CHEVRON AUSTRALIA HOLDINGS JUDGMENT UPDATE ATO WINS FULL FEDERAL COURT DECISION ON CROSS BORDER FINANCING - CHEVRON AUSTRALIA HOLDINGS CASE
|
|
- Owen Fox
- 5 years ago
- Views:
Transcription
1 CHEVRON AUSTRALIA HOLDINGS JUDGMENT UPDATE ATO WINS FULL FEDERAL COURT DECISION ON CROSS BORDER FINANCING - CHEVRON AUSTRALIA HOLDINGS CASE 28 April 2017 INTRODUCTION AND OVERVIEW In a major Australian transfer pricing decision on Friday 21 April, 2017, the Full Federal Court dismissed Chevron Australia Holdings Pty Ltd's (CAHPL) appeal related to the deductibility of interest on the Australian dollar equivalent of US$2.45 billion loans from the US subsidiary of CAHPL, Chevron Texaco Funding Corporation (CFC). The Full Federal Court largely confirmed the judgment at first instance handed down by Robertson J in October 2015 in the Federal Court. Our update on the Federal Court judgment can be found here. The unanimous decision of Allsop CJ, Perram and Pagone JJ provides significant guidance on Australia's transfer pricing laws contained in Division 13 of the Income Tax Assessment Act 1936 (Cth) (Division 13) and Subdivision 815-A of the Income Tax Assessment Act 1997 (Cth) (Subdivision 815-A). Whilst the decision deals with certain administrative, constitutional and procedural issues, the decision is most important in terms of determining the arm's length consideration (particularly, interest rates) applicable to cross border financing arrangements. The two principal judges (Allsop CJ and Pagone J), taking a commercial and pragmatic approach, found that no independent lender and borrower dealing at arm's length would have entered into the borrowing arrangements in place without taking security or requiring covenants. In coming to this conclusion, their honours gave consideration to the Chevron Group's external borrowing policy, and effectively imputed a parent company guarantee to the loans in order to determine the arm's length consideration applicable. This resulted in lower effective interest rates and a subsequent tax bill (including penalties) of approximately $340 million. FACTS CAHPL is indirectly wholly owned by the Chevron Corporation (CVX), a US-based oil and gas company listed on the New York Stock Exchange. CAHPL and CFC effected an internal refinancing, including to fund the CAHPL's acquisition of Texaco Australia Pty Ltd, by entering in a 'Credit Facility Agreement'. CFC, a US company, was established as a whollyowned subsidiary of CAHPL for the sole purpose of raising money through the issue of commercial paper in the US at an interest rate of approximately 1.2%. Under the Credit Facility Agreement, CFC on-lent these funds to CAHPL at an interest rate of approximately 9% and CAHPL drew down, on two separate occasions, a total of the Australian dollar equivalent of US$2.45 billion. The Credit Facility Agreement was not consistent with the Chevron borrowing policy under which members of the Chevron Group obtained external financing. It contained no financial or operational covenants requiring CAHPL to conduct its business or behave in a certain way, nor was any security provided. In addition, there was no guarantee in respect of the loan, unlike the commercial paper issued by CFC, which was guaranteed by CVX.
2 CAHPL claimed tax deductions in Australian for the interest it paid to CFC. The income received from CFC by way of dividends it returned as non-assessable nonexempt income pursuant to section 23AJ of the Income Tax Assessment Act Effectively under this arrangement, CAHPL reduced its Australian taxable income through the deductions claimed, whilst CFC made significant profits by borrowing at a rate of 1.2% and on-lending at 9%. These profits were not taxed in either the US or Australia. The Commissioner disallowed the deductions claimed by CAHPL over the income years spanning 2004 to 2008 (inclusive). Amended assessments were issued pursuant to both Division 13 and Subdivision 815-A on the basis that the loans between CAHPL and CFC were not at arm's length. DIVISION 13 Under the former Division 13, the Court explained that the following tasks were required: (i) Identify the property acquired by CAHPL: The Court agreed with the findings of the trial judge that the property acquired by CAHPL was the rights or benefits granted under the Credit Facility, including the sums lent. The lack of security was an absence in the consideration it was required to give for the funds it received (rather than part of what it obtained). (ii) Identify the consideration given by CAHPL: This is the actual consideration provided by CAHPL in order to obtain the property (funds) above. (iii) Identify the arm's length consideration: This final step is to identify the consideration that might reasonably be expected to have been given in respect of the loan had that loan been acquired under an agreement between hypothetical independent parties dealing at arm's length with each other in relation to the acquisition of the property above. Similar steps to the above are also required for Subdivision 815-A, however, the new rules look more broadly to the arm's length 'conditions' rather than merely the arm's length 'consideration'. The critical issue for the Court was therefore to identify the arm's length consideration (for Division 13) and the arm's length conditions (for Subdivision 815-A) in respect of the Credit Facility Agreement. How do we assess what is arm's length? As a matter of statutory interpretation, the Court agreed with Robertson J that to determine whether the Credit Facility Agreement was on arm's length would require the agreement to be 'depersonalised' so as to make it hypothetically between independent parties dealing at arm's length (without altering the property acquired). This means that the terms of the actual agreement may need to be adjusted to arrive at a realistic, commercial hypothetical agreement that independent parties dealing at arm's length would conclude. Importantly, as Allsop CJ provided, the 'degree and extent of the depersonalisation will be dictated by what is appropriate to the task of determining an arm's length consideration that is one that satisfactorily replaces what the taxpayer gave by what it should be taken to have given had it