Ninth Circuit Court of Appeals Addresses Scope of Primary Violation Liability Under Rule 10b-5(a) and (c)
|
|
- Piers Goodwin
- 5 years ago
- Views:
Transcription
1 Ninth Circuit Court of Appeals Addresses Scope of Primary Violation Liability Under Rule 10b-5(a) and (c) New York July 11, 2006 On June 30, 2006, the Ninth Circuit issued the first appellate decision defining the scope of primary liability under the scheme prongs of Section 10(b). Simpson v. AOL Time Warner Inc., --- F.3d ---, No , 2006 WL (9th Cir. June 30, 2006). Employing a test proposed by the SEC, the Court held that to be liable as a primary violator of 10(b) for participation in a scheme to defraud, the defendant must have engaged in conduct that had the principal purpose and effect of creating a false appearance of fact in furtherance of a scheme. Key to the Court s decision is its holding that each defendant s own conduct must fully satisfy the test. Short of that, allegations of fraud amount to mere aiding and abetting, at most, which since Central Bank 1 has been insufficient to state a claim under Section 10(b). The Court s analysis strongly suggests that only illegitimate or sham transactions -- transactions that would have no purpose other than to deceive -- would satisfy the scheme test. Significantly, the Court explicitly made clear that the primary purpose test it was adopting is related to but different than scienter. In other words, adequately pleading scienter is not enough to plead scheme liability; there must also be adequately pleaded allegations of primary purpose in order to state a claim under Rule 10b-5(a) or (c). Homestore.com, an Internet company that provided links to a variety of home ownership related services, including real estate listings, announced in late 2001 that it would restate its financials to reflect lower revenues. (It eventually restated financials for seven quarters, lowering revenues by more than $170 million.) Multiple class action suits immediately followed, alleging that Homestore, with the active participation of outside businesses, engaged in illicit revenue-boosting transactions. On September 25, 2002, Homestore s former COO, CFO and VP of Finance pled guilty to securities fraud charges, thereby eliminating, as the District Court noted, the question of whether the fraud actually happened. I. 1 Central Bank of Denver, N.A. v. First Interstate Bank of Denver, N.A., 511 U.S. 164 (1994). Cleary Gottlieb Steen & Hamilton LLP, All rights reserved. This memorandum was prepared as a service to clients and other friends of Cleary Gottlieb to report on recent developments that may be of interest to them. The information in it is therefore general, and should not be considered or relied on as legal advice.
2 Plaintiffs alleged that Homestore engaged in three types of phony revenue creating transactions involving outside business entities: barter transactions, revenue purchasing, and triangular transactions. The complaint implicated three categories of non-insider defendants: PWC, third party vendors, and the Business Partner defendants -- AOL, Cendant, L90, and certain of their employees. Of primary interest here are the Business Partner defendants and the allegations concerning triangular transactions. In 1998 Homestore purchased from AOL the exclusive right to place real estate listing products on AOL. Shortly thereafter, Homestore and AOL entered into an advertising reseller, or revenue sharing, agreement pursuant to which AOL would sell advertising on Homestore s website, retain a commission from the sale, and give the balance of the advertising revenue to Homestore. In 2001 Homestore entered into a series of triangular transactions with third party vendors, by which Homestore bought shares at inflated prices or products and services it did not need from thinly capitalized companies (who wished to go public ) on condition that they would in turn purchase advertising on Homestore.com through AOL for approximately the same amount Homestore was paying them. Pursuant to its revenue sharing agreement with Homestore, AOL received a commission for the advertising purchased by the third party vendors and forwarded the rest of the money to Homestore. These triangular, or round trip, transactions created revenue for Homestore with its own money. According to the District Court, plaintiffs alleged that AOL was a major player in arranging many of the illicit revenue boosting transactions, and certain AOL employees were the architects of those transactions. Plaintiffs also alleged that AOL s commissions from the revenue sharing agreement were far above market value, and that AOL agreed not to document the triangular nature of the transactions. L90 allegedly participated in similar triangular transactions. In addition, an L90 officer allegedly signed a false statement to the effect that the transactions were not contingent on any related transactions. However, the information in that false confirmation letter never made it into the market place because the following day Homestore s CEO refused to sign the related Form 10-Q. Cendant sold Move.com to Homestore in 2001 for $750 million in Homestore stock. Plaintiffs alleged that Homestore vastly overpaid for the website and that Cendant agreed in exchange to funnel some of the money back to Homestore, which it accomplished by creating a separate corporate entity funded with $95 million that was subsequently paid to Homestore for various products and services. Significantly, the District Court noted that there was no allegation that Cendant attempted to conceal the contingent nature of the transaction. 2
