Sham trusts, the High Court and "Putin's Banker"

Size: px
Start display at page:

Download "Sham trusts, the High Court and "Putin's Banker""

Transcription

1 JERSEY GUERNSEY LONDON BVI SINGAPORE GUERNSEY BRIEFING November 2017 Sham trusts, the High Court and "Putin's Banker" On 11 October 2017, the High Court released its latest judgment in the long running saga between Mezhprom Bank and its liquidator, the Deposit Insurance Agency (the "DIA"), and Russian businessman Mr Sergei Pugachev (also known as "Putin's banker"). "The key, as ever, is this: what is the true intention of all the relevant players at the time a trust is settled?" The case 1 concerned five discretionary New Zealand trusts, in respect of which the High Court had previously ordered Mr Pugachev to provide disclosure. In a decision which might initially be of concern to individuals and trustees with a connection to or looking to establish a trust in Guernsey, Mr Justice Birss, presiding, ruled that the assets held by the trusts should be available for enforcement (albeit he declined to order relief and adjourned the matter for further submissions). On the facts of this particular case, Birss J found that at all material times, Mr Pugachev: " regarded all the assets in these trusts as belonging to him and intended to retain ultimate control. The point of the trusts was not to cede control of his assets to someone else, it was to hide his control of them. In other words, Mr Pugachev intended to use the trusts as a pretence to mislead other people, by creating the appearance that the property did not belong to him when really it did" (paragraph 424). This has led some to worry about the susceptibility of offshore structures to onshore actions. Indeed, an article published in the Financial Times on Thursday 12 October 2017 declared that, "the ruling shows a decreasing tolerance in the High Court for 1 JSC Mezhdunarodniy Promyshlenniy Bank v Pugachev [2017] EWHC 2426 (Ch) opaque offshore accounts that put assets out of the reach of creditors". The reality, however, is that the sort of claims run successfully by the claimants in this case remain difficult to prove. The key, as ever, is this: what is the true intention of all the relevant players at the time a trust is settled? It is also worth bearing in mind that Guernsey, in common with other offshore jurisdictions, has "firewall" provisions in its Trusts Law which confer exclusive jurisdiction on the Royal Court of Guernsey over matters concerning Guernsey trusts. Accordingly, even if an English Court were to declare a Guernsey trust to be a sham, potentially this would be of limited impact. Overview Between 2011 and late 2013, whilst enquiries (and later proceedings) were ongoing in Russia, Mr Pugachev (for the most part via his son, Victor Pugachev) purported to settle assets worth over US $95 million into five discretionary New Zealand trusts, including properties in London, Russia and St Barts. Each of the trust deeds named Mr Pugachev as a discretionary beneficiary and a protector. Birss J, sitting at the High Court in London, ruled that Mr Pugachev was the true owner of the assets held by the New Zealand trusts (which had come to light during a disclosure exercise and in respect of which further

2 GUERNSEY BRIEFING 2 "The claimants argued that the beneficial interest in the assets held by all the trusts belonged to Mr Pugachev " disclosure was later ordered). The judge reached the conclusion that Mr Pugachev's intention in setting up the trusts "was to retain control of the assets but use them as a pretence to mislead third parties by hiding his control" (paragraph 456) and that the assets within the trusts should be available for enforcement. Background Mezhprom Bank was founded by Mr Pugachev in 1992 and entered into insolvent liquidation in late In December 2013, the DIA brought proceedings against Mr Pugachev for the misappropriation of assets prior to the bank's collapse and in April 2015 the Russian Court gave judgment against Mr Pugachev in the sum of around RUR 76 billion (equivalent to around US $1 billion). That judgment is now the subject of an appeal. By the time the High Court trial began on 4 July 2017, the claimants' lawyers had secured a 1.1 billion freezing order against Mr Pugachev's assets, and Mr Pugachev himself had been committed to two years' imprisonment for contempt of court (a sentence which he escaped as he had already left the country by the time the judgment was pronounced). Only Mr Pugachev's infant children (acting by their mother, Alexandra Tolstoy, as their litigation friend) defended the bank and the DIA's application. Apparently, the High Court has issued more than 170 orders relating to the DIA's litigation against Mr Pugachev to date. The issues The claimants argued that the beneficial interest in the assets held by all the trusts belonged to Mr Pugachev, notwithstanding that much of the money or other assets which ultimately went into the trusts was provided by Victor. They sought an order requiring the assets to be vested in the claimants or alternatively in such persons or a receiver as the court deemed fit. The claimants put their case on three bases: Firstly, that the trust deeds properly construed and on a proper application of the law, were not effective to divest Mr Pugachev of his beneficial ownership of the assets placed into the trusts. This is referred to in the judgment as the "True Effect of the Trusts" claim (albeit such arrangements are perhaps more commonly referred to as "illusory trusts"); Secondly, in the alternative to the True Effect of the Trusts claim, the trusts were "shams" because it was the intention of all the parties involved in the creation of the trusts that the assets should continue to belong to Mr Pugachev and therefore they had no effect; and Thirdly, in the alternative to the first two claims, the trusts should be set aside under section 423 of the UK Insolvency Act 1986 on the basis that the transfers of the assets into the trusts were carried out with the intention to prejudice the interests of Mr Pugachev's creditors, including the claimants. These claims were denied by Ms Tolstoy on behalf of her infant children. She (and her parents) gave evidence that Mr Pugachev had told her that the family properties had been bought and placed into trust for her and her children. Mr William Patterson, the New Zealand solicitor who drafted the trust deeds, denied that the trusts were shams and that they were under the complete control of Mr Pugachev. The court's findings Assets transferred by Victor Mr Justice Birss found that "for all these transfers Victor was acting entirely on the instruction of his father and that the beneficial ownership of each asset (money or shares) belonged to Mr Pugachev until the property was transferred into the trusts" (paragraph 205). He reached this conclusion on the basis that: there was no evidence that Victor had the means to generate this sort of wealth independently of his father; given the provisions of the trust deeds (some of which made no provision for Victor or his children) there was no plausible reason that Victor would wish to transfer his assets into the trusts and Victor acted in concert with his father and the associates in his father's family office in London in setting up the trusts, which Birss J considered provided some support for the inference that Victor was simply doing his father's bidding. The true effect of the trusts claim The trust deeds conferred wide powers on the Protector and required his consent in a wide variety of circumstances, including the trustees' power of distribution, investment and removal of a Discretionary Beneficiary. Under the trust deeds, the Protector could

