SUBJECT: SEE BELOW DATE: March 23, 2017

Size: px
Start display at page:

Download "SUBJECT: SEE BELOW DATE: March 23, 2017"

Transcription

1 COUNCIL AGENDA: 4/4/17 ITEM: 4.1 TO: HONORABLE MAYOR AND CITY COUNCIL FROM: Toni J. Taber, CMC City Clerk SUBJECT: SEE BELOW DATE: March 23, 2017 SUBJECT: CONSTRUCTION TAX MODIFICATION RECOMMENDATION: As recommended by the Community and Economic Development Committee on January 23, 2017, accept the report and approve an ordinance to: (a) Amend Title 4 of the San José Municipal Code to create a temporary partial suspension from the Commercial-Residential-Mobilehome Park Building Tax (SJMC 4.47) to achieve a rate of 1% for the following uses: (1) Office, General Business (SJMC ) (2) Office, Research and Development (SJMC ) (3) Data Center (SJMC ) to allow the City Council the flexibility to review the uses included and verify that these sectors are being accurately represented this provision shall sunset March 31, (b) Amend Section of Chapter 4.82 of Title 4 of the San José Municipal Code to authorize the City Manager or designee to compromise or settle tax refund claims for amounts between fifty thousand dollars ($50,000.00) and a threshold to be determined by the City Council in its consideration of the proposed ordinance, with the written approval of the City Attorney.

2 CED AGENDA: zyxwvutsrqponmlkjihgfed 1/23/17 ITEM: (D) 2 CITY OF 7SI SAN JOSE uronmedam CAPITAL OF SILICON VALLEY Memorandum TO: COMMUNITY AND ECONOMIC DEVELOPMENT COMMITTEE FROM: Kim Walesh Jim Ortbal Harry Freitas SUBJECT: CONSTRUCTION TAXES DATE: January 13, 2017 RECOMMENDATION Accept report and forward a recommendation to the full City Council to approve an ordinance to: 1. Amend Title 4 of the San Jose Municipal Code to create a temporary partial suspension from the Commercial-Residential-Mobilehome Park Building Tax (SJMC 4.47) to achieve a rate of 1% for the following uses: a. Office, General Business (SJMC ) b. Office, Research and Development (SJMC ) c. Data Center (SJMC ) To allow the City Council the flexibility to review the uses included and verify that these sectors are being accurately represented, this provision shall sunset March 31, Amend Title 4 of the San Jose Municipal Code to amend section to authorize the City Manager or designee to compromise or settle tax refund claims for amounts exceeding fifty thousand dollars ($50,000.00), with the written approval of the City Attorney. OUTCOME Providing further refinement of the Title 4 definitions of Industrial and Commercial development by adding an Office category and appropriate tax rate will ensure that San Jose remains a competitive market in the region for the development and leasing of commercial real estate by driving industry companies. The new Office category included in Title 4 will include the Title 20 definitions of "Office, General Business", "Office/ Research and Development" and "Data Centers", and provide clarity and consistency to the development and business community

3 To: Community and Economic Development Committee Date: January 13, 2017 zyxvutsrponmlkjihgfedcbayxwvutsrponmlkjihgfedcba Subject: Construction Taxes Page 2 regarding the applicability of the City's construction taxes. The result is that projects designated as these uses will be taxed at a rate of 2.5% rather than the 4.5% rate for commercially designated projects. BACKGROUND On December 13, 2012, City Council directed staff to propose a plan for full modernization of the City's construction taxes to better align the taxation policies with the job goals of the City's Economic Strategy and Envision Construction-Related Taxes San Jose has four construction-related taxes, but for the purposes of this discussion only two are pertinent: The Building and Structures Construction Tax (SJMC 4.46), and the Commercial- Residential-Mobilehome Park Building Tax found at SJMC 4.47, (also known as the CRMP Tax). These two taxes have been the primary focus of this analysis as they represent a sizeable proportion of the cost of many building permits issued by the City and fund the majority of the Traffic Capital Improvement Program, that includes projects and programs such as pedestrian and traffic safety, pavement maintenance, traffic signals, and grant project required local matches. The remaining elements of project permitting costs can be attributed to administration, plan check and inspection fees, which are 100% cost-recovery, and Impact Fees (parks, traffic, affordable housing etc.). San Jose's Building and Structure Construction Tax and Commercial-Residential-Mobilehome Park Building Tax are applicable to all building permits including both new construction and tenant improvements. For the purposes of collecting these taxes, permit applications are deemed by Building Department pennitting staff to be Residential, Commercial or Industrial. The Building and Structures Tax is a special tax, the revenues from which must be used for the construction and enhancement of major collectors and arterial streets in the City. The Commercial-Residential-Mobilehome Park Building Tax is a general tax with no restrictions on expenditure, but has historically been used for transportation purposes to fund pedestrian and traffic safety, pavement maintenance, and grant project required local matches. Rates for these taxes vary based on the intended use of the building or structure being permitted. Construction taxes are collected against the valuation of the project derived from the higher of either the International Code Council's building valuation data table or the submitted valuation estimate by the project applicant. The table below outlines the tax rates applied to the different building uses by tax fund:

4 To: Community and Economic Development Committee Date: January 13, 2017 zyxvutsrponmlkjihgfedcbayxwvutsrponmlkjihgfedcba Subject: Construction Taxes Page 3 Use Building & Structures Tax Commercial- Residential- Mobilehome Park Building Tax Total Residential % 2.75% 4.5% Commercial 1.5% 3% 4.5% Industrial 1% N/A 1% Residential and Commercial uses are broadly defined for both taxes based on the provisions of the Zoning Ordinance. "Residential" uses is considered in terms of single-family dwellings, two-family dwellings or multiple dwellings, while "Commercial" uses are those allowed in the General Commercial Zoning District per the Zoning Ordinance. "Industrial" uses are defined differently in that twelve specific uses are explicitly called out as eligible for the lower tax rate based upon the Zoning Ordinance that went into effect at the time, September 1987, and are as follows: - Laboratories devoted exclusively to research, product development and testing, engineering development, and sales development - Manufacturing facilities - Photographic processing and developing - Mini-warehouses - Production, preservation and preparation of food products for human consumption, excluding public dining - Trade and business schools - Repair, cleaning, and servicing of commercial or industrial equipment or products - Storage, warehousing and distribution establishments - Construction and corporation yards - Repair and cleaning of vehicles, including boats, excluding gasoline service stations and repair shops installation of tire, battery, brake, muffler and shock absorber, and wheel aligning - 9 and 18 hole golf courses - Frozen food lockers Purpose and Use of Taxes for Transportation Purposes The City heavily relies on construction taxes to plan, develop, operate and maintain the local transportation system, given the very limited General Fund resources available for transportation purposes. For context on the two major transportation funds in the City's Traffic Capital 1 Residential projects are assessed taxes based on 88% of the project valuation, whereas Commercial and Industrial projects are assessed based on 100% of the project valuation. For comparison, the effective combined tax rate for Residential projects is 3.96%.

5 To: Community and Economic Development Committee Date: January 13, 2017 zyxvutsrponmlkjihgfedcbayxwvutsrponmlkjihgfedcba Subject: Construction Taxes Page 4 Program, 89% of the Building and Structure Fund revenues and 44% of Construction Excise Fund revenues come from these construction taxes. As briefly mentioned previously, these revenues fund essential transportation projects and programs including pedestrian and traffic safety projects (e.g. enhanced crossings by schools and radar speed signs), the operation and maintenance of traffic signals, streetlights, signs and markings, complete street projects that modernize the travel experience for pedestrians, bicyclists and vehicles, pavement maintenance activities, and required local matches for numerous transportation grant projects, creating great leverage of the funds. The current five year CIP invests $37M in local match dollars resulting in a return of $200M in grant dollars. Loss of revenue to these funds severely limit the City's ability to achieve key transportation priorities. It is important to note that San Jose's local transportation is facing serious maintenance backlogs for a wide range of essential transportation infrastructure of approximately $670 million, of which $521 million is for pavement maintenance alone. In addition, pavement maintenance has projected annual funding shortfalls of almost $70 million of the over $100 million annual need. However, San Jose is somewhat unique in its levy of construction taxes on development, raising concerns about competitiveness. Key neighboring cities, including Santa Clara, Milpitas, and Fremont, do not charge construction taxes. Other cities such as Mountain View, Sunnyvale and Cupertino have either a low construction tax or a flat rate across commercial and industrial projects. Neighboring cities are often less reliant on construction tax revenue because they invest General Fund money into their transportation network, which San Jose has not had the ability to do given its limited resources and significant general purpose needs. Prior Amendments Following the adoption of the City's first Comprehensive Economic Strategy in 2003, the City Council approved an ordinance in June 2004 amending Title 4 to temporarily expand the list of uses that were taxed at the lower industrial rate of 1 % to include additional uses that represent the types of industries that occur in the cities industrial areas and help drive job and general purpose revenue growth. These uses were: - Industrial Services - Retail or wholesale commercial entity, single occupant greater than 100,000 gross square feet - Sales, office furniture, industrial equipment, machinery - Printing and publishing - Base Load Facility Photovoltaic - Sale or lease of commercial trucks, buses, trailers, campers, boats, mobile homes, construction equipment - Software development - Internet applications

