Tax Executives Institute Houston Chapter. Partnership Update. February 27, 2018
|
|
- Wendy Hawkins
- 6 years ago
- Views:
Transcription
1 Tax Executives Institute Houston Chapter Partnership Update February 27, 2018
2 Today s Presenters Todd McArthur Principal Washington National Tax Services Todd McArthur is a Principal in the Mergers & Acquisitions Group in the PricewaterhouseCoopers LLP Washington National Tax Services office. Todd has over twenty-five years of transactional and tax controversy experience involving domestic and cross-border partnerships, oil and gas joint ventures, strategic joint ventures and other partnership, acquisitions, dispositions, and financings. In recent years, he has represented fund sponsors and institutional investors in respect of the formation of and investment in a wide variety of alternative investment funds. todd.y.mcarthur@pwc.com Nancy Langdon Managing Director Washington National Tax Services Nancy Langdon is a Managing Director of the Partnership Analytics Group in the Mergers & Acquisitions Group in the PricewaterhouseCoopers LLP Washington National Tax Services office, which specializes in modeling and quantitative analysis for partnership transactions. Nancy oversees complex modeling projects for domestic and international partnerships that include analyzing the projected tax and economic implications for multi-billion dollar transactions to determine which solutions best fit the client's needs, such as post acquisition restructuring, strategic joint ventures, and recapitalization events. nancy.l.langdon@pwc.com 2
3 Agenda 1. Tax Reform Choice of Entity Section 163(j) Interest Expense Limitation Sections 864(c)(8) & 1446(f) Codification of Rev. Rul Selected International Issues (US Shareholder, Toll Charge, GILTI) Section 199A 20% Deduction for Domestic Qualified Business Income Other Partnership Issues 2. BBA (Partnership Audit and Adjustment Rules) 3. Oil & Gas Partnership Agreements 3
4 Tax Reform 1 4
5 Choice of Entity 5
6 Choice of Entity Traditional choice of business entity considerations remain relevant, but tax reform requires rebalancing based on all relevant facts and circumstances Change in rates (39.6% to 37% for individuals; 35% to 21% for corporations) - Section 199A individual deduction up to 20% of QBI, subject to wage and basis limitations and uncertain scope - Near complete loss of individual deduction for state and local taxes and full loss of deduction for miscellaneous itemized deductions - Corporate advantage for holding foreign corporations 100% dividends received deduction Offsets for GILTI (Section 250) and availability of deemed paid credits) - Corporate deduction on foreign derived intangible income (FDII) 6
7 Choice of Entity (continued) Distribution considerations - Double tax remains a consideration but lower corporate rate Timing and amount of expected distributions? Impact of accumulated earnings tax? Reasonable compensation and other disguised dividend risks - Partnership distributions remain flexible compared to corporate distributions Debt-financed distributions generally tax free Distributions of appreciated property generally tax free 7
8 Choice of Entity (continued) Planning for operating losses - Individual limitations - Sections 465, 469; new Section 461(l) ($250,000/$500,000) - Section 163(j) applicable to both individuals and corporations - BEAT base erosion payments of corporations subject to a 10% minimum tax Formation and exit considerations - Tax free formation of partnerships is more flexible and permits more flexible, tax free economic arrangements - Basis step up in assets held by a partnership only subject to one level of tax - Accumulated earnings provide step up in partnership interest - Liquidating distributions of partnerships v. corporations 8
9 Choice of Entity (continued) Other considerations - Cost and complexity of Schedule K-1 reporting v. Form 1099-DIV reporting - Specter of Section 1446(f) withholding - Impact of BBA audit rules - State tax reporting - Long-term viability of rate structure? - Other? 9
10 Interest Expense Limitation (Section 163(j)) 10
11 Interest Expense Limitation (Section 163(j)) -- Partnerships Interest Limitation Amount: A taxpayer s interest deduction may not exceed 30% of Adjusted Taxable Income (ATI) plus business interest income plus floor plan financing interest - ATI is roughly equivalent to EBITDA for tax years beginning before January 1, ATI is roughly equivalent to EBIT (i.e., the add back for depreciation, amortization, and depletion is removed) for tax years beginning after January 1, Impact of IDC and depletion partner level deductions under general principles Under the partnership provisions, the limitation applies at the partnership level. When computing ATI of the partner, K-1 information from the partnership is ignored, but if the partnership has unused limitation, new Section 163(j) provides for a mechanic for it to be used by the partner 11
12 Interest Expense Limitation (Section 163(j)) -- Partnerships (continued) Any deduction for business interest is taken into account in determining the nonseparately stated income or loss of the entity - The partnership determines its ATI - The partnership s interest limitation is equal to its business interest income plus 30% of its ATI - The partnership may deduct business interest against non-separately stated income - Disallowed interest expense is allocated to the partners - To the extent interest is not deductible at the partnership level, the carryforward ( excess business interest ) is at the partner level 12
13 Interest Expense Limitation (Section 163(j)) -- Partnerships (continued) At the partner level: A partner s ATI shall be determined without regard to such partner s distributive share of any items of income, gain, deduction, or loss of such partnership and shall be increased by such partner s share of such partnership s excess taxable income A partner s distributive share of excess taxable income (ETI) is equal to its share of non-separately stated income 13
14 Interest Expense Limitation (Section 163(j)) -- Partnerships (continued) ETI is a percentage of partnership ATI equal to unused limitation/total limitation - ATI x [((30% x Partnership ATI) net business interest expense))/(30% x Partnership ATI)] Example -- partnership has ATI of $100 and business interest expense of $10 - ETI = $100 x (($30 - $10)/$30)) = $ At the partner level, $66.67 gives the partners the ability to deduct another $20 of interest (i.e., $66.67 x 30%) 14
15 Interest Expense Limitation (Section 163(j)) -- Partnerships (continued) Excess business interest (EBI) is allocated to the partners in proportion to their distributive share of nonseparately stated items. An allocation of EBI immediately reduces a partner s basis in its partnership interest (but not below zero). 15
16 Interest Expense Limitation (Section 163(j)) -- Partnerships (continued) The partner treats the EBI as business interest paid or accrued by the partner in the next succeeding taxable year in which the partner is allocated excess taxable income from such partnership, but only to the extent of such excess taxable income. Unclear what this means -- if partner is allocated $100 of EBI in year 1 and $100 of ETI in year 2, is the partner treated as (a) having $100 of business interest paid or accrued in year 2 that is deductible to the extent provided in 163(j) or (b) permitted to deduct $30 of the carryforward? If partner disposes of its interest in a taxable or nonrecognition transaction the reduction to basis (as a result of an allocation of EBI) is reversed to the extent the allocation of EBI was not treated as business interest paid or accrued by the partner. 16
17 Interest Expense Limitation (Section 163(j)) -- Partnerships (continued) Issues for consideration: - Partnership has no trade or business but has interest income/expense Are individual partners treated differently than corporate partners? FN 688 of Conference Committee Explanation (describing the House Provision): Section 163(d) applies in the case of a taxpayer other than a corporation. Thus, a corporation has neither investment interest nor investment income within the meaning of section 163(d). Thus, interest income and interest expense of a corporation is properly allocable to a trade or business, unless such trade or business is otherwise explicitly excluded from the application of the provision. 17
18 Interest Expense Limitation (Section 163(j)) -- Partnerships (continued) Issues for consideration: - Partnership has net business interest income -- how is it taken into account by a partner? - If a partnership has a trade or business, does it need to allocate between trade or business interest income/expense and investment interest income/expense if it also finances corporate subsidiaries? - If a partnership has no operations but receives effectively connected income from an investment that is separate and apart from its interest income/expense, is the ECI enough to cause the partnership and its partners to have business interest income/expense for purposes of Section 163(j)? 18
