Protest Procedure: A Primer

Size: px
Start display at page:

Download "Protest Procedure: A Primer"

Transcription

1 Protest Procedure: A Primer Marjorie Welch Interim General Counsel Oklahoma Tax Commission

2 Agency s Mission Statement: To serve the people of Oklahoma by promoting tax compliance through quality service and fair administration.

3 APPLICABLE LAW Title 68 Uniform Tax Procedure Code: OAPA Hearing Procedures do not apply OKLA. ADMIN. CODE 710 Rules of Practice & Procedure: 710:1-5-1 through 710: Commission Orders: or Westlaw

4 CONFIDENTIALITY 68 O.S. 205 OTC employees cannot discuss any aspect of a taxpayer s account without a power of attorney Form BT-129. Available at OTC attorneys cannot discuss any aspect of a taxpayer s account without a power of attorney or entry of appearance filed with the Office of Administrative Law Judge Generally any person authorized by a taxpayer may represent that taxpayer before the agency s administrative tribunal (OKLA. ADMIN. CODE 710:1-5-27)

5 NOTICE OF ADJUSTMENTS & ASSESSMENTS 221(A): OTC may audit and issue proposed tax assessments in case of failure to report and where the tax disclosed by report is less than tax disclosed by OTC examination. Results of examination are sent to the taxpayer s last-known address.

6 Last-Known Address 208: the last address given for such person as it appears on the records of the division of the Tax Commission giving such notice, or if no address appears on the records of that division, the last address given as appears on the records of any other division of the Tax Commission. If no such address appears, the notice shall be mailed to such address as may reasonably be obtained. If the Tax Commission receives an address from USPS as a result of a change of address submitted to USPS, last-known address shall mean the address provided to USPS. ACTUAL NOTICE IS NOT REQUIRED. Mailing to the last-known address is presumptive evidence of the taxpayer s receipt of the notice

7 PROTESTS

8 Goal of the Administrative Process: Resolve controversies at the lowest level and at the lowest cost, in terms of resources and time, to the taxpayer while ensuring that the taxpayer is provided an independent review of the proposed agency action.

9 PROTEST PERIODS Assessments: 60 days from date the assessment was mailed (date on the notice of proposed assessment) 221(C) Prior to expiration of 60 day protest period, taxpayer may request extension of time to file protest. The extension shall not exceed an additional 90 days. 221(F) Denial of claim for refund (other than income tax refund): 60 days from date assessment was mailed (date on notice of denial) 227 Denial of income tax refund: 207; OTC Order No Filing of tax return constitutes the claim for refund ( ) Taxpayer must file claim for refund of income tax within 3 years from due date of original return or refund is barred. 2373; OKLA. ADMIN. CODE 710:50-9-2; Neer v. OTC, 1999 OK 41 An extension to file the return does not extend this 3 year SOL. Matlock v. OTC, 2001 OK CIV APP 104

10 Note OKLAHOMA TAX COMMISSION COMPONENTS Signed & filed by taxpayer or taxpayer representative Amount in controversy Errors states each error alleged to have been made by OTC division Authority & legal argument Statement of relief Verification by taxpayer or taxpayer representative No filing fees, court costs, or administrative fees Mail to address provided on notice A protest will not be rejected simply because it was not sent to the address on the notice

11 COMPONENTS (CONT.) The OTC will accept any written indication of disagreement as a protest so long as the protest is timely. TIP TIP TIP Enclose a copy of the notice Enclose documentation supporting the taxpayer s position Proof of filing: copy of post-marked enveloped, tracking number, certified mail

12 TIMELINESS Mailbox Rule 221.1; OKLA. ADMIN. CODE 710: The protest is timely so long as the postmark on the envelope is within the required number of days from the date on the notice.

13 DOCKETING Taxpayer receives acknowledgment letter Process is aimed at resolving the dispute at the lowest level, and without need for formal hearing if possible (OKLA. ADMIN. CODE 710:1-5-20(a)) If can t be resolved at division level, division forwards the protest to the ALJ ALJ assigns case number and sends taxpayer docketing letter with administrative rules booklet Protest file is transmitted to Office of the General Counsel where it is assigned to an attorney as counsel for the division that issued the notice The assigned attorney will file an Entry of Appearance and send the taxpayer or the taxpayer s representative a letter of introduction

14 EX PARTE COMMUNICATIONS Rules of ex parte communications apply to all parties to the protest (OKLA. ADMIN. CODE 710:1-5-27(e) & 710:1-5-36(b)) Attorneys in the Office of the General Counsel will not communicate with the ALJ without taxpayer or taxpayer representative being afforded an opportunity to be present, or, if in written form, without providing a copy of the document filed with the ALJ to taxpayer or taxpayer representative The Office of the General Counsel expects taxpayers and their representatives to likewise refrain from engaging in any ex parte communications and to provide the OGC with copies of all documents submitted to the ALJ Parties are free to contact the ALJs clerks regarding procedural and scheduling matters

15 PRE-TRIAL PROCEDURE ALJ sets prehearing teleconference (PHC). Unless protest is to denial of claim for refund under 227. Instead of a prehearing teleconference, the ALJ sets the protest for hearing within 60 days of receipt of the protest in the ALJ s Office. Parties can agree to strike that hearing and reset at a later date. 227(e) PHC can be continued or rescheduled upon request If parties have discussed issues and agree additional time is advisable to resolve preliminary issues or attempt resolution, parties may file a status report in lieu of the PHC ALJ will issue PHC Order or other notice directing the parties as to the next action required by the ALJ

16 PRE-TRIAL RESOLUTION Protests may be resolved without need for ALJ intervention. Division may withdraw the assessment or adjustment Taxpayer may withdraw the protest Division may issue revision to which taxpayer is agreeable In such cases, ALJ will issue a notice that the file is closed. OKLA. ADMIN. CODE 710: No Findings of Fact, Conclusions of Law, and Recommendations will be issued.

17 BURDEN Taxpayer bears the burden of proof (OKLA. ADMIN. CODE 710:1-5-47; Enterprise Mgmt. Consultants, Inc. v. OTC, 1988 OK 91) Standard is preponderance of the evidence. Each element must be supported by reliable, probative, and substantive evidence of sufficient quality and quantity as to show the existence of the facts supporting the claim are more probable than their nonexistence (2 Am. Jur. 2d Administrative Law 357) Failure to provide evidence sufficient to show an adjustment to the proposed assessment is warranted will result in denial of protest (Continental Oil Co. v. Okla. State Bd. of Equalization, 1976 OK 23) Because taxpayer bears the burden, taxpayer is entitled to the first and last word (OKLA. ADMIN. CODE 710:1-5-32(3))

18 SUBMISSION OF THE CASE May be submitted by several methods: Verified response if taxpayer fails to appear at PHC and has not requested a hearing (OKLA. ADMIN. CODE 710:1-5-28(c)) Live evidentiary hearing before the ALJ (OKLA. ADMIN. CODE 710:1-5-29) Stipulation of facts with briefing cycle (OKLA. ADMIN. CODE 710:1-5-38) Full or partial summary disposition (OKLA. ADMIN. CODE 710: ) Depending on complexity of the issues, scheduling order may be issued, or the parties may proceed directly to hearing In all cases, a legal brief or position statement must be filed with the ALJ, usually 1 week before the hearing

19 Verified Response OKLA. ADMIN. CODE 710:1-5-28(c) Taxpayer did not appear for the PHC Taxpayer did not request a hearing in the protest letter or in any other document filed with the ALJ No hearing is held Division submits legal brief with exhibits attached supporting division s factual assertions Verified Response is signed by the attorney representing division, & verified under oath by division representative Taxpayer is provided an opportunity to respond in writing. After opportunity for taxpayer response, ALJ closes record and issues Findings of Fact, Conclusions of Law, and Recommendations (FCRs)