3 GUERNSEY BRIEFING 3 "The Judge confirmed that the burden of establishing the section 423 claim was on the claimants " also remove the trustees "with or without cause" and to act on that removed trustee's behalf to vest the trust property in the new trustee. There were no provisions expressly fettering any of the Protector's powers. Birss J found (after careful consideration of the terms) that, on a true construction of the trust deeds, the powers conferred on Mr Pugachev as First Protector were personal powers (and therefore not fettered in any way, for instance by fiduciary obligations) "conferred to give the Protector the ability to act in his own best interests" (paragraph 267) and not in the interests of the Discretionary Beneficiaries as a class. He could, for instance, remove a trustee who refused to distribute trust assets to him and replace the trustee with someone who would. He reached this conclusion because of the extensive nature of the Protector's powers (particularly the power of removal of trustees "with or without cause") combined with the fact that Mr Pugachev, in addition to being the First Protector, was also the settlor of all the trust assets (albeit he was not named as such in the deeds themselves) and one of the named Discretionary Beneficiaries. Birss J held that provisions about Mr Pugachev's functions as Protector transferring to Victor should the Protector come "Under a Disability", which was defined as to include a disability by operation of law, supported the same conclusion. He found that what this provision did was to allow "Mr Pugachev's effective complete control of the trusts to cease to exist the moment he is compelled to do something he does not want to do, like hand over the assets to a creditor. It is an attempt to make the trust judgment proof and should not be accepted" (paragraph 275). In conclusion, the Judge found that "on their own terms these trusts do not divest Mr Pugachev of the beneficial ownership he had of the assets transferred into them. In substance the deeds allow Mr Pugachev to retain his beneficial ownership of the assets" (paragraph 278) and that they amounted to "a bare trust for Mr Pugachev" (paragraph 455). The sham claim In the event that his interpretation of the first claim was incorrect, Birss J ruled that the trusts were "shams and should not be given effect to" (paragraph 456). In arriving at this conclusion, the Judge considered that the evidence showed: Mr Pugachev is "not a person who would lightly relinquish control of anything", that he is "a person quite willing to lie and put forward false statements deliberately if it would suit his purpose" and that "The circumstances as a whole and Mr Pugachev's character support a credible inference that one of Mr Pugachev's purposes in transferring the property into these trusts was what is euphemistically called "asset protection", in other words to hide them from possible claims, facilitate a plausible denial of ownership, while retaining control in fact" (paragraph 298) Mr Pugachev's family by Ms Tolstoy benefitted from use of the assets in the trust but only on his say so and that it was "no part of Mr Pugachev's purpose to divest control in favour of his family as distinct from himself" (paragraph 425); and Mr Patterson simply did "Mr Pugachev's bidding" (paragraph 379) and that he had no intention independent of Mr Pugachev (and therefore shared, albeit recklessly, in his "shamming intention") (paragraphs ). The section 423 claim The Judge confirmed that the burden of establishing the section 423 claim was on the claimants and that the focus had to be on Mr Pugachev's purpose at the time of the transactions, which must have been to defeat creditors. J Birss stated that, had it been necessary to look into this claim in detail, he would have found that each of the transfers in setting up the trusts satisfied the test in section 423. He stated that this was because, even if the deeds did in fact divest Mr Pugachev of control, his intention was always to use the trusts to mislead other people, who might make a claim in the future. The Judge considered the increased pressure on Mr Pugachev in Russia from 2011 to be a relevant factor in this regard. Comment This case is an extreme example on its facts and it remains to be seen whether the High Court will be willing to declare that other, less controversial trusts (possibly not involving a Russian oligarch subject to a worldwide freezing order and committed to two years' imprisonment for contempt of court) are shams and should not be given effect to.

4 GUERNSEY BRIEFING 4 "...a stark and timely reminder...to look beyond the headlines prevailing in the press to see the reality of a judgment and its actual impact on day to day trust matters." Certainly, this judgment contains a useful restatement of the legal principles governing the concepts of "sham" and "illusory" trusts (the section 423 claim having been given relatively short thrift), as well as a useful examination of the scope and nature of a protector's powers and duties and the circumstances in which they may be considered fiduciary or personal in nature (which Birss J gave careful consideration to by reference to the terms of the trust deeds themselves and the circumstances surrounding them). It is also a stark and timely reminder not only of the sorts of issues trustees should be mindful of when creating and/or administering trusts, but also to look beyond the headlines prevailing in the press to see the reality of a judgment and its actual impact on day to day trust matters. In the meantime it is clear, to misquote Mark Twain, that reports of the death of the trust are greatly exaggerated. Continued on following page

5 GUERNSEY BRIEFING 5 For further information, please contact: Guernsey Alasdair Davidson Partner T +44 (0) E Rebecca Hale Associate T +44 (0) E 2017 Bedell Cristin The information contained in this briefing is intended to provide a brief update in relation to the topics covered. The information and opinions expressed in this briefing do not purport to be definitive or comprehensive and are not intended to provide legal advice and should not be acted or relied upon as doing so. Professional advice appropriate to the specific situation should always be obtained. No responsibility or liability is accepted in connection with the content of any websites to which you may gain access from this briefing.

Sham and Illusory Trusts - Back on the Agenda?

Sham and Illusory Trusts - Back on the Agenda? STEP Cayman 18 January 2018 Sham and Illusory Trusts - Back on the Agenda? Where are we after the English decision in Pugachev? Shân Warnock-Smith QC and Andrew De La Rosa ICT Chambers 1 Prince Hamlet?

More information

Bonnie Steiner Jur, Dr., LLM, TEP

Bonnie Steiner Jur, Dr., LLM, TEP J S C M E Z H D U N A R O D N I Y P R O M Y S H L E N N I Y & S T A T E C O R P O R A T I O N D E P O S I T I N S U R A N C E A G E N C Y V. S E R G E I V I K T O R O V I C H P U G A C H E V E T. AL [

More information

Protectors: are their powers fiduciary and does the court have power to intervene?

Protectors: are their powers fiduciary and does the court have power to intervene? JERSEY GUERNSEY LONDON BVI SINGAPORE JERSEY BRIEFING March 2016 Protectors: are their powers fiduciary and does the court have power to intervene? This briefing formed the basis of a presentation delivered

More information

CYPRUS: INTERNATIONAL TRUSTS

CYPRUS: INTERNATIONAL TRUSTS CYPRUS: INTERNATIONAL TRUSTS 2013 LEDRA HOUSE 15 Ayiou Pavlou Street, Ayios Andreas 1105 Nicosia, Cyprus MAILING ADDRESS: P.O. Box 24444, 1703 Nicosia, Cyprus Tel: +357 22 556677 Fax: +357 22 556688 www.vasslaw.com

More information

Date : 7 th November, 2017

Date : 7 th November, 2017 Article : Recent unappealed judicial authority on what is a "Sham Trust": a correlation with the forthcoming assault by Tax administrations on trusts via the OECD CRS information on Protectorships Date

More information

Guernsey trusts. GUERNSEY BRIEFING June 2013

Guernsey trusts. GUERNSEY BRIEFING June 2013 JERSEY GUERNSEY LONDON BVI SINGAPORE GUERNSEY BRIEFING June 2013 Guernsey trusts A "trust" is a legal arrangement which exists in many jurisdictions when one person (a "trustee") owns assets not for his

More information

GUIDE TO TRUSTS IN MAURITIUS

GUIDE TO TRUSTS IN MAURITIUS GUIDE TO TRUSTS IN MAURITIUS CONTENTS PREFACE 1 1. Introduction 2 2. What is a Trust? 2 3. Settlors 2 4. Beneficiaries 3 5. Why a Mauritius Trust? 3 6. Creating a Trust 3 7. Trust Duration 4 8. Trustees

More information

Beneficiaries' rights to trust information in the light of Schmidt v Rosewood Trust Limited

