Veterans Affairs: The Appeal Process for Veterans Claims

Size: px
Start display at page:

Download "Veterans Affairs: The Appeal Process for Veterans Claims"

Transcription

1 Veterans Affairs: The Appeal Process for Veterans Claims Douglas Reid Weimer Legislative Attorney January 24, 2011 Congressional Research Service CRS Report for Congress Prepared for Members and Committees of Congress RL33704

2 Summary Congress, through the United States Department of Veterans Affairs (VA), provides a variety of benefits and services to veterans and to certain members of their families. These benefits range from health care and related services to burial benefits. The veteran s basic eligibility for these programs and services is usually determined by the local VA office. Veterans not satisfied with the VA s decision(s) may wish to have them reviewed and may appeal the decision(s). The VA has certain statutory obligations to assist the veteran in the preparation of his/her application for benefits and any subsequent appeal(s). Among these obligations are assistance in the preparation of the initial application; provision of various records; medical exams; and other related issues. Certain legal and factual presumptions are established by statute that may be favorable to the veteran s claim. These issues are examined in Appendix A of this report. Following the filing of the initial appeal, the local VA office will either allow or disallow the claim. If the veteran/claimant wishes to appeal further, a written request for appeal must be filed and various time deadlines and other requirements must be met prior to the case being considered by the Board of Veterans Appeals (BVA). The appeal before the BVA may be a hearing at the local VA office by a traveling Board member; a hearing at the BVA office in Washington, DC; or a videoconference hearing at the local VA office. There are specific guidelines for a person representing a veteran before the BVA. The veteran/claimant may appeal the decision of the BVA to the Court of Appeals for Veterans Claims (CAVC), which is an independent federal court and not part of the VA. The decision of the CAVC may be appealed by either the veteran/claimant or the VA to the U.S. Court of Appeals for the Federal Circuit (Federal Circuit), an Article III court that sits in Washington, DC and has exclusive jurisdiction to hear cases challenging CAVC rulings. Decisions of the Federal Circuit may be appealed to the U.S. Supreme Court, which has final jurisdiction. Both Congress and the courts have focused their attention on the appeal process. A case argued before the U.S. Supreme Court (Court) on December 6, 2010, Henderson v. Shinseki (U.S. No ) concerns the issue of whether the appeal deadline to the CAVC may be extended beyond the current statutory 120-day limit. The case involves a disabled veteran who missed the filing deadline for appeals of BVA s decisions to the CAVC. The veteran argued that his disability (mental illness for which he was seeking VA disability benefits) prevented him from filing within the 120-day appeal period. The outcome of the case may have far-reaching impact on various aspects of the appeal procedure, and may ultimately involve congressional legislative action and/or administrative action. This report traces the various steps involved in the appeal process starting with the original application for benefits and concluding with an appeal to the U.S. Supreme Court. A flow chart outlining all of the steps in the appeal process is provided. Legislation was introduced in the 111 th Congress concerning the appeal process which can generally be categorized as (1) streamlining the appeal process; and (2) extending the 120-day application appeal deadline to the CAVC. This legislation is summarized in Appendix B. It is expected that similar legislation concerning the appeal process may be introduced in the 112 th Congress. This report will be updated to reflect legislative activity as it occurs. Congressional Research Service

3 Contents Introduction...1 Benefits for Veterans...1 Appeals from the Local VA Office Decisions...1 The Appeal Process...2 Flow Chart of the Various Steps in the Appeal Process...2 Filing the Original Claim for Benefits at the VA...4 The Appeal: The First Steps...4 Time Limit...5 The Notice of Disagreement (NOD)...5 Appeal to the Local VA Office...5 The Statement of the Case...5 VA Form 9 and the Substantive Appeal...6 Supplemental Statement of Case...6 Time Limitation...6 Withdrawal of Issue(s)...6 Issues Related to the Appeal Process...6 Filing Extensions...6 Representation for the Appeal...7 Attorney Representation...7 Information for the Appeal...8 Location of the VA Form The Board of Veterans Appeals (BVA)...8 Organization...8 The BVA s Docket...9 The BVA Docket and Docket Number...9 Waiting Time...9 Personal Hearings...9 Request for a BVA Hearing...10 Scheduling the BVA Hearing...10 The Ninety Day Rule...10 The Appeal at the BVA Notification of the Board s Decision The Remand Additional Appeal Options...12 Notice of Appeal...12 Motion for Reconsideration...12 Reopening the Case...12 CUE Motion...13 Death of the Appellant Before a Decision Issued...13 Subsequent Judicial Appeals...13 The 120-Day Filing Deadline...14 Background and Possible Issues for Congress...14 Decisions of the RO, BVA, and Lower Courts...14 U.S. Supreme Court Henderson v. Shinseki...15 Congressional Research Service

4 Figures Figure 1. Appeal Process...3 Appendixes Appendix A. Duties and Obligations of the VA to the Claimant/Appellant...16 Appendix B. Legislation Considered in the 111 th Congress...21 Contacts Author Contact Information...22 Congressional Research Service

5 Introduction Benefits for Veterans Congress, through the United States Department of Veterans Affairs (VA), provides a broad variety of benefits and services to veterans and certain members of their families. 1 Among the benefits that the VA extends to veterans are various types of health care and related services, such as nursing homes, clinics, and medical centers; various types of financial benefits, including disability compensation and pensions; education, vocational training, and related career assistance; home financing; life insurance; burial benefits; and benefits for certain family survivors. 2 The veteran s basic eligibility for these various services and programs is usually determined by the local VA office. 3 Various criteria must be met in order for the veteran to be eligible for VA benefits, and the local VA office scrutinizes the veteran s claim before determining eligibility. 4 Appeals from the Local VA Office Decisions Veterans not satisfied with the decisions made by the local VA office on their claims or benefits may wish to have the decisions reviewed on appeal. 5 The VA has stated that the two most common types of appeals concern 1) the VA s denial of benefits for a disability that the veteran believes is service-connected; and 2) the VA s rating a disability as less severe than the veteran believes is warranted. 6 The first issue involves disability compensation, which is a monthly cash benefit for veterans currently impaired from past service-connected activities. 7 The second issue 1 See generally Federal Benefits for Veterans and Dependents, published by the Department of Veterans Affairs (2010 edition), available online at See CRS Report RL33113, Veterans Affairs: Basic Eligibility for Disability Benefit Programs, by Douglas Reid Weimer. This report deals with the fundamental requirements for disability benefit programs. See CRS Report RL33323, Veterans Affairs: Benefits for Service-Connected Disabilities, by Douglas Reid Weimer. This report discusses various aspects of disability compensation, a monthly cash benefit program for veterans currently impaired from past service-connected activities. 2 For a comprehensive list of CRS-related products relating to benefits for veterans, go to then click on Social Policy, and then click on Benefits for Veterans. 3 The local VA office is defined by the VA as any local office of the Department of Veterans Affairs where claims for VA benefits are received and determined. This is usually a VA Regional Office or an administrative office at a VA medical center. The legal term for such an office is the agency of original jurisdiction. A VA Regional Office is one of 58 VA regional offices located throughout the United States and its territories, and it is at these offices where most claims for VA benefits are filed and determined. Thus, all Regional Offices are considered to be local offices, but the concept of local office may also include administrative offices located at VA medical centers. Therefore, all Regional Offices are local offices, but not all local offices are Regional Offices. See Board of Veterans Appeals, Understanding the Appeal Process, published by the Department of Veterans Affairs; VA Pamphlet (January 2000) at (cited to afterward as Understanding ). (Apparently, this publication is no longer available online). 4 See CRS Report RL33323, Veterans Affairs: Benefits for Service-Connected Disabilities, by Douglas Reid Weimer. 5 How Do I Appeal?, published by the Board of Veterans Appeals, Department of Veterans Affairs; VA Pamphlet A (April 2002) at 1 (cited to afterward as How Do I Appeal? ). See How_Do_I_APPEAL.asp. 6 Id. 7 See CRS Report RL33323, Veterans Affairs: Benefits for Service-Connected Disabilities, at 1. Congressional Research Service 1

6 involves the VA s rating of the severity of the veteran s disability which is directly related to the amount of monthly disability compensation (a cash payment) the veteran receives. 8 While these two issues seem to be the most prevalent types of appeals, nearly any decision made by the local VA office concerning benefits for veterans may be appealed. 9 An appeal of the local VA office s decision may be made to 1) the local VA office (which made the original decision) and/or 2) the Board of Veterans Appeals (BVA), which is discussed below. The findings of the BVA may be appealed to the U.S. Court of Veterans Claims. Subsequent appeals may be made to the U.S. Court of Appeals for the Federal Circuit and ultimately to the U.S. Supreme Court. The Appeal Process Flow Chart of the Various Steps in the Appeal Process The appeal process consists of several steps. The following flow chart provides a simplified outline of the steps that must be taken by the veteran in an appeal. Each step is discussed in detail in the text following the chart. 8 Id. at For instance, the local VA office may determine that the veteran is 10% disabled, while the veteran believes that he/she is 40% disabled. 9 See How Do I Appeal?, supra note 5, at 1. For example, a veteran may appeal a denial of education benefits made by the local VA office. Congressional Research Service 2

7 Figure 1. Appeal Process Source: Adapted from charts at How Do I Appeal?, supra note 5, at 2 and Understanding, supra note 3, at 32. Note: These filing time limits apply in most cases. However, they do not apply to simultaneously contested claims, when more than one person is trying to receive benefits that only one person is entitled to, such as life insurance proceeds. See Understanding at 11. Congressional Research Service 3

