Control Number : Item Number : 33. Addendum StartPage: 0

Size: px
Start display at page:

Download "Control Number : Item Number : 33. Addendum StartPage: 0"

Transcription

1 Control Number : Item Number : 33 Addendum StartPage: 0

2

3 DOCKET NO. PUC LAURANCE KRIEGEL * PRO SE APPELLANT * * V. * MARIAH NORTHWEST, LLC * SCANDIA WIND SOUTHWEST, LLC * SCANDIA JIM SWAFFORD PARMER COUNTY COMMISSIONERS* PARMER COUNTY JUDGE * TREY ELLIS APPELLEE'S PUBLIC UTILITY COMMISSION OF TEXAS 2 To The Texas Public Utility Clerk; CLERK's ENTRY FOR DEFAULT JUDGMENT NOW COMES APPELLANT, filing this ENTRY of Default Judgment for the Public Utility Clerk to enter this Order for the following reasons; Appellant finds from the record that Appellee's have not answered or defended this proceeding. Appellant finds from the record the Public Utility Commissioners have not entered a Opinion or Order is this proceeding for Appellee's to stop the construction of the Alternate Electric Windmill projects or program's with their flawed electrical design. Appellant has just recently been granted his Constitutional and Statutory Right to intervene in these PUC cases by SOAH after Appellant appealed this error to The Supreme Court of Texas. A Order by the PUC on a Complaint before caused a Appeal to the Supreme Court of Texas, This case is still open. Texas Civil Practice and Procedure Rules state that the Appellant will close a case. Upon examination of the record Appellee's have had notice since of this proceeding. PUC has accepted and filed additional Intervention documents with additional facts and additional construction areas in this proceeding. 1 3,-)

4 Appellee's had notice again on and this recent notice on Each involved a different area with different legal descriptions. Each involved a different group of parties in the heading of the Complaint. Appellee's have had notice of the proceeding for more than 20 days. The PUC has had notice of the Default Judgment for more than 30 days. Texas Rules of Civil Procedure, Rule 239a allow The Public Utility Commission Clerk of Texas to enter this Default Judgment. Appellant is allowed to receive this Default Judgment since Appellee has not placed any of Appellant's facts at issue, Rule 419. There are no disputed facts. Appellee's have failed to plead since Appellant has filed addition documents of record in this proceeding since the PUC's Order No. 2, dated This order caused another Appeal the Supreme Court of Texas case, Additional new complaints by Appellant with new information and new Alternate Electric Windmill Company's involved were filed by The Public Utility Commission of Texas under the same number Rule 21a, Rule 101 and require a answer within 20 days plus mail delivery. Appellee, received the complaints on , , and with the filing in The Public Utility Commission of Texas. Appellee did not answer the filing in this proceeding with in prescribed time required by Texas Civil Practice and Procedure, therefore the Court is lawfully allowed to enter a Default Judgment, Rule 239. Now the clerk of the PUC has the lawfully authority to enter the Default Judgment into the record, Rule 239a. Appellant has filed addition documents of record in this proceeding since the case was filed that Appellee's have not responded to. Appellee's, has received and not responded with a answer to the Motion for Replevin, dated Appellee's, has received and not responded with a answer to the Motion for Injunctive Relief, dated Appellee's, the Partner County Commissioners and The Parmer County Judge do not have authority to designate my property as a reinvestment zone, the fee simple clear title landowner on most of the designated lands, if not all. See the Original Petition That pleading clearly explains the errors in Law. Appellee, Mariah North West LLC does not have all of the necessary documents in the State Comptrollers office of Texas for legal standing to conduct business in Texas. Mariah does not have a Electric Provider number or Electric Billing number or all of the documents with THE STATE OFFICE of COMPTROLLER. 2

5 Appellee, Scandia does not have all of the necessary documents in the State Comptrollers office of Texas for legal standing to conduct business in Texas, or the PUC for the Electric Provider number or Electric Billing numbers. Appellee's have used Quit Claim deeds recorded in the Parmer County Clerk's office, the 1836 and/or the 1845 Republic of Texas Constitution does not allow the use of Quit Claim deeds. Appellee's do not have a valid wind lease recorded in the Parmer County Clerk office. This memorandum does not contain the necessary information required by Texas Property Code or The Texas Natural Resource Code for a Wind Lease. Appellee's, do not have any authority to construct any type of Alternate Electric Windmill project using comments about the Competitive Renewable Energy Zone (CREZ). [The Alternate Electric Windmill Energy is not competitive]. The CREZ was for only 3 Windmills. This project was built a number of years ago. All Alternate Electric Windmill Energy is unaffordable and unreasonable and unsafe. The Texas PUC has approved excessive Electric Windmill rates in other proceeding in excessive of $1.35 per KWH. Conventional Electricity can be produced for $.0001 per KWH. Appellee's do not have a Electric Energy Provider number on record in the Public Utility Commission of Texas office. Texas Public Utility Code. Appellee's do not have a Electric Energy Billing number on record in the Public Utility Commission of Texas office. Texas Public Utility Code Appellants Land records are recorded in The General Land office of Texas. Land of Appellants has been sold without permission of Laurance Kriegel or his father (now deceased). Land of Appellant is being built on by Alternate Windmill Energy company's without permission of Appellant. Appellee's and other Company's [SPS and XCEL] and other Alternate Electric Windmill Company's have been notified of the Lands of Laurance Kriegel for several years. Appellee's has not been given permission to be on these lands. Appellee's Alternate Electric Windmill design is flawed and this documentation is recorded in the Public Utility Commission of Texas by Southwestern Public Service. Flawed electric should never be constructed; it is dangerous to the Citizens of Texas, and all types of electric motors. One danger is from the sparks the Electric Windmill will emit. The sparks can be large or small. Appellee's should stop construction of all of there projects over all of Texas. Appellee's are demising the land they are on without permission of the fee simple land owner. Rule 799. Appellee's do not have permission to be on Appellants land. Appellee's have continued to dig holes in this illegal Parmer County Reinvestment Zone for what Appellant construes to be for a large concrete base, since they were notified again during Jan., Appellee's, Parmer County Commissioners

6 are not allowed to be involved in this type of business. See the internet cite for Parmer County Reinvestment zone. Appellee's have failed to plead. Appellee's have not challenged any fact in the proceeding, Rule 419. Appellee's were notified again in Jan., 2014 of there wrongs, over 20 days have elapsed since the notice was received by Appellee's. Appellee's have failed to answer or otherwise serve a copy of a answer in the proceeding. The legal time for pleading or otherwise defending has expired and the default against Appellee's can be entered according to Law. The grounds for the default have been clearly established by LAW and presented to Appellee's. AFFIDAVIT This affidavit is executed by affiant in accordance with Rule 239 of THE TEXAS RULES OF CIVIL PROCEDURE for the purpose of Appellant to obtain an entry of default against Appellee's for their failure to answer or otherwise defend as to Appellant's complaint. Laurance Kriegel REQUESTED RELIEF WHEREFORE, APPELLANT moves this Court make and enter a Default Judgment that instructs Appellee's to; 1] shall stop construction and remove there equipment from the land after the land is restored to the Original condition at their expense. 2] shall take down all Alternate Electric Windmill Towers and Transformers systems and Electric Transmission Lines. Appellee's shall pickup up and remove all bolts, nuts, steel, pieces of steel, wire, small pieces of wire, and all concrete and small chips of concrete from the land. 3] shall plow all roads they created with a chisel plow to the depth of the hard pan created by Appellee's. Appelleee's shall protect a112 inch Natural Gas Lines and larger Mainline natural gas lines. Appellee shall place all Natural Gas Lines back in service at their expense. Appellee shall replace all Natural Gas Meters with meters that read Natural Gas in MCF. ORDERED AND ADJUDGED, that Appellant receive this Default Judgment written if favor of Appellant and all fee simple land owners were Appellee's have entered the land to build the unsafe and flawed Alternate Windmill Electricity without correct legal documentation. Signed this day of, 2014, Clerk 4