Beneficiaries' rights to trust information in the light of Schmidt v Rosewood Trust Limited JERSEY GUERNSEY LONDON BVI SINGAPORE JERSEY BRIEFING February 2004 Beneficiaries' rights to trust information in the light of Schmidt v Rosewood Trust Limited The decision of the Privy Council in Schmidt

More information

A Trustee s top three part three

A Trustee s top three part three BERMUDA BRITISH VIRGIN ISLANDS CAYMAN ISLANDS CYPRUS DUBAI HONG KONG LONDON MAURITIUS MOSCOW SÃO PAULO SINGAPORE conyersdill.com June 2011 A Trustee s top three part three In the first two parts of this

More information

ALL THAT IS NOT GIVEN IS LOST GIFTS TO TRUSTEES AND UNDERLYING COMPANIES

ALL THAT IS NOT GIVEN IS LOST GIFTS TO TRUSTEES AND UNDERLYING COMPANIES ALL THAT IS NOT GIVEN IS LOST GIFTS TO TRUSTEES AND UNDERLYING COMPANIES YVETTE A. WALLACE PROBLEMS WITH GIFTS TO TRUSTEES AND UNDERLYING COMPANIES Petrodel v Prest the problems which can arise when gifts

More information

1. The English Court s power to vary a settlement is found in section 24(1)(c) Matrimonial Causes Act 1973:

1. The English Court s power to vary a settlement is found in section 24(1)(c) Matrimonial Causes Act 1973: Chancery Bar Association Conference 2016 Offshore Trusts and English Divorces Notes Nuptial Settlement 1. The English Court s power to vary a settlement is found in section 24(1)(c) Matrimonial Causes

More information

The sins of the father Yearwood v Yearwood

The sins of the father Yearwood v Yearwood The sins of the father Yearwood v Yearwood June 2011 It is becoming increasingly common for parties to matrimonial litigation to seek cross border recognition and/or enforcement of financial orders. An

More information

THE IMMIGRATION ACTS. Heard at Field House Decision & Reasons Promulgated On 19 October 2018 On 13 November Before

THE IMMIGRATION ACTS. Heard at Field House Decision & Reasons Promulgated On 19 October 2018 On 13 November Before Upper Tribunal (Immigration and Asylum Chamber) THE IMMIGRATION ACTS Heard at Field House Decision & Reasons Promulgated On 19 October 2018 On 13 November 2018 Before DEPUTY UPPER TRIBUNAL JUDGE ESHUN

More information

ASYLUM AND IMMIGRATION TRIBUNAL

ASYLUM AND IMMIGRATION TRIBUNAL RS and SS (Exclusion of appellant from hearing) Pakistan [2008] UKAIT 00012 ASYLUM AND IMMIGRATION TRIBUNAL THE IMMIGRATION ACTS Heard at: Field House Date of Hearing: 18 December 2007 Before: Mr C M G

More information

Statement of Practice on penalties for incorrect returns

Statement of Practice on penalties for incorrect returns Statement of Practice on penalties for incorrect returns States of Guernsey Income Tax PO Box 37 St Peter Port Guernsey GY1 3AZ Telephone: (01481) 724711 Facsimile: (01481) 713911 E-mail: taxenquiries@gov.gg

More information

WESLEY BORK JR. And THE TAMARIND CLUB II LIMITED

WESLEY BORK JR. And THE TAMARIND CLUB II LIMITED BRITISH VIRGIN ISLANDS EASTERN CARIBBEAN SUPREME COURT IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUSTICE CLAIM NO: BVIHCV 245/2009 IN THE MATTER OF THE INSOLVENCY ACT 2003 AND IN THE MATTER OF THE TAMARIND CLUB II LIMITED

More information

Offshore trusts. Publication - 20/04/2016

Offshore trusts. Publication - 20/04/2016 Offshore trusts Publication - 20/04/2016 INTRODUCTION This briefing is intended to provide a general overview of some of the factors to be considered by clients and their advisers in the establishment

More information

British Virgin Islands private trust companies

British Virgin Islands private trust companies British Virgin Islands private trust companies Service area Trusts and Private Wealth Location British Virgin Islands Date March 2017 Introduction Private trust companies ( PTCs ) are widely used in international

More information

Rawofi (age assessment standard of proof) [2012] UKUT 00197(IAC) THE IMMIGRATION ACTS. Before UPPER TRIBUNAL JUDGE WARR. Between SAIFULLAH RAWOFI.

Rawofi (age assessment standard of proof) [2012] UKUT 00197(IAC) THE IMMIGRATION ACTS. Before UPPER TRIBUNAL JUDGE WARR. Between SAIFULLAH RAWOFI. Upper Tribunal (Immigration and Asylum Chamber) Rawofi (age assessment standard of proof) [2012] UKUT 00197(IAC) THE IMMIGRATION ACTS Before LORD JUSTICE McFARLANE UPPER TRIBUNAL JUDGE WARR Between Given

More information

IN RE HAMPDEN SETTLEMENT TRUSTS [1977] T.R. 177 JUDGMENT

IN RE HAMPDEN SETTLEMENT TRUSTS [1977] T.R. 177 JUDGMENT IN RE HAMPDEN SETTLEMENT TRUSTS [1977] T.R. 177 JUDGMENT MR. JUSTICE WALTON: The originating summons in this matter raises a short but difficult question. It is that it may be determined whether upon the

More information

Cayman Islands Role of the Trust Protector

Cayman Islands Role of the Trust Protector Cayman Islands Role of the Trust Protector What is a protector? Many trusts are now established which contain provisions appointing a protector. The office of protector has no statutory background and

More information

THE IMMIGRATION ACTS. Before THE HONOURABLE MRS JUSTICE PATTERSON DEPUTY UPPER TRIBUNAL JUDGE J G MACDONALD. Between. and

THE IMMIGRATION ACTS. Before THE HONOURABLE MRS JUSTICE PATTERSON DEPUTY UPPER TRIBUNAL JUDGE J G MACDONALD. Between. and Upper Tribunal (Immigration and Asylum Chamber) THE IMMIGRATION ACTS Heard at Field House Determination Promulgated On 4 th February 2015 On 17 th February 2015 Before THE HONOURABLE MRS JUSTICE PATTERSON

More information

THE IMMIGRATION ACTS. Promulgated On 19 May 2015 On 17 June Before DEPUTY JUDGE OF THE UPPER TRIBUNAL MURRAY. Between

THE IMMIGRATION ACTS. Promulgated On 19 May 2015 On 17 June Before DEPUTY JUDGE OF THE UPPER TRIBUNAL MURRAY. Between Upper Tribunal (Immigration and Asylum Chamber) THE IMMIGRATION ACTS Heard at Field House Determination Promulgated On 19 May 2015 On 17 June 2015 Before DEPUTY JUDGE OF THE UPPER TRIBUNAL MURRAY Between

More information

THE IMMIGRATION ACTS. Promulgated On 19 April 2016 On 19 May Before DEPUTY UPPER TRIBUNAL JUDGE NORTON-TAYLOR. Between. and

THE IMMIGRATION ACTS. Promulgated On 19 April 2016 On 19 May Before DEPUTY UPPER TRIBUNAL JUDGE NORTON-TAYLOR. Between. and Upper Tribunal (Immigration and Asylum Chamber) Appeal Numbers: IA/05732/2015 IA/05912/2015 THE IMMIGRATION ACTS Heard at Field House Decision & Reasons Promulgated On 19 April 2016 On 19 May 2016 Before