3 II. The Business Partner defendants moved to dismiss the claims against them in District Court, arguing that Central Bank precludes claims against simple business partners. They argued that most attempts to hold secondary actors liable under the scheme prongs of Rule 10b-5 have been rejected as aiding and abetting claims barred by Central Bank. Moreover, they argued, Rule 10b-5 liability requires significant participation in the making or dissemination of a false or misleading statement. 2 Although the District Court disagreed with defendants assertion that Rule 10b-5 liability requires the making of a statement, the Court did agree that Central Bank precluded the claims made against the Business Partners on the facts alleged, and it dismissed them with prejudice. 3 The Court gave three reasons for its decision. First, the Business Partners did not have a special relationship with Homestore. According to the District Court, no other post-central Bank decision has ever held that a simple business partner to a corporation is liable to the shareholders of that corporation for securities fraud. The Court reviewed the cases plaintiffs cited, and found that in each instance where an outsider has been held liable as a primary violator, that outsider had some type of special relationship with the corporation, i.e. accountant, auditor, etc. 4 Second, the Business Partners did not employ the scheme to defraud investors, as required by the text of Rule 10b-5. The District Court reasoned that those who actually employ the scheme to defraud investors are primary violators, while those who merely participate in or facilitate the scheme are secondary violators and thus aiders and abettors within the meaning of Central Bank. In the District Court s analysis, the distinction lay in identifying the primary architects of the scheme -- in this case, the officers of Homestore who designed and carried out the schemes to defraud. The Business Partners, who actively participated in the triangular transaction scheme, did not employ the scheme to defraud investors, and are therefore secondary actors. 2 The substantial participation test is a uniquely Ninth Circuit test. Other Circuit Court s addressing the scope of primary liability under the misstatement or omission prong of Rule 10b-5 have applied the bright line rule, requiring the actual making of a statement to investors (or the failure to do so when duty-bound to speak). 3 In re Homestore.com, Inc. Sec. Litig., 252 F. Supp. 2d 1018 (C.D. Cal. 2003). 4 The cited cases included In re Software Toolworks, 50 F.3d 615, (9th Cir. 1994), in which the court declined to dismiss Section 10(b) claims against an underwriter who had played a significant role in reviewing, drafting and editing letters sent to the SEC. 3
4 Third, the Homestore shareholders were damaged by their reliance on statements and material omissions made by Homestore, not the scheme itself. Although a statement is not required for a claim under Rule 10b-5, such as in the case of a manipulative act, in this case it actually was plaintiffs reliance on false or misleading statements that caused their damages. Because plaintiffs could not allege that the Business Partners substantially contributed to those statements, there was no reliance and thus no basis for a claim against them. Unfortunately, the District Court s decision did little to provide a useful test for distinguishing between primary liability under the scheme prongs of Rule 10b-5 and mere non-actionable aiding and abetting. Among other things, although the special relationship rule appeared to provide a convenient bright line test, it offered only a superficial litmus. Likewise, focusing on role descriptors such as primary architect gave a quantitative measure where a qualitative test was needed, and it required an answer to, but left unanswered, the basic question of what constitutes a scheme. Moreover, because of their bright line characteristics, both tests were vulnerable to gamesmanship. Plaintiffs appealed to the Ninth Circuit. The SEC filed amicus briefs, arguing that the District Court s holding was based on unwarranted distinctions (as discussed above), and that using those distinctions as the test for primary liability would undermine the purpose of the antifraud provisions. The SEC proposed its own test for identifying primary liability, and it offered several very helpful illustrative hypotheticals. As discussed below, the Ninth Circuit has now essentially adopted that test. 5 III. Rather than focusing on the categorical distinctions that defined the District Court s analysis, the Ninth Circuit employed a test that examines the purpose and effect of each defendant s own conduct: We hold that to be liable as a primary violator of 10(b) for participation in a scheme to defraud, the defendant must have engaged in conduct that had the principal purpose and effect of creating a false appearance of fact in furtherance of the scheme. It is not enough that a transaction in which a defendant was involved had a deceptive purpose and effect; 5 As a result, the SEC s amicus briefs, and in particular the hypotheticals they discuss, may become a helpful guide to applying the Ninth Circuit s decision. 4
5 the defendant s own conduct contributing to the transaction or overall scheme must have had a deceptive purpose and effect. Moreover, the Court emphasized that the principal purpose test is related to -- but different than -- scienter, pointedly noting that a defendant would have no Section 10(b) scheme liability if it intended to deceive the public by substantially assisting another s misconduct as part of a scheme to defraud, but fail[ed] to perform personally any action that created a false appearance as part of th[e] scheme. Applying these tests to the Homestore plaintiffs allegations against the Business Partner defendants, the Court easily determined that they had failed to state a Section 10(b) claim. For example, as summarized by the Ninth Circuit, plaintiffs alleged that AOL and its officers played a role in the scheme to overstate revenues and had helped Homestore organize and create the triangular transactions, and in this way assisted Homestore in misrepresenting the revenues from these transactions. Those allegations were insufficient. The Circuit Court held that more is required than assertions of helping or assisting another s deception. To allege a primary violation, the complaint must allege that AOL or its officers actually engaged in a deceptive act. The Ninth Circuit s analysis helpfully goes a step further, pointing out specifically what plaintiffs did not allege, and in so doing it provides guidance as to the kinds of specific allegations that might satisfy the test. The Court observes, for example, that [i]t is not alleged that AOL or its officers