Administrative Law Exam CML 2212 / 2008 Forcese
|
|
- Samson Hunt
- 5 years ago
- Views:
Transcription
1 Administrative Law Exam CML 2212 / 2008 Forcese General Instructions This is an 8 hour take-home exam. Exam papers must be submitted to the Common Law Secretariat by no later than 4:30 pm. ed or electronic copies of exam papers will not be accepted. Please use full sentences in responding to all of these questions. Please ensure that your exam paper is fully legible. You are strongly encouraged to type your exam paper. Exam papers written or typed on loose sheets must have student numbers in the top right hand corner of each page. The pages that comprise the exam must be stapled (and not paper clipped) together. Exam papers MUST be each student s individual work product. Consultation between students or other third parties on anything related to the exam during the exam period is prohibited. The rules barring plagiarism apply fully in this exam, as they do to all other student work product. Under no circumstance may the exam be longer than 10 pages, double-spaced, typed pages (8.5 X 11), with 1 inch margins and times roman 12 point font. Pages that exceed this length will not be graded. This exam has 2 sections, each with several parts. The questionnaire totals 6 pages. Good luck and best wishes for the summer! *** SECTION A: This question has 2 parts. Read the facts associated with each part and respond to the accompanying question. If you find duplication between your discussion of the law in the different parts, you may incorporate your earlier discussion of law by reference rather than by repeating material. If you incorporate by reference, be sure to indicate expressly where you discussed the relevant law and to include any fact-specific analysis, conclusions and recommendations. Marks are assigned not only for spotting issues, applying the appropriate law and arriving at reasonable outcomes, but also for briefly defining terms and concepts, where appropriate. In answering these questions, be sure to consult (and raise in your answer) any applicable provisions found in the relevant statute and/or regulations included in the case study sections of the Casebook. Part 1 (19%) Since 2003, EarthForce has been opposing the expansion of Ontario s largest landfill at Belching Gap Mine, Ontario. The existing landfill site occupies a 17.3-hectare area within a larger hectare property, and is a discontinued hard rock mine. It is licensed to receive 105,000 tonnes of non-hazardous waste per year. The facility opened in 1954 and was designed on what was then good science that the resulting pollution would be controlled by natural 1
2 attenuation. That 1954 phase, however, produced and continues to produce leachate, which the Ontario Ministry of Environment says is contained within the site. EarthForce is concerned about the impact of that first-phase leachate on both ground and surface water. Expansions of the site since 1954 have been fully lined, although EarthForce remains concerned about potential contamination. Residents living around the site allege that the landfill adversely affects their agricultural operations and causes reproductive anomalies in their animals. The landfill owner Ontario Environmental Design (OED) denies that there is any environmental impact outside the landfill site, and blames any problems on the farmers own agricultural practices. OED, a subsidiary of Acme Waste Management (AWM) of the United States, acquired the landfill in In 2003, it decided to seek expansion of the landfill to a total capacity of 750,000 tonnes per year, up to a capacity of 23.5 million cubic metres of waste over 30 years. That expansion project is subject to environmental assessment under the Ontario Environmental Assessment Act (EAA). By April 2008, proponent OED had completed the environmental assessment, which was then reviewed by the Ontario Ministry of the Environment. EarthForce is extremely concerned that this assessment is inadequate. While the analysis focused on the impact of leachate on ground water, it is almost entirely silent on the effect of the landfill expansion on surface waters. EarthForce asked the Minister to refer the proponent s assessment to the Environmental Review Tribunal (Tribunal). In May 2008, the Minister responded as follows: I decline to refer the application to the Tribunal because EarthForce lacks standing to so request and because to do so would be an unacceptable expense to the taxpayers of Ontario. Question: EarthForce is very unhappy with this decision. The senior partner at Best & Hope wants a brief memorandum on the legal issues at stake, your recommendations on how EarthForce should proceed, and what remedies EarthForce should seek and might hope for. Write the memo. Part 2 (15%) The dispute discussed in question 1 is resolved in EarthForce s favour and OED s application was referred by the Minister to the Tribunal in July During oral hearings, the Tribunal was pressed by counsel for EarthForce to deny OED s application. Hoping to expedite matters during cross-examination of an expert witness on ground water by OED s lawyer, the chair for the Tribunal asserted: Look counsel, we all know that landfills taint water and we also know all about the disastrous impact these projects can have on a government s political reputation. Let s move on with arguments. Subsequently, the Tribunal rendered the following decision: Based on a careful and thorough assessment of the application, the environmental assessment, the Ministry s review of that assessment and comments received during our hearings, we refuse to give approval to proceed with the undertaking. 2
3 Question: EarthForce is thrilled with this outcome, but is concerned that it might be vulnerable to challenge by OED. Advise EarthForce. SECTION B: This question has 2 parts. Read the facts associated with each part and respond to the accompanying question. If you find duplication between your discussion of the law in the different parts, you may incorporate your earlier discussion of law by reference rather than by repeating material. If you incorporate by reference, be sure to indicate expressly where you discussed the relevant law and to include any fact-specific analysis, conclusions and recommendations. Marks are assigned not only for spotting issues, applying the appropriate law and arriving at reasonable outcomes, but also for briefly defining terms and concepts, where appropriate. In answering these questions, be sure to consult (and raise in your answer) any applicable provisions found in the relevant statute and/or regulations included in the case study sections of the Casebook. Part 1 (28%) In April 2007, Sean Kelly was named by the federal Cabinet to serve as Canada s counsel-general in Chicago. This appointment was made conditional on Kelly receiving proper security clearance, after an assessment by the Canadian Security and Intelligence Service (CSIS). In November 2007, CSIS concluded that Kelly had ties to the Provisional IRA dating to the 1970s, at a time when that group was resisting the British presence in Northern Ireland using terrorist tactics. CSIS therefore recommended that Kelly not be given security clearance. The Cabinet withdrew its appointment of Kelly as counsel-general. Kelly was shocked by this conclusion; he has had no contact with Ireland or Irish political issues, and concluded that this was a case of mistaken identity. He appealed the CSIS finding to the Security Intelligence Review Committee (SIRC), the review body that hears complaints concerning CSIS. This appeal is permitted by s.42 of the CSIS Act. In support of his application, Kelly submitted certified photocopies of all the passports he had ever possessed, none of which bear the entry stamp of Ireland or the United Kingdom. He received a response that read, in part, as follows: Dear Mr. Kelly, Pursuant to s.46, please find attached below the information we have on your complaint [not included for the purposes of this exam question]. We will be sure to have a full and exhaustive investigation and then hearing into this matter. At that hearing, we will hear everything you wish to present. I would not worry too much about this situation. In many instances in the past, we have found that CSIS performed a perfunctory assessment and was wrong in recommending denial of a security clearance. They can really be careless. And I m sure we ll find that same thing in your case. 3
