IN THE COURT OF APPEAL OF TANZANIA AT TANGA CIVIL APPEAL NO. 127 OF 2005 VERSUS 1. JUMANNE D. MASANGWA 2. AMOS A. MWALWANDA.

Size: px
Start display at page:

Download "IN THE COURT OF APPEAL OF TANZANIA AT TANGA CIVIL APPEAL NO. 127 OF 2005 VERSUS 1. JUMANNE D. MASANGWA 2. AMOS A. MWALWANDA."

Transcription

1 1 Citation Parties Legal Principles Discussed CIVIL APPEAL NO. 127 OF COURT OF APPEAL OF TANZANIA AT TANGA- MAKAME, J.A., MUNUO, J. A., AND KAJI, J. A. THE MANAGING DIRECTOR, TANGA CEMENT COMPANY LIMITED Vs. 1. JUMANNE D. MASANGWA, 2. AMOS A. MWALWANDA (Appeal from a judgment of the High Court of Tanzania at Tanga- Civil Appeal No. 4 of M. H. C. S. Longway J.) Exercise of employer s legal option not to reinstate employment services- Whether the respondents are entitled to be paid arrears of wages and fringe benefits for the period they were out of work, that is, from when their employment was purportedly terminated by the appellant until when the Board ordered their reinstatement- A correct answer can be found in sections 40 A (4) (a), Section 40 A (5) (a) (b) and 36 of the Employment Act. Where the Board or Minister orders re instatement of an employee and the employer complies, then on re instatement the employee will be entitled to the payment of wages, severance allowance and other retiring benefits from the date of the termination of the employee s employment or dismissal, as the case may be. But the employer may deduct the said wages in respect of the period which the employee was out of work. IN THE COURT OF APPEAL OF TANZANIA AT TANGA (CORAM: MAKAME, J.A., MUNUO, J. A., AND KAJI, J. A.) CIVIL APPEAL NO. 127 OF 2005 THE MANAGING DIRECTOR, TANGA CEMENT COMPANY LIMITED.. APPELLANT VERSUS 1. JUMANNE D. MASANGWA 2. AMOS A. MWALWANDA. RESPONDENTS (Appeal from a judgment of the High Court of Tanzania at Tanga)

2 2 (M. H. C. S. Longway J.) Dated the 5 th day of September, in Civil Appeal No. 4 of 2001 JUDGMENT OF THE COURT 5 July, 2006 & 21 st September,2007 KAJI, J. A.: In this appeal, the appellant, the Managing Director, Tanga Cement Company Limited, is appealing against the decision of the High Court at Tanga (Longway J.) dated 5 th September, 2001 in Civil Appeal No. 4 of 2001, whereby the appellant was ordered to reinstate and pay the respondents Jumanne D. Masangwa and Amos A. Mwalwanda shs. 7, 087, 482= being arrears of wages and fringe benefits for the period they were out of work. The respondents were employed by the appellant. On 10/10/1999 their services were terminated by the appellant. They were aggrieved. They successfully appealed to the Tanga Labour Conciliatory Board (The Board) on 26/05/2000. The Board ordered reinstatement with effect from 11/10/1999. The appellant refused to reinstate them and opted to pay them 12 months salaries, statutory

3 3 compensation equivalent to severance allowance, house allowance for the notice period, repatriation costs/ allowance, 7 days salary in lieu of leave for the period 1/7/1999 to 11/10/1999, one month salary in lieu of notice plus 11 days salary for the month of October 1999 (ANN AFI). The respondents were not satisfied. Apart from the above payments they wanted to be re instated in their jobs as ordered by the Board and to be paid arrears of wages and fringe benefits for the period they were under termination. The appellant was not ready to do so. The respondents filed an application in the District Court of Tanga under Sections 27 (1) and 25 (1) (a) of the Security of Employment Act, Cap 574 and prayed for the following reliefs:- 1. An order to compel the appellant to pay the respondents shs 7,087,482=, or to issue an execution order by attachment and sale of a motor vehicle Registration No. TZM 4714 the property of the appellant for the amount claimed. 2. Costs of the application. 3. Any other order(s) the court could deem fit, fair and equitable to make.

4 4 The appellant resisted the application on the ground that he exercised his legal option not to reinstate the respondents and instead duly paid them statutory compensation and a sum equal to 12 months wages in addition to other terminal benefits stated above. The trial court agreed with the appellant and dismissed the application with costs. The respondents were dissatisfied with the decision. They successfully appealed to the High Court at Tanga. The High Court, Longway J, held the view that, since the Board had ordered reinstatement, the appellant had to reinstate the respondents and pay them all arrears of wages/ salary from 11/10/1999 up to actual reinstatement. Each party was ordered to bear their own costs of the appeal and of the court below. The appellant was aggrieved; hence this second appeal. Before us the appellant was represented by Mr. A. J. Akaro, learned counsel who had preferred the following grounds of appeal. 1. That the learned High Court judge erred in law by ordering reinstatement of the respondents whereas the respondents did not apply for such relief in the District Court

5 5 nor did they seek to enforce such order in the said court. 2. That the learned High Court judge erred in law in ordering reinstatement of the respondents whereas the facts of the case clearly indicate that the appellant was unwilling to continue engaging the services of the respondents. 3. That the learned High Court Judge erred in law by declining to hold that the respondents having been paid statutory compensation and a sum equal to 12 months wages in accordance with the provisions of section 40 A (5) (a) of the Security of Employment Act the appellant had an option not to pay the respondents wages for the number of days that they did not work for the appellant while awaiting the decision of the Conciliatory Board.

6 6 The learned counsel elaborated on these grounds at length in his oral submission. The respondents who were not represented by an advocate, fended for themselves. They pointed out that, the option whether to be reinstated or to be paid 12 months wages and statutory compensation was upon them and not on the appellants. They further contended that, on their part, after the Board had ordered their reinstatement, they were ready and willing to be reinstated, even up to now. They pointed out that, the Board s order meant that they had been in service all the time from 11/10/1999 and that they deserved to be paid salaries and fringe benefits for all that period, the very amount they claimed in their chamber summons in the trial court. They complained bitterly that, by refusing to reinstate them, the appellant had denied them, their constitutional right to work. The respondents observed that, since the Board s decision has not been reversed by any competent authority, it is still in force and they are deemed to be in continuous employment to date. In a brief rejoinder Mr. Akaro insisted that, after paying the respondent 12 months wages and statutory compensation and other

7 7 payments as stated above, the appellant discharged his burden under Section 40 A (5) (a) (b) of the Employment Act and, there is no justification for paying the respondents wages and other fringe benefits for the period they were out of work. On our part, we think, the crucial issue in this case is whether the respondents are entitled to be paid arrears of wages and fringe benefits for the period they were out of work, that is, from 11/10/1999 when their employment was purportedly terminated by the appellant until on 26/5/2000 when the Board ordered their reinstatement. We think, a correct answer can be found in sections 40 A (4) (a), Section 40 A (5) (a) (b) and 36 of the Act. Section 40 A (4) (a) provides: 40 A (4): Where in the exercise of its powers under this section a Board or the Minister orders:- (a) re instatement of an employee, the employer shall re instate the employee in his former employment, and such re instatement shall have effect for the purpose of the payment of wages, entitlement to severance

8 8 allowance and other retiring benefits, and otherwise in relation to any benefits of the employment, from the date of the termination or his summary dismissal, as the case may be, but the employer may deduct from any wages due on or after re instatement, the wages in respect of the number of days during which the employee remained absent from work during (and including) the day on which the termination or the dismissal took effect and the day on which the re instatement is ordered by the Board or, inthe case of a further reference to the Minister, the day on which re in statement in confirmed or ordered by the Minister (emphasis provided). Our understanding of this provision is that, where the Board or Minister orders re instatement of an employee and the employer complies, then on re instatement the employee will be entitled to the payment of wages, severance allowance and other retiring benefits

9 9 from the date of the termination of the employee s employment or dismissal, as the case may be. But the employer may deduct the said wages in respect of the period which the employee was out of work. As demonstrated above, this applies only where the employer has complied with the re instatement order. In the instant case the appellant failed or refused to comply with the re instatement order. In such case what is the position? This brings us to Section 40 A (5) which provides:- 40 A (5): Where a re instatement or re engagement has been ordered under this section and the employer refuses or fails to comply with the order (a) in the case of an order made by a Board against which no reference has been made to the Minister, within twenty eight days of the order being made; or (b) in case of the order made by the Minister on a further reference to him, within fourteen days of the order being made by the Minister, the employer shall be liable to pay the

10 10 employee compensation of an amount equal to the aggregate of (i) the statutory compensation computed in accordance with section 36; and (ii) a sum equal to twelve months wages at the rate of wages to which the employee was entitled immediately before the termination of his employment, or as the case may be, his dismissal, and such compensation shall be recoverable in the same manner as statutory compensation, the payment of which has been ordered under section 40. Section 36 provides in part as follows:- 36: The statutory compensation shall be (a) Such some of money as shall be equal to the severance allowance due and payable to the employee on the termination of his employment; or (b) The sum of five hundred shillings, whichever is greater.

