Financial Ombudsman Service s consultation transparency and the Financial Ombudsman Service publishing ombudsman decisions: next steps
|
|
- Rhoda Sparks
- 6 years ago
- Views:
Transcription
1 Financial Ombudsman Service s consultation transparency and the Financial Ombudsman Service publishing ombudsman decisions: next steps The UK Insurance Industry 1. The UK insurance industry is the third largest in the world and the largest in Europe. It is a vital part of the UK economy, managing investments amounting to 26% of the UK s total net worth and contributing 10.4 billion in taxes to the Government. Employing over 290,000 people in the UK alone, the insurance industry is also one of this country s major exporters, with 28% of its net premium income coming from overseas business. 2. Insurance helps individuals and businesses protect themselves against the everyday risks they face, enabling people to own homes, travel overseas, provide for a financially secure future and run businesses. Insurance underpins a healthy and prosperous society, enabling businesses and individuals to thrive, safe in the knowledge that problems can be handled and risks carefully managed. Every day, our members pay out 147 million in benefits to pensioners and long-term savers as well as 60 million in general insurance claims. The ABI 3. The ABI is the voice of insurance, representing the general insurance, protection, investment and long-term savings industry. It was formed in 1985 to represent the whole of the industry and today has over 300 members, accounting for some 90% of premiums in the UK. 4. The ABI s role is to: Be the voice of the UK insurance industry, leading debate and speaking up for insurers. Represent the UK insurance industry to government, regulators and policy makers in the UK, EU and internationally, driving effective public policy and regulation. Advocate high standards of customer service within the industry and provide useful information to the public about insurance. Promote the benefits of insurance to the government, regulators, policy makers and the public. 5. The ABI welcomes the opportunity to respond to the Financial Ombudsman Service s consultation transparency and the Financial Ombudsman Service publishing ombudsman decisions: next steps Overall comments 6. We welcome early engagement by the FOS on the issue of publication of ombudsman decisions. We support greater transparency regarding FOS decisionmaking but we are unclear what problem publishing all decisions is intended to solve. Transparency is a means to an end (increased accountability and improved outcomes for consumers) not an end in itself.
2 7. There is a danger that the stock of ombudsmen determinations will unintentionally be interpreted by firms and consumers as a second rulebook. It may also deter firms from appealing an adjudicator s decision to an ombudsman, even if they regard the adjudicator s decision to be a poor one. 8. The ABI share the view of the FOS that most decisions are individual and unique with no broader implications or learning points. The FOS acknowledges in the paper that looking through large numbers of ombudsman decisions is not the way that most consumers and financial businesses will prefer to learn about our approach. Therefore putting them all in the public domain will not serve a useful purpose. 9. However, a small minority of cases can raise broader issues. We would prefer the FOS to work with industry and consumer groups to select appropriate cases, building on the current model of publication of anonymised case studies, ombudsman news and technical notes. For example, the FOS recently published a provisional decision on Arch Cru, making clear this represented the Ombudsman s general approach to that kind of case. This model is an effective way of: Explaining and illustrating the FOS approach to cases. Supporting industry to further improve standards. Enhancing consumer confidence in the financial system. 10. We wish to emphasise the following additional key points: Transparency and openness of decision making does not require the naming of any party to a dispute. The published decision should determine the material facts that may or may not apply to one or more financial institution. If firms are to be named in the decision this should be balanced by safeguards for a firm to challenge publication which it considers would be inappropriate. There is a risk that the publication of decisions including firm names will be used by Claims Management Companies (CMCs) to drive unfounded customer complaints. CMCs will mine data for the purpose of, for example, generating standardised complaints without bearing in mind the specifics of the case or submitting phantom claims. This could cause consumer detriment. There should be a clear process in place for determining whether a decision is suitable for publication, including quality and consistency monitoring. 11. The attached annex sets out our comments in response to the consultation questions.
3 Questions for consultation Annex 1. Do you agree with our overall approach? Are there other considerations we should bear in mind, in approaching the publication of our ombudsmen s final decisions? We support the agreed principle of proportionate transparency and openness where it improves standards and enhances confidence in the financial system. We also welcome moves to improve the accountability of the Financial Ombudsman Service (FOS). We agree that the availability of clear information on FOS decision making and key FOS decisions, is beneficial for consumers and industry. However, as we have made clear in our recent consultation response on regulatory reform to the Government and FSA, we do not agree with the proposal to publish all final decisions. We believe the FOS stated objectives would be better served by expanding the current practice of publishing anonymised case studies, lead decisions on key issues and technical notes. We are concerned that the publication of the substantial majority of decisions, when taken in conjunction with FSA rules/guidance requiring firms to take account of ombudsman decisions, will be interpreted by consumers and firms as a second rule book. This will result in a system more extensive and burdensome that the legal system which only publishes notable cases. Since Lord Hunt s review in 2008, significant progress has been made in making information about FOS available to consumers and firms. It is unclear what the benefits of publication of all decisions will be for consumers or whether publication is something that consumers expect or want. Consumer research, conducted for the Legal Ombudsman when investigating whether to publish decisions, found that the levels of interest in publication of Legal Ombudsman case results were relatively low. The report also noted that there was little sign of consumers visiting other regulators websites for case report information. We are not persuaded that the approach outlined will easily enable consumers and firms to compare and contrast decisions. The myriad of decisions will be confusing and may create false expectations of what may or may not be successful grounds for complaint. The sheer volume of decisions will also make it difficult for consumers and firms to extract relevant information. The consultation paper acknowledges that looking through large numbers of ombudsman decisions is not the way that most consumers and financial businesses will prefer to learn about our approach. Accordingly, the methodology should centre on what will meet the needs of the user (i.e. consumers and firms). We welcome the FOS intention to conduct consumer research. Before the FOSD or the Government reaches any decision on what should be published, it is important to determine what information stakeholders would like to see and would benefit most from. We would also welcome further engagement with the FOS following this consultation.
