Meeting Report Code of Conduct Group 20 March 2013
|
|
- Daniella Penelope Parrish
- 5 years ago
- Views:
Transcription
1 EUROPEAN COMMISSION DIRECTORATE-GENERAL TAXATION AND CUSTOMS UNION Direct taxation, Tax Coordination, Economic Analysis and Evaluation Company Taxation Initiatives Meeting Report Code of Conduct Group 20 March 2013 I. EXECUTIVE SUMMARY The proposals made by CH were discussed first. However some delegates also noted that CH was susceptible to international pressure and that it would be unwise to end the dialogue prematurely, particularly in view of wider international developments (e.g. BEPS project). COM would make an oral report to CH on views expressed at the meeting. The UK's patent box measure was discussed. Following a presentation by the UK it was agreed that a description of the measure would be prepared for circulation to the Group. The UK wanted to try and have the description ready by the meeting in May. CY's rules for income from intangible property were not discussed. CY's document had been circulated prematurely as no expert was available to attend the meeting. However it was agreed to move to an agreed description of the CY regime as well. The UK:Isle of Man retail tax measure was notified to the Group. ES asked for more information concerning the purpose and impact of the regime. UK updated the Group on the progress of the rollback proposals for Gibraltar's Income Tax Act 2010 which it hoped would be circulated in time for the May meeting. The discussion of the paper on inbound profit transfers was deferred at the request of NL. The draft Model Instruction on cross-border rulings was presented to the Group and the deadline for comments noted. The revised draft guidance was discussed. The guidance relating to intermediary regimes (section 4) and special economic zones (section 5) was agreed. Paragraphs 1 to 4 of the introduction (section 1) were also agreed. However no agreement could be reached on paragraph 5 and after a lengthy discussion the item was adjourned. CHAIR updated the Group on the anti-abuse subgroup which met in January. It had made significant progress in reaching agreement on key issues and was due to meet again the following day to discuss a revised version of COM's original guidance. Commission européenne/europese Commissie, 1049 Bruxelles/Brussel, BELGIQUE/BELGIË - Tel
2 II. REPORT 1. Work Package 2011 Links to Third Countries - Switzerland CHAIR explained that unless there were any objections agenda item 6 would be dealt with first as the Director General of TAXUD needed to be in Parliament during the afternoon. CHAIR said that CH's paper was only received recently so MS might need some time to consider it but he wanted to hear initial reactions. IT said that they were surprised by the room document and not in a good way. The question was what did IT want to do regarding the IT measures that had been identified by CH? The answer was nothing; they fell within the scope of IT's national competence and protected its tax base. Noting the recent developments such as the BEPS project and COM's recently announced action plan, IT said it would be inappropriate to have special treatment for CH. There can be no question of a "soft" acquis for CH. That would set a very bad precedent. EL said it was too early to answer and entered a political reservation. However in general EL agreed with IT's comments about national competence and protection of the tax base. FR agreed with IT and EL. The CH request was not acceptable. FR's anti-abuse rules were not targeted at CH but at abuse. DK agreed with the other delegations. CH was asking for too much from MS with regard to MS anti-abuse laws. However the Group had embarked on a dialogue and there were indications that something was changing in CH and CH would also be under pressure in the context of the BEPS project. Therefore, the Group should avoid a premature end to the dialogue. ES agreed with the other delegations SE also agreed with previous speakers. The CH demands were unacceptable. Antiabuse rules only applied where there was abuse; they could not be disapplied on the basis of promises. 2
3 DE said that CH companies could not be treated as EU companies. However, how should the Group proceed to keep the pressure on CH? As DK said, this needed to be examined. CZ agreed with the other MS. The CH position was not acceptable but it would make sense to continue to talk and look for alternatives. CZ wondered what COM thought. How does the CH proposal fit in with the Communication of December 2012? CHAIR said some reaction needed to be communicated to CH. COM said that If agreement was not reached by the summer, talks would end and MS would have to decide what they did. COM explained that the paper had only very recently been supplied by CH. CH had wanted COM's help with drafting it but COM had refused as CH had to be responsible for setting out its position. CHAIR said that the Group needed to act quickly as the current mandate expired in the summer. CH had to understand that the Code of Conduct was a political instrument and could not lead to a legally binding outcome. DE noted that the OECD's Forum on Harmful Tax Practices still had the CH regimes under detailed examination. CHAIR said that it was good that they were on the Forum's agenda but noted that the Forum moved very slowly. COM (PK) explained that as a result of the technical discussions CH knew the Group's views on the different regimes. There were clear links with the BEPS project and the work of the Forum on Harmful Tax Practices where the previous reluctance to look at sub-federal regimes appeared to have given way. FR said that the Group needed to be strict and clear, so that CH understood the message and noted that CH was sensitive to international pressure. The Group needed to stand firm and apply strong political pressure. The links with wider international developments meant that it was plainly not a good idea to weaken the Group's position at this point. CHAIR suggested that COM should answer in the name of the group. COM said it would report back to CH on the reaction of the group. COM will describe what has been discussed in the group. MS reserved the right to react to abuse. 3
