Structuring Defined Value Clauses in Trust Transfers: Formula Allocations and Price Adjustment Clauses
|
|
- Grace Hensley
- 5 years ago
- Views:
Transcription
1 Presenting a live 90-minute webinar with interactive Q&A Structuring Defined Value Clauses in Trust Transfers: Formula Allocations and Price Adjustment Clauses TUESDAY, JULY 18, pm Eastern 12pm Central 11am Mountain 10am Pacific Today s faculty features: Paige K. Ben-Yaacov, Partner, Baker Botts, Houston Patrick J. Duffey, Attorney, Holland & Knight, Tampa, Fla. Jonathan J. Rikoon, Partner, Loeb & Loeb, New York The audio portion of the conference may be accessed via the telephone or by using your computer's speakers. Please refer to the instructions ed to registrants for additional information. If you have any questions, please contact Customer Service at ext. 10. NOTE: If you are seeking CPE credit, you must listen via your computer phone listening is no longer permitted.
2 Tips for Optimal Quality FOR LIVE EVENT ONLY Sound Quality If you are listening via your computer speakers, please note that the quality of your sound will vary depending on the speed and quality of your internet connection. If the sound quality is not satisfactory, you may listen via the phone: dial and enter your PIN when prompted. Otherwise, please send us a chat or sound@straffordpub.com immediately so we can address the problem. If you dialed in and have any difficulties during the call, press *0 for assistance. NOTE: If you are seeking CPE credit, you must listen via your computer phone listening is no longer permitted. Viewing Quality To maximize your screen, press the F11 key on your keyboard. To exit full screen, press the F11 key again.
3 Continuing Education Credits FOR LIVE EVENT ONLY In order for us to process your continuing education credit, you must confirm your participation in this webinar by completing and submitting the Attendance Affirmation/Evaluation after the webinar. A link to the Attendance Affirmation/Evaluation will be in the thank you that you will receive immediately following the program. For CPE credits, attendees must participate until the end of the Q&A session and respond to five prompts during the program plus a single verification code. In addition, you must confirm your participation by completing and submitting an Attendance Affirmation/Evaluation after the webinar and include the final verification code on the Affirmation of Attendance portion of the form. For additional information about continuing education, call us at ext. 35.
4 Program Materials FOR LIVE EVENT ONLY If you have not printed the conference materials for this program, please complete the following steps: Click on the ^ symbol next to Conference Materials in the middle of the lefthand column on your screen. Click on the tab labeled Handouts that appears, and there you will see a PDF of the slides for today's program. Double click on the PDF and a separate page will open. Print the slides by clicking on the printer icon.
5 Background Why Use a Formula Clause? Client wants to transfer hard-to-value assets to beneficiaries Assets selected for growth potential compared to current appraised value Some of that is due to real business potential but with a trade-off in volatility and risk But some of it may be due to a depressed valuation: Market conditions Special risks and exposures regulatory, tax environment. Closely held business interest with no control or marketability 5
6 The Problem What If the IRS Disagrees on Value? A plain gift may generate unexpected gift tax cost A GRAT avoids the gift tax risk but - Mortality risk: all in estate if grantor does not survive term Liquidity risk: GRAT has rigid formula for paying annuity Inter-generational gifting: Not readily available for generation-skipping planning A leveraged (installment) sale to a grantor trust can reduce gift tax cost without the mortality or liquidity risk of a GRAT. - But the risk of additional gift tax remains unchanged (same as a gift) and unaffected by the leverage of the installment note. Exception to the extent use of the note saves gift tax exemption to be available as an audit cushion 6
7 Solution Can a Formula Save the Day? We know formulas work in some contexts: - Marital deduction/credit shelter legacies - GST exemption legacies - Disclaimers - Size of annuity/unitrust amount for charitable split interest trusts (CLATs, CLUTs, CRATs, CRUTs) Why not just give (or sell) so much of the asset as is worth $X (e.g., gift tax exemption), whatever percentage that turns out to be? Alternative: formula allocation clause transfer entire asset but allocate the transfer between completed-gift transferee (by gift or sale) and non-taxable transferee. Or, sell the asset (or X% of it) for a price equal to its fair market value, whatever that turns out to be? 7
8 No Surprise IRS Hates Formula Clauses in Gifts or Sales Public Policy (takes away incentive to audit, requires courts to decide moot cases) Technical arguments (condition subsequent: gift is already complete by the time clause kicks in) Potential for gamesmanship or collusion Encourages overly aggressive appraisals no down side? IRS won some early cases but has been losing lately as practitioners learn lessons 8
9 The First Clause (it didn t work) Procter (4 th Cir. 1944) Trust document said that if a court later determines that any part of this transfer is subject to gift tax, then that portion shall automatically be deemed not to be included in the conveyance... and shall remain the sole property of the transferor. Court: that s a condition subsequent and the gift was already made and taxable before we rule, too late to reverse gift. Violates public policy; trifling with the judicial process. Discourages collection of tax. Decision of court would deprive the court of jurisdiction: once the final judgment fixes the gift tax liability, the gift (and the tax) disappears. End-run around the prohibition on declaratory judgments for tax cases. 9
10 Proctor s Progeny Proctor Was Followed (for a while at least) Ward (TC 1986) Gift of 25 shares of closely held stock, with the number of shares of the gift to be adjusted if the finally determined fair market value is other than $2,000/sh, such that each gift turns out to be $50,000. Donors argued they intended to give $50,000 worth of stock and the 25 shares was just representative of the value. But that s not what the documents said. 2 of 3 Proctor public policy arguments still applied: no incentive for IRS to challenge valuation, and the donor cannot be compelled to reclaim a portion of the property which would thus escape gift and estate taxation. Distinguishes King (below) as an arms-length sale, no donative intent; plus in King the clause operated to insure that no unintended gift was made while here the agreement purports to retroactively alter the amount of an otherwise completed gift. Q: Does that mean if the gift had indeed been so much stock as is worth $50,000 it would have been OK? Form over substance but a critical drafting point. 10
11 Proctor s Progeny Proctor Was Followed (for a while at least) McLendon (TC 1993) Private annuity sale agreement in closely held business provided for adjustment of fixed dollar purchase price if final gift tax valuation differs from appraisal. Analysis closely follows Ward. Formula stated that if value "changed through a settlement process with the Internal Revenue Service, or a final decision of the United States Tax Court, the purchase price hereunder shall be adjusted accordingly." Q: If the sale price had been a King-style whatever the fair market value is formula rather than a fixed dollar price to be subsequently adjusted, would that have been OK? 11
12 Turning the Corner What About a Price Adjustment Clause? King (10 th Circuit 1976): Sale price of closely held stock to family trust used formula of similar sales to stock option plan. Ordinary course of business. Sale agreement provided: "if the fair market value... as of the date of... [the agreement] is ever determined by the Internal Revenue Service to be greater than the fair market value determined in the... manner described above, the purchase price shall be adjusted to the fair market value determined by the Internal Revenue Service." Trial court had found that the parties really intended to pay FMV but they recognized that it was difficult to ascertain. Actual price adjustment had real financial effect. No donative intent. Distinguished Proctor based on these facts. Plus: no diminution of seller s estate Unlike clauses where a contingency would alter, change, or destroy the nature of the transaction. 12