6 To: Community and Economic Development Committee Date: January 13, 2017 zyxvutsrponmlkjihgfedcbayxwvutsrponmlkjihgfedcba Subject: Construction Taxes Page 5 - Server farms and co-location facilities - Telephone switching gears, telecommunication facilities, wireless communication facilities, antenna, and equipment The ordinance included a sunset provision of five years or until June 30, 2009 to allow the City Council the flexibility to review the uses included and verify that these sectors represented those businesses that were still driving the economy and growth in the cities industrial areas. The memorandum recommending the ordinance specifically noted that the sunset provision would provide the City Council with the "flexibility to determine if the sectors included continue to generate a significant number of middle and high paying jobs and thus merit assistance from the City." The amendment sunset on June 30, The effect of the five years of the suspension followed by two years of no suspension caused confusion in the development community and directly impacted a number of driving industry projects in process or under consideration. In January 2012, new definitions were included to help clarify what sectors were considered office/r&d to match what was occurring in our Major Employment Areas/Industrial Park Zoning Districts, and that would be eligible to pay the lower industrial rate of 1%. This modification included the following uses: - Office, research and development uses as defined by Title 20 - Data center uses - Installation of solar photovoltaic systems This provision was set to sunset on March 15, but was later extended to March , with direction for staff to return to Council with a plan to recommend changes to the municipal code to "fix" the issue long term. A full modernization of the City's construction related taxes - which addresses the underlying challenges related to implementation, sufficiently funding transportation improvements, and encouraging job creation - would require voter approval and the intent of this previous extension was to align with the potential inclusion of a measure on the November 8, 2016 ballot. Due to other competing high-priority ballots initiatives, staff believed that a potential measure may have had a negative impact on other initiatives or may have been unsuccessful, and that a different administrative approach was necessary at that time. ANALYSIS In evaluating the modernization of the City's construction taxes, staff has laid out the following principles to ensure that adjustments to the rate of tax for development (both new construction and investment in existing buildings and equipment) meets the following three City goals. 1. Competitive - Align with the types of development that the City is interested in promoting and to remain competitive with surrounding cities, which do not have these taxes and use alternate funding methods to finance major infrastructure needs.

7 To: Community and Economic Development Committee Date: January 13, 2017 zyxvutsrponmlkjihgfedcbayxwvutsrponmlkjihgfedcba Subject: Construction Taxes Page 6 2. Revenue Neutral - Remain revenue neutral so as not to impact the limited funding that supports transportation infrastructure build out and essential maintenance. 3. Administrative Simplicity - Create clear definitions and process steps so that the development community has a better understanding of how the City implements these taxes and so that staff has clear implementation guidelines. Need for Modernization - Changing Nature and Location of Driving Industries As highlighted by the history of work on this topic over the past 13 years, the changing nature of uses in the City's commercial and industrial buildings since the adoption of the ordinance has created ambiguity and challenges in how these taxes are applied to some of our driving industries and commercial office development. "Driving Industries" are sectors that disproportionally stimulate the local economy because they serve external markets, and generate jobs and investment in the community. These uses typically have more options as to where they invest and locate facilities at the regional, state and national level. Locally, many of our driving industries are technology-related, but in the same way that the terms "technology-related" or "tech" have become too vague to encapsulate all of the variations in uses and users in these industries, so have the definitions used to determine the appropriate tax rate throughout the City. When these taxes were enacted in the 1970s, there was a very clear understanding and difference between R&D and office uses. The perception of R&D was that it occurred in a clean room like a laboratory and utilized significant capital equipment, and that it occupied the majority of the space in the building. Today R&D is more likely to require the use of computers in an open office environment, may have some specialized equipment or conditioned space, and may be integrated with sales and administration teams in a single space. The inclusion of "office, research and development" as a definition eligible to pay the reduced rate in 2012 was intended to address some of the ambiguity between different R&D uses by defining it as "industrial or scientific research and product design that involves the use of computers and other related office equipment in an office setting, including administrative services, product design and sales." While this went some way to addressing the changing nature of tech related uses, the broader industry has continued to evolve and the nature of uses has become more blurred and harder to define by conventional terms. For example, traditional professional service firms now occupy work environments that resemble those of software companies. This continued transition also poses problems for the City from a land use perspective since the Industrial Park Zoning District, which is prevalent in key growth areas such as North San Jose and Edenvale, does not allow professional service offices but does allow software development. In addition to the changing nature of industrial uses, San Jose is experiencing change in where these uses are occurring. Following the adoption of the Envision 2040 General Plan, tech related employers have expressed interest outside of the traditional employment and industrial centers of North San Jose and Edenvale. This trend is likely to continue as the City works to attract more

8 To: Community and Economic Development Committee Date: January 13, 2017 zyxvutsrponmlkjihgfedcbayxwvutsrponmlkjihgfedcba Subject: Construction Taxes Page 7 employers to address the jobs/housing imbalance and continue to build out more employment uses in mixed-use urban villages. This locational shift is also being driven by the changing nature of how employers choose their location. Amenity-rich urban centers continue to attract the talent that technology companies are looking to hire. Over the last five years, Downtown San Jose has shifted from predominantly traditional financial and professional services firms to a majority of new leases being tech related. This is also occurring as areas such as West San Jose see additional growth due to proximity to amenities and other large/anchor tech-companies. This will likely result in employers that would otherwise be consistent with the definition of an industrial use for tax purposes, doing business outside of the City's traditional industrial areas. Staff Recommendation The prior solution to this challenge was to provide an expanded list of uses eligible to pay the industrial rate, thereby removing a financial obstacle for driving industry uses interested in locating in San Jose. As San Jose begins to realize more new construction, this could have significant negative impacts on the funds available to support the build out and maintenance of the City's transportation network. As employment uses become more office-like in nature, an alternative approach would be to consider more uses as offices and therefore tax them at the higher rate. When considering options for relocation or expansion, many companies are less concerned with the way the City classifies their use, and ultimately only consider the total cost of permitting the project. As such, considering these uses at the full commercial rate would have the impact of making San Jose more expensive and less competitive with surrounding cities that do not have similar taxes, justifying a rate lower than traditional commercial development. To address these competing priorities staff is recommending that in future, uses that are performed in an "office-like" environment be considered commercial, consistent to existing provisions of Title 4, but that Council approve a partial suspension to reduce the Commercial- Residential-Mobilehome Park Building Tax (SJMC 4.47) to 1% from 3% for office uses, thereby creating a combined effective tax rate of 2.5%, instead of the commercial rate of 4.5% or the industrial rate of 1%. Use Building & Structures Tax Commercial- Residential- Mobilehome Park Building Tax Total Commercial 1.5% 3% 4.5% Office 1.5% 1% 2.5% Industrial 1% N/A 1% To ensure consistent application of this rate, the definition of office uses will utilize the two Zoning Ordinance definitions of business offices: - Office, General Business: A "General business office" is a space within which management-level administrative services for firms and institutions are provided; or

9 To: Community and Economic Development Committee Date: January 13, 2017 zyxvutsrponmlkjihgfedcbayxwvutsrponmlkjihgfedcba Subject: Construction Taxes Page 8 within which services to individuals, firms, or other entities are provided. Examples of a general business office use include but are not limited to offices within which the following services are provided: real estate, insurance, property management, title companies, investment, personnel, travel, and similar services, and including business offices of public utilities or other activities when the service rendered is a service that is customarily associated with office services. (SJMC ) - Office, Research and Development: "Office, research and development" is an establishment engaged in industrial or scientific research and product design that involves the use of computers and other related office equipment in an office setting. The facility may also include administrative services related to product design or sales, but does not include laboratories, manufacturing or assembly. (SJMC ) In the past, uses that are unclear, or developments that do not have a specified user at the time the construction taxes are paid, have had the commercial and industrial applied inconsistently. As such, commercial uses have pre-paid the industrial rate, and vice-versa. By creating a new definition that is agnostic to location with the city and that focusses on nature of the environment rather than narrow industry types, staffs recommendation will ensure that the new rate is applied more consistently without making San Jose uncompetitive and without impacting revenues to the Transportation Capital Improvement Program. Data Centers Data centers are an important part of San Jose's driving industry ecosystem. In addition to being an important piece of private sector infrastructures that supports many of the companies that the City is actively trying to attract, data centers also generate considerable secured and unsecured property taxes for the City. Because of the significant capital investment required to construct data centers, the permit valuation is often high, resulting in significant development costs for data center developers. Staff is therefore proposing that they also be included at the 2.5% combined construction tax rate. Implementation As companies and developers come to the City to obtain building permits, their projects are deemed by Building Department staff to be either Commercial or Industrial for purposes of calculating appropriate construction tax rates based on the Title 4 use definitions. This determination of the tax rate can have significant implications on the cost of permitting developments, as the difference can result in the applicant paying four and a half times more on the construction taxes due on a project. As such, the predictability and consistency of these tax costs are important considerations in promoting economic development. The process for assessing whether a use is considered Industrial or Commercial relies on the submittal of an industrial use designation form when an applicant pulls a building permit and is

