Police Dep t v. Leclerc OATH Index No. 1707/06, mem. dec. (June 14, 2006)
|
|
- Roxanne Robinson
- 6 years ago
- Views:
Transcription
1 Police Dep t v. Leclerc OATH Index No. 1707/06, mem. dec. (June 14, 2006) Police Department is entitled to retain car seized in connection with primary user s arrest. Arrestee and friend found to be beneficial owners, so nominal owner s innocent owner defense fails. NEW YORK CITY OFFICE OF ADMINISTRATIVE TRIALS AND HEARINGS In the Matter of POLICE DEPARTMENT Petitioner - against - PATRICIA LECLERC AND STENLO WELCH Respondent MEMORANDUM DEISION ROBERTO VELEZ, Chief Administrative Law Judge Petitioner, the Police Department, brought this proceeding to determine its right to retain a vehicle seized as the alleged instrumentality of a crime pursuant to section of the Administrative Code. Respondent Patricia Leclerc was the titled, but not registered, owner of the vehicle at the time it was seized in connection with the arrest of respondent Stenlo Welch. This proceeding is mandated by Krimstock v. Kelly, 99 Civ (MBM), second amended order and judgment (S.D.N.Y. Dec. 6, 2005) (the "Krimstock Order"); see County of Nassau v. Canavan, 1 N.Y.3d 134, 770 N.Y.S.2d 277 (2003). The vehicle in issue, a 2000 Ford, voucher number B079889, was seized on January 29, 2006 in connection with Mr. Welch s arrest for criminal possession of a weapon (Pet. Ex. 5). Following receipt of Ms. Leclerc's demand for a hearing on May 2, 2006, the Department scheduled a hearing for May 16, The matter was adjourned at the request of the Department, and a hearing was held on June 1, Mr. Welch did not appear at the hearing. Ms. Leclerc appeared without counsel and contested the Department's petition. As set forth below, I conclude that the Department is entitled to retain the vehicle.
2 -2- ANALYSIS The Department seeks to sustain its retention of the seized vehicle as the instrumentality of a crime. To do so, the Department bears the burden of proving three points by a preponderance of the evidence: (i) that probable cause existed for the arrest pursuant to which the vehicle was seized; (ii) that it is likely that the Department will prevail in a civil action for forfeiture of the vehicle; and (iii) that it is necessary that the vehicle remain impounded to ensure its availability for a judgment of forfeiture. Krimstock Order at 3; Canavan, 1 N.Y.3d at , 770 N.Y.S.2d at 286. The due process rights at issue here require an "initial testing of the merits of the City's case," not "exhaustive evidentiary battles that might threaten to duplicate the eventual forfeiture hearing." Krimstock v. Kelly, 306 F.3d 40, (2d Cir. 2002); see Canavan, 1 N.Y.3d at 144 n.3, 770 N.Y.S.2d at 286 n.3 (hearing is intended to establish "the validity, or at least the probable validity, of the underlying claim"; citation omitted). The threshold issue in any proceeding of this nature is whether the respondent established that she is a proper claimant entitled to possession of [the] vehicle (Krimstock Order at 3-4 ). The only evidence Ms. Leclerc presented in support of her ownership claim was a North Carolina Re-assignment of Title showing that the registered owner transferred the vehicle to her (Resp. Ex. A). But there is substantial conflict in the record regarding ownership. A Pennsylvania insurance card, for example, shows Avion Kineve Cornwall to be the titled owner (Resp. Ex. C). Nevertheless, for the purposes of this proceeding, I find that Ms. Leclerc has standing to challenge the seizure as she produced proof that the title was in her name. The Department s case consisted entirely of documentary evidence, which, although hearsay in nature, was properly admissible (Krimstock Order at 3), and which I find to be reliable and credible. The Department's evidence showed that, on January 29, 2006, Ms. Leclerc called 911 to report that Mr. Welch was assaulting her at her residence in violation of an order of protection. According to an affidavit prepared by the arresting officer, Police Officer Paula Smith, and notations in Officer Smith s memo book, Officer Smith responded to Ms. Leclerc s apartment based upon Ms. Leclerc s complaint that Mr. Welch attempted to assault her and that there was a gun in her vehicle (Pet. Exs. 7e & 9). Mr. Welch did not cooperate with the police officers and was arrested for resisting
3 -3- arrest and criminal contempt (Pet. Ex. 1). Based upon statements by Ms. Leclerc and Mr. Welch that there was a loaded gun in the vehicle, the vehicle was brought to the station house. During the processing of the arrest, Mr. Welch stated that the gun in the vehicle belonged to him (Pet. Ex. 9). When a sergeant gained access to the vehicle, a loaded gun was recovered where Ms. Leclerc and Mr. Welch said it would be found (Pet. Ex. 9). Mr. Welch was subsequently arrested for criminal possession of a weapon and unlawful possession of marijuana (Pet. Ex. 5). Mr. Cornwall later arrived at the station with keys to the vehicle. With respect to the first element of the Krimstock order, I find that the documentary evidence submitted by the Department clearly established probable cause for Mr. Welch s arrest. The same evidence also satisfactorily established the Department s likelihood of success in a subsequent civil forfeiture action on the basis that Mr. Welch used the seized vehicle as the instrumentality of a crime, which establishes the second element. See Police Dep't v. Rice, OATH Index No. 1709/05, mem. dec. at 7-8 (Apr. 21, 2005) (possession of drugs and weapons in vehicle renders vehicle instrumentality of the crime of transporting drugs and weapons). The third element that the Department is entitled to retain the vehicle pending final outcome of the civil forfeiture action requires proof that retention is necessary to preserve the vehicle from loss, sale or destruction or that retention is necessary to protect the public's safety. We have held that where the return of the vehicle to the respondent would pose a heightened risk to the public safety, such risk satisfies this element. See, e.g., Police Dep't v. McFarland, OATH Index No. 1124/04, mem. dec. at 2, citing Canavan, 1 N.Y.3d at 144, 770 N.Y.S.2d at We have also held that such a heightened risk might be evidenced, for instance, by the circumstances of the crime itself (e.g., Police Dep't v. Mohammed, OATH Index No. 1159/04, mem. dec. at 3-4 (Mar. 2, 2004) (vehicle used for multiple sales of illegal firearms)). The Department challenges Ms. Leclerc s claim for the return of the vehicle by asserting that Messrs. Welch and Cornwall are the actual users and beneficial owners of the vehicle. Beneficial ownership refers to a situation where the vehicle's actual user is distinct from the nominal owner. See Police Dep't v. Bloise, OATH Index No. 2138/04, mem. dec. (June 17, 2004). Beneficial ownership or a possessory interest in a vehicle