created sham business entities or engaged in deceptive conduct as part of illegitimate transactions.... There is no indication from the [complaint] that the transactions engaged in by AOL were completely illegitimate or in themselves created a false appearance. (emphasis added). Plaintiff only alleges that the first leg of the [triangular] transaction was truly a sham.... The complaint does not allege that AOL itself entered into a transaction that had no legitimate economic value or created a false appearance. (emphasis added). And [w]hile the advertising transactions between the Third Party Vendors and AOL are alleged to contain suspect qualities, such as exaggerated commissions by AOL, there is no suggestion that actual advertisements were not purchased and sold by these companies. Hence, although the Ninth Circuit did not explicitly require inherently illegitimate conduct or a sham transaction in order for primary liability to attach, as a practical matter scheme liability would seem to depend on whether the conduct in question had any legitimate purpose. The Ninth Circuit explained: Conduct by the defendant that does not have a principal legitimate business purpose, such as the invention of sham corporate entities to misrepresent the flow of income, may 5
6 have a principal purpose of creating a false appearance. Conduct that is consistent with the defendants normal course of business would not typically be considered to have the purpose and effect of creating a misrepresentation. Participation in a legitimate transaction which does not have a deceptive purpose or effect would not allow for a primary violation even if the defendant knew or intended that another party would manipulate the transaction to effectuate a fraud. IV. This decision comes at an important time. Plaintiffs have increasingly looked to the scheme element of Rule 10b-5 in an attempt to avoid Central Bank s restrictions on claims against non-speaking secondary actors who, previously, at most would have been considered aiders and abettors. District Court decisions in a number of these cases, including In re Enron Corp. Sec. Derivative & ERISA Litig, 235 F. Supp. 2d 549 (S.D. Tex. 2002), In re Lernout & Hauspie Sec. Litig., 236 F. Supp. 2d 161 (D. Mass. 2003), and In re Parmalat Sec. Litig., 376 F. Supp. 2d 472 (S.D.N.Y. 2005), have declined to dismiss scheme claims against non-speaking secondary actors, even where the conduct in question did not come within the traditionally understood scope of a manipulative scheme -- such as matched orders or wash trades in which sham transactions were orchestrated for the purpose of deceiving the market. This has given rise to concern among the defense bar over the possibility that new law in this largely undeveloped area of primary scheme liability could lead to an end-run around Central Bank s prohibition against aiding and abetting claims. In Cleary Gottlieb s September 2005 Litigation & Arbitration Report, we noted: One can question whether, if Section 10(b) can be so stretched, the conduct at issue really justifies the imposition of primary liability exposure. Indeed, in light of Central Bank, at a minimum that conduct must -- as in standard manipulation cases -- be the equivalent of false speech (and conduct must also include scienter by the actor). If not, primary liability conduct will be hard to differentiate from the substantial assistance component of aiding and abetting that the pre- Central Bank cases tried to define. The Ninth Circuit s test goes a long way toward addressing these concerns. It returns the focus of the inquiry to the nature of each defendant s own conduct, asking whether that conduct itself was misleading -- i.e., the equivalent of false speech. The Court appropriately narrows the scope of primary scheme liability so that it reaches only conduct that has no legitimate business purpose. And the test requires that a plaintiff plead and 6
7 prove both scienter and that the defendant engaged in conduct that had the principal purpose and effect of creating a false appearance of fact in furtherance of the scheme. Mitchell A. Lowenthal Stuart N. Mast * * * For further information about any of the issues raised above, please contact Mitchell Lowenthal or Stuart Mast in the Firm s New York office ( ). CLEARY GOTTLIEB STEEN & HAMILTON LLP 7
8 NEW YORK One Liberty Plaza New York, NY Fax WASHINGTON 2000 Pennsylvania Avenue, NW Washington, DC Fax PARIS 12, rue de Tilsitt Paris, France Fax BRUSSELS Rue de la Loi Brussels, Belgium Fax LONDON City Place House 55 Basinghall Street London EC2V 5EH, England Fax MOSCOW Cleary Gottlieb Steen & Hamilton LLP CGS&H Limited Liability Company Paveletskaya Square 2/3 Moscow, Russia Fax FRANKFURT Main Tower Neue Mainzer Strasse Frankfurt am Main, Germany Fax COLOGNE Theodor-Heuss-Ring Cologne, Germany Fax ROME Piazza di Spagna Rome, Italy Fax MILAN Via San Paolo Milan, Italy Fax HONG KONG Bank of China Tower One Garden Road Hong Kong Fax BEIJING Twin Towers West 12 B Jianguomen Wai Da Jie Chaoyang District Beijing , China Fax
Alert Memo. More Documents About the Target Would Be Required
Alert Memo AUGUST 19, 2010 FTC Proposes HSR Changes: Would Require More Documents from All Filers, Extensive New Information from Private Equity Funds, Foreign Manufacturers, and Others On August 16, the
More informationAlert Memo. SEC Adopts Final Proxy Access Rules
Alert Memo AUGUST 25, 2010 SEC Adopts Final Proxy Access Rules On August 25, the SEC adopted final proxy access rules by a 3-2 vote. Subject to conditions, the new rules provide sizeable, long-term and
More informationExecutive Summary New Section 457A (Nonqualified Deferred Compensation)
Executive Summary New Section 457A (Nonqualified Deferred Compensation) New York November 3, 2008 On October 3, 2008, the Emergency Economic Stabilization Act of 2008 (H.R. 1424) was signed into law. The
More informationAlert Memo. Second Circuit Provides Guidance on Section 13(d) Group Issues but Declines to Address Beneficial Ownership Issues in the Swap Context
Alert Memo JULY 20, 2011 Second Circuit Provides Guidance on Section 13(d) Group Issues but Declines to Address Beneficial Ownership Issues in the Swap Context On July 18, 2011, almost three years after