been independent of its counterparty.' Further, Allsop CJ agreed with the trial judge that 'the hypothetical independent parties have the characteristics relevant to the pricing of the loan so as to enable the hypothesis to work' and, accordingly, the hypothetical borrower would be an oil and gas exploration and production subsidiary. In this way, the parties do not have carte-blanche to define the terms of the cross border related party arrangement and then merely ask a court to price it accordingly. This would be a 'rigid' interpretation of the transfer pricing rules and such 'unrealistic inflexibility would undermine the sensible operation' of the transfer pricing rules in ways controlled by the taxpayer (and therefore open to manipulation). Rather, the transfer pricing rules must be applied commercially in a way that is grounded in reality. As Pagone J stated, the transfer pricing rules 'are intended to operate in the context of real world alternative reasonable expectations of agreements between parties and not in artificial constructs.' The extent of the differences between actual and hypothetical agreements will predictably vary depending DLA Piper 2
3 on the specific facts and circumstances. In each case, Pagone J stated, 'the focus of inquiry must be to identify a reliable comparable agreement to the actual agreement by the actual taxpayer'. The ultimate goal of this analysis is to ensure that the consideration in respect of the acquisition in the hypothetical agreement is not distorted by the lack of independence between the parties or by a lack of arm's length dealings in relation to the acquisition. As Pagone J stated, this requires the Court to 'make a prediction about what might reasonably be expected to be given or agreed to be given under a hypothetical agreement if the parties had been independent and were dealing at arm's length in relation to the acquisition'. Was the loan arm's length? The Court unanimously agreed with the trial judge that the loan was not on arm's length terms (for Division 13 or Subdivision 815-A purposes). Allsop CJ, by quoting his honour, affirmed the conclusion reached by Robertson J at first instance that '[i]f the property had been acquired under an agreement between independent parties dealing at arm s length with each other, I find that the borrower would have given such security and operational and financial covenants and the interest rate, as a consequence, would have been lower.' This conclusion is supported by the following findings by the Full Federal Court: Pagone J stated, to treat CAHPL as an 'orphan' or standalone company 'would distort the application of Division 13' and the commercial reality of the situation. There was sufficient evidence to predict that, if the parties had been dealing at arm's length, what might reasonably be expected to happen under a hypothetical agreement is for the loan to have been provided to CAHPL on terms that included parental support for CAHPL. Evidence included on this point was that it was Chevron Group policy to borrow externally at the lowest rate possible. The usual commercial policy of the Chevron group was to provide a parent company guarantee for external borrowings by subsidiaries (in order to drive down the cost of debt). Accordingly, Allsop CJ held that the expected arm's length consideration 'would be an interest rate hypothesised on the giving of a guarantee of CAHPL's obligations to the lender by a parent such as Chevron.' Had the property been acquired under an agreement between independent parties dealing at arm's length, the borrower would have given security and operational and financial covenants and, accordingly, the interest rate would have been lower. The Credit Facility Agreement did not provide security for the lender or impose operational or financial covenants on the borrower. Allsop CJ found that this absence of security and covenants 'was not dictated by any commercial or operational imperatives; rather their absence can be explained by the protection given to the lender by common control'. SUBDIVISION 815-A The Court unanimously affirmed the trial judge's interpretation of Subdivision 815-A. Importantly, it confirmed that: Unlike Division 13, Subdivision 815-A requires consideration of all conditions operating under the arrangement. That is, Subdivision 815-A permits a broad and wide ranging inquiry into the relations between the enterprises concerned, and is not limited to the consideration under the agreement. The object was to then determine whether the actual conditions that existed between the entities differed from those which might be expected to operate if they had been dealing wholly independently with each other. The Court confirmed the trial judge's comment that 'independent enterprises dealing wholly independently with one another may still be subsidiaries and may still have subsidiaries even if the enterprises are independent of each other'. That is, it was permissible to have regard to matters such as implied parental guarantees over the debt in determining what might reasonably be expected to have occurred. Subdivision (1)(c) requires a hypothetical consideration of what profits might have accrued, but DLA Piper 3
4 for the operation of the conditions under the arrangement and this postulate is considered in the context of the relevant 'associated enterprises' article, in this case the US/Australia Double Tax Treaty (Article 9). CAHPL's submissions that the arrangement had not resulted in an actual reduction in profits (as opposed to a reduction in taxable profits/income) due to the receipt of dividends received (which were nonassessable non-exempt income under s 23AJ of the 1936 Act) were rejected. The Court found that while 'profits' should be construed in accordance with its ordinary meaning, in this case the dividends could not be offset against reduced profits caused by nonindependent party conditions. CONSTITUTIONAL VALIDITY OF SUBDIVISION 815-A The Court also unanimously upheld the trial judge's findings that Subdivision 815-A was constitutionally valid. In particular, it confirmed that: The tax imposed was not arbitrary or incontestable as argued by CAHPL because it was based on ascertainable criteria with sufficiently general