FILED: ERIE COUNTY CLERK 01/30/ :20 PM INDEX NO /2017 NYSCEF DOC. NO. 1 RECEIVED NYSCEF: 01/30/2017
|
|
- Antony Craig
- 5 years ago
- Views:
Transcription
1 SUPREME COURT OF THE STATE OF NEW YORK COUNTY OF ERIE In the Matter of the Application of LEVEL 3 COMMUNICATIONS, LLC, -2gainst- Petitioner, ERIE COUNTY, CITY OF BUFFALO, CITY OF LACKAWANNA, EDEN CENTRAL SCHOOL DISTRICT, LAKE SHORE CENTRAL SCHOOL DISTRICT, and NORTH COLLINS CENTRAL SCHOOL DISTRICT, : Index No.: : NOTICE OF PETITION Respondents, For A Judgment Under Article 78 of the Civil Practice Law and Rules. PLEASE TAKE NOTICE that upon the annexed Petition of Level 3 Communications, LLC ("Level 3"), verified on January 25, 2017, and the exhibits annexed thereto, the accompanying affirmation of John G, Nicolich, dated January 27, 2017, and the exhibits annexed thereto, and the accompanying memorandum of law, Level 3 will move this Court, at the Courthouse located at the Erie County Court Building, 25 Delaware Avenue, Buffalo, New York 14202, at 9:30 A.M. on April 17, 2017, or at such place, date, and time scheduled by the justice assigned to this proceeding, for judgment, pursuant to Section 3001 and Article 78 of the New York State Civil Practice Law and Rules ("CPLR"): (a) Declaring that Level 3's fiber optic cables and inclosures therefor ("Fiber Optic Installations") located on private rights of way in Erie County are not real property taxable under the Real Property Tax Law ("RPTL"); _1/ of 18
2 (b) Annulling determinations by respondents Erie County, Eden Central School District, Lake Shore Central School District, and North Collins Central School District denying Level 3's Applications for Refund and Credit of Real Property Taxes ("Applications") pursuant to Section 556 of the RPTL relating to its Fiber Optic Installations located on private rights of way in Erie County; (c) Ordering respondents Erie County, Eden Central School District, Lake Shore Central School District, and North Collins Central School District (1) to approve Level 3's Applications that were denied by these tax-levying bodies, and (2) to provide refunds to Level 3 of the real property taxes that each respondent received for the tax periods in issue based on the erroneous assessments of Level 3's Fiber Optic Installations, with interest from the dates nf payments made by or on behalf of Level 3; (d) Ordering respondents City of Buffalo and City of Lackawanna (I) to determine and approve Level 3's Applications relating to assessments of Fiber Optic Installations, and (2) to provide refunds to Level 3 of the real property taxes that these respondents received for the tax periods in issue based on the erroneous assessments of Level 3's Fiber Optic Installations, with interest from the dates of payments made by or on behalf of Level 3; and (e) For costs and disbursements of this proceeding, and such other relief as this Court may deem just and proper / of 18
3 PLEASE TAKE FURTHER NOTICE that pursuant to CPLR 7804(c), answering papers, if any, must be served so as to be received by the undersigned at least five (5) days prior to the return date. Dated: New York, New York January 30, 2017 ING M YUZEK GAINEN CARROLL & BERTOLOTTI, LLP TO: Erie County 95 Franklin Street Buffalo, NY City of Buffalo 65 Niagara Square Buffalo, NY City of Lackawanna City Hall 714 Ridge Road Lackawanna, NY Eden Central School District 3150 Schoolview Road Eden, NY Lake Shore Central School District 959 Beach Road Angola, NY North Collins Central School District 2045 School Street North Collins, NY By: John G. Nicolich Roger Cukras Attorneys for Petitioner Level 3 Communications, LLC 250 Park Avenue New York, New York (212) _1/ of 18
4 SUPREME COURT OF THE STATE OF NEW YORK COUNTY OF ERIE In the Matter of the Application of LEVEL 3 COMMUNICATIONS, LLC, -against- Pe itioner, ERIE COUNTY, CITY OF BUFFALO, CITY OF LACKAWANNA, EDEN CENTRAL SCHOOL DISTRICT, LAKE SHORE CENTRAL SCHOOL DISTRICT, and NORTH COLLINS CENTRAL SCHOOL DISTRICT, : Index No.: VERIFIED PETITION Respondents, For a Judgment Under Article 78 of the Civil Practice Law and Rules. Petitioner, by its attorneys, Ingram Yuzek Gainen Carroll & Bertolotti, LLP, for its Verified Petition asserting claims under Section 3001 and Article 78 of the New York Civil Practice Law and Rules ("CPLR"), alleges as follows: 1. Petitioner Level 3 Communications, LLC ("Level 3") brings this proceeding to address the improper and illegal assessment and collection of real property taxes imposed with respect to Level 3's fiber optic cables and inclosures therefor ("Fiber Optic Installations") at numerous locations on private rights of way in Erie County. As described below, courts have issued conflicting determinations as to whether Level 3's fiber optic cables on private property fall within the definition of taxable real property under Section 102(12) of the New York Real Property Tax Law ("RPTL"). Level 3 contends that the real property tax assessments of Level / of 18
5 3's Fiber Optic Installations are based on an "unlawful entry" under RPTL 550(7)(c), and that Level 3 is entitled to refunds of taxes under Article 5 of the RPTL. 2. After paying real property taxes levied with respect to the Fiber Optic Installations, Level 3 submitted Applications for Refund and Credit of Real Property Taxes pursuant to RPTL 556 (the "Applications") to the Erie County Director of Real Property Tax Services, Joseph L. Maciejewski (the "County Director"). Level 3's Applications requested refunds or credits with respect to real property taxes assessed on Level 3's Fiber Optic Installations by respondents Erie County, City of Buffalo, City of Lackawanna, Eden Central School District, Lake Shore Central School District, and North Collins Central School District ("Respondents") on the ground that Respondents' assessments were based on an "unlawful entry" under RPTL 550(7). 3. As described below, upon information and belief, the County Director referred each of Level 3's Applications to the appropriate tax levying body for determination, with a recommendation to deny the Applications. Level 3 recently received determinations denying many of the Applications but Level 3 did not receive determinations of Applications that Level 3 submitted for taxes assessed by respondents City of Buffalo and City of Lackawanna. 4. Level 3 accordingly brings this proceeding for the following relief: a. For a declaratory judgment, pursuant to CPLR 3001, declaring that Level 3's Fiber Optic Installations on private rights of way in Erie County are not real property taxable under the RPTL; b. For judgment, pursuant to CPLR 7806, annulling the determinations by respondents Erie County, Eden Central School District, Lake Shore Central School District, and North Collins Central School District denying Level 3's Applications on the ground that those _1/ of 18
6 determinations were affected by an error of law because the assessments of Level 3's Fiber Optic Installations, which are not taxable real property under the RPTL, were based on an unlawful entry; c. For judgment, pursuant to CPLR 7806, ordering respondents Erie County, Eden Central School District, Lake Shore Central School District, and North Collins Central School District (1) to approve Level 3's Applications that were denied by these tax levying bodies, and (2) to refund to Level 3 the real property taxes paid to these respondents for the tax periods in issue, with interest from the dates of payments made by or on behalf of Level 3; and d. For judgment, pursuant to CPLR 7806, ordering respondents City of Buffalo and City of Lackawanna (1) to determine and approve Level 3's undetermined Applications, and (2) to refund to Level 3 the real property taxes paid to these respondents for the tax periods in issue, with interest from the dates of payments made by or on behalf of Level 3; and e. For costs and disbursements of this proceeding, and such other relief as this Court may deem just and proper. A. Parties And Background 5. Petitioner Level 3 is a limited liability company organized under the laws of the State of Delaware, is duly authorized to do business in the New York State, and has its executive offices at 1025 Eldorado Boulevard, Broomfield, Colorado. Level 3 provides telecommunications services to customers in New York State and other locations, is not a company subject to regulation by the New York State Public Service Commission, and accordingly is not a "telephone company" as defined in RPTL 102(12)(d) _1/ of 18
