THE CONSTITUTIONAL COURT OF THE REPUBLIC OF LITHUANIA
|
|
- Cornelia Booth
- 6 years ago
- Views:
Transcription
1 THE CONSTITUTIONAL COURT OF THE REPUBLIC OF LITHUANIA DECISION ON RETURNING THE PETITION OF THE VILNIUS REGIONAL ADMINISTRATIVE COURT, THE PETITIONER, REQUESTING AN INVESTIGATION INTO THE COMPLIANCE OF THE PROVISIONS OF THE REPUBLIC OF LITHUANIA S LAW ON PERSONAL INCOME TAX WITH THE CONSTITUTION OF THE REPUBLIC OF LITHUANIA 16 January 2015, No. KT5-S4/2015 Vilnius The Constitutional Court of the Republic of Lithuania, composed of the Justices of the Constitutional Court: Elvyra Baltutytė, Vytautas Greičius, Danutė Jočienė, Pranas Kuconis, Gediminas Mesonis, Vytas Milius, Egidijus Šileikis, Algirdas Taminskas, and Dainius Žalimas The court reporter Daiva Pitrėnaitė The Constitutional Court has, in its procedural sitting, considered a petition (No. 1B- 58/2014) of the Vilnius Regional Administrative Court, the petitioner, requesting an investigation into whether Paragraph 2 (wording of 23 December 2008, Official Gazette Valstybės žinios, 2008, No ) of Article 17 of the Republic of Lithuania s Law on Personal Income Tax, insofar as it prescribes that the relief provided for in Item 32 of Paragraph 1 of this article does not apply where the respective income of an individual is received from individuals whose permanent place of residence is in a target territory, is not in conflict with the provision <...> childhood shall be under the <...> care of the State of Paragraph 2 of Article 38 and Paragraph 1 of Article 29 of the Constitution of the Republic of Lithuania and the constitutional principle of a state under the rule of law. The Constitutional Court has established: The Constitutional Court has received petition No. 1B-58/2014 of the Vilnius Regional Administrative Court requesting an investigation into the compliance of Paragraph 2 of Article 17 (wording of 23 December 2008) of the Republic of Lithuania s Law on Personal Income Tax (hereinafter also referred to as the LPIT), insofar as it prescribes that the relief provided for in Item
2 2 32 of Paragraph 1 of this article does not apply where the respective income of an individual is received from individuals whose permanent place of residence is in a target territory, with Paragraph 1 of Article 29 and the provision <...> childhood shall be under the <...> care of the State of Paragraph 2 of Article 38 of the Constitution and the constitutional principle of a state under the rule of law. The Constitutional Court holds that: 1. The Vilnius Regional Administrative Court, the petitioner, requests an investigation, to the specified extent, into the compliance of Paragraph 2 of Article 17 (wording of 23 December 2008) of the LPIT with the Constitution Article 17 Tax-Exempt Income (wording of 23 December 2008) of the LPIT, inter alia, prescribes: 1. The following income shall be exempt from tax: <...> 32) maintenance awarded by court or received under an agreement; <...> 2. The reliefs provided for in Items 7, 8, 9, 10, 11, 12, 13, 14, 15, 16, 17, 18, 19, 20, 23, 24, 27, 28, 29, 30, 32, 33, 34, 36, 39, 40, 42, 44, 46, and 53 of Paragraph 1, as well as the relief applicable, under Item 26, to income received by gift from persons other than a spouse, children (adopted children), parents (adoptive parents), brothers, sisters, and grandparents, shall not apply where the respective income of an individual is received from foreign entities registered or otherwise organised in the target territories, or from individuals whose permanent place of residence is in a target territory. Thus, Paragraph 1 of Article 17 (wording of 23 December 2008) of the LPIT specifies the types of tax-exempt income, and Paragraph 2 lays down certain exceptions to the general rule established in Paragraph 1 the conditions under which personal income tax is considered to be payable on certain income, although, according to the general rule, such income falls under the regulation of Paragraph 1 of the same article, i.e. is categorised as non-taxable income. In the context of the petition, it should be noted that the income indicated in Item 32 of Paragraph 1 of Article 17 (wording of 23 December 2008) of the LPIT, inter alia, maintenance received under an agreement, is not categorised as income exempt from personal income tax where this income is received, inter alia, from an individual whose permanent place of residence is in a target territory It should be noted that, under Paragraph 21 of Article 2 The Main Notions of the Law of the LPIT, a target territory means a foreign country or zone that is included in the List of Target Territories, established by the Minister of Finance, and satisfies at least two of the criteria set in this paragraph: inter alia, the rate of profit tax or equivalent tax in that territory is below 75 percent of
3 3 the corresponding rate set in the Republic of Lithuania s Law on Profit Tax; different rules for levying profit tax or equivalent tax apply in that territory; there is no effective exchange of information and/or there is no financial and administrative transparency in that territory, i.e. the rules for the administration of profit tax or equivalent tax are not completely clear and the procedure for the application of these rules is not communicated to the tax administrators of other countries. Thus, in terms of taxation, target territories are specific territories where not only different rates of certain taxes and/or different taxation rules may be applied, but also where such rules for the administration of taxes may be applied that are not clear and not known to the authorised institutions of other countries; also there may be reasonable doubts regarding financial and administrative transparency in these territories The List of Target Territories was approved by the Decision (No. 344) On Approving the List of Target Territories of the Minister of Finance of the Republic of Lithuania of 22 December 2001; this list includes, inter alia, Hong Kong as a target territory It should be noted that the petition of the Vilnius Regional Administrative Court, the petitioner, and the material of the administrative case considered by the petitioner make it clear that the dispute in that administrative case arose in relation to the administrative acts based on which the applicant in the said administrative case owed tax arrears as a result of her default on, among other things, personal income tax levied on the income received from a Hong Kong citizen during the period from 1 January 2007 to 31 December According to the applicant in the administrative case, the income from the Hong Kong citizen was received during the indicated period for the maintenance of her and that citizen s child (under an oral agreement with that citizen) Thus, in substance, in its petition, the Vilnius Regional Administrative Court, the petitioner, has raised doubts regarding the compliance of Paragraph 2 of Article 17 (wording of 23 December 2008) of the LPIT with the Constitution only to the extent that it is prescribed that the relief provided for in Item 32 of Paragraph 1 of the said article (based on which, in the opinion of the petitioner, tax-exempt income includes, among other things, child maintenance received from the child s father under the respective agreement) does not apply where child maintenance income is received from the child s father whose permanent place of residence is in a target territory. 2. Under Item 5 of Paragraph 2 of Article 67 of the Law on the Constitutional Court of the Republic of Lithuania, a ruling of a court, by means of which an application is made to the Constitutional Court, must specify the legal arguments presenting the court s opinion on the conflict of a legal act with the Constitution. The Constitutional Court has held on more than one occasion that courts, when applying to the Constitutional Court with a petition requesting an investigation into whether a law or another legal act (part thereof) is not in conflict with the Constitution and when presenting their arguments