19 Interest Expense Limitation (Section 163(j)) -- Partnerships (continued) Application to tiered partnerships (1) LTP has business income UTP has net interest expense All of LTP s business income should flow through to UTP as excess taxable income Excess taxable income is included in UTP s ATI calculation If LTP has interest income, does that flow through as a separately stated item that UTP can net against its interest expense? UTP LTP LTP Interest Expense Business Income 19
20 Interest Expense Limitation (Section 163(j)) -- Partnerships (continued) Application to tiered partnerships (2) LTP has interest expense UTP has business income Assume no deduction at LTP Interest expense is treated as being incurred by UTP in next taxable year UTP reduces basis in LTP UTP may use the expense carried forward only against future excess taxable income of LTP UTP LTP LTP Business Income Interest Expense 20
21 Sections 864(c)(8) and 1446(f) Codification of Rev. Rul and withholding 21
22 Codification of Rev. Rul Non-US Person s Sale of a Partnership Engaged in US Trade or Business In response to the Grecian Magnesite case, Congress codified Rev. Rul as part of tax reform Other Partner 40% Foreign Seller 60% FPS FP interest Foreign Buyer Gain or loss from the sale or exchange of a partnership interest treated as income that is effectively connected with a US trade or business (ECI) to the extent that the transferor would have had ECI if the partnership sold all of its assets at fair market value on the date of the sale o Withholding requirement is effective for tax years beginning after December 31, 2017 But provision is otherwise applicable for sales or exchanges on or after November 27, 2017 USTB Notice suspends withholding for publicly traded partnerships until further guidance is issued - substantive tax still in effect o Partnership required to withhold from distributions to the new partner amounts (plus interest) not withheld by transferee 22
23 Selected International Issues - Expanded definition of US Shareholder - Toll charge - GILTI/FDII 23
24 US Shareholder -- Only a US person can be a US shareholder US Partnership Foreign Partnership A US partnership can qualify as a US shareholder if it owns: o o 10% or more of the total combined voting power of all classes of voting stock OR 10% or more of the total value of shares of all classes of stock Therefore, partners of a US partnership may be allocated their distributive share of partnership items as a result of the US partnership qualifying a US shareholder A foreign partnership does not qualify as a US shareholder. Therefore, partners of a foreign partnership are only treated as a US shareholder to the extent they own: o o 10% or more of the total combined voting power of all classes of voting stock OR 10% or more of the total value of shares of all classes of stock 24
25 Expanding the Definition of United States Shareholder -- Section 951(b) 100 Individuals FPS Foreign Corp USPS 20% Profits Interests, 0 Invested Capital Issue: How do you measure value for purposes of establishing whether a partner is a US Shareholder with respect to a CFC held through a foreign partnership? Analysis: Section 318(a)(2)(A): Stock owned, directly or indirectly, by or for a partnership or estate shall be considered as owned proportionately by its partners or beneficiaries However, there is little direct guidance on what proportionate means for this context. In general, existing analogous authority establishes a partner s ownership under one of two approaches: 1. Greater of capital or profits interest in the partnership 2. Hypothetical partnership liquidation Under this approach each partner s ownership of the partnership is determined by calculating the amount proceeds each partner would receive upon a hypothetical liquidation of the partnership Takeaway: Historically capital or profits interest has been more commonly used to establish ownership through partnerships. However, hypothetical liquidation value has been used recently in the section 956 regulations 25
26 Deemed Repatriation Toll Charge (Section 965) -- What s the New Law? The Act: Imposes a toll charge on a US shareholder s pro rata share of certain foreign subsidiaries previously untaxed foreign earnings Treats the US shareholder s toll charge inclusion amount as additional Subpart F income, which may be reduced by a pro rata share of the deficits of certain foreign subsidiaries Deduction is allowed to the extent necessary for the foreign E&P attributable to cash and other liquid assets to be taxed at an effective rate of 15.5% and all residual foreign E&P at an effective rate of 8% (based on the corporate tax rate in existence during the year of inclusion) Permits an election to pay the tax liability imposed over eight years Effective for the last taxable year of a foreign corporation that begins before January 1, 2018, and, with respect to US shareholders, for the taxable years in which or with which such taxable years of the foreign corporation ends 26
27 Deemed Repatriation Toll Charge (Section 965) -- Application to Investors in Passthrough Entities The mechanics of the toll charge to US passthrough entities generally operate in a similar manner to US corporations However, the effective tax rate for individuals is higher as compared to US corporations This disparity in tax rate is a result of US individuals being taxed at higher rates as compared to corporations The mechanism of getting the desired effective rates of 15.5% and 8% is via a deduction based on the applicable corporate tax rate For example, to the extent the toll charge is due on December 31, 2017, the deduction is based on a corporate tax rate of 35%. Therefore the effective tax rate for individuals is higher as a result of the individual rate being 39% However, this disparity can dramatically increase to the extent the toll charge is due in 2018 (e.g., CFC tax year is November 30) 27
28 Toll Charge (Section 965) -- Partner s Tax Basis Issue: What is partner s tax basis increased for income under toll charge? Analysis: US Corp 1 US Corp 2 US Partner 3 US Partner 4 Section 965 is implemented through a US Shareholder level subpart F inclusion. USPS is the US Shareholder that includes the toll charge into income under section 965(a), and its partners are allocated a distributive share of the inclusion 45% 5% 45% USPS 100% CFC 5% The corresponding section 965(c) deduction is determined at the level of USPS (i.e., the US Shareholder with the section 965(a) inclusion) and allocated to its partners Section 965(f)(2) The portion which is included in the income of a United States shareholder under section 951(a)(1) by reason of subsection (a) which is equal to the deduction allowed under subsection (c) by reason of such inclusion (A) shall be treated as income exempt from tax for purposes of section 705(a)(1)(B) and 1367(a)(1)(A), and (B) shall not be treated as income exempt from tax for purposes of determining whether an adjustment shall be made to an accumulated adjustment account under section 1368(e)(1)(A) Takeaway: Although the language that attempts to create full basis for the partner is not clear or accurate, it appears that the intent is to allow the partner to get basis in its partnership interest for the full amount of the section 965(a) inclusion (not net of the deduction) 28
29 Toll Charge (Section 960) -- FTCs Issue: Which partners are entitled to use foreign tax credits ( FTCs ) to offset its toll charge inclusion? Analysis: US Corp 1 US Corp 2 US Partner 3 US Partner 4 Section 960 only applies to corporate US Shareholders. As a result, US Partner 3 and US Partner 4 are not eligible to claim deemed paid FTCs in connection with the toll charge unless a special rule applies 5% 45% Additionally US Corp 2 does not qualify as a US Shareholder and thus is not entitled to offset toll charge with foreign tax credits 45% USPS 100% CFC 5% US Partner 3 (but not US Partner 4) may consider electing (under section 962) to be treated as a US corporation for purposes of subpart F. US Partner 4 does not qualify as a US Shareholder Takeaway: An individual is not entitled to deemed paid FTCs under section 960, absent a section 962 election 29
30 Toll Charge (Section 965) -- Liability Deferral Election Issue: Who (i.e., partnership or partner) is entitled to make the election to defer toll charge tax liability? Analysis: US Corp 1 US Corp 2 US Partner 3 US Partner 4 Section 965(h) allows a US shareholder to elect to pay its tax liability in 8 installments 45% 5% 45% USPS 100% CFC 5% USPS is a US Shareholder that includes the toll charge into income, but does not pay the tax. It is unclear whether the partnership can make the election on behalf of its partners US Corp 1 and US Partner 3 are US Shareholders (i.e., as they indirectly own more than 10% of the CFC) so they can make the election under 965(h) to defer their tax liability - However, US Corp 2 and US Partner 4 both have a tax liability (i.e., distributive share of USPS s toll charge income) but as they are not US Shareholders, it is unclear whether they can make a section 965(h) election even though they have a tax liability on the distributive share of USPS s toll charge inclusion Takeaway: It is unclear who can make a section 965(h) election to defer tax liability. We expect this to be addressed in future guidance 30