4 A month later, without having had any further communication or contact with SIRC, Kelly received the following letter from the Chair of SIRC: Dear Mr. Kelly, We have concluded that you in fact have had no affiliation with the IRA. Instead, you were a member of Sinn Fein, the political wing of the anti-british movement, and that you regularly visited both Ireland and Northern Ireland. While we have concerns about this affiliation, we see no reason why past affiliation with Sinn Fein should preclude security clearance for a posting in the United States. Under these circumstances, we think it was unreasonable for CSIS to recommend against security clearance and recommend that this clearance be given. Question: Both the government and Mr. Kelly are unhappy with this decision (Mr. Kelly continues to urge that he has had no contact with Irish political movements and is concerned about the impact of this finding on his future prospects). Explain the administrative law grounds available to a) Mr. Kelly and b) the government to challenge this decision. Briefly explain c) the procedure they would follow and the remedy they would seek. Part 2 (38%) On January 15, 2008, Kelly arrived at Pearson International airport to board an Air Canada flight to Winnipeg. He was told at that time by the Air Canada check-in agent, upon consultation with Transport Canada, that he would not be permitted to board the flight under Canada s Passenger Protect program that is, he would be denied boarding permission by Transport Canada pursuant to an emergency direction issued by the Minister of Transport under section 4.76 of the Aeronautics Act. On February 1, 2008, the following regulation was made, pursuant to sections 4.71 and 4.9 of the Aeronautics Act: SOR/ February 1, 2008 AERONAUTICS ACT Office of Reconsideration Regulations P.C February 1, 2008 Her Excellency the Governor General in Council, on the recommendation of the Minister of Transport, Infrastructure and Communities, pursuant to sections 4.71 and 4.9 of the Aeronautics Act, hereby makes the annexed Office of Reconsideration Regulations. 1. The definitions in this section apply in these Regulations. emergency direction means a direction issued by the Minister pursuant to section 4.76 of the Aeronautics Act. 4
5 3. The Minister shall appoint twelve persons to a Reconsideration Tribunal as follows: a) three members of the Royal Canadian Mounted Police; b) three members of the Canadian Security Intelligence Service; b) three officials of the Department of Transport; and, c) three lay persons. 4. The Reconsideration Tribunal sits in panels of three, composed as directed by the Minister. 5.(1) The Reconsideration Tribunal shall hear requests from persons subject to an emergency direction that the emergency direction be reconsidered. (2) Where the Reconsideration Tribunal determines that an emergency direction should be reversed, it shall so advise the requestor and the Minister. (3) The Minister may at any time instruct the Reconsideration Tribunal to dismiss a request referred to in this section, if, in the Minister s opinion, this dismissal is in the interest of national security or foreign affairs. 6. Where the Minister considers that the reversal of the emergency direction is in the interest of aviation security, the Minister may cancel the emergency direction. 7. By directive, the Minister may prescribe criteria to be applied by the Reconsideration Tribunal in the exercise of its powers under section 5. On February 15, Sean Kelly filled a request under section 5. On March 1, the Minister issued the following directive: Pursuant to my powers under section 6, I prescribe that in deciding requests for reconsideration, the Reconsideration Tribunal shall take into account commitments made to the United Kingdom to cooperate fully in the suppression of terrorism by bringing to justice members of the provisional IRA. Kelly s case was heard by the Reconsideration Tribunal, constituted as directed by the Minister, on March 15. To expedite matters, the Tribunal agreed to receive only written submissions and no vive voce evidence. On March 30, the three members of the panel charged with Kelly s case met with the other nine members of the Reconsideration Tribunal. The minutes of that meeting read as follows: Present: [names of the twelve members]. Subject: Application of Minister s March 1 directive to Tribunal Proceedings. Decided: March 1 directive implicates the Sean Kelly case and must be applied. On March 31, the Minister issued the following instruction to the Tribunal: Pursuant to my powers under section 5(3), I instruct the Tribunal to dismiss the request of Sean Kelly in light of the formal protest filed by the United Kingdom government about Mr. Kelly s past activities with the provisional IRA and our promise to bring these individuals to justice. 5
6 On April 1, the Tribunal issued the following decision: In the Matter of a Request for Reconsideration by Sean Kelly: Request dismissed. Question: Explain the administrative law grounds available to Mr. Kelly to challenge the Tribunal process and proceedings described above and the outcome of these proceedings in Kelly s case. -- END OF EXAMINATION -- 6
2016 Paralegal Cup Mooting Competition Guide TABLE OF CONTENTS
2016 Paralegal Cup Mooting Competition Guide TABLE OF CONTENTS Introduction... 2 What is a moot?... 2 Who competes in a moot?... 2 How does a moot work?... 2 Who judges a moot?... 3 What are the judges
More informationThis is in response to your July 17, 2006 letter (attached) in which you state that
1 ROBERT J. PELLATT COMMISSION SECRETARY Commission.Secretary@bcuc.com web site: http://www.bcuc.com VIA E-MAIL nfnsn_hrly@yahoo.ca July 26, 2006 SIXTH FLOOR, 900 HOWE STREET, BOX 250 VANCOUVER, B.C. CANADA
More informationSecurity Intelligence Review Committee Estimates
Security Intelligence Review Committee 2010-11 Estimates Part III Report on Plans and Priorities The Right Honourable Stephen Harper Prime Minister of Canada Table of Contents Chair s Message... 1 SECTION
More informationREAL ESTATE COUNCIL OF ONTARIO DISCIPLINE DECISION
REAL ESTATE COUNCIL OF ONTARIO DISCIPLINE DECISION IN THE MATTER OF A DISCIPLINE HEARING HELD PURSUANT TO BY-LAW NO. 10 OF THE REAL ESTATE COUNCIL OF ONTARIO John Van Dyk Respondent This document also
More informationIndexed as: Pelzner v. Coseco Insurance Co.