8 Filing the Original Claim for Benefits at the VA In order to apply for VA benefits, the veteran must file a claim at the local VA office or VA medical facility. 10 A claim for benefits may also be filed online. 11 The claim must specifically state the requested benefit(s). 12 Assistance to the veteran during the application process may be provided by representatives from Veterans Service Organizations (VSOs) 13 and/or by other persons or agents. 14 The VSOs have staff located at most local VA offices. In addition to assistance that may be provided by the VSOs or other agents, the VA is obligated by statute and regulation to provide certain assistance to the claimant during the original claim procedure and during any subsequent appeal(s). Such assistance many involve locating and producing records and providing medical examinations. Certain presumptions relating to medical conditions are also mandated by statute. These obligations and presumptions are summarized in Appendix A of this report. 15 Following receipt of the veteran s claim for benefits, the local VA office will review the claim and make a decision about the claim(s). 16 The local VA office will either allow or deny the claim. 17 Where relevant, the local VA office may also rate (on a percentage basis) the veteran s degree of service-connected disability. 18 The local VA office s determination will be mailed to the veteran. 19 If the veteran is not satisfied with the local VA office decision, the veteran may appeal. The Appeal: The First Steps An appeal 20 is a request for a review of a local VA determination 21 on a claim for benefits. 22 Anyone who has filed a claim for benefits with the VA and has received a determination from a 10 The local VA office is defined by the VA as any local office of the Department of Veterans Affairs where claims for VA benefits are received and determined. See discussion at note See How Do I Appeal?, supra note 5, at 3. File the claim at This is the Veterans ON-line APPlication (VONAPP) website. It should be noted that sometimes this website is not functional. 12 Such benefits might relate to medical care, disability compensation, or educational benefits. 13 Such organizations are the American Legion, the Disabled American Veterans, and other veterans groups. 14 See How Do I Appeal?, supra note 5, at See discussion at Appendix A. 16 See CRS Report RL33323, Veterans Affairs: Benefits for Service-Connected Disabilities, Douglas Reid Weimer, at Id. 18 Id. at See How Do I Appeal?, supra note 5, at See 38 C.F.R What Constitutes An Appeal. An appeal consists of a timely filed Notice of Disagreement in writing and, after a Statement of the Case has been furnished, a timely filed Substantive Appeal. 21 See Understanding, supra note 3, at 6. Most local determinations are made by the local VA office. However, some determinations made by VA medical facilities, such as eligibility for medical treatment, may also be appealed U.S.C. 511(a) outlines the authority of the Secretary of the VA to make decisions regarding benefits for veterans. Congressional Research Service 4

9 local VA office is eligible to appeal a complete or a partial denial of a claim. 23 The veteran may also appeal the level of benefit granted. 24 Time Limit The veteran seeking a review of the local VA office decision (called the appellant ) has one year from the date on which the local VA office mails the appellant its initial determination of the claim to appeal. After one year, the local VA office determination is considered final and cannot be appealed unless there is proof of clear and unmistakable error on the part of the VA. 25 The Notice of Disagreement (NOD) 26 There is no special form needed to initiate the appeal process. The appellant need only submit a written statement disagreeing with the local VA office s claim determination and stating the veteran s wish to appeal the claim determination. This statement is called the Notice of Disagreement (NOD). 27 Appeal to the Local VA Office The NOD is filed with the same local VA office that made the decision being appealed, 28 as this is the location of the appellant s claims file or claims folder, 29 unless the appellant has moved. After the NOD is filed, the appellant may request that a Decision Review Officer (DRO) from the local VA office review the claims file. The DROs provide a second review of the entire file and may also hold a personal hearing on the claim. 30 The Statement of the Case At this point, the local VA office will either allow or not allow the claim. If the claim is disallowed, the local VA office will prepare and send to the appellant a Statement of Case (SOC) and a blank VA Form 9 to be used for continuation of the appeal. The SOC summarizes the submitted evidence, the relevant laws, and regulations and provides the local VA office s reasons for disallowing the claim Again, see Understanding at 6. Most local determinations are made by the local VA office. However, some determinations made by VA medical facilities, such as eligibility for medical treatment, may also be appealed. 24 For example, a veteran may be determined to be 20% disabled, but the veteran may believe that he/she is 40% disabled and appeal. 25 See Understanding, supra note 3, at See 38 C.F.R See Understanding, supra note 3, at C.F.R For the purpose of this report, the appellant s records will be referred to as claims file. 30 See How Do I Appeal?, supra note 5, at See Understanding, supra note 3, at 8-9. Congressional Research Service 5

10 VA Form 9 and the Substantive Appeal 32 To continue an appeal, the appellant must fill out and return the VA Form 9 the Substantive Appeal to the local VA office. Form 9 is available online. 33 The appellant must state the requested benefit, any mistakes in the SOC, and indicate whether a personal hearing is requested. 34 The Form 9 becomes part of the claims folder and is the basis for adding the appeal to the Board of Veterans Appeals docket. Specific provisions exist for withdrawing the appeal. 35 Supplemental Statement of Case 36 If the appellant submits new evidence or information, the local VA office will prepare a Supplemental Statement of Case (SSOC). The SSOC is similar to the SOC and includes the newly submitted information. 37 The appellant has 60 days from the date the SSOC was mailed to submit, in writing, any matter in dispute on the SSOC. Time Limitation 38 The local VA office must receive the VA Form 9 within 60 days from the date that the VA mailed the SOC (or SSOC) or within one year of the date that the original decision denying the claim, whichever date is later. 39 Withdrawal of Issue(s) If the appellant does not wish the Board of Veterans Appeals to examine an issue that is contained in the SOC or the SSOC, the appellant may state on Form 9 that the appellant is withdrawing the issue(s) on the appeal. 40 Issues Related to the Appeal Process Filing Extensions 41 An appellant may request an extension of the 60-day filing period for filing a Substantive Appeal or the 60-day period to respond to a Supplemental Statement of the Case. 42 The appellant makes C.F.R See Go to the website, then go to Board of Veterans Appeals, then go to VA Forms (in the lower right hand corner), then type in VA9. 34 A personal hearing must be requested. Without such a request, the BVA will review the claims file and the VA Form 9 and make a decision without meeting or speaking with the appellant and his/her representative C.F.R C.F.R (b), (c). 37 See Understanding, supra note 3, at C.F.R Id. See How Do I Appeal?, supra note 5, at See Understanding, supra note 3, at C.F.R U.S.C 5105(d)(3); 38 C.F.R Congressional Research Service 6

11 this request in writing to the local VA office handling the appeal. The appellant needs to explain to the VA local office why extra time is needed to file. Representation for the Appeal 43 The appellant may represent him/herself at the appeal. However, the VA has reported that about 90 percent of appeals heard before the Board of Veterans Appeals (BVA) have some third-party representation. 44 There are three different categories of representatives that the appellant may engage. The first includes representatives of the VSO or from the state or local veterans office. Usually, the representatives from the VSOs and the government veterans offices do not charge for their services. 45 Second, the VA recognizes certain agents who are able to represent appellants and who are certified by the VA. 46 Third, the appellant may engage a lawyer for representation. 47 The appellant must complete a VA Form to authorize representation by a VSO or a related entity on the appeal. 48 The appellant must complete a VA Form 21-22a to authorize representation by a recognized agent 49 or a lawyer for his/her appeal. 50 An appellant is limited to one representative recognized by the BVA. 51 Attorney Representation The Veterans Benefits, Health Care, and Information Technology Act of 2006, 52 enacted in the 109 th Congress, modified attorney participation in the appeal process. The act also requires the Secretary of the VA to provide additional qualifications and standards for agents and attorneys who represent veterans before the VA, including standards that deal with (1) training and character and (2) fee criteria and limitations. The Secretary is authorized to charge and collect fees from the agents or attorneys to be used for administrative expenses for veterans benefits programs. The following grounds for suspension of agents or attorneys are provided in the act: presenting frivolous claims, prior suspensions, charging excessive or unreasonable fees, or failure to comply with the Secretary s regulations. The legislation significantly broadened opportunities for legal representation during administrative appeals. Previously, an attorney could not represent a veteran for a fee until the BVA made a final decision. 53 This had the effect of excluding an attorney from the process until all of the administrative appeals had been exhausted. The act now permits an attorney to enter the 43 See in general, 38 C.F.R See Understanding, supra note 3, at See Understanding, supra note 3, at U.S.C. 5904; 38 C.F.R C.F.R C.F.R See note C.F.R C.F.R See note See Understanding, supra note 3, at P.L , Title I. 53 See Figure 1. Appeal Process at 3. Congressional Research Service 7

12 appeal process at a much earlier date after the veteran has received a decision on his or her claim from the VA and decides to appeal this initial decision administratively through the filing of a NOD. 54 An attorney may now provide representation for a fee after the NOD is filed. The act requires the Secretary to provide Congress with an evaluation of the effect of the new system of representation not later than 42 months after the date of enactment. The Secretary is also authorized to review fee agreements, and the Secretary may order a reduction in an agreed upon fee if the Secretary finds the fee excessive or unreasonable. The Secretary s decision may be reviewed by the BVA, which is authorized to make the final review of the issue. 55 Information for the Appeal Should new evidence or medical proof supporting the appellant s claim arise during the appeal process, the evidence should be submitted to the VA. If the appellant s claims file is at the local VA office and the new evidence is sent there, the VA local office will send the appellant an SSOC if it does not allow the claim after reviewing the new evidence. The new evidence will be added to the claims file and considered during the appeal process. 56 Location of the VA Form 9 After the Form 9 is filed, it becomes part of the claims file and serves as the basis for the appeal to the BVA. The Form 9, as part of the claims file, will be sent by the local VA office to the BVA and will be reviewed later by the BVA when the BVA considers the appeal and reviews the entire claims file. The Board of Veterans Appeals (BVA) Organization 57 Known as the Gateway to VA Appeals, 58 the Board of Veterans Appeals (BVA) is a part of the VA based in Washington, DC. 59 The BVA reviews benefit claims appeals and issues decisions on those appeals. The BVA is composed of Members of the Board who are attorneys experienced in veterans law, appointed by the Secretary of Veterans Affairs and approved by the President of the United States. Staff attorneys, who are designated as Counsel or Associate Counsel, assist Members of the Board in preparing decisions. 60 The function that they provide is similar to a law clerk who assists a judge in his/her legal capacities Id U.S.C See Understanding, supra note 3, at For a general overview of the BVA, see the website at 58 Id U.S.C. 7101(a); 38 U.S.C See Understanding, supra note 3, at Id. Congressional Research Service 8

