basel III Pillar 3 Regulatory Capital Disclosures For the quarter ended September 30, 2018 1 Table of Contents Disclosure Map.. 3 Introduction... 6 Executive Summary... 6 Company
More informationSUPPLEMENTARY REGULATORY CAPITAL DISCLOSURE FOURTH QUARTER 2015
SUPPLEMENTARY REGULATORY CAPITAL DISCLOSURE FOURTH QUARTER (unaudited) For more information: Ghislain Parent, Chief Financial Officer and Executive Vice-President Finance and Treasury, Tel: 514 394-6807
More informationSUPPLEMENTARY REGULATORY CAPITAL DISCLOSURE. First Quarter 2015
SUPPLEMENTARY REGULATORY CAPITAL DISCLOSURE First Quarter 2015 (unaudited) For more information: Ghislain Parent, Chief Financial Officer and Executive Vice-President Finance and Treasury, Tel: 514 394-6807
More informationBASEL II PILLAR 3 DISCLOSURE
2012 BASEL II PILLAR 3 DISCLOSURE HALF YEAR ENDED 31 MARCH 2012 APS 330: CAPITAL ADEQUACY & RISK MANAGEMENT IN ANZ Important notice This document has been prepared by Australia and New Zealand Banking
More informationRegulatory treatment of accounting provisions
BBA response to the Basel Committee s proposal for the Regulatory treatment of accounting provisions January 2017 Introduction The British Banker s Association (BBA) is pleased to respond to the Basel
More informationIncorporating the requirements of APS 330 Half Year Update as at 31 March 2018
Incorporating the requirements of APS 330 Half Year Update as at 31 March "My patients weren't liking the shoes out there. That's when I decided to design my own range." Caroline McCulloch FRANKiE4 Footwear
More informationIFRS 9 Pro-cyclicality of provisions. Spanish banks as an illustration
IFRS 9 Pro-cyclicality of provisions. Spanish banks as an illustration Cristina T. Plata García / María Rocamora / Ana Rubio / Javier Villar Burke 1 Madrid, October 2017 Executive summary The financial
More informationThe Goldman Sachs Group, Inc. PILLAR 3 DISCLOSURES
The Goldman Sachs Group, Inc. PILLAR 3 DISCLOSURES For the period ended December 31, 2016 TABLE OF CONTENTS Page No. Index of Tables 1 Introduction 2 Regulatory Capital 5 Capital Structure 6 Risk-Weighted
More informationRegulatory Disclosures 30 June 2017
Regulatory Disclosures 30 June 2017 CONTENTS PAGE 1. Key ratio 1 2. Overview of 2 3. Credit risk for non-securitization exposures 3 4. Counterparty credit risk 15 5. Securitization exposures 20 6. Market
More informationPillar 3 Disclosure Report For the First Half 2013
Pillar 3 Disclosure Report For the First Half 2013 United Overseas Bank Limited Incorporated in the Republic of Singapore Company Registration Number: 193500026Z SUMMARY OF RISK WEIGHTED ASSETS ( RWA )
More informationBasel II Pillar 3 - Capital Adequacy and Risk Disclosures Quarterly update as at 30 September 2009
Commonwealth of Australia Basel II Pillar 3 - Capital Adequacy and Risk Disclosures Quarterly update as at 30 September 2009 1. Scope of Application The Commonwealth of Australia (the Group) is an Authorised
More informationCommonwealth Bank of Australia Recent Developments
November 24, 2014 Commonwealth Bank of Australia Recent Developments The information set forth below is not complete and should be read in conjunction with the information contained on the Supplementary
More informationRegulatory Disclosures 30 June 2017
Regulatory Disclosures 30 June 2017 CONTENTS PAGE Key ratio - Capital ratio 1 - Leverage ratio 1 Overview of RWA 2 Credit risk for non-securitization exposures 3 Counterparty credit risk 12 Securitization
More informationTable of Contents. For further information contact: Investor Relations Warwick Bryan Phone: Facsimile: com.