7 Entered this _ day of, 2014 Clerk of the Public Utility Commission Respectfully Submitted; v Dated July 21, 2014 p. Q Laurance Kriegel, Pro Se 1202 Hwy 86 Bovina, Texas Copies: The Texas Rules of Civil Procedure for District Court rules require the clerk to send a copy to all involved. This administrative proceeding follows the same rules. Appellant request the clerk send a copy of this document to all involved. CERTIFICATE OF SERVICE I, Appellant, Laurance Kriegel, certify that a true and correct copy of the Motion for Default Judgment and this request for Entry of the Default Judgment has been sent to all of record by U. S. Mail to: SPS 600 Tyler St., Suite 27B01 Amarillo, Texas Public Utility Commission of Texas 1701 N. Congress Avenue P.O. Box Austin, Tx Paul M. Guinn Xcel Energy Services, Inc. 816 Congress Austin, Texas Federal Energy Regulatory Commission Washington, D. C Reference Docket # EL # EL Public Utility Commission of New Mexico The CT Corporation Company P.O. Box North S. Paul Santa Fe, N.M Dallas, Tx FAX Spinning Spur Ranch Wildorado Wind Ranch, LP Wildorado Wind LP 5

8 % Cielo Wind Services, LLC %Edison Mission Group 6798 CO RD Congress Avenue, Suite Von Karman Ave, P.O. Box 55 Austin, Texas Suite 1700 Vega, Tx Irvine, CA Fax Mariah North West, LLC Prinsens Gate Oslo, Norway Fax Attention: Ketil Reed Aasgaard, CEO Scandia Wind Southwest, LLC 201 North Street P.O. Box 783 Bovina, Texas Attention: Jim Swafford Parmer County Commissioners %Trey Ellis P.O. Box 506 Farwell, Texas Respectfully Submitted; Dated Laurance Kriegel, Pro e 6

9 LAURANCE KRIEGEL PRO SE APPELLANT DOCKET NO. PUC V. * PUBLIC UTILITY MARIAH NORTHWEST, LLC * COMMISSION OF TEXAS SCANDIA WIND SOUTHWEST, LLC * SCANDIA JIM SWAFFORD PARMER COUNTY COMMISSIONERS* PARMER COUNTY JUDGE TREY ELLIS * APPELLEE'S DEFAULT JUDGMENT The PUBLIC UTILITY COMMISSION of TEXAS finds that Appellants claims against Appellee's are proven in Appellant's Original Petition, Motion for Replevin, and Motion for Injunctive relief. The Public Utility Commission of Texas finds that Appellee's shall stop construction and remove all there equipment and Alternate Electric Windmills and Alternate Electric Transmission lines. The PUC finds that Appellee's are to remove every piece and crumb of concrete, electric wire, bolt and nut from the property of Appellant. The PUC finds that Appellee's shall close all the holes in the ground to the same condition as the soil was in before the soil was disturbed. All roads created by Appellee in the fields shall be plowed with a chisel plow to the depth of the hard pan created by Appellee's equipment. All natural gas pipelines, mainline and 2 inch, and irrigation pipelines, and gas meters shall be placed back in service where they were disconnected. THEREFORE, IT IS, ORDERED and ADJUDGED that Appellee's carry out these instructions at there expense. Public Utility Clerk Dated

10

BEFORE THE NEW MEXICO PUBLIC REGULATION COMMISSION ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) APPLICATION

BEFORE THE NEW MEXICO PUBLIC REGULATION COMMISSION ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) APPLICATION BEFORE THE NEW MEXICO PUBLIC REGULATION COMMISSION IN THE MATTER OF SOUTHWESTERN PUBLIC SERVICE COMPANY S APPLICATION REQUESTING: (1 ACKNOWLEDGEMENT OF ITS FILING OF THE 2016 ANNUAL RENEWABLE ENERGY PORTFOLIO

More information

BEFORE THE NEW MEXICO PUBLIC REGULATION COMMISSION

BEFORE THE NEW MEXICO PUBLIC REGULATION COMMISSION BEFORE THE NEW MEXICO PUBLIC REGULATION COMMISSION SOUTHWESTERN PUBLIC SERVICE ) COMPANY'S APPLICATION FOR: (1) ) AUTHORIZATION TO FORM A ) SUBSIDIARY; (2) AUTHORIZATION TO ) CONTRIBUTE CERTAIN TRANSMISSION

More information

BEFORE THE NEW MEXICO PUBLIC REGULATION COMMISSION ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) APPLICATION

BEFORE THE NEW MEXICO PUBLIC REGULATION COMMISSION ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) APPLICATION BEFORE THE NEW MEXICO PUBLIC REGULATION COMMISSION IN THE MATTER OF SOUTHWESTERN PUBLIC SERVICE COMPANY S APPLICATION REQUESTING: (1 ACKNOWLEDGEMENT OF ITS FILING OF THE 2017 ANNUAL RENEWABLE ENERGY PORTFOLIO

More information

In The Court of Appeals Fifth District of Texas at Dallas. No CV

In The Court of Appeals Fifth District of Texas at Dallas. No CV Reverse and Remand; Opinion Filed June 12, 2014. S In The Court of Appeals Fifth District of Texas at Dallas No. 05-13-00984-CV FEDERAL NATIONAL MORTGAGE ASSOCIATION, Appellant V. JAMES EPHRIAM AND ALL

More information

SUPERIOR COURT DECISION

SUPERIOR COURT DECISION Basic Steps of a Civil Traffic Appeal Step One Step Two Receipt of Traffic Court Final Order or Judgment and Notice of Right to Appeal Appellant Files a Notice of Appeal Step Three Appellant Pays Record

More information

BEFORE THE NEW MEXICO PUBLIC REGULATION COMMISSION

BEFORE THE NEW MEXICO PUBLIC REGULATION COMMISSION BEFORE THE NEW MEXICO PUBLIC REGULATION COMMISSION IN THE MATTER OF SOUTHWESTERN PUBLIC SERVICE COMPANY S APPLICATION FOR APPROVAL TO RECOVER ITS REGULATORY DISINCENTIVES AND INCENTIVES ASSOCIATED WITH

More information

Court of Appeals of Ohio

Court of Appeals of Ohio [Cite as Capital One Bank (USA), NA v. Gordon, 2013-Ohio-2095.] Court of Appeals of Ohio EIGHTH APPELLATE DISTRICT COUNTY OF CUYAHOGA JOURNAL ENTRY AND OPINION No. 98953 CAPITAL ONE BANK (USA), NA PLAINTIFF-APPELLEE

More information

Court of Appeals. Fifth District of Texas at Dallas

Court of Appeals. Fifth District of Texas at Dallas In The Court of Appeals ACCEPTED 225EFJ016968176 FIFTH COURT OF APPEALS DALLAS, TEXAS 12 July 10 P3:25 Lisa Matz CLERK Fifth District of Texas at Dallas NO. 05-12-00368-CV W.A. MCKINNEY, Appellant V. CITY

More information

UNITED STATES OF AMERICA BERFORE THE FEDERAL ENERGY REGULATORY COMMISSION

UNITED STATES OF AMERICA BERFORE THE FEDERAL ENERGY REGULATORY COMMISSION UNITED STATES OF AMERICA BERFORE THE FEDERAL ENERGY REGULATORY COMMISSION Southwestern Public Service Company, ) v. ) Docket No. EL13-15-000 Southwest Power Pool, Inc. ) ) Southwestern Public Service Company,

More information

BEFORE THE NEW MEXICO PUBLIC REGULATION COMMISSION ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) NOTICE TO SPS CUSTOMERS

BEFORE THE NEW MEXICO PUBLIC REGULATION COMMISSION ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) NOTICE TO SPS CUSTOMERS BEFORE THE NEW MEXICO PUBLIC REGULATION COMMISSION IN THE MATTER OF SOUTHWESTERN PUBLIC SERVICE COMPANY S ENERGY EFFICIENCY COMPLIANCE APPLICATION THAT REQUESTS AUTHORIZATION TO: (1 PER APPROVED VARIANCE,

More information

IN THE COURT OF APPEALS OF THE STATE OF NEW MEXICO. v. NO. 34,412. APPEAL FROM THE DISTRICT COURT OF SANTA FE COUNTY Francis J. Mathew, District Judge

IN THE COURT OF APPEALS OF THE STATE OF NEW MEXICO. v. NO. 34,412. APPEAL FROM THE DISTRICT COURT OF SANTA FE COUNTY Francis J. Mathew, District Judge This memorandum opinion was not selected for publication in the New Mexico Appellate Reports. Please see Rule -0 NMRA for restrictions on the citation of unpublished memorandum opinions. Please also note

More information

D-1-GN NO.