application. The fact that the tax was imposed retrospectively did not make the tax arbitrary or incontestable. The direction under Subdivision 815-A to consider documents including OECD guidelines is a 'direction given in aid of the operative provision' and is 'for the purpose of interpretation'. It does not render the criteria of liability to be uncertain. KEY TAKEAWAYS Division 13 in particular, requires a hypothetical analysis to determine what consideration (interest rates) would reasonably be expected to be paid under the loans. It is critical that the hypothetical/comparable arrangement is explored on the basis that the relevant parties (ie. lender and borrower) are independent and are dealing at arm's length with one another. However, this does not mean to 'depersonalise' CAHPL to the extent that it was a stand-alone entity, no longer a member of the Chevron Group, and independent of the group s borrowing policies. The hypothesising that takes place under Division 13 (and Subdivision 815-A for that matter) must be grounded in commercial reality. Importantly, this decision does not deal specifically with Subdivisions 815-B to E of the Income Tax Assessment Act 1997 (Cth) which are Australia's principal transfer pricing laws operative for income tax years commencing from 1 July, Subdivision 815-B focuses on determining the armslength conditions (rather than specifically arm's length consideration) in determining whether a transfer pricing benefit arises. While Division 13 and Subdivision 815-B are both based on the arms-length principle, more specific statutory guidance is provided in, for example, Subdivision 815-B on comparable circumstances to assist in identifying the arms-length conditions. It appears the two principal judges were mindful of (or perhaps concerned about) the structure of the funding arrangement between CAHPL and CFC and its potentially circular nature. Accordingly, their decision (based on their hypothetical approach) may be more reflective of the specific circumstances of the Chevron Group. While the decision would appear to provide broader precedent for the general application of Australia s general transfer pricing laws, all multi-nationals should review their current international loan arrangements in the context of this decision. In this context, if security arrangements are to be imputed it may be that a deductible fee can be included for provision of security/support by the ultimate parent company (based on the alternative submission of Chevron Group). Given the amount of tax at stake, we would expect Chevron to appeal this decision in the High Court. We expect the ATO to quickly issue a Practical Compliance Guideline (PCG) dealing with preferred approaches to determining arm's length loan arrangements and related interest rates. It is also likely that the ATO will shortly issue a Decision Impact Statement outlining its formal views of the decision. DLA Piper 4
5 The Australian Government has welcomed the decision of the Full Federal Court as evidence of its strong action, along with the Multinational Anti- Avoidance Law, Diverted Profits Tax, updated transfer pricing laws and increased penalties, to ensure the integrity of the Australian tax system - see joint Media Release of the Treasurer and Minister for Revenue and Financial Services on 21 April FURTHER INFORMATION For further information on any of the topics discussed, do not hesitate to contact: Jock McCormack Partner - Head of Tax, Australia T Jock.McCormack@dlapiper.com Chris Fielden T Chris.Fielden@dlapiper.com James Newnham Partner T James.Newnham@dlapiper.com Daniel Kornberg T Daniel.Kornberg@dlapiper.com Michael Yunan Senior Associate T Michael.Yunan@dlapiper.com Meena Muthuraman T Meena.Muthuraman@dlapiper.com Contact your nearest DLA Piper office: BRISBANE Level 9, 480 Queen Street Brisbane QLD 4000 T F brisbane@dlapiper.com MELBOURNE Level 21, 140 William Street Melbourne VIC 3000 T F melbourne@dlapiper.com PERTH Level 31, Central Park St Georges Terrace Perth WA 6000 T F perth@dlapiper.com SYDNEY Level 22, No.1 Martin Place Sydney NSW 2000 T F sydney@dlapiper.com DLA Piper is a global law firm operating through various separate and distinct legal entities. For further information, please refer to Copyright 2017 DLA Piper. All rights reserved. DLA Piper 5
THE AUSTRALIAN GOVERNMENT INCREASES PRESSURE ON MULTINATIONAL TAX AVOIDANCE: 40% DIVERTED PROFITS TAX (DPT) INTRODUCED
THE AUSTRALIAN GOVERNMENT INCREASES PRESSURE ON MULTINATIONAL TAX AVOIDANCE: 40% DIVERTED PROFITS TAX (DPT) INTRODUCED 2 DECEMBER 2016 INTRODUCTION AND OVERVIEW The Australian Government released draft
More informationTAX ALERT AUSTRALIAN RECENT DEVELOPMENTS - AUSTRALIAN TRANSFER PRICING (TP) RULES: TIME TO STEP UP MARCH 2015
MARCH 2015 AUSTRALIAN TAX ALERT RECENT DEVELOPMENTS - AUSTRALIAN TRANSFER PRICING (TP) RULES: TIME TO STEP UP INTRODUCTION With the Australian Taxation Office's (ATO) escalating focus on international
More informationChevron Australia Holdings Pty Ltd v Commissioner of Taxation [2017] FCAFC 62 Reinterpreting the arm s length principle
Chevron Australia Holdings Pty Ltd v Commissioner of Taxation [2017] FCAFC 62 Reinterpreting the arm s length principle Frank Putrino,, KPMG Transfer Pricing & Angela Wood,, KPMG Law Tax Dispute Resolution
More informationAustralian court rules in favor of tax authorities in Chevron transfer pricing case
Australian court rules in favor of tax authorities in Chevron transfer pricing case The Australian Federal Court on 23 October issued its much anticipated decision in Chevron Australia Holdings Pty Ltd
More informationTAX ALERT AUSTRALIAN THE MEANING OF "CREDITABLE PURPOSE" IN THE AUSTRALIAN GST ACT MARCH 2015
MARCH 2015 AUSTRALIAN TAX ALERT THE MEANING OF "CREDITABLE PURPOSE" IN THE AUSTRALIAN GST ACT Justice Davies recently handed down her decision in the case of Rio Tinto Services Ltd v FCT [2015] FCA 94,
More informationTAX ALERT AUSTRALIAN MINING FOR TAX BREAKS? THE EXPLORATION DEVELOPMENT INCENTIVE EXPLAINED OCTOBER 2014
OCTOBER 2014 AUSTRALIAN TAX ALERT MINING FOR TAX BREAKS? THE EXPLORATION DEVELOPMENT INCENTIVE EXPLAINED The Government has released an exposure draft of the Exploration Development Incentive ("EDI") legislation.