Basel II Pillar 3 Capital Adequacy and Risk Disclosures as at 31 December 2008 Table of Contents 1. Introduction... 3 2. Scope of application... 4 3. Capital and Risk Summary... 5 3.1 Capital... 6 3.2
More information2015 HSBC Bank Canada Regulatory Capital and Risk Management Pillar 3 Supplemental Disclosures as at September 30, 2015
215 HSBC Bank Canada Regulatory Capital and Risk Management Pillar 3 Supplemental Disclosures as at September 3, 215 Index & Notes to Users Index Page Index Page Regulatory Capital Risk-Weighted Assets
More informationBasel III Pillar 3 disclosures 2014
Basel III Pillar 3 disclosures 2014 In various tables, use of indicates not meaningful or not applicable. Basel III Pillar 3 disclosures 2014 Introduction 2 General 2 Regulatory development 2 Location
More informationINTRODUCTION. This document is not audited and should be read in conjunction with our Q Quarterly Report to Shareholders and 2017 Annual Report.
INTRODUCTION This document is not audited and should be read in conjunction with our Q3 2018 Quarterly Report to Shareholders and 2017 Annual Report. Effective November 1, 2012, Canadian banks are subject
More informationWells Fargo & Company. Basel III Pillar 3 Regulatory Capital Disclosures
Wells Fargo & Company Basel III Pillar 3 Regulatory Disclosures For the quarter ended March 31, 2018 1 Table of Contents Disclosure Map Introduction Executive Summary Company Overview Basel III Overview
More informationThe Goldman Sachs Group, Inc. PILLAR 3 DISCLOSURES
The Goldman Sachs Group, Inc. PILLAR 3 DISCLOSURES For the period ended September 30, 2017 TABLE OF CONTENTS Page No. Index of Tables 1 Introduction 2 Regulatory Capital 5 Capital Structure 6 Risk-Weighted
More informationResults of the 2011 EBA EU-wide stress test: Summary (1-3)
Results of the 2011 EBA EU-wide stress test: Summary (1-3) Name of the bank: NATIONAL BANK OF GREECE SA Actual results at 31 December 2010 million EUR, % Operating profit before impairments 2,072 Impairment
More informationCapital management. Management s Discussion and Analysis Royal Bank of Canada: Annual Report
We caution that the foregoing discussion of risk factors, many of which are beyond our control, is not exhaustive and other factors could also adversely affect our results. Forward-looking statements in
More informationCommonwealth Bank of Australia. Recent Developments
May 15, 2017 Commonwealth Bank of Australia Recent Developments The information set forth below is not complete and should be read in conjunction with the information contained on the US Investors Supplemental
More information2014 Pillar 3 Report. Incorporating the requirements of APS 330 Half Year Update as at 31 March 2014
Pillar 3 Report Incorporating the requirements of APS 330 Half Year Update as at 31 March This page has been left blank intentionally Contents Contents 1. Introduction 4 1.1 The NAB Group s Capital Adequacy
More informationBasel III Pillar 3. Capital Adequacy and Risks Disclosures as at 30 September 2017
Basel III Pillar 3 Capital Adequacy and Risks Disclosures as at 30 September 2017 Commonwealth Bank of Australia ACN 123 123 124 8 November 2017 This page has been intentionally left blank Table of Contents
More informationCREDIT LOSS ESTIMATES USED IN IFRS 9 VARY WIDELY, SAYS BENCHMARKING STUDY CREDITRISK
CREDITRISK CREDIT LOSS ESTIMATES USED IN IFRS 9 VARY WIDELY, SAYS BENCHMARKING STUDY U.S BANKS PREPARING for CECL implementation can learn from banks that have already implemented IFRS 9. Similarly, IFRS
More informationBasel Committee on Banking Supervision. High-level summary of Basel III reforms
Basel Committee on Banking Supervision High-level summary of Basel III reforms December 2017 This publication is available on the BIS website (www.bis.org). Bank for International Settlements 2017. All
