IN THE HIGH COURT OF SOUTH AFRICA, FREE STATE DIVISION, BLOEMFONTEIN
|
|
- Robyn Boyd
- 5 years ago
- Views:
Transcription
1 IN THE HIGH COURT OF SOUTH AFRICA, FREE STATE DIVISION, BLOEMFONTEIN Reportable: YES/NO Of Interest to other Judges: YES/NO Circulate to Magistrates: YES/NO Appeal No: A140/2015 In the matter between:- MOEKETSI PETRUS LELALA APPELLANT and THE STATE RESPONDENT CORAM: VAN ZYL J et MHLAMBI, J HEARD ON: 05 JUNE 2017 DELIVERED ON: 05; 15 JUNE 2017 REASONS MHLAMBI, J
2 2 [1] On 05 June 2017 this appeal served before this court and the following orders were made: 1. The appeal is upheld and the conviction and sentence are set aside. 2. The person in charge of the appeals of this division is requested to forthwith inform the relevant prison authorities of the outcome of this appeal. [2] During argument, Mr Nel, the appellant s counsel, informed the court that, based on the correspondence between the appellant and Mr D. Reyneke (also attached to the office of Legal Aid South Africa) the accused s last known address during 2017 was at the Grootvlei prison near Bloemfontein. Mr Bontes, on behalf of the respondent, referred to the transcribed record and advised the court that on 6 September 2011, the accused had been granted bail pending the appeal in the amount of four thousand rand (R ) only. It was therefore evident the appellant had failed to pay the bail money. The court was of the view that in the interest of justice and fairness, it was necessary and imperative that an order as granted above, be made to facilitate the appellant s early release from prison while the full reasons for his successful appeal were being written. [3] I now come to the reasons that gave rise to upholding of the appeal and the setting aside of the conviction. The grounds of appeal were crafted as follows:
3 3 1.3 In convicting the appellant, the court a quo erred in making the following findings: That the state proved the guilt of the appellant beyond a reasonable doubt; That the warning statement of the appellant was admissible as evidence against him; That the only reasonable inference that could be drawn from the money found with the appellant was his participation in the robbery; Rejecting the appellant s version as not being reasonably possibly true. [4] Both the state and the appellant were ad idem that the appeal should succeed and the conviction set aside. The appellant and two others were convicted on a charge of robbery with aggravating circumstances of a mazda motor vehicle and cash in the amount of R The second charge was the pointing of a firearm and all three accused were acquitted on this charge. The court below found that the appellant s involvement in the commission of the crime was proven beyond reasonable doubt by: a) the discovery of the amount of R which he handed over to the police and b) the contents of his voluntary admission which he made in his warning statement to inspector Ncangiso on 6 October [5] A trial within a trial was held to determine the admissibility or otherwise of the appellant s statement to the police officer, inspector Ngcaniso. The court found that the state
4 4 had proven beyond reasonable doubt that the statement made to the inspector was made voluntarily and without compulsion and the contents were admissible as evidence against the appellant. [6] Inspector Ncganiso testified that he took the appellant s warning statement and also explained his rights to him. The appellant responded positively to the questions posed to him and made the warning statement of his own free will, without being coerced. During re-examination and in response to questions from the bench surrounding the appellant s warning statement, the inspector stated the following: Hof: Wat is die vrae, kan die getuie net vir die Hof sê wat is die vrae wat voorkom op bladsy 3, kom daar enige veduidelikings voor op bladsy Ja. Wat is dit? Hy het dit voorheen gesê, ek verkies om geen verklaring te maak op die stadium nie. Aanklaer: Verskoning, ek gaan net die ondersoekbeampte daar stop edelagbare. During cross-examination by Mr Johnson on behalf of the appellant, the inspector s responses are recorded as follows in the transcribed record on page 233: Ek sien daar is geen melding daarvan dat hy, beskuldigde 2 aangedui het dat hy bereid is om te antwoord op vrae of enigsins so iets nie, stem u saam daarmee?---- Wat hy aangedui het? Ja.--- Ja, dit is so. Want soos ek gesê het, hy het gesê hy wil geen verklaring maak nie. Maar ek het hom nog steeds vrae gevra wat hy geantwoord het.
5 5 Met ander woorde desnieteenstaande die feit dat hy gesê het hy verkies om geen verklaring te maak nie, het u nog steeds vrae gevra, nè?----- Dit is korrek. [7] The investigating officer, inspector Motsoeneng testified that before the appellant made a warning statement to the police various police men questioned the appellant about the incident in the kombi and at the police offices. During the trial and under cross-examination the witness gave the following response on page 269: En toe het u hulle beïnvloed deur te sê hulle sal lank tronk toe gaan as hulle nie saamwerk nie en toe gee hulle samwerking daarna. Dit is u weergawe in die borgaansoek, bevestig u dat?--- As ek mooi onthou het ek so gesê. Ja. U het hulle mos derhalwe beïnvloed dan om met u saam te werk en byvoorbeeld op u weergawe, uitwysings te doen. Ek praat van hulle in geheel, nie net een nie.---- Dit is nie om n persoon te beïnvloed of te dreig nie maar ek wys hom net dat hy moontlik gevangenis toe kan gaan as die goed gekry word. Ek verwys u na bladsy 105 agbare van die rekord vanaf reël 4: Eers het hulle vir ons laat sukkel, maar na ons verduidelik het hulle sal nie borg kry nie, het hulle saamgewerk. Wat beteken dit? Wat anders as onbehoorlike beïnvloeding is daardie sinnetjie wat ek nou net vir u gelees het? Eers het hulle vir ons laat sukkel, maar na ons veduiduidelik het hulle sal nie borg kry nie, het hulle saamgewerk. Wat anders as onbehoorlike beïvloeding beteken daardie sinnetjie?---- Dit is wat ek gesê het dat as hulle maak dat die ondersoek dan stadig moet gaan en daar nie vordering is nie, dan sal ek moet gaan sê in die borgaansoek dat hulle nie borg moet kry nie.