13 A New Contender Formula Allocation Clauses Used to limit gift or estate tax liability by: transferring a fixed or "defined" value portion of the asset to one or more taxable donees, and allocating the rest of the asset to one or more non-taxable donees Examples of non-taxable donees include charities, marital trust, etc. If the value going to the taxable donee is a fixed or "defined" amount, then: an increase in the value of the asset on audit does not change the value passing to the taxable donee only the value transferred to the non-taxable donee is adjusted, meaning no additional gift or estate tax should be due. 13
14 A New Contender Formula Allocation Clauses Two different types of formula allocation clauses McCord/Hendrix style clause: McCord (5th Cir. 2006) Hendrix (Tax Ct. 2011) Petter/Christiansen style clause: Petter (Tax Ct. 2009; 9th Cir. 2011) Christiansen (Tax Ct. 2008; 8th Cir. 2009) Best illustrated by an example; the following pages show 4 stages of a hypothetical transfer using a formula allocation clause, as follows: Stage 1: the Transfer by donor to a taxable donee and a non-taxable donee Stage 2: the Division of the Interest between the donees Stage 3: the Audit Stage 4: Adjustments because of Audit (?) 14
15
16 Formula Allocation Clauses Example Stage 1 The Transfer Daddy Warbucks ("DW") has a 99% LP interest in a FLP that he thinks is worth $10 million DW transfers the entire 99% LP interest to a trust for his daughter, Annie, and Orphan World Relief, a public charity ("OWR") DW states in the transfer document that the 99% LP Interest will be allocated between the trust and OWR as follows: first, that portion of the 99% LP interest having a fair market value, as of the date of the transfer, equal to $9.9 million is allocated to the trust; second, any remaining portion of the interest is allocated to OWR. 16
17 Formula Allocation Clauses Example Stage 2 The Division of the Interest Between the Donees Hypothetical example (Stage 2- the division of the interest by the donees): The trustee of Annie's trust and OWR each hire an appraiser to determine the fair market value of the 99% LP Interest After consulting with the appraisers, the trustee and OWR agree, in a written document, as follows: the 99% LP interest was worth $10 million on the date of the transfer; 99% (i.e., $9.9 million out of $10 million) of the 99% LP Interest (i.e., a 98% LP interest) is allocated to the trustee; and the remaining portion of the 99% LP Interest (i.e., a 1% LP interest) is allocated to OWR).! DW took no part in the negotiations between the trustee and OWR, nor was DW a party to the agreement between the trustee and OWR by which the 99% LP interest was allocated between the donees. 17
18 Formula Allocation Clauses Example Stage 3 The Audit On audit, the IRS asserts that the 99% LP interest was worth $15 million; rather than $10 million DW explains to the IRS that any increase in the value of the 99% LP interest does not result in any additional gift tax because, regardless of the overall value of the 99% LP interest, he transferred only $9.9 million to the trust for Annie. If the 99% LP interest is worth $10 million, OWR received an interest worth $100,000; if the LP interest is worth $15 million, OWR received an interest worth $5.1 million. If OWR actually received something worth $5.1 million (as opposed to $100,000), DW has a bigger charitable deduction. DW and the IRS settle at a $12 million value for the LP Interest; DW pays no additional gift tax 18
19 Formula Allocation Clauses Example Stage 4 Adjustment as a Result of Audit (?) There are two types of formula allocation clauses one type results in changes to the percentages owned by the donees if value is adjusted on audit (Petter/Christiansen) the other type does not result in any changes to the percentages owned, even if values are adjusted on audit (McCord/Hendrix) Petter/Christiansen: division of the LP Interest between the donees is based on values as finally determined for federal gift/estate taxes In our example, the value of the 99% LP Interest was adjusted from $10 million to $12 million on audit If DW used a Petter/Christiansen style formula, the trustee's interest would decrease from 98% to 81.7% ($9.9 mill. out of $12 million, multiplied by 99%), and OWR's interest would increase from 1% to 17.3%. Huge Difference! McCord/Hendrix: division of the LP Interest is based on agreement between the donees - increase in value on audit does not change the ownership split! 19
20 McCord v. Petter Drafting Comparison McCord* The Assigned Shares shall be allocated among the Assignees in the following order: (a) that portion of the Assigned Shares having a fair market value as of the Effective Date equal to $, is assigned the Trust; and (b) then, any remaining portion of the Assigned Shares is assigned to the Foundation. For purposes of this paragraph, the fair market value of the Assigned Shares as of the Effective Date shall be the price at which the Assigned Shares would change hands as of the Effective Date between a hypothetical willing buyer and a hypothetical willing seller, neither being under any compulsion to buy or sell and both having reasonable knowledge of relevant facts for purposes of Chapter 12 of the Internal Revenue Code of 1986, as amended. * Note: underlined language is unique to clause Petter* The Assigned Shares shall be allocated among the Assignees in the following order: (a) that portion of the Assigned Shares having a fair market value as of the Effective Date equal to $, as such value is finally determined for federal gift tax purposes, is assigned the Trust; and (b) then, any remaining portion of the Assigned Shares is assigned to the GRAT. 20
21 McCord v. Petter Division of Transferred Asset For both McCord and Petter, division of the transferred asset initially is based on negotiations between donees very important to have a good feel for value of asset on date of transfer requires "whisper number" from appraiser, which can be hard to obtain for operating entities For Petter but not McCord the division agreed upon by the donees would be altered if the value of the transferred asset is adjusted on audit The IRS essentially gets to have a hand in how much goes to the taxable donee v. the non-taxable donee Adjustment on audit can make a big difference in ownership percentages Assume FLP holds $15.6 mill. in assets; if a combined 35% discount applies to a 99% LP interest, that interest is valued at approx. $10 mill. If discount is reduced to 20% on audit, the 99% LP interest is valued at approx. $12 mill. In our example, this changed the charity's ownership from 1% to 17.3% Adjustments to ownership of entity can result in need to amend income tax returns, true-up distributions, etc. 21
22 McCord v. Petter Non-Taxable Donee Because the division of the transferred asset in a McCord-style formula is not based on values as finally determined for federal gift or estate tax purposes, the non-taxable donee must be completely independent from the donor and the other donee for the transaction to work public charity (e.g., donor-advised fund) is a good choice There must be no collusion between the donor and the non-taxable donee in McCord, it was important that there was no evidence of any agreement-not so much as an implicit, wink-wink understanding-between the Taxpayers and any of the donees regarding the percentage interest to which each donee was entitled" non-taxable donee should have its own attorney and its own appraiser document the back-and-forth between the donees regarding value By contrast, in a Petter-style formula, there is less pressure on the independence of the non-taxable donee could be a marital trust could be a GRAT (this will not completely protect from gift tax exposure, but will minimize it) 22
23 McCord v. Petter Enforceability McCord transfer to non-taxable donee was not contingent on value adjustment having a charity as the non-taxable donee is helpful because of the strong public policy in favor of charities McCord-style formula is particularly strong in the 5th circuit Petter has the additional argument that valuation is not a moot issue because an adjustment to the value of the asset changes the percentage interests held by the donees For McCord-style transactions, should a small portion (say, 5%) of the non-taxable portion also pass to the taxable gift, to give the IRS an audit incentive and deal with one of the Proctor arguments? 23