Page 1 Indexed as: Pelzner v. Coseco Insurance Co. Between: Bozena Pelzner and Peter Pelzner, applicant, and Coseco Insurance Co./HB Group/Direct Protect, insurer [2000] O.F.S.C.I.D. No. 81 File No. FSCO
More informationDip Chand and Sant Kumari. Richard Uday Prakash
BEFORE THE IMMIGRATION ADVISERS COMPLAINTS AND DISCIPLINARY TRIBUNAL Decision No: [2012] NZIACDT 60 Reference No: IACDT 006/11 IN THE MATTER BY of a referral under s 48 of the Immigration Advisers Licensing
More informationFUNDSERV INC. (Fundserv) RULES FOR SERVICE PROVIDERS ACCESS STANDARDS
FUNDSERV INC. (Fundserv) RULES FOR SERVICE PROVIDERS ACCESS STANDARDS PROCESS FOR GRANTING, LIMITING, OR DENYING ACCESS TO FUNDSERV NETWORK, FUNDSERV STANDARDS, AND FUNDSERV S CLEARING AGENCY SERVICES
More informationMr S complains about Bar Mutual Indemnity Fund Limited s decision to withdraw funding for his claim.
complaint Mr S complains about Bar Mutual Indemnity Fund Limited s decision to withdraw funding for his claim. background I issued a provisional decision on this complaint in December 2015. An extract
More informationWCAT Decision Number: WCAT
Noteworthy Decision Summary Decision: WCAT-2010-00928 Panel: J. Callan Decision Date: March 30, 2010 Section 7 of the Workers Compensation Act Appeal Regulation Invoice for Expense Tariff Occupational
More informationPART FIVE INVESTMENT, SERVICES AND RELATED MATTERS. Chapter Eleven. Investment
PART FIVE INVESTMENT, SERVICES AND RELATED MATTERS Chapter Eleven Investment Section A - Investment Article 1101: Scope and Coverage 1. This Chapter applies to measures adopted or maintained by a Party
More informationCANADIAN INTERNATIONAL TRADE TRIBUNAL. Appeals NOTICE OF APPEAL
Canadian International Trade Tribunal Tribunal canadien du commerce extérieur CANADIAN INTERNATIONAL TRADE TRIBUNAL Appeals NOTICE OF APPEAL TABLE OF CONTENTS NOTICE OF APPEAL... 1 APPELLANT IDENTIFICATION...
More informationALBON ENGINEERING AND MANUFACTURING LIMITED. - and - Sitting in public at the Royal Courts of Justice, Strand, London WC2A 2LL on 16 June 2017
[17] UKFTT 60 (TC) TC06002 Appeal number:tc/14/01804 PROCEDURE costs complex case whether appellant opted out of liability for costs within 28 days of receiving notice of allocation as a complex case date
More informationPART FIVE INVESTMENT, SERVICES AND RELATED MATTERS. Chapter Eleven. Investment
CHAP-11 PART FIVE INVESTMENT, SERVICES AND RELATED MATTERS Chapter Eleven Investment Section A - Investment Article 1101: Scope and Coverage 1. This Chapter applies to measures adopted or maintained by
More informationTHE IMMIGRATION ACTS. Before THE HONOURABLE MRS JUSTICE PATTERSON DEPUTY UPPER TRIBUNAL JUDGE J G MACDONALD. Between. and
Upper Tribunal (Immigration and Asylum Chamber) THE IMMIGRATION ACTS Heard at Field House Determination Promulgated On 4 th February 2015 On 17 th February 2015 Before THE HONOURABLE MRS JUSTICE PATTERSON
More informationSAMPLE Examination for
Federation of Law Societies of Canada National Committee on Accreditation SAMPLE Examination for Foundations of Canadian Law Candidate No.: (To ensure your anonymity, please do not print or sign your name)
More informationTHE JAPAN COMMERCIAL ARBITRATION ASSOCIATION COMMERCIAL ARBITRATION RULES. CHAPTER General Provisions
THE JAPAN COMMERCIAL ARBITRATION ASSOCIATION COMMERCIAL ARBITRATION RULES As Amended and Effective on January 1, 2008 CHAPTER General Provisions Rule 1. Purpose The purpose of these Rules shall be to provide
More informationInsurance Coverage Law
Ohio State Bar Association Insurance Coverage Law Attorney Information and Standards Accredited by the Supreme Court Commission on Certification of Attorneys as Specialists Contents Insurance Coverage
More informationProcedures for Protest to New York State and City Tribunals
September 25, 1997 Procedures for Protest to New York State and City Tribunals By: Glenn Newman This new feature of the New York Law Journal will highlight cases involving New York State and City tax controversies
More informationFIRST YEAR MOOTS 2017
FIRST YEAR MOOTS 2017 INTRODUCTION All first-year students, working in teams of two, argue a moot problem in the second term. The moot takes the form of an appeal based on a set of given facts, the reasons
More informationArbitration CAS 2010/A/2046 Samir Ibrahim Ali Hassan v. National Anti-Doping Committee of the United Arab Emirates (UAE), award of 5 October 2010
Tribunal Arbitral du Sport Court of Arbitration for Sport Arbitration Samir Ibrahim Ali Hassan v. National Anti-Doping Committee of the United Arab Emirates (UAE), Panel: Mr Gerhard Bubnik (Czech Republic),
More informationUpper Tribunal (Immigration and Asylum Chamber) PA/03023/2017 THE IMMIGRATION ACTS
Upper Tribunal (Immigration and Asylum Chamber) PA/03023/2017 Appeal Number: THE IMMIGRATION ACTS Heard at Royal Court Justice Decision & Reasons Promulgated On 3 rd July 2017 On 5 th July 2017 Before
More information1. Company/Organization/Individual named in the determination ( Appellant ) Name Address Postal Code
APPEAL FORM (Form 1) This Appeal Form, along with the required attachments, must be delivered to the Employment Standards Tribunal within the appeal period. See Rule 18(3) of the Tribunal s Rules of Practice
More informationWORKPLACE SAFETY AND INSURANCE APPEALS TRIBUNAL DECISION NO. 565/09R