4 CHAIR summarised saying that there would be no letter to CH only an oral report, today if possible. 2. Notification of Rollback and Standstill returns including administrative practices for year ending 31 January 2013 a) Standstill UK: patent box regime UK presented its patent box measure. DK asked how the rules would be used. Were they linked to research in UK or could the research be carried out abroad? UK said that the IP company needs to have developed the patent. In a group of companies the development had to have been done in the group. Where the development was undertaken by a related company the IP company needed to satisfy the "active management condition". DK said it was "fishing" for the extent to which research had to be carried out in the UK. Was it possible that research is carried out in a foreign company with the patent ending up in the UK with the related profits being taxed at a low rate? UK said that the measure was applicable if the development took place outside the UK in another group company. In which case the IP company would have to satisfy the active management condition. ES asked if the box included income from selling the patent as well as patented products? UK said yes. All such income would be taxed at a rate of 10% on net profits. DE asked what the requirements for "active management" were and how net profit would be calculated? UK explained that its published guidance referred to there being a significant amount of management carried out in the company with respect to the patent such as making plans for its development, granting licences, maintaining protection. The net profit figure was based on the UK's existing tax rules with the additional deduction of the amount of profit representing the routine return and the marketing return. COM noted its support for promoting innovation and said that with this type of regime the main risk related to economic substance. It COM's view the Group needed to be cautious due to the crossover with the BEPS project. COM was not suggesting that the patent box measure must be harmful but to say that it was not the procedure would need to be followed. DK said its interest stemmed from its view that the UK measure had the same effect on Danish companies as Switzerland's. It only need involve the movement of a few senior officers or accountants to shift half the profits. That was the effect of the regime. The Group needed to have a co-ordinated approach in this area. It was wrong for the first movers to secure all the advantages. DE agreed with DK. The Group should look at IP measures. An internal discussion was needed; either nobody should have such regimes or everyone should be free to have them. 4
5 UK noted the reasonableness of COM's comments. If MS needed more time to consider the regime the UK was happy to receive questions over the next few weeks. In response to DK UK said that they did not want this regime to become a way of diverting profit, therefore it had ensured that passive income was excluded through the exclusion of the routine return and marketing profits as well as the active management condition. The UK accepted DK and DE's point about fairness and said that the issue was worth considering at a European level. COM asked if the UK was proposing a more detailed discussion at a later meeting or was COM being asked to prepare an agreed description of the measure? UK clarified that it would respond to questions by consolidating its replies and circulating them before the next meeting via the Secretariat. DK said that it preferred a more general discussion as they believed they understood the UK measure only too well. COM said that DK had raised two issues, being a general concern about the UK and CY regimes and the wider matter of tax policy on patent boxes in the EU. There was also obviously the question of regimes that the Group had decided not to assess in the past and the planned discussion on guidance notes which included IP. COM believed that the first stage of any analysis that the Group wished to pursue should be the preparation of an agreed description rather than some new procedure which omitted it. The Group also needed to keep an eye to the future as a discussion about this issue would soon arise out of the BEPS project and the Group would need to have a sound position. CHAIR said it was up to the Group to decide whether an agreed description was to be made. DE said it was a difficult issue and not a pleasant one for some MS. However there were two regimes on the table and the Group should get stuck in and have a look at them. CHAIR asked the UK if it agreed to the preparation of an agreed description. UK said that it did. CHAIR said that room document 7 (Cyprus IP regime) had been circulated in error; no-one was available from CY to discuss the issue until the next meeting. COM said that if the UK regime were to be described the CY measure should be too. This would differ from room document 7 as it would only contain a factual description of the regime. CY said that it did not believe the regime was harmful but has happy to have bilateral talks to answer questions. CHAIR said, to be clear, the process would start with the UK and then move to CY irrespective of bilateral discussions. COM said the Group should not discuss the current CY document but establish the facts and then, on the basis of an agreed description, consider whether an assessment was necessary. Both regimes had to be treated in the same way. UK said it was content to move to an agreed description and intended to get the process under way as soon as possible, hopefully in time for the meeting in May. CHAIR agreed that it would be possible to have the UK's agreed description on the agenda for May, perhaps CY too but perhaps not. 5