31 Global Intangible Low-Taxed Income (GILTI) (Section 951A) -- What s the New Law? The Act: Subjects US shareholders of CFCs to current US taxation on global intangible lowtaxed income (GILTI) Provides that GILTI is computed annually as the excess of each US shareholder s net CFC tested income over the shareholder s net deemed tangible income return - Net deemed tangible return is 10% of tax basis in depreciable assets - Net deemed tangible return is reduced for interest deducted in the determination of a US shareholder s net CFC tested income Corporations are entitled to a deduction of 50% (reduced to 37.5% for tax years beginning after 2025) of GILTI Permits a FTC for 80% of foreign taxes deemed paid by the US corporate shareholder with respect to the GILTI inclusion 31
32 GILTI (Section 951A) -- Application to Investors in Passthrough Entities Individuals unexpectedly are subject to the new GILTI US partnerships and S corporations qualify as US shareholders of a CFC. Therefore the partners of US partnerships are subject to tax on their allocable share of the GILTI income However, the GILTI allocable to individual partners will be taxed at the US individual tax rates with no corresponding deductions or foreign tax credits that are otherwise available to corporations 32
33 GILTI (Section 951A) -- Application Issue: Who is subject to GILTI? Analysis: Section 951A(a) states: US Corp 1 US Corp 2 US Partner 3 Foreign Partner 4 a) In general. Each person who is a United States shareholder of any controlled foreign corporation for any taxable year of such United States shareholder shall include in gross income such shareholder s global intangible low-taxed income for such taxable year 45% 5% 45% 5% In the case of a US partnership that is a US shareholder with respect to a CFC, the US partnership must include in gross income its pro rata share of GILTI, similar to inclusions under Subpart F Takeaway: USPS USPS qualifies as US Shareholder that includes GILTI in income 100% CFC US Corp 1 and US Partner 3 also are US Shareholders, but they do not directly include the GILTI under section 951A (because they do not hold the CFC stock directly or indirectly through a foreign entity as described in section 958(a)). Instead, they should be allocated a distributive share of USPS s GILTI under section 702 US Corp 2 is not a US Shareholder, but it also should be allocated a distributive share of USPS s GILTI under section 702 Foreign Partner 4 may not be taxed on its allocable share of GILTI income. In informal guidance, the Service has stated that it is inappropriate to include subpart F income in the income of foreign persons not otherwise subject to U.S. tax 33
34 GILTI (Section 951A) -- Application Issue: Who can utilize section 250 deductions and foreign tax credits to offset the GILTI income inclusion? Analysis: US Corp 1 US Corp 2 45% 5% US Partner 3 45% 5% USPS 100% CFC Foreign Partner 4 The new section 250 GILTI deduction entitles a domestic corporation to a 50% deduction of GILTI included in income under section 951A(reduced to 37.5% for tax years beginning after 2025) Section 960 was amended to include subsection (d), which permits a FTC for 80% of foreign taxes deemed paid by the corporate US Shareholder with respect to the GILTI included under section 951A o o o Takeaway: GILTI is included under section 951A by USPS Footnote 1525 of the conference report could be read to imply that Congress intended some partners to be eligible for section 250(a)(1)(B) deductions with respect to GILTI inclusions at the partnership level Section 702(a)(5) provides that a section 250 deduction will be a separately stated item (by virtue of being part of Subchapter B, Part VIII) US Corp 1 may be eligible for both the section 250 GILTI deduction and a FTC under section 960(d)(1) US Corp 2 may be eligible for the section 250 GILTI deduction, but it is not clear whether it may utilize a FTC under section 960(d)(1) US Partner 3 may not be eligible for the section 250 GILTI deduction. It also cannot utilize FTCs under section 960(d), unless it makes a section 962 election (discussed more below) 34
35 GILTI (Section 951A) -- Aggregation Rules Issue: Whether USPS s QBAI is taken into account when determining US Sub s GILTI inclusion? US Corp Analysis: US Sub 40% Generally, a US Shareholder s GILTI equals its net CFC tested income, minus its net deemed tangible income return (i.e.,10% of QBAI, minus any interest expense taken into account in determining net CFC tested income) Foreign Corp 1 60% USPS Because each of US Sub and USPS are US Shareholders that directly own shares of a CFC, they should compute their GILTI inclusions separately - Even if future regulations treat US Shareholders that are members of an affiliated group as a single US Shareholder for purposes of determining GILTI, USPS is not a member of any affiliated group, so it likely would be excluded Foreign Corp 2 Tangible Assets Takeaway: US Sub s GILTI inclusion is determined without regard to QBAI held by Foreign Corp 2, even if Foreign Corp 2 has excess QBAI that prevents USPS from currently including any GILTI in income 35
36 Foreign-Derived Intangible Income (FDII) -- Section 250 Issue: How does the deduction for FDII apply to partners of a partnership? Analysis: US Corp 1 US Corp 2 US Partner 3 US Partner 4 The section 250 deduction for FDII is available only to C corporation that are not RICs or REITs. This does not include an individual making a section 962 election FDII = DII x FDDEI 45% 5% 45% 5% o DEI DEI: Deductible eligible income is all gross income other than subpart F, GILTI, foreign branch income o DII: Deemed intangible income is DEI less 10 percent of QBAI USPS o FDDEI only includes income derived in connection with Property sold by the taxpayer (including by way of lease, license, or other disposition) to a foreign person for foreign use, and Income Services provided by the taxpayer to any person, or with respect to property, located outside the United States 36
37 Foreign-Derived Intangible Income (FDII) -- Section 250 (continued) If a partnership earns sales or services income, is the corporate partner who otherwise would be eligible or the deduction treated as selling or providing services so that its income can qualify as FDDEI? US Corp 1 US Corp 2 US Partner 3 US Partner 4 5% 45% 45% 5% USPS Income o o Footnote 1525 of the conference report could be read to imply that Congress intended some partners to be eligible for section 250(a)(1)(A) deductions with respect to FDII at the partnership level: Due to the reduction in the effective U.S. tax rate resulting from the deduction for FDII and GILTI, the conferees expect the Secretary to provide, as appropriate, regulations or other guidance similar to that under amended section 965 with respect to the determination of basis adjustments under section 705(a)(1) and the determination of gain or loss under section 986(c) Separately stated items allocated to a partner generally have the same character as if the partner earned/incurred the item directly under section 702(b) 37
38 Tax on Base Erosion Payments (BEAT) (Section 59A) -- Payment by a Partnership Issue: Does BEAT apply to this payment? US Corp 1 US Corp 2 5% 45% - + US Partner 3 US Partner 4 45% 5% USPS 100% CFC Analysis: BEAT applies to all domestic corporations to the extent they receive a deduction attributable to payments made to a related foreign person (based on 25% of vote or value). No rules specifically address the application of BEAT to corporations that are partners in partnerships that make base erosion payments. o Takeaway: Therefore, the rules also do not explain how to test a corporate partner's gross receipts or determine a partner s base erosion percentage. We believe the better view is to test the relationship between the relevant corporate partner and the foreign person to determine if BEAT is applicable to that corporate partner. If the corporate partner is related to the foreign person (e.g., US Corp 1), we believe the better application of BEAT is that a base erosion payment by a partnership is treated as a payment from the partners. 38
39 Tax on Base Erosion Payments (BEAT) (Section 59A) -- Payment to a Partnership Issue: Does BEAT apply to this payment? 50% - US Corp (US) CFC 1 CFC 2 50% 50% 50% Analysis: BEAT applies to all domestic corporations to the extent they receive a deduction attributable to payments made to a related foreign person (based on 25% of vote or value). The rules do not address base erosion payments from a domestic corporation to a domestic partnership with CFC partners. Takeaway: There is risk an aggregate approach should be applied which would cause the payment to be subject to BEAT. + USPS 39