7 6. Upon information and belief, respondent Erie County is a governmental entity created under the Laws of the State of New York, is duly authorized to levy and collect real property taxes, and has received certain of the real property taxes at issue herein. 7. Upon information and belief, respondent City of Buffalo is a political subdivision of the State of New York, is duly authorized to levy and collect real property taxes, and has received certain of the real property taxes at issue herein. 8. Upon information and belief, respondent City of Lackawanna is a political subdivision of the State of New York, is duly authorized to levy and collect real property taxes, and has received certain of the real property taxes at issue herein. 9. Upon information and belief, respondent Eden Central School District is a school district created under the Laws of the State of New York, is duly authorized to levy and collect real property taxes, and has received certain of the real property taxes at issue herein. 10. Upon information and belief, respondent Lake Shore Central School District is a school district created under the Laws of the State of New York, is duly authorized to levy and collect real property taxes, and has received certain of the real property taxes at issue herein. 11. Upon information and belief, respondent North Collins Central School District is a school district created under the Laws of the State of New York, is duly authorized to levy and collect real property taxes, and has received certain of the real property taxes at issue herein. B. Background 12. Level 3 is the owner of the Fiber Optic Installations, which are comprised of (a) fiber optic cables used to provide telecommunications services, and (b) conduit within which the fiber optic cables are enclosed. Level 3's Fiber Optic Installations are placed on private rights of way at various locations within Erie County _1/ of 18
8 13. The fiber optics cables within the Fiber Optic Installations are electrical insulators made of glass or plastic fibers that transmit signals by way of modulated light waves, do not conduct electricity, and are not electrical conductors. 14. The conduits which enclose the fiber optic cables in the Fiber Optic Installations are not inclosures for electrical conductors because the fiber optic cables enclosed by the conduits are not electrical conductors. 15. Level 3's Fiber Optic Installations are used for the transmission of various types of telecommunicat ons services, information, and data, including the transmission of news or entertainment radio, television or cable television signals for immediate, delayed or ultimate exhibition to the public. 16. For tax periods between 2015 and 2016, Level 3's Fiber Optic Installations were included on the assessment rolls for real property located within Erie County (the "Assessments"). 17. Respondents collectively levied and/or collected in excess of $61,000 in real property taxes relating to the Fiber Optic Installations as a result of the Assessments for the periods in issue. 18. The Assessments were unlawful because the Fiber Optic Installations are personal property that is excluded from real property taxation, and each of the Assessments was based on an "unlawful entry" under RPTL 550(7) because the assessors for each taxing jurisdiction have no authority to assess real property tax against personal property. 19. In particular, the Fiber Optic Installations are not within the statutory definition of taxable real property because the Fiber Optic Installations do not constitute "lines, wires, poles, supports [or] inclosures for electrical conductors upon, above [or] underground" under RPTL / of 18
9 102(12)(i), and because the definition of real property in RPTL 102(12)(i) expressly does not include "property used in the transmission of news or entertainment radio, television or cable television signals for immediate, delayed or ultimate exhibition to the public." 20. On May 3, 2012, the Appellate Division of the First Department issued an opinion finding that Level 3's "fiber optic cables are electrical insulators which transmit light impulses and do not conduit electricity." The Appellate Division according held that "[Once the cables at issue are not 'for electrical conductors' they cannot be assessed under" RPTL 102(12)(i). Matters of RCN NY Communications, LLC and Level 3 Communications, LLC v. Tax Commn. of City of New York, 95 A.D.3d 456, 457 (1st Dep't), lv denied, 20 N.Y.3d 855 (2012). 21. After the Court of Appeals denied leave to appeal in Matter of RCN, Level 3 and certain of its affiliates sought to obtain corrections of tax rolls and refunds of taxes in other jurisdictions in the State of New York that assessed real property tax with respect to Level 3's fiber optic properties on private rights of way. 22. In and after June 2013, Level 3 and certain of its affiliates filed applications for correction of tax rolls and for refunds of taxes with the county directors of real property tax services of a number of counties in the State of New York, including Chautauqua County, Clinton County, and Erie County. C. Level 3's Original Applications Challenging Assessments Of Its Fiber Optic Installations 23. On or about June 3, 2013, Level 3 and its affiliate, Broadwing Communications, LLC ("Broadwing"), by undersigned counsel, mailed to County Director Maciejewski applications for correction of errors and for refunds on Form RP-556-b concerning Fiber Optic Installations in Erie County that had been assessed by Respondents and certain other tax levying bodies (the "Original Applications") _1/ of 18
10 24. The Original Applications, each titled "Application for Correction of Multiple- Parcel Errors," sought correction of the tax roll and refunds of taxes paid for the 2010, 2011, and 2012 tax years on grounds that the challenged tax assessments were made upon personal property -- i.e., fiber optic cables and inclosures therefor located on private rights of way in Erie County. The Original Applications also alleged that the assessments were based on an "unlawful entry" under RPTL 550(7)(c) because the assessor had no authority to assess personal property. 25. On or about January 30, 2014, the County Director mailed to undersigned counsel determinations of tax levying bodies denying virtually all of the Original Applications that Level 3 and Broadwing had filed with the County Director. Level 3 and Broadwing did not receive written determinations of the remaining Original Applications. 26. On May 14, 2014, Level 3 and Broadwing commenced a proceeding in this Court under Article 78 of the CPLR, captioned Matter of Level 3 Communications, LLC v. Erie County, Index No , which was assigned to Honorable Timothy J. Walker (the "Prior Proceeding"). In the Prior Proceeding, Level 3 and Broadwing requested, inter alia, an order (a) annulling the determinations denying the Original Applications, and (b) requiring the tax levying bodies to grant the Original Applications. 27. In a decision and order dated November 3, 2014, Justice Walker dismissed Level 3's and Broadwing's petition in the Prior Proceeding on two grounds: (a) the Fiber Optic Installations are taxable as "equipment for the distribution of... light" under RPTL 102(12)(f); and (b) Level 3 and Broadwing had not paid the taxes in issue under protest. Level 3 and Broadwing appealed Justice Walker's order dated November 3, 2014 to the Appellate Division, Fourth Judicial Department _ / of 18
11 28. Before the Fourth Department ruled on the appeal of Level 3 and Broadwing, the Clinton County Supreme Court and the Chautauqua County Supreme Court issued decisions and orders that adopted the reasoning in Justice Walker's November 3, 2014 decision and order and held that Level 3's Fiber Optic Installations in those counties are equipment for the distribution of light and therefore are taxable as real property under RPTL 102(12)(f). 29. Subsequently, on October 3, 2015, the Fourth Department reversed Justice Walker's order in the Prior Proceeding, granted the petition for annulment of the determinations denying the Original Applications, and remitted the matter for reconsideration by the tax levying bodies, including "whether the taxes that petitioners paid may be recovered despite the lack of protest by them and whether the fiber optic cables at issue constitute taxable real property within the meaning of the RPTL." Level 3 Communications, LLC v. Erie County, 132 A.D.3d 1271 (4th Dep't 2015), lv denied, 2016 NY Slip Op (2016). 30. Subsequently, the Third Department modified the decision and order that had been issued by the Clinton County Supreme Court and declared that Level 3's "fiber optic installations are not real property taxable under RPTL 102(12)." Matter of Level 3 Communications, LLC v. C'linton County, 144 A.D.3d 115, 120 (3d Dep't 2016). Level 3 also is currently appealing the order that was entered in the proceeding that Level 3 commenced in Chautauqua County to challenge the assessments of its Fiber Optic Installations by tax levying bodies in that county. Level 3's appeal in that proceeding was argued to the Fourth Department on December 1, D. Level 3's Applications At Issue In This Proceeding 31. By letter dated February 9, 2016, Level 3 submitted to County Director Maciejewski applications for refunds and credit of taxes for tax periods between 2015 and / of 18