D-1-GN NO. D-1-GN-17-003234 NO. 7/13/2017 3:49 PM Velva L. Price District Clerk Travis County D-1-GN-17-003234 victoria benavides NEXTERA ENERGY, INC., VS. Plaintiff, PUBLIC UTILITY COMMISSION OF TEXAS, Defendant.

More information

ARKANSAS COURT OF APPEALS

ARKANSAS COURT OF APPEALS ARKANSAS COURT OF APPEALS DIVISION III No. CV-13-457 KENT SMITH, D.V.M., Individually and d/b/a PERRY VET SERVICES APPELLANT V. KIMBERLY V. FREEMAN and ARMISTEAD COUNCIL FREEMAN, JR. APPELLEES Opinion

More information

Court of Appeals of Ohio

Court of Appeals of Ohio [Cite as Lakhodar v. Madani, 2008-Ohio-6502.] Court of Appeals of Ohio EIGHTH APPELLATE DISTRICT COUNTY OF CUYAHOGA JOURNAL ENTRY AND OPINION No. 91564 SEBTI LAKHODAR PLAINTIFF-APPELLEE vs. ADAM MADANI

More information

APPELLANT S RESPONSE TO APPELLEE S MOTION FOR REHEARING

APPELLANT S RESPONSE TO APPELLEE S MOTION FOR REHEARING E-Filed Document May 16 2017 15:18:32 2016-IA-00571-SCT Pages: 6 IN THE SUPREME COURT OF MISSISSIPPI FAWAZ ABDRABBO, MD. APPELLANT VS. CIVIL ACTION NO. 2016-IA-00571-SCT AUDRAY (ANDRES) JOHNSON (PRO SE)

More information

SUPREME COURT OF LOUISIANA DOCKET NO CQ DANNY KELLY, Appellant VERSUS. STATE FARM FIRE & CASUALTY COMPANY, Appellee CIVIL ACTION

SUPREME COURT OF LOUISIANA DOCKET NO CQ DANNY KELLY, Appellant VERSUS. STATE FARM FIRE & CASUALTY COMPANY, Appellee CIVIL ACTION SUPREME COURT OF LOUISIANA DOCKET NO. 2014-CQ-1921 DANNY KELLY, Appellant VERSUS STATE FARM FIRE & CASUALTY COMPANY, Appellee _ CIVIL ACTION _ On Certified Questions from the United States Court of Appeals

More information

COURT OF APPEALS TUSCARAWAS COUNTY, OHIO FIFTH APPELLATE DISTRICT

COURT OF APPEALS TUSCARAWAS COUNTY, OHIO FIFTH APPELLATE DISTRICT [Cite as OSI Funding Corp. v. Huth, 2007-Ohio-5292.] COURT OF APPEALS TUSCARAWAS COUNTY, OHIO FIFTH APPELLATE DISTRICT OSI FUNDING CORPORATION Plaintiff-Appellee -vs- MICHELA HUTH Defendant-Appellant JUDGES:

More information

IN THE SUPREME COURT OF THE STATE OF DELAWARE

IN THE SUPREME COURT OF THE STATE OF DELAWARE IN THE SUPREME COURT OF THE STATE OF DELAWARE H. DAVID MANLEY, ) ) No. 390, 2008 Defendant Below, ) Appellant, ) Court Below: Superior Court ) of the State of Delaware in v. ) and for Sussex County ) MAS

More information

IN THE COURT OF APPEALS OF TENNESSEE AT NASHVILLE DECEMBER 2, 2008 Session

IN THE COURT OF APPEALS OF TENNESSEE AT NASHVILLE DECEMBER 2, 2008 Session IN THE COURT OF APPEALS OF TENNESSEE AT NASHVILLE DECEMBER 2, 2008 Session UNIVERSITY PARTNERS DEVELOPMENT v. KENT BLISS, Individually and d/b/a K & T ENTERPRISES Direct Appeal from the Circuit Court for

More information

SUPREME COURT OF ARKANSAS

SUPREME COURT OF ARKANSAS SUPREME COURT OF ARKANSAS No. 09-386 DESOTO GATHERING COMPANY, LLC, APPELLANT, VS. JANICE SMALLWOOD, APPELLEE, Opinion Delivered JANUARY 14, 2010 APPEAL FROM THE WHITE COUNTY CIRCUIT COURT, NO. CV-2008-165,

More information

Southwestern Public Service Company Attachment O SPS Transmission Formula 2017 Projection Material Accounting Changes since January 1, 2016

Southwestern Public Service Company Attachment O SPS Transmission Formula 2017 Projection Material Accounting Changes since January 1, 2016 1 The Company has listed below any material changes that have taken effect since January 1, 2016. For additional information, please refer to the Southwestern Public Service Company FERC Form 1 for Q4

More information

Table of Contents. AT&T Texas. May 24, Informational Notice Change to AT&T Business Local Calling Promotion. Page. I.

Table of Contents. AT&T Texas. May 24, Informational Notice Change to AT&T Business Local Calling Promotion. Page. I. AT&T Texas May 24, 2011 Table of Contents Informational Notice Change to AT&T Business Local Calling Promotion Page I. Cover Letter 2 II. Informational Notice 3 III. Attachment A 4 Affidavit of Notice

More information

COURT OF APPEALS OF OHIO, EIGHTH DISTRICT ACCELERATED DOCKET LARRY FRIDRICH : : JOURNAL ENTRY. For defendant-appellee : :

COURT OF APPEALS OF OHIO, EIGHTH DISTRICT ACCELERATED DOCKET LARRY FRIDRICH : : JOURNAL ENTRY. For defendant-appellee : : [Cite as Fridrich v. Seuffert Constr. Co., Inc., 2006-Ohio-1076.] COURT OF APPEALS OF OHIO, EIGHTH DISTRICT COUNTY OF CUYAHOGA No. 86395 ACCELERATED DOCKET LARRY FRIDRICH JOURNAL ENTRY Plaintiff-appellant

More information

Case 4:11-cv Document 143 Filed in TXSD on 06/25/13 Page 1 of 5

Case 4:11-cv Document 143 Filed in TXSD on 06/25/13 Page 1 of 5 Case 4:11-cv-02830 Document 143 Filed in TXSD on 06/25/13 Page 1 of 5 IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE SOUTHERN DISTRICT OF TEXAS HOUSTON DIVISION SECURITIES AND EXCHANGE COMMISSION, vs. PLAINTIFF,

More information

NOTICE OF CLASS ACTION SETTLEMENT AND FAIRNESS HEARING

NOTICE OF CLASS ACTION SETTLEMENT AND FAIRNESS HEARING IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE NORTHERN DISTRICT OF TEXAS FORT WORTH DIVISION Whitney Main, et al., Plaintiffs, v. American Airlines, Inc., et al., Defendants. Civil Action No.: 4:16-cv-00473-O

More information

0 GT (; 6 z )a 8 CLERK OF COURT SUPREME COURT OF OHIO IN THE SUPREME COURT OF OHIO. John Tarantino. Appellant,. Case No

0 GT (; 6 z )a 8 CLERK OF COURT SUPREME COURT OF OHIO IN THE SUPREME COURT OF OHIO. John Tarantino. Appellant,. Case No IN THE SUPREME COURT OF OHIO John Tarantino Appellant,. Case No. 2008-1741 V. Franklin County Board of Revision, et al. Appeal from the Ohio Board of Tax Appeals Case No. 2006-M-1628 Appellees. APPELLEE

More information

In The Court of Appeals Fifth District of Texas at Dallas. No CV

In The Court of Appeals Fifth District of Texas at Dallas. No CV Reverse and Remand; Opinion Filed October 5, 2015. In The Court of Appeals Fifth District of Texas at Dallas No. 05-14-00855-CV DEUTSCHE BANK, NATIONAL TRUST COMPANY, AS TRUSTEE, IN TRUST FOR THE REGISTERED

More information

IN THE COURT OF APPEALS OF OHIO FOURTH APPELLATE DISTRICT SCIOTO COUNTY BRIEF OF APPELLANT C.D.