11 11 Computation of severance allowance due and payable is provided by Section 5 of the Severance Allowance Act, However for the purpose of the case at hand we do not think we need to go into the details therein, suffice it to say that severance allowance does not include arrears of wages for the period an employee is absent from work. See the case of Pius Sangali & Others V Tanzania Portland Cement Company Limited, Civil Appeal No. 100 of 2001 (Unreported). With all these in clear light, we are of the firm view that, the learned judge on first appeal erred when she ordered the payment of arrears of wages and fringe benefits for the period the respondents were not at work, that is, from 11/10/1999 to 26/5/2000. The respondents are only entitled to what is provided under section 40 A (5). With regard to the respondents complaint that by refusing to re instate them the appellant has denied them their constitutional right to work, we can only say that, this right, by its very nature, cannot be absolute. It is subject to many factors which include availability of work suitable to the person involved. It does not mean that one can simply walk into an office, factory or worksite and force

12 12 to be given work under the pretext of Article 22 of the Constitution as was remarked by the Court in the Case of Timoth Kaare V Mara Co operative Union (1984) Limited, Civil Appeal No. 42 of 1992 (Unreported). In the end result, and for the reasons stated above, we allow the appeal, quash the order of the court on first appeal which ordered the appellant to re instate and pay the respondents arrears of wages and fringe benefits for the period they were out of work.; and hold that the respondents are only entitled to what is provided under Section 40 A (5). Due to the circumstances of the case where the respondents have been out of work for almost ten years, we direct that each party is to bear his own costs. DATED at DAR ES SALAAM this 21 st day of September, L. M. MAKAME JUSTICE OF APPEAL E. N. MUNUO

13 13 JUSTICE OF APPEAL S. N. KAJI JUSTICE OF APPEAL I certify that this is a true copy of the original. S. M. RUMANYIKA DEPUTY REGISRTRAR Delivered in Court /Chambers under my hand and Court seal this... day of......

(CORAM: MSOFFE, J. A., KILEO, J. A. And KALEGEYA, J.A.) DAVID KAPOMA APPELLANT VERSUS THE GENERAL MANAGER TANGA CEMENT COMPANY LTD RESPONDENT

(CORAM: MSOFFE, J. A., KILEO, J. A. And KALEGEYA, J.A.) DAVID KAPOMA APPELLANT VERSUS THE GENERAL MANAGER TANGA CEMENT COMPANY LTD RESPONDENT IN THE COURT OF APPEAL OF TANZANIA AT TANGA (CORAM: MSOFFE, J. A., KILEO, J. A. And KALEGEYA, J.A.) CIVIL APPEAL NO. 19 OF 2006 DAVID KAPOMA APPELLANT VERSUS THE GENERAL MANAGER TANGA CEMENT COMPANY LTD

More information

IN THE COURT OF APPEAL OF TANZANIA AT DAR ES SALAAM (CORAM: MUNUO, J.A. MSOFFE, J.A. AND KILEO, J.A.) CIVIL APPEAL NO. 55 OF 2003

IN THE COURT OF APPEAL OF TANZANIA AT DAR ES SALAAM (CORAM: MUNUO, J.A. MSOFFE, J.A. AND KILEO, J.A.) CIVIL APPEAL NO. 55 OF 2003 Citation Parties Legal Principles Discussed CIVIL APPEAL LEILA No.55/2003 - Munuo J.A - Msoffe, J.A - Kileo, J.A JALALUDIN HAJI JAMAL Vs. SHAFKIN JALALUDIN HAJI JAMALI Appeal from a ruling of the High

More information

IN THE COURT OF APPEAL OF TANZANIA AT DODOMA. (CORAM: MUNUO, J.A., KAJI, J.A. And KIMARO, J.A.) CRIMINAL APPEAL NO. 215 OF 2004

IN THE COURT OF APPEAL OF TANZANIA AT DODOMA. (CORAM: MUNUO, J.A., KAJI, J.A. And KIMARO, J.A.) CRIMINAL APPEAL NO. 215 OF 2004 Citation Parties Legal Principles Discussed JULIUS NDAHANI Vs. THE REPUBLIC-(Appeal from the judgment of the Resident Magistrate s Court E/J at Dodoma- Criminal Appeal No 25 of 2004-S.N. MAFURU,SRM E/J)

More information

IN THE HIGH COURT OF TANZANIA AT DAR ES SALAAM. CIVIL APPEAL NO.19 OF 2004 (Appeal from Kisutu Court Employment Case No.

IN THE HIGH COURT OF TANZANIA AT DAR ES SALAAM. CIVIL APPEAL NO.19 OF 2004 (Appeal from Kisutu Court Employment Case No. IN THE HIGH COURT OF TANZANIA AT DAR ES SALAAM CIVIL APPEAL NO.19 OF 2004 (Appeal from Kisutu Court Employment Case No.24 of 2002) SECURITY GROUP (T) LTD APPELLANT VERSUS 1. KURWAJOSEPH) 2. SALUM KITUA

More information

IN THE HIGH COURT OF TANZANIA AT DAR ES SALAAM VERSUS

IN THE HIGH COURT OF TANZANIA AT DAR ES SALAAM VERSUS IN THE HIGH COURT OF TANZANIA AT DAR ES SALAAM RASHIDI SELUHOMBO VERSUS RESPONDENT. Date of last Order 14/08/2007 Date of Judgment 23/10/2007 The respondent RASHID SELUHOMBO sued the appellant JUHUDI Y.

More information

IN THE COURT OF APPEAL OF TANZANIA AT DODOMA. (CORAM: MUNUO, J.A., KAJI, J. A., And KIMARO, J. A.) CRIMINAL APPEAL NO.130 OF 2006

IN THE COURT OF APPEAL OF TANZANIA AT DODOMA. (CORAM: MUNUO, J.A., KAJI, J. A., And KIMARO, J. A.) CRIMINAL APPEAL NO.130 OF 2006 Citation Parties Legal Principles Discussed BAKARI OMARI@ The evidence which the trial LUPANDE Vs. THE court thought linked the REPUBLIC- (Appeal from appellant with the the judgment of the commission

More information

IN THE COURT OF APPEAL OF TANZANIA AT DAR ES SALAAM (CORAM: KIMARO,J.A. MBAROUK, J. A. and MSAJIRI, J.A) CIVIL APPEAL NO.

IN THE COURT OF APPEAL OF TANZANIA AT DAR ES SALAAM (CORAM: KIMARO,J.A. MBAROUK, J. A. and MSAJIRI, J.A) CIVIL APPEAL NO. IN THE COURT OF APPEAL OF TANZANIA AT DAR ES SALAAM (CORAM: KIMARO,J.A. MBAROUK, J. A. and MSAJIRI, J.A) CIVIL APPEAL NO. 86 OF 2008 SAMSON NGW ALIDA APPELLANT VERSUS THE COMMISSIONER GENERAL TANZANIA

More information

JUDGMENT OF THE COURT

JUDGMENT OF THE COURT IN THE COURT OF APPEAL OF TANZANIA AT ZANZIBAR CIVIL APPEAL NO. 27 OF 2013 (CORAM: MBAROUK, J.A., LUANDA, AND J.A. And JUMA, J.A.) HOTELS AND LODGES (T) LIMITED..... APPELLANT VERSUS 1. THE ATTORNEY GENERAL

More information

The appellant, Tanzania Ports Authority, is challenging the. decision of the Tax Revenue Tribunal in VAT Appeal No. 14 of

The appellant, Tanzania Ports Authority, is challenging the. decision of the Tax Revenue Tribunal in VAT Appeal No. 14 of 1 IN THE COURT OF APPEAL OF TANZANIA AT DAR ES SALAAM (CORAM: LUBUVA, J.A., MROSO, J.A. AND MUNUO, J.A.) CIVIL APPEAL NO. 27 OF 2008 TANZANIA PORTS AUTHORITY..APPELLANT VERSUS COMMISSIONER GENERAL (TRA)...RESPONDET

More information

ludgment OF THE COURT The appellant, School of st. Jude Limited has appealed against the

ludgment OF THE COURT The appellant, School of st. Jude Limited has appealed against the IN THE COURT OF APPEAL OF TANZANIA AT DODOMA (CORAM: luma, Cl., MWARIJA, l.a., And MZIRAY, l.a.) CIVIL APPEAL NO. 21 OF 2018 THE SCHOOL OF ST.lUDE LIMITED..................... APPELLANT VERSUS THE COMMISSIONER

More information

An Act to amend certain Labour Laws

An Act to amend certain Labour Laws THE UNITED REPUBLIC OF TANZANIA No. 1 OF 1975 J I ASSENT, An Act to amend certain Labour Laws ENACTED by the Parliament of the United Republic of Tanzania. [4TH APRIL, 1975] 1. This Act may be cited as

More information

IN THE HIGH COURT OF TANZANIA AT DAR ES SALAAM. (From the decision of the RM's Court at Kisutu before Msongo, RM) JUDGMENT

IN THE HIGH COURT OF TANZANIA AT DAR ES SALAAM. (From the decision of the RM's Court at Kisutu before Msongo, RM) JUDGMENT 1 IN THE HIGH COURT OF TANZANIA AT DAR ES SALAAM EMMANUEL P. KYAUKA RESPONDENT (From the decision of the RM's Court at Kisutu before Msongo, RM) Date of last order - 12/9/2007 Date of Judgment - 18/10/2007

More information

IN THE FAIR COMPETITION TRIBUNAL AT DAR ES SALAAM BEFORE HON. R.SHEIKH, J/CHAIRMAN DR. M.M.P. BUNDARA, MEMBER MR. F.