6 6 [8] The appellant testified that he was assaulted at the time of his arrest and when he was forced to sign a statement that was already prepared by the police. The assault stopped when he signed the statement. On the day in question, 29 September 2000, he was at his brother-in-law s house where the latter conducted a tuck shop business. He slept in a room attached to the shop. The police found him there, assaulted him and informed him that he was being arrested for the robbery that took place at the factories. They said to him they wanted the money that was robbed from the factories. [9] He informed the police that his remuneration or money he received from his brother-in-law was kept for him by Ngotwana, his co-worker at the shop. The reason for him being at his brother-in-law s place was that the shop was burgled. The money in the amount of R was handed over to the police at Ngotwana s house, a few blocks away from the shop. [10] It was submitted on behalf of the appellant that the appellant contested the warning statement from the beginning and the court a quo should have found that there was doubt regarding its voluntariness. The appellant had furthermore given a reasonable explanation for his possession of the amount of R and the court should have accepted it as such.
7 7 [11] The state, in its submission, pointed out that page 3 of the appellant s warning statement (exhibit A) indicated that he did not want to make a statement to the police and that Exhibit B was taken after the appellant had indicated that he did not want to make a statement. This in itself violated the appellant s right of remaining silent. [12] The state submitted further that the appellant had sufficiently explained where he got the R from. The inference could therefore not be made that the money was from the robbery and there was no evidence whatsoever that the money could have been obtained from the robbery. There was no gainsaying evidence that the money was not received from the brother-in-law. For that reason, the state conceded that the conviction could not be supported and that the appeal against conviction should be upheld. I agree. [13] Consequently, we made the order referred to in paragraph 1 of this judgment.
8 8 C. VAN ZYL, J I concur J.J. MHLAMBI, J On behalf of appellant: On behalf of appellant: /SR Adv. P. Nel Instructed by: Bloemfontein Justice Centre Bloemfontein Adv. L Bontes Instructed by: Director Public Prosecutions Bloemfontein
VAN DER MERWE, J et MATSEPE, AJ
IN THE HIGH COURT OF SOUTH AFRICA (ORANGE FREE STATE PROVINCIAL DIVISION) In the appeal between: Appeal No.: A40/2005 SAMUEL TLADI Appellant and THE STATE Respondent CORAM: VAN DER MERWE, J et MATSEPE,
More informationIN THE HIGH COURT OF SOUTH AFRICA (NORTH GAUTENG DIVISION)
IN THE HIGH COURT OF SOUTH AFRICA (NORTH GAUTENG DIVISION) Appeal case A450/05 In the matter between: MNISI, MTHOBIAI CHARLES NDUBANE, SIBUSISO MAFIKA First Appellant Second Appellant and THE STATE Respondent
More informationIN THE HIGH COURT OF SOUTH AFRICA, FREE STATE DIVISION, BLOEMFONTEIN
SAFLII Note: Certain personal/private details of parties or witnesses have been redacted from this document in compliance with the law and SAFLII Policy IN THE HIGH COURT OF SOUTH AFRICA, FREE STATE DIVISION,
More informationVAN DER MERWE J et VAN ZYL, AJ
IN THE HIGH COURT OF SOUTH AFRICA (ORANGE FREE STATE PROVINCIAL DIVISION) APPEAL NO. 27/2003 In the appeal between: MATTHEWS MORALE Appellant and THE STATE Respondent CORAM: VAN DER MERWE J et VAN ZYL,
More informationIN THE HIGH COURT OF SOUTH AFRICA FREE STATE DIVISION, BLOEMFONTEIN
SAFLII Note: Certain personal/private details of parties or witnesses have been redacted from this document in compliance with the law and SAFLII Policy IN THE HIGH COURT OF SOUTH AFRICA FREE STATE DIVISION,
More informationTHE SUPREME COURT OF APPEAL OF SOUTH AFRICA
THE SUPREME COURT OF APPEAL OF SOUTH AFRICA In the matter between: Reportable Case No 156/03 PETRUS LIEBENBERG Appellant and THE STATE Respondent Coram: FARLAM, JAFTA AND MLAMBO JJA Heard: 19 MAY 2005
More informationIN THE HIGH COURT OF SOUTH AFRICA (BOPHUTHATSWANA PROVINCIAL DIVISION) MAHLANGU MAFIKA : Applicant. THE STATE : Respondent
CA 137/2003 IN THE HIGH COURT OF SOUTH AFRICA (BOPHUTHATSWANA PROVINCIAL DIVISION) In the matter between: MAHLANGU MAFIKA : Applicant and THE STATE : Respondent APPLICATION MAFIKENG HENDRICKS AJ DATE OF
More informationCORAM: E M GROSSKOPF, MILNE JJA et NICHOLAS AJA.
Case no 50/88 /MC IN THE SUPREME COURT OF SOUTH AFRICA (APPELLATE DIVISION) Between: DOLLY VERONICA DANIELS Appellant (Appellant a quo) - and - THE STATE Respondent CORAM: E M GROSSKOPF, MILNE JJA et NICHOLAS
More informationIN THE HIGH COURT OF SOUTH AFRICA (EASTERN CAPE DIVISION) CASE NO: CA and R 839/2002
1 IN THE HIGH COURT OF SOUTH AFRICA (EASTERN CAPE DIVISION) CASE NO: CA and R 839/2002 In the matter between: ZOLISEKILE BUSAKWE APPELLANT and THE STATE RESPONDENT JUDGMENT PLASKET AJ: [1] The appellant,
More informationIN THE HIGH COURT OF SOUTH AFRICA GAUTENG LOCAL DIVISION, JOHANNESBURG
In the matter between: IN THE HIGH COURT OF SOUTH AFRICA GAUTENG LOCAL DIVISION, JOHANNESBURG Case No: A38/2014 Appeal Date: 4 August 2014 MDUDUZI KHUBHEKA Appellant And THE STATE Respondent JUDGMENT [1]
More informationIN THE HIGH COURT OF SOUTH AFRICA EASTERN CAPE DIVISION, GRAHAMSTOWN. CASE NO: CA&R 187/2014 Date Heard: 11 March 2015 Date Delivered: 19 March 2015
IN THE HIGH COURT OF SOUTH AFRICA EASTERN CAPE DIVISION, GRAHAMSTOWN CASE NO: CA&R 187/2014 Date Heard: 11 March 2015 Date Delivered: 19 March 2015 In the matter between MELISIZWE DYINI Appellant And THE
More informationFREE STATE HIGH COURT, BLOEMFONTEIN REPUBLIC OF SOUTH AFRICA
FREE STATE HIGH COURT, BLOEMFONTEIN REPUBLIC OF SOUTH AFRICA In the appeal between:- Appeal No. : A176/2008 BRAKIE SAMUEL MOLOI Appellant and THE STATE Respondent CORAM: EBRAHIM, J et LEKALE, AJ HEARD
More information_ JUDGMENT DELIVERED : 15 AUGUST 2003
Republic of South Africa REPORTABLE IN THE HIGH COURT OF SOUTH AFRICA (CAPE OF GOOD HOPE PROVINCIAL DIVISION) CASE No: A 848/2002 In the matter of ANTOINETTE MBO Appellant First PUMLA VERONICA NJOKWANA
More informationTHE SUPREME COURT OF APPEAL REPUBLIC OF SOUTH AFRICA JUDGMENT
THE SUPREME COURT OF APPEAL REPUBLIC OF SOUTH AFRICA JUDGMENT Reportable CASE NO: 494/07 In the matter between : LUVUYO MANELI Appellant and THE STATE Respondent Before: STREICHER, HEHER JJA & KGOMO AJA
More informationTHE SUPREME COURT OF APPEAL REPUBLIC OF SOUTH AFRICA JUDGMENT. RICHARD MOKOENA Appellant. THE STATE Respondent
THE SUPREME COURT OF APPEAL REPUBLIC OF SOUTH AFRICA JUDGMENT Case No: 563/08 RICHARD MOKOENA Appellant and THE STATE Respondent Neutral citation: Mokoena v S (563/08) [2009] ZASCA 14 (19 March 2009).