4 We are concerned that the approach proposed may result in the publication of some poor quality and inconsistent decisions. Insurers have concerns about the quality and consistency of decision-making, particularly by adjudicators, but sometimes also ombudsmen. Some variation in quality of decisions is inevitable, particularly given the growing numbers of ombudsman, but we have reservations about putting such decisions in the public domain. Once a decision is made public it will be very difficult to retract. Publication of inconsistent or poor quality decisions could undermine confidence in the industry and the role of the FOS. When developing these proposals further it is vital that the FOS considers its approach to quality and consistency. Any approach should be transparent. The consultation paper states that it is unlikely that publication will enable CMCs to identify new target areas or focus unfairly on certain businesses. We believe there is a risk that CMCs will mine data for the purpose of, for example, generating standardised complaints without bearing in mind the specifics of the case or submitting phantom claims. They may also selectively quote from decisions thereby creating a misleading picture of a complaint to firms, the FOS and the consumer. Currently 45% of complaints handled by the Ombudsman Service involve CMCs. The Insurance Fraud Bureau reports that 85% of fraud operations involve CMCs. Insurers frequently see examples of CMCs acting without authority, submitting phantom claims and auto-forwarding complaints to the Ombudsman Service, regardless of the reason for the rejection by the provider. For example, one firm estimates that in approximately 20% of Payment Protection Insurance complaints they receive from CMCs, the complainant has never held a policy with the firm. We would welcome, as part of any impact assessment, further exploration of the consideration of the effect of the proposals on CMC behaviour and the associated impact on consumers and firms. 2. Do you agree that we should not publish the views of adjudicators instead limiting the publication of decisions to those made by our ombudsmen? We agree that adjudicator s views should not be published. These views may not be the end of the process for the consumer or the firm. Publication could create a misleading view of the outcome. Also quality is inevitably more variable given the numbers of adjudicators and volumes of cases. We also agree that it would be unworkable and costly given the number of cases considered. 3. Do you agree that our published reports on cases should not normally be specially commissioned summaries, but the actual determination made by the ombudsman (subject to the appropriate safeguards)? We agree that, should the proposal to publish all ombudsman decisions be taken forward, the full decision and not a specially commissioned summary should be published. Specially commissioned summaries may be open to the criticism that they are not an accurate reflection of the case. They may also be viewed as the FOS editorialising decisions, (a perception the FOS intends the proposals to eliminate). The full decision reduces the risk of misinterpretation. In addition, the costs associated with summarising all decisions would also be prohibitive and would not constitute value for money.
5 However, insurers report a trend towards short form decisions with standardised paragraphs that often do not provide sufficient information to understand a ruling in a more complex case. It will be important that where decisions are published they contain an appropriate level of detail and follow a standard format. The FOS should also consider how they intend to contextualise the body of decisions. For example, providing explanation that each case is different and is treated on its own merits, that they are not intended to set precedent etc. 4. Overall do you think our proposed approach strikes the right balances between transparency, protecting genuinely confidential information and the costs of implementation? We do not agree that the proposed approach strikes the right balance. For the reasons already outlined above, publishing final decisions will not provide the proposed benefits to consumers or firms. Transparency and openness of decision making does not require the naming of any party to a dispute. We disagree that in many cases the identity of the financial business is central to the complaint. The published decision should determine the material facts that may or may not apply to one or more financial institution. The only purpose served by publishing firm identities is to name and shame. The consultation paper states that where they have upheld the customer complaint the reputational damage may be deserved. The FOS already publishes six-monthly complaint data which consumers can use as an independent way to assess organisations complaint handling. We believe that it is still possible to have a meaningful decision with the details of all parties redacted. This is already evidenced from the information the FOS already publishes. For example Ombudsman News case studies. We suggest that the FOS look into the proportion of cases that would be rendered incomprehensible if this information is removed. In cases where redaction would cause the meaning to be lost, the FOS could consider preparing a case study reflecting the circumstances of the findings. We agree that cost implications are an important consideration. Any costs must be proportionate to the benefits delivered. The costs in the consultation paper cover only the FOS administrative costs. However, we are aware that further work is being conducted on costs. A full cost benefit analysis should be produced and consulted upon with key stakeholders. Contrary to the view put forward in the consultation paper, we believe there is a risk that these proposals will increase costs for all businesses as the decision information is used by: Complains Management Companies (CMCs) to drive customer complaints vexatious complainants by proving them with materials to manufacture grounds for complaints other interested parties.