More informationTerm Asset-Backed Securities Loan Facility Launches: Key Details
Term Asset-Backed Securities Loan Facility Launches: Key Details Washington, DC March 11, 2009 On March 3, 2009, the U.S. Treasury and Federal Reserve Board ( Fed ) announced the launch of the Term Asset-Backed
More informationAlert Memo. Background
Alert Memo AUGUST 11, 2011 Bankruptcy Court Holds That Safe Harbor in Section 546(e) of the Bankruptcy Code for Settlement Payments Protects Recipients of Repurchase Payments for Privately Placed Notes
More informationAlert Memo BRUSSELS AND HONG KONG FEBRUARY 18, China s State Council Issues Notice on National Security Review of Foreign Acquisitions
Alert Memo BRUSSELS AND HONG KONG FEBRUARY 18, 2011 China s State Council Issues Notice on National Security Review of Foreign Acquisitions On March 5, 2011, a new national security regime regulating foreign
More informationAlert Memo. PCAOB Proposes New Standard on Auditor Communications with Audit Committee
Alert Memo NEW YORK APRIL 1, 2010 PCAOB Proposes New Standard on Auditor Communications with Audit Committee Introduction At an open meeting on March 29, 2010, the Public Company Accounting Oversight Board
More informationAlert Memo. Financial Regulatory Reform - Hedge Fund and Private Equity Provisions
Alert Memo NEW YORK JUNE 17, 2009 Financial Regulatory Reform - Hedge Fund and Private Equity Provisions The Administration s sweeping recommendations for financial regulatory reform, issued June 17, 2009,
More informationThe Decision. 1. The Facts
June 13, 2013 clearygottlieb.com Circuit Court Affirms Broad Reading of the Bankruptcy Code Safe Harbor for Transfers in Connection with a Securities Contract in In re Quebecor World (USA) Inc. A recent
More informationAlert Memo. Dodd-Frank Corporate Governance Proposed Rules: Compensation Committee and Adviser Independence
Alert Memo APRIL 11, 2011 Dodd-Frank Corporate Governance Proposed Rules: Compensation Committee and Adviser Independence On March 30, 2011, the U.S. Securities and Exchange Commission (the SEC ) released
More informationAlert Memo NEW YORK & WASHINGTON, DC FEBRUARY 4, SEC Interpretive Release Establishes New Guidance on Disclosure of Climate Change Matters
Alert Memo NEW YORK & WASHINGTON, DC FEBRUARY 4, 2010 SEC Interpretive Release Establishes New Guidance on Disclosure of Climate Change Matters On February 2, 2010, the Securities and Exchange Commission
More informationAlert Memo. Directors Remuneration Reforms in the United Kingdom: UK Enterprise and Regulatory Reform Act 2013 Published
Alert Memo MAY 21, 2013 Directors Remuneration Reforms in the United Kingdom: UK Enterprise and Regulatory Reform Act 2013 Published 1. Introduction The UK Enterprise and Regulatory Reform Bill received
More informationSEC Proposes New Requirements for Credit Rating Agencies
SEC Proposes New Requirements for Credit Rating Agencies New York July 17, 2008 On June 16, 2008, the U.S. Securities and Exchange Commission (the Commission ) published for comment a series of new rules
More informationAlert Memo PREPARING FOR "PROXY ACCESS" SHAREHOLDER PROPOSALS
Alert Memo SEPTEMBER 26, 2011 PREPARING FOR "PROXY ACCESS" SHAREHOLDER PROPOSALS Following the SEC s decision not to seek a rehearing of the decision by the U.S. Court of Appeals for the District of Columbia
More informationAlert Memo. Further Changes to Russian Securities Law Aimed at Bringing Liquidity to the Local Market
Alert Memo 25 FEBRUARY 2013 Further Changes to Russian Securities Law Aimed at Bringing Liquidity to the Local Market On December 29, 2012, the President of the Russian Federation signed into law Federal
More informationSEC Publishes Final Rules for Credit Rating Agencies, Reproposes Others
SEC Publishes Final Rules for Credit Rating Agencies, Reproposes Others New York February 12, 2009 On February 2, 2009, the U.S. Securities and Exchange Commission (the Commission ) published new rules
More informationCLEARY GOTFTLIEB NEW SENATE FINANCE COMMITTEE PROPOSALS SIGNIFICANTLY CURTAIL DEFERRED COMPENSATION. New York January 17, 2007
CLEARY GOTFTLIEB NEW YORK WASHINGTON PARIS BRUSSELS LONDON MOSCOW FRANKFURT COLOGNE ROME MILAN HONG KONG BEIJING NEW SENATE FINANCE COMMITTEE PROPOSALS SIGNIFICANTLY CURTAIL DEFERRED COMPENSATION New York
More informationAnticipating Next Year's Option Awards: A Thought Piece About Capturing Option Value
Anticipating Next Year's Option Awards: A Thought Piece About Capturing Option Value New York March 28, 2007 Difficulty in measuring the value of employee stock options, and inequality between option expense
More informationRecent Developments Regarding the Application of German Merger Control to International Transactions
GERMAN COMPETITION LAW UPDATE Recent Developments Regarding the Application of German Merger Control to International Transactions Brussels/Cologne March 17, 2009 This note summarizes a number of recent
More informationAlert Memo NEW YORK, BRUSSELS, LONDON, AUGUST 28, 2012
Alert Memo NEW YORK, BRUSSELS, LONDON, AUGUST 28, 2012 European Banking Authority Publishes Guidelines for Data Collection on EEA Remuneration Practices On July 27, 2012, the European Banking Authority
More informationAlert Memo. Walker Review of Corporate Governance in UK Banks and Other Financial Institutions
Alert Memo LONDON DECEMBER 7, 2009 Walker Review of Corporate Governance in UK Banks and Other Financial Institutions On November 26, 2009, Her Majesty s Treasury ( HM Treasury ) published the final version
More informationAlert Memo. FASB Reproposes Disclosure Requirements for Loss Contingencies
Alert Memo AUGUST 2, 2010 FASB Reproposes Disclosure Requirements for Loss Contingencies The FASB has republished for comment proposed amendments to the accounting standard for disclosure of loss contingencies.
More informationEXTENDED REPORTING REQUIREMENTS FOR INVES-
EXTENDED REPORTING REQUIREMENTS FOR INVES- TORS IN GERMAN LISTED COMPANIES ENTERED INTO FORCE ON MARCH 1, 2009 AND WILL ENTER INTO FORCE ON MAY 31, 2009, RESPECTIVELY Frankfurt, March 2009 The following
More informationAlert Memo. 1. Introduction. 2. Consultation on profit forecasts, merger benefits statements and material changes in information. 2.