4 -4- may be established by dominion and control over the vehicle. See Vergari v. Kraisky, 120 A.D.2d 739, 502 N.Y.S.2d 788 (2d Dep't 1986). I find that the Department established by a preponderance of the credible evidence that Messrs. Welch and Cornwall are the beneficial owners of the vehicle. Ms. Leclerc testified that she purchased the vehicle in North Carolina in March She paid $2,500 for the vehicle, which has a book value of $6,000, and she produced a letter from her mother stating that her mother provided the money for the purchase (Resp. Ex. B). Ms. Leclerc arranged to drive it to New York with a friend because she did not have a driver s license. She claims that the car sat unused in a parking space until October 2005, when Mr. Welch arranged for his friend Mr. Cornwall to temporarily insure and register the vehicle. Ms. Leclerc did not explain why she did not insure and register the vehicle herself, nor was it explained why the insurance card with Mr. Cornwall s name is from Pennsylvania. Ms. Leclerc, at the time she purchased the vehicle, and for the entire period she claims to have been its owner, did not have a driver s license. She received her license in February 2006, after the vehicle s seizure. Considering this, it is doubtful that she could have been a regular user of the vehicle. She claims to have sometimes used the vehicle on the weekends, but she did not explain how and for what purpose she did so. The lack of a driver s license would have severely limited her opportunities to use the vehicle legally. She also did not use it to travel to school, having testified that Mr. Cornwall used the vehicle when she would go to school. There is therefore no basis in the record to find that Ms. Leclerc used the vehicle regularly or as her primary mode of transportation. See Police Dep't v. Torres, OATH Index No. 1412/06, mem. dec. (Mar. 31, 2006) (finding that the driver was not a beneficial owner where the owner used the vehicle as her primary mode of transportation); Police Dep't v. Murray, OATH Index No. 1144/06, mem. dec. (Jan. 31, 2006) (holding that the driver, not the titled owner, was the beneficial owner of the vehicle where the driver used the vehicle as his primary mode of transportation, and where the title owner used the vehicle only in limited circumstances). Ms. Leclerc also testified that Mr. Welch used the vehicle to drive to work, and Mr. Cornwall used it as often as four days a week. Both individuals therefore used the vehicle far more often than she testifies she did. See id. (finding that the driver was not a
5 -5- beneficial owner where he was allowed to use the vehicle only in limited circumstances). Ms. Leclerc did not herself insure or register the vehicle, nor did she seek to have the title and registration transferred to her name in New York. Instead, Mr. Stenlo arranged for his friend Mr. Cornwall to temporarily insure and register the vehicle. See Police Dep't v. Bacon, OATH Index No. 551/06, mem. dec. (Oct. 19, 2005) (The driver was the beneficial owner of the vehicle because he made the monthly loan and insurance payments for the vehicle). Ms. Leclerc further testified that the police could not open the vehicle when she called them because she could not find her keys. The police had to take the vehicle to the precinct and wait for a special unit to open it. That Mr. Cornwall was able to go down to the precinct that night with keys to the car, while Ms. Leclerc could not even give the police access to it, is additional evidence that Ms. Leclerc did not have dominion and control over the car. See Police Dep't v. Torres, OATH Index No. 1412/06, mem. dec. (Mar. 31, 2006) (fact that there was only one set of keys relevant to determining who had dominion and control). All of this points to an arrangement in which Ms. Leclerc purchased the vehicle, perhaps taking money from her mother to put up all or part of the purchase price (see Resp. Ex. B), for the use of Mr. Welch, with Mr. Cornwall perhaps subsequently being brought into the arrangement by Mr. Welch. Mr. Cornwall, upon being questioned by police after trying to claim the vehicle by presenting documents relating to the vehicle in his name, stated that the vehicle belonged to Mr. Welch (Pet Ex. 9). To summarize, Ms. Leclerc was not the primary user of the vehicle, she did not register or insure the vehicle, she admits that it was used frequently by Messrs. Welch and Cornwall, and her own testimony provides evidence that someone other than her had dominion and control over the vehicle. In addition, Mr. Cornwall s statements contradict Ms. Leclerc s claim of ownership. The Department has established by a preponderance of the credible evidence that Ms. Leclerc owned the vehicle for the benefit of Messrs. Welch and Cornwall. Therefore, the vehicle should not be returned to Ms. Leclerc.
6 -6- ORDER The Department is entitled to retain the seized vehicle. June 14, 2006 APPEARANCES: LAWRENCE V. SISTA, ESQ. Attorney for Petitioner PATRICIA LECLERC pro se Roberto Velez Chief Administrative Law Judge
Office of the Comptroller v. Craft Fence, Inc., Robert Guido, & Craft Contracting Group, Inc. OATH Index No. 494/14 (May 6, 2014)
Office of the Comptroller v. Craft Fence, Inc., Robert Guido, & Craft Contracting Group, Inc. OATH Index No. 494/14 (May 6, 2014) Following respondents default, petitioner proved violation of Labor Law,