13 The BVA s Docket The BVA Docket and Docket Number The local VA office will forward the appellant s claims file to the BVA s docket. The law requires that the BVA decide cases on a first come, first served basis. 62 Each appellant s case is added to the docket when the VA receives the substantive appeal VA Form 9 and the claims file from the local VA. 63 On occasion, the BVA may, on a motion by the appellant, advance the order of a claim on its docket. 64 The appellant must demonstrate compelling need, exceptional circumstances, or proof of hardship. 65 The BVA seldom grants a request for advancement on the docket, as the BVA feels that most appeals involve some form of hardship and the BVA wishes to treat all appellants fairly. 66 Waiting Time Once a case/claim has been entered on the BVA s docket, it is uncertain how long it may take for the BVA to reach a decision on the case. The VA has stated that it takes an average of two years from the time a NOD is filed until a final decision is issued. 67 However, the 2009 Report of the BVA Chairman appears to indicate that the decision/processing time has been substantially reduced. 68 Personal Hearings There are two types of personal hearings: a local VA office hearing 69 and a BVA hearing. As previously discussed, 70 a local office hearing is held at the local VA office between the appellant and a hearing officer from the local VA office staff. Such a hearing is arranged between the appellant and the local VA office. The local VA office may find in favor of the appellant. The appellant may subsequently appeal an adverse finding by the local office hearing through the BVA. The appellant may present his/her case in person to a member of the BVA. There are three types of BVA hearings: a hearing by a Board member at a the local VA office (Regional Office), called U.S.C. 7107(a); 38 C.F.R See Understanding, supra note 3, at 15. Each case is assigned a docket number when it is added to the list of cases. The first two digits are the year in which the case was filed and the remaining digits indicate the order in which the case was added to that year s list/docket. For example, , would indicate the 111 th claim filed in U.S.C. 7107(a)92); 38 C.F.R For example, terminal illness, bankruptcy, pending eviction, and other hardships. 66 See Understanding, supra note 3, at Id. 68 Report of the Chairman of the Board of Veterans Appeals (Fiscal Year 2009), at This is sometimes called a Regional Office hearing, an RO hearing, or a hearing officer hearing. 70 See Appeal to the Local VA Office on page 6. Congressional Research Service 9

14 a Travel Board hearing; 71 a hearing at the BVA office in Washington, DC; or a videoconference hearing at the local VA office, if it is equipped for videoconferencing. The VA does not pay the appellant s travel expenses. 72 Request for a BVA Hearing The typical way to request a BVA hearing is for the appellant to indicate on VA Form 9 the type of hearing that the appellant wishes. The appellant may also write to the BVA to request a hearing, indicating whether a hearing is requested at the local level or in Washington, DC. Scheduling the BVA Hearing The schedule of the hearing depends upon the type of hearing requested. The BVA has reported that the Travel Board hearings are usually held as soon as they can be scheduled on the hearing officer s calendar, 73 but that they may be difficult to arrange because of the schedules of the BVA Board members and the accumulation of a sufficient number of appeals to warrant a scheduled visit from a BVA member. 74 Videoconferenced hearings are less complicated to arrange and can be scheduled more quickly than Travel Board hearings, according to the BVA. 75 Hearings that are held at the BVA offices in Washington DC are usually scheduled close to the time when the BVA will consider the case. The BVA has reported that hearings are scheduled about three months in advance. 76 The Ninety Day Rule The local VA office will notify the appellant by letter when it transfers the claims file to the BVA in Washington, DC. The letter will inform the claimant that the claimant has ninety days from the date of the letter or until the BVA decides the case, whichever comes first, to add additional evidence to the file, request a hearing (if none was selected), and/or select or change representation. 77 In order for the BVA to accept any of these materials after the expiration of the ninety-day period, the appellant must submit a motion a written request asking the BVA to accept the item, even though it is late. The motion must include an explanation of why the item is late and demonstrate why the BVA should accept the item into the claims file. 71 See note See Understanding, supra note 3, at Id. at Id. 75 Id. 76 Id C.F.R Congressional Research Service 10

15 The Appeal at the BVA The local VA office will forward the appellant s file to the BVA. The appellant will be notified in writing when the file is officially transferred and received by the BVA. 78 The decision time in the appeal process varies from case to case. After the file is received by the BVA, the appellant s case will then be assigned to a Board member for review. When the docket number for the appeal has been reached, the file will be examined by a Board member and a staff attorney. They will check the file for completeness, review all of the evidence and arguments, the transcript of the local VA hearing, the statement of the appellant s representative (if the appellant has a representative), and any additional information that may be with the claims file. 79 The Board member may request the staff attorney to undertake additional research on the case and prepare recommendations for the review of the Board member. If the appellant requested a BVA hearing, the Board member assigned to the case will conduct the hearing before reaching a decision. Notification of the Board s Decision The BVA will issue its decision in writing. The decision may contain legal documents and legal discussions as well as medical discussions. The decision will be mailed to the appellant s home address. 80 The decision will allow, deny, or remand the claim. If the claim is allowed or denied, the BVA s decision is final. A remand is not a final decision and allows further work on the claim. 81 If the appeal is denied, the BVA will send a copy of the Notice of Appellate Rights that describes additional actions that the appellant may choose to pursue. The Remand At times, the BVA may review an appeal and determine that the case is not ready for a final decision. The BVA will send the case back to the local VA office with directions as to what should be done. The action of returning the case to the local VA office for additional work is called a remand. It is sometimes described as additional development. 82 After the case has been returned to the local VA office, the office will perform the additional work on the file. The local VA office will review the case and issue a new determination. If the local VA office does not allow the claim, it will return the case to the BVA for a final decision. The case keeps its original place on the BVA s docket, so it is usually reviewed relatively soon after it is returned to the BVA See Understanding, supra note 3, at 21. Appellants may check the status of their files after its transfer by BVA by telephone at Id. at Id. 81 See How Do I Appeal?, supra note 5, at See Understanding, supra note 3, at Id. Congressional Research Service 11

16 Certain cases are remanded because of new rulings by the U.S. Court of Appeals for Veterans Claims or changes in the law. The local VA office will then review them within the context of the new legislation or the court ruling. 84 Additional Appeal Options Should the appellant wish to appeal the BVA s decision, the appellant may appeal to the United States Court of Appeals for Veterans Claims (CAVC), an independent court and not part of the VA. 85 An appellant may also wish to pursue further motions with the BVA. Notice of Appeal Usually, the appellant must file the Notice of Appeal with the CAVC within 120 days from the date the BVA s decision is mailed. (The mailing date is stamped on the front of the BVA s decision.) 86 If the appellant filed a motion to reconsider with the BVA within the 120-day time period and that motion was denied, the appellant has a new 120-day period to file the Notice of Appeal with the CAVC. 87 The new 120-day period begins on the date the BVA mails the appellant a letter notifying the appellant that it has denied the motion to reconsider. Motion for Reconsideration If the appellant is able to demonstrate that the BVA made an obvious error of fact or of law in its decision, the appellant may file a written motion to reconsider the appeal. 88 The appellant may have the VSO representative advise him/her whether to file the motion, and the VSO representative may also provide assistance in its preparation. The motion to reconsider is sent directly to the BVA and not to the local VA office. The appellant must demonstrate that the BVA made a mistake in law or in fact and that the BVA s decision would have been different if the mistake had not been made. 89 Reopening the Case If the appellant has new and material evidence relating to his/her claim, the appellant can request that the case be reopened. 90 In order to be considered new and material, the evidence 84 Id. 85 See the CAVC s website: 86 See discussion below of current litigation concerning this issue, and also congressional consideration of an extension of the 120-day appeal filing period. 87 See Understanding, supra note 3, at for the appropriate addresses to file the Notice of Appeal and a copy of the Notice of Appeal U.S.C. 7103; 38 C.F.R ; 38 C.F.R See Understanding, supra note 3, at U.S.C. 5108; 38 U.S.C. 7104(b); 38 C.F.R ; 38 C.F.R Congressional Research Service 12

17 submitted must include information related to the case that was not included in the claims folder when the Board reviewed and decided the case. To reopen a case, the appellant must submit the new evidence directly to the local VA office and not to the BVA. 91 CUE Motion A BVA decision may be reversed or revised if the appellant is able to show that the decision contained clear and unmistakable error (CUE). 92 The written request for the BVA to review its decision for CUE is called a motion. CUE motions are filed directly with the BVA and not with the local VA office. The motion for CUE review must meet various requirements. In order to succeed, the conclusion must be reached that the BVA would have decided the case differently, but for the error. A difference in opinion is not sufficient. 93 If the motion is denied, the appellant cannot request another CUE review. The VA has reported that not many CUE motions are successful. The appellant may file a motion to review a BVA decision for CUE at any time. However, if the motion for CUE is filed after filing a timely Notice of Appeal with the CAVC (120 days), the BVA will not be able to rule on the CUE motion. 94 Death of the Appellant Before a Decision Issued The death of the appellant usually ends the appeal. 95 If the appellant dies, the BVA normally dismisses the appeal without issuing a decision. Any rights of a deceased appellant s survivors are not affected by this action. The survivors may file a claim at the VA regional office (RO) for any benefits to which they may be entitled. 96 Subsequent Judicial Appeals The U.S. Court of Appeals for the Federal Circuit (Federal Circuit) has exclusive jurisdiction to hear cases involving challenges to VA decisions in an appeal of a CAVC decision and in a direct challenge to VA regulation and VA policies of general applicability. 97 A decision of the CAVC may be appealed to the Federal Circuit by the persons who appealed to the CAVC or by the VA. An appeal to the Federal Circuit must be filed within 60 days of the final CAVC decision. After the Federal Circuit issues a final decision, either the claimant or the VA may petition the U.S. 91 See Understanding, supra note 3, at U.S.C. 7111; 38 C.F.R. 20, subpart O. 93 Id. 94 See Understanding, supra note 3, at U.S.C. 7104(a); 38 C.F.R See Understanding, supra note 3, at U.S.C See CRS Report RS22561, Veterans Affairs: The U.S. Court of Appeals for Veterans Claims Judicial Review of VA Decision Making, by Douglas Reid Weimer. Congressional Research Service 13

18 Supreme Court for certiorari (to hear the case) within ninety days of the Federal Circuit s final action. 98 The Supreme Court is the court of last resort and the Supreme Court s decision is final. 99 The 120-Day Filing Deadline Background and Possible Issues for Congress An area of considerable interest has been the 120-day statute of limitations for the veteran to appeal an adverse decision of the BVA to the CAVC. 100 Interest has focused on the possibility of expanding the filing deadline, under certain circumstances either administratively or legislatively. This requirement has been interpreted as being absolute, and generally not subject to extension. Over the years, questions have arisen concerning the situation where a veteran s serviceconnected disability may prevent the veteran from meeting the 120-day filing deadline to the CAVC. For example, a veteran may be mentally disabled through post-traumatic stress. Should such cases be given special exception(s) or treatment? Decisions of the RO, BVA, and Lower Courts Such a case has arisen and has been appealed to the U.S. Supreme Court Henderson v. Shinseki. 101 In this case, the veteran, David Henderson, had served on active military duty from 1950 to He was discharged in 1952 after being diagnosed with paranoid schizophrenia; he established a service connection and received and currently has a 100% disability rating. In 2001, Henderson filed a claim for monthly compensation based on his need for in-home care with the VA Regional Office (RO). The RO denied the claim and Henderson appealed to the BVA. The BVA denied his claim. Henderson filed a notice of appeal with the CAVC 15 days after the expiration of the 120-day appeal period (38 U.S.C. 7266(a)). The CAVC ruling, in a 2-1 decision, denied Henderson s claim, and determined that Congress had specifically authorized it to conduct independent judicial appellate review of the Board, and that well-settled law established that its cases were civil actions. 102 Henderson s appeal was dismissed by the CAVC for lack of jurisdiction. 103 Henderson appealed the CAVC s ruling to the U.S. Court of Appeals for the Federal Circuit (appeals court), in a case captioned Henderson v. Shinseki. 104 Examining the factual and legal U.S.C. 7292(c). 99 In recent testimony, the Chairman of the BVA outlined in detail the statistical figures of the various appeals from the BVA to the CAVC. Examining the Appellate Processes and Their Impact on Veterans: Hearing Before the H. Sub. On Disability Assistance and Memorial Affairs, 111 th Cong., 1 st Sess (2009)(statement of Hon. James P. Terry, Chairman, Board of Veterans Appeals, U.S. Department of Veterans Appeals. 100 See discussion on p U.S. No (Argued Dec. 6, 2010). 102 Henderson, 22 Vet. App. at Id. at F.3d 1201 (Fed. Cir. 2009). Congressional Research Service 14