12 on Form RP-556 (defined above as the "Applications"). Copies of the Applications, with Level 3's transmittal letter dated February 9, 2016, are annexed as Exhibit A. 32. Level 3's Applications requested refunds or credits of taxes assessed by and paid to Respondents Erie County, City of Lackawanna, Eden Central School District, Lake Shore Central School District, and North Collins Central School District. The Applications were signed on behalf of Level 3 by Lisa Akins, Level 3's Director of Tax, and the addendum to each Form RP-556 Application represented that "the assessments in issue were made on Applicant's fiber optic cables and inclosures therefor located on private rights of way," that "Applicant's fiber optic cables and the inclosures therefor are not taxable as real property under New York law," and that taxes "were assessed on the properties in issue based on an 'unlawful entry.' 33. As detailed on Exhibit B to this Petition, and as set forth in the Applications, Level 3 paid more than $61,000 in real property taxes with respect to the Fiber Optic Installations for the tax years in issue. 34. Level 3 submitted the Applications to County Director Maciejewski pursuant to RPTL 556, which provides that tax levying bodies may provide refunds of taxes where an application for refunds "is made within three years from the annexation of the warrant for such tax." 35. Upon information and belief, the County Director submitted the Applications and his recommendation for denial of the Applications to Respondents on or about September l 5, By letter dated October 6, 2016 the County Director provided Level 3 with copies of Applications that had been denied on October 2, 2016 by Erie County, Eden Central School District, Lake Shore Central School District, and North Collins Central School District on the _1/ of 18
13 ground that "Fiber optic cable is taxable." Copies of those denied Applications with the October 6, 2016 letter from the County Director are annexed as Exhibit C. 37. As of the date of this Petition, Level 3 has not received determinations of its Applications on Form RP-556 that were submitted to the County Director for taxes assessed by Respondents City of Buffalo and City of Lackawanna. FIRST CAUSE OF ACTION (Declaration That Level 3's Fiber Optic Installations Are Not Real Property) 38. Level 3 repeats and realleges the preceding paragraphs of this Petition as if fully set forth here. 39. Level 3's Fiber Optic Installations were entered on the tax rolls for real property located within Erie County for tax periods from 2015 to Respondents have collectively received from Level 3 more than $61,000 in real property taxes levied with respect to the Fiber Optic Installations for the tax periods in issue. 41. The Fiber Optic Installations do not constitute real property under RPTL 102(12). The Fiber Optic installations are therefore not taxable as real property under New York law, and the Assessments of the Fiber Optic Installations were based on an unlawful entry under RPTL 550(7). 42. A justiciable controversy exists between the parties as to whether or not the Fiber Optic Installations are taxable as real property under New York law. 43. Level 3 is entitled to a declaration that the Fiber Optic Installations do not constitute property that is taxable as real property under the RPTL / of 18
14 SECOND CAUSE OF ACTION (Annulling Determinations Denying Refund Applications) 44. Level 3 repeats and realleges the preceding paragraphs of this Petition as if fully set forth herein. 45. The Fiber Optic Installations do not constitute real property under RPTL 102(12), and the Fiber Optic Installations are accordingly not subject to taxation as real property under New York law. 46. Respondents Erie County, Eden Central School District, Lake Shore Central School District, and North Collins Central School District have wrongfully denied Level 3's Applications with respect to the assessments of the Fiber Optic Installations for the tax periods in issue. 47. The determinations denying Level 3's Applications should be armulled on the ground that those determinations were affected by an error of law because Level 3's Fiber Optic Installations are not real property that is taxable under the RPTL 102(12). THIRD CAUSE OF ACTION (Writ of Mandamus Compelling Erie County, Eden Central School District, Lake Shore Central School District, And North Collins Central School District To Approve Applications And To Refund Taxes) 48. Level 3 repeats and realleges the preceding paragraphs of this Petition as if fully set forth herein. 49. The Fiber Optic Installations do not constitute real property within the meaning of RPTL 102(12), and the Fiber Optic Installations are accordingly not subject to taxation as real property under New York law _1/ of 18
15 50. Respondents Erie County, Eden Central School District, Lake Shore Central School District, and North Collins Central School District have wrongfully denied Level 3's Applications with respect to the assessments of the Fiber Optic Installations for the tax years in issue. 51. The determinations denying Level 3's Applications were affected by an error of law because the Fiber Optic Installations are personal property, and are not taxable real property. 52. Level 3 is entitled to a writ of mandamus ordering Respondents Erie County, Eden Central School District, Lake Shore Central School District, and North Collins Central School District to comply with their statutory obligations by (a) approving Level 3's Applications, and (b) providing for refunds to Level 3 of the real property taxes assessed against Level 3's Fiber Optic Installations for the tax years in issue. FOURTH CAUSE OF ACTION (Writ Of Mandamus Compelling City Of Buffalo And City of Lackawanna School To Determine And Approve Level 3's Applications And To Refund Taxes) 53. Level 3 repeats and realleges the preceding paragraphs of this Petition as if fully set forth herein. 54. The Fiber Optic Installations do not constitute real property within the meaning of RPTL 102(12), and the Fiber Optic Installations are therefore not subject to taxation as real property under New York law. 55. Upon information and belief, Respondents City of Buffalo and City of Lackawanna have not yet issued determinations either approving or rejecting the Applications that Level 3 filed with the County Director seeking refunds of taxes assessed on Level 3's Fiber Optic Installations _ l/ of 18
16 56. Under RPTL 556, following receipt of a written report from the County Director concerning Level 3's Applications, Respondents City of Buffalo and City of Lackawanna were required to take action thereon by (a) either approving or rejecting the Applications, (b) providing Level 3 with mailed notice of the rejection of any of the Applications, and (c) providing for refunds of real property taxes to Level 3 with respect to approved Applications. 57. Respondents City of Buffalo and City of Lackawanna failed to comply with duties enjoined upon them by RPTL 556 because these Respondents (a) have not taken action to either approve or reject Level 3's Applications; (b) have not approved Level 3's Applications; and (c) have failed to provide refunds to Level 3 for the real property taxes assessed against Level 3's Fiber Optics Installations for the tax periods in issue. 58. Level 3 is entitled to a writ of mandamus (a) compelling City of Buffalo and City of Lackawanna to determine and approve Level 3's Applications and, (b) compelling City of Buffalo and City of Lackawanna to provide for refunds to Level 3 of the real property taxes assessed against Level 3's Fiber Optic Installations for the tax periods in issue. WHEREFORE, Level 3 respectfully requests that this Court award judgment as follows: (a) Declaring that Level 3's Fiber Optic Installations on private rights of way in Erie County are not real property taxable under the RPTL; (b) Annulling the determinations by Respondents Erie County, Eden Central School District, Lake Shore Central School District, and North Collins Central School District denying Level 3's Applications; (c) Ordering Respondents Erie County, Eden Central School District, Lake Shore Central School District, and North Collins Central School District (1) to approve Level 3's Applications that were denied by these Respondents, and (2) to provide refunds to Level 3 of the / of 18