More informationIN THE HIGH COURT OF SOUTH AFRICA (EASTERN CAPE DIVISION, GRAHAMSTOWN) CASE NO.: CA&R69/2012 In the matter between: JUDGMENT
IN THE HIGH COURT OF SOUTH AFRICA (EASTERN CAPE DIVISION, GRAHAMSTOWN) CASE NO.: CA&R69/2012 In the matter between: RICARDO JOHNNY DE JAGER KEITH KORKEE WILLIE LOUW First Appellant Second Appellant Third
More information[2] In February 1998 respondent commenced a process of restructuring a division of
IN THE LABOUR APPEAL COURT OF SOUTH AFRICA HELD AT CAPE TOWN CASE NO. CA9/00 In the matter between: WINDA VISSER Appellant And SANLAM Respondent JUDGMENT DAVIS AJA: Introduction [1] This is an appeal against
More informationMARK JOHN LA BERCENSIE
1 IN THE HIGH COURT OF SOUTH AFRICA (EASTERN CAPE, GRAHAMSTOWN) Case No: CC 23/2008 Date heard: 30.8.2010 Date delivered:22.9.10 Not reportable In the matter between: MARK JOHN LA BERCENSIE Appellant and
More informationREPUBLIC OF SOUTH AFRICA IN THE SOUTH GAUTENG HIGH COURT (JOHANNESBURG)
REPUBLIC OF SOUTH AFRICA IN THE SOUTH GAUTENG HIGH COURT (JOHANNESBURG) CASE NO: A 100/2008 DATE:26/08/2011 REPORTABLE In the matter between LEPHOI MOREMOHOLO APPELLANT and THE STATE RESPONDENT Criminal
More informationIN THE HIGH COURT OF SOUTH AFRICA CASE NUMBER: A145/2008 NOT REPORTABLE DATE: 11 DECEMBER In the matter between AND JUDGMENT TLHAPI, V
SAFLII Note: Certain personal/private details of parties or witnesses have been redacted from this document in compliance with the law and SAFLII Policy IN THE HIGH COURT OF SOUTH AFRICA CASE NUMBER: A145/2008
More information(APPELLATE DIVISION) THE MINISTER OF WATER AFFAIRS GREGORY MANGENA AND 25 OTHERS. HOEXTER, KUMLEBEN, GOLDSTONE, JJA et NICHOLAS, HOWIE, AJJA
IN THE SUPREME COURT OF SOUTH AFRICA (APPELLATE DIVISION) CASE NO 708/89 In the matter between THE MINISTER OF WATER AFFAIRS Appellant and GREGORY MANGENA AND 25 OTHERS Respondent CORAM: HOEXTER, KUMLEBEN,
More informationIN THE HIGH COURT OF SOUTH AFRICA (NORTH GAUTENG HIGH COURT, PRETORIA)
IN THE HIGH COURT OF SOUTH AFRICA (NORTH GAUTENG HIGH COURT, PRETORIA) UNREPORTABLE DATE: 29/05/2009 CASE NO: A440/2007 In the matter between: MARIA CATHARINA ALETTA SMIT Appellant And BENITA WILLERS Respondent
More informationIN THE HIGH COURT OF SOUTH AFRICA (Northern Cape Division) JUDGMENT ON APPEAL
Reportable: Yes / No Circulate to Judges: Yes / No Circulate to Magistrates: Yes / No IN THE HIGH COURT OF SOUTH AFRICA (Northern Cape Division) Case no: CA&R 124/07 Date heard: 2008-09-08 Date delivered:
More informationTHE HIGH COURT OF SOUTH AFRICA (WESTERN CAPE DIVISION, CAPE TOWN)
THE HIGH COURT OF SOUTH AFRICA (WESTERN CAPE DIVISION, CAPE TOWN) High Court Ref No: 1773 Clanwilliam Case No: 582/16 Magistrate s Serial No: 01/17 In the matter of: THE STATE and NKABELO MKULU Coram:
More informationIN THE HIGH COURT OF SOUTH AFRICA, FREE STATE DIVISION, BLOEMFONTEIN
IN THE HIGH COURT OF SOUTH AFRICA, FREE STATE DIVISION, BLOEMFONTEIN Reportable: YES/NO Of Interest to other Judges: YES/NO Circulate to Magistrates: YES/NO In the matter between: Case No: A73/2017 SIFISO
More informationIN THE HIGH COURT OF SOUTH AFRICA (Northern Cape Division, Kimberley)
Reportable: Circulate to Judges: Circulate to Magistrates: YES /NO YES / NO YES/ NO SAFLII Note: Certain personal/private details of parties or witnesses have been redacted from this document in compliance
More informationIN THE SUPREME COURT OF SOUTH AFRICA (APPELLATE DIVISION)
CG CASE NUMBER: 661/91 IN THE SUPREME COURT OF SOUTH AFRICA (APPELLATE DIVISION) In the matter between: MOSES ZITHA Appellant and THE STATE Respondent CORAM: JOUBERT ACJ, EKSTEEN JA et HOWIE AJA HEARD
More informationCase No 166/89 /wlb SUPREME COURT OF SOUTH AFRICA APPELLATE DIVISION. In the appeal between: MZIWOXOLO HLEHLI Appellant. and
Case No 166/89 /wlb SUPREME COURT OF SOUTH AFRICA APPELLATE DIVISION In the appeal between: MZIWOXOLO HLEHLI Appellant and THE STATE Respondent CORAM: E M GROSSKOPF, MILNE et STEYN JJA Date of Hearing:
More informationIN THE HIGH COURT OF SOUTH AFRICA NORTH WEST DIVISION, MAHIKENG CRIMINAL APPEAL
IN THE HIGH COURT OF SOUTH AFRICA NORTH WEST DIVISION, MAHIKENG CASE NO. CA 04/2014 In the matter between: BONGANI MKHIZE APPELLANT And THE STATE RESPONDENT LANDMAN J AND GUTTA J. CRIMINAL APPEAL GUTTA
More informationIN THE LABOUR COURT OF SOUTH AFRICA, JOHANNESBURG MJ BUTHELEZI AND 1 OTHER
IN THE LABOUR COURT OF SOUTH AFRICA, JOHANNESBURG Not Reportable Case no: JR 609.15 In the matter between: MJ BUTHELEZI AND 1 OTHER Applicants and THE SAFETY AND SECURITY BARGAINING COUNCIL F.J. VAN DER
More informationIN THE HIGH COURT OF SOUTH AFRICA (NORTH GAUTENG DIVISION: PRETORIA) DEI FT WHICHEVER IS NOT APPLICABLE (1) REPORTABLE: VES/NO. \i,.n,m^- / DATE I.
