MINNESOTA YMCA YOUTH IN GOVERNMENT Case Analysis Sheet
|
|
|
- Ethan Wright
- 5 years ago
- Views:
Transcription
1 MINNESOTA YMCA YOUTH IN GOVERNMENT Case Analysis Sheet Case Name: Partner name: Partner name: Case #: Delegation: Delegation: INTRODUCTION Who is the Appellant? Does the Appellant want the trial court s decision overturned or upheld? overturned (circle one) upheld Who is the Respondent? Does the Respondent want the trial court s decision overturned or upheld? overturned PROCEDURAL HISTORY (circle one) upheld By the time the case gets to the Court of Appeals, the questions in this case have already been addressed by the trial court. Answer the following questions about the trial court s decision. At the trial court, who won? (Appellant or Respondent) On Issue 1, what did the trial court decide? Why? On Issue 2, what did the trial court decide? Why?
2 ISSUES What is the question that the court must answer for Issue 1? (rephrase Issue 1 from your case file in the form of a yes or no question) What is the answer that the Appellant wants in response to that question? What is the answer that the Respondent wants in response to that question? What is the question that the court must answer for Issue 2? (rephrase Issue 2 from your case file in the form of a yes or no question) What is the answer that the Appellant wants in response to that question? What is the answer that the Respondent wants in response to that question? THE RULE OF LAW Each issue in this case is governed by a basic rule of law. The rule of law is the basic law that the court must apply to the facts of your case. This is sometimes referred to as the test a court must apply in order to respond to an issue in a case. After reading the Summary of the Issues and Legal Background, respond to the following prompts with respect to each issue. For Issue 1, summarize the rule of law in 1-3 sentences. For Issue 2, summarize the rule of law in 1-3 sentences.
3 THE PRIOR CASE LAW ISSUE 1 Although we have a rule of law for each issue in this case, you might have realized by now that the rule of law does not exactly answer the question given the facts of this particular case. Each of the three prior cases, or legal precedents, provided for each issue interprets or expands on the basic rule of law in some way. The way that those cases interpreted the law may help or hurt your case, depending on how well the prior cases fit your case in terms of the reasoning and the facts. The following prompts will help you decide whether the prior cases help or hurt the Appellant or the Respondent, and this will help you use these cases in your argument. Does Prior Case 1 help the Appellant, Respondent, or neither? Explain why in Does Prior Case 2 help the Appellant, Respondent, or neither? Explain why in Does Prior Case 3 help the Appellant, Respondent, or neither? Explain why in THE PRIOR CASE LAW ISSUE 2 Although we have a rule of law for each issue in this case, you might have realized by now that the rule of law does not exactly answer the question given the facts of this particular case. Each of the three prior cases, or legal precedents, provided for each issue interprets or expands on the basic rule of law in some way. The way that those cases interpreted the law may help or hurt your case, depending on how well the prior cases fit your case in terms of the reasoning and the facts. The following prompts will help you decide whether the prior cases help or hurt the Appellant or the Respondent, and this will help you use these cases in your argument.
4 Does Prior Case 1 help the Appellant, Respondent, or neither? Explain why in Does Prior Case 2 help the Appellant, Respondent, or neither? Explain why in Does Prior Case 3 help the Appellant, Respondent, or neither? Explain why in THE FACTS Based on your understanding of the rule of law and the prior cases, you should now understand that certain facts as described in your case file will be helpful to the Appellant, and some will be helpful for the Respondent. Based on your understanding of the law for Issue 1, what facts of this case will be helpful for the Appellant? Based on your understanding of the law for Issue 1, what facts of this case will be helpful for the Respondent? Based on your understanding of the law for Issue 2, what facts of this case will be helpful for the Appellant?
5 Based on your understanding of the law for Issue 2, what facts of this case will be helpful for the Respondent? ARGUMENTS Your argument for each issue in this case will have three components: (1) your interpretation of the law (the basic rule + interpretations provided by prior cases), (2) the application of your interpretation of the law to the facts of this case, and (3) your argument about how the appeals court should rule based on your interpretation of the law and the facts. Appellant s Argument for Issue 1 Summarize the law in the way most favorable to the Appellant. Appellant s Argument for Issue 1 Describe why the law as applied to the facts of the case means that the Appellant should win. Appellant s Argument for Issue 1 In one sentence, explain what the Appellant wants the appeals court to do (i.e. Overturn the trial court s decision because ). Respondent s Argument for Issue 1 Summarize the law in the way most favorable to the Respondent.
6 Respondent s Argument for Issue 1 Describe why the law as applied to the facts of the case means that the Respondent should win. Respondent's Argument for Issue 1 In one sentence, explain what the Respondent wants the appeals court to do (i.e. Uphold the trial court s decision because ). Appellant s Argument for Issue 2 Summarize the law in the way most favorable to the Appellant. Appellant s Argument for Issue 2 Describe why the law as applied to the facts of the case mean that the Appellant should win. Appellant s Argument for Issue 2 In one sentence, explain what the Appellant wants the appeals court to do (i.e. Overturn the trial court s decision because ). Respondent s Argument for Issue 2 Summarize the law in the way most favorable to the Respondent.
