Proposition 70 s Tax on Indian Gaming Open to Challenge
|
|
- Duane Potter
- 5 years ago
- Views:
Transcription
1 Proposition 70 s Tax on Indian Gaming Open to Challenge Tax Provision Could Be Invalidated Leaving 99-Year Monopoly, Expanded Gaming and Unlimited Expansion Without Revenues to the State or Taxpayer Protection In reviewing Proposition 70 s proposed charge on Indian gaming activities, we have concluded that the initiative is drafted in such a way as to leave open the possibility that the charge is challenged in Court as an unconstitutional tax on Indian tribes. The initiative has been placed on the ballot and is being heavily promoted by a few California Indian gaming interests. However, the initiative is a legislative act much as if it were passed by the legislature itself. The imposition of a charge or tax - this take or leave it sort of approach - is susceptible to challenge because States are prohibited from imposing such demands. If these charges are successfully challenged as unconstitutional or otherwise ruled to violate federal law, the initiative itself provides a mechanism whereby the Courts can and must severe the offending provisions and effectuate the remainder. If successful, the real taxpayers in California, including local governments, police and fire protection services are the ones stuck paying for and providing the services necessary to support this enterprise while the tribes enjoy a 99-year monopoly for unlimited and virtually unregulated gambling throughout California. When you consider how much money the proponents of Proposition 70 are spending to try and pass this initiative and how much money will be at stake should this unlimited authority for gaming in California pass, it s not unreasonable to conclude the some tribe, whether they supported Proposition 70 or not, will file suit challenging the imposition of this tax. That is a risk, the California Taxpayers Association believes, the people of California cannot afford to take.
2 October 1, 2004 Proposition 70 s Tax on Indian Gaming Open to Challenge We have reviewed Proposition 70 with respect to the question of whether its provisions intending to require payment from Indian casinos that is equivalent to the amount of revenue the State would receive on the same amount of net business income, earned by a private, non-exempt California corporation based upon the then-prevailing general corporate tax rate might be vulnerable to legal challenge as an impermissible tax imposed on the operations of a tribal enterprise. If these corporate tax provisions were found to be preempted by federal ban on taxing Indian tribe casinos and severed from the initiative, the tribes could be rewarded with expanded casino gaming rights and a 99-year franchise on their monopoly operations but not be required to make any payments to the State. Background: Federal law provides that the state imposition of on-reservation taxes of tribes or their members is presumptively invalid. As the United States Supreme Court held in California v. Cabazon Band of Mission Indians (1987) 480 U.S. 202, 215, n.17; We have repeatedly addressed the issue of state taxation of tribes and tribal members and the state, federal, and tribal interest which it implicates. We have recognized that the federal tradition of Indian immunity from state taxation is very strong and that the state interest in taxation is correspondingly weak. Accordingly, it is unnecessary to rebalance these interests in every case. See also, Oklahoma Tax Comm n v. Chickasaw Nation (1995) 515 U.S. 450, 458. Furthermore, the federal Indian Gaming Regulatory Act (25 U.S.C. section 2710(d)(4)) expressly prohibits the states from imposing a tax as a condition for agreeing to a tribal-state compact. There is simply no argument; the states cannot tax tribes and their members. The only question is whether the provisions of Proposition 70 are an impermissible tax. Proposition 70 amends the State Constitution in three key ways: 1 1. Proposition 70 adds subdivision (I) to Article IV, section 19 of the California Constitution, and provides, in relevant part that Any federally recognized Indian tribe requesting to enter into a new or amended compact pursuant to this subdivision shall agree under the terms of the compact to contribute to the state, on a sovereign-to-sovereign basis, a percentage of its net income from gaming activities that is equivalent to the amount of revenue the State would receive on the same amount of net business income earned by a private, non-exempt California corporation based upon the then-prevailing general corporate tax rate under the state Revenue and Taxation Code. This contribution shall be made in consideration for the exclusive right enjoyed by Indian tribes to operate gaming facilities in an economic environment free of competition for slot machines and other forms of Class III casino gaming on non-indian lands in California. The compact shall provide that in the event the Indian tribes lose their exclusive right to - 1 -
3 1) The measure requires that any tribe seeking the terms of Proposition 70 in a tribal-state compact must pay to the State a percentage of its net income from gaming activities that is equivalent to the amount that the State would receive on the net business income of a non-indian business based on the then prevailing general corporate tax rate. Net income from gaming activities is not defined. 2) These payments are deemed to be in consideration for the [tribes ] exclusive right to conduct casino gaming and will cease if gaming is authorized for any non-indian entity. 3) The payment to the State is in lieu of any other state or local tax, fee or levy that might be charged against the tribe. It is our view that a credible argument can be made that Proposition 70 s provisions requiring tribes to make payments to the State could exceed the permissible scope of revenue-sharing agreements permitted by prevailing federal law and the Department of Interior. If the payments are deemed to be a tax, they would be stricken as inconsistent with federal law. Should this happen, the severability clause provided for in Section 6 of the initiative would work to preserve the tribes 99-year monopoly on near unlimited casino gaming in California with no obligation to make any payment to the State or any local government of any kind. Discussion: On August 20, 2004, the Secretary of the Interior approved the five amended compacts singed by Governor Schwarzenegger on June 22 and ratified by the Legislature shortly thereafter. In her letter of approval to the Governor, the Secretary notes that in the over 200 compacts approved by the Department of the Interior, only a few have include tribal payments to States other than for direct expenses to defray the costs of regulating a gaming activity under the compact. She further notes that [t]his is because IGRA prohibits states from imposing a tax, fee, charge or other assessment to engage in Class III gaming. The Secretary goes on to state that the Department has sharply limited the circumstances under which Indian tribes can make direct payments to a State for purposes other than defraying the costs of regulating gaming activities. The only exception is where the payments are in exchange for quantifiable economic benefits over which the State is not required to negotiate, such as substantial exclusive rights to engage in Class III gaming activities. The amount of the payment of the State must be appropriate in light of the exclusivity right conferred on the tribe. In the case of the five re-negotiated compacts, the Secretary found that the payment of the equivalent of a 10% net win (when considering the tribe s obligation to pay for the $1 billion transportation bond and certain other payments) was of sufficient substantial economic benefit to the tribes so as to justify the payment. The Secretary ultimately found that, in the overall context of these compacts, the payments should not be considered a fee, charge, or assessment. operate slot machines and other forms of Class III casino gaming in California, the obligation of the Indian tribe to contribute to the state a portion of its net income from gaming activities pursuant to this subdivision shall case. Contributions made to the State pursuant to this subdivision shall be in lieu of any and all other fees, taxes, or levies that may be charged or imposed, directly or indirectly, by the state, cities, or counties against the Indian tribe on its authorized gaming activities