More information

HEARING DISCIPLINARY COMMITTEE OF THE ASSOCIATION OF CHARTERED CERTIFIED ACCOUNTANTS

HEARING DISCIPLINARY COMMITTEE OF THE ASSOCIATION OF CHARTERED CERTIFIED ACCOUNTANTS DISCIPLINARY COMMITTEE OF THE ASSOCIATION OF CHARTERED CERTIFIED ACCOUNTANTS REASONS FOR DECISION In the matter of: Mr Jawad Raza Heard on: Thursday 7 and Friday 8 June 2018 Location: ACCA Head Offices,

More information

A purposive approach to the rule against foreign revenue enforcement. International Corporate Rescue 2010, 7(2),

A purposive approach to the rule against foreign revenue enforcement. International Corporate Rescue 2010, 7(2), A purposive approach to the rule against foreign revenue enforcement International Corporate Rescue 2010, 7(2), 137-139 Joseph Curl The rule against foreign revenue enforcement The principle that the courts

More information

Upper Tribunal (Immigration and Asylum Chamber) PA/03023/2017 THE IMMIGRATION ACTS

Upper Tribunal (Immigration and Asylum Chamber) PA/03023/2017 THE IMMIGRATION ACTS Upper Tribunal (Immigration and Asylum Chamber) PA/03023/2017 Appeal Number: THE IMMIGRATION ACTS Heard at Royal Court Justice Decision & Reasons Promulgated On 3 rd July 2017 On 5 th July 2017 Before

More information

REVENUE COMMISSIONERS DETERMINATION

REVENUE COMMISSIONERS DETERMINATION AC Ref: 18TACD2017 BETWEEN NAME REDACTED V REVENUE COMMISSIONERS DETERMINATION Appellant Respondent Introduction 1. This appeal concerns the application of the standard rate of tax in accordance with Taxes

More information

Before : MR JUSTICE MORGAN Between : - and - THE ROYAL LONDON MUTUAL INSURANCE SOCIETY LIMITED

Before : MR JUSTICE MORGAN Between : - and - THE ROYAL LONDON MUTUAL INSURANCE SOCIETY LIMITED Neutral Citation Number: [2016] EWHC 319 (Ch) IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUSTICE CHANCERY DIVISION Case No: CH/2015/0377 Royal Courts of Justice Rolls Building, Fetter Lane, London, EC4A1NLL Before : MR JUSTICE

More information

THE IMMIGRATION ACTS. Heard at Field House Decision & Reasons Promulgated On 16 June 2017 On 6 July Before DEPUTY UPPER TRIBUNAL JUDGE CHAPMAN

THE IMMIGRATION ACTS. Heard at Field House Decision & Reasons Promulgated On 16 June 2017 On 6 July Before DEPUTY UPPER TRIBUNAL JUDGE CHAPMAN Upper Tribunal (Immigration and Asylum Chamber) Appeal Number: IA/30759/2015 THE IMMIGRATION ACTS Heard at Field House Decision & Reasons Promulgated On 16 June 2017 On 6 July 2017 Before DEPUTY UPPER

More information

THE IMMIGRATION ACTS. Before UPPER TRIBUNAL JUDGE HEMINGWAY. Between ENTRY CLEARANCE OFFICER. and

THE IMMIGRATION ACTS. Before UPPER TRIBUNAL JUDGE HEMINGWAY. Between ENTRY CLEARANCE OFFICER. and IAC-AH-SAR-V1 Upper Tribunal (Immigration and Asylum Chamber) THE IMMIGRATION ACTS Heard at Bradford Decision & Reasons Promulgated On 27 th October 2015 On 6 th November 2015 Before UPPER TRIBUNAL JUDGE

More information

THE IMMIGRATION ACTS. Heard at Columbus House, Newport Sent to parties on: On 3 April 2017 On 23 May Before DEPUTY UPPER TRIBUNAL JUDGE L MURRAY

THE IMMIGRATION ACTS. Heard at Columbus House, Newport Sent to parties on: On 3 April 2017 On 23 May Before DEPUTY UPPER TRIBUNAL JUDGE L MURRAY Upper Tribunal (Immigration and Asylum Chamber) Appeal Number: AA/06052/2014 THE IMMIGRATION ACTS Heard at Columbus House, Newport Sent to parties on: On 3 April 2017 On 23 May 2017 Before DEPUTY UPPER

More information

THE IMMIGRATION ACTS. Heard at Field House Decision & Reasons Promulgated On 26 th February 2016 On 19 th April Before

THE IMMIGRATION ACTS. Heard at Field House Decision & Reasons Promulgated On 26 th February 2016 On 19 th April Before IAC-AH-DP-V2 Upper Tribunal (Immigration and Asylum Chamber) THE IMMIGRATION ACTS Heard at Field House Decision & Reasons Promulgated On 26 th February 2016 On 19 th April 2016 Before DEPUTY UPPER TRIBUNAL

More information

Topic 1 Basics of Trusts. Introduction

Topic 1 Basics of Trusts. Introduction Topic 1 Basics of Trusts Introduction A trust is a legal instrument that is perhaps one of the most important instruments in law. Trusts derive their history almost entirely from equity and it is equity

More information

ALBON ENGINEERING AND MANUFACTURING LIMITED. - and - Sitting in public at the Royal Courts of Justice, Strand, London WC2A 2LL on 16 June 2017

ALBON ENGINEERING AND MANUFACTURING LIMITED. - and - Sitting in public at the Royal Courts of Justice, Strand, London WC2A 2LL on 16 June 2017 [17] UKFTT 60 (TC) TC06002 Appeal number:tc/14/01804 PROCEDURE costs complex case whether appellant opted out of liability for costs within 28 days of receiving notice of allocation as a complex case date

More information

How Discretionary Trusts Work

How Discretionary Trusts Work How Discretionary Trusts Work Information here may help you as a guide to provide general overview of operation of a discretionary trust and explain the commercial advantages and disadvantages of conducting

More information

ASSET PROTECTION: NUPTIAL SETTLEMENTS AND CLAIMS AGAINST TRUSTS. Richard Wilson

ASSET PROTECTION: NUPTIAL SETTLEMENTS AND CLAIMS AGAINST TRUSTS. Richard Wilson ASSET PROTECTION: NUPTIAL SETTLEMENTS AND CLAIMS AGAINST TRUSTS Richard Wilson 1. Introduction 1.1 Parties to litigation frequently encounter situations in which the opposing party claims to have no assets

More information

IN THE COURT OF APPEAL OF BELIZE, A.D. 2006

IN THE COURT OF APPEAL OF BELIZE, A.D. 2006 IN THE COURT OF APPEAL OF BELIZE, A.D. 2006 CRIMINAL APPEAL NO. 5 OF 2006 BETWEEN: LAURIANO RAMIREZ Appellant AND THE QUEEN Respondent BEFORE: The Hon. Mr. Justice Mottley President The Hon. Mr. Justice

More information

FROM THE CIRCUIT COURT OF THE CITY OF RICHMOND Melvin R. Hughes, Jr., Judge. This appeal is from an order removing George B.