19 circumstances, the appeals court determined that the120-period was a time of review provision in a civil case, rather than a statute of limitations. As such, the statute was not subject to equitable tolling; it was mandatory and jurisdictional. In its opinion, the appeals court held that if Congress determined that the 120-day period for appealing to the Veterans Court from a decision of the Board should be subject to equitable tolling, it may amend 7266(a) to compel a result different from the one we reach today. 105 The appeals court upheld the CAVC s finding of lack of jurisdiction, and dismissed Henderson s appeal. U.S. Supreme Court Henderson v. Shinseki 106 Henderson appealed the decision of the appeals court to the U.S. Supreme Court (Court). Oral argument was held before the Court on December 6, The central issue is whether a veteran may still file an appeal to the CAVC after an unfavorable BVA decision, even if the veteran fails to file within the statutorily mandated 120-day filing period, due to circumstances which may make it impossible for the veteran to meet the deadline. In the factual situation, Henderson was bedridden during a portion of the 120-day appeal period, and filed his Notice of Appeal (NOA) with the CAVC 15 days late. The Court s decision may have far-reaching effects and could impact many aspects of the appeal process. If the Court affirms the decision of the appeals court, the current 120-day appeal period will presumably be absolute, admitting of no exceptions. If the Court determines that the statute can be interpreted so as to provide exceptions to the 120-day period, changes may have to be made administratively and/or legislatively to accommodate such a change. The Court s finding is eagerly awaited by numerous veterans and others, and may have a significant impact on future appeals and the timeliness of their filing. 105 Id. at U.S. No (Argued Dec. 6, 2010). Congressional Research Service 15

20 Appendix A. Duties and Obligations of the VA to the Claimant/Appellant Duties and Obligations of the VA to the Claimant/Appellant 107 The VA 108 has various legal obligations to a claimant/appellant relating to the completeness of the application for benefits (or a subsequent appeal), the provision of medical and service records, and other issues related to the application/appeals process. Application and Notice of Incomplete Application The VA is required to provide to any person claiming or applying for any benefit, the instructions and forms necessary to apply for that benefit. 109 These materials are to be provided free of all expense to the claimant. 110 If the claimant s application for a VA benefit is incomplete, the VA is required to notify the claimant of the information that is necessary to complete the application. 111 Required Information and Evidence; and Time Limitation 112 After the VA receives a complete or a nearly complete application for benefits, the VA is required to notify the claimant of any information or medical or lay evidence that is needed to substantiate the claim. 113 As part of this notification requirement, the VA is required to indicate which information and evidence is to be provided by the claimant and which information the VA will attempt to obtain on the claimant s behalf to substantiate and complete the claim. The claimant is required to submit the above-mentioned evidence to substantiate the claim within one year of the date of the VA s notification. If no further evidence is obtained, no benefits will be paid or furnished on this claim See CRS Report RL33323, Veterans Affairs: Benefits for Service-Connected Disabilities, by Douglas Reid Weimer. 108 The statutory language provides that the Secretary is required to provide various assistance to the claimant. For the purposes of this summary and for consistency, the term VA is used instead U.S.C. 5102(a); 38 C.F.R (a) U.S.C. 5102(a) U.S.C. 5102(b); 38 C.F.R (b)(2). 112 These provisions are not applicable for any application or claim for government insurance benefits. 38 U.S.C. 5103(b)(2) U.S.C. 5103(a); 38 C.F.R (b) U.S.C. 5103(a); 38 C.F.R (b)(1). Congressional Research Service 16

21 Duty to Assist Claimants: Records The VA is required to make reasonable efforts to assist a claimant in obtaining evidence necessary to substantiate the claim for benefits. 115 However, certain exceptions exist to this requirement. The VA is not required to provide assistance to the claimant if no reasonable possibility exists that such assistance would aid in substantiating the claim. 116 The VA may defer providing assistance pending the claimant s submission of essential information that is missing from the claimant s application. 117 Assistance in Obtaining Records The VA is required to make reasonable efforts to obtain relevant records (including private records) that the claimant adequately identifies to the VA and authorizes the VA to obtain. 118 Federal regulations outline the procedures for obtaining records not in the custody of a federal department or agency 119 and for obtaining records that are in the custody of a federal department or agency. 120 If, after making reasonable efforts, the VA is unable to locate the records, the VA will notify the claimant that it is unable to obtain the records pursuant to this claim. 121 The notification must identify the records being sought, explain the efforts made to obtain the records, and describe any further action to be taken by the VA regarding this claim. 122 The VA s efforts to obtain records from the federal department or agency must continue until the records are obtained, unless it is reasonably certain that such records do not exist or that further efforts to obtain the records would be futile. 123 Records for Compensation Claims If the case involves a claim for disability compensation, additional assistance in obtaining records is required to be provided. 124 Assistance is to be provided in locating the claimant s service medical records and other relevant records relating to the claimant s active military, naval, or air service that are held or maintained by a governmental entity; 125 records of relevant medical treatment or examination at VA health-care facilities; 126 and any other relevant records held by any federal department or agency that the claimant identifies and authorizes the VA to obtain U.S.C. 5103A(a)(1); 38 C.F.R (c)(1) U.S.C. 5103A(a)(2); 38 C.F.R (d) U.S.C. 5103A(a)(3) U.S.C. 5103A(b)(1); 38 C.F.R (c) C.F.R A(c)(1) C.F.R A(c)(2) U.S.C. 5103A(b)(2); 38 C.F.R (e). 122 Id U.S.C. 5103A(b)(3) U.S.C. 5103A(c); 38 C.F.R (c)(3) U.S.C. 5103A(c)(1) U.S.C. 5103A(c)(2) U.S.C. 5103A(c)(3). Congressional Research Service 17

22 Medical Examinations for Compensation Claims If the case involves a claim for disability compensation, the VA is required to provide a medical examination or obtain a medical opinion when such an examination or opinion is necessary to make a decision on the claim. 128 The VA is required to treat an examination or opinion as necessary if the evidence on the record, taking into consideration all information and lay or medical evidence 1) contains competent evidence that the claimant has a current disability or persistent or recurrent symptoms of disability 129 or 2) indicates that the disability or symptoms may be associated with the claimant s active military, naval, or air service; 130 but the record does not contain sufficient medical evidence for the VA to make a decision on the claim. 131 Other Assistance not Precluded The statute is not to be construed as precluding the VA from providing such other assistance to a claimant in substantiating a claim as the VA considers appropriate. 132 Decisions and Notices of Decisions When the VA makes a decision affecting the provision of benefits to a claimant, the VA is required, on a timely basis, to provide the claimant (and the claimant s representative) notice of the decision. 133 The notice must include an explanation of the procedure for obtaining a review of the decision. 134 If the VA denies a benefit, the notice is required to include a statement of the reason for the decision and a summary of the evidence considered by the VA. 135 VA s Obligation to Assist in the Development of Claims Federal regulations require the VA to assist the claimant in developing the facts pertinent to the claim and to render a decision that grants every benefit that can be supported in law while protecting the interests of the government. 136 Therefore, the VA has the duty to consider all legal theories upon which the claim could be granted, regardless of whether the claimant argues or focuses on every possible legal theory U.S.C. 5103A(c)(4); 38 C.F.R (c)(4) U.S.C. 5103A(d)(2)(A) U.S.C. 5103A(d)(2)(B) U.S.C. 5103A(d)(2)(C) U.S.C. 5103A(g) U.S.C. 5104(a); 38 C.F.R (b). 134 Id U.S.C. 5104(b) C.F.R (a). Congressional Research Service 18

23 Disallowed Claims The statute specifically provides that the VA is not required to reopen a claim that has been disallowed except when new and material evidence is presented or secured. 137 Reopening Disallowed Claims If any new or material evidence is presented or secured relating to a claim that has been disallowed, the VA is required to reopen the claim and review the former disposition of the claim. 138 Revision of Decisions on Grounds of Clear and Unmistakable Error A VA decision is subject to revision on the grounds of clear and unmistakable error, as previously discussed. 139 A review to determine whether a clear and unmistakable error exists in a case may be initiated by the VA or upon the request of the claimant. 140 A request for a revision of a VA decision based on clear and unmistakable error may be made at any time after the decision is made. 141 Such a request for a revision shall be submitted to the VA and shall be decided in the same manner as any other claim. 142 If there is evidence to establish the error, the prior decision is reversed or revised. 143 For the purposes of authorizing benefits, a rating or other adjudicative decision that constitutes a reversal or revision of a prior decision on the grounds of clear and unmistakable error, is treated as if the decision had been made on the date of the prior decision. 144 Benefit of the Doubt Standard The VA is required to consider all information and the legal and medical evidence of record in a case before it with respect to benefits under the laws administered by the VA. 145 When there is an approximate balance of positive and negative evidence regarding any issue material to the determination, the VA shall give the benefit of the doubt to the claimant. 146 Regulations provide that when reasonable doubt arises, such doubt will be resolved in favor of the claimant. 147 For instance, the submitted medical evidence generally needs to show that it is as likely as not that there is a connection between the in-service injury, occurrence, or illness and the current disability. Thus, the VA can deny the claim only if the preponderance of the evidence is against the claim U.S.C. 5103A(f) U.S.C U.S.C. 5109A(a). See discussion at U.S.C. 5109A(c) U.S.C. 5109A(d) U.S.C. 5109A(e) U.S.C. 5109(A)(a). See discussion at U.S.C. 5109(A)(b) U.S.C. 5107(b). 146 Id. See 38 C.F.R C.F.R Congressional Research Service 19