20 Discovery 68 O.S. 206(b); OKLA. ADMIN. CODE 710: Rules provide for written discovery; deposition; and production of documents Subpoenas (including to 3 rd parties) may be issued by the ALJ on behalf of either party Note Differs from district court: an attorney is not authorized as an officer of the court to issue the subpoena. Instead, the attorney, or taxpayer representative, submits the subpoena to the ALJ to be signed and issued. The attorney/representative will then serve the subpoena. Parties typically agree to abide by the Oklahoma Discovery Code (12 O.S ) Request responses to admissions Require response to requests within 30 days of receipt Request sanctions No protective order is necessary at the administrative stage. All information obtained through discovery is confidential (68 O.S. 205; OKLA. ADMIN. CODE 710:1-5-33(3))

21 Stipulation/Briefing Cycle OKLA. ADMIN. CODE 710: Issue is purely legal in nature Parties agree on the undisputed, material facts Joint Stipulation of the Issue(s) filed by the parties Note The ALJs typically require the parties to file an Agreed Statement of Issues regardless of whether the parties are stipulating to the facts; this ensures that both sides have the opportunity to fully respond to all issues raised in the protest. Joint Stipulation of Facts filed with attached evidentiary material Briefing cycle 30 days after Joint Stipulation of Facts filed, taxpayer files brief-in-chief 20 days after taxpayer s brief-in-chief filed, division files response 10 days after division response filed, taxpayer files reply At conclusion of briefing cycle, record is closed and ALJ will issue FCRs

22 Partial Stipulations Even if the parties are unable to fully stipulate to the facts, parties are encouraged to stipulate to any undisputed material facts. This reduces the amount of time needed at any hearing and allows the parties to focus on the actual issue to be determined. Parties to a protest can typically agree to most of the following facts: Date the return/report examined was filed Date the return/report was assessed/adjusted Date the assessment/adjustment was protested Certain documents, such as Return/report Notice of assessment/adjustment Protest Authenticity of certain other documents

23 Summary Disposition OKLA. ADMIN. CODE 710: Moving party believes there are no material facts in dispute Evidentiary materials must be attached affidavits, documents, etc. Must be verified Moving party believes it is entitled to a judgment in its favor Motion may be for full summary disposition or partial summary disposition Respondent may file response to motion within 15 days after service of motion Note The Rule does not provide for a counter-motion by the respondent, nor does it provide for the movant to file a reply to the response Timing If protest has been set for hearing, must be filed at least twenty (20) days before the scheduled hearing By date set by court order

24 Summary Disposition (cont.) OKLA. ADMIN. CODE 710: Disposition of the Motion Denied: ALJ determines that material facts are in dispute. Matter proceeds to full evidentiary hearing Accepted: ALJ determines that there is no substantial controversy as to the material facts and that one of the parties is entitled to a decision in its favor as a matter of law If hearing has been set or requested, ALJ sets motion for oral argument If no hearing has been requested, ALJ may rule on the motion based on parties submission Partial: accepted on the submitted issue; remainder of issues proceed to hearing. Decision on submitted issue is incorporated into the FCRs for the protest

25 Hearings OKLA. ADMIN. CODE 710:1-5-31, 710: Notice of hearing and date for legal briefs/position statements ALJ controls hearing Confidentiality is invoked unless specifically waived Recorded by ALJ s clerk Party can provide court reporter but must provide ALJ and opposing party with transcript Witnesses testify under oath Record may be held open or closed at conclusion of hearing Once record is closed, ALJ will issue FCRs

26 Hearings (cont.) OKLA. ADMIN. CODE 710:1-5-31, 710: Evidentiary rulings Oklahoma Evidence Code (12 O.S et seq. generally applies, OKLA. ADMIN. CODE 710:1-5-34(a)) ALJ may officially notice certain facts (OKLA. ADMIN. CODE 710:1-5-36) Matters which could be judicially noticed by judges of district court (12 O.S. 2201, 2202, 2203) Facts within the scope of personal knowledge or within the specialized knowledge of the OTC Sua sponte or upon request of a party Party objecting to any ruling of ALJ may certify the issue to the Commissioners for decision prior to conclusion of proceeding (OKLA. ADMIN. CODE 710: (b)) ALJ, moving party, and opposing party must all sign the request

27 FINDINGS OF FACT, CONCLUSIONS OF LAW, AND RECOMMENDATIONS OKLA. ADMIN. CODE 710: Regardless of method of submission to the ALJ, once the record has closed, the ALJ will issue FCRs. Absent a motion for rehearing/reconsideration, or a motion for en banc hearing before the Commissioners, the FCRs are presented to the Commissioners for consideration. Commissioners issue order adopting, modifying, or vacating the FCRs. The Commission Order is the final, appealable agency order.

28 POST-FCR RELIEF OKLA. ADMIN. CODE 710: Within 15 days of issuance of FCRs, either party may file: Before the ALJ: motion for rehearing (new evidence) or reconsideration (unconsidered issue) If granted, FCRs are vacated If denied, FCRs are deemed issued on date motion is denied Before the Commissioners: motion for en banc hearing 15 days from issuance of FCRs or 15 days from the date of denial of motion for rehearing/reconsideration Upon filing of any of these motions, responding party may files its reply within 15 days of the mailing of the motion Note Issues not raised in a motion will not later be considered

29 APPEALS OF FINAL AGENCY ORDERS 68 O.S. Supp. 2014, 225

30 EXHAUSTION OF ADMINISTRATIVE REMEDIES Taxpayer must exhaust all administrative remedies before filing an appeal of the Commission Order (OKLA. ADMIN. CODE 710:1-5-43; Cimarron Ind., Inc. v. OTC, 1980 OK 190)

31 WHAT IS THE AUDIT PERIOD? Before January 1, 2014: taxpayer may appeal directly to the Oklahoma Supreme Court. Before and after January 1, 2014: taxpayer may appeal directly to the Oklahoma Supreme Court or may appeal for trial de novo in (1) Oklahoma County District Court or (2) district court of the county in which the taxpayer resides. After January 1, 2014: taxpayer may appeal directly to the Oklahoma Supreme Court or may appeal for trial de novo in (1) Oklahoma County District Court or (2) district court of the county in which the taxpayer resides.

32 A taxpayer has 30 days from the date the Commission Order is mailed to appeal.

33 CONFIDENTIALITY Appeals are generally public records under the Oklahoma Open Records Act and 205 does not apply to any part of the appeal filed by a taxpayer, including the underlying agency record. Taxpayers wishing to preserve confidentiality should petition the appellate court to seal the record (Okla.Sup.Ct.R. 1.6)

34 DISTRICT COURT APPEALS Trial de novo No jury trial Over $10,000, heard by district or associate judge Under $10,000, may be heard by special judge Appeal from District Court Order Governed by Okla.Sup.Ct.R , not Okla.Sup.Ct.R Appeal to OSC must be filed within 30 days of the date the district court order was issued

35 221(E) Abatement Requests OKLA. ADMIN. CODE 710: through 710:1-5-78

36 WHAT IS AN ABATEMENT? An abatement is basically an untimely protest to an assessment A taxpayer may request an adjustment or abatement of assessed taxes if the request is submitted in writing within 1 year of the date the assessment becomes final Mailbox rule still applies No special language required; if taxpayer submits written disagreement with an assessment within the time period under 221(E), the written disagreement will be construed as a request for a 221(E) abatement

37 HOW DOES AN ABATEMENT DIFFER FROM A PROTEST? The assessment is a final liability collection activity by the OTC is not prohibited No ALJ or evidentiary hearing Commission Order is not appealable

38 MECHANICS Request should be sent to the division that issued the assessment As with protests, all documents supporting taxpayer s position should be submitted Taxpayer bears the burden of proof to demonstrate, by a preponderance of the evidence, that the assessment or some portion thereof is clearly erroneous Division agrees with taxpayer Division adjusts final liability and mails copy of adjustment to taxpayer No new right to protest is created Division disagrees with taxpayer Division notifies taxpayer in writing that request is denied Taxpayer may appeal division denial to the Office of the General Counsel within 30 days of the date the notification was mailed

39 MECHANICS (CONT.) Taxpayer timely files appeal with the Office of the General Counsel Written request for review with any additional information not previously provided attached OGC creates new E file and assigns an attorney to review the request Letter of introduction and request for provision of any additional information not previously provided sent to taxpayer or taxpayer representative OGC attorney reviews all information submitted by taxpayer OGC attorney notifies taxpayer of recommendation Presentation of request to Commissioners Matter set on Commission agenda for Commissioners consideration Taxpayer may appear and present documentary evidence and testimony in affidavit form Non-appealable order issued