More informationTAX ALERT AUSTRALIAN EXPOSURE DRAFT ON TAX CONSOLIDATION INTEGRITY MEASURES
6 MAY 2015 AUSTRALIAN TAX ALERT EXPOSURE DRAFT ON TAX CONSOLIDATION INTEGRITY MEASURES THE GOVERNMENT HAS RELEASED AN EXPOSURE DRAFT RELATING TO CHANGES TO THE TAX CONSOLIDATION REGIME. WHILE THE AMENDMENTS
More information27 April Lessons from Chevron. 1. Background
27 April 2017 Lessons from Chevron In one of the most significant decisions for many years, the Full Federal Court has handed down its decision in Chevron Australia Holdings Pty Ltd v Commissioner of Taxation
More informationUPDATE LITIGATION DECEMBER 2012 HUNT & HUNT LAWYERS V MITCHELL MORGAN NOMINEES PTY LTD & ORS
DECEMBER 2012 LITIGATION UPDATE HUNT & HUNT LAWYERS V MITCHELL MORGAN NOMINEES PTY LTD & ORS SNAPSHOT On 12 December 2012, the High Court of Australia heard the appeal by Hunt & Hunt Lawyers (Hunt & Hunt)
More informationCOMPETITION & REGULATION UPDATE
AUGUST 2013 COMPETITION & REGULATION UPDATE ACCC OBTAINS ITS FIRST UNFAIR CONTRACT TERMS DECLARATIONS: ACCC V BYTECARD PTY. LIMITED The Australian Competition and Consumer Commission's (ACCC) first case
More informationThe Chevron transfer pricing case the story so far
5 November 2015 The Chevron transfer pricing case the story so far On 23 October 2015 the Federal Court delivered the long-awaited transfer pricing decision in the Chevron Australia Holdings case [2015]
More informationTax Executives Institute (Calgary) Transfer Pricing Update. Douglas Richardson May 30, 2017
Tax Executives Institute (Calgary) Transfer Pricing Update Douglas Richardson May 30, 2017 Transfer Pricing Update Overview Cameco Corporation v. The Queen, Court File No. 2009-2430(IT)G Chevron Australia
More informationTAX UPDATE AUSTRALIAN JULY 2012 SNOWY HYDRO CASE AND RECENT LEGISLATIVE CHANGES TO STAMP DUTY
JULY 2012 AUSTRALIAN TAX UPDATE SNOWY HYDRO CASE AND RECENT LEGISLATIVE CHANGES TO STAMP DUTY Substantive legislative reforms to the stamp duty law continue across several Australian states, including
More informationAUSTRALIAN BUDGET
MAY 2013 AUSTRALIAN TAX UPDATE AUSTRALIAN BUDGET 2013-2014 2013-2014 Australian Federal Budget - Government attacks thin capitalisation, offshore debt structures, tightens key tax concessions for multinationals
More informationAUSTRALIAN BUDGET
MAY 2015 AUSTRALIAN TAX UPDATE AUSTRALIAN BUDGET 2015-2016 INTRODUCTION The Australian Government has released a measured but significant 2015-2016 Federal Budget. The three main tax changes include a
More informationSynopsis Tax today May 2017
Synopsis Tax today May 2017 A monthly journal, published by South Africa, that gives informed commentary on current developments in the tax arena, both locally and internationally. Through analysis of
More informationAnnual International Bar Association Conference 2014 Tokyo, Japan. Recent Developments in International Taxation in Australia
Bourke Place 600 Bourke Street Melbourne VIC 3000 GPO Box 9925 VIC 3001 Tel (03) 9672 3000 Fax (03) 9672 3010 www.corrs.com.au Sydney Melbourne Brisbane Perth Annual International Bar Association Conference
More informationDraft hybrid mismatch rules: potential impacts for real estate and infrastructure investments
TaxTalk Insights Real Estate and Infrastructure Draft hybrid mismatch rules: potential impacts for real estate and infrastructure investments 7 December 2017 In brief As currently drafted, the proposed
More informationTax Time Monthly FEBRUARY ISSUE INCOME TAX... pg Truck driver work-related expenses denied. 2 SUPERANNUATION...
Tax Time Monthly FEBRUARY ISSUE 2018 1 INCOME TAX... pg 3 1.1 Truck driver work-related expenses denied 1.2 Australian beneficiaries of foreign trust in receipt of capital gains taxed as assessable income
More informationTax Insights Hybrid Mismatch and Multinational Group Financing Integrity Rules. Snapshot. 22 June 2018 Australia 2018/12
22 June 2018 Australia 2018/12 Tax Insights Hybrid Mismatch and Multinational Group Financing Integrity Rules Snapshot On 21 June 2018, the Australian Taxation Office (ATO) released draft Practical Compliance
More informationNew Financial Year, New Tax Developments for Inbound Financing
TaxTalk Insights Financial Services New Financial Year, New Tax Developments for Inbound Financing What should Inbound Real Estate Entities look out for? 24 August 2017 In brief Recent changes to the tax
More informationTax Brief. 18 June Bamford: Taxation of trusts clarified. Facts
Tax Brief 18 June 2009 Bamford: Taxation of trusts clarified In its recent decision in Bamford v Commissioner of Taxation [2009] FCAFC 66, the Full Federal Court has settled (at least at the level of the
More informationGENERAL TAX ISSUES. represents. income and gains
GENERAL TAX ISSUES Income tax represents approximately 70 percent of the total tax revenue of the Australian Federal Government Income tax represents approximately 70% of the total tax revenue of the Australian
More informationTransfer Pricing Country Profile (to be posted on the OECD Internet site
Transfer Pricing Country Profile (to be posted on the OECD Internet site www.oecd.org/taxation) Name of Country: Australia Date of profile: November 2006 No. Item Reference to and wherever possible text
More informationTax Alert. Major changes to Australian Transfer Pricing rules. At a glance
December 2012 Tax Alert At a glance Exposure draft (ED) law was released on 22 November 2012 Broad powers now given to the ATO to reconstruct or disregard related party arrangements Without documentation
More informationRecent Developments in Transfer Pricing and the Taxation of Multinational Companies in Australia
WHITE PAPER November 2017 Recent Developments in Transfer Pricing and the Taxation of Multinational Companies in Australia As part of a wide-ranging crackdown on multinational tax avoidance, the Australian
More informationTax Brief. 8 September Withholding Tax on Interest Paid to US and UK Financial Institutions - The ATO's Opening Gambit.