7 Respondent s Argument for Issue 2 Describe why the law as applied to the facts of the case mean that the Respondent should win. Respondent s Argument for Issue 2 In one sentence, explain what the Respondent wants the appeals court to do (i.e. Uphold the trial court s decision because )
[Note: You must send this letter by certified mail/return receipt and regular mail.] ARCHIVE
![[Note: You must send this letter by certified mail/return receipt and regular mail.] ARCHIVE](/thumbs/90/104457488.jpg "[Note: You must send this letter by certified mail/return receipt and regular mail.] ARCHIVE")
Prototype Notice of Suspension (Combined Serious Deficiency, Suspension, Proposed Termination and Proposed Disqualification Notice; Imminent Threat to Health or Safety) This letter concerns the [brief
License Denied, Suspended or Revoked and Appeals
Section 4 License Denied, Suspended or Revoked and Appeals Section 4 License Denied, Suspended or Revoked and Appeals This section is for people who are refused a license, and for people who have a license
IX. Findings and Conclusions in the Appellate Body Report WT/DS339/AB/R (European Communities)
WT/DS339/AB/R Page EC-105 IX. Findings and Conclusions in the Appellate Body Report WT/DS339/AB/R (European Communities) 253. In the appeal of the Panel Report, China Measures Affecting Imports of Automobile
Serious Deficiency Process for Providers Prototype Letter: Notice of Serious Deficiency
Serious Deficiency Process for Providers Prototype Letter: Notice of Serious Deficiency [Note: You must send this letter by certified mail/return receipt and regular mail.] This letter concerns the [brief
WCAT ORAL HEARING GUIDE. Workers Compensation Appeal Tribunal
WCAT Workers Compensation Appeal Tribunal ORAL HEARING GUIDE An oral hearing is your opportunity to tell us in person why, if you are the appellant, you should win your appeal and what benefits you think
In a binomial experiment of n trials, where p = probability of success and q = probability of failure. mean variance standard deviation
Name In a binomial experiment of n trials, where p = probability of success and q = probability of failure mean variance standard deviation µ = n p σ = n p q σ = n p q Notation X ~ B(n, p) The probability
Active IQ Centre Appeals Policy
Active IQ Centre Appeals Policy Introduction This policy is aimed at our customers, including learners, who are delivering, registered onto or who have completed an Active IQ qualification or unit. It
A Guide to Appeal. Family Support for Children with Disabilities Act (FSCD Act) Related Documents
A Guide to Appeal Family Support for Children with Disabilities Act (FSCD Act) Related Documents Thinking About Filing an Appeal under the FSCD Act Preparing and Presenting Your Case Appellant FSCD Act
SUPERIOR COURT DECISION
Basic Steps of a Civil Traffic Appeal Step One Step Two Receipt of Traffic Court Final Order or Judgment and Notice of Right to Appeal Appellant Files a Notice of Appeal Step Three Appellant Pays Record
Example Court Questions
Example Court Questions Direct Examination Questions to Ask QDRO Group Expert Would you please give the court your name? Would you also give us your business name and address? What does QDRO Group do?
The Arbitration Court as part of a Chamber of Commerce: [Im]partial?
![The Arbitration Court as part of a Chamber of Commerce: [Im]partial?](/thumbs/94/118264730.jpg "The Arbitration Court as part of a Chamber of Commerce: [Im]partial?")
MEALEY S TM International Arbitration Report The Arbitration Court as part of a Chamber of Commerce: [Im]partial? by Calvin A. Hamilton HAMILTON Madrid, New York A commentary article reprinted from the
Midterm Test 1 (Sample) Student Name (PRINT):... Student Signature:... Use pencil, so that you can erase and rewrite if necessary.
MA 180/418 Midterm Test 1 (Sample) Student Name (PRINT):............................................. Student Signature:................................................... Use pencil, so that you can erase
Claims Summary Report
Claims Summary Report Category Descriptions Non-protestable Non-protestable claims involve issues where the claimant s eligibility cannot be contested. Examples include layoffs, employees working all available
Analysis of NERC Compliance Registry & Registration Appeals
Electric Reliability Organization (ERO) Compliance Analysis Report NERC Compliance Registry and Registration Appeals May 2011 Table of Contents ERO Compliance Analysis Report... 2 Background Information...
UNITED STATES AIR FORCE COURT OF CRIMINAL APPEALS UNITED STATES. Airman JOSHUA A. BOBINSKI United States Air Force ACM
UNITED STATES AIR FORCE COURT OF CRIMINAL APPEALS UNITED STATES v. Airman JOSHUA A. BOBINSKI United States Air Force ACM 34357 29 January 2002 Sentence adjudged 21 September 2000 by GCM convened at Vandenberg
DIRECT TESTIMONY AND EXHIBITS
Page of CA-T- DOCKET NO. 0-0 DIRECT TESTIMONY AND EXHIBITS OF RALPH C. SMITH, CPA THE DIVISION OF CONSUMER ADVOCACY SUBJECT: REVENUE REQUIREMENT Page of CA T- Docket No. 0-0 Page of ADIT balance for the
The leaflet will also explain the meaning of some of the terms and expressions used in this guidance.