40 MISCELLANEOUS Regularly scheduled Commission meetings September May: Tuesdays & Thursdays at 1:30 p.m. June August: Tuesdays at 1:30 p.m. ALJs accept electronically filed documents Fax: (405) Judge Harrington: Linda Spradlin, Judge Kasper: Audra Minton, Locations Commission meetings: Connors Building, 5 th Floor, Capitol Complex Public entrance is located on the south side of the building Hearings before the ALJ: 3700 N. Classen, Ste. 260 (northeast corner of 36 th & Classen) Office of the General Counsel: 100 N. Broadway Ave., Ste (15 th Floor, Chase Tower)

41 Questions?

42 Resources Oklahoma Statutes Attorney General Opinions Rules & Proposed Rules Tax Commission Decisions Letter Rulings Tax Commission Agendas Visit for Forms, Up to the Minute, Quick Clicks, Reports, and other helpful information

43 Useful Phone Numbers General Counsel s Office 405/ fax 405/ General Counsel s Office, Tulsa 918/ fax 918/ Administrative Law Judges Judge Harrington 405/ Judge Kasper 405/ fax 405/ Tax Practitioner Hotline 405/

44 Useful Phone Numbers (cont.) Permits, Income Tax Refunds, OKTAP, General Information 405/ Waivers 405/ Settlements 405/ Tax Warrants & Warrant Payoffs 405/ Audit 405/ Notice to Show Cause 405/ Payments/Pay-Out Plans 405/ Professional Licensing 405/

Procedures for Protest to New York State and City Tribunals

Procedures for Protest to New York State and City Tribunals September 25, 1997 Procedures for Protest to New York State and City Tribunals By: Glenn Newman This new feature of the New York Law Journal will highlight cases involving New York State and City tax controversies

More information

2017 Salt Lake County Board of Equalization Administrative Rules

2017 Salt Lake County Board of Equalization Administrative Rules 2017 Salt Lake County Board of Equalization Administrative Rules Adopted 18 July 2017 TABLE OF CONTENTS I. GENERAL PROVISIONS... 1 II. AUTHORITY OF THE BOARD OF EQUALIZATION... 1 III. APPLICATIONS FOR

More information

BOARD OF TRUSTEES OF THE VILLAGE OF TEQUESTA GENERAL EMPLOYEES PENSION TRUST FUND ADMINISTRATIVE RULES

BOARD OF TRUSTEES OF THE VILLAGE OF TEQUESTA GENERAL EMPLOYEES PENSION TRUST FUND ADMINISTRATIVE RULES BOARD OF TRUSTEES OF THE VILLAGE OF TEQUESTA GENERAL EMPLOYEES PENSION TRUST FUND ADMINISTRATIVE RULES August 2015 TABLE OF CONTENTS PART 1 - GENERAL PROVISIONS... 1 1.1 Purpose... 1 1.2 Definitions...

More information

Various publications, including FTB Publication 7277, "Personal Personal Income Tax Notice of Action

Various publications, including FTB Publication 7277, Personal Personal Income Tax Notice of Action M0RRISON I FOERS 'ER Legal Updates & News Legal Updates California State Board of Equalization Adopts New Rules for Franchise Tax Board Tax Appeals May 2008 by Eric J. Cofill Coffill Related Practices:

More information

The Audit is Over Now What?

The Audit is Over Now What? Where Do We Go From Here: A Comparison of Alternatives When You and the IRS Agree to Disagree JENNY LOUISE JOHNSON, Holland & Knight LLP Co-Chair of Tax Controversy Practice CHARLES E. HODGES, Kilpatrick

More information

DOCKET NO. AP ) ) ) ) ORDER ) ) ) ) ) This case arises out of a Forcible Entry and Detainer Action that Appellee Rowell, LLC

DOCKET NO. AP ) ) ) ) ORDER ) ) ) ) ) This case arises out of a Forcible Entry and Detainer Action that Appellee Rowell, LLC STATE OF MAINE YORK, ss. ROWELL,LLC Appellee, v. 11 TOWN,LLC Appellant. ORDER SUPERIOR COURT DOCKET NO. AP-16-0032 I. Background A. Procedural History This case arises out of a Forcible Entry and Detainer

More information

STATE OF ARKANSAS DEPARTMENT OF FINANCE & ADMINISTRATION OFFICE OF HEARINGS & APPEALS ADMINISTRATIVE DECISION TODD EVANS, ADMINISTRATIVE LAW JUDGE

STATE OF ARKANSAS DEPARTMENT OF FINANCE & ADMINISTRATION OFFICE OF HEARINGS & APPEALS ADMINISTRATIVE DECISION TODD EVANS, ADMINISTRATIVE LAW JUDGE STATE OF ARKANSAS DEPARTMENT OF FINANCE & ADMINISTRATION OFFICE OF HEARINGS & APPEALS ADMINISTRATIVE DECISION IN THE MATTER OF LICENSE NO.: DOCKET NO.: 19-209 GROSS RECEIPTS (SALES) TAX REFUND CLAIM DENIAL

More information

TAX LITIGATION MEMORANDUM

TAX LITIGATION MEMORANDUM LAW OFFICES DAVID L. SILVERMAN, J.D., LL.M. 2001 MARCUS AVENUE LAKE SUCCESS, NEW YORK 11042 (516) 466-5900 SILVERMAN, DAVID L. TELECOPIER (516) 437-7292 NYTAXATTY@AOL.COM AMINOFF, SHIRLEE AMINOFFS@GMAIL.COM

More information

HOW THE 1998 TAX ACT AFFECTS YOUR DEALINGS WITH THE IRS APPEALS OFFICE. The IRS Restructuring and Reform Act of 1998.

HOW THE 1998 TAX ACT AFFECTS YOUR DEALINGS WITH THE IRS APPEALS OFFICE. The IRS Restructuring and Reform Act of 1998. HOW THE 1998 TAX ACT AFFECTS YOUR DEALINGS WITH THE IRS APPEALS OFFICE The IRS Restructuring and Reform Act of 1998 January 22, 1999 Robert M. Kane, Jr. LeSourd & Patten, P.S. 600 University Street, Ste

More information

STATE OF ARKANSAS DEPARTMENT OF FINANCE & ADMINISTRATION OFFICE OF HEARINGS & APPEALS ADMINISTRATIVE DECISION

STATE OF ARKANSAS DEPARTMENT OF FINANCE & ADMINISTRATION OFFICE OF HEARINGS & APPEALS ADMINISTRATIVE DECISION STATE OF ARKANSAS DEPARTMENT OF FINANCE & ADMINISTRATION OFFICE OF HEARINGS & APPEALS ADMINISTRATIVE DECISION IN THE MATTER OF GROSS RECEIPTS TAX & ALCOHOLIC BEVERAGE ACCT. NO.: TAX ASSESSMENTS AUDIT NO.:

More information

TITLE VII RULES OF PROCEDURE FOR INTERNATIONAL COMMERCIAL ARBITRATION MODEL CLAUSE

TITLE VII RULES OF PROCEDURE FOR INTERNATIONAL COMMERCIAL ARBITRATION MODEL CLAUSE TITLE VII RULES OF PROCEDURE FOR INTERNATIONAL COMMERCIAL ARBITRATION MODEL CLAUSE "Any dispute or difference regarding this contract, or related thereto, shall be settled by arbitration upon an Arbitral

More information

THE COMMERCIAL ARBITRATION LAW OF THE KINGDOM OF CAMBODIA

THE COMMERCIAL ARBITRATION LAW OF THE KINGDOM OF CAMBODIA KINGDOM OF CAMBODIA NATION RELIGION KING THE COMMERCIAL ARBITRATION LAW OF THE KINGDOM OF CAMBODIA Adopted by The NATIONAL ASSEMBLY Phnom Penh, March 6 th, 2006 THE COMMERCIAL ARBITRATION LAW OF THE KINGDOM

More information

Waushara County Circuit Court Rules

Waushara County Circuit Court Rules Waushara County Circuit Court Rules (Sixth Judicial District) Small Claims Rules Facsimile Transmission of Documents to the Court Civil Rule-Mortgage Foreclosure Small Claims Rules I. These rules are made