6 For example it may generate more complaints about Private Medical Insurance (PMI), driven by medical specialists with their own interest trying to establish a published precedent for a particular treatment to be covered under a PMI scheme We would welcome further information on how the costs will be financed. We believe any costs should be funded through efficiencies at the FOS rather than an increase in the levy or case fee. 5. Do you think the steps we propose are sufficient to protect consumer identities and personal information or are there other specific steps we should take? We agree that the steps are sufficient. However, the identity of the financial business should be protected also (See answer to question 4 & 6). 6. Do you agree that we should not seek to protect the identity of financial businesses? If you disagree, what other steps would you want us to take? See also the answer to question 4. The identity of financial businesses should not be published. The FOS operates as a dispute resolution service and settles complaints impartially, looking solely at the specific facts of the case. Accordingly, ombudsman decisions should also be viewed in this light and do not require the firm to be named. The process is not intended to be a public forum, a punishment or sanction. Alternative mechanisms are already in place to inform the consumer and industry of points of significance or poor practice. It is the role of the regulator to impose sanctions in cases of wrongdoing. Publishing firm names could lead to considerable reputational damage (even in cases where the outcome favours the firm). We believe that this consideration may deter firms from appealing an adjudicator s decision to an ombudsman, even if they regard the adjudicator s decision to be a poor one. This undermines the independent arbitrator role of the FOS. Naming and shaming may also lead to a change in the character of the dispute resolution process. It may be rendered more adversarial and costly as firms seek to protect themselves from unfair outcomes and generalised criticism arising from individual complaints. There is a risk that the publication of firm names will be used by CMCs to drive customer complaints, using the firm name to target customers, misrepresenting cases to consumers by selectively quoting decisions. 7. Do you agree with our planned approach to the identities of third parties including other financial businesses, professionals, other representatives and third-party businesses? In principle we believe that complainant, firm and third parties details should be removed. Third parties should be removed to avoid unfair negative publicity. This
7 approach may also result in third parties declining to assist with the provision of specialist advice or information during a claim and/or complaint. 8. Do you agree that we should reserve the right not to publish certain decisions or to exempt information in other exceptional circumstances? We agree that certain decisions should not be published. There must be a clear process in place for determining whether a decision is suitable for publication (including quality and consistency monitoring), and whether all potential confidential / commercially sensitive information has been removed. This process should be consulted on with key stakeholders and published externally. Prior to the publication of any decision, firms should be given the opportunity to review the decision to ensure that all commercially sensitive information has been redacted. The FOS should report the volumes of decisions being published, those not published and the reasons for non-publication. This will help to ensure that consumers and industry have confidence that there is no distortion of the picture of FOS decisions. 9. Are there other considerations about safeguarding personal information that are not covered in this paper and that we need to take into account? We have no further comments to add to those made in response to previous questions. 10. What impacts do you believe publication of decisions as we propose will have on consumers, financial businesses and on our service? In general, we welcome greater transparency on the way in which complaints are considered and decided by the ombudsman. However, the current proposals do not meet the objectives set out in the paper. Our response to earlier questions has outlined the impact of these proposals but we highlight some specific impacts as follows: We do not agree that consumers will have access to a full, accurate and balanced picture of the decisions reached by ombudsman through the proposals. In particular, we believe consumers will be better informed by the expansion of the current practice of publishing anonymised case studies, lead decisions on key issues and technical notes. We believe increasing consumer awareness of the ombudsman can be achieved through its current awareness and accessibility programmes and there are more cost effective ways to help the consumer understand the role of the ombudsman, how to pursue a valid complaint or understand whether a firm has investigated a complaint fairly. For firms, we expect that these proposals will increase costs in the following ways:
8 - Increased number of complaints and subsequent referral to the ombudsman as a result of CMCs driving complaints and an increase in vexatious complainants. - Increased case fees/levy as a result of increased ombudsman costs arising from the publication of final decisions. - Costs of analysing decisions and assessing whether there are broader implications. There is a risk that firms will suffer disproportionate reputational damage. 11. Do you agree with our approach to the timing of publication? If not, when should decisions be published and why? We do not agree with the proposed approach to the timing of publication. Many firms report that the flow of decisions from the FOS is often inconsistent and erratic. Providing seven days between date of decision and publication provides very little opportunity for the firm to correct any errors the FOS may have made when redacting. More importantly, if firms are named in the decision, there must be safeguards that allow a firm to challenge publication that it considers would be inappropriate. There must also be reasonable time between decision and publication to ensure the quality and consistency of decision making. We suggest a minimum of three months. Please also see our response to question Do you agree with our approach to the form of publication? We agree with the form of publication proposed. As mentioned earlier it will be important for there to be robust quality and consistency processes embedded in the publication process. We agree that it is sensible that decisions are made available on the website. Information must be clearly catalogued and accompanied by an advanced search facility (for example by product type). This will allow information to be more easily retrieved and analysed. 13. Do you have any comments on when we should start publication of decisions and what are your views on past decisions? Publication should only begin after the completion of the legislative process. Notwithstanding this timetable, the FOS should ensure that publication only commences following consultation on detailed, clear proposals, accompanied by a comprehensive impact assessment. FOS should continue to improve the resolution times for cases. We have concerns about the publication of decisions whilst waiting times remain as high as they are now. Insurers have noted some improvement in resolution time. However, it can still take two years or more for a final decision from an ombudsman, particularly for complex cases. Publication of such decisions may no longer be relevant as practices may have changed or products have been discontinued.
9 We agree with the FOS that there is no rationale for publishing past decisions. 14. Do you agree that we should adopt the same approach across all of our jurisdictions and specifically do you agree we should cover our voluntary jurisdiction in the same way as our compulsory (FSA/FCA) jurisdiction and our consumer-credit jurisdiction? We agree that there should be consistency in the approach adopted across jurisdictions.
THE WHEATLEY REVIEW OF LIBOR
THE WHEATLEY REVIEW OF LIBOR The ABI s Response to the initial discussion paper Introduction The UK Insurance Industry The UK insurance industry is the third largest in the world and the largest in Europe.