Guidance notes on completing form N161 Appellant s notice (all appeals except small claims track appeals or appeals to the Family Division of the High Court) Please note form N161 is to be used for fast
KING S COLLEGE LONDON Mooting Society. Mooting Guide 2016/2017
KING S COLLEGE LONDON Mooting Society Mooting Guide 2016/2017 Welcome! About Us The KCL Mooting Society was established in 2012 and is officially registered as a student society with the Kings' College
Appeals Policy. 1. Purpose
Appeals Policy 1. Purpose ACAS is committed to providing quality training and assessment in accordance with the Standards for Registered Training Organisations (RTOs) 2015. As such, ACAS is required to
Enquiries about Results, Access to Scripts and Appeals to Awarding Bodies procedures 2017/18
Enquiries about Results, Access to Scripts and Appeals to Awarding Bodies procedures 2017/18 These procedures are reviewed annually to ensure compliance with current regulations Approved/reviewed by DAN/
Regulatory Appeals Policy
Regulatory Document REGULATORY POLICIES AND PROCEDURES Regulatory Appeals Policy June 2016 Version control This version (2) of Qualifications Wales Regulatory policy was approved on 25 June 2016 by the
QUALIFICATIONS WALES POLICIES AND PROCEDURES REGULATORY APPEALS POLICY
QUALIFICATIONS WALES POLICIES AND PROCEDURES Version control REGULATORY APPEALS POLICY This version (2) of Regulatory policy was approved on 25 June 2016 by the Board. Section 48 of the Act 2015 (the Act
Chapter 9: What to do if you have a problem or complaint (coverage decisions, appeals, complaints)
Chapter 9: What to do if you have a problem or complaint (coverage decisions, appeals, complaints) SECTION 6 Your Part D prescription drugs: How to ask for a coverage decision or make an appeal? Have you
DISTRICT OF COLUMBIA COURT OF APPEALS. No. 00-CO-929. Appeal from the Superior Court of the District of Columbia (M )
Notice: This opinion is subject to formal revision before publication in the Atlantic and Maryland Reporters. Users are requested to notify the Clerk of the Court of any formal errors so that corrections
1. Company/Organization/Individual named in the determination ( Appellant ) Name Address Postal Code
APPEAL FORM (Form 1) This Appeal Form, along with the required attachments, must be delivered to the Employment Standards Tribunal within the appeal period. See Rule 18(3) of the Tribunal s Rules of Practice
1.2 It is intended to provide ongoing updates for future quarters to the first available Development Control Committee after each quarter.
ITEM 9 Planning Appeals Record for Quarters 1 & 2 2017-18 Author: Jeremy Lee, Senior Planning Officer Email: Jeremy.lee@milton-keynes.gov.uk Tel: 01908 252316 1.0 Introduction 1.1 This report sets out
Planning Appeal Check List
Planning Appeal Check List (Please read notes overleaf before completing) 1. The appeal must be in writing (e.g. not made by electronic means). 2. State the name of the appellant (not care of agent) address
THE HIGH COURT OF SOUTH AFRICA GAUTENG LOCAL DIVISION, JOHANNESBURG
THE HIGH COURT OF SOUTH AFRICA GAUTENG LOCAL DIVISION, JOHANNESBURG CASE NUMBER: A102/2014 DATE OF HEARING: 3 DECEMBER 2015 DATE OF JUDGMENT: 11 DECEMBER 2015 In the matter between: (1) REPORTABLE: YES
IN THE COURT OF CRIMINAL APPEALS OF TENNESSEE AT NASHVILLE December 15, 2004 Session
IN THE COURT OF CRIMINAL APPEALS OF TENNESSEE AT NASHVILLE December 15, 2004 Session STATE OF TENNESSEE v. JESSE JAMES JOHNSON Appeal from the Circuit Court for Franklin County No. 14731 Thomas W. Graham,
IN THE COURT OF APPEAL OF TANZANIA AT DODOMA. (CORAM: MUNUO, J.A., KAJI, J. A., And KIMARO, J. A.) CRIMINAL APPEAL NO.130 OF 2006
Citation Parties Legal Principles Discussed BAKARI OMARI@ The evidence which the trial LUPANDE Vs. THE court thought linked the REPUBLIC- (Appeal from appellant with the the judgment of the commission
REPORT BY THE CLAIMS ADMINISTRATOR OF THE DEEPWATER HORIZON ECONOMIC AND PROPERTY DAMAGES SETTLEMENT AGREEMENT ON THE STATUS OF CLAIMS REVIEW
Case 2:10-md-02179-CJB-JCW Document 22769 Filed 04/27/17 Page 1 of 16 UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT EASTERN DISTRICT OF LOUISIANA In Re: Oil Spill by the Oil Rig MDL NO. 2179 Deepwater Horizon in the Gulf
Krauser, C.J., Berger, Reed,
UNREPORTED IN THE COURT OF SPECIAL APPEALS OF MARYLAND No. 1634 September Term, 2014 TERENCE CRAWLEY v. STATE OF MARYLAND Krauser, C.J., Berger, Reed, JJ. Opinion by Reed, J. Filed: February 6, 2017 *This
INTERNATIONAL COURT OF APPEAL (I.C.A.) of the FEDERATION INTERNATIONALE DE L'AUTOMOBILE
INTERNATIONAL COURT OF APPEAL (I.C.A.) of the FEDERATION INTERNATIONALE DE L'AUTOMOBILE Appeal brought by the Deutscher Motor Sport Bund E.V. (DMSB) on behalf of its licence-holder Young Driver AMR against
Medications can be a large
Find tips for talking about healthcare costs and the appeal process inside. Common Roadblocks to Care Advice to prevent and deal with the most common insurance-related hurdles The Doctor I Need Is Out
Your action is required. Please vote today.