4 4 concerning their opinion (which is expressed in their petition) on the conflict of the law or another legal act (part thereof) with the Constitution, may not limit themselves only to general reasoning or statements, or to the fact that the law or another legal act (part thereof) is, in their opinion, in conflict with the Constitution, but must clearly indicate which impugned articles (paragraphs, items thereof) of legal acts and to what extent are, in their opinion, in conflict with the Constitution and must substantiate their position on the compliance of every impugned provision of the legal act (part thereof) with the Constitution by clearly formulated legal arguments (inter alia, the Constitutional Court s ruling of 12 December 2005 and its decisions of 14 October 2008, 10 November 2011, and 2 September 2014). Otherwise, the petition of a court requesting an investigation into the compliance of a law or another legal act (part thereof) with the Constitution should be considered not to comply with the requirements of Article 67 of the Law on the Constitutional Court (inter alia, the Constitutional Court s rulings of 12 December 2005 and 16 January 2006 and its decisions of 5 July 2007, 14 October 2008, and 16 November 2010). It should be noted that, if a petition requesting an investigation into the compliance of a legal act (part thereof) with the Constitution in view of the content of norms and/or the scope of regulation indicates neither any concrete articles (parts thereof) or items of the legal act, the compliance of which with the Constitution is doubted by the petitioner, nor any concrete provisions norms and/or principles of the Constitution, with which, in the opinion of the petitioner, the concretely indicated articles (parts thereof) or items of the impugned legal act are in conflict in view of the content of norms and/or the scope of regulation, nor the legal reasoning grounding the doubt of the petitioner concerning each concretely indicated article (part thereof) or item of the impugned legal act (part thereof), the compliance of which with the concretely indicated provisions of the Constitution in view of the content of norms and/or the scope of regulation is doubted by the petitioner, and if such a petition were accepted at the Constitutional Court and a case were commenced subsequent to it, the rights of the party concerned the state institution that has passed the impugned legal act would be restricted, since it would be more difficult for the party concerned to provide explanations concerning the arguments of the petitioner and to prepare for judicial consideration (inter alia, the Constitutional Court s decisions of 16 April 2004, 19 March 2010, 12 December 2012, 8 January 2013, and 28 August 2014). 3. As mentioned before, the petitioner requests an investigation, to the specified extent, into the compliance of the legal regulation laid down in Paragraph 2 of Article 17 (wording of 23 December 2008) of the LPIT with Paragraph 1 of Article 29 and the provision <...> childhood shall be under the <...> care of the State of Paragraph 2 of Article 38 of the Constitution and the constitutional principle of a state under the rule of law The position of the petitioner, in terms of the aforementioned aspect, regarding the
5 5 compliance of the impugned legal regulation, inter alia, with the provision <...> childhood shall be under the <...> care of the State of Paragraph 2 of Article 38 of the Constitution, is, among other things, substantiated by the fact that, in the opinion of the petitioner, Item 32 of Paragraph 1 of Article 17 (wording of 23 December 2008) of the LPIT consolidates a form of childhood social security; therefore, child maintenance income received by the child s mother from the child s father under their agreement should be exempt from personal income tax. In other words, in the opinion of the petitioner, child maintenance may not at all be categorised as income on which personal income tax is payable Seeking to substantiate the aforementioned and other statements, the petitioner, among other things, cites the provisions of the official constitutional doctrine in relation to the obligation of the state to ensure that childhood, as a constitutional value, is fostered and protected in every possible way; however, the petitioner has neither pointed out nor considered that the impugned legal regulation governs specifically the legal relations in connection with taxing, i.e. this legal regulation establishes the types of income exempt from personal income tax and lays down the exceptions where the relief from personal income tax is not applicable to certain income categorised, according to the general rule, as tax-exempt income. Nor does the petitioner points to the official constitutional doctrinal provisions that are particularly relevant in the context of its petition, i.e. the provisions in relation to the constitutional competence of the legislature to establish taxes: inter alia, that the establishment of taxes is an exceptional constitutional competence of the legislature (Articles 67 and 127 of the Constitution), as well as that taxable objects may be very varied (the Constitutional Court s ruling of 22 December 2006) Thus, in its petition, the petitioner does not provide any arguments substantiating that the legislature, while following the Constitution, is unable to implement its exceptional constitutional competence to establish taxes, among other things, in the event of the legal regulation under which income on which personal income tax is payable also includes child maintenance received under the respective agreement from an individual whose permanent place of residence is in a target territory The petitioner substantiates its doubts regarding the compliance of the impugned legal regulation with, inter alia, Paragraph 1 of Article 29 of the Constitution and the constitutional principle of a state under the rule of law by contending that, according to it, the legislature not only has unjustifiably differentiated income, but also has, in certain terms, differently treated children (citizens of the Republic of Lithuania) supported by maintenance income received from territories other than target territories, if compared to children supported by maintenance income received from target territories. In other words, in the opinion of the petitioner, through the impugned legal