IN THE HIGH COURT OF SOUTH AFRICA (NORTH GAUTENG DIVISION: PRETORIA) CASE NO.: A175/08 DATE: In the matter between: PETER IAN THOMPSON DEI FT WHICHEVER IS NOT APPLICABLE (1) REPORTABLE: VES/NO. (2) OF
More informationREITUMETSE LESLY SEGALO
FREE STATE HIGH COURT, BLOEMFONTEIN REPUBLIC OF SOUTH AFRICA In the appeal between: Case No.: A298/2010 REITUMETSE LESLY SEGALO Appellant and THE STATE Respondent CORAM: RAMPAI J et EBRAHIM J JUDGMENT:
More informationm~frc[i 01' 'rhe CHH!F JOS'l1CE REJ>lJI.IUC ()f SOUTH AF.fd(:A In the High Court of South Africa (Western Cape Division, Cape Town}
m~frc[i 01' 'rhe CHH!F JOS'l1CE REJ>lJI.IUC ()f SOUTH AF.fd(:A In the High Court of South Africa (Western Cape Division, Cape Town} CASE NO: A200/17 In the matter between: HEADMAN NOGQALA APPELLANT and
More informationIN THE HIGH COURT OF SOUTH AFRICA EASTERN CAPE DIVISION, GRAHAMSTOWN CASE NO. CA & R 272/2016
IN THE HIGH COURT OF SOUTH AFRICA EASTERN CAPE DIVISION, GRAHAMSTOWN CASE NO. CA & R 272/2016 In the matter between: SIZWE NDLANZI Appellant and THE STATE Respondent JUDGMENT Bloem J. [1] The main issue
More informationBENJAMIN OVERMEYER APPELLANT. and. Judgment by: NESTADT, JA
BENJAMIN OVERMEYER APPELLANT and THE STATE RESPONDENT Judgment by: NESTADT, JA CASE NO. 297/88 /ccc IN THE SUPREME COURT OF SOUTH AFRICA (APPELLATE DIVISION) In the matter between BENJAMIN OVERMEYER APPELLANT
More informationTHE SUPREME COURT OF APPEAL OF SOUTH AFRICA JUDGMENT
THE SUPREME COURT OF APPEAL OF SOUTH AFRICA JUDGMENT NOT REPORTABLE Case No: 100/13 In the matter between: GEOFFREY MARK STEYN Appellant and THE STATE Respondent Neutral citation: Geoffrey Mark Steyn v
More information1/?-l::11 1}~" =,-. In the matter between: IN THE HIGH COURT OF SOUTH AFRICA (GAUTENG DIVISION, PRETORIA) Case number: A736/2015.
,. IN THE HIGH COURT OF SOUTH AFRICA (GAUTENG DIVISION, PRETORIA) Case number: A736/2015 Date: 1 /;1 bt) 1 =,-. DELETE WHICHEVER IS NOT APPLICABLE (1) REPORTABLE: YES/ (2) OF INTEREST TO OTHERS JUDGES:
More informationH.C.Cr. Appeal No. 621 of 2001) ****************************** JUDGMENT OF THE COURT
REPUBLIC OF KENYA IN THE COURT OF APPEAL AT NAIROBI (CORAM: OMOLO, GITHINJI & DEVERELL, JJ.A.) CRIMINAL APPEAL NO. 120 OF 2004 BETWEEN ALBANUS MWASIA MUTUA APPELLANT AND REPUBLIC... RESPONDENT (Appeal
More informationd:p,- $: ~,Jo DATE IN THE HIGH COURT OF SOUTH AFRICA GAUTENG DIVISION, PRETORIA MANDLA SIBEKO THE STATE CASE NUMBER: A90/16 DA TE: 16 February 2018
IN THE HIGH COURT OF SOUTH AFRICA GAUTENG DIVISION, PRETORIA (1) REPORTABLE: Yi8'fNO (2) OF INTEREST TO OTHER JUDGES: Y~O (3) REVISED d:p,- $: ~,Jo DATE CASE NUMBER: A90/16 DA TE: 16 February 2018 MANDLA
More informationTHE LABOUR COURT OF SOUTH AFRICA, CAPE TOWN JUDGMENT
Not reportable Of interest to other judges THE LABOUR COURT OF SOUTH AFRICA, CAPE TOWN JUDGMENT Case no: C 351/2016 In the matter between: SCEPTRE FISHING (PTY) LTD Applicant and ADAM KLAUS SWANEPOEL SOUTH
More informationIN THE HIGH COURT OF SOUTH AFRICA (NORTH GAUTENG HIGH COURT)
SAFLII Note: Certain personal/private details of parties or witnesses have been redacted from this document in compliance with the law and SAFLII Policy IN THE HIGH COURT OF SOUTH AFRICA (NORTH GAUTENG
More informationTHE SUPREME COURT OF APPEAL OF SOUTH AFRICA JUDGMENT BENJAMIN CHARLES JOSEPH VESAGIE
THE SUPREME COURT OF APPEAL OF SOUTH AFRICA JUDGMENT In the matter between: NOT REPORTABLE Case no: 734/2013 BENJAMIN CHARLES JOSEPH VESAGIE NO BENJAMIN FRANCIS VESAGIE NO BENJAMIN CHARLES JOSEPH VESAGIE
More informationJUDGMENT CASE NO: A735/2005
1 IN THE HIGH COURT OF SOUTH AFRICA (CAPE OF GOOD HOPE PROVINCIAL DIVISION) CASE NO: A73/0 DATE: OCTOBER 06 In the matter of: THE STATE versus 1. SITHEMBELE PLATI 2. TOFO HEBE J U D G M E N T KLOPPER,
More informationJUDGEMENT ON BAIL APPEAL
Circulate to Magistrates: Yes / No Reportable: Yes / No Circulate to Judges: Yes / No IN THE HIGH COURT OF SOUTH AFRICA (Northern Cape Division) Date heard: 2008-03-06 Date delivered: 2008-03-07 Case no:
More information1.This application concerns the alleged unfair retrenchment of the applicant. by the respondent with effect from 31 October 1998 following the
IN THE LABOUR COURT OF SOUTH AFRICA HELD AT CAPE TOWN CASE NO: C105/99 In the matter between: W VISSER Applicant and SANLAM Respondent ing: 16, 17 and 20 March 2000 ent: 23 March 2000 n: For the Applicant,
More informationFREE STATE HIGH COURT, BLOEMFONTEIN REPUBLIC OF SOUTH AFRICA BENJAMIN POPO MOFOKENG