24 A Different Kind of Clause Wandry (Tax Ct. 2012) Background Taxpayers were Albert & Joanne Wandry Gift Tax deficiency for 2004 year based on gifts of LLC interests to children and grandchildren LLC was Norseman Capital Structure: Mr. & Mrs. Wandry Gift of LLC units equal to $1 million exemption split among children and grandchildren Kenneth $261,000 Cynthia $261,000 Jason $261,000 Jared $261,000 5 grandchildren $11,000 each - Norseman was formed by TPs and their children in Court characterized Norseman as part of a family business - Gifts were in dollars (not units/percentages/shares, etc.) 24
25 Wandry Clauses Evidence of Transfer In Wandry-style clauses, consistency is key establishing that the transfer actually occurred as documented. Evidence of the Transfer in Wandry -Capital Account Ledger: reflected a downward adjustment of the TP s capital accounts and an upward adjustment of the children s and grandchildren s capital accounts. the adjustments did not reconcile with TP s claimed gift amounts Partnership Tax Return (Form 1065 and K-1s): reflected capital adjustments, generally did not itemize adjustments that were attributable to the gifts Gift Tax Return: described the gifts as percentage interests, not dollar amounts Less-than-ideal (return was prepared by CPAs, not planners) 25
26 Wandry Clauses Structure 26
27 Wandry Clauses Tax Court Analysis IRS ARGUMENTS (1) Gift Tax Descriptions are Admissions TAX COURT RESPONSE Gift Tax descriptions are admissions, but the percentage interests were derived from and consistent with the Gift documents. (2) Capital Accounts are Controlling (3) DVC is Ineffective Capital Accounts are reflective of ownership, not dispositive. They are frequently subject to adjustment in other contexts. King (10th Cir.) not on point, Petter (9th Cir.) controls. Petter Test: Donees always entitled to receive a predefined number of units Passes Formula had one unknown, which was a constant (value of an LLC unit) Pre-audit, donees were legally entitled to receive same number of units The audit only ensured that donees would receive the units to which they were always entitled. 27
28 Asset What Went Right - old and cold (2001) - operating business Drafting Wandry Clauses Key Take-Aways - clear and well-drafted documents Consistency - Consistently characterized gift as pecuniary amount on the 709, during audit, and at trial Jurisdiction - 10 th Circuit (King) Best Practices Precise descriptions of the gift on the 709 Use an attachment or continuation sheet to describe the transfer. Record-Keeping Entity records (especially capital accounts) should accurately reflect the transfer Income Tax Reporting Ensure that the entity s income tax reporting is accurate and consistent w/ the transfer (likely Form 1065 and K-1) Forum Shopping The Tax Court is relatively friendly to formula clauses, but Wandry was just a TC Memo. 5 th, 8 th, 9 th, and 10 th Circuits all have favorable (but perhaps not dispositive) law. 28
29 Wandry Clauses On Audit The Service strongly dislikes Wandry -On November 13, 2012 the IRS announced its non-acquiescence to Wandry -A Wandry clause is, anecdotally, an audit flag Q: does operation of a Wandry-style clause always benefit the client? Consider: (a) IRS sensitivity to DVC clauses; and (b) Potential appreciation of the underlying asset(s). A DVC will partially undo the estate tax freeze aspect of such a transfer (gift or sale) The IRS may be willing to trade operation of the DVC in exchange for a better valuation discount Timing is also important: gift tax audit or estate tax audit? Audit Example: the IRS hates Wandry, until it doesn t 29
30
31 Woelbing The Service s Continued Attack on Wandry Woelbing v. Comm r. (actually two companion cases) is not a reported case The taxpayer and the IRS settled before the IRS filed a response (on January 12, 2016) Woelbing involved the sale of all of the taxpayer s non-voting stock in a closely-held business (Carma Laboratories) to grantor trusts in exchange for promissory notes. It involved a number of issues: (1) asset valuation dispute, (2) consideration valuation dispute (2702), and (3) gross estate inclusion (2036 & 2038). (1) transfer of a significant asset (TP valued at $59M); (2) lack of collateral (personal guaranties for 10% of note value from two trust beneficiaries); (3) below-market promissory notes (interest-only, AFR), (4) defined value clause in sales agreement (Wandry-style). 31
32 Woelbing The Value Adjustment Clause The IRS did not have a chance to respond, but in the Tax Court Petition the Taxpayer outlined the key provisions of the Wandry-style clause used to transfer the non-voting shares. The Instalment Sale Agreement apparently included the following provisions: 1. Sale of the taxpayer s non-voting stock to the Trust for $59M 2. The number of shares and the value of those shares were determined on the transfer date (2/28/06), but the buyer and seller acknowledged that the exact number of shares purchased depends on the FMV of each share of stock. Based on the appraisal, approximately 1.1M shares of stock were transferred 3. In the event that the value of a share of stock is determined to be higher or lower than that set forth in the appraisal whether by the IRS or a court then the purchase price shall remain the same, but the number of shares of stock purchased shall automatically adjust so that the fair market value of the stock purchased equals the purchase price. 32
33 Practicalities Simpler Formula Transfer Clauses Stated value transfer clause (transfer of so many units as equals $X as determined for gift tax purposes) (Wandry). Can be a sale or a gift. Not a condition subsequent, does not take back any property just defines how much is transferred, balance not in the transfer at all. Forgoes the charitable gift public policy argument Puts pressure on independence and fiduciary duties of transferee to fight for full valuation. Alternative: gift of $X worth of assets and sale of excess for a note. Alternative: gift with a donee disclaimer of excess above $X worth. 33
34 Practicalities Simpler Formula Transfer Clauses Stated price sale clause (transfer of X units, for whatever the fair market value is) (King). Not a condition subsequent; does not alter the amount of property transferred just defines purchase price for what is transferred. Forgoes the charitable gift public policy argument Puts pressure on independence and fiduciary duties of transferee to fight for full valuation. 34
35 Example of Price Adjustment Clause Recitals A. Transferor wishes to sell the Transferred Interest to Transferee, and Transferee wishes to purchase the Transferred Interest, for the fair market value of the Transferred Interest as of the date of this Agreement. B. Based on the parties estimate of the fair market value of the Transferred Interest as of the date of this Agreement, Transferee will deliver to Transferor the consideration set forth in paragraph 1 below. C. If the fair market value of the Transferred Interest is determined to be higher or lower than the Estimated Price or the Appraisal Price, determined as provided in this Agreement, then Transferor and Transferee will adjust the Purchase Price of the Transferred Interest as provided in this Agreement so that the Purchase Price is equal to the fair market value, as so determined 35