More informationComm n on Human Rights v. Shahid OATH Index No. 1381/13 (May 13, 2013)
Comm n on Human Rights v. Shahid OATH Index No. 1381/13 (May 13, 2013) In default proceeding, evidence established that landlord posted an advertisement online for an apartment indicating no program and
More informationOffice of the Comptroller v. Jetstream Maintenance Corp. OATH Index No. 997/11 (Jan. 24, 2011), adopted, Comptroller s Dec. (Apr. 28, 2011), appended
Office of the Comptroller v. Jetstream Maintenance Corp. OATH Index No. 997/11 (Jan. 24, 2011), adopted, Comptroller s Dec. (Apr. 28, 2011), appended Following respondents default, petitioner proved violation
More informationNON-PRECEDENTIAL DECISION - SEE SUPERIOR COURT I.O.P Appellant No EDA 2012
J-S70010-13 NON-PRECEDENTIAL DECISION - SEE SUPERIOR COURT I.O.P. 65.37 COMMONWEALTH OF PENNSYLVANIA Appellee IN THE SUPERIOR COURT OF PENNSYLVANIA v. RICHARD JARMON Appellant No. 3275 EDA 2012 Appeal
More informationFollow this and additional works at:
University of Tennessee, Knoxville Trace: Tennessee Research and Creative Exchange Tennessee Department of State, Opinions from the Administrative Procedures Division Law 6-3-2008 TENNESSEE DEPARTMENT
More informationT.C. Memo UNITED STATES TAX COURT. STEVEN A. SODIPO, Petitioner v. COMMISSIONER OF INTERNAL REVENUE, Respondent
T.C. Memo. 2015-3 UNITED STATES TAX COURT STEVEN A. SODIPO, Petitioner v. COMMISSIONER OF INTERNAL REVENUE, Respondent Docket No. 19156-12. Filed January 5, 2015. Steven A. Sodipo, pro se. William J. Gregg,
More informationNON-PRECEDENTIAL DECISION - SEE SUPERIOR COURT I.O.P
NON-PRECEDENTIAL DECISION - SEE SUPERIOR COURT I.O.P. 65.37 COMMONWEALTH OF PENNSYLVANIA Appellee IN THE SUPERIOR COURT OF PENNSYLVANIA v. GARY D. WILLIAMS Appellant No. 2428 EDA 2014 Appeal from the PCRA
More informationIN THE COMMONWEALTH COURT OF PENNSYLVANIA
IN THE COMMONWEALTH COURT OF PENNSYLVANIA John H. Morley, Jr., : Appellant : : v. : No. 3056 C.D. 2002 : Submitted: January 2, 2004 City of Philadelphia : Licenses & Inspections Unit, : Philadelphia Police
More informationSTATE OF OHIO ) IN THE COURT OF APPEALS NINTH JUDICIAL DISTRICT COUNTY OF MEDINA ) DECISION AND JOURNAL ENTRY
[Cite as State v. Sloan, 2005-Ohio-5191.] STATE OF OHIO ) IN THE COURT OF APPEALS )ss: NINTH JUDICIAL DISTRICT COUNTY OF MEDINA ) STATE OF OHIO Appellee v. WILLIAM JOSHUA SLOAN Appellant C. A. No. 05CA0019-M
More informationBusiness Integrity Comm n v. Santos, Orfilio, Villatoro OATH Index No. 2516/14 (July 1, 2014) Violation No. TW
Business Integrity Comm n v. Santos, Orfilio, Villatoro OATH Index No. 2516/14 (July 1, 2014) Violation No. TW-209505 In default hearing, evidence established that respondent collected trade waste without
More informationFollow this and additional works at: Part of the Administrative Law Commons
University of Tennessee, Knoxville Trace: Tennessee Research and Creative Exchange Tennessee Department of State, Opinions from the Administrative Procedures Division Law 10-26-2011 TENNESSEE DEPARTMENT
More informationNON-PRECEDENTIAL DECISION - SEE SUPERIOR COURT I.O.P Appellant No EDA 2013
NON-PRECEDENTIAL DECISION - SEE SUPERIOR COURT I.O.P. 65.37 COMMONWEALTH OF PENNSYLVANIA Appellee IN THE SUPERIOR COURT OF PENNSYLVANIA v. LAURENN HARVIN Appellant No. 2521 EDA 2013 Appeal from the PCRA
More informationDISTRICT COURT OF APPEAL OF THE STATE OF FLORIDA FOURTH DISTRICT
DISTRICT COURT OF APPEAL OF THE STATE OF FLORIDA FOURTH DISTRICT RISTO JOVAN WYATT, Appellant, v. STATE OF FLORIDA, Appellee. No. 4D12-4377 [ May 20, 2015 ] Appeal from the Circuit Court for the Nineteenth
More informationConflicts of Interest Bd. v. Oni OATH Index No. 458/14 (Dec. 6, 2013), adopted, COIB Case No (May 14, 2014), appended
Conflicts of Interest Bd. v. Oni OATH Index No. 458/14 (Dec. 6, 2013), adopted, COIB Case No. 2013-299 (May 14, 2014), appended Human Resources Administration employee borrowed $6,740 from eight subordinates.
More informationNON-PRECEDENTIAL DECISION - SEE SUPERIOR COURT I.O.P
NON-PRECEDENTIAL DECISION - SEE SUPERIOR COURT I.O.P. 65.37 COMMONWEALTH OF PENNSYLVANIA Appellee IN THE SUPERIOR COURT OF PENNSYLVANIA v. KYLE KEHRLI Appellant No. 2688 EDA 2012 Appeal from the Judgment
More informationNON-PRECEDENTIAL DECISION - SEE SUPERIOR COURT I.O.P
NON-PRECEDENTIAL DECISION - SEE SUPERIOR COURT I.O.P. 65.37 COMMONWEALTH OF PENNSYLVANIA Appellee IN THE SUPERIOR COURT OF PENNSYLVANIA v. IRA NEAL GOLDBERG Appellant No. 732 MDA 2014 Appeal from the PCRA
More informationNON-PRECEDENTIAL DECISION - SEE SUPERIOR COURT I.O.P Appellant No. 44 MDA 2013
NON-PRECEDENTIAL DECISION - SEE SUPERIOR COURT I.O.P. 65.37 COMMONWEALTH OF PENNSYLVANIA, Appellee IN THE SUPERIOR COURT OF PENNSYLVANIA v. WAYNE EUGENE EBERSOLE, JR., Appellant No. 44 MDA 2013 Appeal
More informationNON-PRECEDENTIAL DECISION - SEE SUPERIOR COURT I.O.P
NON-PRECEDENTIAL DECISION - SEE SUPERIOR COURT I.O.P. 65.37 COMMONWEALTH OF PENNSYLVANIA IN THE SUPERIOR COURT OF PENNSYLVANIA v. WILLIAM ERIC WEBB Appellant No. 540 EDA 2016 Appeal from the PCRA Order
More informationNON-PRECEDENTIAL DECISION - SEE SUPERIOR COURT I.O.P IN THE SUPERIOR COURT OF PENNSYLVANIA
NON-PRECEDENTIAL DECISION - SEE SUPERIOR COURT I.O.P. 65.37 MARY BUSH Appellant IN THE SUPERIOR COURT OF PENNSYLVANIA THOMAS LAWRENCE v. Appellee No. 1713 EDA 2018 Appeal from the Order Entered April 26,
More informationIN THE COMMONWEALTH COURT OF PENNSYLVANIA
IN THE COMMONWEALTH COURT OF PENNSYLVANIA Douglas Gilghrist : : v. : : Commonwealth of Pennsylvania, : Department of Transportation, : Bureau of Motor Vehicles, : No. 726 C.D. 2014 Appellant : Submitted:
More informationNON-PRECEDENTIAL DECISION - SEE SUPERIOR COURT I.O.P
NON-PRECEDENTIAL DECISION - SEE SUPERIOR COURT I.O.P. 65.37 COMMONWEALTH OF PENNSYLVANIA IN THE SUPERIOR COURT OF PENNSYLVANIA v. JERMAINE THOMPSON Appellant No. 870 EDA 2016 Appeal from the Judgment of
More informationDep t of Citywide Admin. Services v. Done
Dep t of Citywide Admin. Services v. Done OATH Index No. 1119/02 (April 3, 2002) OATH Index No. 1119/02, mem. dec. (Apr. 22, 2003), appended, rev'd, NYC Civ. Serv. Comm'n Item No. CD04-26-R (May 19, 2004),appended.