17 real property taxes that each Respondent received for the tax periods in issue based on the erroneous assessments of Level 3's Fiber Optic Installations, with interest from the dates of payments made by or on behalf of Level 3; (d) Ordering respondents City of Buffalo and City of Lackawanna (1) to determine and approve Level 3's Applications that have not yet been determined by these Respondents, and (2) to provide refunds to Level 3 of the real property taxes that these Respondents received for the tax periods in issue based on the erroneous assessments of Level 3's Fiber Optic Installations, with interest from the dates of payments made by or on behalf of Level 3; and (e) For costs and disbursements of this proceeding, and such other and further relief as the Court deems just and proper. Dated: New York, New York January 25, 2017 INGRAM YUZEIC GA1NEN CARROLL & BERTOLOTTI, LLP / John G. Nicolich Roger Cukras Attorheys for Petitioner Level 3 Communications, LLC 250 Park Avenue New York, New York (212) jnicolich@ingramllp.com _1/ of 18
18 VERIFICATION STATE OF COLORADO COUNTY OF BROOMFIELD ).ss. : The undersigned, Douglas A. Richards, being duly sworn, states that he is the Senior Vice President - Tax for the Petitioner in the above-entitled proceeding; that he has read the foregoing Petition; and that the contents are true to his knowledge, except as to those matters which are alleged upon information and belief, which he believes to be true. Sworn to before me this 'day of January, 2017 DOUGE AS A. OCT ARDS Notar Public HIRLEY WELCH NOTARY PUBLIC STATE OF COLORADO NOTARY ID # Y COMMISSION EXPIRES _1/ of 18
FILED: QUEENS COUNTY CLERK 10/10/2013 INDEX NO /2013 NYSCEF DOC. NO. 1 RECEIVED NYSCEF: 10/10/2013
FILED: QUEENS COUNTY CLERK 10/10/2013 INDEX NO. 802537/2013 NYSCEF DOC. NO. 1 RECEIVED NYSCEF: 10/10/2013 Attorney Group No. 323 SUPREME COURT OF THE STATE OF NEW YORK COUNTY OF QUEENS In the Matter of
More informationState of New York Supreme Court, Appellate Division Third Judicial Department
State of New York Supreme Court, Appellate Division Third Judicial Department Decided and Entered: May 3, 2012 511897 In the Matter of MORRIS BUILDERS, LP, et al., Appellants, v MEMORANDUM AND ORDER EMPIRE
More information: : : : : : : : : I, ROGER CUKRAS, under penalty of perjury, hereby declares as follows:
INGRAM YUZEK GAINEN CARROLL & BERTOLOTTI, LLP 250 Park Avenue New York, NY 10177 Telephone (212) 907-9600 Facsimile (212) 907-9681 Roger Cukras Special Tax Counsel for Debtors UNITED STATES BANKRUPTCY
More informationFILED: NEW YORK COUNTY CLERK 06/12/ :05 PM INDEX NO /2013 NYSCEF DOC. NO. 14 RECEIVED NYSCEF: 06/12/2017 EXHIBIT A
EXHIBIT A SUPREME COURT OF THE STATE OF NEW YORK COUNTY OF NEW YORK ----------------------------------------------------------------X Index No.: 651747/2013 VALIANT INSURANCE COMPANY and NORTHEAST REMSCO
More informationNOTICE OF PETITION. -agai,nst- CAPSAG HARBOR MANAGEMENT, LLC, PLEASE TAKE NOTICE that, upon the annexed Verified Petition, dated
-agai,nst- NOTICE OF PETITION CAPSAG HARBOR MANAGEMENT, LLC, PLEASE TAKE NOTICE that, upon the annexed Verified Petition, dated January 26, 2012, and pursuant to Section 1005(b) of the New York Limited
More informationMatter of Lewis County 2012 NY Slip Op 33565(U) October 18, 2012 Supreme Court, Lewis County Docket Number: Judge: Charles C.
Matter of Lewis County 2012 NY Slip Op 33565(U) October 18, 2012 Supreme Court, Lewis County Docket Number: 2010-000556 Judge: Charles C. Merrell Cases posted with a "30000" identifier, i.e., 2013 NY Slip
More information: : : : : : : : : : : : : : : : : and the Affirmation of Janice I. Goldberg, Esq., in support of an Ex Parte Petition for an Order
At the Ex-Parte Motion Part of the Supreme Court of the State of New York, County of New York, held at the Courthouse located at 60 Centre Street, New York, New York October, 2016 HON. J.S.C. SUPREME COURT
More informationFILED: NEW YORK COUNTY CLERK 07/25/ :58 PM INDEX NO /2013 NYSCEF DOC. NO. 33 RECEIVED NYSCEF: 07/25/2014 EXHIBIT
FILED: NEW YORK COUNTY CLERK 07/25/2014 04:58 PM INDEX NO. 652072/2013 NYSCEF DOC. NO. 33 RECEIVED NYSCEF: 07/25/2014 EXHIBIT SUPREME COURT OF THE STATE OF NEW YORK COUNTY OF NEW YORK NEXBANK SSB Index
More informationState of New York Supreme Court, Appellate Division Third Judicial Department
State of New York Supreme Court, Appellate Division Third Judicial Department Decided and Entered: July 17, 2014 518219 In the Matter of SUSAN M. KENT, as President of the NEW YORK STATE PUBLIC EMPLOYEES
More informationFILED: NEW YORK COUNTY CLERK 10/13/ :40 PM INDEX NO /2017 NYSCEF DOC. NO. 1 RECEIVED NYSCEF: 10/13/2017
FILED NEW YORK COUNTY CLERK 10/13/2017 0640 PM INDEX NO. 656382/2017 NYSCEF DOC. NO. 1 RECEIVED NYSCEF 10/13/2017 SUPREME COURT OF THE STATE OF NEW YORK COUNTY OF NEW YORK In The Matter of the Application
More informationPetitioners Sierra Club and Ratepayer and Community Intervenors ( RCI ) (collectively,
SUPREME COURT OF THE STATE OF NEW YORK COUNTY OF ALBANY ----------------------------------------------------------------------X In the Matter of the Application of SIERRA CLUB and CAROL CHOCK, President,
More informationFiling a Debt Amortization Debt Case Under Wis. Stats IN MILWAUKEE COUNTY 1. Petition to Amortize Debts
Index of exhibits 1.0 Filing a Debt Amortization Case Under Wis. Stats. 128.21 In Milwaukee County 1.1 Petition to Amortize Debts 1.2 Affidavit of Debts 1.3 Order Appointing Trustee and Enjoining Creditors
More informationMatter of th St. LLC v City of New York 2017 NY Slip Op 32216(U) October 3, 2017 Supreme Court, Queens County Docket Number: 803/17 Judge:
Matter of 24-60 47th St. LLC v City of New York 2017 NY Slip Op 32216(U) October 3, 2017 Supreme Court, Queens County Docket Number: 803/17 Judge: Howard G. Lane Cases posted with a "30000" identifier,
More informationState of New York Supreme Court, Appellate Division Third Judicial Department
State of New York Supreme Court, Appellate Division Third Judicial Department Decided and Entered: May 2, 2013 513539 In the Matter of ANTHONY PICCOLO et al., Petitioners, v OPINION AND JUDGMENT NEW YORK
More informationFILED: NEW YORK COUNTY CLERK 01/09/2014 INDEX NO /2013 NYSCEF DOC. NO. 4 RECEIVED NYSCEF: 01/09/2014
FILED: NEW YORK COUNTY CLERK 01/09/2014 INDEX NO. 653829/2013 NYSCEF DOC. NO. 4 RECEIVED NYSCEF: 01/09/2014 SUPREME COURT OF THE STATE OF NEW YORK COUNTY OF NEW YORK -------------------------------------------------------------------x
More informationState of New York Supreme Court, Appellate Division Third Judicial Department
State of New York Supreme Court, Appellate Division Third Judicial Department Decided and Entered: June 25, 2009 506294 In the Matter of VILLAGE OF CANAJOHARIE, Appellant, v MEMORANDUM AND ORDER PLANNING
More informationIN THE COMMONWEALTH COURT OF PENNSYLVANIA
IN THE COMMONWEALTH COURT OF PENNSYLVANIA In Re: Petition of the Venango County : Tax Claim Bureau for Judicial : Sale of Lands Free and Clear : of all Taxes and Municipal Claims, : Mortgages, Liens, Charges
More informationFILED: NEW YORK COUNTY CLERK 03/04/ :40 PM INDEX NO /2016 NYSCEF DOC. NO. 31 RECEIVED NYSCEF: 03/04/2016
FILED: NEW YORK COUNTY CLERK 03/04/2016 09:40 PM INDEX NO. 150973/2016 NYSCEF DOC. NO. 31 RECEIVED NYSCEF: 03/04/2016 SUPREME COURT OF THE STATE OF NEW YORK COUNTY OF NEW YORK In the Matter of the Application
More informationState of New York Supreme Court, Appellate Division Third Judicial Department
State of New York Supreme Court, Appellate Division Third Judicial Department Decided and Entered: November 22, 2017 523287 In the Matter of WEGMANS FOOD MARKETS, INC., Petitioner, v MEMORANDUM AND JUDGMENT
More informationFILED: NEW YORK COUNTY CLERK 07/11/ :26 PM INDEX NO /2016 NYSCEF DOC. NO. 1 RECEIVED NYSCEF: 07/11/2016
FILED NEW YORK COUNTY CLERK 07/11/2016 0426 PM INDEX NO. 653624/2016 NYSCEF DOC. NO. 1 RECEIVED NYSCEF 07/11/2016 SUPREME COURT OF THE STATE OF NEW YORK COUNTY OF NEW YORK PHILIPPE BUHANNIC and PATRICK
More informationIN THE COURT OF CHANCERY OF THE STATE OF DELAWARE ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) VERIFIED COMPLAINT UNDER 6 DEL. C
EFiled: Oct 26 2017 10:39AM EDT Transaction ID 61282640 Case No. 2017-0765- IN THE COURT OF CHANCERY OF THE STATE OF DELAWARE HARVEY WEINSTEIN, v. Plaintiff, THE WEINSTEIN COMPANY HOLDINGS, LLC, Defendant.