WORKPLACE SAFETY AND INSURANCE APPEALS TRIBUNAL DECISION NO. 565/09R BEFORE: A. T. Patterson: Vice-Chair HEARING: March 5, 2010 at Toronto Written DATE OF DECISION: March 9, 2010 NEUTRAL CITATION: 2010
More informationArbitration CAS 2014/A/3670 Traves Smikle v. Jamaica Anti-Doping Commission (JADCO), award of 23 February 2015 (operative part of 4 November 2014)
Tribunal Arbitral du Sport Court of Arbitration for Sport Arbitration Traves Smikle v. Jamaica Anti-Doping Commission (JADCO), Panel: Prof. Matthew Mitten (USA), President; Mr Jeffrey Benz (USA); Prof.
More informationTHE IMMIGRATION ACTS. On 28 November 2006 On 27 February Before
SS (s104(4)(b) of 2002 Act = application not limited) Nigeria [2007] UKAIT 00026 Asylum and Immigration Tribunal THE IMMIGRATION ACTS Heard at Field House Determination Promulgated On 28 November 2006
More informationOntario Municipal Board Commission des affaires municipales de l Ontario
Ontario Municipal Board Commission des affaires municipales de l Ontario ISSUE DATE: December 15, 2017 CASE NO(S).: MM160053 PROCEEDING COMMENCED UNDER subsection 11(5) of the Aggregate Resources Act,
More informationTHE IMMIGRATION ACTS. On 13 June 2013 On 24 June 2013 Prepared: 14 June Before UPPER TRIBUNAL JUDGE O CONNOR. Between
Upper Tribunal (Immigration and Asylum Chamber) THE IMMIGRATION ACTS Heard at Field House Determination Sent On 13 June 2013 On 24 June 2013 Prepared: 14 June 2013 Before UPPER TRIBUNAL JUDGE O CONNOR
More informationProcess and methods Published: 18 February 2014 nice.org.uk/process/pmg18
Guide to the technology appraisal aisal and highly specialised technologies appeal process Process and methods Published: 18 February 2014 nice.org.uk/process/pmg18 NICE 2014. All rights reserved. Contents
More informationHEARING DISCIPLINARY COMMITTEE OF THE ASSOCIATION OF CHARTERED CERTIFIED ACCOUNTANTS
DISCIPLINARY COMMITTEE OF THE ASSOCIATION OF CHARTERED CERTIFIED ACCOUNTANTS REASONS FOR DECISION In the matter of: Mr Jawad Raza Heard on: Thursday 7 and Friday 8 June 2018 Location: ACCA Head Offices,
More informationARBITRATION RULES OF THE PDRCI (Effective as of 1 January 2015)
ARBITRATION RULES OF THE PDRCI TABLE OF CONTENTS Section I: Introductory Provisions Model Arbitration Clause: Article 1 - Scope of Application Article 2 - Notice and Calculation of Period of Time Article
More informationWorld Bank Administrative Tribunal. Decision No EC, Applicant. International Bank for Reconstruction and Development, Respondent
World Bank Administrative Tribunal 2017 Decision No. 561 EC, Applicant v. International Bank for Reconstruction and Development, Respondent (Preliminary Objection) World Bank Administrative Tribunal Office
More informationFACULTY OF LAW. Business Organizations. Section 3. Jon Festinger, Q.C. TOTAL MARKS: 100
FACULTY OF LAW THE UNIVERSITY OF BRITISH COLUMBIA Page 1 of 8 HAS 3 PARTS. SUPPORT YOUR ANSWERS WITH REFERENCE TO MIGHT BE. RELEVANT CASE LAW AND/OR STATUTORY AUTHORITY WHERE DEFINITIVE CONCLUSION, THEN
More informationCategory Scottish Further and Higher Education: Higher Education/Plagiarism and Intellectual Property
Scottish Parliament Region: Mid Scotland and Fife Case 201002095: University of Stirling Summary of Investigation Category Scottish Further and Higher Education: Higher Education/Plagiarism and Intellectual
More informationChapter 3 Preparing the Record
Chapter 3 Preparing the Record After filing the Notice of Appeal, the appellant next needs to specify what items are to be in the record (the official account of what went on at the hearing or the trial
More informationTHE IMMIGRATION ACTS. Heard at Field House Decision & Reasons Promulgated On 26 th April 2016 On 9 th June Before
Upper Tribunal (Immigration and Asylum Chamber) THE IMMIGRATION ACTS Heard at Field House Decision & Reasons Promulgated On 26 th April 2016 On 9 th June 2016 Before DEPUTY UPPER TRIBUNAL JUDGE D N HARRIS
More informationImproving the Regulatory Environment for the Charitable Sector Highlights
Voluntary Sector Initiative Joint Regulatory Table Improving the Regulatory Environment for the Charitable Sector Highlights August 2002 Table of Contents Table of Contents... i Introduction... 1 Your
More informationNETHERLANDS ARBITRATION INSTITUTE
NETHERLANDS ARBITRATION INSTITUTE ARBITRATION RULES In force as of 1 January 2015 Netherlands Arbitration Institute, Rotterdam SECTION ONE - GENERAL Article 1 - Definitions NAI ARBITRATION RULES In these
More informationNETHERLANDS - ARBITRATION ACT DECEMBER 1986 CODE OF CIVIL PROCEDURE - BOOK IV: ARBITRATION TITLE ONE - ARBITRATION IN THE NETHERLANDS
NETHERLANDS - ARBITRATION ACT DECEMBER 1986 CODE OF CIVIL PROCEDURE - BOOK IV: ARBITRATION TITLE ONE - ARBITRATION IN THE NETHERLANDS SECTION ONE - ARBITRATION AGREEMENT AND APPOINTMENT OF ARBITRATOR Article
More informationLabour Relations Board Saskatchewan. CITY OF NORTH BATTLEFORD, Applicant v. CANADIAN UNION OF PUBLIC EMPLOYEES, LOCAL 287, Respondent
Labour Relations Board Saskatchewan CITY OF NORTH BATTLEFORD, Applicant v. CANADIAN UNION OF PUBLIC EMPLOYEES, LOCAL 287, Respondent LRB File No. 054-01; May 22, 2003 Vice-Chairperson, James Seibel; Members:
More informationTOOLKIT: CHALLENGING CORPORATE POWER IN TRADE DEALS.