More informationFollow this and additional works at: Part of the Administrative Law Commons
University of Tennessee, Knoxville Trace: Tennessee Research and Creative Exchange Tennessee Department of State, Opinions from the Administrative Procedures Division Law 8-31-2009 TENNESSEE DEPARTMENT
More informationState of New Jersey OFFICE OF ADMINISTRATIVE LAW
State of New Jersey OFFICE OF ADMINISTRATIVE LAW DECISION OAL DKT. NO. HEA 20864-15 AGENCY DKT. NO. HESAA NEW JERSEY HIGHER EDUCATION STUDENT ASSISTANCE AUTHORITY (NJHESAA; THE AGENCY), Petitioner, v.
More informationCASE NO. 1D Nancy A. Daniels, Public Defender, and Gail E. Anderson, Assistant Public Defender, Tallahassee, for Appellant.
IN THE DISTRICT COURT OF APPEAL FIRST DISTRICT, STATE OF FLORIDA RICHARD SUMMERALL, v. Appellant, NOT FINAL UNTIL TIME EXPIRES TO FILE MOTION FOR REHEARING AND DISPOSITION THEREOF IF FILED CASE NO. 1D14-1256
More informationNON-PRECEDENTIAL DECISION - SEE SUPERIOR COURT I.O.P Appellant No WDA 2014
NON-PRECEDENTIAL DECISION - SEE SUPERIOR COURT I.O.P. 65.37 COMMONWEALTH OF PENNSYLVANIA, Appellee IN THE SUPERIOR COURT OF PENNSYLVANIA v. SHANE BERNARD VITKA, JR., Appellant No. 1985 WDA 2014 Appeal
More informationDecided by the Commissioner of Education, April 15, 1997
C #185-97 SB # 46-97 IN THE MATTER OF THE TENURE : HEARING OF ALYCE STEWART, STATE-: OPERATED SCHOOL DISTRICT OF THE : STATE BOARD OF EDUCATION DECISION CITY OF NEWARK, ESSEX COUNTY. : Decided by the Commissioner
More informationARBITRATION ACT. May 29, 2016>
ARBITRATION ACT Wholly Amended by Act No. 6083, Dec. 31, 1999 Amended by Act No. 6465, Apr. 7, 2001 Act No. 6626, Jan. 26, 2002 Act No. 10207, Mar. 31, 2010 Act No. 11690, Mar. 23, 2013 Act No. 14176,
More informationDECISION OF TH& INDEPENDENT ADMINISTRATOR GORDON ROBERTS, Respondent.
INVESTIGATIONS OFFICER, Claimant, v. DECISION OF TH& INDEPENDENT ADMINISTRATOR GORDON ROBERTS, Respondent. This matter concerns a charge filed by the Investigations Officer, Charles M. Carberry, against
More informationTriborough Bridge and Tunnel Auth. v. Walsh OATH Index No. 153/04 (Jan. 23, 2004)
Triborough Bridge and Tunnel Auth. v. Walsh OATH Index No. 153/04 (Jan. 23, 2004) Petitioner charged respondent, a bridge and tunnel officer, with toll shortages on his toll lane on two occasions. The
More informationIN THE COMMONWEALTH COURT OF PENNSYLVANIA
IN THE COMMONWEALTH COURT OF PENNSYLVANIA In Re: Petition of the Venango County : Tax Claim Bureau for Judicial : Sale of Lands Free and Clear : of all Taxes and Municipal Claims, : Mortgages, Liens, Charges
More informationCOURT OF APPEALS OF VIRGINIA. Present: Judges Benton, Coleman and Senior Judge Cole Argued at Richmond, Virginia
COURT OF APPEALS OF VIRGINIA Present: Judges Benton, Coleman and Senior Judge Cole Argued at Richmond, Virginia ARTHUR RAMBERT v. Record No. 0559-94-2 MEMORANDUM OPINION * BY JUDGE MARVIN F. COLE COMMONWEALTH
More informationFINAL ORDER REVERSING TRIAL COURT. Franklin Chase ( Appellant ) appeals the denial of his Motion to Suppress 1. This court
IN THE CIRCUIT COURT OF THE NINTH JUDICIAL CIRCUIT IN AND FOR ORANGE COUNTY, FLORIDA APPELLATE CASE NO: 2014-AP-000027-A-O LOWER CASE NO.: 2014-CT-001011-A-O FRANKLIN W. CHASE, v. Appellant, STATE OF FLORIDA,
More informationNON-PRECEDENTIAL DECISION - SEE SUPERIOR COURT I.O.P
NON-PRECEDENTIAL DECISION - SEE SUPERIOR COURT I.O.P. 65.37 COMMONWEALTH OF PENNSYLVANIA Appellee IN THE SUPERIOR COURT OF PENNSYLVANIA v. TYREEK DENMARK Appellant No. 722 EDA 2015 Appeal from the Judgment
More informationMelcara Corp. v. Dep t of Housing Preservation & Development OATH Index No. 926/13, mem. dec. (Mar. 13, 2013)
Melcara Corp. v. Dep t of Housing Preservation & Development OATH Index No. 926/13, mem. dec. (Mar. 13, 2013) Applicable unit prices in bid documents must be used to determine credit for omitted and extra
More informationSTATE OF OHIO MIGUEL A. JIMENEZ
[Cite as State v. Jimenez, 2011-Ohio-1572.] Court of Appeals of Ohio EIGHTH APPELLATE DISTRICT COUNTY OF CUYAHOGA JOURNAL ENTRY AND OPINION No. 95337 STATE OF OHIO PLAINTIFF-APPELLEE vs. MIGUEL A. JIMENEZ
More informationCASE NO. 1D Appellant challenges an order entered by the circuit court that adopted a
IN THE DISTRICT COURT OF APPEAL FIRST DISTRICT, STATE OF FLORIDA SENCOA DAMAIR CRAWFORD, v. Appellant, NOT FINAL UNTIL TIME EXPIRES TO FILE MOTION FOR REHEARING AND DISPOSITION THEREOF IF FILED CASE NO.