More informationState of New York Supreme Court, Appellate Division Third Judicial Department
State of New York Supreme Court, Appellate Division Third Judicial Department Decided and Entered: October 25, 2018 524018 In the Matter of JOSEPH SPIEZIO III et al., Petitioners, v COMMISSIONER OF TAXATION
More informationState of New York Supreme Court, Appellate Division Third Judicial Department
State of New York Supreme Court, Appellate Division Third Judicial Department Decided and Entered: November 29, 2018 525671 In the Matter of the Trust of JUNE R. JOHNSON, Deceased. TRUSTCO BANK, as Trustee
More informationState of New York Court of Appeals
State of New York Court of Appeals OPINION This opinion is uncorrected and subject to revision before publication in the New York Reports. No. 140 In the Matter of T-Mobile Northeast, LLC, Appellant, v.
More informationCOURT OF APPEALS THIRD APPELLATE DISTRICT HARDIN COUNTY PLAINTIFF-APPELLEE CASE NUMBER
COURT OF APPEALS THIRD APPELLATE DISTRICT HARDIN COUNTY STATE OF OHIO PLAINTIFF-APPELLEE CASE NUMBER 6-2000-12 v. CHERYL BASS O P I N I O N DEFENDANT-APPELLANT CHARACTER OF PROCEEDINGS: Criminal Appeal
More informationTelecommunications Service Agreement (Pursuant to PSC No. 9 Electricity, Rider X)
Consolidated Edison Company of New York, Inc. Telecom Application Management Department Telecommunications Service Agreement (Pursuant to PSC No. 9 Electricity, Rider X) WHEREAS, ( Customer ) has applied
More informationFILED: NEW YORK COUNTY CLERK 09/11/ :43 PM INDEX NO /2017 NYSCEF DOC. NO. 1 RECEIVED NYSCEF: 09/11/2017
SUPREME COURT OF THE STATE OF NEW YORK COUNTY OF NEW YORK R3 HOLDCO LLC, : Index No. : Date of filing: Plaintiffs, v. RIPPLE LABS, INC. and XRP II LLC, Defendants. SUMMONS. The basis of venue is the residence
More informationMatter 15- Petition of Verizon New York Inc. for Limited Orders of Entry for 10 Multiple-Dwelling Unit Buildings in the City of New York
140 West Street 6 th Floor New York, NY 10007 Tel (212) 519-4718 richard.fipphen@verizon.com Richard C. Fipphen Assistant General Counsel Honorable Kathleen H. Burgess Secretary New York Public Service
More informationState of New York Supreme Court, Appellate Division Third Judicial Department
State of New York Supreme Court, Appellate Division Third Judicial Department Decided and Entered: May 3, 2012 513553 In the Matter of HOMESTEAD FUNDING CORPORATION, Appellant, v MEMORANDUM AND ORDER STATE
More informationState of New York Supreme Court, Appellate Division Third Judicial Department
State of New York Supreme Court, Appellate Division Third Judicial Department Decided and Entered: June 29, 2017 523242 In the Matter of SHUAI YIN, Petitioner, v STATE OF NEW YORK DEPARTMENT OF TAXATION
More informationARBITRATION AWARD. Injured Person(s) hereinafter referred to as: Claimant ["AM"]
American Arbitration Association New York No-Fault Arbitration Tribunal In the Matter of the Arbitration between: Erie County Medical Center (Applicant) - and - Geico Insurance Company (Respondent) AAA
More informationState of New York Supreme Court, Appellate Division Third Judicial Department
State of New York Supreme Court, Appellate Division Third Judicial Department Decided and Entered: June 9, 2011 509668 In the Matter of KATHLEEN KARLSBERG, Petitioner, v TAX APPEALS TRIBUNAL OF THE STATE
More informationCOMPLAINT FOR DECLARATORY JUDGMENT. Plaintiff Board of Education of the City of Chicago (the School Board ), by and through
Jeff J. Friedman Merritt A. Pardini KATTEN MUCHIN ROSENMAN LLP 575 Madison Avenue New York, New York 10022-2585 Telephone: (212) 940-8800 Facsimile: (212) 940-8776 Attorneys for the Board of Education
More informationIN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE MIDDLE DISTRICT OF TENNESSEE NASHVILLE DIVISION ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) COMPLAINT
IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE MIDDLE DISTRICT OF TENNESSEE NASHVILLE DIVISION FORBA HOLDINGS, LLC, Plaintiff, v. ZURICH AMERICAN INSURANCE CO., Defendant. Civil Action No: COMPLAINT Comes
More informationSTROOCK & STROOCK & LAVAN LLP
SUPREME COURT OF THE STATE OF NEW YORK COUNTY OF NEW YORK x GOLDMAN, SACHS & Co, Plaintiff, - against - CVR ENERGY, INC. Index No. 652149/2012 Date Filed: June 21, 2012 SUMMONS Defendant. x TO THE ABOVE
More informationPetitioner, New York Communications Company, Inc., filed a petition for redetermination
STATE OF NEW YORK DIVISION OF TAX APPEALS In the Matter of the Petition : of : NEW YORK COMMUNICATIONS : DETERMINATION COMPANY, INC. DTA NO. 825586 for Redetermination of a Deficiency or for Refund of
More informationIN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE WESTERN DISTRICT OF MISSOURI
IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE WESTERN DISTRICT OF MISSOURI Cerner Corporation Plaintiff, vs. Columbia Casualty Co.; AIG Specialty Insurance Company (formerly known as Chartis Specialty Insurance
More informationFILED: NEW YORK COUNTY CLERK 09/20/ :18 PM INDEX NO /2018 NYSCEF DOC. NO. 2 RECEIVED NYSCEF: 09/20/2018
NYSCEF DOC. NO. 2 RECEIVED NYSCEF 09/20/2018 SUPREME COURT OF THE STATE OF NEW YORK, COUNTY OF NEW YORK ------------------------------------------------------------------- x THE CHARLES SCHWAB CORPORATION,
More informationLong Island New York Personal Injury and Accident Attorney Jeena Belil
SUPREME COURT OF THE STATE OF NEW YORK COUNTY OF SUFFOLK In the Matter of the Application for an Order Staying Arbitration Between TRAVELERS PROPERTY CASUALTY COMPANY, -against- RESPONDENT I and RESPONDENT
More informationJudgment Rendered October
NOT DESIGNATED FOR PUBLICATION STATE OF LOUISIANA COURT OF APPEAL FIRST CIRCUIT NUMBER 2008 CA 0450 IN THE MATIER OF THE MASHBURN MARITAL TRUSTS CONSOLIDATED WITH NUMBER 2008 CA 0451 IN THE MATTER OF THE
More informationFILED: NEW YORK COUNTY CLERK 05/23/2012 INDEX NO /2012 NYSCEF DOC. NO. 2 RECEIVED NYSCEF: 05/23/2012
FILED: NEW YORK COUNTY CLERK 05/23/2012 INDEX NO. 651242/2012 NYSCEF DOC. NO. 2 RECEIVED NYSCEF: 05/23/2012 SUPREME COURT OF THE STATE OF NEW YORK COUNTY OF NEW YORK X JONATHAN BLOOSTEIN, STEVEN BRANDIS,
More informationState of New York Supreme Court, Appellate Division Third Judicial Department
State of New York Supreme Court, Appellate Division Third Judicial Department Decided and Entered: April 29, 2004 92539 In the Matter of THOMAS L. HUCKABY, Petitioner, v MEMORANDUM AND JUDGMENT NEW YORK
More informationCITY OF LOS ANGELES, Plaintiff and Appellant, v. CENTEX TELEMANAGEMENT, INC., Defendant and Respondent.