Your action is required. Please vote today. Dear Shareholder: We are asking you to vote to authorize the Fund s board of trustees (the Board ) to amend the Agreement and Declaration of Trust of Highland
THE SUPREME COURT OF APPEAL OF SOUTH AFRICA
THE SUPREME COURT OF APPEAL OF SOUTH AFRICA Not Reportable Case no: 439/2007 In the matter between: JEWELL CROSSBERG Appellant and THE STATE Respondent Coram: Navsa, Heher, Jafta, Ponnan JJA et Malan AJA
IN THE HIGH COURT OF SOUTH AFRICA BOPHUTHATSWANA PROVINCIAL DIVISION CASE NO. 33/07. In the matter between: AND CRIMINAL APPEAL MMABATHO
IN THE HIGH COURT OF SOUTH AFRICA BOPHUTHATSWANA PROVINCIAL DIVISION CASE NO. 33/07 In the matter between: MICHAEL MAKGALE APPELLANT AND THE STATE RESPONDENT CRIMINAL APPEAL MMABATHO GURA J, LEVER AJ.
ADMINISTRATIVE HEARING STATEMENT OF RIGHTS AND RESPONSIBILITIES
ADMINISTRATIVE HEARING STATEMENT OF RIGHTS AND RESPONSIBILITIES In accordance with Richmond Municipal Code 2.62.060, any recipient of an Administrative Citation may contest that there was a violation of
A GUIDE FOR SELF-REPRESENTED LITIGANTS
COURT OF APPEAL OF NEWFOUNDLAND AND LABRADOR A GUIDE FOR SELF-REPRESENTED LITIGANTS 2017 This document explains what to do to prepare and file a factum. It includes advice and best practices to help you.
PRACTICE DIRECTION A APPEALS. This practice direction supplements Part 20 of the Court of Protection Rules 2007
PRACTICE DIRECTION APPEALS This practice direction supplements Part 20 of the Court of Protection Rules 2007 PRACTICE DIRECTION A APPEALS 1. This practice direction applies to appeal proceedings within
COURT OF APPEALS, STATE OF COLORADO 2 East 14 th Avenue Denver, Colorado 80203
COURT OF APPEALS, STATE OF COLORADO 2 East 14 th Avenue Denver, Colorado 80203 Appeal from Board of Assessment Appeals, State of Colorado Presiding Judges Diane M. Devries and Amy J. Williams Case No.
IN THE HIGH COURT OF SOUTH AFRICA NATAL PROVINCIAL DIVISION AR 274/05 NKOSINATHI ELIJAH MAPHUMULO REASONS FOR JUDGMENT
IN THE HIGH COURT OF SOUTH AFRICA REPORTABLE NATAL PROVINCIAL DIVISION AR 274/05 In the matter between: NKOSINATHI ELIJAH MAPHUMULO Appellant and THE STATE Respondent REASONS FOR JUDGMENT Hurt J On 6 December
LIFT Operations Procedures Title: Service Suspension and Appeals Procedure ATP Date: Approved 4/26/17; Revised 4/9/18 Page 1 of 6
Date: Approved 4/26/17; Revised 4/9/18 Page 1 of 6 1.0 Background TriMet s LIFT complementary paratransit program provides transportation service to eligible individuals as required by Title II of the
Before. BRESLIN, HEAD, and BILLETT Appellate Military Judges OPINION OF THE COURT
UNITED STATES AIR FORCE COURT OF CRIMINAL APPEALS BILLETT, Judge: UNITED STATES v. Staff Sergeant JOHN E. BEACHAM United States Air Force 28 January 2002 Sentence adjudged 3 December 1999 by GCM convened
Chapter Chapter 6. Modeling Random Events: The Normal and Binomial Models
Chapter 6 107 Chapter 6 Modeling Random Events: The Normal and Binomial Models Chapter 6 108 Chapter 6 109 Table Number: Group Name: Group Members: Discrete Probability Distribution: Ichiro s Hit Parade
NOVA SCOTIA WORKERS COMPENSATION APPEALS TRIBUNAL
NOVA SCOTIA WORKERS COMPENSATION APPEALS TRIBUNAL Appellant: [X] (Worker) Participants entitled to respond to this appeal: [X] (Employer) and The Workers Compensation Board of Nova Scotia (Board) APPEAL
2016 Paralegal Cup Mooting Competition Guide TABLE OF CONTENTS
2016 Paralegal Cup Mooting Competition Guide TABLE OF CONTENTS Introduction... 2 What is a moot?... 2 Who competes in a moot?... 2 How does a moot work?... 2 Who judges a moot?... 3 What are the judges
PENSION CHANGES AND PLAN UPDATES. By Jim Linn, Glenn Thomas and Jennifer Cowan Lewis, Longman & Walker, P.A.
