Tax alert. Australia s Diverted Profits Tax - Draft Law, affecting many multinational businesses. At a glance

Transcription

1 December 2016 Tax alert Australia s Diverted Profits Tax - Draft Law, affecting many multinational businesses At a glance Many hundreds of multinational groups, inbound and outbound, might be affected by the DPT. EY can help affected companies to consider their positions, to prepare for an even closer interaction with the ATO to head off potential DPT risks. Groups need to consider the DPT implications of their future country-bycountry reporting disclosures. As well, the DPT is likely to lead to increased tax controversy with the ATO. Many multinational businesses will be affected by the proposed Australian Diverted Profits Tax (DPT) set out in the Exposure Draft (ED) issued by the Government on 29 November 2016 for comment by 23 December. Introduction of a Bill into Parliament is anticipated in early The DPT is to apply in respect of income years commencing on or after 1 July The DPT will broaden the Part IVA anti-avoidance law to allow the Australian Taxation Office (ATO) to impose DPT on multinational businesses which transfer profits to offshore associates. The ATO, through the Commissioner, will be able to impose DPT at a penalty tax rate of 40% on diverted profits, broadly, where: an Australian entity or permanent establishment is a member of a significant global entity with annual global income of AU$1 billion or more and has total Australian turnover of more than AU$25 million; a scheme involves foreign associated entities in lower tax jurisdictions or jurisdictions in which they receive tax concessions; the relevant taxpayer obtains a tax benefit in connection with the scheme; the scheme has a principal purpose of avoiding Australian tax; and the foreign entities do not have sufficient economic substance for their income. Key carveouts from the DPT include: the sufficient foreign tax test. This carves out schemes, broadly, where the increased foreign taxes exceed 80% of the Australian tax reduction; the sufficient economic substance test. This will use transfer pricing principles including the recent updated guidance arising from BEPS Actions 8 to 10. The ED has no carveouts for financing or the investment sectors (such as in the UK). The objective of the DPT is to compel voluntary disclosures to the ATO. The ATO will be empowered to use whatever information is available to it (including country-by-country reporting data) to raise DPT assessments. The ED has measures to discourage taxpayers from holding back information from the ATO. Many hundreds of multinational groups, inbound and outbound, might be affected by the DPT - many more than those affected by the Multinational Anti Avoidance Law (MAAL). Affected companies will need to consider their positions, to prepare for an even closer interaction with the ATO to head off potential DPT risks. It is imperative that affected groups consider the DPT implications of their future country-by-country reporting disclosures. The DPT is likely to lead to increased tax controversy with the ATO.

2 Detailed discussion Overview of the DPT The Commissioner will be able to impose DPT on an entity under the Part IVA (anti-avoidance) rules where the following conditions are met, broadly: the relevant Australian company or permanent establishment is a significant global entity for the year of income - i.e., it is a global parent entity or a member of a consolidated accounting group that has annual global income exceeding AU$1 billion in the year, based on accounting principles; there is a scheme (using the existing wide drafting of that term); the relevant taxpayer obtains a tax benefit in connection with a scheme; a foreign entity that is an associate of the relevant taxpayer entered into the scheme or is otherwise connected to the scheme; and it is reasonable to conclude that the scheme (or any part of a scheme) was carried out for a principal purpose of enabling the relevant taxpayer (and/or associate) to obtain a tax benefit, or both to obtain a tax benefit and reduce a foreign tax liability of an associate. Under the DPT assessment, tax is payable on the amount of the diverted profits at a penalty rate of 40%. While the DPT ED is based to some extent on the one limb of the UK DPT, the rules are wider than the UK, with fewer carveouts or principles covering conventional transactions. The ED has issued in an Australian political environment which sees continuing focus on corporate tax revenues including those from multinational businesses. That focus has intensified with the fall in tax revenues from the mining and resources sector. Table 1 below summarises the analysis required. A principal purpose The new rules apply where it would be concluded that a scheme was carried out for a principal purpose (which may be only one of the principal purposes) of: obtaining a (Australian) tax; or obtaining both a (Australian) tax benefit and a reduction of one or more tax liabilities under a foreign law. It is unclear from the draft explanatory memorandum on what basis a tax benefit will be determined and quantified. A principal purpose, the threshold test for the DPT, like the MAAL, is wider than the sole or dominant purpose that applies for other purposes of Part IVA. Non-tax financial benefits which are quantifiable, e.g., commercial benefits generating economic value, may be considered in relation to the results of the scheme under the principal purpose threshold test. A transaction involving a foreign associate, with similar benefits and pricing as would apply with an unrelated party, should not in our view invoke the DPT, but that needs to be clearer in the law. There is no equivalent to the UK-legislated carveout for some such transactions. Exclusions Exclusions apply where it is reasonable to conclude that one of the following tests applies: a AU$25 million or less turnover for the Australian entity (provided no Australian related entities have artificially booked turnover outside Australia ); the sufficient foreign tax test (basically, the increase of the foreign tax liability is equal or exceeds 80% of the Australian tax reduction); or the sufficient economic substance test, if the income derived by each entity covered reasonably reflects the economic substance of the entity s activities in connection with the scheme. Sufficient economic substance, transfer pricing and disclosures The sufficient economic substance test is very briefly expressed in the ED. This looks to whether the income derived by each entity covered reasonably reflects the economic substance of the entity s activities in connection with the scheme. This is to apply only if the taxpayer provides information to satisfy the Commissioner that the activities of the relevant entity have sufficient economic substance in relation to the income derived, received or made by the entity as a result of the scheme. December 2016 Page 2