40 20% Deduction for Domestic Qualified Business Income (Section 199A) 40
41 20% Deduction for Domestic Qualified Business Income (Section 199A) -- What s the New Law? Non-corporate taxpayers generally may deduct 20% of combined qualified business income from a partnership, S corporation, or sole proprietorship In the case of a taxpayer who has qualified business income from a partnership or S corporation, the amount of the deduction is capped at the greater of: - 50% of the W-2 wages paid with respect to the qualified trade or business or - The sum of 25% of the W-2 wages with respect to the qualified trade or business plus 2.5% of the unadjusted basis, immediately after acquisition, of all qualified property. W-2 wage limit phases in for taxpayers with taxable income more than $157,500 (single)/$315,000 (married filing jointly). Limit is fully phased in at $207,500/$415,000, respectively 41
42 20% Deduction for Domestic Qualified Business Income (Section 199A) -- What s the New Law? (continued) Qualified business income - Effectively connected with a trade or business within the United States Qualified business income does not include: - Income from specified services trades or businesses (for taxpayers with income above the income thresholds) - Individuals share of S Corp. reasonable compensation and partnership guaranteed payment income - Investment-type income (e.g., capital gains and dividends) REIT dividends, cooperative dividends, and qualified publicly traded partnership income are qualified income not subject to the wage limitations and are limited to 20% of such income - Qualified PTP income includes Section 751(a) gain - Is Section 751(a) gain from the sale of non-ptp partnership interests included? 42
43 20% Deduction for Domestic Qualified Business Income (Section 199A) -- What is a Specified Service Trade or Business? Any trade or business involving the performance of services described in Section 1202(e)(3)(A), other than engineering and architecture, but including investing, trading, or dealing in securities (as defined in Section 475(c)(2)), partnership interests, or commodities Section 1202(e)(3)(A): any trade or business involving the performance of services in the fields of health, law, engineering, architecture, accounting, actuarial science, performing arts, consulting, athletics, financial services, brokerage services, or any trade or business where the principal asset of such trade or business is the reputation or skill of 1 or more of its employees Significant uncertainty regarding scope of definition and the impact of comingled qualified and specified service activities 43
44 20% Deduction for Domestic Qualified Business Income (Section 199A) -- What are Specified Service Activities? (continued) The provision may provide a benefit to certain labor income (e.g., specified services below the income thresholds) No benefit for guaranteed payments -- structure into Reg. sec (c), Example 2? - Partner C in the CD partnership is to receive 30% of partnership income as determined before taking into account any guaranteed payments, but not less than $10,000. The income of the partnership is $60,000, and C is entitled to $18,000 (30% of $60,000) as his distributive share. No part of this amount is a guaranteed payment. However, if the partnership had income of $20,000 instead of $60,000, $6,000 (30% of $20,000) would be partner C's distributive share, and the remaining $4,000 payable to C would be a guaranteed payment 44
45 20% Deduction for Domestic Qualified Business Income (Section 199A) Partnerships Applied at the partner level Individual partners determine allocable shares of each qualified item of income, gain, deduction, and loss Individual partners take allocable share of W-2 wages and unadjusted basis immediately after the acquisition of qualified property - W-2 wages based on allocable share of wage expense - Unadjusted basis based on allocable share of depreciation 45
46 Other Partnership Issues 46
47 Carried Interest Issues (Section 1061) -- What s the New Law? The Act: Long-term capital gains (LTCGs) with respect to certain applicable partnership interests (APIs) get benefit of preferential 20% rate only if the capital asset was held for at least three years. Applicable partnership interest: a partnership interest that is transferred to a partner in connection with the performance of substantial services in connection with an applicable trade or business An applicable trade or business: raising and returning of capital in connection with either (i) investing in specified assets or (ii) developing specified assets Specified assets: securities, commodities, real estate held for rental or investment, cash or cash equivalents, options or derivative contracts with respect to any of the foregoing, and an interest in a partnership to the extent of the partnership s proportionate interest in any of the foregoing. 47
48 Carried Interest Issues (Section 1061) -- What s the New Law? (continued) APIs do not include interests held by a corporation and certain capital interests. - Does corporation mean just C corporations? What about S corporations? - What about mixed profits and capital interests? - Purchased interests? Specified assets: regulations may exclude any asset not held for portfolio investment on behalf of third party investors (not self effecting). Does the provision apply to partnership interests, partnership assets, or both? Who s holding period -- partner s or partnership s -- is relevant? What is the effect of special long-term capital gain provisions (e.g., Section 1231 or Section 1256)? 48
49 Other Passthrough Considerations -- What s the New Law? The Act: Repeals the technical termination rules for partnership for tax years beginning after December 31, 2017 (Section 708) Modifies the definition of substantial built-in loss under Section 743(d) to provide that a substantial built-in loss also exists if the transferee partner would be allocated a net loss in excess of $250,000 upon a hypothetical sale and liquidation of the partnership (not an issue for partnerships making a Section 754 election) Modifies Section 704(d) to apply the outside basis limitation to a partner s distributive share of charitable contributions and foreign tax credits Section 168(k) allows businesses to expense immediately the cost of qualified property Section 743(b) possible direct expensing 49
50 BBA - Partnership Audit and Adjustment Rules) 2 50
51 BBA -- Partnership Audit and Adjustment Rules For returns filed for partnership taxable years beginning after December 31, 2017: 6221: Election out for partnerships with 100 or fewer partners 6222: Consistency requirement for partners returns 6223: Partnership must designate one representative to deal with IRS examinations 6225 (Default Rule): Tax on imputed underpayments is assessed and collected at the partnership level in the adjustment year and adjustment-year partners bear economic burden 6226 (Push-out Election): Election available to pass adjustment through to its partners by the partnership 51
52 BBA -- Default Rule vs. Push-Out Default Rule Push-out Tax on imputed underpayments is assessed and collected at the partnership level in the adjustment year Shift the economic burden to the current year partners (adjustment year) Prevent adjustment-year partners from bearing tax liability for reviewed years (unless they also were reviewed-year partners) Mitigates potential distortions caused by the default rule (requires the reviewedyear partners to bear the tax liability for the reviewed year) Higher interest than under default rule (+ 2%) Partnership furnishes statement 52
53 BBA -- Updated Guidance REG and REG specifies that partnership can pass the tax along to the ultimate partner in a tiered structure (December 19, 2017) REG aims to re-align partnership owners capital accounts after an audit if the partnership pays the tax liability (February 2, 2018) All passthrough partners making a push-out election must furnish push-out statements no later than the extended due date for the return for the adjustment year of the partnership that made the election (the audited partnership) 53
54 BBA -- Practical Considerations Q: Does the partnership need to amend the partnership agreement? A: No. Designation of PR and/or election out are made on partnership returns; there is no requirement to amend the partnership agreement Q: Is it a good idea to amend the partnership agreement to clarify who will serve as PR and to address conflicts that may arise among the partners with regard to the application of the BBA rules? A: Yes Q: What should the amendment say? A: It depends Q: The statute goes into effect at the end of the year, do the amendments to the partnership agreement need to be completed by January 1, 2018? A: No 54