More informationFinancial Ombudsman Service: strategic plans and budget for 2019/2020
Financial Ombudsman Service: strategic plans and budget for 2019/2020 30 January 2019 Introduction The BSA is pleased to respond to the consultation by the Financial Ombudsman Service on its strategic
More informationBBA RESPONSE TO JOINT COMMITTEE CONSULTATION PAPER ON GUIDELINES FOR CROSS-SELLING PRACTICES JC/CP/2014/05
20 March 2015 BBA RESPONSE TO JOINT COMMITTEE CONSULTATION PAPER ON GUIDELINES FOR CROSS-SELLING PRACTICES JC/CP/2014/05 1. The British Bankers Association ( BBA ) welcomes the opportunity to respond to
More informationFINAL NOTICE. 1. For the reasons given in this notice, and pursuant to section 56 of the Act, the FSA has decided to:
FINAL NOTICE To: Mr Colin Jackson To: Baronworth (Investment Services) Limited (in liquidation) FSA FRN: 115284 Reference Number: CPJ00002 Date: 19 December 2012 ACTION 1. For the reasons given in this
More informationAlternative Dispute Resolution Service Consumer Guide
Alternative Dispute Resolution Service Consumer Guide The Furniture Ombudsman works with the British Association of Removers member firms (BAR) to raise industry standards and ensure that their customers
More information26 th February Final report by the Complaints Commissioner Complaint number FCA00376
Final report by the Complaints Commissioner Complaint number FCA00376 26 th February 2018 The complaint 1. On 23 rd July 2017 you asked me to investigate a complaint about the FCA. I carefully reviewed
More informationRequest for legal advice concerning outsourcing contact with taxpayers
Request for legal advice concerning outsourcing contact with taxpayers Legislation: Official Information Act 1982, ss 18(c)(i), 52(3)(b)(i) and 9(2)(h); Tax Administration Act 1994, s 81 (see appendix
More informationOmbudsman Services response to Ofcom consultation
Ombudsman Services response to Ofcom consultation Review of Alternative Dispute Resolution 29 June 2012 Ombudsman Services response to Ofcom s consultation: Review of Alternative Dispute Resolution Author
More information26 April CarolAnne Macdonald Policy, Risk and Research Division Financial Services Authority 25 The North Colonnade Canary Wharf London E14 5HS
26 April 2013 CarolAnne Macdonald Policy, Risk and Research Division Financial Services Authority 25 The North Colonnade Canary Wharf London E14 5HS Email: transparencydp@fsa.gov.uk Dear CarolAnne LMA
More informationWe welcome the Commission s initiative in this area, and we set out below our perspectives on the questions you have asked in your consultation.
Consultation on the use of Alternative Dispute Resolution as a means to resolve disputes related to commercial transactions and practices in the European Union Memorandum from the UK Financial Ombudsman
More informationInterim Report Review of the financial system external dispute resolution and complaints framework
EDR Review Secretariat Financial System Division Markets Group The Treasury Langton Crescent PARKES ACT 2600 Email: EDRreview@treasury.gov.au 25 January 2017 Dear Sir/Madam Interim Report Review of the
More informationIBA GUIDELINES ON PARTY REPRESENTATION IN INTERNATIONAL ARBITRATION
IBA GUIDELINES ON PARTY REPRESENTATION IN INTERNATIONAL ARBITRATION COMMENTS AND RECOMMENDATIONS BY THE BOARD OF THE SWISS ARBITRATION ASSOCIATION (ASA) Since 2013, several discussions have taken place
More informationTHE PANEL ON TAKEOVERS AND MERGERS DEALINGS IN DERIVATIVES AND OPTIONS
RS 2005/2 Issued on 5 August 2005 THE PANEL ON TAKEOVERS AND MERGERS DEALINGS IN DERIVATIVES AND OPTIONS STATEMENT BY THE CODE COMMITTEE OF THE PANEL FOLLOWING THE EXTERNAL CONSULTATION PROCESSES ON DISCLOSURE
More informationResponse to: Publishing Ombudsman decisions Transparency and the Financial Ombudsman Service
Eiko Heffer Financial Ombudsman Service South Quay Plaza 183 Marsh Wall London E14 9SR 9 December 2011 Dear Eiko, Response to: Publishing Ombudsman decisions Transparency and the Financial Ombudsman Service
More informationResponse to Ofcom s consultation on price rises in fixed term contracts
Response to Ofcom s consultation on price rises in fixed term contracts 14 March 2013 Price rises in fixed term contracts Ombudsman Services consultation response 1 Summary 1.1 About Ombudsman Services
More information18 December This document
18 December 2015 Memorandum of Understanding between the Financial Conduct Authority (the FCA) and the scheme operator, the Financial Ombudsman Service Limited This document 1 This memorandum of understanding
More informationFSA Consultation CP 13/7: High-level proposals for an FCA regime for consumer credit
FSA Consultation CP 13/7: High-level proposals for an FCA regime for consumer credit The ABI s Response to the FSA consultation on transferring consumer credit regulation to the Financial Conduct Authority
More information10/21. Financial Ombudsman Service and Financial Services Authority. Consumer complaints:
Consultation Paper 10/21 Financial Ombudsman Service and Financial Services Authority Consumer complaints: The ombudsman award limit and changes to complaints-handling rules September 2010 Contents List
More informationFINAL NOTICE Park s confirmed on 8 August 2008 that it will not be referring the matter to the Financial Services and Markets Tribunal.
Financial Services Authority FINAL NOTICE To: Park s of Hamilton (Holdings) Limited Of: 14 Bothwell Road Hamilton Lanarkshire ML3 0AY Date: 20 August 2008 TAKE NOTICE: The Financial Services Authority
More informationFOS Submission. Small Business & Family Enterprise Ombudsman discussion paper. Financial Ombudsman Service SBFEO D10 LF.