36 Example of Price Adjustment Clause Operative Language (a) Sale and Purchase. Upon the terms and subject to the conditions set forth in this Agreement, Transferor hereby sells, assigns and transfers to Transferee all of Transferor s right, title and interest in and to the Transferred Interest for an amount equal to the fair market value of the Transferred Interest as of the date of this Agreement ( Purchase Price ). (b) Payment. The parties have engaged [NAME OF APPRAISER] to prepare an appraisal ( Appraisal ) of the Transferred Interest to determine the Purchase Price. Upon execution and delivery of this Agreement, Transferee shall deliver to Transferor a payment on account of the Purchase Price in the amount of ($ ) ( Estimated Price ), payable $ in cash, receipt of which by Transferor is hereby acknowledged, and the balance of which is payable in accordance with the terms of a note dated the same day as this Agreement in the face amount equal to the balance of the Estimated Price ( Note ). [COLLATERAL] (c) Post-Appraisal Adjustment. If the fair market value of the Transferred Interest set forth in the Appraisal ( Appraisal Price ) is greater or less than the Estimated Price, the difference shall be delivered as follows: (i) if the Estimated Price is less than the Appraisal Price, Transferee shall deliver to Transferor an amount equal to the excess ( Additional Payment Amount ) of the Appraisal Price over the Estimated Price; or (ii) if the Estimated Price is greater than the Appraisal Price, Transferor shall deliver to Transferee an amount equal to the excess ( Return Amount ) of the Estimated Price over the Appraisal Price. [MECHANICS] (d) Subsequent Adjustment of Price. If at any time any governmental agency or a court of competent jurisdiction finally determines that the fair market value of the Transferred Interest as of the date of this Agreement ( Finally Determined Price ) is greater or less than the Appraisal Price, then such portion of the difference shall be delivered as follows: (i) if the Appraisal Price is less than the Finally Determined Price, Transferee shall deliver to Transferor an amount equal to the excess ( Final Additional Payment Amount ) of the Finally Determined Price over the Appraisal Price; or (ii) if the Appraisal Price is greater than the Finally Determined Price, Transferor shall deliver to Transferee an amount ( Final Return Amount ) equal to the excess of the Appraisal Price over the Finally Determined Price. [MECHANICS] 36
37 Example of Formula Allocation Clause Recitals A. Transferor intends to sell to Dynasty Trust the Sale Fraction of the Transferred Interest in Company for its fair market value, and to give to GRAT as a gift the Gift Fraction of the Transferred Interest in Company. B. Dynasty Trust intends to purchase the Sale Fraction from Transferor for its fair market value, and GRAT intends to accept as a gift the Gift Fraction from Transferor. C. Based on the parties estimate of the fair market value of the Transferred Interest as of the date of this Agreement ( Estimated Price ), Dynasty Trust will deliver to Transferor the consideration set forth in Section 1 below. D. If the fair market value of the Transferred Interest is determined to be different from the Estimated Price or the Appraisal Value of the Transferred Interest, determined as provided in this Agreement, then Dynasty Trust and GRAT will adjust the Sale Fraction of the Transferred Interest and the Gift Fraction of the Transferred Interest as provided in this Agreement so that the Purchase Price is equal to the fair market value of the Sale Fraction of the Transferred Interest, as so determined. 37
38 Example of Formula Allocation Clause Definitions E. The term Gift Tax Value of the Transferred Interest shall be the Transferred Interest s value on the date of this Agreement, as finally determined for federal gift tax purposes or by a court of competent jurisdiction. F. The term Sale Fraction shall be a fraction, not to exceed one, the numerator of which is equal to the Appraisal Value, and the denominator of which is equal to the Gift Tax Value of the Transferred Interest. The Gift Fraction shall be a fraction of the Transferred Interest, the numerator (which in no event shall be less than zero) of which is the Gift Tax Value less the numerator of the Sale Fraction, and the denominator of which is the Gift Tax Value. To illustrate the operation of this section, assume that the Appraisal Value of the Transferred Interest is $1,000,000, and the Gift Tax Value is $1,500,000. As of the date of this Agreement, the Sale Fraction is one ($1,000,000 + $0/$1,000,000), the portion of the Transferred Interest sold to Dynasty Trust is 100%, the Gift Fraction is zero, and the portion of the Transferred Interest transferred to GRAT as a gift is 0%.. As a result of the increase in the value of the Transferred Interest from $1,000,000 to $1,500,000, the Sale Fraction is 2/3 ($1,000,000/ $1,500,000) and the Gift Fraction is 1/3 ([$1,500,000 - $1,000,000] / $1,500,000). The portion of the Transferred Interest sold to Dynasty Trust is adjusted to 2/3 of the Transferred Interest, and the portion of the Transferred Interest transferred to GRAT as a gift is adjusted to 1/3 of the Transferred Interest. 38
39 Example of Formula Allocation Clause Operative Language (transfer and initial payment) 1.1 Transfer. Upon the terms and subject to the conditions set forth in this Agreement, Transferor (i) hereby sells, assigns and transfers to Dynasty Trust the Sale Fraction of the Transferred Interest for an amount equal to the fair market value of the Sale Fraction of the Transferred Interest as of the date of this Agreement ( Purchase Price ), and (ii) transfers to GRAT by gift the Gift Fraction of the Transferred Interest. As of the date of this Agreement, but subject to the terms of this Agreement, Dynasty Trust and GRAT agree that the following interests in the Transferred Interest have been transferred to Dynasty Trust and GRAT, respectively: (a) Dynasty Trust: 100% (b) GRAT: 0% 1.2 Payment. Based on the parties good faith estimate of the fair market value of the Transferred Interest as of the date of this Agreement, upon execution and delivery of this Agreement, Dynasty Trust shall deliver to Transferor a payment on account of the Purchase Price the Estimated Price of Dollars ($ ), payable with a note dated the same day as this Agreement in the face amount equal to the Purchase Price ( Note ). The Note (as well as any additional Note delivered pursuant to subsection 1.3 or subsection 1.4 of this Section 1) has the benefit of the security agreement dated the same day as this Agreement between Transferor and Dynasty Trust ( Security Agreement ). 39
40 Example of Formula Allocation Clause Operative Language (two-stage adjustment) 1.3 Post-Appraisal Adjustment. The parties have engaged to prepare an appraisal ( Appraisal ) of the Transferred Interest to determine the Purchase Price. If the fair market value of the Transferred Interest set forth in the Appraisal ( Appraisal Value ) is greater or less than the Estimated Price, then the difference shall be delivered as follows: (i) if the Estimated Price is less than the Appraisal Value, Dynasty Trust shall deliver to Transferor an amount equal to the excess ( Additional Payment Amount ) of the Appraisal Value over the Estimated Price; or (ii) if the Estimated Price is greater than the Appraisal Value, Transferor shall deliver to Dynasty Trust an amount equal to the excess ( Return Amount ) of the Estimated Price over the Appraisal Value. The Additional Payment Amount shall be delivered by Dynasty Trust to Transferor in immediately available funds or, at the sole discretion of Dynasty Trust, pursuant to an additional note substantially in the form of the Note, dated as of the same date as this Agreement and bearing interest at the applicable federal rate set forth in the Note. 1.4 Subsequent Adjustment. If at any time any governmental agency or court of competent jurisdiction finally determines that the Gift Tax Value of the Transferred Interest as of the date of this Agreement ( Finally Determined Value ) is greater than the Appraisal Value, then Dynasty Trust and GRAT will adjust the percentage of the Transferred Interest sold to Dynasty Trust and transferred to GRAT by gift to reflect the Sale Fraction and the Gift Fraction of the Transferred Interest, as so determined. Dynasty Trust will transfer to GRAT the percentage of the Transferred Interest equal to the Gift Fraction. 1.5 Distribution Adjustment. Dynasty Trust and GRAT agree that if subsection 1.3 or 1.4 of this Section is applicable, all distributions made from Company since the date of this Agreement shall be adjusted between Dynasty Trust and GRAT, so that Dynasty Trust and GRAT receive the distributions that they would have received had the ownership of the Transferred Interest been as determined in subsection 1.3 or 1.4 as of the date of transfer. All amounts payable shall bear interest at the applicable federal rate to the date that the distributions are adjusted. 40
41 Thank You Jonathan J. Rikoon Partner, Loeb & Loeb LLP (212) Paige K. Ben-Yaacov Partner, Baker Botts L.L.P. (713) Patrick J. Duffey Attorney, Holland & Knight (813)
