Analysis of High Income Individuals Restriction 2013

Transcription

1 Analysis of High Income Individuals Restriction 2013 June 2015 Statistics & Economic Research Branch

2 Analysis of High Income Individuals Restriction 2013 Statistics & Economic Research Branch

3 1 Background The 2006 and 2007 Finance Acts introduced, with effect from 1 January 2007, measures to limit the use of certain tax reliefs and exemptions (known as specified reliefs ) by highincome individuals. Such individuals, by means of the cumulative use of various tax incentive reliefs, had in previous years the potential to substantially reduce their tax liabilities. The overall objective is to ensure that, from 2007, individuals with an adjusted income of 500,000 or more (where the full applied) pay an effective rate of income tax of approximately 20 per cent on a combination of adjusted income and ring-fenced income. 1 The began to apply where an individual s adjusted income exceeded 250,000 and a full applied where an individual had adjusted income of 500,000 or more. The 2010 Finance Act introduced further limitations on the use of specified reliefs, which took effect from 1 January These limitations are designed to ensure that individuals with an adjusted income level of 400,000 or more (where the full applies) pay an effective rate of income tax of approximately 30 per cent on a combination of adjusted income and ring-fenced income. In addition, the adjusted income on which the begins to apply was reduced to 125,000. This report relates to the use of specified reliefs by high-income individuals who were subject to the in the tax year Other high-income individuals are subject to the normal tax rules. Reports relating to the in previous years, as well as statistics on the tax paid by all individuals, are available on the Revenue website. 2 1 Adjusted income is the taxable income of an individual before the is applied, to which is added the amount of income sheltered in the year through the use of the specified reliefs. It excludes ring-fenced income (e.g., DIRT) which is normally liable to tax at specific rates regardless of the amounts involved or the marginal rate of tax at which the individual is liable. 2 Prior year reports are published at and general Revenue statistics can be found at 1 Statistics & Economic Research Branch

4 2 Results for 2013 Analysis of the the high-income individuals for the tax year 2013 shows that the objective of achieving an effective rate of income tax of approximately 30 per cent for individuals with an adjusted income of 400,000 or more was achieved. Where adjusted income was less than 400,000, a tapering approach ensured that there was a graduated the, with the effective rate of income tax increasing towards 30 per cent as adjusted income increased towards 400,000. A brief summary of how the operated for the tax year 2013, and the specified tax reliefs covered by the, is included in Annex 1. A breakdown of the 2013 results showing the effect of the in its seventh year of operation is set out in Annex 2. These results are based on actual returns received. A comparison of the outcome for 2007 through 2012 is set out below. Year Total Number of Individuals Additional Income Tax m , , , The results for 2013 show that the overall number of individuals who were subject to the was 904 and that the additional income tax yield was 60.43m. Compared to 2012, this represents a decrease of 146 in the number of individuals and a decrease of 2.72m in the additional yield from the measure. Cases where full applies Adjusted Income of 400,000 or more Table 1A (Annex 2) shows that the 231 high-income individuals with an adjusted income of 400,000 or more (i.e., where the full applied) paid an average effective income tax rate of 30.3 per cent on the combination of adjusted income and ring-fenced income. These individuals paid on average 40.5 per cent tax inclusive of Universal Social Charge (USC). This meets the objective set out for the measure. The additional income tax involved was 40.7 million, representing a 194 per cent increase on the tax that would otherwise have 2 Statistics & Economic Research Branch

5 been paid if the had not applied. Furthermore, of those 231 individuals, 55 who would not otherwise have paid income tax in 2013 were brought into the tax net. Table 1B (Annex 2) summarises the distribution of the effective tax rates for the 231 cases with adjusted income of 400,000 or more. It shows that the majority of highincome individuals within this category fall into the effective income tax rate bands of 30% to 35% (196 cases). Cases where partly applies Adjusted Income of up to 400,000 Table 2A (Annex 2) shows that the 673 high-income individuals with an adjusted income of up to 400,000 (i.e., where the applies on a graduated basis) paid an average effective income tax rate of per cent on the combination of adjusted income and ring-fenced income. These individuals paid on average 29.2 per cent tax inclusive of USC. The additional income tax involved was 19.7 million representing a 160 per cent increase on the tax that would otherwise have been paid if the had not applied. Furthermore, of those 673 individuals, 216 individuals who would not otherwise have paid income tax in 2013 were brought into the tax net. Table 2B (Annex 2) summarises the distribution of the effective income tax rates for the 673 cases with adjusted income of up to 400,000. The spread reflects the graduated nature of the the for cases in this category. Schedule of declared use of Reliefs Table 3 (Annex 2), in relation to each specified relief, shows: The overall number of individuals subject to the, who declared that they used the relief; and The total combined amount of the relief declared as used by those individuals. 3 Statistics & Economic Research Branch