FOS Submission Small Business & Family Enterprise Ombudsman discussion paper Financial Ombudsman Service SBFEO D10 LF.Docx 1 of 27 Contents 1. Overview of FOS 4 1.1 Small business disputes 4 1.2 Our mission
More informationCode for Underwriting Agents: UK Personal Lines Claims & Complaints Handling Update (July 2018)
Market Bulletin Ref: Y5200 Title Code for Underwriting Agents: UK Personal Lines Claims & Complaints Handling Update (July 2018) Purpose To update the Code to reflect changes in relation of Lloyd s complaints
More informationPolicy 42 Anti-Fraud, Anti-Theft & Anti-Corruption
Policy 42 Anti-Fraud, Anti-Theft & Anti-Corruption Table of Contents Introduction...1 Our written rules...2 Expected Behaviour...2 Preventing fraud, theft and corruption...3 Detecting and investigating
More informationJustice Committee Civil Litigation (Expenses and Group Proceedings) (Scotland) Bill Written submission from Zurich Insurance plc
Justice Committee Civil Litigation (Expenses and Group Proceedings) (Scotland) Bill Written submission from Zurich Insurance plc 1. Zurich is a leading insurer in the UK, employing over 6,000 people. For
More informationSee article 36A4 of The Financial Services and Markets Act 2000 (Regulated Activities) Order 2001, S.I. 2001/544. 2
SERVICE-SPECIFIC GUIDANCE NOTE Consumer Credit Who should read this? As at October 2014, the Phone-paid Services Authority notes that the primary providers of consumer credit services in the premium rate
More informationFinal report by the Complaints Commissioner dated 2nd January 2018 Complaint number FCA00269
Final report by the Complaints Commissioner dated 2 nd January 2018 Complaint number FCA00269 The complaint 1. On 24 July 2017 you asked me to investigate a complaint about the Financial Conduct Authority
More informationThe Future of Financial Reporting in the UK and Republic of Ireland
Michelle Sansom Accounting Standards Board 5 th Floor, Aldwych House 71-91 Aldwych London WC2B 4HN 26 April 2012 Dear Michelle The Future of Financial Reporting in the UK and Republic of Ireland The Association
More informationSUMMARY OF THE LEUVEN BRAINSTORMING EVENT ON COLLECTIVE REDRESS 29 JUNE 2007
SUMMARY OF THE LEUVEN BRAINSTORMING EVENT ON COLLECTIVE REDRESS 29 JUNE 2007 COLLECTING THOUGHTS AND EXPERIENCES ON COLLECTIVE REDRESS The event was opened by Commissioner Meglena Kuneva who gave a key-note
More informationMr and Mrs F accepted the adjudicator s assessment but Aviva did not agree with this assessment and asked for an ombudsman s decision.
complaint This complaint is about two single premium payment protection insurance ( PPI ) policies sold in conjunction with two loans, taken out in 2001 and 2002. Mr and Mrs F say that Aviva Insurance
More information1. The ABI welcomes the opportunity to respond to the DWP consultation paper regarding the British Steel Pension Scheme.
Consultation Response: British Steel Pension Scheme Executive Summary 1. The ABI welcomes the opportunity to respond to the DWP consultation paper regarding the British Steel Pension Scheme. 2. A number
More informationInquiry into the Powers and Operations of the Inland Revenue Department
A.5 Government to the Report of the Finance and Expenditure Committee on Inquiry into the Powers and Operations of the Inland Revenue Department Presented to the House of Representatives in accordance
More informationempowering consumers Caroline Wayman principal ombudsman and legal director Financial Ombudsman Service
empowering consumers Caroline Wayman principal ombudsman and legal director Financial Ombudsman Service May not be reproduced without permission of Financial Ombudsman Service Ltd 1 about us We were set
More informationCP15/39 Rules and guidance on payment protection insurance complaints
Telephone: 020 7066 9346 Email: enquiries@fs-cp.org.uk Lauren Dixon & Julian Watts Specialist Supervision Division Financial Conduct Authority 25 The North Colonnade Canary Wharf London E14 5HS 26 February
More informationCode for Underwriting Agents: UK Personal Lines Claims & Complaints Handling
Code for Underwriting Agents: UK Personal Lines Claims & Complaints Handling OCTOBER 2015 2 INTRODUCTION Lloyd s seeks to ensure that policyholders are treated fairly and can have confidence that their
More informationFINAL NOTICE. Policy Administration Services Limited. Firm Reference Number:
FINAL NOTICE To: Policy Administration Services Limited Firm Reference Number: 307406 Address: Osprey House Ore Close Lymedale Business Park Newcastle-under-Lyme Staffordshire ST5 9QD Date: 1 July 2013
More informationThe British Association of Removers CODE OF PRACTICE April 2013
FOREWORD For over 100 years the British Association of Removers (BAR) has been the recognised voice of the professional moving and storage industry in the United Kingdom. Currently, it has 470 Members
More informationD0369B
D0369B-2012 29.02.2012 EBF observations on the European Commission Proposals for a Directive on consumer alternative dispute resolution and a Regulation on consumer online dispute resolution The European
More informationSRA BOARD 21 January 2015
Regulation of Consumer Credit Activities Purpose 1 The purpose of this paper is: i) to provide the Board with an update on discussions with the Financial Conduct Authority (FCA) and the Treasury (HMT)
More informationFRAUD ADVISORY PANEL REPRESENTATION 02/17
FRAUD ADVISORY PANEL REPRESENTATION 02/17 RESPONSE TO CORPORATE LIABILITY FOR ECONOMIC CRIME CALL FOR EVIDENCE PUBLISHED 13 JANUARY 2017 The Fraud Advisory Panel welcomes the opportunity to comment on
More informationPensions Ombudsman and Pension Protection Fund Ombudsman
The DWP triennial review of pensions bodies Response to call for evidence by Pensions Ombudsman and Pension Protection Fund Ombudsman 8 August 2013 Introduction 1. DWP s call for evidence of 27 June 2013
More informationBERMUDA MONETARY AUTHORITY THE INSURANCE CODE OF CONDUCT FEBRUARY 2010
Table of Contents 0. Introduction..2 1. Preliminary...3 2. Proportionality principle...3 3. Corporate governance...4 4. Risk management..9 5. Governance mechanism..17 6. Outsourcing...21 7. Market discipline
More informationsummary of complaint background to complaint
summary of complaint Mr N complains about the Gresham Insurance Company Limited s requirement for his chosen solicitors to enter into a Conditional Fee Agreement (CFA). Claims for legal expenses are handled
More informationLocal authority accounts: A guide to your rights
Guide by the National Audit Office Local authority accounts: A guide to your rights MARCH 2017 Our vision is to help the nation spend wisely. Our public audit perspective helps Parliament hold government
More informationCivil Justice Council response to Ministry of Justice consultation paper Fee Remissions for the Courts & Tribunals
Civil Justice Council response to Ministry of Justice consultation paper Fee Remissions for the Courts & Tribunals Introductory remarks There are many aspects about this consultation which have caused
More informationCONSULTATION RESPONSE FINANCIAL LIST CONSULTATION PAPER
CONSULTATION RESPONSE FINANCIAL LIST CONSULTATION PAPER A. Introduction 1. The Commercial Bar Association ( COMBAR ) is a specialist bar association representing self-employed and employed barristers who
More informationPCP 2012/1: PROFIT FORECASTS, QUANTIFIED FINANCIAL BENEFITS STATEMENTS, MATERIAL CHANGES IN INFORMATION AND OTHER AMENDMENTS TO THE TAKEOVER CODE
PCP 2012/1: PROFIT FORECASTS, QUANTIFIED FINANCIAL BENEFITS STATEMENTS, MATERIAL CHANGES IN INFORMATION AND OTHER AMENDMENTS TO THE TAKEOVER CODE The ABI s Response to the Takeover Panel s consultation
More informationResponse by TISA to DWP Consultation Meeting future workplace pension changes: improving transfers and dealing with small pots.