Structuring Defined Value Clauses in Trust Transfers: Formula Allocations and Price Adjustment Clauses
Presenting a live 90-minute webinar with interactive Q&A Structuring Defined Value Clauses in Trust Transfers: Formula Allocations and Price Adjustment Clauses TUESDAY, JULY 19, 2016 1pm Eastern 12pm Central
More informationEstate Planning With Grantor Trusts: Leveraging GRATs and IDGTs to Minimize Taxes, Preserve and Transfer Assets
Presenting a live 90-minute webinar with interactive Q&A Estate Planning With Grantor Trusts: Leveraging GRATs and IDGTs to Minimize Taxes, Preserve and Transfer Assets THURSDAY, OCTOBER 15, 2015 1pm Eastern
More informationPresenting a live 90-minute webinar with interactive Q&A. Today s faculty features:
Presenting a live 90-minute webinar with interactive Q&A Grantor Trusts After Divorce: Tax Reform, Fiduciary Challenges, and Minimizing Tax for Trust Transfers to Former Spouse Gift Tax Exemption on Divorce
More informationSpringing the Delaware Tax Trap: Drafting Limited Powers of Appointment to Increase Asset Income Tax Basis
Presenting a live 90-minute webinar with interactive Q&A Springing the Delaware Tax Trap: Drafting Limited Powers of Appointment to Increase Asset Income Tax Basis TUESDAY, JUNE 28, 2016 1pm Eastern 12pm
More informationEstate Planning and Tax Reform: Wealth Transfer Structures Under the New Tax Law
Presenting a live 90-minute webinar with interactive Q&A Estate Planning and Tax Reform: Wealth Transfer Structures Under the New Tax Law WEDNESDAY, FEBRUARY 7, 2018 1pm Eastern 12pm Central 11am Mountain
More informationPresenting a live 90-minute webinar with interactive Q&A. Today s faculty features: Brian E. Hammell, Esq., Sullivan & Worcester, Boston
Presenting a live 90-minute webinar with interactive Q&A Buy-Sell Agreements for Corporations and LLCs: Drafting Stock Redemption, Cross-Purchase and Mixed Agreements Navigating Complex Corporate, Tax,
More informationPresenting a live 90-minute webinar with interactive Q&A. Today s faculty features:
Presenting a live 90-minute webinar with interactive Q&A Structuring and Operating Family Limited Partnerships: Asset Protection and Income Tax Reduction Shifting Income Tax Burden to Lower-Taxed Family
More informationGrantor Retained Annuity Trusts in 2013: Tax-Efficient Estate Planning Techniques Leveraging GRATs to Preserve and Transfer Assets
Presenting a live 90-minute webinar with interactive Q&A Grantor Retained Annuity Trusts in 2013: Tax-Efficient Estate Planning Techniques Leveraging GRATs to Preserve and Transfer Assets WEDNESDAY, MARCH
More informationQDRO Drafting Boot Camp: Preparing QDROs for 401(k)s and Similar Defined Contribution Plans
Presenting a live 90-minute webinar with interactive Q&A QDRO Drafting Boot Camp: Preparing QDROs for 401(k)s and Similar Defined Contribution Plans Strategies for Family Law Practitioners to Help Ensure
More informationPresenting a live 90-minute webinar with interactive Q&A. Today s faculty features:
Presenting a live 90-minute webinar with interactive Q&A NING and DING Trusts in Estate Planning: Designing ING Trusts to Avoid State Income Tax and Protect Assets Effective Drafting of Incomplete Gift
More informationPresenting a live 90-minute webinar with interactive Q&A. Today s faculty features: Dean C. Berry, Partner, Cadwalader Wickersham & Taft, New York
Presenting a live 90-minute webinar with interactive Q&A Estate Planning Involving Resident and Non-Resident Aliens Navigating Estate, Gift and GST Tax Rules; Leveraging Estate and Lifetime Gifting Opportunities
More informationPresenting a live 90-minute webinar with interactive Q&A. Today s faculty features:
Presenting a live 90-minute webinar with interactive Q&A Transactional Risk Insurance in M&A: Reps and Warranties, Contingent Liability and More Leveraging Insurance to Allocate Risk and Protect Deal Value;
More informationStructuring Equity Compensation for Partnerships and LLCs Navigating Capital and Profits Interests Plus Section 409A and Tax Consequences
Presenting a live 90-minute webinar with interactive Q&A Structuring Equity Compensation for Partnerships and LLCs Navigating Capital and Profits Interests Plus Section 409A and Tax Consequences TUESDAY,
More informationDefined Value Clause Updates Hendrix and Petter
Defined Value Clause Updates Hendrix and Petter Steve R. Akers, Bessemer Trust Copyright 2011 by Bessemer Trust Company, N.A. All rights reserved. a. Hendrix v. Commissioner, T.C. Memo. 2011-133 (June
More informationProtecting Business Assets From Creditors in Litigation: Strategic Choice of Entities, Avoiding Fraudulent Transfers
Presenting a live 90-minute webinar with interactive Q&A Protecting Business Assets From Creditors in Litigation: Strategic Choice of Entities, Avoiding Fraudulent Transfers TUESDAY, JULY 21, 2015 1pm
More informationScott J. Bakal, Partner, Neal Gerber & Eisenberg, Chicago Robert C. Stevenson, Attorney, Skadden Arps Slate Meagher & Flom, Washington, D.C.
Presenting a live 90-minute webinar with interactive Q&A : Tax Basis Step-Up Through Deemed Asset Sale Treatment Structuring Qualifying Stock Dispositions for Partnership and Private Equity Acquirers WEDNESDAY,
More informationExercising Setoff and Recoupment Rights in Bankruptcy
Presenting a live 90-minute webinar with interactive Q&A Exercising Setoff and Recoupment Rights in Bankruptcy Mutuality of Obligation; Disputed Transactions; Relief From Automatic Stay TUESDAY, NOVEMBER
More informationSale to Grantor Trust Transaction (Including Note With Defined Value Feature) Under Attack, Estate of Donald Woelbing v.
Sale to Grantor Trust Transaction (Including Note With Defined Value Feature) Under Attack, Estate of Donald Woelbing v. Commissioner (Docket No. 30261-13) and Estate of Marion Woelbing v. Commissioner
More informationPresenting a live 110-minute teleconference with interactive Q&A
Presenting a live 110-minute teleconference with interactive Q&A Valuation Challenges With $10 Million-and-Under Businesses Avoiding Mistakes With Built-In Gains and Taxes, Misuse of Market Data and Other
More informationCompletion Guaranties in Construction Lending: Key Provisions for Lenders and Guarantors
Presenting a live 90-minute webinar with interactive Q&A Completion Guaranties in Construction Lending: Key Provisions for Lenders and Guarantors TUESDAY, MARCH 6, 2018 1pm Eastern 12pm Central 11am Mountain
More informationStructuring Equity Compensation for Partnerships and LLCs Navigating Capital and Profits Interests Plus Section 409A and Tax Consequences
Presenting a live 110-minute webinar with interactive Q&A Structuring Equity Compensation for Partnerships and LLCs Navigating Capital and Profits Interests Plus Section 409A and Tax Consequences THURSDAY,
More informationExecutive Compensation: Tax and Other Considerations for Restricted Stock Awards
Presenting a live 90-minute webinar with interactive Q&A Executive Compensation: Tax and Other Considerations for Restricted Stock Awards Strategies for Navigating Substantial Risk of Forfeiture Analysis,
More informationTax Strategies for Real Estate LLC and LP Agreements: Capital Commitments, Tax Allocations, Distributions, and More
Presenting a live 90-minute webinar with interactive Q&A Tax Strategies for Real Estate LLC and LP Agreements: Capital Commitments, Tax Allocations, Distributions, and More Structuring Provisions to Achieve
More informationU.S.-Israeli Estate Tax Planning for Dual Citizens
Presenting a 90-Minute Encore Presentation of the Webinar with Live, Interactive Q&A U.S.-Israeli Estate Tax Planning for Dual Citizens Reconciling U.S. and Israeli Law on Trust Taxation, Inheritance Laws,
More informationPrivate Investment Funds and Tax Reform
Presenting a live 90-minute webinar with interactive Q&A Private Investment Funds and Tax Reform Carried Interest, QBI and Interest Deductions, Sale of Partnership Interests, Computation of UBTI, and More
More informationBankruptcy Section 506(c) Surcharge on Secured Collateral
Presenting a live 90-minute webinar with interactive Q&A Bankruptcy Section 506(c) Surcharge on Secured Collateral Seeking or Defeating Recovery of Expenses for Preserving or Disposing of Collateral TUESDAY,
More informationAsset Sale vs. Stock Sale: Tax Considerations, Advanced Drafting and Structuring Techniques for Tax Counsel
Presenting a live 90-minute webinar with interactive Q&A Asset Sale vs. Stock Sale: Tax Considerations, Advanced Drafting and Structuring Techniques for Tax Counsel TUESDAY, AUGUST 2, 2016 1pm Eastern