IN THE COURT OF APPEALS OF OHIO FOURTH APPELLATE DISTRICT SCIOTO COUNTY BRIEF OF APPELLANT C.D. IN THE COURT OF APPEALS OF OHIO FOURTH APPELLATE DISTRICT SCIOTO COUNTY A.B., Inc., : Case No. Plaintiff-Appellee, : v. : On Appeal from the Scioto County Court of C.D., : Common Pleas, Case No. Defendant-Appellant.

More information

COURT OF APPEALS STARK COUNTY, OHIO FIFTH APPELLATE DISTRICT

COURT OF APPEALS STARK COUNTY, OHIO FIFTH APPELLATE DISTRICT [Cite as Roberts v. Republic Storage Systems Co., 2005-Ohio-1953.] COURT OF APPEALS STARK COUNTY, OHIO FIFTH APPELLATE DISTRICT ROBERT D. ROBERTS -vs- Plaintiff-Appellant REPUBLIC STORAGE SYSTEMS, CO.,

More information

IN THE UNITED STATED BANKRUPTCY COURT FOR THE EASTERN DISTRICT OF TEXAS SHERMAN DIVISION. Civil Action No. 4:11-cv-655

IN THE UNITED STATED BANKRUPTCY COURT FOR THE EASTERN DISTRICT OF TEXAS SHERMAN DIVISION. Civil Action No. 4:11-cv-655 Case 4:11-cv-00655-MHS -ALM Document 50 Filed 02/07/12 Page 1 of 9 PageID #: 1053 IN THE UNITED STATED BANKRUPTCY COURT FOR THE EASTERN DISTRICT OF TEXAS SHERMAN DIVISION SECURITIES AND EXCHANGE COMMISSION

More information

) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) Petitioner Z Financial, LLC, appeals both the trial court s granting of equitable

) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) Petitioner Z Financial, LLC, appeals both the trial court s granting of equitable FOURTH DIVISION April 30, 2009 No. 1-08-1445 In re THE APPLICATION OF THE COUNTY TREASURER AND Ex Officio COUNTY COLLECTOR OF COOK COUNTY ILLINOIS, FOR JUDGMENT AND ORDER OF SALE AGAINST REAL ESTATE RETURNED

More information

Case Survey: May v. Akers-Lang 2012 Ark. 7 UALR Law Review Published Online Only

Case Survey: May v. Akers-Lang 2012 Ark. 7 UALR Law Review Published Online Only THE SUPREME COURT OF ARKANSAS HOLDS THAT AN AD VALOREM TAX ON GAS, OIL, AND MINERALS EXTRACTED FROM PROPERTY IS NOT AN ILLEGAL EXACTION AND DOES NOT VIOLATE EQUAL PROTECTION. In May v. Akers-Lang, 1 Appellants

More information

COURT OF APPEALS SECOND DISTRICT OF TEXAS FORT WORTH

COURT OF APPEALS SECOND DISTRICT OF TEXAS FORT WORTH COURT OF APPEALS SECOND DISTRICT OF TEXAS FORT WORTH NO. 2-08-103-CV EARL C. STOKER, JR. APPELLANT V. CITY OF FORT WORTH, COUNTY OF TARRANT, TARRANT COUNTY REGIONAL WATER DISTRICT, TARRANT COUNTY HOSPITAL

More information

PUC DOCKET NO. I. Business Address and Authorized Representatives The business address of the Company is:

PUC DOCKET NO. I. Business Address and Authorized Representatives The business address of the Company is: PUC DOCKET NO. NON-STANDARD TRUE-UP FILING OF ENTERGY TEXAS, INC. PURSUANT TO THE FINANCING ORDER IN DOCKET NO. 37247 CONCERNING SCHEDULE SRC PUBLIC UTILITY COMMISSION OF TEXAS PETITION Entergy Texas,

More information

Case bjh11 Doc 168 Filed 12/20/18 Entered 12/20/18 12:51:25 Page 1 of 9

Case bjh11 Doc 168 Filed 12/20/18 Entered 12/20/18 12:51:25 Page 1 of 9 Case 18-33967-bjh11 Doc 168 Filed 12/20/18 Entered 12/20/18 12:51:25 Page 1 of 9 Shad Robinson State Bar No. 24013412 HALEY & OLSON, P.C. 100 N. Ritchie Rd., Ste. 200 Waco, Texas 76712 Tel: 254-776-3336

More information

NON-PRECEDENTIAL DECISION - SEE SUPERIOR COURT I.O.P Appellant No WDA 2012

NON-PRECEDENTIAL DECISION - SEE SUPERIOR COURT I.O.P Appellant No WDA 2012 NON-PRECEDENTIAL DECISION - SEE SUPERIOR COURT I.O.P. 65.37 COMMONWEALTH OF PENNSYLVANIA, Appellee IN THE SUPERIOR COURT OF PENNSYLVANIA v. FREDERICK MARKOVITZ, Appellant No. 1969 WDA 2012 Appeal from

More information

Waushara County Circuit Court Rules

Waushara County Circuit Court Rules Waushara County Circuit Court Rules (Sixth Judicial District) Small Claims Rules Facsimile Transmission of Documents to the Court Civil Rule-Mortgage Foreclosure Small Claims Rules I. These rules are made

More information

mg Doc 3836 Filed 05/28/13 Entered 05/28/13 10:24:28 Main Document Pg 1 of 11

mg Doc 3836 Filed 05/28/13 Entered 05/28/13 10:24:28 Main Document Pg 1 of 11 Pg 1 of 11 UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT SOUTHERN DISTRICT OF NEW YORK ----------------------------------------X In re: RESIDENTIAL CAPITAL, LLC, et al. Case No. 12-12020 (MG) Chapter 11 Debtors. ----------------------------------------X

More information

IN THE COMMONWEALTH COURT OF PENNSYLVANIA

IN THE COMMONWEALTH COURT OF PENNSYLVANIA IN THE COMMONWEALTH COURT OF PENNSYLVANIA In Re: Petition of the Venango County : Tax Claim Bureau for Judicial : Sale of Lands Free and Clear : of all Taxes and Municipal Claims, : Mortgages, Liens, Charges

More information

In The Court of Appeals Fifth District of Texas at Dallas. No CV

In The Court of Appeals Fifth District of Texas at Dallas. No CV Dissenting and Opinion Filed February 16, 2016. In The Court of Appeals Fifth District of Texas at Dallas No. 05-14-01312-CV CHAN IL PAK, Appellant V. AD VILLARAI, LLC, THE ASHLEY NICOLE WILLIAMS TRUST,

More information

IN THE UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE ELEVENTH CIRCUIT. No Non-Argument Calendar. D. C. Docket No.

IN THE UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE ELEVENTH CIRCUIT. No Non-Argument Calendar. D. C. Docket No. Case: 13-13134 Date Filed: 02/14/2014 Page: 1 of 7 IN THE UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE ELEVENTH CIRCUIT No. 13-13134 Non-Argument Calendar D. C. Docket No. 1:11-cv-03483-SCJ [DO NOT PUBLISH]

More information

WASHINGTON MUTUAL BANK, Appellee, MAHAFFEY, Appellant. [Cite as Washington Mut. Bank v. Mahaffey, 154 Ohio App.3d 44, 2003-Ohio-4422.