6 b) Rollback UK:Gibraltar c) Standstill UK:Isle of Man retail tax UK explained that it had notified the IOM's retail tax measure. This would apply the 10% tax rate to retail profits of more than 500,000 in any accounting period. The new measure would affect less than twenty corporate taxpayers and raise around 3.5m of revenue. It would have no material impact on the number of corporate taxpayers so that 0% remained the rate generally prevailing in the IOM. ES said it wanted more information on the measure as it might materially extend the 10% rate. UK said it would prepare a note with IOM's assistance. 3. Work Package 2011 Monitoring the implementation of agreed guidance on inbound profit transfers 6
7 4. Work Package 2011 Administrative Practices Model Instruction CHAIR noted that there were three questions in room document 4. The deadline set for comments was 26 April. However the Chair wondered if it would be possible to address the third question at the meeting? IT noted that the scrutiny reservation it had expressed at CACT was included in the room document. IT wanted to be clear that it supported the exercise strongly. The point of the reservation was that the process had to be as transparent as possible. IT was keen to ensure that there was verifiable co-operation. COM said that it understood IT's position but noted that other Groups (such as CACT) operate under different legal frameworks. The collection of statistics would be very useful but MS would need to agree the process in the appropriate body and there also needed to be a legal basis for collecting them. COM said that it would argue for the rapid incorporation of unilateral APAs into the Model Instruction as this would send a clear signal to CACT. 7
8 CHAIR noted the merits of an early mandate and asked for other views. UK supported the ongoing work and would strongly support a mandate for CACT to integrate the two. DE, SE and AT agreed with the UK. NL asked for time to come back in writing. CHAIR agreed and asked for comments by the deadline set in the room document. COM's proposed organisation of the work was agreed. 5. Work Package 2011 Preparation of guidance or application notes CHAIR introduced the room document and asked whether the Group thought it would be possible to agree sections four and five of the revised draft guidance by silence? There were no comments so these sections were agreed. Turning then to the introduction the Group also agreed paragraphs 1 to 4 by silence. CHAIR then moved on to paragraph 5 and asked one of the countries that had proposed the changes to explain them. NL said that it was seeking to add clarity where the Group had decided not to assess particular regimes. DK said it accepted the text without the proposals from BE, LU and NL. FR, ES and DE supported DK. BE stressed that regimes that had been assessed and those that had not been had to be treated in the same way. COM said that there were evidently two divergent views. The question was how the Group should deal with past work. If there was no agreement on this it might be necessary to agree the guidance first and then, separately, deal with the new issue. Paragraph 5 of the draft guidance was discussed extensively. It was common ground that no measure could be immune from re-examination but there was no consensus on how measures that had not been formally assessed should be dealt with. After a short break in proceedings CHAIR adjourned the discussion. 6. Work Package 2011 Anti-Abuse: subgroup report CHAIR briefly summarised the positive progress made at the meeting of the subgroup that had been held in January. A further meeting was scheduled for the following day at which a revised version of the original guidance was due to be discussed. 7. Any other business None
Report from the EU Code of Conduct Group (Business Taxation) to the ECOFIN Council of 4 December European Council (comments by Nouwen)
Vindplaats H&I 2013/1.6 Auteur Council of the European Union 23 November 2012, no. 16488/12 Report from the EU Code of Conduct Group (Business Taxation) to the ECOFIN Council of 4 December 2012. European
More informationDiscussion paper on General Anti-Abuse Rules (GAAR)
EUROPEAN COMMISSION DIRECTORATE-GENERAL TAXATION AND CUSTOMS UNION Direct taxation, Tax Coordination, Economic Analysis and Evaluation Company Taxation Initiatives Brussels, October 2014 Taxud/D1/ DOC:
More informationPUBLIC INTRODUCTION. 9620/15 AS/FC/df 1 DG G 2B LIMITE EN. Council of the European Union. Brussels, 11 June 2015 (OR. en) 9620/15 LIMITE
Conseil UE Council of the European Union PUBLIC Brussels, 11 June 2015 (OR. en) 9620/15 LIMITE FISC 60 ECOFIN 443 REPORT From: To: Subject: Code of Conduct Group (Business Taxation) Permanent Representatives
More informationEU JOINT TRANSFER PRICING FORUM
EUROPEAN COMMISSION DIRECTORATE-GENERAL TAXATION AND CUSTOMS UNION Analyses and tax policies Analysis and coordination of tax policies Brussels, 30 May 2005 Taxud/E1/WB DOC: JTPF/019/REV5/2004/EN EU JOINT
More informationPUBLIC LIMITE EN COUNCILOF THEEUROPEANUNION. Brusels,22November /10 LIMITE FISC139 REPORT
ConseilUE COUNCILOF THEEUROPEANUNION PUBLIC Brusels,22November2010 16766/10 LIMITE FISC139 REPORT from: to: on: Subject: CodeofConductGroup(Businestaxation) Council(ECOFIN) 7December2010 CodeofConduct(BusinesTaxation)
More informationPUBLIC INTRODUCTION /15 AS/FC/mpd 1 DG G 2B LIMITE EN. Council of the European Union Brussels, 23 November 2015 (OR. en) 14302/15 LIMITE
Conseil UE Council of the European Union Brussels, 23 November 2015 (OR. en) PUBLIC 14302/15 LIMITE FISC 159 ECOFIN 883 REPORT From: To: Subject: Code of Conduct Group (Business Taxation) Permanent Representatives