More informationUniversal Health Services v. Escobar: Avoiding Implied Certification Liability Under FCA
Presenting a live 30-minute webinar with interactive Q&A Universal Health Services v. Escobar: Avoiding Implied Certification Liability Under FCA MONDAY, JULY 25, 2016 1pm Eastern 12pm Central 11am Mountain
More informationIRC 751 "Hot Asset" Treatment: New Rules for Calculating Ordinary Income Recharacterization
Presenting a live 90-minute webinar with interactive Q&A IRC 751 "Hot Asset" Treatment: New Rules for Calculating Ordinary Income Recharacterization New IRS Proposal on Determining Partners' Share of Section
More informationFinancing Multi-Family Housing: Structuring the Low Income House Tax Credit and Tax-Exempt Bonds Documenting Transactions for Investors and Developers
Presenting a live 90-minute webinar with interactive Q&A Financing Multi-Family Housing: Structuring the Low Income House Tax Credit and Tax-Exempt Bonds Documenting Transactions for Investors and Developers
More informationForeign Investment in U.S. Real Estate: Impact of Tax Reform
Presenting a live 90-minute webinar with interactive Q&A Foreign Investment in U.S. Real Estate: Impact of Tax Reform Entity Selection, FIRPTA, Tax Concerns When Acquiring or Disposing of Ownership Interests
More informationCommercial Lease Negotiations: Property and Liability Insurance, Proof of Coverage, AI and Loss Payee Issues
Presenting a live 90-minute webinar with interactive Q&A Commercial Lease Negotiations: Property and Liability Insurance, Proof of Coverage, AI and Loss Payee Issues Structuring Lease Provisions to Require
More informationPrivate Equity Waterfall and Carried Interest Provisions: Economic and Tax Implications for Investors and Sponsors
Presenting a live 90-minute Encore Presentation of the Webinar with Live, Interactive Q&A Private Equity Waterfall and Carried Interest Provisions: Economic and Tax Implications for Investors and Sponsors
More informationFraudulent Conveyance Exposure for Intercorporate Guaranties, Integrated Transactions and Designated-Use Loans
Presenting a live 90-minute webinar with interactive Q&A Fraudulent Conveyance Exposure for Intercorporate Guaranties, Integrated Transactions and Designated-Use Loans Navigating the Contours of Section
More informationERISA Pre-Approved and Customized Benefit Plans: Overhauled IRS Procedures and Determination Letter Process
Presenting a live 90-minute webinar with interactive Q&A ERISA Pre-Approved and Customized Benefit Plans: Overhauled IRS Procedures and Determination Letter Process TUESDAY, NOVEMBER 14, 2017 1pm Eastern
More informationPresenting a live 90-minute webinar with interactive Q&A. Today s faculty features:
Presenting a live 90-minute webinar with interactive Q&A Equity Joint Ventures: Structuring Capital Contribution, Waterfall and Other Payment Provisions Promoted Interest, Carried Interest, Cash Flow Splits
More informationERISA Retirement Plan Investment Management Agreements: Guidance for Plan Sponsors to Minimize Risks
Presenting a live 90-minute webinar with interactive Q&A ERISA Retirement Plan Investment Management Agreements: Guidance for Plan Sponsors to Minimize Risks Selecting 3(38) Investment Managers, Negotiating
More informationPresenting a live 90-minute webinar with interactive Q&A. Today s faculty features: Elizabeth A. Gartland, Esq., Fenwick & West, San Francisco
Presenting a live 90-minute webinar with interactive Q&A Structuring Management Carve-Out Plans for Privately Held Corporations: Mechanics, Tax Obstacles and Optimization Guidance for Employee Benefits
More informationImpact of Tax Reform on ABLE Accounts and Special Needs Trusts: Guidance for Elder Law Attorneys
Presenting a live 90-minute webinar with interactive Q&A Impact of Tax Reform on ABLE Accounts and Special Needs Trusts: Guidance for Elder Law Attorneys THURSDAY, SEPTEMBER 27, 2018 1pm Eastern 12pm Central
More informationWandry v. Commissioner
Wandry v. Commissioner The Secret Sauce Estate Planners Have Been Waiting For? By Tiffany B. Carmona And Tye J. Klooster Tiffany B. Carmona is a senior vice-president and associate fiduciary counsel in
More informationClearing Title for Defects Due to Mortgage-Related Issues, Legal Description Errors, and Foreclosure
Presenting a live 90-minute webinar with interactive Q&A Clearing Title for Defects Due to Mortgage-Related Issues, Legal Description Errors, and Foreclosure Identifying and Resolving Common Title Defects
More informationPresenting a live 90-minute webinar with interactive Q&A. Today s faculty features:
Presenting a live 90-minute webinar with interactive Q&A Commercial Mortgage Modifications: Lien Priority, Title Insurance and Bankruptcy Issues Structuring Modification Agreements While Avoiding Legal
More informationStructuring Preferred Partnership Freezes in Estate Planning: Navigating IRC Chapter 14 Valuation Rules
Presenting a live 90-minute webinar with interactive Q&A Structuring Preferred Partnership Freezes in Estate Planning: Navigating IRC Chapter 14 Valuation Rules WEDNESDAY, MARCH 30, 2016 1pm Eastern 12pm
More informationPresenting a live 90-minute webinar with interactive Q&A. Today s faculty features:
Presenting a live 90-minute webinar with interactive Q&A Goodwill in Corporate Asset Sales: Tax Planning Opportunities Distinguishing Between Personal and Corporate Goodwill, Navigating Allocation and
More informationLeveraging Defined Value Clauses to Mitigate Estate and Gift Tax Drafting Formula Clauses and Donee Selection Post Petter
Presenting a live 110 minute teleconference with interactive Q&A Leveraging Defined Value Clauses to Mitigate Estate and Gift Tax Drafting Formula Clauses and Donee Selection Post Petter TUESDAY, MAY 31,
More informationPresenting a live 90-minute webinar with interactive Q&A. Today s faculty features:
Presenting a live 90-minute webinar with interactive Q&A Tax Reform: Impact on REITs, Real Estate Businesses and Investors Pass-Through Business and Interest Deductions, Cost Recovery, Carried Interest,
More informationDrafting Shareholder Agreements for Private Equity M&A Deals
Presenting a live 90-minute webinar with interactive Q&A Drafting Shareholder Agreements for Private Equity M&A Deals Structuring Provisions on Board Composition and Duties, Drag-Along, Tag-Along, Information
More informationNew Section 199A: Structuring Real Estate Transactions to Take Advantage of the Qualified Business Income Deduction
Presenting a 90-minute encore presentation featuring live Q&A New Section 199A: Structuring Real Estate Transactions to Take Advantage of the Qualified Business Income Deduction THURSDAY, JANUARY 17, 2019
More informationPresenting a live 90-minute webinar with interactive Q&A. Today s faculty features:
Presenting a live 90-minute webinar with interactive Q&A D&O Indemnification Provisions in Governance Documents and Agreements Drafting Effective Indemnity and Advancement Agreements to Protect Directors
More informationPresenting a live 90-minute webinar with interactive Q&A. Today s faculty features:
Presenting a live 90-minute webinar with interactive Q&A Converting to Nongrantor Trusts to Minimize Income Tax: Maximizing Increased Exemption Benefits Switching Off Grantor Trust Features in Existing
More informationERISA Considerations in Structuring Credit Facilities with Private Investment Funds
Presenting a live 90-minute webinar with interactive Q&A ERISA Considerations in Structuring Credit Facilities with Private Investment Funds WEDNESDAY, AUGUST 15, 2018 1pm Eastern 12pm Central 11am Mountain
More informationStructuring Commercial Loan Term Sheets, Proposals and Commitment Letters: Key Terms for Lenders and Borrowers
Presenting a live 90-minute webinar with interactive Q&A Structuring Commercial Loan Term Sheets, Proposals and Commitment Letters: Key Terms for Lenders and Borrowers Avoiding Unintended Consequences
More informationIP Agreements: Structuring Indemnification and Limitation of Liability Provisions to Allocate Infringement Risk
Presenting a live 90-minute webinar with interactive Q&A IP Agreements: Structuring Indemnification and Limitation of Liability Provisions to Allocate Infringement Risk TUESDAY, OCTOBER 4, 2016 1pm Eastern
More informationPresenting a live 90-minute webinar with interactive Q&A. Today s faculty features: James O. Lang, Shareholder, Greenberg Traurig, Tampa, Fla.