6 6 regulation, the legislature, having established that income on which personal income tax is payable also includes child maintenance received under the respective agreement from the child s father whose permanent place of residence is in a target territory, has at the same time unjustifiably singled out one group of children from other children receiving maintenance the group whose maintenance income is received from the parents whose permanent place of residence is in target territories, as well as has unjustifiably differentiated maintenance income received to support a child As mentioned before, Paragraph 1 of Article 17 (wording of 23 December 2008) of the LPIT specifies the types of tax-exempt income, and Paragraph 2 lays down certain exceptions to the general rule established in Paragraph 1 the conditions under which personal income tax is considered to be payable on certain income, although, according to the general rule, such income falls under the regulation of Paragraph 1 of the same article, i.e. is categorised as tax-exempt income. It has also been mentioned that, in view of the petition of the petitioner, it is clear that the relevant exception laid down to the aforementioned general rule in Paragraph 2 of Article 17 (wording of 23 December 2008) of the LPIT is the one under which certain income, i.e. child maintenance received under the respective agreement, is considered to be income on which personal income tax is payable in cases where such income is received from an individual (in the context of the petition from the child s father) whose permanent place of residence is in a target territory. While clarifying the legal regulation consolidated in Paragraphs 1 and 2 of Article 17 (wording of 23 December 2008) of the LPIT, in the context of the petition, it should be noted that certain income is categorised as non-exempt or exempt from personal income tax according to the territory of residence of a person from whom the respective income is received. Thus, the relief from personal income tax, as established under the impugned legal regulation in Paragraph 1 of Article 17 (wording of 23 December 2008) of the LPIT, is applicable or non-applicable to particular income child maintenance received under the respective agreement in view of the source of that income, i.e. depending on whether the income is received from an individual permanently resident in a target territory or another territory. Consequently, although it is, among other things, maintained by the petitioner that one group of children those whose maintenance income is received from the parents whose permanent place of residence is in target territories is unjustifiably singled out under the impugned legal regulation from other children receiving maintenance, and, thus, a worse situation is created with regard to children (citizens of the Republic of Lithuania) who receive maintenance from target territories, if compared to children (citizens of the Republic of Lithuania) who receive maintenance from territories other than target territories, nevertheless, the petitioner does not consider that the impugned legal regulation lays down such rules for levying personal income tax that differ
7 7 depending not on persons for whose maintenance particular income is received, but on sources from which such income is received As mentioned before, in terms of taxation, target territories are specific territories where not only different rates of certain taxes and/or different taxation rules may be applied, but also where such rules for the administration of taxes may be applied that are not clear and not known to the authorised institutions of other countries; also there may be reasonable doubts regarding financial and administrative transparency in these territories. It should be noted that the petitioner, in maintaining that the income in question is unjustifiably differentiated under the impugned legal regulation, does not provide any arguments to substantiate that the indicated types of income maintenance received to support a child under the respective agreement from an individual whose permanent place of residence is in a target territory and income received for an analogous purpose under the respective agreement from a person resident in another territory do not differ to the extent making it impermissible for the legislature to establish different legal regulation regarding the imposition of personal income tax on these types of income. In addition, the petitioner takes no account of the specific status of target territories in terms of the imposition, among other things, of personal income tax and provides no arguments to substantiate that, from the point of view of taxation, no special legal regulation may apply to income received from these territories Thus, it should be held that, in its petition, the petitioner provides no legal arguments substantiating its position regarding the compliance of the legal regulation laid down in Paragraph 2 of Article 17 (wording of 23 December 2008) of the LPIT with the articles of the Constitution indicated by the petitioner, insofar as, under this legal regulation, the relief provided for in Item 32 of Paragraph 1 of Article 17 (wording of 23 December 2008) of the LPIT (based on which taxexempt income includes, among other things, child maintenance received from the child s father under the respective agreement) does not apply where child maintenance income is received from the child s father whose permanent place of residence is in a target territory. Consequently, the petition does not comply with the requirements established in Item 5 of Paragraph 2 of Article 67 of the Law on the Constitutional Court. Under Article 70 of the Law on the Constitutional Court, in the case that a petition (part thereof) fails to comply with the requirements set forth in Article 67 of the Law on the Constitutional Court, the petition is returned to the petitioner. The return of a petition does not take away the right of the petitioner to reapply to the Constitutional Court according to the general procedure once the deficiencies of the petition have been removed. 4. In view of what has been stated above, the conclusion should be drawn that there is a ground to return the petition of the Vilnius Regional Administrative Court, the petitioner, requesting
8 8 an investigation into whether Paragraph 2 of Article 17 (wording of 23 December 2008) of the LPIT, insofar as it prescribes that the relief provided for in Item 32 of Paragraph 1 of this article does not apply where the respective income of an individual is received from individuals whose permanent place of residence is in a target territory, with Paragraph 1 of Article 29 and the provision <...> childhood shall be under the <...> care of the State of Paragraph 2 of Article 38 of the Constitution and the constitutional principle of a state under the rule of law. Conforming to Paragraphs 3 and 4 of Article 22, Paragraph 2 of Article 25, Article 28, Item 5 of Paragraph 2 of Article 67, and Article 70 of the Law on the Constitutional Court of the Republic of Lithuania, the Constitutional Court of the Republic of Lithuania adopts the following decision: To return the petition of the Vilnius Regional Administrative Court, the petitioner, requesting an investigation into whether Paragraph 2 (wording of 23 December 2008, Official Gazette Valstybės žinios, 2008, No ) of Article 17 of the Republic of Lithuania s Law on Personal Income Tax, insofar as it prescribes that the relief provided for in Item 32 of Paragraph 1 of this article does not apply where the respective income of an individual is received from individuals whose permanent place of residence is in a target territory, is not in conflict with the provision <...> childhood shall be under the <...> care of the State of Paragraph 2 of Article 38 and Paragraph 1 of Article 29 and of the Constitution of the Republic of Lithuania and the constitutional principle of a state under the rule of law. This decision of the Constitutional Court is final and not subject to appeal. Justices of the Constitutional Court: Elvyra Baltutytė Vytautas Greičius Danutė Jočienė Pranas Kuconis Gediminas Mesonis Vytas Milius Egidijus Šileikis Algirdas Taminskas Dainius Žalimas