3 The draft explanatory memorandum states that the test will allow the use of transfer pricing principles and data, including the expanded global transfer pricing guidance arising from the G20 and OECD BEPS Actions That expanded guidance is planned to be adopted in Australia from 1 July The adoption is to be implemented, we understand, in the same Bill which will introduce the DPT. There are no legislated carveouts such as those in the UK DPT for: intragroup financing which is covered by other rules such as Australia s thin capitalisation and transfer pricing; transactions involving managed funds; or transactions which if undertaken with other parties would have similar outcomes. So, based on the ED, such transactions will need exhaustive analysis under the transfer pricing and other rules. EY will, amongst other items, submit to Treasury that the ED needs clearer legislated principles and rules for such transactions; otherwise the compliance costs, administration issues and uncertainty will be problematic. The legislative scheme is clearly designed to enhance disclosures to the ATO. The ED provides that if taxpayers have contemporaneous information which they did not supply to the ATO when the DPT is raised, they cannot use that information in later appeals unless the ATO consents. DPT assessment and review process The ATO will be authorised to issue DPT assessments based on the best information available to it. That will include the country-bycountry reporting data which will be first lodged in relation to tax returns for the 2017 income year. The administration and development of DPT compliance requirements is to be in the hands of the ATO and the Commissioner will issue guidance on the administrative processes prior to the decision to issue an assessment for a DPT liability. The processes will include the internal review process that the Commissioner will establish to ensure the DPT is only applied when appropriate. Table 2 below sets out the process. The ED states that the ATO is unlikely to issue DPT assessments without first having notified taxpayers in the course of tax controversies. However the draft explanatory memorandum states that, after the Commissioner notifies a taxpayer of an intent to issue a DPT assessment, the taxpayer has only 60 days to provide information to the Commissioner to the proposed DPT issue and payment. 60 days is a very short time for multinational groups to assemble the array of transfer pricing data needed to demonstrate sufficient economic substance and the purpose of global supply chains to the ATO and (potentially) in future court proceedings. Further information can be provided after the DPT assessment and payment of tax. The ED provides that appeals from the ATO DPT decisions can only be made to the Federal Court. This tight proposed time period means that affected groups will need to prepare for action on potentially risky transactions. Many unresolved issues require Treasury and ATO clarification The ED approach to the DPT has few changes from the problematical proposal released in the May 2016 Budget: the ED expresses the DPT at a very high level and lacks clarity. There are few exclusions, unlike the UK DPT. December 2016 Page 3