Alert Memo JULY 11, 2012 Takeover Panel publishes three consultation papers (on profit forecasts, merger benefits statements and material changes in information; issues relating to pension scheme trustees;
More informationAlert Memo. Italy Introduces a Financial Transaction Tax as of 2013
Alert Memo DECEMBER 26, 2012 Italy Introduces a Financial Transaction Tax as of 2013 On December 21, 2012, the Italian Parliament approved the budget law for 2013 (the Budget Law ) contemplating, among
More informationAlert Memo BRUSSELS AND LONDON, DECEMBER 28, Reform of the Markets in Financial Instruments Directive: European Commission Consultation
Alert Memo BRUSSELS AND LONDON, DECEMBER 28, 2010 Reform of the Markets in Financial Instruments Directive: European Commission Consultation On December 8, 2010, the European Commission published a public
More informationAlert Memo. CFTC Proposes New Federal Position Limits and Exemptions for Certain Energy Commodity Contracts
Alert Memo NEW YORK FEBRUARY 2, 2010 CFTC Proposes New Federal Position Limits and Exemptions for Certain Energy Commodity Contracts On January 26, 2010, the U.S. Commodity Futures Trading Commission (
More informationAlert Memo. PCAOB Issues Proposals on Related Parties, Significant Unusual Transactions and Financial Relationships with Executive Officers
Alert Memo MARCH 7, 2012 PCAOB Issues Proposals on Related Parties, Significant Unusual Transactions and Financial Relationships with Executive Officers At its recent open meeting, the Public Company Accounting
More informationAlert Memo. Coordination but no Consolidation: Internal Draft Bill on Group Insolvencies in Germany
Alert Memo FRANKFURT, FEBRUARY 4, 2013 Coordination but no Consolidation: Internal Draft Bill on Group Insolvencies in Germany We have reviewed an internal draft of the German Federal Ministry of Justice
More informationAlert Memo. FDIC Proposes Rules on Nullifying Subsidiary and Affiliate Cross-Defaults Under OLA
Alert Memo MARCH 23, 2012 FDIC Proposes Rules on Nullifying Subsidiary and Affiliate Cross-Defaults Under OLA On March 20, 2012, the Federal Deposit Insurance Corporation ( FDIC ) issued a proposed rule
More informationAlert Memo. Italy s new rules on notes and commercial paper
Alert Memo JUNE 15, 2012 Italy s new rules on notes and commercial paper June 15, 2012 The Italian Cabinet adopted today a Law Decree (the Decree ) 1 introducing important measures aimed at stimulating
More informationAlert Memo OVERVIEW OF ESTATE, GIFT AND GST TAX PLANNING IN LIGHT OF 2010 TAX LEGISLATION
Alert Memo JANUARY 19, 2011 OVERVIEW OF ESTATE, GIFT AND GST TAX PLANNING IN LIGHT OF 2010 TAX LEGISLATION This memorandum reviews lifetime and testamentary estate planning in the current tax environment,
More informationAlert Memo. SEC Proposes to Liberalize Solicitation and Advertising in Private Placements
Alert Memo SEPTEMBER 5, 2012 SEC Proposes to Liberalize Solicitation and Advertising in Private Placements On August 29, 2012, the U.S. Securities and Exchange Commission proposed rule changes to liberalize
More informationAlert Memo. Insolvency Reform to Boost Restructurings in Germany
Alert Memo DECEMBER 14, 2011 Insolvency Reform to Boost Restructurings in Germany On December 13, 2011, the so-called Act to Facilitate Further the Restructuring of Companies (Gesetz zur weiteren Erleichterung
More informationSecond Circuit Holds That Kazakh Sovereign Wealth Fund Is Not Immune From Securities Fraud Suit
February 16, 2016 clearygottlieb.com Second Circuit Holds That Kazakh Sovereign Wealth Fund Is Not Immune From Securities Fraud Suit Addressing an issue of first impression, on February 3, 2016, the United
More informationFCA AUTHORISED FIRMS REQUIRED TO DISCLOSE POSSIBLE COMPETITION INFRINGEMENTS
August 18, 2015 clearygottlieb.com FCA AUTHORISED FIRMS REQUIRED TO DISCLOSE POSSIBLE COMPETITION INFRINGEMENTS The Financial Conduct Authority ( FCA ) now requires authorised firms 1 to report to the
More informationImpact of the Draft German Bill on Issuer- Bondholder Relationships on Convertible and Exchangeable Bond Offerings
Impact of the Draft German Bill on Issuer- Bondholder Relationships on Convertible and Exchangeable Bond Offerings Frankfurt August 2008 In June 2008, the Federal Ministry of Justice ( FMJ ), published
More informationDismissal of Madoff Trustee s Claims Clarifies Standards for Fraudulent Conveyance Claims
March 18, 2016 clearygottlieb.com Dismissal of Madoff Trustee s Claims Clarifies Standards for Fraudulent Conveyance Claims In the latest turn in the fraudulent conveyance litigation arising out of the
More informationNew Form 5500 Rules Greatly Increase Information Required To Be Disclosed About Compensation Received By Service Providers To Plans Subject To ERISA
New Form 5500 Rules Greatly Increase Information Required To Be Disclosed About Compensation Received By Service Providers To Plans Subject To ERISA New York January 10, 2008 On November 16, 2007, the
More informationAlert Memo. Prudential Regulators Propose Swap Margin and Capital Requirements
Alert Memo APRIL 14, 2011 Prudential Regulators Propose Swap Margin and Capital Requirements On April 12, 2011, the Federal Reserve Board ( FRB ), the Federal Deposit Insurance Corporation ( FDIC ), the
More informationAlert Memo. Changed Supervision of Savings and Loan Holding Companies and Savings Associations
Alert Memo SEPTEMBER 14, 2011 Changed Supervision of Savings and Loan Holding Companies and Savings Associations The Dodd-Frank Wall Street Reform and Consumer Protection Act ( Dodd- Frank ), transferred
More informationAlert Memo NEW IRS FILING REQUIREMENT FOR U.S. EXECUTIVES WITH NON-U.S. COMPENSATION
Alert Memo MARCH 12, 2012 NEW IRS FILING REQUIREMENT FOR U.S. EXECUTIVES WITH NON-U.S. COMPENSATION The U.S. Foreign Account Tax Compliance Act ( FATCA ), which was enacted by the U.S. Congress in 2010,
More informationTreasury Proposes Changes to the Regulations Governing Exon-Florio National Security Reviews of Foreign Investment in the United States
Treasury Proposes Changes to the Regulations Governing Exon-Florio National Security Reviews of Foreign Investment in the United States Washington, DC April 22, 2008 The Department of the Treasury ( Treasury
More informationAlert Memo BRUSSELS, FEBRUARY 21, EU Agrees Stability Mechanism and Fiscal Compact
Alert Memo BRUSSELS, FEBRUARY 21, 2012 EU Agrees Stability Mechanism and Fiscal Compact On February 2, 2012, the eurozone Member States signed the treaty establishing the European Stability Mechanism (the