Tax Brief 8 September 2004 Withholding Tax on Interest Paid to US and UK Financial Institutions - The ATO's Opening Gambit On 1 September 2004, the ATO issued its preliminary view in the form of Draft
More informationControlled Foreign Companies and Foreign Accumulation Funds: Release of Exposure Draft Legislation
On 17 February 2011, the Assistant Treasurer released exposure draft legislation (ED) for the proposed new Controlled Foreign Company (CFC) and Foreign Accumulation Fund (FAF) rules. The ED also includes
More informationThe Orica decision and its Implications
14 December 2015 The Orica decision and its Implications The first instance decision of Justice Pagone in Orica Limited v Commissioner of Taxation [2015] FCA 1399 represents a significant win by the ATO
More informationComments on the ATO s paper Intra-group finance guarantees and loans Application of Australia s transfer pricing and thin capitalisation rules
Level 2 95 Pitt Street Sydney, NSW 2000 Telephone 02 8223 0000 Facsimile 02 8223 0077 Email tia@taxinstitute.com.au Website www.taxinstitute.com.au ABN 45 008 392 372 29 th July 2008 Mr Marc Simpson Australian
More informationAUSTRALIAN-BASED FUND MANAGERS ARE INCREASINGLY WELL CREDENTIALED TO ADVISE FOREIGN FUNDS.
MARCH 2012 TAX UPDATE AUSTRALIAN-BASED FUND MANAGERS ARE INCREASINGLY WELL CREDENTIALED TO ADVISE FOREIGN FUNDS. RELEASE OF SECOND EXPOSURE DRAFT LEGISLATION IN RESPECT OF THE FIRST TWO ELEMENTS OF THE
More informationTax Management International Forum
Tax Management International Forum Comparative Tax Law for the International Practitioner Reproduced with permission from Tax Management International Forum, 38 FORUM 14, 6/5/17. Copyright 姝 2017 by The
More informationAustralian perspective on 2015 BEPS package
TaxTalk Insights BEPS Australian perspective on 2015 BEPS package 8 October 2015 In brief The Organisation for Economic Co-operation and Development (OECD) has released the 2015 Base Erosion and Profit
More informationTax Time Monthly NOVEMBER 2017 INCOME TAX SUPERANNUATION STATE TAXES
Tax Time Monthly NOVEMBER 2017 INCOME TAX SUPERANNUATION STATE TAXES CONTENTS 1 INCOME TAX pg 3 Reduction in corporate tax rate: Draft TR 2017/D7 and legislation introduced 2 SUPERANNUATION pg 4 Binding
More informationTAX AND DUTY UPDATE 7 DECEMBER 2017
TAX AND DUTY UPDATE 7 DECEMBER 2017 Manuel Makas, Director Head of Real Estate, +61 9225 5957, manuel.makas@greenwoods.com.au Andrew White, Director, +61 9225 5984, andrew.white@greenwoods.com.au Chris
More informationTax Insights Exposure draft to improve the debt equity rules
25 October 2016 Australia 2016/20 Tax Insights Exposure draft to improve the debt equity rules Snapshot On 10 October 2016, the Government released exposure draft (ED) legislation and explanatory memorandum
More informationTHE HIGH COURT AND THE ATO RESHAPE THE TAX LANDSCAPE FOR TRUSTS
THE HIGH COURT AND THE ATO RESHAPE THE TAX LANDSCAPE FOR TRUSTS Author: Simon Tisher Date: 1 November, 2010 Copyright 2010 This work is copyright. Apart from any permitted use under the Copyright Act 1968,
More informationTHE PARLIAMENT OF THE COMMONWEALTH OF AUSTRALIA HOUSE OF REPRESENTATIVES
2010-2011-2012 THE PARLIAMENT OF THE COMMONWEALTH OF AUSTRALIA HOUSE OF REPRESENTATIVES TAX LAWS AMENDMENT (CROSS-BORDER TRANSFER PRICING) BILL (NO. 1) 2012 EXPLANATORY MEMORANDUM (Circulated by the authority
More informationTax Insights Resource Capital Fund decision. Snapshot. 14 February 2018 Australia 2018/03
14 February 2018 Australia 2018/03 Tax Insights Resource Capital Fund decision Snapshot In a long and complex judgement (Resource Capital Fund IV LP v Commissioner of Taxation [2018] FCA 41), the Federal
More informationTax Brief. 12 August IMR and MIT: A going-away present? 1. Investment Manager Regime
Tax Brief 12 August 2013 IMR and MIT: A going-away present? The centrepiece of business tax policy that the Labor Party carried into the 2007 federal election was to make Australia an Asian funds management
More informationRoundup of Australia s BEPS developments
TaxTalk Insights Global Tax Roundup of Australia s BEPS developments 12 April 2017 In brief Since its presidency of the G20 in 2014, Australia has been at the forefront of efforts to combat tax avoidance
More informationFTA Treasury Implications of Global Tax Reform
FTA Treasury Implications of Global Tax Reform Geoff Gill, Transfer Pricing Partner, Deloitte 16 November 2017 Agenda 1. G20 BEPS global tax reset & financing 2. Australian approach law changes, case law
More informationAre you prepared for the 2018 Reportable Tax Position Schedule?