THE CONSTITUTIONAL COURT OF THE REPUBLIC OF LITHUANIA
Case No. 08/2008-23/2009 THE CONSTITUTIONAL COURT OF THE REPUBLIC OF LITHUANIA RULING ON THE COMPLIANCE OF PARAGRAPH 1 (WORDING OF 12 DECEMBER 2006) OF ARTICLE 38 OF THE REPUBLIC OF LITHUANIA LAW ON STATE
More informationTHE CONSTITUTIONAL COURT OF THE REPUBLIC OF LITHUANIA
Case No. 13/95 THE CONSTITUTIONAL COURT OF THE REPUBLIC OF LITHUANIA R U L I N G On the compliance of Items 5, 6, 7, 8, 16, 17, 19, 27.4 27.9, 29, 34, 36 of the stamp tax rates confirmed by the Resolution
More informationTHE CONSTITUTIONAL COURT OF THE REPUBLIC OF LITHUANIA R U L I N G. Vilnius, 18 October 2000
Case No. 29/98-16/99-3/2000 THE CONSTITUTIONAL COURT OF THE REPUBLIC OF LITHUANIA R U L I N G On the compliance of the Republic of Lithuania s Law on the Reorganisation of the Joint-stock Companies Būtingės
More informationTHE CONSTITUTIONAL COURT OF THE REPUBLIC OF LITHUANIA
Case No. 46/2001-48/2001-50/2001-2/2002-6/2002-18/2002 THE CONSTITUTIONAL COURT OF THE REPUBLIC OF LITHUANIA RULING ON THE COMPLIANCE OF PARAGRAPH 2 OF ARTICLE 11 (WORDING OF 21 DECEMBER 2000) AND PARAGRAPH
More informationREPUBLIC OF LITHUANIA LAW ON DECLARATION OF THE PROPERTY OF RESIDENTS. 16 May 1996 No I-1338 (As last amended on 11 February 2010 No XI-684) Vilnius
REPUBLIC OF LITHUANIA LAW ON DECLARATION OF THE PROPERTY OF RESIDENTS 16 May 1996 No I-1338 (As last amended on 11 February 2010 No XI-684) Vilnius CHAPTER I GENERAL PROVISIONS Article 1. Purpose of the
More informationVilnius, the twenty seventh of April, two thousand and eighteen
To Special Closed-Ended Type Private Capital Investment Company INVL Technology Gynėjų g. 14, Vilnius Translation from Lithuanian SPECIAL CLOSED-END TYPE PRIVATE CAPITAL INVESTMENT COMPANY INVL TECHNOLOGY
More informationAGREEMENT BETWEEN THE GOVERNMENT OF AUSTRALIA AND THE GOVERNMENT OF THE ARGENTINE REPUBLIC ON THE PROMOTION AND PROTECTION OF INVESTMENTS
Agreement between the Government of Australia and the Government of the Argentine Republic on the Promotion and Protection of Investments, and Protocol (Canberra, 23 August 1995) Entry into force: 11 January
More informationORDER OF THE CHIEF OF THE STATE TAW INSPECTORATE UNDER THE MINISTRY OF FINANCE OF THE REPUBLIC OF LITHUANIA
ORDER OF THE CHIEF OF THE STATE TAW INSPECTORATE UNDER THE MINISTRY OF FINANCE OF THE REPUBLIC OF LITHUANIA ON THE APPROVAL OF THE RULES FOR THE SUBMISSION OF A TAXPAYER S REQUEST TO CONSENT TO THE PRINCIPLES
More informationCHAPTER I GENERAL PROVISIONS
APPROVED by the Order No VA-106 of the Head of the State Tax Inspectorate under the Ministry of Finance of the Republic of Lithuania of 21 October 2011 (version of the Order No VA-63 of the Head of the
More information1 Article 52 of the Constitution: The State shall guarantee its citizens the right to receive old age and disability
Facing the Challenges of the Financial Crisis: The Role of the Constitutional Court of the Republic of Lithuania Dainius Žalimas, President of the Constitutional Court of the Republic of Lithuania I. Challenges
More informationEN Official Journal of the European Union L 166/ 1. (Acts whose publication is obligatory)
30.4.2004 EN Official Journal of the European Union L 166/ 1 I (Acts whose publication is obligatory) REGULATION (EC) No 883/2004 OF THE EUROPEAN PARLIAMENT AND OF THE COUNCIL of 29 April 2004 on the coordination
More informationJUDGMENT OF THE COURT (Second Chamber) 17 February 2005'*
LINNEWEBER AND AKRITIDIS JUDGMENT OF THE COURT (Second Chamber) 17 February 2005'* In Joined Cases C-453/02 and C-462/02, REFERENCES for a preliminary ruling under Article 234 EC from the Bundesfinanzhof
More informationTranslation from Lithuanian To INVL Baltic Farmland, AB Gynėjų str. 14, Vilnius
Translation from Lithuanian To INVL Baltic Farmland, AB Gynėjų str. 14, Vilnius INVL BALTIC FARMLAND, AB AUDIT COMMITTEE ACTIVITY REPORT FOR THE FINANCIAL YEAR 2017 Vilnius, the tenth of April, two thousand
More informationCanberra, 12 November Entry into force, 14 March 2007 AUSTRALIAN TREATY SERIES [2007] ATS 22
AGREEMENT BETWEEN THE GOVERNMENT OF AUSTRALIA AND THE GOVERNMENT OF THE DEMOCRATIC SOCIALIST REPUBLIC OF SRI LANKA FOR THE PROMOTION AND PROTECTION OF INVESTMENTS Canberra, 12 November 2002 Entry into
More informationIN THE COMMONWEALTH COURT OF PENNSYLVANIA. In Re: Estate of Ray Bloom Ross, : Deceased, : No C.D : Argued: September 10, 2002 Appellant :
IN THE COMMONWEALTH COURT OF PENNSYLVANIA In Re: Estate of Ray Bloom Ross, : Deceased, : No. 2652 C.D. 2001 : Argued: September 10, 2002 Appellant : BEFORE: HONORABLE BONNIE BRIGANCE LEADBETTER, Judge
More information117 T.C. No. 1 UNITED STATES TAX COURT. GLAXOSMITHKLINE HOLDINGS (AMERICAS) INC., Petitioner v. COMMISSIONER OF INTERNAL REVENUE, Respondent
117 T.C. No. 1 UNITED STATES TAX COURT GLAXOSMITHKLINE HOLDINGS (AMERICAS) INC., Petitioner v. COMMISSIONER OF INTERNAL REVENUE, Respondent Docket No. 3-01-D. Filed July 5, 2001. G and R (the applicants)
More informationAGREEMENT BETWEEN THE REPUBLIC OF TURKEY AND AUSTRALIA ON THE RECIPROCAL PROMOTION AND PROTECTION OF INVESTMENTS
AGREEMENT BETWEEN THE REPUBLIC OF TURKEY AND AUSTRALIA ON THE RECIPROCAL PROMOTION AND PROTECTION OF INVESTMENTS The Republic of Turkey and Australia ("the Parties"), RECOGNISING the importance of promoting
More informationAGREEMENT BETWEEN THE REPUBLIC OF CHILE AND THE REPUBLIC OF TURKEY CONCERNING THE RECIPROCAL PROMOTION AND PROTECTION OF INVESTMENTS
AGREEMENT BETWEEN THE REPUBLIC OF CHILE AND THE REPUBLIC OF TURKEY CONCERNING THE RECIPROCAL PROMOTION AND PROTECTION OF INVESTMENTS The Republic of Chile and the Republic of Turkey, hereinafter called
More informationRecreational Residence Trust Package
Recreational Residence Trust Package Fees: $6,000 Documents: 1. Recreational Residence Trust, with related documents, as required: If registered in the Land Title Office: Form A Transfer Property Transfer
More informationCOMMON CONVENTION ON INVESTMENTS IN THE STATES OF THE CUSTOMS AND ECONOMIC UNION OF CENTRAL AFRICA *
COMMON CONVENTION ON INVESTMENTS IN THE STATES OF THE CUSTOMS AND ECONOMIC UNION OF CENTRAL AFRICA * The Common Convention on Investments in the States of the Central African Customs and Economic Union
More informationLAW ON INVESTMENT 7 July 1999 No. VIII-1312 Vilnius CHAPTER ONE GENERAL PROVISIONS
LAW ON INVESTMENT 7 July 1999 No. VIII-1312 Vilnius Official translation CHAPTER ONE GENERAL PROVISIONS Article 1. Purpose of the Law 1. The Law sets forth the terms and conditions of investment in the
More informationFinancial Supervision Authority Act. Passed 9 May 2001 (RT 1 I 2001, 48, 267), entered into force 1 June 2001, amended by the following Act:
Financial Supervision Authority Act Passed 9 May 2001 (RT 1 I 2001, 48, 267), entered into force 1 June 2001, amended by the following Act: 20.02.2002 entered into force 01.07.2002 - RT I 2002, 23, 131.