More informationAlert Memo. The El Paso/Kinder Morgan Opinion: Further Delaware Guidance on Sell-side Conflicts
Alert Memo MARCH 5, 2012 The El Paso/Kinder Morgan Opinion: Further Delaware Guidance on Sell-side Conflicts In its recent decision regarding the acquisition of El Paso Corporation by Kinder Morgan, Inc.,
More informationAlert Memo. The new rules apply to innovative start-ups and include:
Alert Memo OCTOBER 5, 2012 Incentives for Innovative Start-Ups October 5, 2012 I. Overview On October 4, 2012, the Italian Government approved a Law Decree (the Decree ), aimed at promoting the establishment
More informationAlert Memo. Recovery and Resolution of Banks German Legislative Developments
Alert Memo JANUARY 2013 Recovery and Resolution of Banks German Legislative Developments In December 2012, the German Federal Ministry of Finance (Bundesministerium für Finanzen) started a consultation
More informationProvisions of the American Recovery and Reinvestment Act of 2009 Relating to Deferral of Cancellation of Debt Income
Provisions of the American Recovery and Reinvestment Act of 2009 Relating to Deferral of Cancellation of Debt Income New York February 19, 2009 I. BACKGROUND. In recent months, many issuers of outstanding
More informationAlert Memo. Binding Shareholder Say-on-Pay Vote on Route to Reality in the UK: US Companies Take Note
Alert Memo JULY 9, 2012 Binding Shareholder Say-on-Pay Vote on Route to Reality in the UK: US Companies Take Note In 2002, the UK began requiring an advisory shareholder vote on the annual executive and
More informationDominant Companies May Not Refuse Ordinary Orders With The Aim Of Restricting Parallel Trade - ECJ Judgment in GlaxoSmithKline AEVE
Dominant Companies May Not Refuse Ordinary Orders With The Aim Of Restricting Parallel Trade - ECJ Judgment in GlaxoSmithKline AEVE Brussels October 1, 2008 On September 16, 2008, the European Court of
More informationAlert Memo. FDIC Finalizes Rule on Nullification of Subsidiary and Affiliate Cross-Defaults under OLA
Alert Memo OCTOBER 17, 2012 FDIC Finalizes Rule on Nullification of Subsidiary and Affiliate Cross-Defaults under OLA On October 9, 2012, the Federal Deposit Insurance Corporation ( FDIC ) finalized its
More informationAlert Memo NEW YORK SEPTEMBER 2, Application of the TARP Compensation Rules in the Fiscal Year in Which the TARP Obligation is Repaid
Alert Memo NEW YORK SEPTEMBER 2, 2009 Application of the TARP Compensation Rules in the Fiscal Year in Which the TARP Obligation is Repaid On Friday, August 28, 2009, the U.S. Treasury Department ( Treasury
More informationAlert Memo. CFTC Proposes Uncleared Swap Margin Requirements
Alert Memo APRIL 27, 2011 CFTC Proposes Uncleared Swap Margin s On April 14, 2011, the Commodity Futures Trading Commission ( CFTC ) proposed margin requirements under Section 731 of the Dodd-Frank Wall
More informationAIFMD Implementation Guidance from the Commission, ESMA and UK
BRUSSELS MAY 29, 2013 clearygottlieb.com AIFMD Implementation Guidance from the Commission, ESMA and UK Less than two months before July 22, 2013 (the Implementation Date ), the date on which Directive
More informationAlert Memo BRUSSELS AND LONDON, MAY 12, European Commission Proposes New Regulatory System for Hedge Funds and Private Equity Funds
Alert Memo BRUSSELS AND LONDON, MAY 12, 2009 European Commission Proposes New Regulatory System for Hedge Funds and Private Equity Funds On April 30, 2009, the European Commission (the Commission ) published
More informationAlert Memo NEW YORK & WASHINGTON OCTOBER 28, FDIC s Final Safe Harbor Rule Imposes New Securitization Standards
Alert Memo NEW YORK & WASHINGTON OCTOBER 28, 2010 FDIC s Final Safe Harbor Rule Imposes New Securitization Standards On September 27, 2010, the Board of Directors of the Federal Deposit Insurance Corporation
More informationFirst Circuit Puts the Fund in Pension Underfunding
AUGUST 19, 2013 clearygottlieb.com First Circuit Puts the Fund in Pension Underfunding The United States Court of Appeals for the First Circuit (the Circuit Court ) recently held, in Sun Capital Partners
More informationAlert Memo. ESMA s Technical Advice on Possible Delegated Acts Concerning Amendments to The Prospectus Directive
Alert Memo OCTOBER 17, 2011 ESMA s Technical Advice on Possible Delegated Acts Concerning Amendments to The Prospectus Directive On October 4, 2011, the European Securities and Markets Authority ( ESMA
More informationAbu Dhabi Global Market Brings Core Regulations Into Force
June 23, 2015 clearygottlieb.com Abu Dhabi Global Market Brings Core Regulations Into Force The 8 core regulations that will apply to companies operating within the Abu Dhabi Global Market (the ADGM),
More informationCorporate Disclosure of Government Enforcement Developments
Corporate Disclosure of Government Enforcement Developments U.S. District Court for the Southern District of New York Holds No General Duty for Issuers to Disclose SEC Investigations or Receipt of SEC
More informationSupreme Court of the United States
No. 06-43 ================================================================ In The Supreme Court of the United States --------------------------------- --------------------------------- STONERIDGE INVESTMENT
More informationNinth Circuit Holds That Non-U.S. Issuers Can Be Liable in U.S. for Unsponsored American Depositary Receipt Facility
Ninth Circuit Holds That Non-U.S. Issuers Can Be Liable in U.S. for Unsponsored American Depositary Transactions in Unsponsored American Depositary Receipts Can Qualify as Domestic Transactions Subject
More informationAlert Memo. Say-on-Pay and the Business Judgment Rule: Lessons from Cincinnati Bell and Beazer Homes
Alert Memo OCTOBER 24, 2011 Say-on-Pay and the Business Judgment Rule: Lessons from Cincinnati Bell and Beazer Homes Over 40 companies received negative say-on-pay advisory votes in 2011, the first year
More informationAlert Memo. Tax Rules on Debt Securities Issued by Non-Listed Companies Amended
Alert Memo OCTOBER 4, 2012 Tax Rules on Debt Securities Issued by Non-Listed Companies Amended October 4, 2012 Today, the Italian Government issued a law decree (the Decree ) that, among other things,
More informationMONROE v. HUGHES; HUDSON; and DELOITTE & TOUCHE, fka DELOITTE, HASKINS & SELLS,
MONROE v. HUGHES; HUDSON; and DELOITTE & TOUCHE, fka DELOITTE, HASKINS & SELLS, UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE NINTH CIRCUIT 31 F.3d 772 July 21, 1994 JUDGES: Before: James R. Browning, Mary M.