Presenting a live 90-minute webinar with interactive Q&A Leveraging New Markets Tax Credits to Finance Community Development: Latest Regs, Guidance and Legal Developments Twinning With Historic Tax Credits,
More informationUCC Article 9 Blanket Asset Lien Exclusions and Purchase Money Security Interests
Presenting a live 90-minute webinar with interactive Q&A UCC Article 9 Blanket Asset Lien Exclusions and Purchase Money Security Interests Navigating Statutory, Contractual and Other Exclusions to All
More informationPartnership Exchanges: Structuring "Drop and Swap" and "Mixing Bowl" Transactions Minimizing the Risk of an Unfavorable Audit Outcome
Presenting a live 90-minute webinar with interactive Q&A Partnership Exchanges: Structuring "Drop and Swap" and "Mixing Bowl" Transactions Minimizing the Risk of an Unfavorable Audit Outcome WEDNESDAY,
More informationCreatively Completing The Capital Stack: Real Estate GP Private Equity Funds
Presenting a live 90-minute webinar with interactive Q&A Creatively Completing The Capital Stack: Real Estate GP Private Equity Funds Structuring Key Deal Terms Regarding Distribution, Sharing of Promote
More informationPresenting a live 90-minute webinar with interactive Q&A. Today s faculty features:
Presenting a live 90-minute webinar with interactive Q&A Special Needs Trusts and Guardianships: Protecting Government Benefits for the Disabled Crafting and Administering First- and Third-Party Trusts
More informationTax Challenges for NPO Counsel: Excess Benefit Transactions for Executive Comp and Other Financial Dealings
Presenting a live 110-minute teleconference with interactive Q&A Tax Challenges for NPO Counsel: Excess Benefit Transactions for Executive Comp and Other Financial Dealings Identifying Prohibited Transactions
More informationUCC Article 9 Blanket Asset Lien Exclusions and Purchase Money Security Interests
Presenting a live 90-minute webinar with interactive Q&A UCC Article 9 Blanket Asset Lien Exclusions and Purchase Money Security Interests Navigating Statutory, Contractual and Other Exclusions to All
More informationPresenting a live 90-minute webinar with interactive Q&A. Today s faculty features:
Presenting a live 90-minute webinar with interactive Q&A Trust Situs for Dynasty Trusts and DAPTs: Key Differences Among Top-Tier States Selecting the Best Situs Among Nevada, Delaware, Alaska, South Dakota,
More informationSurvivor Benefit Plans and Military Divorce: Defending Against or Claiming Former-Spouse SBP Coverage
Presenting a live 90-minute webinar with interactive Q&A Survivor Benefit Plans and Military Divorce: Defending Against or Claiming Former-Spouse SBP Coverage WEDNESDAY, JUNE 28, 2017 1pm Eastern 12pm
More informationBest Efforts and Commercially Reasonable Efforts in M&A Agreements: Drafting and Interpretation Challenges
Presenting a live 90-minute webinar with interactive Q&A Best Efforts and Commercially Reasonable Efforts in M&A Agreements: Drafting and Interpretation Challenges Lessons From Case Law for Interpreting
More informationERISA Compliance and Monitoring 401(k) Investments: Safe Harbor Rules and Appointing Advisers
Presenting a live 90-minute webinar with interactive Q&A ERISA Compliance and Monitoring 401(k) Investments: Safe Harbor Rules and Appointing Advisers TUESDAY, APRIL 3, 2018 1pm Eastern 12pm Central 11am
More informationAdvanced Trust Drafting for Income Tax Minimization: Including Capital Gains in DNI, Push-Outs and More
Presenting a live 90-minute webinar with interactive Q&A Advanced Trust Drafting for Income Tax Minimization: Including Capital Gains in DNI, Push-Outs and More Managing the Disparity in Income Tax Treatment
More informationAllocating Operating Expenses in Commercial Real Estate Leases: Negotiating Strategies for Landlords and Tenants
Presenting a live 90-minute webinar with interactive Q&A Allocating Operating Expenses in Commercial Real Estate Leases: Negotiating Strategies for Landlords and Tenants Structuring Pass-Throughs, Exclusions,
More informationPresenting a live 90-minute webinar with interactive Q&A. Today s faculty features:
Presenting a live 90-minute webinar with interactive Q&A Qualified Opportunity Zones: New Tax Incentives for Commercial Real Estate and Other Investments Deferred Capital Gains and Tax Abatement Under
More informationM&A Indemnification Deal Terms: 2017 Survey Results
Presenting a 60-minute encore presentation featuring live Q&A M&A Indemnification Deal Terms: 2017 Survey Results What's Market for Negotiating and Drafting Private Target Company Indemnification Terms
More informationInsurance Coverage for Statutory and Liquidated Damages and Attorney Fees: Policyholder and Insurer Perspectives
Presenting a live 90-minute webinar with interactive Q&A Insurance Coverage for Statutory and Liquidated Damages and Attorney Fees: Policyholder and Insurer Perspectives Advocating Coverage for Statutory
More informationStructuring Commercial Loan Documents to Protect Non-Affiliated Lenders
Presenting a live 90-minute webinar with interactive Q&A Structuring Commercial Loan Documents to Protect Non-Affiliated Lenders Negotiating and Drafting Provisions Involving Loan Buybacks, Additional
More informationMinority Investors in LLCs: Contractual Limitations, Waivers of Fiduciary Duties, Other Key Provisions
Presenting a live 90-minute webinar with interactive Q&A Minority Investors in LLCs: Contractual Limitations, Waivers of Fiduciary Duties, Other Key Provisions Protecting Minority Interests, Choice of
More informationInterest Rate Hedges in Real Estate Finance: Placing Swaps, Caps, and Collars on Floating Rate Loans
Presenting a live 90-minute webinar with interactive Q&A Interest Rate Hedges in Real Estate Finance: Placing Swaps, Caps, and Collars on Floating Rate Loans Understanding Pricing and Trade Confirmations,
More informationUCC Article 9 Update: Searching and Filing Under New Amendments
Presenting a live 90-minute webinar with interactive Q&A UCC Article 9 Update: Searching and Filing Under New Amendments Lessons Learned Under the Recent Rules, Best Practices for Secured Lenders WEDNESDAY,
More informationPresenting a live 90-minute webinar with interactive Q&A. Today s faculty features:
Presenting a live 90-minute webinar with interactive Q&A Drafting Standstills in Intercreditor Agreements: Balancing Rights and Remedies of Junior and Senior Lienholders Structuring Duration, Commencement,
More information30(b)(6) Depositions in Insurance Coverage and Bad Faith Litigation Preparing and Responding to Notices of Corporate Representative Depositions
Presenting a live 90-minute webinar with interactive Q&A 30(b)(6) Depositions in Insurance Coverage and Bad Faith Litigation Preparing and Responding to Notices of Corporate Representative Depositions
More informationInvestment Adviser Advertising Rule: New SEC Guidance and Best Practices for Compliance
Presenting a live 90-minute webinar with interactive Q&A Investment Adviser Advertising Rule: New SEC Guidance and Best Practices for Compliance TUESDAY, NOVEMBER 21, 2017 1pm Eastern 12pm Central 11am
More informationM&A Buyer Protection Beyond Indemnification and Escrows
Presenting a live 90-minute webinar with interactive Q&A M&A Buyer Protection Beyond Indemnification and Escrows Structuring Deal-Specific and Often Overlooked Acquisition Provisions to Minimize Buyer's