More information

BEFORE THE ALASKA OFFICE OF ADMINISTRATIVE HEARINGS DECISION

BEFORE THE ALASKA OFFICE OF ADMINISTRATIVE HEARINGS DECISION BEFORE THE ALASKA OFFICE OF ADMINISTRATIVE HEARINGS In the Matter of ) ) HALLIBURTON ENERGY ) SERVICES, INC ) ) OAH No. 15-0652-TAX Oil and Gas Production Tax ) I. Introduction DECISION The Department

More information

County Boards of Equalization: Creation, Duties, and Statutory Procedures

County Boards of Equalization: Creation, Duties, and Statutory Procedures County Boards of Equalization: Creation, Duties, and Statutory Procedures Prepared and Presented By F. Barry Wilkes Clerk of the Superior Court of Liberty County General Provisions Laws specifically pertaining

More information

Procedural Rules for Washington Health Benefit Exchange Appeals As Amended by the WAHBE Board of Directors on September 25, 2014

Procedural Rules for Washington Health Benefit Exchange Appeals As Amended by the WAHBE Board of Directors on September 25, 2014 Procedural Rules for Washington Health Benefit Exchange Appeals As Amended by the WAHBE Board of Directors on September 25, 2014 1. Purpose 2. Definitions 3. What Decisions Can Be Appealed 4. Requesting

More information

Medicare Claims Appeals Developments and Proposals for Expansion

Medicare Claims Appeals Developments and Proposals for Expansion Medicare Claims Appeals Developments and Proposals for Expansion Donna Thiel Tracy Weir Shareholder Shareholder Washington, D.C. Washington, D.C. 202.508.3404 202.508.3481 dthiel@bakerdonelson.com tweir@bakerdonelson.com

More information

THE HANDBOOK OF THE LICENSE APPEAL COMMISSION OF THE CITY OF CHICAGO

THE HANDBOOK OF THE LICENSE APPEAL COMMISSION OF THE CITY OF CHICAGO THE HANDBOOK OF THE LICENSE APPEAL COMMISSION OF THE CITY OF CHICAGO RICHARD J. DALEY CENTER 50 WEST WASHINGTON STREET ROOM - CL 21 CHICAGO, ILLINOIS 60602 (312) 744-4095 www.cityofchicago.org/lac The

More information

CITY OF LOS ANGELES, Plaintiff and Appellant, v. CENTEX TELEMANAGEMENT, INC., Defendant and Respondent.

CITY OF LOS ANGELES, Plaintiff and Appellant, v. CENTEX TELEMANAGEMENT, INC., Defendant and Respondent. 29 Cal. App. 4th 1384, *; 1994 Cal. App. LEXIS 1113, **; 34 Cal. Rptr. 2d 782, ***; 94 Cal. Daily Op. Service 8396 CITY OF LOS ANGELES, Plaintiff and Appellant, v. CENTEX TELEMANAGEMENT, INC., Defendant

More information

Chapter 3 Preparing the Record

Chapter 3 Preparing the Record Chapter 3 Preparing the Record After filing the Notice of Appeal, the appellant next needs to specify what items are to be in the record (the official account of what went on at the hearing or the trial

More information

REVISED PROPOSED REGULATION OF THE NEVADA TAX COMMISSION. LCB File No. R146-15

REVISED PROPOSED REGULATION OF THE NEVADA TAX COMMISSION. LCB File No. R146-15 REVISED PROPOSED REGULATION OF THE NEVADA TAX COMMISSION LCB File No. R146-15 EXPLANATION Matter in italics is new; matter in brackets [omitted material] is material to be omitted. COMBINED VERSION-INCLUDES

More information

ADMINISTRATIVE DECISION

ADMINISTRATIVE DECISION STATE OF ARKANSAS DEPARTMENT OF FINANCE AND ADMINISTRATION OFFICE OF HEARINGS & APPEALS ADMINISTRATIVE DECISION IN THE MATTER OF (ACCT. NO.: ) INDIVIDUAL INCOME TAX ASSESSMENT DOCKET NO.: 17-061 TAX YEAR

More information

Litigating a New York Tax Case, Volume 3: The Administrative Appeals Process

Litigating a New York Tax Case, Volume 3: The Administrative Appeals Process Litigating a New York Tax Case, Volume 3: The Administrative Appeals Process by Timothy P. Noonan and Ariele R. Doolittle Timothy P. Noonan Ariele R. Doolittle Timothy P. Noonan is a partner in the Buffalo

More information

New Jersey Division of Taxation

New Jersey Division of Taxation New Jersey Division of Taxation Protest and Conference Guidebook Office of Counsel Services Conference and Appeals Branch October 2017 CAB-300 Protest and Conference Guidebook Page 2 Submitting a Protest

More information

Proposed Palestinian Law on International Commercial Arbitration

Proposed Palestinian Law on International Commercial Arbitration Case Western Reserve Journal of International Law Volume 32 Issue 2 2000 Proposed Palestinian Law on International Commercial Arbitration Palestine Legislative Council Follow this and additional works

More information

Circuit Court for Frederick County Case No.: 10-C UNREPORTED IN THE COURT OF SPECIAL APPEALS OF MARYLAND. No September Term, 2017

Circuit Court for Frederick County Case No.: 10-C UNREPORTED IN THE COURT OF SPECIAL APPEALS OF MARYLAND. No September Term, 2017 Circuit Court for Frederick County Case No.: 10-C-02-000895 UNREPORTED IN THE COURT OF SPECIAL APPEALS OF MARYLAND No. 1100 September Term, 2017 ALLAN M. PICKETT, et al. v. FREDERICK CITY MARYLAND, et

More information

TABLE OF CONTENTS. .03 Farmers cooperatives. .01 A request made during the course of an examination

TABLE OF CONTENTS. .03 Farmers cooperatives. .01 A request made during the course of an examination Rev. Proc. 2000 2 TABLE OF CONTENTS SECTION 1. WHAT IS THE p. 77 PURPOSE OF THIS REVENUE PROCEDURE? SECTION 2. WHAT IS p. 78 TECHNICAL ADVICE? SECTION 3. ON WHAT ISSUES p. 78 MAY TECHNICAL ADVICE BE REQUESTED

More information

ARBITRATION ACT. May 29, 2016>

ARBITRATION ACT. May 29, 2016> ARBITRATION ACT Wholly Amended by Act No. 6083, Dec. 31, 1999 Amended by Act No. 6465, Apr. 7, 2001 Act No. 6626, Jan. 26, 2002 Act No. 10207, Mar. 31, 2010 Act No. 11690, Mar. 23, 2013 Act No. 14176,

More information

BYLAWS and RULES PUBLIC COMPANY ACCOUNTING OVERSIGHT BOARD

BYLAWS and RULES PUBLIC COMPANY ACCOUNTING OVERSIGHT BOARD 1666 K Street, N.W. Washington, DC 20006 Telephone: (202) 207-9100 Facsimile: (202) 862-8430 www.pcaobus.org BYLAWS and RULES OF THE PUBLIC COMPANY ACCOUNTING OVERSIGHT BOARD Revised as of January 31,

More information

Part VIII RULES GOVERNING PRACTICE IN THE TAX COURT OF NEW JERSEY TABLE OF CONTENTS

Part VIII RULES GOVERNING PRACTICE IN THE TAX COURT OF NEW JERSEY TABLE OF CONTENTS APPENDIX C - New Jersey Tax Court Rules Part VIII RULES GOVERNING PRACTICE IN THE TAX COURT OF NEW JERSEY Rule 8:1. Rule 8:2. Rule 8:3. Rule 8:4. Rule 8:5. TABLE OF CONTENTS Scope: Applicability Review

More information

Appeal Process Overview

Appeal Process Overview Appeal Process Overview DISCLAIMER AND SCOPE The following discussion broadly outlines the process for the most common property-tax appeals appeals from local officials assessments. Slightly different