TOOLKIT: CHALLENGING CORPORATE POWER IN TRADE DEALS www.isdscorporateattacks.org Does Your Member of Congress Reject the Expansion of Corporate Power in Our Trade Deals? The North American Free Trade Agreement
More informationGuidance for ADR Applicants - updated CAP 1324
Guidance for ADR Applicants - updated CAP 1324 Published by the Civil Aviation Authority 2016 Civil Aviation Authority, CAA House, 45-59 Kingsway London WC2B 6TE You can copy and use this text but please
More informationEnvironmental Appeal Board
Environmental Appeal Board Fourth Floor 747 Fort Street Victoria British Columbia Telephone: (250) 387-3464 Facsimile: (250) 356-9923 Mailing Address: PO Box 9425 Stn Prov Govt Victoria BC V8W 9V1 DECISION
More informationNoteworthy Decision Summary. Decision: WCAT AD Panel: Jill Callan, Chair Decision Date: July 30, 2003
Noteworthy Decision Summary Decision: WCAT-2003-01800-AD Panel: Jill Callan, Chair Decision Date: July 30, 2003 Lawfulness of Policy - Sections 33(1) and 251 of the Workers Compensation Act - Item #67.21
More informationDISCIPLINE CASE DIGEST
DISCIPLINE CASE DIGEST Case 16-10 Member: Jurisdiction: James Graeme Earle Young Winnipeg, Manitoba Called to the Bar: June 16, 2005 Particulars of Charges: Professional Misconduct (11 Counts): Breach
More informationMarch 13, Dear Minister: Tax Court of Canada
March 13, 2008 The Honourable Robert D. Nicholson, P.C., Q.C., M.P. Minister of Justice and Attorney General of Canada East Memorial Building, 4th Floor 284 Wellington Street Ottawa, ON K1A 0H8 Dear Minister:
More informationCertified Mail Return Receipt Requested. September 30, 2015
U.S. Department of Transportation Office of the Secretary of Transportation GENERAL COUNSEL 1200 New Jersey Ave., S.E. Washington, DC 20590 Certified Mail Return Receipt Requested September 30, 2015 Evelyn
More informationReasons and decision Motifs et décision
Reasons and decision Motifs et décision RAD File No. / N de dossier de la SAR : VB3-02197 Private Proceeding / Huis clos Person(s) who is(are) XXXX XXXX XXXX XXXX Personne(s) en cause the subject of the
More informationNetherlands Arbitration Institute
BOOK FOUR - ARBITRATION TITLE ONE - ARBITRATION IN THE NETHERLANDS SECTION ONE - ARBITRATION AGREEMENT Article 1020 (1) The parties may agree to submit to arbitration disputes which have arisen or may
More informationIN THE HIGH COURT OF NEW ZEALAND AUCKLAND REGISTRY CIV [2015] NZHC KIWIBANK LIMITED Defendant
IN THE HIGH COURT OF NEW ZEALAND AUCKLAND REGISTRY CIV-2015-404-694 [2015] NZHC 1417 BETWEEN AND E-TRANS INTERNATIONAL FINANCE LIMITED Plaintiff KIWIBANK LIMITED Defendant Hearing: 23 April 2015 Appearances:
More informationWHAT S NEW IN PENSIONS AND BENEFITS AT FSCO. PENSION e-bulletin
Volume 19, No. 2 April 2011 Pensions and Benefits Law Section WHAT S NEW IN PENSIONS AND BENEFITS AT FSCO PENSION e-bulletin Don t forget to subscribe to the Pension e-bulletin by clicking on the Subscribe
More informationTHE IMMIGRATION ACTS. On 6 July 2015 On 22 July 2015 Prepared on 7 July Before DEPUTY UPPER TRIBUNAL JUDGE JM HOLMES.
Upper Tribunal (Immigration and Asylum Chamber) THE IMMIGRATION ACTS Heard at North Shields Determination Promulgated On 6 July 2015 On 22 July 2015 Prepared on 7 July 2015 Before DEPUTY UPPER TRIBUNAL
More informationNORTHERN IRELAND VALUATION TRIBUNAL THE RATES (NORTHERN IRELAND) ORDER 1977 (AS AMENDED)
NORTHERN IRELAND VALUATION TRIBUNAL THE RATES (NORTHERN IRELAND) ORDER 1977 (AS AMENDED) AND THE VALUATION TRIBUNAL RULES (NORTHERN IRELAND) 2007 (AS AMENDED) CASE REFERENCE NUMBER: NIVT2/16 JENNIFER ADGEY
More informationTB (Student application variation of course effect) Jamaica [2006] UKAIT THE IMMIGRATION ACTS. On 28 February 2006 On 06 April 2006.