More information14784/17 AS/FC/fm 1 DG G 2B
Council of the European Union Brussels, 24 November 2017 (OR. en) 14784/17 FISC 300 ECOFIN 999 REPORT From: To: Subject: Code of Conduct Group (Business Taxation) Permanent Representatives Committee/Council
More informationthe procedural aspects of its future Work Package (as contained in Annex I); the final version of the future WorkPackage (as contained in Annex II);
COUNCIL OF THE EUROPEAN UNION Brussels, 26 November 2008 16410/08 FISC 174 "A" ITEM NOTE from: General Secretariat to: Council Subject:: Code of Conduct (Business Taxation) = Draft Council Conclusions
More informationSUMMARY OF THE RESPONSES TO THE PUBLIC CONSULTATION
EUROPEAN COMMISSION Internal Market and Services DG FINANCIAL INSTITUTIONS Retail issues, consumer policy and payment systems Brussels, 14 September 2009 SUMMARY OF THE RESPONSES TO THE PUBLIC CONSULTATION
More informationTHE OECD S REPORT ON HARMFUL TAX COMPETITION JOANN M. WEINER * & HUGH J. AULT **
THE OECD S REPORT ON HARMFUL TAX COMPETITION THE OECD S REPORT ON HARMFUL TAX COMPETITION JOANN M. WEINER * & HUGH J. AULT ** Abstract - In response to pressures created by the increasing globalization
More informationEU JOINT TRANSFER PRICING FORUM
EUROPEAN COMMISSION DIRECTORATE-GENERAL TAXATION AND CUSTOMS UNION Direct taxation, Tax Coordination, Economic Analysis and Evaluation Company Taxation Initiatives Brussels, June 2013 Taxud/D1/ DOC: JTPF/007/FINAL/2013/EN
More informationOECD meets with business on base erosion and profit shifting action plan
4 October 2013 OECD meets with business on base erosion and profit shifting action plan Executive summary On 1 October 2013, the Organisation for Economic Cooperation and Development (OECD) held a meeting
More informationNOTE General Secretariat of the Council Delegations ECOFIN report to the European Council on Tax issues
COUNCIL OF THE EUROPEAN UNION Brussels, 12 December 2013 (OR. en) 17674/13 FISC 259 ECOFIN 1147 CO EUR-PREP 50 NOTE From: To: Subject: General Secretariat of the Council Delegations ECOFIN report to the
More informationEUROPEAN COMMISSION HEALTH AND FOOD SAFETY DIRECTORATE-GENERAL
EUROPEAN COMMISSION HEALTH AND FOOD SAFETY DIRECTORATE-GENERAL sante.ddg2.g.5(2017) EXTRACT FROM THE SUMMARY REPORT OF THE STANDING COMMITTEE ON PLANTS, ANIMALS, FOOD AND FEED SECTION PHYTOPHARMACEUTICALS
More informationEUROPEAN COMMISSION DIRECTORATE-GENERAL ENVIRONMENT Directorate A Green Economy ENV.A.3 - Chemicals
EUROPEAN COMMISSION DIRECTORATE-GENERAL ENVIRONMENT Directorate A Green Economy ENV.A.3 - Chemicals CA-July13-Doc.8.3 REVIEW PROGRAMME OF ACTIVE SUBSTANCES: ESTABLISHMENT OF A WORK PROGRAMME TO MEET THE
More informationNOTE FOR THE FILE. Report of the meeting organised by DG External Trade with dual use exporters - Brussels, 26/01/2007- Operational conclusions
EUROPEAN COMMISSION Directorate-General for External Trade Directorate F - WTO Affairs, OECD and Food-related Sectors WTO, OECD and Dual Use Brussels, 05/02/2007 Trade/F/1/FH D(07) 1072 NOTE FOR THE FILE
More information5814/18 AR/sk 1 DG G 2B
Council of the European Union Brussels, 20 February 2018 (OR. en) 5814/18 FISC 44 ECOFIN 75 NOTE From: To: General Secretariat of the Council Delegations Subject: Agreed guidance by the Code of Conduct
More information2. Presentation of the BE SCHENGEN MATTERS Team + Presentation of the BE Presidency programme for Schengen Evaluation
COUNCIL OF THE EUROPEAN UNION Brussels, 11 August 2010 12511/10 LIMITE SCH-EVAL 93 COMIX 530 OUTCOME OF PROCEEDINGS from: General Secretariat on: 15 July 2010 Subject: Outcome of proceedings of the Working
More informationThe Irish GAAR 2015 Tax Nerd Version
The Irish GAAR 2015 Tax Nerd Version To the world we re a tax haven. In fact we have quite onerous anti-avoidance legislation most notably our GAAR, but we ve traditionally eschewed talking about anti
More informationSwitzerland Dispute Resolution Profile. (Last updated: 1 September 2016) General Information
1 Switzerland Dispute Resolution Profile (Last updated: 1 September 2016) General Information Switzerland tax treaties are available at: https://www.admin.ch/opc/fr/classifiedcompilation/0.67.html#0.67
More informationComments on Public Consultation Document Addressing the Tax Challenges of the Digitalisation of the Economy
Ernst & Young, LLP 1101 New York Avenue, NW Washington, DC 20005-4213 Tel: +202-327-6000 ey.com 6 March 2019 Organisation for Economic Co-operation and Development Centre for Tax Policy and Administration
More informationRef: BEPS CONFORMING CHANGES TO CHAPTER IX OF THE OECD TRANSFER PRICING GUIDELINES
Jefferson VanderWolk Organisation for Economic Cooperation and Development 2 rue André-Pascal 75775, Paris, Cedex 16 France August 16, 2016 William Morris Chair, BIAC Tax Committee 13/15, Chaussée de la
More informationTHE FUTURE OF TAX PLANNING: TRANSPARENCY AND SUBSTANCE FOR ALL? Friday, 26 February AM PM Conrad Hotel, Hong Kong
THE FUTURE OF TAX PLANNING: TRANSPARENCY AND SUBSTANCE FOR ALL? Friday, 26 February 2016 9.00AM - 12.00PM Conrad Hotel, Hong Kong THE DRIVE TOWARDS TRANSPARENCY: CHALLENGES AND OPPORTUNITIES IN INTERNATIONAL
More informationOUTCOME OF PROCEEDINGS General Secretariat of the Council Delegations Subject: Summary of discussions of DAPIX VRD of 9 September 2013
COUNCIL OF THE EUROPEAN UNION Brussels, 12 September 2013 (OR. en) 13514/13 JAI 757 DAPIX 108 CRIMORG 113 FOPOL 288 FOCUSTOM 135 OUTCOME OF PROCEEDINGS From: General Secretariat of the Council To: Delegations
More informationOLAF's comments on the Supervisory Committee Opinion No 3/2015 OLAF draft Investigation Policy Priorities (IPPs) for the year 2016
Ref. Ares(2016)2233714-12/05/2016 OLAF's comments on the Supervisory Committee Opinion No 3/2015 OLAF draft Investigation Policy Priorities (IPPs) for the year 2016 EXECUTIVE SUMMARY: I. OLAF took on board