Response by TISA to DWP Consultation Meeting future workplace pension changes: improving transfers and dealing with small pots. March 2012 TISA response to DWP Consultation: Meeting future workplace pension
More informationStrengthening Consumer Redress in the Housing Market. Executive Summary
Which?, 2 Marylebone Road, London, NW1 4DF Date: 16/04/2018 Response to: Strengthening Consumer Redress in the Housing Market Social Housing Division Ministry of Housing, Communities and Local Government
More informationSnapshot Own Motion Inquiry Investigation of Claims and Outsourced Services
2014 General Insurance Code of Practice Snapshot Own Motion Inquiry Investigation of Claims and Outsourced Services 1 May 2017 Page 1 of 16 Chair s message I am proud to present the Code Governance Committee
More informationConsultation response
Consultation response SRA: Regulation of consumer credit activities Overview 1. Regulation of consumer credit activities is specialised and complex. Credit activities (and in particular debt collection)
More informationProposed changes to the Energy Complaints Scheme
6 April 2018 James Blake-Palmer Manager Stakeholder Engagement Utilities Disputes Limited PO Box 5875 WELLINGTON 6140 First Gas Limited 42 Connett Road West, Bell Block Private Bag 2020, New Plymouth,
More informationVODAFONE GROUP PLC TAX STRATEGY
VODAFONE GROUP PLC TAX STRATEGY In accordance with Para 16(2) Schedule 19 Finance Act 2016 this represents the Group s tax strategy in effect for the year ended 31 March 2018. 1 The areas below form the
More informationGFXC Request for Feedback on Last Look practices in the FX Market: Results and Recommendations 1
December 19, 2017 GFXC Request for Feedback on Last Look practices in the FX Market: Results and Recommendations 1 I. Executive Summary The Global Foreign Exchange Committee (GFXC) is publishing this paper
More informationDecision Notice. Decision 234/2014 Shetland Line (1984) Ltd and Transport Scotland
Decision Notice Decision 234/2014 Shetland Line (1984) Ltd and Transport Scotland Tender Evaluation Northern Isles Ferry Services Reference No: 201401121 Decision Date: 11 November 2014 Print date: 11/11/2014
More informationFreedom of Information Act 2000 (FOIA) Decision notice
Freedom of Information Act 2000 (FOIA) Decision notice Date: 1 November 2016 Public Authority: Address: Department of Health 79 Whitehall London SW1A 2NS Decision (including any steps ordered) 1. The complainant
More informationDirect Saver. Downloadable and accessible brochure. Piece of cake. Open your account with just 1. Enjoy easy access to your savings.
Direct Saver. Downloadable and accessible brochure. Piece of cake. Open your account with just 1. Enjoy easy access to your savings. About Direct Saver Read this before you apply Getting in touch Overview
More informationBonding arrangements for insolvency practitioners
Bonding arrangements for insolvency practitioners A call for evidence issued by the Insolvency Service Comments from December 2016 Ref: TECH-CDR-1473 (the Association of Chartered Certified Accountants)
More informationWritten evidence submitted by the Association of British Insurers (ABI) (PCB 20)
Written evidence submitted by the Association of British Insurers (ABI) (PCB 20) Prisons and Courts Public Bill Committee About the ABI The Association of British Insurers is the leading trade association
More informationResponse from the Solicitors Regulation Authority
Legal Services Board / Legal Ombudsman consultation: The Levy: funding legal services oversight regulation Response from the Solicitors Regulation Authority September 2010 Legal Services Board / Legal
More informationI The objective and scope of the Recommendation, the basis for its formulation
Recommendation No. 11/2012. (XI.8) of the President of the Hungarian Financial Supervisory Authority on the complaints handling procedure of financial organisations I The objective and scope of the Recommendation,
More informationInvesting in community shares
Investing in community shares Update to Investing in Community Shares From Communities UK Co-operatives and Community Benefit Societies: All Change What are the most significant features of the new legislation?
More informationin which some significant issue was decided in the applicant s favour.
Comparative Tables 2016 17 Glossary Glossary Applicant s Favour These disputes were resolved by FOS issuing either: a Preliminary View, or a Determination in which some significant issue was decided in
More informationTHE FCA PRACTITIONER PANEL S. Response to HM Treasury s Review of the Balance of Competences:
THE FCA PRACTITIONER PANEL S Response to HM Treasury s Review of the Balance of Competences: Single Market: Financial Services and the Free Movement of Capital - call for evidence 17 January 2014 1 1.