TaxTalk Insights Corporate Tax Are you prepared for the 2018 Reportable Tax Position Schedule? 29 October 2018 Explore more insights In brief For income years ending on or after 30 June 2018, the Reportable
More informationSmall business tax concessions - ATO finalises guidance on carrying on a business
TaxTalk Insights Corporate Tax Small business tax concessions - ATO finalises guidance on carrying on a business 11 April 2019 Explore more insights In brief The Australian Taxation Office (ATO) has recently
More informationAustralian Taxation Office Issues Guidance on APAs
Australian Taxation Office Issues Guidance on APAs The Australian Taxation Office (ATO) recently released Practice Statement Law Administration PS LA 2015/4, a guide for advance pricing arrangement (APA)
More informationTax Brief. 5 April A Bet Each Way. Facts. Sherlinc Enterprises Pty Ltd v FCT (2004) AATA 113
Tax Brief 5 April 2004 A Bet Each Way Sherlinc Enterprises Pty Ltd v FCT (2004) AATA 113 The AAT has found that a purported choice to apply the now repealed replacement asset rollover under Div 123 was
More informationIntra-group finance guarantees and loans
DISCUSSION PAPER EXTERNAL JUNE 2008 UNCLASSIFIED FORMAT AUDIENCE DATE CLASSIFICATION FILE REF: 08/7290 Intra-group finance guarantees and loans Application of Australia s transfer pricing and thin capitalisation
More informationTax Insights Diverted Profits Tax: the future is here
1 December 2016 Australia 2016/22 Tax Insights Diverted Profits Tax: the future is here Snapshot On 29 November 2016, the Australian government released Exposure Draft (ED) legislation and an Explanatory
More informationTax Brief. 7 June GST-Free Supplies of Services to Non Residents Court Supports Commissioner s Draft Ruling. The Facts
Tax Brief 7 June 2004 GST-Free Supplies of Services to Non Residents Court Supports Commissioner s Draft Ruling Fiduciary Ltd & Ors v Morningstar Research Pty Ltd & Ors [2004] NSWSC 381 (11 May 2004) For
More informationTax Time Monthly MARCH ISSUE INCOME TAX... pg 3. 2 SUPERANNUATION... pg 5
Tax Time Monthly MARCH ISSUE 2018 1 INCOME TAX... pg 3 1.1 CGT small business concessions: restricted to assets used in business draft legislation released 1.2 Amendments to consolidation regime to close
More informationUK s bilateral APA program for financial transactions is in line with growing global approach
5 November 2018 Global Tax Alert News from Transfer Pricing UK s bilateral APA program for financial transactions is in line with growing global approach NEW! EY Tax News Update: Global Edition EY s new
More informationTax Brief. 10 April Transfer Pricing Emerges From the Shadows. Facts
Tax Brief 10 April 2008 Transfer Pricing Emerges From the Shadows Over the last 15 years there has been a noticeable discrepancy between word and deed. On the one hand, the Australian Taxation Office (
More informationTax watch: Edition 2. March Transfer Pricing, Permanent Establishment and Interest Limitation Changes Announced
The views reflected in this document are the views of the authors and do not necessarily reflect the views of the global EY organisation or its member firms. Tax watch: Edition 2 March 2017 Transfer Pricing,
More informationGlobal Tax Alert. Australian multinational antiavoidance. reporting and increased penalties. Wide-ranging impact requires action by multinationals
17 September 2015 EY Library Access both online and pdf versions of all EY Global Tax Alerts. Copy into your web browser: http://www.ey.com/gl/en/ Services/Tax/International- Tax/Tax-alert-library#date
More informationTaxTalk Monthly Other news
TaxTalk Monthly Other news Other news 1 February 2015 Mid-Year Economic and Fiscal Outlook (MYEFO) 2014-15 The Treasurer released the 2014-15 MYEFO on 15 December 2014. The MYEFO which forecasts an underlying
More informationTax Brief. 19 December Transfer Pricing Consultation Paper. Do tax treaties confer an independent transfer pricing adjustment power?
Tax Brief 19 December 2011 Transfer Pricing Consultation Paper On Tuesday 1 November 2011 when the foreigners were taking over the Melbourne Cup, the Assistant Treasurer put out a Press Release and Consultation
More informationTAX LAWS AMENDMENT (CROSS BORDER TRANSFER PRICING) BILL 2013: MODERNISATION OF TRANSFER PRICING RULES EXPOSURE DRAFT - EXPLANATORY MEMORANDUM
2012 TAX LAWS AMENDMENT (CROSS BORDER TRANSFER PRICING) BILL 2013: MODERNISATION OF TRANSFER PRICING RULES EXPOSURE DRAFT - EXPLANATORY MEMORANDUM (Circulated by the authority of the Deputy Prime Minister
More informationFOREIGN INVESTMENT IN AUSTRALIA
FOREIGN INVESTMENT IN AUSTRALIA CONTENTS 1. INTRODUCTION...03 2. WHO NEEDS TO SEEK APPROVAL IN AUSTRALIA?...04 2.1 Foreign Persons...04 2.2 Foreign Government Investors...05 3. WHAT TYPES OF ACTIONS NEED
More informationPwC also welcome the opportunity for continued involvement throughout the consultation process prior to its finalisation.