Veterans Affairs: The Appeal Process for Veterans Claims

Veterans Affairs: The Appeal Process for Veterans Claims Order Code RL33704 Veterans Affairs: The Appeal Process for Veterans Claims Updated March 20, 2008 Douglas Reid Weimer Legislative Attorney American Law Division Veterans Affairs: The Appeal Process for

More information

HOW TO WIN YOUR VA CLAIM

HOW TO WIN YOUR VA CLAIM Introduction HOW TO WIN YOUR VA CLAIM This book is intended to provide veterans with a short and easy to understand explanation about how to win a VA disability claim. This includes information on how

More information

Designated for electronic publication only UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR VETERANS CLAIMS NO Before SCHOELEN, Judge. MEMORANDUM DECISION

Designated for electronic publication only UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR VETERANS CLAIMS NO Before SCHOELEN, Judge. MEMORANDUM DECISION Designated for electronic publication only UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR VETERANS CLAIMS NO. 14-3623 PHILIP M. DOBBINS, APPELLANT, V. ROBERT A. MCDONALD, SECRETARY OF VETERANS AFFAIRS, APPELLEE. Before

More information

UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR VETERANS CLAIMS NO On Appeal from the Board of Veterans' Appeals. (Decided June 22, 2012)

UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR VETERANS CLAIMS NO On Appeal from the Board of Veterans' Appeals. (Decided June 22, 2012) UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR VETERANS CLAIMS NO. 11-1828 DAVID A. MAYS, APPELLANT, V. David A. Mays, Pro se. ERIC K. SHINSEKI SECRETARY OF VETERANS AFFAIRS, APPELLEE. On Appeal from the Board of

More information

UNITED STATES COURT OF VETERANS APPEALS. No On Appeal from the Board of Veterans' Appeals. (Decided April 30, 1996 )

UNITED STATES COURT OF VETERANS APPEALS. No On Appeal from the Board of Veterans' Appeals. (Decided April 30, 1996 ) UNITED STATES COURT OF VETERANS APPEALS No. 93-903 EMERSON E. ARCHBOLD, APPELLANT, v. JESSE BROWN, SECRETARY OF VETERANS AFFAIRS, APPELLEE. On Appeal from the Board of Veterans' Appeals (Decided April

More information

New Developments in How to Win Benefits. New Court Cases

New Developments in How to Win Benefits. New Court Cases New Developments in How to Win Benefits New Court Cases Savage v. Shinseki, Vet. App. No. 09-4406 Duty to seek clarification of a private medical report What happened? Veteran sought higher rating for

More information

Types of Significant VA Benefits

Types of Significant VA Benefits Types of Significant VA Benefits Service-Connected Disability Benefits ( Compensation ) Non-Service-Connected Disability Pension Benefits for War-Time Veterans ( Needs Based ) Service-Connected Death Benefits

More information

Designated for electronic publication only UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR VETERANS CLAIMS NO Before SCHOELEN, Judge. MEMORANDUM DECISION

Designated for electronic publication only UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR VETERANS CLAIMS NO Before SCHOELEN, Judge. MEMORANDUM DECISION Designated for electronic publication only UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR VETERANS CLAIMS NO. 13-328 RONALD FRADKIN, APPELLANT, V. ERIC K. SHINSEKI, SECRETARY OF VETERANS AFFAIRS, APPELLEE. Before

More information

United States Court of Appeals for the Federal Circuit

United States Court of Appeals for the Federal Circuit United States Court of Appeals for the Federal Circuit BONNIE J. RUSICK, Claimant-Appellant, v. SLOAN D. GIBSON, Acting Secretary of Veterans Affairs, Respondent-Appellee. 2013-7105 Appeal from the United

More information

An introduction to VA disability benefits

An introduction to VA disability benefits Introduction to Benefits for Veterans with Disabilities An introduction to VA disability benefits Unruh Law, P.C. 100 Pine Street, Suite 1250 San Francisco, CA 94111 john@jru-law.com About Me B.A. from

More information

UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR VETERANS CLAIMS. Before PIETSCH, BARTLEY, and GREENBERG, Judges. O R D E R

UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR VETERANS CLAIMS. Before PIETSCH, BARTLEY, and GREENBERG, Judges. O R D E R UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR VETERANS CLAIMS NO. 15-0835 WILLIE J. THREATT, APPELLANT, V. ROBERT A. MCDONALD, SECRETARY OF VETERANS AFFAIRS, APPELLEE. Before PIETSCH, BARTLEY, and GREENBERG, Judges.

More information

Department of Veterans Affairs

Department of Veterans Affairs Department of Veterans Affairs 1. Office of Inspector General -- Audit Report Audit of Appeals Processing Impact on Claims For Veterans' Benefits -- Report # 5D2-B01-013 Date: March 15, 1995 VA needs to

More information

Designated for electronic publication only UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR VETERANS CLAIMS NO Before GREENBERG, Judge. MEMORANDUM DECISION

Designated for electronic publication only UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR VETERANS CLAIMS NO Before GREENBERG, Judge. MEMORANDUM DECISION Designated for electronic publication only UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR VETERANS CLAIMS NO. 13-333 GLEN P. HOFFMANN, APPELLANT, V. ERIC K. SHINSEKI, SECRETARY OF VETERANS AFFAIRS, APPELLEE. Before

More information

Designated for electronic publication only UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR VETERANS CLAIMS NO Before SCHOELEN, Judge. MEMORANDUM DECISION

Designated for electronic publication only UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR VETERANS CLAIMS NO Before SCHOELEN, Judge. MEMORANDUM DECISION Designated for electronic publication only UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR VETERANS CLAIMS NO. 14-2033 IVOR R. PARSONS, APPELLANT, V. ROBERT A. MCDONALD, SECRETARY OF VETERANS AFFAIRS, APPELLEE. Before

More information

BOARD OF VETERANS' APPEALS DEPARTMENT OF VETERANS AFFAIRS WASHINGTON, DC 20420

BOARD OF VETERANS' APPEALS DEPARTMENT OF VETERANS AFFAIRS WASHINGTON, DC 20420 BOARD OF VETERANS' APPEALS DEPARTMENT OF VETERANS AFFAIRS WASHINGTON, DC 20420 IN THE APPEAL OF DOCKET NO. 12-07 243 ) DATE ) ) On appeal from the Department of Veterans Affairs Regional Office in Portland,

More information

Citation Nr: DOCKET NO ) DATE ) ) On appeal from the Department of Veterans Affairs Regional Office in Atlanta, Georgia THE ISSUE

Citation Nr: DOCKET NO ) DATE ) ) On appeal from the Department of Veterans Affairs Regional Office in Atlanta, Georgia THE ISSUE Citation Nr: 1424188 Decision Date: 05/29/14 Archive Date: 06/06/14 DOCKET NO. 11-31 143 ) DATE ) ) On appeal from the Department of Veterans Affairs Regional Office in Atlanta, Georgia THE ISSUE 1. Whether

More information

Overview of the Fully Developed Claims (FDC) Program and Provisional Decisions NVLSP

Overview of the Fully Developed Claims (FDC) Program and Provisional Decisions NVLSP Overview of the Fully Developed Claims (FDC) Program and Provisional Decisions NVLSP 2014 1 FDC OVERVIEW What is an FDC Claim? VA claims that it will process FDC claims within 90 days In general, it is

More information

VA Claims Manual Contents

VA Claims Manual Contents Contents Introduction... 1 Can I file my claim by myself?... 1 Where can I find a VSO, Attorney, or Accredited Claims Representative?... 2 Recent Legislation Impact... 7 Claims Overview... 7 Burden of

More information

UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR VETERANS CLAIMS NO On Appeal from the Board of Veterans' Appeals. (Decided April 4, 2014)

UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR VETERANS CLAIMS NO On Appeal from the Board of Veterans' Appeals. (Decided April 4, 2014) UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR VETERANS CLAIMS NO. 12-1700 GEORGE D. MURPHY, APPELLANT, V. ERIC K. SHINSEKI, SECRETARY OF VETERANS AFFAIRS, APPELLEE. On Appeal from the Board of Veterans' Appeals (Decided

More information

UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR VETERANS CLAIMS. No On Appeal From the Board of Veterans' Appeals. (Decided August 16, 2006 )

UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR VETERANS CLAIMS. No On Appeal From the Board of Veterans' Appeals. (Decided August 16, 2006 ) UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR VETERANS CLAIMS No. 04-0845 PAMELA R. SHEETS, APPELLANT, V. R. JAMES NICHOLSON, SECRETARY OF VETERANS AFFAIRS, APPELLEE. On Appeal From the Board of Veterans' Appeals

More information

GAO VETERANS BENEFITS. Quality Assurance for Disability Claims and Appeals Processing Can Be Further Improved

GAO VETERANS BENEFITS. Quality Assurance for Disability Claims and Appeals Processing Can Be Further Improved GAO United States General Accounting Office Report to the Ranking Democratic Member, Committee on Veterans Affairs, House of Representatives August 2002 VETERANS BENEFITS Quality Assurance for Disability

More information

Vet. App. No IN THE UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR VETERANS CLAIMS. EARNEST L. WILSON, Appellant,

Vet. App. No IN THE UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR VETERANS CLAIMS. EARNEST L. WILSON, Appellant, Vet. App. No. 12-1838 IN THE UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR VETERANS CLAIMS EARNEST L. WILSON, Appellant, v. ERIC K. SHINSEKI, Secretary of Veterans Affairs, Appellee. ON APPEAL FROM THE BOARD OF VETERANS

More information

Designated for electronic publication only UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR VETERANS CLAIMS NO Before SCHOELEN, Judge. MEMORANDUM DECISION

Designated for electronic publication only UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR VETERANS CLAIMS NO Before SCHOELEN, Judge. MEMORANDUM DECISION Designated for electronic publication only UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR VETERANS CLAIMS NO. 10-2391 PETER J. KONDOS, APPELLANT, V. ERIC K. SHINSEKI, SECRETARY OF VETERANS AFFAIRS, APPELLEE. SCHOELEN,

More information

The Audit is Over Now What?

The Audit is Over Now What? Where Do We Go From Here: A Comparison of Alternatives When You and the IRS Agree to Disagree JENNY LOUISE JOHNSON, Holland & Knight LLP Co-Chair of Tax Controversy Practice CHARLES E. HODGES, Kilpatrick

More information

Note: Pursuant to 38 U.S.C. 4067(d)(2) (1988) this decision will become the decision of the Court thirty days from the date hereof.