55 Key Practical Considerations -- The Partnership Representative Choice of partnership representative Approval of partnership representative s decisions any limits need to be included in the partnership agreement Level of engagement/diligence expected from partnership representative does state law impose any duty of care? Does it matter whether the partnership representative is itself a partner? Indemnification of the partnership representative any limits? 55
56 Key Practical Considerations -- Pay or Push-out Consider inter-generational conflicts Consider whether the total adjustment amount plus interest is higher under section 6225 or 6226 If tax is paid at the partnership level, how is the allocation of the tax burden among the partners determined? If tax is paid at the partnership level, how is the tax payment funded? 56
57 Key Practical Considerations -- Actions of Partners to Reduce Imputed Underpayment Can the partnership representative require partners to file amended returns? Can the partnership representative require a partner to provide information that would reduce the partnership s tax? What if the partner is itself a partnership? Can an upper-tier partnership be required to provide information about its partners? If a partner s attribute (e.g., status as tax exempt) results in a reduction in the partnership s tax, should the benefit be allocated solely to the partner with the attribute or shared? 57
58 Retaining Flexibility: One Approach A. General designation of the partnership representative and scope of authority - General partner is designated as the partnership representative (PR) - PR has the right to take all actions/make all elections provided in BBA - Partners agree to cooperate with such actions/election (e.g., file amended returns and pay tax and provide any requested information required to reduce tax under section 6225) B. Provisions to address payment of tax by the partnership - If partnership pays the tax, GP may cause the partners (including former partners) to pay their share of the tax, as determined by the GP in its "sole [good faith] discretion - If the partner does not pay promptly, interest accrues on the amount due to the partnership - A payment of the tax is not treated as a capital contribution/does not reduce capital commitment - Partnership may reduce distributions by unpaid amount C. Some indemnification/hold harmless language that applies to the PR for actions taken in its capacity as PR 58
59 Oil & Gas Partnership Agreements 3 59
60 Oil and Gas Partnership Agreements The API model partnership agreement was last revised in 1997 Intended to meet the SEE safe harbor - Capital accounts maintained in a manner intended to comply with Treas. Reg (b) - Partners have full DROs and balancing cash obligations 60
61 Selected Changes in Partnership Tax Law and Other Guidance and Developments Since (c)(1)(B): substituted 7 years for 5 years in introductory provisions (1997) 704(c)(1)(C): built in loss property (2004) 737(b)(1): substituted 7 years for 5 years (1997) : contingent liability regulations (2003) Rise of target capital account allocations: Section 704(b) PIP BBA audit rules replace TEFRA audit procedures (2015; effective 2018) Tax reform (e.g., Section 1446(f)) 61
62 Questions? All rights reserved. refers to the US member firm or one of its subsidiaries or affiliates, and may sometimes refer to the network. Each member firm is a separate legal entity. Please see for further details. This content is for general information purposes only, and should not be used as a substitute for consultation with professional advisors. At, our purpose is to build trust in society and solve important problems. is a network of firms in 157 countries with more than 223,000 people who are committed to delivering quality in assurance, advisory and tax services. Find out more and tell us what matters to you by visiting us at
Disruption and Uncertainty in Partnership Tax
Disruption and Uncertainty in Partnership Tax Chair: Phillip Gall, Ernst & Young LLP, New York City Karen Lohnes, PricewaterhouseCoopers LLP, Washington, DC Bryan Rimmke, Attorney- Treasury, Washington,
More informationChanges to S Corporation, Partnership and LLC Taxation under the Tax Cuts and Jobs Act
Changes to S Corporation, Partnership and LLC Taxation under the Tax Cuts and Jobs Act Morgan Klinzing, Pepper Hamilton LLP, Philadelphia, PA Mike Hauswirth, PwC, Washington, DC Ryan Dobens, PwC, Washington,
More informationPartnerships and the Tax Cuts and Jobs Act (TCJA) Overview of new Sections 163(j), 199A, 1061 and selected other provisions of the TCJA
Partnerships and the Tax Cuts and Jobs Act (TCJA) Overview of new Sections 163(j), 199A, 1061 and selected other provisions of the TCJA Disclaimer EY refers to the global organization, and may refer to
More informationUS Tax Reform: Impact on Private Funds
2018 INVESTMENT MANAGEMENT CONFERENCE CHICAGO US Tax Reform: Impact on Private Funds Adam J. Tejeda, New York Frank W. Dworak, Orange County January 31, 2018 Copyright 2018 by K&L Gates LLP. All rights
More informationTax Executives Institute Houston Chapter. Consolidated Return Updates
www.pwc.com Tax Executives Institute Houston Chapter Consolidated Return Updates February 28, 2018 Presenters Pavi Mani Partner, Email: pavithra.mani@pwc.com Phone: (713) 356-4040 Pavi is a Partner in
More informationProvisions affecting private equity funds in tax reform bills House bill and Senate Finance Committee bill
Provisions affecting private equity funds in tax reform bills House bill and Senate Finance Committee bill November 22, 2017 1 The U.S. House of Representatives on November 16, 2017, passed H.R. 1, the
More informationCONFERENCE AGREEMENT PROPOSAL INTERNATIONAL
The following chart sets forth some of the international tax provisions in the Conference Agreement version of the Tax Cuts and Jobs Act, as made available on December 15, 2017. This chart highlights only
More informationUS tax reform: A sea change for international taxation The Dbriefs Tax Reform series
US tax reform: A sea change for international taxation The Dbriefs Tax Reform series Todd Izzo, Partner, Deloitte Tax LLP Rochelle Kleczynski, Partner, Deloitte Tax LLP Chris Trump, Principal, Deloitte
More informationPrivate Investment Funds and Tax Reform
Presenting a live 90-minute webinar with interactive Q&A Private Investment Funds and Tax Reform Carried Interest, QBI and Interest Deductions, Sale of Partnership Interests, Computation of UBTI, and More
More informationThe Investment Lawyer
The Investment Lawyer Covering Legal and Regulatory Issues of Asset Management VOL. 25, NO. 3 MARCH 2018 REGULATORY MONITOR Private Funds Update By Frank Dworak and Adam Tejeda The Tax Cuts and Jobs Act
More informationChanges Abound in New Tax Bill for Multinational Companies
News Changes Abound in New Tax Bill for Multinational Companies 01.08.2018 Perhaps some of the most extensive changes in H.R. 1, known as the Tax Cuts and Jobs Act (the Act ), deal with the taxation of
More informationInbound and Outbound International Tax Rules
Inbound and Outbound International Tax Rules PRESENTED BY: TRACY MONROE, CPA, MT, PARTNER RAY POLANTZ, CPA, MT, PARTNER CYNTHIA PEDERSEN, JD, LLM, TAX MANAGER July 31, 2018 Welcome & Introductions Tracy
More informationInternational Tax: Tax Reform
International Tax: Tax Reform Joseph Calianno Partner and International Technical Tax Practice Leader Ben Vesely International Tax Senior Manager The below summary contains a high level overview of certain
More informationUS proposed regulations offer much-needed guidance on Section 163(j) business interest expense limitation
30 November 2018 Global Tax Alert US proposed regulations offer much-needed guidance on Section 163(j) business interest expense limitation NEW! EY Tax News Update: Global Edition EY s new Tax News Update:
More informationPartnership Issues in International Tax Planning Tax Executives Institute February 16, 2015
www.pwc.com Partnership Issues in International Tax Planning Tax Executives Institute Instructors Craig Gerson WNTS Principal Craig Gerson recently rejoined as a Principal in the Mergers and Acquisitions
More informationGeneral Feedback for Issues Requiring Regulatory Attention as of 3/7/2018
General Feedback for Issues Requiring Regulatory Attention as of 3/7/2018 This document covers the following issue areas: Individual Tax Reform - Treatment Of Business Income Business Tax Reform Cost Recovery
More informationGeneral Feedback for Issues Requiring Regulatory Attention as of 3/7/18
General Feedback for Issues Requiring Regulatory Attention as of 3/7/18 This document covers the following issue areas: Individual Tax Reform - Treatment Of Business Income Business Tax Reform Cost Recovery
More informationSENATE TAX REFORM PROPOSAL INTERNATIONAL
The following chart sets forth some of the international tax provisions in the Senate Finance Committee s version of the Tax Cuts and Jobs Act bill, as approved by the Senate Finance Committee on November
More informationInternational Tax Reform - Practical Impacts and Considerations. 30 November 2017