FROM THE CIRCUIT COURT OF THE CITY OF RICHMOND Melvin R. Hughes, Jr., Judge. This appeal is from an order removing George B. Present: All the Justices GEORGE B. LITTLE, TRUSTEE OPINION BY v. Record No. 941475 CHIEF JUSTICE HARRY L. CARRICO June 9, 1995 WILLIAM S. WARD, JR., ET AL. FROM THE CIRCUIT COURT OF THE CITY OF RICHMOND

More information

STEP Bahamas. 11 th October The tax treatment of trusts in Continental Europe: Belgium, France, Germany, Italy, the Netherlands and Switzerland

STEP Bahamas. 11 th October The tax treatment of trusts in Continental Europe: Belgium, France, Germany, Italy, the Netherlands and Switzerland STEP Bahamas 11 th October 2005 The tax treatment of trusts in Continental Europe: Belgium, France, Germany, Italy, the Netherlands and Switzerland Jean-Marc Tirard and Maryse Naudin Tirard, Naudin Paris

More information

Upper Tribunal (Immigration and Asylum Chamber) IA/42299/2013 THE IMMIGRATION ACTS. Promulgated On 10 February 2016 On 29 February 2016.

Upper Tribunal (Immigration and Asylum Chamber) IA/42299/2013 THE IMMIGRATION ACTS. Promulgated On 10 February 2016 On 29 February 2016. Upper Tribunal (Immigration and Asylum Chamber) IA/42299/2013 Appeal Number: THE IMMIGRATION ACTS Heard at Field House Decision & Reasons Promulgated On 10 February 2016 On 29 February 2016 Before DEPUTY

More information

IN THE COURT OF APPEAL BETWEEN BISSONDAYE SAMAROO AND

IN THE COURT OF APPEAL BETWEEN BISSONDAYE SAMAROO AND TRINIDAD AND TOBAGO IN THE COURT OF APPEAL Civil Appeal No: 164 of 2008 BETWEEN BISSONDAYE SAMAROO Appellant AND 1. AZIZOOL MOHAMMED 2. KHALIED MOHAMMED ALSO CALLED KHALID MOHAMMED 3. FAZILA MOHAMMED 4.

More information

STEP response to the consultation on the tax rules governing distributions by a company, published 9 December 2015

STEP response to the consultation on the tax rules governing distributions by a company, published 9 December 2015 STEP response to the consultation on the tax rules governing distributions by a company, published 9 December 2015 STEP is the worldwide professional association for those advising families across generations.

More information

CONCERNING CONCERNING BETWEEN. HH and II. The names and identifying details of the parties in this decision have been changed.

CONCERNING CONCERNING BETWEEN. HH and II. The names and identifying details of the parties in this decision have been changed. LCRO 247/2014 CONCERNING an application for review pursuant to section 193 of the Lawyers and Conveyancers Act 2006 AND CONCERNING BETWEEN a determination of the [Area] Standards Committee [X] GG Applicants

More information

Upper Tribunal (Immigration and Asylum Chamber) IA/02277/2014 THE IMMIGRATION ACTS. Promulgated On 2 September 2014 On 19 th January 2015.

Upper Tribunal (Immigration and Asylum Chamber) IA/02277/2014 THE IMMIGRATION ACTS. Promulgated On 2 September 2014 On 19 th January 2015. Upper Tribunal (Immigration and Asylum Chamber) Appeal Number: IA/02277/2014 THE IMMIGRATION ACTS Heard at Field House Determination Promulgated On 2 September 2014 On 19 th January 2015 Before Deputy

More information

Ombudsman s Determination

Ombudsman s Determination Ombudsman s Determination Applicant Scheme Respondents Mr T FP1 Retirement Plan (the Plan) Fast Pensions Limited (FP), FP Scheme Trustees Limited (the Trustee) Outcome 1. Mr T s complaint is upheld, and

More information

NAME REDACTED REVENUE COMMISSIONERS DETERMINATION

NAME REDACTED REVENUE COMMISSIONERS DETERMINATION AC Ref: 17TACD2017 BETWEEN NAME REDACTED V REVENUE COMMISSIONERS Appellant Respondent DETERMINATION Introduction 1. This appeal concerns the entitlement to the employee tax credit pursuant to Taxes Consolidation

More information

Before : MR JUSTICE FANCOURT Between :

Before : MR JUSTICE FANCOURT Between : Neutral Citation Number: [2018] EWHC 48 (Ch) Case No: CH-2017-000105 IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUSTICE BUSINESS AND PROPERY COURTS OF ENGLAND AND WALES CHANCERY APPEALS (ChD) ON APPEAL FROM THE COUNTY COURT

More information

GUIDE TO FAMILY TRUSTS

GUIDE TO FAMILY TRUSTS GUIDE TO FAMILY TRUSTS GUIDE TO FAMILY TRUSTS This memorandum helps explain the commercial advantages and disadvantages of conducting an investment or a business through a family trust. The various planning

More information

LEVEL 6 - UNIT 21 PROBATE PRACTICE SUGGESTED ANSWERS - JANUARY 2012

LEVEL 6 - UNIT 21 PROBATE PRACTICE SUGGESTED ANSWERS - JANUARY 2012 Note to Candidates and Tutors: LEVEL 6 - UNIT 21 PROBATE PRACTICE SUGGESTED ANSWERS - JANUARY 2012 The purpose of the suggested answers is to provide students and tutors with guidance as to the key points

More information

Upper Tribunal (Immigration and Asylum Chamber) HU/08884/2017 THE IMMIGRATION ACTS

Upper Tribunal (Immigration and Asylum Chamber) HU/08884/2017 THE IMMIGRATION ACTS Upper Tribunal (Immigration and Asylum Chamber) HU/08884/2017 Appeal Number: THE IMMIGRATION ACTS Heard at Royal Courts of Justice Decision & Reasons Promulgated On 18 December 2017 On 11 January 2018

More information

Before: HIS HONOUR JUDGE SMITH MR ANTHONY SMITH. -v- EXCEL PARKING SERVICES LIMITED. Lay Representative for the Appellant: Counsel for the Respondent:

Before: HIS HONOUR JUDGE SMITH MR ANTHONY SMITH. -v- EXCEL PARKING SERVICES LIMITED. Lay Representative for the Appellant: Counsel for the Respondent: IN OUNTY OURT AT MANSTR laim No. 0P94/M17X062 Manchester ounty ourt and amily ourt earing entre 1 ridge Street West Manchester M60 9J Thursday, 8 th June 2017 efore: IS ONOUR JU SMIT etween: ANTONY SMIT

More information

DISCIPLINARY COMMITTEE OF THE ASSOCIATION OF CHARTERED CERTIFIED ACCOUNTANTS

DISCIPLINARY COMMITTEE OF THE ASSOCIATION OF CHARTERED CERTIFIED ACCOUNTANTS DISCIPLINARY COMMITTEE OF THE ASSOCIATION OF CHARTERED CERTIFIED ACCOUNTANTS REASONS FOR DECISION In the matter of: Stephen Jeremy Bache Heard on: 27 July 2015 Location: Committee: Legal Adviser: Persons

More information

Subject to being issued as a final ruling, Draft TR 2017/D10 arguably resolves many of the uncertainties surrounding trust vesting.