Note: Pursuant to 38 U.S.C. 4067(d)(2) (1988) this decision will become the decision of the Court thirty days from the date hereof. Note: Pursuant to 38 U.S.C. 4067(d)(2) (1988) this decision will become the decision of the Court thirty days from the date hereof. UNITED STATES COURT OF VETERANS APPEALS No. 90-107 BONNIE L. MURPHY,

More information

DEPARTMENT OF VETERANS AFFAIRS Veterans Benefits Administration Washington, D.C

DEPARTMENT OF VETERANS AFFAIRS Veterans Benefits Administration Washington, D.C DEPARTMENT OF VETERANS AFFAIRS Veterans Benefits Administration Washington, D.C. 20420 March 26, 2013 Director (00/21) In Reply Refer To: 211 All VA Regional Offices and Centers Fast Letter 13-05 ATTN:

More information

SEC. 5. SMALL CASE PROCEDURE FOR REQUESTING COMPETENT AUTHORITY ASSISTANCE.01 General.02 Small Case Standards.03 Small Case Filing Procedure

SEC. 5. SMALL CASE PROCEDURE FOR REQUESTING COMPETENT AUTHORITY ASSISTANCE.01 General.02 Small Case Standards.03 Small Case Filing Procedure 26 CFR 601.201: Rulings and determination letters. Rev. Proc. 96 13 OUTLINE SECTION 1. PURPOSE OF MUTUAL AGREEMENT PROCESS SEC. 2. SCOPE Suspension.02 Requests for Assistance.03 U.S. Competent Authority.04

More information

Disability Benefits Available Under the Social Security Disability Insurance (SSDI) and Veterans Disability Compensation (VDC) Programs

Disability Benefits Available Under the Social Security Disability Insurance (SSDI) and Veterans Disability Compensation (VDC) Programs Disability Benefits Available Under the Social Security Disability Insurance (SSDI) and Veterans Disability Compensation (VDC) Programs Umar Moulta-Ali Presidential Management Fellow June 17, 2010 Congressional

More information

USFC {104BCF5 F-D956-4C09-A64F-4E78C5CE5 E1F} {95338} { '071752} {081908} REPLYBRIEF

USFC {104BCF5 F-D956-4C09-A64F-4E78C5CE5 E1F} {95338} { '071752} {081908} REPLYBRIEF Irllll IIIIIIII Irll IMIIIII Ilfll fill IIIIrl IIIIIll MI111111 IIII USFC2008-7058-04 {104BCF5 F-D956-4C09-A64F-4E78C5CE5 E1F} {95338} {30-080910'071752} {081908} REPLYBRIEF 2008-7058 UNITED STATES COURT

More information

Follow this and additional works at:

Follow this and additional works at: 2013 Decisions Opinions of the United States Court of Appeals for the Third Circuit 7-3-2013 USA v. Edward Meehan Precedential or Non-Precedential: Non-Precedential Docket No. 11-3392 Follow this and additional

More information

Department Of Veterans Affairs 2 Main Divisions

Department Of Veterans Affairs 2 Main Divisions Federal Veterans Benefits Anna S. Richardson, Esq. Co-Executive Director January 16, 2018 MCLE/MLRI Department Of Veterans Affairs 2 Main Divisions Veterans Benefits Administration Regional Offices Boston,

More information

Information on Individual Unemployability

Information on Individual Unemployability Information on Individual Unemployability DEPARTMENT OF VETERANS AFFAIRS Veterans Benefits Administration Washington, D.C. 20420 September 14, 2010 Director (00/21) In Reply Refer To: 211B All VA Regional

More information

Chairman Coffman, Ranking Member Kirkpatrick and members of the Subcommittee:

Chairman Coffman, Ranking Member Kirkpatrick and members of the Subcommittee: STATEMENT OF JOSEPH A. VIOLANTE DAV NATIONAL LEGISLATIVE DIRECTOR BEFORE THE COMMITTEE ON VETERANS AFFAIRS SUBCOMMITTEE ON OVERSIGHT AND INVESTIGATIONS HOUSE OF REPRESENTATIVES SEPTEMBER 10, 2014 Chairman

More information

SERVICE OFFICER CODE OF PROCEDURE

SERVICE OFFICER CODE OF PROCEDURE The American Legion SERVICE OFFICER CODE OF PROCEDURE One of the most important responsibilities of the accredited representative is to ensure that the claimant receives Due Process under the laws and

More information

Designated for electronic publication only UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR VETERANS CLAIMS NO Before LANCE, Judge. MEMORANDUM DECISION

Designated for electronic publication only UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR VETERANS CLAIMS NO Before LANCE, Judge. MEMORANDUM DECISION Designated for electronic publication only UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR VETERANS CLAIMS NO. 13-1036 JAMES B. WALKER, APPELLANT, V. ROBERT A. MCDONALD, SECRETARY OF VETERANS AFFAIRS, APPELLEE. Before

More information

STATE OF MICHIGAN SIXTEENTH JUDICIAL CIRCUIT COURT. Case No AE OPINION AND ORDER

STATE OF MICHIGAN SIXTEENTH JUDICIAL CIRCUIT COURT. Case No AE OPINION AND ORDER STATE OF MICHIGAN SIXTEENTH JUDICIAL CIRCUIT COURT LISA NELSON, Claimant/Appellant, vs. Case No. 17-0123-AE ROBOT SUPPORT, INC., and Employer/Appellee, MICHIGAN DEPARTMENT OF LICENSING AND REGULATORY AFFAIRS,

More information

ARMED SERVICES BOARD OF CONTRACT APPEALS. Appeal of -- ) ) The Swanson Group, Inc. ) ASBCA No ) Under Contract No. N C-9509 )

ARMED SERVICES BOARD OF CONTRACT APPEALS. Appeal of -- ) ) The Swanson Group, Inc. ) ASBCA No ) Under Contract No. N C-9509 ) ARMED SERVICES BOARD OF CONTRACT APPEALS Appeal of -- ) ) The Swanson Group, Inc. ) ASBCA No. 54863 ) Under Contract No. N68711-91-C-9509 ) APPEARANCE FOR THE APPELLANT: APPEARANCES FOR THE GOVERNMENT:

More information

Mr. Chairman and Members of the Subcommittee:

Mr. Chairman and Members of the Subcommittee: STATEMENT OF PAUL R. VARELA DAV ASSISTANT NATIONAL LEGISLATIVE DIRECTOR COMMITTEE ON VETERANS AFFAIRS SUBCOMMITTEE ON DISABILITY ASSISTANCE AND MEMORIAL AFFAIRS UNITED STATES HOUSE OF REPRESENTATIVES JANUARY

More information

ARKANSAS COURT OF APPEALS

ARKANSAS COURT OF APPEALS ARKANSAS COURT OF APPEALS DIVISION II No. CV-15-293 UNIFIRST CORPORATION APPELLANT V. LUDWIG PROPERTIES, INC. D/B/A 71 EXPRESS TRAVEL PLAZA APPELLEE Opinion Delivered December 2, 2015 APPEAL FROM THE SEBASTIAN

More information

Procedures for Protest to New York State and City Tribunals

Procedures for Protest to New York State and City Tribunals September 25, 1997 Procedures for Protest to New York State and City Tribunals By: Glenn Newman This new feature of the New York Law Journal will highlight cases involving New York State and City tax controversies

More information

United States Court of Appeals for the Federal Circuit

United States Court of Appeals for the Federal Circuit United States Court of Appeals for the Federal Circuit KELLY L. STEPHENSON, Petitioner, v. OFFICE OF PERSONNEL MANAGEMENT, Respondent. 2012-3074 Petition for review of the Merit Systems Protection Board

More information

Chapter 15 Claim Disputes Member Appeals and

Chapter 15 Claim Disputes Member Appeals and 15 Claim Disputes, Member Appeals, and Member Grievances Reviewed/Revised: 10/10/2017, 07/13/2017, 02/01/2017, 02/15/2016, 09/16/2015, 09/18/2014 Definitions: Claim Dispute As defined in A.A.C.R9-34-402

More information

ARKANSAS COURT OF APPEALS

ARKANSAS COURT OF APPEALS ARKANSAS COURT OF APPEALS DIVISION III No. CV-13-457 KENT SMITH, D.V.M., Individually and d/b/a PERRY VET SERVICES APPELLANT V. KIMBERLY V. FREEMAN and ARMISTEAD COUNCIL FREEMAN, JR. APPELLEES Opinion

More information

[NOTE: The following annotated sections of the C.F.R. are from BNA s Patent, Trademark, and Copyright Regulations,

[NOTE: The following annotated sections of the C.F.R. are from BNA s Patent, Trademark, and Copyright Regulations, [NOTE: The following annotated sections of the C.F.R. are from BNA s Patent, Trademark, and Copyright Regulations, edited by James D. Crowne, and are current as of June 1, 2003.] APPEAL TO THE BOARD OF

More information

Case3:09-cv MMC Document22 Filed09/08/09 Page1 of 8

Case3:09-cv MMC Document22 Filed09/08/09 Page1 of 8 Case:0-cv-0-MMC Document Filed0/0/0 Page of IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE NORTHERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA 0 United States District Court For the Northern District of California NICOLE GLAUS,

More information

Arbitration Forums, Inc. Rules

Arbitration Forums, Inc. Rules Arbitration Forums, Inc. Rules Effective June 15, 2013; Revision Effective November 1, 2013 The following rules are made and administered by Arbitration Forums, Inc. (AF) under the authority of Article

More information

Public Safety Officers Benefits (PSOB) and Public Safety Officers Educational Assistance (PSOEA) Programs

Public Safety Officers Benefits (PSOB) and Public Safety Officers Educational Assistance (PSOEA) Programs Public Safety Officers Benefits (PSOB) and Public Safety Officers Educational Assistance (PSOEA) Programs Scott D. Szymendera Analyst in Disability Policy October 1, 2018 Congressional Research Service

More information

SECTION 5. SMALL CASE PROCEDURE FOR REQUESTING COMPETENT AUTHORITY ASSISTANCE.01 General.02 Small Case Standards.03 Small Case Filing Procedure

SECTION 5. SMALL CASE PROCEDURE FOR REQUESTING COMPETENT AUTHORITY ASSISTANCE.01 General.02 Small Case Standards.03 Small Case Filing Procedure Rev. Proc. 2002 52 SECTION 1. PURPOSE OF THE REVENUE PROCEDURE SECTION 2. SCOPE.01 In General.02 Requests for Assistance.03 Authority of the U.S. Competent Authority.04 General Process.05 Failure to Request