More information(Ca p.80) (Made under section 60 (i))
Go v e r n m e n t No t i c e no. 167 published on 7/6/2013 the civil aviation act (Ca p.80) regulations (Made under section 60 (i)) t h e civil av i at i o n (c o n t r i b u t i o n a n d a d m i n i
More informationThe Government of the United Mexican States and the Government of the Republic of Belarus, hereinafter referred to as "the Contracting Parties,"
AGREEMENT BETWEEN THE GOVERNMENT OF THE UNITED MEXICAN STATES AND THE GOVERNMENT OF THE REPUBLIC OF BELARUS ON THE PROMOTION AND RECIPROCAL PROTECTION OF INVESTMENTS The Government of the United Mexican
More informationCONSTITUTIONAL JUDGEMENT
CONSTITUTIONAL JUDGEMENT 3-2-1-143-03 JUDGMENT OF THE SUPREME COURT EN BANC No. of the case 3-2-1-143-03 Date of judgment 17 June 2004 Composition of court Court Case Disputed judgment Petitioner and type
More informationREPUBLIC OF LITHUANIA L A W ON EXCISE DUTY. 30 October 2001 No. IX-569 Vilnius CHAPTER I GENERAL PROVISIONS
NOTE: Law No. XI-722 as of 01.04.2010 establishes that the provisions applied before 20.04.2010 concerning the movement, storage and monitoring of excise goods shall apply to excise goods, movement whereof
More informationPLEASE NOTE Legislative Counsel Office not Table of Public Acts
c t INCOME TAX ACT PLEASE NOTE This document, prepared by the Legislative Counsel Office, is an office consolidation of this Act, current to January 1, 2017. It is intended for information and reference
More informationINVALDA INVL, AB AUDIT COMMITTEE ACTIVITY REPORT FOR THE FINANCIAL YEAR 2017 Vilnius, the thirtieth of April, two thousand and eighteen
To Invalda INVL, AB Gynėjų str. 14, Vilnius Translation from Lithuanian INVALDA INVL, AB AUDIT COMMITTEE ACTIVITY REPORT FOR THE FINANCIAL YEAR 2017 Vilnius, the thirtieth of April, two thousand and eighteen
More informationJUDGMENT OF THE COURT (First Chamber) 6 July 2006*
JUDGMENT OF 6. 7. 2006 - CASE C-251/05 JUDGMENT OF THE COURT (First Chamber) 6 July 2006* In Case C-251/05, REFERENCE for a preliminary ruling under Article 234 EC from the Court of Appeal (England and
More informationChapter 18 EQUITY SECURITIES FINANCIAL INFORMATION. Introduction
Chapter 18 EQUITY SECURITIES FINANCIAL INFORMATION Introduction 18.01 This Chapter sets out the continuing obligations of a listed issuer with regard to the disclosure of routine financial information
More informationJUDGMENT OF THE COURT (Fifth Chamber) 20 June 2002 *
JUDGMENT OF THE COURT (Fifth Chamber) 20 June 2002 * In Case C-287/00, Commission of the European Communities, represented by G. Wilms and K. Gross, acting as Agents, with an address for service in Luxembourg,
More informationLithuania. UNCTAD Compendium of Investment Laws. Law on Investments (1999) Unofficial translation
UNCTAD Compendium of Investment Laws Lithuania Law on Investments (1999) Unofficial translation Note The Investment Laws Navigator is based upon sources believed to be accurate and reliable and is intended
More informationAgreement between. the Government of the Republic of Finland. and. the Government of the Republic of Nicaragua
Agreement between the Government of the Republic of Finland and the Government of the Republic of Nicaragua on the Promotion and Protection of Investments The Government of the Republic of Finland and
More informationIncome Tax Act CHAPTER 217 OF THE REVISED STATUTES, as amended by
Income Tax Act CHAPTER 217 OF THE REVISED STATUTES, 1989 as amended by 1987, c. 3, s. 206; 1990, c. 10, ss. 7-11; 1992, c. 10, s. 35; 1992, c. 15, ss. 10-12; 1993, c. 3, s. 29; 1993, c. 26; 1994, c. 9,
More informationREPUBLIC OF LITHUANIA LAW ON EXCISE DUTY. 30 October 2001 No IX 569 Vilnius
REPUBLIC OF LITHUANIA LAW ON EXCISE DUTY 30 October 2001 No IX 569 Vilnius (a new version of 29 January 2004 No IX 1987) (as amended by 20 January 2006 No X 503) CHAPTER ONE GENERAL PROVISIONS Article
More informationJUDGMENT OF THE COURT (Fifth Chamber) 22 February 2001 *
JUDGMENT OF THE COURT (Fifth Chamber) 22 February 2001 * In Case C-408/98, REFERENCE to the Court under Article 177 of the EC Treaty (now Article 234 EC) by the High Court of Justice of England and Wales,
More informationReference to the Court by the Second Chamber of the Gerechtshof (Fiscal
JUDGMENT OF 25. 2. 1969 CASE 23/68 In Case 23/68 Reference to the Court by the Second Chamber of the Gerechtshof (Fiscal Chamber), The Hague, for a preliminary ruling in the action pending before that
More informationChapter 1 GENERAL PROVISIONS. Article 1 GENERAL DEFINITIONS. 1. For the purposes of this Agreement, unless the context otherwise requires:
AGREEMENT BETWEEN THE GOVERNMENT OF JAPAN AND THE GOVERNMENT OF BERMUDA FOR THE EXCHANGE OF INFORMATION FOR THE PURPOSE OF THE PREVENTION OF FISCAL EVASION AND THE ALLOCATION OF RIGHTS OF TAXATION WITH
More informationChapter 19 EQUITY SECURITIES OVERSEAS ISSUERS. Preliminary
Chapter 19 EQUITY SECURITIES OVERSEAS ISSUERS Preliminary 19.01 The Exchange Listing Rules apply as much to overseas issuers as they do to Hong Kong issuers, subject to the additional requirements, modifications
More informationJUDGMENT OF THE COURT (Second Chamber) 18 October 2007 *
JUDGMENT OF THE COURT (Second Chamber) 18 October 2007 * In Case C-299/05, ACTION for annulment under Article 230 EC, brought on 26 July 2005, Commission of the European Communities, represented by M.-J.
More informationJUDGMENT OF THE COURT (Fifth Chamber) 17 May 2001 *
FISCHER AND BRANDENSTEIN JUDGMENT OF THE COURT (Fifth Chamber) 17 May 2001 * In Joined Cases C-322/99 and C-323/99, REFERENCE to the Court under Article 234 EC by the Bundesfinanzhof (Germany) for a preliminary
More informationCivil Service Additional Voluntary Contribution Scheme
Civil Service Additional Voluntary Contribution Scheme Civil Service Additional Voluntary Contribution Scheme The Civil Service Additional Voluntary Contribution Scheme was made on 21 December 1988 under
More informationCROWN FOREST INDUSTRIES LIMITED
The following version is for informational purposes only, for the official version see: http://www.courts.gov.bc.ca/ for Stated Cases see also: http://www.assessmentappeal.bc.ca/ for PAAB Decisions SC
More informationSUPERANNUATION BILL 1989
THE PARLIAMENT OF THE COMMONWEALTH OF AUSTRALIA HOUSE OF REPRESENTATIVES (As read a first time) SUPERANNUATION BILL 1989 Section I. 2. 3. Short title Commencement Interpretation TABLE OF PROVISIONS PART
More informationChapter 5 GENERAL DIRECTORS, COMPANY SECRETARY, BOARD COMMITTEES, AUTHORISED REPRESENTATIVES AND CORPORATE GOVERNANCE MATTERS.