More informationASIC Enforcement Review Industry codes in the financial sector. Submission by Financial Ombudsman Service Australia August 2017
ASIC Enforcement Review Industry codes in the financial sector Submission by Financial Ombudsman Service Australia August 2017 1 Contents Executive summary 3 1 Role of industry codes 5 2 Service standards
More informationTHE PASSPORT UNDER MIFID
THE COMMITTEE OF EUROPEAN SECURITIES REGULATORS Ref: CESR/07-318 THE PASSPORT UNDER MIFID Recommendations for the implementation of the Directive 2004/39/EC Feedback Statement May 2007 11-13 avenue de
More informationEuropean Commission Proposed Directive on Statutory Audit of Annual Accounts and Consolidated Accounts
Policy on EC Proposed Directive Fédération des Experts Comptables Européens 31 March 2004 European Commission Proposed Directive on Statutory Audit of Annual Accounts and Consolidated Accounts On 16 March
More informationFINAL NOTICE. County House, St. Marys Street, Worcester Date: 18 June 2012
Financial Services Authority FINAL NOTICE To: Principal Mortgage Services Limited FSA Reference Number: 303168 Address: County House, St. Marys Street, Worcester Date: 18 June 2012 1. ACTION 1.1. For the
More informationResponse to the Accounting Standards Board s consultation: The future of UK GAAP
Response to the Accounting Standards Board s consultation: The future of UK GAAP The Building Societies Association The Building Societies Association represents mutual lenders and deposit takers in the
More informationJune 2017 Whistleblower Policy
June 2017 Public POLICY CONTROL Effective from: 28 June 2017 Contact officer: Manager Organisational Development Last review date: Feb 2016 Next review date: N/A Published externally: Yes Status: Approved
More informationCentral Bank of Ireland Discussion paper on the Payment of Commission to Intermediaries
October 2016 Central Bank of Ireland Discussion paper on the Payment of Commission to Intermediaries Submission in response by AA Ireland. Introduction: The AA is Ireland s motoring organisation. It has
More informationSeminar for Professional Indemnity Insurers Effective Management of PI Disputes at FOS
Seminar for Professional Indemnity Insurers Effective Management of PI Disputes at FOS Melbourne, 12 October 2010 Sydney, 13 October 2010 Alison Maynard, Ombudsman, Investments, Life Insurance & Superannuation
More information1 January 2010 (as amended 1 January 2015) Table of contents
Terms of Reference 1 January 2010 (as amended 1 January 2015) Table of contents Section A: Preliminary Matters 1. Introduction 1.1 Purpose of the Service 1.2 Principles that underpin FOS operations and
More informationFINAL NOTICE. Unit 8a, Maple Estate, Stocks Lane, Barnsley, South Yorkshire S75 2BL
Financial Services Authority FINAL NOTICE To: Address: Cricket Hill Financial Planning Limited Unit 8a, Maple Estate, Stocks Lane, Barnsley, South Yorkshire S75 2BL Date: 16 February 2011 TAKE NOTICE:
More informationMr S complains about Bar Mutual Indemnity Fund Limited s decision to withdraw funding for his claim.
complaint Mr S complains about Bar Mutual Indemnity Fund Limited s decision to withdraw funding for his claim. background I issued a provisional decision on this complaint in December 2015. An extract
More information3.6. Please also note, unless your policy confirms otherwise, the rights under your policy may only be pursued in an English court.
Terms of Business - commercial customers Bluefin Insurance Services Limited Authorised and regulated by the Financial Conduct Authority No: 307899. Registered Office: 1 Tower Place West, Tower Place, London,
More informationI issued a provisional decision in September 2013 concluding that Mr A s complaint should be upheld.
complaint Mr A s complaint, in summary, is that Lighthouse Advisory Services Limited advised him to invest in a carbon trading partnership scheme (CTP) that was unsuitable for him. background I issued
More informationAssociation of Accounting Technicians response to Law Commission Consultation on Anti-Money Laundering: the SARs regime
Association of Accounting Technicians response to Law Commission Consultation on Anti-Money Laundering: the SARs regime 1 Association of Accounting Technicians response to Law Commission Consultation on
More informationPutting Consumers First. Code of Practice The Professional Financial Claims Association. All rights reserved.
Putting Consumers First Code of Practice 2016 The Professional Financial Claims Association. All rights reserved. Introduction The members of the Professional Financial Claims Association (PFCA) wish to
More informationFinancial Services Authority FINAL NOTICE. DB UK Bank Limited (trading as DB Mortgages) Winchester House 1 Great Winchester Street London EC2N 2DB
Financial Services Authority FINAL NOTICE To: DB UK Bank Limited (trading as DB Mortgages) Of: Winchester House 1 Great Winchester Street London EC2N 2DB Date: 15 December 2010 TAKE NOTICE: The Financial
More informationOmbudsman Services response to DECC s consultation
Ombudsman Services response to DECC s consultation Proposed new power for Ofgem to compel regulated energy businesses to provide redress to consumers - July 2012 Ombudsman Services response to DECC s consultation:
More informationYou are also unhappy that Enforcement refused to say whether or not you were identifiable in JP Morgan s Financial Notice.