10 To: Community and Economic Development Committee Date: January 13, 2017 zyxvutsrponmlkjihgfedcbayxwvutsrponmlkjihgfedcba Subject: Construction Taxes Page 9 required to pay all appropriate fees and taxes. This represents a number of implementation challenges for the permitting staff responsible for making this determination, which include: - Differing characterization of industrial/office/r&d projects, o Internally, by Building, Planning or OED, o Externally, by broker, tenant, property owner or contractor. - Level of understanding or awareness of the construction taxes or the cost implications of incorrect project definition. - Multiple actors from the development team are interacting with Building Department staff throughout the process (architect, general contractor, sub-contractor, tenant, property owner, broker, and lobbyist). - Because the Industrial definition is very use specific, the Commercial rate has become the default for projects that don't submit the industrial use form. - When a developer or property owner constructs a building or undergoes "market ready" improvements, the ultimate user is unknown. - When circumstances change or mistakes are made, the municipal code currently requires Council authorization for refunds over $50k. Over the last two years, these challenges (along with the changing nature of driving industries detailed above) have impacted a series of projects resulting in the need for several significant refunds to be approved by City Council. All of these instances have arisen from new, speculative construction or renovation projects marketed to accommodate driving industry companies across different parts of the City. In most of these cases, the improvements are not tenant specific, the developers and contractors are referring to the project as "office", the projects are located in mixed-use areas, and developers have been unaware of the difference in definition for tax purposes. As such, over 1 million square feet of development has been built or renovated under the commercial designation which, depending on the ultimate tenant of the building, may be industrial under the current definition. The creation of a separate designation and tax rate specifically for Office uses (both technology and non-technology related) will reduce the likelihood that significant refunds of this type will be required in the future. In addition, OED staff will be coordinating closely with the Building Department on current tenant trends in commercial real estate and provide additional support and training. Refund Authority On October 4, 2016, City Council directed staff to return with an Ordinance granting the City Manager authority to approve all refunds, with the written approval of the City Attorney, where the calculation of the refund amount is addressed by application of the Municipal Code. In cases where construction taxes have been paid above the determined rate, the Council approval process for refunds can be time intensive and can tie up resources for the applicant. Staff has included a recommendation to approve an ordinance that amends the current provisions for processing tax refund claims that require City Council approval for amounts exceeding $50,000. The new provisions would give the City Manager or his designee authority to issue refund claims for the

11 To: Community and Economic Development Committee Date: January 13, 2017 zyxvutsrponmlkjihgfedcbayxwvutsrponmlkjihgfedcba Subject: Construction Taxes Page 10 above $50,000, with the written approval of the City Attorney and coordination with the City Manager's Budget Office and Department of Transportation. EVALUATION AND FOLLOW-UP On December 13, 2012, City Council directed staff to propose a plan for full modernization of the City's construction taxes to better align the taxation policies with the job goals of the City's Economic Strategy and Envision A full modernization of the City's construction related taxes which addresses the underlying challenges related to implementation, funding transportation improvements and encouraging job creation, requires voter approval and staff considered recommending the inclusion of a measure on the November 8, 2016 ballot. Due to competing ballots initiatives, staff believed that a proposed measure would be unsuccessful and therefore held off pursuing that outcome. While staff is requesting a five-year time limit on the partial suspension to provide for further modification at a later date, staff will continue to monitor and analyze the collection and implementation of these taxes and will return to Council should a future ballot measure be appropriate. Following Council's recommendation and to ensure transparency on significant refunds (those over $100,000), staff will report out to the City Council on refund activity on an annual basis through an information memo to the Council. BUDGET IMPACT The Building and Structures Construction Tax (SJMC 4.46), and the Commercial-Residential- Mobilehome Park Building Tax (SJMC 4.47) fund the majority of the Traffic Capital Improvement Program. Revenues from these taxes are dependent on the level and nature of construction activity moving through the building permit process. Based on historical analysis of the past five years permitting activity, staff anticipates that the partial suspension and clarification of use definitions will result in revenues remaining neutral or experiencing a modest increase. PUBLIC OUTREACH. This memorandum will be posted on the City's website for the January 23, 2017 Community and Economic Development Committee agenda. COORDINATION The memorandum has been coordinated with the City Attorney's Office and the City Manager's Budget Office.

12 To: Community and Economic Development Committee Date: January 13, 2017 zyxvutsrponmlkjihgfedcbayxwvutsrponmlkjihgfedcba Subject: Construction Taxes Page 11 CEOA Statutorily Exempt, File No. PP (a), CEQA Guidelines Section Rates, Tolls, Fares, and Charges. /s/ KIM WALESH Deputy City Manager Director of Economic Development /s/ JIM ORTBAL Director, Department of Transportation /s/ HARRY FREITAS, Director Planning, Building and Code Enforcement For questions please contact Chris Burton, Sr. Business Development Manager, at (408)

13 Construction Taxes City of San José Construction Taxes

14 Construction-Related Taxes Building & Structure Construction Tax (B&S) Chapter 4.46 Tax Rate of Building Valuation Residential: 1.54% Commercial: 1.50% Industrial: 1.00% Commercial- Residential- Mobilehome Park Building Tax (CRMP) Chapter 4.47 Construction Tax Chapter 4.54 Tax Rate of Building Valuation Residential: 2.42% Mobile Home Parks: 2.42% Commercial: 3.00% Residential: $75 - $150 Per Unit Commercial: $0.08 /sf Industrial: $0.08 /sf Residential Construction Tax Chapter 4.64 Residential: $90 - $180 Per Unit

15 Use of Tax Revenue Building & Structure Construction Tax (B&S) Chapter 4.46 Commercial- Residential- Mobilehome Park Building Tax (CRMP) Chapter 4.47 Construction Tax Chapter 4.54 Residential Construction Tax Chapter 4.64 Revenues are reserved for developing the General Plan Transportation System. This revenue funds key transportation infrastructure in support of economic development. The Construction Excise tax is a general purpose tax not restricted in its uses. Per City Council Policy the revenues are dedicated to the Traffic CIP. The revenue is used for a number of programs in support of the City s general plan to develop a pedestrian, bicycle, and transit environment. Acquisition, construction, capital improvements/ maintenance of Libraries, Fire Stations, Parks and PW Facilities Reimburse people that construct public streets/highways at their sole cost/expense, and street maintenance.

16 Use of Tax Revenue Construction Tax Revenue for Transportation Purposes Construction Tax Revenues Construction Tax Uses Pavement & Traffic Maintenance Pedestrian Safety & Traffic Calming Projects Local Complete Streets Grant Funded Projects Local Match Traffic Signals & Timing Projects

17 Types of Building Use Residential: - One-family dwellings, two-family dwellings or multiple dwellings Commercial: - Those allowed in the General Commercial Zoning District per the Zoning Ordinance. Industrial: - Laboratories devoted to research, product development and testing - Manufacturing facilities - Photographic processing and developing - Miniwarehouses - Production and preparation of food products - Trade and business schools - Repair, cleaning, and servicing of equipment or products - Storage, warehousing and distribution - Construction and corporation yards - Repair and cleaning of vehicles, - 9 and 18 hole golf courses

18 Prior Amendments June 2004 additions (sunset June 30, 2009): - Industrial Services - Retail or wholesale commercial entity, single occupant greater than 100,000 gross square feet - Sale or lease of commercial trucks, buses, trailers, campers, boats, mobilehomes, construction equipment. - Software development. - Sales, office furniture, industrial equipment, machinery - Printing and publishing - Base Load Facility - Photovoltaic - Internet applications - Server farms and co-location facilities - Telephone switching gears, telecommunication facilities, wireless communication facilities, antenna, and equipment January 2012 additions (sunset March 31, 2017): - Office research and development uses - Data center uses - Installation of solar photovoltaic systems

19 Modernization Principles: Adjust the rate structure on these taxes to achieve three things: 1. Competitive Align with the types of development that the City is interested in promoting and to remain competitive with surrounding cities, which do not have these taxes and use alternate funding methods to finance major infrastructure needs. 2. Revenue Neutral Remain revenue neutral so as not to impact the funding that supports infrastructure build out and pavement maintenance, and 3. Administrative Simplicity Create clear definitions and process steps so that the development community has a better understanding of how the City implements these taxes and so that staff has clear implementation guidelines.

20 Need for Modernization: Changing Nature of Use Industrial Commercial Research & Development Laboratories devoted exclusively to research, product development and testing Office Office space within which management-level administrative services for firms and institutions are provided; or within which services to individuals, firms, or other entities are provided.