4 Numerous open questions including the need for stringent governance and controls, and EY will participate in the ongoing submission process closing by 23 December EY will highlight to the ATO and Treasury that further guidance is needed to be resolved speedily, given that foreign multinationals might have financial reporting requirements in relation to tax risks generated by the DPT. What does this mean for your business? Multinational groups with an Australian presence should start to prepare for the changed environment when the DPT commences to apply. Groups will need to identify any existing or proposed arrangements potentially within the proposed DPT scope. The interaction with country-by-country reporting as well as transfer pricing and other ATO interactions will be a key element here. For potentially affected arrangements, groups will need to consider how to prepare for responses to be ready for potential future ATO queries within 60 days after preliminary advice from ATO, e.g., by identifying the principal purpose of the scheme taking into account non-tax financial benefits that are quantifiable; or documenting sufficient economic substance. How EY can help EY can help multinational groups with an Australian presence to prepare for the changed environment when the DPT commences to apply. This will include: identifying existing or proposed arrangements potentially within the proposed DPT scope; considering the interaction with country-by-country reporting as well as transfer pricing and other ATO interactions will be a key element here; and for potentially affected arrangements, starting to plan how to prepare for responses to be ready for the ATO within 60 days after preliminary advice from the ATO. This will include documentation to show the principal purpose of the scheme taking into account non-tax financial benefits that are quantifiable. It will also involve documenting sufficient economic substance, in line with the eventual guidance to issue from the ATO. December 2016 Page 4

5 Table 1: Decision tree - Is your company caught by the Diverted Profits Tax? Source Draft explanatory memorandum December 2016 Page 5

6 Table 2: DPT assessment and review process Source Draft explanatory memorandum December 2016 Page 6

7 For more information please contact: International Tax Services Sydney Sean Monahan +61 (2) Michael Anderson +61 (2) Jim Axiomakarou +61 (2) David Burns +61 (2) Stephen Chubb +61 (2) Lachlan Cobon +61 (2) Tony Cooper +61 (2) Daryn Moore 61 (2) Leonid Shaflender +61 (2) David Short +61 (2) Melbourne Brendan Dardis, +61 (3) Peter Janetzki +61 (3) Perth Mathew Chamberlain +61 (8) Martin Webster +61 (8) Transfer Pricing Brisbane Kevin Griffiths Tel: kevin.griffiths@au.ey.com Perth Joe Lawson Tel: joe.lawson@au.ey.com Sydney Paul Balkus Tel: paul.balkus@au.ey.com Jesper Solgaard Tel: jesper.solgaard@au.ey.com December 2016 Page 7

8 EY Assurance Tax Transactions Advisory About EY For more information please contact: Danielle Donovan Tel: danielle.donovan@au.ey.com David Tracey Tel: david.tracey@au.ey.com Jason Vella Tel: jason.vella@au.ey.com Melbourne Keir Cornish Tel: keir.cornish@au.ey.com Julian Hine Tel: julian.hine@au.ey.com Adelaide Michelle Fardone Tel: michelle.fardone@au.ey.com Financial Services Office Sydney Grant C Peters Tel: grant.c.peters@au.ey.com Rosalind Myint Tel: rosalind.myint@au.ey.com Tax Policy Sydney Alf Capito Tel: alf.capito@au.ey.com EY is a global leader in assurance, tax, transaction and advisory services. The insights and quality services we deliver help build trust and confidence in the capital markets and in economies the world over. We develop outstanding leaders who team to deliver on our promises to all of our stakeholders. In so doing, we play a critical role in building a better working world for our people, for our clients and for our communities. EY refers to the global organization, and may refer to one or more, of the member firms of Ernst & Young Global Limited, each of which is a separate legal entity. Ernst & Young Global Limited, a UK company limited by guarantee, does not provide services to clients. For more information about our organization, please visit ey.com. About EY s Tax services Your business will only succeed if you build it on a strong foundation and grow it in a sustainable way. At EY, we believe that managing your tax obligations responsibly and proactively can make a critical difference. Our global teams of talented people bring you technical knowledge, business experience and consistency, all built on our unwavering commitment to quality service wherever you are and whatever tax services you need. We create highly networked teams that can advise on planning, compliance and reporting and help you maintain constructive tax authority relationships wherever you operate. Our technical networks across the globe can work with you to reduce inefficiencies, mitigate risk and improve opportunity. Our 45,000 tax professionals, in more than 150 countries, are committed to giving you the quality, consistency and customization you need to support your tax function. For more information, please visit Ernst & Young, Australia. All Rights Reserved. SCORE NO: AU This communication provides general information which is current at the time of production. The information contained in this communication does not constitute advice and should not be relied on as such. Professional advice should be sought prior to any action being taken in reliance on any of the information. Ernst & Young disclaims all responsibility and liability (including, without limitation, for any direct or indirect or consequential costs, loss or damage or loss of profits) arising from anything done or omitted to be done by any party in reliance, whether wholly or partially, on any of the information. Any party that relies on the information does so at its own risk. Liability limited by a scheme approved under Professional Standards Legislation. December 2016 Page 8