Mr Andrew Harnisch Australian Taxation Office GPO Box 9977 CANBERRA ACT 2600 17 May 2017 By email: andrew.harnisch@ato.gov.au Dear Andrew, Draft Taxation Ruling 2017/D2 PricewaterhouseCoopers (PwC) welcomes
More informationA GUIDE TO LISTING IN AUSTRALIA
A GUIDE TO LISTING IN AUSTRALIA 2015 FOREWORD BY AUSTRALIAN SECURITIES EXCHANGE As at 31 December 2014, the aggregate market capitalisation of the Australian Securities Exchange ( ASX ) was about AUD$1.6
More informationProposed hybrid mismatch rules: impact on Australian securitisation industry
Chris Dalton Chief Executive Officer 3 Spring Street, Sydney NSW 2000 T +61 (0)2 8243 3906 M +61 (0)403 584 600 E cdalton@securitisation.com.au www.securitisation.com.au 29 March 2018 William Potts Senior
More informationModernisation of Transfer Pricing Rules Exposure Draft
21 December 2012 The Manager International Tax Integrity Unit The Treasury Langton Crescent PARKES ACT 2600 Email: transferpricing@treasury.gov.au Dear Sir/Madam Modernisation of Transfer Pricing Rules
More informationReview of the thin capitalisation arm s length debt test
13 March 2014 Review of the thin capitalisation arm s length debt test The Australian Private Equity and Venture Capital Association Limited (AVCAL) welcomes the opportunity to comment on the Board of
More informationTrust losses Remain Idle Background
Tax Brief 6 October 2004 Trust losses Remain Idle The Federal Court has held in Idlecroft Pty Ltd v Commissioner of Taxation [2004] FCA 1087 that a trust stripping scheme was caught by reimbursement agreement
More informationTax Brief. 3 March Stamp Duty Tail Wags CGT Dog? The Facts
Tax Brief 3 March 2005 Stamp Duty Tail Wags CGT Dog? Whilst the High Court decision in Chief Commissioner of State Revenue v Dick Smith Electronics Holdings Pty Ltd ( Dick Smith ) involves NSW stamp duty,
More informationMore ruminations on valuation issues
4 December 2017 More ruminations on valuation issues The market value of an asset is a pervasive feature of tax law, and when it is in dispute it is almost always problematic. The value of a particular
More informationEU STATE AID. An International Tax Perspective. Wednesday, December 7, :00 p.m. 5:00 p.m. GMT
EU STATE AID An International Tax Perspective Wednesday, December 7, 2016 4:00 p.m. 5:00 p.m. GMT *This presentation is offered for informational purposes only, and the content should not be construed
More informationGST & Property Update End of GST Transitional Relief
Tax Brief 13 October 2005 GST & Property Update Given the volume of cases, legislative change and new or revised rulings relating to GST & property that have issued or been enacted since our last GST &
More informationCHINA TRANSFER PRICING IMPLEMENTING MEASURES - BEYOND THE COMPLIANCE REQUIREMENTS
CHINA TRANSFER PRICING IMPLEMENTING MEASURES - BEYOND THE COMPLIANCE REQUIREMENTS JANUARY 2009 In our Newsletter of 12 January 2009, we reported that the China State Administration of Taxation ("SAT")
More informationTAX UPDATE AUSTRALIAN OCTOBER 2012
OCTOBER 2012 AUSTRALIAN TAX UPDATE WITHHOLDING TAX CUT FOR CLEAN BUILDING MANAGED INVESTMENT TRUSTS: CLARITY PROVIDED ON BREADTH AND DETAIL OF TAX CONCESSION INTRODUCTION Following announcements earlier
More informationAustralia s revised exposure draft on hybrid mismatch tax rules: A detailed review
19 March 2018 Global Tax Alert Australia s revised exposure draft on hybrid mismatch tax rules: A detailed review EY Global Tax Alert Library Access both online and pdf versions of all EY Global Tax Alerts.
More informationBEPS strengthening our interest limitation rules
BEPS documents release - August 2017: #15 In Confidence Office of the Minister of Finance Office of the Minister of Revenue Cabinet Economic Growth and Infrastructure Committee BEPS strengthening our interest
More informationTax Brief. 29 May New International Tax Measures. Re-written Interest Withholding Tax Exemption. Background
Tax Brief 29 May 2007 New International Tax Measures The Government introduced the Tax Laws Amendment (2007 Measure No 3) Bill 2007 ("the Bill") into Parliament on Thursday 10 May. The Bill contains a
More informationKNOWING YOUR INVESTMENT (ARSN ) INDEX
AUSTGROWTH PROPERTY SYNDICATE No. 23 (ARSN 108 542 043) This Enhanced Disclosure document provides Information Pursuant to ASIC s Regulatory Guide 46 Disclosure Principles Information contained herein
More informationAustralian government introduces bill to combat multinational tax avoidance
Australian government introduces bill to combat multinational tax avoidance The Australian Treasurer introduced a bill to combat multinational tax avoidance into parliament on 16 September 2015. The proposals
More informationDIRECTORS DUTIES IN AUSTRALIA A GUIDE FOR RESIDENT AND NON-RESIDENT DIRECTORS
DIRECTORS DUTIES IN AUSTRALIA A GUIDE FOR RESIDENT AND NON-RESIDENT DIRECTORS TABLE OF CONTENTS Overview of directors duties in Australia...4 Directors duties under the corporations act...6 Directors
More informationTHE PARLIAMENT OF THE COMMONWEALTH OF AUSTRALIA SENATE TREASURY LAWS AMENDMENT (COMBATING MULTINATIONAL TAX AVOIDANCE) BILL 2017
2016-2017 THE PARLIAMENT OF THE COMMONWEALTH OF AUSTRALIA SENATE TREASURY LAWS AMENDMENT (COMBATING MULTINATIONAL TAX AVOIDANCE) BILL 2017 DIVERTED PROFITS TAX BILL 2017 REVISED EXPLANATORY MEMORANDUM
More informationINTERNATIONAL ASPECTS OF AUSTRALIAN INCOME TAX
INTERNATIONAL ASPECTS OF AUSTRALIAN INCOME TAX Chartered Accountants Business Advisers and Consultants Suite 201, Level 2 65 York Street, Sydney NSW 2000 Australia Telephone: 61+2+9290 1588 Facsimile:
More informationTax Laws Amendment (Countering Tax Avoidance and Multinational Profit Shifting) Bill 2013 No., 2013
0-0-0-0 The Parliament of the Commonwealth of Australia HOUSE OF REPRESENTATIVES Presented and read a first time Tax Laws Amendment (Countering Tax Avoidance and Multinational Profit Shifting) Bill 0 No.,
More informationTax Time Monthly NOVEMBER ISSUE INCOME TAX... pg 3. 2 STATE TAXES... pg Small business reduction in tax rate brought forward now law