IN THE FAIR COMPETITION TRIBUNAL AT DAR ES SALAAM BEFORE HON. R.SHEIKH, J/CHAIRMAN DR. M.M.P. BUNDARA, MEMBER MR. F. IN THE FAIR COMPETITION TRIBUNAL AT DAR ES SALAAM BEFORE HON. R.SHEIKH, J/CHAIRMAN DR. M.M.P. BUNDARA, MEMBER MR. F. KIBODYA, MEMBER TRIBUNAL APPEAL NO. 6 OF 2011 SHAYAAN FILLING STATION APPELLANT VERSUS

More information

AT DAR ES SALAAM. CIVIL APPEAL NO. 45 OF 2006 (Original Morogoro District Court's Labour Case No. 23 of Mzonge, SDM) JUDGMENT

AT DAR ES SALAAM. CIVIL APPEAL NO. 45 OF 2006 (Original Morogoro District Court's Labour Case No. 23 of Mzonge, SDM) JUDGMENT AT DAR ES SALAAM CIVIL APPEAL NO. 45 OF 2006 (Original Morogoro District Court's Labour Case No. 23 of 2005 - Mzonge, SDM) Date of last order - 15/2/2008 Date of Judgment 21/2/2008 Shangwa, J. JUDGMENT

More information

IN THE PUBLIC PROCUREMENT APPEALS AUTHORITY AT DAR ES SALAAM APPEAL CASE NO. 20 OF BETWEEN M/S HUMPHREY CONSTRUCTION LTD..

IN THE PUBLIC PROCUREMENT APPEALS AUTHORITY AT DAR ES SALAAM APPEAL CASE NO. 20 OF BETWEEN M/S HUMPHREY CONSTRUCTION LTD.. IN THE PUBLIC PROCUREMENT APPEALS AUTHORITY AT DAR ES SALAAM APPEAL CASE NO. 20 OF 2017-18 BETWEEN M/S HUMPHREY CONSTRUCTION LTD..APPELLANT AND PUBLIC PROCUREMENT REGULATORY AUTHORITY (PPRA)..RESPONDENT

More information

IN THE COURT OF APPEAL OF TANZANIA AT MWANZA CIVIL APPEAL NO. 126 OF 2011

IN THE COURT OF APPEAL OF TANZANIA AT MWANZA CIVIL APPEAL NO. 126 OF 2011 IN THE COURT OF APPEAL OF TANZANIA AT MWANZA (CORAM: RUTAKANGWA, J.A., KILEO, J.A., And ORIYO, J.A.) CIVIL APPEAL NO. 126 OF 2011 BETWEEN TANZANIA REVENUE AUTHORITY APPELLANT AND DAWSON ISHENGOMA.... RESPONDENT

More information

CRIMINAL APPEAL NO. 227 OF COURT OF APPEAL OF TANZANIA AT ARUSHA- MROSO, J.A., KAJI, J.A. And RUTAKANGWA, J.A.

CRIMINAL APPEAL NO. 227 OF COURT OF APPEAL OF TANZANIA AT ARUSHA- MROSO, J.A., KAJI, J.A. And RUTAKANGWA, J.A. CRIMINAL APPEAL NO. 227 OF 2005- COURT OF APPEAL OF TANZANIA AT ARUSHA- MROSO, J.A., KAJI, J.A. And RUTAKANGWA, J.A. JOAKIM ANTHONY MASSAWE Vs. REPUBLIC (Appeal from the Judgment of the High Court of Tanzania

More information

IN THE HIGH COURT OF TANZANIA AT DAR ES SALAAM

IN THE HIGH COURT OF TANZANIA AT DAR ES SALAAM IN THE HIGH COURT OF TANZANIA AT DAR ES SALAAM CIVIL APPEAL NO.130 OF 2003 (Appeal from original Civil Case No.34 of 2001 Temeke District court Dar es Salaam judgment of J.N. NZOTA- DM, dated 23 rd April

More information

IN THE PUBLIC PROCUREMENT APPEALS AUTHORITY AT DAR ES SALAAM CONSOLIDATED APPEAL CASES NO. 28 AND 29 OF BETWEEN COMPANY LIMITED...

IN THE PUBLIC PROCUREMENT APPEALS AUTHORITY AT DAR ES SALAAM CONSOLIDATED APPEAL CASES NO. 28 AND 29 OF BETWEEN COMPANY LIMITED... IN THE PUBLIC PROCUREMENT APPEALS AUTHORITY AT DAR ES SALAAM CONSOLIDATED APPEAL CASES NO. 28 AND 29 OF 2017-18 BETWEEN M/S NANDHRA ENGINEERING AND CONSTRUCTION COMPANY LIMITED... APPELLANT AND SONGEA

More information

IN THE HIGH COURT OF GUJARAT AT AHMEDABAD. TAX APPEAL NO. 866 of 2013 ======================================

IN THE HIGH COURT OF GUJARAT AT AHMEDABAD. TAX APPEAL NO. 866 of 2013 ====================================== IN THE HIGH COURT OF GUJARAT AT AHMEDABAD TAX APPEAL NO. 866 of 2013 FOR APPROVAL AND SIGNATURE: HONOURABLE MR.JUSTICE M.R. SHAH and HONOURABLE MR.JUSTICE R.P.DHOLARIA 1 Whether Reporters of Local Papers

More information

JUDGMENT OF THE COURT

JUDGMENT OF THE COURT IN THE COURT OF APPEAL OF TANZANIA AT MWANZA (CORAM: MUNUO, J.A., MASSATI, J.A And MANDIA, J.A.) CRIMINAL APPEAL NO. 326 OF 2010 FURAHA MICHAEL...... APPELLANT VERSUS THE REPUBLIC........ RESPONDENT (Appeal

More information

IN THE HIGH COURT OF TANZANIA AT DAR ES SALAAM PC CIVIL APPEAL NO. 113 OF 2004

IN THE HIGH COURT OF TANZANIA AT DAR ES SALAAM PC CIVIL APPEAL NO. 113 OF 2004 IN THE HIGH COURT OF TANZANIA AT DAR ES SALAAM PC CIVIL APPEAL NO. 113 OF 2004 (From the Decision of the Temeke District ABDULHAMANI Appeal No. 44 of 2003 Mzava PDM). Court in Civil HASSANI LITOKI APPELLANT

More information

(CORAM: MSOFFE, J. A., KILEO, J. A. And KALEGEYA, J. A.)

(CORAM: MSOFFE, J. A., KILEO, J. A. And KALEGEYA, J. A.) IN THE COURT OF APPEAL OF TANZANIA AT TANGA CRIMINAL APPEAL NO. 130 OF 2005 MSOFFE, J.A SEIF SELEMANI VS THE REPUBLIC (Appeal from the Judgment of the High Court of Tanzania at Tanga by Longway, J 1) -

More information

IN THE FAIR COMPETITION TRIBUNAL OF TANZANIA AT DAR ES SALAAM BEFORE: HON. R. H. SHEIKH, J/CHAIRMAN MR. A.K. JUMA, MEMBER DR. M.M.P.