More informationThird District Court of Appeal State of Florida
Third District Court of Appeal State of Florida Opinion filed April 4, 2018. Not final until disposition of timely filed motion for rehearing. No. 3D16-1071 Lower Tribunal No. 14-554 Terrence Jefferson,
More informationT.C. Memo UNITED STATES TAX COURT. YULIA FEDER, Petitioner v. COMMISSIONER OF INTERNAL REVENUE, Respondent
T.C. Memo. 2012-10 UNITED STATES TAX COURT YULIA FEDER, Petitioner v. COMMISSIONER OF INTERNAL REVENUE, Respondent Docket No. 1628-10. Filed January 10, 2012. Frank Agostino, Lawrence M. Brody, and Jeffrey
More informationNON-PRECEDENTIAL DECISION - SEE SUPERIOR COURT I.O.P
NON-PRECEDENTIAL DECISION - SEE SUPERIOR COURT I.O.P. 65.37 COMMONWEALTH OF PENNSYLVANIA, Appellee IN THE SUPERIOR COURT OF PENNSYLVANIA v. EMANUEL BRYANT, Appellant No. 508 EDA 2013 Appeal from the Judgment
More informationFINANCIAL INDUSTRY REGULATORY AUTHORITY OFFICE OF HEARING OFFICERS
FINANCIAL INDUSTRY REGULATORY AUTHORITY OFFICE OF HEARING OFFICERS REGULATORY OPERATIONS, v. Complainant, TIMOTHY STEPHEN FANNIN (CRD No. 4906131), Respondent. Expedited Proceeding No. ARB170007 STAR No.
More informationTermination of Employment for Misconduct; Request for Public Comments Notice 99 27
Termination of Employment for Misconduct; Request for Public Comments Notice 99 27 SECTION I. PURPOSE Section 1203 of the Internal Revenue Service Restructuring and Reform Act of 1998 (the RRA ) provides
More informationIN THE OREGON TAX COURT MAGISTRATE DIVISION Income Tax DECISION
IN THE OREGON TAX COURT MAGISTRATE DIVISION Income Tax WAYNE A. SHAMMEL, Plaintiff, v. DEPARTMENT OF REVENUE, State of Oregon, Defendant. TC-MD 120838D DECISION Plaintiff appeals Defendant s denial of
More informationYulia Feder v. Commissioner, TC Memo , Code Sec(s) 61; 72; 6201; 7491.
Checkpoint Contents Federal Library Federal Source Materials Federal Tax Decisions Tax Court Memorandum Decisions Tax Court Memorandum Decisions (Current Year) Advance Tax Court Memorandums Yulia Feder,
More informationFollow this and additional works at:
University of Tennessee, Knoxville Trace: Tennessee Research and Creative Exchange Tennessee Department of State, Opinions from the Administrative Procedures Division Law 4-28-2009 TENNESSEE DEPARTMENT
More informationIN THE COURT OF CRIMINAL APPEALS OF TENNESSEE AT NASHVILLE Assigned on Briefs May 6, 2008
IN THE COURT OF CRIMINAL APPEALS OF TENNESSEE AT NASHVILLE Assigned on Briefs May 6, 2008 JEREMIAH GINN v. STATE OF TENNESSEE Appeal from the Circuit Court for Warren County No. F-9025 Larry B. Stanley,
More informationMARIO DIAZ NO CA-1041 VERSUS COURT OF APPEAL EUDOLIO LOPEZ, ASSURANCE AMERICA INSURANCE COMPANY, DARRELL BUTLER AND ALLSTATE INSURANCE COMPANY
MARIO DIAZ VERSUS EUDOLIO LOPEZ, ASSURANCE AMERICA INSURANCE COMPANY, DARRELL BUTLER AND ALLSTATE INSURANCE COMPANY NO. 2014-CA-1041 COURT OF APPEAL FOURTH CIRCUIT STATE OF LOUISIANA APPEAL FROM FIRST
More informationUnited States Court of Appeals for the Federal Circuit
NOTE: Pursuant to Fed. Cir. R. 47.6, this disposition is not citable as precedent. It is a public record. United States Court of Appeals for the Federal Circuit 04-3376 JAMES A. KOKKINIS, v. Petitioner,
More informationNON-PRECEDENTIAL DECISION - SEE SUPERIOR COURT I.O.P Appellant No. 25 MDA 2014
NON-PRECEDENTIAL DECISION - SEE SUPERIOR COURT I.O.P. 65.37 COMMONWEALTH OF PENNSYLVANIA Appellee IN THE SUPERIOR COURT OF PENNSYLVANIA v. RICHARD CLARK STEWART Appellant No. 25 MDA 2014 Appeal from the
More informationNON-PRECEDENTIAL DECISION - SEE SUPERIOR COURT I.O.P Appellant No EDA 2013
NON-PRECEDENTIAL DECISION - SEE SUPERIOR COURT I.O.P. 65.37 COMMONWEALTH OF PENNSYLVANIA Appellee IN THE SUPERIOR COURT OF PENNSYLVANIA v. JAIME OTERO Appellant No. 2771 EDA 2013 Appeal from the PCRA Order
More informationSTATE OF OHIO, JEFFERSON COUNTY IN THE COURT OF APPEALS SEVENTH DISTRICT
[Cite as State v. Draper, 2011-Ohio-1007.] STATE OF OHIO, JEFFERSON COUNTY IN THE COURT OF APPEALS SEVENTH DISTRICT STATE OF OHIO, CASE NO. 10 JE 6 PLAINTIFF-APPELLEE, - VS - O P I N I O N THEODIS DRAPER,
More informationCASE NO. 1D David P. Healy of Law Offices of David P. Healy, PLC, Tallahassee, for Appellants.