Subject to being issued as a final ruling, Draft TR 2017/D10 arguably resolves many of the uncertainties surrounding trust vesting. Tax Office plays secret Santa as the long awaited guidance on trust vesting gets released - by Matthew Burgess and Patrick Ellwood, Directors, View Legal As it seems is tradition, the Tax Office has delivered

More information

An Analysis of the Concepts of 'Present Entitlement'

An Analysis of the Concepts of 'Present Entitlement' Revenue Law Journal Volume 13 Issue 1 Article 9 January 2003 An Analysis of the Concepts of 'Present Entitlement' Anna Everett Bond University Follow this and additional works at: http://epublications.bond.edu.au/rlj

More information

James Corbett QC. built rapport and gained the confidence and trust. of the parties very quickly. Overview

James Corbett QC. built rapport and gained the confidence and trust. of the parties very quickly. Overview CEDR Accreditation: CEDR Panel Member Since: 2000 2002 Languages: Location: English Grand Cayman built rapport and gained the confidence and trust James Corbett QC of the parties very quickly. Mediation

More information

Reference Guide TESTAMENTARY TRUSTS

Reference Guide TESTAMENTARY TRUSTS Reference Guide TESTAMENTARY TRUSTS While most people have heard about trusts, many do not really know what they are or what benefits they offer and often incorrectly believe that trusts are only for wealthy

More information

British Virgin Islands Trusts

British Virgin Islands Trusts British Virgin Islands Trusts Preface This Publication has been prepared for the assistance of those who are considering the formation of trusts in the British Virgin Islands ( BVI ). It is not intended

More information

THE IMMIGRATION ACTS. On 30 March 2015 On 15 April Before DEPUTY UPPER TRIBUNAL JUDGE BIRRELL. Between

THE IMMIGRATION ACTS. On 30 March 2015 On 15 April Before DEPUTY UPPER TRIBUNAL JUDGE BIRRELL. Between Upper Tribunal (Immigration and Asylum Chamber) THE IMMIGRATION ACTS Heard at Manchester Piccadilly Decision Promulgated On 30 March 2015 On 15 April 2015 Before DEPUTY UPPER TRIBUNAL JUDGE BIRRELL Between

More information

Upper Tribunal (Immigration and Asylum Chamber) PA/06808/2016 THE IMMIGRATION ACTS

Upper Tribunal (Immigration and Asylum Chamber) PA/06808/2016 THE IMMIGRATION ACTS Upper Tribunal (Immigration and Asylum Chamber) PA/06808/2016 Appeal Number: THE IMMIGRATION ACTS Heard at Newport Decision & Reasons Promulgated On 22 August 2017 On 7 September 2017 Before UPPER TRIBUNAL

More information

THE IMMIGRATION ACTS. Before UPPER TRIBUNAL JUDGE WARR. Between I L (ANONYMITY DIRECTION MADE) and THE SECRETARY OF STATE FOR THE HOME DEPARTMENT

THE IMMIGRATION ACTS. Before UPPER TRIBUNAL JUDGE WARR. Between I L (ANONYMITY DIRECTION MADE) and THE SECRETARY OF STATE FOR THE HOME DEPARTMENT Upper Tribunal (Immigration and Asylum Chamber) Appeal Number: AA/12026/2015 THE IMMIGRATION ACTS Heard at Field House Decision & Reasons Promulgated On 24 May 2016 On 1 June 2016 Before UPPER TRIBUNAL

More information

Upper Tribunal (Immigration and Asylum Chamber) PA/08153/2017 THE IMMIGRATION ACTS

Upper Tribunal (Immigration and Asylum Chamber) PA/08153/2017 THE IMMIGRATION ACTS Upper Tribunal (Immigration and Asylum Chamber) PA/08153/2017 Appeal Number: THE IMMIGRATION ACTS Heard at Field House Decision & Reasons Promulgated On 15 March 2018 On 11 May 2018 Before DEPUTY UPPER

More information

IN THE HIGH COURT OF THE HONG KONG SPECIAL ADMINISTRATIVE REGION COURT OF FIRST INSTANCE MISCELLANEOUS PROCEEDINGS NO.

IN THE HIGH COURT OF THE HONG KONG SPECIAL ADMINISTRATIVE REGION COURT OF FIRST INSTANCE MISCELLANEOUS PROCEEDINGS NO. HCMP1850/2009 IN THE HIGH COURT OF THE HONG KONG SPECIAL ADMINISTRATIVE REGION COURT OF FIRST INSTANCE MISCELLANEOUS PROCEEDINGS NO. 1850 OF 2009 ------------------------------ IN THE MATTER of the Estate

More information

Before: MR JUSTICE MORGAN Between: - and -

Before: MR JUSTICE MORGAN Between: - and - Neutral Citation Number: [2017] EWHC 2691 (Ch) IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUSTICE CHANCERY DIVISION Case No: CH-2017-000070 Royal Courts of Justice Rolls Building, Fetter Lane, London, EC4A 1NL Before: MR JUSTICE

More information

EASTEND HOMES LIMITED. - and - (1) AFTAJAN BIBI (2) MAHANARA BEGUM JUDGMENT. Dates: 24 August 2017

EASTEND HOMES LIMITED. - and - (1) AFTAJAN BIBI (2) MAHANARA BEGUM JUDGMENT. Dates: 24 August 2017 Claim No. B00EC907 In the County Court at Central London On Appeal from District Judge Sterlini Sitting at Clerkenwell & Shoreditch His Honour Judge Parfitt EASTEND HOMES LIMITED Appellant - and - (1)

More information

Retirement Annuity Contracts (Section 226) Buy-Out Plans (Section 32)

Retirement Annuity Contracts (Section 226) Buy-Out Plans (Section 32) Retirement Annuity Contracts (Section 226) Buy-Out Plans (Section 32) Declaration of trust Guidance notes These notes are designed to explain the consequences of completing the Declaration of trust ( the

More information

LIMITED LIABILITY PARTNERSHIPS (JERSEY) LAW 1997

LIMITED LIABILITY PARTNERSHIPS (JERSEY) LAW 1997 LIMITED LIABILITY PARTNERSHIPS (JERSEY) LAW 1997 Revised Edition Showing the law as at 1 January 2017 This is a revised edition of the law Limited Liability Partnerships (Jersey) Law 1997 Arrangement

More information

GUIDANCE NOTE. Know Your Debtor Types of Debtor Under English Law. August 2014

GUIDANCE NOTE. Know Your Debtor Types of Debtor Under English Law. August 2014 GUIDANCE NOTE Know Your Debtor Types of Debtor Under English Law August 2014 Background This Guidance Note is aimed at overseas lawyers and their clients. Its purpose is to set out the types of debtor

More information

SOUTH GAUTENG HIGH COURT, JOHANNESBURG

SOUTH GAUTENG HIGH COURT, JOHANNESBURG SAFLII Note: Certain personal/private details of parties or witnesses have been redacted from this document in compliance with the law and SAFLII Policy REPUBLIC OF SOUTH AFRICA SOUTH GAUTENG HIGH COURT,

More information

The names and identifying details of the parties in this decision have been changed.