FREE STATE HIGH COURT, BLOEMFONTEIN REPUBLIC OF SOUTH AFRICA In the matter between:- Appeal No. : A185/11 BENJAMIN POPO MOFOKENG Appellant and THE STATE First Respondent CORAM: EBRAHIM, J et CHESIWE, AJ
More informationIN THE HIGH COURT OF SOUTH AFRICA FREE STATE DIVISION, BLOEMFONTEIN TSHEDISO NICHOLAS NTSASA. VAN DER MERWE, J et MBHELE, AJ
SAFLII Note: Certain personal/private details of parties or witnesses have been redacted from this document in compliance with the law and SAFLII Policy IN THE HIGH COURT OF SOUTH AFRICA FREE STATE DIVISION,
More informationIN THE HIGH COURT OF SOUTH AFRICA (WITWATERSRAND LOCAL DIVISION)
IN THE HIGH COURT OF SOUTH AFRICA (WITWATERSRAND LOCAL DIVISION) CASE NO: A5022/2007 In the matter between: PRINSLOO, JAN STEPHANUS obo CORNÉ PRINSLOO Appellant (Plaintiff a quo) and ROAD ACCIDENT FUND
More informationTHE SUPREME COURT OF APPEAL OF SOUTH AFRICA
THE SUPREME COURT OF APPEAL OF SOUTH AFRICA Case no 308/96 In the appeal of YOUNIS KHAN Appellant and THE STATE Respondent CORAM: HOWIE, SCOTT, JJA ET STREICHER AJA. Date of Hearing: 26 August 1997 Date
More informationGovernment Gazette Staatskoerant
, Government Gazette Staatskoerant REPUBLIC OF SOUTH AFRICA REPUBLIEK VAN SUID-AFRIKA Vol. 619 Cape Town, Kaapstad, 19 January 17 No. 4061 THE PRESIDENCY DIE PRESIDENSIE No. 39 19 January 17 No. 39 19
More informationJUDGMENT. Siyabonga Mooi Appellant. The State Respondent. Neutral citation: Mooi v The State (162/12) [2012] ZASCA 79 (30 May 2012)
THE SUPREME COURT OF APPEAL OF SOUTH AFRICA JUDGMENT Not Reportable Case No: 162/12 In the matter between: Siyabonga Mooi Appellant and The State Respondent Neutral citation: Mooi v The State (162/12)
More information349/89 N v H. JEREMIA HLAKOTSA and MARTHA RABODILA v THE STATE SMALBERGER, JA
349/89 N v H JEREMIA HLAKOTSA and MARTHA RABODILA v THE STATE SMALBERGER, JA 349/89 N v H IN THE SUPREME COURT OF SOUTH AFRICA (APPELLATE DIVISION) In the matter between: JEREMIA HLAKOTSA MARTHA RABODILA
More informationCASE NO: A495 /2008DATE OF APPEAL: 18/05/2009 DPP VERW: MA25/2008 (18/5/MJM)
i ' IN THE HIGH COURT OF SOUTH AFRICA (North Gauteng High Court, Pretoria) CASE NO: A495 /2008DATE OF APPEAL: 18/05/2009 DPP VERW: MA25/2008 (18/5/MJM) In the appeal of: MOHAU JAFTA SEKHOKHO Appellant
More informationREPUBLIC OF SOUTH AFRICA IN THE HIGH COURT OF SOUTH AFRICA GAUTENG LOCAL DIVISION, JOHANNESBURG
REPUBLIC OF SOUTH AFRICA IN THE HIGH COURT OF SOUTH AFRICA GAUTENG LOCAL DIVISION, JOHANNESBURG CASE NO: A399/2012 (1) REPORTABLE: YES (2) OF INTEREST TO OTHER JUDGES: NO (3) REVISED: YES _14 August 2014
More informationTHE SUPREME COURT OF APPEAL OF SOUTH AFRICA JUDGMENT MUGWEDI MAKONDELELE JONATHAN
THE SUPREME COURT OF APPEAL OF SOUTH AFRICA JUDGMENT Case No: 694/13 In the matter between Not Reportable MUGWEDI MAKONDELELE JONATHAN APPELLANT and THE STATE RESPONDENT Neutral citation: Mugwedi v The
More informationIN THE HIGH COURT OF SOUTH AFRICA (EASTERN CAPE, GRAHAMSTOWN) CASE NO: CA&R 303/2009 DATE HEARD: 25/08/2010 DATE DELIVERED: 13/9/10 NOT REPORTABLE
1 IN THE HIGH COURT OF SOUTH AFRICA (EASTERN CAPE, GRAHAMSTOWN) CASE NO: CA&R 303/2009 DATE HEARD: 25/08/2010 DATE DELIVERED: 13/9/10 NOT REPORTABLE In the matter between MZAMO NGCAWANA Appellant and THE
More informationROBERT SHAKA MTHETHWA...APPELLANT THE STATE...RESPONDENT JUDGMENT
SAFLII Note: Certain personal/private details of parties or witnesses have been redacted from this document in compliance with the law and SAFLII Policy NOT REPORTABLE IN THE HIGH COURT OF SOUTH AFRICA
More informationIN THE HIGH COURT OF SOUTH AFRICA (BOPHUTHATSWANA PROVINCIAL DIVISION)
A NO: 18/2002 C IN THE HIGH COURT OF SOUTH AFRICA (BOPHUTHATSWANA PROVINCIAL DIVISION) In the matter between:- ALEX DHIKUSOOKA and THE STATE APPELLANT RESPONDENT APPLICATION MMABATHO LEEUW J COUNSEL FOR
More informationTHE SUPREME COURT OF APPEAL REPUBLIC OF SOUTH AFRICA JUDGMENT. THOMAS NICHOLAS JOHN STEYNBERG Appellant. WENHANDEL 4 (PTY) LIMITED Respondent
THE SUPREME COURT OF APPEAL REPUBLIC OF SOUTH AFRICA JUDGMENT CASE NO 103/06 Not reportable In the matter between: PROPFOKUS 49 (PTY) LIMITED THOMAS NICHOLAS JOHN STEYNBERG Appellant DAVID JOHANNES STEYNBERG
More informationIN THE NORTH GAUTENG HIGH COURT, PRETORIA (REPUBLIC OF SOUTH AFRICA) W[...] V[...]...Appellant. THE STATE...Respondent JUDGMENT
SAFLII Note: Certain personal/private details of parties or witnesses have been redacted from this document in compliance with the law and SAFLII Policy IN THE NORTH GAUTENG HIGH COURT, PRETORIA (REPUBLIC