29 Cal. App. 4th 1384, *; 1994 Cal. App. LEXIS 1113, **; 34 Cal. Rptr. 2d 782, ***; 94 Cal. Daily Op. Service 8396 CITY OF LOS ANGELES, Plaintiff and Appellant, v. CENTEX TELEMANAGEMENT, INC., Defendant
More informationAPPENDIX I FORMS (6/30/03) 197
APPENDIX I FORMS The following forms are listed in this appendix: Form 1. Petition (Other Than in Small Tax Case) *Form 2. Petition (Small Tax Case) *Form 3. Entry of Appearance *Form 4. Substitution of
More informationTAX LITIGATION MEMORANDUM
LAW OFFICES DAVID L. SILVERMAN, J.D., LL.M. 2001 MARCUS AVENUE LAKE SUCCESS, NEW YORK 11042 (516) 466-5900 SILVERMAN, DAVID L. TELECOPIER (516) 437-7292 NYTAXATTY@AOL.COM AMINOFF, SHIRLEE AMINOFFS@GMAIL.COM
More informationIN THE SUPERIOR COURT OF FULTON COUNTY STATE OF GEORGIA FULTON COUNTY SCHOOL DISTRICT'S MOTION TO INTERVENE
IN THE MATTER OF: IN THE SUPERIOR COURT OF FULTON COUNTY STATE OF GEORGIA 2017 TAX DIGEST FOR FULTON COUNTY, GEORGIA Civil Action No. 2017CV297039 FULTON COUNTY SCHOOL DISTRICT'S MOTION TO INTERVENE COMES
More informationbefore September 1 following the date of notice of tax under RSA 72:1-d, to the
STATE OF NEW HAMPSHIRE CHESHIRE, SS SUPERIOR COURT Case Number: 213-2014-CV-00178 SHIRE FREE CHURCH: MONADNOCK vs CITY OF KEENE MOTION TO DISMISS NOW COMES the City of Keene, by and through its counsel,
More informationCase KG Doc 1 Filed 08/10/18 Page 1 of 12 IN THE UNITED STATES BANKRUPTCY COURT FOR THE DISTRICT OF DELAWARE
Case 18-50687-KG Doc 1 Filed 08/10/18 Page 1 of 12 IN THE UNITED STATES BANKRUPTCY COURT FOR THE DISTRICT OF DELAWARE In re: SUNIVA, INC., Chapter 11 Case No. 17-10837 (KG) Debtor. SQN ASSET SERVICING,
More information) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) Petitioner Z Financial, LLC, appeals both the trial court s granting of equitable
FOURTH DIVISION April 30, 2009 No. 1-08-1445 In re THE APPLICATION OF THE COUNTY TREASURER AND Ex Officio COUNTY COLLECTOR OF COOK COUNTY ILLINOIS, FOR JUDGMENT AND ORDER OF SALE AGAINST REAL ESTATE RETURNED
More informationTAX OBJECTION COMPLAINT PACKET
TAX OBJECTION COMPLAINT PACKET TAX OBJECTION COMPLAINT REQUIREMENTS THAT NEED TO BE MET BEFORE A TAX OBJECTION CAN BE FILED. 1. If a person desires to file a he/she shall pay all of the taxes due within
More informationFILED: NEW YORK COUNTY CLERK 02/17/ :38 PM INDEX NO /2016 NYSCEF DOC. NO. 6 RECEIVED NYSCEF: 02/17/2017. Touitou Affirmation.
Touitou Affirmation Exhibit A (FILED: NEW YORK COUNTY CLERK 02/17/2017 12/08/2016 01:38 54 PMl INDEX NO. 160298/2016 NYSCEF DOC. NO. 61 RECEIVED NYSCEF: 02/17/2017 12/08/2016 SUPREME COURT OF THE STATE
More informationFILED: NEW YORK COUNTY CLERK 02/16/ :40 PM INDEX NO /2016 NYSCEF DOC. NO. 20 RECEIVED NYSCEF: 02/28/2017
SUPREME COURT OF THE STATE OF NEW YORK COUNTY OF NEW YORK ------------------------------------------------------------------------X LIVE NATION MARKETING, INC., LIVE NATION WORLDWIDE, INC., and WESTCHESTER
More informationFILED: KINGS COUNTY CLERK 11/03/ :08 AM INDEX NO /2016 NYSCEF DOC. NO. 1 RECEIVED NYSCEF: 11/03/2016
FILED KINGS COUNTY CLERK 11/03/2016 1108 AM INDEX NO. 519469/2016 NYSCEF DOC. NO. 1 RECEIVED NYSCEF 11/03/2016 SUPREME COURT OF THE STATE OF NEW YORK COUNTY OF KINGS - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - -
More informationAFFIRMATION IN SUPPORT -against- : : ABEX CORPORATION, et al., : : Defendants. : : X
SUPREME COURT OF THE STATE OF NEW YORK APPELLATE DIVISION: FIRST DEPARTMENT -------------------------------------------------------X : RAYMOND FINERTY and : MARY FINERTY, : INDEX NO. 190187/10 : Plaintiffs,
More informationKahn v Garg 2016 NY Slip Op 31516(U) August 10, 2016 Supreme Court, New York County Docket Number: /2013 Judge: Jeffrey K.
Kahn v Garg 2016 NY Slip Op 31516(U) August 10, 2016 Supreme Court, New York County Docket Number: 652334/2013 Judge: Jeffrey K. Oing Cases posted with a "30000" identifier, i.e., 2013 NY Slip Op 30001(U),
More informationPlaintiffs, Defendants.
/8/2017 9:08 AM 25BOCA-GWFAX -> 18664415439 Page 2 of 10 STATE OF NEW YORK SUPREME COURT COUNTY OF ALBANY RlCHARD CHAMBERLAIN and MARTHA J. CRUM, Plaintiffs, DECISION AND ORDER -against- Index No.: RJI
More informationIN THE SUPREME COURT OF IOWA NO VINCENT ANGERER TRUST and DEWITT BANK & TRUST COMPANY, as Trustee of the Vincent Angerer Trust.
IN THE SUPREME COURT OF IOWA NO. 17-1964 ELECTRONICALLY FILED OCT 29, 2018 CLERK OF SUPREME COURT VINCENT ANGERER TRUST and DEWITT BANK & TRUST COMPANY, as Trustee of the Vincent Angerer Trust Appellants,
More informationRamanathan v Aharon 2010 NY Slip Op 32517(U) September 9, 2010 Supreme Court, Queens County Docket Number: 26744/2009 Judge: Timothy J.