21 Need for Modernization: Driving Industry Locations

22 Staff Recommendation: Use Building & Structures Tax Commercial- Residential- Mobilehome Park Building Tax Total Commercial 1.5% 3% 4.5% Office 1.5% 1% 2.5% Industrial 1% N/A 1%

23 Staff Recommendation: - Office, General Business: A "General business office" is a space within which management-level administrative services for firms and institutions are provided; or within which services to individuals, firms, or other entities are provided. Examples of a general business office use include but are not limited to offices within which the following services are provided: real estate, insurance, property management, title companies, investment, personnel, travel, and similar services, and including business offices of public utilities or other activities when the service rendered is a service that is customarily associated with office services. (SJMC ) - Office, Research and Development: "Office, research and development" is an establishment engaged in industrial or scientific research and product design that involves the use of computers and other related office equipment in an office setting. The facility may also include administrative services related to product design or sales, but does not include laboratories, manufacturing or assembly. (SJMC )

24 Staff Recommendation: Accept report and forward a recommendation to the full City Council to approve an ordinance to: 1. Amend Title 4 of the San José Municipal Code to create a temporary partial suspension from the Commercial-Residential-Mobilehome Park Building Tax (SJMC 4.47) to achieve a rate of 1% for the following uses: a. Office, General Business (SJMC ) b. Office, Research and Development (SJMC ) c. Data Center (SJMC ) To allow the City Council the flexibility to review the uses included and verify that these sectors are being accurately represented this provision shall sunset March 31, Amend Title 4 of the San José Municipal Code to amend section to authorize the City Manager or designee compromise or settle tax refund claims for amounts exceeding fifty thousand dollars ($50,000.00), with the written approval of the city attorney.

25 Questions:

SAN JOSH CAPITAL OP SILICON VALLEY F/ZZ/IL. Memorandum. FROM: Kim Walesh Julia H. Cooper TO: HONORABLE MAYOR AND CITY COUNCIL

SAN JOSH CAPITAL OP SILICON VALLEY F/ZZ/IL. Memorandum. FROM: Kim Walesh Julia H. Cooper TO: HONORABLE MAYOR AND CITY COUNCIL COUNCIL AGENDA: 08/02/16 ITEM: ^3 CITY OF SAN JOSH CAPITAL OP SILICON VALLEY TO: HONORABLE MAYOR AND CITY COUNCIL SUBJECT: POTENTIAL BUSINESS TAX MODERNIZATION MEASURE A pproved ^ Memorandum FROM: Kim

More information

APPROVAL OF INDUSTRIAL PROJECT COMPLETION AGREEMENT WITH CMK, LLC (DBA BAPC, LLC)

APPROVAL OF INDUSTRIAL PROJECT COMPLETION AGREEMENT WITH CMK, LLC (DBA BAPC, LLC) COUNCIL AGENDA: 11/15/16 ITEM: 4.1 CITY OF SANJOSE CAPITAL OF SILICON VALLEY TO: HONORABLE MAYOR AND CITY COUNCIL Memorandum FROM: Kim Walesh SUBJECT: SEE BELOW DATE: Approved TT>-PS N Date //A//c. COUNCIL

More information

SAN JOSE CAPITAL OF SILICON VALLEY

SAN JOSE CAPITAL OF SILICON VALLEY CITY OF 4% SAN JOSE CAPITAL OF SILICON VALLEY COUNCIL AGENDA: 8-23-16 ITEM: 4.4 Memorandum TO: HONORABLE MAYOR AND CITY COUNCIL SUBJECT: SEE BELOW FROM: Toni J. Taber, CMC City Clerk DATE: August 19, 2016

More information

TO: HONORABLE MAYOR AND. FROM: Toni J. Taber, CM1 SUBJECT: SEE BELOW. DATE: November 5, Approval of Adjusted Campaign Contribution Limits.

TO: HONORABLE MAYOR AND. FROM: Toni J. Taber, CM1 SUBJECT: SEE BELOW. DATE: November 5, Approval of Adjusted Campaign Contribution Limits. COUNCIL AGENDA: 11-17-15 ITEM: 2.11, CITY OF SAN IPSE Memorandum CAPITAL OF SILICON VALLEY TO: HONORABLE MAYOR AND CITY COUNCIL SUBJECT: SEE BELOW SUBJECT: FROM: Toni J. Taber, CM1 DATE: November 5, 2015

More information

SAN JOSE CAPITAL OF SILICON VALLEY

SAN JOSE CAPITAL OF SILICON VALLEY COUNCIL AGENDA: 6/9/15 ITEM: CITY OF SAN JOSE CAPITAL OF SILICON VALLEY Memorandum TO: HONORABLE MAYOR AND CITY COUNCIL FROM: Kerrie Romanow SUBJECT: SEE BELOW DATE: Approved Date s'mis SUBJECT: ADOPTION

More information

Memorandum \[\<<\\* /7/ TO: HONORABLE MAYOR AND CITY COUNCIL. FROM: Barry Ng Jennifer A. Maguire

Memorandum \[\<<\\* /7/ TO: HONORABLE MAYOR AND CITY COUNCIL. FROM: Barry Ng Jennifer A. Maguire CITY OF fir *3 SAN JOSE CAPITAL OF SILICON VALLEY TO: HONORABLE MAYOR AND CITY COUNCIL COUNCL AGENDA: 1/31/17 ITEM: Memorandum FROM: Barry Ng Jennifer A. Maguire -------2/7/17 ------ 4.1 SUBJECT: SEE BELOW

More information

Report to the City Council

Report to the City Council The City of San Diego Report to the City Council DATE ISSUED: June 7, 2017 REPORT NO: ATTENTION: Honorable Members of the City Council SUBJECT: Consideration of a Proposed Ballot Measure to Authorize an

More information

SAN FRANCISCO MUNICIPAL TRANSPORTATION AGENCY

SAN FRANCISCO MUNICIPAL TRANSPORTATION AGENCY THIS PRINT COVERS CALENDAR ITEM NO. : 12 SAN FRANCISCO MUNICIPAL TRANSPORTATION AGENCY DIVISION: Finance and Information Technology BRIEF DESCRIPTION: Amend Transportation Code, Division II, by amending

More information

SAN JOSE CAPITAL OF SILICON VALLEY

SAN JOSE CAPITAL OF SILICON VALLEY COUNCIL AGENDA: 6/21/16 ITEM: I.Zfj CITY OF SAN JOSE CAPITAL OF SILICON VALLEY Memorandum TO: HONORABLE MAYOR AND CITY COUNCIL FROM: Barry Ng Jim Ortbal Jennifer A. Maguire SUBJECT: SEE BELOW DATE: Approved

More information

ACTIONS RELATED TO BOARD OF FAIR CAMPAIGN AND POLITICAL PRACTICES RECOMMENDATIONS FOR CHANGES TO THE CITY'S GIFT ORDINANCE UNDER TITLE 12.

ACTIONS RELATED TO BOARD OF FAIR CAMPAIGN AND POLITICAL PRACTICES RECOMMENDATIONS FOR CHANGES TO THE CITY'S GIFT ORDINANCE UNDER TITLE 12. Council Agenda: 6/20/17 ITEM: 3.4 CITY OF fft SAN JOSE CAPITAL OF SILICON VALLEY TO: HONORABLE MAYOR AND CITY COUNCIL SUBJECT: SEE BELOW Memorandum FROM: Toni Taber, CMC City Clerk DATE: SUBJECT ACTIONS

More information

ACTIONS RELATED TO THE RECYCLE PLUS RATES FOR SINGLE-FAMILY AND MULTI-FAMILY SERVICES

ACTIONS RELATED TO THE RECYCLE PLUS RATES FOR SINGLE-FAMILY AND MULTI-FAMILY SERVICES COUNCIL AGENDA: 06/06/17 ITEM: 7.2. CITY OF SAN JOSE CAPITAL OF SILICON VALLEY TO: HONORABLE MAYOR AND CITY COUNCIL Memorandum FROM: Kerrie Romanow SUBJECT: SEE BELOW DATE: Approved Date 1 SUBJECT: ACTIONS

More information

SUBJECT: SEE BELOW DATE: November 22, 2016

SUBJECT: SEE BELOW DATE: November 22, 2016 COUNCIL AGENDA: 12/13/16 ITEM: 10.1(a) TO: HONORABLE MAYOR AND CITY COUNCIL FROM: Planning Commission SUBJECT: SEE BELOW DATE: November 22, 2016 SUBJECT: GPT16-009. CITY-INITIATED GENERAL PLAN TEXT AMENDMENTS

More information

San Francisco's Experience With Business Tax Reform. Ted Egan, Ph.D. Chief Economist City and County of San Francisco

San Francisco's Experience With Business Tax Reform. Ted Egan, Ph.D. Chief Economist City and County of San Francisco San Francisco's Experience With Business Tax Reform Ted Egan, Ph.D. Chief Economist City and County of San Francisco A Bit of History 1970s San Francisco institutes a hybrid, Gross Receipts/Payroll tax

More information

COUNCIL AGENDA REPORT LONG RANGE CAPITAL FUNDING OPTIONS:

COUNCIL AGENDA REPORT LONG RANGE CAPITAL FUNDING OPTIONS: wx F MEETING DATE: 09/ 15/ 15 ITEM NO: O8 c'ns COUNCIL AGENDA REPORT DATE: TO: FROM: LAUREL PREVETTI, TOWN MANAGER W i SUBJECT: LONG RANGE CAPITAL FUNDING OPTIONS: A. IDENTIFY SPECIFIC FUNDING OPTIONS