4 Although the Secretary s opinion is not binding on a court, it will be given deference and the tribes supporting Proposition 70 will undoubtedly argue that paying the state the equivalent of the corporate tax rate of 8.84% on the net income from gaming activities is consistent with the Secretary s approval of their compacts. But there is a critical flaw in this argument. The compacts approved by the Secretary were negotiated between the tribes and the State signifying that the tribes agreed with the revenue-sharing provisions. In contrast, Proposition 70 is a legislative act by the State of California which ties the tribes payments to the state to the Legislature s determination of the corporate tax rate. Moreover, in order to get the 99-year monopoly, they are required to pay 8.84% (or whatever the current corporate tax rate may be) to the State on their net income from gaming activities. Because some of the tribes are sponsoring Proposition 70, it is easy to mistakenly believe that they are proposing a payment to the State. But in strictly legal terms, the enactment of the initiative is a legislative act which sets out the nonnegotiable terms by which tribes must abide in order to achieve their 99-year exclusive franchise. What s more, it is not apparent that all the potential tribes impacted by this initiative are necessarily supportive of its passage. In this context, it s not unreasonable to think that some tribe, whether having supported Proposition 70 or not, could argue that the State s imposition of the corporate tax rate on their net income in exchange for the other provisions of Proposition 70 constitutes a prohibited tax pursuant to the federal Indian Gaming Regulatory Act (25 U.S.C. section 2710(d)(4)). The Ninth Circuit Court of Appeals has opined that, in some instances within the context of negotiations, state may insist on fees from the tribes so long as the State offers something in return. 2 The difference here is that the context is not one of a negotiation, but rather of a legislative act by the people of the State of California setting forth conditions which must be met for a compact to be entered into. There are no negotiations. Under these circumstances, we are concerned that a lawsuit filed by a tribe after Proposition 70 is approved might result in a court invalidating the payment provisions. Section 6 of the proposition sets forth the intent that any provision that is invalidated must be severed from the initiative giving full effect to those remaining provisions not invalidated. The courts will generally sever unconstitutional provisions of an initiative so long as it is grammatically, functionally, and volitionally separable. 3 It could be argued that the 99-year exclusive franchise on casino 2. See In re Indian Gaming Related Cases (9 th Cir. 2003) 331 F.3d 1094, We do not hold that the State could have, without offering anything in return, taken the position that it would conclude a Tribal-State compact with Coyote Valley only if the tribe agreed to pay into the RSTF. Where, as here, however, a State offers meaningful concession in return for fee demands, it does not exercise authority to impose anything. Instead, it exercises its authority to negotiate, which IGRA clearly permits. See S.Rep.No , at 13 (1988), reprinted in 1988 US.C.C.A.N. 3071, 2083 (describing the compacting process as a viable mechanism for setting various matters between two equal sovereigns ). Depending on the nature of both the fees demanded and the concessions offered in return, such demands might, of course, amount to an attempt to impose a fee, and therefore amount to bad faith on the part of a State. If, however, offered concession by a State are real, 2710(d)(4) does not categorically prohibit fee demands. Instead, courts should consider the totality of that State s actions when engaging in the factspecific good-faith inquiry IGRA generally requires. See 25 U.S.C. 2710(d)(7)(B)(iii). (Emphasis in original.) 3. See Calfarm Ins. Co. V. Deukmejian (1989) 48 Cal.3d 805, See also Hotel Employees & Restaurant Employees Internat. Union v. Davis (1999) 21 Cal.4 th 585, 613. [An invalid part] is grammatically separable if it is distinct and separate and, hence, can be removed a as a whole without affecting the wording of any of the measure s other provisions. (Citing Calfarm, supra.) It is - 3 -
5 gaming in Proposition 70 is severable. The question would be whether the payments to the State were of critical importance to the measure s enactment. Indeed, the measure itself provides that the tax provision is, in effect, severable because if nontribal gaming is authorized the obligations to make payments to the State ceases. Given the amount of money at stake should this measure be enacted, it is almost a certainty that one tribe will emerge to invalidate to corporate tax provision. While it is by no means certain what the outcome of that litigation will be, it is important to remember that the Senate Report accompanying the enactment of the Indian Gaming Regulatory Act (IGRA) provides that a court should interpret any ambiguities on these issues in a manner that will be most favorable to tribal interests. 4 Given this command with respect to statutory construction, it is easy to conclude that Proposition 70 is vulnerable in this regard and consequently so are the taxpayers of the State of California. Wm. Gregory Turner General Counsel functionally separable if it si not necessary to the measure s operation and purpose. (Citing Calfarm, supra.) And it is volitionally separable if it was not of critical importance to the measure s enactment. (Citing Calfarm, supra.) 4. S.REP.NO , at p.15 (1988), reprinted in 1988 U.S.C.C.A.N. 3071,
OFFICE OF THE SECRETARY Washington,DC AUG
United States Department OFFICE OF THE SECRETARY Washington,DC 20240 of the Interior Honorable Sherry Treppa Chairperson, Habematolel Porno of Upper Lake 375 E. Hwy. 20, Suite 1 P.O. Box 516 Upper Lake,
More informationIn The Supreme Court of the United States
No. 10-330 ================================================================ In The Supreme Court of the United States --------------------------------- --------------------------------- ARNOLD SCHWARZENEGGER,
More information18TH ANNUAL WESTERN INDIAN GAMING CONFERENCE FEBRUARY 5TH 7TH MORONGO CASINO, RESORT & SPA
18TH ANNUAL WESTERN INDIAN GAMING CONFERENCE FEBRUARY 5TH 7TH MORONGO CASINO, RESORT & SPA Compacts of the Jerry Brown Administration: A Comparison to the Schwarzenegger Compacts and National Trends BROWN
More informationMichael Genest Genest Consulting
Michael Genest Genest Consulting mike.genest@gmail.com Alison Harvey Executive Director 1530 J Street, Suite 250 Sacramento, California 95814 Dear Ms. Harvey: This responds to your request for an estimate
More informationIN THE UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE NINTH CIRCUIT. Plaintiff-Appellee, Defendants-Appellants.