More informationDrafting Asset Purchase Agreements: Reps, Warranties, Covenants, Conditions, Indemnity and Other Key Provisions
Presenting a live 90-minute webinar with interactive Q&A Drafting Asset Purchase Agreements: Reps, Warranties, Covenants, Conditions, Indemnity and Other Key Provisions TUESDAY, DECEMBER 15, 2015 1pm Eastern
More informationFiduciary Compliance in ESOP Transactions: Recent DOL Settlement Agreements
Presenting a live 90-minute webinar with interactive Q&A Fiduciary Compliance in ESOP Transactions: Recent DOL Settlement Agreements Implications of GBTC, FBTS and Alpha Settlement Agreements, Guidance
More informationTax Allocation in Pass-Through Entities
Presenting a live 110-minute teleconference with interactive Q&A Tax Allocation in Pass-Through Entities Minimizing Tax Impact Through Strategic Allocation of Income, Gains, Losses and Liabilities THURSDAY,
More informationPresenting a 90-minute encore presentation featuring live Q&A. Today s faculty features:
Presenting a 90-minute encore presentation featuring live Q&A Private Equity Waterfall and Carried Interest Provisions: Economic and Tax Implications for Investors and Sponsors Distributions, Clawbacks
More informationCorporate Governance of Subsidiaries: Board Roles and Responsibilities, Interplay With Parent Board, Liability Risks
Presenting a live 90-minute webinar with interactive Q&A Corporate Governance of Subsidiaries: Board Roles and Responsibilities, Interplay With Parent Board, Liability Risks THURSDAY, AUGUST 16, 2018 1pm
More informationAllocating Risk in Real Estate Leases: Contractual Indemnities, Additional Insured Endorsements and Waivers of Subrogation
Presenting a live 90-minute webinar with interactive Q&A Allocating Risk in Real Estate Leases: Contractual Indemnities, Additional Insured Endorsements and Waivers of Subrogation Structuring Lease Provisions
More informationPrivate Equity Real Estate Fund Formation: Capital Raising, Regulatory Issues and Negotiating Trends
Presenting a live 90-minute webinar with interactive Q&A Private Equity Real Estate Fund Formation: Capital Raising, Regulatory Issues and Negotiating Trends Capital Contributions, Allocation of Profits/Losses,
More informationAuto Injury Claim Recovery: Maximizing Pain and Suffering, Loss of Future Earning Capacity Damages
Presenting a live 90-minute webinar with interactive Q&A Auto Injury Claim Recovery: Maximizing Pain and Suffering, Loss of Future Earning Capacity Damages Leveraging Calculation Methodologies, Medical
More informationStructuring Preferred Equity Investments in Real Estate Ventures: Impact of True Equity vs. "Debt-Like" Equity
Presenting a live 90-minute webinar with interactive Q&A Structuring Preferred Equity Investments in Real Estate Ventures: Impact of True Equity vs. "Debt-Like" Equity Negotiating Deal Terms, Investor
More informationUCC Article 9 Update on Searching and Filing: Best Practices for Secured Lenders Under the Amended Rules
Presenting a live 90-minute webinar with interactive Q&A UCC Article 9 Update on Searching and Filing: Best Practices for Secured Lenders Under the Amended Rules TUESDAY, JUNE 26, 2018 1pm Eastern 12pm
More informationTrucking and Auto Injury Cases: Deposing Accident Reconstruction and Biomechanical Experts
Presenting a live 90-minute webinar with interactive Q&A Trucking and Auto Injury Cases: Deposing Accident Reconstruction and Biomechanical Experts WEDNESDAY, JULY 11, 2018 1pm Eastern 12pm Central 11am
More informationIP Agreements: Structuring Indemnification and Limitation of Liability Provisions to Allocate Infringement Risk
Presenting a live 90-minute webinar with interactive Q&A IP Agreements: Structuring Indemnification and Limitation of Liability Provisions to Allocate Infringement Risk TUESDAY, SEPTEMBER 1, 2015 1pm Eastern
More informationTax Treatment of Carried Interest: Planning Opportunities for Tax, Private Equity and Real Estate Professionals
Presenting a 90-minute encore presentation featuring live Q&A Tax Treatment of Carried Interest: Planning Opportunities for Tax, Private Equity and Real Estate Professionals IRC Section 1061, Capital Contributions,
More informationPresenting a live 90-minute webinar with interactive Q&A. Today s faculty features:
Presenting a live 90-minute webinar with interactive Q&A Estate Tax Planning Opportunities in 2012 Maximizing Benefits Under Current Gift and Estate Tax Law: Portability, Lifetime Exemptions, Trust Use
More informationAsset Spend-Down for Medicaid Qualification Navigating the Complexities of Classifying Assets, Individuals vs. Married Couples, and Appeals Process
Presenting a live 90-minute webinar with interactive Q&A Asset Spend-Down for Medicaid Qualification Navigating the Complexities of Classifying Assets, Individuals vs. Married Couples, and Appeals Process
More informationStructuring Leveraged Loans After Tax Reform: Concerns for Multinational Entities
Presenting a live 90-minute webinar with interactive Q&A : Concerns for Multinational Entities Section 956 Deemed Dividend Rules, Limits on Interest Deductions, Tax Distributions, Corporate vs. Pass-Through
More informationUsing Inverted Leases to Finance Renewable Energy Projects
Presenting a live 90-minute webinar with interactive Q&A Using Inverted Leases to Finance Renewable Energy Projects Evaluating Tax Risks, Navigating Structural Variations, Leveraging Pass-Through Election
More informationTax Strategies for Real Estate LLC and LP Agreements: Capital Commitments, Tax Allocations and Distributions, and More
Presenting a live 90-minute webinar with interactive Q&A Tax Strategies for Real Estate LLC and LP Agreements: Capital Commitments, Tax Allocations and Distributions, and More TUESDAY, APRIL 3, 2018 1pm
More informationStructuring Preferred Partnership Freezes in Estate Planning: Navigating IRC Chapter 14 Valuation Rules
Presenting a live 90-minute webinar with interactive Q&A Structuring Partnership Freezes in Estate Planning: Navigating IRC Chapter 14 Valuation Rules THURSDAY, MARCH 30, 2017 1pm Eastern 12pm Central
More informationKey Commercial Lease Provisions and SNDAs That Concern Lenders in Mortgage and Leasehold Financing
Presenting a live 90-minute webinar with interactive Q&A Key Commercial Lease Provisions and SNDAs That Concern Lenders in Mortgage and Leasehold Financing Identifying and Correcting Red Flags That Negatively
More informationNegotiating Reserve Provisions in Real Estate Loan Transactions
Presenting a live 90-minute webinar with interactive Q&A Negotiating Reserve Provisions in Real Estate Loan Transactions Determining Funding and Disbursement Conditions for Tax and Insurance, Tenant Rollover,
More informationProperty Management and Leasing Agreements: Key Provisions for Multi-Family, Office, Retail and Industrial Properties
Presenting a live 90-minute webinar with interactive Q&A Property Management and Leasing Agreements: Key Provisions for Multi-Family, Office, Retail and Industrial Properties Navigating Fees and Expenses,
More informationSection 704, Targeted Allocations, and the Distribution Waterfall: Overcoming Challenges Absent IRS Guidance
Section 704, Targeted Allocations, and the Distribution Waterfall: Overcoming Challenges Absent IRS Guidance Understanding the Economic Effect Test and How to Allocate Income or Loss Using Targeted Allocations
More information