WASHINGTON MUTUAL BANK, Appellee, MAHAFFEY, Appellant. [Cite as Washington Mut. Bank v. Mahaffey, 154 Ohio App.3d 44, 2003-Ohio-4422. [Cite as Washington Mut. Bank v. Mahaffey, 154 Ohio App.3d 44, 2003-Ohio-4422.] WASHINGTON MUTUAL BANK, Appellee, v. MAHAFFEY, Appellant. [Cite as Washington Mut. Bank v. Mahaffey, 154 Ohio App.3d 44,

More information

HIM Control Number: Hill Ill Ill Item Number: 34. Addendum StartPage: 0

HIM Control Number: Hill Ill Ill Item Number: 34. Addendum StartPage: 0 HIM 11111 1111 11 Control Number: 47945 Hill Ill Ill Item Number: 34 Addendum StartPage: 0 f I / r) 260 SiN 24 PN 12: SO PU3t. 11'11,1 T )/ Cf311.1".iSSIL%N FIL NG CL FiOc OPEN MEETING COVER SHEET COMMISSIONER

More information

Case LSS Doc 177 Filed 04/13/15 Page 1 of 3 IN THE UNITED STATES BANKRUPTCY COURT FOR THE DISTRICT OF DELAWARE

Case LSS Doc 177 Filed 04/13/15 Page 1 of 3 IN THE UNITED STATES BANKRUPTCY COURT FOR THE DISTRICT OF DELAWARE Case 15-10585-LSS Doc 177 Filed 04/13/15 Page 1 of 3 IN THE UNITED STATES BANKRUPTCY COURT FOR THE DISTRICT OF DELAWARE In re: Chapter 11 Quicksilver Resources Inc., et al., 1 Case No. 15-10585 (LSS Debtors.

More information

July 15, 2015 VIA ELECTRONIC FILING

July 15, 2015 VIA ELECTRONIC FILING July 15, 2015 VIA ELECTRONIC FILING The Honorable Kimberly D. Bose Secretary Federal Energy Regulatory Commission 888 First Street, N.E. Washington, D.C. 20246 Re: Southwest Power Pool, Inc., Docket No.

More information

In The Court of Appeals Fifth District of Texas at Dallas. No CV. DAVID MILLS, Appellant V. ADVOCARE INTERNATIONAL, LP, Appellee

In The Court of Appeals Fifth District of Texas at Dallas. No CV. DAVID MILLS, Appellant V. ADVOCARE INTERNATIONAL, LP, Appellee Dismissed and Opinion Filed September 10, 2015 S In The Court of Appeals Fifth District of Texas at Dallas No. 05-15-00769-CV DAVID MILLS, Appellant V. ADVOCARE INTERNATIONAL, LP, Appellee On Appeal from

More information

U.S. District Court Western District of Texas (San Antonio) CIVIL DOCKET FOR CASE #: 98-CV-324

U.S. District Court Western District of Texas (San Antonio) CIVIL DOCKET FOR CASE #: 98-CV-324 US District Court Civil Docket as of 12/29/99 Retrieved from the court on Tuesday, April 18, 2006 U.S. District Court Western District of Texas (San Antonio) CIVIL DOCKET FOR CASE #: 98-CV-324 Madison

More information

IN THE COURT OF APPEALS OF OHIO SIXTH APPELLATE DISTRICT ERIE COUNTY

IN THE COURT OF APPEALS OF OHIO SIXTH APPELLATE DISTRICT ERIE COUNTY [Cite as Deutsche Bank Natl. Trust Co. v. Greene, 2011-Ohio-1976.] IN THE COURT OF APPEALS OF OHIO SIXTH APPELLATE DISTRICT ERIE COUNTY Deutsche Bank National Trust Company, Court of Appeals No. E-10-006

More information

Case KJC Doc 1002 Filed 11/23/16 Page 1 of 8 IN THE UNITED STATES BANKRUPTCY COURT FOR THE DISTRICT OF DELAWARE.

Case KJC Doc 1002 Filed 11/23/16 Page 1 of 8 IN THE UNITED STATES BANKRUPTCY COURT FOR THE DISTRICT OF DELAWARE. Case 16-11452-KJC Doc 1002 Filed 11/23/16 Page 1 of 8 IN THE UNITED STATES BANKRUPTCY COURT FOR THE DISTRICT OF DELAWARE In re DRAW ANOTHER CIRCLE, LLC, et al., 1 Debtors. Chapter 11 Case No.: 16-11452

More information

UNITED STATES OF AMERICA BEFORE THE FEDERAL ENERGY REGULATORY COMMISSION

UNITED STATES OF AMERICA BEFORE THE FEDERAL ENERGY REGULATORY COMMISSION UNITED STATES OF AMERICA BEFORE THE FEDERAL ENERGY REGULATORY COMMISSION ) Trunkline Gas Company, LLC ) Docket No. CP12-5-000 Sea Robin Pipeline Company, LLC ) ) ANR Pipeline Company ) Docket No. CP11-543-000

More information

NO CR IN THE FIFTH COURT OF APPEALS OF TEXAS AT DALLAS. STEVEN ROTHACKER, Appellant VS. THE STATE OF TEXAS, Appellee

NO CR IN THE FIFTH COURT OF APPEALS OF TEXAS AT DALLAS. STEVEN ROTHACKER, Appellant VS. THE STATE OF TEXAS, Appellee NO. 05-10-00594-CR IN THE FIFTH COURT OF APPEALS OF TEXAS AT DALLAS STEVEN ROTHACKER, Appellant VS. THE STATE OF TEXAS, Appellee On Appeal from the Rockwall County Court Rockwall County, Texas Honorable

More information

Circuit Court for Frederick County Case No.: 10-C UNREPORTED IN THE COURT OF SPECIAL APPEALS OF MARYLAND. No September Term, 2017

Circuit Court for Frederick County Case No.: 10-C UNREPORTED IN THE COURT OF SPECIAL APPEALS OF MARYLAND. No September Term, 2017 Circuit Court for Frederick County Case No.: 10-C-02-000895 UNREPORTED IN THE COURT OF SPECIAL APPEALS OF MARYLAND No. 1100 September Term, 2017 ALLAN M. PICKETT, et al. v. FREDERICK CITY MARYLAND, et

More information

IN THE COURT OF APPEALS STATE OF ARIZONA DIVISION ONE ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) Defendants-Appellees. Appeal from the Arizona Tax Court

IN THE COURT OF APPEALS STATE OF ARIZONA DIVISION ONE ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) Defendants-Appellees. Appeal from the Arizona Tax Court IN THE COURT OF APPEALS STATE OF ARIZONA DIVISION ONE PARK CENTRAL MALL, LLC, an Arizona limited liability company, v. Plaintiff-Appellant, MARICOPA COUNTY, ARIZONA DEPARTMENT OF REVENUE, Defendants-Appellees.

More information

APPELLEE S UNOPPOSED MOTION FOR EXTENSION OF TIME TO FILE BRIEF

APPELLEE S UNOPPOSED MOTION FOR EXTENSION OF TIME TO FILE BRIEF NO. 04-15-00254-CV ACCEPTED 04-15-00254-CV FOURTH COURT OF APPEALS 6/15/2015 6:04:18 PM KEITH HOTTLE CLERK IN THE COURT OF APPEALS FOURTH JUDICIAL DISTRICT CITY OF SAN ANTONIO AND SAN ANTONIO RIVER AUTHORITY

More information

TAX LITIGATION MEMORANDUM

TAX LITIGATION MEMORANDUM LAW OFFICES DAVID L. SILVERMAN, J.D., LL.M. 2001 MARCUS AVENUE LAKE SUCCESS, NEW YORK 11042 (516) 466-5900 SILVERMAN, DAVID L. TELECOPIER (516) 437-7292 NYTAXATTY@AOL.COM AMINOFF, SHIRLEE AMINOFFS@GMAIL.COM

More information

IN THE COURT OF APPEALS OF OHIO TENTH APPELLATE DISTRICT

IN THE COURT OF APPEALS OF OHIO TENTH APPELLATE DISTRICT [Cite as State v. Felder, 2009-Ohio-6124.] IN THE COURT OF APPEALS OF OHIO TENTH APPELLATE DISTRICT State of Ohio, : No. 09AP-459 Plaintiff-Appellee, : (C.P.C. No. 00CR09-5692) No. 09AP-460 v. : (C.P.C.