08-55809 IN THE UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE NINTH CIRCUIT RINCON BAND OF LUISENO MISSION INDIANS OF THE RINCON RESERVATION, a/k/a RINCON SAN LUISENO BAND OF MISSION INDIANS a/k/a.rincon BAND
More informationBILL ANALYSIS. The Senate amendments appropriate $13 million from the SDF to the CGCC to provide grants to local agencies for the fiscal year.
CONCURRENCE IN SENATE AMENDMENTS AB 1042 (Hall) As Amended August 12, 2013 Majority vote BILL ANALYSIS ---------------------------------------------------------------------- ASSEMBLY: 78-0 (May 29, 2013)
More information/ IN THE UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE NINTH CIRCUIT. Plaintiff-Appellee,
Case: 08-55809 10/26/2009 Page: 1 of 19 ID: 7108589 DktEntry: 41 08-55809/08-55914 IN THE UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE NINTH CIRCUIT RINCON BAND OF LUISENO MISSION INDIANS OF THE RINCON RESERVATION,
More informationSeminole Tribe of Florida v. State of Florida
Public Land and Resources Law Review Volume 0 Case Summaries 2014-2015 Wesley J. Furlong University of Montana School of Law, wfurlong@narf.org Follow this and additional works at: https://scholarship.law.umt.edu/plrlr
More informationUpdate: State Taxing Authority in Indian Country, Intertribal Trade and Intergovernmental Agreements
Update: State Taxing Authority in Indian Country, Intertribal Trade and Intergovernmental Agreements Summary of State Taxing Powers in Indian Country: State taxes barred if legal incidence falls on tribe
More informationTITLE 36 CLIFF CASTLE CASINO BUSINESS CODE
TITLE 36 CLIFF CASTLE CASINO BUSINESS CODE Section 101. PURPOSE... 1 Section 201. DEFINITIONS... 1 Section 301. ESTABLISHMENT... 1 Section 302. COUNCIL DELEGATED POWERS TO CCC... 2 Section 303. FINANCIAL
More informationUNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE NINTH CIRCUIT
FOR PUBLICATION UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE NINTH CIRCUIT RINCON BAND OF LUISENO MISSION INDIANS OF THE RINCON RESERVATION, AKA Rincon San Luiseno Band of Mission Indians, AKA Rincon Band of
More informationCalifornia Gaming Update: The End of the Brown Administra:on. California Indian Law Associa1on 17 th Annual Indian Law Conference October 13, 2017
California Gaming Update: The End of the Brown Administra:on California Indian Law Associa1on 17 th Annual Indian Law Conference October 13, 2017 Compacts Since 1999: Gov. Davis - 1999 61 tribal-state
More informationState Tax Return. Sooner Rather Than Later: Oklahoma Court of Civil Appeals Upholds Distinct Withholding Requirements For Nonresident Royalty Owners
September 2007 Volume 14 Number 9 State Tax Return Sooner Rather Than Later: Oklahoma Court of Civil Appeals Upholds Distinct Withholding Requirements For Nonresident Royalty Owners Laura A. Kulwicki Columbus
More informationCase 1:17-cv SCY-KK Document 1 Filed 06/19/17 Page 1 of 35 UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT DISTRICT OF NEW MEXICO
Case 1:17-cv-00654-SCY-KK Document 1 Filed 06/19/17 Page 1 of 35 UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT DISTRICT OF NEW MEXICO THE PUEBLO OF ISLETA, ) a federally-recognized Indian tribe, ) THE PUEBLO OF SANDIA,
More informationRINCON BAND OF LUISENO MISSION
1019 the BIA did not correct that error. We therefore remand to the agency to apply the correct legal standard in considering, in its discretion, Vasquez s application for a fraud waiver. CONCLUSION The
More informationSINCE THE PASSAGE OF THE INDIAN GAMING
GAMING LAW REVIEW Volume 7, Number 1, 2003 Mary Ann Liebert, Inc. Negotiating Enforceable Tribal Gaming Management Agreements HEIDI MCNEIL STAUDENMAIER INTRODUCTION SINCE THE PASSAGE OF THE INDIAN GAMING
More informationSOME THOUGHTS ON PROPOSITIONS 62 AND Does Proposition 62 affect a charter municipality s local taxing powers?