Chapter 5 GENERAL DIRECTORS, COMPANY SECRETARY, BOARD COMMITTEES, AUTHORISED REPRESENTATIVES AND CORPORATE GOVERNANCE MATTERS Directors 5.01 The board of directors of an issuer is collectively responsible
More informationDECISION OF THE BOARD OF APPEAL OF THE EUROPEAN CHEMICALS AGENCY. 7 October 2011
DECISION OF THE BOARD OF APPEAL OF THE EUROPEAN CHEMICALS AGENCY 7 October 2011 (Registration Rejection Registration fee Late payment Admissibility Refund of the appeal fee) Case number Language of the
More informationDESIRING to intensify the economic cooperation for the mutual benefit of the Contracting Parties;
AGREEMENT BETWEEN THE GOVERNMENT OF THE UNITED MEXICAN STATES AND THE GOVERNMENT OF THE REPUBLIC OF TRINIDAD AND TOBAGO ON THE PROMOTION AND RECIPROCAL PROTECTION OF INVESTMENTS The Government of the United
More informationJUDGMENT OF THE COURT (First Chamber) 12 February 2009
JUDGMENT OF THE COURT (First Chamber) 12 February 2009 (Directive 90/435/EEC Article 4(1) Direct effect National legislation designed to prevent double taxation of distributed profits Deduction of the
More information5.1. Short Title: This Act may be cited as the Special Economic Zones Act of 2014.
An Act to Repeal Chapter 5, Liberia Industrial Free Zone Authority, of Title 30, Public Authorities Law, Liberian Code of Laws Revised and to enact in lieu thereof a new Chapter 5 to be known as The Special
More informationSLOVENIA SECURITIES MARKET ACT
SLOVENIA SECURITIES MARKET ACT Important Disclaimer This translation has been generously provided by the Ministry of Finance of the Republic of Slovenia. This does not constitute an official translation
More information969. Pursuant to Article 95 item 3 of the Constitution of Montenegro, I hereby adopt DECREE ON THE PROMULGATION OF THE LAW ON ARBITRATION
969. Pursuant to Article 95 item 3 of the Constitution of Montenegro, I hereby adopt DECREE ON THE PROMULGATION OF THE LAW ON ARBITRATION I hereby promulgate the Law on Arbitration adopted by the 25 th
More informationORDER OF THE COURT (First Chamber) 12 September 2002 *
MERTENS ORDER OF THE COURT (First Chamber) 12 September 2002 * In Case C-431/01, REFERENCE to the Court under Article 234 EC by the Cour d'appel de Mons (Belgium) for a preliminary ruling in the proceedings
More informationAGREEMENT ON SOCIAL SECURITY BETWEEN THE REPUBLIC OF THE PHILIPPINES AND THE SWISS CONFEDERATION
AGREEMENT ON SOCIAL SECURITY BETWEEN THE REPUBLIC OF THE PHILIPPINES AND THE SWISS CONFEDERATION The Government of the Republic of the Philippines and The Swiss Federal Council, Resolved to co-operate
More informationCONVENTION BETWEEN THE GOVERNMENT OF THE UNITED KINGDOM OF GREAT BRITAIN AND NORTHERN IRELAND AND THE GOVERNMENT OF THE REPUBLIC OF CYPRUS
CONVENTION BETWEEN THE GOVERNMENT OF THE UNITED KINGDOM OF GREAT BRITAIN AND NORTHERN IRELAND AND THE GOVERNMENT OF THE REPUBLIC OF CYPRUS FOR THE ELIMINATION OF DOUBLE TAXATION WITH RESPECT TO TAXES ON
More informationTHE CONSTITUTION (ONE HUNDRED AND FIFTEENTH AMENDMENT) BILL, 2011
1 AS INTRODUCED IN LOK SABHA Bill No. 22 of 2011 5 10 THE CONSTITUTION (ONE HUNDRED AND FIFTEENTH AMENDMENT) BILL, 2011 A BILL further to amend the Constitution of India. BE it enacted by Parliament in
More informationAccounting for Interest and Penalties Related to Income Taxes under IFRSs
Exposure Draft of ASCG Interpretation (IFRS) No. 1 (ED ASCG Interpretation 1) Accounting for Interest and Penalties Related to Income Taxes under IFRSs Invitation to Comment All interested individuals
More informationLITHUANIA THE LAW ON COLLECTIVE INVESTMENT UNDERTAKINGS
LITHUANIA THE LAW ON COLLECTIVE INVESTMENT UNDERTAKINGS Important Disclaimer This translation has been generously provided by the Securities Commission of the Republic of Lithuania. This does not constitute
More informationAlfredo Martínez Domínguez, Joaquín Benítez Urbano, Agapito Mateos Cruz and Carmen Calvo Fernández v Bundesanstalt für Arbeit, Kindergeldkasse
Opinion of Advocate General Tizzano delivered on 7February2002 Alfredo Martínez Domínguez, Joaquín Benítez Urbano, Agapito Mateos Cruz and Carmen Calvo Fernández v Bundesanstalt für Arbeit, Kindergeldkasse
More informationTHE 2008 UPDATE TO THE OECD MODEL TAX CONVENTION 18 July 2008
ORGANISATION FOR ECONOMIC CO-OPERATION AND DEVELOPMENT THE 2008 UPDATE TO THE OECD MODEL TAX CONVENTION 18 July 2008 CENTRE FOR TAX POLICY AND ADMINISTRATION THE 2008 UPDATE TO THE MODEL TAX CONVENTION
More informationVALUE ADDED TAX COMMITTEE (ARTICLE 398 OF DIRECTIVE 2006/112/EC) WORKING PAPER NO 948 REV
EUROPEAN COMMISSION DIRECTORATE-GENERAL TAXATION AND CUSTOMS UNION Indirect Taxation and Tax administration Value added tax taxud.c.1(2018)2251441 EN Brussels, 16 April 2018 VALUE ADDED TAX COMMITTEE (ARTICLE
More informationJUDGMENT OF THE COURT (Sixth Chamber) 3 April 2003 *
JUDGMENT OF 3. 4. 2003 CASE C-144/00 JUDGMENT OF THE COURT (Sixth Chamber) 3 April 2003 * In Case C-144/00, REFERENCE to the Court under Article 234 EC by the Bundesgerichtshof (Germany) for a preliminary
More informationSPECIAL TAX REGIMES IN PORTUGAL: THE NON-HABITUAL TAX RESIDENT REGIME
SPECIAL TAX REGIMES IN PORTUGAL: THE NON-HABITUAL TAX RESIDENT REGIME Introduction In recent years, Portugal introduced several measures that aim to promote foreign investment and the relocation of individuals
More informationSTATEMENT ON CORPORATE GOVERNANCE PRINCIPLES FOR YEAR 2016
Joint-stock company DITTON PIEVADĶĒŽU RŪPNĪCA Reg.No.40003030187 STATEMENT ON CORPORATE GOVERNANCE PRINCIPLES FOR YEAR 2016 Corporate Governance Report Annex to the Annual Report 2016 Daugavpils 2017 I
More informationCOMMISSION OF THE EUROPEAN COMMUNITIES COMMUNICATION FROM THE COMMISSION TO THE COUNCIL AND THE EUROPEAN PARLIAMENT
EN EN EN COMMISSION OF THE EUROPEAN COMMUNITIES Brussels, 2.7.2009 COM(2009) 325 final COMMUNICATION FROM THE COMMISSION TO THE COUNCIL AND THE EUROPEAN PARLIAMENT on the VAT group option provided for
More informationTHE CONSTITUTION (ONE HUNDRED AND FIFTEENTH AMENDMENT) BILL, 2011
Bill No. 22 of 2011 5 THE CONSTITUTION (ONE HUNDRED AND FIFTEENTH AMENDMENT) BILL, 2011 A BILL further to amend the Constitution of India. BE it enacted by Parliament in the Sixty-second Year of the Republic
More information4. Article 63(1) TFEU and Article 65(1)(a) TFEU constitute the EU law framework for this case.