19 June 2017 Dear Mr Iksil Complaint against the Financial Conduct Authority Our reference: FCA00106 Thank you for your email of 8 March 2017. I have completed further enquiries of the FCA, and can now
More informationSelling of general insurance policies through price comparison websites
Financial Services Authority Guidance consultation PROPOSED GUIDANCE ON THE: SELLING OF GENERAL INSURANCE POLICIES THROUGH PRICE COMPARISON WEBSITES June 2011 Addressee Firm name Address [Date] Dear Selling
More informationTHE ASSOCIATION OF CONSULTING ENGINEERS NEW ZEALAND INC
THE ASSOCIATION OF CONSULTING ENGINEERS NEW ZEALAND INC Level 8, Hallensteins House, 276 Lambton Quay, PO Box 10 247, Wellington, New Zealand Tel: +64-4-472-1202, Fax: +64-4-473-3814, Email: service @acenz.org.nz
More informationFinancial Services Authority FINAL NOTICE. Royal Liver Assurance Limited. Pier Head Liverpool Merseyside L3 1HT. Date: 6 April 2006
Financial Services Authority FINAL NOTICE To: Of: Royal Liver Assurance Limited Pier Head Liverpool Merseyside L3 1HT Date: 6 April 2006 TAKE NOTICE: The Financial Services Authority of 25, The North Colonnade,
More informationDirect Debit Facilities Management: Switching providers
Consultation paper Direct Debit Facilities Management: Switching providers Consultation on provisional conclusions and proposals to change the Direct Debit rules relating to the switching of Facilities
More informationAlternative Dispute Resolution for Consumers Implementing the Alternative Dispute Resolution Directive and Online Dispute Resolution Regulation.
NCS Alternative Dispute Resolution for Consumers Implementing the Alternative Dispute Resolution Directive and Online Dispute Resolution Regulation. The NCS would like to thank the Department for Business,
More informationConditional Fee Agreement Explanation Leaflet. What you need to know about the CFA
Conditional Fee Agreement Explanation Leaflet. What you need to know about the CFA 1) Explanation of words used (a) Appeal - Any action taken to challenge a final or interim decision of the court (b) Applicable
More informationIMA RESPONSE TO DWP CONSULTATION. Better workplace pensions: Further measures for savers
IMA RESPONSE TO DWP CONSULTATION Better workplace pensions: Further measures for savers May 2014 1 Better workplace pensions: Further measures for savers IMA Response to DWP Consultation The IMA 1 welcomes
More informationRDP Financial Services Ltd. Our Client Agreement
RDP Financial Services Ltd Our Client Agreement This is our supplementary client agreement which should be read in conjunction with the Key Facts about our services and costs document which was provided
More informationIOSCO CONSULTATION FINANCIAL BENCHMARKS PUBLIC COMMENT ON FINANCIAL BENCHMARKS
IOSCO CONSULTATION FINANCIAL BENCHMARKS PUBLIC COMMENT ON FINANCIAL BENCHMARKS General Comments: Standard Chartered Bank welcomes the opportunity to participate in and provide comments to this consultation.
More informationUS Chapter 11 : Should it be adopted in the UK?
US Chapter 11 : Should it be adopted in the UK? The US business rescue procedure, Chapter 11, has enjoyed positive press and parliamentary coverage in the UK, with a number of commentators calling for
More informationPosition Paper on the recast of the Insurance Mediation Directive
Telephone: 020 7066 5268 Email: enquiries@fs-cp.org.uk 19 January 2015 The Financial Services Consumer Panel is an independent statutory body, set up to represent the interests of consumers in the development
More informationRBS Response. Call for Evidence, Substitute Investments Products
Introduction As one of Europe s largest financial services groups, The Royal Bank of Scotland Group (RBS) welcomes the opportunity to respond 1 to the questions raised by the Call for Evidence on Substitute
More informationASX interim guidance: Reporting scoping studies
ASX interim guidance: Reporting scoping studies NOVEMBER 2016 ASX interim guidance: Reporting scoping studies Introduction ASX is working with ASIC, JORC and industry to develop an appropriate and robust
More informationBIBA s response to HM Treasury consultation A new approach to regulation building a stronger system
4 April 2011 HM Treasury 1 Horse Guards Road London SW1A 2HQ Dear Sirs BIBA s response to HM Treasury consultation A new approach to regulation building a stronger system The British Insurance Brokers'
More informationRegulation of Insurance Intermediaries. Insurance Selling and Administration CP187
30 th June 2003 Regulation of Insurance Intermediaries Insurance Selling and Administration CP187 The FSA has today published a consultation paper CP187 setting out its revised proposals for regulating
More informationEngagement between external auditors and supervisors and commencing the PRA s disciplinary powers over external auditors and actuaries
Policy Statement PS1/16 Engagement between external auditors and supervisors and commencing the PRA s disciplinary powers over external auditors and actuaries January 2016 Prudential Regulation Authority
More information7. The ABI's registration number on the European Commission's Register of Interest Representatives is:
RESPONSE TO THE EUROPEAN COMMISSION S REVISED GUIDELINES ON THE APPLICABILITY OF ARTICLE 101 OF THE TREATY OF THE FUNCTIONING OF THE EUROPEAN UNION TO HORIZONTAL CO-OPERATION AGREEMENTS EXECUTIVE SUMMARY
More informationFCA Consultation CP 13/10 December 2013 The ABI s response to proposals for the FCA regime for consumer credit
FCA Consultation CP 13/10 December 2013 The ABI s response to proposals for the FCA regime for consumer credit The ABI is the voice of insurance, representing the general insurance, protection, investment
More informationDraft Deregulation Bill Written evidence from R3, the insolvency trade body
Draft Deregulation Bill Written evidence from R3, the insolvency trade body Introduction 1. R3 represents 97% of UK Insolvency Practitioners (IPs) - the only professionals authorised to take insolvency
More informationEstablishment of Australian Financial Complaints Authority
21 November 2017 Manager Financial Services Unit The Treasury Langton Crescent PARKES ACT 2600 Head of Secretariat AFCA Transition Team Financial Services Unit The Treasury Langton Crescent PARKES ACT
More information