More informationAIDE MEMOIRE OF THE MEETING OF THE NEGOTIATING GROUP ON THE MAI HELD ON APRIL 1996
Unclassified DAFFE/INV/IME(96)28 Organisation for Economic Co-operation and Development 27 June 1996 Organisation de Coopération et de Développement Economiques Negotiating Group on the Multilateral Agreement
More informationSwitzerland Dispute Resolution Profile. (Last updated: 24 August 2018)
1 Switzerland Dispute Resolution Profile (Last updated: 24 August 2018) General Information Switzerland tax treaties are available at: https://www.admin.ch/opc/fr/classifiedcompilation/0.67.html#0.67 (in
More informationOECD releases France peer review report on implementation of Action 14 Minimum Standards
26 December 2017 Global Tax Alert OECD releases France peer review report on implementation of Action 14 Minimum Standards EY Global Tax Alert Library Access both online and pdf versions of all EY Global
More informationProposal for a COUNCIL DIRECTIVE. amending Directive (EU) 2016/1164 as regards hybrid mismatches with third countries. {SWD(2016) 345 final}
EUROPEAN COMMISSION Strasbourg, 25.10.2016 COM(2016) 687 final 2016/0339 (CNS) Proposal for a COUNCIL DIRECTIVE amending Directive (EU) 2016/1164 as regards hybrid mismatches with third countries {SWD(2016)
More informationProcess and methods Published: 18 February 2014 nice.org.uk/process/pmg18
Guide to the technology appraisal aisal and highly specialised technologies appeal process Process and methods Published: 18 February 2014 nice.org.uk/process/pmg18 NICE 2014. All rights reserved. Contents
More informationBASE EROSION AND PROFIT SHIFTING
BASE EROSION AND PROFIT SHIFTING BEPS issues for developing countries Liselott Kana Head of International Revenue Administration, Chile UN Subcommittee mandate Draw on the experiences of subcommittee members
More informationHow BEPS fits in with the EU s tax agenda. The European Union (EU) has actively participated in the entire
How BEPS fits in with the EU s tax agenda Klaus von Brocke and Jurjan Wouda Kuipers look at how BEPS recommendations interact with EU tax laws. The European Union (EU) has actively participated in the
More informationMANAGING TRANSFER PRICING ISSUES IN AN EVOLVING BEPS ENVIRONMENT
MANAGING TRANSFER PRICING ISSUES IN AN EVOLVING BEPS ENVIRONMENT ANTON HUME / DAN MCGEOWN / VEENA PARRIKAR / RICHARD VAN DER POEL / JAY TANG 2 JUNE 2015 AGENDA Control Over Transfer Pricing Policies and
More informationLuxembourg transfer pricing legislation at a glance
2017 EY TAX Alert Luxembourg Luxembourg transfer pricing legislation at a glance Executive summary The law of 23 December 2016 on the budget for the year 2017 ( Budget Law ) has introduced a new article
More informationBEPS ACTION 15. Development of a Multilateral Instrument to Implement the Tax Treaty related BEPS Measures
BEPS ACTION 15 Development of a Multilateral Instrument to Implement the Tax Treaty related BEPS Measures REQUEST FOR INPUT ON THE DEVELOPMENT OF A MULTILATERAL INSTRUMENT TO IMPLEMENT THE TAX TREATY-RELATED
More informationThe Anti Tax Avoidance Package Questions and Answers
European Commission - Fact Sheet The Anti Tax Avoidance Package Questions and Answers Brussels, 28 January 2016 1. Why has the Commission made the fight against corporate tax avoidance a priority? Corporate
More information1st Report on the Monitoring of Patent Settlements (period: mid end 2009)
1st Report on the Monitoring of Patent Settlements (period: mid 2008 - end 2009) Published on 5 July 2010 1. Introduction (1) As announced in the Commission's Communication 1 concluding the pharmaceutical
More informationBrussels, 23 rd September 2013
CEGBPI/BANK/06/2013 Minutes of the 2 nd meeting of the Expert Group on Banking, Payments and Insurance (Banking section) Brussels, 23 rd September 2013 INTRODUCTION BY CHAIRMAN Mr. Mario Nava, Acting Director
More informationEU VAT FORUM INTERIM REPORT OF THE SUB-GROUP ON CROSS- BORDER RULINGS (CBR) DECISIONS OF THE EU VAT FORUM ON THE
EUROPEAN COMMISSION DIRECTORATE-GENERAL TAXATION AND CUSTOMS UNION Indirect Taxation and Tax administration Tax administration and fight against tax fraud Brussels 27 June 2014 taxud.c.4/(2014)2061860rev
More information1: yes directly; 2: yes, in collaborat.; 3: yes, with judicial aut AT BE CY CZ DK EE FI FR DE EL HU IS IE IT LV LT LU MT NL NO PL PT SK SI SE ES UK
Market Abuse Directive -2003/6/EC Ref: 07-382 Supervisory Powers draft combined table of questions June 07 1: yes directly; 2: yes, in collaborat.; 3: yes, with judicial aut AT BE CY CZ DK EE FI FR DE
More information7th Annual Cross-Border Distribution Conference - European Convention Centre Luxembourg
12 February 2019 ESMA34-45-634 Keynote Address 7th Annual Cross-Border Distribution Conference - European Convention Centre Luxembourg Verena Ross Executive Director European Securities and Markets Authority
More informationApril 30, Re: USCIB Comment Letter on the OECD discussion draft on BEPS Action 3: Strengthening CFC Rules. Dear Mr. Pross, General Comments
April 30, 2015 VIA EMAIL Mr. Achim Pross Head, International Cooperation and Tax Administration Division Center for Tax Policy and Administration (CTPA) Organisation for Economic Cooperation and Development
More informationAustralian perspective on 2015 BEPS package
TaxTalk Insights BEPS Australian perspective on 2015 BEPS package 8 October 2015 In brief The Organisation for Economic Co-operation and Development (OECD) has released the 2015 Base Erosion and Profit
More informationOECD releases the United Kingdom peer review report on implementation of Action 14 minimum standards
26 October 2017 Global Tax Alert OECD releases the United Kingdom peer review report on implementation of Action 14 minimum standards EY Global Tax Alert Library Access both online and pdf versions of
More informationGuide for mutual agreement procedure pursuant to tax treaties (MAP) Contents