SOME THOUGHTS ON PROPOSITIONS 62 AND 218 Jay-Allen Eisen Jay-Allen Eisen Law Corporation Sacramento CA January 8, 2003 1. Does Proposition 62 affect a charter municipality s local taxing powers? Proposition
More informationTRIBAL-STATE COMPACT BETWEEN THE STATE OF CALIFORNIA AND THE FEDERATED INDIANS OF GRATON RANCHERIA
TRIBAL-STATE COMPACT BETWEEN THE STATE OF CALIFORNIA AND THE FEDERATED INDIANS OF GRATON RANCHERIA TABLE OF CONTENTS PREAMBLE 1 Sec. 1.0. Purpose and Objectives. 5 Sec. 2.0. Definitions. 6 Sec. 3.0. Scope
More informationCase 4:14-cv LLP Document 124 Filed 03/17/17 Page 1 of 44 PageID #: 3012 UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT DISTRICT OF SOUTH DAKOTA SOUTHERN DIVISION
Case 4:14-cv-04171-LLP Document 124 Filed 03/17/17 Page 1 of 44 PageID #: 3012 UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT DISTRICT OF SOUTH DAKOTA SOUTHERN DIVISION FLANDREAU SANTEE SIOUX TRIBE, a Federally recognized
More informationBOARD OF EQUALIZATION STATE OF CALIFORNIA ) ) ) ) ) ) ) )
0 In the Matter of the Appeal of: BAYANI B. VILLENA AND THELMA F. VILLENA Representing the Parties: BOARD OF EQUALIZATION STATE OF CALIFORNIA SUMMARY DECISION Case No. 0 Adopted: May, For Appellants: Tax
More informationALAN FRANKLIN, Appellant, v. WALTER C. PETERSON, as City Clerk etc., et al., Respondents
87 Cal. App. 2d 727; 197 P.2d 788; 1948 Cal. App. LEXIS 1385 ALAN FRANKLIN, Appellant, v. WALTER C. PETERSON, as City Clerk etc., et al., Respondents Civ. No. 16329 Court of Appeal of California, Second
More informationTestimony of Fred Allyn III, Mayor of the Town of Ledyard, Connecticut
Testimony of Fred Allyn III, Mayor of the Town of Ledyard, Connecticut House Committee on Natural Resources Subcommittee on Indian, Insular and Alaska Native Affairs Oversight Hearing on: "Comparing 21st
More informationNotice of Proposed Rulemaking Action Title 28, California Code of Regulations
Arnold Schwarzenegger, Governor State of California Business, Transportation and Housing Agency Department of Managed Health Care Office of Legal Services 980 Ninth Street, Suite 500 Sacramento, CA 95814-2725
More informationThe Commuter: Residents v. Non-Residents
June 16, 1999 The Commuter: Residents v. Non-Residents By: Glenn Newman The hottest New York tax issue in the last few years has nothing to do with the New York State and City Tax Tribunals or does it?
More informationWhen Indian Law and Tax Law Collide: How Pull- Tab Games Got to the Supreme Court
Cleveland State University EngagedScholarship@CSU Cleveland State Law Review Law Journals 2001 When Indian Law and Tax Law Collide: How Pull- Tab Games Got to the Supreme Court John Burgess Follow this
More informationCase 1:10-cv RJA Document 49 Filed 11/09/10 Page 1 of 13
Case 1:10-cv-00711-RJA Document 49 Filed 11/09/10 Page 1 of 13 UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT WESTERN DISTRICT OF NEW YORK UNKECHAUGE INDIAN NATION, Plaintiff, Decision and Order v. 10-CV-711A DAVID PATERSON,
More informationGolden Gate Restaurant Association. Vs. City & County of San Francisco
A Special Report Prepared By: The Self-Insurance Institute of America, Inc. Golden Gate Restaurant Association Vs. City & County of San Francisco July 1, 2008 www.siia.org SIIA Special Report: Employer
More informationThe MTC Election Following Gillette vs. Franchise Tax Board
The MTC Election Following Gillette vs. Franchise Tax Board Thomas Cornett Senior Manager Deloitte Tax LLP Detroit, Michigan December 6, 2012 Agenda Background: The Multistate Tax Compact Gillette vs.
More informationCase 3:08-cv BHS Document 210 Filed 11/21/13 Page 1 of 8 IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT WESTERN DISTRICT OF WASHINGTON AT TACOMA
Case :0-cv-0-BHS Document 0 Filed // Page of HONORABLE BENJAMIN H. SETTLE 0 0 IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT WESTERN DISTRICT OF WASHINGTON AT TACOMA CONFEDERATED TRIBES OF THE CHEHALIS RESERVATION,
More informationClient Alert. September 11, By Edward L. Froelich
September 11, 2015 No (Tax) Man Is Above the Law: The Tax Court Rejects Final Cost-Sharing Regulations in Altera Corporation and Subsidiaries v. Commissioner, 145 T.C. 3 (July 27, 2015) By Edward L. Froelich
More informationTribes Need More Than Just The Sovereign Immunity Defense
Portfolio Media. Inc. 111 West 19 th Street, 5th Floor New York, NY 10011 www.law360.com Phone: +1 646 783 7100 Fax: +1 646 783 7161 customerservice@law360.com Tribes Need More Than Just The Sovereign
More informationDefined Value Clause Updates Hendrix and Petter
Defined Value Clause Updates Hendrix and Petter Steve R. Akers, Bessemer Trust Copyright 2011 by Bessemer Trust Company, N.A. All rights reserved. a. Hendrix v. Commissioner, T.C. Memo. 2011-133 (June
More informationHEARTH Act Approval of Cheyenne and Arapaho Tribe s Business Site Leasing
This document is scheduled to be published in the Federal Register on 03/28/2018 and available online at https://federalregister.gov/d/2018-06225, and on FDsys.gov [4337-15] DEPARTMENT OF THE INTERIOR
More informationThe Evolution of Acquiring Land in Trust For Gaming : What Tribes Need to Know. Maria Wiseman Deputy Director Office of Indian Gaming
The Evolution of Acquiring Land in Trust For Gaming : What Tribes Need to Know Maria Wiseman Deputy Director Office of Indian Gaming 1 Office of Indian Gaming Staff Director Paula Hart Deputy Director
More informationINDIAN TAX STRATEGIES
INDIAN TAX STRATEGIES Structuring Tribal Business Deals to Maximize Tax Opportunities Kelly S. Croman-Neelands General Counsel Marine View Ventures, Inc. A Wholly-Owned Enterprise of the Puyallup Tribe
More informationSecond and Fifth Circuits Split on Who is Entitled to Whistleblower Protection Under Dodd-Frank