6 Annex 1 Operation of the in the tax year 2013 The works by limiting the total amount of specified reliefs that a high-income individual can use to reduce his or her tax liability in any one tax year. In the tax year 2013, the overall objective was to ensure that individuals with an adjusted income of 400,000 or more would pay an effective rate of tax of approximately 30 per cent on a combination of adjusted income and ring-fenced income. A graduated the below an adjusted income level of 400,000 would ensure that the effective rate of tax increased towards 30 per cent as adjusted income increased towards 400,000. For the tax year 2013, the applied to an individual where all of the following criteria applied: The Adjusted Income of the individual for the tax year was equal to or greater than an Income Threshold Amount which was, in general, 125,000 but was less if the individual had ring-fenced income (e.g. deposit interest); The aggregate of specified reliefs used by the individual for the tax year was equal to or greater than a Relief Threshold Amount which was set at 80,000; and The aggregate of specified reliefs used by the individual for the tax year was greater than 20 per cent of the individual s adjusted income. In the case of a married couple, the to each spouse is determined separately. Therefore, in 2013, the applied to each individual spouse only where the three circumstances above applied to that spouse for that tax year. Specified Reliefs Broadly speaking, the reliefs that are restricted include: The various sectoral and area-based property tax incentives; Certain exemptions (e.g., relating to artists income, woodlands etc.); Certain investment incentive reliefs such as Business Expansion Scheme (BES), Employment and Investment Incentive Scheme (EII) relief and film relief; 3 and Relief for interest paid on loans used to acquire an interest in a company or in a partnership. 3 Finance (No. 2) Act 2013 provided that where an investment which qualifies for EII relief is made after 15 October 2013 and before 1 January 2017, then it will not be a specified relief. 4 Statistics & Economic Research Branch

7 Normal business-related expenses, deductions for capital allowances on plant and machinery, business-related trading losses and losses from a rental activity that do not arise from the use of specified reliefs are not restricted. In addition, personal tax credits are not affected by the. 5 Statistics & Economic Research Branch

8 Annex 2 Table 1A: Cases with Adjusted income of 400,000 or more Range of Adjusted income Number of Cases Tax before Tax after Additional Tax after Average Effective rate before Average Effective rate after Tax including USC payable after Average Effective Rate (including USC) after Amount Amount Amount Rate Rate Amount Rate % % % 400, , ,458,815 10,206,353 5,747, % 29.7% 13,487, % 500, , ,653,620 11,723,423 8,069, % 29.9% 15,800, % 650, , ,063,010 6,512,535 4,449, % 31.0% 8,681, % 800,001 1,000, ,162,792 6,637,783 4,474, % 30.4% 8,830, % 1,000,001 1,500, ,381,800 7,151,143 4,769, % 31.5% 9,542, % 1,500,001 2,000, ,840,783 5,618,743 3,777, % 31.7% 7,377, % Over 2,000, ,379,973 13,775,520 9,395, % 30.8% 19,031, % Totals ,940,793 61,625,500 40,684, % 30.3% 82,749, % 6 Statistics & Economic Research Branch

9 Table 1B: Effective Tax Rates cases with Adjusted Income of 400,000 or more Effective Rate Number of cases % of all cases < 15% % >15% < 20% % >20% < 25% % >25% < 30% % >30% < 35% % >35% < 40% 0 0% > 40% 0 0% Totals % Table 1C: Effective Tax Rates inclusive of USC cases with Adjusted Income of 400,000 or more Effective Rate Number of cases % of all cases (Including USC) < 20% >20% < 25% % >25% < 30% % >30% < 35% % >35% < 40% % >40% < 45% % >45% < 50% % >50% < 55% % >55% % Totals % Note: Certain items are deductible when arriving at adjusted income (e.g., pension contributions, certain rental capital allowances on plant and machinery, trading losses against other income etc.) that are not deductible against income on which USC is chargeable. These differences can give rise to taxpayers having effective USC inclusive tax rates on their adjusted income in excess of the top rate of tax plus the top rate of USC. 7 Statistics & Economic Research Branch