More information

IN THE DISTRICT COURT OF APPEAL OF THE STATE OF FLORIDA FIFTH DISTRICT

IN THE DISTRICT COURT OF APPEAL OF THE STATE OF FLORIDA FIFTH DISTRICT IN THE DISTRICT COURT OF APPEAL OF THE STATE OF FLORIDA FIFTH DISTRICT RECEIVED, 6/14/2017 4:56 PM, Joanne P. Simmons, Fifth District Court of Appeal MICHAEL CONNOLLY, Plaintiff/Appellant, Case No.: 5D17-1172

More information

STATE OF ARKANSAS DEPARTMENT OF FINANCE & ADMINISTRATION OFFICE OF HEARINGS & APPEALS ADMINISTRATIVE DECISION

STATE OF ARKANSAS DEPARTMENT OF FINANCE & ADMINISTRATION OFFICE OF HEARINGS & APPEALS ADMINISTRATIVE DECISION STATE OF ARKANSAS DEPARTMENT OF FINANCE & ADMINISTRATION OFFICE OF HEARINGS & APPEALS ADMINISTRATIVE DECISION IN THE MATTER OF GROSS RECEIPTS (SALES) & COMPENSATING USE TAX (ACCT. NO.: ASSESSMENT AUDIT

More information

ADMINISTRATIVE DECISION

ADMINISTRATIVE DECISION STATE OF ARKANSAS DEPARTMENT OF FINANCE & ADMINISTRATION OFFICE OF HEARINGS & APPEALS ADMINISTRATIVE DECISION IN THE MATTER OF (ACCT. NO.: ) GROSS RECEIPTS TAX ASSESSMENT LETTER ID: DOCKET NO.: 17-381

More information

Arbitration and Conciliation Act

Arbitration and Conciliation Act 1 of 31 20-11-2012 21:02 Constitution of Nigeria Court of Appeal High Courts Home Page Law Reporting Laws of the Federation of Nigeria Legal Education Q&A Supreme Court Jobs at Nigeria-law Arbitration

More information

IAMA Arbitration Rules

IAMA Arbitration Rules IAMA Arbitration Rules (C) Copyright 2014 The Institute of Arbitrators & Mediators Australia (IAMA) - Arbitration Rules Introduction These rules have been adopted by the Council of IAMA for use by parties

More information

Administrative Order

Administrative Order Administrative Order 2010-3 [As amended May 22, 2013] E-filing Pilot Project in Oakland Circuit Court, Family Division On order of the Court, the Sixth Judicial Circuit Court, in consultation with the

More information

ARBITRATION RULES OF THE PDRCI (Effective as of 1 January 2015)

ARBITRATION RULES OF THE PDRCI (Effective as of 1 January 2015) ARBITRATION RULES OF THE PDRCI TABLE OF CONTENTS Section I: Introductory Provisions Model Arbitration Clause: Article 1 - Scope of Application Article 2 - Notice and Calculation of Period of Time Article

More information

CHAPTER 56. SETOFF DEBT COLLECTION ACT

CHAPTER 56. SETOFF DEBT COLLECTION ACT Disclaimer This statutory database is current through the 2003 Regular Session of the South Carolina General Assembly. Changes to the statutes enacted by the 2004 General Assembly, which will convene in

More information

STATE OF ARKANSAS DEPARTMENT OF FINANCE & ADMINISTRATION OFFICE OF HEARINGS & APPEALS ADMINISTRATIVE DECISION

STATE OF ARKANSAS DEPARTMENT OF FINANCE & ADMINISTRATION OFFICE OF HEARINGS & APPEALS ADMINISTRATIVE DECISION STATE OF ARKANSAS DEPARTMENT OF FINANCE & ADMINISTRATION OFFICE OF HEARINGS & APPEALS ADMINISTRATIVE DECISION IN THE MATTER OF (ACCT. NO.: INDIVIDUAL INCOME TAX ASSESSMENT LETTER ID.: DOCKET NO.: 17-045

More information

Commercial Arbitration

Commercial Arbitration International Institute for Conflict Prevention & Resolution CPR PROCEDURES & CLAUSES Global Rules for Accelerated Commercial Arbitration Effective August 20, 2009 30 East 33rd Street 6th Floor New York,

More information

ADMINISTRATIVE DECISION

ADMINISTRATIVE DECISION STATE OF ARKANSAS DEPARTMENT OF FINANCE & ADMINISTRATION OFFICE OF HEARINGS & APPEALS ADMINISTRATIVE DECISION IN THE MATTER OF (ACCT. NO.: ) GROSS RECEIPTS TAX ASSESSMENT LETTER ID: DOCKET NO.: 18-024

More information

T.C. Memo UNITED STATES TAX COURT. YULIA FEDER, Petitioner v. COMMISSIONER OF INTERNAL REVENUE, Respondent

T.C. Memo UNITED STATES TAX COURT. YULIA FEDER, Petitioner v. COMMISSIONER OF INTERNAL REVENUE, Respondent T.C. Memo. 2012-10 UNITED STATES TAX COURT YULIA FEDER, Petitioner v. COMMISSIONER OF INTERNAL REVENUE, Respondent Docket No. 1628-10. Filed January 10, 2012. Frank Agostino, Lawrence M. Brody, and Jeffrey

More information

ARKANSAS COURT OF APPEALS

ARKANSAS COURT OF APPEALS ARKANSAS COURT OF APPEALS DIVISION II No. CV-15-293 UNIFIRST CORPORATION APPELLANT V. LUDWIG PROPERTIES, INC. D/B/A 71 EXPRESS TRAVEL PLAZA APPELLEE Opinion Delivered December 2, 2015 APPEAL FROM THE SEBASTIAN

More information

ARTICLE I OFFICERS AND TERMS OF OFFICE

ARTICLE I OFFICERS AND TERMS OF OFFICE City & County of San Francisco BOARD OF APPEALS RULES OF THE BOARD OF APPEALS ARTICLE I OFFICERS AND TERMS OF OFFICE Section 1. The President and Vice President shall be elected at the first regular meeting

More information

APPEAL AND INDEPENDENT DISPUTE RESOLUTION PROCESSES

APPEAL AND INDEPENDENT DISPUTE RESOLUTION PROCESSES APPEAL AND INDEPENDENT DISPUTE RESOLUTION PROCESSES 2016 Fannie Mae. Trademarks of Fannie Mae. 8.17.2016 1 of 20 Contents INTRODUCTION... 4 PART A. APPEAL, IMPASSE, AND MANAGEMENT ESCALATION PROCESSES...

More information

O.C.G.A GEORGIA CODE Copyright 2015 by The State of Georgia All rights reserved. *** Current Through the 2015 Regular Session ***

O.C.G.A GEORGIA CODE Copyright 2015 by The State of Georgia All rights reserved. *** Current Through the 2015 Regular Session *** O.C.G.A. 48-5-311 GEORGIA CODE Copyright 2015 by The State of Georgia All rights reserved. *** Current Through the 2015 Regular Session *** TITLE 48. REVENUE AND TAXATION CHAPTER 5. AD VALOREM TAXATION

More information

Article 7 - Definition and form of arbitration agreement. Article 8 - Arbitration agreement and substantive claim before court

Article 7 - Definition and form of arbitration agreement. Article 8 - Arbitration agreement and substantive claim before court UNCITRAL Model Law on International Commercial Arbitration (1985) (as adopted by the United Nations Commission on International Trade Law on 21 June 1985) CHAPTER I - GENERAL PROVISIONS Article 1 - Scope

More information

TEXAS ADMINISTRATIVE CODE TITLE 34 PUBLIC FINANCE

TEXAS ADMINISTRATIVE CODE TITLE 34 PUBLIC FINANCE TEXAS ADMINISTRATIVE CODE TITLE 34 PUBLIC FINANCE Part V. TEXAS COUNTY AND DISTRICT RETIREMENT SYSTEM Chapter 101. Practice and Procedure Regarding Claims Chapter 103. Calculations or Types of Benefits

More information

Korean Commercial Arbitration Board

Korean Commercial Arbitration Board Korean Commercial Arbitration Board INTERNATIONAL ARBITRATION RULES Main office (Trade Tower, Samseong-dong) 43rd floor, 511, Yeoungdong-daero, Gangnam-gu, Seoul, 06164 Rep. of Korea TEL : +82-2-551-2000,

More information

ADMINISTRATIVE DECISION

ADMINISTRATIVE DECISION STATE OF ARKANSAS DEPARTMENT OF FINANCE AND ADMINISTRATION OFFICE OF HEARINGS & APPEALS ADMINISTRATIVE DECISION IN THE MATTER OF ACCT. NO.: REFUND CLAIM DISALLOWANCE (Other Tobacco Products) DOCKET NO.:

More information

v No Wayne Circuit Court

v No Wayne Circuit Court S T A T E O F M I C H I G A N C O U R T O F A P P E A L S CITY OF DETROIT, Plaintiff-Appellant, UNPUBLISHED March 15, 2018 v No. 337705 Wayne Circuit Court BAYLOR LTD, LC No. 16-010881-CZ Defendant-Appellee.