H Reprinted with permission from the Employee Relations LAW JOURNAL Vol. 41, No. 4 Spring 2016 SPLIT CIRCUITS Second and Fifth Circuits Split on Who is Entitled to Whistleblower Protection Under Dodd-Frank
More informationISSUES. 1. Can someone have another person use his Certified Hot Club card to gamble for him in his
TO: Jim Green CC: William Tenz FROM: Joseph Benedict DATE: December 11, 2012 RE: Grandpa Amos v Soaring Eagle, ADA ISSUES 1. Can someone have another person use his Certified Hot Club card to gamble for
More informationCase 4:17-cv KES Document 102 Filed 07/16/18 Page 1 of 23 PageID #: 3241 UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT DISTRICT OF SOUTH DAKOTA SOUTHERN DIVISION
Case 4:17-cv-04055-KES Document 102 Filed 07/16/18 Page 1 of 23 PageID #: 3241 UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT DISTRICT OF SOUTH DAKOTA SOUTHERN DIVISION FLANDREAU SANTEE SIOUX TRIBE, A FEDERALLY-RECOGNIZED
More informationCase 3:06-cv WWE Document 282 Filed 03/27/12 Page 1 of 24 UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT DISTRICT OF CONNECTICUT
Case 3:06-cv-01212-WWE Document 282 Filed 03/27/12 Page 1 of 24 UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT DISTRICT OF CONNECTICUT MASHANTUCKET PEQUOT TRIBE, : No. 3:06cv1212 (WWE) Plaintiff, : v. : : TOWN OF LEDYARD,
More informationCase: Document: 56 Page: 1 11/13/ IN THE UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE SECOND CIRCUIT
Case: 13-3769 Document: 56 Page: 1 11/13/2013 1091564 20 13-3769 IN THE UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE SECOND CIRCUIT THE OTOE-MISSOURIA TRIBE OF INDIANS, a federally-recognized Indian Tribe, GREAT
More informationIndian Gaming Revenue Sharing Trust Fund Indian Gaming Special Distribution Fund
Indian Gaming Revenue Sharing Trust Fund Indian Gaming Special Distribution Fund California State Government Code 12012.75, 120120.85 & 12012.90 12012.75. There is hereby created in the State Treasury
More informationTreatment of Section 78 Gross-Up Amounts Relating to Section 960(b) Foreign Income Taxes
Treatment of Section 78 Gross-Up Amounts Relating to Section 960(b) Foreign Income Taxes I. Overview In 2017, Congress significantly revised the structure of the U.S. international tax system as part of
More informationCalifornia Supreme Court Rejects the Federal Narrow Restraint Exception
California Supreme Court Rejects the Federal Narrow Restraint Exception And Holds That Employment Non- Competition Agreements Are Invalid Unless They Fall Within Limited Statutory Exceptions On August
More informationIN THE COURT OF APPEAL OF THE STATE OF CALIFORNIA SECOND APPELLATE DISTRICT DIVISION THREE
Filed 3/20/09 Abbott Laboratories v. Franchise Tax Board CA2/3 NOT TO BE PUBLISHED IN THE OFFICIAL REPORTS California Rules of Court, rule 8.1115(a), prohibits courts and parties from citing or relying
More informationUNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE NINTH CIRCUIT. Case No CONFEDERATED TRIBES OF THE CHEHALIS RESERVATION, et al.,
Case: 10-35642 08/27/2013 ID: 8758655 DktEntry: 105 Page: 1 of 14 UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE NINTH CIRCUIT Case No. 10-35642 CONFEDERATED TRIBES OF THE CHEHALIS RESERVATION, et al., Plaintiffs/Appellants,
More informationRead for yourself. Proposition 8. Dangerous Dialysis Proposition.
Read for yourself. Proposition 8. Dangerous Dialysis Proposition. Below is the full text of Proposition 8, the Dangerous Dialysis Proposition. We ve highlighted portions of text to demonstrate how and
More informationThe Industry Perspective: The Pros and Cons of Mineral Development in Indian Country
University of Colorado Law School Colorado Law Scholarly Commons Natural Resource Development in Indian Country (Summer Conference, June 8-10) Getches-Wilkinson Center Conferences, Workshops, and Hot Topics
More informationAmerican Bar Association Commission on Ethics 20/20 Resolution
1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 12 13 14 15 16 17 18 19 20 21 22 23 24 25 26 27 28 29 30 31 32 33 34 35 The views expressed herein have not been approved by the House of Delegates or the Board of Governors of
More informationAdvisory Opinion to the Attorney General: Slot Machines
The following is a real-time transcript taken as closed captioning during the oral argument proceedings, and as such, may contain errors. This service is provided solely for the purpose of assisting those
More informationSUMMARY: On January 4, 2016, the Bureau of Indian Affairs (BIA) approved the
This document is scheduled to be published in the Federal Register on 01/13/2016 and available online at http://federalregister.gov/a/2016-00518, and on FDsys.gov [4337-15] DEPARTMENT OF THE INTERIOR Bureau
More informationUnconstitutional Taxation of Foreign Dividends Continues
Unconstitutional Taxation of Foreign Dividends Continues 5/1/2001 State + Local Tax Client Alert Although the decision of the United States Supreme Court in Kraft General Foods, Inc. v. Iowa Department
More informationThe Tax Fairness, Transparency and Accountability Act
The Tax Fairness, Transparency and Accountability Act November 2018 Statewide Ballot Measure (Initiative 17-0050) Updated May 2018 The California Taxpayers Association supports the Tax Fairness, Transparency
More informationExhibit A to Resolution ORDINANCE 1527 AN ORDINANCE OF THE PEOPLE OF THE CITY OF BANNING, CALIFORNIA AMENDING TITLE 3 (REVENUE AND FINANCE) OF
Exhibit A to Resolution 2018-82 ORDINANCE 1527 AN ORDINANCE OF THE PEOPLE OF THE CITY OF BANNING, CALIFORNIA AMENDING TITLE 3 (REVENUE AND FINANCE) OF THE BANNING MUNICIPAL CODE TO ADD A NEW CHAPTER 3.18
More informationFinances (Adopted 1969, updated 1975, redone 1976, 1977, 1981 and 1995.)