More informationIN THE HIGH COURT OF SOUTH AFRICA (GAUTENG DIVISION, PRETORIA)
1 SAFLII Note: Certain personal/private details of parties or witnesses have been redacted from this document in compliance with the law and SAFLII Policy IN THE HIGH COURT OF SOUTH AFRICA (GAUTENG DIVISION,
More informationJ T THEART COPPERSUN (PTY) LTD. Attorneys for the appellants : R P Totos Attorneys (Mr R P Totos)
REPORTABLE IN THE HIGH COURT OF SOUTH AFRICA (CAPE OF GOOD HOPE PROVINCIAL DIVISION) In the matter between: CASE NO: A 99/2008 J T THEART COPPERSUN (PTY) LTD 1 st Appellant 2 nd Appellant v DEON MINNAAR
More informationIN THE LABOUR APPEAL COURT OF SOUTH AFRICA HELD AT BRAAMFONTEIN JOHANNESBURG CASE NO: JA 47/2003 C F POTTERILL AND FIFTEEN OTHERS
IN THE LABOUR APPEAL COURT OF SOUTH AFRICA HELD AT BRAAMFONTEIN JOHANNESBURG CASE NO: JA 47/2003 IN THE MATTER BETWEEN C F POTTERILL AND FIFTEEN OTHERS APPELLANTS AND THE MINISTER OF SAFETY AND SECURITY
More information100/85. Case no 25/84 m c BLACK AFFAIRS ADMINISTRATION BOARD, WESTERN CAPE. and MUNICIPAL LABOUR OFFICER, LANGA. - and - MDANWENI ELLIOT MTHIYA
100/85 Case no 25/84 m c BLACK AFFAIRS ADMINISTRATION BOARD, WESTERN CAPE and MUNICIPAL LABOUR OFFICER, LANGA - and - MDANWENI ELLIOT MTHIYA JANSEN JA. Case no 25/84 M C IN THE SUPREME COURT OF SOUTH AFRICA
More informationIN THE HIGH COURT OF SOUTH AFRICA (TRANSVAAL PROVINCIAL DIVISION)
IN THE HIGH COURT OF SOUTH AFRICA (TRANSVAAL PROVINCIAL DIVISION) UNREPORTABLE In the matter between: Date: 2009-02-06 Case Number: A306/2007 AARON TSHOSANE Appellant and THE STATE Respondent JUDGMENT
More informationSUPREME COURT OF APPEAL OF SOUTH AFRICA JUDGMENT
SUPREME COURT OF APPEAL OF SOUTH AFRICA JUDGMENT Not Reportable Case No: 230/2015 In the appeal between: ELPHAS ELVIS LUBISI First Appellant and THE STATE Respondent Neutral citation: Lubisi v The State
More informationIN THE HIGH COURT OF SOUTH AFRICA (TRANSVAAL PROVINCIAL DIVISION) GIDEON SIGASA NELANI BONGANI OWEN TSHABALALA THE STATE JUDGMENT
IN THE HIGH COURT OF SOUTH AFRICA (TRANSVAAL PROVINCIAL DIVISION) NOT REPORTABLE Date: 2008 04 25 Case Number: A245/07 In the matter between: GIDEON SIGASA NELANI BONGANI OWEN TSHABALALA First Appellant
More informationIN THE HIGH COURT OF SOUTH AFRICA (WESTERN CAPE HIGH COURT, CAPE TOWN
IN THE HIGH COURT OF SOUTH AFRICA (WESTERN CAPE HIGH COURT, CAPE TOWN High Court Case No.: A97/12 DPP Referece No.:.9/2/5/1-56/12 In the appeal between- THULANI DYANTYANA Appellant and THE STATE Respondent
More informationJOSEPH MWAMBA KALENGA. SAKALA, CJ, MUYOVWE and MUSONDA, JJS On the 6 th December, 2011 and 8 th May, 2012
IN THE SUPREME COURT FOR ZAMBIA HOLDEN AT NDOLA (Criminal Jurisdiction) SCZ/103/2011 BETWEEN: JOSEPH MWAMBA KALENGA APPELLANT VS THE PEOPLE RESPONDENT Coram: SAKALA, CJ, MUYOVWE and MUSONDA, JJS On the
More informationTHE SUPREME COURT OF APPEAL OF SOUTH AFRICA JUDGMENT. Vincent Olebogang Magano and
THE SUPREME COURT OF APPEAL OF SOUTH AFRICA JUDGMENT In the matter between: Case no: 849/12 Not reportable Vincent Olebogang Magano and The State Appellant Respondent Neutral citation: Magano v S (849/12)[2013]
More informationIN THE HIGH COURT OF SOUTH AFRICA (EASTERN CAPE DIVISION, GRAHAMSTOWN) CA&R 46/2016
SAFLII Note: Certain personal/private details of parties or witnesses have been redacted from this document in compliance with the law and SAFLII Policy IN THE HIGH COURT OF SOUTH AFRICA (EASTERN CAPE
More informationThe appellant was convicted by the District Court of Monduli at. Monduli in absentia for the offence of unlawful possession of government
IN THE COURT OF APPEAL OF TANZANIA AT ARUSHA (CORAM: KIMARO,J.A., LUANDA,J.A., And MJASIRI,J.A.) CRIMINAL APPEAL NO.396 OF 2013 LONING O SANGAU.APPELLANT VERSUS THE REPUBLIC.RESPONDENT (Appeal from the
More informationIN THE SUPREME COURT OF SOUTH AFRICA ATLANTIS DIESEL ENGINES (PTY)LTD NATIONAL UNION OF METALWORKERS OF SOUTH AFRICA
CASE NO: 424/93 N v H IN THE SUPREME COURT OF SOUTH AFRICA (APPELLATE DIVISION) In the matter between: ATLANTIS DIESEL ENGINES (PTY)LTD and NATIONAL UNION OF METALWORKERS OF SOUTH AFRICA SMALBERGER, JA
More informationJUDGMENT PIETRICH FREDERICH GERHARDT CROTS. Neutral citation: Crots v Pretorius (34/10) [2010] ZASCA 107 (17 SEPTEMBER 2010)
THE SUPREME COURT OF APPEAL OF SOUTH AFRICA JUDGMENT In the matter between: Case No: 34/10 PIETRICH FREDERICH GERHARDT CROTS Appellant and JACQUES PRETORIUS Respondent Neutral citation: Crots v Pretorius