More information

State Tax Return (214) (214)

State Tax Return (214) (214) January 2006 Volume 13 Number 2 State Tax Return Sales Of Products Transported Into Indiana By Common Carrier Arranged By Buyer Are Not Indiana Sales For Indiana Corporate Income Tax Apportionment Purposes:

More information

D-1-GN NO.

D-1-GN NO. D-1-GN-17-003234 NO. 7/13/2017 3:49 PM Velva L. Price District Clerk Travis County D-1-GN-17-003234 victoria benavides NEXTERA ENERGY, INC., VS. Plaintiff, PUBLIC UTILITY COMMISSION OF TEXAS, Defendant.

More information

NON-PRECEDENTIAL DECISION - SEE SUPERIOR COURT I.O.P

NON-PRECEDENTIAL DECISION - SEE SUPERIOR COURT I.O.P NON-PRECEDENTIAL DECISION - SEE SUPERIOR COURT I.O.P. 65.37 COMMONWEALTH OF PENNSYLVANIA Appellee IN THE SUPERIOR COURT OF PENNSYLVANIA v. DAVID ROBERT KENNEDY Appellant No. 281 WDA 2013 Appeal from the

More information

COMMERCIAL ARBITRATION RULES

COMMERCIAL ARBITRATION RULES COMMERCIAL ARBITRATION RULES As Amended and Effective on December 10, 2015 ADMINISTRATIVE FEE REGULATIONS As Amended and Effective on February 1, 2014 REGULATIONS FOR ARBITRATOR S REMUNERATION As Amended

More information

Yulia Feder v. Commissioner, TC Memo , Code Sec(s) 61; 72; 6201; 7491.

Yulia Feder v. Commissioner, TC Memo , Code Sec(s) 61; 72; 6201; 7491. Checkpoint Contents Federal Library Federal Source Materials Federal Tax Decisions Tax Court Memorandum Decisions Tax Court Memorandum Decisions (Current Year) Advance Tax Court Memorandums Yulia Feder,

More information

Child Care Center Licensing Manual (August 2016)

Child Care Center Licensing Manual (August 2016) Child Care Center Licensing Manual (August 2016) for use with COMAR 13A.16 Child Care Centers (as amended effective 7/20/15) Table of Contents COMAR 13A.16.18 ADMINISTRATIVE HEARINGS.01 Scope...1.02 Definitions...1.03

More information

BOARD OF ASSESSMENT REVIEW OF NEW CASTLE COUNTY RULES OF PROCEDURE

BOARD OF ASSESSMENT REVIEW OF NEW CASTLE COUNTY RULES OF PROCEDURE Revised: May 17, 2018 BOARD OF ASSESSMENT REVIEW OF NEW CASTLE COUNTY RULES OF PROCEDURE Article I. Authorization. The Board of Assessment Review of New Castle County (hereinafter referred to as the Board

More information

Arbitration Act (Tentative translation)

Arbitration Act (Tentative translation) Arbitration Act (Tentative translation) (Act No. 138 of August 1, 2003) Table of Contents Chapter I General Provisions (Articles 1 to 12) Chapter II Arbitration Agreement (Articles 13 to 15) Chapter III

More information

SEC. 5. SMALL CASE PROCEDURE FOR REQUESTING COMPETENT AUTHORITY ASSISTANCE.01 General.02 Small Case Standards.03 Small Case Filing Procedure

SEC. 5. SMALL CASE PROCEDURE FOR REQUESTING COMPETENT AUTHORITY ASSISTANCE.01 General.02 Small Case Standards.03 Small Case Filing Procedure 26 CFR 601.201: Rulings and determination letters. Rev. Proc. 96 13 OUTLINE SECTION 1. PURPOSE OF MUTUAL AGREEMENT PROCESS SEC. 2. SCOPE Suspension.02 Requests for Assistance.03 U.S. Competent Authority.04

More information

UNCITRAL ARBITRATION RULES

UNCITRAL ARBITRATION RULES UNCITRAL ARBITRATION RULES (as revised in 2010) Section I. Introductory rules Scope of application* Article 1 1. Where parties have agreed that disputes between them in respect of a defined legal relationship,

More information

APPENDIX I FORMS (6/30/03) 197

APPENDIX I FORMS (6/30/03) 197 APPENDIX I FORMS The following forms are listed in this appendix: Form 1. Petition (Other Than in Small Tax Case) *Form 2. Petition (Small Tax Case) *Form 3. Entry of Appearance *Form 4. Substitution of

More information

THE COURT OF APPEALS ELEVENTH APPELLATE DISTRICT LAKE COUNTY, OHIO : 9/14/07

THE COURT OF APPEALS ELEVENTH APPELLATE DISTRICT LAKE COUNTY, OHIO : 9/14/07 [Cite as Aria's Way, L.L.C. v. Concord Twp. Bd. of Zoning Appeals, 173 Ohio App.3d 73, 2007-Ohio-4776.] THE COURT OF APPEALS ELEVENTH APPELLATE DISTRICT LAKE COUNTY, OHIO ARIA S WAY, L.L.C., : O P I N

More information

Disputing a WCIRB or Insurer Action

Disputing a WCIRB or Insurer Action W o r k e r s C o m p e n s a t i o n I n s u r a n c e R a t i n g B u r e a u o f C a l i f o r n i a Disputing a WCIRB or Insurer Action Presented by the Workers Compensation Insurance Rating Bureau

More information

Court of Appeals. Fifth District of Texas at Dallas

Court of Appeals. Fifth District of Texas at Dallas In The Court of Appeals ACCEPTED 225EFJ016968176 FIFTH COURT OF APPEALS DALLAS, TEXAS 12 July 10 P3:25 Lisa Matz CLERK Fifth District of Texas at Dallas NO. 05-12-00368-CV W.A. MCKINNEY, Appellant V. CITY

More information

) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) Petitioner Z Financial, LLC, appeals both the trial court s granting of equitable

) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) Petitioner Z Financial, LLC, appeals both the trial court s granting of equitable FOURTH DIVISION April 30, 2009 No. 1-08-1445 In re THE APPLICATION OF THE COUNTY TREASURER AND Ex Officio COUNTY COLLECTOR OF COOK COUNTY ILLINOIS, FOR JUDGMENT AND ORDER OF SALE AGAINST REAL ESTATE RETURNED

More information

Appeal from the Order Entered April 1, 2016 in the Court of Common Pleas of Northampton County Civil Division at No(s): C-48-CV

Appeal from the Order Entered April 1, 2016 in the Court of Common Pleas of Northampton County Civil Division at No(s): C-48-CV 2017 PA Super 280 THE BANK OF NEW YORK MELLON F/K/A THE BANK OF NEW YORK, AS TRUSTEE FOR THE CERTIFICATE HOLDERS OF CWALT, INC., ALTERNATIVE LOAN TRUST 2007-HY6 MORTGAGE PASS- THROUGH CERTIFICATES SERIES

More information

Fonseca, Edward v. Rimax Contractors, Inc.

Fonseca, Edward v. Rimax Contractors, Inc. University of Tennessee, Knoxville Trace: Tennessee Research and Creative Exchange Tennessee Court of Workers' Compensation Claims and Workers' Compensation Appeals Board Law 1-18-2019 Fonseca, Edward

More information

IN THE COURT OF APPEAL OF THE STATE OF CALIFORNIA SIXTH APPELLATE DISTRICT

IN THE COURT OF APPEAL OF THE STATE OF CALIFORNIA SIXTH APPELLATE DISTRICT IN THE COURT OF APPEAL OF THE STATE OF CALIFORNIA SIXTH APPELLATE DISTRICT PEOPLE OF THE STATE OF CALIFORNIA, ] ] NO. H023838 Plaintiff and Respondent, ] vs. MICHAEL RAY JOHNSON, ] ] Defendant and Appellant.