Tax Time Monthly NOVEMBER ISSUE 2018 1 INCOME TAX... pg 3 1.1 Small business reduction in tax rate brought forward now law 1.2 Treasury releases long-awaited consultation paper to amend operation of Division
More informationTaxing securities lending transactions: substance over form
Taxing securities lending transactions: substance over form A government discussion document Hon Dr Michael Cullen Minister of Finance Minister of Revenue First published in November 2004 by the Policy
More informationRECENT DEVELOPMENTS IN STATE TAXES:
RECENT DEVELOPMENTS IN STATE TAXES: TIPS AND TRAPS TO BE MINDFUL OF Author: Ellen Grant Date: 27 October, 2017 Copyright 2017 This work is copyright. Apart from any permitted use under the Copyright Act
More informationFEDERAL COURT OF AUSTRALIA
FEDERAL COURT OF AUSTRALIA Zappia v Commissioner of Taxation [2017] FCAFC 185 Appeal from: Zappia v Commissioner of Taxation [2017] FCA 390 File number: NSD 709 of 2017 Judges: ROBERTSON, PAGONE AND BROMWICH
More informationTax Insights Risk assessment framework for related party financing
16 May 2017 Australia 2017/09 Tax Insights Risk assessment framework for related party financing Snapshot On 16 May 2017, the ATO released the draft Practical Compliance Guide PCG 2017/D4 (the PCG), which
More informationTax Brief. 9 April Changes to Superannuation. Background. Earnings on assets set aside to meet pension liabilities
Tax Brief 9 April 2013 Changes to Superannuation The Treasurer has put an end to the frenzied pre-budget speculation by announcing the government s plans for changing superannuation. This Tax Brief examines
More informationTax Brief. 15 May In-house Finance Companies. 1. Background
Tax Brief 15 May 2009 In-house Finance Companies It is no secret that the Australian Taxation Office ( ATO ) has been concerned for some time about the tax issues arising from in-house finance companies
More informationChallenger Retirement Fund
Retirement Fund Annual Report Fund Information Statement for the year ended 30 June 2017 Issuer Challenger Retirement and Investment Services Limited (ABN 80 115 534 453) (AFSL 295642) (RSE Licence Number
More informationCraddockMurrayNeumann L A W Y E R S P T Y L T D ABN Case Notes. In This Issue. Our People
CraddockMurrayNeumann L A W Y E R S P T Y L T D ABN 57 166 457 905 Case Notes December 2016 In This Issue MNWA Pty Ltd v Deputy Commissioner of Taxation Bywater Investments & Hua Wang Bank Berhad v Commissioner
More informationBEPS transfer pricing and permanent establishment avoidance
BEPS documents release - August 2017: #17 In Confidence Office of the Minister of Finance Office of the Minister of Revenue Cabinet Economic Growth and Infrastructure Committee BEPS transfer pricing and
More informationIndustry Risk Assessment Multinational Anti-Avoidance Law MAAL the Law Companion Guideline Australian Financial Markets Association
30 March 2016 Mr James Campbell Director, Banking and Finance, Public Groups and International, Australian Taxation Office Goulburn St SYDNEY NSW 2000 Dear James, Industry Risk Assessment Multinational
More informationA guide to the right choices
Redundancy A guide to the right choices July 2005 A ASGARD Capital Management Limited ABN 92 009 279 592 Level 38, Central Park, 152 St.George s Terrace, Perth WA 6000 Telephone 08 9415 5688 Facsimile
More informationInternational Tax Australia Highlights 2018
International Tax Australia Highlights 2018 Investment basics: Currency Australian Dollar (AUD) Foreign exchange control No Accounting principles/financial statements The Australian equivalent of IFRS
More informationCharities Alert. The Hunger Project the most significant case ever on what is a PBI? September The Facts. Introduction.
Charities Alert September 2013 The Hunger Project the most significant case ever on what is a PBI? The Federal Court decision in The Hunger Project Australia v FC of T 2013 ATC 20-399 is probably the most
More informationA simplifi ed approach to documentation and risk assessment for small to medium businesses
BUSINESS SEGMENT SMALL TO MEDIUM BUSINESSES AUDIENCE GUIDE FORMAT NAT 12032-03.2005 PRODUCT ID INTERNATIONAL TRANSFER PRICING A simplifi ed approach to documentation and risk assessment for small to medium
More informationBritish Bankers Association
PUBLIC COMMENTS RECEIVED ON THE DISCUSSION DRAFT ON THE ATTRIBUTION OF PROFITS TO PERMANENT ESTABLISHMENTS PART II (SPECIAL CONSIDERATIONS FOR APPLYING THE WORKING HYPOTHESIS TO PERMANENT ESTABLISHMENTS
More informationPPS Investment Account. Tax Guide. For the year ended 30 June Macquarie Private Wealth A world of opportunities
PPS Investment Account Tax Guide For the year ended 30 June 2009 Macquarie Private Wealth A world of opportunities Tax policies and general assumptions This Tax Guide provides information on the tax policies
More informationChallenger Retirement Fund
Retirement Fund Annual Report Fund Information Statement for the year ended 30 June 2018 Issuer Retirement and Investment Services Limited (ABN 80 115 534 453) (AFSL 295642) (RSE Licence Number L0001304)
More informationJOINT SUBMISSION BY. Date: 30 May 2014
JOINT SUBMISSION BY Institute of Chartered Accountants Australia, Law Council of Australia, CPA Australia, The Tax Institute and the Corporate Tax Association Draft Taxation Ruling TR 2014/D3 Income tax:
More informationInteraction of OECD & US Standards under US Tax Treaties:
Interaction of OECD & US Standards under US Tax Treaties: Branch Profits Allocation & Intangible Property Transfer Pricing Issues for International Banks Andrew P. Solomon June 21, 2010 Outline of Today
More information3/8/2015 PS LA 2014/2 Administration of transfer pricing penalties for income years commencing on o... (As at 17 December 2014)
Practice Statement Law Administration PS LA 2014/2 SUBJECT: Administration of transfer pricing penalties for income years commencing on or after 29 June 2013 PURPOSE: This practice statement explains:
More information