IN THE DISTRICT COURT OF APPEAL FIRST DISTRICT, STATE OF FLORIDA ROBERT B. LINDSEY, JOSEPH D. ADAMS and MARK J. SWEE, Appellants, NOT FINAL UNTIL TIME EXPIRES TO FILE MOTION FOR REHEARING AND DISPOSITION
More informationCOURT OF APPEALS MUSKINGUM COUNTY, OHIO FIFTH APPELLATE DISTRICT
[Cite as State v. Deavers, 2007-Ohio-5464.] COURT OF APPEALS MUSKINGUM COUNTY, OHIO FIFTH APPELLATE DISTRICT STATE OF OHIO -vs- Plaintiff-Appellee LANCE EDWARDS DEAVERS, AKA, TONY CARDELLO Defendant-Appellant
More informationIN THE COURT OF APPEALS OF THE STATE OF MISSISSIPPI FILED JUL OFFICE OF THE CLERK SUPREME COURT COURT OF APPEALS. BRIEF FOR Appellant BY:
IN THE COURT OF APPEALS OF THE STATE OF MISSISSIPPI No. 2013-CP-02023-COA COURTNEY ELKINS, vs. STATE OF MISSISSIPPI FILED JUL 2 2 2015 OFFICE OF THE CLERK SUPREME COURT COURT OF APPEALS Appellant APPELLEE
More information2018 PA Super 31 : : : : : : : : :
2018 PA Super 31 COMMONWEALTH OF PENNSYLVANIA v. JEFFREY ALAN OLSON, Appellant IN THE SUPERIOR COURT OF PENNSYLVANIA No. 158 WDA 2017 Appeal from the PCRA Order December 22, 2016 In the Court of Common
More informationSubmitted July 24, 2018 Decided January 15, Before Judges Ostrer and Vernoia.
NOT FOR PUBLICATION WITHOUT THE APPROVAL OF THE APPELLATE DIVISION This opinion shall not "constitute precedent or be binding upon any court." Although it is posted on the internet, this opinion is binding
More informationSubscribe Past Issues Translate. October 11, 2017
Translate The Jurist: enews for Pennsylvania Judges About Domestic Violence Jurisprudence View this email in your browser October 11, 2017 Pennsylvania Superior Court decision on the Protection from Sexual
More informationASSET FORFEITURE FUNDAMENTALS OF PROSECUTION
ASSET FORFEITURE FUNDAMENTALS OF PROSECUTION Presented by: Gary D. Bergman Prosecuting Attorneys Council of Georgia State Prosecution Support Division THE GEORGIA UNIFORM CIVIL FORFEITURE PROCEDURE ACT
More informationASSET FORFEITURE FUNDAMENTALS OF PROSECUTION. Gary D. Bergman Prosecuting Attorneys Council of Georgia State Prosecution Support Division
ASSET FORFEITURE FUNDAMENTALS OF PROSECUTION Presented by: Gary D. Bergman Prosecuting Attorneys Council of Georgia State Prosecution Support Division THE GEORGIA UNIFORM CIVIL FORFEITURE PROCEDURE ACT
More informationLind v. Commissioner T.C. Memo
CLICK HERE to return to the home page Lind v. Commissioner T.C. Memo 1985-490 Memorandum Opinion PARKER, Judge: Respondent determined a deficiency in petitioners' 1980 Federal income tax in the amount
More informationNON-PRECEDENTIAL DECISION - SEE SUPERIOR COURT I.O.P
NON-PRECEDENTIAL DECISION - SEE SUPERIOR COURT I.O.P. 65.37 COMMONWEALTH OF PENNSYLVANIA Appellee IN THE SUPERIOR COURT OF PENNSYLVANIA MICHAEL J. DOTSKO v. Appellant No. 2580 EDA 2015 Appeal from the
More informationNON-PRECEDENTIAL DECISION - SEE SUPERIOR COURT I.O.P
NON-PRECEDENTIAL DECISION - SEE SUPERIOR COURT I.O.P. 65.37 COMMONWEALTH OF PENNSYLVANIA, Appellee IN THE SUPERIOR COURT OF PENNSYLVANIA v. CHRISTOPHER L. LEISTER, Appellant No. 113 MDA 2015 Appeal from
More informationCOURT OF APPEALS STARK COUNTY, OHIO FIFTH APPELLATE DISTRICT
[Cite as State v. $765 in United States Currency, 181 Ohio App.3d 162, 2009-Ohio-711.] COURT OF APPEALS STARK COUNTY, OHIO FIFTH APPELLATE DISTRICT The STATE OF OHIO, JUDGES: Hon. Sheila G. Farmer, P.J.
More informationCOURT OF APPEALS TUSCARAWAS COUNTY, OHIO FIFTH APPELLATE DISTRICT
[Cite as State v. Hahn, 2013-Ohio-2308.] COURT OF APPEALS TUSCARAWAS COUNTY, OHIO FIFTH APPELLATE DISTRICT STATE OF OHIO Plaintiff-Appellee -vs- COREY HAHN Defendant-Appellant JUDGES: Hon. William B. Hoffman,
More informationmg Doc 3836 Filed 05/28/13 Entered 05/28/13 10:24:28 Main Document Pg 1 of 11
Pg 1 of 11 UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT SOUTHERN DISTRICT OF NEW YORK ----------------------------------------X In re: RESIDENTIAL CAPITAL, LLC, et al. Case No. 12-12020 (MG) Chapter 11 Debtors. ----------------------------------------X
More informationNON-PRECEDENTIAL DECISION - SEE SUPERIOR COURT I.O.P
NON-PRECEDENTIAL DECISION - SEE SUPERIOR COURT I.O.P. 65.37 COMMONWEALTH OF PENNSYLVANIA, Appellee IN THE SUPERIOR COURT OF PENNSYLVANIA v. KENT NORRIS OWENS, Appellant No. 260 MDA 2015 Appeal from the
More informationDebora Schmidt v. Mars Inc
2014 Decisions Opinions of the United States Court of Appeals for the Third Circuit 10-7-2014 Debora Schmidt v. Mars Inc Precedential or Non-Precedential: Non-Precedential Docket No. 13-1048 Follow this
More informationUNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT EASTERN DISTRICT OF VIRGINIA RICHMOND DIVISION
UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT EASTERN DISTRICT OF VIRGINIA RICHMOND DIVISION UNITEDSTATES OF AMERICA, ) CRIMINAL ACTION NO. ) 3:05-CR-00202-REP-1 Plaintiff, ) ) v. ) ) JAMES DOMINIC YYY, ) ) Defendant.
More information2015 PA Super 173 OPINION BY GANTMAN, P.J.: FILED AUGUST 19, Appellant, Quawi Smith, appeals from the order entered in the
2015 PA Super 173 COMMONWEALTH OF PENNSYLVANIA Appellee IN THE SUPERIOR COURT OF PENNSYLVANIA v. QUAWI SMITH Appellant No. 1892 EDA 2014 Appeal from the PCRA Order June 27, 2014 In the Court of Common
More informationNOT DESIGNATED FOR PUBLICATION STATE OF LOUISIANA COURT OF APPEAL, THIRD CIRCUIT **********
NOT DESIGNATED FOR PUBLICATION STATE OF LOUISIANA COURT OF APPEAL, THIRD CIRCUIT 06-864 KIM MARIE MIER VERSUS RUSTON J. BOURQUE ********** APPEAL FROM THE FIFTEENTH JUDICIAL DISTRICT COURT PARISH OF VERMILION,
More informationJ.M., BEFORE THE. Appellant MARYLAND STATE BOARD PRINCE GEORGE S COUNTY BOARD OF EDUCATION OF EDUCATION. Opinion No Appellee.