International Tax Reform - Practical Impacts and Considerations 30 November 2017 Agenda Transition tax Territorial system Limitation on deductions of net interest Foreign high return amount / Global intangible
More informationTax Executives Institute Houston Chapter Tax School May 2, 2017
www.pwc.com Tax Executives Institute Houston Chapter Practical Review of Partnership Agreements - Target Allocations v. Layered Allocations and Other Considerations Todd McArthur Principal Washington National
More informationTax Reform: Knowns and Unknowns. Tax Executive Institute Houston, Texas. February 26, 2018
Tax Reform: Knowns and Unknowns Tax Executive Institute Houston, Texas. February 26, 2018 Section 163(j) Overview of New U.S. Interest Expense Limitation Limits deductibility on net business interest expense
More informationAMERICAN JOBS CREATION ACT OF 2004
AMERICAN JOBS CREATION ACT OF 2004 OCTOBER 26, 2004 TABLE OF CONTENTS Page REPEAL OF EXCLUSION FOR EXTRATERRITORIAL INCOME AND DEDUCTIONS FOR DOMESTIC PRODUCTION ACTIVITIES... 1 TAX SHELTERS... 2 Information
More informationTax Cuts & Jobs Act: Considerations for Funds
A LERT M EM OR A N D UM Tax Cuts & Jobs Act: Considerations for Funds January 25, 2018 On December 22, 2017, the President signed into law the 2017 U.S. tax reform bill formerly known as the Tax Cuts &
More informationSENATE TAX REFORM PROPOSAL INTERNATIONAL
The following chart sets forth some of the international tax provisions in the Senate s version of the Tax Cuts and Jobs Act, as approved by the Senate on December 2, 2017. This chart highlights only some
More information2017 Tax Reconciliation Bill Selected Provisions Impacting Real Estate (As of January 11, 2018)
(As of January 11, 2018) Overview Tax Reform Impact on REITs and Other Investors in Real Estate The enactment of tax reform legislation will have far-reaching consequences and create new planning considerations
More informationInternational tax implications of US tax reform
Arm s Length Standard Global views within reach. International tax implications of US tax reform Congress has approved and President Trump has signed into law a massive tax reform package that lowers tax
More informationInternational Tax & the TCJA for Strategic Alliance Firms
International Tax & the TCJA for Strategic Alliance Firms MAY 22, 2018 TO RECEIVE CPE CREDIT Individuals Participate in entire webinar Answer polls when they are provided Groups Group leader is the person
More informationWhat s News in Tax. Proposed Regulations under Section 199A. Analysis that matters from Washington National Tax
What s News in Tax Analysis that matters from Washington National Tax Proposed Regulations under Section 199A October 8, 2018 by Deanna Walton Harris, Washington National Tax * On August 16, 2018, the
More informationThe U.S. Tax Cuts and Jobs Act: Fundamental Changes to Business Taxation
WHITE PAPER January 2018 The U.S. Tax Cuts and Jobs Act: Fundamental Changes to Business Taxation Signed into law December 22, 2017, the Tax Cuts and Jobs Act represents the most comprehensive reform to
More informationThe Tax Cuts and Jobs Act Implications for the real estate industry
The Tax Cuts and Jobs Act Implications for the real estate industry January 5, 2018 The Tax Cuts and Jobs Act On December 22, 2017, the President signed the Tax Cuts and Jobs Act (the Act), which capped
More informationInternational Tax Reform. March 19, 2018 Nicole R. Suk, CPA
International Tax Reform March 19, 2018 Nicole R. Suk, CPA Why International Reform? Shift to territorial system Protect the U.S. tax base from perceived crossborder erosion Incentive for economic investment
More informationTaxpayers may recharacterize contributions to one type of IRA (traditional or Roth) as a contribution to the other type of IRA.
BENEFITS Affordable Care Act Individual Mandate Under the Affordable Care Act, individuals must have minimum essential The individual responsibility payment is reduced to $0 effective for months beginning
More informationTax Cuts and Jobs Act. Issues Impacting the Asset Management Industry
Tax Cuts and Jobs Act Issues Impacting the Asset Management Industry Tax Cuts and Jobs Act Issues Impacting the Asset Management Industry O n December 22, 2017, the Tax Cuts and Jobs Act (the Act ) was
More informationU.S. Tax Reform. 33 rd Annual TEI-SJSU High Tech Tax Institute November 14, 2017
U.S. Tax Reform 33 rd Annual TEI-SJSU High Tech Tax Institute November 14, 2017 David Forst, Partner Fenwick & West LLP Nathan Giesselman, Partner Skadden, Arps, Slate, Meagher & Flom LLP Sajeev Sidher,
More informationUpdate on Partnership Audit Provisions and Certain Deductions
Update on Partnership Audit Provisions and Certain Deductions Jennifer O Leary, Philadelphia Office olearyj@pepperlaw.com Ph. 215.981.4184 Annette Ahlers, Los Angeles Office ahlersa@pepperlaw.com Ph. 213.928.9825
More informationTransition Tax and Notice Foreign Tax Credits BEAT Interactions
Transition Tax and Notice 2018-26 Foreign Tax Credits BEAT Interactions Steve Blore Greg Kernek Deloitte Tax LLP May 11, 2018 Transition Tax and Anti-Avoidance Copyright 2018 Deloitte Development LLC.
More informationTax Cuts and Jobs Act of 2017 International Tax Provisions and Provisions Affecting Exempt Organizations
Tax Cuts and Jobs Act of 2017 International Tax Provisions and Provisions Affecting Exempt Organizations By Robert E. Ward* Robert E. Ward outlines the international tax provisions and provisions affecting
More informationBasics of International Tax Planning with Tax Reform
Basics of International Tax Planning with Tax Reform Layla Asali & Andy Howlett TEI Houston Tax School 2018 February 28, 2018 Agenda U.S. International Tax System Overview Deemed Repatriation Global Intangible
More informationCHAPTER 18 SECTION 199A 1 TABLE OF CONTENTS Introduction to the Section 199A Deduction... 1
CHAPTER 18 SECTION 199A 1 TABLE OF CONTENTS 18.1 Introduction to the Section 199A Deduction... 1 18.2 Ancillary Consequences of Section 199A Deduction... 3 18.2.1 Ancillary Items Impacted by Section 199A
More informationDon t Let 2018 Be Taxing:
Don t Let 2018 Be Taxing: How Changes to the Tax Laws Change How We Counsel Businesses March 15, 2018 Agenda Introduction C corporation overview Pass-through overview Comparison 2 Introduction Types of
More informationNew Tax Law: Issues for Partnerships, S corporations, and Their Owners
New Tax Law: Issues for Partnerships, S corporations, and Their Owners January 18, 2018 1 Introduction H.R. 1, originally known as the Tax Cuts and Jobs Act, was signed into law on December 22, 2017. The
More informationKPMG report: Initial impressions of proposed regulations under section 163(j), business interest limitation
KPMG report: Initial impressions of proposed regulations under section 163(j), business interest limitation November 28, 2018 kpmg.com 1 The Treasury Department released proposed regulations (REG-106089-18)
More informationJanuary 29, RE: Request for Immediate Guidance Regarding Pub. L. No Dear Messrs. Kautter and Paul:
January 29, 2018 The Honorable David J. Kautter Assistant Secretary for Tax Policy Department of the Treasury 1500 Pennsylvania Avenue, NW Washington, DC 20220 Mr. William M. Paul Principal Deputy Chief
More informationTax Cuts & Jobs Act: Considerations for Funds
Tax Cuts & Jobs Act: Considerations for Funds December 22, 2017 On December 22, 2017, the President signed into law the 2017 U.S. tax reform bill formerly known as the Tax Cuts & Jobs Act (the TCJA ).
More information2/2/2018. Part I: Inbound Base Erosion Provision in socalled Tax Cut and Jobs Act. Inbound Planning & Developments
Inbound Planning & Developments Inbound International Tax Issues with a Focus on Tax Reform 2017 PLI, New York February 6, 2018 Peter Glicklich Davies Ward Phillips & Vineberg LLP Oren Penn PricewaterhouseCoopers
More informationKPMG report: Analysis and observations of final section 199A regulations
KPMG report: Analysis and observations of final section 199A regulations January 24, 2019 kpmg.com 1 Introduction The U.S. Treasury Department and IRS on January 18, 2019, publicly released a version of
More informationClient Alert February 14, 2019
Tax News and Developments North America Client Alert February 14, 2019 Voluminous Proposed Regulations Interpret Section 163(j) Overview On November 26, 2018, the Treasury and IRS released proposed regulations
More informationInternational Tax & the TCJA
International Tax & the TCJA FEBRUARY 22, 2018 TO RECEIVE CPE CREDIT Participate in entire webinar Answer polls when they are provided If you are viewing this webinar in a group Complete group attendance
More informationGOP Tax Cuts and Jobs Act: Preview of the New Tax Regime
CLIENT MEMORANDUM GOP Tax Cuts and Jobs Act: Preview of the New Tax Regime December 20, 2017 The GOP tax bill, passed by both houses of Congress and awaiting the President s signature, is the most significant
More informationSwiech is a director in the Tax Credits and Energy Advisory Services group of WNT (Houston).