More information

BUSINESS TAX MODERNIZATION AND MINIMUM WAGE INCREASE OUTREACH PLAN

BUSINESS TAX MODERNIZATION AND MINIMUM WAGE INCREASE OUTREACH PLAN CITY OF CAPITAL OF SILICON VALLEY COUNCIL AGENDA: 12-13-16 ITEM: 3.7 Memorandum TO: HONORABLE MAYOR AND CITY COUNCIL FROM: Toni J. Taber, CMC City Clerk SUBJECT: SEE BELOW DATE: December 1, 2016 SUBJECT:

More information

SAN JOSE CAPITAL OF SILICON VALLEY

SAN JOSE CAPITAL OF SILICON VALLEY CITY OF SAN JOSE CAPITAL OF SILICON VALLEY TO: HONORABLE MAYOR AND CITY COUNCIL SUBJECT: SEE BELOW Approved COUNCIL AGENDA: 06/28/16 ITEM: ^ Memorandum FROM: Kim Walesh DATE: June 6, 2016 Date COUNCIL

More information

TAUSSIG DEVELOPMENT IMPACT FEE JUSTIFICATION STUDY CITY OF ESCALON. Public Finance Public Private Partnerships Urban Economics Clean Energy Bonds

TAUSSIG DEVELOPMENT IMPACT FEE JUSTIFICATION STUDY CITY OF ESCALON. Public Finance Public Private Partnerships Urban Economics Clean Energy Bonds DAVID TAUSSIG & ASSOCIATES, INC. DEVELOPMENT IMPACT FEE JUSTIFICATION STUDY CITY OF ESCALON B. C. SEPTEMBER 12, 2016 Public Finance Public Private Partnerships Urban Economics Clean Energy Bonds Prepared

More information

CHAPTER 9 FINANCIAL CONSIDERATIONS

CHAPTER 9 FINANCIAL CONSIDERATIONS CHAPTER 9 FINANCIAL CONSIDERATIONS 9.1 INTRODUCTION This chapter presents anticipated costs, revenues, and funding for the Berryessa Extension Project (BEP) Alternative and the Silicon Valley Rapid Transit

More information

zst FROM: Kip Harkness Kim Walesh Margaret McCahan TO: HONORABLE MAYOR AND CITY COUNCIL SUBJECT: SEE BELOW DATE: April 19,2018 Approved g (_ Date

zst FROM: Kip Harkness Kim Walesh Margaret McCahan TO: HONORABLE MAYOR AND CITY COUNCIL SUBJECT: SEE BELOW DATE: April 19,2018 Approved g (_ Date COUNCIL AGENDA FILE ITEM 05/01/18/ 18-580 3.3 zst city of 55: San JOSE Memorandum CAPITAL OF SILICON VALLEY TO: HONORABLE MAYOR AND CITY COUNCIL FROM: Kip Harkness Kim Walesh Margaret McCahan SUBJECT:

More information

SUBJECT: SEE BELOW DATE: April 13, 2017 ANNUAL PAVEMENT MAINTENANCE STATUS REPORT & FUNDING STRATEGY UPDATE.

SUBJECT: SEE BELOW DATE: April 13, 2017 ANNUAL PAVEMENT MAINTENANCE STATUS REPORT & FUNDING STRATEGY UPDATE. COUNCIL AGENDA: 4/25/17 ITEM: 6.2 TO: HONORABLE MAYOR AND CITY COUNCIL FROM: Toni J. Taber, CMC City Clerk SUBJECT: SEE BELOW DATE: April 13, 2017 SUBJECT: ANNUAL PAVEMENT MAINTENANCE STATUS REPORT & FUNDING

More information

Agenda. Background Budget / PW General Fund Budget Streets & Infrastructure Citizen Engagement

Agenda. Background Budget / PW General Fund Budget Streets & Infrastructure Citizen Engagement 1 Agenda Background 2013-2014 Budget / PW General Fund Budget Streets & Infrastructure Citizen Engagement Sustainable Transportation Funding Dedicated Revenues Potential Rate Impact Clarification Proposed

More information

VTA Board of Directors: We are forwarding you the following: Letter of support regarding sales tax measure

VTA Board of Directors: We are forwarding you the following: Letter of support regarding sales tax measure From: Board.Secretary Sent: Thursday, July 28, 2016 5:05 PM To: VTA Board of Directors Subject: VTA Correspondence: Letter of Support Regarding Sales Tax Measure VTA Board of Directors: We are forwarding

More information

CHAPTER 9 FINANCIAL CONSIDERATIONS

CHAPTER 9 FINANCIAL CONSIDERATIONS CHAPTER 9 FINANCIAL CONSIDERATIONS 9.1 INTRODUCTION This chapter presents anticipated costs, revenues, and funding for the BEP and the SVRTP. A summary evaluation of VTA s financial plan for the proposed

More information

Final Report June 1, 2012 San Francisco Municipal Transportation Agency (SFMTA) 2012 Budget Balancing Panel

Final Report June 1, 2012 San Francisco Municipal Transportation Agency (SFMTA) 2012 Budget Balancing Panel Panel Deliverables Final Report June 1, 2012 1. Develop a priority list of recommendations to address the balancing of the FY 2013 and FY 2014 Operating Budget. 2. Developed a priority list of recommendations

More information

ORDINANCE NO. ## N.S.

ORDINANCE NO. ## N.S. ORDINANCE NO. ## N.S. AN ORDINANCE OF THE PEOPLE OF THE CITY OF RICHMOND AS APPROVED BY THE CITY S QUALIFIED ELECTORS AT THE GENERAL MUNICIPAL ELECTION HELD ON NOVEMBER 6, 2018 TO ESTABLISH A SPECIAL PARCEL

More information

Littleton, CO 2016 Business Survey

Littleton, CO 2016 Business Survey Littleton, CO 2016 Business Survey June 2016 2955 Valmont Road Suite 300 Boulder, CO 80301 303-444-7863 www.n-r-c.com Contents Executive Summary... 1 Background and Methods... 3 Business Survey Results...

More information

City of San Mateo San Mateo, California

City of San Mateo San Mateo, California City of San Mateo San Mateo, California Comprehensive Annual Financial Report For the Year Ended June 30, 2005 The City provides a full range of municipal services. These include police and fire

More information

CITY OF EAST PALO ALTO OFFICE OF THE CITY MANAGER 2415 UNIVERSITY AVENUE EAST PALO ALTO, CA 94303

CITY OF EAST PALO ALTO OFFICE OF THE CITY MANAGER 2415 UNIVERSITY AVENUE EAST PALO ALTO, CA 94303 CITY OF EAST PALO ALTO OFFICE OF THE CITY MANAGER 2415 UNIVERSITY AVENUE EAST PALO ALTO, CA 94303 Public Hearing Item: #14C City Council Special Meeting Date: July 31, 2018 To: Via: From: Subject: Honorable

More information

LEGEND Bridges Parks Fire Stations Project Locations Libraries Schools A

LEGEND Bridges Parks Fire Stations Project Locations Libraries Schools A LEGEND Bridges Parks Fire Stations Project Locations Libraries Schools A Aid to Construction Fund The Aid to Construction Fund (Water) are funds received from customers for requested water service and

More information

Memorandum SAN JOSE CAPITAL OF SILICON VALLEY. FROM: Julia H. Cooper Julie Edmonds-Mares TO: HONORABLE MAYOR AND CITY COUNCIL

Memorandum SAN JOSE CAPITAL OF SILICON VALLEY. FROM: Julia H. Cooper Julie Edmonds-Mares TO: HONORABLE MAYOR AND CITY COUNCIL COUNCIL AGENDA: 09/20/16 ITEM: 3.7 CITY OF SAN JOSE CAPITAL OF SILICON VALLEY Memorandum TO: HONORABLE MAYOR AND CITY COUNCIL FROM: Julia H. Cooper Julie Edmonds-Mares SUBJECT: SEE BELOW DATE: Approved

More information

D E F I N I T I O N S

D E F I N I T I O N S D E F I N I T I O N S Actuals vs. Budget/Estimate This document includes analyses of department appropriations and funds based on variances between the 2017-2018 actual revenues/expenditures and either

More information

System Development Charge Methodology

System Development Charge Methodology City of Springfield System Development Charge Methodology Stormwater Local Wastewater Transportation Prepared By City of Springfield Public Works Department 225 Fifth Street Springfield, OR 97477 November

More information

4. Please indicate whether you feel that there are too many, the right amount or not enough of each of the following in Littleton:

4. Please indicate whether you feel that there are too many, the right amount or not enough of each of the following in Littleton: Please complete this questionnaire if you are the person most knowledgeable about this business, typically the owner or manager. Please select the response (by circling the number or checking the box)

More information

SANJOSE CAPITAL OF SILICON VALLEY

SANJOSE CAPITAL OF SILICON VALLEY CITY OF SANJOSE CAPITAL OF SILICON VALLEY COUNCIL AGENDA: 3/22/16 ITEM: 2 ^ Memorandum TO: HONORABLE MAYOR AND CITY COUNCIL SUBJECT: SEE BELOW FROM: Kerrie Romanow Jennifer A. Maguire DATE: Approved Date