1 INTRODUCTION LEAGUE OF WOMEN VOTERS OF THE CLAREMONT AREA LOCAL STUDY CITY GENERAL FUND BUDGETS April, 2011 This Report presents a survey and comparison of General Fund budgets of six local communities,
More informationCalifornia's Estate Tax Dilemma
Chapman University Dale E. Fowler School of Law From the SelectedWorks of Frank J. Doti 2007 California's Estate Tax Dilemma Frank J. Doti Kevin B. Morriss Available at: https://works.bepress.com/frank_doti/1/
More informationIN THE COURT OF APPEAL OF THE STATE OF CALIFORNIA THIRD APPELLATE DISTRICT (Butte) ----
Filed 5/8/15 In re T.R. CA3 NOT TO BE PUBLISHED California Rules of Court, rule 8.1115(a), prohibits courts and parties from citing or relying on opinions not certified for publication or ordered published,
More informationROBERT T. STEPHAN. September 12, 1989 ATTORNEY GENERAL
ROBERT T. STEPHAN ATTORNEY GENERAL September 12, 1989 ATTORNEY GENERAL OPINION NO. 89-115 Mark A. Burghart General Counsel Kansas Department of Revenue Docking State Office Building 915 S.W. Harrison Street
More informationCalif. Consumer Privacy Act: 6 Considerations For Banks
Portfolio Media. Inc. 111 West 19 th Street, 5th Floor New York, NY 10011 www.law360.com Phone: +1 646 783 7100 Fax: +1 646 783 7161 customerservice@law360.com Calif. Consumer Privacy Act: 6 Considerations
More informationCase 4:17-cv KES Document 32 Filed 04/06/18 Page 1 of 45 PageID #: 161 UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT DISTRICT OF SOUTH DAKOTA SOUTHERN DIVISION
Case 4:17-cv-04055-KES Document 32 Filed 04/06/18 Page 1 of 45 PageID #: 161 UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT DISTRICT OF SOUTH DAKOTA SOUTHERN DIVISION FLANDREAU SANTEE SIOUX TRIBE, a Federally recognized
More informationRecent Housing Allowance Opinion - Its Contents and Reasoning
Recent Housing Allowance Opinion - Its Contents and Reasoning On October 6, 2017, U.S. District Judge Barbara B. Crabb of the Western District of Wisconsin found that 26 U.S.C. 107(2) violates the establishment
More informationS09A2016. DEKALB COUNTY v. PERDUE et al. Ten years after DeKalb County voters approved the imposition of a onepercent
In the Supreme Court of Georgia Decided: March 22, 2010 S09A2016. DEKALB COUNTY v. PERDUE et al. HUNSTEIN, Chief Justice. Ten years after DeKalb County voters approved the imposition of a onepercent homestead
More informationPenny Wise and Pound Foolish? Issues for Excess Insurers in the Wake of Comerica and Qualcomm. By Patrick J. Boley
Penny Wise and Pound Foolish? Issues for Excess Insurers in the Wake of Comerica and Qualcomm By Patrick J. Boley I. Introduction When a loss exceeds a primary insurer s limits, a question often arises:
More informationAN IN-DEPTH LOOK AT EMPLOYEE BENEFIT PLANS AND UNCLAIMED PROPERTY LAWS
AN IN-DEPTH LOOK AT EMPLOYEE BENEFIT PLANS AND UNCLAIMED PROPERTY LAWS Publication AN IN-DEPTH LOOK AT EMPLOYEE BENEFIT PLANS AND UNCLAIMED PROPERTY LAWS Author Paul R. O'Rourke May 26, 2010 Some benefits
More informationCommonwealth of Kentucky Court of Appeals
RENDERED: AUGUST 3, 2012; 10:00 A.M. TO BE PUBLISHED Commonwealth of Kentucky Court of Appeals NO. 2009-CA-001839-MR MEADOWS HEALTH SYSTEMS EAST, INC. AND MEADOWS HEALTH SYSTEMS SOUTH, INC. APPELLANTS
More informationCase No. C IN THE COURT OF APPEAL OF THE STATE OF CALIFORNIA THIRD APPELLATE DISTRICT
Case No. C081929 IN THE COURT OF APPEAL OF THE STATE OF CALIFORNIA THIRD APPELLATE DISTRICT PARADISE IRRIGATION DISTRICT, et al., Petitioners and Appellants, v. COMMISSION ON STATE MANDATES, Respondent,
More informationCan a State Tax the Fuel That Is Sold by Non- Indian Distributors to a Tribal Gas Station
University of Connecticut DigitalCommons@UConn Faculty Articles and Papers School of Law 2006 Can a State Tax the Fuel That Is Sold by Non- Indian Distributors to a Tribal Gas Station Bethany Berger University
More information14 OPINIONS OF THE ATTORNEY GENERAL OPINION No. 639
14 OPINIONS OF THE ATTORNEY GENERAL OPINION No. 639 Taxation State income tax Constitutionality Tax imposed upon Federal income tax liability. No act imposing a State tax upon the Federal income tax liability
More informationCRUMMEY v. COMMISSIONER. UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE NINTH CIRCUIT 397 F.2d 82 June 25, 1968
BYRNE, District Judge: CRUMMEY v. COMMISSIONER UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE NINTH CIRCUIT 397 F.2d 82 June 25, 1968 This case involves cross petitions for review of decisions of the Tax Court
More informationIS REINSURANCE THE "BUSINESS OF INSURANCE?" (1) By Robert M. Hall (2)