More information

ARBITRATION ACT 2005 REVISED 2011 REGIONAL RESOLUTION GLOBAL SOLUTION

ARBITRATION ACT 2005 REVISED 2011 REGIONAL RESOLUTION GLOBAL SOLUTION ARBITRATION ACT 2005 REVISED 2011 REGIONAL RESOLUTION GLOBAL SOLUTION According to Section 3(1) of the Arbitration (Amendment) Act 2018 [Act A1563] and the Ministers appointment of the date of coming

More information

KAO LAW ASSOCIATES ATTORNEYS AT LAW

KAO LAW ASSOCIATES ATTORNEYS AT LAW KAO LAW ASSOCIATES ATTORNEYS AT LAW WILLIAM CORNELL ARCHBOLD, JR* JOSEPH PATRICK O'BRIEN** JOHN YANOSHAK CHRISTOPHER H. PEIFER*** OF COUNSEL FRED KREPPEL GLEN MADERE EDWARD KASSAB 1927-2010 *ALSO MEMBER

More information

Third District Court of Appeal State of Florida

Third District Court of Appeal State of Florida Third District Court of Appeal State of Florida Opinion filed August 02, 2017. Not final until disposition of timely filed motion for rehearing. No. 3D16-2672 Lower Tribunal No. 12-15813 Dev D. Dabas and

More information

NOT DESIGNATED FOR PUBLICATION. No. 117,628 IN THE COURT OF APPEALS OF THE STATE OF KANSAS

NOT DESIGNATED FOR PUBLICATION. No. 117,628 IN THE COURT OF APPEALS OF THE STATE OF KANSAS NOT DESIGNATED FOR PUBLICATION No. 117,628 IN THE COURT OF APPEALS OF THE STATE OF KANSAS In the Matter of the Equalization Appeal of HALLBROOK COUNTRY CLUB for the Tax Years 2014 & 2015 in Johnson County,

More information

Electronic Filing in District and Appellate Courts in Oklahoma. The Supreme Court of Oklahoma Administrative Office of the Courts

Electronic Filing in District and Appellate Courts in Oklahoma. The Supreme Court of Oklahoma Administrative Office of the Courts Electronic Filing in District and Appellate Courts in Oklahoma The Supreme Court of Oklahoma Administrative Office of the Courts Version 1.12, 01/29/2013 E-Filing, and other related projects are on-going

More information

Ukrainian Chamber of Commerce and Industry. Legal Acts. THE LAW OF UKRAINE ON INTERNATIONAL COMMERCIAL ARBITRATION

Ukrainian Chamber of Commerce and Industry. Legal Acts. THE LAW OF UKRAINE ON INTERNATIONAL COMMERCIAL ARBITRATION Page 1 of 10 THE LAW OF UKRAINE ON INTERNATIONAL COMMERCIAL ARBITRATION (As amended in accordance with the Laws No. 762-IV of 15 May 2003, No. 2798-IV of 6 September 2005) The present Law: - is based on

More information

STATE OF ARKANSAS DEPARTMENT OF FINANCE & ADMINISTRATION OFFICE OF HEARINGS & APPEALS ADMINISTRATIVE DECISION

STATE OF ARKANSAS DEPARTMENT OF FINANCE & ADMINISTRATION OFFICE OF HEARINGS & APPEALS ADMINISTRATIVE DECISION STATE OF ARKANSAS DEPARTMENT OF FINANCE & ADMINISTRATION OFFICE OF HEARINGS & APPEALS ADMINISTRATIVE DECISION IN THE MATTER OF ACCT. NO.: GROSS RECEIPTS, COMPENSATING USE, ALCOHOLIC BEVERAGE TAX ASSESSMENTS

More information

CASE NO. 1D An appeal from an order of the Unemployment Appeals Commission.

CASE NO. 1D An appeal from an order of the Unemployment Appeals Commission. IN THE DISTRICT COURT OF APPEAL FIRST DISTRICT, STATE OF FLORIDA RICARDO MACHADO, v. Appellant, NOT FINAL UNTIL TIME EXPIRES TO FILE MOTION FOR REHEARING AND DISPOSITION THEREOF IF FILED CASE NO. 1D10-4037

More information

Commercial Arbitration Act Unofficial Translation of the new Venezuelan Commercial Arbitration Act

Commercial Arbitration Act Unofficial Translation of the new Venezuelan Commercial Arbitration Act Commercial Arbitration Act Unofficial Translation of the new Venezuelan Commercial Arbitration Act By Victorino J. Tejera-Pérez in collaboration with Tom C. López Chapter I General Provisions Article 1.

More information

969. Pursuant to Article 95 item 3 of the Constitution of Montenegro, I hereby adopt DECREE ON THE PROMULGATION OF THE LAW ON ARBITRATION

969. Pursuant to Article 95 item 3 of the Constitution of Montenegro, I hereby adopt DECREE ON THE PROMULGATION OF THE LAW ON ARBITRATION 969. Pursuant to Article 95 item 3 of the Constitution of Montenegro, I hereby adopt DECREE ON THE PROMULGATION OF THE LAW ON ARBITRATION I hereby promulgate the Law on Arbitration adopted by the 25 th

More information

1985 UNCITRAL MODEL LAW ON INTERNATIONAL COMMERCIAL ARBITRATION (WITH AMENDMENTS AS ADOPTED IN 2006)

1985 UNCITRAL MODEL LAW ON INTERNATIONAL COMMERCIAL ARBITRATION (WITH AMENDMENTS AS ADOPTED IN 2006) APPENDIX 2.1 1985 UNCITRAL MODEL LAW ON INTERNATIONAL COMMERCIAL ARBITRATION (WITH AMENDMENTS AS ADOPTED IN 2006) (As adopted by the United Nations Commission on International Trade Law on 21 June 1985

More information

ADMINISTRATIVE DECISION

ADMINISTRATIVE DECISION STATE OF ARKANSAS DEPARTMENT OF FINANCE AND ADMINISTRATION OFFICE OF HEARINGS & APPEALS ADMINISTRATIVE DECISION IN THE MATTER OF ACCT. NO.: COMPENSATING USE TAX ASSESSMENT DOCKET NO.: 19-099 ($ ) 1 RAY

More information

STATE OF WISCONSIN TAX APPEALS COMMISSION 06-S-200, 06-S-201, 06-S-202 AND 07-S-45 DAVID C. SWANSON, COMMISSIONER:

STATE OF WISCONSIN TAX APPEALS COMMISSION 06-S-200, 06-S-201, 06-S-202 AND 07-S-45 DAVID C. SWANSON, COMMISSIONER: STATE OF WISCONSIN TAX APPEALS COMMISSION BADGER STATE ETHANOL, LLC, DOCKET NOS. 06-S-199, 06-S-200, 06-S-201, 06-S-202 AND 07-S-45 Petitioner, vs. RULING AND ORDER WISCONSIN DEPARTMENT OF REVENUE, Respondent.

More information

COURT OF APPEALS STARK COUNTY, OHIO FIFTH APPELLATE DISTRICT

COURT OF APPEALS STARK COUNTY, OHIO FIFTH APPELLATE DISTRICT [Cite as George v. Miracle Solutions, Inc., 2009-Ohio-3659.] COURT OF APPEALS STARK COUNTY, OHIO FIFTH APPELLATE DISTRICT ANITA LEE GEORGE Plaintiff-Appellant -vs- MIRACLE SOLUTIONS, INC., ET AL Defendants-Appellees

More information

[Cite as Szakal v. Akron Rubber Dev., 2003-Ohio-6820.] STATE OF OHIO ) IN THE COURT OF APPEALS NINTH JUDICIAL DISTRICT COUNTY OF SUMMIT )

[Cite as Szakal v. Akron Rubber Dev., 2003-Ohio-6820.] STATE OF OHIO ) IN THE COURT OF APPEALS NINTH JUDICIAL DISTRICT COUNTY OF SUMMIT ) [Cite as Szakal v. Akron Rubber Dev., 2003-Ohio-6820.] STATE OF OHIO ) IN THE COURT OF APPEALS )ss: NINTH JUDICIAL DISTRICT COUNTY OF SUMMIT ) ROBERT SZAKAL Appellant v. AKRON RUBBER DEVELOPMENT, et al.