More information

United States Court of Appeals For the Eighth Circuit

United States Court of Appeals For the Eighth Circuit United States Court of Appeals For the Eighth Circuit No. 17-3415 John Johnston lllllllllllllllllllllplaintiff - Appellant v. Prudential Insurance Company of America llllllllllllllllllllldefendant - Appellee

More information

Supportive Documentation for Applying for Individual Mandatory CLE Recognition in Your State

Supportive Documentation for Applying for Individual Mandatory CLE Recognition in Your State Supportive Documentation for Applying for Individual Mandatory CLE Recognition in Your State A. Description of the Course TITLE: Qualified CLE Course to Maintain Accreditation with the Department of Veterans

More information

VA Issues Interim Guidelines on Debt Collection Waiver as a Result of Legislation

VA Issues Interim Guidelines on Debt Collection Waiver as a Result of Legislation Copyright 1990 by National Clearinghouse for Legal Services. All rights Reserved. 24 Clearinghouse Review 829 (December 1990) VA Issues Interim Guidelines on Debt Collection Waiver as a Result of Legislation

More information

Casey Matuszak MOPH Training Orlando, FL March 2014

Casey Matuszak MOPH Training Orlando, FL March 2014 Casey Matuszak OBJECTIVE Overview of Several Fast Letters. o FL 12-22, FL 12-23, o FL 13-4, FL 13-5,, FL 13-9, FL 13-10 o FL 13-13, FL 13-15, Discussion - Impact 2 FAST LETTER 13-15, July 9, 2013 SUBJ:

More information

Child Care Center Licensing Manual (August 2016)

Child Care Center Licensing Manual (August 2016) Child Care Center Licensing Manual (August 2016) for use with COMAR 13A.16 Child Care Centers (as amended effective 7/20/15) Table of Contents COMAR 13A.16.18 ADMINISTRATIVE HEARINGS.01 Scope...1.02 Definitions...1.03

More information

DEPARTMENT OF VETERANS AFFAIRS Veterans Benefits Administration Washington, D.C

DEPARTMENT OF VETERANS AFFAIRS Veterans Benefits Administration Washington, D.C DEPARTMENT OF VETERANS AFFAIRS Veterans Benefits Administration Washington, D.C. 20420 February 20, 2014 All VA Regional Offices and Centers Fast Letter 10-51 (Revised) ATTN: All Veterans Service Center

More information

SOCIAL SECURITY DISABILITY (SSD)

SOCIAL SECURITY DISABILITY (SSD) SOCIAL SECURITY DISABILITY (SSD) Social Security is a federal program that pays monthly benefits to aged, blind and disabled people. In some cases, other family members may also be eligible to get benefits

More information

Basics of VA Benefits

Basics of VA Benefits Basics of VA Benefits David Godfrey, ABA Commission on Law & Aging; Carrie Weletz, Bergmann & Moore Rick Jurgens & Jessica Hiemenz National Consumer Law Center National Elder Rights Training Project for

More information

World Bank Group Directive

World Bank Group Directive World Bank Group Directive Staff Rule 6.11 - Workers' Compensation Program Bank Access to Information Policy Designation Public Catalogue Number HRD3.03-DIR.114 Issued March 13, 2017 Effective October

More information

Medicare Claims Appeals Developments and Proposals for Expansion

Medicare Claims Appeals Developments and Proposals for Expansion Medicare Claims Appeals Developments and Proposals for Expansion Donna Thiel Tracy Weir Shareholder Shareholder Washington, D.C. Washington, D.C. 202.508.3404 202.508.3481 dthiel@bakerdonelson.com tweir@bakerdonelson.com

More information

United States Court of Appeals for the Federal Circuit

United States Court of Appeals for the Federal Circuit NOTE: Pursuant to Fed. Cir. R. 47.6, this disposition is not citable as precedent. It is a public record. United States Court of Appeals for the Federal Circuit 04-3376 JAMES A. KOKKINIS, v. Petitioner,

More information

117 T.C. No. 1 UNITED STATES TAX COURT. GLAXOSMITHKLINE HOLDINGS (AMERICAS) INC., Petitioner v. COMMISSIONER OF INTERNAL REVENUE, Respondent

117 T.C. No. 1 UNITED STATES TAX COURT. GLAXOSMITHKLINE HOLDINGS (AMERICAS) INC., Petitioner v. COMMISSIONER OF INTERNAL REVENUE, Respondent 117 T.C. No. 1 UNITED STATES TAX COURT GLAXOSMITHKLINE HOLDINGS (AMERICAS) INC., Petitioner v. COMMISSIONER OF INTERNAL REVENUE, Respondent Docket No. 3-01-D. Filed July 5, 2001. G and R (the applicants)

More information

IN THE SUPERIOR COURT OF THE COMMONWEALTH OF THE NORTHERN MARIANA ISLANDS ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) I. INTRODUCTION

IN THE SUPERIOR COURT OF THE COMMONWEALTH OF THE NORTHERN MARIANA ISLANDS ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) I. INTRODUCTION FOR PUBLICATION 0 0 IN THE SUPERIOR COURT OF THE COMMONWEALTH OF THE NORTHERN MARIANA ISLANDS ANTONIO A. SANTOS, on behalf of Susana A. Santos (deceased, Claimant-Appellant, vs. PUBLIC SCHOOL SYSTEM, and

More information

In the Supreme Court of the United States

In the Supreme Court of the United States No. 16-757 In the Supreme Court of the United States DOMICK NELSON, PETITIONER v. MIDLAND CREDIT MANAGEMENT, INC. ON PETITION FOR A WRIT OF CERTIORARI TO THE UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE EIGHTH

More information

BEST PRACTICES FOR CLAIMANTS REPRESENTATIVES

BEST PRACTICES FOR CLAIMANTS REPRESENTATIVES BEST PRACTICES FOR CLAIMANTS REPRESENTATIVES www.socialsecurity.gov/appeals/best_practices.html Social Security Administration The Office of Disability Adjudication and Review The Office of the Chief Administrative

More information

IN THE SUPREME COURT OF THE STATE OF MISSISSIPPI COURT OF APPEALS OF THE STATE OF MISSISSIPPI WILLIAM M. MILEY, JR.

IN THE SUPREME COURT OF THE STATE OF MISSISSIPPI COURT OF APPEALS OF THE STATE OF MISSISSIPPI WILLIAM M. MILEY, JR. IN THE SUPREME COURT OF THE STATE OF MISSISSIPPI COURT OF APPEALS OF THE STATE OF MISSISSIPPI RITA FAYE MILEY VERSES WILLIAM M. MILEY, JR. APPELLANT CASE NO. 2008-TS-00677 APPELLEE BRIEF OF APPELLEE WILLIAM

More information

Important Disclosure Information Massachusetts Addendum

Important Disclosure Information Massachusetts Addendum Quality health plans & benefits Healthier living Financial well-being Intelligent solutions a Important Disclosure Information Massachusetts Addendum Massachusetts Mental Health Parity Laws and the Federal

More information

UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR VETERANS CLAIMS NO On Appeal from the Board of Veterans' Appeals. (Decided January 28, 2011)

UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR VETERANS CLAIMS NO On Appeal from the Board of Veterans' Appeals. (Decided January 28, 2011) UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR VETERANS CLAIMS NO. 08-2133 JAMES I. EVANS, APPELLANT, V. ERIC K. SHINSEKI, SECRETARY OF VETERANS AFFAIRS, APPELLEE. On Appeal from the Board of Veterans' Appeals (Decided

More information

THE CLAIMS PROCESS. Jim Richards Casey Matuszak Don Hubbard

THE CLAIMS PROCESS. Jim Richards Casey Matuszak Don Hubbard THE CLAIMS PROCESS Jim Richards Casey Matuszak Don Hubbard 1 OBJECTIVES 1. Understand the elements of the claims process. The Interview Evidence Examination Rating Appeal 2 OBJECTIVES 2. Establish a structure

More information

Designated for electronic publication only UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR VETERANS CLAIMS NO Before MOORMAN, Judge. MEMORANDUM DECISION

Designated for electronic publication only UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR VETERANS CLAIMS NO Before MOORMAN, Judge. MEMORANDUM DECISION Designated for electronic publication only UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR VETERANS CLAIMS NO. 14-1434 JEFFREY G. KINDER, APPELLANT, V. ROBERT A. MCDONALD, SECRETARY OF VETERANS AFFAIRS, APPELLEE. Before

More information

IMPORTANT NOTICE. Late Filed Claims. Enforcement of Time Limits

IMPORTANT NOTICE. Late Filed Claims. Enforcement of Time Limits IMPORTANT NOTICE Among other things, this Booklet sets forth important information on submission of claims for Plan Benefits, including: The notice of claim must be given within 60 days of the start of

More information

Directive. Staff Rule 6.11, Workers' Compensation. Bank Access to Information Policy Designation Public. Catalogue Number. Issued

Directive. Staff Rule 6.11, Workers' Compensation. Bank Access to Information Policy Designation Public. Catalogue Number. Issued Directive Staff Rule 6.11, Workers' Compensation Bank Access to Information Policy Designation Public Catalogue Number Issued Effective October 1, 2011 Retired March 12, 2017 Content Applicable to Issuer

More information

Procedural Rules for Washington Health Benefit Exchange Appeals As Amended by the WAHBE Board of Directors on September 25, 2014

Procedural Rules for Washington Health Benefit Exchange Appeals As Amended by the WAHBE Board of Directors on September 25, 2014 Procedural Rules for Washington Health Benefit Exchange Appeals As Amended by the WAHBE Board of Directors on September 25, 2014 1. Purpose 2. Definitions 3. What Decisions Can Be Appealed 4. Requesting

More information

World Bank Administrative Tribunal. Decision No EC, Applicant. International Bank for Reconstruction and Development, Respondent

World Bank Administrative Tribunal. Decision No EC, Applicant. International Bank for Reconstruction and Development, Respondent World Bank Administrative Tribunal 2017 Decision No. 561 EC, Applicant v. International Bank for Reconstruction and Development, Respondent (Preliminary Objection) World Bank Administrative Tribunal Office

More information

Arbitration Forums, Inc. Rules

Arbitration Forums, Inc. Rules Arbitration Forums, Inc. Rules Effective February 1, 2010 The following rules are made and administered by Arbitration Forums, Inc. (AF) under the authority of Article Fifth (a) of the various Arbitration

More information

DEPARTMENT OF VETERANS AFFAIRS Home Improvements and Structural Alterations (HISA) Benefits Program