More informationBENZILE McDONALD ZWANE B A I L A P P E A L J U D G M E N T. 1]The appellant applied for bail before the Magistrate, Port Elizabeth and his
IN THE HIGH COURT OF SOUTH AFRICA (EASTERN CAPE PORT ELIZABETH) In the matter between: Case No.: CA&R08/2011 Date heard: 12 May 2011 Date delivered: 17 May 2011 BENZILE McDONALD ZWANE Appellant and THE
More informationGUNTER v COMPENSATION COMMISSIONER (2009) 30 ILJ 2341 (O) ORANGE FREE STATE PROVINCIAL DIVISION (A104/2008) February 23, 2009; March 5, 2009 A
GUNTER v COMPENSATION COMMISSIONER (2009) 30 ILJ 2341 (O) ORANGE FREE STATE PROVINCIAL DIVISION (A104/2008) February 23, 2009; March 5, 2009 A Before and MOCUMIE J Flynote : Sleutelwoorde Compensation
More informationIN THE HIGH COURT OF SOUTH AFRICA FREE STATE DIVISION, BLOEMFONTEIN
IN THE HIGH COURT OF SOUTH AFRICA FREE STATE DIVISION, BLOEMFONTEIN Reportable: Of Interest to other Judges: Circulate to Magistrates: YES/NO YES/NO YES/NO Case No.: A18/2017 In the appeal between: STEVE
More informationTHE SUPREME COURT OF APPEAL OF SOUTH AFRICA JUDGMENT. Neutral citation: Madiba v The State (497/2013) [2014] ZASCA 13 (20 March 2014)
SAFLII Note: Certain personal/private details of parties or witnesses have been redacted from this document in compliance with the law and SAFLII Policy THE SUPREME COURT OF APPEAL OF SOUTH AFRICA JUDGMENT
More informationJAMES DAWSON MEENA Vs. REPUBLIC- Appeal from the Conviction and Sentence of the High Court of Tanzania at Moshi- Criminal Sessions Case No.
CRIMINAL APPEAL NO. 222 OF 2007- COURT OF APPEAL OF TANZANIA AT ARUSHA RAMADHANI, C.J., MROSO, J.A. And RUTAKANGWA, J.A. JAMES DAWSON MEENA Vs. REPUBLIC- Appeal from the Conviction and Sentence of the
More informationTHE SUPREME COURT OF APPEAL OF SOUTH AFRICA JUDGMENT TEBOGO PATRICK LEDWABA PHETOE
SAFLII Note: Certain personal/private details of parties or witnesses have been redacted from this document in compliance with the law and SAFLII Policy THE SUPREME COURT OF APPEAL OF SOUTH AFRICA JUDGMENT
More informationHIGH COURT OF SOUTH AFRICA (GAUTENG DIVISION, PRETORIA)
- - ------------------- HIGH COURT OF SOUTH AFRICA (GAUTENG DIVISION, PRETORIA) CASE NO: A200/2016 DELETE WHICHEVER IS NOT APPLICABLE (1) REPORTABLE: ~ / NO. (2) OF INTEREST TO OTHER JUDGES:,$ I NO. (3)
More informationOFFICE OF THE CHIEF JUSTICE GAUTENG DIVISION, PRETORIA
SAFLII Note: Certain personal/private details of parties or witnesses have been redacted from this document in compliance with the law and SAFLII Policy OFFICE OF THE CHIEF JUSTICE GAUTENG DIVISION, PRETORIA
More informationJUDGMENT DELIVERED ON 28 MAY 2014
Republic of South Africa IN THE HIGH COURT OF SOUTH AFRICA (WESTERN CAPE DIVISION, CAPE TOWN) [REPORTABLE] CASE NO: A102/14 In the matter between: SHERABEEN FRANCIS Appellant and THE STATE Respondent JUDGMENT
More informationTHE SUPREME COURT OF APPEAL OF SOUTH AFRICA JUDGMENT
THE SUPREME COURT OF APPEAL OF SOUTH AFRICA JUDGMENT In the matter between: Not Reportable Case No: 494/2016 DONOVAN MAZINA APPELLANT and THE STATE RESPONDENT Neutral Citation: Mazina v The State (494/2016)
More informationTHE SUPREME COURT OF APPEAL OF SOUTH AFRICA
THE SUPREME COURT OF APPEAL OF SOUTH AFRICA Not Reportable Case no: 439/2007 In the matter between: JEWELL CROSSBERG Appellant and THE STATE Respondent Coram: Navsa, Heher, Jafta, Ponnan JJA et Malan AJA
More informationIN THE LABOUR APPEAL COURT OF SOUTH AFRICA HELD IN JOHANNESBURG. Case no: CA 10/2005 IN THE MATTER BETWEEN. Association (SAPRA) 3 rd Appellant
1 IN THE LABOUR APPEAL COURT OF SOUTH AFRICA HELD IN JOHANNESBURG IN THE MATTER BETWEEN South African Rugby Players Case no: CA 10/2005 First Appellant Association (SAPRA) Richard Bands Christo Bezuidenhout
More informationNITROPHOSKA (PTY) LIMITED Applicant. B L JACOBS Third Respondent JUDGMENT. 1. This is an unopposed application to review and set aside an arbitration
IN THE LABOUR COURT OF SOUTH AFRICA HELD AT CAPE TOWN CASE NO: C109/2010 In the matter between: NITROPHOSKA (PTY) LIMITED Applicant and THE COMMISSION FOR CONCILIATION, MEDIATION AND ARBITRATION DANIEL
More informationIN THE HIGH COURT OF SOUTH AFRICA (NORTH WEST DIVISION, MAHIKENG)
SAFLII Note: Certain personal/private details of parties or witnesses have been redacted from this document in compliance with the law and SAFLII Policy IN THE HIGH COURT OF SOUTH AFRICA (NORTH WEST DIVISION,
More informationCRIMINAL APPEAL NO. 227 OF COURT OF APPEAL OF TANZANIA AT ARUSHA- MROSO, J.A., KAJI, J.A. And RUTAKANGWA, J.A.