More informationResults of the 2011 EBA EU-wide stress test: Summary (1-3)
Results of the 2011 EBA EU-wide stress test: Summary (1-3) Name of the bank: Jyske Bank Actual results at 31 December 2010 million EUR, % Operating profit before impairments 373 Impairment losses on financial
More information1. Key Regulatory Metrics
Contents 1. Key Regulatory Metrics... 1 2. Overview... 2 2.1 Introduction... 2 2.2 Overview of Basel III... 2 2.3 Basis of Preparation... 2 3. Capital Resources... 5 3.1 Total Regulatory Capital and Reconciliation
More informationResults of the 2011 EBA EU-wide stress test: Summary (1-3)
Results of the 211 EBA EU-wide stress test: Summary (1-3) Name of the bank: Bank of Valletta P.L.C. Actual results at 31 December 21 million EUR, % Operating profit before impairments 17 Impairment losses
More informationThe Goldman Sachs Group, Inc. PILLAR 3 DISCLOSURES
The Goldman Sachs Group, Inc. PILLAR 3 DISCLOSURES For the period ended December 31, 2015 TABLE OF CONTENTS Page No. Index of Tables 1 Introduction 2 Regulatory Capital 5 Capital Structure 6 Risk-Weighted
More informationResults of the 2011 EBA EU-wide stress test: Summary (1-3)
Results of the 2011 EBA EU-wide stress test: Summary (1-3) Name of the bank: Deutsche Bank AG Actual results at 31 December 2010 million EUR, % Operating profit before impairments 6.620 Impairment losses
More informationResults of the 2011 EBA EU-wide stress test: Summary (1-3)
Results of the 2011 EBA EU-wide stress test: Summary (1-3) Name of the bank: HSH Nordbank Actual results at 31 December 2010 million EUR, % Operating profit before impairments 261 Impairment losses on
More informationRefining the PRA s Pillar 2 capital framework
A response by the British Bankers Association to the PRA s consultation paper CP3/17 on Refining the PRA s Pillar 2 capital framework May 2017 The BBA is the leading association for UK banking and financial
More informationResults of the 2011 EBA EU-wide stress test: Summary (1-3)
Results of the 2011 EBA EU-wide stress test: Summary (1-3) Name of the bank: Irish Life & Permanent plc Actual results at 31 December 2010 million EUR, % Operating profit before impairments 76 Impairment
More informationExpected Loss Models: Methodological Approach to IFRS9 Impairment & Validation Framework
Expected Loss Models: Methodological Approach to IFRS9 Impairment & Validation Framework Jad Abou Akl 30 November 2016 2016 Experian Limited. All rights reserved. Experian and the marks used herein are
More informationAssessing the modelling impacts of addressing Pillar 1 Ciclycality
pwc.com/it Assessing the modelling impacts of addressing Pillar 1 Ciclycality London, 18 February 2011 Agenda Overview of the new CRD reforms to reduce pro-cyclicality Procyclicality and impact on modelling
More informationResults of the 2011 EBA EU-wide stress test: Summary (1-3)
Results of the 2011 EBA EU-wide stress test: Summary (1-3) Name of the bank: Bank of Cyprus Public Company LTD Actual results at 31 December 2010 million EUR, % Operating profit before impairments 733
More informationTSB Banking Group plc. Significant Subsidiary Disclosures 31 December TSB Banking Group plc
Significant Subsidiary Disclosures 31 December 2017 Contents INDEX OF TABLES... 3 1. INTRODUCTION... 4 2. EXECUTIVE SUMMARY... 4 3. OWN FUNDS... 6 3.1 CAPITAL RISK... 6 3.2 TSB GROUP S OWN FUNDS... 7 3.3
More informationAssets and liabilities measured at fair value Table 78 As at October 31, 2016
Most of the other securitization exposures (non-abcp) carry external ratings and we use the lower of our own rating or the lowest external rating for determining the proper capital allocation for these
More informationDisclosure in terms of Regulation 43 relating to banks, issued under section 90 of the Banks Act, No. 94 of 1990, as amended.