What s News in Tax Analysis that matters from Washington National Tax Tax Reform and Publicly Traded Partnerships June 4, 2018 by Megan J. Whitlock, Robert A. Swiech, Washington National Tax * The passage
More informationU.S. Tax Legislation Individual and Passthroughs Provisions. Individual Provisions
U.S. Tax Legislation Individual and Passthroughs Provisions On December 20, 2017, Congress enacted comprehensive tax legislation (the New Law ), and this memorandum highlights some of the important provisions
More informationIndividual Provisions page 2. New Deduction for Pass-through Income page 5. Corporate (and Other Business) Provisions page 6
Table of Contents Individual Provisions page 2 New Deduction for Pass-through Income page 5 Corporate (and Other Business) Provisions page 6 Partnership (and Other Pass-through Business) Provisions page
More informationNew Tax Law: International
New Tax Law: International Provisions and Observations April 18, 2018 kpmg.com 1 In the context of international tax, the Public Law 115-97 (popularly, if not officially, referred to as the Tax Cuts and
More informationNEW YORK STATE BAR ASSOCIATION TAX SECTION. Annual Meeting. State and Local Tax Implications of Federal Tax Reform.
NEW YORK STATE BAR ASSOCIATION TAX SECTION Annual Meeting State and Local Tax Implications of Federal Tax Reform January 23, 2018 Chair: Irwin M. Slomka, Morrison & Foerster LLP, New York City Joshua E.
More informationTECHNICAL EXPLANATION OF THE REVENUE PROVISIONS OF H.R. 5982, THE SMALL BUSINESS TAX RELIEF ACT OF 2010
TECHNICAL EXPLANATION OF THE REVENUE PROVISIONS OF H.R. 5982, THE SMALL BUSINESS TAX RELIEF ACT OF 2010 Prepared by the Staff of the JOINT COMMITTEE ON TAXATION July 30, 2010 JCX-43-10 CONTENTS INTRODUCTION...
More informationFebruary 5, Kaplan Professional, Inc.
February 5, 2018 Section: New Law AICPA Writes Treasury Listing Items Needing Immediate Guidance... 2 Citation: AICPA Letter to United States Treasury Regarding Issues Needing Guidance in PL 115-97, 1/29/18...
More information11100 NE 8th St, Suite 400 Bellevue, WA (425)
the effects of tax ReFoRM 11100 NE 8th St, Suite 400 Bellevue, WA 98004 www.bpcpa.com (425) 454-7990 On December 22, Congress passed the Tax Cuts and Jobs Act, making tax reform a reality. Having taken
More informationU.S. Tax Reform: The Current State of Play
U.S. Tax Reform: The Current State of Play Key Business Tax Reforms House Bill Senate Bill Final Bill (HR 1) Commentary Corporate Tax Rate Maximum rate reduced from 35% to 20% rate beginning in 2018. Same
More informationUS Tax reform. Client event. 6 February 2018
Tax reform Client event 6 February 2018 1 Business tax highlights of tax reform bills Reduction of corporate tax rate: Permanently reduces the 35% corporate income tax rate to a flat 21%, beginning in
More informationUnderstanding the Tax Reform Bill
Understanding the Tax Reform Bill JANUARY 23, 2018 Miguel G. Farra, CPA, JD Tax Chairman Emilio Escandon, CPA Managing Principal, NY Gary DuBoff, CPA, CFP Principal 1 Agenda I. Individuals II. Qualified
More informationCongressional Tax Reform Proposals: Businesses Will Need to Rethink Key Decisions
Latham & Watkins Transactional Tax Practice December 2, 2017 Number 2249 Congressional Tax Reform Proposals: Businesses Will Need to Rethink Key Decisions Potential legislation would significantly affect
More informationSUPPLEMENTAL MATERIALS FOR
SUPPLEMENTAL MATERIALS FOR U.S. INTERNATIONAL TAX PLANNING AND POLICY INCLUDING CROSS-BORDER MERGERS AND ACQUISITIONS (Carolina Academic Press Second Edition 2016) BY Samuel C. Thompson, Jr Professor and
More informationFrom the Deferral Frying Pan into the Worldwide Fire Rethinking CFC Taxation
From the Deferral Frying Pan into the Worldwide Fire Rethinking CFC Taxation 2018 U.S. Cross-Border Tax Conference May 15 17, 2018 kpmg.com Notices The following information is not intended to be written
More informationTax Reform: Taxation of Income of Controlled Foreign Corporations
Reproduced with permission from Daily Tax Report, 14 DTR S-15, 1/22/18. Copyright 2018 by The Bureau of National Affairs, Inc. (800-372-1033) http://www.bna.com CFCs Lowell D. Yoder, David G. Noren, and
More informationTax Reform: Impact of International Provisions on Insurance Companies
Tax Reform: Impact of International Provisions on Insurance Companies 2018 Mid Year ABA Tax Section Meeting, Insurance Companies February 9, 2018, 3:30 4:30 p.m. Moderator: Clarissa Potter, KPMG, New York,
More informationNew Law. Chapter 1. Other Sec. 199A Issues
New Law Chapter 1 Other Sec. 199A Issues 2 FOUR STEPS (Detail below) 1)Potential QBI Deduction: 20% x QBI 2)W2+UB Limit Phases-in based upon TI: (% W-2 Wages + Unadjusted Basis) 3)SSB Exception Phases-out
More informationUS proposed GILTI regulations implement international tax reform changes
17 September 2018 Global Tax Alert US proposed GILTI regulations implement international tax reform changes NEW! EY Tax News Update: Global Edition EY s new Tax News Update: Global Edition is a free, personalized
More informationComprehensive Reform of the U.S. International Tax System The NY State Bar Association Tax Section Annual Meeting
Comprehensive Reform of the U.S. International Tax System The NY State Bar Association Tax Section Annual Meeting Chair: Kathleen L. Ferrell, Davis Polk & Wardwell LLP Michael J. Caballero, Covington &
More informationPresented to: NRF Canadian Tax Clients. New U.S. tax legislation Impact on Selected Cross-Border Transactions
January 11, 2018 Presented to: NRF Canadian Tax Clients New U.S. tax legislation Impact on Selected Cross-Border Transactions Adrienne Oliver Tel: (416) 216-1854 email: adrienne.oliver@nortonrosefulbright.com
More informationAnti-Loss Importation & Anti-Loss Duplication Rules Update
Anti-Loss Importation & Anti-Loss Duplication Rules Update Scott M. Levine Partner Jones Day Krishna Vallabhaneni Attorney-Advisor (Tax Legislation) U.S. Department of the Treasury Office of Tax Policy
More informationTransition Tax DEEMED REPATRIATION OVERVIEW
Transition Tax DEEMED REPATRIATION OVERVIEW Basic Framework A 10% U.S. shareholder (a US SH ) of a specified foreign corporation ( SFC ) must recognize its pro rata share of the SFC s post-1986 accumulated
More informationTax Cuts and Jobs Act. Issues Impacting the Real Estate Industry
Tax Cuts and Jobs Act Issues Impacting the Real Estate Industry Tax Cuts and Jobs Act Issues Impacting the Real Estate Industry On December 22, 2017, President Trump signed the Tax Cuts and Jobs Act (the
More informationTax Reform for Pass-Through Entities: Impact of New Tax Law on Partnerships, LLCs and S-Corporations
Presenting a live 90-minute webinar with interactive Q&A Tax Reform for Pass-Through Entities: Impact of New Tax Law on Partnerships, LLCs and S-Corporations Planning Techniques, Loopholes, Qualified Business
More informationDirectors Club. March 13, 2018
Directors Club March 13, 2018 1 The Tax Wars 2 Business tax highlights of tax reform bills Reduction of corporate tax rate: Permanently reduces the 35% corporate income tax rate to a flat 21%, beginning
More informationU.S. Tax Reform International Corporate Tax Provisions: The Good, the Bad and the Extremely Complex
U.S. Tax Reform International Corporate Tax Provisions: The Good, the Bad and the Extremely Complex On December 22, 2017, President Trump signed into law the 2017 U.S. tax reform bill An Act to provide