CRIMINAL APPEAL NO. 227 OF 2005- COURT OF APPEAL OF TANZANIA AT ARUSHA- MROSO, J.A., KAJI, J.A. And RUTAKANGWA, J.A. JOAKIM ANTHONY MASSAWE Vs. REPUBLIC (Appeal from the Judgment of the High Court of Tanzania
More informationDATED AT PRETORIA ON THIS THE 15th DAY OF JUNE ADV. A CORNELIUS LEGAL OFFICER COUNCIL FOR DEBT COLLECTORS RENTMEESTERPARK
COUNCIL FOR DEBT COLLECTORS COUNCIL IN TERMS OF ACT 114 OF 1998 Saakno: 8/6PROC001/06 In the matter COUNCIL FOR DEBT COLLECTORS THE COUNCIL and PROCLEPT CC FIRST RESPONDENT MARIETJIE ROOS SECOND RESPONDENT
More informationJUDGMENT. [1] This is an appeal against sentence with the leave of the trial court. The
IN THE HIGH COURT OF SOUTH AFRICA (EASTERN CAPE DIVISION, GRAHAMSTOWN) CASE NO : CA&R 73/2016 Date heard : 27 July 2016 Date delivered : 27 July 2016 In the matter between : CARON TROSKIE Appellant and
More informationIN THE SUPREME COURT OF SOUTH AFRICA
34/88 /mb IN THE SUPREME COURT OF SOUTH AFRICA (APPELLATE DIVISION) In the matter between: ANDREAS SHANDUAMA APPELLANT and THE STATE RESPONDENT CORAM : SMALBERGER, KUMLEBEN JJA et NICHOLAS AJA HEARD :
More informationIN THE SOUTH GAUTENG HIGH COURT JOHANNESBURG
REPUBLIC OF SOUTH AFRICA IN THE SOUTH GAUTENG HIGH COURT JOHANNESBURG (1) REPORTABLE: YES / NO (2) OF INTEREST TO OTHER JUDGES: YES/NO (3) REVISED. CASE NO: P143/09 DPP REF NO: JAP 2013/65.. DATE... SIGNATURE
More informationPotatoes SA 25 April 2018
Potatoes SA 25 April 2018 Farm-level Analysis Prepared by Farm-level Scenarios: Limpopo & Sandveld regions Implication of electricity tariff increase, national minimum wage, plant protection cost inflation
More informationREPUBLIC OF KENYA High Court at Busia Criminal Appeal 19 of 2009 STEPHEN OUMA ERONI...APPELLANT -VERSUS- REPUBLIC...RESPONDENT J U D G E M E N T
REPUBLIC OF KENYA High Court at Busia Criminal Appeal 19 of 2009 STEPHEN OUMA ERONI...APPELLANT -VERSUS- REPUBLIC...RESPONDENT J U D G E M E N T The appellant STEPHEN OUMA ERONI was charged and convicted
More informationCOUNSEL FOR THE APPELLANT : Mr M.E SETUMU COUNSEL FOR RESPONDENT : ADV. NONTENJWA
. Reportable: Circulate to Judges: Circulate to Magistrates: Circulate to Regional Magistrates: YES / NO YES / NO YES / NO YES / NO SAFLII Note: Certain personal/private details of parties or witnesses
More informationMALHERBE JP et KRUGER J KRUGER J. [1] Appellant appeals against a judgment in the magistrate s
IN THE SUPREME COURT OF SOUTH AFRICA (ORANGE FREE STATE PROVINCIAL DIVISION) In the appeal of: Appeal No. : A62/2004 KAMOHELO ISAAC MOROE Appellant and ABSA BANK LIMITED t/a BANKFIN Respondent CORAM: MALHERBE
More informationIN THE SUPREME COURT OF SOUTH AFRICA. LULAMA LIVINGSTONE NTONGANA...First Appellant
266/89 /mb IN THE SUPREME COURT OF SOUTH AFRICA (APPELLATE DIVISION) In the matter between: LULAMA LIVINGSTONE NTONGANA...First Appellant ZANELE MAPANDILE Second Appellant and THE STATE Respondent CORAM
More informationTHE SUPREME COURT OF APPEAL OF SOUTH AFRICA JUDGMENT NOMFUSI NOMPUMZA SEYISI
THE SUPREME COURT OF APPEAL OF SOUTH AFRICA JUDGMENT Case no: 117/12 Non Reportable In the matter between: NOMFUSI NOMPUMZA SEYISI APPELLANT and THE STATE RESPONDENT Neutral citation: Seyisi v The State
More informationADDIE NKOSINGIPHILE SHABANGU
SAFLII Note: Certain personal/private details of parties or witnesses have been redacted from this document in compliance with the law and SAFLII Policy IN THE HIGH COURT OF SOUTH AFRICA (GAUTENG DIVISION,
More information