IS REINSURANCE THE "BUSINESS OF INSURANCE?" (1) By Robert M. Hall (2) The McCarran-Ferguson Act, 15 U.S.C. 1011-1012, provides a form of preemption of state insurance law over those federal statutes which
More informationDepartment 29 Superior Court of California County of Sacramento 720 Ninth Street Timothy M. Frawley, Judge Lynn Young, Clerk
Department 29 Superior Court of California County of Sacramento 720 Ninth Street Timothy M. Frawley, Judge Lynn Young, Clerk Hearing: Friday, May 8, 2009, 1:30 p.m. CALIFORNIA TAXPAYERS' ASSOCIATION Case
More informationC&S WHOLESALE GROCERS, INC. Taxpayer Appellant. VERMONT DEPARTMENT OF TAXES Appellee DECISION ON APPEAL
C&S Wholesale Grocers, Inc. v. Vermont Department of Taxes, No. 547-9-14 Wncv (Teachout, J., June 24, 2015) [The text of this Vermont trial court opinion is unofficial. It has been reformatted from the
More informationPage 1 of 6 Home > Publications > ABA Health esource > 2013-14 > March > State Entities and the False Claims Act State Entities and the False Claims Act Vol. 10 No. 7 Scott R. Grubman, Rogers & Hardin
More informationRugby Productions Ltd. v. Commissioner 100 T.C. 531 (T.C. 1993)
Rugby Productions Ltd. v. Commissioner 100 T.C. 531 (T.C. 1993) CLICK HERE to return to the home page Alan G. Kirios and David J. Gullen, for petitioner. Marilyn Devin, for respondent. OPINION NIMS, Judge:
More informationAbstract. Standard formulary apportionment, as currently adopted by states which impose a corporate level
Abstract Standard formulary apportionment, as currently adopted by states which impose a corporate level income tax on multistate corporations, may have a distortive effect in instances where the corporation
More informationLEAGUE OF CALIFORNIA CITIES CITY ATTORNEYS' SPRING CONFERENCE 2016
LEAGUE OF CALIFORNIA CITIES CITY ATTORNEYS' SPRING CONFERENCE 2016 Local Minimum Wage Laws and the Challenge of Balancing Interests by Sky Woodruff, Principal, Chair of the Public Finance Practice Alex
More informationMEMORANDUM SUBJECT: Minimum Wage for Missouri s Tipped Workers DATE: March 8, 2007
SUBJECT: MEMORANDUM Minimum Wage for Missouri s Tipped Workers DATE: March 8, 2007 Last November, Missouri voters overwhelmingly approved Proposition B, which raised the state s minimum wage to $6.50 per
More informationEmployee Relations. Stuck in the Middle: A Cautionary Tale About Beneficiary Designation Forms. Anne E. Moran
VOL. 34, NO. 4 SPRING 2009 Employee Relations L A W J O U R N A L Employee Benefits Stuck in the Middle: A Cautionary Tale About Beneficiary Designation Forms Anne E. Moran Recent developments in the United
More informationPROCUREMENT POLICY. EDD Revision Date: 8/24/00 WDB Review Date: 6/21/07; 12/20/07; 12/17/15 EXECUTIVE SUMMARY: Purpose:
PROCUREMENT POLICY EDD Revision Date: 8/24/00 WDB Review Date: 6/21/07; 12/20/07; 12/17/15 EXECUTIVE SUMMARY: Purpose: This document establishes the Madera County Workforce Development Board s policy regarding
More informationCase 1:15-cv LG-RHW Document 62 Filed 10/02/15 Page 1 of 11
Case 1:15-cv-00236-LG-RHW Document 62 Filed 10/02/15 Page 1 of 11 IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE SOUTHERN DISTRICT OF MISSISSIPPI SOUTHERN DIVISION FEDERAL INSURANCE COMPANY PLAINTIFF/ COUNTER-DEFENDANT
More informationIN THE COMMONWEALTH COURT OF PENNSYLVANIA
IN THE COMMONWEALTH COURT OF PENNSYLVANIA Allstate Life Insurance Company, : Petitioner : : v. : No. 89 F.R. 1997 : Commonwealth of Pennsylvania, : Argued: December 9, 2009 Respondent : BEFORE: HONORABLE
More informationNo IN THE SUPREME COURT OF THE UNITED STATES. JOAN WAGNON, in her official capacity as Secretary, Kansas Department of Revenue, Petitioner,
No. 04-631 IN THE SUPREME COURT OF THE UNITED STATES JOAN WAGNON, in her official capacity as Secretary, Kansas Department of Revenue, Petitioner, PRAIRIE BAND POTAWATOMI NATION, Respondent, On Writ of
More informationKORNFIELD, PAUL & NYBERG Harrison Street, Suite 800 Oakland, California Telephone: (510) Facsimile: (510) or 8681
KORNFIELD, PAUL & NYBERG 1999 Harrison Street, Suite 800 Oakland, California 94612 Telephone: (510) 763-1000 Facsimile: (510) 273-8669 or 8681 Memorandum TO: Frances Medema - League of California Cities
More informationIN THE UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE ELEVENTH CIRCUIT. No D. C. Docket No. 1:09-cv JLK. versus
Merly Nunez v. GEICO General Insurance Compan Doc. 1116498500 Case: 10-13183 Date Filed: 04/03/2012 Page: 1 of 13 [PUBLISH] MERLY NUNEZ, a.k.a. Nunez Merly, IN THE UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE
More informationPENSION CHANGES AND PLAN UPDATES. By Jim Linn, Glenn Thomas and Jennifer Cowan Lewis, Longman & Walker, P.A.