More information

STATE OF ARKANSAS DEPARTMENT OF FINANCE & ADMINISTRATION OFFICE OF HEARINGS & APPEALS ADMINISTRATIVE DECISION DOCKET NO.: WASTE TIRE FEE ( ) 1

STATE OF ARKANSAS DEPARTMENT OF FINANCE & ADMINISTRATION OFFICE OF HEARINGS & APPEALS ADMINISTRATIVE DECISION DOCKET NO.: WASTE TIRE FEE ( ) 1 STATE OF ARKANSAS DEPARTMENT OF FINANCE & ADMINISTRATION OFFICE OF HEARINGS & APPEALS ADMINISTRATIVE DECISION IN THE MATTER OF WASTE TIRE FEE ASSESSMENT (ACCT. NO.: ) DOCKET NO.: 17-254 WASTE TIRE FEE

More information

ALAMEDA COUNTY ASSESSMENT APPEALS BOARD AND EQUALIZATION HEARING OFFICER INSTRUCTION BOOKLET

ALAMEDA COUNTY ASSESSMENT APPEALS BOARD AND EQUALIZATION HEARING OFFICER INSTRUCTION BOOKLET ALAMEDA COUNTY ASSESSMENT APPEALS BOARD AND EQUALIZATION HEARING OFFICER INSTRUCTION BOOKLET OFFICE OF THE CLERK-ADMINISTRATOR ASSESSMENT APPEALS BOARD P. O. BOX 1499 OAKLAND, CA 94612-1499 (510) 272-3854

More information

GOVERNMENT TECHNOLOGY SERVICES INC., Appellee Opinion No OPINION

GOVERNMENT TECHNOLOGY SERVICES INC., Appellee Opinion No OPINION GOVERNMENT TECHNOLOGY SERVICES INC., v. Appellant ANNE ARUNDEL COUNTY BOARD OF EDUCATION, BEFORE THE MARYLAND STATE BOARD OF EDUCATION Appellee Opinion No. 00-47 OPINION In this appeal, Government Technology

More information

2014 Thomson Reuters. No claim to original U.S. Government Works. 1

2014 Thomson Reuters. No claim to original U.S. Government Works. 1 2010 WL 1600562 Only the Westlaw citation is currently available. NOTICE: THIS OPINION IS NOT DESIGNATED FOR PERMANENT PUBLICATION AND MAY NOT BE CITED EXCEPT AS PROVIDED BY NEB. CT. R. APP. P. s 2-102(E).

More information

Duties of Department of Revenue. NC General Statutes - Chapter 105 Article 15 1

Duties of Department of Revenue. NC General Statutes - Chapter 105 Article 15 1 Article 15. Duties of Department and Property Tax Commission as to Assessments. 105-288. Property Tax Commission. (a) Creation and Membership. The Property Tax Commission is created. It consists of five

More information

ARBITRATION RULES OF THE MAURITIUS INTERNATIONAL ARBITRATION CENTRE

ARBITRATION RULES OF THE MAURITIUS INTERNATIONAL ARBITRATION CENTRE ARBITRATION RULES OF THE MAURITIUS INTERNATIONAL ARBITRATION CENTRE Effective 27 July 2018 TABLE OF CONTENTS Section I. Introductory rules... 4 Scope of application Article 1... 4 Article 2... 4 Notice

More information

THE ASSOCIATION OF ARBITRATORS (SOUTHERN AFRICA)

THE ASSOCIATION OF ARBITRATORS (SOUTHERN AFRICA) THE ASSOCIATION OF ARBITRATORS (SOUTHERN AFRICA) RULES FOR THE CONDUCT OF ARBITRATIONS 2013 EDITION STANDARD PROCEDURE RULES (ANNOTATED VERSION, SHOWING DIFFERENCES TO UNCITRAL ARBITRATION RULES, 2010)

More information

STATE OF FLORIDA DEPARTMENT OF REVENUE TALLAHASSEE, FLORIDA

STATE OF FLORIDA DEPARTMENT OF REVENUE TALLAHASSEE, FLORIDA STATE OF FLORIDA DEPARTMENT OF REVENUE TALLAHASSEE, FLORIDA HAROLD PRATT PAVING & SEALING, INC., Petitioner, vs. DEPARTMENT OF REVENUE, Respondent. DOR 05-2-FOF Case No. 04-1054 FINAL ORDER This cause

More information

STATE OF OHIO LASZLO KISS

STATE OF OHIO LASZLO KISS [Cite as State v. Kiss, 2009-Ohio-739.] Court of Appeals of Ohio EIGHTH APPELLATE DISTRICT COUNTY OF CUYAHOGA JOURNAL ENTRY AND OPINION Nos. 91353 and 91354 STATE OF OHIO PLAINTIFF-APPELLEE vs. LASZLO

More information

STATE OF MICHIGAN COURT OF APPEALS

STATE OF MICHIGAN COURT OF APPEALS STATE OF MICHIGAN COURT OF APPEALS CSB INVESTORS, STUART URBAN, and JOHN KIRKPATRICK, UNPUBLISHED December 22, 2015 Petitioners-Appellants, v No. 322897 Tax Tribunal DEPARTMENT OF TREASURY, LC No. 00-441057

More information

CASE NO. 1D Pamela Jo Bondi, Attorney General, and J. Clifton Cox, Special Counsel, Tallahassee, for Appellee.

CASE NO. 1D Pamela Jo Bondi, Attorney General, and J. Clifton Cox, Special Counsel, Tallahassee, for Appellee. IN THE DISTRICT COURT OF APPEAL FIRST DISTRICT, STATE OF FLORIDA VERIZON BUSINESS PURCHASING, LLC, v. Appellant, NOT FINAL UNTIL TIME EXPIRES TO FILE MOTION FOR REHEARING AND DISPOSITION THEREOF IF FILED

More information

Cotton, Alan v. HUMACare, Inc.

Cotton, Alan v. HUMACare, Inc. University of Tennessee, Knoxville Trace: Tennessee Research and Creative Exchange Tennessee Court of Workers' Compensation Claims and Workers' Compensation Appeals Board Law 3-24-2016 Cotton, Alan v.

More information

IN THE COURT OF CRIMINAL APPEALS OF TENNESSEE AT KNOXVILLE Assigned on Briefs January 30, 2008

IN THE COURT OF CRIMINAL APPEALS OF TENNESSEE AT KNOXVILLE Assigned on Briefs January 30, 2008 IN THE COURT OF CRIMINAL APPEALS OF TENNESSEE AT KNOXVILLE Assigned on Briefs January 30, 2008 STATE OF TENNESSEE V. RALPH LEPORE Direct Appeal from the Circuit Court for Sevier County No. 9392 O. Duane

More information

STATE OF MICHIGAN COURT OF APPEALS

STATE OF MICHIGAN COURT OF APPEALS STATE OF MICHIGAN COURT OF APPEALS FOUR G. CONSTRUCTION, INC. d/b/a GEEDING CONSTRUCTION, INC., UNPUBLISHED February 23, 2016 Petitioner-Appellee, v No. 324065 Tax Tribunal DEPARTMENT OF TREASURY, LC No.

More information

Kerry M. Wormwood v. Batching Systems, Inc., et al., No. 874, September Term, 1998 WORKERS COMPENSATION APPEALS TRANSMITTAL OF RECORD --

Kerry M. Wormwood v. Batching Systems, Inc., et al., No. 874, September Term, 1998 WORKERS COMPENSATION APPEALS TRANSMITTAL OF RECORD -- HEADNOTE: Kerry M. Wormwood v. Batching Systems, Inc., et al., No. 874, September Term, 1998 WORKERS COMPENSATION APPEALS TRANSMITTAL OF RECORD -- A failure to transmit a record timely, in literal violation

More information