IN THE FAIR COMPETITION TRIBUNAL OF TANZANIA AT DAR ES SALAAM BEFORE: HON. R. H. SHEIKH, J/CHAIRMAN MR. A.K. JUMA, MEMBER DR. M.M.P. IN THE FAIR COMPETITION TRIBUNAL OF TANZANIA AT DAR ES SALAAM BEFORE: HON. R. H. SHEIKH, J/CHAIRMAN MR. A.K. JUMA, MEMBER DR. M.M.P. BUNDARA, MEMBER TRIBUNAL APPEAL NO. 1 OF 2011 TANZANIA ELECTRIC SUPPLY

More information

JUDGMENT OF THE COURT

JUDGMENT OF THE COURT 1 CRIMINAL APPEAL NO.164 OF 2004 COURT OF APPEAL OF TANZANIA AT DAR ES SALAAM MUNUO, J.A MSOFFE, J.A AND KILEO J.A Nurdin Musa Wailu Vs, The Republic (Appeal from the Conviction of the High Court of Tanzania

More information

IN THE PUBLIC PROCUREMENT APPEALS AUTHORITY AT DAR ES SALAAM APPEAL NO. 26 OF BETWEEN

IN THE PUBLIC PROCUREMENT APPEALS AUTHORITY AT DAR ES SALAAM APPEAL NO. 26 OF BETWEEN IN THE PUBLIC PROCUREMENT APPEALS AUTHORITY AT DAR ES SALAAM APPEAL NO. 26 OF 2018-19 BETWEEN M/S GROUP SIX INTERNATIONAL LIMITED...APPELLANT AND DAR ES SALAAM CITY COUNCIL...RESPONDENT DECISION CORAM

More information

committing an offence of armed robbery contrary to section 287 (A) of the Penal Code, Cap. 16 of the Laws R.E He was sentenced to thirty

committing an offence of armed robbery contrary to section 287 (A) of the Penal Code, Cap. 16 of the Laws R.E He was sentenced to thirty 1 IN THE COURT OF APPEAL OF TANZANIA AT MTWARA (CORAM: MUNUO, J.A., MBAROUK, J.A., And BWANA, J.A.) CRIMINAL APPEAL NO. 121 OF 2009 MAULIDI WAJIBU @ HASSANI... APPELLANT VERSUS THE REPUBLIC... RESPONDENT

More information

WONG SHU LING SHIRL Appellant

WONG SHU LING SHIRL Appellant The purpose of publishing AAB,s decisions in PCPD,s website is primarily to promote awareness and understanding of, and compliance with, the Personal Data (Privacy) Ordinance. The general practice of PCPD

More information

Date: 21/02/2013 & 26/02/2013 R.M. RWEYEMAMU, J:- RULING

Date: 21/02/2013 & 26/02/2013 R.M. RWEYEMAMU, J:- RULING IN THE HIGH COURT OF TANZANIA LABOUR DIVISION AT MWANZA REVISION NO 23 OF 2012 GODFREY RWEKIZA & 11 OTHERS...APPLICANTS VERSUS STANLEY MINING SERVICES (T) LTD...RESPONDENT (Original CMA/MZ//06/2009) Date:

More information

THE REPUBLIC OF UGANDA IN THE SUPREME COURT OF UGANDA AT KAMPALA.

THE REPUBLIC OF UGANDA IN THE SUPREME COURT OF UGANDA AT KAMPALA. THE REPUBLIC OF UGANDA IN THE SUPREME COURT OF UGANDA AT KAMPALA. (CORAM: ARACH-AMOKO, NSHIMYE. OPIO AWERI, MWONDHA, TIBATEMWA JJSC) CIVIL APPEAL NO.09 OF 2015 BETWEEN UGANDA REVENUE AUTHORITY:::::::::::::::::::::::APPELLANT

More information

- 18/7/ /8/2008 JUDGMENT. The Appellant Mwajina Bernard was charged with theft. charged by the Court of the Resident Magistrate at Kisutu in

- 18/7/ /8/2008 JUDGMENT. The Appellant Mwajina Bernard was charged with theft. charged by the Court of the Resident Magistrate at Kisutu in [Original Criminal Case No. 767 of 2002 - Kisutu Resident Magistrates Court Dar es Salaam before A.W. Mahay, RM.] Date of last order Date of Judgment - 18/7/2008-20/8/2008 JUDGMENT SHANGWA, J.: The Appellant

More information

IRISH CONGRESS TRADE UNIONS

IRISH CONGRESS TRADE UNIONS IRISH CONGRESS TRADE UNIONS SECTION 7 OF THE FINANCE ACT 2004 BRIEFING NOTE NEW EXEMPTIONS FROM INCOME TAX IN RESPECT OF PAYMENTS MADE UNDER EMPLOYMENT LAW 1. Introduction 1.1. Congress has secured significant

More information

IN THE COURT OF APPEAL. and BERNARD LIDDIE. and ST. KITTS & NEVIS ANGUILLA NATIONAL BANK LTD

IN THE COURT OF APPEAL. and BERNARD LIDDIE. and ST. KITTS & NEVIS ANGUILLA NATIONAL BANK LTD SAINT CHRISTOPHER AND NEVIS CIVIL APPEAL NO.10 OF 2003 IN THE COURT OF APPEAL BETWEEN: BERNADETTE LIDDIE and BERNARD LIDDIE and ST. KITTS & NEVIS ANGUILLA NATIONAL BANK LTD Appellants Respondent Before:

More information

IN THE HIGH COURT OF DELHI AT NEW DELHI SUBJECT : MOTOR ACCIDENT CLAIMS TRIBUNAL Date of decision: 9th January, 2013 MAC APP.

IN THE HIGH COURT OF DELHI AT NEW DELHI SUBJECT : MOTOR ACCIDENT CLAIMS TRIBUNAL Date of decision: 9th January, 2013 MAC APP. IN THE HIGH COURT OF DELHI AT NEW DELHI SUBJECT : MOTOR ACCIDENT CLAIMS TRIBUNAL Date of decision: 9th January, 2013 MAC APP. 703/2010 UNITED INDIA INSURANCE CO. LTD.... Appellant Through: Mr. D.D. Singh

More information

THE STANDARD BANK OF SOUTH AFRICA LIMITED

THE STANDARD BANK OF SOUTH AFRICA LIMITED 521/82 N v H EMERGENCY TRUCK AND CAR HIRE JAGATHESAN JOHN CHETTY and THE STANDARD BANK OF SOUTH AFRICA LIMITED SMALBERGER, JA :- 521/82 N v H IN THE SUPREME COURT OF SOUTH AFRICA (APPELLATE DIVISION) In

More information

IN THE HIGH COURT OF KARNATAKA AT BENGALURU PRESENT THE HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE VINEET SARAN AND THE HON BLE MR. JUSTICE B.MANOHAR C.S.T.A. NO.

IN THE HIGH COURT OF KARNATAKA AT BENGALURU PRESENT THE HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE VINEET SARAN AND THE HON BLE MR. JUSTICE B.MANOHAR C.S.T.A. NO. 1 IN THE HIGH COURT OF KARNATAKA AT BENGALURU DATED THIS THE 13 TH DAY OF AUGUST, 2015 PRESENT THE HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE VINEET SARAN AND THE HON BLE MR. JUSTICE B.MANOHAR BETWEEN C.S.T.A. NO.4/2015 THE

More information

IN THE PUBLIC PROCUREMENT APPEALS AUTHORITY AT DAR ES SALAAM. APPEAL CASE No. 29 OF BETWEEN M/S MNTAMBO CONSTRUCTION COMPANY LTD.

IN THE PUBLIC PROCUREMENT APPEALS AUTHORITY AT DAR ES SALAAM. APPEAL CASE No. 29 OF BETWEEN M/S MNTAMBO CONSTRUCTION COMPANY LTD. IN THE PUBLIC PROCUREMENT APPEALS AUTHORITY AT DAR ES SALAAM APPEAL CASE No. 29 OF 2016-17 BETWEEN M/S MNTAMBO CONSTRUCTION COMPANY LTD. APPELLANT AND KILINDI DISTRICT COUNCIL. RESPONDENT DECISION CORAM

More information

Criminal Case No. 12 of 2004 in the District Court of Liwale. It was alleged by

Criminal Case No. 12 of 2004 in the District Court of Liwale. It was alleged by IN THE COURT OF APPEAL OF TANZANIA AT MTWARA (CORAM: RAMADHANI, C.J., MUNUO, J.A. And MJASIRI, J.A.) CRIMINAL APPEAL NO. 153 OF 2005 KALOS PUNDA...APPELLANT VERSUS THE REPUBLIC...RESPONDENT (Appeal from

More information

J.N. Wafubwa v Housing Finance Co. of Kenya [2011] eklr REPUBLIC OF KENYA IN THE COURT OF APPEAL OF KENYA AT NAIROBI

J.N. Wafubwa v Housing Finance Co. of Kenya [2011] eklr REPUBLIC OF KENYA IN THE COURT OF APPEAL OF KENYA AT NAIROBI REPUBLIC OF KENYA IN THE COURT OF APPEAL OF KENYA AT NAIROBI (CORAM: TUNOI, KEIWUA & NYAMU, JJA) CIVIL APPEAL NO 253 OF 2004 BETWEEN CAPTAIN J.N. WAFUBWA....APPELLANT AND HOUSING FINANCE CO. OF KENYA..