PENSION CHANGES AND PLAN UPDATES By Jim Linn, Glenn Thomas and Jennifer Cowan Lewis, Longman & Walker, P.A. I. Police and Firefighter Pension Plans: Change in Division of Retirement Interpretation Concerning
More informationNo II COURT OF APPEALS, DIVISION II OF THE STATE OF WASHINGTON
No. 50791-9-II COURT OF APPEALS, DIVISION II OF THE STATE OF WASHINGTON EVERI PAYMENTS INC., successor in interest to, and formerly known as, GLOBAL CASH ACCESS, INC. Appellant, v. STATE OF WASHINGTON,
More informationIN THE COURT OF APPEALS OF THE STATE OF WASHINGTON DIVISION II
Filed Washington State Court of Appeals Division Two December 11, 2018 IN THE COURT OF APPEALS OF THE STATE OF WASHINGTON DIVISION II EVERI PAYMENTS, INC., successor in interest to, and formerly known
More informationTHE UNITED STATES OF AMERICA BEFORE THE FEDERAL ENERGY REGULATORY COMMISSION
THE UNITED STATES OF AMERICA BEFORE THE FEDERAL ENERGY REGULATORY COMMISSION Inquiry Regarding the Effect of the Tax Cuts ) and Jobs Act on Commission-Jurisdictional ) Docket No. RM18-12-000 Rates ) MOTION
More informationSTATEMENT OF THE OHIO STATE BAR ASSOCIATION IN OPPOSITION OF HOUSE BILL 182
STATEMENT OF THE OHIO STATE BAR ASSOCIATION IN OPPOSITION OF HOUSE BILL 182 Presented by Jeffrey J. Fanger, Esq. Before the House Financial Institutions, Housing and Urban Development Committee Jonathan
More informationFrequently Asked Questions (FAQ) on the Interstate Insurance Product Regulation Compact
Frequently Asked Questions (FAQ) on the Interstate Insurance Product Regulation Compact In an attempt to preserve sovereign state regulation of the nation s insurance industry, in July 2003, the Executive
More informationOpportunity to Comment.
Public Notice and Request for Comments on Proposed Enactment of the Possessory Interest Tax of the Three Affiliated Tribes of the Fort Berthold Indian Reservation Copies may also be obtained from the Three
More informationWHAT IS THE FEDERAL GOVERNMENT'S TRUST RESPONSIBILITY TOWARDS REMOVED AND UNREMOVED INDIAN NATIONS?
WHAT IS THE FEDERAL GOVERNMENT'S TRUST RESPONSIBILITY TOWARDS REMOVED AND UNREMOVED INDIAN NATIONS? Ann C. Juliano* The question of removed and unremoved Indian nations competing with each other arises
More informationCase 2:15-cv BJR Document 72 Filed 09/22/16 Page 1 of 41 UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT WESTERN DISTRICT OF WASHINGTON AT SEATTLE
Case 2:1-cv-0090-BJR Document 72 Filed 09// Page 1 of 1 1 2 The Honorable BARBARA J. ROTHSTEIN 6 7 8 9 THE TULALIP TRIBES and THE CONSOLIDATED BOROUGH OF QUIL CEDA VILLAGE, Plaintiffs, UNITED STATES DISTRICT
More informationNEW YEAR REVELATIONS: WHAT IS TRENDING IN 2018 FOR COMMERCIAL LENDERS AND BORROWERS?
Parker Milliken Clark O'Hara & Samuelian, APC Over 100 YEARS - Est. 1913 January 18, 2018 The Commercial Loan Ranger By KENNETH MILLER NEW YEAR REVELATIONS: WHAT IS TRENDING IN 2018 FOR COMMERCIAL LENDERS
More informationMTC Apportionment Yes, No, Maybe? The National Ramifications of the Gillette Case, Recent Legislation and Cases Pending in Other States
2012 COST ANNUAL MEETING Orlando, Florida MTC Apportionment Yes, No, Maybe? The National Ramifications of the Gillette Case, Recent Legislation and Cases Pending in Other States Lynn Gandhi Honigman, Miller,
More informationCorporate Litigation: Enforceability of Board-Adopted Forum Selection Bylaws
Corporate Litigation: Enforceability of Board-Adopted Forum Selection Bylaws Joseph M. McLaughlin * Simpson Thacher & Bartlett LLP October 9, 2014 Last year, the Delaware Court of Chancery in Boilermakers
More informationLOS ANGELES COUNTY BAR ASSOCIATION PROFESSIONAL RESPONSIBILITY AND ETHICS COMMITTEE. FORMAL OPINION NO. 511 December 15, 2003
LOS ANGELES COUNTY BAR ASSOCIATION PROFESSIONAL RESPONSIBILITY AND ETHICS COMMITTEE FORMAL OPINION NO. 511 December 15, 2003 SHARING IN FEES AS PARTNER OR EMPLOYEE OF TWO LAW FIRMS SUMMARY An attorney
More informationSTATE OF MICHIGAN COURT OF APPEALS
STATE OF MICHIGAN COURT OF APPEALS JOSEPH KASBERG, Petitioner-Appellant, FOR PUBLICATION March 16, 2010 9:15 a.m. and NATIONAL CHURCH RESIDENCES OF WIN YPSILANTI, Appellant, v No. 287682 Michigan Tax Tribunal
More informationJudge Sonia Sotomayor s Tax Opinions
Georgetown University Law Center Scholarship @ GEORGETOWN LAW 2009 Judge Sonia Sotomayor s Tax Opinions Stephen B. Cohen Georgetown University Law Center, cohen@law.georgetown.edu This paper can be downloaded
More informationCourtroom, Legislative, and Ballot Box Strategy Response to the State s Fiscal Problems
Courtroom, Legislative, and Ballot Box Strategy Response to the State s Fiscal Problems Betsy Strauss Special Counsel League of California Cities 1595 King Avenue Napa, California 94559 (707) 253-0435
More informationThe Free State Foundation
The Free State Foundation A Free Market Think Tank For Maryland Because Ideas Matter Perspectives from FSF Scholars June 17, 2008 Vol. 3, No. 11 Why Forbearance History Matters by Randolph J. May * The
More information