More informationExpanding EU Role in European Financial Regulation
Expanding EU Role in European Financial Regulation Brussels March 27, 2009 In its conclusions published on March 20, 2009, the European Council endorsed a greatly expanded European Union role in the regulation
More informationTenth Circuit Affirms Ruling Allowing SEC to Bring Securities Fraud Claims Over Certain Foreign Transactions
Tenth Circuit Affirms Ruling Allowing SEC to Bring Securities Fraud Claims Over Certain Foreign Transactions January 30, 2019 Last week, in SEC v. Scoville, the U.S. Court of Appeals for the Tenth Circuit
More informationImplementation of Sanctions Relief for Iran
January 18, 2016 clearygottlieb.com Implementation of Sanctions Relief for Iran On January 16, 2016, following a favorable report from the International Atomic Energy Agency, the P5+1 powers (the United
More informationCFTC v. Wilson: Court Rules against CFTC in Commodities Manipulation Bench Trial
CFTC v. Wilson: Court Rules against CFTC in Commodities Manipulation Bench Trial Court Holds that Open-Market Bids and Offers Made with an Honest Desire to Trade Cannot Support Liability under the Commodity
More informationAlert Memo. Federal Reserve Board Issues Long-Awaited Capital Rules
Alert Memo JUNE 11, 2012 Federal Reserve Board Issues Long-Awaited Capital Rules On June 7, 2012, the Board of Governors of the Federal Reserve System (the Federal Reserve ) took action to bring the U.S.
More informationThe Jumpstart Our Business Startups Act and Its Impact on Equity Research Analysts
To Our Clients and Friends Memorandum friedfrank.com The Jumpstart Our Business Startups Act and Its Impact on Equity Research Analysts I. Overview On Thursday April 5, 2012, President Obama signed the
More informationCHICAGO BAR ASSOCIATION SECURITIES FRAUD PRESENTATION
CHICAGO BAR ASSOCIATION SECURITIES FRAUD PRESENTATION B. JOHN CASEY, LATHAM & WATKINS LLP MICHAEL FARIS, LATHAM & WATKINS LLP CHAD COFFMAN, WINNEMAC CONSULTING, LLC JAMES DAVIDSON, U.S. SECURITIES & EXCHANGE
More information: : PLAINTIFF, : : : : : DEFENDANT : Plaintiffs are hedge funds that invested in the Rye Select Broad Market
UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT SOUTHERN DISTRICT OF NEW YORK ---------------------------------------------x MERIDIAN HORIZON FUND, L.P., ET AL., PLAINTIFF, v. TREMONT GROUP HOLDINGS, INC., DEFENDANT ---------------------------------------------x
More informationSEC Accounting Enforcement: Initiatives, Trends & Developments. April 19, 2012
SEC Accounting Enforcement: Initiatives, Trends & Developments April 19, 2012 Agenda Introduction Presentation Questions and Answers (anonymous) Slides now available on front page of Securities Docket
More informationRecent CFTC Issuances
CFTC Issues Proposed Rules under the Dodd-Frank Act on the Prohibition of Market Manipulation and an Advance Notice of Proposed Rulemaking on the Prohibition of Disruptive Trading Practices SUMMARY On
More informationMemorandum. Combatting Securities Fraud Allegations With 10b5-1 Trading Plans. I. 10b5-1 Plans and Regulatory Requirements.
Memorandum Combatting Securities Fraud Allegations With 10b5-1 Trading Plans July 24, 2017 A recent decision issued by the United States District Court for the District of Massachusetts, Harrington v.
More informationStakes Are High For ERISA Fiduciaries
Portfolio Media. Inc. 860 Broadway, 6th Floor New York, NY 10003 www.law360.com Phone: +1 646 783 7100 Fax: +1 646 783 7161 customerservice@law360.com Stakes Are High For ERISA Fiduciaries Law360, New
More informationU.S. Securities Litigation Against Non-U.S. Issuers by Non-U.S. Plaintiffs
U.S. Securities Litigation Against Non-U.S. Issuers by Non-U.S. Plaintiffs Second Circuit Appellate Court Tightens Rules Governing Foreign- Cubed Claims SUMMARY Over the past several years, U.S. plaintiffs
More informationRicciardi v. Ameriquest Mtg Co
2006 Decisions Opinions of the United States Court of Appeals for the Third Circuit 1-17-2006 Ricciardi v. Ameriquest Mtg Co Precedential or Non-Precedential: Non-Precedential Docket No. 05-1409 Follow
More informationUNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT DISTRICT OF MINNESOTA. Plaintiff, v. MEMORANDUM OPINION AND ORDER Civil No (MJD/TNL) Admiral Investments, LLC,
CASE 0:16-cv-00452-MJD-TNL Document 26 Filed 02/02/17 Page 1 of 9 UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT DISTRICT OF MINNESOTA Brianna Johnson, Plaintiff, v. MEMORANDUM OPINION AND ORDER Civil No. 16 452 (MJD/TNL)
More informationComplaint for Violation of the Federal Securities Laws (Nadler v. Clarent Corp., et al., Case No. C BZ)
Complaint for Violation of the Federal Securities Laws (Nadler v. Clarent Corp., et al., Case No. C-01-3406-BZ Source: Milberg Weiss Date: 09/07/01 Time: 3:57 PM MILBERG WEISS BERSHAD HYNES & LERACH LLP
More informationSECURITIES AND EXCHANGE COMMISSION
Home Previous Page SECURITIES AND EXCHANGE COMMISSION LITIGATION RELEASE NO. 17179 / OCTOBER 11, 2001 SECURITIES EXCHANGE COMMISSION V. RAMOIL MANAGEMENT LTD., ET AL., United States District Court for
More informationDIRECTORS AND OFFICERS LIABILITY STOCK SALES AND SCIENTER. August 15, 2001 JOSEPH M. MCLAUGHLIN S IMPSON THACHER & BARTLETT LLP