Guide for mutual agreement procedure pursuant to tax treaties (MAP) Contents 1 General information about mutual agreement procedures (MAP)... 2 2 Access to MAP... 2 3 Where shall a taxpayer submit a MAP
More informationTax harmonisation versus tax competition in Europe
SPEECH/05/624 László Kovács European Commissioner for Taxation and Customs Tax harmonisation versus tax competition in Europe Conference «Tax harmonisation and legal uncertainty in Central and Eastern
More informationSubmitted to the European Commission on 27 July 2017
Opinion Statement PAC 3/2017 on the European Commission Proposal for a Council Directive amending Directive 2011/16/EU as regards mandatory automatic exchange of information in the field of taxation COM/2016/025
More informationReport to G7 Finance Ministers and Central Bank Governors on International Accounting Standards
Report to G7 Finance Ministers and Central Bank Governors on International Accounting Standards Basel Committee on Banking Supervision Basel April 2000 Table of Contents Executive Summary...1 I. Introduction...4
More informationEuropean Business Initiative on Taxation (EBIT)
European Business Initiative on Taxation (EBIT) Comments on the OECD Public Discussion Draft entitled Make Dispute Resolution Mechanisms More Effective 18 December 2014 16 January 2015 At the time of writing
More informationEEA EFTA States Internal Market Scoreboard. March 2011
EEA EFTA States Internal Market Scoreboard March 2011 Event No: 374279 INTERNAL MARKET SCOREBOARD No. 27 EEA EFTA STATES of the EUROPEAN ECONOMIC AREA March 2011 EFTA SURVEILLANCE AUTHORITY Event No: 374279
More informationReport by Finance Ministers of the Euro Plus Pact on Tax Policy Coordination. European Council (comments by Nouwen)
Highlights & Insights on European Taxation, Report by Finance Ministers of the Euro Plus Pact on Tax Policy Coordination. European Council (comments by Nouwen) Vindplaats H&I 2012/2.2 Bijgewerkt tot 01-01-2012
More information11 Economic and Financial Affairs
11 Economic and Financial Affairs In contrast to Environment and Agriculture, the Economic and Financial Affairs area does not constitute a cohesive policy field. Many observers distinguish between at
More information4th Report on the Monitoring of Patent Settlements (period: January-December 2012)
EUROPEAN COMMISSION Competition DG 4th Report on the Monitoring of Patent Settlements (period: January-December 2012) Published on 9 December 2013 1. Introduction (1) As announced in the Commission's Communication
More informationBEPS Action 14: Making dispute resolution mechanisms more effective
BEPS Action 14: Making dispute resolution mechanisms more effective The Panel Achim Pross, Head, International Cooperation and Tax Administration Division, OECD Doug O Donnell, LB&I Commissioner, IRS Martin
More information9452/16 FC/df 1 DG G 2B
Council of the European Union Brussels, 25 May 2016 (OR. en) 9452/16 FISC 85 ECOFIN 502 OUTCOME OF PROCEEDINGS From: On: 25 May 2016 To: General Secretariat of the Council Delegations No. prev. doc.: 8792/1/16
More informationTAX EVASION AND AVOIDANCE: Questions and Answers
EUROPEAN COMMISSION MEMO Brussels, 6 December 2012 TAX EVASION AND AVOIDANCE: Questions and Answers See also IP/12/1325 Tax Evasion Why has the Commission presented an Action Plan on Tax fraud and evasion?
More informationCommon (Consolidated) Corporate Tax Base A Personal View
Common (Consolidated) Corporate Tax Base A Personal View Christoph Spengel, University of Mannheim / ZEW IFA Austria,, Vienna Agenda 1. C(C)CTB: Institutional Background and Re-Launch 2016 2. Quantitative
More informationThe International Tax Landscape
and EU Tax Reforms How will Ireland, Luxembourg, Netherlands and Switzerland Reform Their Tax Systems to Comply?, Loyens & Loeff NV, PricewatershouseCoopers, PricewaterhouseCoopers 67 th Annual Tax Conference
More informationTransfer Pricing Country Summary United Kingdom
Page 1 of 9 Transfer Pricing Country Summary United Kingdom April 2018 Page 2 of 9 Legislation Existence of Transfer Pricing Laws/Guidelines The UK transfer pricing legislation is contained in Part 4 of
More informationOECD publishes BEPS peer review documents for exchanges of tax rulings and country-by-country reports
OECD publishes BEPS peer review documents for exchanges of tax rulings and country-by-country reports 7 February 2017 In brief On 1 February 2017, the Organisation for Economic Cooperation and Development
More informationProposed new guidelines:
Proposed new guidelines: Transfer pricing documentation & Country by Country reporting (BEPS Action 13) Jeroen Geevers & Jack Favre ITS / Transfer pricing EY Rotterdam May, 2014 Changing information to
More informationCouncil of the European Union Brussels, 22 June 2015 (OR. en)
Council of the European Union Brussels, 22 June 2015 (OR. en) 10161/15 FISC 81 ECOFIN 529 CO EUR-PREP 29 NOTE From: To: Subject: General Secretariat of the Council Delegations ECOFIN Report to the European
More informationEU Finance Ministers reach conclusions on new rules for Code of Conduct
14 March 2016 Global Tax Alert News from EU Tax Services EU Finance Ministers reach conclusions on new rules for Code of Conduct EY Global Tax Alert Library Access both online and pdf versions of all EY
More informationContents. Introduction. International Transfer Pricing: Advance Pricing Arrangements (APAs)
NO.: 94-4R DATE: March 16, 2001 SUBJECT: International Transfer Pricing: Advance Pricing Arrangements (APAs) This circular cancels and replaces Information Circular 94-4, dated December 30, 1994. This
More informationThe Anti Tax Avoidance Package Questions and Answers (Updated)
European Commission - Fact Sheet The Anti Tax Avoidance Package Questions and Answers (Updated) Brussels, 21 June 2016 1. Why has the Commission made the fight against corporate tax avoidance a priority?