Mercantile Bank Holdings Limited and its subsidiaries ( the Group ) unaudited bi-annual disclosure as at (incorporating quarterly disclosure) Disclosure in terms of Regulation 43 relating to banks, issued
More information2013 Risk & Capital Report
Risk & Capital Report Incorporating the requirements of APS 330 Half Year Update as at 31 March This page has been left blank intentionally Contents Contents 1. Introduction 4 1.1 The Group s Capital Adequacy
More informationResults of the 2011 EBA EU-wide stress test: Summary (1-3)
Results of the 2011 EBA EU-wide stress test: Summary (1-3) Name of the bank: DekaBank Deutsche Girozentrale Actual results at 31 December 2010 million EUR, % Operating profit before impairments 858 Impairment
More informationResults of the 2011 EBA EU-wide stress test: Summary (1-3)
Results of the 2011 EBA EU-wide stress test: Summary (1-3) Name of the bank: Svenska Handelsbanken AB (publ) Actual results at 31 December 2010 million EUR, % Operating profit before impairments 1,816
More informationSantander UK plc Additional Capital and Risk Management Disclosures
Santander UK plc Additional Capital and Risk Management Disclosures 1 Introduction Santander UK plc s Additional Capital and Risk Management Disclosures for the year ended should be read in conjunction
More informationChina Construction Bank Corporation, Johannesburg Branch
China Construction Bank Corporation, Johannesburg Branch Pillar 3 Disclosure (Half Year ended 30 June 2018) Builds a better future CONTENTS 1. OVERVIEW... 3 2. COMPOSITION OF CAPITAL... 4 3. LIQUIDITY...12
More informationHSBC Holdings plc. Report on Transition to IFRS 9 Financial Instruments 1 January 2018
HSBC Holdings plc Report on Transition to IFRS 9 Financial Instruments 1 January 2018 HSBC Holdings plc Report on Transition to IFRS 9 Financial Instruments As at 1 January 2018 Issued 27 February 2018
More informationResults of the 2011 EBA EU-wide stress test: Summary (1-3)
Results of the 2011 EBA EU-wide stress test: Summary (1-3) Name of the bank: CAJA DE AHORROS Y M.P. DE GIPUZKOA Y SAN SEBASTIAN Actual results at 31 December 2010 million EUR, % Operating profit before
More informationBCBS Developments in Credit Risk Regulation
BCBS Developments in Credit Risk Regulation Hanne Meihuizen Quantitative Risk Management Expert Supervision Policy Department De Nederlandsche Bank (DNB) June 2015 The views expressed in the following
More informationDisclosure Report as at 30 June. in accordance with the Capital Requirements Regulation (CRR)
Disclosure Report as at 30 June 2018 in accordance with the Capital Requirements Regulation (CRR) Contents 3 Introduction 4 Equity capital, capital requirement and RWA 4 Capital structure 8 Connection
More informationBasel II Pillar 3. Capital Adequacy and Risk Disclosures QUARTERLY UPDATE As at 31 March 2011
Determined to be better than we ve ever been. Basel II Pillar 3 Capital Adequacy and Risk Disclosures QUARTERLY UPDATE As at 31 March 2011 Commonwealth bank of Australia ACN 123 123 124 Commonwealth Bank
More informationAfrican Bank Holdings Limited and African Bank Limited
African Bank Holdings Limited and African Bank Limited Public Pillar III Disclosures in terms of the Banks Act, Regulation 43 CONTENTS 1. Executive summary... 3 2. Basis of compilation... 7 3. Supplementary
More informationResults of the 2011 EBA EU-wide stress test: Summary (1-3)
Results of the 2011 EBA EU-wide stress test: Summary (1-3) Name of the bank: COLONYA - CAIXA D'ESTALVIS DE POLLENSA Actual results at 31 December 2010 million EUR, % Operating profit before impairments
More informationBanco Comercial Português, SA Capital Update - EU Wide Stress Test Results.
Banco Comercial Português, SA Capital Update - EU Wide Stress Test Results. Banco Comercial Português was subject to the 2011 EU-wide stress test conducted by the European Banking Authority (EBA), in cooperation
More informationPILLAR 3 DISCLOSURES
. The Goldman Sachs Group, Inc. December 2012 PILLAR 3 DISCLOSURES For the period ended December 31, 2014 TABLE OF CONTENTS Page No. Index of Tables 2 Introduction 3 Regulatory Capital 7 Capital Structure
More informationRHB Bank Berhad. Basel II Pillar 3 Quantitative Disclosures 30 th June 2011 Consolidated basis
RHB Bank Berhad Basel II Pillar 3 Quantitative Disclosures 30 th June 2011 Consolidated basis RHB Bank Group Basel II Pillar 3 Quantitative Disclosures 30 th June 2011 Pillar 3 Disclosure Contents Page
More informationResults of the 2011 EBA EU-wide stress test: Summary (1-3)
Results of the 2011 EBA EU-wide stress test: Summary (1-3) Name of the bank: CAJA DE AHORROS Y PENSIONES DE BARCELONA Actual results at 31 December million EUR, % Operating profit before impairments 3,364
More informationPillar 3 report. Table of Contents. Introduction 1. Scope of Application 2. Capital 3. Credit Risk Exposures 4. Credit Provision and Losses 6
Pillar 3 report Table of Contents Section 1 Introduction 1 Section 2 Scope of Application 2 Section 3 Capital 3 Section 4 Credit Risk Exposures 4 Section 5 Credit Provision and Losses 6 Section 6 Securitisation
More informationPillar 3 and regulatory disclosures Credit Suisse Group AG 2Q17
Pillar 3 and regulatory disclosures Credit Suisse Group AG 2Q17 For purposes of this report, unless the context otherwise requires, the terms Credit Suisse, the Group, we, us and our mean Credit Suisse
More information2012 Risk & Capital Report Incorporating the requirements of APS 330
Risk & Capital Report Incorporating the requirements of APS 330 Third Quarter Update as at 30 June This page has been left blank intentionally 1. Introduction The Group, as defined in Section 2. Scope
More informationUBS Bank (Canada) Basel Pillar III Disclosures Calendar Year 2014
154 University Avenue Toronto, ON M5H 3Z4 Telephone: 1-800-268-9709 www.ubs.com Basel CCID Corporate Identifier: 89266472 Table of Contents 1. Background... 3 2. Disclosures... 4 Table 1. Scope of application...