J.M., BEFORE THE Appellant v. PRINCE GEORGE S COUNTY BOARD OF EDUCATION Appellee. MARYLAND STATE BOARD OF EDUCATION Opinion No. 17-22 INTRODUCTION OPINION J.M. (Appellant) appeals the decision of the Prince
More informationCOURT OF APPEALS ASHLAND COUNTY, OHIO FIFTH APPELLATE DISTRICT
[Cite as State v. McClain, 2013-Ohio-2436.] COURT OF APPEALS ASHLAND COUNTY, OHIO FIFTH APPELLATE DISTRICT CITY OF ASHLAND : JUDGES: : : Hon. William B. Hoffman, P.J. Plaintiff-Appellee : Hon. Patricia
More informationCourt of Appeals of Ohio
[Cite as State v. Green, 2013-Ohio-3728.] Court of Appeals of Ohio EIGHTH APPELLATE DISTRICT COUNTY OF CUYAHOGA JOURNAL ENTRY AND OPINION No. 99196 STATE OF OHIO PLAINTIFF-APPELLEE vs. GREGORY L. GREEN
More informationHOT ISSUES IN CIVIL ASSET FORFEITURES. Stephen J. Dunn 1. funds on deposit at the bank. Cash needed to operate the business and pay
HOT ISSUES IN CIVIL ASSET FORFEITURES Stephen J. Dunn 1 A business receives a call from its bank that the IRS has seized all of the business funds on deposit at the bank. Cash needed to operate the business
More informationTibor I. Szkircsak v. Commissioner TC Memo
CLICK HERE to return to the home page Tibor I. Szkircsak v. Commissioner TC Memo 1980-129 MEMORANDUM FINDINGS OF FACT AND OPINION DRENNEN, Judge: Respondent determined a deficiency of $2,884.57 in petitioners'
More informationIN THE COMMONWEALTH COURT OF PENNSYLVANIA
IN THE COMMONWEALTH COURT OF PENNSYLVANIA Rashed Kabir, : Appellant : v. : : Commonwealth of Pennsylvania, : Department of Transportation, : No. 264 C.D. 2010 Bureau of Driver Licensing : Submitted: July
More informationNEW YORK CITY OFFICE OF ADMINISTRATIVE TRIALS AND HEARINGS
Office of the Comptroller v. Reliance General Construction, Inc. OATH Index No. 1767/15 (July 23, 2015), adopted, Comptroller s Determination and Order (Sept. 2, 2015), appended Following respondents default,
More informationNON-PRECEDENTIAL DECISION - SEE SUPERIOR COURT I.O.P
NON-PRECEDENTIAL DECISION - SEE SUPERIOR COURT I.O.P. 65.37 COMMONWEALTH OF PENNSYLVANIA Appellee IN THE SUPERIOR COURT OF PENNSYLVANIA v. AHLEEM GREDIC Appellant No. 313 EDA 2015 Appeal from the Judgment
More informationT.C. Memo UNITED STATES TAX COURT. ROBERT LIPPOLIS, Petitioner v. COMMISSIONER OF INTERNAL REVENUE, Respondent
T.C. Memo. 2017-104 UNITED STATES TAX COURT ROBERT LIPPOLIS, Petitioner v. COMMISSIONER OF INTERNAL REVENUE, Respondent Docket No. 18172-12W. Filed June 7, 2017. Thomas C. Pliske, for petitioner. Ashley
More informationNON-PRECEDENTIAL DECISION - SEE SUPERIOR COURT I.O.P COMMONWEALTH OF PENNSYLVANIA, IN THE SUPERIOR COURT OF PENNSYLVANIA Appellee
NON-PRECEDENTIAL DECISION - SEE SUPERIOR COURT I.O.P. 65.37 COMMONWEALTH OF PENNSYLVANIA, IN THE SUPERIOR COURT OF PENNSYLVANIA Appellee ANGEL PEREZ, v. Appellant No. 569 EDA 2012 Appeal from the Order
More informationSTATE OF LOUISIANA COURT OF APPEAL, THIRD CIRCUIT **********
STATE OF LOUISIANA COURT OF APPEAL, THIRD CIRCUIT 16-376 CRYSTAL STEPHENS VERSUS MARY J. KING, ET AL. ********** APPEAL FROM THE TENTH JUDICIAL DISTRICT COURT PARISH OF NATCHITOCHES, NO. C-79,209, DIV.
More informationIN THE COURT OF CRIMINAL APPEALS OF TENNESSEE AT NASHVILLE MARCH 1995 SESSION
IN THE COURT OF CRIMINAL APPEALS OF TENNESSEE AT NASHVILLE MARCH 1995 SESSION FILED October 8, 1996 Cecil W. Crowson Appellate Court Clerk BILLY NOBLE FORREST ) AKA BILLY SALEEM EL-AMIN, ) ) NO. 01C01-9411-CC-00387
More informationLong Island New York Personal Injury and Accident Attorney Jeena Belil
SUPREME COURT OF THE STATE OF NEW YORK COUNTY OF SUFFOLK In the Matter of the Application for an Order Staying Arbitration Between TRAVELERS PROPERTY CASUALTY COMPANY, -against- RESPONDENT I and RESPONDENT
More informationIN THE COURT OF APPEALS OF OHIO SIXTH APPELLATE DISTRICT WILLIAMS COUNTY. Court of Appeals No. WM Appellee Trial Court No.