More informationa) Title of proposal Proposal for a Council Directive amending Council Regulation (EU) 2016/1164 as regards hybrid mismatches with third countries
Unofficial translation of the assessment by the Dutch government of the proposal of the European Commission regarding hybrid mismatches with third countries Leaflet 2: Directive on hybrid mismatches with
More informationKeynote Address. AFME European Compliance and Legal Conference London. Verena Ross Executive Director. Ladies and gentlemen,
20 September 2017 ESMA71-319-53 Keynote Address AFME European Compliance and Legal Conference London Verena Ross Executive Director Ladies and gentlemen, It is a pleasure for me to be here this morning
More informationOECD issues Action Plan on Base Erosion and Profit Shifting (BEPS)
22 July 2013 OECD issues Action Plan on Base Erosion and Profit Shifting (BEPS) Executive summary On 19 July 2013, the Organisation for Economic Cooperation and Development (OECD) issued its much-anticipated
More informationFinancial Services Action Plan
PROGRESS REPORT PROGRESS REPORT Progress Report PROGRESS REPORT Introduction The European Council in Cologne and the European Parliament have supported both the content and urgency of the for 1. The
More informationCOUNCIL OF THE EUROPEAN UNION. Brussels, 10 December /04 AGRI 336 FORETS 39 DEVGEN 254 ENV 675 RELEX 635 JUR 492
COUNCIL OF THE EUROPEAN UNION Brussels, 0 December 004 58/04 AGRI 336 FORETS 39 DEVGEN 54 ENV 675 RELEX 635 JUR 49 REPORT from: Working Party on Forestry to: Coreper Dated: 0 December 004 No. Cion prop.:
More informationGENERAL AGREEMENT ON 23May 1985 TARIFFS AND TRADE
RESTRICTED AIR/W/51 GENERAL AGREEMENT ON 23May 1985 TARIFFS AND TRADE Special Distribution Agreement on Trade in Civil Aircraft COMMITTEE ON TRADE AND CIVIL AIRCRAFT Draft Minutes of the Meeting held in
More informationArticle 23 A and 23 B of the UN Model Conflicts of qualification and interpretation
Distr.: General 30 September 2014 Original: English Committee of Experts on International Cooperation in Tax Matters Tenth Session Geneva, 27-31 October 2014 Agenda Item 3 (a) (viii)* Article 23 Article
More informationGuidance for Tax Administrations on the Application of the Approach to Hard-to-Value Intangibles INCLUSIVE FRAMEWORK ON BEPS: ACTION 8
Guidance for Tax Administrations on the Application of the Approach to Hard-to-Value Intangibles INCLUSIVE FRAMEWORK ON BEPS: ACTION 8 June 2018 GUIDANCE FOR TAX ADMINISTRATIONS ON THE APPLICATION OF THE
More information6th Report on the Monitoring of Patent Settlements (period: January-December 2014)
EUROPEAN COMMISSION Competition DG 1. Introduction 6th Report on the Monitoring of Patent Settlements (period: January-December 2014) Published on 2 December 2015 (1) As announced in the Commission's Communication
More informationGROUP ON THE FUTURE OF VAT
EUROPEAN COMMISSION DIRECTORATE-GENERAL TAXATION AND CUSTOMS UNION Indirect Taxation and Tax administration Value added tax Group on the Future of VAT 12th meeting 7 November 2014 taxud.c.1(2014)4525416
More informationConversations: Jeffrey Owens and Rick McDonell
Volume 75, Number 9 September 1, 2014 Conversations: Jeffrey Owens and Rick McDonell Reprinted from Tax Notes Int l, September 1, 2014, p. 763 Conversations: Jeffrey Owens and Rick McDonell Jeffrey Owens
More informationTechnical advice on Minimum Information Content for Prospectus Exemption
Final Report Technical advice on Minimum Information Content for Prospectus Exemption 29 March 2019 I ESMA31-62-1207 ESMA CS 60747 103 rue de Grenelle 75345 Paris Cedex 07 France Tel. +33 (0) 1 58 36 43
More informationBase Erosion and Profit Shifting (BEPS) in Asia
www.pwc.com Base Erosion and Profit Shifting (BEPS) in Asia David Smith Senior Adviser, Hong Kong Nigel Hobler Partner, Hong Kong Paul Lau Partner, Singapore Former official China State Administration
More informationRollback proposal Advance Company Income Tax System Malta. ML4 and ML5
Document 1 ROOM DOCUMENT#3 Code of Conduct Group (Business Taxation) 28 March 2006 ORIGIN: Commission Services DRAFT Rollback proposal Advance Company Income Tax System Malta ML4 and ML5 Introduction Following
More informationQuestions in the cover letter EIOPA
Name of Association/Stakeholder: Question number Q1 Groupe Consultatif Actuariel Européen Please follow the following instructions for filling in the template: Do not change the numbering in the columns
More informationGeneral Anti-Avoidance Rules (GAARs) A Key Element of Tax Systems in the Post-BEPS Tax World?