More information

IN THE COURT OF APPEALS OF THE STATE OF NEW MEXICO. v. No. 33,864. APPEAL FROM THE DISTRICT COURT OF OTERO COUNTY Angie K. Schneider, District Judge

IN THE COURT OF APPEALS OF THE STATE OF NEW MEXICO. v. No. 33,864. APPEAL FROM THE DISTRICT COURT OF OTERO COUNTY Angie K. Schneider, District Judge This memorandum opinion was not selected for publication in the New Mexico Appellate Reports. Please see Rule 1-0 NMRA for restrictions on the citation of unpublished memorandum opinions. Please also note

More information

The Commuter: Residents v. Non-Residents

The Commuter: Residents v. Non-Residents June 16, 1999 The Commuter: Residents v. Non-Residents By: Glenn Newman The hottest New York tax issue in the last few years has nothing to do with the New York State and City Tax Tribunals or does it?

More information

The plaintiff complaining of defendants, alleges and says: INTRODUCTION

The plaintiff complaining of defendants, alleges and says: INTRODUCTION STATE OF NORTH CAROLINA WAKE COUNTY IN THE GENERAL COURT OF JUSTICE SUPERIOR COURT DIVISION NO. STATE OF NORTH CAROLINA ex rel. ) ROY COOPER, Attorney General, ) ) Plaintiff, ) ) COMPLAINT vs. ) ) D. SCOTT

More information

Pursuant to Rules 211, 213, and 214 of the Rules and Regulations of the Federal

Pursuant to Rules 211, 213, and 214 of the Rules and Regulations of the Federal UNITED STATES OF AMERICA BEFORE THE FEDERAL ENERGY REGULATORY COMMISSION Winding Creek Solar LLC ) ) ) Docket Nos. EL15-52-000 QF13-403-002 JOINT MOTION TO INTERVENE, PROTEST, AND ANSWER OF SOUTHERN CALIFORNIA

More information

Case Document 86 Filed in TXSB on 03/10/15 Page 1 of 5

Case Document 86 Filed in TXSB on 03/10/15 Page 1 of 5 Case 15-31086 Document 86 Filed in TXSB on 03/10/15 Page 1 of 5 IN THE UNITED STATES BANKRUPTCY COURT FOR THE SOUTHERN DISTRICT OF TEXAS HOUSTON DIVISION IN RE: UNIVERSITY GENERAL HEALTH SYSTEM, INC.,

More information

American Electric Power Service Corporation Docket No. ER10- -

American Electric Power Service Corporation Docket No. ER10- - American Electric Power 801 Pennsylvania Avenue N.W. Suite 320 Washington, DC 20004 AEP.com May 3, 2010 Honorable Kimberly D. Bose Secretary Federal Energy Regulatory Commission 888 First Street, N.E.

More information

COMMONWEALTH OF MASSACHUSETTS APPELLATE TAX BOARD. These are appeals filed under the formal procedure

COMMONWEALTH OF MASSACHUSETTS APPELLATE TAX BOARD. These are appeals filed under the formal procedure COMMONWEALTH OF MASSACHUSETTS APPELLATE TAX BOARD MALCOLM HECHT, JR.,TRUST A & B v. COMMISSIONER OF REVENUE ALFRED H. MOSES & ROBERT M. HECHT, TRUSTEES Docket Nos. C270679, C270680 Promulgated: February

More information

TEXAS COURT OF APPEALS, THIRD DISTRICT, AT AUSTIN

TEXAS COURT OF APPEALS, THIRD DISTRICT, AT AUSTIN TEXAS COURT OF APPEALS, THIRD DISTRICT, AT AUSTIN NO. 03-13-00176-CV Anderson Petro-Equipment, Inc. and Curtis Ray Anderson, Appellants v. The State of Texas, Appellee FROM THE DISTRICT COURT OF TRAVIS

More information

NO CV IN THE COURT OF APPEALS FIFTH JUDICIAL DISTRICT OF TEXAS DALLAS, TEXAS

NO CV IN THE COURT OF APPEALS FIFTH JUDICIAL DISTRICT OF TEXAS DALLAS, TEXAS ACCEPTED 225EFJ016538088 FIFTH COURT OF APPEALS DALLAS, TEXAS 11 October 11 P12:36 Lisa Matz CLERK NO. 05-11-01048-CV IN THE COURT OF APPEALS FIFTH JUDICIAL DISTRICT OF TEXAS DALLAS, TEXAS ROSSER B. MELTON,

More information

THE SUPERIOR COURT OF THE STATE OF DELAWARE IN AND FOR NEW CASTLE COUNTY

THE SUPERIOR COURT OF THE STATE OF DELAWARE IN AND FOR NEW CASTLE COUNTY THE SUPERIOR COURT OF THE STATE OF DELAWARE IN AND FOR NEW CASTLE COUNTY INDYMAC BANK, F.S.B., Plaintiff(s, v. C.A. NO. 05L-10-099-FSS PHILLIP A. DYE, REBECCA J. DYE and SOLOWIZ TRUST INTERNATIONAL, Defendant(s.

More information

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT NORTHERN DISTRICT OF ILLINOIS WESTERN DIVISION

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT NORTHERN DISTRICT OF ILLINOIS WESTERN DIVISION UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT NORTHERN DISTRICT OF ILLINOIS WESTERN DIVISION UNITED STATES OF AMERICA, ) ) Plaintiff, ) ) v. ) No. ) HAVE FAITH IN MONEY, A QUARTER ) HORSE AND 310 OTHER QUARTER ) HORSES,

More information

APPEAL FROM THE DISTRICT COURT OF BERNALILLO COUNTY William F. Lang, District Judge

APPEAL FROM THE DISTRICT COURT OF BERNALILLO COUNTY William F. Lang, District Judge Certiorari Denied, May 25, 2011, No. 32,990 IN THE COURT OF APPEALS OF THE STATE OF NEW MEXICO Opinion Number: 2011-NMCA-072 Filing Date: April 1, 2011 Docket No. 29,142 consolidated with No. 29,760 TONY

More information

UNITED STATES OF AMERICA BEFORE THE FEDERAL ENERGY REGULATORY COMMISSION

UNITED STATES OF AMERICA BEFORE THE FEDERAL ENERGY REGULATORY COMMISSION UNITED STATES OF AMERICA BEFORE THE FEDERAL ENERGY REGULATORY COMMISSION AES Huntington Beach, LLC ) Docket No. ER13-351-000 ANSWER OF THE CALIFORNIA INDEPENDENT SYSTEM OPERATOR CORPORATION TO MOTION TO

More information

STATE OF OHIO, COLUMBIANA COUNTY IN THE COURT OF APPEALS SEVENTH DISTRICT

STATE OF OHIO, COLUMBIANA COUNTY IN THE COURT OF APPEALS SEVENTH DISTRICT [Cite as Quick v. Jenkins, 2013-Ohio-4371.] STATE OF OHIO, COLUMBIANA COUNTY IN THE COURT OF APPEALS SEVENTH DISTRICT JANICE LEE QUICK, et al., ) ) CASE NO. 13 CO 4 PLAINTIFFS-APPELLEES, ) ) VS. ) O P