TB (Student application variation of course effect) Jamaica [2006] UKAIT 00034 Asylum and Immigration Tribunal THE IMMIGRATION ACTS Heard at Field House Determination Promulgated On 28 February 2006 On
More informationTHE HUMAN RIGHTS REVIEW TRIBUNAL & ORS Respondents
NOTE: ORDER OF THE HUMAN RIGHTS REVIEW TRIBUNAL AND OF THE HIGH COURT PROHIBITING PUBLICATION OF NAMES, ADDRESSES OR IDENTIFYING PARTICULARS OF THE SECOND, THIRD AND FOURTH RESPONDENTS AND THE SECOND RESPONDENT'S
More informationArbitration CAS 2015/A/3970 K. v. Turkish Athletics Federation (TAF) & World Anti-Doping Agency (WADA), award on jurisdiction of 17 November 2015
Tribunal Arbitral du Sport Court of Arbitration for Sport Arbitration K. v. Turkish Athletics Federation (TAF) & World Anti-Doping Agency (WADA), Panel: His Honour James Robert Reid QC (United Kingdom),
More informationTHE IMMIGRATION ACTS. Before DEPUTY UPPER TRIBUNAL JUDGE WOODCRAFT. Between
Upper Tribunal (Immigration and Asylum Chamber) Appeal Numbers: IA338292015 THE IMMIGRATION ACTS Heard at Field House Decision & Reasons Promulgated Heard on 10 th July 2017 On 17 th July 2017 Prepared
More informationONTARIO SUPERIOR COURT OF JUSTICE ) ) REASONS FOR JUDGMENT
CITATION: Volpe v. Co-operators General Insurance Company, 2017 ONSC 261 COURT FILE NO.: 13-42024 DATE: 2017-01-13 ONTARIO SUPERIOR COURT OF JUSTICE B E T W E E N: Vicky Volpe A. Rudder, for the Plaintiff/Respondent
More informationSummary Matrix - Compensation Services and Adjudication
Compensation Services, Adjudication and Appeals Compensation Services and Adjudication Page 1 ALBERTA SASK MANITOBA ONTARIO Compensation Services Readjustment Short-term rate After 24 months TTD, adjusted
More informationM. M. (No. 3) v. WIPO
Organisation internationale du Travail Tribunal administratif International Labour Organization Administrative Tribunal M. M. (No. 3) v. WIPO 125th Session Judgment No. 3946 THE ADMINISTRATIVE TRIBUNAL,
More informationPRIVATE INTERNATIONAL LAW LECTURE EIGHTEEN. Conduct of arbitration proceedings under the Model Law
LECTURE EIGHTEEN Conduct of arbitration proceedings under the Model Law UNCITRAL MODEL LAW ON INTERNATIONAL COMMERCIAL ARBITRATION MODEL LAW ARBITRATION ACT 1996 Chapter V. Conduct of arbitral proceedings
More informationAPPLICATION FOR REVIEW PURSUANT TO SUBSECTION 43(1) OF THE ACT
Public Commission des Service relations de Labour travail dans la Relations fonction Board publique APPLICATION FOR REVIEW PURSUANT TO SUBSECTION 43(1) OF THE ACT Public Service Labour Relations Act 1.
More informationTiSA: Analysis of the EU s Dispute Settlement text July 2016
TiSA: Analysis of the EU s Dispute Settlement text July 2016 (Professor Jane Kelsey, Faculty of Law, University of Auckland, New Zealand, September 2016) The EU proposed a draft chapter on dispute settlement
More informationPROCEDURE application for stay in proceedings - refused. - and - TRIBUNAL: JUDGE HARRIET MORGAN
Appeal number: TC/13/06946 PROCEDURE application for stay in proceedings - refused FIRST-TIER TRIBUNAL TAX CHAMBER JUMBOGATE LIMITED Appellant - and - THE COMMISSIONERS FOR HER MAJESTY S REVENUE & CUSTOMS
More informationIN THE MATTER OF AN ARBITRATION. Under THE PUBLIC SERVICE ACT. Before THE PUBLIC SERVICE GRIEVANCE BOARD. R. Lee Van Biesbrouck.