10 Table 2A: Cases with Adjusted income of up to 400,000 Range of Adjusted income Number of Cases Tax before Tax after Additional Tax after Average Effective rate before Average Effective rate after Tax including USC payable after Average Effective Rate (including USC) after Amount Amount Amount Rate Rate Amount Rate % % % Under 125, , , , % 11.1% 969, % 125, , ,225,087 3,022,960 1,797, % 11.3% 5,387, % 160, , ,064,064 5,477,345 3,413, % 16.8% 8,711, % 200, , ,261,281 6,613,011 4,351, % 21.3% 9,747, % 250, , ,099,626 8,793,145 5,693, % 25.0% 12,396, % 325, , ,257,383 7,558,451 4,301, % 28.5% 10,255, % Totals ,350,741 32,095,354 19,744, % 18.89% 47,468, % 8 Statistics & Economic Research Branch

11 Table 2B: Effective Tax Rates cases with Adjusted Income of up to 400,000 Effective Rate Number of cases % of all cases >0% < 5% % >5% < 10% % >10% < 15% % >15% < 20% % >20% < 25% % >25% < 30% % >30% < 35% % >35% < 40% % Above 40% % Totals % Table 2C: Effective Tax Rates inclusive of USC Adjusted Income of up to 400,000 Effective Rate Number of cases % of all cases (Including USC) >0% < 5% % >5% < 10% % >10% < 15% % >15% < 20% % >20% < 25% % >25% < 30% % >30% < 35% % >35% < 40% % >40% < 45% % >45% < 50% % >50% < 55% % >55% < 60% % > 60% % Totals % Note: Certain items are deductible when arriving at adjusted income (e.g., pension contributions, certain rental capital allowances on plant and machinery, trading losses against other income etc.) that are not deductible against income on which USC is chargeable. These differences can give rise to taxpayers having effective USC inclusive tax rates on their adjusted income in excess of the top rate of tax plus the top rate of USC. 9 Statistics & Economic Research Branch

12 Table 3 Schedule of declared use of different reliefs Ref Number Specified Relief Number of Cases Amount of Relief used in 2013 by those affected by the 1/2/3/4 Sect 140, 141, 142 and 143 dividends and ,031 distributions out of exempt income from stallion fees, stud greyhounds, woodlands, patents, certain mines and other mining operations 5 Sect 195 Exempt income, profits or gains of 12 1,264,622 artists, writers or composers 6 Sect 231 Exempt stallion fees Did not apply in Sect 232 Exempt woodland income 7 319,805 8 Sect 233 Exempt stud greyhound fees Did not apply in Sect 234 Exempt patent royalty income Did not apply in /11/ Sect 248 and 250 relief for interest paid on loans ,697 to acquire an interest in a company 12 Sect 253 relief for interest paid on loans to acquire 6 54,802 an interest in a partnership 13 Sect 272 writing down allowances in respect of capital expenditure on: hotels and holiday camps/cottages ,667,224 nursing homes, residential units attached to nursing 61 7,761,969 homes and convalescent homes hospitals, sports injury clinics and mental health 59 5,685,076 centres 14 Sect 273 accelerated writing down allowances in 14 1,470,601 respect of certain industrial buildings or structures 15 Sect 274 balancing allowances in respect of capital expenditure on: hotels and holiday camps/cottages 61 8,150,786 nursing homes, residential units attached to nursing 14 1,500,181 homes and convalescent homes hospitals, sports injury clinics and mental health 25 3,166,665 centres 15A Sect 304(4) Carry forward of capital allowances (relating to specified reliefs) in trading situations 15B Sect 305(1) Set off and carry forward of capital 18 3,847,294 allowances (relating to specified reliefs) in rental situations 15C 284 (subject to section 485C(1B) wear & tear 1 3,583 allowances on plant and machinery claimed by a passive trader when leasing the plant and machinery to a manufacturing trade. 15D 288 (subject to section 485C(1B) balancing allowances on plant and machinery claimed by a passive trader when leasing the plant and machinery to a manufacturing trade 16/17 Sect 323 and 324 Custom House Docks Area: 8 3,960,394 capital allowances for commercial premises and double rent allowance in respect of rent paid for certain business premises 18/19/20 Sect 331, 332 and 333 Temple Bar Area: capital 3 31,455 allowances for industrial buildings, commercial premises and double rent allowance in respect of rent paid for certain business premises 21 Sect 341 Urban Renewal Scheme: capital 25 2,181,300 allowances for industrial buildings 22 Sect 342 Urban Renewal Scheme: capital 33 5,581,000 allowances for commercial buildings 23 Sect 343 Enterprise Area: capital allowances for ,919 certain buildings 24 Sect 344 Multi Story Car Park capital allowances , Sect Urban Renewal, Enterprise Area, Multi 3 1,208,642 Story Car Park: double rent allowance in respect of rent paid for certain business premises 26 Sect 352 Qualifying Resort Area: capital allowances for certain industrial buildings 4 124, Statistics & Economic Research Branch