More information

IN THE STATE COMMISSION : DELHI (Constituted under Section 9 of the Consumer Protection Act, 1986)

IN THE STATE COMMISSION : DELHI (Constituted under Section 9 of the Consumer Protection Act, 1986) IN THE STATE COMMISSION : DELHI (Constituted under Section 9 of the Consumer Protection Act, 1986) Date of Decision: 06.02.2018 First Appeal No.13/2018 (Arising out of the order dated 06.12.2017 passed

More information

IN THE PUBLIC PROCUREMENT APPEALS AUTHORITY AT DAR ES SALAAM APPEAL CASE NO. 29 OF BETWEEN AND

IN THE PUBLIC PROCUREMENT APPEALS AUTHORITY AT DAR ES SALAAM APPEAL CASE NO. 29 OF BETWEEN AND IN THE PUBLIC PROCUREMENT APPEALS AUTHORITY AT DAR ES SALAAM APPEAL CASE NO. 29 OF 2015-16 BETWEEN M/S MUWA TRADING (TZ) LTD.1 ST APPELLANT M/S TANGANYIKA WATTLE COMPANY LTD.2 ND APPELLANT AND TANZANIA

More information

THE HIGH COURT OF DELHI AT NEW DELHI. % Judgment delivered on: THE COMMISSIONER OF INCOME TAX. - versus M/S ZORAVAR VANASPATI LIMITED

THE HIGH COURT OF DELHI AT NEW DELHI. % Judgment delivered on: THE COMMISSIONER OF INCOME TAX. - versus M/S ZORAVAR VANASPATI LIMITED THE HIGH COURT OF DELHI AT NEW DELHI % Judgment delivered on: 24.07.2009 + ITA 596/2005 THE COMMISSIONER OF INCOME TAX Appellant - versus M/S ZORAVAR VANASPATI LIMITED... Respondent Advocates who appeared

More information

The appellant was convicted by the District Court of Monduli at. Monduli in absentia for the offence of unlawful possession of government

The appellant was convicted by the District Court of Monduli at. Monduli in absentia for the offence of unlawful possession of government IN THE COURT OF APPEAL OF TANZANIA AT ARUSHA (CORAM: KIMARO,J.A., LUANDA,J.A., And MJASIRI,J.A.) CRIMINAL APPEAL NO.396 OF 2013 LONING O SANGAU.APPELLANT VERSUS THE REPUBLIC.RESPONDENT (Appeal from the

More information

H.C.Cr. Appeal No. 621 of 2001) ****************************** JUDGMENT OF THE COURT

H.C.Cr. Appeal No. 621 of 2001) ****************************** JUDGMENT OF THE COURT REPUBLIC OF KENYA IN THE COURT OF APPEAL AT NAIROBI (CORAM: OMOLO, GITHINJI & DEVERELL, JJ.A.) CRIMINAL APPEAL NO. 120 OF 2004 BETWEEN ALBANUS MWASIA MUTUA APPELLANT AND REPUBLIC... RESPONDENT (Appeal

More information

IN THE HIGH COURT OF DELHI AT NEW DELHI SUBJECT : INCOME TAX. Judgment reserved on : Judgment delivered on : ITA No.

IN THE HIGH COURT OF DELHI AT NEW DELHI SUBJECT : INCOME TAX. Judgment reserved on : Judgment delivered on : ITA No. IN THE HIGH COURT OF DELHI AT NEW DELHI SUBJECT : INCOME TAX Judgment reserved on : 08.09.2008 Judgment delivered on : 06.11.2008 ITA No. 428/2007 COMMISSIONER OF INCOME TAX DELHI-II... Appellant -versus-

More information

The appellant is challenging the decision of Lukelelwa, J. in

The appellant is challenging the decision of Lukelelwa, J. in CRIMINAL APPEAL NO.125 OF 2005 COURT OF APPEAL OF TANZANIA AT MTWARA. (CORAM: RAMADHANI, C.J, MUNUO J.A, AND MJASIRI, J.A) ISSA HAMIS KIMALILA APPELLANT VERSUS THE REPUBLIC RESPONDENT (Appeal from the

More information

IN THE COURT OF APPEAL OF TANZANIA AT MBEYA (CORAM: MSOFFE, J.A., MBAROUK, J.A., And MANDIA, J.A.)

IN THE COURT OF APPEAL OF TANZANIA AT MBEYA (CORAM: MSOFFE, J.A., MBAROUK, J.A., And MANDIA, J.A.) Dr. Moses Norbert Achiula versus Republic IN THE COURT OF APPEAL OF TANZANIA AT MBEYA (CORAM: MSOFFE, J.A., MBAROUK, J.A., And MANDIA, J.A.) CRIMINAL APPEAL NO. 63 OF 2012 MOSES NORBERT ACHIULA.APPELLANT

More information

IN THE SUPREME COURT OF INDIA CIVIL APPELLATE JURISDICTION. CIVIL APPEAL No.958 OF Prem Nath Bali Appellant(s) VERSUS J U D G M E N T

IN THE SUPREME COURT OF INDIA CIVIL APPELLATE JURISDICTION. CIVIL APPEAL No.958 OF Prem Nath Bali Appellant(s) VERSUS J U D G M E N T IN THE SUPREME COURT OF INDIA CIVIL APPELLATE JURISDICTION CIVIL APPEAL No.958 OF 2010 Reportable Prem Nath Bali Appellant(s) VERSUS Registrar, High Court of Delhi & Anr. Respondent(s) J U D G M E N T

More information

IN THE HIGH COURT OF TANZANIA AT OAR ES SALAAM

IN THE HIGH COURT OF TANZANIA AT OAR ES SALAAM 1 IN THE HIGH COURT OF TANZANIA AT OAR ES SALAAM CIVIL APPEAL NO. 20 OF 2005 (Originating from Resident Magistrate Court at Kisutu in Civil Case No. 339 of 2000) KWANZA BOTTLERS LTD APPELLANT HANS JOHN

More information

This is a second appeal by ALFRED WILLIAM NYAMHANGA seeking to. overturn his conviction and sentence for armed robbery contrary to

This is a second appeal by ALFRED WILLIAM NYAMHANGA seeking to. overturn his conviction and sentence for armed robbery contrary to IN THE COURT OF APPEAL OF TANZANIA AT MWANZA (CORAM: MSOFFE, l.a., KIMARO, l.a., And luma, l.a.) CRIMINAL APPEAL NO. 237 OF 2011 ALFRED WILLIAM NYAMHANGA...... APPELLANT VERSUS THE REPUBLIC.............

More information

IN THE SUPREME COURT OF INDIA CIVIL APPELLATE JURISDICTION. CIVIL APPEAL No. 7 OF 2019 [Arising out of SLP (C) No of 2014] Versus

IN THE SUPREME COURT OF INDIA CIVIL APPELLATE JURISDICTION. CIVIL APPEAL No. 7 OF 2019 [Arising out of SLP (C) No of 2014] Versus REPORTABLE IN THE SUPREME COURT OF INDIA CIVIL APPELLATE JURISDICTION CIVIL APPEAL No. 7 OF 2019 [Arising out of SLP (C) No. 17975 of 2014] Management of the Barara Cooperative Marketing cum Processing

More information

IN THE COURT OF APPEAL PORT OF SPAIN BETWEEN TRANSPORT AND INDUSTRIAL WORKERS UNION NATIONAL MAINTENANCE TRAINING AND SECURITY COMPANY LIMITED

IN THE COURT OF APPEAL PORT OF SPAIN BETWEEN TRANSPORT AND INDUSTRIAL WORKERS UNION NATIONAL MAINTENANCE TRAINING AND SECURITY COMPANY LIMITED REPUBLIC OF TRINIDAD AND TOBAGO CA No. 207 of 1997 IN THE COURT OF APPEAL PORT OF SPAIN BETWEEN TRANSPORT AND INDUSTRIAL WORKERS UNION Appellant NATIONAL MAINTENANCE TRAINING AND SECURITY COMPANY LIMITED

More information

THE UNITED REPUBLIC OF TANZANIA THE MOTOR VEHICLES (TAX ON REGISTRATION AND TRANSFER) ACT CHAPTER 124 REVISED EDITION 2008

THE UNITED REPUBLIC OF TANZANIA THE MOTOR VEHICLES (TAX ON REGISTRATION AND TRANSFER) ACT CHAPTER 124 REVISED EDITION 2008 THE UNITED REPUBLIC OF TANZANIA THE MOTOR VEHICLES (TAX ON REGISTRATION AND TRANSFER) ACT CHAPTER 124 REVISED EDITION 2008 This Revised edition of 2008 of the Motor Vehicles (Tax on Registration and Transfer)

More information

IN THE HIGH COURT OF DELHI AT NEW DELHI SUBJECT : SERVICE MATTER W.P.(C) No.5282/2012 DATE OF DECISION : 2nd July, 2013

IN THE HIGH COURT OF DELHI AT NEW DELHI SUBJECT : SERVICE MATTER W.P.(C) No.5282/2012 DATE OF DECISION : 2nd July, 2013 IN THE HIGH COURT OF DELHI AT NEW DELHI SUBJECT : SERVICE MATTER W.P.(C) No.5282/2012 DATE OF DECISION : 2nd July, 2013 R.K. JAIN Through: Mr. K.G. Mishra, Advocate. versus... Petitioner PUNJAB NATIONAL

More information

(CORAM: LUBUVA, J.A., MROSO, J.A., And RUTAKANGWA, J.A.) 1. RASHID ALFRED KUBOKA ] 2. GERALD JUMA ].. APPELLANTS VERSUS THE REPUBLIC...