PSGB # P/0001/97 BETWEEN IN THE MATTER OF AN ARBITRATION Under THE PUBLIC SERVICE ACT Before THE PUBLIC SERVICE GRIEVANCE BOARD R. Lee Van Biesbrouck - and - The Crown in Right of Ontario (Ministry of
More informationSUPPLEMENTARY ESTIMATES (A) Supplementary Estimates (A),
SUPPLEMENTARY ESTIMATES (A) Supplementary (A), 2016 17 For the Fiscal year ending March 31, 2017 Her Majesty the Queen in Right of Canada, as represented by the President of the Treasury Board, 2017 This
More informationASYLUM AND IMMIGRATION TRIBUNAL
RS and SS (Exclusion of appellant from hearing) Pakistan [2008] UKAIT 00012 ASYLUM AND IMMIGRATION TRIBUNAL THE IMMIGRATION ACTS Heard at: Field House Date of Hearing: 18 December 2007 Before: Mr C M G
More informationASYLUM AND IMMIGRATION TRIBUNAL
BA (321A Immigration Rules mandatory) Nigeria [2006] UKAIT 00080 ASYLUM AND IMMIGRATION TRIBUNAL THE IMMIGRATION ACTS Heard at Field House Determination Promulgated: On 10 th October 2006 On 7 th November
More informationEDITORIAL NOTE: NO SUPPRESSION APPLIED. IN THE DISTRICT COURT AT QUEENSTOWN CIV [2016] NZDC 2055
EDITORIAL NOTE: NO SUPPRESSION APPLIED. IN THE DISTRICT COURT AT QUEENSTOWN CIV-2014-059-000156 [2016] NZDC 2055 BETWEEN AND JAMES VELASCO BUENAVENTURA Plaintiff ROWENA GONZALES BURGESS Defendant Hearing:
More informationWCAT. Workers Compensation Appeal Tribunal. Annual Activity Report 2012
WCAT Workers Compensation Appeal Tribunal Annual Activity Report 2012 161 St. Peters Road, P.O. Box 2000, Charlottetown, PE C1A 7N8 Phone 902-894-0278 Fax 902-620-3477 www.gov.pe.ca/wcat Message from the
More informationUpper Tribunal (Immigration and Asylum Chamber) IA/35017/2015 THE IMMIGRATION ACTS. On 10 January 2018 On 11 January Before
Upper Tribunal (Immigration and Asylum Chamber) IA/35017/2015 Appeal Number: THE IMMIGRATION ACTS Heard at Field House Decision Promulgated On 10 January 2018 On 11 January 2018 Before UPPER TRIBUNAL JUDGE
More informationHEARING at Specialist Courts and Tribunals Centre, Chorus House, Auckland
NEW ZEALAND LAWYERS AND CONVEYANCERS DISCIPLINARY TRIBUNAL [2015] NZLCDT 29 LCDT 002/15 BETWEEN AUCKLAND STANDARDS COMMITTEE 4 Applicant AND ANTHONY BERNARD JOSEPH MORAHAN Respondent CHAIR Judge BJ Kendall
More informationGuide to taking part in planning and listed building consent appeals proceeding by an inquiry - England
Guide to taking part in planning and listed building consent appeals proceeding by an inquiry - England April 2016 Guide to taking part in planning and listed building consent appeals proceeding by an
More informationIMMIGRATION APPEAL TRIBUNAL. Before: MR H J E LATTER (CHAIRMAN) MRS R FAUX DIANE PITHER. and SECRETARY OF STATE FOR THE HOME DEPARTMENT
CH Heard at Field House On 3 May 2002 Dictated 9 May 2002 DP (Risk Lissouba Region) Republic of Congo Brazzaville CG [2002] UKIAT 02773 HX60021-2000 IMMIGRATION APPEAL TRIBUNAL Date Determination notified:
More informationKorean Commercial Arbitration Board
Korean Commercial Arbitration Board INTERNATIONAL ARBITRATION RULES Main office (Trade Tower, Samseong-dong) 43rd floor, 511, Yeoungdong-daero, Gangnam-gu, Seoul, 06164 Rep. of Korea TEL : +82-2-551-2000,
More informationCanada. Record of Proceedings, Reasons for Decision. Proponent. Subject
Canadian Nuclear Safety Commission Commission canadienne de sorete nucleaire Record of Proceedings, Reasons for Decision Including Proponent Canadian Nuclear Safety Commission Subject Request for Exemption
More informationForest Appeals Commission
Forest Appeals Commission Fourth Floor 747 Fort Street Victoria British Columbia V8W 3E9 Telephone: (250) 387-3464 Facsimile: (250) 356-9923 Mailing Address: PO Box 9425 Stn Prov Govt Victoria BC V8W 9V1
More informationThe CBSA Decision In Certain Laminate Flooring. Jon R. Johnson Goodmans LLP June 20, 2005
The CBSA Decision In Certain Laminate Flooring Jon R. Johnson Goodmans LLP June 20, 2005 Contents Background...3 Renunciation Of Zeroing...4 Participation In The Investigation...5 Chinese Subsidy Programs...5
More informationTHE IMMIGRATION ACTS. Before UPPER TRIBUNAL JUDGE CRAIG. Between MR ABDUL KADIR SAID. and. THE SECRETARY OF STATE FOR THE HOME DEPARTMENT Respondent
IAC-FH-NL-V1 Upper Tribunal (Immigration and Asylum Chamber) Appeal Number: DA/00950/2014 THE IMMIGRATION ACTS Heard at Royal Courts of Justice Oral determination given immediately following the hearing
More informationDISCUSSION PAPER DECISION-MAKING ROLES ON PROJECTS
DISCUSSION PAPER DECISION-MAKING ROLES ON PROJECTS TOPIC: Roles and responsibilities for making decisions under the National Energy Board Act (NEB Act). CONTEXT: In 2012, there were legislative amendments
More informationFST FINANCIALSERVICES. KEITH BRYAN WESTERGAARD and GET ACCEPTANCE CORPORATION REGISTRAR OF MORTGAGE BROKERS APPEAL DECISION
FST-05-017 FINANCIAL SERVICES TRIBUNAL In the matter of Mortgage Brokers Act R.S.B.C. 1996, C. 313 BETWEEN: KEITH BRYAN WESTERGAARD and GET ACCEPTANCE CORPORATION APPELLANT AND: REGISTRAR OF MORTGAGE BROKERS
More informationThe Advocates Society PROMOTING EXCELLENCE IN ADVOCACY
The Advocates Society PROMOTING EXCELLENCE IN ADVOCACY BY E-MAIL December 2, 2013 Senior Manager Insurance Policy Unit Industrial and Financial Policy Branch Ministry of Finance 95 Grosvener Street, 4th
More informationUpper Tribunal (Immigration and Asylum Chamber) DC/00014/2016 THE IMMIGRATION ACTS
Upper Tribunal (Immigration and Asylum Chamber) DC/00014/2016 Appeal Number: THE IMMIGRATION ACTS Heard at Bradford Decision & Reasons Promulgated On 12 March 2018 On 27 April 2018 Before UPPER TRIBUNAL
More informationCOMMERCIAL ARBITRATION RULES
COMMERCIAL ARBITRATION RULES As Amended and Effective on December 10, 2015 ADMINISTRATIVE FEE REGULATIONS As Amended and Effective on February 1, 2014 REGULATIONS FOR ARBITRATOR S REMUNERATION As Amended
More information969. Pursuant to Article 95 item 3 of the Constitution of Montenegro, I hereby adopt DECREE ON THE PROMULGATION OF THE LAW ON ARBITRATION
969. Pursuant to Article 95 item 3 of the Constitution of Montenegro, I hereby adopt DECREE ON THE PROMULGATION OF THE LAW ON ARBITRATION I hereby promulgate the Law on Arbitration adopted by the 25 th
More informationPLEASE NOTE. For more information concerning the history of this Act, please see the Table of Public Acts.