More informationPillar 3 Disclosures (OCBC Group As at 30 June 2018)
Oversea-Chinese Banking Corporation Limited Pillar 3 Disclosures (OCBC Group As at 30 June 2018) Incorporated in Singapore Company Registration Number: 193200032W Table of Contents 1. Introduction... 3
More informationIn various tables, use of - indicates not meaningful or not applicable.
Basel II Pillar 3 disclosures 2008 For purposes of this report, unless the context otherwise requires, the terms Credit Suisse Group, Credit Suisse, the Group, we, us and our mean Credit Suisse Group AG
More informationJanuary 19, Basel III Capital Standards Requests for Clarification
January 19, 2018 Mr. William Coen Secretary General Basel Committee on Banking Supervision Bank for international Settlements CH-4002 Basel Switzerland Re: Basel III Capital Standards Requests for Clarification
More informationBasel III Pillar 3 Disclosures Report. For the Quarterly Period Ended September 30, 2016
Basel III Pillar 3 Disclosures Report For the Quarterly Period Ended September 30, 2016 BASEL III PILLAR 3 DISCLOSURES REPORT For the quarterly period ended September 30, 2016 Table of Contents Page 1
More informationFinancial Instruments: Impairment Adapting to change
Financial Instruments: Impairment Adapting to change The building blocks A new measurement philosophy The change from the incurred to the expected loss methodology for measuring impairment represents a
More informationResults of the 2011 EU-wide stress testing exercise. Bank of Cyprus successfully passed the stress test exercise
Announcement Results of the 2011 EU-wide stress testing exercise Bank of Cyprus successfully passed the stress test exercise The results reaffirm the solid financial fundamentals of the Bank which by maintaining
More informationBasel II Pillar 3 Disclosures Year ended 31 December 2009
DBS Group Holdings Ltd and its subsidiaries (the Group) have adopted Basel II as set out in the revised Monetary Authority of Singapore Notice to Banks No. 637 (Notice on Risk Based Capital Adequacy Requirements
More informationBasel III Pillar 3. Capital adequacy and risk disclosures Quarterly Update as at 31 March 2013
Basel III Pillar 3 Capital adequacy and risk disclosures Quarterly Update as at 31 March 2013 COMMONWEALTH BANK OF AUSTRALIA ACN 123 123 124 15 May 2013 Basel III Pillar 3 Capital Adequacy and Risk Disclosures
More informationBasel II Pillar 3. Capital Adequacy and Risk Disclosures as at 31 December Determined to be better than we ve ever been.