PENSION CHANGES AND PLAN UPDATES By Jim Linn, Glenn Thomas and Jennifer Cowan Lewis, Longman & Walker, P.A. I. Police and Firefighter Pension Plans: Change in Division of Retirement Interpretation Concerning
Nos CR & CR IN THE COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE FIFTH DISTRICT OF TEXAS AT DALLAS. ANTHONY CHARLES GARRETT, Appellant
Nos. 05-11-00304-CR & 05-11-00305-CR IN THE COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE FIFTH DISTRICT OF TEXAS AT DALLAS 5th Court of Appeals FILED: 8/10/11 14:00 Lisa Matz, Clerk ANTHONY CHARLES GARRETT, Appellant v. THE
IN THE UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE TENTH CIRCUIT
IN THE UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE TENTH CIRCUIT AMANDA N. VU, ) ) Petitioner-Appellant, ) ) v. ) No. 17-9007 ) COMMISSIONER OF INTERNAL REVENUE, ) ) Respondent-Appellee. ) APPELLANT S REPLY
Massachusetts Health Connector Appeals Unit
FINAL APPEAL DECISION Appeal Decision: Penalty Overturned in Full X Penalty Upheld Penalty Overturned in Part Hearing Issue: Appeal of the 2015 Tax Year Penalty Hearing Date: February 6, 2017 Decision
A GUIDE FOR SELF-REPRESENTED LITIGANTS
COURT OF APPEAL OF NEWFOUNDLAND AND LABRADOR A GUIDE FOR SELF-REPRESENTED LITIGANTS 2017 This document explains what to do to prepare and file an appeal book. It describes what should be in an appeal book
SUPREME COURT OF COLORADO OFFICE OF THE CHIEF JUSTICE
SUPREME COURT OF COLORADO OFFICE OF THE CHIEF JUSTICE DIRECTIVE CONCERNING ASSESSMENT OF COST RECOVERY FEES FOR MAINTAINING THE TECHNICAL INFRASTRUCTURE NECESSARY TO SUPPORT ELECTRONIC ACCESS TO COURT
COURT OF APPEAL FOR ONTARIO. APPELLANT S / RESPONDENT S FACTUM (Select One)
C.A. N o A-123-11 COURT OF APPEAL FOR ONTARIO BETWEEN: HER MAJESTY THE QUEEN (Appellant) - and - RAHEEM KHAN (Respondent) APPELLANT S / RESPONDENT S FACTUM (Select One) NAME OF LAW FIRM Address of law
Massachusetts Health Connector Appeals Unit
FINAL APPEAL DECISION Appeal Decision: X Penalty Overturned in Full Penalty Upheld Penalty Overturned in Part Hearing Issue: Appeal of the 2015 Tax Year Penalty Hearing Date: January 24, 2017 Decision
IN THE DISTRICT COURT OF APPEAL FIRST DISTRICT STATE OF FLORIDA
IN THE DISTRICT COURT OF APPEAL FIRST DISTRICT STATE OF FLORIDA OFFICE OF INSURANCE, REGULATION Appellant, RECEIVED, 9/15/2016 5:27 PM, Jon S. Wheeler, First District Court of Appeal vs. STATE FARM FLORIDA
This appeal is decided by one judge pursuant to (2)(c) and (f), STATS.