Opinion of Advocate General Szpunar, 10 September 2015 1 Case C-252/14 Pensioenfonds Metaal en Techniek v Skatteverket Introduction 1. It is a well-established principle of the case-law of the Court that,
More informationTHE HIGH COURT OF DELHI AT NEW DELHI SUBJECT : FINANCE ACT, 1994 Judgment delivered on: W.P.(C) 4456/2012 & C.M.No.9237/2012( for stay)
THE HIGH COURT OF DELHI AT NEW DELHI SUBJECT : FINANCE ACT, 1994 Judgment delivered on: 01.02.2013 W.P.(C) 4456/2012 & C.M.No.9237/2012( for stay) DELHI CHARTERED ACCOUNTANTS SOCIETY (REGD.)...Petitioner
More informationChapter 19 EQUITY SECURITIES OVERSEAS ISSUERS. Preliminary
Chapter 19 EQUITY SECURITIES OVERSEAS ISSUERS Preliminary 19.01 The Exchange Listing Rules apply as much to overseas issuers as they do to Hong Kong issuers, subject to the additional requirements, modifications
More informationTHE PRESIDENCY. No June 2001
THE PRESIDENCY No. 550 20 June 2001 It is hereby notified that the Acting President has assented to the following Act which is hereby published for general information: - NO. 5 OF 2001: TAXATION LAWS AMENDMENT
More informationANNEX 8-A REGULATORY COOPERATION ON FINANCIAL REGULATION
ANNEX 8-A REGULATORY COOPERATION ON FINANCIAL REGULATION Regulatory cooperation 1. The Parties shall work together bilaterally and in international bodies with the objective of further strengthening global
More informationT.D DEPARTMENT OF THE TREASURY Internal Revenue Service 26 CFR Part 301 Relief for Service in Combat Zone and for Presidentially Declared
T.D. 8911 DEPARTMENT OF THE TREASURY Internal Revenue Service 26 CFR Part 301 Relief for Service in Combat Zone and for Presidentially Declared Disaster AGENCY: Internal Revenue Service (IRS), Treasury.
More informationOfficial Gazette of the Republic of Slovenia, No. 72/06 Official consolidated version BANKA SLOVENIJE ACT
Official Gazette of the Republic of Slovenia, No. 72/06 Official consolidated version BANKA SLOVENIJE ACT JULY 2006 Published by: BANK OF SLOVENIA Slovenska 35 1505 Ljubljana Tel.: +386 1 47 19 000 Fax:
More informationMUNICIPAL FISCAL POWERS AND FUNCTIONS ACT 12 OF 2007
MUNICIPAL FISCAL POWERS AND FUNCTIONS ACT 12 OF 2007 (English text signed by the President) [Assented to: 3 September 2007] [Commencement date: 7 September 2007] ACT To regulate the exercise by municipalities
More informationMoot Court Problem THE BACKGROUND
Moot Court Problem THE BACKGROUND 1. Around 2009, when internal government reports were predicting a steady rise in inflation, the Government of Maharashtra noticed a rather strange trend: limestone prices
More informationJozef van Coile v Rijksdienst voor Pensioenen. - Reference for a preliminary ruling: Arbeidsrechtbank Brugge Belgium
Judgment of the Court (Fifth Chamber) of 18 November 1999 Jozef van Coile v Rijksdienst voor Pensioenen. - Reference for a preliminary ruling: Arbeidsrechtbank Brugge Belgium Social security - Regulation
More informationThe High Net Worth Individuals Rules will run in parallel to the Residents Scheme Regulations as amended.
High Net Worth Individuals Rules announced on the 15 th September 2011 The High Net Worth Individuals Rules will run in parallel to the Residents Scheme Regulations as amended. An application for special
More informationPROVINCIAL TAX REGULATION PROCESS ACT 53 OF 2001
PROVINCIAL TAX REGULATION PROCESS ACT 53 OF 2001 (English text signed by the President) [Assented To: 4 December 2001] [Commencement Date: 1 June 2002] [Proc. R40 / GG 23466 / 20020531] ACT To regulate
More informationStaatssecretaris van Financiën v Coöperatieve Aardappelenbewaarplaats GA (preliminary ruling requested by the Hoge Raad der Nederlanden)
JUDGMENT OF THE COURT (SECOND CHAMBER) OF 5 FEBRUARY 1981 1 Staatssecretaris van Financiën v Coöperatieve Aardappelenbewaarplaats GA (preliminary ruling requested by the Hoge Raad der Nederlanden) "VAT
More informationAlfredo Martínez Domínguez, Joaquín Benítez Urbano, Agapito Mateos Cruz and Carmen Calvo Fernández v Bundesanstalt für Arbeit, Kindergeldkasse
Judgment of the Court (Sixth Chamber) of 24 September 2002 Alfredo Martínez Domínguez, Joaquín Benítez Urbano, Agapito Mateos Cruz and Carmen Calvo Fernández v Bundesanstalt für Arbeit, Kindergeldkasse
More informationJUDGMENT OF THE COURT (Fifth Chamber) 13 April 2000 *
BAARS JUDGMENT OF THE COURT (Fifth Chamber) 13 April 2000 * Case C-251/98, REFERENCE to the Court under Article 177 of the EC Treaty (now Article 234 EC) by the Gerechtshof te 's-gravenhage (Netherlands)
More information(Act No. 48 of June 27, 2012)
Act on Promotion of Support Measures for the Lives of Disaster Victims to Protect and Support Children and Other Residents Suffering Damage due to Tokyo Electric Power Company's Nuclear Accident (Act No.