Conference organized by: Institute for Austrian and International Tax Law Vienna In cooperation with Doctoral Program for International Business Taxation WU Global Tax Policy Center General Anti-Avoidance
More informationESMA s Brexit Reminder
June 1, 2017 ESMA s Brexit Reminder Although most Brexit related media coverage of the financial services sector has focused to date on banking, on insurance and on market infrastructure issues post-divorce,
More informationProposal for amending the Parent-Subsidiary Directive: European Commission is waging war against double non-taxation
Proposal for amending the Parent-Subsidiary Directive: European Commission is waging war against double non-taxation David Ledure/Frederik Boulogne/Pieter Deré On 25 November 2013, the European Commission
More informationA holding company belonging to an equity investor group was not considered as an equity investor
Tax news PwC Finland 2.10.2014 Corporate Income Tax FINLAND A holding company belonging to an equity investor group was not considered as an equity investor Decision 14/1367/3 of the Administrative Court
More informationCEIOPS-RP December Peer Review about the Exchange of Information and Cooperation Provisions of the General Protocol.
CEIOPS-RP-150-10 30 December 2010 Peer Review about the Exchange of Information and Cooperation Provisions of the General Protocol Final Report Table of Contents 0. Executive summary...3 1. Introduction...4
More informationCOMMUNICATION FROM THE COMMISSION TO THE EUROPEAN PARLIAMENT AND THE COUNCIL
EUROPEAN COMMISSION Brussels, 21.3.2018 COM(2018) 146 final COMMUNICATION FROM THE COMMISSION TO THE EUROPEAN PARLIAMENT AND THE COUNCIL Time to establish a modern, fair and efficient taxation standard
More informationCOMMITTEE OF EUROPEAN SECURITIES REGULATORS GUIDANCE. Date: 4 th June 2010 Ref.: CESR/10-347
COMMITTEE OF EUROPEAN SECURITIES REGULATORS Date: 4 th June 2010 Ref.: CESR/10-347 GUIDANCE CESR s Guidance on Registration Process, Functioning of Colleges, Mediation Protocol, Information set out in
More informationAn overview of the main issues that emerged at the fourth meeting of the subgroup on assets (SG1)
EUROPEAN COMMISSION DIRECTORATE-GENERAL TAXATION AND CUSTOMS UNION Analyses and tax policies Analysis and Coordination of tax policies Brussels, 19 May 2006 Taxud E1 MH/FF CCCTB\WP\032\doc\en Orig. EN
More informationOECD releases Germany peer review report on implementation of Action 14 Minimum Standards
21 December 2017 Global Tax Alert OECD releases Germany peer review report on implementation of Action 14 Minimum Standards EY Global Tax Alert Library Access both online and pdf versions of all EY Global
More informationEUROPEAN COMMISSION PRESENTS ANTI-TAX AVOIDANCE PACKAGE
EUROPEAN COMMISSION PRESENTS ANTI-TAX AVOIDANCE PACKAGE tax.thomsonreuters.com On January 28, 2016, the European Commission presented its Communication on the Anti-Tax Avoidance Package (ATA Package).
More informationGlobal Transfer Pricing Review
GLOBAL TRANSFER PRICING SERVICES Global Transfer Pricing Review Hong Kong kpmg.com/gtps TAX 2 Global Transfer Pricing Review Hong Kong KPMG observation The Hong Kong Inland Revenue Department (IRD) released
More informationPROVISIONAL DRAFT. Information Note from the Commission. on progress in implementing the UN Convention on the Rights of Persons with Disabilities
PROVISIONAL DRAFT Information Note from the Commission on progress in implementing the UN Convention on the Rights of Persons with Disabilities Introduction This note, which is based on the third report
More informationWORKING PAPER. Financial Counsellors - ECOFIN preparation Presidency Issues Note on 'Tax Certainty in a Changing Environment'
Brussels, 29 March 2017 WK 3787/2017 INIT LIMITE ECOFIN WORKING PAPER This is a paper intended for a specific community of recipients. Handling and further distribution are under the sole responsibility
More informationAmCham EU s position on the Commission Anti-Tax Avoidance Package
AmCham EU s position on the Commission Anti-Tax Avoidance Package Executive summary AmCham EU welcomes attempts to ensure that adoption of the OECD s recommendations is consistent across the EU and with
More informationTransfer Pricing in the Age of Transparency, Innovation, and Transformation
Transfer Pricing in the Age of Transparency, Innovation, 17 th Annual Global Transfer Pricing Workshop July 28, 2017 Palace Hotel 2 New Montgomery Street San Francisco, California About the Event The BEPS
More informationShort minutes & Conclusions Item 13 of the agenda. Christine Coin ESTAT-F April 2017 Working Group Social Protection Statistics
Short minutes & Christine Coin ESTAT-F5 Conclusions Item 13 of the agenda 4-5 April 2017 Working Group Social Protection Statistics Item 1 Opening of the meeting Head of Unit welcomed participants (missing:
More informationThis week, the round has been about progressing in all areas including:
Source: European Commission Subject: Press Conference on 10 th TTIP negotiation round Date: July 17 2015 Following the conclusion of the 10 th TTIP negotiation round today in Brussels, the Chief negotiators,
More informationA first EU response to Enron related policy issues
NOTE FOR THE INFORMAL ECOFIN COUNCIL OVIEDO 12 AND 13 APRIL Subject: A first EU response to Enron related policy issues The Enron affair whatever the outcome of the ongoing investigations in the US - has
More informationMarket Abuse Directive. Level 3 Third set of CESR guidance and information on the common operation of the Directive to the market
THE COMMITTEE OF EUROPEAN SECURITIES REGULATORS Ref: CESR/08-717 Market Abuse Directive Level 3 Third set of CESR guidance and information on the common operation of the Directive to the market Public
More informationREPORT FROM THE COMMISSION TO THE EUROPEAN PARLIAMENT AND THE COUNCIL
EUROPEAN COMMISSION Brussels, 24.1.2019 COM(2019) 13 final REPORT FROM THE COMMISSION TO THE EUROPEAN PARLIAMENT AND THE COUNCIL Regulation (EU) No 511/2014 of the European Parliament and of the Council
More information