COURT OF APPEALS DECISION DATED AND FILED August 26, 1999 Marilyn L. Graves Clerk, Court of Appeals of Wisconsin NOTICE This opinion is subject to further editing. If published, the official version will
Common Procedures in Successful Shareholder Dispute Matters An Attorney s Perspective and a Valuation Practitioner s Perspective
Shareholder Dispute Litigation Insights Best Practices Common in Successful Shareholder Dispute Matters An Attorney s Perspective and a Valuation Practitioner s Perspective Michael J. Zdeb, Esq., and Kevin
Cite as 2017 Ark. App. 684 ARKANSAS COURT OF APPEALS DIVISION IV
Cite as 2017 Ark. App. 684 ARKANSAS COURT OF APPEALS DIVISION IV No. CV-17-48 JAN CHRISTOPHER SARNA APPELLANT V. ARKANSAS DEPARTMENT OF CORRECTION SEX OFFENDER COMMITTEE APPELLEE Opinion Delivered: December
Funding Extension Services with User Fees Minnesota Public Finance Note #
Laura Kalambokidis Extension Economist Department of Applied Economics Phone: (612) 625-1995 E-mail: lkalambo@apec.umn.edu Funding Extension Services with User Fees Minnesota Public Finance Note #2002-01
FINAL APPEAL DECISION
FINAL APPEAL DECISION Appeal Decision: _xx Penalty Overturned in Full Penalty Overturned in Part Penalty Upheld Hearing Issue: Appeal of the 2015 Tax Year Penalty Hearing Date: November 21, 2016 Decision
Murray State University Classification of Residency for Fee Assessment Purposes
Murray State University Classification of Residency for Fee Assessment Purposes I. Rationale for Residency Regulation The Council on Post-Secondary Education (CPE) has promulgated an administrative regulation
Administrative Code Chapter 31 Amendments
t Administrative Code Chapter 31 Amendments Case Number: Ordinance No. 161-13 Initiated by: Supervisor Wiener Effective Date: September 25, 2013 1650 Mission St. Suite 400 San Francisco, CA 94103~2479
APPEAL TRIBUNAL PROCEDURES
APPEAL TRIBUNAL PROCEDURES Notice of Appeal 1. A reported person or reporting umpire seeking to appeal ( Appellant ) a decision of the Victorian Summer Baseball League Tribunal ( VSBL Tribunal ) must lodge
A new approach to generic marks in Portugal The Law Firm of Gonçalo Moreira Rato
A new approach to generic marks in Portugal The Law Firm of Gonçalo Moreira Rato This text first appeared in the IAM magazine supplement 'Brands in the Boardroom 2007' April 2007 Feature Portugal A new
State & Local Tax Alert
State & Local Tax Alert Breaking state and local tax developments from Grant Thornton LLP Washington Supreme Court Upholds Retroactive Application of Amendment to B&O Tax Exemption The Washington Supreme
IN THE SUPREME COURT OF MISSISSIPPI. No DP SCT SUPPLEMENTAL BRIEF OF APPELLEE JIM HOOD ATTORNEY GENERAL STATE OF MISSISSIPPI
E-Filed Document Dec 17 2013 12:58:24 2011-DP-00410-SCT Pages: 13 IN THE SUPREME COURT OF MISSISSIPPI TIMOTHY ROBERT RONK, Appellant versus No. 2011-DP-00410-SCT STATE OF MISSISSIPPI, Appellee SUPPLEMENTAL
C. The DRB Member designated by the Assistant Administrator for HR shall serve as the Board Chair.
OFFICE OF HUMAN RESOUCES TSA MANAGEMENT DIRECTIVE No. 1100.77-1 1. PURPOSE: This directive establishes the Transportation Security Administration (TSA) Disciplinary Review Board (DRB or Board) to provide
IN THE SUPREME COURT OF TEXAS
IN THE SUPREME COURT OF TEXAS 444444444444 NO. 07-0924 444444444444 OLD FARMS OWNERS ASSOCIATION, INC. AND SUSAN C. LEE, TRUSTEE OF THE TRUST CREATED UNDER ARTICLE IV OF THE WILL OF KATHERINE P. BARNHART,
KORNFELD LLP. Section 96 of The Employment Standards Act: Balancing Competing Interests
Page 1 Shafik Bhalloo sbhalloo@kornfeldllp.com d: 604-331-8308 Introduction Section 96 of The Employment Standards Act: Balancing Competing Interests With the imposition of statutory liability on directors
INTERVIEW QUESTIONS - WORKERS' COMPENSATION APPEALS POLICY AND PROCESS JURISDICTION: ALBERTA 1. STRUCTURE OF APPEAL PROCESS
INTERVIEW QUESTIONS - WORKERS' COMPENSATION APPEALS POLICY AND PROCESS JURISDICTION: ALBERTA 1. STRUCTURE OF APPEAL PROCESS Please review and confirm the information in the attached summary of information
Mutua Mulundi v Republic [2005] eklr REPUBLIC OF KENYA IN THE HIGH COURT OF KENYA AT MACHAKOS
![Mutua Mulundi v Republic [2005] eklr REPUBLIC OF KENYA IN THE HIGH COURT OF KENYA AT MACHAKOS](/thumbs/85/92084050.jpg "Mutua Mulundi v Republic [2005] eklr REPUBLIC OF KENYA IN THE HIGH COURT OF KENYA AT MACHAKOS")
REPUBLIC OF KENYA IN THE HIGH COURT OF KENYA AT MACHAKOS Criminal Appeal 23 of 2003 (From Original conviction (s) and Sentence (s) in Criminal Case No. 720 of 2001 of the Resident Magistrate s Court at
NOTICE OF DECISION of the MISSISAUGA APPEAL TRIBUNAL established pursuant to section 23.5 of the Municipal Act 2001
NOTICE OF DECISION of the MISSISAUGA APPEAL TRIBUNAL established pursuant to section 23.5 of the Municipal Act 2001 IN THE MATTER OF a Notice of Appeal, dated January 4, 2010 to the Mississauga Appeal
New Mexico Junior College
New Mexico Junior College 2017 2018 Income Verification Worksheet - Dependent Student Your 2017 2018 Free Application for Federal Student Aid (FAFSA) was selected by the federal processor for review in
NOT RECOMMENDED FOR PUBLICATION File Name: 16a0037n.06. Nos /2488 UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE SIXTH CIRCUIT ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) )
NOT RECOMMENDED FOR PUBLICATION File Name: 16a0037n.06 Nos. 14-1693/2488 UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE SIXTH CIRCUIT UNITED STATES OF AMERICA, Plaintiff-Appellee, v. RICHARD DEAN WOOLSEY, Defendant-Appellant.