The names and identifying details of the parties in this decision have been changed. LCRO 142/2014 & 160/2014 CONCERNING applications for review pursuant to section 193 of the Lawyers and Conveyancers Act 2006 AND CONCERNING a determination of Standards Committee BETWEEN VL Applicant (and

More information

THE IMMIGRATION ACT. Heard at Field House Decision & Reasons Promulgated On 8 th February 2018 On 23 rd February Before

THE IMMIGRATION ACT. Heard at Field House Decision & Reasons Promulgated On 8 th February 2018 On 23 rd February Before Upper Tribunal (Immigration and Asylum Chamber) Appeal Number: THE IMMIGRATION ACT Heard at Field House Decision & Reasons Promulgated On 8 th February 2018 On 23 rd February 2018 Before DEPUTY UPPER TRIBUNAL

More information

The Insolvency (England and Wales) Rules 2016

The Insolvency (England and Wales) Rules 2016 UPDATE December 2016 Welcome to the CRI Insolvency Law Update, a summary of recent judgments and insolvency related reports and news items which we hope you will find of interest The Insolvency (England

More information

What is a trust?

What is a trust? What is a trust? 02 Trusts have been used by families for centuries. A trust is a mechanism whereby one person (the settlor ) may give away the enjoyment of assets to a group of individuals (the beneficiaries

More information

This publication is written as a general guide only. It is not intended to contain definitive legal There are many different names and types of trust. This article attempts to give a very brief synopsis

More information

THE IMMIGRATION ACTS. On 14 August 2015 On 19 August Before DEPUTY UPPER TRIBUNAL JUDGE FROOM. Between S E Y (ANONYMITY DIRECTION MADE) and

THE IMMIGRATION ACTS. On 14 August 2015 On 19 August Before DEPUTY UPPER TRIBUNAL JUDGE FROOM. Between S E Y (ANONYMITY DIRECTION MADE) and Upper Tribunal (Immigration and Asylum Chamber) THE IMMIGRATION ACTS Heard at Field House Decision Promulgated On 14 August 2015 On 19 August 2015 Before DEPUTY UPPER TRIBUNAL JUDGE FROOM Between S E Y

More information

Challenging ATE Premiums. Andrew Hogan

Challenging ATE Premiums. Andrew Hogan Challenging ATE Premiums Andrew Hogan One of the areas of costs practice that has a little while to run yet despite the implementation of the Jackson reforms is the recovery of ATE premiums. A long tail

More information

Upper Tribunal (Immigration and Asylum Chamber) Appeal Numbers: OA/03496/2014 OA/03497/2014 OA/03500/2014 OA/03504/2014 THE IMMIGRATION ACTS

Upper Tribunal (Immigration and Asylum Chamber) Appeal Numbers: OA/03496/2014 OA/03497/2014 OA/03500/2014 OA/03504/2014 THE IMMIGRATION ACTS Upper Tribunal (Immigration and Asylum Chamber) Appeal Numbers: OA/03496/2014 THE IMMIGRATION ACTS Heard at Field House Decision & Reasons Promulgated On 17 th March 2015 On 24 th March 2015 Prepared on

More information

THE IMMIGRATION ACTS. Before UPPER TRIBUNAL JUDGE GRUBB. Between NM (ANONYMITY DIRECTION MADE) And

THE IMMIGRATION ACTS. Before UPPER TRIBUNAL JUDGE GRUBB. Between NM (ANONYMITY DIRECTION MADE) And Upper Tribunal (Immigration and Asylum Chamber) Appeal Number: AA/06052/2014 THE IMMIGRATION ACTS Heard at Newport Decision & Reasons Promulgated On 31 st March 2016 On 15 th April 2016 Before UPPER TRIBUNAL

More information

An overview of the types and uses of Cayman Islands law trusts

An overview of the types and uses of Cayman Islands law trusts An overview of the types and uses of Cayman Islands law trusts Service area Trusts and Private Wealth Location Cayman Islands Date March 2017 Introduction A trust is a legal arrangement which distinguishes

More information

EXTRACT ONLY

EXTRACT ONLY 3.3.3 Certainty of Objects ---------------- EXTRACT ONLY ------------------ The Court must be able to identify the objects of the trust. The test for certainty that must be satisfied depends on the type

More information

Upper Tribunal (Immigration and Asylum Chamber) PA/07440/2016 THE IMMIGRATION ACTS. On 10 August 2017 On 15 August Before

Upper Tribunal (Immigration and Asylum Chamber) PA/07440/2016 THE IMMIGRATION ACTS. On 10 August 2017 On 15 August Before Upper Tribunal (Immigration and Asylum Chamber) PA/07440/2016 Appeal Number THE IMMIGRATION ACTS Heard at Stoke Determination Promulgated On 10 August 2017 On 15 August 2017 Before DEPUTY UPPER TRIBUNAL

More information

Upper Tribunal (Immigration and Asylum Chamber) DC/00014/2016 THE IMMIGRATION ACTS

Upper Tribunal (Immigration and Asylum Chamber) DC/00014/2016 THE IMMIGRATION ACTS Upper Tribunal (Immigration and Asylum Chamber) DC/00014/2016 Appeal Number: THE IMMIGRATION ACTS Heard at Bradford Decision & Reasons Promulgated On 12 March 2018 On 27 April 2018 Before UPPER TRIBUNAL

More information

Offshore Trust Law Round-Up BY DAVID CADIN, 1 NOVEMBER 2018

Offshore Trust Law Round-Up BY DAVID CADIN, 1 NOVEMBER 2018 LEGAL SERVICES Offshore Trust Law Round-Up BY DAVID CADIN, 1 NOVEMBER 2018 BVI CAYMAN ISLANDS GUERNSEY JERSEY LONDON SINGAPORE In brief 2 It's been a busy year for Offshore 3 Crociani (Jersey): $200m+

More information

Upper Tribunal (Immigration and Asylum Chamber) HU/12666/2015 THE IMMIGRATION ACTS

Upper Tribunal (Immigration and Asylum Chamber) HU/12666/2015 THE IMMIGRATION ACTS Upper Tribunal (Immigration and Asylum Chamber) HU/12666/2015 Appeal Number: THE IMMIGRATION ACTS Heard at Field House Decision & Reasons Promulgated On 15 March 2018 On 11 May 2018 Before DEPUTY UPPER

More information

Client Alert. Hong Kong Jurisdiction Relating to Cross Border Insolvency Issues Becomes Increasingly Clear. Background

Client Alert. Hong Kong Jurisdiction Relating to Cross Border Insolvency Issues Becomes Increasingly Clear. Background Number 1502 22 April 2013 Client Alert Latham & Watkins Litigation Department Jurisdiction Relating to Cross Border Insolvency Issues Becomes Increasingly Clear The fact that the controlling mind of a

More information

SOLICITORS DISCIPLINARY TRIBUNAL. IN THE MATTER OF THE SOLICITORS ACT 1974 Case No

SOLICITORS DISCIPLINARY TRIBUNAL. IN THE MATTER OF THE SOLICITORS ACT 1974 Case No SOLICITORS DISCIPLINARY TRIBUNAL IN THE MATTER OF THE SOLICITORS ACT 1974 Case No. 10922-2012 On 28 June 2013, Mr Moseley appealed against the Tribunal s decision on sanction. The appeal was dismissed