(CORAM: LUBUVA, J.A., MROSO, J.A., And RUTAKANGWA, J.A.) 1. RASHID ALFRED KUBOKA ] 2. GERALD JUMA ].. APPELLANTS VERSUS THE REPUBLIC... IN THE COURT OF APPEAL OF TANZANIA AT MWANZA (CORAM: LUBUVA, J.A., MROSO, J.A., And RUTAKANGWA, J.A.) CRIMINAL APPEAL NO. 38 OF 2005 1. RASHID ALFRED KUBOKA ] 2. GERALD JUMA ].. APPELLANTS VERSUS THE REPUBLIC........

More information

In the matter between:

In the matter between: IN THE LABOUR APPEAL COURT OF SOUTH AFRICA, PORT ELIZABETH Not reportable Case no: PA 1/14 In the matter between: BUILDERS WAREHOUSE (PTY) LTD Appellant COMMISSION FOR CONCILIATION, MEDIATION AND ARBITRATION

More information

IN THE COMMONWEALTH COURT OF PENNSYLVANIA

IN THE COMMONWEALTH COURT OF PENNSYLVANIA IN THE COMMONWEALTH COURT OF PENNSYLVANIA Theodore R. Robinson, : Petitioner : : v. : : State Employees' Retirement Board, : No. 1136 C.D. 2014 Respondent : Submitted: October 31, 2014 BEFORE: HONORABLE

More information

JUDGMENT OF THE COURT

JUDGMENT OF THE COURT IN THE COURT OF APPEAL OF TANZANIA ATTANGA {CORAM: MBAROUK, J.A., MWARIJA, J.A. And MWANGESI. J.A.) CRIMINAL APPEAL NO. 391 of 2016 CHARLES JUMA............ APPELLANT VERSUS THE REPUBLIC.......................

More information

of the proceedings, and that the petition must be, and hereby is, Denied.

of the proceedings, and that the petition must be, and hereby is, Denied. No 3 0, 1973 of the proceedings, and that the petition must be, and hereby is, Denied. PETER P. GELZINIS, JR., Plaintiff LAGOON AVIATION INC., a CORPORATION, and JERRY KRAMER, Defendants Civil Action No.

More information

IN THE PUBLIC PROCUREMENT APPEALS AUTHORITY AT DAR ES SALAAM APPEAL NO 121 OF 2012 BETWEEN AND RULING

IN THE PUBLIC PROCUREMENT APPEALS AUTHORITY AT DAR ES SALAAM APPEAL NO 121 OF 2012 BETWEEN AND RULING IN THE PUBLIC PROCUREMENT APPEALS AUTHORITY AT DAR ES SALAAM APPEAL NO 121 OF 2012 BETWEEN M/S PSM ARCHITECTS CO. LTD 1 ST APPELLANT M/S MEKON ARCH CONSULT LTD 2 ND APPEALLANT AND PARASTATAL PENSIONS FUND...

More information

IN THE COURT OF APPEAL OF TANZANIA AT ARUSHA

IN THE COURT OF APPEAL OF TANZANIA AT ARUSHA CRIMINAL APPEAL NO. 103 OF 2006- COURT OF APPEAL OF TANZANIA AT ARUSHA- RAMADHANI, C.J., MROSO, J.A. And, KAJI J.A. NYEKA KOU Vs. REPUBLIC (Appeal from the Decision of the High Court of Tanzania at Arusha)-

More information

SUPREME COURT OF QUEENSLAND

SUPREME COURT OF QUEENSLAND SUPREME COURT OF QUEENSLAND CITATION: PARTIES: HBU Properties Pty Ltd & Ors v Australia and New Zealand Banking Group Limited [2015] QCA 95 HBU PROPERTIES PTY LTD AS TRUSTEE FOR THE SHANE MUNDEY FAMILY

More information

In the matter between

In the matter between ,. IN THE INDUSTRIAL COURT OF APPEAL OF SWAZILAND HELD AT MBABANE CASE NO. 04/09 In the matter between MASTER GARMENTS APPELLANT AND SWAZILAND MANUFACTURING & ALLIED WORKERS UNION RESPONDENT CORAM HEARD

More information

IN THE HIGH COURT OF SOUTH AFRICA (WESTERN CAPE DIVISION, CAPE TOWN)

IN THE HIGH COURT OF SOUTH AFRICA (WESTERN CAPE DIVISION, CAPE TOWN) SAFLII Note: Certain personal/private details of parties or witnesses have been redacted from this document in compliance with the law and SAFLII Policy IN THE HIGH COURT OF SOUTH AFRICA (WESTERN CAPE

More information

IN THE FAIR COMPETITION TRIBUNAL OF TANZANIA AT DAR ES SALAAM APPEAL NO. 1 OF 2008 (APPEAL ARISING FROM THE DECISION OF THE ENERGY AND WATER

IN THE FAIR COMPETITION TRIBUNAL OF TANZANIA AT DAR ES SALAAM APPEAL NO. 1 OF 2008 (APPEAL ARISING FROM THE DECISION OF THE ENERGY AND WATER IN THE FAIR COMPETITION TRIBUNAL OF TANZANIA AT DAR ES SALAAM APPEAL NO. 1 OF 2008 Dar es Salaam Water and Sewerage Authority (DAWASA) VERSUS Energy and Water Utilities Regulatory Authority (EWURA) APPELLANT

More information

Citation: Korsch v. Human Rights Commission Date: (Man.) et al., 2012 MBCA 108 Docket: AI IN THE COURT OF APPEAL OF MANITOBA

Citation: Korsch v. Human Rights Commission Date: (Man.) et al., 2012 MBCA 108 Docket: AI IN THE COURT OF APPEAL OF MANITOBA Citation: Korsch v. Human Rights Commission Date: 20121113 (Man.) et al., 2012 MBCA 108 Docket: AI 12-30-07792 Coram: B E T W E E N : IN THE COURT OF APPEAL OF MANITOBA Madam Justice Barbara M. Hamilton

More information

IN THE COURT OF APPEAL IPOC INTERNATIONAL GROWTH FUND LIMITED. and

IN THE COURT OF APPEAL IPOC INTERNATIONAL GROWTH FUND LIMITED. and BRITISH VIRGIN ISLANDS IN THE COURT OF APPEAL CIVIL APPEAL NOS. 20 OF 2003 AND 1 OF 2004 BETWEEN: IPOC INTERNATIONAL GROWTH FUND LIMITED and Appellant [1] LV FINANCE GROUP LIMITED [2] TRANSCONTINENTAL

More information

VICTORIAN CIVIL AND ADMINISTRATIVE TRIBUNAL CIVIL DIVISION DOMESTIC BUILDING LIST VCAT Reference: D202/2004. Noreen Cosgriff.