Ramanathan v Aharon 2010 NY Slip Op 32517(U) September 9, 2010 Supreme Court, Queens County Docket Number: 26744/2009 Judge: Timothy J. Flaherty Republished from New York State Unified Court System's E-Courts
More informationIN THE CIRCUIT COURT OF CHILTON COUNTY, ALABAMA
IN THE CIRCUIT COURT OF CHILTON COUNTY, ALABAMA ROY BURNETT, on behalf of himself ) and a class of persons similarly ) situated, ) ) Plaintiff, ) ) v. ) CV 2016-900112 ) CHILTON COUNTY, a political ) subdivision
More informationState of New York Supreme Court, Appellate Division Third Judicial Department
State of New York Supreme Court, Appellate Division Third Judicial Department Decided and Entered: November 13, 2003 87765B In the Matter of MORAN TOWING CORPORATION, Petitioner, and EKLOF MARINE CORPORATION
More informationNO CV IN THE COURT OF APPEALS FIFTH JUDICIAL DISTRICT OF TEXAS DALLAS, TEXAS
ACCEPTED 225EFJ016538088 FIFTH COURT OF APPEALS DALLAS, TEXAS 11 October 11 P12:36 Lisa Matz CLERK NO. 05-11-01048-CV IN THE COURT OF APPEALS FIFTH JUDICIAL DISTRICT OF TEXAS DALLAS, TEXAS ROSSER B. MELTON,
More informationIN THE COURT OF COMMON PLEAS OF CARBON COUNTY, PENNSYLVANIA CIVIL DIVISION
IN THE COURT OF COMMON PLEAS OF CARBON COUNTY, PENNSYLVANIA CIVIL DIVISION IN RE: COUNTY OF CARBON TAX : CLAIM BUREAU JUDICIAL SALE OF : LAND IN THE COUNTY OF CARBON : No. 16-0984 FREE AND DISCHARGE FROM
More informationState of New York Supreme Court, Appellate Division Third Judicial Department
State of New York Supreme Court, Appellate Division Third Judicial Department Decided and Entered: June 23, 2005 95530 In the Matter of CS INTEGRATED, LLC, Petitioner, v MEMORANDUM AND JUDGMENT TAX APPEALS
More informationIN THE OREGON TAX COURT MAGISTRATE DIVISION Municipal Tax ) ) I. INTRODUCTION
IN THE OREGON TAX COURT MAGISTRATE DIVISION Municipal Tax JOHN A. BOGDANSKI, Plaintiff, v. CITY OF PORTLAND, State of Oregon, Defendant. TC-MD 130075C DECISION OF DISMISSAL I. INTRODUCTION This matter
More informationARBITRATION AWARD. Diana Usten. Esq from Baker Sanders, LLC participated in person for the Applicant
American Arbitration Association New York No-Fault Arbitration Tribunal In the Matter of the Arbitration between: ARS Medical PC (Applicant) - and - Liberty Mutual Insurance Company (Respondent) AAA Case
More informationFILED: NEW YORK COUNTY CLERK 07/06/2011 INDEX NO /2011 NYSCEF DOC. NO. 33 RECEIVED NYSCEF: 07/06/2011
FILED: NEW YORK COUNTY CLERK 07/06/2011 INDEX NO. 651786/2011 NYSCEF DOC. NO. 33 RECEIVED NYSCEF: 07/06/2011 SUPREME COURT OF THE STATE OF NEW YORK COUNTY OF NEW YORK In the matter of the application of
More informationState of New York Supreme Court, Appellate Division Third Judicial Department
State of New York Supreme Court, Appellate Division Third Judicial Department Decided and Entered: March 2, 2017 521531 In the Matter of JAY'S DISTRIBUTORS, INC., Petitioner, v MEMORANDUM AND JUDGMENT
More informationAbatements and Refunds
Abatements and Refunds Janeen Ogden Colorado Division of Property Taxation CCTA Conference Colorado Springs, Colorado June 29, 2010 1 Abatements & Refunds Definitions Need for Abatements History of Abatement
More informationFILED: NEW YORK COUNTY CLERK 04/09/ :33 PM INDEX NO /2015 NYSCEF DOC. NO. 1 RECEIVED NYSCEF: 04/09/2015
FILED: NEW YORK COUNTY CLERK 04/09/2015 12:33 PM INDEX NO. 153485/2015 NYSCEF DOC. NO. 1 RECEIVED NYSCEF: 04/09/2015 SUPREME COURT OF THE STATE OF NEW YORK COUNTY OF NEW YORK --------------------------------------------------------------------------x
More informationSTATE OF FLORIDA, DEPARTMENT OF REVENUE TALLAHASSEE, FLORIDA FINAL ORDER. This case is being considered based upon a
STATE OF FLORIDA, DEPARTMENT OF REVENUE TALLAHASSEE, FLORIDA FRANKLIN CODE HOUSE Petitioner, vs. CASE NO. DOR 94-8-FOF FLORIDA DEPARTMENT OF REVENUE, Respondent. FINAL ORDER This case is being considered
More informationCase 2:12-cv CCC-JAD Document 1 Filed 06/15/12 Page 1 of 14 PageID: 1 UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE DISTRICT OF NEW JERSEY
Case 2:12-cv-03628-CCC-JAD Document 1 Filed 06/15/12 Page 1 of 14 PageID: 1 UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE DISTRICT OF NEW JERSEY ANGELA ZBOROWSKI, on behalf of herself and all others similarly situated,
More informationChapter 11. Power Information Network, LLC ( PIN ), an affiliate of J.D. Power and Associates, and
GIBBONS P.C. One Gateway Center Newark, New Jersey 07102-5310 Telephone: (973) 596-4523 Facsimile: (973) 639-6244 E-mail: dcrapo@gibbonslaw.com David N. Crapo, Esq. Attorneys for J D. Power and Associates,
More informationTOWN OF BABYLON, IN THE COUNTY OF SUFFOLK, NEW YORK NOTICE OF $14,508,350* BOND SALE
TOWN OF BABYLON, IN THE COUNTY OF SUFFOLK, NEW YORK NOTICE OF $14,508,350* BOND SALE SEALED PROPOSALS will be received by the Supervisor (the Sale Officer ) of the Town of Babylon (the Town ), Suffolk
More informationAsciutto v New York City Empls. Retirement Sys NY Slip Op 30093(U) January 9, 2019 Supreme Court, Kings County Docket Number: /2018
Asciutto v New York City Empls. Retirement Sys. 2019 NY Slip Op 30093(U) January 9, 2019 Supreme Court, Kings County Docket Number: 511644/2018 Judge: Paul Wooten Cases posted with a "30000" identifier,
More informationState of New York Supreme Court, Appellate Division Third Judicial Department
State of New York Supreme Court, Appellate Division Third Judicial Department Decided and Entered: April 29, 2004 94814 In the Matter of MARGARET VAN HANEGHAN, Appellant, v MEMORANDUM AND ORDER NEW YORK
More informationBOARD OF TAX APPEALS STATE OF LOUISIANA
BOARD OF TAX APPEALS STATE OF LOUISIANA, B.T.A. DOCKET NO. Petitioner versus KIMBERLY L. ROBINSON, SECRETARY, DEPARTMENT OF REVENUE, STATE OF LOUISIANA Respondent PETITION TO REVIEW DENIAL OF REFUND/CREDIT
More informationFiling # E-Filed 06/15/ :03:27 PM
Filing # 73627233 E-Filed 06/15/2018 12:03:27 PM IN THE CIRCUIT COURT OF THE SECOND JUDICIAL CIRCUIT, IN AND FOR LEON COUNTY, FLORIDA ST. ROCH DESIGN DISTRICT, LLC, Plaintiff, Case No. v. FLORIDA DEPARTMENT
More informationCITY OF VIRGINIA BEACH OPINION BY JUSTICE LEROY R. HASSELL, SR. v. Record No April 19, 2002
Present: All the Justices CITY OF VIRGINIA BEACH OPINION BY JUSTICE LEROY R. HASSELL, SR. v. Record No. 011307 April 19, 2002 INTERNATIONAL FAMILY ENTERTAINMENT, INC. FROM THE CIRCUIT COURT OF THE CITY
More informationNo. ORDER APPROVING GUARDIAN S ACCOUNT FOR FINAL SETTLEMENT
No. IN RE: THE GUARDIANSHIP IN THE PROBATE COURT OF NUMBER TWO OF INCAPACITATED/MINOR TARRANT COUNTY, TEXAS ORDER APPROVING GUARDIAN S ACCOUNT FOR FINAL SETTLEMENT On this day the Guardian s Account for
More informationDate Received: Accepted by (initial): Case Number:
City of Safety Harbor Application For PETITION FOR REDUCTION OR WAIVER OF CODE ENFORCEMENT LIEN Date Received: Accepted by (initial): Case Number: All information fields must be completed before this application
More informationNON-PRECEDENTIAL DECISION - SEE SUPERIOR COURT I.O.P
NON-PRECEDENTIAL DECISION - SEE SUPERIOR COURT I.O.P. 65.37 SABR MORTGAGE LOAN 2008-1 SUBSIDIARY-1, LLC, C/O OCWEN LOAN SERVICING, LLC 1661 WORTHINGTON ROAD #100, WEST PALM BEACH, FL 33409 IN THE SUPERIOR
More informationCROWN FOREST INDUSTRIES LIMITED
The following version is for informational purposes only, for the official version see: http://www.courts.gov.bc.ca/ for Stated Cases see also: http://www.assessmentappeal.bc.ca/ for PAAB Decisions SC
More information2015 PA Super 96 OPINION BY JENKINS, J.: FILED APRIL 24, Appellant Kevin Wyatt appeals from the order of the Philadelphia
2015 PA Super 96 COMMONWEALTH OF PENNSYLVANIA Appellee IN THE SUPERIOR COURT OF PENNSYLVANIA v. KEVIN WYATT Appellant No. 2343 EDA 2014 Appeal from the PCRA Order July 21, 2014 In the Court of Common Pleas
More informationSupreme Court of the State of New York Second Department Appellate Term 9th and 10th Judicial Districts Appellate Term
Supreme Court of the State of New York Second Department Appellate Term 9th and 10th Judicial Districts Appellate Term THE PEOPLE OF THE STATE OF NEW YORK --Against-- Respondent, ERIC ROSENBAUM, Appellant.