More information

THE IMMIGRATION ACTS. Promulgated On 24 September 2014 On 6 October Before DEPUTY UPPER TRIBUNAL JUDGE MONSON. Between. and

THE IMMIGRATION ACTS. Promulgated On 24 September 2014 On 6 October Before DEPUTY UPPER TRIBUNAL JUDGE MONSON. Between. and Upper Tribunal (Immigration and Asylum Chamber) Appeal Number: IA/43816/2013 THE IMMIGRATION ACTS Heard at Field House Determination Promulgated On 24 September 2014 On 6 October 2014 Before DEPUTY UPPER

More information

THE IMMIGRATION ACTS. Decision and Reasons Promulgated On 18 th September 2015 On 3 rd December Before

THE IMMIGRATION ACTS. Decision and Reasons Promulgated On 18 th September 2015 On 3 rd December Before st Upper Tribunal (Immigration and Asylum Chamber) Appeal Number: OA/04749/2014 THE IMMIGRATION ACTS At Field House Decision and Reasons Promulgated On 18 th September 2015 On 3 rd December 2015 Before

More information

It must be noted that: There is no difference in principle between «executive» and «non executive directors»,

It must be noted that: There is no difference in principle between «executive» and «non executive directors», BULLETIN 6 DUTIES AND LIABILITIES OF DIRECTORS UNDER CYPRUS LAW Cap. 113, Cyprus Companies Law, provides that every private company must have at least one director and every public company must have at

More information

THE IMMIGRATION ACTS. Before DEPUTY UPPER TRIBUNAL JUDGE D N HARRIS. Between. and THE SECRETARY OF STATE FOR THE HOME DEPARTMENT

THE IMMIGRATION ACTS. Before DEPUTY UPPER TRIBUNAL JUDGE D N HARRIS. Between. and THE SECRETARY OF STATE FOR THE HOME DEPARTMENT Upper Tribunal (Immigration and Asylum Chamber) Appeal Number: IA/43426/2013 THE IMMIGRATION ACTS Heard at Manchester Determination Promulgated On 10 th July 2014 On 2 nd September 2014 Before DEPUTY UPPER

More information

THE IMMIGRATION ACTS. Before DEPUTY UPPER TRIBUNAL JUDGE MCGINTY. Between MS G.N. (ANONYMITY DIRECTION MADE) and

THE IMMIGRATION ACTS. Before DEPUTY UPPER TRIBUNAL JUDGE MCGINTY. Between MS G.N. (ANONYMITY DIRECTION MADE) and Upper Tribunal (Immigration and Asylum Chamber) THE IMMIGRATION ACTS Heard at Field House Decision & Reasons Promulgated On 30 th May 2017 On 14 June 2017 Before DEPUTY UPPER TRIBUNAL JUDGE MCGINTY Between

More information

THE IMMIGRATION ACTS. On 23 February 2015 On 18 March Before UPPER TRIBUNAL JUDGE LATTER. Between SECRETARY OF STATE FOR THE HOME DEPARTMENT

THE IMMIGRATION ACTS. On 23 February 2015 On 18 March Before UPPER TRIBUNAL JUDGE LATTER. Between SECRETARY OF STATE FOR THE HOME DEPARTMENT - Upper Tribunal (Immigration and Asylum Chamber) Appeal Numbers: AA/06792/2014 THE IMMIGRATION ACTS Heard at Field House Promulgated On 23 February 2015 On 18 March 2015 Before UPPER TRIBUNAL JUDGE LATTER

More information

SUPREME COURT OF QUEENSLAND

SUPREME COURT OF QUEENSLAND SUPREME COURT OF QUEENSLAND CITATION: Wallerstein v Bedington [2012] QSC 71 PARTIES: RENEE WALLERSTEIN (First Plaintiff) and CHANELLE WALLERSTEIN (BY HER FATHER AND LITIGATION GUARDIAN JOHN WALLERSTEIN)

More information

IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUSTICE

IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUSTICE EASTERN CARIBBEAN SUPREME COURT TERRITORY OF THE VIRGIN ISLANDS COMMERCIAL DIVISION CLAIM NO. BVIHC (COM) 34 OF 2016 IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUSTICE BETWEEN: WONG TAM YEE Claimant -and- (1) HUGE LEADER HOLDINGS

More information

Tariq. The effect of S. 12 (1) of the Motor Vehicles Insurance (Third Party Risks) Act Ch. 48:51 The Act is agreed. That term is void as against third

Tariq. The effect of S. 12 (1) of the Motor Vehicles Insurance (Third Party Risks) Act Ch. 48:51 The Act is agreed. That term is void as against third REPUBLIC OF TRINIDAD AND TOBAGO HCA No. CV 2011-00701 IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUSTICE BETWEEN GULF INSURANCE LIMITED AND Claimant NASEEM ALI AND TARIQ ALI Defendants Before The Hon. Madam Justice C. Gobin

More information

THE IMMIGRATION ACTS. Heard at Field House Decision & Reasons Promulgated On 31 March 2016 On 19 April Before

THE IMMIGRATION ACTS. Heard at Field House Decision & Reasons Promulgated On 31 March 2016 On 19 April Before IAC-FH-AR-V1 Upper Tribunal (Immigration and Asylum Chamber) Appeal Number: AA/06365/2015 THE IMMIGRATION ACTS Heard at Field House Decision & Reasons Promulgated On 31 March 2016 On 19 April 2016 Before

More information

REVERT TO SETTLOR TRUST (CREATING DISCRETIONARY TRUSTS) DECLARATION. (for use with the Regular Savings Plan only)

REVERT TO SETTLOR TRUST (CREATING DISCRETIONARY TRUSTS) DECLARATION. (for use with the Regular Savings Plan only) REVERT TO SETTLOR TRUST (CREATING DISCRETIONARY TRUSTS) DECLARATION (for use with the Regular Savings Plan only) Please refer to the notes in the margin when completing this form. Boxes A F should be completed

More information

THE IMMIGRATION ACTS. Heard at Field House Decision & Reasons Promulgated On 28 November 2017 On 02 February Before

THE IMMIGRATION ACTS. Heard at Field House Decision & Reasons Promulgated On 28 November 2017 On 02 February Before Upper Tribunal (Immigration and Asylum Chamber) Appeal Numbers: IA/00580/2016 THE IMMIGRATION ACTS Heard at Field House Decision & Reasons Promulgated On 28 November 2017 On 02 February 2018 Before THE

More information

Ombudsman s Determination

Ombudsman s Determination Ombudsman s Determination Applicant Scheme Respondent Mrs S Canon (UK) Ltd Pension Scheme (the Scheme) Trustees of the Canon (UK) Retirement Benefit Scheme (the Trustees) Complaint Summary 1. Mrs S complaint

More information

PENSION SCHEMES ACT 1993, PART X DETERMINATION BY THE DEPUTY PENSIONS OMBUDSMAN

PENSION SCHEMES ACT 1993, PART X DETERMINATION BY THE DEPUTY PENSIONS OMBUDSMAN PENSION SCHEMES ACT 1993, PART X DETERMINATION BY THE DEPUTY PENSIONS OMBUDSMAN Applicant Scheme Respondent(s) Mr S Travis Lloyds Bank Offshore Pension Scheme Pension Investment Plan (PIP) Section (the

More information