VICTORIAN CIVIL AND ADMINISTRATIVE TRIBUNAL CIVIL DIVISION DOMESTIC BUILDING LIST VCAT Reference: D202/2004. Noreen Cosgriff. VICTORIAN CIVIL AND ADMINISTRATIVE TRIBUNAL CIVIL DIVISION DOMESTIC BUILDING LIST VCAT Reference: D202/2004 APPLICANT: FIRST RESPONDENT: SECOND RESPONDENT: WHERE HELD: BEFORE: HEARING TYPE: Noreen Cosgriff

More information

IN THE HIGH COURT OF DELHI AT NEW DELHI SUBJECT : SUIT FOR SPECIFIC PERFORMANCE. Judgment reserved on : December 10, 2008

IN THE HIGH COURT OF DELHI AT NEW DELHI SUBJECT : SUIT FOR SPECIFIC PERFORMANCE. Judgment reserved on : December 10, 2008 IN THE HIGH COURT OF DELHI AT NEW DELHI SUBJECT : SUIT FOR SPECIFIC PERFORMANCE Judgment reserved on : December 10, 2008 Judgment delivered on : December 12, 2008 RFA No. 159/2003 IQBAL AHMED... Through:

More information

S. v. ICC. 121st Session Judgment No. 3600

S. v. ICC. 121st Session Judgment No. 3600 Organisation internationale du Travail Tribunal administratif International Labour Organization Administrative Tribunal S. v. ICC 121st Session Judgment No. 3600 THE ADMINISTRATIVE TRIBUNAL, Considering

More information

In this petition short point is involved which is. with respect to the petitioner s right to get the benefit of

In this petition short point is involved which is. with respect to the petitioner s right to get the benefit of IN THE ARMED FORCES TRIBUNAL, PRINCIPAL BENCH NEW DELHI 29. OA 55 /2014 Ex Nk Singheshwar Singh...Petitioner Versus UOI & Ors For petitioner For respondents : Mr. SR Kalkal, Advocate : Mr.Prashant Sivarajan

More information

LAWS OF GUYANA CAPITAL GAINS TAX ACT CHAPTER 81:20

LAWS OF GUYANA CAPITAL GAINS TAX ACT CHAPTER 81:20 Capital Gains Tax 1 CAPITAL GAINS TAX ACT CHAPTER 81:20 Act 13 of 1966A Amended by 4 of 1966B 22 of 1967 33 of 1970 11 of 1983 5 of 1987 6 of 1989 6 of 1991 8 of 1992 Current Authorised Pages Pages Authorised

More information

TC04086 [2014] UKFTT 974 (TC) Appeal number: TC/2014/00845

TC04086 [2014] UKFTT 974 (TC) Appeal number: TC/2014/00845 [14] UKFTT 974 (TC) TC086 Appeal number: TC/14/00845 CONSTRUCTION INDUSTRY SCHEME failure to deduct tax from payments made to sub-contractors Regulations 9 and 13 Income Tax (Construction Industry Scheme)

More information

Versus P R E S E N T HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE PRASHANT KUMAR This writ application has been filed for the following. reliefs:

Versus P R E S E N T HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE PRASHANT KUMAR This writ application has been filed for the following. reliefs: CIVIL WRIT JURISDICTION CASE No. 33 of 1994 (R) In the matter of an application under Articles 226 and 227 of the Constitution of India. ---- M/S Tata Engineering & Locomotive Company Limited,Singhbhum(East),

More information

NON-PRECEDENTIAL DECISION - SEE SUPERIOR COURT I.O.P

NON-PRECEDENTIAL DECISION - SEE SUPERIOR COURT I.O.P NON-PRECEDENTIAL DECISION - SEE SUPERIOR COURT I.O.P. 65.37 FIRST NATIONAL COMMUNITY BANK, Appellee IN THE SUPERIOR COURT OF PENNSYLVANIA v. THE POWELL LAW GROUP, P.C., Appellant No. 1512 MDA 2012 Appeal

More information

COURT OF APPEALS TUSCARAWAS COUNTY, OHIO FIFTH APPELLATE DISTRICT

COURT OF APPEALS TUSCARAWAS COUNTY, OHIO FIFTH APPELLATE DISTRICT [Cite as OSI Funding Corp. v. Huth, 2007-Ohio-5292.] COURT OF APPEALS TUSCARAWAS COUNTY, OHIO FIFTH APPELLATE DISTRICT OSI FUNDING CORPORATION Plaintiff-Appellee -vs- MICHELA HUTH Defendant-Appellant JUDGES:

More information

John Ooko Otieno v Republic [2008] eklr REPUBLIC OF KENYA IN THE COURT OF APPEAL OF KENYA AT KISUMU. Criminal Appeal 137 of 2002

John Ooko Otieno v Republic [2008] eklr REPUBLIC OF KENYA IN THE COURT OF APPEAL OF KENYA AT KISUMU. Criminal Appeal 137 of 2002 REPUBLIC OF KENYA IN THE COURT OF APPEAL OF KENYA AT KISUMU Criminal Appeal 137 of 2002 JOHN OOKO OTIENO.. APPELLANT AND REPUBLIC.... RESPONDENT (Appeal from a conviction and sentence of the High Court

More information

SEPTEMBER 21, 2016 KERRY WEST NO CA-0148 VERSUS COURT OF APPEAL SEWERAGE AND WATER BOARD FOURTH CIRCUIT STATE OF LOUISIANA * * * * * * *

SEPTEMBER 21, 2016 KERRY WEST NO CA-0148 VERSUS COURT OF APPEAL SEWERAGE AND WATER BOARD FOURTH CIRCUIT STATE OF LOUISIANA * * * * * * * KERRY WEST VERSUS SEWERAGE AND WATER BOARD NO. 2016-CA-0148 COURT OF APPEAL FOURTH CIRCUIT STATE OF LOUISIANA APPEAL FROM CITY CIVIL SERVICE COMMISSION ORLEANS NO. 8287 JAMES F. MCKAY III CHIEF JUDGE (Court

More information

Circuit Court for Cecil County Case No. 07-K UNREPORTED

Circuit Court for Cecil County Case No. 07-K UNREPORTED Circuit Court for Cecil County Case No. 07-K-07-000161 UNREPORTED IN THE COURT OF SPECIAL APPEALS OF MARYLAND No. 2115 September Term, 2017 DANIEL IAN FIELDS v. STATE OF MARYLAND Leahy, Shaw Geter, Thieme,

More information

2 said issue of non-granting of interest on the refund due to the appellant, in the present appeal. 2. This appeal came up for preliminary hearing bef

2 said issue of non-granting of interest on the refund due to the appellant, in the present appeal. 2. This appeal came up for preliminary hearing bef - In the Gujarat Value Added Tax Tribunal at Ahmedabad Before: Hon'ble Mr. Justice, KA.Puj, President Shri Y.P.Bhatt, Member Shri N.A.Acharya, Member SECOND APPEAL NO. 895 OF 2013 MIS. JUPITER ENGINEERS

More information

BETWEEN DISMAS KABAYA MILANZI... APPELLANT. (An Appeal from the Decision of the High Court of Tanzania, at Mtwara)

BETWEEN DISMAS KABAYA MILANZI... APPELLANT. (An Appeal from the Decision of the High Court of Tanzania, at Mtwara) THE COURT OF APPEAL OF TANZANIA AT MTWARA (CORAM: RAMADHANI A, Ca; MUNUO, J.A; And MJASIRI, IA.) CRIMINAL APPEAL NO. 218 OF 2005 BETWEEN DISMAS KABAYA MILANZI... APPELLANT AND REPUBLIC RESPONDENT (An Appeal

More information

IN THE COURT OF APPEAL [1] HONOURABLE ATTORNEY-GENERAL [2] THE HONOURABLE EDZEL THOMAS [3] MINISTER OF LABOUR

IN THE COURT OF APPEAL [1] HONOURABLE ATTORNEY-GENERAL [2] THE HONOURABLE EDZEL THOMAS [3] MINISTER OF LABOUR 1 GRENADA IN THE COURT OF APPEAL CIVIL APPEAL NO.8 1995 BETWEEN: LIBERTY CLUB LIMITED v Appellant [1] HONOURABLE ATTORNEY-GENERAL [2] THE HONOURABLE EDZEL THOMAS [3] MINISTER OF LABOUR Before: The Hon.

More information

IN THE LABOUR APPEAL COURT OF SOUTH AFRICA, JOHANNESBURG IMPERIAL CARGO SOLUTIONS. First Respondent

IN THE LABOUR APPEAL COURT OF SOUTH AFRICA, JOHANNESBURG IMPERIAL CARGO SOLUTIONS. First Respondent IN THE LABOUR APPEAL COURT OF SOUTH AFRICA, JOHANNESBURG Reportable Case no: JA63/2016 IMPERIAL CARGO SOLUTIONS Appellant and SATAWU First Respondent INDIVIDUAL RESPONDENTS LISTED IN ANNEXURE A TO THE

More information

VERSUS THE REPUBLIC.. RESPONDENT (Criminal from the judgement of the High Court of Tanzania at Dodoma) Kaijage, J (DC) Criminal Appeal No.5 of 2003.