More informationProposed revisions to US tax code would significantly impact inbound companies
from International Tax Services Proposed revisions to US tax code would significantly impact inbound companies November 28, 2017 In brief On November 17, 2016 the House of Representatives passed the Tax
More informationNAVIGATING US TAX REFORM:
NAVIGATING US TAX REFORM: WHAT BUSINESSES NEED TO KNOW Pass-Through Entities January 25, 2018 Presented by: William Nelson, Bill McKee, & Sarah Brodie 2018 Morgan, Lewis & Bockius LLP AGENDA Partnership-Specific
More informationUnderstanding the Tax Cuts and Jobs Act
Understanding the Tax Cuts and Jobs Act. What Business Owners, Real Estate Investors, and Their Advisors Need to Know February 13, 2018 Michele Mulrooney MMulrooney@Venable.com 310.229.0347 William Burford
More informationFinance Republicans chart their own course for tax reform... 1 Tax reform proposal clears Ways and Means... 21
Tax News & Views Capitol Hill briefing. In this issue: Finance Republicans chart their own course for tax reform... 1 Tax reform proposal clears Ways and Means... 21 Finance Republicans chart their own
More informationTax reform readiness: The FTC regulations Credit given (maybe) where credit is due
from International Tax Services Tax reform readiness: The FTC regulations Credit given (maybe) where credit is due December 17, 2018 In brief The 2017 tax reform act (the Act) amended several Code provisions
More information2017 Tax Reform: Checkpoint Special Study on foreign income, foreign persons tax changes in the "Tax Cuts and Jobs Act"
2017 Tax Reform: Checkpoint Special Study on foreign income, foreign persons tax changes in the "Tax Cuts and Jobs Act" On December 15, the Conference Committee-having reconciled and merged the differing
More informationThis notice announces that the Department of the Treasury ( Treasury
Additional Guidance Under Section 965; Guidance Under Sections 62, 962, and 6081 in Connection With Section 965; and Penalty Relief Under Sections 6654 and 6655 in Connection with Section 965 and Repeal
More informationS Corporation Association Technical Comments & Questions
S Corporation Association Technical Comments & Questions Priorities Section 199A and Grouping: The new law fails to specify what constitutes a trade or business for purposes of this rule, though it does
More informationHouse and Senate tax reform proposals could significantly impact US international tax rules
from International Tax Services House and Senate tax reform proposals could significantly impact US international tax rules November 28, 2017 In brief The House of Representatives passed the Tax Cuts and
More informationStructuring in the Face of the Pass Through Deduction, Interest Limitations and Immediate Depreciation
Structuring in the Face of the Pass Through Deduction, Interest Limitations and Immediate Depreciation Steven D. Bortnick Partner Tax Bortnicks@pepperlaw.com 609.951.4117 47616748v1 February 27, 2017 FEA
More information2017 Tax Act (Pub. L. No )
2017 Tax Act (Pub. L. No. 115-97) General Corporate Provisions The Act reduces the corporate tax rate from 35 percent to 21 percent for taxable years beginning after December 31, 2017. This will impact
More informationChairman Camp s Discussion Draft of Tax Reform Act of 2014 and President Obama s Fiscal Year 2015 Revenue Proposals
Chairman Camp s Discussion Draft of Tax Reform Act of 2014 and President Obama s Fiscal Year 2015 Proposals Relating to International Taxation SUMMARY On February 26, 2014, Ways and Means Committee Chairman
More informationHighlights of the Tax Cuts and Jobs Act (S Corp, Partnership & Other Changes)
Highlights of the Tax Cuts and Jobs Act (S Corp, Partnership & Other Changes) On 12/22/17, President Trump signed into law H.R. 1, the Tax Cuts and Jobs Act, a sweeping tax reform law that will entirely
More informationInternational tax update. 1 May 2018
International tax update 1 May 2018 Disclaimer EY refers to the global organization, and may refer to one or more, of the member firms of Ernst & Young Global Limited, each of which is a separate legal
More informationSide-by-Side Summary of Current Tax Law and the Final Version of the Tax Reform Bill 1
Side-by-Side Summary of Current Tax Law and the Final Version of the Tax Reform Bill 1 Corporate Tax Provisions Tax rates C corporations pay tax on their income based on a graduated rate structure with
More informationU.S. TAX REFORM: INTERNATIONAL IMPLICATIONS
DID YOU GET YOUR BADGE SCANNED? U.S. TAX REFORM: INTERNATIONAL IMPLICATIONS #TaxLaw #FBA Username: taxlaw Password: taxlaw18 PanelistS Jorge Castro, Castro Strategies LLC Alan Granwell, Sharp Partners
More informationTax Reform Issues Related to Group Financing - 163j, 267A, BEAT and GILTI Issues International Tax Institute, Inc. June 11, 2018
Tax Reform Issues Related to Group Financing - 163j, 267A, BEAT and GILTI Issues International Tax Institute, Inc. June 11, 2018 James Tobin, Ernst & Young LLP Kevin Glenn, King & Spalding LLP TCJA International
More informationComparison of Current Tax Law, House and Senate Tax Reform Bills, and Conference Report. December 15, 2017 INSURANCE PROVISIONS...
Comparison of Current Tax Law, House and Senate Tax Reform Bills, and Conference Report December 15, 2017 INSURANCE PROVISIONS...2 COMPENSATION AND RETIREMENT SAVINGS PROVISIONS...5 GENERAL BUSINESS PROVISIONS...7
More informationPRIVATE EQUITY FUND AND PORTFOLIO COMPANIES: THE IMPACT OF TAX REFORM
PRIVATE EQUITY FUND AND PORTFOLIO COMPANIES: THE IMPACT OF TAX REFORM Jan. 23, 2018 Authors Nick Gruidl, Partner Gennaro Musi, Partner Michael Nader, Partner 1 The Tax Cuts and Jobs Act (TCJA) was signed
More informationTax Cuts and Jobs Act
Tax Cuts and Jobs Act Deduction for Qualified Business Income of Pass-Through Entities (Amount of deduction equals the sum of Slide 1 or Slide 2, as applicable, plus Slide 3) Is the taxpayer engaged in
More informationINTERNATIONAL PROVISIONS OF THE TCJA: IMPLICATIONS FOR INDIVIDUALS
INTERNATIONAL PROVISIONS OF THE TCJA: IMPLICATIONS FOR INDIVIDUALS Panelists: Sally Thurston Skadden Arps Slate Meagher & Flom LLP Benjamin Handler Deloitte LLP Melinda Harvey Internal Revenue Service
More informationUS Tax Reform Update. 30 January 2018
US Tax Reform Update Introduction Aaron Topol Partner and Leader EY Asia-Pacific Tax Desk (US) Hong Kong Ernst & Young Tax Services Limited Robert King Partner and Leader Business Tax Advisory Vietnam
More informationChoice of Entity Post Tax Reform
Choice of Entity Post Tax Reform University of Chicago Tax Conference November 10, 2018 Rachel Cantor Moderator Peter Schuur, Stephen Jordan, Christopher Trump Panelists Agenda Corporate vs Pass-through
More informationPASS-THROUGHS. 1/15/18 Page 1. New Deduction for Pass-Through Income
New Deduction for Pass-Through Income PASS-THROUGHS Under pre-act law, the net income of these pass-through businesses- sole proprietorships, partnerships, limited liability companies (LLCs), and S corporations-was
More informationPARTNERSHIP TAXATION: RECENT DEVELOPMENTS
PARTNERSHIP TAXATION: RECENT DEVELOPMENTS December 2017 BDO USA, LLP, a Delaware limited liability partnership, is the U.S. member of BDO International Limited, a UK company limited by guarantee, and forms
More information