More information

DEVELOPMENT CHARGES BACKGROUND STUDY

DEVELOPMENT CHARGES BACKGROUND STUDY DEVELOPMENT CHARGES BACKGROUND STUDY Revised City of Mississauga C o n s u l t i n g L t d. September 2009 TABLE OF CONTENTS EXECUTIVE SUMMARY... 1 I INTRODUCTION... 10 II METHODOLOGY IS BASED ON A CITY-WIDE

More information

HEMSON C o n s u l t i n g L t d

HEMSON C o n s u l t i n g L t d DEVELOPMENT CHARGES BACKGROUND STUDY Town of Gravenhurst C o n s u l t i n g L t d April, 2014 TABLE OF CONTENTS EXECUTIVE SUMMARY... 1 I INTRODUCTION... 7 II A TOWN-WIDE UNIFORM CHARGE APPROACH TO ALIGN

More information

SUBJECT: BUSINESS TAX MODERNIZATION DATE: July 29, 2016

SUBJECT: BUSINESS TAX MODERNIZATION DATE: July 29, 2016 COUNCIL AGENDA: 8-2-16 ITEM: 3.3 CITY OF SAN JOSE CAPITAL OF SILICON VALLEY Memorandum TO: HONORABLE MAYOR AND CITY COUNCIL FROM: Councilmember Donald Rocha SUBJECT: BUSINESS TAX MODERNIZATION DATE: July

More information

1. Accept staff report on the updated study of cost of service to provide potable water to San Jose Municipal Water System (SJMWS) customers; and

1. Accept staff report on the updated study of cost of service to provide potable water to San Jose Municipal Water System (SJMWS) customers; and CITY OF Cr SAN IPSE CAPITAL OF SILICON VALLEY TO: HONORABLE MAYOR AND CITY COUNCIL SUBJECT: MUNICIPAL WATER SYSTEM COST OF SERVICE STUDY COUNCIL AGENDA: 05/09/17 ITEM: 7.2 Memorandum FROM: Kerrie Romanow

More information

BEVERLY HILLS AGENDA REPORT HILLS TO SUPPORT THE PROPOSED BALLOT INITIATIVE (# ) TO REPEAL SENATE BILL 1 THE ROAD REPAIR AND ACCOUNTABILITY ACT

BEVERLY HILLS AGENDA REPORT HILLS TO SUPPORT THE PROPOSED BALLOT INITIATIVE (# ) TO REPEAL SENATE BILL 1 THE ROAD REPAIR AND ACCOUNTABILITY ACT BEVERLY HILLS Meeting Date: May 8, 2018 Item Number: D 4 To: From: AGENDA REPORT Honorable Mayor & City Council Cynthia Owens, Senior Management Analyst Subject: A. RESOLUTION OF THE COUNCIL OF THE CITY

More information

rall The City of Red Wing is dedicated to creating, preserving and enhancing the quality of life for all."

rall The City of Red Wing is dedicated to creating, preserving and enhancing the quality of life for all. City of RE rall NG The City of Red Wing is dedicated to creating, preserving and enhancing the quality of life for all." TO: Honorable Mayor and Members of the City Council FROM: Council Administrator,

More information

RESOLUTION NO

RESOLUTION NO RESOLUTION NO. 2018-062 A RESOLUTION OF THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF SAN CARLOS SETTING A MEASURE ON THE NOVEMBER 6, 2018 GENERAL MUNICIPAL ELECTION BALLOT SEEKING VOTER APPROVAL OF A PROPOSED ORDINANCE

More information

FINANCE & ECONOMIC DEVELOPMENT COMMITTEE

FINANCE & ECONOMIC DEVELOPMENT COMMITTEE FINANCE & ECONOMIC DEVELOPMENT COMMITTEE MAY 6, 2015 8:00 AM COUNCIL CHAMBERS 1. 2015 FIRST QUARTER FINANCIAL UPDATE TROY WOO, FINANCE DIRECTOR (ATTACHMENT) 2. CITY BUSINESS LICENSE UPDATE TROY WOO, FINANCE

More information

Sec Transportation management special use permits Purpose and intent.

Sec Transportation management special use permits Purpose and intent. Sec. 11-700 Transportation management special use permits. 11-701 Purpose and intent. There are certain uses of land which, by their location, nature, size and/or density, or by the accessory uses permitted

More information

Memorandum. Background memorandum for Independence/Constitution Project fiscal impact analysis

Memorandum. Background memorandum for Independence/Constitution Project fiscal impact analysis Memorandum To: From: Re: Thomas H. Rogers, City of Menlo Park Ron Golem, Steve Murphy, BAE Background memorandum for Independence/Constitution Project fiscal impact analysis Date: June 16, 2008 Purpose

More information

FROM: CITY MANAGER DEPARTMENT: PUBLIC WORKS DATE: SEPTEMBER 19, 2001 CMR:354:01

FROM: CITY MANAGER DEPARTMENT: PUBLIC WORKS DATE: SEPTEMBER 19, 2001 CMR:354:01 TO: HONORABLE CITY COUNCIL FROM: CITY MANAGER DEPARTMENT: PUBLIC WORKS DATE: SEPTEMBER 19, 2001 CMR:354:01 SUBJECT: REQUEST APPROVAL OF A BUDGET AMENDMENT ORDINANCE FOR FISCAL YEAR 2001-02 IN THE AMOUNT

More information

Proposed Operating Budget Overview

Proposed Operating Budget Overview City of San José 2017-2018 Proposed Operating Budget Overview May 10, 2017 City of San José Budget Overview 2017-2018 PROPOSED CITY BUDGET 1 : $3.2 billion TOTAL NUMBER OF FUNDS: 116 TOTAL NUMBER OF POSITIONS

More information

SAN IPSE CAPITAL OP SILICON VALLEY

SAN IPSE CAPITAL OP SILICON VALLEY CITY OF SAN IPSE CAPITAL OP SILICON VALLEY TO: HONORABLE MAYOR AND CITY COUNCIL SUBJECT: SEE BELOW COUNCIL AGENDA: 10/25/16 ITEM: Memorandum FROM: Kerrie Romanow Barry Ng DATE: Approved Date /O 1 /^/j(e>

More information

Community Planning & Development

Community Planning & Development Community Planning & Development Mayor Office of Manager Community Planning & Developement Office of the Manager Development Services Code Administration & Enforcement Planning Services North Denver Cornerstone

More information

Credit Presentation of the City of Los Angeles Richard H. Llewellyn Jr., City Administrative Officer

Credit Presentation of the City of Los Angeles Richard H. Llewellyn Jr., City Administrative Officer Credit Presentation of the City of Los Angeles Richard H. Llewellyn Jr., City Administrative Officer Presentation by Ben Ceja, Assistant City Administrative Officer March 19, 2018 Disclaimer This Investors

More information

GRASS VALLEY TRANSPORTATION IMPACT FEE PROGRAM NEXUS STUDY

GRASS VALLEY TRANSPORTATION IMPACT FEE PROGRAM NEXUS STUDY HEARING REPORT GRASS VALLEY TRANSPORTATION IMPACT FEE PROGRAM NEXUS STUDY Prepared for: City of Grass Valley Prepared by: Economic & Planning Systems, Inc. March 2008 EPS #17525 S A C R A M E N T O 2150

More information

SAN IPSE CAPITAL OF SILICON VALLEY

SAN IPSE CAPITAL OF SILICON VALLEY CITY OF C7 2 SAN IPSE CAPITAL OF SILICON VALLEY TO: SMART CITIES AND SERVICE IMPROVEMENTS COMMITTEE SCSI AGENDA: 03/02/2017 ITEM: d (2) Memorandum FROM: Rob Lloyd SUBJECT: SEE BELOW DATE: February 21,2017

More information

NOTICE OF PROPOSED ORDINANCE

NOTICE OF PROPOSED ORDINANCE NOTICE OF PROPOSED ORDINANCE Pursuant to Section 7-3 of the Town of Castle Rock Home Rule Charter, notice is hereby given that the Town Council will consider adoption of the following named and described

More information

SB 83 Additional Vehicle Registration Fee Expenditure Plan (July 15, 2010)

SB 83 Additional Vehicle Registration Fee Expenditure Plan (July 15, 2010) 1. INTRODUCTION A. SUMMARY In late October, the Governor signed into law SB 83 (Hancock), which authorizes congestion management agencies (CMAs) to impose an annual vehicle registration fee increase of

More information

Memorandum TO: HONORABLE MAYOR AND CITY COUNCIL. FROM: Toni J. Taber, C City Clerk SUBJECT: SEE BELOW. DATE: October 13, 2016

Memorandum TO: HONORABLE MAYOR AND CITY COUNCIL. FROM: Toni J. Taber, C City Clerk SUBJECT: SEE BELOW. DATE: October 13, 2016 CITY OF CAPITAL OF SILICON VALLEY COUNCIL AGENDA: 10-25-16 ITEM: 4.1 Memorandum TO: HONORABLE MAYOR AND CITY COUNCIL SUBJECT: SEE BELOW FROM: Toni J. Taber, C City Clerk DATE: October 13, 2016 SUBJECT:

More information

GENERAL FUND REVENUES BY SOURCE

GENERAL FUND REVENUES BY SOURCE BUDGET DETAIL BUDGET DETAIL The Budget Detail gives more information on the budget, than is shown in the Executive Summary. Detail information is provided on the General Fund, Special Revenue Funds, Enterprise

More information

SAN FRANCISCO MUNICIPAL TRANSPORTATION AGENCY

SAN FRANCISCO MUNICIPAL TRANSPORTATION AGENCY THIS PRINT COVERS CALENDAR ITEM NO. : 11 DIVISION: Chief of Staff BRIEF DESCRIPTION: SAN FRANCISCO MUNICIPAL TRANSPORTATION AGENCY Resolution urging the Board of Supervisors to place the $500 million Transportation

More information

MINUTES - SHOREWOOD BOARD OF TRUSTEES Special Village Board Meeting August 29, 2018

MINUTES - SHOREWOOD BOARD OF TRUSTEES Special Village Board Meeting August 29, 2018 MINUTES - SHOREWOOD BOARD OF TRUSTEES Special Village Board Meeting August 29, 2018 Call to Order President Rozek called the Special meeting of the Village Board to order at 6:10 p.m. in the Court Room.