VERSUS THE REPUBLIC.. RESPONDENT (Criminal from the judgement of the High Court of Tanzania at Dodoma) Kaijage, J (DC) Criminal Appeal No.5 of 2003. THE COURT OF APPEAL OF TANZANIA AT DODOMA (CORAM: MSOFFE, J.A, RUTAKANGWA, J.A, BWANA, J.A) CRIMINAL APPEAL NO 182 OF 2006 NAADI BILALI APPELLANT VERSUS THE REPUBLIC.. RESPONDENT (Criminal from the judgement

More information

IN THE PUBLIC PROCUREMENT APPEALS AUTHORITY AT DAR ES SALAAM APPEAL NO. 31 OF BETWEEN

IN THE PUBLIC PROCUREMENT APPEALS AUTHORITY AT DAR ES SALAAM APPEAL NO. 31 OF BETWEEN IN THE PUBLIC PROCUREMENT APPEALS AUTHORITY AT DAR ES SALAAM APPEAL NO. 31 OF 2018-19 BETWEEN M/S ZECCON COMPANY LIMITED...APPELLANT AND TANZANIA CIVIL AVIATION AUTHORITY...RESPONDENT DECISION CORAM 1.

More information

IN THE HIGH COURT OF KARNATAKA AT BENGALURU PRESENT THE HON BLE MR.JUSTICE VINEET SARAN AND THE HON BLE MRS.JUSTICE S SUJATHA

IN THE HIGH COURT OF KARNATAKA AT BENGALURU PRESENT THE HON BLE MR.JUSTICE VINEET SARAN AND THE HON BLE MRS.JUSTICE S SUJATHA 1 IN THE HIGH COURT OF KARNATAKA AT BENGALURU R DATED THIS THE 18 TH DAY OF MARCH 2015 PRESENT THE HON BLE MR.JUSTICE VINEET SARAN AND THE HON BLE MRS.JUSTICE S SUJATHA WRIT APPEAL NOS. 989-1009/2015 (T-RES)

More information

SEVENTY-SIXTH SESSION

SEVENTY-SIXTH SESSION Registry's translation, the French text alone being authoritative. SEVENTY-SIXTH SESSION In re GAUTREY Judgment 1326 THE ADMINISTRATIVE TRIBUNAL, Considering the complaint filed by Mr. Michael Leslie Howard

More information

NOTICE OF CERTIFICATION AND SETTLEMENT APPROVAL HEARING IN THE MATTER OF THE HONDA CIVIC HYBRID FUEL ECONOMY CLASS ACTION

NOTICE OF CERTIFICATION AND SETTLEMENT APPROVAL HEARING IN THE MATTER OF THE HONDA CIVIC HYBRID FUEL ECONOMY CLASS ACTION NOTICE OF CERTIFICATION AND SETTLEMENT APPROVAL HEARING IN THE MATTER OF THE HONDA CIVIC HYBRID FUEL ECONOMY CLASS ACTION Read this Notice Carefully as it May Affect Your Rights TO: Former or present owners

More information

B., S. and T. v. FAO

B., S. and T. v. FAO Organisation internationale du Travail Tribunal administratif International Labour Organization Administrative Tribunal B., S. and T. v. FAO 123rd Session THE ADMINISTRATIVE TRIBUNAL, Considering the complaints

More information

IN THE HIGH COURT OF DELHI AT NEW DELHI SUBJECT : CODE OF CIVIL PROCEDURE Date of decision: 16th December, 2013 RFA No.581/2013.

IN THE HIGH COURT OF DELHI AT NEW DELHI SUBJECT : CODE OF CIVIL PROCEDURE Date of decision: 16th December, 2013 RFA No.581/2013. IN THE HIGH COURT OF DELHI AT NEW DELHI SUBJECT : CODE OF CIVIL PROCEDURE Date of decision: 16th December, 2013 RFA No.581/2013 SUNIL GUPTA Through: Mr. Amrit Pal Singh, Adv.... Appellant Versus HARISH

More information

SOCIAL SECURITY TRIBUNAL DECISION Appeal Division

SOCIAL SECURITY TRIBUNAL DECISION Appeal Division Citation: S. V. v. Minister of Employment and Social Development, 2016 SSTADIS 87 Tribunal File Number: AD-15-1088 BETWEEN: S. V. Appellant and Minister of Employment and Social Development (formerly known

More information

IN THE HIGH COURT OF TANZANIA (DAR ES SALAAM DISTRICT REGISTRY) AT DAR ES SALAAM CIVIL APPEAL NO. 214 OF 2000

IN THE HIGH COURT OF TANZANIA (DAR ES SALAAM DISTRICT REGISTRY) AT DAR ES SALAAM CIVIL APPEAL NO. 214 OF 2000 Lawrence Mtefu v. Germana Mtefu 206 IN THE HIGH COURT OF TANZANIA (DAR ES SALAAM DISTRICT REGISTRY) AT DAR ES SALAAM CIVIL APPEAL NO. 214 OF 2000 (Appeal from the judgment and decree of the District Court

More information

IN THE SUPREME COURT OF THE DEMOCRATIC SOCIALIST REPUBLIC OF SRI LANKA

IN THE SUPREME COURT OF THE DEMOCRATIC SOCIALIST REPUBLIC OF SRI LANKA IN THE SUPREME COURT OF THE DEMOCRATIC SOCIALIST REPUBLIC OF SRI LANKA In the matter of an Appeal from the Civil Appellate High Court of the Sabaragamuwa Province holden in Kegalle. Ceylon Bank Employees

More information

REPORTABLE IN THE HIGH COURT OF SOUTH AFRICA (CAPE OF GOOD HOPE PROVINCIAL DIVISION) JUDGMENT DELIVERED ON 25 OCTOBER 2007

REPORTABLE IN THE HIGH COURT OF SOUTH AFRICA (CAPE OF GOOD HOPE PROVINCIAL DIVISION) JUDGMENT DELIVERED ON 25 OCTOBER 2007 REPORTABLE IN THE HIGH COURT OF SOUTH AFRICA (CAPE OF GOOD HOPE PROVINCIAL DIVISION) In the matter between CASE NUMBER: A970/2005 CAPE COBRA (PTY) LTD Appellant and ANN LANDMAN Respondent JUDGMENT DELIVERED

More information

(Ca p.80) (Made under section 60 (i))

(Ca p.80) (Made under section 60 (i)) Go v e r n m e n t No t i c e no. 167 published on 7/6/2013 the civil aviation act (Ca p.80) regulations (Made under section 60 (i)) t h e civil av i at i o n (c o n t r i b u t i o n a n d a d m i n i

More information

IN THE COURT OF SH. RAKESH KUMAR ADDL. SESSIONS JUDGE-04 (NORTH) : DELHI

IN THE COURT OF SH. RAKESH KUMAR ADDL. SESSIONS JUDGE-04 (NORTH) : DELHI IN THE COURT OF SH. RAKESH KUMAR ADDL. SESSIONS JUDGE-04 (NORTH) : DELHI CA No.05/08 1. Kapil Rastogi S/o Sh. Subhash Chand Rastogi, 2. Smt. Shakuntala Rastogi W/o Sh.Subhash Chand Rastogi Both residents

More information

Case Name: Wawanesa Mutual Insurance Co. v. AXA Insurance (Canada)

Case Name: Wawanesa Mutual Insurance Co. v. AXA Insurance (Canada) Page 1 Case Name: Wawanesa Mutual Insurance Co. v. AXA Insurance (Canada) Between The Wawanesa Mutual Insurance Company, Applicant (Appellant in Appeal), and AXA Insurance (Canada), Respondent (Respondent

More information

IN THE HIGH COURT OF DELHI AT NEW DELHI SUBJECT : INTEREST ON THE AMOUNT OF LEAVE ENCASHMENT Judgment delivered on W.P.

IN THE HIGH COURT OF DELHI AT NEW DELHI SUBJECT : INTEREST ON THE AMOUNT OF LEAVE ENCASHMENT Judgment delivered on W.P. IN THE HIGH COURT OF DELHI AT NEW DELHI SUBJECT : INTEREST ON THE AMOUNT OF LEAVE ENCASHMENT Judgment delivered on 13.03.2012 W.P.(C) 1227/2012 DELHI POLICE... Petitioner versus BALWANT SINGH Advocates

More information

JUDGMENT. [1] This is an appeal in terms of section 65 of Act 51 of 1977 ( the Act ) against a

JUDGMENT. [1] This is an appeal in terms of section 65 of Act 51 of 1977 ( the Act ) against a IN THE HIGH COURT OF SOUTH AFRICA EASTERN CAPE, PORT ELIZABETH CASE NO.: CA&R14/10 In the matter between: BASHARAD ALI Appellant and THE STATE Respondent JUDGMENT GROGAN AJ: [1] This is an appeal in terms

More information

In The Supreme Court of Belize A.D., 2010

In The Supreme Court of Belize A.D., 2010 In The Supreme Court of Belize A.D., 2010 Civil Appeal No. 2 In the Matter of an Appeal pursuant to section 43 (1) of the Income and Business Tax Act, CAP 55 of the Laws of Belize 2000 In the Matter of

More information