DEPARTMENT OF VETERANS AFFAIRS Home Improvements and Structural Alterations (HISA) Benefits Program This document is scheduled to be published in the Federal Register on 11/20/2013 and available online at http://federalregister.gov/a/2013-27672, and on FDsys.gov DEPARTMENT OF VETERANS AFFAIRS 8320-01

More information

APPEALS AND GRIEVANCES Section 6. Member Grievances / Complaints

APPEALS AND GRIEVANCES Section 6. Member Grievances / Complaints Member Grievances / Complaints A grievance is an expression of dissatisfaction from a member, member s representative or provider on behalf of a member about any matter other than an action. A member may

More information

AMERICAN BAR ASSOCIATION ADOPTED BY THE HOUSE OF DELEGATES August 11-12, 2003

AMERICAN BAR ASSOCIATION ADOPTED BY THE HOUSE OF DELEGATES August 11-12, 2003 AMERICAN BAR ASSOCIATION ADOPTED BY THE HOUSE OF DELEGATES August 11-12, 2003 RESOLVED, That the American Bar Association recommends the following reforms in the Medicare claims adjudication process to

More information

Primer on Disability Benefits: Social Security Disability Insurance (SSDI) and Supplemental Security Income (SSI)

Primer on Disability Benefits: Social Security Disability Insurance (SSDI) and Supplemental Security Income (SSI) Primer on Disability Benefits: Social Security Disability Insurance (SSDI) and Supplemental Security Income (SSI) William R. Morton Analyst in Income Security October 24, 2016 The House Ways and Means

More information

Case 1:00-cv RBW Document 249 Filed 06/11/15 Page 1 of 9 IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE DISTRICT OF COLUMBIA

Case 1:00-cv RBW Document 249 Filed 06/11/15 Page 1 of 9 IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE DISTRICT OF COLUMBIA Case 1:00-cv-02502-RBW Document 249 Filed 06/11/15 Page 1 of 9 IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE DISTRICT OF COLUMBIA ) ) ROSEMARY LOVE, et al., ) ) Plaintiffs, ) ) Case Number: 1:00CV02502 vs.

More information

Part VII. Part V of the Polish Code of Civil Procedure Arbitration. [The following translation is not an official document]

Part VII. Part V of the Polish Code of Civil Procedure Arbitration. [The following translation is not an official document] Part VII Part V of the Polish Code of Civil Procedure Arbitration [The following translation is not an official document] 627 Polish Code of Civil Procedure. Part five. Arbitration [The following translation

More information

United States Small Business Administration Office of Hearings and Appeals

United States Small Business Administration Office of Hearings and Appeals Cite as: Matter of Robra Construction, Inc., SBA No. VET-160 (2009) United States Small Business Administration Office of Hearings and Appeals IN THE MATTER OF: Robra Construction, Inc. Appellant SBA No.

More information

IN THE COMMONWEALTH COURT OF PENNSYLVANIA

IN THE COMMONWEALTH COURT OF PENNSYLVANIA IN THE COMMONWEALTH COURT OF PENNSYLVANIA Theodore R. Robinson, : Petitioner : : v. : : State Employees' Retirement Board, : No. 1136 C.D. 2014 Respondent : Submitted: October 31, 2014 BEFORE: HONORABLE

More information

Appeals for providers

Appeals for providers This section contains information about the processes for the following types of provider appeals and disputes: Dental Provider Appeals and Disputes Medical Provider Appeals and Disputes Hospital/Facility

More information

Disputing an assessment

Disputing an assessment IR776 June 2018 Disputing an assessment What to do if you dispute an assessment 2 DISPUTING AN ASSESSMENT Introduction While we make every effort to apply the tax laws fairly and correctly, there may be

More information

UNITED STATES OF AMERICA MERIT SYSTEMS PROTECTION BOARD 2006 MSPB 29. Docket No. DC I-1. Marc A. Garcia, Appellant, Department of State,

UNITED STATES OF AMERICA MERIT SYSTEMS PROTECTION BOARD 2006 MSPB 29. Docket No. DC I-1. Marc A. Garcia, Appellant, Department of State, OPINION AND ORDER UNITED STATES OF AMERICA MERIT SYSTEMS PROTECTION BOARD 2006 MSPB 29 Docket No. DC-3443-05-0216-I-1 Marc A. Garcia, Appellant, v. Department of State, Agency. February 27, 2006 Gregory

More information

Welcome and Introduction

Welcome and Introduction Welcome and Introduction 1 Social Security Disability Insurance The Good, the Bad and the Ugly Presented by Tai Venuti Manager Allsup Strategic Alliances National Spinal Cord Injury Association Webinar

More information

Department of Veterans Affairs Aid and Attendance Benefit

Department of Veterans Affairs Aid and Attendance Benefit SPECIAL REPORT Department of Veterans Affairs Aid and Attendance Benefit This Special Report is brought to you by HOOK LAW CENTER Legal Power for Seniors Tel: 757-399-7506 Fax: 757-397-1267 Locations:

More information

Rights to Workers Compensation Benefits and How to Obtain Them. What Are The Benefits? Workers compensation benefits can include:

Rights to Workers Compensation Benefits and How to Obtain Them. What Are The Benefits? Workers compensation benefits can include: THE INJURED WORKER Rights to Benefits and How to Obtain Them What Is? If you get an injury or illness on the job, your employer is required by law to provide workers compensation benefits. You could get

More information

Board of Alien Labor Certification Appeals 800 K Street, NW, Suite 400-N Washington, DC (202) (202) (FAX)

Board of Alien Labor Certification Appeals 800 K Street, NW, Suite 400-N Washington, DC (202) (202) (FAX) U.S. Department of Labor Board of Alien Labor Certification Appeals 800 K Street, NW, Suite 400-N Washington, DC 20001-8002 (202) 693-7300 (202) 693-7365 (FAX) Issue Date: 06 August 2009 BALCA Case No.:

More information

NATIONAL ELEVATOR INDUSTRY HEALTH BENEFIT PLAN 19 Campus Boulevard Suite 200 Newtown Square, PA

NATIONAL ELEVATOR INDUSTRY HEALTH BENEFIT PLAN 19 Campus Boulevard Suite 200 Newtown Square, PA NATIONAL ELEVATOR INDUSTRY HEALTH BENEFIT PLAN 19 Campus Boulevard Suite 200 Newtown Square, PA 19073-3288 800-523-4702 www.neibenefits.org Summary of Material Modifications February 2018 New Option for

More information

State of New Jersey OFFICE OF ADMINISTRATIVE LAW

State of New Jersey OFFICE OF ADMINISTRATIVE LAW State of New Jersey OFFICE OF ADMINISTRATIVE LAW DECISION OAL DKT. NO. HEA 20864-15 AGENCY DKT. NO. HESAA NEW JERSEY HIGHER EDUCATION STUDENT ASSISTANCE AUTHORITY (NJHESAA; THE AGENCY), Petitioner, v.

More information

Appeal of Denial of Benefits

Appeal of Denial of Benefits May 2018 To All Participants: The Trustees of the North Central States Regional Council of Carpenters' Pension Fund ("Plan") regularly review the Plan and make changes when necessary. Please take time

More information

SPD Administrative Information

SPD Administrative Information Administrative Information 04/01/2018 15-1 Administrative Information This section contains information on the administration and funding of all the plans described in this book, as well as your rights

More information

Basic Service Officer Claims. Brian Mullican Department Service Officer American Legion Department of Virginia

Basic Service Officer Claims. Brian Mullican Department Service Officer American Legion Department of Virginia Basic Service Officer Claims Brian Mullican Department Service Officer American Legion Department of Virginia Before we Begin here are some terms you need to know CFR = Code of Federal Regulations S/C

More information

IN THE COMMONWEALTH COURT OF PENNSYLVANIA

IN THE COMMONWEALTH COURT OF PENNSYLVANIA IN THE COMMONWEALTH COURT OF PENNSYLVANIA Julie Zezenski, : Petitioner : : v. : No. 2458 C.D. 2011 : Submitted: June 22, 2012 Unemployment Compensation : Board of Review, : Respondent : BEFORE: HONORABLE

More information

Green Book Reclamations

Green Book Reclamations 5 Overview Section 1 defines reclamation and provides some background information on the subject. Section 2 covers an RDFI s liability in the reclamation process. Topics include full and limited liability,

More information

IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE WESTERN DISTRICT OF MISSOURI WESTERN DIVISION

IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE WESTERN DISTRICT OF MISSOURI WESTERN DIVISION IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE WESTERN DISTRICT OF MISSOURI WESTERN DIVISION RICHARD BARNES, ) ) Plaintiff, ) ) v. ) No. 4:13-cv-0068-DGK ) HUMANA, INC., ) ) Defendant. ) ORDER GRANTING DISMISSAL

More information

969. Pursuant to Article 95 item 3 of the Constitution of Montenegro, I hereby adopt DECREE ON THE PROMULGATION OF THE LAW ON ARBITRATION

969. Pursuant to Article 95 item 3 of the Constitution of Montenegro, I hereby adopt DECREE ON THE PROMULGATION OF THE LAW ON ARBITRATION 969. Pursuant to Article 95 item 3 of the Constitution of Montenegro, I hereby adopt DECREE ON THE PROMULGATION OF THE LAW ON ARBITRATION I hereby promulgate the Law on Arbitration adopted by the 25 th

More information

UNITED STATES OF AMERICA MERIT SYSTEMS PROTECTION BOARD

UNITED STATES OF AMERICA MERIT SYSTEMS PROTECTION BOARD UNITED STATES OF AMERICA MERIT SYSTEMS PROTECTION BOARD Conyers, Appellant v. Docket No. CH-0752-09-0925-I-1 Department of Defense, Agency. and Northover, Appellant v. Docket No. AT-0752-10-0184-I-1 Department

More information

ARMED SERVICES BOARD OF CONTRACT APPEALS. Appeals of-- ) ASBCA Nos , Kellogg Brown & Root Services, Inc. )

ARMED SERVICES BOARD OF CONTRACT APPEALS. Appeals of-- ) ASBCA Nos , Kellogg Brown & Root Services, Inc. ) ARMED SERVICES BOARD OF CONTRACT APPEALS Appeals of-- ) Kellogg Brown & Root Services, Inc. ) Under Contract No. DAAA09-02-D-0007 ) APPEARANCES FOR THE APPELLANT: ) ) ASBCA Nos. 57530,58161 Douglas L.

More information

Table of Contents Section Page

Table of Contents Section Page Arbitration Regulations 2015 Table of Contents Section Page Part 1 : General... 1 1. Title... 1 2. Legislative authority... 1 3. Application of the Regulations... 1 4. Date of enactment... 1 5. Date of

More information