More information

1989LITTLE ORCHARD. Industrial Facility. ±158,200 s.f. state-of-the-art FOR SALE OR LEASE OVERVIEW. ±158,200 square feet

1989LITTLE ORCHARD. Industrial Facility. ±158,200 s.f. state-of-the-art FOR SALE OR LEASE OVERVIEW. ±158,200 square feet ±158,200 s.f. state-of-the-art Industrial Facility OVERVIEW JLL is pleased to bring to market 1989 Little Orchard Street in. This ±158,200 square feet state-ofthe-art industrial/manufacturing building

More information

Traffic Impact Analysis Guidelines Methodology

Traffic Impact Analysis Guidelines Methodology York County Government Traffic Impact Analysis Guidelines Methodology Implementation Guide for Section 154.037 Traffic Impact Analysis of the York County Code of Ordinances 11/1/2017 TABLE OF CONTENTS

More information

Standing Committee on Policy and Strategic Priorities. General Manager of Planning, Urban Design and Sustainability

Standing Committee on Policy and Strategic Priorities. General Manager of Planning, Urban Design and Sustainability ADMINISTRATIVE REPORT Report Date: June 29, 2018 Contact: Chris Robertson Contact No.: 604.873.7684 RTS No.: 12564 VanRIMS No.: 08-2000-20 Meeting Date: July 25, 2018 TO: FROM: SUBJECT: Standing Committee

More information

ZONING. 27 Attachment 1. Township of East Rockhill. Table of Use Regulations

ZONING. 27 Attachment 1. Township of East Rockhill. Table of Use Regulations ZONING 27 Attachment 1 Township of East Rockhill Table of Use Regulations AP Agriculture Preservation RP Resource Protection RR Rural Residential S Suburban R-1 Residential VR Village Residential VC Village

More information

ALAMEDA COUNTY REGISTRAR OF VOTERS LIST OF LOCAL MEASURES November 6, 2012 GENERAL ELECTION MEASURE I

ALAMEDA COUNTY REGISTRAR OF VOTERS LIST OF LOCAL MEASURES November 6, 2012 GENERAL ELECTION MEASURE I MEASURE I Chabot-Las Positas Community College District Parcel Tax To provide Chabot and Las Positas Community Colleges funds that cannot be taken by the state, ensure affordable quality education, prepare

More information

Document A Exhibit A Determination of the Cost of the Work

Document A Exhibit A Determination of the Cost of the Work Document A121 2014 Exhibit A Determination of the Cost of the Work THE OWNER: (Name, legal status, address and other information) THE CONTRACTOR: (Name, legal status, address and other information) This

More information

9.2 Inventory and Existing Conditions This section highlights government structure, administration responsibilities, and fiscal responsibilities.

9.2 Inventory and Existing Conditions This section highlights government structure, administration responsibilities, and fiscal responsibilities. 9 9.0 Government and Administration 9.1. Introduction 9-1 9.2. Inventory and Existing Conditions 9-1 9.3. Summary of Issues and Opportunities 9-7 9.4. Goals, Objectives and Policies 9-7 9.1 INTRODUCTION

More information

BUSINESS LICENSE PERMIT INFORMATION AND PROCEDURE

BUSINESS LICENSE PERMIT INFORMATION AND PROCEDURE COUNTY OF MADERA COMMUNITY AND ECONOMIC DEVELOPMENT 200 W. 4th Street, Suite 3100, Madera, CA 93637 Telephone: (559) 675-7821 Fax: (559) 675-6573 e-mail: mc_planning@madera-county.com BUSINESS LICENSE

More information

ADMINISTRATIVE ANALYST (Class Code 1590) TASK LIST

ADMINISTRATIVE ANALYST (Class Code 1590) TASK LIST ADMINISTRATIVE ANALYST (Class Code 1590) TASK LIST A. General Administration 1. Writes narrative material such as letters, memos, and reports on various personnel, budgetary, contractual, grant, and policy

More information

Budget Calendar - Action Dates

Budget Calendar - Action Dates 2018 BUDGET Budget Calendar - Action Dates General Budget Presentation............... March 27 th Cap Bank Ordinance Introduction........... February 27 th Budget Introduction...................... February

More information

MEETING DATE: 3/06/2018 ITEM NO: 07 TOWN OF LOS GATOS COUNCIL AGENDA REPORT DATE: FEBRUARY 21, 2017 MAYOR AND TOWN COUNCIL

MEETING DATE: 3/06/2018 ITEM NO: 07 TOWN OF LOS GATOS COUNCIL AGENDA REPORT DATE: FEBRUARY 21, 2017 MAYOR AND TOWN COUNCIL TOWN OF LOS GATOS COUNCIL AGENDA REPORT MEETING DATE: 3/06/2018 ITEM NO: 07 DATE: FEBRUARY 21, 2017 TO: FROM: MAYOR AND TOWN COUNCIL LAUREL PREVETTI, TOWN MANAGER SUBJECT: RECOMMENDATION: PROVIDE DIRECTION

More information

SAN FRANCISCO MUNICIPAL TRANSPORTATION AGENCY

SAN FRANCISCO MUNICIPAL TRANSPORTATION AGENCY THIS PRINT COVERS CALENDAR ITEM NO. : 10.12 SAN FRANCISCO MUNICIPAL TRANSPORTATION AGENCY DIVISION: Finance and Information Technology BRIEF : Amend Transportation Code, Division II, Sections 302 and 303

More information

CITY OF REDDING, CALIFORNIA COUNCIL POLICY

CITY OF REDDING, CALIFORNIA COUNCIL POLICY COUNCIL 94 26 804 02 01 94 1 BACKGROUND In furtherance of the City Council's goals involving economic development and job creation, the City offers a number of financial incentives, either through its

More information

3,052+/- Sq Ft Office-Retail Building For Sale or Lease 261 Main Street, Wareham, MA

3,052+/- Sq Ft Office-Retail Building For Sale or Lease 261 Main Street, Wareham, MA 3,052+/- Sq Ft Office-Retail Building For Sale or Lease 261 Main Street, Wareham, MA Main Street / Central Business District location (water front) Currently configured as a bank, with existing drive-thru

More information

COBB COUNTY HOUSING REHABILITATION PROGRAM

COBB COUNTY HOUSING REHABILITATION PROGRAM COBB COUNTY HOUSING REHABILITATION PROGRAM Temporary Relocation Assistance Policy For Owner Occupied Residential Single Family Housing Rehabilitation and Lead-Based Paint/ Asbestos Abatement REVISED: JANUARY,

More information

AN ACT. Be it enacted by the General Assembly of the State of Ohio:

AN ACT. Be it enacted by the General Assembly of the State of Ohio: (131st General Assembly) (Amended Substitute House Bill Number 233) AN ACT To amend sections 133.04, 133.06, 149.311, 709.024, 709.19, 3317.021, 4582.56, 5501.311, 5709.12, 5709.121, 5709.82, 5709.83,

More information

SUBJECT: CONSIDERATION OF OPTIONS FOR INCREASED REVENUES / EXPENDITURES FOR STREET RECONSTRUCTION / IMPROVEMENT PROJECTS

SUBJECT: CONSIDERATION OF OPTIONS FOR INCREASED REVENUES / EXPENDITURES FOR STREET RECONSTRUCTION / IMPROVEMENT PROJECTS Agenda Report Fullerton City Council MEETING DATE: JULY 17, 2018 TO: SUBMITTED BY: PREPARED BY: CITY COUNCIL / SUCCESSOR AGENCY KENNETH A. DOMER, CITY MANAGER KENNETH A. DOMER, CITY MANAGER SUBJECT: CONSIDERATION

More information

ORDINANCE NO

ORDINANCE NO FULL TEXT OF MEASURE ORDINANCE NO. 2016-03 AN ORDINANCE OF THE CITY OF ALBANY ENACTING A SPECIAL PARCEL TAX TO FUND REPAIRING AND UPGRADING PUBLIC SIDEWALKS AND REMOVING OBSTRUCTIONS TO IMPROVE SAFETY