Determined to be better than we ve ever been. Basel II Pillar 3 Capital Adequacy and Risk Disclosures as at 31 December 2010 Commonwealth bank of Australia ACN 123 123 124 Table of Contents 1 Introduction
More informationThe Goldman Sachs Group, Inc. PILLAR 3 DISCLOSURES
The Goldman Sachs Group, Inc. PILLAR 3 DISCLOSURES For the period ended September 30, 2016 TABLE OF CONTENTS Page No. Index of Tables 1 Introduction 2 Regulatory Capital 5 Capital Structure 6 Risk-Weighted
More informationResults of the 2011 EBA EU-wide stress test: Summary (1-3)
Results of the 2011 EBA EU-wide stress test: Summary (1-3) Name of the bank: Unione di Banche Italiane Scpa Actual results at 31 December 2010 million EUR, % Operating profit before impairments 1.027 Impairment
More informationHow is IFRS9 expected to impact capital adequacy ratios of Maltese banks? Deloitte Malta Risk Advisory - Banking
How is IFRS9 expected to impact capital adequacy ratios of Maltese banks? Deloitte Malta Risk Advisory - Banking How is IFRS9 expected to impact capital adequacy ratios of Maltese banks? Deloitte Malta
More informationThe Goldman Sachs Group, Inc. PILLAR 3 DISCLOSURES
The Goldman Sachs Group, Inc. PILLAR 3 DISCLOSURES For the period ended June 30, 2015 TABLE OF CONTENTS Page No. Index of Tables 1 Introduction 2 Regulatory Capital 5 Capital Structure 6 Risk-Weighted
More informationPillar 3 Disclosures. Quantitative Disclosures As at 31 December 2015
Pillar 3 Disclosures Quantitative Disclosures As at 31 December 2015 DBS Group Holdings Ltd Incorporated in the Republic of Singapore Company Registration Number: 199901152M Content Page Introduction...
More informationPILLAR 3 DISCLOSURES
The Goldman Sachs Group, Inc. December 2012 PILLAR 3 DISCLOSURES For the period ended June 30, 2014 TABLE OF CONTENTS Page No. Index of Tables 2 Introduction 3 Regulatory Capital 7 Capital Structure 8
More informationBasel 2: FSA view on long-run PDs, Variable scalars & Stress testing. Dickon Brough Risk Model Review Financial Services Authority.
Basel 2: FSA view on long-run PDs, Variable scalars & Stress testing Dickon Brough Risk Model Review Financial Services Authority 29 August 2007 IRB Mortgage Modelling IRB Waiver Approval Process Waiver
More informationBANK OF SHANGHAI (HONG KONG) LIMITED
For the First six months ended 3 June 217 CONTENTS Pages Introduction 1 Capital Adequacy 1 Composition of Capital 3 Leverage Ratio 13 Overview of Risk-weighted Amount 16 Credit Risk 17 Counterparty Credit
More information2018 HSBC Bank Canada Regulatory Capital and Risk Management Pillar 3 Supplemental Disclosures as at March 31, 2018
218 HSBC Bank Canada Regulatory Capital and Risk Management Pillar 3 Supplemental Disclosures as at March 31, 218 Index & Notes to Users Index Page Index Page Regulatory Capital Risk-Weighted Assets Exposure
More informationAfrican Bank Holdings Limited and African Bank Limited. Annual Public Pillar III Disclosures
African Bank Holdings Limited and African Bank Limited Annual Public Pillar III Disclosures in terms of the Banks Act, Regulation 43 as at 30 September 2016 1 African Bank Holdings Limited and African
More informationBASEL II & III IMPLEMENTATION FRAMEWORK. Gift Chirozva Chief Bank Examiner Bank Licensing, Supervision & Surveillance Reserve Bank of Zimbabwe
BASEL II & III IMPLEMENTATION 1 FRAMEWORK Gift Chirozva Chief Bank Examiner Bank Licensing, Supervision & Surveillance Reserve Bank of Zimbabwe email: gchirozva@rbz.co.zw 9/16/2016 giftezh@gmail.com Outline
More informationSamba Financial Group Basel III - Pillar 3 Disclosure Report. June 2018 PUBLIC
Basel III - Pillar 3 Disclosure Report June 2018 Basel III - Pillar 3 Disclosure Report as at June 30, 2018 Page 1 of 19 Table of Contents Capital Structure Page Statement of financial position - Step
More informationDeutsche Bank. IFRS 9 Transition Report
IFRS 9 Transition Report April 2018 Table of Contents Introduction... 3 IFRS 9 Implementation Program... 3 Impact Analysis... 4 Key Metrics... 4 Classification and Measurement... 4 Impairment... 5 Classification
More informationThe Goldman Sachs Group, Inc. PILLAR 3 DISCLOSURES
The Goldman Sachs Group, Inc. PILLAR 3 DISCLOSURES For the period ended March 31, 2018 TABLE OF CONTENTS Page No. Index of Tables 1 Introduction 2 Regulatory Capital 5 Capital Structure 6 Risk-Weighted
More information