More information

E-FILING UPDATES FOR ALLEN COUNTY

E-FILING UPDATES FOR ALLEN COUNTY LISBETH A. BORGMANN Clerk of the Allen Circuit and Superior Courts Allen County Courthouse 715 S. Calhoun Street Fort Wayne, Indiana 46802 E-FILING UPDATES FOR ALLEN COUNTY October 10, 2017 This document

More information

November 1, 2018 VIA ELECTRONIC CASE FILING

November 1, 2018 VIA ELECTRONIC CASE FILING Clark Hill PLC 212 East Grand River Avenue Lansing, Michigan 48906 Bryan A. Brandenburg T 517.318.3100 T 517.318.3011 F 517.318.3099 F 517.318.3099 Email: bbrandenburg@clarkhill.com clarkhill.com VIA ELECTRONIC

More information

: : The Fee Examiner of General Motors Corporation (n/k/a Motors Liquidation Company)

: : The Fee Examiner of General Motors Corporation (n/k/a Motors Liquidation Company) Timothy F. Nixon GODFREY & KAHN, S.C. 780 North Water Street Milwaukee, Wisconsin 53202 Telephone (414) 273-3500 Facsimile (414) 273-5198 Attorneys for Fee Examiner Presentment Date and Time January 28,

More information

COURT OF APPEALS FAIRFIELD COUNTY, OHIO FIFTH APPELLATE DISTRICT

COURT OF APPEALS FAIRFIELD COUNTY, OHIO FIFTH APPELLATE DISTRICT [Cite as Johnson-Floyd v. REM Ohio, Inc., 2011-Ohio-6542.] COURT OF APPEALS FAIRFIELD COUNTY, OHIO FIFTH APPELLATE DISTRICT RHODA JOHNSON-FLOYD Plaintiff-Appellant -vs- REM OHIO, INC., ET AL. Defendants-Appellees

More information

IN THE SUPREME COURT OF THE STATE OF MISSISSIPPI COURT OF APPEALS OF THE STATE OF MISSISSIPPI WILLIAM M. MILEY, JR.

IN THE SUPREME COURT OF THE STATE OF MISSISSIPPI COURT OF APPEALS OF THE STATE OF MISSISSIPPI WILLIAM M. MILEY, JR. IN THE SUPREME COURT OF THE STATE OF MISSISSIPPI COURT OF APPEALS OF THE STATE OF MISSISSIPPI RITA FAYE MILEY VERSES WILLIAM M. MILEY, JR. APPELLANT CASE NO. 2008-TS-00677 APPELLEE BRIEF OF APPELLEE WILLIAM

More information

COURT OF APPEALS STARK COUNTY, OHIO FIFTH APPELLATE DISTRICT

COURT OF APPEALS STARK COUNTY, OHIO FIFTH APPELLATE DISTRICT [Cite as George v. Miracle Solutions, Inc., 2009-Ohio-3659.] COURT OF APPEALS STARK COUNTY, OHIO FIFTH APPELLATE DISTRICT ANITA LEE GEORGE Plaintiff-Appellant -vs- MIRACLE SOLUTIONS, INC., ET AL Defendants-Appellees

More information

COURT OF APPEALS STARK COUNTY, OHIO FIFTH APPELLATE DISTRICT

COURT OF APPEALS STARK COUNTY, OHIO FIFTH APPELLATE DISTRICT [Cite as State v. DeSantis, 2004-Ohio-4607.] COURT OF APPEALS STARK COUNTY, OHIO FIFTH APPELLATE DISTRICT STATE OF OHIO JUDGES Sheila G. Farmer, P.J. Plaintiff-Appellee John W. Wise, J. Julie A. Edwards,

More information

STANDARD INTERCONNECTION AGREEMENT FOR QUALIFYING FACILITIES (QF) 10 KW OR LESS

STANDARD INTERCONNECTION AGREEMENT FOR QUALIFYING FACILITIES (QF) 10 KW OR LESS STANDARD INTERCONNECTION AGREEMENT FOR QUALIFYING FACILITIES (QF) 10 KW OR LESS (Customer) and Roosevelt County Electric Cooperative, Inc. (Utility), referred to collectively as parties and individually

More information

Fourteenth Court of Appeals

Fourteenth Court of Appeals Affirmed and Opinion filed August 1, 2017. In The Fourteenth Court of Appeals NO. 14-16-00263-CV RON POUNDS, Appellant V. LIBERTY LLOYDS OF TEXAS INSURANCE COMPANY, Appellee On Appeal from the 215th District

More information

Court of Appeals of Ohio

Court of Appeals of Ohio [Cite as Cuyahoga Cty. Treasurer v. Samara, 2014-Ohio-2974.] Court of Appeals of Ohio EIGHTH APPELLATE DISTRICT COUNTY OF CUYAHOGA JOURNAL ENTRY AND OPINION No. 99977 TREASURER OF CUYAHOGA COUNTY, OHIO

More information

NON-PRECEDENTIAL DECISION - SEE SUPERIOR COURT I.O.P

NON-PRECEDENTIAL DECISION - SEE SUPERIOR COURT I.O.P NON-PRECEDENTIAL DECISION - SEE SUPERIOR COURT I.O.P. 65.37 SABR MORTGAGE LOAN 2008-1 SUBSIDIARY-1, LLC, C/O OCWEN LOAN SERVICING, LLC 1661 WORTHINGTON ROAD #100, WEST PALM BEACH, FL 33409 IN THE SUPERIOR

More information

IN THE COURT OF APPEALS OF OHIO FOURTH APPELLATE DISTRICT HOCKING COUNTY. : vs. : Released: June 1, 2006 : APPEARANCES:

IN THE COURT OF APPEALS OF OHIO FOURTH APPELLATE DISTRICT HOCKING COUNTY. : vs. : Released: June 1, 2006 : APPEARANCES: [Cite as State v. Staley, 2006-Ohio-2860.] IN THE COURT OF APPEALS OF OHIO FOURTH APPELLATE DISTRICT HOCKING COUNTY STATE OF OHIO, : : Plaintiff-Appellee, : Case No. 05CA23 : vs. : Released: June 1, 2006

More information

April 28, Southwest Power Pool, Inc., Docket No. ER11- Submission of Formula Rate Template

April 28, Southwest Power Pool, Inc., Docket No. ER11- Submission of Formula Rate Template Secretary Federal Energy Regulatory Commission 888 First Street NE Washington, DC 20426 Re: Southwest Power Pool, Inc., Docket No. ER11- Submission of Formula Rate Template Honorable Secretary Bose: Pursuant

More information

ANGELO BARRERA CASE NO.: CVA LOWER COURT CASE NO.:

ANGELO BARRERA CASE NO.: CVA LOWER COURT CASE NO.: IN THE CIRCUIT COURT OF THE NINTH JUDICIAL CIRCUIT, IN AND FOR ORANGE COUNTY, FLORIDA ANGELO BARRERA Appellant, CASE NO.: CVA1 07-02 LOWER COURT CASE NO.: 2006-TR-191094-O v. STATE OF FLORIDA Appellee.

More information

IN THE UNITED STATES BANKRUPTCY COURT SOUTHERN DISTRICT OF TEXAS HOUSTON DIVISION IN RE: Garden Oaks Maintenance Org., Inc, CASE NO.