More informationBANK OF MONTREAL DIRECTOR INDEPENDENCE STANDARDS
As approved by the Board of Directors: August 28, 2012 BANK OF MONTREAL DIRECTOR INDEPENDENCE STANDARDS The Board of Directors must be able to operate independently of management to maximize effectiveness.
More information$~ * IN THE HIGH COURT OF DELHI AT NEW DELHI Date of Decision : 14 th August, W.P.(C) 7727/2015 and C.M.No /2015.
$~ * IN THE HIGH COURT OF DELHI AT NEW DELHI Date of Decision : 14 th August, 2015. + W.P.(C) 7727/2015 and C.M.No.15149-15150/2015 DELHI EPDP COOPERATIVE GROUP HOUSING SOCIETY LTD.... Petitioner Through:
More informationJUDGMENT OF THE COURT (First Chamber) 22 March 2007 * ACTION under Article 226 EC for failure to fulfil obligations, brought on 15 October 2004,
JUDGMENT OF 22. 3. 2007 CASE C-437/04 JUDGMENT OF THE COURT (First Chamber) 22 March 2007 * In Case C-437/04, ACTION under Article 226 EC for failure to fulfil obligations, brought on 15 October 2004,
More informationThe Government of the Hashemite Kingdom of Jordan and the Government of the Italian Republic (hereafter referred to as the Contracting Parties)
AGREEMENT BETWEEN THE GOVERNMENT OF THE HASHEMITE KINGDOM OF JORDAN AND THE GOVERNMENT OF THE ITALIAN REPUBLIC ON THE PROMOTION AND PROTECTION OF INVESTMENTS The Government of the Hashemite Kingdom of
More informationCasebase Number: G0073 Title of Payment: Family Income Supplement (FIS)
Casebase Number: G0073 Title of Payment: Family Income Supplement (FIS) Community Law and Mediation Northside Northside Civic Centre Bunratty Road Coolock Dublin 17 Date of Final Decision: 29 th June 2015
More informationJudgment of the Court (Grand Chamber) of 7 June Christine Dodl and Petra Oberhollenzer v Tiroler Gebietskrankenkasse
Judgment of the Court (Grand Chamber) of 7 June 2005 Christine Dodl and Petra Oberhollenzer v Tiroler Gebietskrankenkasse Reference for a preliminary ruling: Oberlandesgericht Innsbruck - Austria Regulations
More informationVIRGIN ISLANDS MUTUAL FUNDS (RESTRICTED PUBLIC FUND) REGULATIONS, 2005 ARRANGEMENT OF REGULATIONS
VIRGIN ISLANDS MUTUAL FUNDS (RESTRICTED PUBLIC FUND) REGULATIONS, 2005 ARRANGEMENT OF REGULATIONS Regulation 1.. Citation. 2.. Interpretation. 3.. Restricted public fund. 4.. Condition. SCHEDULE 1 VIRGIN
More informationTHE FOREIGN EXCHANGE ACT
THE FOREIGN EXCHANGE ACT The full wording of Act of the National Council of the Slovak Republic No. 202/1995 Coll. dated 20 September 1995, the Foreign Exchange Act and the act amending and supplementing
More informationDesiring to further develop their economic relationship and to enhance their co-operation in tax matters,
CONVENTION BETWEEN JAPAN AND THE REPUBLIC OF SLOVENIA FOR THE ELIMINATION OF DOUBLE TAXATION WITH RESPECT TO TAXES ON INCOME AND THE PREVENTION OF TAX EVASION AND AVOIDANCE Japan and the Republic of Slovenia,
More informationBill 30 (2001, chapter 44)
SECOND SESSION THIRTY-SIXTH LEGISLATURE Bill 30 (2001, chapter 44) An Act to amend the Act respecting income support, employment assistance and social solidarity and other legislative provisions Introduced
More informationInternational Tax Lithuania Highlights 2017
International Tax Lithuania Highlights 2017 Investment basics: Currency Euro (EUR) Foreign exchange control No Accounting principles/financial statements IAS and IFRS, or Business Accounting Standards
More informationPackaging Excise Duty Act
Issuer: Riigikogu Type: act In force from: 01.01.2011 In force until: 26.05.2014 Translation published: 11.11.2013 Amended by the following acts Passed 19.12.1996 RT I 1997, 5, 31 Entry into force 01.03.1997,
More informationIAMA Arbitration Rules
IAMA Arbitration Rules (C) Copyright 2014 The Institute of Arbitrators & Mediators Australia (IAMA) - Arbitration Rules Introduction These rules have been adopted by the Council of IAMA for use by parties
More informationAGREEMENT OF 22 ND MARCH, The Netherlands. This Agreement shall apply to persons who are residents of one or both of the Contracting Parties.
AGREEMENT OF 22 ND MARCH, 2010 The Netherlands Chapter I Scope of the Agreement Article 1 Persons Covered This Agreement shall apply to persons who are residents of one or both of the Contracting Parties.
More informationIN THE MATTER of the Insurance Act, R.S.O. 1990, c.1.8, s. 268 (as amended) and Regulation 283/95 (as amended);
B E T W E E N : IN THE MATTER of the Insurance Act, R.S.O. 1990, c.1.8, s. 268 (as amended) and Regulation 283/95 (as amended); AND IN THE MATTER of the Arbitration Act, 1991, S.O. 1991, c.17, (as amended);
More informationEC Court of Justice, 14 February Case C-279/93. Finanzamt Köln-Altstadt v Roland Schumacker
EC Court of Justice, 14 February 1995 Case C-279/93 Finanzamt Köln-Altstadt v Roland Schumacker Court: Advocate General: G.C. Rodríguez Iglesias, President, F.A. Schockweiler (Rapporteur), P.J.G. Kapteyn
More informationPENSIONS ACT. Act 90 of January 1952 Act 19 of 1954 Act 5 of 1976 PENSIONS ACT
PENSIONS ACT Act 90 of 1951 1 January 1952 Act 19 of 1954 Act 5 of 1976 ARRANGEMENT OF SECTIONS 1. Short title 2. Interpretation 3. Pension regulations 4. Pensions to be charged on Consolidated Fund 4A.
More informationPENSIONS ACT Act 90 of January 1952 Act 19 of 1954 Act 5 of 1976
Revised Laws of Mauritius PENSIONS ACT Act 90 of 1951 1 January 1952 Act 19 of 1954 Act 5 of 1976 ARRANGEMENT OF SECTIONS SECTION 1. Short title 2. Interpretation 3. Pension regulations 4. Pensions to
More informationTitle 1 FOREIGN INVESTMENT AND INVESTMENT CONTRACT
FOREIGN INVESTMENT STATUTE DECREE LAW 600 FOREIGN INVESTMENT COMMITTEE REPUBLIC OF CHILE DECREE LAW 600 FOREIGN INVESTMENT STATUTE Restated, Coordinated and Standardized Text of Decree-law N 600, as of
More information