More information

CITY COUNCIL UNFINISHED BUSINESS FEBRUARY 2, 2015 SHARED ECONOMY TASK FORCE RECOMMENDATIONS

CITY COUNCIL UNFINISHED BUSINESS FEBRUARY 2, 2015 SHARED ECONOMY TASK FORCE RECOMMENDATIONS CITY COUNCIL UNFINISHED BUSINESS FEBRUARY 2, 2015 SUBJECT: INITIATED BY: SHARED ECONOMY TASK FORCE RECOMMENDATIONS CITY MANAGER'S DEPARTMENT -ARTS & ECONOMIC DEVELOPMENT DIVISION (Paul Arevalo, City Manager)

More information

Response to Staff Direction SD Budget Options

Response to Staff Direction SD Budget Options To: From: Cc: Members of the Committee of the Whole - Budget Joan Ford, Director of Finance Tim Commisso, Acting City Manager Date: January 15th, Re: Response to Staff Direction SD-27-18 - Budget Options

More information

Analysis of the Alameda County Transportation Expenditure Plan Prepared by Alameda County Transportation Commission

Analysis of the Alameda County Transportation Expenditure Plan Prepared by Alameda County Transportation Commission Analysis of the Alameda County Transportation Expenditure Plan Prepared by Alameda County Transportation Commission Discussion: In 1986, voters approved Measure B, a 1/2 cent sales tax, to fund transportation

More information

Staff Report. Staff requests Commission review, discussion and determination of a policy on Unincorporated Islands and Corridors

Staff Report. Staff requests Commission review, discussion and determination of a policy on Unincorporated Islands and Corridors SONOMA LOCAL AGENCY FORMATION COMMISSION 575 ADMINISTRATION DRIVE, ROOM 104A, SANTA ROSA, CA 95403 (707) 565-2577 FAX (707) 565-3778 www.sonoma-county.org/lafco Staff Report Meeting Date: April 4, 2012

More information

Public Works and Development Services

Public Works and Development Services City of Commerce Capital Improvement Program Prioritization Policy Public Works and Development Services SOP 101 Version No. 1.0 Effective 05/19/15 Purpose The City of Commerce s (City) Capital Improvement

More information

SAN JOSE CAPITAL OF SILICON VALLEY

SAN JOSE CAPITAL OF SILICON VALLEY COUNCIL AGENDA: 06/21/16 ITEM: ^ CITY OF 'S SAN JOSE CAPITAL OF SILICON VALLEY Memorandum TO: HONORABLE MAYOR AND CITY COUNCIL SUBJECT: CITY OF SAN JOSE 2016 TAX AND REVENUE ANTICIPATION NOTE FROM: Julia

More information

Chapter PERMITTED USES

Chapter PERMITTED USES Sections: 19.60.010 General. 19.60.020 Use categories. 19.60.030 Uses not listed. 19.60.040 Explanation of table abbreviations. 19.60.050 Permitted uses matrix. 19.60.010 General. Chapter 19.60 PERMITTED

More information

Balanced Financial Plan Projected Changes and Assumptions

Balanced Financial Plan Projected Changes and Assumptions Appendix I Resolution Adopting the Three Year Plan Town of Castle Rock Projected Changes and Assumptions Unless otherwise noted, following is a general list of Townwide growth rates used in future years:

More information

Approve the following amendments to the Proposed Operating Budget and the Capital Improvement Program:

Approve the following amendments to the Proposed Operating Budget and the Capital Improvement Program: MANAGER'S BUDGET ADDENDUM #25 SAN CITY OF IPSE :3 CAPITAL OF SILICON VALLEY Memorandum TO: HONORABLE MAYOR AND CITY COUNCIL SUBJECT: SALE OF HAYES MANSION - IMPLICATIONS OF AGREEMENT TERMINATION FROM:

More information

GUIDE TO THE OPERATING BUDGET

GUIDE TO THE OPERATING BUDGET GUIDE TO THE OPERATING BUDGET I. INTRODUCTION Why This Guide? The purpose of this guide is to explain Anchorage's operating budget process and how to read the forms contained in the budget document. Budgets

More information

City of Garland. Fee List (2015) Zoning Change or Specific Use Provision Applications

City of Garland. Fee List (2015) Zoning Change or Specific Use Provision Applications Planning Department Collects the following fees: City of Garland Fee List (2015) Zoning Change or Specific Use Provision Applications Type of Application Fee Planned Development (PD) Zoning (New or revised

More information

Executive Summary Operating Budget and Forecast

Executive Summary Operating Budget and Forecast Executive Summary The 2017 Budget Discussion Document presents the proposed 2017 operating budget, 2018-2019 forecasts and the 2017 Capital Budget for the Town of Oakville. The document represents the

More information

Infrastructure Financing Plan. Infrastructure Financing District No. 1 (Rincon Hill Area) DRAFT

Infrastructure Financing Plan. Infrastructure Financing District No. 1 (Rincon Hill Area) DRAFT DRAFT Infrastructure Financing Plan Infrastructure Financing District No. 1 (Rincon Hill Area) Prepared for: City and County of San Francisco Office of Economic Development Prepared by: December 2010 TABLE

More information

AN ACT to create (4e) and of the statutes; relating to: limiting

AN ACT to create (4e) and of the statutes; relating to: limiting 0-0 LEGISLATURE PRELIMINARY DRAFT - NOT READY FOR INTRODUCTION AN ACT to create.00 (e) and.0 of the statutes; relating to: limiting the authority of the state and political subdivisions to regulate wireless

More information

Population, Housing, and Employment Methodology

Population, Housing, and Employment Methodology Appendix O Population, Housing, and Employment Methodology Final EIR APPENDIX O Methodology Population, Housing, and Employment Methodology This appendix describes the data sources and methodologies employed

More information

Draft-Fiscal Impact Analysis of Union Square and Boynton Yards

Draft-Fiscal Impact Analysis of Union Square and Boynton Yards Draft-Fiscal Impact Analysis of Union Square and Boynton Yards Prepared for: City of Somerville, Massachusetts November 16, 2015 Prepared by: 4701 Sangamore Road Suite S240 Bethesda, Maryland 20816 800.424.4318

More information

CITY OF HEALDSBURG RESOLUTION NO

CITY OF HEALDSBURG RESOLUTION NO CITY OF HEALDSBURG RESOLUTION NO. 67-2016 RESOLUTION OF THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY HEALDSBURG ESTABLISHING NOVEMBER 8, 2016 AS THE DATE FOR A MUNICIPAL ELECTION ON A PROPOSED BALLOT MEASURE SEEKING VOTER

More information

FY 08/09 ADOPTED GENERAL FUND REVENUES $224,391,325

FY 08/09 ADOPTED GENERAL FUND REVENUES $224,391,325 GENERAL FUND REVENUES FY 08/09 ADOPTED GENERAL FUND REVENUES $224,391,325 State Revenue 10% Transfers 1% Federal Revenue 2% Fund Balance 0.2% Other Local Revenue 3% Other Local Taxes 22% Gen. Property

More information

AN ORDINANCE. SECTION 1. Title 14 of The Philadelphia Code is hereby amended to read as follows: TITLE 14. ZONING AND PLANNING * * *

AN ORDINANCE. SECTION 1. Title 14 of The Philadelphia Code is hereby amended to read as follows: TITLE 14. ZONING AND PLANNING * * * AN ORDINANCE Amending Title 14 of The Philadelphia Code, entitled Zoning and Planning, by creating a new commercial mixed use district, providing for permitted uses and dimensional standards in that district,

More information

SCOTTS VALLEY FIRE PROTECTION DISTRICT ORDINANCE NO

SCOTTS VALLEY FIRE PROTECTION DISTRICT ORDINANCE NO SCOTTS VALLEY FIRE PROTECTION DISTRICT ORDINANCE NO 005- AN ORDINANCE ESTABLISHING A SCHEDULE OF FEES FOR INSPECTION SERVICES, PLAN CHECKS, PERMITS, COST RECOVERY, AND OTHER FIRE SERVICE RELATED FEES WHEREAS,

More information

2014 INTERGOVERNMENTAL PROPERTY TAX ABATEMENT AGREEMENT

2014 INTERGOVERNMENTAL PROPERTY TAX ABATEMENT AGREEMENT 2014 INTERGOVERNMENTAL PROPERTY TAX ABATEMENT AGREEMENT THIS AGREEMENT made and entered into this day of, 2014, by and between the Village of Morton, Morton Unit School District 709, Morton Park District,

More information

DRAFT. September 25, 2017

DRAFT. September 25, 2017 DRAFT September 25, 2017 FY2018 Business Plan & Budgets 1. FY2018 Funding Envelope 2. FY2018 Goals 3. FY2018 Targeted Investments 4. FY2018 Capital Budget 5. FY2018 Operating Budget 6. FY2018 Budget Summary

More information

CITY OF BLOOMINGTON, ILLINOIS MANAGEMENT LETTER. April 30, 2010

CITY OF BLOOMINGTON, ILLINOIS MANAGEMENT LETTER. April 30, 2010 CITY OF BLOOMINGTON, ILLINOIS MANAGEMENT LETTER April 30, 2010 October 6, 2010 Honorable Mayor and Members of the City Council 109 East Olive St. Bloomington, Illinois 61702 In planning and performing

More information