[Cite as State v. Robbins, 2012-Ohio-3862.] IN THE COURT OF APPEALS OF OHIO SIXTH APPELLATE DISTRICT WILLIAMS COUNTY State of Ohio Court of Appeals No. WM-11-012 Appellee Trial Court No. 10 CR 103 v. Barry
More informationCLAIMS AGAINST INDUSTRIAL HYGIENISTS: THE TRILOGY OF PREVENTION, HANDLING AND RESOLUTION PART TWO: WHAT TO DO WHEN A CLAIM HAPPENS
CLAIMS AGAINST INDUSTRIAL HYGIENISTS: THE TRILOGY OF PREVENTION, HANDLING AND RESOLUTION PART TWO: WHAT TO DO WHEN A CLAIM HAPPENS Martin M. Ween, Esq. Partner Wilson, Elser, Moskowitz, Edelman & Dicker,
More informationGAW v. COMMISSIONER 70 T.C.M. 336 (1995) T.C. Memo Docket No United States Tax Court. Filed August 8, MEMORANDUM OPINION
1 of 6 06-Oct-2012 18:01 GAW v. COMMISSIONER 70 T.C.M. 336 (1995) T.C. Memo. 1995-373 Anthony Teong-Chan Gaw and Rosanna W. Gaw v. Commissioner. Docket No. 8015-92. United States Tax Court. Filed August
More informationTHE COURT OF APPEALS ELEVENTH APPELLATE DISTRICT GEAUGA COUNTY, OHIO
[Cite as In re Salsgiver, 2003-Ohio-1203.] THE COURT OF APPEALS ELEVENTH APPELLATE DISTRICT GEAUGA COUNTY, OHIO IN THE MATTER OF: : O P I N I O N SHILAR SALSGIVER, : DEPENDENT CHILD CASE NO. 2002-G-2478
More informationNON-PRECEDENTIAL DECISION - SEE SUPERIOR COURT I.O.P
NON-PRECEDENTIAL DECISION - SEE SUPERIOR COURT I.O.P. 65.37 COMMONWEALTH OF PENNSYLVANIA, : IN THE SUPERIOR COURT OF : PENNSYLVANIA Appellee : : v. : : MELISSA ARNDT, : : Appellant : No. 3571 EDA 2014
More informationNON-PRECEDENTIAL DECISION - SEE SUPERIOR COURT I.O.P
NON-PRECEDENTIAL DECISION - SEE SUPERIOR COURT I.O.P. 65.37 COMMONWEALTH OF PENNSYLVANIA, Appellee IN THE SUPERIOR COURT OF PENNSYLVANIA v. CHARLES RICHARD BRENNAN, Appellant No. 1363 MDA 2014 Appeal from
More informationCOURT OF APPEALS EIGHTH DISTRICT OF TEXAS EL PASO, TEXAS
COURT OF APPEALS EIGHTH DISTRICT OF TEXAS EL PASO, TEXAS ROBERTO CASTILLO, Appellant, v. THE STATE OF TEXAS, Appellee. No. 08-11-00142-CR Appeal from County Court at Law No. 4 of El Paso County, Texas
More informationTHE COURT OF APPEALS ELEVENTH APPELLATE DISTRICT GEAUGA COUNTY, OHIO. Civil Appeal from the Court of Common Pleas, Case No. 00 C
[Cite as State v. Holder, 2003-Ohio-5860.] THE COURT OF APPEALS ELEVENTH APPELLATE DISTRICT GEAUGA COUNTY, OHIO STATE OF OHIO, : O P I N I O N Plaintiff-Appellee, : - vs - : CASE NO. 2002-G-2469 JILLIAN
More informationIN THE TENTH COURT OF APPEALS. No CR. From the 19th District Court McLennan County, Texas Trial Court No C1 MEMORANDUM OPINION
IN THE TENTH COURT OF APPEALS No. 10-12-00372-CR MARK BRADLEY GRAVES, v. THE STATE OF TEXAS, Appellant Appellee From the 19th District Court McLennan County, Texas Trial Court No. 2011-2140-C1 MEMORANDUM
More informationIN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE EASTERN DISTRICT OF PENNSYLVANIA MEMORANDUM
GROSSMAN v. METROPOLITAN LIFE INSURANCE CO., Doc. 21 IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE EASTERN DISTRICT OF PENNSYLVANIA JACK GROSSMAN, Plaintiff, CIVIL ACTION v. METROPOLITAN LIFE INSURANCE CO.,
More information2018 PA Super 51 : : : : : : : : :
2018 PA Super 51 COMMONWEALTH OF PENNSYLVANIA Appellee v. PHILIP LAWRENCE MORIARTY Appellant IN THE SUPERIOR COURT OF PENNSYLVANIA No. 780 MDA 2017 Appeal from the PCRA Order April 25, 2017 In the Court
More information: : : : : : : : : : CHARACTER OF PROCEEDING: Criminal Appeal from Mount Vernon Municipal Court, Case No. 01 CRB 773 A & B. Reversed and Remanded
[Cite as Mt. Vernon v. Harrell, 2002-Ohio-3939.] COURT OF APPEALS KNOX COUNTY, OHIO FIFTH APPELLATE DISTRICT CITY OF MOUNT VERNON Plaintiff-Appellee -vs- BRUCE HARRELL Defendant-Appellant JUDGES Hon. Sheila
More informationNON-PRECEDENTIAL DECISION - SEE SUPERIOR COURT I.O.P Appellant No. 482 MDA 2013
NON-PRECEDENTIAL DECISION - SEE SUPERIOR COURT I.O.P. 65.37 COMMONWEALTH OF PENNSYLVANIA, Appellee IN THE SUPERIOR COURT OF PENNSYLVANIA v. TERRY SIMONTON, JR., Appellant No. 482 MDA 2013 Appeal from the
More informationHOME INSURANCE COMPANY and
............ SHORT FORM ORDER SUPREME COURT - STATE OF NEW YORK COUNTY OF NASSAU - PART 22 Present: HON. WilLIAM R. lamarca Justice In the Matter of the Petition of METLIFE AUTO & HOME INSURANCE COMPANY,
More informationIN THE COURT OF APPEALS OF OHIO SIXTH APPELLATE DISTRICT HURON COUNTY. Court of Appeals No. H Appellee Trial Court No.
[Cite as State v. Young, 2012-Ohio-1669.] IN THE COURT OF APPEALS OF OHIO SIXTH APPELLATE DISTRICT HURON COUNTY State of Ohio Court of Appeals No. H-10-025 Appellee Trial Court No. CRB 1000883 v. Robert
More informationIN THE COMMONWEALTH COURT OF PENNSYLVANIA
IN THE COMMONWEALTH COURT OF PENNSYLVANIA Karen Hansen, : Petitioner : : v. : No. 524 C.D. 2008 : Workers' Compensation Appeal : Submitted: August 1, 2008 Board (Stout Road Associates), : Respondent :
More informationT.C. Summary Opinion UNITED STATES TAX COURT
T.C. Summary Opinion 2016-57 UNITED STATES TAX COURT MARIO JOSEPH COLLODI, JR. AND ELIZABETH LOUISE COLLODI, Petitioners v. COMMISSIONER OF INTERNAL REVENUE, Respondent Docket No. 17131-14S. Filed September
More information