IN THE UNITED STATES BANKRUPTCY COURT SOUTHERN DISTRICT OF TEXAS HOUSTON DIVISION IN RE: Garden Oaks Maintenance Org., Inc, CASE NO. Case 18-60018 Document 20 Filed in TXSB on 05/17/18 Page 1 of 5 IN THE UNITED STATES BANKRUPTCY COURT SOUTHERN DISTRICT OF TEXAS HOUSTON DIVISION IN RE: Garden Oaks Maintenance Org., Inc, CASE NO. 18-60018-H2-11

More information

In The Court of Appeals Fifth District of Texas at Dallas. No CR. DAVID CARL SWINGLE, Appellant V. THE STATE OF TEXAS, Appellee

In The Court of Appeals Fifth District of Texas at Dallas. No CR. DAVID CARL SWINGLE, Appellant V. THE STATE OF TEXAS, Appellee AFFIRM; and Opinion Filed February 27, 2014. S In The Court of Appeals Fifth District of Texas at Dallas No. 05-13-00430-CR DAVID CARL SWINGLE, Appellant V. THE STATE OF TEXAS, Appellee On Appeal from

More information

201 North Washington Square Suite 910 Lansing, Michigan Timothy J. Lundgren Direct: 616 /

201 North Washington Square Suite 910 Lansing, Michigan Timothy J. Lundgren Direct: 616 / 201 North Washington Square Suite 910 Lansing, Michigan 48933 Telephone 517 / 482-6237 Fax 517 / 482-6937 www.varnumlaw.com Timothy J. Lundgren Direct: 616 / 336-6750 tjlundgren@varnumlaw.com January 19,

More information

IN THE COURT OF APPEAL FIRST DISTRICT, STATE OF FLORIDA

IN THE COURT OF APPEAL FIRST DISTRICT, STATE OF FLORIDA IN THE COURT OF APPEAL FIRST DISTRICT, STATE OF FLORIDA RECEIVED, 12/6/2016 2:17 PM, Jon S. Wheeler, First District Court of Appeal FLORIDA OFFICE OF INSURANCE REGULATION, and DAVID ALTMAIER, Solely in

More information

Appeal No CV IN THE COURT OF APPEALS FIFTH JUDICIAL DISTRICT DALLAS, TEXAS. DEAN A. SMITH SALES, INC. DBA THE DEAN GROUP, Appellant

Appeal No CV IN THE COURT OF APPEALS FIFTH JUDICIAL DISTRICT DALLAS, TEXAS. DEAN A. SMITH SALES, INC. DBA THE DEAN GROUP, Appellant Appeal No. 05-11-01449-CV ACCEPTED 225EFJ016691771 FIFTH COURT OF APPEALS DALLAS, TEXAS 12 January 24 A12:33 Lisa Matz CLERK IN THE COURT OF APPEALS FIFTH JUDICIAL DISTRICT DALLAS, TEXAS DEAN A. SMITH

More information

Case: 1:10-cv Document #: 56 Filed: 12/06/10 Page 1 of 9 PageID #:261

Case: 1:10-cv Document #: 56 Filed: 12/06/10 Page 1 of 9 PageID #:261 Case: 1:10-cv-00573 Document #: 56 Filed: 12/06/10 Page 1 of 9 PageID #:261 IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE NORTHERN DISTRICT OF ILLINOIS EASTERN DIVISION VICTOR GULLEY, ) ) Plaintiff, ) )

More information

COURT OF APPEALS THIRTEENTH DISTRICT OF TEXAS CORPUS CHRISTI - EDINBURG NUMBER CV NUMBER CV MEMORANDUM OPINION

COURT OF APPEALS THIRTEENTH DISTRICT OF TEXAS CORPUS CHRISTI - EDINBURG NUMBER CV NUMBER CV MEMORANDUM OPINION COURT OF APPEALS THIRTEENTH DISTRICT OF TEXAS CORPUS CHRISTI - EDINBURG NUMBER 13-11-00243-CV IN THE INTEREST OF C.L.H., MINOR CHILD NUMBER 13-11-00244-CV IN THE INTEREST OF D.A.L. AND M.L., MINOR CHILDREN

More information

IN THE SUPREME COURT OF THE STATE OF MISSISSIPPI NO CA-00062

IN THE SUPREME COURT OF THE STATE OF MISSISSIPPI NO CA-00062 E-Filed Document Jun 8 2016 17:38:15 2016-CA-00062 Pages: 24 IN THE SUPREME COURT OF THE STATE OF MISSISSIPPI NO. 2016-CA-00062 GULFPORT PARTNERS V, L.P.; GULFPORT PARTNERS VI, L.P.; GULFPORT PARTNERS

More information

IN THE COURT OF APPEALS OF OHIO SIXTH APPELLATE DISTRICT ERIE COUNTY. Trial Court No. CVI Appellant Decided: April 23, 2010 * * * * *

IN THE COURT OF APPEALS OF OHIO SIXTH APPELLATE DISTRICT ERIE COUNTY. Trial Court No. CVI Appellant Decided: April 23, 2010 * * * * * [Cite as Jackson v. Big O's Ltd., 2010-Ohio-1779.] IN THE COURT OF APPEALS OF OHIO SIXTH APPELLATE DISTRICT ERIE COUNTY Clint Jackson dba Marvalous Eastwoodtainment Appellee Court of Appeals No. E-09-043

More information

No CV. In the Fifth Court of Appeals Dallas, Texas

No CV. In the Fifth Court of Appeals Dallas, Texas No. 05-15-01559-CV ACCEPTED 05-15-01559-CV FIFTH COURT OF APPEALS DALLAS, TEXAS 8/4/2017 4:19 PM LISA MATZ CLERK In the Fifth Court of Appeals Dallas, Texas DAWN NETTLES, Appellant, v. GTECH CORPORATION

More information

DOCKET NO. AP ) ) ) ) ORDER ) ) ) ) ) This case arises out of a Forcible Entry and Detainer Action that Appellee Rowell, LLC

DOCKET NO. AP ) ) ) ) ORDER ) ) ) ) ) This case arises out of a Forcible Entry and Detainer Action that Appellee Rowell, LLC STATE OF MAINE YORK, ss. ROWELL,LLC Appellee, v. 11 TOWN,LLC Appellant. ORDER SUPERIOR COURT DOCKET NO. AP-16-0032 I. Background A. Procedural History This case arises out of a Forcible Entry and Detainer

More information

APPEAL FROM THE CIRCUIT COURT OF HARRISON COUNTY, MISSISSIPPI, FIRST JUDICIAL DISTRICT, CAUSE NO.: A

APPEAL FROM THE CIRCUIT COURT OF HARRISON COUNTY, MISSISSIPPI, FIRST JUDICIAL DISTRICT, CAUSE NO.: A IN THE SUPREME COURT OF MISSISSIPPI COURT OF APPEALS OF THE STATE OF MISSISSIPPI NO. 2009-CA-Ol723 BERTHA MADISON APPELLANT VERSUS GEICO GENERAL INSURANCE COMPANY APPELLEE APPEAL FROM THE CIRCUIT COURT

More information

Administrative Order

Administrative Order Administrative Order 2010-3 [As amended May 22, 2013] E-filing Pilot Project in Oakland Circuit Court, Family Division On order of the Court, the Sixth Judicial Circuit Court, in consultation with the

More information

[Cite as Leisure v. State Farm Mut. Auto. Ins. Co., 2001-Ohio ] : : : : : : : : : :

[Cite as Leisure v. State Farm Mut. Auto. Ins. Co., 2001-Ohio ] : : : : : : : : : : [Cite as Leisure v. State Farm Mut. Auto. Ins. Co., 2001-Ohio- 1818.] COURT OF APPEALS STARK COUNTY, OHIO FIFTH APPELLATE DISTRICT ANNETTE LEISURE, ET AL. -vs- Plaintiffs-Appellees STATE FARM MUTUAL AUTOMOBILE

More information

ARBITRATION ACT. May 29, 2016>

ARBITRATION ACT. May 29, 2016> ARBITRATION ACT Wholly Amended by Act No. 6083, Dec. 31, 1999 Amended by Act No. 6465, Apr. 7, 2001 Act No. 6626, Jan. 26, 2002 Act No. 10207, Mar. 31, 2010 Act No. 11690, Mar. 23, 2013 Act No. 14176,

More information

Texas Delinquent Tax Case Law Review 2017 (Cases current through September 1, 2017)

Texas Delinquent Tax Case Law Review 2017 (Cases current through September 1, 2017) Texas Delinquent Tax Case Law Review 2017 (Cases current through September 1, 2017) City of Austin v. Travis Cent. Appraisal Dist., 506 S.W.3d 607 (Tex. App. Austin 2016, no pet.) TAKEAWAY: A taxing unit

More information