CHAPTER 28 WORKING WITH THE TAX LAW SOLUTIONS TO PROBLEM MATERIALS. Status: Q/P Question/ Present in Prior Problem Topic Edition Edition
CHAPTER 28 WORKING WITH THE TAX LAW SOLUTIONS TO PROBLEM MATERIALS Status: Q/P Question/ Present in Prior Problem Topic Edition Edition 1 Code Unchanged 1 2 Code Modified 2 3 Tax legislation Modified 3
The Binomial Distribution
The Binomial Distribution January 31, 2018 Contents The Binomial Distribution The Normal Approximation to the Binomial The Binomial Hypothesis Test Computing Binomial Probabilities in R 30 Problems The
hotel for downtown Lancaster. A favorable ruling soon might allow construction to begin in early Date: April 24, 2002
Paper: LANCASTER NEW ERA (LANCASTER, PA.) Title: Big win for center, hotel Pa. top court's decision to hear controversial case delights backers of proposed convention center, hotel for downtown Lancaster.
In the Supreme Court of Ohio APPEAL FROM THE COURT OF APPEALS FIFTH APPELATE DISTRICT COSHOCTON COUNTY, OHIO CASE NO CA-0024.^.
In the Supreme Court of Ohio APPEAL FROM THE COURT APPEALS FIFTH APPELATE DISTRICT COSHOCTON COUNTY, OHIO CASE NO. 2013-CA-0024.^.,^ 1% r 7 DEBORAH BIGELOW, Plaintiff-Appellee, vs. AMERICAN FAMILY INSURANCE,
COURT OF APPEAL FOR ONTARIO. APPELLANT S / RESPONDENT S FACTUM (Select One)
C.A. N o A-226-09 COURT OF APPEAL FOR ONTARIO BETWEEN: TYSON ROY (Appellant) - and - HER MAJESTY THE QUEEN (Respondents) APPELLANT S / RESPONDENT S FACTUM (Select One) NAME OF LAW FIRM Address of law firm
Massachusetts Health Connector Appeals Unit
FINAL APPEAL DECISION Appeal Decision: X Penalty Overturned in Full Penalty Upheld Penalty Overturned in Part Hearing Issue: Appeal of the 2015 Tax Year Penalty Hearing Date: January 24, 2017 Decision
The Binomial Distribution
The Binomial Distribution January 31, 2019 Contents The Binomial Distribution The Normal Approximation to the Binomial The Binomial Hypothesis Test Computing Binomial Probabilities in R 30 Problems The
ATTACHMENT APPELLATE RULES AND INSTRUCTIONS
ATTACHMENT 1 2016-2017 APPELLATE RULES AND INSTRUCTIONS Specific Competition Instructions... 1-1 What is Appellate and How Does it Work... 1-2 Briefs... 1-4 Research Tips... 1-8 Constructing Your Argument...
Application Form APPLICATION FOR EMPLOYMENT PLEASE ATTACH RESUME TO APPLICATION APPLICANTS MAY BE TESTED FOR ILLEGAL DRUGS
Application Form APPLICATION FOR EMPLOYMENT PLEASE ATTACH RESUME TO APPLICATION APPLICANTS MAY BE TESTED FOR ILLEGAL DRUGS DATE Name Last First Middle Initial Present address Street Number City State Zip
BEFORE THE REAL ESTATE AGENTS DISCIPLINARY TRIBUNAL. GILLIES REALTY LIMITED Appellant. THE REAL ESTATE AGENTS AUTHORITY (CAC 410) First Respondent
BEFORE THE REAL ESTATE AGENTS DISCIPLINARY TRIBUNAL [2018] NZREADT 4 READT 031/17 IN THE MATTER OF BETWEEN AND AND AND An appeal under section 111 of the Real Estate Agents Act 2008 GILLIES REALTY LIMITED
FILED: NEW YORK COUNTY CLERK 04/11/ :27 PM INDEX NO /2017 NYSCEF DOC. NO. 38 RECEIVED NYSCEF: 04/11/2017
NYSCEF DOC. NO. 38 RECEIVED NYSCEF: 04/11/2017 SUPREME COURT OF THE STATE OF NEW YORK COUNTY OF NEW YORK APPELLATE DIVISION: FIRST DEPARTMENT -------------------------------------------------------X REEC
Case No 392/92 IN THE SUPREME COURT OF SOUTH AFRICA APPELLATE DIVISION. In the matter between: COMMISSIONER FOR INLAND REVENUE.