PLEASE NOTE This document, prepared by the Legislative Counsel Office, is an office consolidation of this Act, current to January 1, 2009. It is intended for information and reference purposes only. This
More informationIN THE MATTER OF appeals heard on July 4, 1996, under section 67 of the Customs Act, R.S.C. 1985, c. 1 (2nd Supp.);
Ottawa, Thursday, November 7, 1996 BETWEEN IN THE MATTER OF appeals heard on July 4, 1996, under section 67 of the Customs Act, R.S.C. 1985, c. 1 (2nd Supp.); AND IN THE MATTER OF decisions of the Deputy
More informationSTUDENT APPEALS. The purpose of this policy is to provide a process for hearing student appeals.
Policy and Procedures Manual Policy #3-30 Approved By: Education Council Approval Date: March 26, 1997 Revision Date: June 2002 June 10, 2011 October 16, 2015 Effective Date: October 16, 2015 Date to be
More informationPolicy on Freedom of Information
Policy on Freedom of Information Page 1 of 16 Change Control Version: New or Replacement: Approved by: V2 Replacement Principal / Chief Executive Date approved: 24 June 2014 Name of author: Name of responsible
More informationA GUIDE FOR SELF-REPRESENTED LITIGANTS
COURT OF APPEAL OF NEWFOUNDLAND AND LABRADOR A GUIDE FOR SELF-REPRESENTED LITIGANTS 2017 This document explains what to do to prepare and file a factum. It includes advice and best practices to help you.
More informationBefore: THE HONOURABLE SIR STEPHEN STEWART MR GODWIN BUSUTTIL DR. ROSEMARY GILLESPIE
APPEAL TO THE VISITORS TO THE INNS OF COURT ON APPEAL FROM THE DISCIPLINARY TRIBUNAL OF THE COUNCIL OF THE INNS OF COURT Royal Courts of Justice Strand, London, WC2A 2LL Date: 09/10/2013 Before: THE HONOURABLE
More informationNew York Court of Appeals Rules on Brownfield Eligibility. By Larry Schnapf
New York Court of Appeals Rules on Brownfield Eligibility By Larry Schnapf On February 18, 2010, the New York State Court of Appeals handed down its longawaited decision in Lighthouse Pointe Property Associates
More informationENVIRONMENTAL ALBERTA APPEALS BOARD. Dems on. Preliminary. Appeal No : _ ID1. Properties
ALBERTA APPEALS BOARD ENVIRONMENTAL THE MATTER OF sections 91, 92, and 95 of the IN Protection and Enhancement Act, R.S.A. 2000, c. Environmental THE MATTER OF an appeal filed by Alberta Foothills IN Ltd.
More informationSECOND CONSULTATION ON FIT AND PROPER TEST. February 2006 CONSULTATION PAPER CP15 1
SECOND CONSULTATION ON FIT AND PROPER TEST February 2006 CONSULTATION PAPER CP15 1 Table of Contents 1 Background... 3 2 General Points about process... 3 3 Proposed Amendments... 4 3.1 Scope... 5 3.2
More informationWorld Bank Administrative Tribunal. Decision No BU, Applicant. International Bank for Reconstruction and Development, Respondent
World Bank Administrative Tribunal 2012 Decision No. 465 BU, Applicant v. International Bank for Reconstruction and Development, Respondent World Bank Administrative Tribunal Office of the Executive Secretary
More informationGovernment crackdown on employing illegal immigrants
Government crackdown on illegal immigrants Q. What does the haulage industry need to be aware of? Given the recent announcement of the Government s intention to crackdown on Companies illegal immigrants,
More informationArbitration CAS 2013/A/3237 Bratislav Ristic v. FK Olimpic Sarajevo, award of 14 March 2014
Tribunal Arbitral du Sport Court of Arbitration for Sport Arbitration CAS 2013/A/3237 Panel: Mr Stuart McInnes (United Kingdom), Sole Arbitrator Football Termination of the employment contract Definition
More informationThe Voice of the Legal Profession
The Voice of the Legal Profession Expert Panel Review of the Mandates of the Financial Services Commission of Ontario (FSCO), Financial Services Tribunal (FST) & the Deposit Insurance Corporation of Ontario
More informationArbitration CAS 2010/A/2078 Gabros International Football Club v. Hertha BSC Berlin, award of 16 November 2010
Tribunal Arbitral du Sport Court of Arbitration for Sport Arbitration CAS 2010/A/2078 Panel: Mr Mark Hovell (United Kingdom), Sole Arbitrator Football Transfer Withdrawal of the offer before its acceptance
More informationSuggested Changes to the ICSID Rules and Regulations. Working Paper of the ICSID Secretariat. May 12, 2005
International Centre for Settlement of Investment Disputes 1818 H Street, N.W., Washington, D.C. 20433, U.S.A. Telephone: (202) 458-1534 FAX: (202) 522-2615/2027 Website:www.worldbank.org/icsid Suggested
More informationPCA Case Nº IN THE MATTER OF THE ATLANTO-SCANDIAN HERRING ARBITRATION. - before -
PCA Case Nº 2013-30 IN THE MATTER OF THE ATLANTO-SCANDIAN HERRING ARBITRATION - before - AN ARBITRAL TRIBUNAL CONSTITUTED UNDER ANNEX VII TO THE 1982 UNITED NATIONS CONVENTION ON THE LAW OF THE SEA - between
More information