More informationCase 1:17-cv MJW Document 5 Filed 03/03/17 USDC Colorado Page 1 of 10
Case 1:17-cv-00575-MJW Document 5 Filed 03/03/17 USDC Colorado Page 1 of 10 DISTRICT COURT, CITY AND COUNTY OF DENVER, COLORADO 1437 Bannock Street Denver, Colorado 80202 JULIE ANN MEADE, ADMINISTRATOR,
More informationARBITRATION AWARD. Steven Miranda from Law Offices of Gabriel & Shapiro, LLC. participated in person for the Applicant
American Arbitration Association New York No-Fault Arbitration Tribunal In the Matter of the Arbitration between: XYJ Acupuncture P.C. (Applicant) - and - Geico Insurance Company (Respondent) AAA Case
More informationIn the Matter of Index No /2014. Benjamin M. Lawsky, Superintendent of Financial Services of the State of New York
At IAS Part 57 of the Supreme Court of the State of New York, County of New York, at the courthouse located at 111 Centre Street, New York, New York, on the 20 th day of February, 2015. P R E S E N T:
More informationIN THE COURT OF APPEALS ELEVENTH APPELLATE DISTRICT LAKE COUNTY, OHIO. Civil Appeal from the Lake County Court of Common Pleas, Case No. 12 CV
[Cite as Great Lakes Crushing, Ltd. v. DeMarco, 2014-Ohio-4316.] IN THE COURT OF APPEALS ELEVENTH APPELLATE DISTRICT LAKE COUNTY, OHIO GREAT LAKES CRUSHING, LTD., : O P I N I O N Plaintiff-Appellant, :
More informationVOLUNTARY DISSOLUTION OF NOT-FOR-PROFIT CORPORATIONS WITH NO ASSETS
VOLUNTARY DISSOLUTION OF NOT-FOR-PROFIT CORPORATIONS WITH NO ASSETS Office of the New York State Attorney General Charities Bureau 28 Liberty Street New York, NY 10005 (212) 416-8400 www.charitiesnys.com
More informationPage 1 of 6 [*1] Citibank N.A. v McCray 2013 NY Slip Op 51931(U) Decided on November 22, 2013 Supreme Court, Bronx County González, J. Published by New York State Law Reporting Bureau pursuant to Judiciary
More informationSupreme Court of the State of New York Appellate Division: Second Judicial Department
Supreme Court of the State of New York Appellate Division: Second Judicial Department D54628 G/hu AD3d WILLIAM F. MASTRO, J.P. MARK C. DILLON JOHN M. LEVENTHAL CHERYL E. CHAMBERS ROBERT J. MILLER, JJ.
More informationApril 13, Dear Mr. Attorney General:
April 13, 2015 Honorable Eric H. Holder, Jr. Attorney General of the United States U.S. Department of Justice 950 Pennsylvania Avenue, NW Washington, DC 20530-0001 Dear Mr. Attorney General: As detailed
More informationIN THE SUPERIOR COURT OF THE STATE OF DELAWARE
IN THE SUPERIOR COURT OF THE STATE OF DELAWARE ) SOLERA HOLDINGS, INC., ) ) Plaintiff, ) ) v. ) C.A. No. (CCLD) ) XL SPECIALTY INSURANCE COMPANY, ) ACE AMERICAN INSURANCE COMPANY, ) TRIAL BY JURY OF ILLINOIS
More information386 October 25, 2017 No. 507 IN THE COURT OF APPEALS OF THE STATE OF OREGON
386 October 25, 2017 No. 507 IN THE COURT OF APPEALS OF THE STATE OF OREGON In the Matter of the Compensation of Steven Vaida, Claimant. Steven VAIDA, Petitioner Cross-Respondent, v. HOWELLS CUSTOM CABINETS,
More informationBEFORE THE DEPARTMENT OF FINANCIAL INSTITUTIONS DIVISION OF CONSUMER SERVICES PETITION FOR DECLARATORY ORDER
BEFORE THE DEPARTMENT OF FINANCIAL INSTITUTIONS DIVISION OF CONSUMER SERVICES In the Matter of ) ) PETITION Petition of the Electronic Transactions ) Association for a Declaratory Order ) PETITION FOR
More informationIN THE COMMONWEALTH COURT OF PENNSYLVANIA
IN THE COMMONWEALTH COURT OF PENNSYLVANIA Atlantic City Electric Company, : Keystone-Conemaugh Projects, : Baltimore Gas and Electric Company, : Delaware Power and Light Company, : Metropolitan Edison
More informationINTERACTIVE LEGAL UPDATE
INTERACTIVE LEGAL UPDATE Peter J. Crossett Barclay Damon LLP David Crapo Crapo Deeds Jonathan A. Block Pierce Atwood LLP Sarah M. Bradshaw Tax Division, Arkansas Public Service Commission Interactive Legal
More informationFILED IN THE SUPREME COURT OF THE STATE OF NEVADA. VILLAGE LEAGUE TO SAVE INCLINE No ASSETS, INC., A NEVADA NON PROFIT CORPORATION, ON BEHALF
VILLAGE LEAGUE TO SAVE INCLINE No. 43441 ASSETS, INC., A NON IN THE THE STATE PRIT CORPORATION, ON BEHALF Appellant, Judge. O1-O7O2 NEvwA FACTS DEPUTY CL&K (O)1947A 41D herself from participation in the
More informationSHORT FORM ORDER SUPREME COURT-NEW YORK STATE-NASSAU COUNTY PRESENT: HON. ANTHONY L. PARGA JUSTICE
--- --- ----- ----- - - ---- - --- - --- - -- ---- ----- - -- ---- - --- - - - - - - ----- - --- - --- - --- - ---- - ----- --- --- -- - ---- --- - - --- - )(...... SHORT FORM ORDER SUPREME COURT-NEW YORK
More informationSCAP IN THE SUPREME COURT OF THE STATE OF HAWAII
SCAP-16-0000462 Electronically Filed Supreme Court SCAP-16-0000462 12-OCT-2017 05:32 PM IN THE SUPREME COURT OF THE STATE OF HAWAII TAX FOUNDATION OF HAWAI`I, a Hawai`i non-profit corporation, on behalf
More information