Case No 392/92 IN THE SUPREME COURT OF SOUTH AFRICA APPELLATE DIVISION In the matter between: COMMISSIONER FOR INLAND REVENUE Appellant and GIUSEPPE BROLLO PROPERTIES (PROPRIETARY) LIMITED Respondent CORAM:
MATH 227 CP 6 SHORT ANSWER. Write the word or phrase that best completes each statement or answers the question.
MATH 227 CP 6 SHORT ANSWER. Write the word or phrase that best completes each statement or answers the question. Identify the given random variable as being discrete or continuous. 1) The number of phone
Ohio Court of Appeals Decides Courts May Authorize Receiver s Sales Free and Clear of Liens
Ohio Court of Appeals Decides Courts May Authorize Receiver s Sales Free and Clear of Liens Susan M. Argo, Esq. sargo@graydon.com Zachary D. Prendergast, Esq. zprendergast@graydon.com Graydon Head & Ritchey
IN THE SUPREME COURT OF THE STATE OF DELAWARE
IN THE SUPREME COURT OF THE STATE OF DELAWARE IN RE ABERCROMBIE & FITCH No. 282, 2005 CO. SHAREHOLDERS DERIVA- TIVE LITIGATION: JOHN O MALLEY, DERIVA- Court Below: Court of Chancery TIVELY ON BEHALF OF
ACCT Introduction to Accounting Chapter 6 - Closing Entries and the Post Closing Trial Balance Prof. Johnson
ACCT 100 - Introduction to Accounting Chapter 6 - Closing Entries and the Post Closing Trial Balance Prof. Johnson Purpose: The purpose of this handout is to summarize key concepts of Chapter 6. This represents
Lessons Learned from the ALJ Experience
Lessons Learned from the ALJ Experience Ralph Wuebker, MD, MBA Chief Executive Officer AHA Solutions, Inc., a subsidiary of the American Hospital Association, is compensated for the use of the AHA marks
IN THE COURT OF APPEALS OF GEORGIA
IN THE COURT OF APPEALS OF GEORGIA CRAIG MOORE, ) ) Appellant, ) ) v. ) Appeal No. A07A0316 ) MARY T. CRANFORD, Judge of the) Coweta County Probate Court, ) ) Appellee ) APPELLANT S BRIEF IN SUPPORT OF
IN THE SUPREME COURT OF FLORIDA. vs. CASE NO. SC96659 REPLY BRIEF OF APPELLEE/ CROSS APPELLANT
IN THE SUPREME COURT OF FLORIDA ROBERT BEELER P0WER, Appellant/Cross-Appellee, vs. CASE NO. SC96659 STATE OF FLORIDA, Appellee/ Cross-Appellant. / REPLY BRIEF OF APPELLEE/ CROSS APPELLANT INTERLOCUTORY
TEXAS COURT OF APPEALS, THIRD DISTRICT, AT AUSTIN
TEXAS COURT OF APPEALS, THIRD DISTRICT, AT AUSTIN NO. 03-10-00393-CR Merril Leroy Jessop, Appellant v. The State of Texas, Appellee FROM THE DISTRICT COURT OF SCHLEICHER COUNTY, 51ST JUDICIAL DISTRICT
Know your English Total marks for the section: 15
Know your English Total marks for the section: 15 Part 1 Finding the right word: Name the circled parts 5 x 1 = 5 Marks a) There are only three parts to the normal safety pin. Name the part which has been
Fidelis Care Appeals Department 490 CrossPoint Parkway Getzville, NY Phone: ext Fax:
PROVIDER APPEALS This section deals with appeals from two kinds of denials: (i) denials for lack of medical necessity, discussed in Part I, and (ii) administrative denials or alleged underpayments discussed
Important Notice About Increased Retirement Benefits from the Foot Locker Retirement Plan and Proposed Attorneys Fee and Expense Award
UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT SOUTHERN DISTRICT OF NEW YORK --------------------------------------------------------------X GEOFFREY OSBERG, On behalf of himself and on behalf of all others similarly situated,
Principles for Ensuring Fair and Appropriate Practices for Individual Market Policy Rescissions and Pre-existing Conditions Clauses
Principles for Ensuring Fair and Appropriate Practices for Individual Market Policy Rescissions and Pre-existing Conditions Clauses The Board of Directors of America s Health Insurance Plans (AHIP) and
Reconsideration, Review and Appeals Policy
Reconsideration, Review and Appeals Policy 1. Purpose 1.1. The purpose of the Reconsideration, Review and Appeals Policy (Policy) is to define College decisions that can be reconsidered, reviewed, or appealed.