13 Ref Number Specified Relief Number of Cases Amount of Relief used in 2013 by those affected by the 27 Sect 353 Qualifying Resort Area: capital allowances 3 21,065 for certain commercial buildings 28 Sect 354 Qualifying Resort Area: double rent 0 0 allowance in respect of rent paid for certain business premises 29 Sect 372C Qualifying (Urban) Areas: capital 30 2,196,055 allowances for certain industrial buildings 30 Sect 372D Qualifying (Urban) Area and Living over 19 5,871,021 the shop scheme: capital allowances for certain commercial buildings 31/32 Sect 372M and Sect 372N Qualifying Rural Areas: 14 1,481,250 capital allowances for certain industrial and commercial buildings 33/34 Sect 372V and 372W Park and Ride Scheme: 2 323,586 Capital allowances for Park and Ride Facilities and for certain commercial buildings 35 Sect 372AC Town Renewal Area: capital allowances 8 561,690 for certain industrial buildings 36 Sect 372AD Town Renewal Area: capital ,648 allowances for certain commercial buildings 36A/36B Sect 372AX and 372AY Mid Shannon Corridor 3 255,550 Tourism Scheme: capital allowances for certain registered holiday camps and tourism infrastructure facilities 37/38 Sect 372AP and Sect 372AU(1) Relief for lessors of 47 6,796,731 residential premises ( section 23 type relief, including old schemes) 39 Sect 381 Repayment of tax due to losses (arising 4 227,582 from use of Specified.Reliefs) 40 Sect 381 Repayment of tax due to losses (arising 1 101,471 from use of specified reliefs), as extended by Sect Sect 382 Carry forward of losses (arising from use 5 399,125 of specified reliefs) to future years 42/43/44 Sect 383, Sect 384 and Sect 385 Relief (arising 59 9,633,366 from use of specified reliefs) for losses under Case IV and Case V and for Terminal losses 45 Sect 481 Relief for investment in Films , Sect 482 Relief for investment on significant 9 1,592,818 buildings and gardens 47 Sect 485F Carry forward of excess relief ,907,340 47A Sect 489(2)(a) Employment and Investment 37 2,346,788 Incentive Scheme 4 48 Sect 489(3) BES relief 4 437, Sect 843 Capital allowances for buildings used for 13 2,600,221 third level education purposes 50 Sect 843A Capital allowances for certain child-care 19 1,195,015 facilities 51 Sect 847A Donations to certain sports bodies 1 50, Sect 848A - donations to approved bodies Did not apply in Paragraph 11 of Schedule 32, Urban Renewal 4 70,505 Scheme 1986: Capital allowances for certain commercial premises in designated areas 54 Paragraph 13 of Schedule 32, Urban Renewal Scheme 1986: Double rent allowances in relation to certain premises in designated areas 2 196,371 Totals 1, ,298,557 Note: for publication purposes some categories have been amalgamated. 4 Finance (No. 2) Act 2013 provided that where an investment is made after 15 October 2013 and before 1 January 2017, then it will not be a specified relief. 11 Statistics & Economic Research Branch