DIRECTORS AND OFFICERS LIABILITY STOCK SALES AND SCIENTER JOSEPH M. MCLAUGHLIN SIMPSON THACHER & BARTLETT LLP August 15, 2001 The Private Securities Litigation Reform Act requires plaintiffs seeking to
More informationUNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT SOUTHERN DISTRICT OF FLORIDA CASE NO CIV-DIMITROULEAS
In re DS Healthcare Group, Inc. Securities Litigation / UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT SOUTHERN DISTRICT OF FLORIDA CASE NO. 16-60661-CIV-DIMITROULEAS NOTICE OF PENDENCY AND PROPOSED SETTLEMENT OF CLASS
More informationDepartment of Labor Reverses Course: Mortgage Loan Officers Do Not Meet the Administrative Exemption s Requirements
A Timely Analysis of Legal Developments A S A P In This Issue: March 2010 In a development that may have significant implications for mortgage lenders and other financial services employers, the Department
More informationNOT FOR PUBLICATION UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE NINTH CIRCUIT. Plaintiff-Appellant, D.C. No. 4:16-cv CW
NOT FOR PUBLICATION UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE NINTH CIRCUIT FILED JUN 4 2018 MOLLY C. DWYER, CLERK U.S. COURT OF APPEALS HOTCHALK, INC. No. 16-17287 v. Plaintiff-Appellant, D.C. No. 4:16-cv-03883-CW
More informationLearning the True Meaning of Fiduciary, the Hard Way Sub: As 401(k) values plummet, pensioners look to employers and question their performances
Learning the True Meaning of Fiduciary, the Hard Way Sub: As 401(k) values plummet, pensioners look to employers and question their performances By Evan Miller and Alison Cera National Law Journal Although
More informationCommon Purpose Test Under RICO Can Be Effective Dismissal Tool
Reprinted with permission from The New York Law Journal (May 24,1999) Common Purpose Test Under RICO Can Be Effective Dismissal Tool by Ethan M. Posner Ethan M. Posner is a partner at the Washington, D.C.
More informationMemorandum. WTO Appellate Body Rules Against U.S. Zeroing in Anti-Dumping Calculations
Memorandum T o O u r F r i e n d s a n d C l i e n t s WTO Appellate Body Rules Against U.S. Zeroing In its fourth significant decision against the United States in recent years, 1 the Appellate Body of
More informationFraudMail Alert. Please click here to view our archives
FraudMail Alert Please click here to view our archives Justice Department Brandishes Rarely Used Weapon FIRREA in Full-Scale Assault on S&P, and California Joins the Battle with Separate State False Claims
More informationNew Government Theories of Civil Liability for Off-Label Promotion: Are They Legitimate?
BEIJING BRUSSELS CHICAGO DALLAS FRANKFURT GENEVA HONG KONG LONDON LOS ANGELES NEW YORK SAN FRANCISCO SHANGHAI SINGAPORE TOKYO WASHINGTON, D.C. New Government Theories of Civil Liability for Off-Label Promotion:
More informationB. Co-Defendant Coverage. This alternative grants coverage for any claim against the company provided that the claim is also made against D&Os.
GLOSSARY I. INSURANCE COVERAGE TERMS Allocation refers to the process of determining the amount of defense costs and any settlement or judgment which is properly attributable or allocated to covered claims
More informationLatham & Watkins Capital Markets Practice Group
Number 986 February 11, 2010 Client Alert Latham & Watkins Capital Markets Practice Group Testing the Waters Ahead of Exchange Offers C&DI 139.29, coupled with the Staff s informal interpretation of Rules
More informationDIRECTORS AND OFFICERS LIABILITY ERISA ENTERS THE SPOTLIGHT
DIRECTORS AND OFFICERS LIABILITY ERISA ENTERS THE SPOTLIGHT JOSEPH M. MCLAUGHLIN * SIMPSON THACHER & BARTLETT LLP DECEMBER 9, 2004 Directors of public companies and their advisers have long understood
More informationSEC PUBLISHES FINAL AMENDMENTS TO RULE 105 OF REGULATION M
CLIENT MEMORANDUM SEC PUBLISHES FINAL AMENDMENTS TO RULE 105 OF REGULATION M On August 6, 2007, the Securities and Exchange Commission (the SEC or the Commission ) published final amendments that significantly
More informationI. WTO. Brussels January March 2006
Brussels January March 2006 Included in this issue: Appellate Body report in the EC/United States Foreign Sales Corporation dispute Court of First Instance ruling on the EC s liability under Article 288(2)
More informationUNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT
Case 6:17-cv-01523-GAP-TBS Document 29 Filed 01/18/18 Page 1 of 6 PageID 467 DUDLEY BLAKE, UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT Plaintiff, MIDDLE DISTRICT OF FLORIDA ORLANDO DIVISION v. Case No: 6:17-cv-1523-Orl-31TBS
More informationSEC Antifraud Rule Applicable to Investment Advisers to Pooled Investment Vehicles Becomes Effective
CAHILL GORDON & REINDEL LLP SEPTEMBER 10, 2007 EIGHTY PINE STREET NEW YORK, NEW YORK 10005-1702 TELEPHONE: (212) 701-3000 FACSIMILE: (212) 269-5420 This memorandum is for general information purposes only
More informationTHE FIGHT AGAINST FINANCIAL CRIMES AND ITS EFFECT ON THE CHIEF COMPLIANCE OFFICER
THE FIGHT AGAINST FINANCIAL CRIMES AND ITS EFFECT ON THE CHIEF COMPLIANCE OFFICER How proposed New York regulations and the Department of Justice may hold CCOs personally liable Sara K. Weed Global Banking
More information